From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DO...
- For nominators: DO...
- ... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
- ... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
- ... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
- ... Add
{{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
- ... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.
- For voters: DO...
- ... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
- ... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so:
'''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
- ... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.
- For Administrators: DO...
- ... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
- ... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
- ... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
- ... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.
DON'T...
- ... Revert administrators.
- ... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
- ... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
- ... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like
THIS to indicate that they have been kept.
 Archives
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Pages for Deletion
New entries will be at the bottom of this page.
|
Score: -1 Elapsed Time: 2299 hours
|
| Keep (4) |
 Keep.  BraGreMat  07:54, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Strong keep. Gigabased. Willy on Wheels, The Fuerdai Vandal. (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 00:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)- Keep.
 taxworm / talk 11:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. – Kip > Talk • Works ••
         01:17, Sep. 24, 2022
|
| Delete (3) |
 Delete. short vanity article about nothing Microsoft for POTUS (talk) 06:06, 20 June 2022 (UTC)- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 22:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. For the same reason as Microsoft. ARandomPage, the named space (Update them!) (Stuff they do) 05:12, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I don't think that we should adhere to stare decisis for that one. We shouldn't have so many in-jokes in main space given that they aren't very funny to someone that isn't familiar with the Uncyclopedia community.
|
|
Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 80 hours
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (1) |
Nom and Delete. - doesn't make sense and is filled with red links. Written by one registered user that has a history of blanking articles, making articles filled with red links, making random things bold when they don't need to, and writing nonsense. The IP who is editing also is adding lots of red links creating nonsense. It seems like some kind of fictional series of people, but I don't find it funny. Microsoft for POTUS (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC) added {{ICU}}
|
| Comments |
I´m pretty sure we can just put an ICU on this article and call it a day.  BraGreMat 17:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fair, but if it isn't fixed, then perhaps it should be deleted. Microsoft for POTUS (talk) 17:51, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but it still shouldn´t be on VFD then. BraGreMat 17:53, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Understood Microsoft for POTUS (talk) 17:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -1 Elapsed Time: 79 hours
|
| Keep (2) |
- Keep. It is a very funny article to me. I don't see why would it get deleted. taxworm / talk 19:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- "Asperger syndrome (pronounced us-per-juh SIN-drome), also known as Asperger's syndrome, Asperger disorder (AD) or simply Asperger's, is an imaginary semi-voluntary behavioral disorder in the guise of a more serious and involuntary neurodevelopment disability. The horrible consequences of Asperger Syndrome include: not making small talk, tendency to think for yourself against the herd, and high intelligence. Pretty much it boils down to your typical hipster or college professor. Completely opposite the language issues common to Autism, those afflicted with Asperger Syndrome are linguistically verbose, to the point of vexation. They think it is blasphemy to not use the King's English even during the most informal events. "
- Again, it reads like a Conservapedia article. Microsoft for POTUS (talk) 19:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- It has been discussed before to delete this article, both times it was kept. I think there's no reason for this discussion to end in a different way than the ones before. About that section, I think it is relatively funny too. taxworm / talk 21:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not terrible enough. BraGreMat 21:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
Nom and Delete. Yes, I am aware we have offensive articles, but they are required to be funny. This reads like a Conservapedia article. If I hadn't read it on Uncyclopeda, you could've plagiarized this over to Conservapedia and I would've believe it came from there. Microsoft for POTUS (talk) 18:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
DO...
DON'T...
Keep. 
Strong keep. Gigabased. 
Delete. short vanity article about nothing 
