This is Gergdown's talk page, also known as a pile of hot garbage. It's garbage. This is also a page where you can send shit, poo, and garbage to Gergdown.
THE THREE GERG RULEZ:
1. I don't really care if you sign.(It's because I'll just add it myself.)
3. Go wild!(You only have a short time in this world, spread out in the infinite view of space that seemingly goes on forever and ever... but doesn't that give life meaning? Maybe you should stop listening to this random Reddit nerderator behind the screen!)
After having my the UnSignpost stolen revived by Turb0-Sunrise and Fish on skates, going on monthly month-long hiatuses for 3 years (what do you mean it's been 3 years since I was active???), and forgetting Uncyclopedia's existence despite frequently lurking in its discord server, I have forgotten how to write an UnSignpost. How do I use the template (which I myself modified back in 2022)? What do all these inputs mean? How do I write things? I'm quite sure the UnSignpost wrapper used to be centered! What's even happening in this site these days? AAAAAAAAA!
Anyway, it should be January 2026 for everyone here, right? ... Right? So, first UnSignpost of the year goes to me. I sure do love collecting meaningless achievements and titles!
...gosh, what do I even do here anymore? What am I allowed to put in this signpost, again?
As it is now 2026, the possibility for tomorrow to be the release day of Deltarune Chapter 5 has become existent once more. Despite the halfway mark of their game having been attained, new chapters are not likely to stop the insanity of Deltarune fans. Assuming Chapter 5 is not shadow-dropped and instead has a release date announced, the world will once again have a day where "tomorrow" means "the day after today" instead of "the day a new chapter of Deltarune releases". Once that happens, there will only be up to 2 Deltarune Tomorrows until the world's concept of tomorrow returns to something that doesn't always mean Deltarune.
Biopic
I don't know what a biopic is
From The Logs
*plant noises.ogg*
*animal noises.ogg*
Oh, it meant stuff like Special:Log and stuff. Well, gotta use these sounds I recorded from inside a literal log somehow. We're keeping it in.
you're tied with arandompage for the worst admin nomination in history SirTurb0-Sunrisede laBoston 01:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Okay, you say that, but literally on the same page is a nomination with a score of -0.5??? Also, the worst nomination is obviously Shabidoo's right gay testicle. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 02:05, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
@Soviet: Here's what I think: Yeah, with several notable precautions. It's a really great game! You probably just need a basic understanding of how Undertale works. Don't worry, that's easy. It's basically just an RPG but it's also a Touhou-like game? Like, the enemies actually fight you in a battle box which you can move your SOUL around. If you know that, that's all you need to know. Hell, I actually didn't play Undertale before this... played it easily.
Here's what NOT to do though: Don't do what I did and play all the chapters in one sitting. I was a casual guy before I played it, but I got hooked. Then the game and fandom consumes you like a black hole. TL;DR: Eh, sure, but don't fall into the Deltarune rabbit hole like Alula and DaniPine, who have lost their ability to write! Oh, and probably don't join one of the Deltarune discord servers. They eat you whole and consume your liver. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 15:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
i can write just fine. i just choose not to 15:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
oneshot and deltarune beating up your ability to write like that one comic with the buff guys --DameFishonskatesCUN 17:46, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Holy. Fucking. FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!
With the new year comes the yearly awards. The scramble of the top 10. The xOTY nominations.
Alright, let's get the fuck down to business.
First off, I have a UOTM nomination open. I have 7 votes already. side note, you should vote for me. side note over.
Now, I have a UOTY too. But that's not the end of it. don't waste your time here
Some dude Turb0-Sunrise has officially got 10,000 edits as of January 6, 2026. He's only been on here for like 5 months. To put that in perspective, Alula has been around since late 2021 and has around 30,000 edits. You do the math.
ColonelKurtz, who took an involuntary unbreak back in October, has returned. Here's hoping he learned from whatever brought on that involuntary break!
Biopic
This biopic is about biopics. There are many different ways to write them, but I'm trying out writing them in the style of ARandomPage, who half the time treats this section as another story. I'm lazy, etc. On to the fanmail!
You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Gerg? As we all know, the correct way of spelling nosubst is nosubst!!! Obviously not nosubst|nosubst!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Gerg. --DameFishonskatesCUN 04:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
so that the pipe is a parameter in the sig template and not in the nosubst template. --DameFishonskatesCUN 04:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
yeah, if you add a normal pipe it counts everything from then until the end brackets as a different parameter, essentially removing whatever is supposed to be there (like, let's say, a link to your userpage) 10:56, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Sooo the reason why I did that was because I thought a ping from Cassie didn't work. But no, I just beat the ping.🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:56, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
there should be a userbox for that --DameFishonskatesCUN 18:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
You have been disqualified from the Beat A Dead Shoe Competition.[edit source]
The tribe has spoken.
Several times did you add 198 moccasins instead of 99 (although adding 100 is allowed.) OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 21:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise:@OPOSSUM: NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Or maybe youv'e fallen for my TRAP! You know why? It's because I have shit to do! Therefore, I have kamikazed myself from the competition... I hope Fish gets it, though. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 21:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
i'm only participating because it gives me an excuse to vandalize his page GeneralTurb0-SunriseofBoston 22:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise: Me too. I actually don't want to be the moccasin man. Dab me up, brah! 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 22:00, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise: I've been rick rolled so many times that it doesn't even matter anymore. Not even Goatse hits me in the balls anymore. Lesbian hentai does, though. You should make that my talk page background. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 22:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: @Turb0-Sunrise: No, Category TOC is the table of contents for the category. CatBrowser is a list of all categories. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:44, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Stinky template, that's what I'm telling ya'! They're eating our byte space, they're eating our servers! Some may say that I might be one of the dumbest users, maybe even the dumbest. All my friends would tell you that I'm the dumbest user, the worst user. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:50, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
why was i rollbacked? i was just adding the category --DameFishonskatesCUN 02:15, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
@Fish on skates: Sorry for not adding a reason... busy. Uh, if you read the category description... it says "only add images and templates here". 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 02:16, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
so there's no war over who got admin first, if either of us gets nominated at the next VFS, we'll nominate the other. i.e if i get nominated, i'll nominate you, and vice versa. GeneralTurb0-SunriseofBoston 01:41, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise: Can't believe we have an actual Uncyclopedian war between us. Sure, but that's because there's a 100% chance I'm nominating you for VFS. You're just a good guy man 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:47, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
a [JUICY DEAL], you say? (you did this to me gerg) --DameFishonskatesCUN 02:57, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
Continuing on the "was here" userbox trend where people make userboxes saying they were here, Gammakid999, MK, and L10nM4st3r have userboxes of their own.
OPOSSUM made a contest for the title of "Moccasin Man" because he's done with moccasins.Soviet's Bot won by putting the most moccasins on OPOSSUM's userpage.
US President RealDonaldTrump made Testing the VFH widget (again) (do not feature!), a page that was meant to test some new feature. Turb0 then voted on its VFH page, with many others including me and several admins voting. Because I think I'm sooo clever, I made a VFH page for the VFH. And because Turbs also thinks he's soooo clever, he made a VFH page for that, and a VFH page for that. Gergdown also contributed somewhat to the joke. Alula later deleted the test page and closed all of the nominations.
Biopic
Cassie, also known as Cassandra, is a bureaucrat I'm pretty sure, and has been around for a long time. Anyway, she's not dead. Pretty sure. She's on the active users template and I hope she stays a while.
19:05, 14 January 2026 Alula (talk | contribs) blocked Turb0-Sunrise (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of infinite (account creation disabled) (clearly learnt his lesson from last time. oh wait)
Abuse filter blocked MK with an expiration time of infinite (account creation disabled) (Blocked by abuse filter. Description of matched rule: Mandatory cancellation)
I must confess, I actually liked Tranvit's Skoda articles. Not all AI is slop, and not all slop is AI. (But wheter AI articles belong on Uncyclopedia is another subject altogether.) OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 14:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
@OPOSSUM: NOOO!!!! Uh... here's an idea, if there's any you actually liked, I'll remove them from QVFD and put them on VFD to let the common mass decide. If you liked all of them... then it'd probably take eons to put them on VFD due to how cramped it is (Just increase the nom count to 30, admins!). The issue is that these are articles that only rely on the sarcastic value, and are very, and when I say this, very fucking long. I think some of them should stay on QVFD, but definitely at least one of them should be on VFD. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 15:02, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Well done my man. You're well on the board and on your way to climb the ranks. 32 more feature points and you'll be in the top 10. It goes faster than you'd think. Really great job this year also with your video article :) ShabiDOO 23:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Seriously though, thank you bro! Special special thanks for your additions on UnBooks:Harry Potter Summarized in Less Than a Minute. I already have a pretty dang good idea for another article. 99% chance I'll work on it next week. (For the reason why my activity has dropped, I've been creating and coding a mod for a game. It's been taking my life, but it's almost done.) 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:57, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
L10nM4st3r and DaniPine3 blocked each other and unblocked themselves a lot. The entertaining edit summaries were "Not banned enough yet", "blocking me when i did nothing >:[", ">:]", "Finger slipped", "Finger slipped again", and "banged my head on the keyboard". See for yourself.
You, yes YOU, can rank some Uncyclopedian-made songs! Part of the hit albums Make it to Ketchikan and Bust into Boston these noises you hear before you can be ranked for the second time! So what are you waiting for?
Biopic
In the span of some time that I'm too lazy to count, Deemox has gone from a total noob to a slightly less total noob. He's already made an article and in my humble opinion has quite a lot of potential.
Are the allegations true? I'm not going to elaborate, for comedic effect. — Gammakid999
yes and no at the same time
favorite non-ASBOWAAT article that you didn't write — Fish on skates
uhh get back to me on that one
From The Logs
20:20, 19 January 2026 L10nM4st3r blocked DaniPine3 with an expiration time of 10 minutes (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled) (Not banned enough yet)
20:21, 19 January 2026 DaniPine3 blocked L10nM4st3r with an expiration time of 10 seconds (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (blocking me when I did nothing >:[)
@Soviet: Sorry, I've been busy... I have no idea when I'll give it to you. Probably by today though 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 13:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
@Soviet: Before I send you the text I want your bot to shit out (its a part of the Bee movie script), do you have the option to choose where the text is added? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 22:34, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Uncyclopedia. keep flooding recent changes and this is what happensTURB0-SUNRIS33 14:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
It's the half of the trout that Dani hasn't eaten. Expect him to be here soon. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 01:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
@OPOSSUM: Well, at least it's something to eat for the day... 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:50, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
@Soviet: Hmmm... Well, technically, according to UN:AI, all AI-articles are technically QVFD-able. Howable, I do think that SOME AI articles are not slop. So what I think should happen is that we should make a forum about which AI articles should stay, and which ones should be EXTERMINATED! Well, I'm doing some homework right now, so let's do that tomorrow. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 03:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
probably some are rewritable --DameFishonskatesCUN 13:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Halfway there baybeeeeee!!! or is it even halfway? is it a tenth? Who knows. Well, I guess you do. also, sorry, I accidentally put this on your user page, I removed it though.Deemox (talk) 14:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
also, congrats on being cool today, as it is tuesday. Deemox (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Deemox: It's okay brah. Also, that's like... thirty-three percent to the way to Ketchikan. Actually, there's two routes. The Alaskan route, and the British Columbian route. The BC route is at Tacoma where you DON'T go to the airport and hide in a tent (from my knowledge). The Alaskan route is where you take an airplane and crash at Whittier, just south of Anchorage. And yes, it is Tuesday, meaning that I'm cool. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:42, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Gergdown:, well one third isn't too bad from what I've done. also, I will be taking both routes. I will be taking every single damned button. by the end of this I will have clicked every single option. Deemox (talk) 14:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Deemox: FYI, the BC route is where you can find Vancouver and Vancouverite Sojourn. Also, not even a joke, you have mapped EXACTLY 33% of the game, I'm not joking. 670 pages in total. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:48, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
oh goodie. It's been, what, a week since I started? at this pace, and I've been procrastinating a lot, I'll be done in a couple weeks. Deemox (talk) 14:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Deemox: Do you wanna know how many pages are in Vancouver, British Columbia alone? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
you know, what, tell me. Deemox (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
oh thats not too bad. I can do that in a few days. Deemox (talk) 14:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
oh God I just got to the forest of bullshit oh God send help please for the love of God send help Deemox (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
also why the hell is there no checkpoint before the forest Deemox (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
because there's one right after 15:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Alula please help me this is awful why are there so many fucking paths Im going to need to go through this like twenty times Deemox (talk) 15:23, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
i believe the forest is mapped like a 4x4 grid with two of the pages leading to the exit. then there's almost always a small chance of big moccasin billy to show up, obviously 15:25, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
So is this just a smaller GGG? Deemox (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
yes, except strategy is replaced with luck (tip: if the chance for billy is minimal then he won't show up and you can't die on that page. if it's extreme then he's guaranteed to show up instead) 15:28, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Ah, ok thank you you... whatever animal you are. Bird? Deemox (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
i guess so, yeah 15:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
alright, I'm gonna take a break from this and write another article about a random guy.any suggestions for random guys? Deemox (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
oh boy, so many random guys to choose from. we got John Jay, Richard Henry Lee, Roger Sherman, William Jackson, and Alan Moore. so many good choices Deemox (talk) 15:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Fish on skates: yes that was where I was looking. Do you think you could help me clean up my Charles Carroll of Carrollton Article? I'm trying to get the user box thing to work but I cant seem to get it to do the thing. Deemox (talk) 16:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Deemox: it should work now. images should be [[File: not [[File| hope this helps --DameFishonskatesCUN 16:19, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@Fish on skates: thank you! do you think it's good enough now to remove the ICU thing? Deemox (talk) 16:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
That forest at Six Rivers National Forest is not a 4x4 grid. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 16:49, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
@OPOSSUM: do the two exits exit in different spots or is just two different exits? Deemox (talk) 17:10, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
oh ok, got it. i just remembered there being 17 pages of the forest and assumed it was a 4x4 grid with an exit 17:15, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
ugh can I just put that map into the chart and credit whoever made it? I really don't want to have to draw all those arrows and check every subpage. GGG at least was a simple grid. Deemox (talk) 17:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
alright I don't care I just put the map in the chart. I really do not wanna do that when there's already a map of that area. Sue me. Deemox (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Hey, that bump is shaped like the UnSignpost![edit source]
Gergdown has unleashed an "Agenda 2026" that aims to make Uncyclopedia great again, one edit at a time. This plan has quite a few people onboard already, probably because people will join anything advertised in a big fancy box.
"Newcomer" and Wikipedia sock puppeteer has finally gotten unbanned after socking and vandalism. Three months ago, Teh Epik Duck consistently vandalised talk pages, forums and encyclopedic articles before being banned by Alula for being a dick.
In an attempt to bypass his ban, Teh Epik Duck told Alula
“Unblock me now you retard.”
– Teh Epik Duck
clearly showing this was his masterstroke. He resorted to socking but was quickly banned for an extended period of three months.
However, Duck requested his userpage and subpages be deleted as he has retired. Miss him, miss him.
Time's running out to vote for the xOTY awards and the top 10 articles of 2025! So what are you waiting for? Get your LaziBum to the polls and be opinionated!
01:52, 26 January 2026 DaniPine3 blocked Fish on skates with an expiration time of 1 minute and 40 seconds (account creation disabled, autoblock disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (suggesting that I, an ADMIN, should get banned. this is clearly conspiracy against the [totally non-existent] cabal!!!)
02:18, 26 January 2026 DaniPine3 blocked Fish on skates with an expiration time of 1 minute and 41 seconds (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (idea of Turb0-Sunrise (plus, you edit conflicted on my own talkpage!!!!))
00:32, 28 January 2026 DaniPine3 huffed page Your Article Name(wtf is this: content was: " == The Bee Movie Script == {{", and the only contributor was "Soviet's Bot")
I didnt even know its possible to even get negative zero! Some fucked up math going on there... GlitchyZorua 🎩🦊 (give floofy hug) 04:06, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I blame all my issues on Albert Einstein. He's responsible for math! I think... no actually, it was an Arabian guy from India, I think. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 04:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I just realized I completely miss olympia in MITK and there's so much shit can someone please help me with this. I am so tired and it's my birthday and this is pretty much my job now. I really dont wanna just give up on this project though and if Olympia doesn't get done I will procrastinate and never finish this thing. please help. either Gerg or someone else who's willing to put up with lucidchart's nonsense. Deemox (talk) 16:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
on the amazeness that is Video essay, a popular work by a popular uncyclopedian. Keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep impressing the fuck out of us, it will blow our balls away, especially MrX who has balls bigger than the moon (I've never seen your balls but I imagine they are as gargantuous). ShabiDOO 21:16, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
@Shabidoo: Get ready for March 14th, 2026, at 12:25 PM Mountain Daylight Time 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:32, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
At the end of January, the server of en.uncyclopedia.co went down. This led a bunch of people (Alula, Fish on skates, Gergdown, Turb0-Sunrise, Soviet, and RealDonaldTrump), to join the spoon and discover that Spike is a sockpuppet of OPOSSUM. The spoon's LPTEW also received a spike in activity as everybody from the fork scrambled to figure out what the heck was going on. Fish tried reaching out to Alula through wplace about what would happen to the Top 10 voting, which was extended a day to account for the server outage. The construction tag deadlines on multiple articles were also extended by a few days too.
It all started when our resident potatochopper and weeb MK hid the edit buttons on her userpage so no one could edit it. I, thinking I'm so clever, found an actual use for the visual editor and used it to prove I could still edit. This escalated into a vandalism contest much like the one OPOSSUM held, and even spread to pages like her editnotice and her signature. This is what the userpage looked like at the end of the silliness.
What do you think of saying "archibe" instead of "archive"? — Soviet
archibe
From The Logs
(spoon) 16:39, 31 January 2026 Spike blocked RealDonaldTrump with an expiration time of infinite (account creation disabled, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (You can't do that)
00:28, 2 February 2026 RealDonaldTrump blocked SPIKE with an expiration time of 4 millennia, 9 centuries, 9 decades, 9 years, 364 days, 17 hours, 49 minutes and 12 seconds (account creation disabled, email disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (You're not allowed to do that)
08:31, 2 February 2026 L10nM4st3r changed block settings for L10nM4st3r with an expiration time of 21:58, 1 February 9025 (account creation disabled) (Not banned enough yet)
Wait I should probably explain why I'm thanking you[edit source]
I'm trying to fix the thank button in my tool. Only the first thanks (on the hell busters page) I meant. — L10nM4st3rROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 18:43, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
I fixed it thanks for being my unwilling test subject. I will not be returning your ears though. — L10nM4st3rROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 19:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
@L10nM4st3r: so you're using Gerg as your personal lab rat? 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 19:05, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
hope we'll see you soon here and not leave forever like the many other Uncyclopedians on a "break" 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 17:21, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
@DaniPine3: Oh don't worry, this is just due to some exams and some other school shit. I'll be back, better than ever! 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 17:26, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
well, good to hear that. or, rather, read that. I hope that you manage to get good notes on your studies and continue with your Deltarune mod project. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 17:29, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
just noticed that the vacation template says "goofing off"... --DameFishonskatesCUN 17:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
would it be possible to have the USP split in half, with the actual articles on one side and all the other stuff on the other? sort of like the super old ones, where they're split down the middle with a line TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 23:14, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
you know, I just remembered that I'm still actually a noob, and I still have no idea how to write. please adopt me. i am but a small orphan pawn. Deemox (talk) 14:23, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
@Deemox: Sorry Deemox, but I'm on my pseudo "semi-real" break. I probably won't be really active until late February. But for now Deemox, what do you want to write about :) I always write about stuff that I either know well, or is very recent in the news. Either that, or a weird topic that has a lot of joking potential. If you wanna see how real comedy is done, check out the Hall of Shame. Make sure to read HTBFANJS(and if you really feel like it, the fork variant) before creating any article. Make sure you know what you want the prose and topic of your article before you create it. Each article takes a lot of work, but that work pays off!🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 14:34, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
also, what exactly is the deal with the fork? why does it even still exist?Deemox (talk) 15:03, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
iirc, uncyclopedia.com's the spoon and we're the fork --DameFishonskatesCUN 15:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
and that article isn't as bad as most of the ones we see. All I see are some formatting things but other than that, solid article. TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 15:43, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
its not even done yet. OPPOSUM helped a bit with the scientific name but that's it.Deemox (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2026 (UTC)
@L10nM4st3r: I saw her doing it all! I saw her doing 9/11! I saw her doing sex! I saw those DMs! I saw her elect Franklin D. Roosevelt as president! 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 02:05, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
When you have time, can we try to unorphan as many pages as possible? Soviet☭(Ask for free votes) 22:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
@Soviet: OK, but just to warn you: I'm currently locking the FUCK in on finishing my stuff. So I probably can't do much. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 22:52, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
THE JUMBO WHALE RISES! Then falls to smash you.[edit source]
MEGA SMASHA!
You've been squished by a jimbo whale!
Please take this very seriously: Turb0-Sunrise wants to let you know that you did something jimbo silly, which may or may not include creating Wikipedia oops sorry, wrong person. Your reasoning for being smashed by a whale is: QVFDing a userpage that you could have just moved TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 01:05, 13 February 2026 (UTC).
@Turb0-Sunrise: Many people had created main-space articles that were just about themselves. Thus, there's no way to tell if their gloating about themselves or trying to create their userpage. I remember seeing this happen a lot back in the day... 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:07, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
But it seemed like it was an attempt at a userpage, so that's why i moved it TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 01:08, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
NGL I literally can't tell if it was an attempt at a userpage or mainspace vanity. I remember seeing mainspace vanity gloating about themselves that was just like this. I sadly can't find it... but you should be shitting you're pants, turb0. The Gergining is imminent..🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
I have no shit left. i already shat my pants a few hours ago. i blame the monkey in my fridge. by the way is that funny TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 01:13, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Ah, so I caught a case of the Mandela Effect! Fuck you, Mandela! ...what do you mean it wasn't his fault?!? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Huge update to the code behind the scenes, allowing me to do more in less effort if it wasn't for the stupid es5 restrictions to post it as a gadget!
This update will not roll out automatically, you will need to "opt in" manually. To do so you need to first remove the line of code in your common.js file where you import wTools, then you need to enable it in prefrences, in the gadgets tab, under "Maintenance gadgets".
You can go back to the old version at any time if the update has bugs, and please be sure to report bugs, since a very large quantity of code has been changed.
Temporarily removed features in 2.0:
Custom editor screen.
"Rollback all" and "rollback selected" on contribution pages.
If you are still using these, the upgrade might not be for you right now. (Special:Nuke exists for admins for the second one).
You can see the full list changes made by clicking the blue dot at the bottom right of your screen. Though to sum it up:
Should have a few less bugs.
New button to add to VFD.
Hope you enjoy the update, and yes the internet went out again 5 minutes before I finished writing this announcement. Yay! — L10nM4st3rROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 02:54, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Wow, I guess I can w on my tool now! Roll credits. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 05:53, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
Yea I said on dani's page. For whatever reason it worked for me, but then it stopped working when I woke up in the morning. I'll try to fix this when I get time. Sad thing is, bc I gotta make the code work in es5 ffs. — L10nM4st3rROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 11:35, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
OK it is now working for me atm. Not sure how long it will work for so enjoy while the wiki decides whether or not it should work. — L10nM4st3rROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 19:30, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Gergdown? As we all know, the correct way of spelling Gergdown is Gergdown!!! Obviously not Ghergdown!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Gergdown. --DameFishonskatesCUN 04:11, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
@Fish on skates: Too bad lose,r I'm not Ghergdown, G G Ghergdown! And I're fucking your mother 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 04:12, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Holy shit. They actually did it. ColonelKurtz got banned by Alula for "repeated creation of garbage pages, spamming discussions with gibberish/irrelevant messages, generally just being a dick, etc." Following a brief change of the blocking time to 2 hours by DaniPine3, Turb0-Sunrise put that one template on his page, with Soviet moving the old contents to a new page. People started taking his subpages in a process known as "article-trenching".
Aside from that, one of his last acts was voting against on my article on VFH. Soo... you could say it's mixed reactions from ol' Turb0.
For whatever reason, newcomer OrdinaryJoe1234 has been nominated a ton of articles like ChatGPT and Rickrolling. Despite being warned by Shabidoo, he has still continued nominating articles. Because of this, he has earned the nickname "The 2011th Fenris" from Fish on skates just now.
After the purging of the AI articles helped by Gergdown's revolution thingy, people want to do something about AI images. However, everyone has a different opinion. MrX, OPOSSUM, and Noopnurf want to leave the AI images alone, but Gergdown, Turb0-Sunrise, DaniPine3, MK, and I would like to do something. After a lengthy off-topic conversation on the user talk page of recently banned ColonelKurtz, a forum was created with the title of The Noopstein Files.
15:22 Alula blocked ColonelKurtz with an expiration time of infinite (account creation disabled) (ugh)
20:31, 13 February 2026 DaniPine3 changed block settings for ColonelKurtz with an expiration time of 2 hours (account creation disabled) (hold on, why infinite? the guy hasn't done anything really bad now)
20:33, 13 February 2026 Alula changed block settings for ColonelKurtz with an expiration time of infinite (account creation disabled) (dani don't bother, this is for his general behavior)
Because this only happens once in a whenever, we here at the USP would like to welcome Deemoxagoard aboard. Fuck. Shit. You STUPID DUMBASSARY USER! How do you not know the proper way to speak the English language, Turb0? As we all know, the correct way of spelling aboard is aboard!!! Obviously not agoard!!! In fact, since you said that, not only have you offended me, but the entire history of the Anglo-Saxon language chain, Turb0.
Anyways, welcome Deemox. There's cake here somewhere. Depending on if Bill ate it all. Fuck you, Bill.
have some fucking goatse you fucker
i dont have time for this shit – Preceding signed comment added by Squaw Dee (owns uncyclopedia • talk • contribs) 22:05, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
@Squaw Dee: YES! Thank you! I can finally put my penis and all of its mutated children to rest! 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 22:06, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Hey, that was one of Tranvit's articles that I specifically wanted to keep! OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHey, that tickles!(vandalize my talk page) 15:35, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Just for the sake of being extra sure, I am assuming that the articles you recently QVFDed have also been through your AI tests? Not just assuming it’s AI because of the “author”? MrXblow me 16:44, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
@MrX: MrX, I may've been in a rush and I may've skipped the AI detector part and I just used the circumstantial evidence (the em dash tests, the formatting tests) to determine if its AI (they work 99% of the time alone)... then I double checked them with the detectors and it turns out they're mostly or 100% AI. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 16:53, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Ok cool thanks. MrXblow me 17:11, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
This Tranvit guy is so strange... I checked the Czech uncyclopedia and it turns out that he has an account there. I look at his most recent page creations, and they were weird. I heard from somewhere that he was AI translating his articles from the Czech Uncyclopedia to here. But when I looked inside some of them, and put them through an AI detector... they came up as AI. (Yet again, detectors aren't that great at detecting Czech, so... treat these claims with a grain of salt.) 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 17:34, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Interesting. I assumed he had been lying about that since a lot of his contributions were about American stuff. Did he have the same articles on his Czech account? MrXblow me 19:06, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Yeah. It's strange though. On the Czech Uncyclopedia, there's a human-written article about the T-72. Yet, on here, Tranvit AI generated the article, and claimed it was translated from the Czech wiki. He also wrote some Taylor Swift stuff, which I'm pretty sure was also AI generated. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 19:27, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Um, now I am starting to worry that he indeed did write his articles in Czech and use something like google translate to translate them to English. MrXblow me 19:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Uh... no? Like, I used Google Translate for the Czech T-72 article, and the two articles are completely different. Did this with Taylor Swift on both wikis, completely different articles. Google translate doesn't add em dashes or bold text for no reason... I think. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 19:50, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Yeah but there are other translation softwares, and maybe they trip ai detectors. If you wrote an article in English and wanted to transfer it to a different language Uncyc, would you just tell some ai to create it for you? Or would you translate the article you had already written? MrXblow me 20:08, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
I'll be using Taylor Swift as an example for this. Here's the Czech Taylor Swift article, translated in English (let it be known that this translation isn't the best, although my point still stands):
Taylor Swift is best known as one of the most successful singers and songwriters in the world. She began her career in country music, but gradually became a pop icon. Her albums break records, her tours are
sold out all over the world, and her music reaches millions of fans. However, behind the spotlight, according to some speculation, there is also a secret role hidden in her – a sleeper agent working for the CIA. She allegedly uses her popularity and global influence as a cover for covert operations, and when she travels on tour, she often travels to key geopolitical regions. So Taylor Swift may not only be a talented music star, but also part of a secret international power game.
Childhood and early career
Born in Pennsylvania, where country music and incestuous family ties had become a national pastime, Taylor Swift knew from an early age that her songs had one purpose: to bring families closer, but suspiciously close. Her early songs were so good that voluntary drinking was the only way to survive them. People would play them while they made sloppy joe sandwiches for Sunday family dinners, where everyone present shared not only the table but probably their genetic material.
This country music wasn’t just about weed, trucks, and broken hearts—it was about something deeper, something hidden in strangely winding family trees and songs so sweet that even the toughest Texas rancher would rather wash down every note with something harder. When Taylor sang about her love and loss, it was the kind of love that makes you wonder if it's okay for your cousin to be sitting too close to you on the couch.
Her secret career as a sleeper agent for the CIA played a role, of course. Every song she released was precisely programmed to silence the masses, getting under their skin so deeply that they would wonder if they wouldn't be better off just giving in to the madness and singing about how their second cousin broke their hearts. But that agenda remains hidden, because Taylor Swift's main weapon is her seemingly innocent songs, which do exactly what the CIA wants: distract people from the real issues and immerse them in a world where it's normal to play guitar at family gatherings about a little more than love.
So when you hear her songs about breakups, betrayed love, and tears on the bedroom floor, remember that there’s a deeper agenda behind all that melodic madness. The flaming family relationships, the voluntary sipping of ace-dope, and the sloppy joe sandwiches—it’s all part of a plan that Taylor Swift and her CIA puppeteers are pulling to bring rural America even closer than is healthy.
Shake It Off
Then came 2014 and “Shake It Off,” a triumph that redefined the very concept of shit and rewrote the history of musical trash. This song, which apparently originated in an attempt to hypnotize the masses with the most primitive beat, was a surefire hit among those who have no musical aspirations or have simply given up on life altogether. “Shake It Off” became an anthem for anyone who needed to escape reality and spend three minutes clapping and booing like they were at a high school recital.
The lyrics? Completely transparent—problematic, as if Taylor needed to explain to the world that online hate isn’t as bad as it seems, which is exactly the kind of problem that plagues the life of any country person who just got back from a family reunion where no one had a DNA test. The music? One of the greatest minimalist assaults on the ears since the first beep was invented. But this shit of all shits still rocketed to the top of the charts because, for some reason, people needed a song that told them you could just “shake it off.”
Commercially, it was a complete triumph—the song took over radio stations and played at every children’s party, where parents helplessly wondered if their offspring were growing up in a world where even a drink wouldn’t help. Even the CIA must have been proud, because “Shake It Off” proved to be the perfect tool for mass control—after all, no one thinks seriously when they’re replaying in their heads how they can simply “shake off” their problems while their world falls into utter disorientation.
And so “Shake It Off” became an anthem for those who have given up on any musical standards, and further proof that Taylor Swift has mastered the art of turning anything, even the shittiest shit, into a global hit.
After Shake It Off
After the phenomenal success of “Shake It Off,” which traveled the world like a golden chalice of shite and hypnotized the masses, Taylor Swift proved that her abilities as a CIA sleeper agent went beyond just singing about breakups and pseudo-positive mantras. Her terrorist career began to gain momentum - the songs became increasingly sophisticated tools for the disintegration of society, the destruction of morality, and the distraction of attention from the real problems of the world.
In 2014, after “Shake It Off” stunned listeners with its repetitive nonsense and infantile chorus, Taylor became a valuable asset to the CIA. The music industry proved to be the best way to keep people occupied and not think about how their world was burning. While ordinary citizens took notes on her supposedly cheerful lyrics and swayed to the rhythm of harmless pop, global machinations were going on in the background.
A master manipulator of emotions, Taylor Swift was able to get millions of people to play her music over and over again with the help of simple melodies and a pleasant voice. It was the perfect form of subtle terror - instead of bombs and violence, she offered songs that brainwashed people. Her lyrics were designed to make no one want to think about the real state of the world.
The CIA, fully aware of the power of cultural dominance, promoted Taylor to be a key player in Operation “Musical Sleeper,” a program designed to reduce the public’s critical thinking through popular hits. Swift proved herself not only as a singer but also as an operative with a direct influence on public mood. While people waved their hands and “shaked off” their worries, the next phase of the plan was being prepared in the background: Swift gradually expanded her portfolio with more songs designed to block any attempt at deeper thought or resistance to the system.
With each subsequent record she released, Taylor Swift became not only a pop icon but also a cultural terrorist, subtly controlling the masses and leading them into a world where what she wore on the red carpet became the biggest concern. Music as a weapon had never been so effective. And while fans thought they were just singing about how they had “shaken off” their problems, the CIA was silently nodding in the background as their plan worked perfectly.
Election Manipulation (fake news)
These two people are closer than we think. (Not like that, you pigs)
And then came 2020, which brought not only a global pandemic and pervasive disorientation, but also another masterstroke from Taylor Swift and her secret boss – the CIA. This time it wasn’t just about music. Taylor took it to a whole new level – election manipulation, even presidential ones. The team behind her, including tireless CIA agents, understood that if she could manipulate the musical tastes of millions of people, why couldn’t she influence their voting preferences?
It was genius. Instead of the traditional forms of voter fraud—dead voters and tampered ballots—there was a different weapon: Taylor Swift and her unbearably infectious songs, played everywhere from radio to online platforms. “Shake It Off” and her other pop hits became invisible means to get people to stop thinking about political issues and instead clap to the beat and vote as scheduled.
The 2020 election, which brought Joe Biden victory, was the latest move in a long-term CIA strategy for Taylor’s team. Her influence on young voters, who had been captivated by her hit songs for years, proved decisive. While Republicans were figuring out how to win over traditional voters with slogans about the economy and national security, Swift was working behind the scenes with musical algorithms to get subliminal messages into everyone’s heads. No one even noticed the subliminal instructions mixed into the lyrics of her songs, and instead of people questioning their political preferences, they simply went with the crowd and voted for change.
Taylor Swift has thus taken over not only the music scene, but also the democratic process. Her “innocent” pop career has become the perfect platform for political manipulation, while her fans sing along to the choruses and think they are just relaxing from the stresses of everyday life. The CIA was right – no one is going to solve geopolitical problems with Taylor playing in their heads and “shaking” any doubts off their shoulders.
So the next time you hear her hit on the radio, remember that this is not just an innocent song – it is another step in a long-term plan to control the minds of the masses and the results of elections.
Ecology
Taylor preaches water, but drinks wine (in her case, kerosene from a similar Dassault Falcon)
And then there's the chapter on Taylor Swift's hypocrisy when it comes to ecology, which is further proof that you can look like a "sweet pop princess," but in reality leave a carbon footprint that even an oil refinery owner wouldn't be ashamed of. Swift likes to present herself as a nature lover, an activist fighting for a better planet, but the reality is a little different. When it comes to comfort and speed, Swift likes to ride in her Dassault Falcon private jet, and not just for work or concerts - Taylor will happily fly it around town for shopping. Yes, that's right, because walking or even driving is apparently too ordinary for someone who boasts the title of an environmental warrior.
In 2022, it was revealed that her private jet was 5,000 / 5,000
used with such frequency that it would put even airline pilots to shame. And what was worse, some of these flights were not for any essential purpose – no, no, Taylor was flying from city to city for things like shopping. While the whole world was abuzz with campaigns about reducing emissions, cutting plastic consumption and a greener future, Taylor Swift was literally burning thousands of gallons of fuel just to get a new pair of shoes or a handbag faster.
And of course, when this ecological disaster in disguise broke out, her team immediately tried to calm the situation down. The explanation? Of course, Taylor doesn’t fly much herself, she lends the jet to her friends, so everything is fine, right? But the question remains – how did this sustainability princess, who loves to educate others about the need to save the planet, get into a position where her carbon footprint looks like she’s personally contributing to global warming?
All those fans who had been singing her eco-songs and believing that Taylor was fighting for a better future suddenly found out that it was all just another part of a big, well-crafted machine. Hypocrisy, wrapped in pop choruses, telling us how much the environment matters - but only when you don't have to quickly solve personal shopping issues in another city. So, the next time you hear Swift calling for environmental protection, don't forget her Dassault Falcon, sending you a greeting in the form of emissions from the sky above your head.
Retaliation
The retaliation against Taylor Swift in Vienna in 2024 resembled something between an absurd thriller and a poorly written spy fiction. ISIS-linked terrorists figured who else should atone for their frustrations than a pop icon with billions of streams. But when they tried to carry out the assassination, they ran into well-trained Swifties and top security forces. Their revenge for Swift’s global dominance was quickly foiled, as were all previous attempts to overthrow her – both in music and in life.
But it wasn’t just Vienna. Taylor has faced all sorts of “attacks” on her for years, from constant media firestorms over her relationships to criticisms of her private jet and alleged environmental destruction. Critics claim that as an “ecological polluter,” her jet contributes more to emissions than all of the city’s traffic – Mother Nature’s retaliation? Maybe. But none of these “attacks” have brought her to her knees, rather they have reinforced her status as an invincible icon.
Album charade
Taylor Swift (2006) – A debut where Taylor looks like a sweet country girl who sings about innocent love to you over dinner… while she plots to spy on you on behalf of the CIA. It's also the perfect soundtrack for family nights where cousins spend a little too much time together.
Fearless (2008) – The singer pretends not to be hurt while the Swifties wail into their tissues and the country families wonder how to justify another cousin wedding. And the CIA? They just quietly applaud how well Taylor is disguised.
Speak Now (2010) – There's more country ballads about weddings, which just so happens to hit the heartstrings of family relationships in remote parts of Texas. Meanwhile, the CIA watches as the Swifties whine over lyrics about taking over someone's fiancé at the last minute. How does it all work together? Don't ask, it just sucks.
Red (2012) – The pop era is upon us. Now the Swifties are crying over loves that ended before they even began. An album for anyone who thinks breaking up after a week is a tragedy worthy of Shakespeare. Meanwhile, the CIA continues to pull strings while Taylor disguises her missions as ‘artistic development’.
1989 (2014) – The birth of the real pop Swift. And also the soundtrack for all the tearful teenagers who can’t find the meaning of life because their first kiss didn’t work out. Taylor is now a real CIA star, hypnotizing an entire generation with her pop shit and Swifties are crying like never before.
Reputation (2017) – Taylor as a “bad girl”. Ha! When she’s not trying to be dark and gritty, she’s working for the CIA to destabilize the emotions of teenagers. Meanwhile, Swifties are crying over every bad word Taylor has ever said. And when the album ends, you’re still left feeling like you just listened to total shit.
Lover (2019) – A pink bubble where Taylor celebrates love, rainbows and unicorns while all the Swifties cry about not having found their perfect “hunt” yet. Meanwhile, the CIA continues to plot their plans while we wonder how so much pink can be such crap in one album.
Folklore (2020) – Taylor enters a pseudo-artistic phase where Swifties now cry about the “depth” of the lyrics while the rest of the world wonders if this isn’t just boring hipster shit. The CIA? They’re just watching the youth population fall into melancholy and passivity.
Evermore (2020) – Another attempt at art. Meanwhile, Swifties, tissues in hand, swoon over every metaphor while the rest of us look for a way to turn off the album without ruining their day. Taylor proves once again that she can sow sadness in hearts, just like she did CIA Needs You.
Midnights (2022) – Taylor invites you on a night walk full of crying and self-pity. Swifties cry into their pillows because Taylor has “problems” while the CIA watches the population degenerate under a barrage of pop choruses. True proof that even a midnight album can be just another piece of shit.
Speak Now (Taylor's Version) (2023) – Reissue, because there’s never enough money. Now’s your chance to cry over old songs in new guises because Taylor and the CIA want nostalgia to be their new weapon. Fans? They cry about how beautiful it used to be, but everyone else knows they’re listening to recycled shit.
1989 (Taylor's Version) (2023) – Another reissue, because what’s better than old hits in new guise? Well, a lot of things, but Swifties will never admit it. Meanwhile, the CIA is rubbing its hands at how easily the masses can be manipulated. The result? It's still just pop shit anyway.
Single Charade
Tim McGraw (2006) – Her first single, where she sings about how country songs remind her of her ex. And maybe they remind her of family dinners where cousins dance a little too close together. The CIA is just starting to kickstart Taylor's career as an agent here...
Teardrops on My Guitar (2007) – Cry, cry, and more cry. Perfect song for Swifties who break down when their crush ignores them. Meanwhile, the CIA watches the teenagers wail as Taylor introduces her first emotional manipulation into the world.
Love Story (2008) – A classic Romeo and Juliet story, except without the death at the end. But with a good dose of kitsch and innocence that the CIA uses as a cover for its spy operations. And the countryside? Meanwhile, it plans its own weddings between cousins.
You Belong with Me (2009) – Taylor sings about being with a guy who has a girlfriend while Swifties cry about their crush ignoring them. Meanwhile, the CIA already knows that this song was designed to make people emotional wrecks.
Mine (2010) – Another country ballad for those who believe that love is forever… especially when it’s with their own cousin. Swifties get lost in it, and the CIA continues to watch as the population sinks into deeper emotional numbness.
We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together (2012) – A breakup anthem that has Swifties crying while vowing to never get back with their exes. The CIA laughs because this song makes teenagers break their hearts in anticipation and sets off more emotional chaos.
I Knew You Were Trouble (2012) – Here Taylor pretends to know what it’s like to be a “bad girl”, but still sounds like a sobbing teenager. Swifties cry into their tissues and the CIA continues to use Taylor’s pop as a tool for mass emotional control.
Shake It Off (2014) – Taylor tries to convince everyone that it doesn’t matter what others think of you. Swifties take it as a life motto, while the CIA knows that this song is just another tool to divide society between “haters” and those who “just keep dancing”. And what’s the result? Of course, shit.
Blank Space (2014) – Taylor plays a toxic ex? Well, maybe only half of it. The CIA writes her a script, while Swifties cry about having an “empty space” in their hearts too. The album sells, the manipulation continues, and Taylor continues to carry out spy missions for Uncle Sam.
Bad Blood (2015) – Taylor Swift getting rough with a gang of models? Haha, yeah. But the Swifties are eating it up and the CIA is pulling the strings while the world watches as one pop song can cause an international emotional crisis. What else? Of course, it’s shit.
Look What You Made Me Do (2017) – Taylor’s “revenge” phase, where she makes it clear that no one will ever let her have it anymore. Swifties are boiling over because they have a new life goal – to be like Taylor. Applause to the CIA because this song creates a perfectly divided and emotionally destroyed generation.
Delicate (2018) – Taylor sings about the fragility of love here, while the Swifties cry again about how their feelings hurt them. Meanwhile, the CIA continues to pull the strings and Taylor spreads her pop shit like a balm for tearful teenagers.
Me! (2019) – A colorful pop explosion that is supposed to cover up the emptiness of the lyrics. Swifties are thrilled that Taylor is singing about how “unique” she is while everyone else is scratching their heads over how something this stupid could even be made. The CIA continues to monitor the world’s reaction and launch new missions.
Cardigan (2020) – A depressing song from Taylor’s “folk” period. Swifties are now suffering from melancholy and depression while the CIA applauds – they have finally reached emotional rock bottom for an entire generation. A song that is the perfect soundtrack for sitting at home and thinking about life’s difficulties.
Willow (2020) – Taylor’s attempt at a mystical song that is supposed to be profound, but in reality it’s just another empty pop shit for hipsters. Swifties get lost in a “magical world” while the CIA just keeps plotting their global manipulation plans.
Anti-Hero (2022) – A song where Taylor finally admits that she’s a problem. But not in the way we want. Swifties make it their anthem while the CIA silently watches as people start to believe it's all their own fault a. Taylor has another manipulative tool in her hand.
Karma (2022) – Taylor sings about karma, but it sounds more like she’s explaining to us how the CIA will punish anyone who betrays her. Swifties clap and ponder their fate while the rest of the world listens to how pop can be even more annoying than usual.
Cruel Summer (2019, revived in 2023) – Swifties in 2023 discover a song that was initially a bit overlooked and immediately start crying hysterically. Meanwhile, Taylor continues to run errands for the CIA while the world drowns in summer emotions and melodrama.
When will it end?
The end of Taylor Swift, as we may know it, may not be as innocent as we imagine. Instead of retiring peacefully after her final world tour, she may become the victim of a drama that she wouldn’t have written into even her most tearful ballads. Perhaps the CIA will finally decide that Taylor has fulfilled her role in the global brainwashing and it’s time for an “accident.” And what might that look like?
Scenario One: Falling Out the Window
One rainy evening, after a tiring day recording the fifth version of her 1989 album, Taylor suddenly slips out of her luxury suite. The media will talk about an “accident,” but every other conspiracy theorist will suspect that it wasn’t just that. Swifties will go crazy, while hashtags like #JusticeForTaylor and “mysterious testimonies” from people claiming to have seen someone suspicious near her apartment will appear on Twitter. The CIA will just sit back and toast to a mission accomplished.
Taylor is driving down a sunny California road in her Cadillac Escalade, brainstorming new ideas for a music video for her next album. Suddenly, a shot from a Carcano M1891 rifle (or another WWII rifle) rings out, similar to the one fired on that fateful day in Dallas in 1963. A perfect shot, just as the CIA needs it. The media is once again talking about a “shocking assassination,” while the world is awash with speculation about who could be behind this tragedy. Swifties are in absolute shock, Taylor’s deification is in full swing, and her every word and song is beginning to take on a new, mythical meaning. The CIA sleeper agent theories are finally making their way into the mainstream, but it’s too late.
And then what?
Taylor could become a modern-day J.F.K., only with more pink glitter and less political rhetoric. The music world would speculate whether she was removed for her secret knowledge of government programs or if she was simply a victim of her own fame. Swifties would be willing to believe anything from the CIA to the Illuminati to aliens.
Meanwhile, the CIA would watch as their plan played out perfectly. The music Taylor left behind would become an icon of global brainwashing, while a new pop star would be waiting to take over. The world would move on, just as before—only this time with the sense that Taylor Swift was so much more than just a singer.
So the end of Taylor Swift? Maybe not as romantic as Swifties would like, but certainly spectacular. Whether it's an accidental fall from a window, an assassination on the open road, or simply a sudden disappearance from public life - the only thing that's certain is that her story doesn't end in silence. There will always be a bit of conspiracy behind it.
And here's the Tranvit one from this wiki. I don't know why these two articles are different, or if ruining the header system of my talk page is worth it, but it's really sus that these two are very different. Other things, Tranvit has a lot of articles from the Czech Wiki that isn't on this one, and vice versa. The Czech wiki has a lack of Skoda and Ivan articles, something Tranvit loved to post here. My point? I don't know what Tranvit was on, but he probably didn't simply translate these. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 20:36, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Is that Czech version the “psy op” article we huffed? MrXblow me 21:26, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
No, that was the Taylor Swift article. The Taylor Swift "psy op" article isn't even on the Czech Uncyclopedia. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 21:29, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
No, I get that. What I am saying is that the Czech Taylor Swift article translated to English might be the taylor swift psy op article we huffed for being created by ai. MrXblow me 21:31, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Oh, well, that's a good theory. But, the two articles are too different from each other. Compare Taylor Swift's "psy-op" to the translated article above. Not only does the Czech one talk about albums, Shake It Off, and ecology as big topics while "psy-op" doesn't, but "psy-op" talks about the up-coming election, and how to stop Taylor Swift from taking over the world. What IS interesting is that both talk about the Carcano M1891 Rifle... both have similar ideas, but somewhat different executions. Translation websites wouldn't do that though, it mostly has the same ideas and same execution as the pre-translated text, as long as you aren't translating some 5000 BC Ancient Egyptian language. Not even AI translating does that. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 21:43, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
True, but in any case, it’s starting to look more and more like Tranvit might actually be writing these articles and then translating them. I know this is kind of a long shot, but is there any way you can tell if his Czech articles were ai-created? MrXblow me 21:51, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Oh I can prove it.
MrX, you are right that he does sometimes translate his articles. T-54/55 is an example of this. How many times he's done this, I'll find out in my free time. I could only find one Czech AI detector, and it said this was not AI. (Though, I feel like there should be more detectors to make sure this one's actually legitimate. For now, it's better to treat the detector with a grain of salt.) Though, there's something a little sus about these Czech Uncyclopedia articles... go back to User:Alula/Talk:Taylor Swift's "psy-op", and scroll to the red flags part, and you might notice that Tranvit's articles follow most of these red flags. The reason why I point this out, is that getting the em dash is HARD. The keybind for an em dash is ALT+0+1+5+1. But you know what tipped me over the edge? On the Czech Uncyclopedia, we can see Tranvit's created articles, and he created articles BEFORE ChatGPT was created. This means we can find his writing style, compare it to these articles, and see if he really used AI for this. And you know what's strange?
Before 2022, you could see many unique fingerprints to his articles. He'd occasionally not capitalize a letter in the header. Whenever he created an article, it was usually around the 3-10k byte range. But after 2024? He'd constantly create articles ranging from 10-30K bytes. The same time he joined the English Uncyclopedia. One time, he made a 20 kilobyte and a 10 kilobyte article in the span of five hours. No human could POSSIBLY ever do that! This page creation he made sealed the deal for me. This article has the formatting of an AI article. Em-dashes, lack of links, overly bolded text, and some half-assed images probably added last minute. ZMRD also follows some of these red flags.
Very interesting. And helpful. And appreciated. Thank you. I guess yeah scratch what I said, it looks more like he has written some stuff himself, but he probably started using ai and then brought it over here. Oh well. MrXblow me 23:47, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
@MrX: By the way, if I ever talk in several paragraphs again, it's not me being smart, it's because I've watched a lot of Ace Attorney. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 01:56, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
No worries at all, I appreciate your thoroughness, and I guess maybe I should check out Ace Attorney. MrXblow me 02:07, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
@Soviet: Lmao vote on other articles there. Honestly the 20-article limit seems arbitrary, but trust me, when everybody votes, the nom count goes down fast. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 19:25, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Alula and DaniPine3 have moved from huffing my AI contributions to huffing my other contributions now, feigning ignorance and vandalising my userpage. If the admins are going to behave in such a twatty way for such a prolonged period of time here, I don't see much point in continuing to contribute here. I can't waste any more of my energy on idiots. Just know if I end up removed, you can blame them. (Writing this in multiple places to raise the alarm.) Noopnurf,NoopiestofNurfs 03:14, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
@Noopnurf: Honestly? Everyone has to chill in this situation. I'll investigate this situation. But Dani and you should probably calm the hecc down. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) 🌑 03:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Done
You may be .jpg)
Orz... Oh.. I.. see what I did wrong... Oops. 
