User talk:Shabidoo

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

PENUT BUTTA JELLA TIME.gifPENUT BUTTA JELLA TIME.gifPENUT BUTTA JELLA TIME.gifPENUT BUTTA JELLA TIME.gifPENUT BUTTA JELLA TIME.gif

Archive1 Archive2 Archive3 Archive4 Archive5 Archive6 Archive7 Archive8 Archive9 Archive10 Archive11

Hey it's me Mrthejazz[edit source]

Sorry I wandered off shortly after wandering on 2 years ago. I'm immortal so tine perception wise, it was like leaving for day. Regardless, thought the changes you made to that waiter dildo article you made were brilliant and sorry I never told you that then.

Also, you're a freaking crat now? Congradumashuns! It's TheReturn ofJazz... Because non sequiturs. 06:54, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey duderino. Glad to see you back. Yeah, the site has an energy we haven't seen in a long while. Also article numbers are relatively high and the quality is through the roof.

Defo, the dildo article was a good one. I just read it and needed a smoke and a quick nap ;)

My crat responsibilities are epic, with great power comes great responsibility opportunities to abuse a system and terrorize the plebs.

We should defo do a collabShabiDOO 09:40, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

I'd be open to that. No idea what though. It's TheReturn ofJazz... Because non sequiturs. 09:26, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Actually, I do have an idea. We should do an article making fun of how omnipresent AI is. Maybe have it written from the perspective of someone who is just now hearing about it for the first time... somehow. And it can take that naivety and dovetail from there. What do you think? It's TheReturn ofJazz... Because non sequiturs. 09:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
User:TheReturnOfJazz/Have You Heard About this AI Thing?
That's where I'm going to be working on this. You're welcome to use it if you want. I know it's user space but I'm cool with it, collab and all. It's TheReturn ofJazz... Because non sequiturs. 09:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
hell, that's actually a great idea. I'd like to help if possible. New England Patriots logo.pngGO PATS! ROLL IT! SEA-COCKS SUCK!New England Patriots logo.png 15:16, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
I'm cool with it if Shabidoo is. Also I technically haven't got their agreement yet. But yeah the more the merrier. I'm just working in use space so it doesn't get burninated before it's done cooking. Not sure if that mixed metaphor made sense but who cares?It's TheReturn ofJazz... Because non sequiturs. 20:13, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Congratulations on[edit source]

Your contributions to Moccasins and Gouverneur Morris.

Well thank you Shabidoo, but don't forget 9-11

Oh yeah there was also that Shabidoo.

Yeah

Well done.

Thanks.

Would it be incestuous if we made out?

Do you care?

No.

Are we doing this?

Shut up and kiss me already Shabidoo.

Okay Shabidoo...

....(the following is too obscene even for uncyclopedia)...

ShabiDOO 21:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

wait until MrX finds out you're cheating on him --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 22:11, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Can you unlock the talk page for Top 10 Articles of 2025/voting?[edit source]

@Shabidoo: I was doing an updated tally for the final results, with breakdown before you locked it. Cheers  Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 22:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

weird question[edit source]

for the UTCG, i need some sort of, well... something... to represent you. Are you the grue on your user page? a banana? I keep thinking its shabadoo from the simpsons, but that doesn't sound right... Metal Kitten っ◔◡◔)っ 13:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

I used to be most commonly referred to by the banana on my talkpage. But the grue is also cool. Whatever fits with your aesthetic will work. Looking forward to seeing these!!!ShabiDOO 16:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

USP, how about you read?[edit source]

The Newspaper That Won't Tell Everyone That You Wet the Bed! Oops...

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 01:11, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I thought i quit doing this[edit source]

You'd be crazy not to listen!

TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 01:55, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Happy Valentines Day[edit source]

Are you, by any chance, kissing Turb0 in the ass right nowy? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 15:01, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Yo, thanks for chipping in[edit source]

Been busy lately, should have sent this sooner. Thanks for your contributions to 2020 United States presidential election controversies. All funny of course, I removed/tweaked some of them just cuz I thought doing so keeps the concept more in line. But please do feel free to keep contributing to that or any other article I created. Cheers. MrX blow me Emoji-drool.gif 16:15, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey no prob. I'm travelling for the month so will take a look in a few weeks ;) ShabiDOO 08:54, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Nice. Hope it’s fun! MrX blow me Emoji-drool.gif 15:11, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I'll deliver one UnSignpost a week[edit source]

The Newspaper 9 out of 10 Dentists Agree On! Fuck you, Dr. Miller!

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 17:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I mean, yeah, I'm pretty fucking awesome. ShabiDOO 08:55, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Wait, these claims are false, I was not on "face book", because I do not use "face book", or even the similarly but confusingly named "facebook". — L10nM4st3r ROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 13:22, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
nuh uh, I clearly saw a lion going out for a walk on facebook a while ago! Metal Kitten っ◔◡◔)っ 13:24, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
and I saw a bird outside. this connects L10nM4st3r to Alula, more proof that L10n and DaniPine3 and Alula and OPOSSUM constantly work together to the point that they my even be socks of each other --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 15:25, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
@Fish on skates: "she's a sockpuppet, he's a sockpuppet, I'm a sockpuppet... are there any more sockpuppets I should know about?" 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 15:32, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Little do you know, I've got the UnSignpost![edit source]

Tip your waitress!

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 01:46, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Imma get you another UnSignpost![edit source]

Now with 20% more ninjas!

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 00:43, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Pulverize this talk page with my UnSignpost[edit source]

The newspaper Oscar Wilde's puppy pisses on!

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 02:49, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

adopt me?[edit source]

hello,so,ADOPT ME? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedia Hater (talk • contribs)

Very happy to do so. What brings you to uncyclopedia @Wikipedia Hater:. What do you want to get out of writing here? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)

squiggly squiggly squiggly squiggly[edit source]

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 01:11, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I feel like I'm living in coocoo-land, I never forget to sign my posts....what are you all on about? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
Also, even if I did stop signing my posts...what are you going to do about it? Huh? Punk? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
I'm gonna keep spamming that tilde template. Like so:
Tilde.jpg
Due to the regrettable fact that you have entirely forgotten to sign your posts, the entirety of Uncyclopedia is very mad at you. This is rather unfortunate as many of us are capable of summoning Grues at will. I politely suggest that you quickly rectify this by using the four-tilde rule whenever you post on a talk page from now on. Copy and paste the following handy text for your own convenience in signing your posts: ~~~~

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 13:09, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

My ghaster has been flabbed!!! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
Your what now? --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 15:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

It seems you're in luck! UnSignpost![edit source]

Th-the m-m-most con-confident new-Newspaper in a wh-while

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 02:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

a thingy[edit source]

On UN:List of notable Uncyclopedians, i kinda want to split the super long section (Modern Age, 2011-) into multiple sections, but idk what to separate it into. Since you were active in the 2010s, what do you think? --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 01:21, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hmmm[edit source]

Never ever saw this page before. Isn't that crazy!?!?! Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I would definitely say as of 2018 would deserve a new section. That was definitely a new phase (with a gap of 2 years with no new notables). That could use a bit of updating as well.

If you want to break it up further, you could create a phase starting with Leverage up to and including myownbad self. As leverage and magic bus brought in a whole new era of writing (extremely good writing). The loss of Leverage I would say was pretty devastating.

If you do break them up into three ages, then Omnifluff to sinner george would the be Dark Ages (this was the post break up of the site which was a hard time and didn't see that many featured articles)

From Leverage to Myownbadself would be the Middleages (a rebuilt)

Cassie on would be the revival age.

And from Cassie on would be the renaissance age.

I would also suggest removing (having written a single article) because that conflicts with being in the hall of shame). To be notable would require at least three features or anything else there. Otherwise, this list would explode. ShabiDOO 08:32, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you think we should remove the banned users from this list, as some kind of Damnatio memoriae? or do you think it's better to leave those alone? 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 08:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
We should leave the banned users on the list. For better or worse, they were notable. MrX blow me Emoji-drool.gif 22:18, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

If the USA's so great, why'd they make the USP?[edit source]

Woop Woop! it's the sound of the Police UnSignpost!

--Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 02:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Palpatine democracy.png
I totally won't make Uncyclopedia a dictatorship.
Through UnSignposts and unsigned posts, I likely won't disappoint. --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 14:23, 1 May 2026 (UTC)ShabiDOO
It's true, one of the things that made uncyclopedia so great during the golden age was the talk page banter. It's fun when it's vibrant. ShabiDOO 22:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

That’s a USP, not a me-S-P[edit source]

Telling You Stuff You Already Knew, But With Different Words!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Too much stuff happened, so here's a week-early UnSignpost[edit source]

Smiting the vandal of news with the squeaky hammer of go fuck yourself

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

2018[edit source]

So, I was reading the List of notable Uncyclopedians, and it said that you weren’t active in 2018 but you were in 2017 and 2019. Why? YTPFPW72.0.jpg watchOS 7 Icons-flag-am.png Twitter Verified Badge Gray.svg @OfficialWatchOS7 Phone iOS.svg Apple_Notes_icon IMessage logo.svg Illogicopedia PLEB? 09:23, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Ehhh, the website had died down back then to the point that I tried to run a competition, and two people signed up and none of them submitted their article, I couldn't get any VFH passed with minimum votes and people were mostly unresponsive on the website. It was so dead, it seemed as though the website was over. Meanwhile, no chance I was going back to the spoon whilst SPIKE was bullying the shit out of everyone and Romartus and Simslikesims did nothing about it. I would say splitting to the fork here was the right thing to do (especially looking at the mess that is wikia now) but it could have been handled a lot better. There was a lot of drama at the time and people just fizzled away. Looked back a year later and saw, magically, the site was somewhat revitalised and has since grown back to a vibrant community again. Really happy the place is still going. Back in the day, like in the 2010s, I'd spend hours on the site. There were some absolutely outstanding writers and the banter on the talk-pages was legendary. We now have that again. Really happy to see it thriving once more. ShabiDOO 10:10, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Collab...[edit source]

...you say? I'm writing with this new account - I think there totally is no way to recover my password and it doesn't matter, nothing's really lost. Check Fish on skates' talk page and mine, we have this series of articles going. I don't remember if you were in on Summit of Spin but the idea is the same: link articles together by contradicting articles and so forth, so that one article breeds others. We started with Broken TV set and the ideas are already exploding. TV set of many uses is a veiled attempt by a TV manufacturer to market TVsomu:s to get better prices: idea is to have consumers believe that TVsomu can be used better than a regular TV set after it has broken. Later UnNews where people riot when their spiritual beliefs urge them to just keep the broken TV sets without turning them into other useful things as per the Usage section within Broken TV set (which can be expanded as much as you have ideas). Then portrait articles where the implied author (some invented character obviously) is seen as the saviour of whatever we come up with, something around the TV set thing. You know, nonsense that satirizes spin mechanisms of the real world, the way I like to mix it. Fish is writing an article on fixing your TV set and I just finished one on how to choose tools for dismantling the set, a sideline that just happened because it seemed funny. MultLit (talk) 11:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I give up, do what you like. I quit Uncyclopedia last time after getting into this kind of arguments with people and it's not important enough to me. This is not me being bitter already - I just realized it's far better to collaborate than have everything my way. I mean it, go ahead. The stuff will probably improve if you write a lot. MultLit (talk) 11:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Also, that's part of the reason why I'd want to establish collaboration serials rather than collaborating on articles (much). I just now remembered it was a big reason for starting the SoS thing. We get ideas from each others' articles and can discredit everything in them in our own articles, and so forth. Reduces friction. MultLit (talk) 11:44, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Hey mate, there is absolutely NO aggression or hostility meant from my side, no argument started. If you are open to full collaboration, bring it on. ShabiDOO 12:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
OK, I thought about this for a couple of days and I concluded most of it was because I was in a fucking bad mood having spent 2 weeks with a flu. I just interpreted your way of doing things as aggressive, and should have replied after thinking. But we are even 60% dumber when in a bad mood, so what did I have to think with? Now that you gave me advice, also, here's mine to you: the right way to get shit done is not "I think this is better" but "Yes, and...", the way they do it in improvisation theatres like Second City. Not my idea, but a well studied one by other people. If it's OK by you, let's put all this aside and restart? I would honestly like you to collaborate (which is part of the reason I blew up a bit - I thought I had spoiled it for good) - but if our styles are too different in principle, why not join in the general idea pool (which we could also set up concretely) around this whole overall thing I'm trying to set up? Also, if any of our articles spark others please write those. We're cool by me. MultLit (talk) 04:40, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Nicenone, let's do it! ShabiDOO 10:46, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Let me be pretty clear on why I'd like you not to alter what I have written. This is a shortcut: in the end we're both out to prove we're superior to the other as a writer. This is a huge waste of time and energy, and I generally get fed up with it even before it really starts. It's not certain this will happen, of course, if you only alter it once and let me have my way then. The solution, as I've been saying, lies in collaborating within an article series. Believe me, I thought this through pretty extensively when I was last here. There's no possible way two writers' tastes can be quickly altered so that both are satisfied with what the other wrote, not even if one of them is clearly superior to the other. You mentioned prima donnas on the talk pages. We all are prima donnas. Noobody will write anything if they don't believe it should be written. MultLit (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Also, if you insist on trying to improve what I wrote, why not add the improved section to the talk page? We can then fix it back and forth until we're both satisfied, instead of stepping on each other's toes. MultLit (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
I'm sorry you see this website as a competition rather than a collaborative environment where being superior at writing is a goal rather than openness to improvement, personal development and being happy for others when they succeed and grow. I'm definitely not the Shabidoo I first was 15 years ago. I find much of my fondest experiences have been collaborating with users I have very different styles with, think Nillion, Krypton and Five-second rule. I'll leave you with your article and wish you the best on it. ShabiDOO 08:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
No, that's not what I meant. I meant that if we start fixing each other's text without asking it implies we figure we're a better writer than the other. I don't know if there's any way to deny that, but you can try if you think I'm wrong here. MultLit (talk) 08:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
You invited people to edit. I edited. You reverted. I respect that. All the best on your article mate. I consider this over and done with and no hard feelings. ShabiDOO 08:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
OK, no hard feelings of course. If you still feel like it, go ahead and add your own article(s) to the series, there's no way that could fail. I'm sorry I'm being stubborn but like I said in the deleted comments, a bit too old to change my style or much else. MultLit (talk) 08:45, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Klink[edit source]

User:MultLit/Article ideas etc

Annoying article[edit source]

I've brainstormed up some random shit for a new article about "annoying" at User:SystemPhantom/Annoying, let me know if any of that seems good ❄️SystemPhantom, with a 🫑bell pepper for you! (talk)❄️ 00:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I liked the general concept of the article itself being annoying, and I think it can work, but it might be helpful to have a bit more restraint about some stuff. Like avoiding a huge long section of text or too many random unrelated ideas. A more ambitious idea would be trying to write an article about annoying, but then annoying things happening that stop you from completing it (though would require some clever GIFs or special effects). Alternatively, you can go along the routes of a more encylopaedic route. But when so, at least with virtually all of my own articles, I have a general uniting underlying concept (other than the topic itself). For example Antipasta's underlying concept was some cheesy pastacentric puns relating pasta terms with sciency terms alongside how ludicrously dangerous it is, whereas Sarah Palin was celebrating her hockey mom'ness with the fact that conversative media gloss over the fact that she is a failed and incompetent politician and speaker. Or maybe closer to yours This is not an article, the underlying concept is playing with Magrittes art form, where he's making the statement that the representation (a painting) is not the real thing, as well as playing with French existentialism (the langauge they use to talk about the absurdity of the human condition). It's always helpful to have an underlying concept or better two which help drive the purpose of your article. It adds coherence and structure, even when the article is absurd. Does that all make sense? ShabiDOO 08:39, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, also meant to add, if you are keen, would be fun to collaborate with you on it :) ShabiDOO 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Suddenly, UnSignpost[edit source]

The newspaper with the most [citation needed]s since forever!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

As the years go by, the UnSignpost will never die[edit source]

Reading This Is The Mysterious Second Step To Getting Profit From Stealing Childrens' Underwear!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Suggestion for your user page[edit source]

I recommend you use

{{#stamplogo:notFeatured.png|190px|top}}

to replace the featured stamp your user page has. [Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 17:19, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay. Nice one. Done ShabiDOO 23:48, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Is this the Krusty Krab? No, this is the UnSignpost[edit source]

Witty line goes here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Heyo[edit source]

Any chance you could start checking for which dates don't already have a feature queued up before featuring something? You've managed to put two features on the same date twice now, and it looks awful when put on the main page. Thanks. user:alulauser talk:alula 23:36, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Ahhh yeah thats defo my bad. I didn't put in the date so it defaults to the next slot. I'll be mindful of that in the future my darling Alula! ShabiDOO 09:43, 10 July 2026 (UTC)