From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- I had to look him up on Wikipedia to understand this article's attempted joke. -- The Zombiebaron 05:23, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
 "A fighter from the future born in year 766." Tedious misspelled randumbo for a cartoon voiceover artist. Spıke ¬ 08:38 23-Oct-12- Delete But they weren't even from the future though they were from the future, but they were from the past, yet it was somehow in the future, which looked and felt just like the past, even though lots of it looked futuristic, but in a way where you could mistake the futuristic stuff from things from the past, but things in the past generally look like things from the future, even though the future is the past, and the past is the future and the future and the past and the future and the past, even though though. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:13, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:28, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Just bad. -- The Zombiebaron 03:00, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. -- UserTalkContributions 03:04, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah. Start over--perhaps after we see how bad the real thing really is. Spıke ¬ 09:24 22-Oct-12
- Delete Not only is it bad, it's bad in a 1998 kind of way. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:33, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 21:59, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 0
|
| Keep (1) |
- Keep O_o ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 05:53, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- Unused. Just want to know if it would be appropriate on any article to be written in the near future. So it's more of an RFC than a VFD. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 23:49, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I cannot work VFD if the job involves passing judgement on every unused photo that stops here on its way to QVFD. In this case: No, I was not planning to write a bawdy article on Brasil. Spıke ¬ 00:00 18-Oct-12
- I was just checking if there's anyone out there who wants it; else it'll go to QVFD. Not any particular user. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 00:33, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- 'For' Spike writing a bawdy article on Brasil. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:16, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- 'For' bolding that. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 20:34, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I think someone talked to you before about putting unused images on VFD. Remember that talk please and, if I am incorrect about such a talk having happened, remember this talk right now: VFD is not the place for unused images. --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  21:29, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 3
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (3) |
- Cruft. And I'm just passing through. Can you fuckers actually patrol the edits here? Nominally Humane! 03:11 05 Oct
- Delete. The history suggests that the article was largely dumped into Uncyclopedia on a single day in February, 2008; presumably machine-translated from another wiki. Simsie has been making small changes. Even if you made big changes--process all the text and try to help it along via witty writing--you'd get an article mostly about urban problems that, except for place names and the history, could apply to any city; and it still wouldn't be original work. Spıke ¬ 12:05 5-Oct-12
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:15, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -2
|
| Keep (3) |
 Keep. Found a better revision. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:28, October 2, 2012 (UTC)- Keep The Wiki software allows you to restore older versions. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:35, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Adequate. Thanks, Frosty. Can this be made to stick to its original comedy concept throughout? Spıke ¬ 22:45 2-Oct-12
|
| Delete (1) |
- TBH, the IPs ruined this article. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky!
|
| Comments |
- Reason why I never check the revision history is that it's such a pain in the ass to search through it especially if there are a lot of revisions. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 22:52, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
- This page has a tiny history, it took me 2 minutes to find a good revision. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:56, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
- If you can't be arsed to search through the revision history, don't nominate articles. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:59, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Kept. Revert button. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:25, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 1
|
| Keep (2) |
- Weak keep. I don't know enough about Indian politics to find any theoretical article on this political party funny, so I have no idea whether any of this is funny to someone who does. There's enough coherent content there that I think its flaws can be handled through the normal editorial process rather than deletion.
 pillow talk 18:40, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
- I do know that the article is not funny. The blue humor is not funny, the cheap shots against officials of this party aren't funny, and that's all there is. I did look up the Wikipedia article and found that there is no "spin-off party, The Shiv Sena" (a recent edit) but rather vice versa. Russian Reversal ain't funny either. Separately, though, there is no competent editor likely to repair this through the normal process and there is no need for an article on a regional political party of India. Spıke ¬ 12:12 2-Oct-12
- I think this has some potential. We could make it an article about an Indian
leftist rightist group that favors outsourcing. That'd be absolutely hilarious. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 23:12, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it could be peppered up with randomness. Regarding "hilarious," your only proof is to demonstrate. Spıke ¬ 11:44 4-Oct-12
|
| Delete (3) |
- Delete. Without the unfunny blue humor, what is left is simply unfunny. Spıke ¬ 16:22 24-Sep-12
- Wow that's terrible. -- The Zombiebaron 19:13, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Trash. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:24, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 0
|
| Keep (5) |
- Keep. I put a lot of work into making it presentable, and I still maintain that it is not bad enough for deletion. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:18, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Presentable, yes. Is it funny, then? Spıke ¬ 18:46 13-Sep-12
- Keep. Good enough for me. pillow talk 18:26, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Unfortunately, it just seems too factual to be funny. -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 12:40, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- i do not intend to.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!!
 08:09, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not so bad. --Chiefjustice3DS 14:53, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (5) |
- Nonsense, unfunny article that deserves scrapping in my view. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
- Delete. Should have been deleted in July, nothings changed so yes burn it! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:17, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. This self-satisfied flight of fancy, of the Wacky War genre, is giving me deja vu--Didn't we indeed kill this once before? Spıke ¬ 10:51 13-Sep-12
- ' Delete' A waste of time. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:23, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 04:54, September 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- So, you guys think this article is dumb and unfunny, but you think this article (which I am still shocked was kept because of how unbelievably awful it is) isn't? That makes no sense. This article is at least better than at least a third of the articles on this site currently. -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 15:30, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Calm down. Exact consistency on a measurement of your choosing (every article above 61% is kept, every article below 61% is deleted) will not happen and should not be the criterion. Personally, I found this article quite "presentable"; just nothing near funny. Spıke ¬ 16:18 20-Sep-12
- PS: Articles are Kept not just because of inconsistent voters but from apathy. Me, I mostly abstain on gamecruft/bandcruft/otherspaces because something unfunny to me might yet have an audience. But am biased toward Delete on articles whose title no one will ever type. No one, you see, is searching either for more information or for jokes on the Soviet galactic battle fleet. Spıke ¬ 12:09 21-Sep-12
- Kept --Chiefjustice3DS 14:53, September 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- This will have to be adopted by someone to improve it, otherwise I recommend a mercy killing. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
- There's nothing funny about this, unless we define "not true" as "funny." pillow talk 00:49, September 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:37, September 22, 2012 (UTC)
 Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:32, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- We have, inexplicably, two articles on Goering--this one and Hermann Goering (politician)--and no one is going to correctly type the title of either one. The technique of morphing the gruesome Hitler officer to music acts such as Manfred Mann works for me. If this article is adopted, the adopter should merge the two and give the page a simple title. If no one adopts it, this one should lose. Spıke ¬ 20:37 17-Sep-12
|
|
Score: -1
|
| Keep (3) |
- Keep. Well-written article about a real disease. (Found on Wikipedia without the apostrophe. Here, it is spread by the transatlantic-cruise bacterium and by a 9-stone insect: How can you say it's not close to funny?) Later, it does seem to descend into ramble, and it ought to steal a few photos from Wikipedia. Spıke ¬ 22:28 11-Sep-12
- Keep. - It'd take work to make it good but it certainly isn't bad enough for deletion - jack mort | cunt | talk
 - 04:02, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not a laugh riot, but it's not deletion material. pillow talk 18:25, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (2) |
- Disintegrate. As a story, I will admit I found myself quietly engrossed. As an Uncyclopedia article, it's not even close to funny. Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:55, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Gayer than Christmas. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 12:08, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Page moved, as Chagas, not Chaga, is the real discoverer's name. (Redirect retained in case some reader doesn't know this.) Spıke ¬ 18:50 14-Sep-12
- Kept 239 hours will do. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:04, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 2
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (2) |
- Basically a carbon copy of the Baraq Hussein Osama article, only with a different name and slightly cruder humor. I've migrated most of the funny content from this article into the BHO one, so I propose this one be deleted. --EpicWinner (talk) 20:33, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. This article has nothing on our legitimate Obama pages--and by also moving some of its "slightly [sic] cruder humor" there, nominator was not helping; not all poor work has to wind up somewhere. One of the "slightly cruder" pages ought to be kept, to provide kids and incompetents an outlet so they don't wind up hacking away at our good pages. Spıke ¬ 21:48 17-Sep-12
- Actually, most of what I did to the Baraq Hussein Osama article involved moving some of the humor from the Barack Osama page and re-working the entire article, removing the stupidest and unfunniest bits (most of which originally came from the Barack Osama article, go figure). But yes, I agree, this article is redundant should be deleted. --EpicWinner (talk) 22:02, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 2
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (2) |
- Just a random jumble that has been around for years. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
- Delete. Does author want to tell us why he dislikes the video game? Or does he just want a springboard for an aimless chat? In either case, I agree with the final template: "This article is terribly random." Spıke ¬ 21:43 17-Sep-12
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 2
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (2) |
-
 -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 12:27, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Dumb. As always when you have to already know the punch line to type the name of the article. Also, the entire article is a single overlong pun, before it starts to digress into ramble. Separately, the tone is newsy and salesy and self-congratulatory. Spıke ¬ 14:27 16-Sep-12
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 3
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (3) |
- Hardly ever used, {{Whoops}} would do the job fine and it's not all that attractive/original. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:53, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Like Frosty said. Spıke ¬ 14:29 16-Sep-12
- Pointless Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:07, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- Unfunny. Possibly UN:CB. Nominally Humane! 11:54 16 Sep
- Delete. That the locals drink to excess and commit rape is not a comedy plan, it is just trite. Second half of article descends into mindless babble and listcruft (presumably because the author was drinking to excess, rather than raping, at the time). Spıke ¬ 01:02 17-Sep-12
- Delete. Standard abuse template for somewhere so local I can't find it on a map. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:13, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Chiefjustice3DS 07:07, September 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -1
|
| Keep (4) |
- Keep. If you were a user who didn't know how to spell Massachusetts, as opposed to an author who doesn't know how to spell Massachusetts, the redirect would have taken you to the article you wanted, as it will eventually take your readers there when they click on the misspelled link. In other words, this is useful--though surely not the most common misspelling of the name. Spıke ¬ 15:18 8-Sep-12
- Spike makes a good point. If you're writing an article and you're not sure of the spelling, look it up. --
 Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:56, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Harmless. And potentially helpful. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN02:03, 9 Sep
- Keep. The fact that some users use blue links as a spell check is really no reason to delete a possibly helpful redirect. pillow talk 18:22, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (3) |
- Delete. - This is a proposal to delete this redirected misspelling of the name of the commonwealth, NOT THE HILARIOUS ARTICLE ITSELF. The reason is that it encourages use of said misspelling in an article. It's an easy and forgivable misspelling. The namers of this commonwealth were high on - ahem - "tea" - when they named it and now no one can spell it. I spelled it this wrong way in good faith and linked it in a recent article, and since the link went blue I lazily went ahead with it, making my UnNews look stoopid. Again, the point is that keeping this redirect encourages this common misspelling for no good reason. In fact, the only reasons I can think of to keep it are for existing misspelled links (which can be fixed) and so people searching for our brilliant Massachusetts article on the search page don't have to know how many god damn sssss's it has (which so what, who really is uising search for that purpose?). --
 GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 22:48, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Writing it like that would change the pronounciation. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:37, 8 September 2012
- Gayer than Christmas ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:51, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 3
|
| Keep (1) |
- Keep. Just needs some images imho ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:50, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (4) |
- Disintegrate. Short and shitty, and the links are dead. Saberwolf116 (talk) 03:35, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Vanity. Is Jeremy Lavine an actual notable person (Hint: No Wikipedia page) or just some guy whose Angelfire blog needs a few more visitors? The writing is good, but I'm assuming it is a vanity page; feel free to rebut me. Spıke ¬ 11:09 7-Sep-12
- Per Spike. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:53, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Chiefjustice3DS 11:58, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- Alternates between awful humour and a straight-faced attack on how awful the film is. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:05, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- What's the difference between Manos: The Hands of Fate and this article? MTHOF is funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:15, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Needs a unifying concept. There's some potential here, but currently the jokes are alternating between the film and completely unrelated matters, with the result that it's a pretty horrendous read. --Chiefjustice3DS 11:15, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:28, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- The humor fails because the author has competing agendas: not just a serious attack on the film, but heavy self-promotion ("don't fall asleep, even if I'm trying to make it more entertaining"). Will not vote Delete because I haven't seen the film and can't tell what is topical; also, it's a real article about a real film--just poorly done. Spıke ¬ 21:36 3-Sep-12
|
|
Score: 3
|
| Keep (1) |
- Keep. - This is shit of the lowest order but I'm voting keep in deference to the creator on account of the fact that he put a u in colour where it fucking belongs ;P - jack mort | cunt | talk - 04:07, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (4) |
- Delete. This sucks unbelievably bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:00, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Virtually none of the items are fleshed out--as any reason a color is "bad" would be a stretch--so the article is almost entirely listcruft. In one case where it tries to ("Sorry, It's hard to pad these out to a hundred"), it writes its own epitaph. Spıke ¬ 11:38 9-Sep-12
- Delete. Admittedly, #11 was OK, but that's about it. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:27, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 Burninate! Why the heck did they spell "color" wrong? -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 19:47, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
WHY THE FUCK DO YOU HATE BEIGE. BEIGE IS ONE OF MY FAVOURITE COLORS WHY DO YOU HATE IT WHY DO YOU HATE IT WHY DO YOU HATE IT FUCK YOU FUCK YOU -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 19:49, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Adding new meaning to the phrase "gayer than Christmas" ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:53, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Again: Don't tell me how to interpret your humor. Don't scold me on how I may and may not edit your page. Don't deliver an unexplained slap against Americans, apropos of nothing, and call it funny. None of the above matters, however, as this template is used by exactly one user page and exactly one user talk page. Spıke ¬ 11:05 7-Sep-12
- Just ban from mainspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:55, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Ban from mainspace. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:41, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Burninate!. Why the heck is "humor" spelled wrong? -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 22:24, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Erase. Per my usual prejudice against ugly templates in general. -OptyC Sucks! CUN02:05, 9 Sep
|
| Comments |
- It's presumably for use on articles written in British English rather than American English ('humour' is the British English spelling). I guess it's supposed to be funny because of the supposed differences between American humour and British humour. Unfortunately, it's bobbins. Thankyoubloke (talk) 17:21, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- Well, this has been festering as a << WORK IN PROGRESS >> for two odd years now. There's the odd good bit, but it mostly reads like it's been written by a graphic designer. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:50, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, then... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:11, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Substantive editing actually ended over three years ago. Abandoned article; huff. PS--Shouldn't an article on graphic design have some graphics? Spıke ¬ 21:40 3-Sep-12
- Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 03:36, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -3
|
| Keep (5) |
- No. How can you delete this?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 14:06, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. A real article about a real medical condition, written in the style of the thing it is about. God-awful formatting is not best remedied by deletion. (I've deleted half of the templates at the start.) It doesn't take genius to write an article on Tourette's whose only real joke is a thousand Tourette's-like outbursts, but the article does what it tried to do. Spıke ¬ 14:22 2-Sep-12
 ɹǝuoq. -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 17:37, September 2, 2012 (UTC)- Not not without its not flaws. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:14, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Classic. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:10, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (2) |
- Something of an in-joke, but still god-awfully formatted and seriously unfunny. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 14:03, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Whats the joke? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 20:57, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 0
|
| Keep (3) |
- Keep. It's an article about a British political figure and, to be honest, people arguing that it should be deleted because it's of no interest to them are barely arguing at all. --Zarbag (talk) 18:44, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I am also not an expert on European politics, but the fact that I don't care, nor know enough to understand most of the humor, doesn't mean no one else will. It is a real page about a real celebrity. It does need work, as it begins with drivel including a fake quote, a nonsense number, and extraterrestrial babble; and most of the rest seems to be a hatchet job. Spıke ¬ 17:54 30-Aug-12
- Keep. He's fairly well known in the UK and is both a genius and a complete lunatic. Satirists love him: easy pickings. --Thankyoubloke (talk) 21:18, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (3) |
 Obliterate. A boring article about a person no-one cares about. Because I'm not an expert on European politics I fail to see the point in keeping this article. -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 17:20, August 30, 2012 (UTC)- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 17:52, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Disintegrate. Very random and too obvious humo(u)r. Saberwolf116 (talk) 03:54, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
 Comment. Most of it appears to be Zarbag so we could ask him to at least update the article. Redwood's nickname was the 'vulcan' as he looks like Spock from Star Trek and was a Conservative government minister in the 90s. Saying all that, the article isn't good. I will leave a message on Zarbag's page. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:03, September 2, 2012 (UTC)- Comment. The "extraterrestrial babble" is because Redwood is widely mocked in the UK for his lack of emotion and general "humanity" which saw him dubbed a "vulcan" in the 1990s. --Zarbag (talk) 18:44, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks; then I will write that rather than "Zloooooooooook"--which is, exactly, babble. Spıke ¬ 21:46 3-Sep-12
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Dumb, pointless & ugly ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:32, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 05:54, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Another template tries to interpret the page for the reader, when the page should just jump in and deliver results. No, in fact the template is Sell, sell, sell. Also, what Frosty said. Spıke ¬ 13:20 2-Sep-12
- Delete. Per Spike →
 L A B O R A T O R I E S 13:38, 2 September 2012
- Delete Doesn't work. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:50, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Pointless stupid template ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:26, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 05:54, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. A template that warns the reader not to edit a page as its awfulness is deliberate. Instead, bring all such pages here and we will Do The Right Thing. Spıke ¬ 13:22 2-Sep-12
- In fact, there are only two; one is Zana Dark's Lesbo, the other is the more-stereotypical-than-funny The African Superman. Huffing this template will markedly improve both articles. Spıke ¬ 13:26 2-Sep-12
- Delete. Per Spike →L A B O R A T O R I E S 13:40, 2 September 2012
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:53, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- 2005cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 21:25, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- dafuq -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 22:44, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:25, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The Heisenberg principle--essentially, that the act of observation necessarily disturbs the thing being measured so that there is an absolute limit on how precise measurement can be--is ready for humor ranging from the ironic to the voyeuristic. It should have better than an article that makes us wonder whether the author is trying to write like a moron, or the moron is trying to be an author. The eventual article wouldn't have this title anyway. Spıke ¬ 00:35 2-Sep-12
- Delete. Old crap that hasn't matured with age. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:55, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 3
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (3) |
- Dumb and pointless ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:12, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. These templates should exist solely to spoof Wikipedia--not to indulge the child's notion that it is somehow sophisticated to explain his humor style to you before he's delivered a single laugh in the first place. Spıke ¬ 12:51 1-Sep-12
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:52, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- Do we really need this? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:56, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. No, we do not, as it is linked to by 0 pages; QVFD, even. "The man of who which wrote this article"? Spıke ¬ 12:49 1-Sep-12
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:52, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete If it's not used why do we need to delete it? mAttlobster. (hello) 15:02, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Wat -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:19, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:03, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- What the hell was that? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:19, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. There is nothing encyclopedic about this messy piece of performance art. And, incidentally, there is nothing funny about it, except to those who laugh at high-school massacres. Spıke ¬ 12:47 1-Sep-12
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 18:52, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- 2006cruft -- The Zombiebaron 18:02, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The first-person chatty style could perhaps survive in HowTo:--only, why do we need an article on "Syntactical concepts of visual basic"? Spıke ¬ 18:04 30-Aug-12
- Random concept with an awful execution. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:54, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -3
|
| Keep (8) |
- It's a funny category for a satire site as Fred Phelps claims that God hates everything and this is usually appropriate and got a giggle out of me the first time I saw it. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:36, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- what makes you want to delete this?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 14:58, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. --EMC [TALK] 18:58 Aug 27 2012
- Hardly obscure, and one of our better, broader joke categories. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:18, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't really care much for this category, but if some people want to use it on some of their articles, let them. But if you see an IP add it to a random article where it doesn't add anything to the humour, please feel free to hit the undo button. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:04, 29 August 2012
- Keep. I think it is a funny category. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 11:27, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Category spamming is an issue with this one, but I don't see it as a reason to delete the category altogether. As far as joke categories go, this one is pretty much harmless. --Chiefjustice3DS 11:13, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This one works. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:54, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (5) |
- Stupid and unfunny. Commonly used as category spamming on articles with far too many categories. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:43, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't crack wise with the navigation tools. As Xamralco notes, the category could be applied to anything; so its function is to let an IP deposit a totally generic Fred Phelps joke at the end of an article. Spıke ¬ 15:11 27-Aug-12
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 15:24, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Just added this category to itself. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 16:37, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Too obscure and not very useful either. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:44, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- The main issue I have with this one is when is the category needed and when is it just because of stupidity? There is no distinct line between a harmless joke and being just plain idiotic. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:15, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Kept --Chiefjustice3DS 06:57, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- Randumb. -- The Zombiebaron 18:22, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Part HowTo: or even UnRecipe, and mostly babble. Uses Bush twice as a meme without explaining what's funny. The usual juvenile writing techniques; for example, the article starts by stating the meaning of a definition that it has not yet made. Spıke ¬ 19:15 30-Aug-12
- Oh that silly George Bush! Let's make fun of him because no one's ever done that before. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:10, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Crap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 12:12, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- 2006cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 18:17, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The Infidar is a made-up weapon against infidels, and this article is an irreverent owner's manual that is not clever and is not worth reading. Spıke ¬ 19:11 30-Aug-12
- Per SPIKE. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:07, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:30, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Disambig page that links to itself and to a redirect that doesn't really relate. Nominally Humane! 06:49 27 Aug
- I hate haet hat disambiguation pages formatted like that. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 13:21, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- No need for this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:38, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Disambiguation pages can be funny in their own right and/or perform useful disambiguation. This one does nothing. Spıke ¬ 15:07 27-Aug-12
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 15:25, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (1) |
- I thought it was funny imho. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 16:09, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (6) |
- Pointless and dumb. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:38, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree; there is no point having a template that merely invites edits, an invitation that is implicit throughout Uncyclopedia. It has nothing to say. Spıke ¬ 13:46 25-Aug-12
- There is no need for this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:39, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Also, it's super ugly. -- The Zombiebaron 05:24, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:45, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
- This shit is ridiculous. The Woodburninator
 Minimal Effort ™ 18:19, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -3
|
| Keep (4) |
- Keep. If you've ever seen a Bum Review, you'll realize how great this is. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:33, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
- FUNNY!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 14:38, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
- THIS IS THE BEST ARTICLE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE!! - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 18:57, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
- FEATURE! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:41, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- Horrible and links off to another site for good measure. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
|
| Comments |
- Thoroughly bad writing, on purpose, completes the trite joke that only a moron would like Mr. Bum or his reviews. Nevertheless, do not write articles as though a moron wrote them, because it is too hard to tell from the real thing. Especially when either you or follow-on writers don't stick to the all-capital-letters gag. I won't vote Delete because the author mostly did what he was trying to do. But it's an awfully bad article. Spıke ¬ 16:48 24-Aug-12
- Kept -- The Zombiebaron 05:23, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -1
|
| Keep (2) |
- I normally wouldnt vote to keep such unfunny shit, but I heard the nominator enjoys rimjobs from Silverback gorillas. when he isn't conducting dubious experiments on Romani peoples. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 14:55, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. because... haha! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:51, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- Nil content based on an unfunny movie, yet still seems three times as long as it should be. Plus, the author purportedly has an inverted penis. I would normally forgo that reason if the content was namespace or absolutely hilarious, but, y'know, the author gently fucks himself to sleep at night. --Imrealized ...hmm? 12:48, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Goodbye England's rose / May you ever grow in our hearts / You were the grace that placed itself / Where lives were torn apart / You called out to our country / And you whispered to those in pain / Now you belong to heaven / And the stars spell out your name. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:06, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- K-k-kept -- The Zombiebaron 05:21, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 7
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (7) |
- Burninate! Wha... what-t is... th... this? -- ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 13:24, August 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The substance supposes that untrue equals funny. The goal seems either to give legs to a proposed new meme, or to cyber-bully some actual Jew (or half-Jew). Spıke ¬ 14:55 21-Aug-12
- Delete. Half assed. --Count of Monkey Crisco (talk) 18:02, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Pure crap. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:40, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Dafuq? ~ QZEKЯOM
  Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 02:47, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:39, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Snippy 10:18, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: -1
|
| Keep (5) |
- Fixed. This was a badly miscoded page about a real website that reviews new music, whose "name was taken from Satan's favorite gardening tool." I've done a copy-edit, deleted the quotes, and deleted the listcruft that overused
<math>. The gassy intro suggested that its only theme was "It's shitty," but there was some actual wry humor throughout it. Spıke ¬ 15:00,23:16 17-Aug-12
- Keep. Per Spike. A Token nom? What a waste if your time.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:07, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Like Sheldon on The Big Bang Theory, I can be OCD. If there's nothing on VFD, it drives me crazy. Saberwolf116 (talk) 22:27, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, it worked, at least. Spike gave it a sort-of rewrite-ish. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:04, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
- SPIKE!!! Aleister 18:08 aug20 '12
- Keep. FU HATERS. --MasterWangs
 CUNT and proud of it! 10:48, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Token Keep against token nom. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:21, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (4) |
- Holy hell, things are slow lately. Here's a token VFD nom. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:16, August 16, 2012 (UTC)
 Limp boner. -OptyC Sucks! CUN02:53, 17 Aug- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:27, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
- I was gonna rewrite this with Leoispotter but then we both quit I think. So fuck it. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:22, August 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- Limp boner. I don't know what this is about, but it's terrible. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:18, 13 Aug
- Delete. I've never had a limper boner before. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 22:26, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Kill it. --Gamma287
  ☭Tetяis? 05:34, August 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:37, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:26, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Won't vote Delete as I don't know what this refers to. But I do know it's a vehicle for a list mercilessly extending to (yawn!) 13 items. Spıke ¬ 22:48 13-Aug-12
- I'm not ready to vote yet because I just don't get it. I think it just needs a single image to tie everything together if it's about a squad of some sort. ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 23:30, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -3
|
| Keep (4) |
- Keep. Because I worked hard on this one, to bring it from the irredeemable shite the IPs wrote to a half descent article. So ha! (I do however think they could be merged or whatever) ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:48, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Just replace the content with it. --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 11:13, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
- I guess... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 18:00, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
- It's okay. Nothing special but hardly deletion worthy. -- Lost Labyrinth
 • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:50, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- I has a rewrite.--Snippy 10:44, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Work out it out on talk pages. I'm kind of sick of situations like this coming to VFD. This shouldn't be the place to approve a rewrite, especially when the authors of both articles are active contributors. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:45, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -1
|
| Keep (4) |
- Keep No point deleting UnNews. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:11, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- pointless--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 05:54, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Boner. Aleister 15:42 8-7-'012
- Its a 2006 UnNews Who cares if it stays up? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:18, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (3) |
 So noughties it's scary. This article is THE definition of 2006cruft. In fact, it presents a perfect summary of the writing styles, fashions, ideas and culture of the period which this old unNews article archives. The only reason to keep this article would be to preserve the legacy of the dusty, historical relics of long ago. And MySpace isn't spelt properly - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 16:13, August 5, 2012 (UTC)- A lot of these old unnews articles can be done away with. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:53, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- If we were gonna vote, I'd vote "kill". You know, hypothetically speaking, of course. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 7 '12 1:51 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Last time we strove over an unambiguously bad UnNews, the official line was that it is a drive-by namespace; we write it and move on, and there is no point in trying to pretty up the Front Pages of six years ago. Is the official line different now? Spıke ¬ 21:38 5-Aug-12
- Probably not, but occasionally people will come across an old mediocre UnNews and want to see it deleted. And if it's really bad, I don't see any harm in deleting it. It should be made clear, though, that actively looking for UnNewses to delete and consequently flooding VFD with them would be a waste of everyone's time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:22, 8 August 2012
- Kept --Chiefjustice3DS 16:30, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -1
|
| Keep (4) |
- Version by Bizzeebeever is better than the old one, I'm changing it to Keep. ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:07, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Ice cream mafia, dude. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 7 '12 1:50 (UTC)
- Rewroted version good is. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz
 16:09, 7 August, 2012 (UTC)
- Nay thou. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:18, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (3) |
 #BoycottThisArticle ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d!- Burninate! - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 16:04, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Uber-bad! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:51, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Just another terrible tech article. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:28, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I reverted to one of the first versions of this article, from last year. Still not great. I'll keep poking it, maybe. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Aug 6 '12 5:22 (UTC)
- Your version is much better. I'm voting Keep now. ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:08, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, those are mostly Ice cream mafia's changes, I just added two jokes and a pic. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 7 '12 1:50 (UTC)
- Kept --Chiefjustice3DS 16:29, August 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: -2
|
| Keep (3) |
- Keep. if you want to fix it, then you don't have to delete the old history. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:47, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. A real article, about a real thing (that is especially topical right now), with the start of a real comedy strategy (confuse it with Olympus cameras). It is crufty but better than starting over. A Mitt Romney tie-in regarding past games would be miles better than all the crap about future games. I hear that Qzekrom can probably write better than this. Will we ever know? Spıke ¬ 13:32 11-Aug-12
- Major topic, doesen't deserve.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:47, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Delete (1) |
- Looks from a distance like listcruft to me. I can probably write better than this.
 Huff. ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 02:40, August 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 7
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (7) |
- I demand that this is killed via a laser blast to the exposed heart. *coughs and wheezes* --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:29, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Only thing worse than this is Wikipedia's article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 7 '12 2:03 (UTC)
- Delete. Also known as huff, also known as remove, also known as excise. Apart from being written in the style of its subject (and having a template that takes care to tell you it is written in the style of its subject, which you either already knew or else the entire article was lost on you), it has nothing other than babble. Spıke ¬ 15:39 7-Aug-12
- As Admiral Ackbar would say, "It's a crap!" -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:05, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Disintegrate and redirect to the featured Star Wars. Also, Gamma, remember to put the VFD tag on next time... Saberwolf116 (talk) 02:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Template:Loner--Bp2611 22:32, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Bad ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:52, August 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Check it, bitches:
In the feature film Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, General Grievous was dubbed by actor and sound editor Matthew Wood. Wood also plays Grievous in the animated series The Clone Wars as well as for all of Grievous' video game appearances. Gary Oldman, a friend of producer Rick McCallum, agreed to submit a voice audition, but his involvement never went beyond that. For several months following Oldman's reported (but never confirmed) refusal, actor John Rhys-Davies was widely reported to be the voice of Grievous. This was eventually revealed to be a prank.— Wikipedia
I'm resetting the time, as Gamma forgot to put the VFD tag on. Saberwolf116 (talk) 02:50, August 8, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 4
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (4) |
- Meant to be about a cartoon character, seems like a load of something that anyone who isn't familiar with The Wild Thornberries wouldn't understand and it's random enough to make me question whether or not this has a real purpose. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:21, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Ugh. By the drugs and prostitute part, I was done (though I was still forced to finish it). -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:08, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Blaarargh. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 23:29, August 6, 2012 (UTC)
 WTF? ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 00:21, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I'm erring on the side of keep, but not enough to vote that way. This has had a lot of work done to it, and while it's not very funny, it's also not completely terrible. I'd drop a {{Fix}} as not funny and give the author a chance to improve it. Nominally Humane! 11:52 06 Aug
- A meme on Uncyclopedia that's less than ten years old?!?!? ZOMG! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 7 '12 4:12 (UTC)
- I had added a couple of images to this, hoping the writer would return but as others note, it is a meme. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:56, August 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Score: 5
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Delete (5) |
- thisarticlesux.com And Hypster, don't remove this again. ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 16:24, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- It was an accident! Oh and this article is atrocious - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 16:43, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- It's fine. ~ QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 16:58, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Is this even a real thing? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:54, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- whataloadofshite.net -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:29, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Neh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:34, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
"A fighter from the future born in year 766." Tedious misspelled randumbo for a cartoon voiceover artist. 
:File:Bandeira.jpg
Keep. Found a better revision. 
Obliterate. A boring article about a person no-one cares about. Because I'm not an expert on European politics I fail to see the point in keeping this article. -- 
Comment. Most of it appears to be 
So noughties it's scary. This article is THE definition of 2006cruft. In fact, it presents a perfect summary of the writing styles, fashions, ideas and culture of the period which this old unNews article archives. The only reason to keep this article would be to preserve the legacy of the 
WTF? ~ 
