DO...

For nominators: DO...

... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
... Add {{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.

For voters: DO...

... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so: '''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.

For Administrators: DO...

... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.

DON'T...

... Revert administrators.
... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like THIS to indicate that they have been kept.

Pages for Deletion

New entries will be at the bottom of this page.

Football Nature Documentary

Score: 2 Elapsed Time: 897 hours
Keep (1)	Re~~cycle~~write.. Admittedly, it has poor execution, but if it does get deleted, could it be userfied into my sandbox? Pasmorade (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Delete (3)	n o --+-=÷x Sapplerx x÷=-+ (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC) DETONATE!! Fenris2010 (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Kill. More than ten days later, when I read this article again, I thought that this article may not be suitable to stay here. 12:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments	...wut? Seems to be an oddly peculiar creation by Crocotta1 but if Pasmorade can make it better, I'm all for userfying it. OranguTang94 (Complaint board) (Damage trail) 17:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC) Comment. No need to delete, but someone needs to improve it and make it more suitable for Uncyclopedia. 06:34, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 824 hours
Keep (1)	Useful for reference on the 2024 debate. Also, I added a new section on debate styles. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:52, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Unfunnyish. --+-=÷x Sapplerx x÷=-+ (talk) 15:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Half Support Lack of interesting pictures. 06:51, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Meh. It's unfunny, but it has some potential. If it does get deleted, can someone maybe put it in their userspace and improve it? Fenris2010 (talk) 02:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 2.5 Elapsed Time: 816 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2.5)	Delete. --+-=÷x Sapplerx x÷=-+ (talk) 23:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC) Half Support Lack of interesting pictures. 06:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Nuke. Fenris2010 (talk) 02:14, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments

Score: -2 Elapsed Time: 683 hours
Keep (3)	For. I find it funny.ݬલטαฬ םɐۼ - ᚦ¡ទᑕʋᛢᛇ - ɪ øటñ ᑌᑎᑦᛉ๔1០ᖀξᗟᛧą - but ɳ̩ɵɞ_°₫￥ ເἀᚱΞᛇ For. I also find it funny. User:Fenris2010 20:06, 22 July 2024 Keep. 12:09, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Clearly unfunny and plain ranty.– Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasmorade (talk • contribs)
Comments

Score: 3 Elapsed Time: 390 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Nuke. As someone who actually experienced it, albeit only gales. I'm offended at how lackluster this article is. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Pasmorade (talk • contribs) Infinity and beyond . . . 15:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Nuke. Fenris2010 (talk) 02:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 4 Elapsed Time: 293 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. There's literally only one person on that list. It sounds like a good concept to me, but there's just one person and that's pretty much all. --+-=÷x Sapplerx x÷=-+ (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2024 (UTC) DETONATE!! 15:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC) That was easy. Dumpster. 15:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC) ݬલטαฬ םɐۼ - ᚦ¡ទᑕʋᛢᛇ - ɪ øటñ ᑌᑎᑦᛉ๔1០ᖀξᗟᛧą - but ɳ̩ɵɞ_°₫￥ ເἀᚱΞᛇ DETONATE!! User:Fenris2010 20:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 165 hours
Keep (1)	It's not that bad. -- User:Fenris2010 20:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Delete (2)	This is humorless to me. --+-=÷x Sapplerx x÷=-+ (talk) 02:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC) Delete. Not worth staying. 05:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 1.5 Elapsed Time: 25 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1.5)	Delete. It's doesn't really make sense. Fenris2010 (talk) 22:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC) Meh. As long as you add interesting pictures to the article and complete the content, it will not be eligible for deletion. 12:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Comments