Uncyclopedia:VFS

...and so shall it be that every Admin is presented with Shit-Wading Galoshes, a Steel-Plated Banhammer, and an Industrial Strength HuffMaster 2000 upon inception to the order. “Better to reign in Uncyclopedia than serve in Wikipedia” – John Milton on stating the obvious Are you looking to join a team of enthusiastic and extremely sarcastic individuals? Do you like to feel like you are a valuable part of a "team?" Do you want an employer who considers you their slave? If you said "I prefer not to answer" to any or all of these questions, you may be qualified to be a sysop at Uncyclopedia! This is the place where twice a year, Uncyclopedia users choose and vote for the most qualified users to be given the mop of power. Additionally, this is the place for votes to remove ops from a user, either in urgent cases, or during the regular bi-annual votes. Rules for op votes You may nominate whomever you want. Only registered users whose accounts are at least 2 weeks old and have 75 constructive edits may vote on or nominate administrators. No self-nominations. Votes for bureaucrats and interface ops follow the same rules. Votes on those ends follow seperate vote counts. Joke nominations and votes are permitted. These do not count towards normal vote limits, but each user is limited to a maximum of 1 joke nomination. Joke nominations should go on the bottom, in italics. The process (all dates and times are calculated in UTC, unless someone gets lazy and is a few hours late/early) Each user may nominate one sysop, beginning on the 1st of every April and October. Until the 20th, users may vote on a maximum of three sysop candidates. From the 21st - 30th, current ops take the candidates with at least 50% of the leader's score and vote on who to op. The ten-day admin-only vote has been replaced by a ten-day admin-only bender, after which the crats will be too hung over to fulfil their duties on time. During the bender, late votes are still valid but dramatically groaned at. On the last day of any month with 31 days, current ops play Russian Roulette to see who gets de-opped. (Colin "All your base" Heaney goes first with a bazooka) Rules for de-op votes Only established users, per the above qualifications, may nominate an administrator to be de-opped. Be professional, and lay out your case for de-opping clearly and with evidence of their supposed wrongdoing uploaded to Uncyclopedia, and linked in your nomination. For a de-op to be successful, a supermajority (2/3) of votes must be in favor of the motion. No half votes or semi-votes. NB: The ops can change these rules at any time for any reason to help the fight against wiki-terrorism.

Adminship

L10nM4st3r (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6

1. Nom. was already given the status of an admin de facto not too long ago, so why not give him the status of an admin de jure as well. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 21:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
2. Yes. Why not? LM has been a very reliable, technically savvy user who paints with his shit all over the website. – Preceding signed comment added by Squaw Dee (owns uncyclopedia • talk • contribs) 

   I mean, I wouldn't call myself savvy. My shit frequently breaks (like it has now apparently) — L10nM4st3r ^{ROAR at me!} / _{What my paws scratched} 21:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

3.  For. MrX blow me 00:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
4. 4 Four! 00:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
5.  For. Bad Motherfucker GET FUCKED! 03:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
6.  For. He has my full and unconditional support! Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump •  05:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)