Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive274

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.

Longwood University

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Schoolcruft.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Icky. Boring. And that jpg logo...ych. Should have been svg. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 07:03, 1 Mar 2014 EXTERMINATE! -RA HB 07:12, 1 March 2014 (UTC) -- The Zombiebaron 08:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC) Nah. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 11:38, 1 March, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Furfag

Score: 4
Keep (1)	prove him invalid.– Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr-ex777 (talk • contribs)
Delete (5)	More a rant than a genuinely funny article, and poorly written. Nominally Humane! 07:16 31 Jan My thoughts exactly, Puppy. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:18, 31 Jan 2014 Delete. Mildly offensive, weirdly incomprehensible, and not at all funny. (Chased a pointer from there -- looks like somebody around here has it in for DeviantArt, for reasons unknown but IMHO neither funny nor accurate. Perhaps the DeviantArt page should be VFD'd too...) Snarglefoop (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Half this article is reworded from the ED article. More than half the pictures are taken from the ED article. So funny or unfunny aside, it's not original. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:59, Feb. 5, 2014
Comments	if wakkoswish123/NeXT votes here prove him invalid. he's doing this with malicious intent. he is not trying to defend humor, he just want bad stuff about furries removed.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 18:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC) You have to link the page at the top because it doesn't do it automatically. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:19, 31 Jan 2014 I did find the first image kind of funny. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:53, 31 Jan 2014

Mop

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Not that funny, incorrectly formatted, underlinked, shortish, bad grammar. This has the beginnings of some good ideas in it, but its creator has been indef blocked and I don't think anyone else is up to developing it into anything sensible. Pretty sure it's too old for qvfd. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:44, 3 Feb 2014 Not worth keeping in it's current state. Either delete or move to creator's user space. The latter so if he ever gets unblocked, or someone is inspired to rewrite it, it will be available. Nominally Humane! 03:50 03 Feb *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:59, Feb. 5, 2014
Comments

Welsh

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This isn't that funny. There are some ok ideas in it, but those can all be found here and overall it's not great. Should probably either redirect to Welsh language or Wales, or be a disambiguation page. (And can somebody please vote on this page besides me. Please?) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:24, 18/01/2014 Delete. This consists mostly of an annoying string of racist and not very clever comments about the Welsh, with emphasis on the oh-so-tired "they are all stupid" and "they shag sheep" memes. Let it die a well deserved death, smothering under the deadening weight of its own trite "humor". (Hmmmm... This sounds harsh, perhaps I'm overstating it a bit.) But note that there is a sentence fragment in the article which is worth preserving, IMNSHO: '"whose coat is that jacket?", "see those two houses over there? Mine's the one in the middle", "shut up when you're talking to me" and "I'll do it in a minute now"'. And then there's another sentence ... uh ... no, actually I don't see anything else in the article that strikes me as funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not funny. <+Dominiol> talk! 21:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Welshisms were mildly amusing, but the rest of the article is bad, especially the final paragraph. --FAKEHATER spam me 21:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. If you think your version's better, which in my opinion is true, why don't you just paste it over the current version? If someone doesn't like that change he will revert you and, hopefully, explain why he did it. If you don't go ahead and replace the content of the page with yours, I will. --Mimo &maxus 17:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC) My version's not better. It's short and vaguely stupid. It's not about 'Welsh' either; it's about Welsh English. You really want to paste it in? I guess, but... Also, I agree with you that the picture you removed wasn't adding anything. I would have removed it myself but I didn't want to leave it all lonely and orphaned, but I guess that's what it deserves. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:15, 18/01/2014

Wernicke's syndrome

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Kind of unnecessary. Of the three articles only 1 exists. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 19:41, 18 January, 2014 (UTC) Per nom. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:02, 18/01/2014 Delete. First, it's not funny. In fact if you didn't know it was on Uncyclopedia, its summary descriptions of the syndromes could be completely serious (I have no idea if they're correct, tho). Second, and possibly worse, it's not a disambiguation page. It provides summary descriptions of three things, with a live link to one of them, and that's not really what a disambiguation page is supposed to look like (I think). Anyhow it should probably just redirect to Wernicke's Aphasia and let it go at that. Snarglefoop (talk) 00:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -RA HB 02:23, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments	You have to put brackets around the page's title or it doesn't link. That's why it says '[[Article title]]' instead of 'Article title' in the box. Sorry. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:00, 18/01/2014 Oh sorry, didn't notice my mistake. Thanks from fixing. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 08:52, 19 January, 2014 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:VFS

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Why delete this? It's actually been used quite often, and has a long history here. I'm confused, and dazed for that matter. I don't see it as hurting anything. Sadness. Crying. Eating sandwich now. And besides, it's a fun concept. Aleister 14:08 18-1-14 Keep. Right now Uncyclopedia.co has got a shitload of articles deserving to be deleted as you guys have been very neglectful towards VFD in the past. If you want to start cleaning up, start with those pages and not with the ones of important historical value. --Mimo &maxus 15:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Keep. But delete the contents, starting with the word January, and replace it with something funnier. I mean, in the amount of time being ~~wasted~~spent deciding whether to keep it or not, surely somebody could come up with a funnier sandwich to propose? Maybe? (I'd do it myself, right now, but all that comes into my somewhat blurred head right now is images of tofu and tomato chili and that's not even a sandwich, let alone funny. It's probably dinner, OTOH.) (And BTW since I'm saying keep it but delete part of it I wasn't sure where to stick this vote, nor quite what to do with the 'keep' and 'delete' counts...) Snarglefoop (talk) 23:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Keep.. History is fun! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 08:55, 19 January, 2014 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Mark as historical. The main function of this used to be voting on sysops, but that got moved to the forums, and the other function, voting on sandwiches, doesn't seem that popular. If you think sandwiches are really important feel free to vote keep, but it's been about half a year since anyone did anything with them and it doesn't contribute to the encyclopedia or anything. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:30, 18/01/2014 always thought the sandwich thing was hella lame/the antithesis of comedy. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 04:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Meh sandwiches. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jan 18 '14 4:37 (UTC) Keep as historical. The sandwich thing is moot if this page is no longer used, but the page history has value. Nominally Humane! 06:39 18 Jan
Comments	I know this has historical value and such, which is why we would of course not delete it. I'm just saying that, since it's not being used for anything, it should be tagged with the historical template and locked. And Mimo&maxus, there's an article deserving to be deleted in the section right above this one; why don't you go vote on it? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:25, 18/01/2014 Why should VFS be locked? Is it causing any troubles by being editable? Are you bored of seeing it constantly in recent changes? I don't think so. Also, the reason I don't vote on Welsh is because I can't have an opinion on something I don't know. I can barely speak english, let alone welsh so I'm afraid I can't do much there. --Mimo &maxus 17:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC) No, it's not causing any trouble, but FFS wasn't causing any trouble either and we locked that for roughly the same reason - it was unused. If there are objections to closing VFS though then we shouldn't close it. And you can barely speak English? That's news to me. I think you speak it really well. You can have an opinion on something you don't know all you want. If the article isn't funny to people who don't know the topic, it should probably be deleted, right? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:18, 18/01/2014 Snarglefoop put a new sandwich on it. I think this means we keep it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:13, 19/01/2014 Kept. Not goin' anywhere. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 19 '14 11:02 (UTC)

Plaid Cymru

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	I put together another version of this article, based on a translation of cy:Plaid Cymru, and I'd like to replace the current article with that but thought I should put it to a vote. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:40, 11/01/2014
Comments

Banana Blitzkrieg

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This is up for a delete over at the old site, and while I say the remaining users over there have a deficient sense of humor, this page is probably one of the worst still on this site. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 25 '13 1:01 (UTC) Yes I know furries are terrible and need indefinitely blocked on sight...oh wait, wrong wiki. Anyway, not good. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 07:01, 26 December 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:44, Dec. 30, 2013 Fuck this shit Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:00, 30 December, 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Their vfd votes are taking longer to close than ours. 100s of red hours. That means...er...something. I guess. And most of the users over there who do seem reasonable people are also active here and many of those have run into trouble. For some reason or other, or maybe none, or maybe blocks are fun or something but of course they always deny that. Because they shouldn't be. Oh, bah. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 07:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC) As an Administrator for the One, the True, and the Only Uncyclopedia, I must uphold the Sanctity, the Decorum, and the Holiness of my office. Therefore, I must restrain myself to saying, "neener neener!" ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 26 '13 8:34 (UTC)

HowTo:Be An Asshole

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	HowTo: Bore your audience. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 25 '13 12:01 (UTC) Per nom. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 07:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:45, Dec. 30, 2013 Mm, nope Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:03, 30 December, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Uncyclopedia:FFS

Score: 2
Keep (1)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Mark as historical. Unused since July this year. I brought it up as a project with low activity in this forum, and Bizzeebeever commented that 'nobody likes being banned', which I take as a reason we shouldn't get this going again. Since we don't want to get this going, and it isn't terribly important if at all, we might as well officially mark it as being dead. It's also been closed on wikia, for what it's worth; Simsilikesims objected to Spike's ending joke bans but I think the present community is no longer interested in them anyway. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Yeah, nobody likes being banned. Anyway, this was maybe a fun thing back when Uncyclopedia had 400 people making edits every day and 399 of them were assholes and the other was Cajek. Now there's just me and my four sockpuppets. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 30 '13 13:12 (UTC) You have four sockpuppets? I only knew about the one. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC) I meant five. Yeah, there's Modusoperandi, Zombiebaron, RAHB, and Llwy-ar-lawr. Man, this place is just me in a room talking to myself. Fucked up, ain't I? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 31 '13 2:33 (UTC) Oh ok...but I never knew I was your sock, and I don't feel I belong on that list because the other ones are all admins. And I'm not. Or is that not important? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC) For HISTORY! -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:46, Dec. 30, 2013
Comments	This was deleted on Wikia for the same reason as this. Only here it can get a second chance. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC) If you want it to get a second chance here, you can vote to keep it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Can I close this? It doesn't need to be deleted, so I could do it. If you let me. And 100 hours is a long time. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC) {{Historical}}'d -- The Zombiebaron 03:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Wheeling_Jesuit_University/People/Kevin_Quirk

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Um, major vanity, apparently. The dude who it's about came here and started editing it and stuff. -RA HB 06:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC) If it's vanity, why can't we call "Vanity" and wipe it out? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 30 '13 13:12 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:46, Dec. 30, 2013 Icky. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Wheeling_Jesuit_University/People/Hammond_the_Holy

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Also vanity? -RA HB 06:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC) Ditto above. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 30 '13 13:12 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:47, Dec. 30, 2013 Yes, I think it would be funny to the right people, but I'm not them. I feel like I'm missing something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Lions

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	EXTERMINATE! Quite awful. -RA HB 07:26, 27 December 2013 (UTC) JESUS CHRIST! IT'S A LIONS! GET IN THE CAR ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 30 '13 13:35 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:47, Dec. 30, 2013 Leave dem emos alone plz ;_; Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:05, 30 December, 2013 (UTC) No, lions are just the real version of cats. Cats are an undersize version of lions made to make fun of them. That could be an ok concept, but at the moment it doesn't have one. Somebody certainly tried though. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	And someone actually said that somewhere too, about cats being a mockery of lions. I forget the context. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Monster Hunter

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. I was thinking if I could write a monster hunter article and I find this. The only thing funny I find in this is the Lord Tigerex jokes, all others are much overused. And I wonder if could be deleted before I myself get Monster hunter 3 Ultimate. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2013 (UTC) I can't decide whether the user-name of the guy who wrote this is cheekily meta or pathetically truthful. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 24 '13 6:09 (UTC) No. I only read bits of it but it's clearly not good. Some of the ideas in it might serve as a basis for an entirely different article, but they would have to be phrased entirely differently. Not working as it is. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:44, Dec. 30, 2013
Comments	We should have a longer thingy before closing delete discussions because often there are very few votes by the time the number turns red. Maybe. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Prolly. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 26 '13 7:27 (UTC) The thingy turning red is actually just a sign that if the vote total has reached a decisive point, then it's okay for an admin to close the vote at that time. The vote isn't closed until an admin comes along and officially closes it. -RA HB 07:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Wapanese

Score: 2
Keep (1)	this is funny.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. It's more of an insulting article rather than a funny one Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 23:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC) I was considering nominating this myself, but then you got to it first. Mr-ex777 can write well, but in this case - if I may for a moment comment on the contributor rather than the content - I think he has written something that would fit much better on encyclopedia dramatica than here. As you say it mostly attacks Wapanese without really being funny. Being purely insulting is considered funny by some, but those are not we, or perhaps we are not those, and that kind of thing doesn't fly here. There was a previous version of the page I consider better, but I don't think it's better enough to be worth keeping. So yeah, delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC) Really, Spoonie said it all. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 24 '13 6:18 (UTC)
Comments	Tis a redirect. May want to fix this... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC) ~~I assume you meant to nominate Wapanese, which this redirects to. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)~~ Never mind, you have already. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC) Another note, deletionism does not help against biased facts. make 9 people vote delete and pursuit this article until it is deleted if you want, but you can't hide from fact.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC) Is this Wikipedia, Mr-ex? Is it? No? It isn't? It isn't, is it? No, it is not. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 25 '13 12:02 (UTC) had you ever saw wikipedia insulting weeaboos? also, you can clearly see that i am ridiculing weeaboos in the article.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Oh I thought you were giving them fellatio. My bad. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 25 '13 14:33 (UTC) Bizzeebeever's point is that facts should not play a role in whether this article should be deleted, as it is Wikipedia, not Uncyclopedia, that would concern itself with facts in deletion discussions. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:35, 26 December 2013 (UTC) K-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-kept: no consensus. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 30 '13 13:12 (UTC)

Chester

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Unfunny InMooseWeTrust (talk) 12:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC) Your town sucks, your town sucks, heigh-ho the dairy-o, but your town sucks. Achoo! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 24 '13 6:10 (UTC) What? Why? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC) Has no images and it sucks Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Pi equals exactly three

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	As SPIKE might put it, "Anon has prematurely marked this page for deletion. While his sentiment was improperly manifested, I nevertheless concur with his assessment of this article's lack of humor." Crap. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 30 '13 13:32 (UTC) I've actually got tired of that reference to The Hitchhiker's Guide. 42 is the meaning of life blah blah very clever you've seen that movie lol eksdee. Come on, it's not funny anymore. So Delete. (yes, just because of the shitty overused reference) Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:09, 30 December, 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 19:29, Dec. 30, 2013 I thought BOOBS at the end of a sentence might be vandalism, but considering how little the rest of the article seems to connect to itself I'm not sure...it might be intentional. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Wow that was a lot of digits Kip before you took them all away. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:20, 31 December 2013 (UTC) This gets to be deleted right at 24 hours. Yay. And I get to archive it! If I'm there of course. I might be busy. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC) When are you going to delete this? It's all red. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

You are alive

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. Spin-offs like this keep us virile and determined, and uh....delicious. -RA HB 01:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC) For. Wikia uncy has taken aim at our in-jokes, let not this scourge spread here, let us man and woman the barricades to protect the in-jokes from the curse of SPIKE and his Unwilling band of in-joke destroyers (aye!) Aleister 15:03 11-2-14 For.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC) For. Hadn't seen this before, thank you kind VFD! Nice one! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 19:08, 14 February, 2014 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Sporked from You are dead, thus an in-joke and not a very funny one. Anton (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC) Yes. Haven't got much to add to that really. You Are Dead is pretty funny, but spork it like this and you get something that makes too little sense to be funny. I wouldn't quite say it's an injoke, though understanding the joke in it does take reading the original article. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:15, 10 Feb 2014
Comments	You never know when you might stumble on an article that you think is bad but someone else is prepared to fiercely defend. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:27, 11 Feb 2014 I want so badly to close this because it is closable and the consensus is obviously keep but I know I'm not allowed and it's annoying so please close it thank you. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:51, 14 Feb 2014 Kept -- The Zombiebaron 20:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Why?:Cut Your Wrists

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Sarah brought this to my attention when she replaced it with statements to the effect that you should not cut your wrists but rather get help and that this is a disturbing website. I've told her on her talk page that you don't blank pages like that, but now that I've really read the article I don't think it's so great. If we're going to have something like this it should be well-written enough that people get what it is and don't mess it up because they were offended; this one just, well, isn't. In my opinion. Delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:50, 8 Mar 2014 Last time I cut my wrists I missed and damn if my thumb still can be seen in the water cooler. Aleister 3:54 8-3-14 Pooooooop poop poop. Poop. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Mar 8 '14 3:59 (UTC) Delete. Make it go away... Double failure: fails to be funny, and fails to be just stupid. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC) If you read till the end, you see that it really isn't about persuading you to cut your wrists, but still - stupid. Anton (talk) 12:00, 8 March 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:28, Mar. 9, 2014
Comments

My Little Pony: Astrophysics is BUTT POOP!!!!

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Anton, you must be whipped like a dog. I repeats, this is not Spikepedia, we no speak Spikeish here. You've been too long in the fields, and your workday is done and now you can play! As for the page, it's creative and weird, fine elements in satire. Aleister 18:13 11-3-14 Derp - Exactly what Cosmos would look like if Seth MacFarlane were a brony and given more creative control. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 10:10, Mar. 14, 2014 Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeit - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 07:02, Saturday 15 March 2014 - Fucking genius Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 18:24, 15 March, 2014 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. What is this? Sorry, Kip! Anton (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Not enough pregnancy jokes --Argylesocks (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC) The absurdity of it is just, well...absurd. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:02, 14 Mar 2014 Delete. I dunno, seems like if we're going to keep it, it should have, like, a joke or something in it. (And don't make me repeat what I said about butt poop over on the VFH page -- because if I do it'll include that same link, and you'll click through it to see if it really is the same link, and you'll get like totally wicked grossed out all over again. So don't do that. Hrmhrmrhmmm...) Snarglefoop (talk) 04:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Comments	What is this, indeed. Aleister is knowledgeable enough about the site that I'm inclined to respect his opinion, but on the other hand I'm tired of this sort of article, so I'm torn. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:38, 11 Mar 2014 You can respect his opinion on VFH and yours here! That's what I want to achieve: to get this article featured and deleted at the same time! Anton (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC) That's an illogical goal, worthy of this site. Good for you. But I am afraid I have done the opposite. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:45, 11 Mar 2014 the joke here, for those who may have missed it, is that the ButtPoop series features Mike Tyson. This one is Eric D. Tyson. Tysons all around. Aleister 18:23 14=3=14 I got that, but I don't get what the ponies or the dark matter have to do with anything. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:27, 14 Mar 2014 I guess Dark Matter, a space term, can be a play on Tyson being a black fellow. The pony, my guess is as good as yours, but satirical at some level. Aleister minute later It has nothing to do with Tyson being black. There's this video - linked in the corner star of the article - where a kid applies physics to My Little Pony in a presentation for school. He tries to explain how Applejack can sling Rainbow Dash across town on the catapult when her supposed weight doesn't carry enough momentum to do so, concluding that maybe she's made of dark matter. Hence, this weird concoction I made with BUTT POOP!!!!, apples and someone named Tyson. If anything, this satires the MLP fandom's penchant for memes, parodies and remixing, something very relatable to Uncyclopedia. See: Know Your Meme. ("The usage is therefore similar to how the phrase a wizard did it is used in other fandoms.") Plus, putting a mask of science on a little girls' cartoon and something so stupid as BUTT POOP!!!! has to be funny by some angle, right? In fact, I'm also planning to write some UnNewses in the future to carry on a running theme about space and poop. Stephen Hawking has a wormhole built into his chair so he doesn't have to wear adult diapers, NASA accidentally takes a photo of Jesus on the toilet, astrophysicists discover that dark matter is really fecal matter, etc. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 00:00, Mar. 15, 2014 Ah I see, that is a funny-sounding incident. The way you wrote the article, though...I'm afraid this won't sound right, but you'd never know what it was about from reading the article, and it's short enough that a casual reader just assumes it's empty; I think it would work all right if there were a decent amount of text to go with it, an article in the usual sense, but as it is, I don't think it's a good plan. See, I can't quite get myself to see it as putting a mask of science on it, because...well, there just isn't that much to the article. It's one of those things you have to be very well-versed in these various memes to understand, and then sometimes even when you are...I don't know, you see? Certainly not featureworthy and possibly deleteworthy though I doubt this will be deleted considering the number of keeps and the general apathy around here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:28, 15 Mar 2014 It doesn't need text or further explanation. It's a fucking parody of BUTT POOP!!!! Which is also why it shouldn't be featured. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 11:32, Mar. 15, 2014 And why it should be deleted. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:13, 15 Mar 2014 Also I pity the poor hypothetical admin who would be tied in knots attempting to feature and delete this at the same time. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:21, 15 Mar 2014 Kept, no consensus. You go, Kip. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Mar 16 '14 4:34 (UTC)

Camp Fuck You Die

Score: -5
Keep (6)	A joy to behold, as well as an ode. Aleister 14:16 Ides of March-14 Keep. Not bad enough to delete. Good concept, and funny in parts, though perhaps it should be made a tad shorter. I also like the 'flies in the face of vfd' thing, though I wouldn't keep it just for that. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:12, 15 Mar 2014 Zombiebaron. -- The Zombiebaron 04:55, 16 March 2014 (UTC) with a little bit a ah ah --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC) We are NOT uncyclowikia.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:47, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Someone get me an androgynous person with glasses. NAU. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 20:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Terrible. The fact that it is an in-joke should not be a good reason to keep it. In-jokes should be funny. Fisher Price has no merit, but Fisher Price: A Retrospective explains it well. My sojourn articles are often funny and original (making a good one requires obeying a strict formula while being as creative as possible). Some people would say that A wizard did it has humour. But this! Anton (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Comments	It's a fucking terrible article. But I want to rewrite it some day, because the title is full of promise. You remember the days when you were all full of promise? When you ran, naked as mole rats, and frolicked in the sunlight, with the sunlight shining through your back-hair? Yes, you do. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Mar 16 '14 4:37 (UTC) The faggots with aids Are all gonna fry You stuck it up an ass Primate now were gonna die DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 06:22, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Excuse me but what has an androgynous person with glasses got to do with anything? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:11, 19 Mar 2014 Kept -- The Zombiebaron 01:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Bloc Party

Score: -2
Keep (2)	Real article about a real thing, and there's definitely something here that we should hold on to at least a little while longer so I can figure out how to make it shine. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:32, 19 Mar 2014 Llwy's wish is my command. Aleister 19:41 19-3-14
Delete (0)	~~Ew. -The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 05:24, 19 March 2014 (UTC)~~ Not good, not good at all. I laughed at the line 'The essential thrust of Bloc Party's manifesto is that moping around the house feeling mildly disaffected is a woefully unsubsidised sector of today's society, a situation that must be rectified by diverting money away from health, welfare and education.', and if I were someone else I might know how to find all the redeeming value in this and bring it to centre stage, but I'm not, so I don't, so here I am voting Delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:36, 19 Mar 2014 Hold it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:42, 19 Mar 2014
Comments

╬

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	This was ffw'd back in August 2013, and for some reason I removed the tag. Now I look back at it and I have no idea why I did that - it's a pile of random made up stuff, always has been, half of it lists of unrelated factoids, and the two quotes I left I find mildly amusing but could really be said about any Unicode character or really anything else as well. If I took out all the bad, random parts, there'd be nothing left, and that's how it should be. Possibly worth rewriting with a different concept but nothing worth saving in its current state. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:59, 19 Mar 2014
Comments

Recent advances in mecha technology

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Not too funny IMO. Topic could work as UnNews tho. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 02:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC) That thing you said. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:49, 28 Mar 2014 *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 15:22, Mar. 31, 2014 Madclaw @ ^talk 15:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC) not funny really but yes could maybe work as an unnews Banzaikitten (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Regina, Saskatchewan

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	obscure as fuck. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 02:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Real enough place, but the article is pretty yuck. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:52, 28 Mar 2014 One of the Worst crap that i had ever saw on the site.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 05:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 15:22, Mar. 31, 2014 Someone clearly put some effort into it despite it being not very funny. I'd suggest we leave it to be improved but considering the OP hasn't done anything for 3 years and noone else know where it is probably delete. Banzaikitten (talk) 15:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Madclaw @ ^talk 15:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Yrgk...not only did you forget the vfd tags, you didn't link the headings. I'm sorry but you have to do those things...so I will go and do it now. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:47, 28 Mar 2014 There ought to be a way to make it preload a link. Having the placeholder tell you to is something, but it's not enough. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:09, 28 Mar 2014

Find the Taco

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Fictional thingy nobody will look for, ~~random like the template says,~~ criticises the reader in an apparent attempt to be funny but just isn't funny. Yuck. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:15, 23 Mar 2014 The randomness was added by random people, and is now gone. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:11, 25 Mar 2014 2006 cruft. Baleet. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Mar 23 '14 18:17 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 15:23, Mar. 31, 2014
Comments	I notice an ip said on the talk page that it should be deleted. Pity they didn't know about vfd. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:27, 23 Mar 2014 Reverted a few bad edits that increased the randomness per Uncyclopedia:Check the history DAMMIT! and I also notice that it was NRV'd by Gwax and Keitei decided it was 'not that bad' which is why it got to stay. Now...we should reconsider our votes I guess? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:34, 23 Mar 2014 The first version was pretty reasonable if a bit short. Rather than delete it, I'd say rewind it right back to the version initially created by some IP, before Abbot Vesuvius screwed it up. Then slap an 'Under Construction' tag on it, and see if anyone can think of a few more paragraphs of stuff that's actually funny to flesh it out. And then, I'd suggest looking over Abbot Vesuvius's contributions and see what else needs to get ripped out of our collective history. Snarglefoop (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2014 (UTC) I looked over Abbot Vesuvius's contributions list and they mostly actually look sort of OK. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:09, 23 March 2014 (UTC) I quite like the idea- the execution is pretty terrible though so I am undecided. Banzaikitten (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Gnarls Barkley

Score: 3
Keep (1)	lololololoooôlolllololiiuutyuycufiyfyuvjyfthgfdwfhcty --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 05:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Delete (4)	A good effort by Ketchup Boss, but unfortunately not good enough, and I don't see it getting there any time soon. This was on qvfd but it's been around a while and the construction tag didn't 'expire', it got removed, presumably by accident but anyway I don't think it's qvfd. But it should probably be deleted or userspaced. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:45, 25 Mar 2014 --Mimo &maxus 20:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 15:23, Mar. 31, 2014 Who do you... who do you... who do you think you are! Ha-ha-ha, bless your soul. You think you're in control? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Apr 1 '14 6:40 (UTC)
Comments	The WIP tag did 'expire', 2 days ago to be precise. See the page history. Also, since you're not an admin yet, don't you think it's still kinda early for you to cross out pages for QVFD? --Mimo &maxus 20:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC) Er...hm. I thought the date was reset when the page was edited? And about the second thing...yeah, no idea. Haven't got any complaints before now though. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:02, 25 Mar 2014 Have dug into this a bit - RAHB says poopsmiths can cross off stuff, and the construction tag didn't expire, if you look at when it was still on the page (it has been removed by its author) and the code for {{construction}} you can see that the date it expires is reset whenever the page is edited, and it was edited recently enough in this case that the tag hadn't yet expired. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:08, 25 Mar 2014 Right. Sorry. --Mimo &maxus 21:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC) I know it's short, but I am a college student studying to become a music teacher, so this is the reason why I can't edit as much as I used to on this article. I promise I will add some adjustments.--Ketchup Boss (talk) 02:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Sure, that's fine - we can move it to your userspace if you like, and you can work on it there. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:42, 26 Mar 2014

Ultimate Marvel Comics

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	uh --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC) uhh -- The Zombiebaron 04:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC) Nope. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 12:15, 3 Apr 2014 You fuckbags deleted Lobo so you might as well delete this too Madclaw @ ^talk 14:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC) TL;DR. (Actually I mean this comment is tldr, not the article...) Get rid of it. (This time I do mean the article.) It's a rant about what's wrong with Marvel these days. In fact it sounds all too plausible, and the outline of Marvel's decline and fall is probably accurate, obviously random bits of nonsense aside. But such possible accuracy doesn't bring it any closer to being funny. (OTOH the article failed to mention Marvel's ditching the comics code, in order to cash in the sex-drugs-and-violence craze that everybody else was cashing in on. You may have noticed the change -- that's when Wolverine started actually ripping people's heads off and leaving intestines and stuff lying around on the floor for other guys to slip on. OTOH last I looked Marvel's characters mostly were still keeping their clothes on so I suppose their downhill slide isn't quite over yet.) (And BTW the Daredevil article is pretty bad too IMHO but I've got to go clean some litter boxes just now so I won't be VFDing it this evening.) Snarglefoop (talk) 03:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC) This is just so terrible that i laughed frantically! Seriously, i laugh at the most terrible articles.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments	The article may have been created by an ip but it's pretty different now from the original version as you can see here. That said, the original version wasn't much good either imho. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:05, 4 Apr 2014

Tao

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Pretty random, and Kip said it should be deleted. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:13, 7 Apr 2014 I only had to read the first paragraph. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:37, Tuesday 08 April 2014 - Delete. Good God get rid of it. Delete it twice; once is not enough for this article. Ugh. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC) Could somebody check and see if we have a Random-Shit Generator? I've seen so many of these shit-by-numbers articles. They're like a fungus. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Apr 8 '14 4:20 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:NRA celebrates Colorado theatre shootings

Score: 4
Keep (1)	encyclopedia dramatica is hilarious!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC) Say what? You do realize we're not voting on whether to delete Encyclopedia Dramatica here, right? That would need a separate nomination. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC) This only refers to i like this style of writing.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 05:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Why of course you do, you're from encyclopedia dramatica after all. I expect the rest of us don't, though, except for the author who is long gone and will stay gone or I'm no spoon. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:02, 19 Apr 2014 Du calme, du calme! We are an inclusive community (or something like that) and it's not polite to attack someone for what they are (even if what they are is from Encyclopedia Dramatica, while we happen to be something else, like, say, from upstate New York). Let's not let this deteriorate into piano paint! Snarglefoop (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Sorry, that was a stupid remark on my part. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:09, 19 Apr 2014
Delete (5)	I don't think this works the way it was done. It's basically taken the real event and exaggerated it a bit but kind of stupidly, and it's not that funny. This is also aimsplode's only remaining live article, if that means anything. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:24, 18 Apr 2014 Delete. "Exaggerated ... stupidly" pretty much summarizes it. Little sense, no humor. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:50, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Delete I didn't really care one way or another, but Mr-ex777 makes such a persuasive argument. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 20:58, Apr. 19, 2014 Delete. I didn't even read it, I just saw that it was aimsplode's last remaining article. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 09:35, Sunday 20 April 2014 - Not funny --FAKEHATER spam me 17:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Maximum Seriousness (German Surrealist)

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Apparently was meant for this wiki Dadapedia about the shittiness of translators? This is Uncyclopedia. Duh! About time someone put this up here. Me, You, You, talk to me >^.^< 02:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC) I think someone thought google translating an article from Dutch was funny, judging by the errors in the text and the note at the bottom, but it doesn't relate to the subject and I don't see much other humour here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:30, 22 Apr 2014 Delete. On the plus side it's not offensive, doesn't contain 347 repetitions of the F word, and there's not an ethnic slur in sight. On the minus side, there's also no humor, and darn little grammar. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 03:49, Apr. 22, 2014
Comments	Someone needs to fix that box. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:31, 22 Apr 2014 What box? Snarglefoop (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC) The one where you nominate stuff. It doesn't automatically link the text you put in, and it should because it's apparently hard for people to figure out what to do. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:52, 22 Apr 2014

Faggotry

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Not funny; just another attack-some-group page. Being offensive isn't the same as being funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC) I have a rewrite. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 2 May 2014 GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY!! FUCK DIS SHIT. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 19:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. what llwy said. I read her article, it's funnier than this. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. Anton (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. and For. for llwy's re-write. And so on. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 19:23, 2 May, 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Sharp signs mumble...will explain properly tomorrow. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 2 May 2014

Plants vs Zombies war (Walkthrough)

Score: 1
Keep (2)	What? There must be someone who is trying to delete every single one of my articles one by one.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 04:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Let this be the one time I vote 'keep', as Mr-ex put a lot of effort into this and I think it could be polished and made acceptable with a lot of love. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 05:07, May. 5, 2014
Delete (3)	Nom This isn't even funny. I'm not sure what this is supposed to be, maybe it got kicked off of Wikipedia or IGN and found its way here, but it doesn't belong here. Hell, it's not even a proper walkthrough. It's too... shudder serious/factual. Me, You, You, talk to me >^.^< 00:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC) It's a walkthrough of a fake game i wrote in order to satirize EA.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:14, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Too long and too factual as well as attackish. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:19, 4 May 2014
Comments	Added something to the nominate button - maybe now it will be clear what to do. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:19, 4 May 2014 This is getting too suspicious. This time Faggotry gets rewritten and deleted, this gets deleted. I guess what will be next?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 04:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC) I hate to break it to you, but there's nothing suspicious about it - we vote to delete articles that aren't funny. There is nothing more to it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:35, 4 May 2014 Also, if this gets deleted, move all it's pages to my userspace.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 2 keeps pretty much means kept – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 13:40, 5 May 2014

Template:Barnacle dick

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Barnacle dick. - Streisand effect, bitches! -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 03:32, May. 7, 2014 Like, ban from mainspace?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:36, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Mainspace? These templates aren't supposed to be used in mainspace anyway, so not sure what you're on about. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:39, 7 May 2014
Delete (2)	Unused voting template. Listed in Category:Voting templates so clearly somebody thought it would be useful, but it doesn't seem to have worked out that way. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:55, 7 May 2014 Delete --EMC^[TALK]03:19 May 7 2014
Comments	Hmmm You could've deleted it without anyone noticing, I'm sure, but since you nommed it for being unused it's been used something like four times so it's not really an 'unused' template anymore. Is there a moral here somewhere? Snarglefoop (talk) 14:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC) No, just a paradox. --EMC^[TALK]19:32 May 7 2014 Barnacle dick. :D - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:04, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Kept. 50 hours gone by with no consensus; original reason for my nomination is no longer valid anyway. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:12, 9 May 2014

Cockroach

Score: 2
Keep (1)	Keep. Changed my vote. I just rewrote it, and put the new version into place about 5 minutes ago. Whoo hoo! Dunno how good it is but I sure had fun writing it. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. Is there anything funny there that I missed? Anton (talk) 11:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC) I've mostly reverted to a better version for the benefit of anyone who thinks it might be salvageable. I still don't think this is worth saving, though, except for these sentences in the intro: 'Cockroaches have been the only documented mammals known to be immune to radioactivity. Thus, cockroaches have been planning war on humanity for a total of 20 years running.' and the text in the Survival section: 'Along with Keith Richards, cockroaches are known for surviving atomic bombs but not surviving a human foot. They can also survive up to around about a week headless. After one week the head regenerates. However, the roach's personality is lost, often leading to broken homes and alcoholism, and, if the cockroach suffocates during that time, it actually explodes. Or is that termites?'. And even those snippets could use some reworking. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:19, 7 May 2014 Still not quite good enough Granted, it's 'way better than it was -- I looked at the previous version; it was pretty vile. (And the fun facts were just dumb -- I mean, like, they taste good with chianti? Heck, anything tastes good with enough chianti, most notably more chianti...) Snarglefoop (talk) 18:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. My wyvern article that used to exist on wikia had more quality than, this. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 21:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments	FWIW I've read (not on Uncyclopedia) that cockroaches are actually highly nutritious, with the only drawback being that they taste kind of awful, so you need to use a lot of spices and such to flavor them up. This has been proposed as a solution to the roach overpopulation problem that plagues most cities: Just eat 'em. (Idea never seemed to acquire any legs, not sure why.) Maybe we should put up some cockroach recipes somewhere -- hmmm.... Snarglefoop (talk) 03:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Snarglefoop rewrote it so it doesn't suck. Looks like a keep though you can always vfd it again later if you still hate it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:07, 10 May 2014

User:SPIKE

Score: 7
Keep (2)	Against. I disagree. I thought we didn't touch in-jokes, no matter cyberbullying or not. Anton (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Keep. Abortion is genocide. Maybe someone will adopt it, like Joseph Kony. --EMC^[TALK]19:31 May 7 2014
Delete (9)	nom& For.- I find this page highly offensive. I am unclear of what it's purpose on this website is. I don't believe it contributes to humour in any way and is in fact nothing more than a shrine to a false admin. It displays blatant vanity (moreso than a regular userpage) and frankly I don't know this guy or care about him but he sounds like a bell.Banzaikitten (talk) 10:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Never heard of a guy called SPIKE. I believe this article is just cyber bullying on a non-famous person called SPIKE, probably written by his classmates on elementary school or something, so For.. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:33, 6 May, 2014 (UTC) For. - I logged on for the first time in months thanks to SPIKE having renewed my spite-filled interest in Uncyc. --Ovidius IV (talk) 10:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC) For. - What kind of dumb name is SPIKE anyway? It sounds like an edgy 15-year-old's metalcore band name, especially with the capitalization. The Hamon Master WeinribJo Joestar of Earth 13:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Boner. Unencyclopedic page is one of those tired uncy in-jokes. Delete post haste with post traumatic haste. Aleister 16:50 this day in 2014 Delete. This page is much too unfair to SPIKE to keep. It leaves out nearly all of SPIKE's most notable achievements. In particular, it doesn't mention any of the people he saved from Uncyclopedia (by chasing them away), and doesn't say anything about his efforts to balance the excessive and uncontrolled mirth caused by all the humorous articles by spreading around as much misery as he can singlehandedly provide. Snarglefoop (talk) 18:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Come to think of it, if someone were to go in and fix it so that it was better balanced, and showed SPIKE in a better (or perhaps I should say clearer) light, I might be convinced to change my vote... Might be tough to do that and still keep it funny, tho. Snarglefoop (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Spike is annoying and so is his userpage. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:16, 6 May 2014 This article has lead me to suffer from depression and I don't think I'm going to make it unless this travesty is gone. I feel Uncyclopedia deserves better than being depressed thanks to one article. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Delete.per llwy Madclaw @ ^talk 16:54, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Wait, you people are serious? Mimo &maxus 11:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Of course we're serious. We're always serious. How could you think otherwise? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:51, 6 May 2014 This is a deadly serious site with deadly serious votes. To even threaten a joke would be doing this website a severe disservice. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC) How the hell could you EVER assume we were not serious!? We're ALWAYS serious. I'm offended. The Hamon Master WeinribJo Joestar of Earth 17:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Abstain. Meh. --Mimo &maxus 19:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC) There is one funny thing on this page, namely the fact that Spike's editcount appears as 0 since he has never logged in. That, however, is not enough to save this page from being an inflated pile of puffery with no humor value, with plenty of irrelevant images to match. His 95 Theses against the Admins--to partially borrow one of his favorite phrases for attacking the truly better Uncyclopedia--at the end also do not give the reader a good impression. We are writing for the readers, not for ourselves, and Spike seems to have forgotten that here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:16, 7 May 2014 Leaving this here for now so we can savour the quantum whatsit energy of its feng shui. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:48, 7 May 2014

Why?:Date on Facebook

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. Low-quality quotes are half of the article. The other half is not quotes, but is still low-quality. Anton (talk) 11:11, 7 May 2014 (UTC) I was surprised to find that XDshempXD had written this because she generally strikes me as a good writer, and yet this article is...bah. I suspect she wrote this based on her own experience and it is funny to her because she knows the context. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:46, 7 May 2014 Delete. A good subject for humor but a poor attempt. --EMC^[TALK]19:34 May 7 2014 Delete. Didn't make me as moist as I wanted it to. - The Hamon Master WeinribJo Joestar of Earth 15:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. Gak. I hope this isn't a personal documentary. And I hope that's not a selfie -- like, PII & stuff, should be someplace "safer" (like Facebook, errrmmm hmmm). In any case it's 'way too serious and not enough hah-hah. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Bulimia

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Not great and worth rewriting. There is another article at Republic of Bulimia. Anton (talk) 11:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC) There is another version of this article, but it's very short and not that funny. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:25, 7 May 2014 OMG get rid of it It's awful. The author also doesn't seem to understand that anorexia and bulimia are two sides of the same coin; people who have either frequently have both. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 22:32, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Portal:Games/Bloodbath

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	The Hell?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 14:14, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Lots of redlinks. Not sure what this is good for. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:27, 7 May 2014 Delete. Yep, not all games need a portal. Anton (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Weak delete It's not horrible, and it has snazzy formatting, but it doesn't seem to add anything beyond what's in the Bloodbath article, which, please note, has a 'Related Articles' section which includes all the links to other Bloodbath stuff which is linked to on the portal. Maybe the portal should just be a redirect to the main article? (Or would that be, like, stupid?) Oh, yeah, and it's not funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive274

Navigation menu

Search