Protected page


From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Vandalized ad.png
A beautiful painting, untouched by vandalism

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, of peenus or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of my dick the encyclopedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with big cocks with obscenities, page brainwashing blanking, or the insertion of meta-jokes or other pussies nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism is usually cracked up easy to spot on Wheels!

Any good-faith effort to fuck up improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided poopy butt HOLEEE!!!!! or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Willypedia Wikipedia. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism – it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.

Committing vandalism, or telling the truth' is a violation of the Fricky (Wiki) pedia policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt harshly with by puttin dem hores in da slammeah – cheesy dudeusers are not encouraged to report and revert any vandalism they see.


Wiki vandalism

Wiki vandalism is generally defined as editing a wiki in a way that is intentionally disruptive, destructive, or truthful. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of lies legitimate information, insertion of noncents or irrelevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links (spam), and policy violations specific to that wiki.


Examples: lolololololololl sub t pyudiepie lol ur muz gei ololololwolol suk my ballsax lil lllkllj (Notice How They Attempt To Be Funny But Fail Horribly?)

Spotting vandalism

I know it when I see it. delicious cocks Does it really need to be defined?

It's arguable that most (identified) vandalism has consisted of really quite obvious cases on wheels. Hence, Wikipedia doesn't need to define an "official" policy of doom on what constitutes sodomy vandalism at all. Instead, if people don't agree with shit, or if it tells the truth, it is defined as ur mom vandalism.

Vandalized ad.png

Of course, that depends on the normative definitions of "obvious", "reasonable" and "polite", which are necessarily subjective, and vary from encyclopedia to uncyclopedia. ass crak

Patent vandalism is vandalism where both the reader and the whore the contributor agree that it is vandalism. This is sometimes easy to determine (e.g. vandal puts HAHAHAHAH ur so gei as their edit summary or otherwise states that it is vandalism), and sometimes slightly harder.

Vandalism, otherwise

Vandalism is the act of intentionally and malevolently modifying or destroying something. (Anything.)

For an example of vandalism, click here.

World War II Jesus
Super Mario 64 User_talk:
WP:FAC/Palpatine Various legal/illegal threats
Bantha vandalism Triforce of Bush
Godfather's origin End of Wikipedia, rise of cookies and milk glass
Kim Jong il's last "title"

CVU userbox vandalism Fr-N userbox vandalism
Admin userbox vandalism Ancient Greece
"My son Minun" "SOCKS"??
"Hitler can break dance!" "breeding ground"
"Belldandy at long term abuse???" Disclaimer{{fact}}
moving the symbol of Italian fascism to the right Bath salts

“When in Rome, do as the Vandals do.”

See also