User talk:MrX

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I smoke cigars, therefore your argument is invalid.
x:talk archive


Hi, can you create 2021 to redirect to Now(now that it is 2021, in every timezone)? I can't due to my sanction, which is a mainspace ban from everything except geography/hurricanes/interstates. --Gale5050 complain about me! 20:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

K, good idea. MrX blow me 04:32, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Please contribute to Baked Potato[edit]

Trying to get a new featured article to end the 12 nights of potato. It is Baked Potato. Please contribute in whatever way you like (be bold, add new sections, change text, add images). Would like to get it featured as rapidly as possible. ShabiDOO 23:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey Shabidoo, I'll take a look shortly and see if I have any ideas to contribute. It's pretty good so far. MrX blow me 04:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
So I made a few semi-funny changes. I’ll try to take another look soon and maybe add some more. MrX blow me 05:07, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
No they were great changes. Thanks a lot for helping us whip out a featured article in two days! ShabiDOO 12:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


Congratulations you've made it into the hall of shame! I've created an entry for you here. With three of your own features and two collabs you have 4 featured articles. All you need to do now is feature 37 more articles are you'll be in the top 10. You can do it! ShabiDOO 12:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! My contribution to Baked Potato was kinda small but I appreciate everything! MrX blow me 15:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Random character[edit]

If you weren't aware, the reason the random character wasn't working was because you had to purge the page to get a new character. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

@JJPMaster: Ah of course, thanks! Wait, how do I purge a page? MrX blow me 22:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
MrX, The way I do it is by using a gadget that you can enable by going to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and checking "Add a clock in the personal toolbar that displays the current time in UTC. Also provides a link to purge the current page." and clicking said clock. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 22:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks again! MrX blow me 22:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


😠😠😠 – Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)

cool JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 18:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Lol indeed. Maybe I recently reverted their edit or something. MrX blow me 19:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
MrX, well, this was their first and only edit, so... JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
True, though maybe their ip changes or maybe they sometimes use an account or who knows? MrX blow me 04:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
CU time? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 17:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
No, not even close. This really doesn't matter lol. MrX blow me 17:04, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


I left a comment at UN: BP. Might be worth replying to. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 02:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I would have replied here (well, I guess I am, but my reply would've been slightly different), because the rules on BP say not to babble, since it's not a discussion page. That's why I didn't post any diffs there. Again, read. I see Kev left you a warning. I hope that will work, and I hope you get the message. Take care. MrX blow me 03:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail[edit]

Hey @Kev: thanks for helping out with all this. One quick thing, you are joking about the edit summaries, right? You do realize that Gale5050 was just looking for a petty reason to criticize me, right? For example, at the time I'm writing this, if you click on my contributions and look at my past 50 edits, you'll see I used an edit summary in 11 of them, Gale5050 has 12.
I'm sorry you feel I'm being too harsh with Gale5050. Just in case you're not aware (I know you do an excellent, thorough job with everything here, but just in case), Gale5050 has been a problem that Zombiebaron and I (among others) have been dealing with since last August, when on his second day here he started trying to clean things up and remove cussing from a variety of pages, including at least one Uncyc policy/information page and my own user page. If you look through his talk page history, you'll see that on many occasions I was very kind and encouraging with Gale5050. My problem with him isn't just his bad reverts and VFDs, but mainly the way he deals with other people here. As you can see from our recent discussion on his talk page, I pointed out a clear and undeniable mistake he made. Rather than simply acknowledge the mistake, he refused to listen (again) and tried to bring up irrelevant stuff (again). You've said that Gale5050 seems to be here with good intentions. I respectfully disagree. I believe Gale5050 is here because of his obsession with Wikipedia, and he views Uncyclopedia as a Wikipedia-lite to use until he gets back on Wikipedia one way or another. I do not believe he cares about us, which is why the last time he was able to return to editing Wikipedia, he changed his user page to say "I am basically retired. I will rarely dip in. I have better things to do."
As for the recent sanctions and warning, well, Gale5050 was just warned 3 days ago, and he started violating his sanctions less than 24 hours after acknowledging them the first time last September, so I remain doubtful (but hopeful) that this will be effective. Above all else, I respect your decision and thank you again for all your help.
You have a good day too, and may Sophia bless you as well, my friend. MrX blow me 23:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
I hope it works too. I usually always try to go as light as possible, unless absolutely necessary. That's why I specifically chose to prevent Gale from being able to perform "negative" actions (e.g. deletion, rollback) minus within a few specific circumstances; it's to force 'em to do more "positive" actions (e.g. writing new articles). If it doesn't work, please let me know on my talk page and I'll try my best to resolve everything. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  11:55pm  January 18, 2021
Who is Sophia anyway? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Sophia is a goddess who sometimes graces us on Earth as Sophia Loren, the most underrated actress ever. Praise Sophia is the fifth and by far the most important of Uncyc's five pliers. MrX blow me 00:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Ah, ok. I read wp: wp: 5P but forgot to read UN: 5P. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speaking of edit summaries, your revert on Albania did not use any. When it would have been required. Also, you didn't follow up your revert with a warning, I have now done it. Keep in mind uw-vandalism1 is different format then the other templates. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:55, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

No, Gale5050, you're wrong again. That kind of revert does not require an edit summary, because it's obvious what I was doing. As for following up the revert with a warning, I pretty much never do that when the editor is an IP with only one edit, because it's usually a waste of time. Please stop telling other people they've made mistakes when they haven't, it's very disruptive. MrX blow me 15:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
The first was a test edit, no harm in saying "Rv test edit", and relating to the warnings, it's not pointless because while IPs change, some are static. It's worth spending 10 minutes to see if its static or dynamic, and you'll evantually become a pro at it ;). --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Gale5050, you're missing the point, again. Stop telling me I've made a mistake when I haven't. Stop telling me that edit summaries are required in situations where they aren't. You were using edit summaries much less frequently before January 18. It's obvious to everyone that your complaints about edit summaries are just petty bullshit in retaliation to me for bringing your disruption to the admins. MrX blow me 20:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

New message[edit]

understood (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail (again!)[edit]

Hi MrX! I've just applied a set of broad sanctions on Gale5050. See User talk:Kev/Gale5050 sanctions for details. If you see any further noncompliance, please tell me; I have included a special clause stating that if a non-admin user (such as you) brings any issue concerning Gale5050 to me, block lengths are doubled. I'm also sorry if I disappointed you by not blocking the aforementioned user for a more extended amount of time; however, I hope the block-report clause will make up for it, if necessary. Quoting an admin speaking in #admin-chat, "$10 bucks says Gale5050 will get banned forever within the next 3 months". Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  01:30am  January 25, 2021

Hey Kev, no I’m not disappointed, rather pleased that the new restrictions include long overdue specifications for bans. Thanks again. MrX blow me 01:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Very big thanks for that too! ShabiDOO 12:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

what's wrong?[edit]

Why does it appear that you have abandoned CTAM? JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 23:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Lol wow that was fast. It's just now that it's almost done, does my life still have meaning? Lol MrX blow me 23:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Kind of like Professor Farnsworth (if you're familiar with Futurama) in that episode where he discovers something that explains all of science's questions ever, and then he gets depressed cuz there are no more questions to be answered, no more science to be done, yes I'm being a little overdramatic lol. MrX blow me 00:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail![edit]

Hey Kev, ok, I guess. I kinda disagree that we need to be so sensitive, but I was thinking about changing that line anyway, so I guess it all worked out. I probably will do something about the 18/21 thing though. Yeah, there’s still a few things 18 year-olds can’t legally do here, so I might leave it in or revise it. Cheers. MrX blow me 01:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


We nee'd to regulate the u'se of apostr'phe's. For more information', see my article Apostrophe. --Jabberwock (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm just advertising my article. I prepare to put it onto VFH when its size reaches 5000 bytes.
@Jabberwock: haha k, I think it's pretty good so far. I'll take a closer look later today and see if I have anything to add. Cheers. MrX blow me 14:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
@Jabberwock: hey, I just finally got a chance to take a closer look at Apostrophe. Great stuff! I added a few things. Hope you like them. Of course, feel free to change and/or remove any of them. Cheers. MrX blow me 21:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Monkey Competition 2021[edit]


Hey its HAPPY MONKEY TIME 2021 (Feb 21-28). Your favourite writing competition where we write articles on one another's suggested topics. Go ahead and sign up because the more users we have competiting the more ridonculously fun it is. If you don't wanna write you can sign up to judge! Sing up here. Remember it's not about writing a sure fire VFH article, but pushing the limits of your originality and creativity and spitting out an article on a topic you had never thought about writing before. Also...Shabidoo will love you forever and owe you like a zillion favours for it. He will literally do anything to please you if it means you participate. Happy Monkey Farts!!! ShabiDOO 15:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Looking forward to it!! MrX blow me 15:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Have you seen this template?[edit]

Hey MrX, I have a faint memory of you writing (or at least contributing) to an article that had a template I'd like to use for an article. It was something along the lines of "If this article failed to offend you, please change it so it does." Do you know what template this is? ---WohMi, the best damn duelist on this website (talk) 13:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey @WohMi: you're probably referring to this template, {{Offensive}}, which Kev added to my article on Female genital mutilation before he nominated it for VFH, both of which I appreciated. I always have fun here, but to be honest, writing that article and doing the research for it was a little soul-crushing. Seriously, FGM is a way bigger problem than I realized. Anyway, hope this helps, go be offensive! MrX blow me 15:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Funny template[edit]

I've made a useless template. It's Template:Useless. You may like to put it onto your userpage. For the effect, see my userpage. --Jabberwock (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Haha nice! Yeah I think I will add it. MrX blow me 04:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Derp de derp de derpity derp derp de derp de derp.
ShabiDOO 11:48, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Messing up Uncyclopedia[edit]

Please vote against HowTo:Mess up Uncyclopedia on VFH. But make sure you read it before you vote. --Jabberwock (talk) 06:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

LOL @Jabberwock: I already get the joke, love it! I'll take a closer look soon. Might be tonight (10:49 pm my local as I type this), might Monday, ah who am I kidding, almost for sure tonight! MrX blow me 06:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok, um, maybe not. I finally looked at it, but didn't click anything. Lol. Should I be worried? lol MrX blow me 08:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
No, the way to break Uncyclopedia is actually using CTAM. Btw, there are other VFH's that could use your vote. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
But leaving a comment is better then leaving none. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I finally did click through everything. It's funny, and I like it, but I don't know if I'll vote for it to be featured. As for the others at VFH, if I didn't vote for it, it's because I don't have a strong opinion on it one way or the other, and if I didn't leave a comment, it's because I don't have anything useful to add. MrX blow me 19:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

My new template[edit]

Hey, wanna try out my new Timezone template? After a while of fixing everything (the time module was being weird), I've finally made it work. It displays your timezone as well as the current time there, so people will know when to find you and when you are asleep (or binge-watching Youtube at 1am). ~ HipponiasCUN Talk - Contribs - Articles  19:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey thanks Hipponias! Yeah, I'll check it out. Does it also automatically update with daylight saving time (god I hope we get rid of it soon)? MrX blow me 19:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
No, it calculates the time by the timezone increment (my experiment to have it work out the offset by timezone name failed miserably), so you'll have to manually adjust daylight saving time. The template is based on the Mediawiki time module, which isn't designed to calculate timezones, so yeah you'll have to do it by yourself. By the way, I've also made a userbox version of the template. ~ HipponiasCUN Talk - Contribs - Articles  19:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
OMG so much work! Lol, just another reason to do away with daylight saving time. Ok sweet, I'll check out the userbox too. Thanks again. MrX blow me 19:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
And yes, I am on PST, I looked at how it was written on your user page, and I assumed I had to type GMT to show that I'm -8 from that, then I only looked at the time and made sure that the possibility that I've been drinking vodka is always there. Thanks again. MrX blow me 19:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

My 2020Top10 logo design[edit]

Look at my artwork!

The joke is that dix is French for ten and sounds like "dicks" in English. I think the letter O should wear a face mask with a dick protruding from it. See the forum. --Jabberwock (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

OMG I love it!!!! MrX blow me 13:45, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Monkey Competition Topic[edit]


Hey. Ready to dig deep into your creative juices? Your topic for the Happy Monkey Competition is:
2020 US Presidential Election Controversies.
Please write an article on this topic in your userspace/sandbox (if you don't know how to do so just reply here and I'll help you set it up). You have one week starting right now to complete an article. It can be anything (you can write a standard article, something off the wall, a news piece, an unbook...whatever you like). Remember that you are being judged quite strictly and equally in points by three categories: Originality, creativity (with the topic) and humour. Being original is as important as being funny (you can reference other works if you like...just do it in an original way). So go outside of your comfort box, be bold and write something you've never written before. Most importantly have fun. Happy monkey wishes you luck and pisses all over your face. ShabiDOO 21:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Shabidoo! Looking forward to it! Don’t be concerned/surprised if you don’t see me start something for a few days. The next few days at work are gonna suuuuuck donkey balls for me. But I’ll be thinking and formulating an idea! MrX blow me 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
No problemerino. You have until Sunday. Hope you can finish an article :) ShabiDOO 00:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Yeah I’ll definitely be able to finish by then. I’ve got a few good ideas, including an UnNews article I was gonna do but will now roll into this instead. MrX blow me 02:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[edit]

Do you play I love that game because it has three main challenges. The first is, of course, zombies. But they are not too bad.

On Day 10 or so, the base upgrades to level 4. Zombies haven't evolved at all. On Day 20, the base upgrades to level 7. Zombies evolved a little, but are still weak. Then upgrades slow down. On Day 50, the base is level 10, and zombies are not too strong to handle. You think, the game is so easy! You're wrong. Soon you'll have to face a new challenge: boredom.

On Day 200, you conquer the whole map. Then the monotony begins. On Day 205, it is totally monotonous. Nights are almost identical to each other. On Day 210, things get interesting again, not because of the boss that appears, but because of another challenge: finding words to describe your boredom.

So you searched Uncyclopedia and found this text: "On Day 10 or so, the base upgrades to level 4. On Day 20, the base upgrades to level 7, and zombies are still weak. Then upgrades slow down. On Day 50, the base is level 10, and zombies are not too strong to handle. You think, the game is so easy! You're wrong. Soon you'll have to face a new challenge: boredom."

You copied it and sent it to the game chat. Then other players agreed. Then an ad pops out. You think, the ad is more interesting than the game itself! You clicked the ad and bought whatever in it. You went back to the game and saw the message: "GAME OVER".

--Jabberwock (talk) 05:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Um, what? Lol. I've never heard of the game, but I'll check it out! Might not have time this week. MrX blow me 05:37, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Go to and don't play I think yorg3 is not funny at all. Also, what I described is in regular mode. Easy mode is similar. In hard mode, however, few people can survive 100 days. I recommend beginners to play regular mode. And you have to manually upgrade the base, it isn't automatic. --Jabberwock (talk) 08:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok, thanks, I'll probably give it a shot next week, maybe this weekend. MrX blow me 14:44, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

New set of sanctions applicable to User:Gale5050[edit]

Greetings MrX,

Please take the time to read the new set of sanctions scheduled to be imposed upon Gale5050 on March 1st, and let me know if you believe that they are too loose, too strict, or just fine.

Have a good day! Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  02:31pm  February 27, 2021

Hey @Kev: yeah those look good. Thanks for spending a lot of time and effort on this. Cheers. MrX blow me 14:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Huggle message[edit]

Hi _MrX!

Uncyclopedia has been on a growth spurt as of recently, and as such, we are introducing a brand new feature to the table tonight: Huggle! Yes, the same tool you know and love from Wikipedia has made its way into the Uncyclomedia Foundation's impenetratable walls.

Huggle makes it easy to revert vandalism, leave messages to users and basically speedily process edits here on Uncyclopedia. You may also use it to block users and do other things, if you are a sysop!

To use Huggle, you must be both extended-confirmed (having 500 edits and 30 days' existence), and you must also have rollback rights. If you are an admin who does not have either of these rights, feel free to grant them to yourself. Some features, such as page protection and user blocking, are locked behind the walls of adminship.

If you wish to install Huggle, feel free to do so now! For assistance, please contact either JJPMaster or Kev, who are jointly responsible for this implementation of Huggle.

Have a wonderful day, and may Sophia bless you, Charlie the bot (talk) 01:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Charlie/Kev! I will probably check it out in the near future. MrX blow me 03:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The Happy Monkey Competition is ending soon[edit]

Hi MrX!

The Happy Monkey Competition 2021 ends in less than 22 hours! Please make sure that you article is sufficiently good in quality by the time this time limit elapses, since your article will be judged, regardless of quality, at the aforementioned time.

Remember that you will be judged on:

  • Originality
  • Humour
  • Creativity, with the topic

Good luck! May Sophia be with you, Charlie the bot (talk) 02:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder, I’ll be getting back to it later tonight. MrX blow me 03:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

HMC 2021 Results[edit]


Hey MrX First thanks for participating in the Happy Monkey 2021 Competition. Was a lot of fun this year. SOOOOOOOOOOOOO CLOSE TO PLACING!!! Only two points away. Was tough to judge!

You article 2020 United States presidential election controversies scored 80/120 points.

You can see the full scores and feed back for your article here.

Full competition scores and results are here.

Consider telling the winners how shitty their articles were and how you totally should have won!

Thanks again and happy monkey lovingly farts all over your article. ShabiDOO 10:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey thanks Shabidoo! I really appreciate you putting this together, a lot of fun indeed! At some point, maybe later today but probably tomorrow, I'll move the article to main space and leave some notes on the talk page. I really like the feedback I got, I plan on putting a lot of those ideas into the article, and I welcome you and anyone who wants to help beef it up. Thanks again! MrX blow me 21:37, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

George Floyd[edit]

hey, so I saw there was no george floyd article, I thought I could show together somethings from wp, and add some stuff about george floyd gaming, but I wanted to check if it is okay to create a controversial article like that – Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedia Be Sucking (talk • contribs)

Hey @Wikipedia Be Sucking: yes, it is very okay to create controversial articles. In fact, we have a contest kinda devoted to it every now and then. While we are a comedy website, we do try to not be too horrible, especially with something like that, but you can definitely create an article about George Floyd. If it is deemed overly racist, it might get deleted, but as long as it's funny without being totally bigoted, it should be fine. You might wanna check out Black Lives Matter if you haven't already. Let me know if you have any questions or would like any help with the article. Cheers. MrX blow me 21:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
There's absolutely no reason we shouldn't have a Floyd article. Just make sure it is helarious and be careful how you write it. Almost always with articles related to a marginalised group, you should always make it sympathetic to the marginalised group or point out the injustice of how they are treated even if the narrative seems shocking or racist. South Park does this really well quite a lot, where it seems like it's a racist or sexist trashing on the surface but in reality (sometimes without realising it) it's demonstrating the unfairness or stupidity of racism or sexism. ShabiDOO 22:45, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Yeah I would definitely point out how ridiculous and avoidable his death was, as well as how I don’t think the cops normally get called when someone tries to use a counterfeit bill at a convenience store. Like, wouldn’t they give him the benefit of the doubt? Maybe he didn’t know? Not saying he didn’t do that intentionally, but it seems like something not worth calling the cops over in my opinion. MrX blow me 22:52, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy Monkey Competition articles[edit]

Hi MrX! I just wanted to remind you all that you may now freely move the articles you have written for the Happy Monkey Competition '21 into mainspace, and subsequenty, say, throw 'em into VFH or something. Everything's now in your control!

Congratulations to Scofield, Cat and Hipponias for scoring the most points this year! The articles this year were of very high quality; I sure do hope that you can replicate such impressive performance once Poo Lit Surprise comes along! Honorable mention goes to WohMi, who managed to score the most points per word used: 5.8 points per word!

Have a great day, and may Sophia bless you! Charlie the bot (talk) 00:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks CHARLIE! You Computerized Humanoid Animatronic Robot Lovifying Internet Encyclopedias you. MrX blow me 16:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


hello, sorry its been awhile, I just wanted to tell you that I am back! Wikipedia Be Sucking (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Sweet! And no worries, we all are busy, it's kewl. MrX blow me 15:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 :), also about the constitution article, I thought it looked like an article from that unc parody website, sorry if it was unfunny Wikipedia Be Sucking (talk)!
also did you read my UN news article??? Wikipedia Be Sucking (talk) 16:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey yeah the edit on the constitution article was kinda funny but it also removed a bunch of stuff. Shortness can be great for comedy, but in my opinion the stuff there should stay. If you want to try to add some of your stuff, that might work. And yea I just saw your UnNews article, great way to parody our recent holiday! MrX blow me 16:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thanks :))


hey, sorry if this is self promo, I just wanted to see if you would like tovote, i am open to criticism, because it helps me to create better articles Wikipedia Be Sucking (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey! So, as it stands, the article is a little shorter than I'd like for a VFH. This article definitely has the potential to be featured, but it needs some work. I'd recommend expanding it first, and I'd also recommend toning down at least one of the femdem quotes (but this isn't necessarily a must-do). Don't worry, I'm not a fan of Hillary or Nancy. While going-off-the-rails anger is funny, being closer to the truth is often funnier. So reworking those quotes to make it sound like something they "might" say in an actual press conference is usually funnier. It could also be really funny to have one of those quotes stay the same tho. Maybe leave Nancy's quote as is and then have Hillary says something like "Ok, settle down Nancy, good girl, yes that's a very good girl..." or maybe just have her reiterate the same thing without caps. There's a lot of different ways you could go with this.
So the first thing I would do is add some more content to the article. I'll try to keep an eye on it and see if I have any specific suggestions. Feel free to hit me up with any questions. Cheers. MrX blow me 17:50, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Oh, and also, this type of "self promo" isn't necessarily a bad thing. I've nominated several of my own articles for VFH. MrX blow me 17:57, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thanksFUCK WIKIPEDIA! (talk) 18:24, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
@Wikipedia Be Sucking: Hey! So you've done a good job improving the article, but I'd say it still needs more work before getting featured. It's still a little on the short side. Also, there are formatting issues that are kind of related to the short length. There are lots of big white gaps between the quotes and images. Adding some more content will help with that. Another issue is that the whole humor and concept of the article are a little scattered and random. Going from a parody/satire on Women's Day to Wikipedia nuking the world isn't impossible, and it certainly can be funny in and of itself, but that big of a leap isn't the type of thing that usually gets featured. I would consider trying to rein this puppy in a bit and give it a more clear direction if you want it to get featured, but you don't exactly have to do that if you think it's funny as is. A lot of my articles don't have perfectly coherent concepts, and that's okay. But they're also not feature, and that's okay too. I hope this helps, I do find the article funny, and I'll keep checking on it to see any changes. As usual, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers. MrX blow me 19:56, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
yeah, I will try to fix it up tomorrow, also what do you recon about this?! I DIDN'T GET ACCEPTED! FUCK THEM, FUCK EVERYONE!!! FUCK HARVARD!!!! (talk) 19:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
It looks like it's on par with the other "Mr-ex777 having sex etc..." "articles". I wasn't around when the others were created tho, so I can't comment on the artists' true inspiration for their breathtaking work lol, but yours looks comparatively solid to me. MrX blow me 19:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thanks, also look at this lol WTF! I DIDN'T GET ACCEPTED! FUCK THEM, FUCK EVERYONE!!! FUCK HARVARD!!!! (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Haha nice. MrX blow me 19:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
This cycle of articles culminated with a colab I did with Cat the Colourful called Mr-ex777 raped by Magic Ponies which I think was an absolute masterpiece. How it was not a Top 10 article of that year I will never understand ;) ShabiDOO 21:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Brilliant. MrX blow me 22:00, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

image help[edit]

hello, my image is not working on this article, do you know what the problem may be WTF! I DIDN'T GET ACCEPTED! FUCK THEM, FUCK EVERYONE!!! FUCK HARVARD!!!! (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I would also like to know how to get an archive bot WTF! I DIDN'T GET ACCEPTED! FUCK THEM, FUCK EVERYONE!!! FUCK HARVARD!!!! 14:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
@Wikipedia Be Sucking: Hey, it looks like the problem was that you didn't type File: before the file name. Also, putting a space between the .png and the |thumb... may have been a problem too. As for an "archive bot", do you mean a bot to archive your talk page? Cuz I don't think we have any here. I know Wikipedia does, but I'm pretty sure we don't. I just archived my talk page manually by creating a page titled User talk:MrX/archive2020 (I chose years cuz it worked nicely, but you can number/name your archives whatever you like) and then copying and pasting everything. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers. MrX blow me 14:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thanks WTF! I DIDN'T GET ACCEPTED! FUCK THEM, FUCK EVERYONE!!! FUCK HARVARD!!!! (talk) 15:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Fo sho. MrX blow me 15:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

In all seriousness (copypasted from Shabidoo's talk page)[edit]

Hi MrX,

First of all, I must apologize for any failure on my end to correctly moderate everything that is going on between Gale5050 and other editors on the site (including you and Shabidoo). I have been particularly lenient towards Gale in the hopes that he will improve, but I do not know how to apply sanctions in a way that would improve his behavior (trust me, I've tried!). Excessively punitive punishment may result in worse behavior later on, and overly lenient punishment, which is the way I have attempted to proceed so far, seems to not be helping either. I'm still trying to find a good balance, and as such, owing to the severity of what happened earlier today, which I have failed to grasp when adding the sanctions earlier today, I will undo many of the actions against Gale I have taken today (including the interaction ban, which I hastily accepted owing to JJPMaster's suggestion, and will impose a 48-hour part. block (nothing but userspace), per sanctions, in order to aid Gale in no longer performing non-productive, often excessively overreaching edits as has been the case on several occasions.

Please let me know if you have any further comments to add. Once again, my apologies for making Uncyclopedia not as "good" as it should be. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  12:24am  March 18, 2021

Hey Kev, thanks, and no need to apologize or be so hard on yourself. This is a tough situation indeed. Thanks for all the work you do helping out every area of this site. May Sophia bless you. MrX blow me 01:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Universal Top 10 Election[edit]

You are welcome to vote in Uncyclopedia:Universal Top 10 Election (or erection). --Jabberwock (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey Jabberwock, looks pretty cool! I left a question on the project talk page. I’ll vote some time this weekend, most likely after adding a few articles. Cheers. MrX blow me 02:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


I need the article to be more visible. stop un redirecting my redirect. KommanderC (talk) 16:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

K, you actually need to stop acting like your article is so important, or you might be blocked. MrX blow me 16:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

HE 8765-9764[edit]

HE 8765-9764 is a Metal-Poor Stars in Constellation Virgo – Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennon4788 (talk • contribs)

K, we have no use for it here. MrX blow me 05:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Recent Shootings[edit]

I think we should create a memorial of some sort to honor the dead people from the shootings, and place it in the news, whattya say? I feel we shouldn't satirize, due to it being such a sensitive event, though we should satirize the shooters. WTF! I DIDN'T GET ACCEPTED! FUCK THEM, FUCK EVERYONE!!! FUCK HARVARD!!!! (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey! So to my knowledge we don't have any sorts of memorials or things like that (i.e. things that are only memorials with no comedy). It could potentially kinda start a slippery slope. Once we have a memorial for one thing, we'll have to have more and more. However, satirizing the shooters is a great idea. And if you wanna see a good example of a way to honor the dead and write something funny, take a look at one of the many great pieces of journalistic excellence by the illustrious PF4Eva: UnNews:UnNews remembers Eddie Van Halen. Here you can see a "serious zone" and a "yahoo serious zone". Hope this helps, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers. MrX blow me 14:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Improvements to China[edit]

Hi MrX, do you want to help make some improvements to China? I'm trying to get it to feature level (it has failed twice before) but it needs serious work. Feel free to add back the sections I removed and/or revert me. ~ HipponiasCUN Talk - Contribs - Articles  17:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Definitely! I might have some time to take a look at it this weekend, definitely within a week. MrX blow me 18:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey @Hipponias: I've started to make some small improvements to the article. I'm gonna start a little convo on the talk page there so others can join in. See you there. MrX blow me 22:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Re-feature queue/Nominate[edit]

I just wanted to make you aware of it. And also since your in the Hall of Shame, you can put one article on. Oh, and in addition, just a question - do you think I-180 should be userfied to WohMi's userspace, as a comprimise per VFD? That may be a good idea. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 16:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. If WohMi wants to put it in his userspace that's fine. MrX blow me 18:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your FA vote was appreciated...[edit]

Fo sho, well done! MrX blow me 05:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Random question time[edit]

Hi MrX,

If you could wipe one article out of existence from Uncyclopedia, unilaterally, which one would it be?

That is all, take care for now. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  10:45pm  April 1, 2021

I love random questions! But can I get a little clarification? Like any article? Or one currently on VFD? MrX blow me 22:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
ANY article, regardless of namespace, minus the Main Page. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  10:50pm  April 1, 2021
Filial Piety ShabiDOO 22:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia talk:Check user JJPMaster 22:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
I actually kinda like those! But, k, I don't really have a strong dislike for any one particular article. I mean there's a lot written by Gale5050 that need a lot of work, but none of them stick out as "must huff", in fact if they were combined from several to a few they might even be pretty good. I guess if I had to pick one, right now, I'd go for one that I put on VFD, Mt. Lebanon, because even with work, the subject has almost nothing funny to work with, I can't imagine it ever being something funny to read. Did you have one in mind? MrX blow me 23:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Seems like a fine choice. It's tough to tell apart the shittiest of articles from the shitty articles. I'd probably go ahead and huff Microsoft Windows out of sheer hatred for the aforementioned operating system. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  11:04pm  April 1, 2021
Which OS do you use? I use windows but I’m no expert. Maybe dump your thoughts and feelings into the article and you can make it hilarious? MrX blow me 23:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

I do believe that Kev uses Debian GNU/Linux. I use Windows, but don't want to. JJPMaster 23:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Hmm, interesting, something to think about next time I get a new computer. MrX blow me 23:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Butting into this conversation: I would wipe out UnPoetia:My Pseudopenis. In fact, after reading it over for the purpose of this joke, I'm putting it up for VFD.WohMi, the Dueling King (talk)

That one has some redeeming value, but might still need to get huffed. I will try to complete an in depth literary analysis of the poem and vote later tonight. MrX blow me 23:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Good god, man. I'll start booking your therapist appointment. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Lol MrX blow me 23:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
I think that the help company that controls the therapists is currently dealing with a larger issue right now, and as such, the appointment may need to be postponed. JJPMaster 23:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
But they can still write my prescriptions, right? MrX blow me 23:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
I can't vote, used up my 3. Personally, I'm neutral lean (tilt) against just cause Mt.Lebanon could be worked on sufficiently. However, he is somewhat reasonable, I just don't see a huge need for him to have the rights. --Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 00:10, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok as promised, I did a thoroughly in depth literary analysis of the poem and consulted with several other Ivy League English professors, and we concluded that it is only slightly better than The Old Man and the Sea, meaning it's not up to our standards. Ok for real, I hadn't even read it earlier, and The Old Man and the Sea sucks donkey balls. I think we should userfy it tho. Will leave a message on VFD. MrX blow me 03:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

I think even userspacification is a bit much, but ok. For the UnPoetia.--Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 13:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Troll account[edit]

This user seems to be a troll account specialized in anti-Croatian edits. Such as this . How does one delete this? (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Well, that editor does have some annoying edits and edit summaries, but I actually thought those edits on Croatia weren't too bad. If you want something deleted, you can nominate it at UN:VFD. Let me know if you have any other questions. Cheers. MrX blow me 02:47, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Weren’t too bad? As in you deem them relevant or randomness comedic? Perhaps to those not familiar or not aware of context of this part of the globe I suppose. Often Serbian internet users push this idea of Croatians being german nazi sycophants despite all other countries that had parts collaborate during WWII not having such content in their pages. Not even Japan. :P Both countries have pretty much non existent relations as apposed to say France and Croatia. So that guy who remived France as a vacation spot is weird. These aren’t intended to be satire. They made no sense. Just nationalist hate edits really not intended as comedy. You won’t find the same editors making nazi loving jokes on Serbian articles despite the infamous Chetniks... It’s common Balkan drama, trying to demonize the other side basically. Used to be way worse on here while back. Would always ruin the fun. :(
Thanks for the tip on images. However I am unable to nominate articles it seems. Would you be able to post it? Cheers (talk) 03:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
A. Yes, randomness can be comedic. B. Yes, they were kinda relevant. I don't want to get into too much of a historical debate here, but as I understand it, Croatia fought for the Axis powers in World War II. And I think the Chetniks were anti-Axis. But that's not entirely relevant here. We're writing comedy. Stuff that is random/incorrect can be funny. Also, while we do try to not be too offensive, any comedy will usually offend someone. But in any case, you reverted those edits, and they haven't been put back in, so I guess problem solved. I won't nominate the image on VFD, because I don't see an issue with it. Why don't you just create an account? In 4 days, you can nominate it yourself and enjoy other benefits too. Let me know if you have any more questions. Cheers. MrX blow me 04:07, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I want to state first that I am cool with you having different opinions on these things. And that if you read my entire response and walk away with a reality check, than this was all worth writing if only to teach one person. Just want to bring some missing critical info. Also I appreciate your time. But wow no winder you saw nothing wring with these edits. God damn that’s alarming. Going after people victimized by Nazis as Generally being Nazis is below even this website’s standards. Jokes are funny when based on some sort of reality. You won’t see “Hungarian, Serbian, Slovenian etc Suburbs” with that image despite eager collaborators of each nation. That double standard w should be seen as wrong. It normalizes misconceptions. Despite collaboration Bosnia, Serbia, Slovenia aren’t generalized as Nazi entities despite active Axis collaborators fighting for the Axis from those territories. Invading a nation and installing a brutal pro Nazi regime isn’t conprable to state that chose to do so or had huge support amkng the population. Western scholars literary say that due to such poor popularity, without German bayonets, the Ustashe would never make it or keep power. Yeah, though easy to confuse, these are realities.
You can’t state what are evident false statements ignoring the rest of Croatian history and expect to walk away from “debate”. There is jo debate. Your summary was wring and grossly misleading. Whether you agree is as relevant as 2+2= 5. You may continue to think it but doesn’t make it so. Croatia as today didn’t even exist. And if you want to acknowledge the German puppet state of Independent state of Croatia... You have to acknowledge the even more popular Socialist Republic of Croatia, an anti-Fascist state that also existed over the same area. Why ignore that unless you want to?.... Denial of parts of WWII history isn’t something you can state and expect to walk away from. Sorry. Croats were over represented in the antifascist Partisan army in relation to population size. Most drafted by force under the Ustashe, the Croatian collaborators, savotaging Ustashe and Nazi military actions. Per population relatively speaking, The Jewish Holocaust Museum acknowledged a disproportionate number of Croatian Righteous among Nations for protecting Jewish civilians. It’s commonly said in Western literature that the majority of Criats were repulesed by the smaller pro Nazi Croat group installed by Hitler and Mussolini. Not really the same or at all comparable to w, Bulgaria, and so on. It’s misleading to say “Croatia fought for the Axis” because which Croatia? It’s why Ustashe or NDH is used instead. It would be like saying Serbia fought for the axis when nop, it was the collaborators installed in power that did. The majority of Serbs fought against it. Weird you didn’t paint them with a large brush... I go in more detail and the alternate history of the Chetniks which I don’t know where you read this other than a Serbian user or portal telling you such. Their objective is working. But thing is I go by neutral sources in order to know reality of the Balkan history as it is plagued with revision unfortunately impacting outsiders such as yourself. The very same groups that refuse to acknowledge the Bosnian Genocide. Parrot that and you will find yourself in an uncomfortable situation with a certain label.
Sorry I come across annoyed and shocked but what you said was really incorrect and insulting. Call be sensitive but I am no more sensitive than other ethnicities that had family killed for fighting the Nazis in WWII. And only parroted by those found-to have a bias against Croats. Not saying you do but only those types say the same thing you said. Might want to contemplate that.

You can skim or skip much of the history portion of my response and look up the topics yourself so as to ensure you are getting the kist neutral take you can. I have my biased takes like any other. (Both side of my family suffered under Nazi oppression and gave their lives for the Partisan cause)
You can use to see for yourself. The intros of each article give a decent synopsis. The jverwhelming majority were not pro Axis. They were occupied and had no say in the matter. You wouldn’t say Muslims are terrorists instead of Al Queuda or ISIS. Or Serbia carried out the Bosnian Genocide when it was really two lunatics and their followers that went nuts and pretended to represent their ethnic group. Most had no say in this. Maybe you can see the diuble standards unfold. Keep in kind in order to make people believe it was independent they called it “Independent State of Croatia”. Really it was a slave puppet state. It’s why historians don’t call it generally just “Croatia” as it connects country forms that aren’t so. Different again compared to other actually entire countries that fought for the A is. Croatia was not an Axis state as Socialist Republic of Croatia was also a Croatia. 🤦‍♂️
Don’t take this the wrong way. But I’m curious how you came to these viewpoints of Croatia as a “country fighting for Nazis” despite the majority of the nation rejected them and not having existed as a country even? Your comment is sorta in contrast with Western literature on it. I don’t mean this is a aggressive way. Just surprised and kinda concerned 😧 . Why mention “Croatia” instead of the organization that faught for the Axis, the Ustashe? I’d never say Serbia fought for them, I’d specify Nedic’s puppet regime so that all people are clear the the majority of people opposed the intruders. If we can differentiate Chetniks, we can do the same for orher grouops. However that’s just details really. ... I discuss later how Croatia didn’t even exist at the time. Just different groups claiming different overlapping borders. It’s why historians refer to it as a Croatian civil war. Nazi Croats and their German muscle power as they alkne had no real support to stay in oower without Daddy Hitler vs Anti Fascist Croats and their own government and Prime Minister. They don’t get wares frkm history. I would understand if this was a minority group but not when the w portion of Croatian population was pro Partisans. the first Partisan military uprising was jn Sisak Today’s Croatia by Croats. Again this is why it is really not relevant to put Pro Nazi or German Subordination edits. It is relevant on the Independent State of Croatia page kn here but Not the Croatia page. Two very different states. Hell even the Nurnburg trials called Croatian territory occupied at all times with no choice of their own and that modern Croatia is jot a successor state like Germany today is for Nazi Germany. Because Croatia didn’t have an official state until 1991...
That’s the huge issue now., Having buildings in form of a Swastika labeled “Croatian Suburbs” despite Croatians by majority fighting against the Nazis as opposed to those that fought for the Nazis, despite having the first Partisans anti fascist movement that was lead by a Croatian leader, Tito, seems totally undue to me. Hence why I undid them. Doesn’t seem due enough to be a relevant gag. unfortunate to see. It’s incredibly misleading and tricking the readers. Thats was the editor’s intent. Often comedy is the best way to push propaganda as cowards when caught will claim “just a joke dude”. Odd such jokes are present in even more relevant. Contires with more or less similar history aren’t defines strictly by the bad eggs. But for sime reason people have no issue when it comes tk Croatia. Nit sure if resentment if for a small irrelevant country lasting so long, present in Western sports or false feeling of compensation of the bad images their neighbors got in the 90s. A lot thanks to propaganda and information wars still goin on tk this day to sway public opinion of people pike yourself. Again you can fact check me and see rhat everything I said is true and I denied no facts. I’ve educated people before and showed the sources quickly changing their views on Croatian WWII history and shocked at the genocide also carried out by Chetniks being buried deep. Thankfully the Croatian government despite it’s problems with some rightwingers, acknowledge the Ustahse Croat crimes and apologized. Their neighbors however rehabilitated the Chetnik leader while was excecuted in the 40’s for aiding the Nazis and war crimes against Bosnians and Croatians. Hell many outsiders never even heard of the Chetniks or the Ustashe which is sad to see. Such evils must be remembered not weaponized or hidden. A recent serbian film called Dara of Jasenovac was panned by outside critics for misrepresenting Croatian collaboration and using history as a political nationalist weapon to demonize Croats jbstead of using government funds to better their own nation. These such films lead to people like yourself unknowingly going a long with it. I don’t blame you. If J wasn’t Croatian I also would care and easily just go with Croats Nazis, Serbs Good guys. As I wouldn’t care. Same as many who’s ancestors weren’t Armenia don’t care about the Armenian genocide much as it didn’t impact them. They aren’t Armenian. It’s a rewarding but emotionally tiring experience. As I hoped people would be diligent eniugh to verify what they THINK they know.
PLEASE NOTE, BRIEF HISTORY RUNDOWN. I WELCOME YOU VERIFYING YOURSELF:You might want to be more careful when summarizing the Chetnik as rehabilitaters attempt at rewriting them as simply anti-fascists ignoring the genocidal campaign waged against non-Serb civilians. Of course they pale in comparison to the Ustashe genocide of Serbs. Though guven more resouces by the Geramns they got to expand their sadistic ways as historians say if Chetniks got such infrastructure and military backing it would have been far mor deadly. Funny enough according to original Wikipedia: Croatia was occupied and Ustashe (Ethnic Croat Nazi collaborators) Terrorist group installed into power, lacking support from average citizens of the new rump state. There was Independent State of Croatia, the puppet state installed by Germany and Italy pretending to be real, And Socialist Republic of Croatia, the Communist anti fascist Croat state establish by Partisan forces. Basically a civil war over overlapping territories among Croats. (It gets really weird and complicated here) so Saying “Croatia fought for Axis” isn’t accurate and implies other things. Ustashe and Independent State of Croatia (NDH) did. Croatia was a territory in Yugoslavia before Axis invasion commenced. It is extremely misleading to depict Chetniks being really “anti-Fascist” as throughout the war they extensively collaborated with the Axis forces (even with Croatian Nazis) to fight off anti fascist Partisans (founded by Croats and lead by one, Tito (well he liked to claim he was, while born in Croatia his Mother was Slovene) as did the Serbian puppet government run by Nedic that worked with the Chetniks who wanted to restore Serbian Monarch rule. All of this is in the Wikipedia articles with quick search incase you worry I may be talking rubbish. I’ve been studying the regional history for many years. Unfortunately many like yourself get misleading or oversimplified half truth viewpoints thrown your way but all sides. Due to a vocal minority online dedicated to posting alternate takes... Again, seems odd even if given your historical views, only this country be getting such edits compared to other countries that actually existed and voluntarily collaborated at the time.... You have to admit it’s kinda specific and weird.
You are probably now either thinking “huh I didn’t know any of this!” Or “meh ignored, probably some revisionist”. Either way, please do look up the the Croatian and Serbian puppet regimes, look up the Ustashe, the Chetniks, Nedic, Pavelic, Tito, The Yugoslav Partisans, how populare each group were with each ethnicity group in the region etc. just quick peak the intros of the English articles (unless you really get into it and want to read further). As English Wikipedia is fairly balanced I’d say. Crotian and Serbian Wikipedia literally make for great Uncyclopedia sites lol!
Anyway sorry for the long response just wanted to present the rest of the context you maybe did not know. I hope you now better understand the history of this part of the world. If not and my comment had no effect, I feel good that I tried. 🤷🏼‍♂️ I won’t be responding further as I provided the facts. To those interested in facts instead of romanticism of biased fixation. I hope you simply weren’t fully in the know (I hope so) and went with what you thought was a correct simple summary. Nk Balkan historians disagree with your summary. I hope this may help you in future understanding :) If not, well, I hate to ask the motives. 😬 (talk) 04:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
You should create an account. Also Uncyclopedian is a parody. I think it's pretty obvious that the Croats weren't nazis. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
No kidding it’s a parody site. Doesn’t take away my point at all at the aggressive pushing for such edit over the years. Notice a how it is specifically one ethnic group that makes such edits about Croatia or Croats? Please spare me “it’s just a joke bro” as the is always the copout. Hell one time the entire Croatia page was deleted with a redirect to the Nazi puppet state form. Clearly not done for fun or comedy but out of contempt dude. I’m not an an idiot. I see what is going on. When I alerted and admin they were surprised and restored the page. Jokes are based in some extent of truth. You wouldn’t go the England page and make pro Nazi joke edits. It wouldn’t match the theme. I’m not an idiot lol. Also Mr X literally went by the logic of them being Nazis who as a country that didn’t even exist at the time “fought for the Axis”. Almost every European country had collaborators of various degrees. So weird these list of same “jokes” appear. Especially when the accounts or IPs are evidently Serbian trolls. Yeah not really jokes, they actually mean it and think it helps change historical accounts. Comedy is the best way to distance yourself when caught. I see it again and again. But heavens forbid one makes such hokes on certain other country pages 😂 . Would be deleted instantly. There is comedy and then there is subtle pushes for jncorrect bases of a joke. Like if I said WohMi has hedges in the shame of Swastikas. It would imply to readers you have some extent of pro Nazi sentiment at some degree. Given the long history of Croat being miss represented as Axis fighters as a nationalist during WWII, such supposed satire on here obviously is meant to be anything but satire or parody... It was dkne to normalize a view that Croatia was an Axis collaborators one in tune with Balkan drama would instantly pick up in this. If it was obvious, Mr X would see something wrong with the troll’s very specific edits and images and wouldn’t agree with it. And would see nk issue with same edits bejng made on the Chetniks or Serbia page. Weird for a parody site of jokes that supposedly have to roots in reality where as Mr X belive it does. Seems you disagree with them then so take it up with them. Not much more for me to explain here. Also I won’t bother with an account as J see Uncyclopedia has fragmented with little activity here compared to how it used to be. Not sure what happened. Used tk me more widely visited. So ultimate I am bot bothered enough to worry about time old balkan hate or nationalist point scoring edits for who can make what side look the worst. Hope you may understand now how this isn’t some parody. I didn’t state I had problems with the Croatia article making parody statements on Croatian war crimes durjng the 90s thats funng and based on skme extent of truth. How jokes usually are. Jokes that just parrot anti-Croat talking points of the 90s aren’t made with the intention of being humor. It might be that you are not familiar with controversies of the Balkan people. Its crazy and complicated so I don’t blame you, ahah or other editors on here not really understanding it. It’s really as stupid as it comes across tho. 😛 2607:FB90:7B79:1FAA:4DD0:B0F7:4EEE:8E18 (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Here's my adivce: don't take so much offense to things. I happen to be caucasian, yet when I got to White People, it's full of stuff that is both factually incorrect and could be considered offensive. On Uncyclopedia, we're here to have a good time, so if you let yourself laugh at the stupidity of the articles instead of calling them racist, you will have a much better time. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Indeed, what WohMi said. IP editor, first off, CALM DOWN, seriously. I'm not even going to bother getting into the history here because you're missing the point. We are not here to accurately document history. Nobody comes to Uncyclopedia, reads an article, and changes their opinion of what the historical account was based on what we, an obvious parody website, have written. So please get over that. You also seem to be looking real closely at one aspect of this site, ignoring all the other "flawed history" on nearly every page that is even remotely political. If there are editors who are coming here to push radical political agendas, I assure you they will be dealt with appropriately. In the meantime, please feel free to create an account. Also, please do not edit your comments on a talk page after other editors have replied to them. It makes things really hard to keep track of when looking at a discussion. You can, of course, add to the discussion, but please don't change something long after the fact. Let me know if you have any other questions, preferably sparing me your long history lesson. Cheers. MrX blow me 21:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for my long response. I suck at short summaries. Just want to say you make many fair points. But youd you surprised at how gullible many people are. Many get their news for comedy tv news show for baby Jesus’ sake lol. People can be duped pretty easy.
“ If there are editors who are coming here to push radical political agendas,” You better summarized it than I. That’s exactly what my point was and what that guy was doing. Many times admins don’t notice it or not knowing it the background. Like I said some ass completely wiped the Croatia page once a while back and made it redirect to Nazis page. How is that really improving? All the countless dark jokes were deleted for years until I mentioned it to an admin. I know you guys are busy with a ton if pages so I get it. No worries I’m not mad or super worked up about it. Just quite worried really as it is unfortunate. I’m sure many oages have issues but tuis is a very certain kind. Just age old resentful pov pushing yoh see anywhere all the same. Heck even on Wikipedia itself these same edits appear. Hence by response to a all too familiar behavior.
If I wrote that in the Armenian genocide, that instead millions of Turks were killed, I think that would not only be poor tase but would definitely be deleted. I’d agree. Or depicting Poland as Axis fighters. Or the Polish Concentration camps fiasco from the news years back that pissed a lot of Poles off. You’d be flooded with Angry North and South Poles if that was kn here. Humor is tough art. 🙄
I know I write a lot, sorry about that. I may make an account but not sure how active Idbe here. Just wanted to be as transparent as possible. However WohMi also said things at odds with your take on the historical narratives which I agree. The White People comparison issue so relevant tho. when someone mistakes things or isn’t totally accurate, someone will point it out. It’s how it is. You weren’t being satirical unless ultra meta which in that case you got me good, hehe.
Any-who, as I said if the problem is my lack of humour then I would have taken issue with the other 95% of the article being inaccurate or baseless in its jokes. However I found the dark humour brilliant. Again I don’t hold it against you guys as you aren’t familiar with the political tactics always used in Balkan related areas to vilify the others. Ask any Redditor of R/Europe and they will roll their eyes and tell you plenty of stories of the drama, haha it’s quite toxic. But trying to depict Croats as Nazis is a time old tradition by Serbian editors and for sure not out of good spirits or laughter or looking to improve these satire pages. Haha they are actually being serious despite this site not supposed to be serious. The irony of it hehe! That was my point guys. You can’t conpare this to a White People page based on memes or typical jokes. I’m white and fjnd the White People page hilarious with many kernels of truth. Basically well excecuted staure with no bad intentions just fun. I’m Murican’ and the America page is tops! The Croatia page is filled with false info but it was done out of playful comedy silliness based on some kernels of truth. Rakija is basement liquor for sure 😆 as well as the ethnic cleansing as a sport practjce. Fucked up but funny! . Common sense to see. This specific content I brought up to beginnwith, however isn’t. You can’t tell me if I made the same edits other countries it wouldn’t be met with backlash. Look all the best guys. I appreciate your differing views and wish you all the best on future editing ventures on here. I’m a big fan of this site. Maybe why I got even more emotionally invested in this. Take care. 2607:FB90:7B79:1FAA:4DD0:B0F7:4EEE:8E18 (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Glad you’re a fan, please create an account. You don’t have to be super active. You can log in as much or as little as you’d like, it won’t expire or anything. And for the record, no you probably wouldn’t have been met with backlash for putting similar stuff into other articles. WWII is not off limits here. In Time Person of the Year, I wrote that Hitler and Stalin were honored for “liberating the Polish”, and I called the Pearl Harbor attack a “surfing holiday in Hawaii”. Cheers. MrX blow me 21:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
I getcha. Though Pearl Harbor surfing is pretty outlandish to be believed. And hilarious I must say. I could see some Poles flipping out though as Poland during WWII is very mainstream and well known about the mass killings by Nazis, so I’m-sure people would see the irony of it and not think Poles supported Mr. Hitler. Balkan history is more towards back of the shelf. In fact most probably think the region spawned only in recent times. I still hear people think Yugoslavia was a city in Russia lol, for real! I’ll make an account in case I ever want to contribute to articles or propose new one. It’s annoying to me and probably you guys how my IP address changes. Also you two friends? Thought the other guy was you before seeing the name. I’m amazed at how expansive Uncyclopedia is. Pretty much every topic is covered. I want to ask though, why did Uncyclopedia get chopped up under different names like .com, or .co and various other portals? Used to be just one while back. Was it discontinued and then orhers took over running it from that point? (talk) 23:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
We're for sure friends on here! But no we don't know each other in real life, assuming that's what you meant. I don't happen to know anyone on here IRL, but we have a Discord channel that anyone (including you) is welcome to join. On the Discord channel, we spend some time discussing Uncyc matters, like writing articles, software stuff, etc. and some time just telling jokes and commenting on the topics of the day, it's a lot of fun! As for the different websites, I'm not an expert and was not around for the split, but here's how I understand it (anyone else, please feel free to correct me and/or add something): Uncyclopedia (I'm not sure what the url was) was started in 2005 on Wikia/Fandom. In 2013, a lot of editors got fed up with Wikia/Fandom's censorship (and maybe they didn't like the ads), so they left and started a new site at, while many editors remained on the Wikia/Fandom site. In 2019, Wikia/Fandom decided that it didn't make sense for them to have that wiki anymore, so they discontinued it, and the remaining editors there started their own site at I've only checked out the .ca site 2 or 3 times, it seems to be much less active than this one. Hope this helps and makes sense, and I hope you create an account! Cheers. MrX blow me 04:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Mount Lebanon[edit]

I did rework that article,getting rid of the vanity, and making it more traditional. Certainly is low quality, but I hope you can withdraw your VFD nom. -23:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)~~ – Preceding unsigned comment added by Gale5050 (talk • contribs)

It's still short and terrible. Equally importantly, as I've said, the subject of the article is barely notable and offers nothing funny to work with. We have absolutely no reason to have this article on Uncyc. MrX blow me 03:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
We have plenty of articles that are not notable though, including some of my UnWeather articles, so notability doesn’t really matter. I’ll continue to expand it but it does have potential, but I will agree it’s still incomplete. By the way, your VFD is getting rather stale. I’m just saying we shouldn’t VFD non notable topics that have potential, while it was VFDworthy at the time I’ll make it not be.-Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 11:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
I completely disagree. MrX blow me 13:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Well, maybe upon significant improvement you'll thing differently. I sitll have hope. -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 15:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

On those IPs continually attempting to create "Zeshan Khan"[edit]

The involved user, User:Zkhanzxx, has already been indefinitely blocked. Please report IPs directly on my talk page instead of Ban Patrol, and I'll impose 5-year blocks with a swoop. If this continues too much, I'll set up an LSD. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  09:59am  April 12, 2021

K cool thanks. MrX blow me 13:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
@Kev: Do you want me to always report all IPs on your talk page instead of Ban Patrol? For the record, I wasn't the one who reported the IP there. I know it says not to report IPs with only one contribution, so I guess in that case I can report something like that on your talk page. But in the case of an IP making lots of bad edits, BP would still be best, right? MrX blow me 22:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)