Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive267

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Hentaium

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Nah. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Aug 5 '12 9:57 (UTC) Delete. DO NOT WANT ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:57, August 5, 2012 (UTC) Kill with Helium. ~ Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 14:17, August 5, 2012 (UTC) Can it compare to sodium... Na. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:21, August 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. The concept of placing Hentai in the periodic table is clever (if there were also a clever explanation of why it belongs there), but every aspect of the implementation is mechanical and unfunny. Spıke ¬ 21:06 5-Aug-12 Um what? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:12, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

XDTV

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Literally a completely random article about some TV station that broadcasts anime. Saberwolf116 (talk) 06:32, August 4, 2012 (UTC) Delete. San Seattle? Teximundo? Scrambling the names of things isn't humor. The main section reads like a boring spork of broadcast-licensing issues, until suddenly jumping to history-of-the-future. The use of Mexican superstations to achieve signal strength into the US not permitted (for very good reasons) by US regulation is a fine subject for satire, but this article doesn't begin. Spıke ¬ 14:49 4-Aug-12 Delete. I don't actually know what this is supposed to be. I can tell that the writer(s) of this article were trying to be funny, but I was mostly confused reading it, wondering what was trying to be a joke and what wasn't. Perfectionist Dude-man (2012-08-4 18:34 UTC) Yeah... that was pretty bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:04, August 4, 2012 (UTC) No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Aug 5 '12 11:02 (UTC)
Comments

Northallerton College

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. My-school-sucks cruft. Saberwolf116 (talk) 06:26, August 4, 2012 (UTC) Shit nobody cares about. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:10, August 4, 2012 (UTC) Delete. This article is essentially the personal diary of a malcontent. Spıke ¬ 14:45 4-Aug-12 UN:N -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:03, August 4, 2012 (UTC) Non. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Aug 5 '12 11:04 (UTC)
Comments

Manga

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Strong Keep. --TC02 ^{(Chat with me)} 11:13, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Listcruft. And important enough that it shouldn't be this bad. (And I'm so glad my tags work again!) Nominally Humane! 12:42 02 Aug The article has a "comedy" theme--that Manga is a Japanese plot to turn everyone gay. It's not a good theme; it's a trite theme, and the article does not develop it, but plunges into listing many attributes of manga and asking the not really knee-slapping question, How dumb is that?!!!--for a further laugh riot, dwelling on the additional trite joke that Asians do stuff backwards. Spıke ¬ 12:47 2-Aug-12 Manga or Mangay? Seriously, has it come to this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 12:55, August 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:01, August 4, 2012 (UTC) Two pages on VFD. Well, I'd hit random page a few times but my sidebar is fucked up, so we might as well get this out of the way first.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 06:07, August 4, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Gamecruft

Score: 0
Keep (4)	me lol--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:17, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Strong keep. I like it. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:55, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Yes. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 18:26, Jul. 28, 2012 I find it ironic that Frosty wants to delete a page that pretty much embodies his beliefs in relation to our gamespace. So to answer Frosty's question, you care. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:39, 30 July 2012 If I am for deleting all the games, why would I see it as valid to have an article on Gamecruft when if I had it my way "Gamecruft (as in Games)" wouldn't exist? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:23, July 31, 2012 (UTC) If you were to succeed in getting all games deleted, then this article would become dated. But seeing as all games aren't deleted yet and I don't see this becoming the case anywhere in the near future, I'd say this nom is rather premature. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:44, 31 July 2012 I beg to differ. I agree that as a stand alone this article has no real quality. I have no intention of deleting gamespace myself (Given there are at least 4 features there), but I agree that this article is pretty crap. It'll possibly survive this nom, despite my feelings, but a vote for or against this article is not a vote for or against the name space. Nominally Humane! 09:58 31 Jul
Delete (4)	Who cares? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:10, July 28, 2012 (UTC) I removed a few links to deleted games in ig because it had no relevance to it. The formatting in the article is dreadful and it looks like (and most likely is, judging by the way the author linked to the "best text-game on uncyclopedia", which happens to be deleted) a vanity project. This is the kind of article VfD was made for. And it's not even funny. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 12:53, July 30, 2012 (UTC) It's purposed. Learn to humor.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:59, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Purposed for what? To be a steaming pile of horse-shit? Because it does that a bit too well for my liking. There is literally no redeeming value to be found in this article and the fact that established and renowned users such as yourself think that it is humorous in even the slightest leaves me dumbfounded. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 16:33, August 1, 2012 (UTC) I learn to humor goodly. I laugh bigly at this article, not. Nominally Humane! 07:06 31 Jul I poop on this page. POOP ON IT. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 31 '12 10:57 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. No clear consensus reached. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:32, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

Order of the stick

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	New page has been written here, and the author blanked the one one and redirected. I prefer his version, and offered to add this to VFD on his behalf. (I don't think he's autocofirmed yet) Nominally Humane! 09:39 02 Aug I like the other one better ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:00, August 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 11:42, August 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. New version is better: It has a much better intro, declines into rant but does it with some eloquence, and the listcruft at the end has been manicured. Spıke ¬ 12:51 2-Aug-12 New version blows this one away. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre** 12:57, August 2, 2012 (UTC) My order to this article is to stick it. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Aug 2 '12 13:08 (UTC) I'm inserting my stick into that, i.e. killing it. ~ Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 14:01, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed and redirected. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:40, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Star

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate and redirect to Sun. For such a well known and frequented topic, this article is remarkably short and unfunny. Saberwolf116 (talk) 08:56, August 1, 2012 (UTC) Or someone could just replace this with a disambiguation page. It just plain sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:52, August 1, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Really dumb, throughout. Spıke ¬ 12:53 2-Aug-12 Delete. It sucks. --Master Wangs CUNT and proud of it! 10:13, August 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed. Now a disambiguation page. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:45, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Ped Xing

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. Lacks humor? The article morphs the common pedestrian street sign into a Chinese podiatrist; a serious bio, until you read closely, with outrageous pix with more outrageous captions in a send-off of health care via franchise. Spıke ¬ 14:01,18:37 27-Jul-12 idk it's not that bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:36, July 27, 2012 (UTC) I chortled. Nominally Humane! 07:12 31 Jul What's not to get? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Aug 2 '12 7:49 (UTC)
Delete (2)	A good concept, but...it lacks...what's it called...humour, that's it. --Oli Omni Ombudsman 21:03, July 26, 2012 (UTC) What? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:17, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:23, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Faroe Islands

Score: 0
Keep (5)	Keep. A real place, and it tries to be a real article. Saberwolf, rambling consists of random sentences; the sentences here are not very funny but are based on actual references to Danish stuff. Needs quoticide, listicide, and then better writing. Spıke ¬ 18:43 27-Jul-12 In that case, I nominate YOU, sir. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 28 '12 12:08 (UTC) Have done a copy-edit. Spıke ¬ 15:47 28-Jul-12 And now some actual additions, mocking the economic excuse-making in the Wikipedia article. Spıke ¬ 13:24 30-Jul-12 While this article is still kind of messy and it wouldn't hurt to remove the last navbox (which I have already done), I think this article has potential to live and become a quality article. I say Keep and put a stub or fix tag on it. ~ Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:22, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Keep Spike has lezzed this up a little. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:18, July 28, 2012 (UTC) And I have continued to sex it up the last couple days, mostly taking more unflattering commentary from Wikipedia and making it downright loathsome. Spıke ¬ 19:49 1-Aug-12 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 22:08, August 1, 2012 (UTC) See above. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 07:13, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Silly, idiotic, rambling article. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:27, July 26, 2012 (UTC) Gack! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:53, July 26, 2012 (UTC) Love the photoshop (which came from somewhere else, OF COURSE). Hate the article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 27 '12 7:27 (UTC) Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:28, July 28, 2012 (UTC) End it, end it NOW!!! →L A B O R A T O R I E S ^{14:16, 1 August 2012}
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticePS3 16:25, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

File:Ceilingcat.jpg

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Duplicate of (more used) File:Yikers ceiling cat1.jpg. --TC02 ^{(Chat with me)} 08:19, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. You should just fix the links so that anything linkking to this links to the other image and then QVFD it. VFD is not for this really... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:26, August 1, 2012 (UTC)

Team Fortress 2

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Unfunny, excessively listy and very random. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:19, July 31, 2012 (UTC) Just another bad gaming article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:26, July 31, 2012 (UTC) S.U.C.K.I.N.G.D.I.C.K. Though players of this game might recognize the references, it's unlikely that even they would be amused. Spıke ¬ 21:10 31-Jul-12 If somebody wants to fix it, anything other than a total rewrite isn't gonna cut it. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:43, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Worst 100 Uncyclopedia In-Jokes of All Time/GameFAQs/Random Insanity/Literature

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Another vandalism/example on wheels, but more pointless. Nominally Humane! 11:01 31 Jul WTF did I just read? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 11:29, July 31, 2012 (UTC) Fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck penis. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:25, July 31, 2012 (UTC) A literary masterpiece worthy of many plautids, deletion one of them. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:57, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Holland house

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	WTF I don't even Nominally Humane! 05:49 31 Jul Random cruft about a care home. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 11:32, July 31, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Reads like vanity/cyberbullying. --ChiefjusticePS3 13:57, July 31, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:26, July 31, 2012 (UTC) Likes to drink fermented cum. Articles in which an inmate of an asylum describes other inmates will tend to always be poor comedy to anyone not in the asylum. Spıke ¬ 18:17 31-Jul-12 Whuh? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:22, July 31, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Looks suspiciously like a vanity article, only about an old folks home instead of a school. Then again, that may be the point. Can't decide on this one. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:36, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

User:Zombiebaron

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Better than User:ChiefjusticeDS ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:58, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:52, July 29, 2012 (UTC) norabeibmoZ. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 30 '12 20:47 (UTC) Green potato brains. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 06:31, July 31, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Zombiebaron. I just realized...Zombiebaron is a zombie. Ergo, he should be dead. Ergo, WE MUST KILL HIM! Saberwolf116 (talk) 05:54, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Sure why not. -- The Zombiebaron 17:31, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:54, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 19:21, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Zombiebaron. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:46, 30 July 2012 To all those voting Zombiebaron, I just have to say, "Zombiebaron Zombiebaron Zombiebaron." -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:51, July 30, 2012 (UTC)

Haruhi Suzumiya

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	2011cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 18:20, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Delete. A childish attempt to ridicule an anime character with triteness. In order, it (1) links her to Communism, (2) uses references to sex and rape, and (3) claims there is really nothing to say. Spıke ¬ 19:15 30-Jul-12 Everything that SPIKE said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:17, July 30, 2012 (UTC) This page is worse than AIDS. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:28, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Sex slaves and Communism. Seems like a common theme in our worse articles. Is this part of some sort of conspiracy? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 30 '12 20:53 (UTC)
Comments

Walt Disney

Score: -4
Keep (7)	Keep. Actually, he was a sexist, and a racist, as well as being bigoted in a number of different ways. But ignoring the accuracy of the article - as articles don't stand or fall on accuracy but on humour - this is not bad as satire. It could do with a minor rewrite, but most of the concept is worth keeping, as is the content. Nominally Humane! 05:31 30 Jul A bit messy, but still OK. I might try and tidy it up tomorrow. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:32, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Keep, on the condition that it is made more offensive. Not enough words beginning with the letters "k", "n", "f" and "c". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 30 '12 7:36 (UTC) Keep. lol ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:40, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Keep. A certain someone is in urgent need of some better idols. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:21, 30 July 2012 Keep. A real article on a real person with real humor closely based on actual facts (the goodness or badness of which doesn't concern us). Sometimes an invalid nomination does not beg to be made valid. Spıke ¬ 12:31 30-Jul-12 Ruining your childhood isn't a good reason to delete a good article. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:29, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	ake it down.now.Walt disney was not a fucking sexist, and you're forgetting all the great things he ever fucking did for us. WHY THE HELL ARE YOU SAYING THAT WALT HAD SEX 2,000 TIMES YOU DUMBASSES! This guy is one of my idols. I don't care a bit about all these shit people write about him! R.I.P. Walt Disney, and thanks for all your wonderful, timeless animated movies!!! GODDAMIT THIS FUCKING SITE JUST FUCKING RUINED MY CHILDHOOD YOU MORONS!! - waltdisneyfan999 (Comment taken from https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion&oldid=5556408#Walt_Disney and transposed here by PuppyOnTheRadio) Delete I'm a big Scooby-Doo fan. This ISN'T ON people. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:14, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Delete Goes a tad too far in my opinion. The idea of his being a furry (since he created all number of talking furry characters) is hilarious, but isn't addressed enough. Sorry, but I didn't find the implied rape joke funny in the part about "Snow White and the Seven Studs" at all, and it was the Japs that were discriminated against by Disney Inc during WWII not the Jews. Just didn't find most of the article very funny. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:33, July 31, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Added the nomination as it was requested by the waltdisneyfan999. Despite the manner of asking it, it's still a nomination - just possibly based upon ignorance of what this site is. Nominally Humane! 05:31 30 Jul Delete. Why you idiot! If you think he was so bad watch this:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIrq3RFUQPU HE SHOWS THAT HE WAS JUST A MAN WITH A DREAM, STUPIDO, AND IF HE WAS SUCH A RACIST THEN WHY DID EH MAKE MICKEY MOUSE BLACK??? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Waltdisneyfan999 (talk • contribs) 05:36, July 30, 2012 Yes. Putting rodents in blackface is a sure sign of his striving for equality. Nominally Humane! 05:40 30 Jul Actually, he's got you there. Mick is a black rodent in whiteface. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 30 '12 7:36 (UTC) Don't forget about the two lip plates attached to his head. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:31, 30 July 2012 Those seem more like ear plates. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 31 '12 11:49 (UTC) Everybody here is just feeding the trolls by helping them. i guess you KNOW The nominator is Bambifan101, a 1337 vandal.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:16, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticePS3 12:33, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

Celebrity Big Brother

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Terrible shitty stupidness. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:09, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Extremely messy, I would suggest putting a template on the page but since the page has been inactive for months I don't think there's any point. --Owen12345 (talk) 03:32, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Cruft Nominally Humane! 04:02 30 Jul Listy nonsense without substance --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 11:46, July 30, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Seriously not worth the bytes used; only possibly funny to the users who, until recently, have been using Uncyclopedia for the sole purpose of maintaining similar scorecards of their own. Spıke ¬ 12:27 30-Jul-12 DO NOT WANT ~Sir Frosty** (Talk to me!) 06:23, July 31, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Tscheap

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 18:48, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Tschit. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:51, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Unless a member of the Cabal can provide some Yiddish insight, I presume that Mr. Michael Tschiderer owes money to the author. Spıke ¬ 20:10 29-Jul-12 Thwat? --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 11:44, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Internet wars

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Crap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:53, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Parc. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:51, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Obliterate. By noobs, for noobs. Noobs: Please don't bother me with this shit, I'm trying to watch polar bears and a soccer game at the same time. ~ Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:13, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Nonsense on Steroids --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 11:41, July 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Bill Nye the Science Guy

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Inertia is a property of butt fuck. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 18:25, Jul. 28, 2012 I don't think that it's possible to parody Bill Nye and be funny. I've never seen it done successfully. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:52, July 28, 2012 (UTC) Kill it before it does science! --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:08, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Do not want. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:44, July 29, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Intro, with its tedious list of aliases and its pedophilia UnScript, does not lure me in with the promise of anything funny, but it accurately sums up the rest of the article. Spıke ¬ 16:15 29-Jul-12
Comments

The Go! Show

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. The latest in my purge of shitty television show articles. Saberwolf116 (talk) 21:04, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Agreed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:10, July 27, 2012 (UTC) crap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:40, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Really bad writing; succumbs repeatedly to the urge to become a HowTo. Author thinks drug use is inherently funny. Spıke ¬ 23:50 27-Jul-12
Comments

Mahadolf Gandhitler

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. A companion to the Germandia article, and just as shitty. Saberwolf116 (talk) 04:32, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Ok, first off, the page should be named "Mahatma Hitler". Second, I don't see any problem with a high-concept article. Juxtapositions between extremes are at the heart of comedy. The problem is, this article gives up on its concept one sentence in, and from there, the fail just accelerates until it becomes a runaway tractor-trailer of raging, flaming retarsion. Retarsion. That's a word, right? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 27 '12 8:17 (UTC) Delete. BB, there is nothing at all wrong with either "a high-concept article" nor juxtapositions between extremes. But a high concept is all this article has; there is seriously no humor beyond some pretty fine shoops, and the section on "one rather ridiculous theory" (compare "nothing definitive is known") makes the pursuit of Randumbo explicit. I agree with you on the rename. Spıke ¬ 18:34 27-Jul-12 Wait, aren't you pretty much agreeing with everything I said? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 28 '12 3:41 (UTC) Just another retarded Hitler spin-off. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:08, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Oh please, can we stop it with the Hitler spinoffs. How about a rule that any more Hitler spinoffs, unless they're really witty and clever, will automatically be deleted and will get the creator blocked for a week? [[User: ChromaNebula\|<span style=color:red>C/span><span style=color:orange>h/span><span style=color:yellow>r/span><span style=color:green>o/span><span style=color:blue>m/span><span style=color:purple>a/span><span style=color:silver>Nebula</span>]] (talk) 02:37, July 28, 2012 (UTC) No. --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 06:50, July 28, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Poor people

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This article just plain sucks. Huff and redirect to the far better The poor article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:09, July 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Yes, do exactly that. This article's aimlessness finally yields to the impulse to build lists of people to insult by including them as "poor people." Spıke ¬ 14:19 26-Jul-12 Also, that picture at the bottom doesn't match the caption, and appears to be either vanity or else cyberbullying. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 26 '12 21:44 (UTC) Killit -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:36, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Okay -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:36, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Probably should delete File:Gayninja.jpg. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 26 '12 21:44 (UTC)

Germandia

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. Another article in the long line of fake country articles, in the proud tradition of the Bermuda Square and the Gayman Islands. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:32, July 26, 2012 (UTC) Fake and gay. --EMC^[TALK]22:01 Jul 26 2012 Another one bites the dust. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:16, July 26, 2012 (UTC) ...and another one down... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 04:11, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Hey! I'm gonna get you, too!... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 27 '12 6:55 (UTC) Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:43, July 27, 2012 (UTC) Delete. A smallish collection of fractured facts and unexplained juxtapositions. Spıke ¬ 18:46 27-Jul-12
Comments

University of Wisconsin–Platteville

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Can someone explain what any of this has to do with U of W? Saberwolf116 (talk) 04:43, July 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:18, July 26, 2012 (UTC) UGH! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:26, July 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Saberwolf, to the extent it has anything to do with U of W (for example, the existence of ugly women), the problem is that it also has something to do with everywhere else. It is a small page of ramble supposedly on the topic of U of W. Spıke ¬ 13:51 26-Jul-12
Comments

Labradeer Retriever

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. Kinda has the same stuff that made the Grue article great. Though this is distinctly inferior, I doubt that it's bad enough for deletion. --Lord Scofield Stark 12:50, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	2005 cruft ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:02, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Leet and lists and, again, a pun where you have to already know the punch line to type the name of the article. Spıke ¬ 16:29 25-Jul-12 Kill the dog My pen1s can write a better article. --TC02 t 18:52, July 25, 2012 (UTC) The only funny thing about this was the name, and even that was kind of stupid... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 19:48, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Per what everyone else already said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:26, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

BASIC

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Crap ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:16, July 25, 2012 (UTC) "-GRUNT" "-BURPS" "-FARTS" I do know code and once wrote a BASIC interpreter. This article, apart from being "in the style of the thing it is describing," has nothing except a nonsense acronym, rambling history, and other ramble, styled as a BASIC program. That is, it conforms to several well-known formulas for writing humor, without containing humor. Spıke ¬ 16:25 25-Jul-12 Randommmmm Saberwolf116 (talk) 04:38, July 26, 2012 (UTC) More dumb. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:25, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. Looks OK to me, but then again I know nothing about computer programming code. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:39, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

Tcl

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Half baked stub ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:12, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Short and photo-less mix of ramble and a few inside jokes, such as name-dropping of other programming languages. Spıke ¬ 16:30 25-Jul-12 Pull the kill switch! We're shuttin' 'er down! --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 19:49, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Dumb. --Xamralco (talk) 13:20, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Thames Pirates

Score: -3
Keep (5)	It's not too stupid. It could use a nice expansion, however... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:38, July 25, 2012 (UTC) I actually enjoyed this one. Not bad at all. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 02:04, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Nice historical enclyclopedic page. Could be expanded along the same lines. Aleister 16:40 July 25, '12 Is a good candidate for {{AAP}} and {{expansion}}, but not for deletion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:55, 26 July 2012 Keep. --Xamralco (talk) 13:19, July 26, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Disintegrate. Short n' shitty '06 cruft. Saberwolf116 (talk) 09:52, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Delete. It is a short, photo-less, somewhat whimsical piece of fiction. It does not seem to be humor based on anything. Spıke ¬ 22:48 24-Jul-12
Comments	Kept. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:29, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Cruel and unusual punishment (replace with Ice cream mafia's version)

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Replace. I laughed at the newer version. The old one not so much. Nominally Humane! 04:41 26 Jul
Comments	If you want to replace it, just restore the old revision. Saberwolf116 (talk) 04:56, July 26, 2012 (UTC) You were the one who reverted it in the first place. If you think something is funny, be italic. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:46, July 26, 2012 (UTC) FEATURE! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:47, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Hollyoaks

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. I will admit I only did a cursory glance through this, but what I saw was enough to tell me this is an exceedingly long, exceedingly unfunny circlejerk written by fans of this show. Begone. Saberwolf116 (talk) 09:57, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Congratulations to anyone who finds the one funny line in here. I read through it until my eyes started to bleed and still had no luck. Nominally Humane! 10:17 24 Jul Hollycrap. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 24 '12 10:22 (UTC) Delete Someone's spent a lot of time not spending too much time on it. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:41, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Hollyweird. I do believe nearly half of this article was a list... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 00:33, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Crap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:58, July 25, 2012 (UTC) Has some potential. Still shite though. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:41, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

NCAA College Football

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Listcruft Nominally Humane! 11:30 23 Jul Oh Lord, deleeeeeeeeete. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 24 '12 3:18 (UTC) EXPUNGE! --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:50, July 24, 2012 (UTC) DELETE I don't know what NCAA College Football is, and now I really don't want to. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:46, July 24, 2012 (UTC) I read this article thinking there must be something worth saving somewhere in it. If there is, I couldn't find it. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 02:05, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Eric the Red

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	It's not a complete disaster, but it's pretty bad and looks unlikely to be taken care of. Might just be better off to start anew. --Oli Omni Ombudsman 21:36, July 23, 2012 (UTC) Get your crapola here - now with extra fibre. Nominally Humane! 01:54 24 Jul Not a major pile, but kind of stupid. --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:46, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. Didn't do anything for me. Saberwolf116 (talk) 10:04, July 24, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Who thinks that lists of unrelated persons, countries, etc., are funny? Agree: Start over. Spıke ¬ 10:33 24-Jul-12
Comments

Quasar

Score: 9
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (9)	2006 cruft, pure shite ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:15, July 23, 2012 (UTC) I want to be able to save it, like a baby bird with a broken wing, but the humane thing is to bash it's head in with a hammer, smashing it's skull in over and over again, until it becomes a bloody pulpy mess, and then drinking the juices that ooze - sorry, what were we talking about? Nominally Humane! 08:20 23 Jul Delete. An encyclopedia article that makes sport of the fact that it knows nothing about the subject, that there is nothing to say about it, and that the list of related articles might not be related, is using a technique that is thoroughly trite. Articles should never joke about being notoriously bad; it is too hard to tell from the real thing. Spıke ¬ 13:56 23-Jul-12 Oh my Gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:57, July 23, 2012 (UTC) Starts out quasi-okay, but quickly devolves into memes and randomness. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:13, 23 July 2012 Insert black hole here. --Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:19, July 23, 2012 (UTC) MY ULTRA BIG P3N1S can delete this FUCKING ARTICLE!!!!! --TC02 t 00:21, July 24, 2012 (UTC) KILL IT. --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:44, July 24, 2012 (UTC) BIGWHITEBLOBSSSSS--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:19, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

The Church of Deal or No Deal

Score: 1
Keep (5)	Keep. I like this.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:38, July 17, 2012 (UTC) Keep. There is a concept here, though I'm not sure it isn't just a personal grudge. I've deleted the section of listcruft, the initial template, and the external link to someone's blog. Spıke ¬ 22:05 17-Jul-12 Keep. I've removed an extra line that claimed Noel was dead. --Lord Scofield Stark 11:42, July 18, 2012 (UTC) It may need a bit of work but it's definitely not deletion-worthy. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:58, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Keep. idk I like it somewhat. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:14, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. I like the concept, but it isn't very well executed and there isn't much there. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:01, July 17, 2012 (UTC) Meh, only one line appeals to me: "It is believed the Banker created the Box before he created the Universe, and created the Universe simply as a place to put it." -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:32, July 18, 2012 (UTC) No Deal. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:22, July 18, 2012 (UTC) I'm not even sure if the TV show is still on the air in the U.S. Either way, it doesn't even qualify as pop culture; it's empty and stupid, and any article about it is going to have to be a lot better than this one to make me feel anything but coldness towards it. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 20 '12 14:34 (UTC) I find your lack of faith disturbing and your coldness... arousing.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC) If I could poop in a bag, and then make Howie Mandel handle it without rubber gloves... it would not pay him back for the horrible misery that watching 15 minutes of this crappy show put me through. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 20 '12 19:19 (UTC) Obliterate. An incredibly unfunny article based on a shit television show starring one of the single most godawful people on television. If this article was a person it would be fitting if it was stabbed in the stomach and buried up to the neck on a beach in front of an oncoming tide for crimes against humor. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 22:07, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Not particularly good in any way -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:56, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	The only religion along with Raptor Jesus that I take seriously--Sycamore (Talk) 20:38, July 17, 2012 (UTC) The show may still be on in Oz. I've never been tempted to watch it deliberately - even when I had family members on there. (And I am now voluntarily estranged from my family.) The article has promise, but needs work. As it is, not bad enough to delete. Nominally Humane! 11:37 23 Jul Kept. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:45, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Fluxom

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	My dog can write a better article. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:54, July 22, 2012 (UTC) An article ostensibly about phlegm, and in fact about...the author. "In conclusion," Delete. Spıke ¬ 21:43 22-Jul-12 Yucky! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:33, July 23, 2012 (UTC) My penis can write a better article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 23 '12 3:53 (UTC) This is why we can't have nice things ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:23, July 23, 2012 (UTC) So we can have nice things again. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:11, 23 July 2012
Comments

Kiptown Upon Windsearching

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Can somebody please explain what this article is about? Is this some British town that the writer despises for some unfathomable reason? Is it an inside joke related to a movie? Or is it just random crap? Saberwolf116 (talk) 06:43, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Must be an English town near Weston-super-Mare. Author is so wedded to his code names for things that he gives the article a name that no one will request. There are scads of red-links and nearly no effort to make the material funny to a reader who isn't already In The Know. Spıke ¬ 16:16 22-Jul-12 Delete. It's remarkable how it survived for almost 7 years. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:55, July 22, 2012 (UTC) God, no. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:32, July 23, 2012 (UTC) One penis up. Two thumbs down. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 23 '12 3:50 (UTC) Delete. Redlinks. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:15, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Fallout New Vegas: Bleed Me Dry Quest

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	It's so bad it's scary. I'm a huge fan of the fallout games and when I discovered this was the only article on the topic I died a little inside. According to fallout.wikia.com, this is an unimportant and obscure side-quest which has almost no relevance to the rest of the game. So why is there an article on this and not, you know, the actual game? and it's not even funny. The entire joke is that "lol u get to bone a npc!!". Even an article on one of the game's factions like the NCR of the Brotherhood of Steel would be much better than this. And even though there would be a large amount of potential for an article on the franchise in general, all we have on our wiki is an article about an un-notable quest from one of the shittier games in the franchise. Good god. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 12:17, July 21, 2012 (UTC) Be italic. You sound like the perfect candidate. Transform it. Then rename it. Spıke ¬ 17:26 21-Jul-12 Wut -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 18:41, July 21, 2012 (UTC) He wants you to write a Fallout 3 article. Which you should. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:07, July 22, 2012 (UTC) One Enclave, One America! --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 22:03, July 21, 2012 (UTC) Ain't that a kick in the head! Saberwolf116 (talk) 06:34, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Another failed porn article... -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:56, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Pi

Score: -4
Keep (7)	Actually hilarious. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:17, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:41, July 20, 2012 (UTC) But it's funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:11, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:38, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron -- The Zombiebaron 07:10, July 22, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 07:10 Jul 22, 2012 π ! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:45, 22 July 2012
Delete (3)	Delete. ~~I've been waiting for a while to do this.~~ This article is way too random and un-encyclopedic. Added on 16:59, July 20, 2012 (UTC): I mean, I think the Spock images are funny (but the rest is huffable). In retrospect, my version of the article wouldn't have done well in mainspace either. -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 00:05, July 20, 2012 (UTC) I'm gonna say "Eh" just to piss off Zombiebaron. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 20 '12 14:20 (UTC) I got a bit over exited there. But holy shit man. Given that the audience for an article on Pi is largely cerebral, wouldn't cerebral humor be better than pre-teen, potty-mouthed babble? Spıke ¬ 14:24 20-Jul-12 Isn't that the point? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:52, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Qzekrom, it might be an idea to think over your nominations in future, some are really obvious keeps--Sycamore (Talk) 17:38, July 20, 2012 (UTC) I just nominate stuff I think are stupid or just plain boring. If I say an article isn't funny, it's my opinion. -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 18:18, July 20, 2012 (UTC) And that's exactly where you're wrong. You shouldn't nom stuff when you don't find it funny, you should nom stuff when you think hardly anyone would find it funny, or if it's of exorbitantly bad quality. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:01, 22 July 2012 Pi kept this -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:32, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Inkheart

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Not very good at all -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:17, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Gross. -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 00:09, July 20, 2012 (UTC) I seem to recall seeing trailers for that movie. Wasn't Brendan Fraser in it? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 20 '12 14:24 (UTC) Delete. An generally plain article about Inkheart featuring random appearances from Dumbledore and Saruman just to rape someone for copyvio. With a context like that, it's certainly unfunny. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:02, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Comma splice

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. It has a concept; its only problem is that it doesn't follow it--every sentence in the article should be a run-on sentence--and it's infested with grade-school stuff like the need to write an "In conclusion." Spıke ¬ 17:26 18-Jul-12 Keep. Not bad enough for deletion. --Lord Scofield Stark 17:47, July 18, 2012 (UTC) This article isn't bad, I'm voting keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:26, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Not that bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:45, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Keep. I fixed it up a little bit, this article has some potential, also 6666. -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 16:57, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Thanks to 86.167.244.68 for showing this one to me. -500 points for doing it wrong. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 18 '12 17:12 (UTC)
Comments	Purty kept -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:54, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Asuka Langley Soryu

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Quite bad, even for an article written by rabid jacking off antilingual anime addicts. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:17, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Not want. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:36, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Trash. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 20 '12 14:29 (UTC) She's hot, but the article isn't. -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 16:51, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

The Prodigy

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Really a terrible article in general, and also specifically -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:17, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Sucks Saberwolf116 (talk) 03:53, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:37, July 20, 2012 (UTC) Delete. This a tricky one - I don't think there's anyone besides myself on here at the moment who could do this justice. I have a colonic and then anal bleaching... as you can imagine I may be too busy to write something amusing about smackin' ma bitch up.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:30, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Special:PrefixIndex/Vandalism/example_on_wheels!/Archive

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	To quote a wise man, "Preserving the history of chaos implies order." Also it fucks with categories and DPL and stuff or some shit. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:41, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Move them to my userspace...not! -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 02:50, July 19, 2012 (UTC) EpicAwesomeness (talk) 06:29, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Delete the Vandalism/Example of wheels! page entirely imo. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:55, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Delete. But don't delete the Vandalism/Example of on wheels! page entirely, unless you want me to sabotage your attempt with a rigged rain of "keep" votes. --Lord Scofield Stark 10:39, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Can't put a VFD on the special page, and I literally cannot load some of the archive pages, so I'm calling an exception to that technicality in this case. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:42, July 19, 2012 (UTC) Deleted -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 04:48, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

Albert Fish

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. Nah, this is good. Nothing wrong with sporks...--Sycamore (Talk) 08:22, July 16, 2012 (UTC) It's not a VFD lock that the author hews closely to the Wikipedia article's organization, though thrusts in other directions should be welcome. It is a serious liability to require the reader to first read Wikipedia to enjoy the humor. This article needs more clever writing of its own; its overlong quotations are funny mainly as perversions of the Wikipedia article. Spıke ¬ 14:15 17-Jul-12
Delete (5)	This article exists word-for-word (pretty much) over on Wikipedia, which made me think "how dare they parody us like this!" until I realized somebody else just copied it over, and made a few "zany" and "hilarious" changes. Can we kill it? Huh? Huh? Can we? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 16 '12 8:17 (UTC) A plain shitty page. Also, try to refrain from bringing up articles already tagged with another maintenance tag on VFD. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 15:49, July 16, 2012 (UTC) Dick, suck, etc. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 16 '12 15:54 (UTC) Delete. Extracting humour from the true story of a notorious child killer and cannibal is a tall order to start with. Can't say this succeeds and just copying slabs of text from the wikipedia version doesn't help either. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 10:22, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Backspace. -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:44, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Shit ~Sir Frosty** (Talk to me!) 10:09, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I would also argue that having an article about this guy from any perspective other than straight-on is hard to do without glorifying him. The true account of him already reads like something a demented writer would come up with. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 16 '12 8:17 (UTC) VFD is not a place to 'argue', it's a place to agree about what is complete crap and what isn't.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:22, July 16, 2012 (UTC) A spork usually does more than just change five or six sentences out of an 18kb (or so) article, doesn't it? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 16 '12 8:30 (UTC) VFD is a place for nominators to defend their claim that someone else's work should be deleted. It is not a place to 'argue,' but we do not all agree, and vigorous defense of the claim (also-known-as 'argument') is valuable. Spıke ¬ 18:38 16-Jul-12 Comment. I find the humor style trite and doubt that it offers much value beyond the other articles referenced by the Cannibalism template. But it seems more than a complete spork with a few sentences changed. Spıke ¬ 18:38 16-Jul-12

Cumbria

Score: 1
Keep (2)	Keep. Bit of a cleanup (de-list etc.) and this is passable.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:13, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Keep Confusing-a-town-with-a-county-delete-vote-cruft. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:31, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Countycruft doesn't have the right ring to it. Nominally Humane! 11:26 15 Jul I disagree. It's alliterative. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 11:33 (UTC) Some people prefer the letter preceding "cruft" to be a consonant, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:59, 17 July 2012
Delete (3)	towncruft Nominally Humane! 03:00 14 Jul I didn't even read past the lede, huff. --Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 04:16, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Stupid and pointless. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:07, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	There is a lot of material here, most of it trite and not specific to Cumbria. Is there someone from there who could keep half and make it encyclopedic? Spıke ¬ 14:35 14-Jul-12 Kept, UN:N clause. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:59, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Game:VFH

Score: 4
Keep (1)	I found it entertaining. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:24, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Since this is too old to go on QVFD, I bring it here. A short, shitty text "game" with zero humor and slightly above zero effort. Saberwolf116 (talk) 02:34, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Delete. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 10:26, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Cmon gert you coulda done so much better gert mang -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:33, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Burninate! What do you know? I actually listed this on QVFD. Hahaha! -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:36, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Delete. The author does illustrate the frustrating process of succeeding at VFH quite brilliantly, though. --Lord Scofield Stark** 17:39, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Absolutely. I was thinking that. But isn't there a funnier approach? (I mean, I got my first feature just 5 months after I joined Uncyc.) -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:42, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

List of Internet phenomena

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Salvageable. --EMC^[TALK]23:10 Jul 13 2012 for--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 03:53, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Very Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:10, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Yup. --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:13, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Pretty sure I nommed this before once, but oh well. This is basically a direct (albeit out of date) copy of the Wikipedia article that lists memes. There is some potential in there (satirising the stupidity of the Internet? Or Wikipedia's stubborn idiocy?) but if anyone wants a copy, for fuck's sake, it's on Wikipedia. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:08, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Once again, just use a category or navbox. --Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:59, July 13, 2012 (UTC) No humor. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:06, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Oh yeah, this article is kind of really bad unless someone actually rewrites it though. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:03, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Awesomeness gave me an idea for a rewrite, though I don't have the right idea for executing it yet: from the perspective of an elderly, humorless Wikipedian who sees these internet memes but doesn't understand them/tries to make sense of them by describing them in all the wrong ways, and such. Also, no memes from less than 7 years ago. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:11, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Sounds good. Like I said, do it in your own time (I'm looking forward to it) and we really don't need this here in the meanwhile. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 06:20, July 14, 2012 (UTC) "In my opinion, based on my extensive and constructive contributions to the wiki, we may not need this article here. Sir"--Sycamore (Talk) 16:51, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Kept. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:01, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

HowTo:Infiltrate ED IRC

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	I tried perservering with this, but it's just not funny. It's heaps outdated and even if it could be updated, I doubt it would be funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:45, July 17, 2012 (UTC) It reads to me like a bitter ex-ED user just trying to kvetch about other users. Not bad, but not funny. Nominally Humane! 10:27 17 Jul Delete. Dittoes. It's like a caller calling a radio talk show to complain about other hosts. It's also like a guy who doesn't fit in at a party doing stand-up somewhere else about how everyone else there was a dick. Spıke ¬ 14:27 17-Jul-12 Delete. Unfunny and gives ED more undeserved attention. --EMC^[TALK]18:59 Jul 17 2012 Delete Cuntish. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:22, July 17, 2012 (UTC) So I herd you haet this article? -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:42, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I found the kvetching funny, but I am told that stuff like this isn't typical over there anymore, so...maybe move to HowTo:Infiltrate ED IRC (circa 2007) or something? I dunno. Seems a shame to take down a page about ED because it's cyberbullying (lol). ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 17 '12 11:36 (UTC) Not sure whether this parodies internet culture or just adds a level of cross wiki navelism.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:40, July 17, 2012 (UTC) Looks like I owe frosty a beer. I figured this article wasn't bad enough to get deleted. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 18 '12 12:52 (UTC)

Template:Un-Fabulous!

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. Barely used template that isn't that funny. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:03, July 17, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Aggravates my aidz.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:41, July 17, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Another template that touts an article or coaches the reader. Belay that; just deliver laughs. Spıke ¬ 21:57 17-Jul-12 Delete. --*RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 10:25, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Pointless gay drivel --Lord Scofield Stark 11:37, July 18, 2012 (UTC) Huff.** -- Sir Cute GroudonOnThe Radio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:24, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Full House

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Paedophilia and randomness. Given the nature of the original, this needs a complete overhaul to make it a decent satire of the original. Nominally Humane! 05:05 17 Jul Shoddily done. The show sucked, but this article sucks so much harder. If it wasn't written by someone borderline-retarded, it could pass for libel. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 17 '12 11:38 (UTC) Zonald Donald Zeagan (Ronald Reagan's evil twin). A potty-mouthed ramble vaguely on the topic of a TV show. Do start over. Spıke ¬ 14:21 17-Jul-12 Disintegrate. A cursory glance tells me this is unfunny crap and that Uncyclopedia will be better off without it. Saberwolf116 (talk) 22:35, July 17, 2012 (UTC) Stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:20, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	See http://www.fullhousereviewed.com/ for an idea of what this should be. Nominally Humane! 05:08 17 Jul 1-Jul-07 "complete re-work" by MyersGuy at least had a theme: the TV series was a military operation designed to protect America by corraling certain corrosive elements in one place. Spıke ¬ 14:21 17-Jul-12

Xiaolin Showdown

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. While not that funny, for an article about a kiddie TV show, I don't think it's that bad. Also, calling something "cruft" for treating a certain topic is hardly a valid reason for deletion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:58, 10 July 2012 Keep. Per the Walloon. It needs work and the impetus should be to improve over delete if there's funny in there.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:57, July 11, 2012 (UTC) I'm Flemish, actually. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:15, 12 July 2012 Belgium: Two countries held together by spit and bubblegum. Saberwolf116 (talk) 06:22, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Not too bad, I just hate the fact that the article is almost a complete wall of text... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:10, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Disintegrate. This is incredibly long, boring, unnecessary, and unfunny showcruft. Give me one good reason to let this live. One. Saberwolf116 (talk) 22:51, July 9, 2012 (UTC) This is terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:17, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Obliterate. It's not even done! --Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:31, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. No clear consensus reached. --ChiefjusticePS3 09:01, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

7 World Trade Center

Score: -5
Keep (6)	Keep. A real article about a real thing, the building that came down on 9/11 despite being neither of the towers hit by the hijackers. I have big doubts about the strategy of dealing with conspiracy kooks by trying to portray them as kooky, but author knew what he was trying to do, and did it, and power to him. Spıke ¬ 23:38 13-Jul-12 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:11, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 22:08, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Meh. It's fine. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:08, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:28, July 16, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:28, 16 July 2012
Delete (1)	WTF? --Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 23:08, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Moved to the more-likely title 7 World Trade Center. That's where the Wikipedia article is. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 14 '12 10:14 (UTC) Yes, good. Though "WTC7" might be kook shorthand, the average user is unlikely to type it. Spıke ¬ 14:26 14-Jul-12 Kept --ChiefjusticePS3 08:59, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Recount

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	The 2000 recount was far funnier than this piece of crap. Ovidius IV (talk) 20:40, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:21, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Just no. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:23, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Delete. A dumb pun, a bit of performance art, and then: Leet! Spıke ¬ 18:35 16-Jul-12
Comments

In Flames

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Just pure rubbish. Änjelajs (talk) 15:51, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Please visualize a plate full of barf. There. You have now seen this article. Thank you! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 16:30 (UTC) Let it go up in flames. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:22, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. Can we please have one article about a band that's actually good? Saberwolf116 (talk) 01:42, July 16, 2012 (UTC) Delete. There is no cleverness in this put-down of the band; just put-downs believing that thereby they are clever. The latter sections are essentially album-by-album listcruft. Spıke ¬ 18:42 16-Jul-12 Delete. An article that was started by an IP, and was "fixed" by an IP, while regular users just stood by and reverted them. The very fact that this load of shit wasn't nominated for deletion immediately is a matter of Uncyclopedian shame. SHAME!!!! --Scofield & Dudes 19:44, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Parasalalafolassas

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Dah fuck? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:07, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Failed attempt at random humor regarding the Parasaurolophus. (It's a dinosaur). ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 11:14 (UTC) WTF? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:59, July 15, 2012 (UTC) ... --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:07, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Delete. The introduction is kinda okay. Every other part of the article sucks. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:04, 15 July 2012 Delete. A grade-school extemporaneous talk given on a topic the teacher chose; here, with the title mangled so no one will ever find it. Spıke ¬ 18:33 16-Jul-12
Comments

HowTo:Be a n00b in 5 ways

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	What is this shit? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:02, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Crap was hackneyed when the article was new. It has steadily been vandalized into nothingness. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 11:12 (UTC) DELETE I fucking hate the word "n00b". mAttlobster. (hello) 12:00, July 15, 2012 (UTC) u r nt 1337, n00b! lol pwnt -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:58, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Fascist-Republican Party

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. As a pro-choice, pro-gay rights atheist, I am the farthest thing from a republican sympathizer that there is. But frankly, saying "REPUBLICKUNS IS NAZIS LOLOLOL" over and over does not a funny article make. Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:17, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Ham-fisted; clichéd; tiresome; listy; ugly; retarded; poorly-executed; offensive to the eyes, mind and spirit. This article is the malformed, misbegotten offspring of the rape of Ignorance by Amateurism. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 7:35 (UTC) Let me guess...you're the Republican sympathizer. --Scofield & Dudes 13:43, July 15, 2012 (UTC) I wouldn't knowingly vote for a Republican, not even if they paid me. Or a Democrat, either. :) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 13:50 (UTC) Delete. Hmm...quite a lot of effort seems to have gone into this conspiracy theory. Sadly, as Saberwolf116 pointed out, the concept doesn't exactly equal an article worth laughing at. --Scofield & Dudes 13:43, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Ugh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:56, July 15, 2012 (UTC) I think minorities would be more offended than Republicans would. Look at all those slurs! Fascinating! --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:05, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Delete. As always, ridiculing politicians or religions by exaggerating their extremism produces the same result as their adversaries do in all seriousness. A writer to my local newspaper juxtaposes names of Republican bugaboos just as this author does. Actually, they both think they are engaging in humor. Spıke ¬ 18:31 16-Jul-12
Comments

Devil May Cry (video game series)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Random fucking insanity Saberwolf116 (talk) 19:59, July 14, 2012 (UTC) (Wow...this might accually turn out to be a good article!) Glad author got something out of the experience; this reader didn't. Spıke ¬ 21:38 14-Jul-12 Nope -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:35, July 14, 2012 (UTC) Eh... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:10, July 15, 2012 (UTC) The proper verb form is "slain", not "slayed". For that unforgivable sin, I fart in this article's open mouth. I FART IN IT. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 7:27 (UTC) Delete. I was the one who suggested this topic for the Happy Monkey Competition. And let me just say, he shouldn't have mainspaced it. --Scofield & Dudes 13:35, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Look, I don't care what you do, just saying: Wow...this might accually turn out to be a good article! was something I put in afterwards, check the history. Änjelajs (talk) 15:40, July 15, 2012 (UTC) Well, this is awkward...Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:16, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

Category:Sports Drew Henson Failed At

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Keep Deleting categories is pointless. mAttlobster. (hello) 05:21, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Before we start this pointless insufferable debate again. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 05:38, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Per above. Clear category and QVFD if appropriate.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:00, July 13, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. Practically unused category. --Q ZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$ty Tw%#ve Gme$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! Delete. Category whose sole purpose is to let Anon add listcruft at the bottom of someone else's page. Don't crack wise with the nav tools. Spıke ¬ 14:36 13-Jul-12
Comments	When I brought up category spamming as an issue in 2008, there was ambivalence and suspicion. When Socky, Mnbvcxz among others set about image categorizing 'semi-nude boobage', there's awards. The boat really has sailed on cracking wise on nav tools. With obvious spam, this is best dealt with via QVFD (Preferably don't QVFD if a category is still on articles).--Sycamore (Talk) 15:05, July 13, 2012 (UTC) This category was not used appropriately on either article. The category was removed and then huffed for being unused. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:04, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive267

Cruel and unusual punishment (replace with Ice cream mafia's version)

Navigation menu

Search