Uncyclopedia:VFS/April2022
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. |
Adminship
Shabidoo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser
Score: 5bidoo
- Nom + For The phrase "It goes without saying..." was originally written by the totally accurate non-charlatan Nostradamus for this exact moment. But I'm gonna say some stuff anyway. Shabidoo is one of the most prolific writers ever to grace Uncyclopedia, and he has also always been a great and much-appreciated help with all maintenance areas of the site. I am sure that it would please Sophia greatly to grant this way-more-than-trusted-writer the admin tools he obvi deserves. MrX 05:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Against The documented history of this website plainly demonstrates that making "the most prolific writers" into administrators is a good way to decrease the number of prolific writers. In the past Shabidoo has wisely refused several admin nominations, and I strongly support his decision not to become an administrator. -- The Zombiebaron 06:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- For.In fact, at this point I no longer see the admin tools for what they once were, they are now (and perhaps always somewhat were), effectively, a set of tools that "trusted users have". If it weren't for the fact that only admins can vote in certain circumstances...I might not bother, but I am weary of this disenfranchisement (as I always have been) and I would like to be able to do a few things when other admins are busy (especially things like the feature queue and site notices). I respectfully disagree with Zombiebarons assumption that I will write less. I've always been here for the writing and sense of community. Thank you MrX for the nom! ShabiDOO 06:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- For. It helps with the writing to feel a little like God. ~ Kakun · talk 07:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- I feel obligated to vote here for some reason, so I'll Support for now. JJPMaster 16:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Absolutely For. - unless, of course, shabs would be somehow opposed to the admin status... and the 200% increase of power and the 500% increase in payment... and the personalized company cars (we are sponsored by Toyota) and other epic administrative employee benefits... (you can pick any color painting from the options of pink, peach and mint-blue for the car btw)... like the luxurious admin staff room with a shared Nintendo Wii and free tap water... oh and the special Hello Kitty napkins (1 package for each bi-annually)... But I mean... your choice.. 13:44, 5 April, 2022 (UTC)
- Against, per the Zombiebaron. I feel like admins contribute in ways I can track much less than regular, non-admin Uncyclopedians. ARandomPage, the named space (ARandomTalkPage) (Stuff they do) 06:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- For. Welcome aboard. PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 14:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- For. I think we're severely underestimating Shabidoo by saying he can't simultaneously create good articles and be a productive admin. WohMi Speaketh Here! 16:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)