User:Ryan Woo-Ming/Ryan's Reviews

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi! I'm a fan of Uncyclopedia, who's writing this article. Welcome!

This special Pee Review covers over 450 funny (and not just stupid) articles (not counting subpages) of this wiki, from the Zork trilogy to the last page. But before I do that, though, I have an introduction to share with you...

I first discovered Uncyclopedia in 2008 by a little search engine incident. I never knew it had some nonsense articles! Heck, I used/trusted it more than Wikipedia after an incident in there which I shouldn't mention to you. (I still like Wikipedia though.) I started using/joining Uncyclopedia more and more in 2022 after I figured a certain pandemic would clear up, and I started typing this just in time before Uncyclopedia's 20th anniversary...

Ok, enough of me. Now to get started with the articles! Click an article name to go to that article. First up's our main attraction, the Zork trilogy...

The Zork Trilogy[edit | edit source]

This's the highlight of the article. Basically, InvisiClues says it's a random game series that has Uncyclopedia memes and fads like Grues and the word Xyzzy. While Xyzzy doesn't show up that much in the trilogy, expect to be eaten by lots of Grues! That's what I did the 1st time I played. I don't remember how many times I have died, but I'm guessing it was around 999,999,999.

BUT! Each game in the trilogy has a goal. The 1st game involves collecting around 20 treasures, the 2nd game has you reunite the Golden Egg of Arkora, and the 3rd and final one... well, let's just go talk about each game in perspective.

Game:Zork[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Like I said before, this game uses a lot of random humor and Uncyclopedia in-jokes. Grues and deaths are the most common, too... except what I don't know the lore of where most of the humor comes from. I've seen Douglas Adams's name in Zork, but not THAT much... Also, I have no idea where the "you've just gone through a dimensional portal" part of the maze came from.
Concept: 10 The concept is great! I don't even know why it could be about someone named "Azroth the Imprisoned Evil One," though; I don't even know who that is. Anyway, I like the concepts of the deaths, like, for example, the Rube Goldberg contraption that was in the biocomplex all along (see Game:Zork/Biocomplex4_7).
Prose and formatting: 7 I like the prose and formatting, too. Everybody knows you can't have a Zork game without the Zorkheader template!
Images: 7 Normally Zork doesn't use that much images, but there are a few areas in it that do, like the hidden (?) Glitch City in File 3. AND MOST OF THEM ARE HOTLINKED AND ARE BROKEN. >:| Luckily, DeletedUser51be906d and I tried to fix a few of them.
Miscellaneous: 7 The quality of the game is good as well, though there are a few inconsistencies between areas...
Final Score: 38 Yeah, this's a good game. If this's your 1st time on UnGames and ESPECIALLY Uncyclopedia, I suggest you visit this article 1st. Try going east! >:)
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Game:Zork2[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 The sequel to Zork, the humor improves a bit, thanks to the Zork2died banner not being that much common, replaced with a more basic "Start over" link or something similar... (Not that I don't like it, but there are mostly parts that unfairly lead to this same page.)
Concept: 10 Another great concept! A rad sequel that belongs in these categories that doesn't suck. Much like Paper Mario 2.
Prose and formatting: 8 Almost great prose. Unlike the 1st one, this game follows a linear plot and uses the Zork2header template. Fitting... Although, there are some areas where you have to type your next path into the URL above.
Images: 10 No images has it, but a 10 would do!
Miscellaneous: 8 Same quality as Game:Zork, but fewer plot holes...
Final Score: 44 The even better (albeit linear) sequel of Game:Zork. Would Mario play it? Yesh!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Game:Zork3[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Even more random humour! For the 3rd and final adventure in the Great Underground Empire, it would take all the humor from Zork 1 up to 11... but, still, there's a repetition of parts that make you die unexpectedly and unfairly.
Concept: 8 This would be yet another great concept... if it weren't for the fact that Zork 3 takes place in an alternate dimension, and things have changed an awful lot. But I did like the Grue/G***/Bonzi Buddy lore behind the scenes!
Prose and formatting: 6 Because of the aforementioned case, Guardian has done almost good attempt to replace every changed Grue instance back, with a few exceptions... Also, some dweeb named Sasuke Kid just Kept using Caps Lock to Emphasize the Part where you Have to fight Cloud to win Zork 3 (mentioned later), so I just had to fix it. (And no, L, it's not THAT funny.) And just like in Zork 2 (I guess?), you have to type in a LOT of passwords to move on to the "final boss" (also mentioned later).
Images: 10 Being the only (?) image in the game, it's funny to invert the Zork 3 logo in the beginning.
Miscellaneous: 6 The quality? Well, aside from all the red links, if you manage to die 5 times and type in all the passwords, you get to fight the Ur-Grue- only for him to revive in the Hall of Activus after 3 turns! This's an endless loop, after all, so all you have to choose at the beginning is "fly up" in order to win. Or, just wait for me to rewrite the whole thing. Nevertheless, at the end there's a teaser for Zork 4: Escape The Darkness!!, which I doubt would exist.
Final Score: 38 Well, it's pretty good, but it might need a rewrite... I think...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

All Your Base Are Belong To Us/Example on wheels![edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Well, the humor's good, given it's (since 2021) 78 variants of the same classic meme/fad compressed in a subpage from that article, All Your Base Are Belong To Us, though there's a few that stick out from the rest... My favorite is the Redundancy variant!
Concept: 10 Great concept! As I said above, it takes 78 different situations and makes an AYB out of them! Including Halloween and Christmas.
Prose and formatting: 10 A marvelous script-style article that for some reason decides to use the Verdana font for almost everything.
Images: 10 Yes, there were some images. They made me giggle... like CATS in baseball.
Miscellaneous: 8 I guess the quality could be the same as the humor. I don't even WANT to know who made the EA variant.
Final Score: 46 Great article! Probably good for those with boredom...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

RTFM[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 A nearly adequate article with nearly adequate humor; I kinda liked the "Other meanings" section.
Concept: 6 Meh, I already know what "RTFM" means.
Prose and formatting: 10 Just a great, almost short featured article, with nothing to report!
Images: 10 Well, if the Rtfm.gif in the tip template counts, that's a nostalgic pass.
Miscellaneous: 10 Again, this featured article's almost so short I can't even determine the quality...
Final Score: 42 An almost short article that manages to get featured. Wow.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Pong! the Movie[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 In this article, Uncyclopedia makes a lot of stuff up from a movie based on a 1st video game that'll less likely exist. Ha ha. :)
Concept: 10 Out of all the concepts for the article about the "film," I like the plot's the most, starting with Tinky Winky farting.
Prose and formatting: 9 "Extra! Extra! This just in!" This article's prose has just been given a 9 for its almost-newsreel look! Not bad!
Images: 10 Some make-believe images about this make-believe movie were obviously photoshopped in for laughs.
Miscellaneous: 9 Yes, the crappy quality over the photoshopped images might as well count. Some stuff might not count, though...
Final Score: 48 Out of all the great video game movies that have recently been released, I still doubt this one will. But Uncyclopedia decides to make and keep this one anyway!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Lies/Lie[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 The humor is good, and I'm not lying. ...Or am I?
Concept: 10 Uncyclopedia tries and actually succeeds to tell 29 of the coolest lies ever to us, and they're funny. Like the blue, photoshopped sky.
Prose and formatting: 10 It's mostly a list of lies, like I mentioned before.
Images: 7 Mostly copyrighted stuff. This is boring.
Miscellaneous: 10 As much as I'm not lying about the humor, I'm not lying about the quality; the quality looks great in comparison.
Final Score: 44 Well, this article DEFINITELY is the truth; it's a good one.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

English-American Dictionary[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Is it "humor," or is it "humour?" Either way, it gets carried away with the definitions pretty clearly.
Concept: 10 The article's supposed to tell us readres (see what I did here?) about "S" vs. "Z," "Zed," who's said to be from Power Rangers, "R", "er" vs. "re," "K" vs. "que" (Ha ha; QueQueQue!), "ou" vs. "O," "oe", "og" vs. "ogue," "um" vs. "ium," "ce" vs. "se," "X" vs. "ct" (What if Mac OS CT was real?), and, of course, various definitions. Great idea.
Prose and formatting: 10 Man, I DO love the intentional typos here and there...
Images: 10 Only 1 image is used: the map of the whole world, but with my home country enlarged.
Miscellaneous: 10 Nothing bad about the quality. Again, the English-American spellings are intentional.
Final Score: 50 Now THAT'S what I'm talking about! That's 1 perfect article here in Uncyclopedia! But how good are the others? Read on and find out!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

The Oldest Trick in the Book[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Somewhat-adequate humor, hence the topic of the article.
Concept: 7 I give it a 7 because it (sort of) reads just like a history report or something like that... with a slight hint of some humor and anachronisms hidden inside of it.
Prose and formatting: 10 Well, great job. You didn't mess it up. 3l
Images: 8 For the image at the top, it reminds me of the one from UnBooks:The Gruesome Book of Grues. I don't even know how they did the other images, though...
Miscellaneous: 10 Another good article of great quality... sigh...
Final Score: 41 In conclusion, it's 1 of those articles that's hard for you to brim through unless you have a TTS device to read it for you. Hmmm... Maybe I should learn how to fuck with people's heads sometime...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Idiotic Table of the Elements[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 A parody of the Periodic table that makes stuff up for fun as usual. Can you find Randomium and its random number?
Concept: 7 I have no idea what's so idiotic about it...
Prose and formatting: 10 It uses the "wikitable" class. What more can I say?
Images: 10 Mmmm, Cheesium...
Miscellaneous: 9 Well, I still see red links, otherwise...
Final Score: 46 What a great table! I'd share to you my element, but I think it's safe not to share.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Aesop's Fables[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The funny part about that is that most of Aesop's fables are made up. :D
Concept: 10 Some people don't (or barely) know who Aesop is, probably like me, nor all of his fables, but this article attempts to explain it all... and then gets carried away!!!
Prose and formatting: 8 Classic and (almost) perfect Aesop prose with a snappy Uncyclopedia twist. The only things I don't like about the current revision are the footnotes. Also, they replaced the explained joke about the other Persian shouting "Potatoes Potatoes" with a TV Tropes link in that revision!
Images: 10 My favorite image is the one with the green Xenomorph that's supposed to resemble a grape-pusher.
Miscellaneous: 7 The quality for this article has gone downhill! And yet... it still gets a 7.
Final Score: 45 Well, if you're a veteran Uncyclopedian and would like to read a past version of this page, I'd recommend reading revision #5806926.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Greatest Inventions[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Looks more serious than silly...
Concept: 10 ...but I DO like the idea of giving a top 10 list of greatest things since sliced bread. WAY better than all of Uncyclopedia's Worst 100 lists.
Prose and formatting: 10 I love Top 10's. Enough said.
Images: 10 The images are great, but what's the license plate supposed to say?
Miscellaneous: 10 I guess this counts...
Final Score: 46 "Serious" humor about a top 10 list explaining the greatest weird and wonderful "inventions" of all time. I have an electric toothbrush; now all I need is a record player...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Banned from the Internet[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Humorous (or is it not so humorous?) examples on just how to get banned from the Internet. (I said "not so humorous" because it won't be funny once you or I actually get banned and see the same templates from the start.)
Concept: 10 The article's supposed to teach Uncyclopedia dweebs what's it's like for them to get banned. I'm glad I'm not 1 of them...
Prose and formatting: 10 Another list, this one gets bonus points for (intentionally) putting 1 of the items on top of the article.
Images: 9 For some reason, I'm totally in love with that window. I might not like the cosplaying doofus dressed up as Sephiroth, though...
Miscellaneous: 10 I don't see anything bad... Again, the 1st item was top posted on purpose.
Final Score: 46 Hmmm... Not bad for an informative article. But there's 1 question... Should users read that article 1st or another guide provided by the wiki? Probably the ubiquitous Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid article...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Banana Phone[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Another nearly adequate article with nearly adequate humor. It may deliver twice than RTFM, though, what with a few funny jokes I might not understand...
Concept: 8 ...Huh? I don't know if it's true or not, though, but the article's supposed to be based on some song by Raffi. If the Wikipedia template says otherwise...
Prose and formatting: 10 I think it just looks like a typical Uncyclopedia article. My favorite part is the Ernie quote!
Images: 9 Again, the Photoshop-style quality counts. But why would I want to see a Willyphone?
Miscellaneous: 10 Still looks good.
Final Score: 44 Man, this article looks so good! It's so featured the main feature of this article got a sighting in Shrooms (later Magic mushroom) and sometimes shows up in intermissions.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Raccoon Tail v. Super Mario Cape[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's so funny to have a case involving 2 Super Mario powerups.
Concept: 10 Erm, look above?
Prose and formatting: 9 To me it looks a bit like an UnNews article, but... ok.
Images: 10 Aside from the fact that the images are copyrighted, the captions under them look a bit silly.
Miscellaneous: 10 Nope; still don't see any article flaws... yet...
Final Score: 49 Almost a good article. I just wonder what the next silly sides would be... Probably my mom v. baseball v. apple pie.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

List of weapons that don't exist, but should[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Wow! There's a lot of crazy humor in this article! All this for a lot of weapons that don't exist, but should...
Concept: 10 In this article, all the Uncyclopedians decide to make up their own types of cool, nonexistent weapons, from firelegs to air strikes.
Prose and formatting: 10 Probably the best list in this wiki, I don't know...
Images: 9 Some images probably look too gross to be funny...
Miscellaneous: 10 For a long article, I can't even determine ITS quality.
Final Score: 49 Same score as last article; I don't think List of weapons that don't exist, but should/Firelegs would count, but I've read the subpage, and it sucked. I'm glad I only reviewed the main article. In fact, it was mentioned in Fark.com!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

iPod Nano 200gb Instructions[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's totally impossible to have an IPod attached to THAT, is it?
Concept: 10 "Wow 200 GB of music on your Nano. Battery life is a bit reduced however." So said Chronarion, the founder (?) of Uncyclopedia.
Prose and formatting: 10 This guy tries his hardest to make it sound like something that belongs in an instruction manual... and yet he succeeds!
Images: 10 I read that most of the images came from ArsTechnica. I don't know either, but they sound like a great company!
Miscellaneous: 10 Still, nothing to report about the quality.
Final Score: 50 Another great article! I used to own an IPod Nano before, but I never thought of attaching it to a hard drive... I'd like to though.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Missing milk[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 How funny could this possibly be to make an article about a single milk bottle?
Concept: 10 The concept is based on those labels you see in them that say something like, "HAVE YOU SEEN THIS KID?"
Prose and formatting: 10 Conspiracies up the ass, the article sounds... interesting.
Images: 10 The front cover of the Sun made me laugh the hardest.
Miscellaneous: 10 I still don't think I see anything bad yet.
Final Score: 50 Wow, another great article reviewed and done. Though I myself am getting worried about that titular missing milk bottle... or am I? >:)
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Redundancy[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's more funnier when you find out Willy on wheels recently put the same thing in... TWICE!!!
Concept: 10 Redundancy makes me laugh.
Prose and formatting: 10 No; I'm not cutting and pasting in the same 10 thrice; that's how it was meant to be: redundant.
Images: 10 It's just Lord Alvin Redund. lol
Miscellaneous: 10 Nope; nothing to say here. Really!
Final Score: 50 No wonder it was one of Uncyclopedia's Top 10 Articles of 2005! Like Lord Alvin Redund in All Your Base Are Belong To Us/Example on wheels!, I AM laughing AND finding this funny.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Crimes inspired by video games[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 I don't think it's funny when you find out and deconstruct the TRUTH about these video games... except for the part about Zork.
Concept: 6 Um... video games are NOT a crime.
Prose and formatting: 9 At least it writes like a(n incomplete) list.
Images: 10 2 images were used! 1 of them showed proof that Qbert had a potty mouth, and another was a fake, copydown image of a newsletter from another website.
Miscellaneous: 7 "Captian Falcon is arrested due to destoying the the universe while boxing." The last parts (and years) don't even make any sense at all!
Final Score: 39 Well, I still don't like the idea of knowing the truth about the lore of most of your favorite video games. A power pellet being slang for crack?! Now that's twisted, man.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA![edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 I used to laugh the hardest at this article ever since I 1st discovered it in 2008.
Concept: 10 There is no obvious "concept" in this article -- it's simply just nonsense!!!! In fact, it just might be the very 1st thing readers will likely click from the "Nonsense" template.
Prose and formatting: 10 It's just the letter "A," over and over again. I prefer to read that over some stupid news articles!
Images: 10 The best part is that 1 of 31 images related to the letter "A" is used in the section at random after the "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASCII!"
Miscellaneous: 10 I also don't think this article even has "quality..."
Final Score: 50 Well, to tell you the truth, this article HAS been my favorite since I 1st browsed Uncyclopedia.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

-- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 I think I find morse code boring and bland.
Concept: 6 Again, this has no concept, but the difference between AAAAAAAAA! and this is that AAAAAAAAA! had an ever funnier concept than this.
Prose and formatting: 6 I could barely read anything; I don't know morse.
Images: 6 I couldn't find any interesting images. Not even the black and white morse girls are that interesting.
Miscellaneous: 10 At least this article deserves a 10 in this category...
Final Score: 34 See, I chose to review this article because it was honorable enough to belong here, being part of the "Nonsense" template.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:32, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Alternate Universes I Seriously Hope Do Not Actually Exist[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Most of these alternate universes I get, but like the title says, I SERIOUSLY hope they don't actually exist.
Concept: 10 Each alternate universe in this article possesses a challenge and some obstacles to why we can never have one of those.
Prose and formatting: 9 The categories didn't say so (yet), but this's one of those articles written in 1st person. :/
Images: 10 The only image here photoshopped Conan O'Brien out in the section where they mentioned what an alternate universe would be like without him! lol
Miscellaneous: 10 I wonder if there's a chance I could edit either the score or the category? Either way, it's getting old.
Final Score: 46 Out of all these AU's in the article I would pick, it'd probably be... none of them.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

IPod yocto[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 It may feel uncomfortable (to my body), but, like the iPod Nano 200gb, it's totally impossible.
Concept: 8 Ha ha, this's really making me feel very uncomfortable... Anyway, it's supposed to be about a veeeeeeeeeery small iPod that fits inside your body, right?
Prose and formatting: 9 The "Features" section looks like something straight from an advertisement.
Images: 8 Even the images don't make me feel comfortable! 1 shows some kind of bacteria enjoying his new IPod yocto, complete with earphones...
Miscellaneous: 10 Either way, it still looks like a good article.
Final Score: 43 Ugh... Sometimes I wonder if we had this "IPod yocto" in our bodies all along. Could this be the causes of all those ear worms?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 16:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Alternative medicine[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Some medicines I don't get.
Concept: 9 What was the purpose of this again? Medicine related to music or culture?
Prose and formatting: 10 The article tells us the pros and cons of alternative medicine, even dying.
Images: 10 I can't tell if the face from this was photoshopped in or not, but...
Miscellaneous: 10 Like "Greatest Inventions" (and most of the rest), I guess this counts too.
Final Score: 46 Lots of pros about this, no cons.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Alliteration[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Let's see now... Do I find alliteration funny? Do I not?
Concept: 10 An awesome, aaaaaaaaah... never mind, it's a good concept for an article.
Prose and formatting: 10 Wow! Wicked writing!
Images: 10 That image looks familiar...
Miscellaneous: 7 Some odd things are slipping out...
Final Score: 45 "This text took the top ten that time" is right. The problem is, I'm bad at alliterating my sentences.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

VCR Manual[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 I barely find the introduction funny, congratulations. Why do you keep saying that?
Concept: 10 So, you know how to set up your VCR, eh? Well, this article explains how to explain your own VCR MANUAL!!!
Prose and formatting: 8 Writes just like a VCR Manual. Again, some parts I don't get or find funny...
Images: 10 I lost the VCR when I moved... Still, the picture brings back old memories.
Miscellaneous: 10 Still another typical quality article.
Final Score: 45 Please don't make me say that, article!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Writer's block[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 This's where I always get stuck when writing this article. lol
Concept: 10 Uh... what was the concept again? Oh yeah, it was about someone getting stuck on... writing an article about writer's block.
Prose and formatting: 10 I can certainly relate to this guy.
Images: 10 All of this for this .gif. Really?
Miscellaneous: 10 How's the quality for this article again? Oh yeah, still good.
Final Score: 50 This article has got to make sense... Now, let's continue.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Do NOT click any links![edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's 1 of those Uncyclopedia in-jokes that I like.
Concept: 10 I was told to not click any links, but I did whatsoever. "Clickbait" (whatever that is) is fun!
Prose and formatting: 10 I think I remember there being lore behind this article, but it faded away into VFD after the 1st few years...
Images: 10 Error messages! Unfortunately, you'll have to go around to enlarge the image...
Miscellaneous: 10 They just painstakingly put links that almost all link to the same subpage... and it's still good.
Final Score: 50 Click here to see more of why I like this article a lot.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

[Insert title here][edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 I used to laugh at this article ever since I 1st discovered it in 2008, but not as much as "AAAAAAAAA!"
Concept: 9 It's supposedly supposed to be an article about placeholders... However, one might not that funny when they go to a blank wiki and see the same thing!
Prose and formatting: 10 Humorously, this messes up the quote section a bit.
Images: 10 Hey, I see an orange kitten! How cute...
Miscellaneous: 7 Some odd, possibly outdated things are slipping out...
Final Score: 46 Wow, that was good. I remember reading in this article back in 2008 something about a gigantic TURTLE MIXED WITH MACARONI CHEESE!!!!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:Adventure gamebook[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 The humor looks mostly bland... except the twist ending involving the used copy of the gamebook.
Concept: 10 It's a meta one, involving an 11-year-old wanting to play an adventure gamebook on a rainy Sunday.
Prose and formatting: 10 Told in a CYOA-style tale.
Images: 10 My favorite image's the one that represents the death of the 11-year-old (that's supposed to be you, by the way) by a Motobug pwning Sonic the Hedgehog.
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality never changes.
Final Score: 47 It supposedly looks more boring than any Zork game on this beloved Uncyclopedia, but it's fun either way.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Calvin and Hobbes[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 So many anachronisms... and THAT was hilariously intentional.
Concept: 10 They took it too literal! Too bad the REAL Calvin and Hobbes was never made into an action-packed buddy comedy show...
Prose and formatting: 10 Definitely looks like your basic Uncyclopedia article.
Images: 10 I like the edits on the art and strips.
Miscellaneous: 10 Ignoring those pseudo-crappy looking edits, the quality looks like it belongs here.
Final Score: 50 I think I should do the knock-offs next... that is, if Uncyclopedia would allow such pages. :D
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:See Dick[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 It makes me laugh so hard I could cry on the inside...
Concept: 7 Basically, this feels like a history lesson to me.
Prose and formatting: 10 This article reads as a parody of those old "Dick and Jane" books I actually have never read.
Images: 7 I think this article needs more funny images other than those 3. Not even the 2nd "See Dick?" is enough.
Miscellaneous: 10 Do I REALLY have to say it?
Final Score: 41 Well, there you have another great article, albeit as a parody of a children's book. It's said that only the Chosen One has the ability to see the rest of the chapters (i.e. check the discussion page). Also, should we even bother with next week's lesson?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:52, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros.: Xtreme Beach Volleyball[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 It's kind of hard to find humor in this article, possibly except for "'Xtreme' is not a real word."
Concept: 7 I don't think I feel comfortable with a Super Smash Bros./Dead or Alive crossover that could possibly change the gameplay...
Prose and formatting: 10 The way you look at it, it looks like a vandalized Wikipedia article.
Images: 6 ...EW!!! I think the Photoshop effects on those images makes them more disturbing.
Miscellaneous: 10 Otherwise, the idea mentioned in the "Prose" section of the review of this article isn't bad, to be honest.
Final Score: 40 Now you've done it! You're probably making me go back to Wikipedia! Or at least making me research the REAL SSB series elsewhere on the internet...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Speech to text software[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The best humor in this article comes from the self-reference itself. Apparently, the article's creator actually USED speech to text software for this article. No, really.
Concept: 10 Yeah; I know; speech to text software sucks. I'm glad I don't use it for writing these articles.
Prose and formatting: 10 It was meant to be written like that...
Images: 10 The Spamusement webcomic used is my favorite of all 3 of them.
Miscellaneous: 10 Again, it's 1 of those articles in Uncyclopedia that's meant to look intentionally bad.
Final Score: 50 For some reason, I can never stop thinking about the Windows Vista speech recognition incident in 2006! Some say it's the Windows 98 Blue Screen of Death incident all over again...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Grue[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 I love Grue humor. It's probably identical to Zork humor. OMG, RUN!!!!!
Concept: 10 We here at Uncyclopedia all know what our Grues look like... If you're confused why, see Forum:A Grue?
Prose and formatting: 10 Uses Uncyclopedia's usual snarky formatting.
Images: 10 Every picture with that Domo-kun-looking monster in it which may or may not involve that most used picture-editing program... well, you know.
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality is good... but, man, was the 5th section intentional?
Final Score: 50 I love Grues. So much, in fact, that I AM one who HAS also ironically been eaten by one. By the way...
*** All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy ***


Does all work and no play make Jack a dull boy? (type RESTART, RESTORE, or QUIT):

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Command Line[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Uses subliminal-style humor & "contemptible" puns hidden in some parts (which can even be confusing), such as:

  X [-displaynumber] [-a acceleration] [-ac] [-audit level] [-auth file]
  [{-}bc] [-br] [-bs] [-c | c volume] [-cc] [-co filename] [-core]
  [-deferglyphs font [font [font ...]]] [-youarentreally readingall
  [thiscrap]] ...

Concept: 10 According to the top of the page, the user was getting annoyed at Windows so much that he (or was it she?) decided to boot something cool called "Uncyclux."
Prose and formatting: 10 It looks just like Zork, complete with the text parsers.
Images: 10 The only image shown here is the boot screen for Uncyclux.
Miscellaneous: 10 They painstakingly made it look nice and tidy, just like your basic command line.
Final Score: 50 To conclude, I've reviewed an article about an operating system I may or may not have used before. Sounds cool, though...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Universal Remote Control Everything 3000[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Meh. It looks a bit funnier than Greatest Inventions...
Concept: 10 They totally had to make an article about an imaginary remote control that will NEVER exist.
Prose and formatting: 10 Looks like another generic Uncyclopedia article to me.
Images: 10 The way I look at the diagram...
Miscellaneous: 10 Sigh... I guess this counts, too. After all, I'm just getting started with the featured articles...
Final Score: 47 I wish I had this remote! Don't you?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Adobe Potatochop[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Ha ha, lots of potato puns everywhere...
Concept: 10 Another imaginary product! You know, I'm starting to wonder if Uncyclopedia is a British website, what with all of the British humour, spellings and cultural references I'm seeing everywhere...
Prose and formatting: 9 Near the end, the 2nd-to-last paragraph about GINSu (GINSu Isn't Necessarily Safe-u) writes like an advertisement, but the article itself's still funny.
Images: 10 All the images in this article (especially the box of "Freedom Fries"), they're making me hungry...
Miscellaneous: 10 Same as most of the other previous featured articles.
Final Score: 49 Not much to say, except... if I ever had the chance to download buy this product, I would "potatochop" all of my favorite pictures from Uncyclopedia by filtering them with McDonald's fries, in the "Cheese and Onion" document, using the "'Freedom Fries' and Hamburger" plugin. No, wait, how about Chipxar?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Pixellated Face Disease[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Censorship isn't funny, but... see below. Besides, the "Monster" template used in the Symptoms section's 1st item (Monsterism) really brought in such a kicker! I don't know what Monsterism has to do with disfigurement, but I don't want to turn into a Tsurani...
Concept: 10 Turning a form of censorship into an explained disease... What a novel idea!
Prose and formatting: 10 Reads like a tragic tale about diseases... or something.
Images: 6 I feel less comfortable looking at these images...
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality is SO good in this article that it's 1 of those rare instances where it gets featured TWICE!!!
Final Score: 44 Well, I'm not going to suffer this disease. I'm not even going to show my face! Maybe I'll just say I'm REALLY Tony Soprano behind the scenes and that's that.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Lost in Translation[edit | edit source]

Humour: 9 Funny, but sounds confusing. Maybe because it's lost in translation?
Concept: 10 A article about a movie lost in translation with the article itself literally lost in translation? Exploding-head.gif
Prose and formatting: 10 The article itself starts trailing into various gratuitous bilingual words and sentences... or something. So do the obligatory Wikipedia links.
Images: 7 Why would I watch an anime starring various literal Japanese kanji "characters?" This's boring.
Miscellaneous: 10 This's so good; need I say more?
Final Score: 46 If I had the chance, maybe I should translate this article from English to French, Spanish, German, the language of the Netherlands, Italian, Russian, Japanese, and then back to English again; what'll I get?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Disneyland[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 The top quote from Goofy I found funny; 1 of the external links at the bottom I did NOT, however. How can I have fun at Disneyland if there are incidents?
Concept: 10 It's true; Disneyland feels like a country after all.
Prose and formatting: 10 This feels like another vandalized Wikipedia article...
Images: 10 I think someone just stole some images from Wikipedia and messed around with 1 of them! I can tell because I've seen this one before...
Miscellaneous: 9 Well, all looks good in this article... except for UNmarine777's section about the military. Looks like he doesn't know how to format right. Someone should either format or remake it while insulting that user.
Final Score: 47 In conclusion, it's safe to say that Disneyland has changed since this article has been featured via its 50th anniversary. For instance, there's a Star Wars-themed land now, called Galaxy's Edge! I'm sure people like OPOSSUM would like it...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:Horton Hires a Ho[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Either the greatest humor from this UnBook comes from the censored rhyme bait-and-switch, or when "Horton the Whorehunter" starts screaming and going bat fuck insane for 1 hour.
Concept: 8 Great concept, but... why all the screaming near the end again?
Prose and formatting: 10 This's where I say it parodies Dr. Seuss's rhyming style.
Images: 10 They had to just made the "cover" of Horton Hires A Ho look real! Cool!
Miscellaneous: 10 Now back to good quality...
Final Score: 48 I still wish I knew what all of this was about...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Double Ristretto Venti Half-Soy Nonfat Decaf Organic Chocolate Brownie Iced Vanilla Double-Shot Gingerbread Frappuccino Extra Hot With Foam Whipped Cream Upside Down Double Blended, One Sweet'N Low and One Nutrasweet, and Ice[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 I only (yet barely) found the long title funny compared to Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying, Sit Down and Relax for a Bit, Try and Read or Something, Maybe Eat a Cheese Sandwich, and Basically Do Anything Other Than Obsessively Think About Being Obliterated in a Massive Nuclear Explosion/Apocalypse.
Concept: 7 Ooh, now this's making me feel a bit uncomfortable... Anyway, it's about a coffee drink which, according to Uncyclopedia themselves, is the longest possible order you could possibly order at Starbucks.
Prose and formatting: 9 There's more conspiracies where that came from, and they're in their own section of this article, no less! The section kind of reads like half UnNews article, half interview column... I guess...
Images: 7 Half of the images here look so disturbing! Also, why place that disproportionately-shaped world from the pages from the "Continent" template right over here?
Miscellaneous: 10 Aside from all that, it's still a good article.
Final Score: 39 I've never drank that kind of coffee before... I wonder what it tastes like? Never mind; next time I go to Starbucks I'm ordering a chocolate chip cookie.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Total Fucking Asshole Server 2006[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 I barely find any of this fucking funny. Whoops! Did I just say that out loud?
Concept: 8 I not THAT familiar with server-based PC's, but...
Prose and formatting: 7 Hey, lay off the insults...
Images: 10 Do servers look like computers? Ah whatever. I liked the concept of "Insulty," though.
Miscellaneous: 10 Neither the humor nor the prose matters; it's still a good article either way.
Final Score: 42 I wonder what would happen if this WAS real?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Internet Movie Database[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 This's a good example of a page about a website that looks like what it's about; it's a parody.
Concept: 10 They just named the displayed movie "Internet Movie Database," which's about... well... the Internet Movie Datebase!
Prose and formatting: 10 Although a lot outdated, it looks like the very same website for... well, you know.
Images: 9 I remember fixing most of the hotlinked "images" from Wikia's Uncyclopedia (which were really small buttons and such) 4 years after Uncyclopedia got removed from Wikia. But there's 1 that still is yet to be found as of 2025...
Miscellaneous: 9 Almost looks perfect. I still need to look for that missing image... or, maybe not.
Final Score: 48 Looks like a good article/movie! Hey, Bad Motherfucker, maybe we should watch it at Warren, AX sometime!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

001[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Well, if this guinea pig is based on the very same dramatic fad from Kill Bill, I guess I'll give it more score if I wanted to...
Concept: 10 Hmmm... looks like we have a scale of evolution here inbetween... That's pretty good!
Prose and formatting: 10 The script in the "Notable Dialogue" section's so funny, I just wonder if it's really real. Especially with "Comedy trumpet" in it.
Images: 8 I think I'm with the ladies... Or not.
Miscellaneous: 10 You know, even the boring (?) pages deserve a 10 on "quality."
Final Score: 45 Well, to be honest, I don't think I'm into these classic movies that much. I just wonder if this "001" actually made it to Sean Connery's James Bond movies.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

HowTo:Cheat At Scrabble[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 My favorite part's the one with the "mumbo jumbo" words. Who wants to see a word called "qayafid," anyway?
Concept: 10 The strategies listed in this HowTo also apply to Bananagrams, you know.
Prose and formatting: 10 Told in the 1st person. Also, I see a little sexual innuendo and a pun, too.
Images: 10 "Bad letters?!" I refer to Q, V, and Z as the bad letters.
Miscellaneous: 10 It looks good, but if a TTS voice were to read the random bits...
Final Score: 50 Whatever it is, the only strategy I'm using from this HowTo is a dictionary of some sort.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Garfield[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The humor mostly focuses on the "stray comics." Especially the cat-related pun from there.
Concept: 6 I don't like the idea of deconstructing my favorite comic, though...
Prose and formatting: 7 Also, the article sounds a lot like criticism to said strip. But I did like this part below!
Images: 10 Like I said before, all the "stray comics" are funny. (And no, HTML comment, I'm not deleting them.)
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality's great, just like the original strips.
Final Score: 43 If I were to read this article, I'd skip to the strays. No, really.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

IQ:Sample test[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Hmmm... the impossibility of all of these questions makes them funny. XD
Concept: 10 Of course they had to make all of these questions impossible, like I said before.
Prose and formatting: 10 It's a quiz, what else did you expect?
Images: 10 Was the black-and-white on all 4 images intentionally meant to reflect printer paper?
Miscellaneous: 10 I just don't know what to say here, except... This article deserves a pass!
Final Score: 50 I wonder if Willy on wheels took this test yet?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

My Journeys with the GPS[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Oh no! More British humour! The article even had the needs to say it!
Concept: 10 I'm not a big fan of GPS's, so this article's a must-read.
Prose and formatting: 10 I can tell somebody needs anger management classes! Caps Lock and bold and then the font gets 3 times big.
Images: 10 Hee hee; something's wrong with this picture...
Miscellaneous: 10 Looks good, UNLIKE MOST GPS'S...
Final Score: 50 As far as I know, the only good GPS's a road map.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Me[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Wouldn't it be funny if you had a userpage like this? My favorite part's the bottom text where this guy behind the "userpage" suddenly sings his (or was it her?) own version of the Pokémon theme song and even tells me I'm screwed.
Concept: 10 A parody of those said-to-be-crappy pages from the old days of the Internet.
Prose and formatting: 10 Lots of Caps Lock abuse in that one...
Images: 10 The funny thing is, the hit counter never updates!!!
Miscellaneous: 10 It's good, even though the quality looks intentionally bad...
Final Score: 50 If only Geocities was still alive, I could make a funny page similar to this one...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

AAA[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The highlight of the article is the "Accomplishments" section. It turns out this "AAA" did the impossible as he achieved the world's highest scores on millions of video games! Like playing through the Zelda CD-I games without snickering at the cutscenes. I read through here about plans of him playing Super Mario World on Wii's Virtual Console, not only with a GameCube controller, but even with an unaccessorized Wii remote...
Concept: 10 Just goes to show ya -- the article's about someone who knows how to play video games wisely and impossibly just because it's called "AAA."
Prose and formatting: 9 This article 1st reads like a typical wiki article, then it goes onto an interview-like section, and finally, the accompllishments. Unfortunately, I gave it a 9 because for the last section, where it mentions Portal, it trails on into some cryptic song, which I can't quite pinpoint yet as of 2025...
Images: 10 You just gotta love the "photographic" evidence of how AAA can beat Minesweeper on expert without a mouse.
Miscellaneous: 10 I THINK I remember back in revision #5882837 when most of this article was the suxxors... It's great how articles can improve from time to time.
Final Score: 49 I wish I was AAA... I just need to increase my skills up to 11 for this. Too bad he found Waldo already...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

List of one letter words starting with A[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 2 points were removed for ruining the joke by adding 2 more items to the minimalistic list in 2023.
Concept: 10 This article just goes down to the basics! Just read the title in case you forget.
Prose and formatting: 10 Long introduction, short list. Eh?
Images: 10 The scan of Samuel L. Johnson's Dictionary has a couple small tweaks to it to make it fit well with the article... Can you find them?
Miscellaneous: 9 What was the point of the "ſ" symbol?
Final Score: 47 Wanna know what the (original) list says? Get ready...

The list just says A.

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

You Are Dead[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The funny part is that dead people can't read this article.
Concept: 10 I don't really know it, but my guess is that the article is just teasing you.
Prose and formatting: 10 Small caps for creating emphasis! It also has a FAQ section, useless for dead people. >:)
Images: 10 The tombstone is just a template image; feel free to use it for your own good...
Miscellaneous: 10 Even the small caps can't stop this article.
Final Score: 50 I think you died while reading this.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Google Middle Earth[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 I could barely find anything funny... except for that image in the "Future Versions" section which I'll tell you about soon enough.
Concept: 10 My guess is that the "concept" came from a pun between Google Earth and the Lord of the Rings's Middle Earth.
Prose and formatting: 10 Nice secret user comment there, Tom Bombadil.
Images: 10 I don't know if that's a non-sequitur, but there's this image that's a bit off topic where it shows what Google Earth would be like probably in another 10 years: gone too far. In other words, if you zoom in too much, you'll actually see people flipping the bird at you!
Miscellaneous: 10 This featured article's almost incomprehensible I can't determine if it's THAT great...
Final Score: 46 I'm still waiting for that update on Google Earth. Can't wait to see people going insane at me!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Movie Trailer Announcer Guy[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 I've read the article AND listened to its audio version (they say it's audio madness!); they're both equally funny.
Concept: 10 Like the talk page says, the supposed plot of the "movie" is that 6 people (1 of them being Oscar Wilde, of course) go to see the Uncyclopedia Movie yet Fred Epstein knows who this guy is; he sets on an adventure to reveal his identity to us.
Prose and formatting: 10 Sort of reads like a trailer, and then in the middle we see a list of all of the nicknames this Don LaFontaine has been given for the past years, plus the trailers of most of the movies we hear his voice in (with some names made up for fun :)), probably sporked from Wikipedia.
Images: 9 I just don't know what that picture with Bull from Night Court with his random muppet/puppet sidekick was about. Also, the obligatory YouTube embed of the "best fight scene ever" made me give it a 9... What if the video gets copyright struck? (Yes, embeds count as images too.)
Miscellaneous: 9 It almost looks theater black... The top part looks cut off.
Final Score: 48 In conclusion, this looks like another 1 of those movies that won't exist.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

HowTo:Cook While Drunk[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 This's another 1 of those articles that relies on humour, not humor. Anyway, the punchline's the best part here: as soon as the drunk victim makes a note to buy flowers on his way home from work tomorrow, he wakes up and realizes he's due at the office in 3 hours!
Concept: 10 A simple concept: After a loooooooooong day at the pub, you go home. You want to go to bed, but you're hungry, and want to, well, cook while drunk.
Prose and formatting: 10 Faux cooking directions.
Images: 8 Delicious-looking images of a cake and omelet. I'm not sure about the cake, though...
Miscellaneous: 10 The British humour really brings in a kick to it.
Final Score: 48 1 of those tricks you shouldn't try at home.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Chainsaw[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's funny because it's short. Also there's some recursion in there somewhere...
Concept: 10 Oh no; a suicide attempt!
Prose and formatting: 10 I don't even see any "prose..." The author died.
Images: 10 If you love the "Blood Spatter" image then be prepared to see it again and again over more than 100 other pages.
Miscellaneous: 10 Intentionally, there are 2 HTML comments telling you not to edit the page nor finish it.
Final Score: 50 Another 1 of those tricks you shouldn't try at home. Déjà vu anyone?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Dyslexia/Dilsexya[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The "Dilsexya" part of the article's my favorite. Since I obviously "connat raed" it, I might need a screen reader for this one...
Concept: 10 2 articles in 1 means 2 times the fun! Well, technically, they used to be separate, until they recently (as of 2024) became the same article; Dilsexya currently redirects to Dyslexia.
Prose and formatting: 8 Well, I don't think there's any interesting "prose" in the main article, but as for the alternate version...
Images: 7 "This article as it appears to a dyslexic?" All I can see is the same dyslexic article in that symbollic language, but, ok...
Miscellaneous: 10 The article switching template is still awesome.
Final Score: 45 You know you're dyslexic when you suddenly type strangely. That's just what I remember hearing.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Grue's Clues[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Blue's Clues + Grue Humor = Absurdity? That's 1 of the categories in the article.
Concept: 10 Again, this's a parody of Blue's Clues, starring Christopher Reeve as the host, Grue as himself, and a colorful cast of animate objects and living characters. I'm pretty sure you've heard of the original show and its usual formula by now and don't need me to remind you again, so instead, read the article, dweeb!
Prose and formatting: 10 Just read the infobox on the right; it's hilarious.
Images: 10 So a typical clue would be a dead body, you say? Hmmm...
Miscellaneous: 9 I'm not sure if the "Fact" template was intentional; Uncyclopedia's said to be content-free.
Final Score: 49 Now the final question is, what would a typical Grue's Clues episode look like?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:16, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Ye Olde Webbe Desyne Shoppe[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 The only thing I could find funny is a little sign of anachronism...
Concept: 10 Is that how they made the Internet back then? I guess so...
Prose and formatting: 10 Either it reads like an article or an advertisement but I don't care.
Images: 10 Some visual puns (?).
Miscellaneous: 10 Looks good. Except (intentionally) for "get you're text write befour pubblishing."
Final Score: 47 Turns out I recently learned that the "permanent exhibition of how websites were produced before the advent of computers" was actually the ARPANET. I gotta go back to Wikipedia...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Grand Theft Audio logo.png[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 I guess the humor must come from the courtroom sequences. Let me show you MY attempts at it:
  • "I find you GUILTY of stealing Mario's intellectual property and financial security, you butt muncher!"
  • "You should be ashamed of further compounding Ted Kennedy's hardships! You are nothing but a gay! Clemency DENIED!"
Concept: 10 Great concept! Now we might have sequels and ports involving stealing movies and video games as well.
Prose and formatting: 10 A typical Wikipedia article parody.
Images: 10 The "Fair Warning" poster was just photoshopped to say "Fair Use."
Miscellaneous: 10 Once again, the courtroom sequence section helps out with the quality.
Final Score: 50 They want me to steal this game... How hard can it be?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

A Visit with your Psychopathic Grandmother[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It looks like 1 of those articles with black comedy, complete with nearly deaf grandmother. Not sure why my grandmother might be Al-Qaeda, though...
Concept: 10 So I go to visit my grandma, my Uncle Mort, and my pet Grue, who somehow has the name of... Lord Voldemort. Why Grandma is acting like this, I don't know...
Prose and formatting: 10 Told in Granny's own old words.
Images: 10 Heh heh; I like the Hitler teapot.
Miscellaneous: 10 Articles told in 1st person aren't bad, as you might guess...
Final Score: 50 Now if I only alter the ending where Grandma begins to hug me tighter so she actually kills me (complete with this), this article would be interesting.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:Employee Manual[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 It looks kind of like a leaked version of a serious McDonald's employee manual, with some subliminal messages and jokes thrown in, though I can't seem to find most of them...
Concept: 10 As I said, this must be a rational explanation of all the things going on at McDonald's (and possibly Burger King and Wendy's and...).
Prose and formatting: 10 It's just a manual that's just being snarky!
Images: 10 All 4 images in the article look copyrighted or something, especially the one with Grimace, though if image captions count toward the score, then I give lots of love to Grimace's image...
Miscellaneous: 10 The only thing I can find wrong is that this article needs more humor...
Final Score: 48 Maybe I should learn how to hack the official McDonald's website... wait a minute...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

HowTo:Play Russian Roulette[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 More dark humor! But it's more dark than humor...
Concept: 7 Instructions on how to die, casino-style.
Prose and formatting: 10 Near the end, the "Going solo?" section has 4 different endings chosen at random, thanks to the "choose" and "option" tags.
Images: 8 The Blood Spatter image strikes again! Also, there's this silly image that sometimes shows up from 1 of the 4 endings...
Miscellaneous: 9 Almost looks perfect, again. To make it more quicker and easier to get the ending you want, instead of using the "Purge" function, I found out you have to type <choose uncached> instead of <choose>.
Final Score: 41 No; Russian Roulette isn't my thing.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Game:Pick Up the Phone Booth and Aisle[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 There's so much infinite humor that I can't keep up with this endless cycle of a silly game!
Concept: 10 It looks mundane at 1st, but the end result is wacky hijinks ensuing!
Prose and formatting: 10 Black on white as opposed to Zork's white on black.
Images: 10 Yes, there are images in this game. Wanna know how many there are?

2. Only 2.

Miscellaneous: 10 Finally! As of 10/1/24, the game is playable again! Thanks, Ljcool2006!
Final Score: 50 I know each choice ends with the same outcome of you dying, but this game's also a must-play.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:18, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Blue Screen of Death[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Since this's Uncyclopedia, this article uses sarcastic-sounding humor. I actually don't feel comfortable looking at it, probably except for the list of platforms that the screen uses. But still, why would it be a Windows operating system with my name on it?!
Concept: 8 I still like the concept, even though it might not seem fair, though. A blue screen often seen so much it ends up becoming a game...
Prose and formatting: 9 A typical parody of a Wikipedia article that looks good, though otherwise...
Images: 9 Some images were at least pleasant, like the one from Star Trek.
Miscellaneous: 10 The only thing I can give a 10 is the quality.
Final Score: 43 I'm not going to even bother "playing" this "game..."
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Why?:Remove Your Penis[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Unfortunately, this article contains dark humor, and the only thing I can find funny is the end.
Concept: 7 The concept's ok, though it freaks me out to not have a penis...
Prose and formatting: 10 First Why? I did on this page.
Images: 7 The penis removal example image freaks me out a bit, too.
Miscellaneous: 9 "Game Over?" What does THAT have to do with killing the article's author?
Final Score: 40 The beginning of the article felt more sexy than the rest...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

UnScripts:Dora the Explorer: The Movie[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The funny thing about this whole "harrowing experience" is, Scene 3 is skipped!
Concept: 10 This's a parody of Dora the Explorer. The title implies it to be a movie, though it's really said to be a TV special.
Prose and formatting: 10 The script looks like it's written by Lemony Snicket.
Images: 7 This image currently doesn't even look like it belongs to the article. Make up your mind, TigerManCP!
Miscellaneous: 10 Other than that, the script looks good; this's the 1st one I'm doing here.
Final Score: 47 Would Viacom approve of this? I'm not sure, though they already (since 2019) made a live-action flick starring Dora and her family, called Dora and the Lost City of Gold. I haven't seen it yet, though I hear it's good...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Mental illness[edit | edit source]

Humour: 9 The backstory mentioned below is funny. The list of mental illnesses included in the article could be, too, but I REALLY am NOT a kleptomaniac and I don't find OCD funny.
Concept: 10 The backstory involves some insane guy trapped in an asylum doing nothing but telling us aaaaaaaaall about menthol illnesses mental illnesses... Then, at the end, he appears to escape, only to bang on thin air...
Prose and formatting: 10 It's just another one of those articles clearly written in the 1st/2nd person.
Images: 8 The 1st image really brought in a crazy kick to the article, and the 2nd image is ok, but the last image is too questionable to me...
Miscellaneous: 10 First DONKEY DICK article I've ever done BASTARD that comes PIGFUCKER with HOMO the NIGGER quality Expletive O CANADA template.
Final Score: 47 I may or may not exhibit any of the mental illnesses mentioned in the article... or DO I???
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

UnScripts:Emergency Room[edit | edit source]

Humour: 9 This UnScript's funny, but what I don't get is Harley Finklestein's "multiple personality disorder" near the end.
Concept: 10 Sounds mundane.
Prose and formatting: 10 I don't see any hidden gems within the subtext of this script... Oh well. It's still good either way.
Images: 9 Why'd they have to censor Dr. Green's/Howard Stern's image?
Miscellaneous: 10 Also sounds like a good script, yet the pilot for "a show about nothing could not possibly succeed" and is said to have failed.
Final Score: 48 I have nothing else to say, except... "BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGGHHHH!"
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Why?:Stick Things in the Electrical Outlet[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Warning: This article contains some dark humor. I think I may be getting a bit of déjà vu here... However, it may not be AS harmful as removing your penis, though, for it seems to have a cheerful attitude at you.
Concept: 8 Another ok concept, though the consequences will ALSO freak me out...
Prose and formatting: 10 Being the 2nd Why? I did on this page, its POV sounds... interesting.
Images: 9 There are definitely shock images showing things you shouldn't try at home... but I still give this a 9 because of the image featuring Cuddles from Happy Tree Friends. You never know what's going to happen to him...
Miscellaneous: 10 I haven't said something like this in a while, but... the quality looks good. But soon will come the bad articles...
Final Score: 45 I don't know why, but when I was little, I never died from sticking my very own finger in an electrical outlet once...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:Life as a 4⅝ Year Old[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Just reading the date headings makes me giggle; the author's totally illiterate.
Concept: 10 Have you ever written something like this when you were 4 and ⅝?
Prose and formatting: 10 I really like this guy's adorable perspective...
Images: 10 "One struggles for words to describe this deeply philosophical exploration of the mind." So says the 4⅝-year-old's signature near the end.
Miscellaneous: 10 This surprisingly gets a 10, despite the age of the author...
Final Score: 50 Well, all's well that ends well... for this review, that is. Onward to the next one!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Please delete this page[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Well, ironically AND unfortunately, the only thing I COULD find funny is the section that shows us the abuse of the USERNAME template (though nobody cares about whenever <insert name here> WAS the asshole or not...). Also the fake Wikipedia template.
Concept: 10 A PSA teaching Uncyclopedia dweebs what pages marked for deletion should look like.
Prose and formatting: 7 This article's written in 1st and 2nd person. It may not be funny to you, but it makes a tiny bit sense, I guess...
Images: 10 Yes; the page image sums it all up. I also love the literal shock image near the end.
Miscellaneous: 8 Is most of it supposed to look like this? I don't know...
Final Score: 42 I think it's best if you keep this page for the sake of information, Uncyclopedia.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2024 (UTC)


G Rated Talking Animal Movie[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 The Mad Libs-style "script" in this article would receive a 10 for humor if the Mad Libs templates from the wiki were used, like this:

"It's me, the block of Gouda you rescued from the desert this morning!"

or

"What? No way! That's not possible! deers can't talk!"

Concept: 10 In this article, Uncyclopedia presents us with what a typical, well, G Rated Talking Animal Movie would be like, complete with a script made impossibly funnier with bad language and curse words for some reason.
Prose and formatting: 10 What did you expect from the 79-act-long "script?"
Images: 10 [[File:Dood.jpg|1px]]''<span style="font-size:60px; font-family:georgia;">Fin.</span>''[[File:Penguin with gun.jpg|1px]]

What looks just like 1 big "Fin." is REALLY surrounded by 2 reeeeeeeeeeally tiny pictures that turn out to be just pictures of penguins.

Miscellaneous: 10 No comment. Thumbs-up-small.png
Final Score: 47 Nothing else to say, really, except...



Dood.jpgEnd of section.Penguin with gun.jpg




Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:The Last Little Pig[edit | edit source]

Humour: 9 This silly little UnBook's humor comes from the obvious potholes the blue links lead to. Especially the call back to the article above. Except I don't know what the "rogue punchline" in this article is.
Concept: 10 What do you think would've happened if the Big Bad Wolf managed to eat the last little pig from that fairy tale? Read this article and find out!
Prose and formatting: 10 Ah; you may not believe it, but this prose looks painstakingly perfect.
Images: 10 The image of that pig looks cute and silly at the same time the more I look at it. Personally I thought his name was "Eugene."
Miscellaneous: 10 See "Prose and formatting"; this's what I want a perfect UnBook to look like.
Final Score: 49 Now my final question is, what was the rogue punchline?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

The Daily Show[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Hoo boy; where do I begin? Well, 1st of all, the main problem is, I don't watch the show, so I barely know what's going on in this article. The only things funny are the "commercial segments" and the randomly chosen Moment of Zen near the end as of revision #6204329. You might see a cameo of a Muppet, or you might not.
Concept: 10 The concept's fine, though. It's--what else?--a parody of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart on Comedy Central.
Prose and formatting: 5 I would've given this a 6, but the prose of this article sucked more than the Wikia version, which I actually read 1st. First 5 I've inputted in this page.
Images: 10 The picture of Jon Stewart looks interesting, for it's said to be the only picture that wasn't age locked on Sarah McCain's DeviantArt page.
Miscellaneous: 5 After lots and lots of perfect articles, I've finally stumbled upon an inadequate one. Yay.
Final Score: 37 In conclusion, I tried fixing most of this article's blunders so it wouldn't suck anymore, but... wait, what? The featured revision's better, you tell me? Now why didn't I think of that before? Shrug.jpg
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:A Day In The Life Of A Redirect[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Unfortunately, the top of this article is the only thing I could find funny.
Concept: 10 And this article's supposed to be about your average wiki redirect living just within 1 freaking day.
Prose and formatting: 10 I also like the emotion in this article. I know how you feel, redirect.
Images: 10 ...? Also the picture of what's confirmed to be a picture of Mr. Ms. Redirect is interesting to see.
Miscellaneous: 10 Now back to good quality AGAIN...
Final Score: 47 Anything else to add? Well, I checked what redirects DO link here and I could (sadly) only find "Parsi Hilton."
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

UnScripts:Genesis, Episode II: In the Garden of Eden[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Being an UnScript from Uncyclopedia, there are lots of anachronisms abound, as well as some gross humor. Not sure about the Chiquita Banana sticker on Adam's bellybutton, though...
Concept: 10 The story of Adam and Eve told in Uncyclopedia's own words.
Prose and formatting: 10 Most lines contain a reference to the Bible verse it originated from. Are they all even real?
Images: 8 Except for the 1st image which literally screams "Hey, look! They're naked!" all the images in this article are ok and funny to look at.
Miscellaneous: 10 Despite the uncomfortable-looking image at the start, it's all A-OK.
Final Score: 45 Note to self: remember to read Genesis Bible verses 2:10-3:9 to figure out what's REALLY going on...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 19:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:BEEP[edit | edit source]

Humour: 9 Very funny! Though there was 1 part that threw me off, and that was the cryptic Matrix reference...
Concept: 10 A "normal person" under the pseudonym of James K. Tittywanker attempts to install Linux on his laptop only to deal with the laptop emitting relentless BEEPs from its internal speaker. Isn't that how you feel sometimes?
Prose and formatting: 10 I like the intentional typos! They instill flavor to the prose of this UnBook...
Images: 10 I like the picture of the broken laptop in Chapter 5. Kids, don't abuse your computer, or else it'll look like this.
Miscellaneous: 10 As for the quality, again, the typos are intentional.
Final Score: 49 This article, too, would be more interesting if I could only alter the ending involving "James K. Tittywanker" getting his ass whipped by his dad's belt, complete with this.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:48, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

PlayStation 4[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Yes; this DOES look dated. This might need a rewrite. The only thing good, though, is Oscar Wilde's quote at the top.
Concept: 5 It's not a good idea to talk about a dumb, made-up console that actually just got released 11 years ago as of 2024...
Prose and formatting: 6 The UnNewsish look barely does anything to help this article.
Images: 7 Why does the image of the cardboard box remind me of something else I know here that should resemble a video game console?
Miscellaneous: 6 The worst part here's that it's said Uncyclopedia's too lazy to update the information in this article, and only put in this footnote to tease us about that.
Final Score: 30 Well, that's enough outdated low quality information for now. Onward to the next review!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:Captain's Blog[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Lots of broken English there is in this article. It's also funny because of the fact that people actually have to write blogs on paper, and that's cool.
Concept: 10 Everything that happened before AND during the events of Zero Wing...
Prose and formatting: 10 ...in "Captain's" point of view.
Images: 10 I just like how the creator of this "blog" put the portraits of Captain, Mechanic, and CATS in various questionable situations.
Miscellaneous: 10 Once again, all the bad English used here is intentional.
Final Score: 50 I wish I knew how all this bad grammar was generated... Babelfish, perhaps? It has improved for more than a decade since this article was created...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:28, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

The Pun Invasion of Uncyclopedia[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 So many silly puns to look at... yet so little time for man to count, react to, and take note of them. What's the porpoise?
Concept: 10 Behold, the Pun Invasion! Feels like some kind of non-sequitur war, though...
Prose and formatting: 10 It's mostly a list full of puns; I'll bet a screen reader can read it better than me.
Images: 9 I (kind of) don't get the porpoise of that picture of these 2 syllables, nor do I get why it says that at the bottom... All I see is a cow and a porpoise jumping out of water. Either way, I give the picture a 9.
Miscellaneous: 10 For an article said to be about bad puns, it doesn't seem to be bad.
Final Score: 49 What the heck does "nucking futs" mean?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

HowTo:Drive a train[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Yes; there IS "humour" in this one. But there's more of that than "humor" given that the article looks overly British.
Concept: 10 A successful train drive in 6 simple steps:
  1. Study the controls.
  2. Realize you still don't know anything.
  3. Learn the route.
  4. Push buttons like you care. (Sound familiar?)
  5. Stop the train at the station.
  6. Exit the train safely!
Prose and formatting: 10 I like the 2 4th wall breaks in steps 2 and 4.
Images: 10 Trains DO come in many shapes and flavors, just like food and toys. This one's a BWT engine.
Miscellaneous: 10 Well, looks like the quality will surely be moving lively for a bit...
Final Score: 50 Is THAT how trains are operated on the inside? I'm buying that book from DK again.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

The Incredible Adventures of MS PAINTMAN![edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 For the record, I'm not so sure about the webcomic's humor...
Concept: 10 Reminds me of those old sprite comics from the early days of the Internet.
Prose and formatting: 10 I'm fine with just 1 introduction paragraph.
Images: 8 The more you look at it, though, the more it starts to get boring super quick.
Miscellaneous: 10 Intentionally bad MS Paint-style images that still give this article a 10.
Final Score: 44 Wow; that was short.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Are you colour-blind?[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Subliminal humor. I'm not going to describe it, though, because it'll make me colorblind if I study it for 10 seconds...
Concept: 10 This looks like a test to see if you ARE colorblind or not. Looks like there's no escape, though... >:)
Prose and formatting: 10 This's also a quiz, what else did you expect?
Images: 10 At the last image, you can barely see words reading "kill your cat."
Miscellaneous: 10 I like how the article's smoothly translated from a foreign version of Uncyclopedia, namely, the French one. First one I've ever done!
Final Score: 47 I don't feel any different from usual.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 I know I haven't seen 1 of those in a while, but it's another "more serious than silly" article, in the style of an UnBook.
Concept: 10 The obligatory Wikipedia link leads to the book it's based off of: A Prison Diary. I don't know that one.
Prose and formatting: 10 I feel sorry for this "JeffArch."
Images: 10 It's that window again! It shows up 4 times and shrinks occasionally.
Miscellaneous: 10 Serious writting=quality writing. Thumbs-up-small.png
Final Score: 46 By the way, I looked up "User:JeffArch" and found out he's not part of this wiki.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Michael Bay[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 This article just sums everything about him (or it?) all up: cliche.
Concept: 10 They say no man is an island, but what if that was true for Michael Bay? Now we all know where all those explosions and not very good characters come from.
Prose and formatting: 10 We also get a typical schedule of what happens in this "Michael Bay."
Images: 10 EXPLOSIONS!!!
Miscellaneous: 10 I know the article's cliche, but it's no problem...
Final Score: 47 Mushroom cloud.jpeg
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:20, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

BILLY MAYS[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Does Billy Mays REALLY yell and swear like that? Wow...
Concept: 10 It's just Billy Mays's article IN HIS OWN WORDS.
Prose and formatting: 10 The OCCASIONAL bold text and PEEPEE expletives give this EMPHASIZING, ALL CAPS article QUITE a KILLER to my EARS... that is, if I was LISTENING to this ARTICLE.
Images: 10 So as a zombie, Billy Mays has his skin color inverted? Maybe he might sound horribly G-Major, too...
Miscellaneous: 10 Being Billy Mays (I guess), the text, again, is in ALL CAPS.
Final Score: 50 Oh, man... I gotta stop emphasizing what I say...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Elevator[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Um, I was expecting more humor, though I liked how 1 link pothole referred to the United Kingdom of Britannia (and Northern Pangaea) as "stupid places..."
Concept: 6 "Torture devices?" Ouch!
Prose and formatting: 7 Another history lesson-type article.
Images: 7 These images don't even look like they're edited for laughs at all. I can't even tell the last one, either...
Miscellaneous: 9 I WOULD give this a 10 if people WOULD finish their quotations with closing marks.
Final Score: 36 I just hope someday the article gets edited with more criticism about the elevator music.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 04:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

DRILL SERGEANT/INSTRUCTOR[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Here we go again... This article is making me so happy I might as well cry... on the inside, I guess. There's even a Waldo sighting here!
Concept: 10 Who doesn't like drill sergeants? This guy calls me a maggot faggot mag-faggot, then a limp-wristed homo, & finally, unfunny.
Prose and formatting: 10 His yelling makes Billy Mays sound worse in comparison!
Images: 8 Yeesh... They just had to increase the pixel size of the page image!
Miscellaneous: 10 The mistakes when "I am a diarrhea slurping redneck bum humper" is printed on the screen 9 more times were intentional:
I am a diarrhea slurping redneck bum humper.
i am a diarrhea sulrping redneck bum humper.
I am a diarrhea slurping redncek bum humpr.
I am a diarrhea slurping redneck bum humper.
i am a diarrhea sulrping redneck bum humper.
I am a diarrhea slurping redncek bum humpr.
I am a diarrhea slurping redneck bum humper.
i am a diarrhea sulrping redneck bum humper.
I am a diarrhea slurping redncek bum humpr.
You are a diarrhea sulrping rdenkce mbu hmuepr.

(And it was only 10 times it was seen, NOT 500!!!)

Final Score: 46 Yes, we ARE clear on getting this article featured on the front page, sir; yes sir.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 04:09, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Trogdor the Burninator[edit | edit source]

Humour: 9 Finally; I get to do a review of an article of something from the Homestar Runner body of work! The obviously made-up Olde English poem based on the song of the same name made me giggle. However, it's not funny to have Mike Chapman drop constant F-bombs while mentioning Trogdor's possible relationship with Beowulf...
Concept: 10 A poem based on a dragon. How classic. Comes down to what the page keeps referring to Strong Bad as the "Trogdor Scribe."
Prose and formatting: 10 Why does this article remind me of the Calvin and Hobbes article?
Images: 10 As I look at the manuscript, there's 1 problem: I can't read it! Doesn't matter, 'cause the article says some lines got burninated anyway.
Miscellaneous: 10 You mean the quality of the Olde English Photoshop filters of the image of the "Trogdor Scribe?" Yes.
Final Score: 49 This article comes in the night.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

History of Google[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 The only things I found funny in this entire article were the anachronisms.
Concept: 7 This article explains what it would've like if Google existed BEFORE its actual birth in 1998... Basically it's the history of the world with Google anachronisms thrown in!
Prose and formatting: 10 Well, great job. You didn't mess this one up either. 3l
Images: 6 Was that what the original Google logo looked like? It looks new to me...
Miscellaneous: 10 How did they manage to write most of these articles like that?
Final Score: 39 I think it'll even better if someone writes an Uncyclopedia version of this article...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Build the Perfect Sandcastle[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 I think there are some parts that make this feel more like "child abuse anti-humour" (?) than just "humour" at all.
Concept: 10 In this article, a 4-year old that goes by the name of "Joshy" tells his experiences of how he tried to, well, build the perfect sandcastle.
Prose and formatting: 10 The article's told in a story, in his own words. The dialogue quotes are written in the "Verdana" font.
Images: 10 2 different images with the same caption on both ends of the same article!
Miscellaneous: 9 Some of "Joshy's" writing looks like it belongs in a fanfic; the article has to be seen to be believed.
Final Score: 46 I just wonder if Joshy's dad will make him do potty training in the sequel...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

UnBooks:Great Abridged Pop Songs[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 The way I see the lyrics to those pop songs, I picture an AI Dot Warner from Animaniacs reciting the lines to them.
Concept: 10 Well, actually, listening to pop songs isn't tedious, but deciphering the lyrics to most of them is.
Prose and formatting: 10 They're so abridged, they don't even rhyme!
Images: 10 Tee hee; even the images look abridged: except for the 1st one, the captions are all 1 to 3 words long while the pixel sizes of the images themselves are 100 pixels long.
Miscellaneous: 10 Despite looking "abridged," the quality of the songs of this "UnBook" looks good.
Final Score: 48 I hope they add more songs to this book...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

LazyTown[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Well, to tell you the truth, I think this's a bit more funnier than that "We Are Number One" meme going on since 2016.
Concept: 10 It's Joshy again! You've known him since he tried to build the perfect sandcastle, right? Well, he's telling you about LazyTown...
Prose and formatting: 10 ...in HIS point of view.
Images: 9 Various stock images. And a cake. With a watermark saying it came from "Cake Craft Creations."
Miscellaneous: 9 I can tell Joshy's writing quality has dropped in the 2nd-to-last section...
Final Score: 45 I think that's both Joshy articles! What's next?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Yellow[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Haha! It's so funny I can barely see a thing! XD
Concept: 10 It's just an article about the color yellow. Duh!
Prose and formatting: 10 There's 1 section, though, where this "yellow" is treated like an evil entity or something...
Images: 7 These images are swell, but if you treat yellow as evil, that's NO good.
Miscellaneous: 10 I think my eyes almost bled...
Final Score: 47 It's good, but still, I recommend reading past revisions of this article like #6210106.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

UnScripts:Star Wars (2010)[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Do I see self-referential humor? I thought this script was based on a (fake and crappy) reboot of the original Star Wars trilogy! XD
Concept: 10 According to the script's backstory in the beginning of article, George Lucas made this remake after criticism from Star Wars: The Clone Wars. It didn't do well, but at least it didn't have Jar Jar Binks...
Prose and formatting: 10 This time, there ARE hidden gems within the link potholes.
Images: 10 I think this article needs more lens flare...
Miscellaneous: 10 ...though its quality's fine, no matter what.
Final Score: 50 I don't know which one's better. Could it be this very UnScript, or the Star Wars sequel trilogy? Because some say the Star Wars sequel trilogy sucks...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

UnScripts:Pixar: An Introduction for Uncyclopedians[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Hoo boy; time for another funny UnScripts article review. Well, the humor comes from stating the same recurring motifs from this Pixar: mismatched buddies, the fish out of water, the rescue attempt, and the occasional Ratzenburger cameo. However, why would the Cars movies (and, by extension, the Good Dinosaur) be described as "horrible?" Those movies were so good.
Concept: 10 This informational article actually has a plot to it: a hero and his sidekick (probably/respectively Buzz Lightyear and Woody? Or the other way around?) are hanging out until a human snatches the hero and "murders" him by telling him all about Pixar's recurring motifs and the films that have it, excluding the Cars movies and the Good Dinosaur. But before the human can talk about the short films and future projects, the hero scares him away and, with luck, returns home!
Prose and formatting: 10 This definitely feels like a script to a Pixar movie...
Images: 10 I like the altered Pixar vanity plate with the Uncyclopedia logo in it.
Miscellaneous: 10 I feel like every UnScript-type article is like this.
Final Score: 48 Well, that's it for this article. Currently, Pixar's made a lot of good films, INCLUDING the Cars movies and the Good Dinosaur... and many more are in development for this page as you read it!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:56, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

The Asylum-Seeker's Guide to Visiting McDonald's[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 I don't see anything funny... Is this another leak?
Concept: 10 I think this's supposed to be for people visiting UK McDonald's areas from other countries.
Prose and formatting: 10 It must be another manual that's just being snarky!
Images: 7 I see some photorealistic photos that might as well look questionable, from the signs to the "fatarse twats."
Miscellaneous: 10 The only thing I can find wrong is that this article needs even more humor as that employee manual...
Final Score: 43 If I could go to a UK McDonald's, I'm getting fish and chips. 'Cause that's what they eat here, right?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Samuel L. Vacuum[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Why do you think I didn't find the puns at the beginning funny? :D
Concept: 10 Even the "Blackuum" portmanteau combined with "mothersucker" makes a good concept.
Prose and formatting: 10 Is he telling most of the article?
Images: 10 I wonder what it'll be like if I owned both the classic and modern Samuel L. Vacuums?
Miscellaneous: 10 No dust in there.
Final Score: 50 Godspeed to you too, Mr. "Blackuum."
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:44, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Microsoft Knowledge Base[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It all comes down to fake Windows XP-style error messages on the center of your screen.
Concept: 9 It's supposed to be a funny (and not just stupid) article based on 1 of Windows's Help and Support features, but the problem is, it's deprecated and no one even calls it that anymore.
Prose and formatting: 10 When you hover your mouse over the words "Amplus Congeries Excrēmentum Error #63726170," you get potholed links to "Big," "Slab," "Shit," "Error," and "Crap," in THAT order. >:)
Images: 10 Again, the gif of the fake Windows XP-style error messages is funny here.
Miscellaneous: 7 Even after I fixed the broken images on this page, it still looks like it collapsed to the bottom like the scenery on a stage play. Oh well.
Final Score: 46 And to conclude, the link pothole at the bottom telling me I need help by e-mail, online, or phone REALLY says... "Get a Mac!"
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:00, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

UnBooks:Gone Fishing[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The categories can describe this UnBook WAY better than me. Even 1 hidden comment in the 3rd section says it best!:

So that must mean using a wiki like Uncyclopedia or Wikipedia (never mind; let's not talk about that on 2nd thought) even one from Wikia Fandom is just like waiting for something to happen, but never happens!

Concept: 10 Just a typical day of fishing with grandfather and son... with a humorously dark twist to it, mostly involving dynamite.
Prose and formatting: 10 Just so you know, "Gramps" (the narrator) uses a normal typeface, his grandson Ralphie's lines are in italics, and the lines of the daddy and the other fisherman are in bold. I don't know why, but the prose reminds me of the classic Berenstain Bears books...
Images: 10 Out of all those 14 mundane images, 1 of them sticks out: the questionable Pope/Emperor Palpatine comparison that looks like the top was obviously photoshopped in. Also the caption of 1 otherwise mundane image that reads "Pathetic! Mine's twice that long!"
Miscellaneous: 10 Similar to "The Last Little Pig," this's what I want a perfect UnBook to look like.
Final Score: 50 I don't have the patience to wait for something to happen. Currently, as I check my watchlist, the work does me.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

The Pirate Bay[edit | edit source]

Humour: 5 While piracy sounds like a cool idea at first glance, it definitely isn't funny because

I don't even speak "torrent" at all! What are "seeds," "magnets," and "leechers," anyway? Also the ads in BitTorrent/Napster/whatever-the-SHITSKIN-else-you-use! With all that combined, "torrenting" something would take forever, as well as contain distractions!

Concept: 7 But I do like the concept, though! Though just a wee bit...
Prose and formatting: 10 Another typical Wikipedia article parody.
Images: 8 The map of the Bay itself and its surrounding areas is the only image here that's interesting because it looks like Disneyland when you squint your eyes.
Miscellaneous: 10 Yes, even this deserves a 10 on "quality," just like Grand Theft Audio.
Final Score: 40 Currently, Wikipedia says the REAL Pirate Bay has been struggling with keeping its site and "torrents" up since 2003... I wonder how Warez is doing?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your estimate of how long to reheat the lasagna[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 It's hard to tell if this's the kind of humor that looks as gross as Ren and Stimpy... or something even WORSE.
Concept: 10 So let me recap this chain reaction of an article by section... the microwave beeps the moment I hit start, then my lasagna begins to boil, THEN that lasagna becomes dry and rubbery, THEN the kitchen fills up with smoke, THEN my house burns down, THEN I go to sleep, THEN Joe Biden gets re-elected, THEN my poor, poor lasagna stops existing, THEN a zombie invasion occurs, and FINALLY... a fusion reaction renders 6 city blocks uninhabitable for centuries. Whatever THAT means.
Prose and formatting: 10 It's written in the 2nd person!
Images: 6 I think we need funnier and less gross images than this...
Miscellaneous: 10 High quality writing JUST TO A STORY ABOUT A MISESTIMATED LASAGNA. >:)
Final Score: 43 And finally, the answer to the question at the end of the article is...

Why would the microwave still be running? I don't get it.

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Handle Flashing Your Vagina in Public[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 This's making me feel a bit uncomfortable... Well, it doesn't matter, because I'm not a girl.
Concept: 7 I think the concept would be better if they mentioned how this works more often in private areas like strip clubs and (mostly nude) beaches.
Prose and formatting: 10 The categories didn't say so (yet), but this's another one of those articles written in 1st person. :/ It's still great either way.
Images: 6 The censorship makes the images look more lewd than I think... Also what happened to Zana Dark's Vagina Flash template? I think it added to the charm...
Miscellaneous: 10 They had to clean up the broken gallery templates lately as of Uncyclopedia's 20th... Right now, it looks fine.
Final Score: 40 When are they going to make a spinoff for us men?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Lateral thinking puzzle[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Possibly except for the one about Milo's grandson, all of the classic lateral thinking puzzles available on the page look a bit bland. They need to look more like adult jokes or something!
Concept: 10 The article header looks like the puzzles might as well be torture.
Prose and formatting: 10 The answers use the "censorship" template, similar to how Zork uses Zorkclue for its InvisiClues pages.
Images: 10 I like the answer to the simple (?) "9 dot puzzle."
Miscellaneous: 10 Looks boring good.
Final Score: 47 I'd like to give you a lateral thinking puzzle, but I'm all laterally thought out of those right now.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

McDonland[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 This seems so serious that the only bit of humor I was able to dig out was how Ronald McDonald calls In-N-Out Burger "Fuck Burger." :l
Concept: 7 I have no idea what this is, but my only guess is that it sounds like fast food lore.
Prose and formatting: 10 This MUST be the clown's own words, I can tell.
Images: 7 Are all 3 images real? Either way, they make me not want to eat at McDonald's...
Miscellaneous: 9 Too many external Wikipedia links (and some YouTube links) overcrowding the Uncyclopedia links. Nevertheless, that's still the beauty of this page, I guess.
Final Score: 40 I still wonder what the difference between McDonland and Mcdonaldland is.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

A wizard did it[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Gotta love the number of redirects to this article. Currently (at time of writing) there's 65, including "Who moved my cheese?" (named after the book of the same name).
Concept: 10 Of course that's the answer to all plot holes ever conceived (according to 1 of the redirects); namely, some pages of the Zork trilogy.
Prose and formatting: 10 It's just the words "WOW! IT'S FUCKING MAGICAL OR SOMETHING!!" in the center of the page, with a notification at the bottom that the article's author is losing his mind and currently hitting himself on the head with a baseball bat 7 or 8 times.
Images: 10 That's Merlin, from Disney's The Sword in the Stone, as well as an owl.
Miscellaneous: 10 If I see quality writing on a good article, please tell me a wizard did it.
Final Score: 50
WOW! IT'S FUCKING MAGICAL OR SOMETHING!!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

You're Screwed[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The name of the article sounds like good, humorous "clickbait"-- it involves a Grue as well. In fact, the Grue is giant. Wow, it's been a while since I've last mentioned Grues in this Pee Review so far...
Concept: 10 The story may sound interesting, but it goes like this: After work on a Friday, I begin to go home when I see a giant Grue heading toward me. Nowhere to go or hide (not even Starbucks), the Grue catches me (and destroys my only hope of survival, too) and

It appears that the last blow was too much for you. I'm afraid that you are dead.

As you take your last breath, you feel relieved of your burdens. The feeling passes as you find yourself before the gates of Hell, where the spirits jeer at you and deny you entry. Your senses are disturbed. The objects in the dungeon appear indistinct, bleached of color, even unreal.


> examine me
You appear to be made of a translucent floating white substance. There seems to be a golden halo hovering above your head.

Prose and formatting: 8 The narrative's good. It looks like Lemony Snicket, though it's starting to look more like an UnNews article, because I see the "5:07 PM, Friday--" at the beginning.
Images: 9 The non-sequitur image of 3 signs leading to death had its other 2 signs on the bottom look horribly and obviously photoshopped. Even the importer had the nerve to say it!
Miscellaneous: 10 It's all good as long as nothing more changes in this article...
Final Score: 47 This seems a lot like a silly Grue article; I can read it again and again if I want to! Wished they actually categorized it as such...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Chatroulette[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 If you think this article's just a boring CGI (not computer animation) tech demo, think again! Because it starts to bleed into a random image in offset #21, & goes all random throughout the rest.
Concept: 10 This page basic acts as a simulator of the infamous unpopular less popular website of the same name. Click "New Game" to get started.
Prose and formatting: 10 Mostly uses CGI, and I don't mean 3D animation!
Images: 10 (deep breath...)

The image offsets consist of some silly reporter girl vs. "Action Man" and Terry the T-rex, Luke Skywalker and Chewbacca vs. Nostalgia Critic, 2 Latin Americans passing popcorn to each other vs. 2 sumos who keep babbling something about E. Honda, Street Fighter, and the 5th Game Master Awards in Japanese, a 404 error vs. a middle finger, 2 surprised men vs. a "well hung" person, 4 male tweenagers vs. uncensored boobies, an old man who looks like Milton Waddams from Office Space vs. a Tech Support lady, an all-wet kid vs. He-Man, "Fluffy" vs. a Furry Neo-Nazi, "LET ME SEE YOUR BOOBIES DANCE!!" vs. a dancing black Rick Roller, a buff speedo vs. the top of a woman, Ceiling Cat vs. a masturbator, "LET ME SEE YOUR BOOBIES" vs. 2 boobies with boobies, boxers vs. buff muscles, "LET ME SEE YOUR BOOBIES DANCE!!" vs. 2 boobies without boobies, someone from CAVS giving a thumbs-up vs. Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Luke vs. his father, Charles Manson vs. 2 people somehow with the filename Joe_steve.jpg on their image, Milfeuelle vs. Kenny McCormick, another little girl vs. Count Lucas, a random image vs. "some kind of freak" with 6 fingers, a thin face vs. a wide face, and finally... it goes random.

(Phew!)

Miscellaneous: 9 The quality looks great, though it might as well vary when it slips into the random images...
Final Score: 49 This article has no limits! It's also probably good for those with boredom...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello there! I'm a kite, and I will ruin your day![edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's so funny to have the kite start out jolly and suddenly have an outburst swearing words! Speaking of which, I only saw the word "fucking" 3 times in this family-friendly article.
Concept: 10 The title says it all. No, really. Does it say "Hello there! I'm a kite, and I will improve your day!"?
Prose and formatting: 10 Well, if link potholes count as this, there's a lot of funny moments, including "Fun" linking to "Torture."
Images: 10 The part where my toddler, kite and I arrive at the park and set off to find a spot where there's wind has 4 images with captions, each representing forests. The 1st one's a normal forest, the 2nd one looks dark, the 3rd one feels kind of creepy, and the 4th one-- it's perfect!
Miscellaneous: 10 This's another 1 of those articles written in the first person, so it shouldn't be that bad.
Final Score: 50 For extra fun, try reading this article in Charlie Day's voice!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Survive the Titanic[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 First off, this article's dark humor's making me feel a LOT uncomfortable. Not only because I've never been on a ship that sunk before, but because of the idea and terror of scrambling to survive a sinking boat.
Concept: 7 If everyone else tries to use the same steps listed in this article at the same time, they're going to be in a LOT of BIG trouble.
Prose and formatting: 10 Um, I don't think the prose matters in this disaster-type article.
Images: 9 The "banana in your pocket" joke from the caption of the person in a swimsuit is getting old.
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality matters, though.
Final Score: 42 I wonder which one's worse... this or the Hindenburg? Actually, a better question is... Why'd they both sink? They were both so popular last century, and that included their names.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Traffic sign[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Mostly the humor in this page comes from its images. I'll tell you about them when we get to that respective section.
Concept: 10 No, Noel Coward, it's not about that crappy film starring Mel Gibson nor the other one, it's about traffic signs in general according to Uncyclopedia.
Prose and formatting: 10 Most of this page's just a gallery, duh.
Images: 7 It's funny how "STOP" stands for "Sit Tight Or Puke," but how on Uncyclopedia would the skull on an octagonal sign represent Luigi of all things?
Miscellaneous: 10 Other than that, I have nothing else to say about this article; as I said before, it's mostly a gallery.
Final Score: 44 Nothing else to say, that is, except for (according to the only associated article in the See also section)... "WHY THE ASSFACE CAN'T ANYONE DRIVE THE RIGHT WAY ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY?!"
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

God's answering service[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's fun to keep dialing the wrong number and then have an ANGRY GOD come down to Earth to get pre-Medieval on my ass and send me to Hell for all eternity as punishment.
Concept: 10 An anachronistic answering service related to God and religion.
Prose and formatting: 10 Like Dyslexia/Dilsexya, it uses the article switching template.
Images: 10 Yes, there were some images here as well. The page image's parents are technically not dead, but the image itself is here once you dial the wrong number, again.
Miscellaneous: 7 The only thing that needs improving on is the fires of Hell that appear on black when I get banished from dialing the wrong number enough times. Like the Microsoft Knowledge Base page itself, it still looks like it collapsed to the bottom like the scenery on a stage play.
Final Score: 47 There's still 1 thing about this very article that bothers me right about now... What was supposed to happen -12 years, 5 months, 23 days and 17 hours from now again?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

UnBooks:Let's take a walk in the city![edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The main character's also the funniest in this whole entire "kid's book"; I just wonder if he's smarter or dumber than Steve Burns...
Concept: 10 It must be like a Shaggy dog story, where the man loses his poor penny (whom he calls "Adam") only to later find it was in his pocket the whole time.
Prose and formatting: 10 His narrative sounds MORE than interesting! For example, in the 8th and final page, after Mr. Funny dweeb eats all the candy (?) that the sex offender gave them (I wonder what game they were playing behind the motel on page 5?), he idiotically decides to try some guy's own homemade crack. Also, when you click on "*Twich* *Twich*", you get taken to Meganew's personal Seizure Page.
Images: 10 There's a lot more pictures than any average UnBook... It's "a children's picture book," what did you expect?
Miscellaneous: 10 So far, this, Gone Fishing, and The Last Little Pig seem to be the finest UnBooks ever in the archive.
Final Score: 50 Oh yeah; I forgot to mention there was a hidden epilogue to the "book": after the man gets hit by an oncoming school bus at the end of the day, the kids take his money for a ride home and say "Yeah!"Yeah!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Blockbuster[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 This "Janet" running gag's starting to get old.
Concept: 7 Ah, Blockbuster brings me back to the good old days... and then there's the bankruptcy, which I'll tell you about at the end comment.
Prose and formatting: 10 A Blockbuster employee who goes under the name of Dave Stimson guides us through a tour of his store in San Pablo, California. Obviously, it has to be told in 1st person.
Images: 10 Oh shoot, I forgot Circuit City existed! How could I possibly forget about it?
Miscellaneous: 9 I repeat, I WOULD give this a 10 if people WOULD finish their quotations with closing marks.
Final Score: 42 As for the bankruptcy, Netflix, a former DVD rental service just like Blockbuster, would KILL all the other remaining DVD rental stores, including Blockbuster. Probably because no one buys VHS tapes anymore? Or the quality of their DVD's? Nevertheless, it isn't as bad as today when your favorite toy store, or your favorite restaurant, or your favorite buffet goes defunct and its location on the map gets replaced with a Starbucks drive-thru of some sort, with a certain angry shouting guy ranting about it...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

BabyTV[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Feels like another anti-humour article.
Concept: 8 Um, what is going on? Is this supposed to be a ripoff of BabyFirst TV or is Uncyclopedia messing my brain cells up?
Prose and formatting: 10 Oh goody goody; maybe I'll let the shows speak for themselves this time.
Images: 10 "Shapes and Pretty Music" looks like some kind of optical illusion. What is THAT weird thing over there?

"Things to See": What are the kids watching?

"Moondance of the Night Garden Faeries": Judging from the section AND image, it sounds just like In the Night Garden.

"That show that's on at 2am that you're never sure whether it's real or a weird dream you're having" features a cameo from Percy the Small Engine.

Miscellaneous: 10 For some kind of mind screw-ish article, it deserves a 10.
Final Score: 44 Buh?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Why?:Categorise pages[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's ironically more funny how this page's heavily categorised.
Concept: 10 It's an interview about why it's important we categorize categorise pages.
Prose and formatting: 10 Each of the 5 interviewed dweebs talks about categories in his or her own point of view and typeface: the man in blood-sp(l)attered coveralls (?) who's polite talks like this, the guy with an oversized m(o)ustache who may or may not be a kid talks like this, the sleep-deprived midget who's totally obsessed with categories and later gets attracted to a nearby fire talks like this, the sexy overdressed elf who describes categories in a way as if she belongs in The Sound of Music using this typeface, and, of course, Milton, that squirrelly-looking fellow, talks like he's high on caffeine in this typeface.
Images: 10 I can't stop looking at that picture of her! <3
Miscellaneous: 10 Categories make this article (and, by extension, Uncyclopedia) a good place.
Final Score: 50 And finally, I understand the picture of the woman at the end, but what I don't get is why the word "cuckoo" near the end links to User:Zim ulator/Belching Hyena; I checked and there's only 5 categories. Also, it sucks.

I wish I understood the conclusion better.

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying, Sit Down and Relax for a Bit, Try and Read or Something, Maybe Eat a Cheese Sandwich, and Basically Do Anything Other Than Obsessively Think About Being Obliterated in a Massive Nuclear Explosion[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 I did find the long title funny compared to Double Ristretto Venti Half-Soy Nonfat Decaf Organic Chocolate Brownie Iced Vanilla Double-Shot Gingerbread Frappuccino Extra Hot With Foam Whipped Cream Upside Down Double Blended, One Sweet'N Low and One Nutrasweet, and Ice, as well as the fact that Peter Sellers was cast to play EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER in... hmmm... what say we call it... Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying, Sit Down and Relax for a Bit, Try and Read or Something, Perhaps Some Nietzsche or Other Such Intellectual Rot, Maybe Eat a Cheese Sandwich, Lightly Toasted On White Bread With Some Orange Juice (But No Pulp) And Perhaps an Ice Cube or Two, Then Rent a Movie, Preferably an Action Comedy Starring Jackie Chan (a Guilty Pleasure of Mine), Go Out and Party, Generally Have a Good Time, and Basically Do Anything Other Than Obsessively Think About Being Obliterated in a Massive Nuclear Explosion, and Perhaps Even Come to the Point of Loving the Idea of Atomic Weapons.
Concept: 10 An article focusing on a really long title of a movie. How original. :)
Prose and formatting: 10 Do you think 1,000 monkeys with typewriters were tasked with writing this here article?
Images: 10 The poster for the film with the long title also makes me giggle. Aside from showing Peter Sellers's name 3 times, it shows the film's original completely loooooooooong title which I'm not transcribing here.
Miscellaneous: 10 Along from the title, it manages to be a good article.
Final Score: 47 I wonder what I can add to the title of the film to make it more interesting to read and laugh at?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Milton Babbitt[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Oh dear, my mind, is a blank.
Concept: 6 I don't understand this Milton Babbitt at all.
Prose and formatting: 10 The prose of this article not only fits Milton Babbitt's character, but our confusion as well...
Images: 7 I couldn't find any interesting images. Probably except for the sheet of music, both right-side up and upside down...
Miscellaneous: 10 And somehow it all looks good that way!
Final Score: 39 For those who are confused or something, some fake user named "Comic Purist" (really TKF) rewrote the article to make it sense.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

2012 phenomenon[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 As uncomfortably outdated as it might seem, this informational article seems so funny I don't know where to start. Probably Mr. T's "Tortuguero" translation?
Concept: 10 In this article, Uncyclopedia give its own crazy theories of how it would've been like if the world ended on December 21, 2012, including doomsday scenarios, primary reasons for this to occur, why it HAS to be December 21, 2012, indications that the world's ending, disseminations about it, and finally, their own survival guide.
Prose and formatting: 10 Some sections contain paragraphs disguised as lists and even LISTS disguised at lists!
Images: 10 2 methods of destruction are displayed as images: the "dirty great rock" clobbering Earth and the unseen super-dimensional being playing it as a golf ball using a 9 iron to chip the Earth into the center of the Milky Way for a perfect "black-hole-in-1."
Miscellaneous: 10 I wonder how often I encounter these kinds of articles? Despite this article getting featured on that year, 2011 must be a great one for high-quality articles like this.
Final Score: 48 It's true. I will NEVER trust conspiracy theorists, EVER! Also, I don't know when 124/19/11 is going to happen. You probably made that up.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Ice cream truck[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Darn; I expected even more humor than the one about the elevator...
Concept: 8 At least the concept's (almost) perfect. Ice cream men as pedophiles who work for the military behind the scenes.
Prose and formatting: 8 Either it's another history lesson-type article, or possibly some kind of leaked document, just like that employee manual!
Images: 10 Well, if you can count the caption on the bottom of the page image, it's funny because it repeats Pop Goes the Weasel 5 times and then gives up the 6th time when I figure it out...
Miscellaneous: 10 Nothing I can find wrong here; this article already has some humor, too.
Final Score: 43 ...and then they want me to check out the article about the "rapist van." I already did that. The article says the van itself is similar to an ice cream truck, but it serves a different purpose... like free candy.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Visual puns[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Oh no... Here come the puns... :) For the greatestIt looks more like a GRAY TEST here... of all visual puns, there's this page. My favorite is Stalin on the WORDS "Visual puns" on the quote at the top of the page!
Concept: 10 This article must beeBEE! an excuse to spout out visual puns all day and all night.
Prose and formatting: 10 This article's also the maineHa ha; very funny. reason why the "PopupImage" template exists on Uncyclopedia. Currently, at time of writing, there are a total of 187 pages that use this.
Images: 10 There's a lot of interesting images here! I can't even Count...von Count... how many there are!
Miscellaneous: 8 The only thingsThings who? that are wrong with this article are the "examples." They were supposed to show the words "Visual puns" in 5 different fonts, but only Rockwell was used while the others got downgraded to Times New Roman... (Probably because all the fonts were from Wikia before the spoon's closure?) Also the title's now broken, thanks to recent changes to the "PopupImage" template...
Final Score: 48 Well, no matter what, this page looks sewI always wanted to do that. fun to stare at. I just wonder why you used an aqua with Darth Tater in place of Mr. Potato Head at the end, though.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 00:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Inbox[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Some of the urls look like they have some subliminal-style humor hidden deep within them. I don't think I understand any of these.
Concept: 6 It just looks like your typical Hotmail simulator. This's boring.
Prose and formatting: 10 The only subpage here is used as this page's template that shows each of the (unread) messages.
Images: 10 Not counting the checkbox and star icons, this article has no images. I probably haven't seen 1 of those in a while since Zork 2.
Miscellaneous: 8 I'm not sure about the score... The top message where 1 of the admins bans me says it just got posted on March 20, while all the messages before that were posted from May to June, in that order. Unless that was the start of a new year...
Final Score: 40 I think this inbox needs a modern rewrite, with more message and even random ads.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Hypnotist[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 The end of the article suggests how much humor it would otherwise get.
Concept: 10 There's 2 articles in 1, which, again, means 2 times the fun! The default version is meant for us men here who want girls while the alternate version's often referred to as the gay or female version.
Prose and formatting: 10 The article's told in a story, in the 2nd person, just like Zork or probably the Twilight Zone.
Images: 10 In the original version, when you get hypnotized, you can see images of some hentai chick, Jessica Alba, Fergie, and Katy Perry (that image's also used in the Katy Perry Hit Generator). In the gay/female version, however, it's images of a gay unicorn, "Goldilocks" (?), Harry Potter, and, of course, Oscar Wilde.
Miscellaneous: 9 It's great, though a few bits of both versions of the same story-based article look like they belong in a fanfic.
Final Score: 45 Maybe I should conclude this section by poll this time...
Which version of the Hypnotist article's your favorite and why?
Please vote below. Results will be shown when you have voted.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
There was one vote since the poll was created on 23:18, 3 April 2025.
poll-id A967C0158C1ED8391E920C9C450CEAE3

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Unobtanium[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 3 6'S IN A ROW!!! I wonder if this means something unusual...
Concept: 10 When I think about this element, I think about its 2 uses in Zork... no wait; the former page uses its imposter.
Prose and formatting: 10 Does this look like yet another vandalized Wikipedia article to me?
Images: 7 Except for the Intel microchip and the girl wearing a shirt both made out of Unobtanium (or probably unobtainium), all of the images don't look that interesting to me, most likely because they're from a live-action flick that I haven't seen and don't even want to.
Miscellaneous: 10 At least the article looks brilliantly written.
Final Score: 43 Oh yeah, I forgot something... I also picture Unobtanium as some black toxic chemical identical to acid.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Why?:IPs can't edit the main page[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 It gets funny when you click on the page title and see what looks like some IP vandalized the main page. However, it DOESN'T get funny when you find out the red links went away on 5/8/24; Emicraft says the actual main page doesn't have these kinds of links anymore.
Concept: 10 I already explained the concept.
Prose and formatting: 10 Is this a case of something worse than 12-year-olds invading the Internet or what? The IP sometimes talks like Cookie Monster.
Images: 10 Sexy stickpeople.
Miscellaneous: 10 It appears that this guy (or girl) doesn't know how to spell his (or her) words correctly... Either way, it's another intentionally bad pass.
Final Score: 47 ...and that's why we IPs shouldn't edit the main page. Can't you also believe this article actually became the main page on the day it was featured?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Negative potato[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Shall I say this article has... negative humor? Also, I kinda the name "Mr. No Head" better than "Mr. Head"; it gives it more "giggity."
Concept: 10 Negative potatoes are not only the opposite of your basic potatoes; they can be used a lot in math as well!
Prose and formatting: 10 The "Mathematics of negative potatoes" section seems to be the article's highlight, especially since, as I said before, these negative potatoes can be used a lot in math.
Images: 10 Most of this article's images use potatoes as stock photos.
Miscellaneous: 10 Like "Are you colour-blind?", this article's a shameless verbatim translation of an original Désencyclopédian article. Second one I've ever done!
Final Score: 46 I've never tried a negative tater tot casserole... Have you?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:08, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

UnTunes:Uncyclopedia Didn't Start The Fire[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's a catchy song. I can imagine these guys bopping their heads to it...
Concept: 10 This UnTune's good for those of you who came in late and want a recap of all the happens on Uncyclopedia as of the year the song was recorded, like "several Zorks."
Prose and formatting: 10 ...Wow. I can't believe this's the 1st UnTunes article I'm doing on this page. (And it's the only FEATURED one, too!)
Images: 7 Billy Joel and a doodle of a bear with the face of Stalin. This is boring.
Miscellaneous: 10 Since this's the only featured UnTune I'm doing on this page, I'd say it looks beautiful. Even RAHB did a good job singing the audio, despite the fact he said it was "incredibly fucking difficult to make!"
Final Score: 47 Looks like this song will still live on, and on, and on, and on...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Subliminal stimuli[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Subliminal messages can be fun...
Concept: 8 ...but creepy if advertisers abuse it too much on TV and on the big screen!
Prose and formatting: 10 On the top of the page, you can see this strange flag for a split second.
Images: 9 For 1 thing, the Elmo's World gif's obviously fake. Somebody did that on purpose!
Miscellaneous: 10 Near the end of the article, it even shows us how to properly use subliminal stimuli- the right way! Love me.
Final Score: 45 Gosh, does Give me all your money randomness count towards Give me all your money subliminal stimuli, Give me all your money too?
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Pac-Man (walkthrough)[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 See "Prose and formatting"; the page even sneaks in a subliminal message saying "kill your cat" on level 5. Whatever that means...
Concept: 10 Aside from the obvious, this walkthrough looks like it covers all 256 levels (complete with parts when to grab the fruit), only to stop at 8 because it appears the author of this article always loses there.
Prose and formatting: 10 It's nonsense!!!! It mostly repeats the words "right," "up," "left," and "down," with NO SET PATTERN and the aforementioned parts above thrown in.
Images: 10 The page image is just a simple compass figure of Pac-Man which was also used in this page for some reason.
Miscellaneous: 9 I heard a little malfunction when I listened to this page via TTS... In 1 instance in level 5, "down" was misspelled as "dow." As if the quality seemed to go dow...
Final Score: 49 I probably always lose in the levels after the 3rd intermission...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Milk a Cow[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 My, that South African farmer sure talks silly!
Concept: 10 Because Uncyclopedia told him to do it, Frikkie van der Merwe Botha the South African farmer teaches us young farmers how to milk a cow the old fashioned way... until he has to cut it short for Gordon Martin Devonshire and his all-new 400,000 lb. (?!) Dairymaster 3000 automatic milking machine.
Prose and formatting: 7 There's too many footnotes in this HowTo article translating most things that Frikkie says. There's 29, and that's WAY MORE than any article I've ever read on Uncyclopedia!
Images: 8 Half of the images look weird...
Miscellaneous: 10 Despite the way that farmer talks, and the footnotes translating what that he says, I don't see many errors.
Final Score: 45 The phone number at the end may be fake, but some day I'd REALLY want to order a Dairymaster 3000...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:46, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

UnBooks:My Tedious Day[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 It may look funny at 1st glance because of its intentional repetitiveness (and the fact that its inspiration is an article I reviewed 2 pages earlier), but it gets boring AND annoying real fast.
Concept: 7 Waking up, eating breakfast, driving "Da Ca'," writing a report sheet, writing lunch, walking back to the office, getting kidnapped, and going home for bed... My goodness; this sounds too mundane for my life.
Prose and formatting: 7 It's nonsense!!!! No wait; it's not. It's just 8 pairs of 2 sentences that repeat over and over again. I ain't gonna count how many times it happens; see for yourself!
Images: 6 7. Repetitive. Images. And they all nearly have the same sentence in the caption. Wanna template? Come have a look!
This is the (blank) that made my day so tedious.
Miscellaneous: 8 A bit better than, say, "Crimes inspired by video games"... but I wouldn't want to have what looks like an autistic, illiterate child (possibly with another mental illness) writing MY UnBook...
Final Score: 35 Well, the tediousness might as well be inside me forever, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

God's userpage[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 ...I could barely get the concept (see below), but it still feels funny nonetheless.
Concept: 10 Various Uncyclopedians disguise themselves as God and make a userpage just for him.
Prose and formatting: 10 Yeah; this looks like something that'd be written in the Bible. ...Well, kind of. There's anachronisms abound.
Images: 7 Being a (fake) userpage-type article, there's no interesting images here... except, perhaps, for the light shining down when it says "Hi, I'm God. Have a Look Around." at the beginning.
Miscellaneous: 10 God-tier quality here...
Final Score: 44 This article may be God, but not quite. There are still some jokes in it I need to figure out...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

UnReviews:Milk[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Wow, dude; I can't believe I'm doing a review of a review! (Well, an UNReview, to be precise.) Anyway, this article looks kind of like a mix of anti-humour and gross humor, all in 1.
Concept: 8 It's just a review about the pros and cons of milk. 1 highlight's its typical usages, with some parts I don't like. Seriously, toning and bathing... with MILK?! That's not how it's intended to work!
Prose and formatting: 8 Why do I have that feeling most of this UnReview treats milk like they're smartphones?
Images: 8 In the "DIY" section, the image of the 2 grades of human produced DIY milk DID come from someone's breasts, according to the filename. It was also another Wikipedia image spork.
Miscellaneous: 10 Well, the quality's the only thing that's not gross or disgusting. 10/10!
Final Score: 41 Conclusion? No; I don't tone my body with milk; I use it to make boxes of Kraft Macaroni and Cheese!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:20, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

999 Perspective.png[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Number recursion. Enough said. Exploding-head.gif
Concept: 10 Some kind of funny little theory about the number 0.999999999999999999999999999999... and if it's related to 1 or not.
Prose and formatting: 10 The "math" tag's used here, because... well, you know.
Images: 10 A picture of what 0.999... doesn't look like is shown, but the pic's filename suggests the uploader thought of something else when he uploaded it... Also the page title looks hilariously recursive to be an image.
Miscellaneous: 10 Doesn't look like this page is broken...
Final Score: 50 Actually, the so-called experts at Wikipedia DO have an article about 0.999... and they're RIGHT. That one was even featured, too!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Twitter[edit | edit source]

Humour: 4 Why would you want to make a self-referential article about a social media app and parody it by stating its users tell their "friends" everything? I was going to give this a 5, but I removed a point because DWIII REALLY got carried away with emulating the app. You'll have to see the page to believe it...
Concept: 6 See above.
Prose and formatting: 6 The order in which the tweets are sorted by date is a bit misaligned. Starting from the newest ones at first, it goes down to chronological order...
Images: 7 Even the gifs aren't interesting to me.
Miscellaneous: 7 Despite its flaws, the article's perfect writing at least gives it a 7. It became the main page on the day it was featured, too.
Final Score: 30 Well, the good news is that this isn't the ONLY page on Uncyclopedia that looks like Twitter! A few Uncyclopedians on this wiki have made 10 special "UnTweets" pages using the same templates that this page uses.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Snips, snails and puppy dog tails[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Yet another anti-humour article...
Concept: 7 Could this be what they meant by "snips, snails and puppy dog tails?"
Prose and formatting: 10 Why do I feel like I'm in health class all over again?
Images: 7 I can't tell if THAT looks like a penis or not...
Miscellaneous: 10 Serious writting=quality writing. Again. Bored.png
Final Score: 40 140 down... and over a whopping 310 more to go...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Disney.png[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 There were some parts I found funny, while the rest I did not... (See below!)
Concept: 6 I don't like the idea of deconstructing a world-famous corporation...
Prose and formatting: 7 Even though there are some parts that are false in my opinion, like Disney Channel being a poor man's Nickelodeon, there ARE some parts that are true, like Disney's dark age lasting from 1972–1983.
Images: 10 The page image sums it all up.
Miscellaneous: 10 I also don't see many errors here.
Final Score: 40 Lastly, despite having its content... er... "huffed" and replaced with the revision we see today, revision #3528705's my favorite because of the Sequels section. Don't know how to find it? Just click the History tab on the top of the page! I dare ya!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:34, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Why?:Your cat died[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 This kind of dark (and gross) humor's making me feel uncomfortable again.
Concept: 8 This brilliant Why? article feels more like a murder mystery story about a harmless little cat, named Mr. Snickermuffins. However, when the truth's unleashed, the narrator starts to tell some pretty little lies...
Prose and formatting: 10 A personal 1st person narration from a cat babysitter. I can imagine how she sounds here...
Images: 9 The Blood Spatter image strikes again... again! Also what's with the non-sequitur image of Puss in Boots... pasted on "RedTube" as a video? It was funny, but not neccessary...
Miscellaneous: 10 Everything else about the article wasn't bad. After all, it was just like the one with the grandma who may or may not have wanted to kill me, except THIS storyteller became a WAY worse mad-axe murderer at the end.
Final Score: 44 Time for another poll...
Do you REALLY think the cat got murdered by his babysitter at the end?
Please vote below. Results will be shown when you have voted.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
There was one vote since the poll was created on 01:43, 21 April 2025.
poll-id 6CD7C718C8CE418EF16D15834274E136

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I want a cookie[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Warning: This article contains some more dark humor. I think I may be getting a bit more déjà vu here... The only things that were less serious here, though, were the "Whoops!" at the beginning and the "1,2 buckle my shoe" nursery rhyme that ends with the same old Blood Spatter image I mentioned previously.
Concept: 8 A non-encyclopedic article about a 9-year-old girl who just wants a chocolate chip-less, frosted sugar cookie.
Prose and formatting: 8 Told in her point of view, this girl sounds very demanding.
Images: 10 The comments for both images of the girl say they came from some movie called "Orphan." Sounds horrifying...
Miscellaneous: 10 Since this looks like this was written by a 9-year-old girl, I'd say this looks better than "Joshy's" fanfic-level writing seen in some parts of HowTo:Build the Perfect Sandcastle and LazyTown, yet identical in quality to UnBooks:Life as a 4⅝ Year Old.
Final Score: 44 Wow... now I want a cookie, too! Maybe I should go to Starbucks and have them put chocolate chips on it... and/or put it in the microwave.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Get rich QUICK!!!:The road to financial freedom!!!!!!
By Peter Stanberg
[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The humor would cheer me up, ESPECIALLY considering I've seen those kinds of stupid scams over and over again. No wait, I was talking about those mobile phishing schemes on the Internet from the 2010's. Either way, they still suck.
Concept: 10 A parody of the aforementioned get-rich-quick schemes seen on the internet especially from the 90's.
Prose and formatting: 10 I like the (obviously fake) quotes section. Even Oscar Wilde's in there!
Images: 10 The page image looks like an old Schoolhouse Rock cartoon.
Miscellaneous: 8 There's only a few typos, however. 1 of them shows us that Mr. Question Mark Man's email address is misspelled.
Final Score: 48 For those who don't know, if you click on the misspelled email address at the bottom, you get sent to this article's talk page! You don't want to know how it works, though...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 21:48, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Snakes on a Plane[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 The Production section's funnier than the rest; see "Images" below for more info.
Concept: 10 Bonus points for the concept go to the coveted "Most Obvious Title" award, if you mean the concept of the title.
Prose and formatting: 10 There's a lot of hidden gems involving stuff that Samuel L. Jackson would say in this article... See if you can spot 'em!
Images: 10 Aside from the page image and some more, there's a subsection containing 9 images of stupid yet funny early concepts of Snakes on a Plane! 2 of them are different sound-alikes of the title, while 7 of them include different animals and vehicles...
Miscellaneous: 10 Looks more than plane.
Final Score: 50 This article may not be safe for plane trips, but it's still a funny read nonetheless...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:37, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Don't judge a book by its cover[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's funny because... the author of the article cherry-picked 5 random, unrelated books for the subject of this very article.
Concept: 10 Basically book reviews. The 5 seemingly random books reviewed were Twilight, an Algebra book, Green Eggs and Ham, the Bible, and Fifty Shades of Gray. By Fifty Shades of Gray, however, the author chickened out.
Prose and formatting: 10 Another 1st person article! What else does it have to be?
Images: 6 Oh, did I also mention that the page image is a non-sequitur that came from another article? Ew...
Miscellaneous: 10 See below; I just don't know what to say here...
Final Score: 46

Scar my soul... to Jesus? I'll rather keep those 1st 8 words, thank you very much.

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

9/11 according(ly) to a 5 year old[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It sounds funny when you use TTS on this article!
Concept: 10 Um... the page title says it all; really.
Prose and formatting: 10 First an unnamed 4⅝ year old, then Joshy, and now Billy! Wait... Joshy was only 4 years old! No matter what, Billy's writing ironically seems to be the dumbest most likely to look like it was written by a child.
Images: 10 I like the picture of the anthropomorphic twin towers.
Miscellaneous: 10 Again, all the misspellings and lowercase letters were meant to be like this.
Final Score: 50 Well, to tell you the truth, I didn't know about 9/11's existence when I was little... until, by some unintentional coincedence, this new Mario game came out on the same day.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Wash the Dishes[edit | edit source]

Humour: 8 Gross humor equal to "Your estimate of how long to reheat the lasagna." Yikes. At least the "Whoops!" at the beginning sums it up pretty well.
Concept: 10 Yes, Uncyclopedia, I know; I've been there too... Anyway, their article tries to clear it all up as much as the "Whoops!" at the beginning did, in 6 simple steps:
  1. First, identify the dishes.
  2. Next... collate (?) the dishes by stacking them.
  3. Soak the dishes in water.
  4. Procrastinate for, say, 69 hours.
  5. Deny washing the dishes.
  6. Seek alternative options!
Prose and formatting: 10 This reminds me of the HowTo about driving a train... Well, sort of.
Images: 6 The page image's so gross I might as well cry!
Miscellaneous: 10 At least this page doesn't look as sloppy as the image provided...
Final Score: 44 You know what? As always, I'm gonna follow... Step 4. Can't waste time to wash dishes when you've got Uncyclopedia articles to write!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Katy Perry Hit Generator[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Lots of sex jokes using Mad Libs...
Concept: 10 Ever wanted to make your very own Katy Perry song? Uncyclopedia here provides a solution, which I'll tell you about in a moment!
Prose and formatting: 10 The solution is within Uncyclopedia's trademark "choose" and "option" tags that make it feel like the generator from the same website that hosts Cookie Clicker. There are currently 125 "past form of sexual verbs" and 107 "people or creatures" in the selection. I'm not going to list them all at once, since doing that would pad out this whole Pee Review... But I will tell you that the results are better than just plain ol' "I kissed a girl and I liked it" and "I licked a goose and I liked it." (Or even "I fucked your mom and I liked it.") Oddly, though, "a goose" ISN'T on the list of people and creatures.
Images: 10 Hey, that's the same Katy Perry from the (original) Hypnotist article!
Miscellaneous: 9 The last 2 "past form of sexual verb" lines may throw the sentence structure of the generator off a bit.
Final Score: 46 Great article, though it'd be even more greater if the "Verb past tense" and "Monster" Mad Libs templates from the wiki were used, like this:

I baptized nothing and I liked it

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 03:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Constitution of the United States (actual text)[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 I can barely find anything funny at all in this parody of a constitution... except for a few quirks. There also used to be an excessive number of disclaimers and warning templates at the very top of this page since 2021, which were interesting, but those were chucked.

I know how you felt about that, Uncyclopedia.

Concept: 7 After actually studying the constitution AND seeing that aforementioned template apology, I can only see this concept only once: a deconstruction of the REAL constitution of the United States, as seen here.
Prose and formatting: 10 The prose of this page actually isn't that bad! The cursive font mainly used for the text was
French Script MT.
Images: 9 The page image consists of Article VII, which's a bunch of signatures, by the way. I can barely read it, aside from the word done...
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality here's so good it actually looks like the official constitution when you squint!
Final Score: 43 I still liked the templates. I'm just glad Uncyclopedia didn't retcon those revisions from existence...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:30, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Why?:Revert the administrators[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 This page sounds MORE stupid serious than funny... but then again, it doesn't hurt to put what they call "Serious Mode" on an article like this one.
Concept: 10 The article's supposed to teach Uncyclopedia dweebs what's it's like for them to revert the administrators and THEN get banned...
Prose and formatting: 10 ...though it also feels more like a horror story about the OTHER ones who DID get banned. Need me to prove it?

Hmmm... Judging from the potholes, it appears that Lollipop, Frosty, Mattsnow, TheSlyFox, Magic man, Black flamingo11, and Shabidoo have gotten into this sort of trouble. Also, as I read on, ChiefjusticeDS, 1 of the administrators here, IS a vandal, and Lyrithya once got into trouble for destroying the whole website.

Images: 10 It's that window... yet again!
Miscellaneous: 10 The only problem about this's that somebody will come and revert the page to garbage...
Final Score: 46 Wow; I just learned something new today! And that something new is someone dangerous...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

You don't want to know[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Hmmm... I don't know. Just see "Prose and formatting" below for a better explanation of what I mean.
Concept: 10 Um... you don't want to know. Hehe...
Prose and formatting: 7 It's written in 1st AND 2nd person. My god, this's starting to get annoying...
Images: 10 Why would I not want to know what the shadowy picture was? It's literally black.
Miscellaneous: 10 Actually, I DO want to know how they manage to write featured articles like that.
Final Score: 44 Well, there's still 1 question left, according to this page and 1 of its external links...

Why would I not want to know about the meat in hot dogs coming from "cheeks and asses?"

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 01:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Cafeteria food[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Judging from the title/topic, it's obvious what kind of humor's used for this article. Also don't get me started on "tuna surprise..."
Concept: 10 Sums up what we think of cafeteria food, doesn't it?
Prose and formatting: 10 You know, I'm starting to think that a vandalized Wikipedia article and a Wikipedia article parody are basically the same thing.
Images: 7 ...EW!!! I can't eat all of this! However, I WILL eat... um... "that weird green jello with bits of odd fruit in it."
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality of this article about cafeteria food seems better than cafeteria food itself.
Final Score: 44 I'd rather have fries with that. That is, if they were from Adobe Potatochop...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 22:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Vader v. Vader[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 It's so funny to have a case involving 2 Super Mario powerups. Whoops; wrong article! Anyway, it's so funny to have a case involving 3 alter egos of Darth Vader.
Concept: 10 Just look above. I'm not repeating that again.
Prose and formatting: 10 For an article about a case involving Darth Vader and his alter egos, it doesn't look like an UnNews article to me... but, why not?
Images: 10 I know I've seen this image somewhere... but, where?
Miscellaneous: 10 Wow; no flaws! Again!
Final Score: 50 Well, as the last sentence of the article goes, there's no legal decision of such wretched scum and villainy as Vader v. Vader! Or maybe I should say, laugh-out-loud decision, because Kramer v. Kramer basically sounds like the same thing...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

twm[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 "twm?" What the heck's THAT mean? "Tom's Window Manager?" "Tab Window Manager?" "Timeless Window Manager?" "Total Window Mess?" Oh wait; I got it; it's all of the above. Anyway, its corresponding Uncyclopedia article kind of looks like 1 of those...
Concept: 6 I think it'll be better if I actually used Tom's Window Manager more often.
Prose and formatting: 10 Also, this page turns out to be a special one-- not just because it's 1 of the many pages that look like the things they're about, but because it rolls back to the Monobook skin just for its own CSS subpage! This makes the Tab Window Manager article 1 of a few I'm reviewing that has this super cool feature.
Images: 10 Lots of images from Timeless Window Manager featuring cyan here and there...
Miscellaneous: 10 Hopefully nothing in this Total Window Mess breaks up again. I remember seeing a blunder or 2 back in 2023 or so...
Final Score: 42 Well, that's another operating system I haven't used before. I'd rather stick with Windows than some dumb ol' X window system.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 02:04, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

Why?:My homework was late[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 This crazy Why? article has to be seen to be believed.
Concept: 10 It also seems like a chain reaction of a story about some guy named Timmy who just happened to not do his homework at home, so let me recap this... last morning Timmy's mom gets angry at him for smoking and then faints just because he said "What are you looking at, BITCH?" After his mom faints, Timmy says to himself, "Who fuckin' cares?" However, his sister thinks HE was the one who killed his mom and she starts strangling him the same way Lisa Simpson strangled Bart that one time... but SUDDENLY, RACCOONS!!! That's when Timmy puts on a suit and tries to burn the poor raccoons down. However, he somehow manages to burn down his whole house... The only way he can save it and his family is to pray to Jesus to create a giant wave that could put out the fire; Jesus, however, gets carried away. Basically, Timmy's hometown gets immersed (and especially his daddy's car), and he finds his homework on a dead fisherman's floating boat. Since his family and house are gone, he tries to salvage it, but suddenly some dolphins come by, taking away Timmy's homework in the process.
Prose and formatting: 10 The book ends are told in "script" form.
Images: 10 14 images tell a good story, plus 1 more at the end...
Miscellaneous: 9 The text looks a bit misaligned, and a bit hard to read...
Final Score: 49 1 more thing: the aftermath's funny too; it must be the twist ending... Τo infinity and beyond!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Page title[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 I don't think I'd laugh at this article as much as Insert title here...
Concept: 6 What on Uncyclopedia is THIS article supposed to be about?! It's just mostly fragments with the words "page title" scattered all over the place! Also, I have no idea who this "page title" is supposed to be.
Prose and formatting: 6 See above; this's getting a bit annoying than blank wikis on Fandom...
Images: 6 The gallery includes bland, random stock photos. They don't even show us who or what "page title" looks like.
Miscellaneous: 10 At least this article deserves a 10 in this category, just like the morse code article...
Final Score: 34 Wow, that was bad. Well, sort of.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Know if you're right brained or left brained[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Well, the main part of this article looks serious, but the subpages (and your experience) beg to differ...
Concept: 10 A 30-second, 9-question test involving your brain and which side's more dominant... with the same results I'll mention later. Here are my answers:
  1. It depends which way the woman's spinning; it's just an optical illusion. Or she's just turning left AND right.
  2. Hitler doesn't appeal to me, nor does the cross-dressing Obama wearing a buff, sexy USA flag bikini... I'd rather have the empty red shopping bag.
  3. The white square + the yellow circle are actually most similar to the kid with the doodle of the sun, loser.
  4. Any will do for friendship, but the 3rd one's obviously a go-for.
  5. "CRIMINAL" is not a color, you call girl!
  6. It's fun to put your hand down your pants (especially if you're a girl), but both hands would do.
  7. No; I can't do that; I'd end up here if that happened to me. Also this's just a screen.
  8. Can I still smell my balls if I cross my legs? No.
  9. Sorry, but no matter what I do, there's no way I can automatically hear myself thinking in a pirate voice.
Prose and formatting: 10 This test consists of mostly images that lead to the same outcome, as I said before.
Images: 7 Most images probably look too gross to be funny...
Miscellaneous: 10 What else can I say about an non-encyclopedic featured article representing a test that mostly consists of images?
Final Score: 44

At the end of the 30-Second Brain Test, it ALWAYS says you are 63% left brained, as well as 37% right brained. Your left side is retarded, gayish, lonely, awkward, a loser, and fat, while your right side loves cheese, has rationality and a desire to kill, felches, and knows motor skills.

Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Homework[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 ...Woah. This sounds close to being a tear jerker. I'm just glad I didn't choose to review Failure University...
Concept: 10 Yep, we all can imagine homework being an endangered species closely related to schoolwork. Luckily, I've outgrown it.
Prose and formatting: 10 Yet another history lesson-type article. Tee hee.
Images: 10 2 images caught my eye: Phil Hendrie, the dog from the Simpsons who looks like Santa's Little Helper, in an excuse that's been already done, and the box art of fake video game Destroy All Homeworks!, photoshopped from the box art of real video game Destroy All Humans!
Miscellaneous: 10 Looks good. Except (intentionally) for the spelling homework section.
Final Score: 47 The beginning of the article says there's a chance I'm supposed to be doing homework right now, but I already graduated. Unless writing an Uncyclopedia article IS homework...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 17:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

UnBooks:My school day[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Um... I expected a Diary of a Wimpy Kid-style UnBook, but all I got was an article that looked like it was written from the point of view of someone who had a strange mental illness...
Concept: 7 Dissecting a tribble with pink scissors?! Raising the roof by eleventeen meters3?! FOOD MADE OUT OF INEDIBLE, GROSS ENTITIES (AND THE FLESH of US UNCYCLOPEDIA USERS)?! ABUSING BABIES MADE OUT OF SOYLENT POTATOES?! My goodness, this guy may be cuckoo-crazy!
Prose and formatting: 10 Well, the prose isn't bad. It just may look like 1 of those children's books...
Images: 10 A muffin? Taken straight from another website?! ...Ok; I'll take that, as long as it doesn't have any anthrax or bird seeds, mixed with used toilet paper and sewer water, the vitamins aren't full of dirt, it's not been around for 2 or more years, and/or the blueberries in it aren't really wax colored with anthrax and other bacterias.
Miscellaneous: 10 The quality isn't bad, either.
Final Score: 44 In conclusion, it seems that half of the things that guy went through turn out to be either boring or dangerous. I'm glad I'm not going through THAT school. Hey; wait a minute... was he at Failure University?!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:31, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Content-free[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 Is THAT what they meant by "Content-free?" ...I don't get it.
Concept: 10 1 of the only things I like about this article is the name, which goes all the way to the slogan of the website you're looking at now. It ain't called "Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia" for nothing! We just go there to have fun and not act stupid!
Prose and formatting: 6 I can barely read that wall of text, especially in the "The new content-free paradigm is so cool that we can do this!" section.
Images: 7 There's nothing interesting about the "FREE HUGS!!" page image... except for the fact it's technically a used unused image uploaded by some other guy who probably doesn't exist on Uncyclopedia anymore.
Miscellaneous: 9 The only thing I'm worried about today is that maybe an AI wrote this whole mess up.
Final Score: 38 Lastly, there are 4 Mad Libs templates in the "See also" section that generate 2 non-functional links which respectively say {{adj}} {{noun}} and {{adv}} {{verb}}. Which reminds me; I'm going to generate not 1, or 2, but 3 random "{{noun}}" links at the bottom of this sentence, if they work...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:31, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

The Speck of Dust Next to My Keyboard[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 What makes this article truly funny is BOTH its concept AND prose/formatting; see below to find out what I mean.
Concept: 9 Who'd ever thought a single yet mundane speck of dust would make such an interesting concept? Also, the title may be a pun on something... I don't know if it is, though.
Prose and formatting: 10 It looks like... well, your average Wikipedia article parody made funnier because the author's telling the whole story...
Images: 9 Yeah; something's wrong with the page image... I don't see the titular speck; all I see are misplaced arrow keys. :)
Miscellaneous: 9 In the "Conspiracy Theories" section, the link to Grand Conspiracy looks a bit off... and the article it links to doesn't even have a corresponding section labelled "Conspiracy Theories About the Speck of Dust Next to My Keyboard." Other than that, nothing related to quality looks wrong here.
Final Score: 47 ...Woah. Another funny (and not just stupid) article done. I was expecting a 50 here, though...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

This is not an article[edit | edit source]

Humour: 6 That image is right; this's not funny.
Concept: 6 I have a feeling this's (NOT) based on those stupid "ceci n'est pas une pipe" paintings Magritte did back then...
Prose and formatting: 7 Reading like a poem, it has 2 quotes near the middle, with the one from Dick Cheney avoiding none of those dreaded double negatives.
Images: 6 The images are bland, they might not be images.
Miscellaneous: 10 I WILL give credit to the fake link near the end.
Final Score: 35 Despite becoming a featured article, it might as well be non-existent, for it's said to be pointless.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Why?:We Can't Have Nice Things[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Sounds serious to me, but there's a few potholes hidden deep inside this article.
Concept: 10 This, I got to see. It stars Timmy (huh, I could swear I've seen that name before...) in a tizzy as he whines about how much he can't have an Xbox 360 or PlayStation 3 like "that kid down the street" without considering why he can't have (those) nice things. After all, he was the one who threw his football right into a valuable $27.99 lamp... Anyway, his family gathers around for a meeting that might as well have relation with the Great Depression... until Timmy reveals to his mean ol' dad that he got a G.I. Joe from 1 of his friends or their parents! In response, Daddy melts the toy, but however, violence ensues as he gets carried away, lighting himself on fire (made worse with the alcohol from his beer), he can't get to Mommy because he's passed out from her medications, Timmy refuses to call 911 to save his daddy and cuts the phone line, and... well, my guess for what happens next is that the house burns down and Timmy escapes.
Prose and formatting: 10 Since it's mainly a family meeting led by Timmy's dad, that means... well, you know.
Images: 10 I think they "taped" the 1st image of the happy 50's family to the page on purpose to make it look like nothing bad's going to happen... 8) Also, if you click "seeded her field," you get a questionable image that was also used in this talk page as a pop-up image.
Miscellaneous: 10 This article isn't bad. I just wonder what everything else will be like...
Final Score: 47 Looks like we got another nice article out of this wiki after all!
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 18:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Bread machine[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Almost boring, but not quite. There are some parts involving redundancy here and there, like the bread sandwich at the beginning...
Concept: 10 Did I say "boring?" Well, yes I did! But I don't just mean plain ol' boring... I mean, boring as in, bread sandwich boring! Because this article spices things up, allowing you to use a bread machine to make 7 simple steps- I mean, recipes!
Prose and formatting: 10 Part HowTo, part cookbook, this looks like something HowToBasic would deal with. Unfortunately, the egg bagels and pizza bread are the only recipes I could find with a possible ingredient list.
Images: 10 The Sand-wich bread's spelled like that for a reason: it has sand everywhere. (The image even has bits of gravel on top!)
Miscellaneous: 10 Nothing bad here.
Final Score: 47 This might be great; I think I need a cement sandwich right now... hang on...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

F4 (The Magical Letter)[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 The only fun thing that I think you can do with the F4 key is use it as an excuse to say "ffff" and "fortississississimo."
Concept: 10 An article providing the many things that F4 can do, according to Uncyclopedia.
Prose and formatting: 10 Gosh; do I HAVE to write something about parodying and/or vandalizing Wikipedia here? I've got 3 285 articles left to review, for crying out loud!
Images: 6 Bland images again...
Miscellaneous: 10 I'm not going to even bother saying something here...
Final Score: 43 ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

UnDebate:What does the fox say?[edit | edit source]

Humour: 7 Well, folks, it looks like we're going to take a brief field trip to 2013 right now for this... Since this's the 1st and only UnDebate I'm doing in this Pee Review, it definitely seems like a interview. But not an ordinary one, at least! It looks like 1 of those fake interview skits that the Muppets would do!
Concept: 10 Yes; we all know dogs go woof, cats go meow, birds go tweet, and mice go squeak, and to try to top it all off, we've got 2 people, Vegard "Fraka-kaka-kaka-kaka-kow!" Ylvisåker and Bård "Tchoff-tchoff-tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoff!" Ylvisåker to help us find out what the fox says.
Prose and formatting: 10 Unlike that interview where 5 people talk about categorising pages in their own points of view (and typeface), the 2 people in THIS interview virtually have the same personality. (And typeface.)
Images: 10 Still, a 10 would do, even though this special UnDebate article has no images. I haven't seen 1 of those in a while since the Inbox article.
Miscellaneous: 10 Well, even though this's the only UnDebate I'm doing in this Pee Review... I'll accept it.
Final Score: 47 And finally, since the verdict seems to be false, no, whatever-your-name-is; "Ring-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding!", "Ring-ding-ding-ding-ding-ding-dingdingeringeding!", and even "Ding-ring-ding-ding-ring-deringedingering!" don't seem like noises that the fox says. All it says is "..." I'd rather play Star Fox.
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

HowTo:Repair a broken smartphone[edit | edit source]

Humour: 10 Whew! I almost gave this another 7! Anyway... you'll have to see the prose and formatting score below to believe yourself.
Concept: 10 We all break our smartphones. Luigi has once. This guide from Uncyclopedia's a rational one from an expert in smartphone repair named "This Guy."
Prose and formatting: 10 Out of both "Factoid" templates used in this article, the 2nd once sounds interesting. Mr. "This Guy" must be out on a photo safari! Also 6 cool text onomatopoeias.
Images: 10 2 images that have 2 false ways to fix an Apple product... 1 involves tying a literal apple on your laptop while the other has the Android mascot connecting the missing piece to the Apple logo. "I fixed it!"
Miscellaneous: 10 Let's just get this over with; this's the last full review for an article I'm doing.
Final Score: 50 All's well that doesn't end well, as it turns out at the end of the article. Darn! I thought my phone would still be alive...
Reviewer: Ryan Woo-Ming (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Everything Else[edit | edit source]

This section of short reviews is for articles that were either featured after the 1st 10 years of Uncyclopedia or otherwise unsuitable to have the potential to be featured on the main page. Time to speed things up!

Clinja[edit | edit source]

Said to be a cross-breed of ninjas and clowns, I picture these crazy critters having Coach Z's head, Yakko Warner's ears, nose, & tail, a Tinkerbat's body, & Bozo the Clown's wig, jumpsuit, & shoes. Also, Oscar Wilde calls them the "shizzle wizzle" for some reason...

Infinite Loop[edit | edit source]

I think infinite loops are too dangerous for your computer, especially your old MS-DOS PC. I'm not going to experiment.

Endless loop[edit | edit source]

See Endless loop.

Recursion[edit | edit source]

Ha ha, Uncyclopedia; you do have a good sense of humor, but if I try to make an actual link to this very same page, it won't work.

Déjà vu[edit | edit source]

Every time I get déjà vu I suffer from... well, ALL of what that article said. Except for insomnia.

Deja-vu[edit | edit source]

Huh; this looks strangely familiar... See Déjà vu.

Redirect page[edit | edit source]

Hee hee; it redirects to the same article.

The page that never loads[edit | edit source]

♫ This is the page that never loads...

never loads...

never loads... ♫

Is this the only stub I'm doing? Maybe it's intentional.

Ambiguation (disambiguation)[edit | edit source]

Originally categorized as an infinite loop page, this disambiguation page's 1 of those rare instances where it's a page that doesn't look like what it's about. Not to be confused with Disambiguation (disambiguation).

Alzheimers Groundhog's Day[edit | edit source]

It's the Groundhog Day movie with a little Alzheimer's disease added to the mix. I haven't watched the original movie, so I barely know what's going on.

Hallucination[edit | edit source]

"This page does not exist" my colon. Obviously, what you're seeing on the page is shown by everyone else, including the dancing mice. Hallucinations.gif sound like a ridiculous concept to me.

Disambiguation (disambiguation), Disamtriguation, Disamquadguation, and Disamquinquation[edit | edit source]

Another truly stupid article idea! But it's still funny... Anyway, it's a morphing list of articles based on various puns of the word "disambiguation," from the "ations" to "AAAAAAAAA!" to "Never Would" to [Insert article name here]. If you click on Disamtriguation, Disamquadguation, or Disamquinquation, you get stuck in a "maze" full of a few more puns of the word "disambiguation!" And with no way out, of course...

Random Page[edit | edit source]

Boy, this page looks really random. And it's right; it's 100% content-free, attends magma pervert okra, and steals egregious liquidation as well. There might be a chance you'd end up here after clicking this button. However, as Maddox says from the top on the page, (presumably) 1,243,351.0 idiots go to this page on purpose...

Random[edit | edit source]

Another random page! (Well, not to be confused with the PAGE named Random Page, or the USER named ARandomPage... Anyway, this page looks impossible to read; I might as well make it say "Aqiootygwrxb??!" instead.

BAT FUCK INSANE!!![edit | edit source]

This looks like a funny article to read, including the title. Just look at it...

BAT FUCK INSANE

BAT FUCK INSANE!

BAT FUCK INSANE!!

bAt fuCk InSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANe

bAT fUCK iNsANE

Also, you say in the beginning you want your Minolta? Sure. I'll give you your Minolta:

Oonerspism[edit | edit source]

Gosh, I don't know what "Rindercella" has to do with oonerspisms, but all I know is that it's peen a lot of bages and I KNILL don't stow what "nucking futs" means.

Mad Libs[edit | edit source]

Another 1 of those options that put me on the map, it has 2 "examples" subelectrons where you can seizure or make other's libs. That's ineffective!

Angry Shouting Guy[edit | edit source]

I see someone needs anger management classes! Luckily, most of his expletives have been censored and replaced by nice-nice semi-nice somewhat-nice words because of something related to Tommy Spade, 1 of them being "cheddar." Man, that guy really hates Starbucks that much! I can understand why as of 2025. Also, is his name REALLY Angry Shouting Guy or what?

Virus alert[edit | edit source]

Why is this page categorized as "Weird Al?" Well, never mind that; it looks kinda catchy.

Are you talking to me?[edit | edit source]

Who am I talking to? Mr. Potato Head?

American-English Dictionary[edit | edit source]

A backwards version of the English-American Dictionary, right down to Picardisms, extensions, and saying PATAHTOE instead of potato. Another great idea.

Australian-English Dictionary[edit | edit source]

I haven't gone to Australia yet, so I'm not quite sure how this whole new dialect works. The most I can see in this article are the words Fark and Mate.

Any Key[edit | edit source]

"Where's the 'any' key?" asks Homer Simpson. 1 of the InvisiClues in Zork says it's "beside the Tab key, over the Pig Up key, and near the Sys Rurrkk key." But in reality? It doesn't exist. Hence the reason why Uncyclopedia made up an explanation for its existence.

Ctrl and Command[edit | edit source]

I'm in ctrl now. I have the commands. I will control anything in existence simply by pressing Ctrl AND Ctrl on my PC, and then I'll press Command, Option and Delete on my Mac to do a whole bunch of commands at once. Ha ha... not really. Sure, both keys look like cool concepts, but you can't do those in real life...

Print Screen[edit | edit source]

Egad! The Print Screen key isn't evil... it's just your friend! Well, it's just that it's none other than a panic button or boss key, which you should only touch just in case, like, you can't get to an extremely important webpage anymore or something...

Microsoft Keyboard[edit | edit source]

Wow! An ergonomic Microsoft Keyboard! I want 1 of these someday! It's just the "three-finger salute" in 1 small package!

Esc[edit | edit source]

I don't think "Evil Sham Charade" looks possible to pronounce, but it sure is the 1st letter of the alphabet.

Broken.keyboard[edit | edit source]

I.hate.this.stupid.disease.so.much.

TheWorstPossibleVariationOfIt'sWhenYou'reForcedToTalkLikeThis

Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz[edit | edit source]

Yes, Oscar Wilde (or was it Big Bird?), it IS a remarkable word. And it's fun to say. Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz. But the REAL question is, WAS it abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz- I mean, the alphabet that came 1st or just words?

SysRq[edit | edit source]

Man, they're not even joking about its unknown use! I guess that's why our keyboards don't have this key today...

Alt +F4[edit | edit source]

I like to prefer Alt +F4 as a way to get out of sites like this when I'm supposed to be doing serious business...

Crazy Frog[edit | edit source]

I always thought "Wolfgang Amadaeus Frog" was purple and did NOT have dangly bits. He's so silly either way.

Strong Bad[edit | edit source]

Another character from the Homestar Runner body of work, there are some parts to this article that sound... wrong. Especially the part where it says "how he masturbates successfully with boxing gloves on is still unknown."

User:Simsilikesims/Ryder/Badger badger badger[edit | edit source]

This looks like the 1st of a few "experiment" pages from other users I'm doing. Anyway, you won't find it funny at 1st, but then, once you watch the Flash file and/or get used to Uncyclopedia's in-jokes, you'll probably get the point.

YTMND[edit | edit source]

This page brings back old memories... I remember reading from Wikipedia's page on YTMND that there were a LOT of sources claiming YTMND to be dead since 2019! But currently it's back, and it's more modern than ever.

The Room (film)[edit | edit source]

Well, the page might not be true to a typical Wikipedian, but what really IS true is that The Room DOES have some fans; they say it's so bad it's good.

The Annoying Orange[edit | edit source]

I don't believe he's THAT annoying. Also, the poll looks a lot bland and outdated; Justin Bieber et al don't sound as annoying as they were anymore. Let me set up a new one...

What's MORE annoying than the Annoying Orange today?
Please vote below. Results will be shown when you have voted.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
There was one vote since the poll was created on 15:09, 7 June 2025.
poll-id EEF5CB5F4BEEA2D965DD280E816ED868

Creepypasta[edit | edit source]

This "intentionally bad" thing's getting old. I have a feeling they're actually writing the "creepypasta" unintentionally bad.

McDonaldland[edit | edit source]

When I was little, I always wondered where McDonaldland was located. At 1st I thought it was in either 1 of those places that donates for charities or even the city where its headquarters is located at! Nowadays, I'm going to start believing this here article and stating it comes from secret portals from the restaurants themselves...

List of weapons that exist, but shouldn't and List of weapons that don't exist, and shouldn't[edit | edit source]

My favorites are the dogs with bees in their mouths and the Spongebomb, respectively.

Microsoft Windows, MS-UNO, MS-DOS, Windows BC, Windows 1.0, Windows 3.1 WINDOW~3.1, Windows 95, Windows TNT, Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows You, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows Vista (Communist article), Windows 7, Windows Error Edition, Windows 8, Windows 9, and Windows 10[edit | edit source]

We here at Uncyclopedia all have our own opinions on this beloved operating system from Microsoft (and its predecessors) since we mostly use it in the 1st place. Of course, we all know that MS-UNO is just a pack of Uno cards in beta, MS-DOS is hard to use, Windows BC runs on literal tablets, Windows 1.0 is just the beginning, Windows 3.1 is also known as WINDOW~3.1, Windows 95 is said to be the 95th edition of Windows according to Bill Gates, Windows TNT is literally the bomb, Windows 98 was prone to BSODing, Windows 2000 is rated R, Windows You is the successor to Windows ME, Windows XP is great, though it's often full of viruses, Windows Vista is controversial enough to have a communist variation of its Uncyclopedia article, Windows 7 is an improvement of Vista, Windows Error Edition obviously does not exist, Windows 8's new logo looks "imaginative," Windows 9 was skipped because of "mind control" issues, and Windows 10... um... well, its name looks like Windows 1.0 to some.

CTRL-ALT-DEL[edit | edit source]

I've eaten a lot of Baby Ruth candy bars in my whole lifetime, yet I've never discovered a single CTRL-ALT-DEL microchip inside 1 of them.

Microsoft Products Online Technical Support[edit | edit source]

Hmmm... Based on the talk page and the page history, it seems that the questions answered here are real.

Regedit[edit | edit source]

This's 1 of those tricks you shouldn't try at home. Anyhow, me, I mostly use Regedit for privacy-related emergencies...

Windows Task Manager[edit | edit source]

Another tool I should save for emergencies! Obviously, this one's related to not responding programs... It's also said to be evil, but why?

Microsoft Word Paperclip[edit | edit source]

Also known as Clippit or Clippy, this paperclip has not only 1, but 2 articles on this crazy redundant wiki! I think they meant to do that on purpose. Anyway, I think I'll mostly cover the next one, The Office Paperclip, later, since that's my favorite. I WILL tell you, however, that I like seeing that crappy but silly MS Paint'd picture of "Evil Clippy..."

Minesweeper[edit | edit source]

Oh, man, this looks less playable than the original Windows version... or 1 of the Action 52 games, called Meong. In fact, I'm going to get started with reviewing Uncyclopedia's take on Action 52 now. But 1st...

Redundant (and possibly Act of Redundancy, too)[edit | edit source]

See Redundancy.

Redundancy: The Movie (film)[edit | edit source]

Ha ha ha! I wonder how that movie would've played out if it was an actual film? I wanna see the sequel, if it exists!

Action 52[edit | edit source]

This sounds to ridiculous to be false on Wikipedia. Also, "Make you selection, now." I did like the Color a Dinosaur joke, though...

01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001[edit | edit source]

For those who were confused at those 1's and 0's, this's actually binary. Ever since then, I'm starting to wonder what the binary in UnGames:Zork/Glitch city 6 actually meant.

Arfenhouse/Randomness[edit | edit source]

Arfenhouse currently links to Randomness, for there isn't such article anymore. But Randomness, however, is DEFINITELY a clear example of 73 clammy documents stupidly earning an impetus up the sea bass, for its article on Uncyclopedia stars lup (also known as guam and abuvak, and also aggat as he now preferred to be called), fasos, and tocattal. Also, Tom Cruise cogitates person!

 : :.` .`: `. ` ` `[edit | edit source]

Ironically, I can't read braille. How do they manage to do it?

8.3[edit | edit source]

Long story short, 8.3 filenames are hard to read. You just have to guess when you're viewing your files in DOSBox.

Developers!/User:Steve Ballmer[edit | edit source]

A funny word that gets carried away. (Seriously, why would it wriggle its way into the external link urls? "http://en.developers.org/developers/Developers!" and "http://www.developers.com/developers?v=KMUOtzLwhbE?") At 1st I thought it was pronounced Devil-OPPers, but...

Rolling your head on the keyboard[edit | edit source]

edsrttbhmjnrtvwszvbryeneutttttttvuvccexcnryxebyoerdscyugfbmdmyotsmdymrudgdmeoruidmdmdotrdmrywegyddyr... I gotta stop.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy[edit | edit source]

This looks pointlessly funny, unlike the Developers! article... At least it's better than UnNews.

My eybo@r i mi$$in it$ omerow[edit | edit source]

For those who can barely read this article, there IS a way... well, sort of. Click here!

I just slam on the keyboard and magic happens[edit | edit source]

I wonder what happens if I SLAM on MY keyboard? ghysedrft ...Nothing happened. :( But that article showed me proof! :D

Contents (Nonsense)[edit | edit source]

...I don't get it. Not even the associated audio file helps out that much, too. Both of them are the word "contents" repeated over and over again.

Vandalism/example on wheels![edit | edit source]

I can't see anything anymore as of today. They really messed this page up for good.

N_ V_w_ls[edit | edit source]

H_w _m _ s_pp_s_d t_ r__d w_th__t v_w_ls? _nl_k_ 8.3 f_l_n_m_s...

Blur[edit | edit source]

We're sure this article's supposed to be about a British musical group, right? 'Cause I can barely see the image...

There is no article here[edit | edit source]

No really; the title said it all. I actually binge-scrolled all the way down and "RECEIVED MULTIPLE BRAIN TUMORS, LUNG CANCER, LEUKEMIA, HERPES, TRENCH FOOT AND JUST ABOUT EVERY DISEASE YOU CAN IMAGINE" at the end (not really) as I saw nothing but the navigation box. Not even the source behind the scenes helped; all I saw was a comment that said "Nope, nothing here either."

Uncyclopoly[edit | edit source]

Well, as Board James once said, everybody's gotta have a Monopoly game, and Uncyclopedia's no exception. I'd like to buy a Grue, please.

Delliteration and Elliteration[edit | edit source]

2 bastardized children of the "Alliteration" page that are still less likely to be huffed today.

Where's Waldo? and Waldo?[edit | edit source]

This feels like another Uncyclopedia in-joke. Since there are 3 variations of this article that change each time you refresh or purge it, that means there are 3 possible places Waldo could be in. He could be right next to Strong Bad, near a pothole link that proves to be him only to lead to HowTo:Fuck with people's heads, or "IN THE 98TH LINK FROM THE TOP."

O p t ical illus i o n[edit | edit source]

Most of the optical illusions seen in this page are real, though the explanations are misleading.

Xenomorph[edit | edit source]

What's with all the "Delicious!" everywhere? Never mind that; it must add to the charm... Anyway, I can imagine there only being a few ways to stop those scary, nigh-invincible beasts. As seen in Zork, they are the +36 elven elfin slaxe-chucks of great antiquity, the Eyegore Bomb, and ThickPills (Ө).

Spam (electronic)[edit | edit source]

If you are reading this, then I think you might as well have won. Click here to claim your prize, otherwise if the link didn't work, you lose...

Caffeine
Caffeine
[edit | edit source]

HahahahahahahahahahaIthinkI'veranoutofspaceorsomethingsorry.
HahahahahahahahahahaIthinkI'veranoutofspaceorsomethingsorry.

Error message[edit | edit source]

It's obvious how EpicAwesomeness got that error. You can actually see the evidence on his desktop.

Nonsense[edit | edit source]

My favorite nonsense (I think) is random subverted rhymes, as seen in Oscar Wilde's epic poem "The threateningly passive glance of a well-knowned stranger":

Red link[edit | edit source]

I hate those stupid Red Links. Enough said.

Tourette's Syndrome[edit | edit source]

WIGGER PISS CUNT JESUS FETUS LIMEY FUCKING JUMP! BOOBS ASSHAT TACO O KURWA! CHINK SUCK MY DICK pen0r SHITE GREASER HORSE SHIT JAP ASSFACE AUTOFELLATIO FUCK FUCKING BUTTFUCKER CUNTING ASSCRACK YOU WANKER AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE OI OI OI TAMPONS DICKFACE HELL ASS NECROPHILIA FUCK SHIT ASS SHITE BUTTFUCKER FUCKFACE CRACKER SCUMBAG CHIGGER FUCKFACE FAGGOT suck my mothers KNOBJOCKEY FUCK AY-AY-AY GANGBANG PEDOPHILIA JACKASS CUNT MARGARET THATCHER FAGGOT BLUMPKIN SHITTY SHITE FAGGOT SHIT IRATEGAMER LOVIN' SHITHEAD FELLATIO INCEST NAZI FUCK NUGGET WANKSPLAT NECROPHILIA TITWANK ARSE DONGSHOVER BOOBIES SHIT FRED PHELPS PEEPEE POMMIE SUITCASE PENIS FUCKER POLACK PIECE OF SHIT LOLCAT SHIT BIRD SHIT FUCKBAG HUMAN RIGHTS ASS CONDOMS NOW, I AIN'T SAYIN' SHE A GOLD DIGGER! JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST SHIT SHITTY FUCKTARD BUNG-HOLE FASHION BUG WOMEN'S RIGHTS CUNNILINGUS DICK FUCKSTAIN TOWELHEAD INBRED TITTY RAPED WITH A PINEAPPLE INBRED PUSSY FUCKER SAND NIGGER BOOBS PUSSY

Tee hee; abusing expletives is so MOTHERFUCKER silly.

Tpyo[edit | edit source]

I've seen oa LOPT OF PEOPLE ON [[[Unclylopedia ]] and other sites who do this sort of stuff... Lucky me; I I don't usually do it that much, because I'm smart..

Alphabetical order[edit | edit source]

It's often hard for me to write poems and prose like that.

Touch typoing[edit | edit source]

A variant of the Tpyo article for your smartphone, which seems wrose. See Tpyo.

Mispeleing[edit | edit source]

See Tpyo and Touch typoing.

Page with no links[edit | edit source]

I know, I know, Captain Obvious. I can't get out either; the links are obviously fake. Luckily, I can still check the top and bottom of the page, like the "helpful voice" said, go back and forth pages using the browser's respective buttons, and/or press Tab to check things out.

Expletive[edit | edit source]

See Tourette's Syndrome; both pages look similar.

Groundhog Day[edit | edit source]

You know it's Groundhog Day when you see something strangely and unintentionally repeat. Ever since then, I'm starting to wonder if the ENTIRE premise of Endless 8 was intentional or not.

Annoying/Annoyance[edit | edit source]

Honestly, Oscar Wilde, this "shit" is repetitive AND funny at all. Just look at the 2 Clippies, for instance.

Redirect[edit | edit source]

Yes, the redirects WERE worth it. The destinations may remind me of a page I've already done before...

Color blindness[edit | edit source]

I'm not going to stare at this page like a complete dolt and lose my sight of color.

Loading...[edit | edit source]

The gif seen on the top of the page, as well as my cursor, are fake. No, seriously; I checked.

3D glasses[edit | edit source]

Things in 3D are fun, but hard for screen readers, certain browsers, and those who don't have, well, 3D glasses.

{{USERNAME}} template abuse[edit | edit source]

Gosh, do I REALLY do that pixellated? Please note that this history may or may not be accurate, <insert name here>...

Four-letter word[edit | edit source]

"This page only uses word with four lett - argh!" Well said, "Ship Boss Duuh." Well said.

The Ignored Wiki Format Article[edit | edit source]

This's another one of my pet peeves on [[the Internet]]. This article seems to [[Parody|mock]] it all.

Shareware[edit | edit source]

Juan Gustavo _UNREGISTERED_ and I _UNREGISTERED_ both _UNREGISTERED_ have _UNREGISTERED_ 2 things _UNREGISTERED_ in common: we _UNREGISTERED_ prefer free software.

The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times[edit | edit source]

No really; not counting the title, it IS written 242 times.

Speech disorders[edit | edit source]

The person who used Ctrl + H to edit all the text to this REALLY got carried away! Too much "likes" replacing spaces, the typical period being replaced by ",okay?", etc... I only liked the page image and random Russian reversal at the beginning a lot, with a really random sighting showing up occasionally.

Wrong link[edit | edit source]

Oh boy; I like playing with wrong links. Which reminds me, we should play a little game... Try looking for Waldo!

Skipping CDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD[edit | edit source]

IIIIIIIIII justjustjustjust hatehatehatehatehatehatehatehatehatehate it when that happens.

My 'E', 'P' and 'A' keys are going to fall off[edit | edit source]

Another "broken keyboard" story! This time, the keys fall off as it progresses...

Tommy Wiseau[edit | edit source]

See The Room (film)... I guess...

Silent movie[edit | edit source]

Why would "Non!" lead to the Wikipedia version of this article? I don't get it.

User:EpicAwesomeness/YouTube Poop[edit | edit source]

An extract from acclaimed YouTube Poop Link's Day Out, I haven't seen the YTP yet and I'm not sure if it's accurate or not.

LEGO Lego Escher[edit | edit source]

Originally called "LEGO," it split into 2 articles and the Lego Escher article is what I'm only going to review. Anyway, the sets seen are impossible to do.

A Cat on a Laptop and A pet cat typing[edit | edit source]

sewvrdbfntvumygbiuyhimyngbdvxsvbdnfumgiiigmfntbxdbtt

Lists that include only one item[edit | edit source]

Yes, there IS only 1.

Download more RAM[edit | edit source]

Now THIS, I gotta see. It's a fake website where you can presumably download 8, 16, 32, 64, or 128 GB of RAM, only for your computer to:

  1. have its victim rickroll'd (8 GB),
  2. display an error message (16 GB),
  3. mistake it for a virus (32 GB),
  4. go to an external link (64 GB), or
  5. just display a 404 error (128 GB).

Pangram[edit | edit source]

I'm honestly bad at making pangrams, aside from "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" and that gross song from Robert O'Hara Burke, which I should change the title to...

"Who Ate All the Apples, Bananas, Cabbages, Doughnuts, Eggs, Figs, Grapes, Ham, Ice Cream, Jelly, Kiwi, Lemons, Mushrooms, Nutmeg, Oranges, Potatoes, Quinoa, Raspberries, Strawberries, Tomatoes, Ugli Fruit, Vanilla, Watermelons, Something that Begins with the Letter X, Yams, and Zucchini While I Wasn't Looking?"

...Wait a minute; this section IS a pangram itself!

Five-word sentences[edit | edit source]

Five-word sentences are dumb. Why'd they bring that up?

User:HooPammI/A perfect article, absolutely destroyed[edit | edit source]

Just look at this whole article; it's a mess. You say an AI caused these edits, Aoz0ra? I don't believe you. I think someone was playing with a Markov text generator or something...

Spell cheque[edit | edit source]

Pee pull often abuse dis to make funny werds, like uxpaptlyl and pcngangpf.

Unfocom[edit | edit source]

Well, this sounds like a true story. Right down to the name and sellout... Maybe I should play Zork again someday.

Fish Within A Fish Within A Fish Within A Fish Within Another Fish[edit | edit source]

I'm only in it because of the fish recursion.

Domo-kun[edit | edit source]

*** Ye have departed this mortale coile ***


Wouldst ye like to commence yower quest once more, restor yower saved position, or cease playing the Zork game? (type RESTART, RESTORE, or QUIT):

Eurg[edit | edit source]

This may look accurate... I hope they make an article for the Grue 2.0 soon...

User:Another n00b/Domosoft[edit | edit source]

Sounds like an interesting company, but does that guy even actually write? He's 1 of those.

Anti-Grue[edit | edit source]

Ha ha, I like it better when I see her (or was it him?) baking cookies for me. I want a cookie, please, Mrs. "Auntie" Grue.

The Uncyclopedia Movie[edit | edit source]

I wonder how this movie would've played out if it was an actual movie. I wanna see the endless Zork mazes in action! Wait; the plot got replaced, but still...

Adobe"®" Photoshop"®"[edit | edit source]

Why are the words trademarked?

California Adventure[edit | edit source]

Just like Disneyland, California Adventure feels like a country after all. Times have changed there, too. I mean, "a bug's land" is no more now! I'm sure people like Chicken4War reacted to this sad news...

Uncyclopedia's Article (on Its Article (on Its Article (on Its Article (on Its Article)))) on Itself[edit | edit source]

...Woah; that was 1 REALLY LONG title. Anyway, Uncyclopedia's Article on Its Article on Its Article on Its Article on Itself is the most recursion you can have... because if you go further 1 more time, YOU BLOW UP UNCYCLOPEDIA! Well, not really. But still...

DON'T MESS WITH UNCYCLOPEDIA!

No Beer and no TV make Homer Go Crazy!!!/User:Naughtyned/No Beer and no TV make Homer ... Something ... Something[edit | edit source]

Another pointlessly funny article, this's a spork of All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy but spawned by someone snorting crack. Which Simpsons episode did this come from, anyway?

Reasons why people create articles with horribly long titles for no apparent reason, hoping somebody will randomly stumble upon it and remark on the length of the title, but then forget about it in five minutes later because their gay granny had a seizure[edit | edit source]

The REAL reasons are the probably the same as the reason why we categorise pages: these people are cuckoo. Also, what's with the 2 obligatory external links to pages from Fandom's Megami Tensei wiki?

Don't click here![edit | edit source]

If you were invited to this page by a pothole link or something like that, you're in BIIIIIIIIIIG trouble. Otherwise, if you came here from Zork, you die!

Shrooms/Magic mushroom[edit | edit source]

These magical mushrooms may taste good, but if you eat the wrong kinds of get high on them, you may get into a scenario where your friend, probably Elvis Presley, is now a Hemulen who wants to come and rape your left buttock for a living.

An article that contains nothing but a full stop and its retrospective[edit | edit source]

That's "period" for all you Yanks out there. Anyhow, I kinda see this article as, say, padding.

Forgotten Books of Dr. Seuss[edit | edit source]

I still don't know why I decided to edit this page before I officially joined Uncyclopedia. Maybe those were experiments... Anyway, I wonder what it'd be like if the Gnasher was a real thing?

Entertainment Software Rating Board[edit | edit source]

All 8 of the "official" ESRB ratings shown in the page image aren't real, nor is the concept of the article itself (which's also the only page you can see Uncyclopedia's take on Humongous Entertainment). Although, I think the 1st quote was "accurate" about the article's rating...

Mighty Morphin Muppet Babies[edit | edit source]

A crossover of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers and Muppet Babies. Think of all the copyright infringement the producers will have to put up with for THIS show if it actually made it to DVD and streaming and had random film clips, just like the original 1984 Muppet Babies itself...

The Office Paperclip[edit | edit source]

Look at that "wall of shame." Haven't I seen it somewhere else before? Anyway, there's more office assistants to Microsoft Office than just 8.

Red Screen of Death and Red Ring of Death[edit | edit source]

I have a feeling the Red Screen of Death's obviously made up (at least on Windows). The Red RING of Death, however, isn't, because my family's Xbox 360 has gotten that issue at least 2 times; we had to get a new one without overheating problems afterwards.

Spyware[edit | edit source]

That page image took me back at least 20 years ago, as of the time I wrote this sentence.

This Program Is Not Responding[edit | edit source]

Sheesh, article, you didn't have to refer to me by name 3 times! I know this has all happened to us a lot since Windows came into our existence! Do you think Mr. Gates would approve of this article by the time we actually see a Windows 12?

Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing[edit | edit source]

Wasn't there a made-up story based on this bad game? It literally starred someone named "Winner," and... I forgot the rest.

Windows Error[edit | edit source]

This fake screenshot, also seen on YTMND, is my favorite. I know we all can't get there in Windows ME, but hey, that explains why it crashes all the time!

4Kids[edit | edit source]

Hey; don't complain! 4Kids was basically the 2nd gateway to seeing anime here in the United States of America, with the 1st being early dubs of, like, Dragon Ball Z and Sailor Moon! It's just that they have repeating themes, just like Pixar...

Elmo's World[edit | edit source]

It's funny because it's true.

Ordering at McDonalds[edit | edit source]

Ugh... This page... and that image... I'd rather go to Burger King.

Blue Ball Factory[edit | edit source]

The "Accidents" section is totally accurate because it's based on a YTMND called "Tragedy at the Blue Ball Factory."

Welcome Party for Noobs[edit | edit source]

How's anyone supposed to get that page when they sign up for Uncyclopedia nowadays? ...Unless they REALLY ARE a noob... Anyway, the page itself must also be an excuse to insert gifs of your favorite characters dancing.

2 Wizards 1 Cup, Four wizards, a slutty nurse, and Dennis Kucinich did it, and A Grue[edit | edit source]

3 spinoffs of the A wizard did it article. Self-explanatory.

Mystery Science Theater 3000[edit | edit source]

Well isn't that clever. The cast of Mystery Science Theater 3000 ACTUALLY REVIEW an earlier revision of their Mystery Science Theater 3000 page on Uncyclopedia!

It Was A Great Blumpkin, Charlie Brown[edit | edit source]

What's a "blumpkin?"

XBible 360, Puu, Imaginabox 360, and Atari 1300[edit | edit source]

4 dumb, made-up consoles that have the Bible, toilet humor, imagination, and basic design as their themes, respectively. If I'd buy 1 of these, it'd be the Atari 1300.

Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying, Sit Down and Relax For a Bit, Try and Read or Something, Maybe Eat a Cheese Sandwich, But Basically Do Anything Other Than Obsessively Think About Being Obliterated in a Massive Nuclear Apocalypse[edit | edit source]

No, this's NOT a mistake; this's a different article. WAY different from Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying, Sit Down and Relax for a Bit, Try and Read or Something, Maybe Eat a Cheese Sandwich, and Basically Do Anything Other Than Obsessively Think About Being Obliterated in a Massive Nuclear Explosion. In fact, it's SO different in which it doesn't even bring up the previous one's running gags!

Template:Pokémon (video games series)/text[edit | edit source]

Am I reviewing a template for real or what? Anyway, it seems like Uncyclopedia has gotten creative with this page for the sake of template copy-pasting. Margaret Thatcher WOULD play it, but would I? I'm not so sure about this even if it were something like Pokémon turquoise...

The intentionally terrible game: Unfunny in-jokes galore[edit | edit source]

Ironically, more like "The unintentionally terrible page: Unfunny misspellings and other crap galore." Seriously; just look at it. There should exist a category for unintentionally bad articles.

Pay-to-win games[edit | edit source]

Well, what the article says is true... unless you ARE AAA... and just in case you asked, YES. I WILL "LOOK AT THE DEVELOPER" and ignore anything made by EA.

Arthur (show)[edit | edit source]

The (obviously fake) list of episodes is the highlight of this article, as well as the made-up plot synopsis for Arthur's Missing Pal. Yeah; we can all assume it was originally 2D before Threshold Entertainment got ahold of it...

I ACCIDENTELATY CREATED A MEME, LETS NOT BE GAY, I MIGHT BE TOO DUR K, WIZARD POOP!!!!, I PEED ON THE SEAR, I AM GOD, and PREHENSILE PENIS[edit | edit source]

7 intentionally bad "memes" that shouldn't have been said to be created in the 1st place, all but 1 of which have this same stock image in them. Abandon all hope ye who enter here!

Hong Kong 97[edit | edit source]

Like The Room (film), this page doesn't look that true to the typical Wikipedian. UNlike The Room (film), though, the video game the article's based on has NO fans at all!

User:Trar/Game:Grueslayer[edit | edit source]

A spinoff of the Zork trilogy, this game may be on indefinite hiatus, but its legend lives on, preserved in Trar's userpage for historical posterity. It's a really big game. You should try it sometime...

Game:Zork Abridged[edit | edit source]

Basically, this's the "Hard Mode" of Zork 1, as some people like to call it. Currently it's messed up. Why the obligatory YouTube link? And whatever happened to "*** You have xyzzy***?" It was a funny non-sequitur... "I have xyzzy!"

User:Gert5/Game and User:WolfZword/Game[edit | edit source]

Gert5 and WolfZword's respective (although abandoned) takes on Zork. Gert5's version's also known as New Zork while WolfZword's game has no name. Also, Homestar Runner makes an appearance in Gert5's version of Zork!

User:Flutter/Enchanter trilogy[edit | edit source]

5 games in 1 sounds like a good concept, though I wouldn't play these games if I were you; they're STILL under construction as of 2025...

User:Pongo Version 2/zorkrandom[edit | edit source]

Also known as "ZORK RANDOM: The revolting apple sauce" on the title screen, it's definitely a complete bear of bananas.

Game:Wizards of Power MMORPG[edit | edit source]

This's a typical MMORPG featuring cameo appearances of random characters, like our mascot, Mr... oops; wrong game.

User:Another n00b/Badgame/SWZork[edit | edit source]

This game REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! combines Zork REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! AND Shareware REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! all REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! together REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! in REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! 1 REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! potshot of REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! a REGISTER ZORK NOW FOR ONLY $19.99! game.

Game:Abyss[edit | edit source]

It's like Zork, but it uses CGI. Just like Chatroulette. And it takes place in an abyss.

Game:HyperSquare[edit | edit source]

A game that pretty much consists of an endless room and an excuse to abuse the Mad Libs templates. No matter which direction you go, a Nebari could come out to getcha...

Game:MMORPG[edit | edit source]

This's a typical MMORPG featuring cameo appearances of random characters, like our mascot, Mr. Potato Head.

Game:VMCSE/Game:VMSCE[edit | edit source]

Short for "Virtual Microsoft Certified Service Engineer," from here you can troubleshoot your computer, assuming it's ONLY Windows 7. From the main menu, if you choose Windows ME or Windows Vista, it would say, "What the hell is wrong with you?!"

Game:TheBlueScreenOfDeath and Game:Infinite Loop[edit | edit source]

See Blue Screen of Death and Infinite Loop, respectively.

Game:Randomness Online and Game:Random Encounters[edit | edit source]

2 text adventures relating to randomness. In the former one, you ARE a Grue.

Game:Installing UncyclolinuX[edit | edit source]

I always imagine installing operating systems is like a game, and Uncyclopedia already has an article like this, so let's just call this Command Line: The Article: The Game...

Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun/Auto-Novel[edit | edit source]

Now you can generate your own story using the Mad Libs templates Uncyclopedia's Departure of Fun provides! It's quite fun, if you ask me.

HowTo:Create a Website[edit | edit source]

This page takes me back to the good old days when MIDI and ESPECIALLY Adobe Flash were the rulers of HTML standards.

HowTo:Divide by Zero[edit | edit source]

Uh oh...

HowTo:De-Snake A Plane[edit | edit source]

For this and its opposite, I'll call in Samuel L. Jackson.

HowTo:Kill Windows[edit | edit source]

Ah, "Shú-t-dó-wn." Isn't that wonderful? And now there's clipart of fellow psychopath Donald Duck smashing a random computer with a mallet! Beautiful.

HowTo:Install Linux[edit | edit source]

Sometimes I think about always wanting to install Linux on my computer. Luckily Uncyclopedia has this HowTo.

HowTo:Win a game of Tic-Tac-Toe[edit | edit source]

It's not Super Mario Bros., nor is it football, nor is it World of Warcraft, nor is it even Tetris for god's sake... It's just, well, a game of Tic-Tac-Toe. Recently someone just created an infinite-type board and caused 3 5XX errors! (Well, not really.)

HowTo:Hyperlink every single word in your article[edit | edit source]

It's fun to do that, you know!

HowTo:Win a Chess Game[edit | edit source]

Hmmm... Maybe I should consider these strategies next time I'm told to play chess.

HowTo:Fix an Xbox 360[edit | edit source]

The red rings around the power button don't mean that my Xbox 360 is mad at me that I didn't use it enough. It just means that it, well, overheated!

HowTo:Build a gaming console from a kitchen appliance[edit | edit source]

A toaster would definitely make a good video game console. A refrigerator, meanwhile, would mock the design of Microsoft's latest Xbox console(s).

HowTo:Write a Bad Uncyclopedia Article/Bad Uncyclopedia Article on wheels![edit | edit source]

Yep; that looks intentionally bad all right...

HowTo:Make Your Own Adventure Game[edit | edit source]

Making text adventures on Uncyclopedia is fun, but the problem is, I myself can't come up with any professional ideas other than editing over someone's pages and templates...

HowTo:Rescue A Princess[edit | edit source]

This sounds cool! Maybe this will go well with, say, HowTo:Make Your Own Adventure Game, I guess...

HowTo:Click with a mouse[edit | edit source]

That 1st picture reminds me of Fozzie Bear. Maybe it IS him, just edited on MS Paint.

HowTo:Hack your iPhone[edit | edit source]

Cquote1.svgDid you mean: HowTo:Jailbreak your iPhone Cquote2.svg
Google on HowTo:Hack your iPhone

User:Primeoffense/How To:Cut Your Head Off With a Wood Chipper[edit | edit source]

This almost looks like a spork of HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Chainsaw. See here for more details.

HowTo:Build a Computer[edit | edit source]

Yes; this's like baking a cake. Most of your computer's ingredients also look too literal. For example, your keyboard can be either an old typewriter or a Fisher Price toy.

HowTo:Install Windows XP[edit | edit source]

This sounds more fun than just installing Linux. The only not-so-fun part is being told by the HowTo to kill "that paperclip bastard" and "that search dog bastard" among other stuff which are SUPPOSED to be here.

HowTo:Experience Your First BSoD[edit | edit source]

Most of this's inaccurate. I've been to the sites listed in Step 2 of "The cheaters' instant ways(on Windows)" (including Nintendo's own website) and I've never gotten a BSOD.

HowTo:Fuck with people's heads[edit | edit source]

I've heard of these types of pranks before, though I don't think it's a good idea to do these...

HowTo:Travel Through Time[edit | edit source]

Wow! Another cool-sounding HowTo! Unfortunately, there's 1 little drawback to this which we all don't like...

HowTo:Drive Drunk[edit | edit source]

Yikes; this looks dangerous. I'm glad I don't have a driver's license.

HowTo:Bake Pineapple Upside-Down Cake[edit | edit source]

Hmmm... Doesn't this look like a big LazyTown reference or something?

HowTo:Create a Cartoon[edit | edit source]

I don't know how Sonic the Hedgehog and Peter Griffin became good ripoffs of Mickey Mouse and Homer Simpson, respectively, but at least this page looks better than HowTo:Create a Website.

HowTo:Pull The End of the World Prank[edit | edit source]

This's not a good idea either, but the article itself's still funny with the quote abuse...

“I agree.”

~ God

HowTo:Start a computer[edit | edit source]

Are you kidding? The power button's right there, stupid!

User:Snarky/HowTo:Pass Go and Collect $200[edit | edit source]

This seems like another in-joke on this here wiki, or possibly the whole Internet itself. ...I don't know.

HowTo:Delete the Recycle Bin[edit | edit source]

What's wrong with the recycle bin on Windows? It's important! ...Well, I've never deleted it before, and I don't want to know what happens afterwards.

HowTo:UnInstall Windows Vista and install Windows 7[edit | edit source]

I think this kinda sounds like the section in the Communist version of the Windows Vista article that teaches you how to "officially rape" your computer with Windows Vista in 13 easy steps.

HowTo:Repair a cracked screen[edit | edit source]

We all crack our smartphone/tablet screens, just like how we all break our smartphones. Strangely enough, according to the results of the poll, most people felt satisfied with these instructions, for their devices work again!

HowTo:Click a link[edit | edit source]

It should be obvious how to do it, just like with clicking with a mouse.

HowTo:Prevent Microsoft from ruining your life[edit | edit source]

Whatever gave him THAT idea to write this technology-related rant on Uncyclopedia?

HowTo:Die[edit | edit source]

No; I don't want to die (yet); I'm actually reading the article for fun. I'll just wait till old age takes its toll on me.

HowTo:Mess up Uncyclopedia[edit | edit source]

I'm not going to even try right now. As I progress forward through that page, it starts to look like today's Vandalism/example on wheels!

UnBooks:1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet[edit | edit source]

Woah; what's going on here?! Does this even look like 1000 Uncyclopedians wrote this "book?" I'm with that guy, though it DOES have a lot of silly nonsensical humor, especially with the fake Mad Libs-style "epilogue" involving not only Hamlet, but Bob, Ophelia, "Sausage," "Eater," John AND Locke (no, really), Mickey Mouse and Minnie Mouse, Shakespeare, "Watch out for snakes," Chuck Norris, Mace Windu (?), "The Dangerous Nerd," "Nose," Wikipedia, Mommy, Daddy, Satan, God, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Harry Potter, Samson, and, of course, The Toxic Snowman. You can literally spend 1 hour, 44 minutes, and 44 seconds figuring out this whole mess here.

UnBooks:The Gruesome Book of Grues and UnBooks:The Rezorkful Book of Cheats[edit | edit source]

These are 2 important books you'll need to read before playing the Zork trilogy. The former tells you all about Grues while the latter lists cheats which may or may not be important to aid you in your quests.

UnBooks:The Very Hungry Caterpillar[edit | edit source]

A philosophical version of the book of the same name. Needs no explanation.

UnPoetia:Snakes on a Plane[edit | edit source]

Did I ever mention that Uncyclopedia bases the movie on this here UnBook UnPoem, "written" by Dr. Seuss? No? Well... here you go then.

UnBooks:Fun Science Experiments for Kids[edit | edit source]

All of these experiments look real... and cool, unlike, say, most HowTos I've ever read here on Uncyclopedia.

UnBooks:The Legend of Ron and the Cheeseburger[edit | edit source]

The original one, we assume that's how the Big Mac was created, but why the IRS IBS?!

UnBooks:The Boy Who Cried Wolf[edit | edit source]

Uncyclopedia tries their best to parody an actual fable by Aesop, though it almost looks identical... to me.

UnBooks:Octagon the Bumble Bee[edit | edit source]

I thought this story was about the OTHER Bumblebee! You know, from Transformers! Anyway, I wonder what this Otacon Octagon would've looked like if this UnBook ACTUALLY HAD pictures...

UnBooks:Max Payne's Max Payne Writing The Book "Max Payne" by Max Payne[edit | edit source]

Bonus points go to the cameo from Clippy, the Microsoft Word Paperclip. I just wish Max Payne (yes; he's a real Uncyclopedian) would put in more recursion on his autobiography...

UnBooks:My First Pubic Hair[edit | edit source]

...EW!!! A purple pube?! No way!

UnBooks:In Search of the Lost Whatchamacallit[edit | edit source]

I'll take a concept about a lost candy bar over an ancient artifact that could turn things into chocolate any day. Also, the Ubergrue.

UnBooks:Boop![edit | edit source]

Boop.JPG
Lauba.jpg
...I don't get it.

UnBooks:Time Magazine (Dec 20, 2012)[edit | edit source]

Even though this, again, looks uncomfortably outdated, it also looks intentionally bad for some reason, probably because they didn't have enough time to finish the job before the world was (presumably) ending...

UnBooks:My Day at the Zoo[edit | edit source]

Another UnBook-type article that's just pictures. There's a lot of stuff in this children's book parody that seem... horribly wrong.

UnBooks:A to Z[edit | edit source]

I already did something like that, in this section. I'm not going to repeat it again.

UnBooks:HowToBasic's Guide To Cooking[edit | edit source]

That HowToBasic (and his obsession with eggs)... Yep; this article is part HowTo as well. None of the recipes here are edible when concocted.

UnTunes:Oscar's Rap (I'm a Wilde Guy)[edit | edit source]

Oscar Wilde sounded more Irish in the Movie Trailer Announcer Guy audio...

UnTunes:Oh No! My microphone's not working![edit | edit source]

Sorry, but no matter how much I turned the volume up, I still couldn't hear the UnTune. Ted Ted's microphone REALLY wasn't working when he did this...

UnTunes:I Forgot The Words[edit | edit source]

This UnTune comes with a special backtrack! According to the backtrack's metadata, Atomic Disturbance used FL Studio 5 to compose the song.

UnTunes:The Randomness Rap[edit | edit source]

It took him forever to transcribe the song? That's so "KOOL!" And it'll be more "KOOLer" if I replaced most of the words with the wiki's silly Mad Libs templates...

UnTunes:Replay[edit | edit source]

This "evil, lyrically catchy spell" lasts 10 verses until Merlin strikes again, placing a reversal counter-spell on my IPod Euroipod. Hooray, my ears are saved!!

Why?:Is there no channel one?[edit | edit source]

This theory sounds a bit outdated, now that we have smart TVs and streaming services. You don't need a Channel 1!

Why?:Is My House Mad At Me and Why?:Is my house on fire[edit | edit source]

These questions sound related. Anyway, both answers are simple: your house's mad at you because it's on fire, and your house's on fire because it's mad at you.

Why?:Is She Taking So God Damn Long in the Bathroom?[edit | edit source]

That stupid "blond guy from Algebra II..." At least the narrator's date wasn't taking a dump.

Why?:Will none of the other children play with you?[edit | edit source]

Sarcasm-filled pothole links aside, that sounded heartwarming.

Why?:Isn't there a toilet in the woods?[edit | edit source]

I don't like that feeling of going in the bushes either, ESPECIALLY if it's #2. Sure, portapotties sound like a great idea, but...

Why?:Won't this stupid TV work?!?[edit | edit source]

That guy must whine more than Angry Shouting Guy does! I wonder how he actually broke the TV?

Why?:Stick Things in the Microwave Oven[edit | edit source]

A strangely familiar-looking spork of Why?:Stick Things in the Electrical Outlet; see its corresponding review for in-depth details.

Why?:Voice recognition software does not work[edit | edit source]

What IS all this stupid nonsense? This looks less readable than the Speech to text software article! Although, I can only decipher a few details, such as the Oscar Wilde quote at the top, the words Hewlett Packard a couple of times, and some kind of RANT WRITTEN ENTIRELY IN CAPS LOCK.

Why?:Why?[edit | edit source]

Why? Why not?

Why?:You're dead[edit | edit source]

STOP MENTIONING THAT POOP INCIDENT! ...jeez... I'm not... dead... but you WILL be SOON if you don't STOP annoying me with it...

Why?:Is there a hashtag on my TV screen[edit | edit source]

The REAL question is, "Why?:Is it called a hashtag?"

Why?:Is my Phone Battery Dead[edit | edit source]

To all you IPs out there, here's another better question than this...

"Why?:Would My Phone Want to Be Like John Cena?"

Why?:Vote Trump[edit | edit source]

I'm with the tumbleweed on THAT one.

Why?:Will you get more than one drill on a school day?[edit | edit source]

To make a long story short, this happens mostly because it's either an accident or a test. Can't waste time when I just have 2 articles left!

UnScripts:Employee Training Video[edit | edit source]

Focusing on Uncyclopedia itself, this's a parody of those typical training videos you see at fast food restaurants, starring none other than you!

Last Page[edit | edit source]

At last...

THE END OF UNCYCLOPEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!

There might be a chance you'd end up here after clicking this button. Man, just look at all those silly sponsors here...


Speaking of which, it's now safe for me to say the time has come at last to bring this entire Pee Review up to its conclusion. I hope you enjoyed this special article, for it took nearly 1 YEAR to finish! I'd like to thank Chronarion for founding (?) this lovely site, because without it, we wouldn't be here, would we? I'd like to thank the creators of all those 450 articles I reviewed. Most of you guys rock! Oh, and I also shouldn't forget to thank Oscar Wilde... he deserves some love.

Thanks for reading.

Oh, now I want a cookie...