User talk:Shabidoo/archive3
Virginal New[edit source]
The page is now white...white like my virginity ;) --ShabiDOO 01:56, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Har. ~ 03:55, 16 May 2011
You know...[edit source]
You could be more encouraging when reviewing articles from the noobs.
Chief said it better, among other things, mind: "Try to be more encouraging, if you think the user hasn't done something right in requesting the review don't mention it, also try to be a bit more generous with the scores for newer users, the yellows are more encouraging than the reds."
Sure, the articles tend to suck, but... well, they're new. They also tend to have more potential to improve, but are likewise more likely to be scared off. ~ 04:57, 17 May 2011
- For me, it was pretty weird. A n00b somewhere (some bob or something) rewiewed my Roses, and I got bad scores. It`s not always a big guy who scares n00bs or other actually pretty good guys. It can be n00b who scares YOU. ,said the great warrior Cathy before fleeing and never coming back. 05:14, 17 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Thats funny cat! I went through it again and made it more encouraging. Thanks Lyrith. Thats good advice. Word to the wise...we can all be more encouraging towards each other as well no? Very few users point out good things people do on the site except during votes, whether its content, writing, fixing, admin and stuff. People also say thanks very little. Though with the pee reviews its a different story. Lots of thanks there :) --ShabiDOO 05:20, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
- What`s encouraging? Is my Roses encouraging? What? 05:59, 17 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Thats funny cat! I went through it again and made it more encouraging. Thanks Lyrith. Thats good advice. Word to the wise...we can all be more encouraging towards each other as well no? Very few users point out good things people do on the site except during votes, whether its content, writing, fixing, admin and stuff. People also say thanks very little. Though with the pee reviews its a different story. Lots of thanks there :) --ShabiDOO 05:20, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
Also, yeah, that's much less scary now. Thanks. ~ 00:19, 18 May 2011
Thanks for everything![edit source]
Thanks for your content, writing, fixing, admin and stuff. But huge thanks for voting for "People Who Like to Fuck Naked" for articles of the month - it came in tied for third! What a tfig (gift spelled backwards)! Thanks again. Aleister 00:26 18-5-'11
- And, wow, I just saw your vote/comment on Britainy Spear. I'm really glad you liked the added work I did on it after your pee review. But I won't thank you again for the pee review, but for your content, writing, fixing, admin and stuff. Aleister 00:39 18-5-'11
- Hahahaha. Well I don't do admin, but I do do stuff...so thanks for thanking me for doing stuff. Ali, I thank you for doing stuff. Like the stuff you did a while back, that was phenomenal jiggery! And the stuff you did just a bit ago...you are a congenial guy! And the stuff just recently that made a big slash re: the thingimabob people were all taking about...that was so thanksworthy, I give you a cordial and emphatic thank you! THANKS ALI FOR DOING STUFF THAT IS THANKSWORTHY!!!!!!!! Thanks thanks thanks thanks --ShabiDOO 01:07, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
Whats worse than a dick?[edit source]
??? --ShabiDOO 03:15, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
- What's wrong with a dick? Pup 01:48 22 Jun '11
Question[edit source]
Since Dexter submitted his entry, would you consider competing against him in the final round? MadMax 12:25, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Ehm...for you budy, ill write the article if Dex agrees to, you know, write an article, a full article, by the deadline, then yeah...it would be fun if its really being taken seriously. Second...could you convince someone to peereview the article I wrote or even at the very least ask the judges to leave a paragraph or two about it...Im at the point where I am ripping my hair out trying to get people to give me constructive feedback on my writing, especially suggestions and ideas? Its not the greatest article ever, but i did work a fair bit on it, and I didnt get even a little bit of feedback on it...you know what I mean? Ill write an article anyways, but it sure would be swell as heck if we could pull off one of these two requests :) --ShabiDOO 00:39, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
I just talked to TKF (which I've probably should have done first) and both ZB and Dexter agreed in IRC to allow ZB to advance to the finals. Is that alright with you? The final round would start this Sunday (May 22) and end June 4. The article would be judged and the winners announced the following day. I'm hoping a two-week writing period might produced better results this time around.
I'll ask some of the regulars at UN:PEE about your article. I thought it was pretty good especially having been written in less than a week. MadMax 17:57, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay...rock and rolling roll and rock. Ehm...who am I playing against. I don't mind who it is...the one who did something before the review, or the one who actually wrote an article (even though it was a day late). Who is my competition? Thanks for asking someone to pee review for me. It wasnt an ultimatum but I appreciate it a lot :)= --ShabiDOO 06:12, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
You'll be facing Zombiebaron. And no problem about the Pee Review. MadMax 02:48, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
You helped develop the anti-death drug![edit source]
More nagging about reviews[edit source]
Because it's what I do, man. Actually, the things are a lot better now... although... salamanders, eh?
I guess this is more asking a favour, than anything else - I've noticed you've been spending a lot more time on them, saving as you go, which is probably actually a good thing, but... well, what if you disappear in the middle of one? Now, we'd have no idea what might have happened, so it'll just be this half finished review sitting there and people might get a little annoyed, so if it turns out you've gone and died, would you really want the last thoughts of you here being about how you left a review half-finished in the queue? Seriously, who wants that? I suppose I'm asking, if you're going to spend more than an hour or two on it, could you be a dear and copy it into your userspace and draft there or some such, copy it back when you're done, instead of saving drafts in the main Pee Review queue? That's what JackOfSpades does, and I was thinking it might work rather well for you as well.
Also, it was mucking up with the maintenance, though I think I fixed that. But if you do do it in your userspace, you'll be able to preview them and save without drawing much attention whilst avoiding unnecessary salamanders, for that matter. ~ 05:54, 21 May 2011
- That is a good idea. When I die, I want my last moment on uncyclopedia to be me writing a 4,000 page essay on the inter-dynamics of power and control between talk page micro-relationships and admin power constructs. --ShabiDOO 06:14, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Stupid Cats is the metaphorical introduction to my thesis. Its pretty clear no? --ShabiDOO 02:54, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, except for the minor detail of the moose that ate half the relevant bits, certainly. ~ 07:31, 22 May 2011
- Stupid Cats is the metaphorical introduction to my thesis. Its pretty clear no? --ShabiDOO 02:54, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
Reviewer of the month[edit source]
Congrats for the nom! You deserve it. I was rather impressed with your review I spoke about on the nom page when I voted for you, HowTo: Become an hero. I did the second one for that article recently, I read yours after posting mine and DorkaDorce told me it's funny becausewe both talked about trying not to be too offensive about the Mitchell thing. LoL. Is there a lot of people voting for that award? It seems rather calm at the moment, it would be funny if you won because of my vote! I have 2 articles submitted on Pee right now, and as a moral rule, I do a pee review of someone's article everytime I post one. I would really appreciate if you find the time to do the one on my article Québec, if you have the time of course. I would be honored, flattered and all, and I don't care about the score: the improvements to be made and what is good about it are most important. Always feel free to ask me for help (lol as if I would be the one able to help you! It's the other way around) or a collab or anything! Mattsnow 02:11, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the pee review[edit source]
Thank you for reviewing my article, User:Joe9320/Why?:Be a refugee from Encyclopedia Dramatica. Following your recommendations, I had edited to your needs. No longer are there any lists. 03:00, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh...was no problem. IT WAS MY PLEASURE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :) :) :) --ShabiDOO 16:52, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
Lollipop has two l's[edit source]
Lollipop. -- Lollipop - 22:18, 31 May 2011
Lyrithya didn't give this to you because she is pants so pretty[edit source]
Reviewer of the Month May 2011 | |
- So here you go. 07:56, 1 June 2011
The Unroyal Wedding[edit source]
Thanks for the feedback - I appreciate it. (I wonder which one is wearing the white dress?) DaveFromMars 01:08, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- My pleasure man. Theres something nuts about all these nOObs just writing out promising stuff. I guess they would probably both be wearing wedding dresses while they have some slave master come visit them once a week. Probably winston churchills ghost. I dunno --ShabiDOO 01:38, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
Here are your awards[edit source]
Hope they work. -- 01:12, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- OH MY F***ING GOD THEY ARE F***ING AMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wow. Hey buddy, if you can...could you put 2010 through them, or it you are burnt out Ill add it on (but probably not as good as you :) --ShabiDOO 01:15, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- What do you mean by put 2010 through them? Do you mean make faint numbers that say "2010" over them? Please tell me what you mean. -- 01:21, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah...we can use these as the barnstars or whatever every year...but we need to get 2010 on them somehow (to distinguish them from years in the future. You could put it in the middle, on the side, small (but noticeable) big. However you like :) --ShabiDOO 01:24, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll do it. But I'll probably just add it in the bottom right corner, because I feel that anything else could detract from the tong-in-cheek humor. Also, anything too big would make them too busy (especially that last one). -- 01:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree totally. These really are, truly truly f***ing groovy and awsome. Whenever you can man. --ShabiDOO 01:37, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll do it. But I'll probably just add it in the bottom right corner, because I feel that anything else could detract from the tong-in-cheek humor. Also, anything too big would make them too busy (especially that last one). -- 01:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah...we can use these as the barnstars or whatever every year...but we need to get 2010 on them somehow (to distinguish them from years in the future. You could put it in the middle, on the side, small (but noticeable) big. However you like :) --ShabiDOO 01:24, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
- What do you mean by put 2010 through them? Do you mean make faint numbers that say "2010" over them? Please tell me what you mean. -- 01:21, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
WOTM[edit source]
Thank you so much for your vote for May Writer of the Month, I really appreciate it! -- Sf13 0050 EST 6 June 2011
Unobtanium[edit source]
Hi Shabi! Much thanks for the pee review on this. I really do enjoy collaborations and I think you have clear understanding and vision for this impossible subject - would you please take what I have started and finish the article!? Well make a collaboration. Is that okay!? Best wishes--Funnybony 20:12, Jun 16
- Hey...yes...it would be fun...but lets not say that I finish it but we work on it together. And secondly...I can't do it for a couple weeks. Im busy in life and I also have 10 articles of my own that Im working on and polishing up. :) --ShabiDOO 18:46, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
Random comment: Those sentences you cited in the review, they were fairly natural and grammatically correct, just so you know. They may not have been the clearest, or could have used some punctuation shuffling in some cases, but... eh. Not that it's not something to address if the meanings don't get across, but that's another matter. Usually it's the most colloquial ones that lose the most meaning, is all, so perhaps 'natural' isn't the best word. ~ 06:15, 18 June 2011
- Thanks for that, Lyrithya. Okay, Shabidoo. For a collab I'll gladly wait until you can work on it. Then we'll finish it together. I'm a Pilgrim English speaker (natives spoke Apache, or something). I have a few things (and articles) to do as well.. so your cooperation is much appreciated. Please let me know when you're ready.--Funnybony 07:24, Jun 19
Fast, it's a break![edit source]
G-REX THANKS from Sog & Fbony[edit source]
Not featured[edit source]
That is actually an ugly way to code it, as the z-index in an article only reflects to within the article part itself. Can I suggest that instead you do up an image of the potato and the not featured thing together, and simply replace the lot using {{logo}}? Pup 12:57 22 Jun '11
- Ehm...thanks a lot puppy for helping me. I sporked the code from someone and I have NO idea who it was, and I cannot tell you at all what any of the code means. All I know was that at the same time that tab thing went screwy (skin change time) the not featured part then went behind the potato. I don't even know what {{logo}}? even means. If you could give me instructions, I would develope a man crush on you. --ShabiDOO 01:01, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
- It's cool. That template replaces the logo of the page with whatever image you want to have there. Let me have a bit of a quick play first, and I'll get back to you. Pup 01:06 22 Jun '11
Put it up there with this code: {{logo|image=Not featured.png|size=160px|}} Cheers! -- 01:31, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Made my life easier! 124.170.60.14
- If that's you, Shabidoo, you're logged out. If not, glad I could make your day easier sir/madam. -- 01:37, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually it's Puppy. Can you adjust that image so that the banner is 175px width but Sophia stays as is? Pup 12:57 22 Jun '11 ish
- No...124.170.60.14|124.170.60.14 is my IP nemesis. Good person otherwise. Addicted to coloured bleach and all...but otherwise I hate 124.170.60.14|124.170.60.14 so much I dont even want to get started. But thanks 124.170.60.14|124.170.60.14 for helping. I dont know what you are upto...but this isnt the last time you help me and not get away with it. --ShabiDOO 01:44, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually it's Puppy. Can you adjust that image so that the banner is 175px width but Sophia stays as is? Pup 12:57 22 Jun '11 ish
- If that's you, Shabidoo, you're logged out. If not, glad I could make your day easier sir/madam. -- 01:37, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Could you also bring the banner to the front. And I'm actually on a fishing boat to Mexico. Pup 01:46 22 Jun '11
- After all that, Lyr fixed it. So thank her. Lots. Pup 03:27 22 Jun '11
Now[edit source]
What you have as code is
{{logo}} {{logo|image=NotFeatured.png|top=-12px|size=160px}}
That first line gives you the default logo. The second line adds an image in front of that. The image you had actually used a white background, which meant that there was a big white square in front of the logo. I've changed the image to have a transparent background, so you can still see Sophia.
Top determines how high the image is. Having it -12 means that it sit slightly off the screen. Size determines how wide--Funnybony 18:37, Jun 23 18:37, June 23, 2011 (UTC) the image is. Interbrowser issues mean that this has to be limited to 160px to stop it mucking up navigation. If you increase the size it will stay at 160px, if you decrease it it will shrink it slightly. If you remove the size altogether it will try to use the images default size, which is actually freaking huge for what it actually is. Don't do that - it looks really ugly.
Hope that clears that all up for you. Should now be good across browsers and different skins. If there are any issues, let Lyr know. Pup 02:51 23 Jun '11
That's awesome[edit source]
So where's the draft of the parody article? :) Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 09:29, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
You voted for visual puns, which got featured![edit source]
Unobtanium[edit source]
Hi Shabi! I made clarifications and adjustments based on your review. If you have no objection then I'll Nom it now for VFH - I think (hope) people will like it better after your Pee. It's really not meant to be a long article. Okay! Cheers!!!--Funnybony 15:43, Jun 23
- if you can wait a bit ill go over a couple things...like...in the next 24 hours. Otherwise...go ahead. :) --ShabiDOO 16:08, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Cool! If you have something in mind, sure we can wait. Looking forward to it. Should be better now than before already, but can always be better. Cheers!--Funnybony 18:37, Jun 23
- Goooooood! I love it! You're on a roll. Good stuff. Really, I think we have a winner. Don't stop me now, we're having such a good time, having a ball!--Funnybony 17:26, Jun 25
- Yeah...youll have to have some patience okay...cause this weekend Im pretty busy and stuff. But we can have fun. Just like when I wrote with Lollipop...lets not worry about it being featured. Lets just have fun collaborating oaky!? --ShabiDOO 17:55, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Cool, Shabi.. Take your time, I have a few other irons in the fire. I just rewrote Dead Dicks after now getting a Pee Review even while it's on VFH (finally). Cheers!--Funnybony 19:29, Jun 25
- Yeah...youll have to have some patience okay...cause this weekend Im pretty busy and stuff. But we can have fun. Just like when I wrote with Lollipop...lets not worry about it being featured. Lets just have fun collaborating oaky!? --ShabiDOO 17:55, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Goooooood! I love it! You're on a roll. Good stuff. Really, I think we have a winner. Don't stop me now, we're having such a good time, having a ball!--Funnybony 17:26, Jun 25
- Cool! If you have something in mind, sure we can wait. Looking forward to it. Should be better now than before already, but can always be better. Cheers!--Funnybony 18:37, Jun 23
Kryptonite[edit source]
Thanks-a-million for disregarding this dumb warning. You have wisely chosen the dark-side of the farce.--Funnybony 08:45, Jun 26
Pantsless Thanks[edit source]
Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.
I appreciate it, and stuff.
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:49, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
CONGRATSSSSSSS[edit source]
Hiya Shabi! Congratulations on your first feature!! If I would've known that I'd have voted twice. And the article was excellent - over kill, almost. You deserve 2 FAs for that masterpiece (in my arrogant opinion). If you have time to work on Unobtanium - as you already made a really good start - then we can finish it together and split a feature 0.5 each. That works really well around here. My best articles are mostly collaborations. Please, let's finish it. Once you have three FAs then you'll be in the Hall of Shame, where you will shine forever more. Cheers!--Funnybony 15:56, Jul 1
- Hahaha...youre a really great guy. Thanks for the compliments. Im in Milan this weekend so I dont have too much time to contribute...but TRUST me when I say Im looking forward to working on it with you. Okay!?!?!? :) --ShabiDOO 16:21, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
You can do the review[edit source]
I doubt I got Time for it anyways--- 18:41, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I was only half serious man. Ill do it...but only if you really feel like passing it on. There are lots to do! --ShabiDOO 19:10, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
articles[edit source]
Hey, thanks for reviewing both my articles. I'm going to do more work on them during the summer to make them better as you said. --Waylander37 20:55, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Waylander...it was my pleasure...absolutely. Let me know if you have any questions about them, or want me to look at it again! --ShabiDOO 00:06, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
Tournament organization[edit source]
Forum:Tournament Plan: Uncyc Summer Extravaganza! OK, I think this is an appropriate place to put the plan in, do you think so? 06:01, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Stupid Cats[edit source]
In added a new section, you can see it here. I'm still fixing it up, and I do think that if we fix it up even more, merge small sections into each other, and make it a readable article, then i'll have my first feature, and you'll have your second. -- Lollipop - 17:43, 6 July 2011
- I promise you will get your first feature (and thanks for voting for me)...I had the idea to make the actual article itself the intro to three further articles (an uncyclopedic description, stupid cats olympics, and cooking stupid cats) with minimal text. We can see if we can get that page featured. It will take time though, there will have to be cuts. Why dont you move the whole sports stuff to your namespace and come up with more ideas? How does that sound? --ShabiDOO 18:12, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
You got banned[edit source]
HA HA! loser! :p--- 20:37, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I love you too. Is it...that you have a crush on me or are you heavily trying to seduce me? --ShabiDOO 16:41, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
You complained about my lack of complaining at you...[edit source]
So here's a complaint or something: In regards to saying you'll do reviews, could you be a dear and wait until you've finished the one before saying you'll do the next? It's not necessarily a problem, but if you go missing or something it's only one tied-up review instead of two.
Also, hi. ~ 21:28, 7 July 2011
- Dear Lyth...thanks for the complaint. As for the reviews, I only tagged two because some one is begging for the cue to get smaller, and Im happy to do reviews, lots even, though Im selective, so If im going to do a bunch, i wanna tag the ones im interested in. Ill get them done in a day, though for some reason I thought the ban yesterday was real, so i didnt do anything, until, i realised it was a joke. Haha. Oh yeah...hi! But...once that message goes away...well...of course Ill tag only one at a time. Unless you complain again, in which case, Ill listen to you...based on abject fear :) --ShabiDOO 00:05, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia Summer Extravaganza Promotion[edit source]
Can you promote my contest please? Please promote this contest so that I can get people to sign up. 01:38, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey...for sure Ill help you. Id love to. but...why dont you get the details ironed out first? Like...make things solid...starting date, will you allow teams of any size? How many teams? Does one team get kicked out each round? Any three articles at all (why not just one article...as thats more likely to get completed rather than three?). Any limit to the amount of teams that enter? :) --ShabiDOO 02:29, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
If I had a crush on you[edit source]
Your ass would be on fire--- 04:13, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Like...after eating tacos from Guatemala?
Thank you for the Pee[edit source]
But I hate to say this, I saw there was a Pee Review done on my article as I went on Pee to cancel it, since it was there for a week... I nommed it on VFH before reading your Pee, fawk! (I thought I would unclog Pee Review) I'll put it on the Discussion page of the article, so it will follow. (Be sure that getting featured is not the goal, having the best article possible is, so your Pee Review is so helpful!) Mattsnow 04:32, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWSOME! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO rah rah rah rah rah!!!!!!!! Ehm...I would also seriously recommend polishing up the article (i.e. taking it off VFH and adding a thing or two). The article could be a LOT better without too much work and this way you could have a super awsome article that could even make the top 10 of the month :) As you like. Hope you enjoyed it. --ShabiDOO 16:16, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
The quick tag doesn't work[edit source]
Thanks for the pee! So, funny, has a concept, no more intentionally bad. Got it!!' And thanks again!--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 06:29, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes...efectively, my suggestions are: Funny, concept, no iontentionally bad ;). I think you got it. And you are welcome again. Let me know if you want to know anything that I know about it. --ShabiDOO 16:14, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
!HFV no etov ruoy rof sknahT[edit source]
.segassem nataS wollof lanimilbus yna dragersid esaelP !sdrawkcab ti daer uoy ,yeH !sdrawkcab egassem siht daer ton oD !sdrawkcab egassem siht daer ton oD ZELUR GNIKSAMKCAB |
- Slithy Tove 00:54, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Sup[edit source]
Hey Shabi. I haven't been on Uncyclopedia in at least 3 months (besides the argument we had on Lyrithya's page) (maybe more) and stupidly, I completely forgot how to change my signature to make it customized (like yours), if you wouldn't mind walking me through how to do it. I was working on a new sig, than it got completely erased in a poof of logic while I was busy playing Angry Birds....lol. Whenever your free, please post some walkthrough steps on my talk page and I will reply quickly, as I usually check the Uncyc every few hours... Thanks man Your very naughty friend (maybe), Aimsplode 15:50, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Aimsplode...you forgot to introduce yourself...and ask me how I am doing? Ask me how my weekend was? How was it? I just spent the last night with 5 cops a paramedic and 15 firefighters allong with three reporters. I had sex with none of them. Anyhoo...nice to meet you Aimsplode. Go talk to Lolipop...he has made my last two signatures which I LOVE! He will both explain it to you and even make you one if you ask nicely. Some...not all...but some of his signatures are amazing --ShabiDOO 15:53, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks man. I appreciate your help (because I am too stupid and lazy to figure out how to make an awesome sig like yours.)
- Thanks again, The Still Lame-Signatured Aimsplode 20:49, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Unobtanium[edit source]
Hi Shabi! Okay, good stuff, bro! I went through your additions and also added and rearranged more additions too. If you could please go through the article for a final polish then it will be ready for VFH. I just did a collab similar to this with Matt and it worked good. More of those planned. Please let me know...Cheers!--Funnybony 16:06, Jul 9
- Hey man...its my pleasure. To be honesty, ive done about a quarter of what I planned to do :) PATIENCE PATIENCE PATIENCE hahaha. I should also check out the peereview I wrote and follow my own suggestions! --ShabiDOO 16:32, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
40th Thanks[edit source]
Thanks for the Tips regarding Pee Review[edit source]
I received your message and you are right, I was terse with the Pee Review for the "Caste" article. I guess the idea seemed so great but the execution seemed so off, that I just didn't have the patience at the time to write more. In the future, I will wait to do reviews until I am in the mood and flow to go into greater detail - I don't want to scare any would-be contributors off.
Also, I will take better note of claimed Pee Reviews before I review articles. I just hope people are getting around to the articles they are claiming to review, because the backlog has gotten pretty long!
I love Uncyclopedia and am just trying to do my part, although I am often far from perfect in my efforts. I'll keep striving to improve and maybe, someday, I'll be able to claim I am a model Uncyclopedia "citizen." Until that time, keep up the constructive criticism - I appreciate it!--Sir NoNamesLeft (GUN) WotM NotM 18:54, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting my 40th featured article.
It also happens to be my third featured UnNews.
—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:50, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Guildenstren...you are...quietly...one of my favourites...for being...one of those really cool nice people who quietly do really great nice stuff here! ROCK AND ROLL!!! You deserve it! --ShabiDOO 00:16, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
Co-hosting my contest[edit source]
In fact, you can co-host my contest. You can advertise my contest too. Contest starts on August 1 by the way. 04:05, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia made my life more different[edit source]
I like your article and think it is ready to feature, negative vote(s) notwithstanding. I think polishing the article would take away from its theme. And I think the "navelism" is what makes the article funny - it is self-reflective to the point of concentrating on the fuzzes in your own navel, which gives it a stream of consciousness and surreal tone. Anyway, I hope the article makes it. You garnered a lot of votes quickly, so I am keeping my fingers crossed for you.--Sir NoNamesLeft (GUN) WotM NotM 23:06, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a million man! When I wrote this...I tried really hard to make it accesible to other people. I think its positive navelism (that is...someone will read it...and infact learn some things about uncyclopedia seeing how I explain what some things mean and make the place seem totally off the wall) and even the most hard core navelism (i.e. I hate chief justice) or Zombie Baron inside joke article, is infact worth featuring because they are still funny, still marginally funny for anyone who has no idea what it means, and more over, people severely over estimate how many new visitors we have and how they are likely to react to things. Its like predicting how many people will go to your birthday party in 10 years and if it will be a sucess or not. Further more...this article never was meant to be about uncyclopedia...its about a guy who doesnt even try to go anywhere in life and yet suceeds and gets shot down once he starts trying. Anyhoo...blah blah blah...thanks again for everything. Me love you long long time! --ShabiDOO 23:17, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey bro! I normally don't vote for articles like this which are self referential - but I thought it was good. Here is one you might like to read too (just for fun). Looks like "more different" is a done deal, just as long as you don't risk it all by voting against some dip-shit noob. Will "more different" be your 3rd FA? If so you made it into the Hall.--Funnybony 20:17, Jul 11
Unobtanium[edit source]
Good stuff on Unobtanium. I'm also adding and cleaning up. Add what you like but please don't delete my material unless it's flat - I'll wait for your finish and go ahead. Then you're looking good for a half feature, which is half as good as a full feature, or vise versa!? Cheers!--Funnybony 20:17, Jul 11
- Funnybony. Thanks for the vote. If we are going to colaborate, its going to have to be more than just Funnybony content + Shabidoo content = article. I made a couple small cuts because I thought it would make a better flow/continuity/concept. If you don't like the cuts, feel free to revert them back and I can try a different way to approach the article or we can talk about it. In any case, though, I cannot imagine collaborating and just adding stuff and nothing else. I hope you understand. --ShabiDOO 12:03, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
Hey thanks...[edit source]
...for your very kind comments! I guess I should have rolled that article out sooner. =) --T. (talk) 18:17, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
Hey Buddy[edit source]
While I appreciate you updating the Pee Review Maintaince tag, you kinda messed up. You're suppose to put the link of the reviews on there. I just noticed that today after looking at it. Just letting you know. Though you may need to fix that as soon as possible--- 20:09, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
Your things[edit source]
You shouldn't be putting those things with the other things because the other things are in the opposite order than your things and linking to different stuff than your things. So you should either learn how the things work, or don't add your own things. Thanks. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:13 Jul 12, 2011
- Already explained it to him. But I think you did a better job than me, so I ain't complaining--- 20:19, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I guess the secret's out. I'm illiterate. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:39 Jul 12, 2011
You're doing better, but don't include articles that were removed from the pee list because of deletion or VFH. I'll remove those articles, but keep in mind that if it has a score of zero it shouldn't Be in the Maintaince table.--~~
Hey[edit source]
Thanks for helping with the pee list! Sorry I barged in and started correcting things there, I thought you were done (I should pay more attention to the edit times). Anyway you see to be getting the hang of it, nice work. --Black Flamingo 23:44, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah good job--- 23:47, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks BF. Let me know if you disagree with my choices on indepth/not indepth for the next little bit. I didn't realise about updating the last review in each reviewer class table. Cheers for that. I didn't know wether to put you at the beginning or end of the second place for top of the month reviewers, as he did one mroe review but your percentage is higher, is there a policy? Finally, i dont mind being barged in on, my talk page feels empty of complaints since Lyrithya started her much needed stress/anxiety leave :)
- And thank you Iwillkillyou333, Me love you long long long long long long super long sloppy long time --ShabiDOO 23:49, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the pee review![edit source]
I received a lot of good advice from you, and also, I have an article on VFH, so if you want to vote for or against is your choice! Choices are nice.--User:CandidToaster/sig 02:57, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
Let's goof off here[edit source]
pisspisspisspisspissLjlegopisspisspisspiss
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[omg spoon]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
-- Lollipop - 05:54, 13 July 2011
Your idea is good[edit source]
Your idea is perfect regarding my contest. Now can you please advertise? 06:55, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
Contest Message, please read ASAP Shabi[edit source]
I want to organize the judging part of your contest by sending around a message to TKF and Iwillkillyou333. How is this message, and does it comply with you're rules? (If not, maybe we could make some changes on the forum. Message:
Hey TKF/Iwillkillyou333... Shabi asked me to pass this message around, which I created with his approval. Judging will be held every two weeks, for weeks 1-2, and 3-4. The max score possible for a team to get is 40.83, and the lowest being 2.45. The two weeks, all teams write 2 articles, and at the end of the weeks, whoever we (TKF, Iwillkillyou333 and ) vote to be the two top teams will advance to the finals, which will be held during weeks 3-4. The winner of that is The Champion, and will probably get a nice badge or something. Because we all have to add up our votes, I will pass around a little rubric for that when I figure out what the max and min scores are. Look forward to Judging,
Is that good? Please respond on my talk page.
Thanks man, I hope the competition goes well (especially cuz' I'm a Judge :))
22:39, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I wouldn't mine a prize or badge or something (just look at my homepage: there are none). I'm going to send the message to Froggy and Iwillkillyou333 anyway, just to clarify everything with them.....as for the maximum/minimum score rubric, I say we go all for the 40.83 and 2.45 thing, I will give you the chart in a minute.
BTW: Actually, you deserve the thanks here. You actually set something up on you're own (with a little help, but it was all you) with a go-getter spirit. Without you, I would be homeless and unemployed right now. Anyway, the max/min scale will arrive shortly. Don't respond until then, and please (when you do), do so here.
Thanks again,
23:07, July 13, 2011 (UTC)Ok, I did the math: Each team will have a max score of 122.49 and a minimum score of 7.35. Scores, which you can update however often you choose on the forum, will be presented in fraction form (?/122.49). Remember to reply with your thoughts here. Thanks again again again, 23:16, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Aimsplode...tell you what...put your ideas here, and Joe and I will look at it...in the end its up to Joe and I (especially Joe since this is actually his brain-child...I administered a small competition before and I am just pushing it forward). So go ahead and put some ideas forward on that page but please not on the forum)... Lots of time to work out the rinkles. The priority now...is..getting contestants. DO HELP. WE NEED CONTESTANTS :) --ShabiDOO 23:20, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Toolate! Already posted it to froggy and IWKY333, sorry. I will send it to Joe, and I will send around a message to all of the people I know on the Uncyc to compete.
23:32, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
I'm still working with you, good morning. I'm trying to get Zombiebaron and his admin friends to colonize one entire team. Not easy. ShabiDOO 14:26, July 14, 2011 (UTC) You don't get it. Zombibaron WANTS a team made up of only admins like himself lol... 01:20, July 15, 2011 (UTC)
13:14, July 14, 2011 (UTC) Dont worry about it being an admin team. Better if its all mixed up. :) --