This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
Delete this stoned nonsense. A negative version of Kanye West might be a funny idea; sadly this is just unfunny nonsense. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 13:21, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
NOM NOM NOM as NOM NOM NOM! Brand-new IP cruft, except this time it's too long for QVFD. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 01:42, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Actually, this IP cruft is about some rather obscure website that doesn't have its own Wikipedia article, thus is violating UN:VAIN and is eligible for speedy deletion... 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 03:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
huffed 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 03:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Nom. 100 kilobyte template! And I just deleted every single transclusion of it. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 19:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Shouldn't this be sent to QVFD, though? @OPOSSUM: Norb (talk) 19:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! yeah, let's kill this usless template... 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
@Norb: I don't think it should be on QVFD, though. Zana deserves at least some credit, this template wasn't made in bad faith. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 19:52, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
@OPOSSUM: it's still a stupid template that deserves to be deleted. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
moccasins. The use of furry speech and femboy stuff is to mock Neo-Nazis. Hyperborea seems to be something that Neo-Nazis are obsessed with, which also explains the triple parentheses. Both have to do with the topic of the article. Not voting for a full keep since it's very short, but if it's expanded and fixed a bit, this could definitely be a solid article. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 12:17, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm nominating this article for a number of reasons.
It's incredibly short; it's weird no one has put a QVFD tag or even a stub tag in this article before, considering how short it is.
It uses a lot of furry speech which makes it hard to understand; what's weird is that the topic of the article doesn't have anything to do with furries.
There's also the use of triple parenthesis which I'm sure I've heard somewhere it's an anthisemitic way to portray the name of someone who's Jewish. Not sure if it's satirical or not and I don't think I want to find out. Also, once again, it has nothing to do with the topic of the article. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment. Hyperborea is a thing that Neo-Nazis talk about a lot, so the triple parentheses in the article do make sense and are related to the subject. Not voting yet, since I haven't actually looked at the article. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 12:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
@Willy on wheels: huh, really? I had never heard of this before, so I just thought it was a really poor attempt at random humor; but now that I know this the article makes more sense. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 12:20, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Huh, I thought this was Knoxville, Tennessee. I don't even think this is worth userfying, as it's too random. Blow it to Kingdom Come, Sheriff. OranguTang94(Complaint board) (Damage trail) 00:17, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Obliterate. 20:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
huffed 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:06, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
ALL redirect categories
Score: 5
Keep (0)
No keep votes.
Delete (5)
EXTERMINATE! Redirect categories are problematic for a number of reasons. Most are empty and don't appear on Special:UnusedCategories. Secondly, they don't appear as redirects on HotCat, and are only noticeable after saving. Thirdly, if added to a page, they don't add the category they redirect to, rather, they add themselves. As such, they serve no real purpose other than aiding searches, and I don't think people are searching for categories very often. I'm 90% sure most redirect categories are left over as the result of a move, where the mover forgot to untick the "create a redirect" box. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 17:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
NOTE: We are absolutely keeping [[Category:Musicians Who Suck So Monumentally That It Really, Truly Amazes Me That The Earth And Any Surrounding Planets And Quite Possibly A Good Bit Of The Afterlife Have Not Yet Been Swallowed Entirely]]. I'm gonna move [[Category:Musicians Without Talent]] to [[Category:Musicians Who Suck So Monumentally...]] in a day or two when I have time. The redirect of the real title will stay. User:Dawg went rogue moving it to such a horrible title. I'm giving everyone who wants a shorter title a compromise. MrXblow me 22:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
@MrX: I could do the moving myself, now that I have L10nM4st3r's tools, which allow you to change the category links when you move the category with only a click of a button... 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:10, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Yeah that would be cool, thanks! MrXblow me 02:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Is there a list of all the redirect categories somewhere? Special:ListRedirects only lists 1000 entries, and all of them are regular redirects. 19:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Huffed. If you find any that i didn't catch, then please send them to QVFD. 20:57, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
[removed]
Score: 3
Keep (0)
No keep votes.
Delete (3)
Nom. I am aware that this is a redirect, but the mere existence of this page attracts trolls from [removed]. Trust me, they have nothing better to do. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 15:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
sure, let's huff it. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 14:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
@Willy on wheels: I'm pretty sure there's already been a troll from [removed] around here. these last days some vandal has been creating different sockpuppets and inserting unfunny stuff into articles like a black banner that hides the text on the article and has written the words "blacked.com" on it. also made an ASCII of a [removed] once, which is why I'm guessing it's from [removed]. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 15:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Comment. @DaniPine3: Decided to make a forum post about him too. It's probably for the best to delete this page in order to prevent garnering further attention, put this guy on UN:LSD, and add a filter to the abuse filter for his edits. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 16:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
@Willy on wheels: the problem that I find with that idea is that, in one of its sockpuppets, this guy wrote "Hail stanan and also add me to UN:LTA" (which apparently redirects to UN:LSD [also the guy spelt satan wrong]), which means that they want that to happen for some reason. so maybe we shouldn't actually add him. also I forgot to mention that several times he's bombarded articles with flashy imaged of goatse. thankfully I haven't seen those pics, or only 1% of it. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 16:10, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
The reason why he wants to be added to UN:LSD is because trolls are chronic attention seekers, and being put on a list gives them that attention. It might be what he wants, but it won't garner him as much attention as he probably thinks, and it's also standard protocol to do this for persistently disruptive users. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 16:12, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: So that means you've actually seen the almighty Goatse in all its glory now? Blessed be thine eyes, for they will really need it after seeing such glory. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
@OPOSSUM: I'm not sure if it was goatse. it had a flashy effect over it to give people a seizure (wow, making people have epilectic attacks, how funny these guys are). anyways, it did look gross, so I huffed it anyways. also that was a pun on glory hole wasn't it 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 14:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: Yeah, I saw the edit, the sharty vandal called the image "hello.gif", the original goatse image was called "hello.jpg" so I'm pretty sure you did, indeed, see THE Goatse. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:37, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Keep. That's an awful lot of articles that aren't even that bad. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:05, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Keep. it seems these articles have historical significance within this wiki, so deleting them seem a rather stupid move for me. they migth not be the best quality, but they definitely should be ketp as historical reliques. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 13:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Keep.. We need more articles written in Norwegian. Herostratus (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Delete. To be honest, according to my research, this person is only known due to being a pest who doxxed some people on Wikipedia and some other wikis in 2006. Additionally, most, if not all, of the jokes throughout the articles either fall horribly flat or are just terribly outdated.
Note: The Daniel Brandt article on Wikipedia is NOT related to this one. Just wanted to note that. Norb (talk) 17:51, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Nom. This is the first time I've ever put up an article for deletion like that. I don't like doing it. But I have to say, the article is more of a ytinav self-insert than an actuall funny UnNews. talk 15:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Short, stubby, and mocking twelve year olds are extremely overused punching bags now. Delete unless fixed within 100 hours.Terminated. (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Keep. {I have to save this! Ahhhhhhh! talk 17:48, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete (5)
Back in the userspace it goes. You know what? Userspace it.Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:11, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Kill.Terminate. Obscure piece of internet culture. OPOSSUM why would you assume a barely functioning website that only gets about half a dozen regular editors would have articles on concurrent internet phenomena? It just seems like bullshit begging. Terminated. (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. This isn't even a leftist ED. It's just an archival site for white supremacist Discords. Certainly fails UN:VAIN. Norb (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Kill.I agree with the other users. This site is way too obscure for an uncyclopedia article. I do think that it would work better as a Rationalwiki article. Tatersforever442 (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
UPDATE: Tatersforever has told me that as much as this resembles a rant article, it isn't supposed to contain serious opinions on the site (which again, I know very little about.) For now, the VFD will be left up, but my vote or this poll COULD be withdrawn in the future. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 05:24, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
I feel like 6 days is a little soon to VFD an article that is being worked on. We can userfy it until it gets better. MrXblow me 18:36, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Uhhh... hell nah! Why? It was already userified once. There is an extremely significant amount of work that was put on it already. It has potential. I'm even working to fix this article myself, so.... It's funny. I did laugh once or twice while reading it. If you aren't a Nazi, you should like it. talk 18:59, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
@Coffi: "If you aren't a Nazi, you should like it" that's quite the reductive statement. most people here critizise that it's a rather obscure website without much notability, which is a vaild criticism. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
I was mainly saying that if it's voted to be deleted it should instead be userfied. And yeah, saying "If you aren't a Nazi, you should like it" is even worse than something like "If you aren't a traitor, you should like the Patriot Act". Seriously calling someone a Nazi just because they disagree with you............ smh MrXblow me 22:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
its time we have done it. we face the greatest challenge of our time: indicting a beloved part of uncyclopedia culture for bring to us countless war crimes.Terminated. (talk) 17:55, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
I didn't know that you were Yoda... also, I thought that Yoda was addicted to ketamine, not LSD. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 19:38, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Yoda I am. Speak backwards I do. Better than you I am, filthy casuals.[[File:Lawrence.Gif.Gif]] (talk) 19:42, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! how hasn't this been QVFD'd earlier? not only is it about an unknown game, it's completely unfunny and incoherent. maybe I should just delete it without nominating first, but I prefer democracy. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 01:38, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Don't huff Maybe userfy it until Shabidoo gets off his lazy ass and brings this article up to the level we all expect from him. MrXblow me 22:37, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Keep. 12:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Keep. its so peak Schism (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. WTF is this article supposed to be? Norb (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete this stoned nonsense. Not really any jokes aside from the premise, which is more just strange than funny anyway. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:16, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Limp boner. It has potential, but the prose is extremely poor. If this article wasn't from over a decade ago, I would believe it was written by AI. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 16:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Kept. --🩷 Sapplerx (talk) 🩷 23:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
I will admit that I enjoyed this article, I've read it before. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 18:58, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
weak keep although it's a bit bad, I wouldn't say it's VFD-worthy. it could always be extended/made funnier. also Kurtz don't be an idiot by mocking admins you've already been blocked enough times 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Nom/Delete. I don't really know what to say here other than the fact that this is a really bad article. 18:53, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, but it still sucks arse. Delete.Norb (talk) 22:12, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
@Alula: "Random-access humor" is a term that Chris Chan came up with to mean stream-of-consciousness random humor, saying whatever comes to mind. Willy on Wheels uses the term as well. But I must say, a lot of Kurtz's humor is pretty random as well. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 19:04, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. I'm sorry for the user that was planning to make this UnGame, but it's been several years now since it was created and it barely has any content. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 08:44, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Burninate! Never played the original game, I've heard people say it's a straight up super meat boy knockoff, and I assumed that the joke of this article was that the "browser-hijacking JavaScript" would just never load. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:24, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. I highly doubt this game is under construction as we speak, but I would love to be proven wrong. Until then, send it to the abyss. SystemPhantom (talk) 19:09, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Terminate with extreme prejudice. Extremely crappy and unfinished. I would try and save it but I am concerned with my own UnGame:Reach AZATHOTH and multiple articles I need to finish. (talk) 13:22, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
@OPOSSUM: I haven't heard about this game either, but from what I've looked about it on the internet it doesn't remind me of Super Meat Boy that much. I also have heard that is incredibly hard tho. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 14:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
a nonsensical article with ip levels of quality. nonsensical story all over the place. too random[[File:Lawrence.gif.gif]] (talk) 20:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
BRRRRRT! the humor is completely incoherent, it might be funny if you're stoned out of your mind but otherwise this article should be shot down with an A-10 warthog SystemPhantom (talk) 18:55, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Infinity and beyond . . . 03:18, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
this is worse than the taxi article. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 18:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Terminate with extreme prejudice. If we are going to write an article on Martin Scorsese and Robert DeNiro shouldn't we focus on the films? (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE! apparently, this was created as a "stupid placeholder until someone gets around to writing something good". no one has done that yet. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 18:48, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Keep. It should be moved to UnNews space though, i honestly thought it was an UnNews article until i looked closer at the title ❄️SystemPhantom, with a 🫑bell pepper for you! (talk)❄️ 03:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Centrism. I understand the joke fairly well (trains are more or less always late here in Norway too), but the execution isn't the best. Could definitely use a lot of work. 14:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Why? Stupidly short even by bad articles' standards. The 'joke' is barely funny. It could be rewritten but it would need to be done soon. (talk) 11:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Could use a couple of categories though. 13:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Keep.❄️SystemPhantom, with a 🫑bell pepper for you! (talk)❄️ 06:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Terminate with extreme prejudice. Extremely short, stupid, and extremely unfunny. The joke existing is about as likely as a neck beard incel finding an extremely beautiful women and marrying her. (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. I have merged this article with the one about HowTo:Do your taxes. Now the question is if we should delete the redirect or leave it be. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:21, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Huffed by admin decree. Someone's using proxies to write AI-generated articles containing a lot of suspicious links. This was one of them. 20:23, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Keep. 'Twas I who put the chemicals in the water that turned the frogs gay, as seen on my userpage. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 03:27, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Keep. The world needs goblins. Noopnurf (talk) 17:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC) Keep. The article was very funny when I read it! Tatersforever442 (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC) Keep. I DON'T LIKE 'EM PUTTIN' CHEMICALS IN THE WATER!!! Mr. George/talk 01:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete. the article is just really short, and not really having any jokes besides "haha this guy was a weirdo and attracted to furry porn" gergdown, eh (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. @Turb0-Sunrise: you know the ICU will expire TODAY... it's not like on the first second of july 31st all admins have to be waken up to delete an icu article, you could just wait until tomorrow and then it'd be deleted... you don't have to make a VFD section about an article that will be removed at most in a day gergdown, eh (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Huffed from an expired ICU. 17:44, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Nominating this mostly because it should be a redirect to Wild Jews. Also it's kinda crappy. (If for some reason it doesn't get VFD'd I'll move it to a different title so that I can make "Wild Jew" a redirect). 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:35, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Should I expand it or something. Also it's not even THAT obscure. Taiwan 20:52, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment. @Taiwan: expansion is not always the best answer to everything. sometimes, you have to insert humour into a page. the funnier it is, the better it gets. i also have to say that the article is a bit short, in which case, you should extend it, or classify it as {{Template:Stub}}, although since your article is under threat of deletion, you better try to make it better. unfortunately i know nothing about the shinkansen, so i can't help gergdown, eh (talk) 02:49, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Keep. I'd argue deleting them is going a step too fat. If anything, we could lock them so that they aren't further edited, but we should keep archived to preserve an era of this wiki. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 20:46, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
Keep.Maybe userfy things like ASBOTAAB or other entries that don't fit if it’s really necessary. I would support not allowing the creation of new ASBOWAATs. --DameFishonskatesCUN 21:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete all but 1, one article at a time. DW III 22:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
yeah, there's way too many of these... i think ASBHAWAAT and ASBTWAAT are good candidates to delete. gergdown, eh (talk) 00:32, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. hey guys (and some gals), uh.. if this succeeds, which ones are we deleting?
we'll definitely delete ASBHAWAAT, and maybe ASBOTAAB, but what else? gergdown, eh (talk) 20:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
No opinion. This is by far the most ambiguous VFD nomination i've ever seen. I'm leaving it up for now because people are apparently having the most civil discussions i've ever seen on the internet here (and because there's no clear consensus and stuff), but i'd recommend nominating each one anyone would want deleted separately in the future. 13:12, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
@Alula: Well the 5 sysadmins there are have been inactive for the last billion and a half years, so it's either create a cyborg or wait till October to nom somebody. Your favorite moron, Turb0-Sunrise (LETS GO RED SOX) 15:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
We don't vote on who gets to be a sysadmin on VFS, sorry. Also, the main active sysadmin doesn't have the sysadmin user right on here to begin with. 16:09, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment. if this vote passes, should we put up a vfd vote for the main four asbowaats articles that were nominated by someone to be removed? (ASBHAWAAT, ASBOTAAB, ASBOTAAT, and uhhh there was another one that i forgot)? gergdown, eh (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
okay i might just do it gergdown, eh (talk) 01:16, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, you should just do it. Nothing's gonna happen if this vote either passes or fails since it's not any specific articles/pages nominated here. 01:23, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
okay doing it now gergdown, eh (talk) 01:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Keep. I'd argue that Pepsiman's article layout needs improving, rather than deleting it. Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs
Delete (1)
EXTERMINATE! really stubby pages with crappy pictures and no humor to be found. also Pepsiman deserves a much better article. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 23:01, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Comments
I'm not going to vote for or against, but I must say that I really like the images in those two articles, especially the Pepsiman article. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 17:26, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Failed because it's two articles in one nomination. Nominate one article at a time please. 20:27, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock. you may ask, "why this one? why not the other more... irrelevant ones?" well here's why: this one was doomed to fail by its rules. there are only so many languages in the world, and like, we went through 25 of them ALREADY!!! this one just feels really unsustainable, not even including the "you are banned until 50 new sentences". THERE'S ONLY BEEN 20ISH!! gergdown, eh (talk) 03:18, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock or userfy. It's unsustainable because there are only so many languages spoken by Uncyclopedians. --DameFishonskatesCUN 03:56, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock. I had completely forgotten about this one. also that ending is perfect. there's no need to build more upon that. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:15, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Userfy. A good concept, but virtually irrelevant and basically dead. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 04:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
locked. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:36, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock. This has, to me, always been the "Coffi wanted his own personal ASBOxAAT version". And the gimmick isn't even unique, it's just ASBOSAAT but with mandatory line breaks. 15:16, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock/Archive let's start with the most... uh... uncontroversial one? i mean the creator wants to blow it up so... gergdown, eh (talk) 01:45, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Is this or will it be referenced by any EfO/MitK pages? --DameFishonskatesCUN 21:11, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
@Fish on skates: don't think that either ASB1/2WAAT or the deletion polls have been referenced in the Ojai games. PS, that signature gif you wanted is long overdue, I promise to make it tomorrow, but it's getting late right now, time for me to go to sleep. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 04:17, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Locked. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:46, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Comment. Uncyclopedia has featured articles on the n word, sexual harassment and Jeffrey Epstein. I'd argue that it being a dark subject to make fun of isn't enough reason for getting it deleted. Although tbf I do agree that you have to be really cautious when making that kind of article, or else it will most likely fail HTBFANJS. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 15:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Nom. Unfunny patented nonsense article in broken English. The AI images don't bother me as much as they bother some of you guys, but they definitely don't make the article much better. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 00:55, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete. This would need a massive rewrite to be funny. --DameFishonskatesCUN 01:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete. kingdom of polbusteamingpileofshit Schism (talk) 01:31, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
how the fuck did this miss qvfd? theoretically it is possible to produce a funny article but it just squanders it and is an extremely short and stupid article. terminate. (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Yes, you do need to explain.--DameFishonskatesCUN 01:12, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Keep. read above. also, i guess we have to delete nihilism now if this gets passed, and that's a top 10! gergdown, eh (talk) 01:14, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Keep. 16:27, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Keep. Soviet, what are you smoking and more importantly, where can I get some? (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Do I need to explain? Soviet912 (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
Keep. I barely knew that this existed, it has potentional. Maybe we should spotlight it onto the forum? GlitchyZorua 🎩🦊 (give floofy hug) 00:04, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Delete (5)
lock yeah this one has barely been edited in all of its existence. let's lock it. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:43, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
lock Quite a few dead videos on this one as well. Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs 01:13, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock. Why is there a "shota island" video in this one? Actually, why does that exist in the first place? 15:06, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Terminate. Why does this exist? It has no coherent story, no important contribution to lore, and why tf is there a shota island video in there? Also several of the links need to be replaced. (talk) 13:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Neutral. It may be dead as a dodo (and it always was), but I always thought that this one was cool. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 00:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
thank u, next --🩷 Sapplerx (talk) 🩷 01:18, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Keep.Userspace pls. (talk) 15:59, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Delete (3)
Nom and delete. This is, from what i can gather, an extremely unfinished and unfunny attempt at making an UnGame that was abandoned after only two days. 00:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Delete. looks to be practically abandoned by the creator, and it seems like nobody is working on it. gergdown, eh (talk) 17:22, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Nuke. Nothin' much going on here. Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs 03:15, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Kept. --🩷 Sapplerx (talk) 🩷 15:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Lock okay this one is just asking to be killed + it died + it's just a story built one sentence at a time but with a very minor twist + how the fuck are we gonna get 1440 edits on this one + it has an expiration date + ratio + l gergdown, eh (talk) 01:06, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock. I don't like Bill Cipher. Also this story kinda sucks even if you took him out and stuff. 15:04, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Lock. I have nothing against Bill Cipher, but this shit is dead as fuck. Also, so imagine it's 9:47 PM UTC. It'll be really hard to go through all the revision history to figure out if anyone else has edited the story at 9:47 PM, and by the time you have edited, it'll be at least 9:48. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 15:28, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
2 out pop to short. it's fucking dead. get locked. Turb0-Sunrise(Yell at me) 00:57, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
Comments
thank u, next --🩷 Sapplerx (talk) 🩷 15:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Wait What The Fucké I know you guys can't believe it... but I actually like this article. A bit, though. But the only reason I like this article is because of the backstory. This is a hoax article on Wikipedia. It literally means people actually fell for this. Sure, it's just the article, but give it a bit of polish, and it shall work. Hell—people actually fell for The Camera Obscura Collection of Hans Helmuth Saltzman (1602-1668) as you can see here. I don'té really think it's featureable in this state—helleeth non—but I also like it a bit, y'know? Maybe I shall improveth it when I have the chance... 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 14:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Blatantly copied from a Wikipedia article that doesn't even exist anymore. 👻CUNTurb0-SunSpookrise, Esquire 👻14:22 12 1 '25 13:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Comments
@Soviet: i'm pretty sure the whole joke is that it's supposed to look and read real... see this article.🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 14:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
@Soviet: @Turb0-Sunrise: that it was copied from a former Wikipedia article doesn't mean this article should be deleted. some articles in Uncyclopedia were taken from Wikipedia vandalisms (see Category:Saved From Wikipedia) -and if this article got deleted, it was probably because it was nonsense. but if it's funny nonsense, then it can stay here. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 15:23, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment. we need to close this on the first day of november. the last vfd of this article had its vfd closed on november 1st, 2010. it would be really cool if exactly 15 years later, another vfd was closed.
that would be funny. 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 16:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Alright i'm not nomming anything for anything for at least 2 weeks 👻CUNTurb0-SunSpookrise, Esquire 👻14:22 12 1 '25 21:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
This is a joke nomination to VFD This nomination should not be taken seriously. Or do take it seriously. Whatever you feel like, we don't judge. Okay, we do judge, but we do our best to hide it. But I guess our best wasn't good enough, 'cause here we are back where we were before...
Score: 4
Keep (0)
No keep votes.
Delete (4)
Nuke. They think they can nom US for deletion TWELVE TIMES?!?! FUCK THEM! KUNSir Turb0-Sunrisede laBoston 00:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Burninate! Total ripoff of Uncyclopedia. --DameFishonskatesCUN 00:39, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
I'M CHUCK NORRIS, AND I FUCKING HATE THIS ARTICLE!!!🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 00:40, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
I'M CHUCK NORRIS, AND I FUCKING HATE THIS ARTICLE!!! Made by the same guy who made whatever Raichu & Wakko Show Bible was. Really stubby and makes no sense; I'm pretty sure this is someone's fan character who added to this wiki for some reason. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 02:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Question to the userfy people: Send it to whose userspace? The creator (called "Paulgb") doesn't have an account, and probably hasn't had any edits in at least 15 years 16:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
oh, then Delete. i guess 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 17:35, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
huffed 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:50, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete this stoned nonsense. really large wall of text that isn't really funny. the fact that it could be AI doesn't help it either. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 15:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Comments
huffed. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 15:02, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
This is a joke nomination to VFD This nomination should not be taken seriously. Or do take it seriously. Whatever you feel like, we don't judge. Okay, we do judge, but we do our best to hide it. But I guess our best wasn't good enough, 'cause here we are back where we were before...
Score: 0 score text
Keep (1)
Strong keep. Adding a keep vote for balance. Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs 15:04, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Nuke.Before you click the "Nominate" button on VFD, you have to change the title. And guess what the title is? This little article! VFD has been telling us to delete this hag of an article for YEARS! It's 'bout time to delete this shit. 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 23:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. this will be my only joke nom btw. unless...🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 23:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Duplicate nomination, archiving. 17:22, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Nom.Gergdown nominated this as a joke, but I'm actually nominating this article(*) because it's just a less funny version of Page title. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 21:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Duplicate article, should be merged. --DameFishonskatesCUN 21:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Burninate!🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 21:37, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
(*) this article was originally named "Article title" before being moved to "Article structure" a long time ago; I have recently changed the "Article title" redirect so that it redirects to the funnier page. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 21:00, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Burninated. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 11:21, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Keep.It doesn't really look like AI to me it's not a bad article. Bad taste? Probably. Too soon? Definitely. But it's not bad. Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs 14:42, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Nuke. Obvious AI article is obvious. 17:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete. the less AI articles on Uncyclopedia, the better. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 11:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. For those wondering how this is AI-generated, it contains multiple signs of AI-generated writing, as recognized on Wikipedia. Notably, all headers are written in title-case instead of sentence-case, the article is full of red links as well as a broken WikiBooks link. The article had a ton of nonexistent categories before I removed them. In Air India Flight 171#The Investigation, the article uses Markdown formatting inappropriately. In addition, the creator of the article has been previously blocked for creating AI-generated articles. While there is a tiny chance that this article was written by an actual person, I'm almost completely confident that it's AI-generated. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 16:47, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment. @Willy on wheels: Ah alright. Makes sense Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs 19:11, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
BRRRRRT! 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 11:35, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
This is a joke nomination to VFD This nomination should not be taken seriously. Or do take it seriously. Whatever you feel like, we don't judge. Okay, we do judge, but we do our best to hide it. But I guess our best wasn't good enough, 'cause here we are back where we were before...
Score: 0 damn cheaters
Keep (2)
Strong keep. Still better than the Oilers, and that's my team! 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 17:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Keep. If you deleted the Yankees, then you'd have nothing to make fun of. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 22:16, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete (2)
YANKEES SUCK! KUNSir Turb0-Sunrisede laBoston 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Burninate! I like New York, but not enough Noopnurf,Noopiest of Nurfs 15:09, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Comments
@OPOSSUM: uhh... the entire city of Cleveland? KUNSir Turb0-Sunrisede laBoston 22:43, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Ok i gotta archive this because it might actually get in the way for the VFD nomination limit. Yes, that's a thing we have. Yes, this is why we largely don't do joke nominations on VFD. 11:41, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Screw it, i'm getting rid of the suckier one. Keep that first image if it does get deleted, it would fit in the other article. KUNSir Turb0-Sunrisede laBoston 20:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE AND KERKILL! AI-generated bilge by a now-indefinitely banned and likely underage user. Also filled with 2025cruft. Willy on Wheels! On Wheels!CUN (Babbling ~ Recent ramblings) 15:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Nuke. only good thing it has is the audio file at the beggining. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 13:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
EXTERMINATE AND KERKILL! AI is one of three truly evil things on this planet with little to no uses. Banish this article IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!! Buv (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong keep. As someone who knows the NATO alphabet, this was indeed very funny. 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 17:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong keep. I had to find out what the NATO alphabet is for me to read this article, and once i did i also found out that this is funny. 11:48, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Strong keep. definitely not an article that should get huffed. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:43, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete (1)
Saying negro asshole rapist could get some laughs but just isn't very funny for an entire article. Sovieт☭ 16:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Comments
@Soviet: there's a bit more of joke to the article than that. check what the International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet is, then come back to this article. you might then get what the real joke of the article is. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 16:35, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment. i wish i could vote a double keep for this article, man! i just say that word list 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 17:48, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
kept. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:50, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
Userify guess i got to delete my deltarot now, since that's something niche, something that basically nobody gets. also, seperate the art from the artist. also, i don't think userpage articles should be deleted, even if they don't serve any purpose anymore... 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 22:44, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Userfy Actually, just for the sake of it, kick it in Gergdowns userspace, still, fuck pedos, but this articles has nothing to do with that. so... yeah. GlitchyZorua 🎩🦊 (give floofy hug) 03:48, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Userfy2. I will promptly ignore the fact that this is already in userspace to begin with. Also it's not vanity? Like, tarot cards are a real thing and not just something made up for this page in particular. 11:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete (2)
pretty much vanity. isn't comedic at all, and was also done by an user that's now banned forever. I think it'd be better for the Uncyclopedia server to just delete every single page in here. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Uncyclopedia is not Wikia (anymore). --DameFishonskatesCUN 19:35, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
@Gergdown: your article is about documenting deltarot on the wiki (and it's also a humorous one), so it's still technically within the scope of the wiki's project. my main concern is that there are hundred of these pages and all of them transclude those horrible A/something templates, and getting rid of these articles in userspace means I get less pages to edit and change them. if that wasn't the case, I'd leave them alone, tho. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:54, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: could i potentially... recreate it in my user space to have a much less laggy experience? it shouldn't be that hard.
@GlitchyZorua: honestly, the art for all artworks should be seperated from the artist. Winston Churchill was probably racist. Michael Jackson was a sexual abuser(allegedly). I shouldn't have mentioned Michael Jackson. Thomas Jefferson owned hundreds of slaves. Genghis Khan... uh... well it's controversial. Yet, all of these people are still hailed as heroes and saviours (to many). so, you should probably separate the art from the artist. or don't—that's completely fine with me. 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 03:49, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
wait, WHAT???? you sent a message at 03:48 UTC and i sent my message at 03:49 UTC??? WHAT??? what in the odds... lol. 🍂 gergdown 🍂 ☀️ 03:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
DaniPine3 drew The Fool, proceeds to lose the tarot tournament (also known as this VFD nomination). 01:06, 29 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete. Just pointless. Entire article is about a joke that doesn't exist anymore, rewriting would essentially make a new article. Buv (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Wet pussy. yeah, I agree. this article ain't really funny to begin with. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 16:20, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Delete. eh, bad formatting, and a bit random. 
Huffed. 
BRRRRRT! Only takes half a second to see how crufty it is. 
Nom. too old for QVFD and not a redirect, but useless nonetheless. 
Invalid link
Keep. The fact that the actual material has nothing to do with the title is kind of funny due to sheer craziness. 
It's so bad it's scary. Classic 
Mokkááwŝen is displeased.
NOM NOM NOM as NOM NOM NOM! Brand-new IP cruft, except this time it's too long for QVFD. 
WTF? You know what? I'm changing my mind, let it stay. 
Comment. Hyperborea is a thing that Neo-Nazis talk about a lot, so the triple parentheses in the article do make sense and are related to the subject. Not voting yet, since I haven't actually looked at the article. 
Obliterate. 
Strong keep. Are you kidding me? Why on earth would you want to delete this article? Heck, this article got featured and ended up in the Top 10! 
Re
Don't huff Maybe userfy it until 
Yuk. 
For. its so peak... 
wut? 
Lock. This has, to me, always been the "Coffi wanted his own personal ASBOxAAT version". And the gimmick isn't even unique, it's just ASBOSAAT but with mandatory line breaks. 
KUNSir 
I guess. 
Fuck off.
Wet pussy. yeah, I agree. this article ain't really funny to begin with. 🎄🎄🎄
