Uncyclopedia:VFS

...and so shall it be that every Admin is presented with Shit-Wading Galoshes, a Steel-Plated Banhammer, and an Industrial Strength HuffMaster 2000 upon inception to the order. “Better to reign in Uncyclopedia than serve in Wikipedia” – John Milton on stating the obvious Are you looking to join a team of enthusiastic and extremely sarcastic individuals? Do you like to feel like you are a valuable part of a "team?" Do you want an employer who considers you their slave? If you said "I prefer not to answer" to any or all of these questions, you may be qualified to be a sysop at Uncyclopedia! This is the place where twice a year, Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for the most qualified users to be given the mop of power. Additionally, this is the place for votes to remove ops from a user, either in urgent cases, or during the regular bi-annual votes. Rules for op votes You may nominate whomever you want. Only registered users whose accounts are at least 2 weeks old and have 75 constructive edits may vote on or nominate administrators. No self-nominations. Votes for bureaucrats and interface ops follow the same rules. Votes on those ends follow seperate vote counts. Joke nominations and votes are permitted. These do not count towards normal vote limits, but each user is limited to a maximum of 1 joke nomination. Joke nominations should go on the bottom, in italics. The process (all dates and times are calculated in UTC, unless someone gets lazy and is a few hours late/early) Each user may nominate one sysop, beginning on the 1st of every April and October. Until the 20th, users may vote on a maximum of three sysop candidates. From the 21st - 30th, current ops take the candidates with at least 50% of the leader's score and vote on who to op. The ten-day admin-only vote has been replaced by a ten-day admin-only bender, after which the crats will be too hung over to fulfil their duties on time. During the bender, late votes are still valid but dramatically groaned at. On the last day of any month with 31 days, current ops play Russian Roulette to see who gets de-opped. (Kakun goes first with a bazooka) Rules for de-op votes Only established users, per the above qualifications, may nominate an administrator to be de-opped. Be professional, and lay out your case for de-opping clearly and with evidence of their supposed wrongdoing uploaded to Uncyclopedia, and linked in your nomination. For a de-op to be successful, a supermajority (2/3) of votes must be in favor of the motion. No half votes or semi-votes. NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against wiki-terrorism.

Adminship

Turb0-Sunrise (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

1. Heh.... get fucked fouls... You think YOU'RED by the guy to nom him??? Hahahaha.... No... I MUST BE THE GUY!!! Also Yankees suck or smth 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 22:40, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
2.  Even stronger than a "strongest possible for" TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 22:42, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
3.  Half for. Turb0 has written some great articles, and reverts vandalism/spam. --Dame Fish on skates DUN VFH UotM 23:03, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
4.  Also half for. What fish said, but also i personally find Turb0 to be a bit hasty when it comes to reverting stuff/sending it to QVFD. This would be great if we got lots of childish vandalism daily, but that's just straight up not the case anymore. 23:13, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
   1. Feels like i'm the reason for there being less childish vandalism around to be honest. Bit hard to get used to it, might be why. TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 23:20, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
      1. From my experience being on here for 4+ years now: no, it doesn't have anything to do with the people who are there to revert it (most likely 80% or more of those editors will never notice their edits be reverted, regardless of how quickly it happens). 23:45, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Gergdown (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

1. hah... It's my turn, motherfuckers. TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 22:41, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
2.  I'm Chuck Norris, and I approve this article. he's been very helpful to the site, specially with his whole revolution thing. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 23:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
3.  Goof. He put my question in his QnA. Definitely for. 23:14, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Fish on skates (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

1. Nom/for. Unlike the two people above me, i will actually make an attempt to explain why i'm nominating Fish here (emphasis on attempt). So basically, Fish is, to my knowledge, very helpful around the site. Like, maybe more than Turb0. 22:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
2.  Forange. per alula 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 23:06, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
3.  For. User more ACTIVE than any OTHER user on THE WEBSITE?!?!? Also read above. The only grudge I have is that if all these noms pass then there would be more admins than active users. Well probably not but you get me, right? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 23:08, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
4.  For. If anyone is being sysopped it should be Fish ー Preceding signed comment added by Squaw Dee (owns uncyclopedia • talk • contribs)  00:22, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Priest Goofball

Score: +4

1.  Goof. He's the final boss of Deltarune Chapter 4! --Dame Fish on skates DUN VFH UotM 23:33, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
2.  Goof. Ok, some of the stuff is mildly funny... TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 23:51, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
3.  Goof. This is my Sermon by Laughter... 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 00:05, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
4.  Goof. Not gonna lie, this Goof is quite baller. 00:16, 1 April 2026 (UTC)