User talk:Wikipedia Be Sucking

Talk page Archive 1

Talk page Archive 2

Tyvvm for ur edits (Harris becoming Pres.)

Good work. Tyvvm. Smuggler 16:17, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

@Smuggler: np! I'll probably add more and link it to UnNews:Welp,_Harris_lost laterWPBS (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)

QVFD

I saw that you QVFD'd Discovered and Professional wrestling. I don't think those are QVFD-worthy articles. Especially since Professional wrestling is a featured article and Discovered is funny in its own way.  Fenris2010 the moccasin-wearing Grue ^{You hear growling...} 03:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@Fenris2010: Yeah I was nomming the redirect for deletion, because most wouldn't see the connection to that and the WWF, and I nommed Discovered for deletion because I already did "Discover" so it didn't make sense to do a past tense as we aren't a dictionary WPBS (talk) 03:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, it makes sense now.  Fenris2010 the moccasin-wearing Grue ^{You hear growling...} 03:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@Fenris2010: You're good lmao, don't sweat it WPBS (talk) 03:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

UnTunes:Famous

@Wikipedia Be Sucking: I thought this was a parody of the song, but I'm reading through and this just seems to be a copy-paste of the original... I'm pretty sure that's copyright infringement DaniPine3 (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: We aren't using it commercially, or making money off of it, and I believe we are a nonprofit, and us having the lyrics isn't affecting the original copyright holders of the song. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use#U.S._fair_use_factors WPBS (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@Wikipedia Be Sucking: yea, but I mean, this is a funny wiki. and for something to be funny, it has to have some kind of twist. it's not like we're going to have some page on the lyrics of an already existing song; that's not funny, it should be a parody of some sort. or else I'll probably delete this page because it's kind of unnecessary to have this here... DaniPine3 (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: I linked this page to the Swifties article and I'm planning on writing an article on Taylor Swift, so it would be funny to link this there. Also the song is funny, because of the whole Kanye made taylor famous thing WPBS (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@Wikipedia Be Sucking: yea, but I mean, if it's about having funny songs, then we should have the complete repertoire of Weird Al's songs, yet all the songs that are here supposedly made by Weird Al are completely fictitious and made as a parody/homage of his own songs. Uncyclopedia doesn't have copied content here, and this song definitely shouldn't be an exception. So if you're not making a parody out of it, the best thing would be to delete it... DaniPine3 (talk) 21:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: fuck it, just delete it lol, I'll just leave the MP3 file in the articles. WPBS (talk) 01:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Wikipedia Be Sucking: I don't think it'd be a good idea either to have a whole (copyrighted) song uploaded as a file on Uncyclopedia. I don't know much about the legality concerning this stuff; but as the saying says, better safe than sorry. After all, you can just link the song from youtube in the article. DaniPine3 (talk) 01:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Dani, that ties in to the whole fair use thing, like I said, we aren't making money off of it, and it's not affecting the market for the track, its readily available to download on multiple websites (such as internet archive), and Kanye really doesn't give much of a crap about his copyright, even if they are being used illegally (which we aren't), the dude is in enough legal trouble as it is lol. I highly doubt anybody is going to download or listen to songs on uncyclopedia. If copyright was a problem here, a good chunk of the images and files we have shouldn't be uploaded or allowed here. As for the whole youtube thing, I tried to do that, but the miniplayer is blocked, that's why you'll notice on the other parody UnTunes I had to add the file in because youtube stopped working. This is likely because YT and Google being the greedy bastards they are blocked external playback of videos in order to make people search up, be bombarded with ads, and watch the thing on youtube. I would have left the miniplayer as it is, however it didn't provide a link to the videos on youtube, instead just sent me to the homepages (both songs were still active today btw). WPBS (talk) 01:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@Wikipedia Be Sucking: I don't know why you say the miniplayer is blocked; in the rest of articles it works just fine, plus it doesn't makre sense the reason is ads because they can still bombard you with ads on the miniplayer instead. I just don't think there should be a whole Kanye West song hosted here on Uncyclopedia. I'll see the miniplayer thing by myself, though... DaniPine3 (talk) 01:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

I successfully added the YouTube player to the article. My guess is that the reason it didn't work when you tried was because you were linking the song's music video, which is 18+ restricted, as it features depictions of naked celebrities. DaniPine3 (talk) 02:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: I didn't even try the miniplayer on Famous lmao, and I would have used the lyric video if I was lol, not a 10 minute clip of naked wax figures. Maybe the issue with the other songs was happening because they were edgy, idk. Now, I'm not suggesting anything here, but what exactly do you mean by this statement? "I just don't think there should be a whole Kanye West song hosted here on Uncyclopedia." That isn't a compelling reason to delete something which doesn't break the rules. Again, I'm not accussing you of anything or trying to be a dick here, I was just trying to point that out, I understand you have been very helpful here and done a lot, which I respect highly. Anyway, it should be fine to host famous here, because it's being used in the Swifties article to make fun of them, hence, parody and entertainment. WPBS (talk) 03:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Eh, lowkey it doesn't matter lol, the youtube player works (unlike this) one, and there no need to argue over something stupid like this, it works, and that all that matters WPBS (talk) 03:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Taylor Swift

Hey so I've seen you've started a draft on Taylor Swift and I wanted to tell you that I actually had an idea for what an article on Taylor Swift could look like. I even have a short draft on a Word I saved in my PC. Would you want me to share what I have? DaniPine3 (talk) 16:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Yeah that would be great! It's better to have other's perspectives when doing an article like this, I think it would be funnier to have others work on this as well as opposed to me writing from my POV. Also I lowkey don't have a very good idea as to what I was going to write lol. WPBS (talk) 17:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

I'll be dropping my idea here, then. DaniPine3 (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Sounds great! WPBS (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Message from The Spoon

I am just checking that is you who have created an account on The Spoon? RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

@Romartus: Yeah that was me, thanks for double checking! WPBS (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the confirmation. :) RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

Attention whore

Thanks for changing all the redirects by yourself :] DaniPine3 (talk) 18:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Don't mention it lol, it was no biggie, prolly like 10 redirects lol WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 18:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

yea but still, it's quite the tiresome activity to manually change so many redirects. I should've been the one to do so, but you decided to do it instead. which is why say, thanks :] DaniPine3 (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: You're welcome :) WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

lol

Extended content

it seems I'm not the only one that thought that guy's name seemed to look a lot like 'Jungle Book'... DaniPine3 (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: lol, it's a pretty common meme, people call him Junglebook just to mess with BTS stans WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC) I never heard of the meme; it's just that the first time I looked at his name I misread it as "Junglebook", and since then I haven't been able to not read it as such... speaking of it, the BTS stans (and k-popers in general) are incredibly insane. they're pretty much a cult. I remember that there was a k-poper in my high school and she turned out to be incredibly toxic; her ex-boyfriend was lucky enough to go out of the unhealthy relationship he had with her. DaniPine3 (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: yeah its kind of a reddit and discord thing lmao. I've never met a kpop stan irl, but they are pretty batshit insane and delusional online, more so than swifites. I think its because k-poppers tend to be younger girls, like in middle school, so there a lack of maturity, I would think most grow out of it by the time the reach high school and college and graduate to swifties, but there are always stragglers. I'm glad that the guy you mentioned was able to get out of a relationship with her, I can't imagine how much worse they would be in person. I have a swiftie in my class and she makes TS her personality, no joke, she said she'd save Taylor before her family, she even saw an eras tour concert twice, its fucking crazy lmao. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 23:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC) I mean, it could be that she was unlucky to have a really shitty family; but even then, she's idolizing Taylor a bit too much. I mean, Taylor Swift is incredibly rich and can perfectly pay for security guards; I doubt TS will ever need help from a fan. DaniPine3 (talk) 23:32, 29 November 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: damn, I don't know how I just noticed this, so sorry for the late reply. I don't think she has a shitty family, they seem to really care about her, and they do lots of things for her, I mean, what kind of a shitty family would fly out on vacation to Europe just to see a TS concert? especially since only the girl is a fan of her, and not the rest of the family. I just think she isn't able to appreciate what she has (like most teens), and seeks comfort in the cult of swifties for some weird reason WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 13:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC) don't worry for replying late; as the saying goes, better late than never. as for the girl you're talking, a toxic family might be hard to spot at first glance as just because they pay for what she wants doesn't mean that they actually give her love; that said, if it's true that she has a caring family that gives her everything she asks for, she definitely shouldn't be putting some rich singer that she doesn't even know in person over her own family. it's true that there's a lot of middle-class teens and young adults out there that don't even recognize that most of the things they have is thanks that they were backed by their parents, who have that money to pay for ... DaniPine3 (talk) 14:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: Fair enough, though I still think it's very strange to find comfort in a singer that doesn't know she exists. You would think she'd put the friends she talks to and hangs out with above TS, I feel that's what most people who come from toxic families do, seek comfort in friends and others they know and form a strong connection with them. Either way, I guess I feel sorry for her now, than irritated, and I hope she get the help she needs. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 15:01, 3 December 2024 (UTC) why does she find comfort in a singer that doesn't know she exists? the same reason why others find comfort in some bearded dude in the skies or an elephant with six arms they themselves have never seen or interacted with. humans have always seeked to find comfort in a being that is supposedly 'above' them; wheather said being is a deity, a king, or a celebrity. and I'm pretty sure part of the reason is that, as we don't know much about them, we can blisfully pretend they're exactly the type of person we'd wish to become, and that they would always be by our side; even though many rulers and celebrities barely care about those who are 'below' them (and we can't really know if a deity would care). not saying that it's a 'bad' thing, it's understandable that many people seek to have some kind of protection when they're feeling low; if anything, it's just sad how many rulers, celebrities and charismatic leaders in general try to take advantage of their subjects/fans that have devoted to said leaders, instead of thanking them. Sorry for the wall of text, btw. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:22, 3 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: You have a point, but there's a difference between looking up to, and blindly following/dying for someone you don't know. Like, you can follow a religion, but when you do stuff in the name of God, or die for your religion instead of your family/close friends, that's extremism. I know a very Catholic dude (like the anti-homosexual and anti-sex kind of Catholic), but I know that if he had to choose between his family/close friends or Jesus, he would choose his family. Heck, this guy believes that Jewish people killed Jesus, yet I know he defends his friend (whos Jewish) from anti-Semitic bullshit and harassment. Fwiw, most religious people would die for their family/friends over their religion, minus extremists. Also, most people view God(s) and religion as some mythical power/force, which explains why people have very strong sentiments and feelings towards it, but a celebrity, that's different. I'd say its borderline erotomania to be obsessed with a celeb to this degree, and it is relatively uncommon among people to be obsessed with a celeb like this, but it is a lot more common now (which is troubling). Either way, nothing good can come out of it, and I used to be into a celebrity at one point when I was younger (for like a year lol), I'm glad I grew out of it and was able to form stronger bonds and friendships with others, it really allowed me to open up to people and speak my pain, which was a lot better than obsessing over a celebrity. I guess that's the main reason I say I wish she gets help, because this is unhealthy, and it also makes others who don't know much about her very uncomfortable. For me, I was never able to appreciate a friendship I had with someone, until I didn't, and it was too late, and it still affects me several years later, I feel a lot of younger people need to appreciate what they have more, rather than investing lots of time and energy into crazy dreams, and what the want. Rant over lol. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2024 (UTC) yea, I too agree that obsessing over anything -regardless if it's a celebrity or something else that someone can obsess over- to that degree is unhealthy. and it's a shame how celebrity culture has convinced people for doing such an unhealthy thing to themselves. I'd say the best example of this is K-pop or other kind of idol (the musical term, not the religious one) bands, where if they have so many raving fans is because the bands' managers market the band in a way that their fans think that the band personally care about them (when the band don't even know who their fans are), and it's pretty fucked up when you think about it, asi it's pretty much like a manipulative relationship. it's specially disgusting when you think a lot of this celebs are pretty young and they probably have to get with such raving fans since a young age. the thing is, although it's (sadly) true it's more and more common to see this kind of celeb obsession, as I told you before this kind of behavior isn't new on humans; it's just now many businessmen have hacked into this kind of thinking to fool many people and giving them some kind of 'god' (I know the comparison is a bit exaggerated, but I'm pretty sure both cases have a conection) in exchange of their money. and also, you say most religious people would choose their family over God (which it's probably true in a lot of cases); but considering that the name 'Abrahamic religions' comes from a dude that literally prefered to obey god than saving his own son, that kind of thinking probably has had its long time existing too. btw, I find it funny that that guy you know claims to be antisemitic yet he helps his Jewish friend. Not saying he shouldn't help them, more so that I wonder why he wants to be antisemitic in the first place (and it also makes me wonder why someone Jewish would be friends with someone who's antisemitic, but heh, that's their choice after all). rant over x2. DaniPine3 (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: yeah, you're right, normal or not, this is troubling, and disgusting that people are preying on impressionable children for money, I guess its not even the celeb's fault (for the most part), its the managers, but even then I would think it's their responsibility to know what their managers are doing. Especially a person like TS, who's well aware of the crazy things her fans do because of how publicized the craziness of her fanbase is. Instead, she uses her platform to voice her political opinions and to change things that affect her, and only her. To top it off, her fans label her as a feminist and justice warrior, which is untrue considering the only time she talks about problems are when it affects her, not the greater good. Also, I understand that DJT is a terrible person, and the things he's done, however I don't think its okay to influence young naive teenage girls politically, I doubt most girls under 16 even understand the scope of the election, and Taylor publicizing her opinion to young fans who repeat her shit like the gospel is unsafe in these times and plain irresponsible. I get that people need to be informed of current events, but I feel that political opinions are like sex ed, it's gotta be done, but at the right age, if yk what I mean. As for the Catholic guy, idk if he's being ironic by saying the Jews killed Jesus, or deadass, either way, so far I haven't seen him act on that, or have negative sentiments towards Jewish people, so idk if he's anti-semetic. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2024 (UTC) yea, you're right that TS is kinda selfish by doing that kind of thing. at the end, she's an incredibly rich woman, and people rarely get to that lever of wealth without doing selfish deeds (not to mention that being so high up on the wealth scale makes them forget of the troubles of the average guy, which is why they're so dettached from society and reality as a whole). As for the Catholic guy, those kind of things are rarely said as a joke and often said dead serious; although if he's actually helping someone Jewish, it might be that he's just a nice guy and the community he's in (regardless if it's his parents, the Catholic Church, or any other community he might have gone to).DaniPine3 (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC) ... has been putting that thing on his head. Forgot to add that at the end of the sentence. DaniPine3 (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: what I think is that, he believes Jews were the reason Christ died (he isn't wrong per say, Judas was Jewish, however Jesus was also Jewish, and Judas being Jewish has no bearing on the rest of the Jewish community. Judas was responsible for the death of Jesus, not Jews as a whole.), however he understands that Jewish people today have nothing to do with it, other than the fact that Judas was a Jew. He also acknowledges the fact that Jesus was a Jew as well. So I think what it is, is that, he doesn't hold prejudice against Jewish people today, because he understands that they had nothing to do with the actions of a Jewish individual 2000 years ago, and honestly, if that's the case, I respect that, it takes a lot of maturity to understand that, I wish many people today could be mature like that and not blindly hate other cultures... EDIT: I just realized that there is no proof that points to Judas being Jewish, aside from him being depicted as a Jew to push anti-semetic narratives and stereotypes. It's been alleged that the writers of the Gospel of John and Matthew were anti-semetic, regardless of if they were anti-semetic or not, the whole Jewish Deicide idea comes from those texts. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC) well, if he has nothing against Jews, then I'm thankful he hasn't bitten into antisemitic propaganda like others have fell. That said, what I've been taught is that it were the Romans the ones who killed Jesus, so I don't know were these guys got the whole 'the Jews killed Jesus' thing from. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: I'm guessing they primarily blame Judas for ratting him out, it honestly differs based on who you ask lol. For more information I'd reccomend checking out Jewish deicide, its a good article that explains different perspective on it. EDIT: I just realized that there is no proof that points to Judas being Jewish, aside from him being depicted as a Jew to push anti-semetic narratives and stereotypes. It's been alleged that the writers of the Gospel of John and Matthew were anti-semetic, regardless of if they were anti-semetic or not, the whole Jewish Deicide idea comes from those texts.WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC) well, I can't deny I didn't doubt when you said that Judas was Jewish because, considering Jesus was Jewish too and lived in a Jewish community, it wouldn't be strange that most of the people he talked with would be Jewish as well. that said, it's incredibly stupid to blame an entire community to what a single man might have done. not to mention that the whole antisemitic Christian narrative makes no sense: if the Christian God is the same as the Jewish God, who told the Jews that they were the chosen people who were going to have the promised land, why would the Jews become the villains afterwards? That would pretty much mean that God lied to the Jews. Antisemitic Christians are pretty much calling their God a liar. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: yeah, I think its just a vocal minority, most Christians I know blame the Romans, Pilate, and Judas. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 18:54, 5 December 2024 (UTC) well, I'm comforted to here most Christians nowadays don't believe that stuff, because that kind of belief can most likely send anybody to a rabbit hole of antisemitism. btw, I find it funny how we started talking about BTS and we ended talking about who's responsible for killing Jesus... DaniPine3 (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: Yeah, its mostly just the redneck and radical weirdos from the southern US states that believe racist crap like this. In every religion there are extermists to some degree, but the majority are nice and normal people. Yeah, funny how we got here, ngl we should probably stop now before it (or someone) escalates it WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Redirects

I think you're kinda overdoing it.. I get why 'Despicable Me' would redirect to 'Minions', but there's no need to make redirects for 'Despicable Me 2' or ' Despicable Me 3', specially if they're going to redirect to the same page. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Sorry, I thought I was being through lol, though I do think having a redirect for Despicable Me (franchise) is a good idea, and once that article exists, Despicable Me could redirect there...WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 16:31, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

... or you could just make the 'Despicable Me' article be about the franchise as a whole, without the need of parentheses. That is, if there is ever an article on that...
btw,I don't think making so many redirects is a good idea because sometimes it's good that the links are red so that people know there isn't an article on that yet. Not saying you shouldn't make redirects at all, but as I said before, maybe you should try to be a bit less overkill... DaniPine3 (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: yeah I was thinking of doing it like that, because that's how WP does it, and I think it'll make it funnier as a parody, because we're knocking off their manual of style. Yeah, I think I can chill with the redirects, its just that when I don't see something that doesn't exist, it starts bugging me, and I need to do something about it, but I'm too lazy to create an article on it atm. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 17:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

it's okay, I get it. it's just that it's kinda unnecessary to have so many redirects; many of which I doubt the average user will ever need to search for. I think you should only focus on redirects for articles that already exists (like apples -> apple for example); and if anything, make from time to time a redirect for an article that doesn't exist which its red link fills you with dread. But don't overdo it, because that will fill the wiki with unnecessary redirects. I hope I'm not being to picky. DaniPine3 (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Fair enough I guess, nah you're not being picky, its a valid statement. Can we keep the Total Drama redirect though? or should we wait until we get an article for it? WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 19:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

I just thought the Total Drama redirect was weird, considering the show has nothing to do with Japanese game shows (well, I've never seen the show myself, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't Japanese). Plus, having its link red might be a better way to tell people that they should do an article on it. I don't mind if you do a redirect for that, though, although if you do, try to make it coherent... DaniPine3 (talk) 19:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: You are right, its not a japanese show. I just linked it to there because it was an article on how to survive a batshit insane gameshow, which is what TD is. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 01:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

Extended content

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for impersonating off-wiki people in order to troll someone. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please write them down on a pineapple and shove it right up your ass. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but it is highly recommended that you stop impersonating off-wiki people in order to troll someone. Thaaanks! -- 18:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC) @Alula: Well, I created that account as a "fuck you, but this name is taken now" kinda dealio. I wasn't planning on impersonating them (or editing from that account for that matter), hence I asked for the ban. Now, if I really was planning on trolling I would have created that account, and verified it with a burner email, and then edit Uncyclopedia in a way to make them look bad, not ask for a ban on the userpage, and ping an admin from this account to make sure it did get banned. Not saying what I did was right, but I just wanted to clarify my motive to you. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 18:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC) that was you? why did you do it, though? do you have some kind of grudge against that guy? I can't deny, I wasn't expecting for you to impersonate someone of all people, specially considering how you're the first to be cautious that other users don't impersonate you... DaniPine3 (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: I can explain it to you further on discord (if you have discord), but yeah in essence, yes, the dude was being a dick, and I created an account under their name to spite them, I truly was not planning on impersonating them or trolling on here, all I wanted to do was express my frusturation on them, by taking their username so if they ever did decide to create an account on here (fat chance), their name would be taken. Yeah, it was a stupid thing to do, and my main regret is breaking the communities' trust more than anything, but I really did not plan to impersonate them, if that was the case, why would I ask for a ban from that account, and ping you with this one? WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 19:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC) I do have Discord, and I actually joined the Uncyclopedia server last week, although I don't know why you wouldn't be able to explain it here... Also, I don't see how taking that guy's name would really affect them. They could perfectly choose a different name, specially considering that when I searched that username on Wikipedia, it turns out the user changed their name to a different one (don't know if that user's the one you had a grudge, though). I don't think you really lost the wiki trust, but it was a tad pointless, and you did come off as a bit of a hypocrite for the several times you've tried to not be impersonated by others. DaniPine3 (talk) 19:52, 15 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: I mean I could explain it here, but I'd rather not air out the dirty laundry for all to see, also its easier for me to send related links and photos on discord to give you a better idea what happened. Yeah thinking about it now, I realize that it probably wouldn't do anything to them, at the time I thought it might inconvenience them (I remember seeing a video about people doing the same thing to troll a microinfluencer who was being a dick about someone having the username she wanted, so people created accounts with varations of her name so that she couldn't change her username to any of them, I'll try to find the video), probably not though, because they don't seem like the type of person to edit over here. Also I don't believe they are a wikipedia editor, at least I didn't interact with them on wikipedia, I guess I see why I look like a hypocrite, though as I mentioned before, my intention was not to impersonate them, and I don't believe I did, because I never tried to make it seem as if that person was running said account, and I don't think there's an explicit rule against using someone else's username on a different site (usernames aren't exclusive to a single person, or shouldn't be at least), as long as you aren't pretending to be the other person, which like I said before I wasn't, also I wouldn't have a problem with people editing under my username, as long as they don't claim to be me, but I didn't want to take a chance in case a troll or some idiot did claim to be me, so I created accounts using this username on other wikis. I'll add you on discord and explain this more in detail over there if you wish. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC) So you tried impersonating someone to spite them over them being an asshole on another wiki? That's not only extremely childish and pointless, but it also makes you the bigger asshole here. 20:53, 15 December 2024 (UTC) @Alula: As I mentioned before, I wasn't trying to impersonate them, and never made it seem like the person in question created that account. All I did was create an account with that username and ask to be banned, never did I once say I was them. I'd really appreciate it if you stopped saying that I was impersonating them, as impersonation is defined as "the act of pretending someone else to decieve others", which I wasn't doing for the reasons above, I think trolling them is a better way to put it. What I was trying to do was inconvenience them by taking their username, so that if they ever decided to create an account on here, they'd have to pick a different name, now that I think about it, it was pointless and fairly childish, and it does make me somewhat of an asshole for being petty, though I wouldn't say it was done with malicious intent to make them look bad, and I was upfront about what I did, and why. If I truly wanted to impersonate them, I wouldn't have went about it this way, as your block message states it was "a horrible impersonation attempt", it was horrible, because well, it wasn't an impersonation attempt. If you want me to clairify more things, or explain some stuff in more detail (eg. links, photos, etc.) I'll be happy to go over it with you (and the other admins if they wish) on Discord. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 00:14, 16 December 2024 (UTC) I mean it's true you didn't do any impersonaying per se- but it still was a stupid decision. Also let me tell you this: the bigger the wall of text, the more suspicious you look. People who don't need to hide anything don't write large wall of texts, they're concise and go straight to the point, because more often than not large words are a tool to hide the truth. Not saying that you're lying; just that using such a long string of words show a clear lack of confidence that you should probably work on. Hope you don't take this as a personal attack but as constructive criticism. DaniPine3 (talk) 00:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC) @DaniPine3: Yeah, thats true, it was incredibly stupid, and not the right thing to do, in retrospect I should have just ignored their behavior. Also for the wall of text thing, you are completely right, others I know irl have noticed this as well and pointed it out to me. Like you mentioned, it's not really a tool to hide the truth for me, I prefer to give as much detail as possible so people understand where I come from, it's something I used to do with my parents because they'd give me crap for a lot of things I didn't do, or blow my actions out of proportion, I guess it just carried over to everyone who questioned my actions, I'd automatically get defensive and think they were out to get me. I currently see a therapist to work on my lack of confidence and waryness of others, and it's better than what it used to be, though I got a long way to go. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 00:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC) @Alula: After thinking about this for a bit, I was wondering if there is any way I can appeal the block or get it commuted? if that's even possible? I know its just a week, but I primarily spend my free time at school on uncyclopedia (they take our phones away), and I keep thinking of things to add on here (So I don't forget: I have to add "drake to type of guy to say, "balderdash!"" and "Drake the type of guy to pikc himself up by the boot straps"to the Drake template, create a redirect for Za and Zaza, add a whoops Weed template to Grass, redirect Get Him to the Greek to Diddy, add baby oil to the diddy section of google searches, this will probably expand as I think of more things). Fwiw, I've been here for 3 years and counting (albeit on and off), and so far I haven't had any issues or warnings on here (aside from this), so I was wondering if I could have the block commuted (or lifted if possible), as it's my first time getting in trouble here and I don't have prior history of troublesome behavior. I realize that regardless of what happened, impersonation or not, what I did was wrong, and I promise to not do stuff like that again, or bring offsite drama over here. I understand if you don't lift the block or shorten it, because I am in the wrong here. Thank you for the time, and have a nice day WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC) No. Also i'm just saying this right now: you shouldn't spend your time at school on editing Uncyclopedia anyway. 20:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC) @Alula: Fair enough, I'll see you in a week then. Well, I don't edit uncyclopedia during actual instruction or when i have work to do, I just edit it in my free time when i have nothing else to do. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 23:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC) To be fair, Plutocow was being a dick, but what did you expect from "Rational"Wiki? Creating that account and user page here was stupid and had almost no chance of affecting Plutocow in any way. I doubt they noticed or cared. I'll probably add the diff of them calling you a troll to our article on rw when I finally get around to it, along with countless other examples of "trolls" in the saloon bar. MrX blow me 00:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC) @MrX: Yeah, idk what I expected, but man that guy is a fucking baby lol. Were you able to find the diffs and convo I had with them in question? I can send you them on Discord and give you more context if you wish, low-key it's kind of funny/stupid now that I think about it, but when I was interacting with them, their attitude and audacity was appalling. It's like talking to a child who's parents never told them no, coupled up with a redditard with a superiority complex. Honestly, I have no idea how someone with an attitude like that becomes one of the people in charge of running a community, who's purpose is collaboration lol. Maybe they pulled a Stalin General Secretary if yk what I mean. Idk why I even bothered to give them a chance, I'm just going to play RationalTroll from now on, lmk if you wanna join in the festivities, I have a trick up my sleeve which will make things interesting, but I can't reveal it here (I'll tell you on Discord), less some Ratard (we should call them that from now on) reads this tp. But to be very very clear, if I play RationalTroll, could I face reprecussions on uncy for it? like that crosswiki abuse stuff, idk that applies here tho. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC) I assume you're talking about this stuff in the deleting my edits section? And no, there is no penalty over here for playing RationalTroll over there. I would like to play, but I doubt I will have time. I'll let you know if that changes, and please do share diffs of your mischief over there. MrX blow me 20:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC) @MrX: Indeed, if you look through my contributions, it's even funnier because I didn't even do anything wrong. Honestly I was planning on contributing using that account (I actually created that account for ColonelKurtz and told him to troll over on RW, but he said he was blocked. He never did use that account and I was still logged into it when I edited that article). Yeah lmk whenever you're free in the next 2 weeks, or if we could set up a game with others on discord (though I think we should only let established users and established trolls play, lest some ratard tip the sysops and mods off and they know when to expect us). Of course I'll share the with you! I've been doing some, erm stuff over there for quite some time now (mostly out of boredom), it was mostly just provocative and nsfw stuff, yk just the usual generic bs, nothing special, but I'll tone it down and make it more creative to make it more uncyclopedia worthy, and I'll actually start scoring myself, though I will say, I did learn a couple tactics and find loopholes on there which should give me an upperhand for RationalTroll (their moderation response, and filter system is laughable), though lmk if you ever need a tip on beating their captchas (which is probably their best vandal deterrent, which doesn't say much) and edit filters. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC) Cool but I don’t think I will have time to make any contributions myself. MrX blow me 16:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC) @MrX: haha, no worries, I'll keep you updated on my exploits though, but would it be possible for us to set up a RationalTroll tournament on discord btw? Also, is thsi you https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/MrX? WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC) Yeah you could see about setting up a tourney on Disccord. And no that's not me on Wikipedia. That guy is a liar and an imposter. MrX blow me 21:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

question

is by any chance the discord friend request that I received the other day from your account? DaniPine3 (talk) 04:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3:If it's from Dodoboomer (or dodoboomer, idk the case lol), then yeah. WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 04:12, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

yea, that's the one I'm talking about. I can't deny, so far I've been using discord to chat with my friends from where I live, so having you there as a friend too would be making a big leap, considering you're at the other side of the Atlantic Ocean... but I could try nonetheless. DaniPine3 (talk) 04:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3:I mean lowkey you don't have to add me back if you don't feel comfortable, I won't judge lol. Also I'm not super active on there lol, I probably log on like 3-4 times a week for a couple minutes. Also, sheesh man it's early for you! Merry Christmas btw (if you celebrate), speaking of time, it's getting a little late for me, so I'm gonna log off now... WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 04:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to you too. I don't celebrate it in a religious way, but I'm pretty sure most people nowadays don't either; and it was a pagan holiday before the Christians changed it anyways, so it's not as if anything has really changed. Btw, it wasn't early for me when I wrote that, more so than late, because I hadn't go to sleep yet (it was Christmas Eve, after all). Well, I guess I'll think whether I'll be adding you to my friends on discord or not; although it comforts me to know you don't mind if I end ignoring the friend request. Anyways, once again, merry Christmas, and have a happy New Year. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Yeah, do whatever makes you feel good, no pressure. I honestly won't be offended if you ignore it, and come to think of it it lowkey doesn't matter because I can talk to you here and on the unc server. On another note, would you mind reverting the main page back to normal tomorrrow? The Christmas stuff is cool, but it's a bit distracting now lol, honestly I'd just replace it with some New Year stuff :) WPBS (ping for response) (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)