Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive273

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Kenan Thompson

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	WHYYYYYYY?! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 02:23, Dec. 20, 2013 I'm gonna need a shoe, a bowl of potato salad, and the entire German Women's Water Polo team. Strap on your boots and meet me at the Vatican! -RA HB 16:57, 20 December 2013 (UTC) This article is so bad, its terribleness was enough to move RAHB to visit VFD. That should tell you how bad this article is. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 24 '13 6:16 (UTC) I deleted a page on fat once. This at least is mainly composed of sentences, but otherwise it's not much better. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Dublin

Score: -1
Keep (2)	I can only muster the lukewarm defense that this is not the worst article on the site. Also that picture has a funny caption. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 24 '13 6:13 (UTC) I like Dublin... no matter which Dublin it is. -- A MagicSleigh Ride Hot Chocolate! 18:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Unfunny InMooseWeTrust (talk) 12:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Kept due to laziness or boredom or moribundity or some shit. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 25 '13 12:03 (UTC)

Template:Users On Uncyclopedia

Score: -2
Keep (2)	Keep, because someone, I don't know who, went to a lot of trouble to make up this template which everyone here uses (as a napkin!). I added one name, someone named Mimo&maxus, but admins can remove him if they think that he is an IP using a disguise. Aleister 20:58 5-12-13 The continued existence of this template hardly matters. For me the only valid reasons to delete a template are if it's unused or extensively abused in mainspace. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Boner from the thought of its Deletion. "Why?" I hear you ask. Because it's useless and I'm sexually attracted to the deletion of stupid no sense-making, faggot-linking templates. Who's lame enough to use it anyway? Seriously though, there are about Over 9000 (Or maybe not) registered users on Uncyclopedia. If you want to keep the thing you should add them too. And it's not cool to highlight specific users with a template. Okay, maybe it is but just a little. --Mimo &maxus 20:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC) I get it. I still think adding yourself on a template is primarily done for self promotion but deleting it isn't worth the trouble. Llwy, I never said there are not many pages linked to it. All I meant was people using it are lame and should die an extremely painful death. But not you. You're cool. Now pass the controller. It's my turn. Ali, thanks for air blasting my user page. I love it. I love YOU! --Mimo &maxus 21:44, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Good to know I'm cool. I agree that it may be self promotion but I think most of the users were added by someone else. Can we call this withdrawn now, then? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	(edit conflict) Comment. 13 user pages actually transclude this template, so it's a bit more widely used than you say. Also, it seems to be for users who are fairly active, i.e. currently 'using' uncyclopedia; that's as specific as it gets. That said, I don't really see the point. ~~Sure - orphan and delete.~~ And yes this is in the comments section, because who needs sections? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I'm going to be an annoying waffle. I can't see the harm in this template, it could be potentially useful by showing a list of fairly active users (there is special:activeusers, but a manual list is easier to read, isn't clogged with spambot names and contains those of us who are around but sometimes go a month without editing), and considering the number of transclusions, it doesn't seem worth deleting. This is in the wrong section because mice. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Closed because meh. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 8 '13 15:40 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is the worst

Score: 0
Keep (1)	This is a parody of a rant, or maybe several different rants, I'm not sure. It was originally based off a forum that I can't be bothered to find at the moment. In my opinion and in that of those who voted to feature it, it's extreme enough that it's actually funny. I don't think you were even allowed to nominate this as it is featured, but since I'm not an admin I'll refrain from closing it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. The last time I checked the article it looked like a full scale rant by a 8 yr old. I wonder why it was even kept previously. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Please start your votes with #. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC) Featured articles do not get VFD'd. -- The Zombiebaron 22:24, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Admin Banning Tools

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete This isn't funny. This isn't even relevant anymore, aside from 90% of the content being about users that haven't edited this site in years it's just a collection of in-jokes. This is crap in summary. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:53, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Delete. I can kind of understand the injokes, but this article seems to me to fall into the same category as a certain section I blanked many months ago. (Don't worry, it's ok now.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Delete I remember when this was funny and relevant. -- The Zombiebaron 03:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Do new pages go at the top or the bottom? The nice create box Bizzeebeever made contradicts the instructions. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Python

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete. ew. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 17:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Delete. Red links in See Also and at top to nonexistent, implausible articles, far too short, somewhat random, and a concept that has no obvious redeeming value. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments	The create box is much nicer now that Bizzeebeever fixed it, but it unfortunately doesn't put an automatic link around the title of the page. You have to do it by hand. Also, it's good to see you back and doing reasonably constructive things. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:26, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Is two delete votes enough to delete, or what now? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:59, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Dragon's Dogma

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. This is a crappy article I made when I first came here. I have done better than this.... Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 23:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments	If you would like your own article deleted, I have been told this does not require a VFD. You may put it on qvfd or irc. (Also, you put # before votes.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:23, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Twelfth Doctor Candidate:PENISMAN!!!

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete.Just Bad. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 23:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC) "Yeah? How'd that go, Stewie?" "Not well, Brian. Not well." ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Nov 28 '13 13:17 (UTC) With IFYMB's permission, I was going to turn this into an UnNews piece that served as a spin-off to a spin-off to this. See, first Moffat picks David Bowie as the next Doctor, as he "has no genitals". Then, Moffat changes his mind and picks Penisman, realized that what really we need is a Doctor who's entirely genitals! But, that moment's passed, so whatever. Fuckity bye. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 15:37, Nov. 28, 2013 CSD G7. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC) The triforce of power promises this article will safely DIE!! Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments	I'm going to assume this is just an attempt to get this Pee Reviewed since you created it, IFYMB. As such, here are my thoughts: The line "and buttcheeks are actually the skin of 312 fish glued to his back" is just random, not funny. Cut it. I can't see Mila Kunis either screaming in fear of Zygons or her telling PENISMAN!!! to use protection. After all, there's no way he uses protection when he's fucking her. Also, are you sure you want Mila Kunis as the companion? I mean, I can see the appeal of having her there, but Doctor Who is a British show. Perhaps you should change her to a British actress. "Cum at me bro" being his catchphrase makes no sense since PENISMAN!!! would be the one cumming. The "odds to be Doctor" section sucks. Larry the Cable Guy's inclusion on the shortlist doesn't really seem set up by the criteria of either "black or a woman or really old." Again, that kind of randomness just doesn't work here. It would actually be better if it was sliced down to "PENISMAN!!! was seen leaving the BBC studios with Steven Moffat after an interview, but witnesses say it was more of a casting couch type meeting." That seems like a conclusion to an article. This could be better. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC) As Zombiebaron told me once, if you don't think one of your articles has potential or would like it deleted, you don't have to put it to a vote. I think the recommended course of action is to post a link to it on irc. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC) Please close this in 5 3 more hours. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:58, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Kicking pigeons is FUN!!

Score: 1
Keep (2)	Keep - Just to motivate someone to rewrite it. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:52, Nov. 17, 2013 Right.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)	This was vfd'd on Wikia, and I wanted to save it somehow so we'd have an article they didn't but I can't think of any way to rewrite it so it's better. Any normal person does not find that kicking pigeons is fun, and that is most of what this article seems to say - that kicking pigeons is fun - which isn't a good concept, at least not by itself. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 13:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Too stupid even to consider keeping it as a stupid article. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Anton (talk) 11:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments	I actually like this article, but I was waiting for someone to vote "keep". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 17 '13 22:27 (UTC) Either of you or Kip is welcome to rewrite it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Kept due to laziness and stupidity and syphilis. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 24 '13 13:28 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:WP: pages

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	We no longer have wp: as an interwiki prefix, so I'd like to propose that we mark this page as historical and move its subpages back where they were. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:25, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments	I used the input box for this one. It says on here you're supposed to put new pages at the top but it put this at the bottom. What do we do now? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Hmm, good point. I'll see what I can do about this. (Stupid inputbox.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 19 '13 14:09 (UTC) @#$@#! Seems it's impossible. Still looking, though. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 19 '13 14:13 (UTC) If it's really impossible we should probably not have the line saying to put new entries at the top. Also, thanks for trying to fix this stuff. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Came to the same concussion as BB. Might be doable with a gigantic amount of workaround, but not with it. Using Lyrithya's tag javascript makes more sense from a utility basis in reverse chronological order than using input box, which sucks huge dongs. Nominally Humane! 08:11 27 Nov

Tenor

Score: 2
Keep (1)	Keep. This gives hope for all humankind, and displaysa remarkable depth of knowledge, coupled with the frisson of unresolved sexual tension that keeps the American sitcom industry alive. Deleting this would be like when nanny Fran finally got to marry that guy from the daytime soap whose name escapes me. Also, it's not bad. Nominally Humane! 08:18 27 Nov
Delete (3)	Per rationale given for Contralto above; has roughly the same issues. I tried to 'batch nominate' it but unfortunately this isn't wikipedia and you can't do that. At least nobody realises it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC) I'm gonna go with an enormous "Meh!" ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 24 '13 13:30 (UTC) Delete --EMC^[TALK]17:43 Nov 25 2013
Comments	Mr Sheffield! (Thank god. That would have bugged me for hours.) Nominally Humane! 08:20 27 Nov +2 is not enough votes to delete. And 177 hours is just embarrassing. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 27 '13 9:57 (UTC)

Hologram

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Ugh. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC) OMFG. How has this been here IN THIS CONDITION since 2006? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 17 '13 21:14 (UTC) Delete. Random, badly spelt, pretty much devoid of any successful humour. Nothing worth saving. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:52, Nov. 17, 2013
Comments

Contralto

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Because I am a jerk who only shows up every once in a while. Because I don't include an independent clause. Independent thought. --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:20, 16 November 2013 (UTC) You should show up and jerk more often. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Nov 16 '13 5:29 (UTC) Jerk should show you up more often. And. --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC) Who is this Jerk character, anyway? --Ga mma287 ☭Tetяis? 05:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC) He's like the Tick, only lame. And his hands are always sticky. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Nov 16 '13 5:41 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete this and Tenor. (You can batch nominate things here, right?) I first came across these when Boobnoob copied them to Illogicopedia, and I'm not entirely sure they fit very well on either wiki; they're written neither with illogic nor with humour, for the most part. Boobnoob seems to have an interest in these articles, but it does not extend beyond adding {{wikipedia}}, which doesn't seem appropriate here as it's not really notable that these things are on wikipedia. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 13:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC) Yep, thass a fail, boss. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Nov 16 '13 2:42 (UTC) Wait what? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:53, Nov. 17, 2013
Comments

Doctor Who - The Force Unleashed

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	This is some sort of insane faggotry that some master of shit created to rape the reputation of uncyclopedia. Hope this gets up to 6-10 votes.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:52, 12 November 2013 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 06:59, Nov. 12, 2013 Please make this stuff die :D --XReaper (talk) 09:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Concept = good. Everything else? MURDER IT TO DEATH UNTIL IT DIES. The Hamon Master WeinribJo Joestar of Earth 14:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Didn't bother reading the whole thing. The only jokes I can make out are sex and swearing and they're not done well. Delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Delete. --Mimo &maxus 17:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, It's bad. MagicBus 20:17, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments

User:XReaper

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Request.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Speedy delete per CSD U1 (user request). – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Deletion requests like this one go to QVFD. Please add your user page there and remove this nomination. --Mimo &maxus 17:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

User:Stephen Yee

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Aznddrdude blanked this page claiming it contained unwanted personal details. I reverted this blanking as I didn't understand why the info was unwanted. Aznddrdude then emailed me about this, and I don't know how many details of that I should give here but it seems this page was created as cyberbullying. It, and the talk page User talk:SliverStarz, have been deleted on uncyclowikia by Sannse for that reason [1] [2]. It seems clear to me that the user page for Stephen Yee, at the very least, should be deleted. I'm not sure about the talk page for SliverStarz but it does mention a Stephen Yee page and that seems to be undesirable. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments

User talk:SliverStarz

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Been asked to list this as a separate entry. Apparently also cyberbullying, or at least unwanted mentions of a private person. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 13:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC) For the record cyberbullying does not get listed on VFD; it gets taken to IRC, an admin's talkpage, or QVFD for speedy deletion. -- The Zombiebaron 20:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Whoops. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Link Not

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. Article isn't very funny, and the concept - an analogy between an external link policy on Uncyclowikia and Welsh Not - doesn't have a lot of potential. I also created it ~~and would prefer it be userspaced rather than just deleted~~. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:34, 13 November 2013 (UTC) Than why don't you just userspace it? Anton (talk) 13:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Even if I am the main contributor, userspacing it out of process seems no different from deleting it out of process. I also don't want or need it userspaced any more because I exported it in a file so I can access it if I really want to. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:34, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Requesting that one of your articles be deleted because you don't think it has any potential does not require VFD. Once again I encourage you to come on IRC and just post links to things you want deleted and they will magically vanish. -- The Zombiebaron 22:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC) Ok. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Mocha

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Chaoarren tagged this with {{vigilance}} but Vigilance Week was over years ago, so I took it here instead. It's certainly not very good - poop jokes can't stand alone that way. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:26, 22 October 2013 (UTC) What a shitty article. - S^tr_aⁱn_j 1_{. .}_{. . TALK} 23:30, 22 October 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:45, Oct. 23, 2013 EXTERMINATE! -RA HB 00:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

4 Minutes to Save the World

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	*It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:47, Oct. 23, 2013 Delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -RA HB 00:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

25.807

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	*It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:48, Oct. 23, 2013 Stupid – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:40, 23 October 2013 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -RA HB 00:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Joseph McCarthy

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Not particularly good. This has apparently needed fixing for years. Does anyone think it should stay? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -RA HB 00:09, 29 October 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 01:53, Oct. 29, 2013
Comments

2009 Bloodbath Confederations Cup

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	DelEEEEEETE! This article talks about a non-existent celebration tournament, and this needs deletion. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions 00:41, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Nonexistent things can make good articles, but this isn't one of them. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. Somehow, even though this non-existent sport sounds like quite an entertaining one, this article made me hate it. I'd prefer to watch lawn bowls. S^tr_aⁱn_j 1_{. .}_{. . TALK} 01:44, 22 October 2013 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:45, Oct. 23, 2013 Drop a bomb on it This article will be a blood bath alright. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 21:16, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Spoida'man

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Keep, funny. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Puppy needs to visit Australia It isn't all Zyzz and Tony Abbott, m8. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC) Puppy visiting Australia would put back that nation's history 500 years. Aleister 14-10 Keep. Salvageable. --Mimo &maxus 16:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC) Keep. She's no beauty, but with a bitta lovin', she'll be right, mate. S^tr_aⁱn_j 1_{. .}_{. . TALK} 20:42, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete. Nominally Humane! 02:27 28 Sep Ahhhh... if only this were funny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:48 (UTC) delete. so little actual content. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:17, 2 October 2013 (UTC) What? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

The page with no discussions

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	What a pile of horse shit ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Not that good really. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Dumb ---- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 07:31, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments	To believe the interwiki link (be:Няма такой старонкі) added to this page, it is supposed to be something like This page does not exist. I'm not so sure though. I think I will take this up with the user who added the iw link. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Felixsowe Academy

Score: 3
Keep (1)	keep. this seems hasty. the author was here last week working on it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Mr. Cheevers gives a good but self-deluded argument. If the author has any balls left after working though the mind-field of writing an article here, more power to him, but he has been gone since Sept. 23rd so fuck him. Then again, cheese knows no master, sayeth the Tao. Aleister 5-10-'13
Delete (4)	Misspellings throughout, not funny and the section about iPads is wtf-worthy. Author appears to be done with this. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Weeeeeeak, dude. Nobody cares about your school. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:46 (UTC)\ The author is a new user with some promise but I'm no longer sure this should stay. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. Nobody, except the students that go there, is going to look for this article. Not funny enough to be redeemable. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 04:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Fisher-Price (company)

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete - Not a particularly great parody. As someone who has dedicated his life to Fisher Price, I don't want to see the brand weakened in any way. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:57, Oct. 6, 2013 Bah. If you ask me there should be an article on the toy store that stands on its own, ie without Fisher price, but I'm too lazy. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC) delete and redirect to Fisher Price: A Retrospective. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Fuck Me

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. Not a bad page at all. I took out one quote (one quote too many) and gave minor touch ups to a few paragraphs, but found the start of it to be interesting, and scanning the rest of it I can't figure out why it's on VFD. Fucking Aleister 15-9-13
Delete (5)	Ran across this when checking Uncyclowikia's deletion log; apparently a picture used in it violated Wikia's Terms of Service. Much as I hate seeing that given as a deletion reason, I do not think either Uncyc would really be any worse off without that picture, or, for that matter, the article itself. Why? For starters, the concept is unclear. It cannot decide if it's talking about 'fuck me' or just 'fuck', and comes off as incoherent. Furthermore, the jokes seem to centre entirely on the use of words and concepts such as/relating to fuck, and while that kind of humour can work, I have a hard time seeing how it does so here as it appears to be the joke almost all by itself. Finally, it's a pretty out-of-the-way article and I expect most of us would not miss it much. Delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 13:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. Anton (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC) "Look at me! I wrote the word 'fuck'! Hee hee hee hee!" ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:09 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk Delete. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments	This page's entry on Wikia is accumulating more delete votes. I do wish we had more traffic... – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Fuck me? Do you wanna fuck me? Is that what you said? Do you wanna fuck me? All right, boy Come on over here... ...and fuck me. Get your ass over here and fuck me. Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck. Fuck Daddy!!! --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Area C4M3R00N

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Nominally Humane! 09:22 01 Oct delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. --Mimo &maxus 10:12, 5 October 2013 (UTC) This has some good ideas but not quite enough to be worth keeping. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:56, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Elle MacPherson

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Typical hack job. Lord Scofield Stark 19:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Jeeeezus Christ go away. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:47 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC) An attempt at being funny purely by including sexual references. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:53, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Hampster

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. This article can be salvaged, and when improved, it will turn into a great article. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions 17:53, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. --Mimo &maxus 08:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC) I facepalmed. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC) No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:44 (UTC) Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 13:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC) delete. nothing worth saving here. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC) might be ok on Illogicopedia, but certainly not here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Water Gun Drive-Bys

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. --Mimo &maxus 14:15, 22 September 2013 (UTC) Da fuck? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:45, 23 September 2013 (UTC) No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:45 (UTC) delete. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	please move this over to my userspace rather than deleting it. i'd like a shot at making it not terrible. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

BBC

Score: -2
Keep (4)	N+K I disagree with the tagging and it's expired now so yeah. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Frosty be knowing things. Aleister 13-9-'13 Keep. Lot's of goodness here.Sycamore (Talk) 13:38, 14 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. No exceptions. \|Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Man on Fire CUN\|IC Kill \| 12:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Dileu. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	If this is kept we should at least get the sheep out of it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Why is it "Dileu"? Anton (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC) That is the Welsh for 'delete', because...well, I don't know. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Yawn. Kept. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:19 (UTC)

iPod

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Keep. I rather like this. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC) The images are good but everything else is not images. Anton (talk) 20:31, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Vital article be vital article. Aleister 13-9-'13
Delete (2)	Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC) As vital as it may be, its foundation is a ton of silliness. If it can't be cleaned up, it's probably better dead. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Somebody needs to go through this with a hatchet. A funny hatchet. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Sep 8 '13 3:45 (UTC) I'll admit it could stand a lot fewer iFoo/iBar/iBaz and a lot more of something else. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC) Kept, laziness and stupidity. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:19 (UTC)

Greater Albania

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete. --Mimo &maxus 13:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC) Not so Great Albania. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:46, 23 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Sep 28 '13 4:12 (UTC)
Comments

Dementia

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete. Mimo &maxus So you return and I give you a reward and congratulate you and in return you nom one of my articles into VFD? Man, I love you... No, just kidding :D Not on that part that I love you because I do love you but this is ok, that article is one of the worst pieces of shit I ever did and it deserves to die. So DELETE Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 12:10, 18 September, 2013 (UTC)
Comments

That time I was nearly eye-raped by An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective during my sojourn in Uncyclopedia

Score: 1.5
Keep (4.25)	Keep. Not really sure how to improve this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:43, 1 September 2013 Keep. I found this funny. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 18:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC) God help us. Aleister 20something 7-9-'13 The pee review is ynnuf. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Sep 8 '13 3:20 (UTC) This is in the wrong side Also, I hate Lightspeed Systems. A whole fucking lot. Anyone affiliated with them should be brutally raped, then murdered. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 20:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC) Used to be, voted in as a rule and all, that once a page had a Keep vote from five established users, it be keep. Aleister 14-9 But this doesn't have five keeps. It has four keeps and one delete vote being counted as a keep because it is in the keep section. I suppose it should count as 1/4 a keep and 3/4 a delete...? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (5.75)	*It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 18:50, Sep. 1, 2013 Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC) There are too many of these things, and this isn't a particularly useful addition to the series if you ask me. If it can't be improved show it the rubbish bin. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC) I really hate really long titles, unless they're really necessary. Really. ｡◕‿◕｡ 19:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Indecision = Kept. Been here for over 400 hours now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:51, 18 September 2013

User talk:Timothy Lim Dao Sheng

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Saw someone blank this in recent changes recently and reverted it because that's what was done in the past. The same user has now undone my reversion. It is not really a user talk page, it seems, but an article, and I do not find it funny. I don't understand why it's been blanked so much over the years but maybe it should just be deleted. (The user whose talk page it was, Timothy, has also been inactive for years.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Don't know what's wrong with all these users. Maybe they are all one person (at least three different accounts have been used in order to fill the talkpage with content, move it to a strange place and then try and blank it). But me, too, I am very confused and I think you could have as well listed it on QVFD, but I understand why you put it here. Anton (talk) 18:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Can't QVFD as it's too old. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC) And the userpage too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:01, 18 September 2013
Comments

300 (film)

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. I'm a bit confuzzled by this having been tagged. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:49, 1 September 2013 Keep. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 20:53, Sep. 1, 2013 Keep. Aleister 20something 7-9-'13 For.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete -- The Zombiebaron 19:15, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Really? O_O —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:37, 1 September 2013 Flies over my head. The first attempt at a joke seems to be about dildos, which is a rather tired strategy, and it doesn't really improve from there. Sorry. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC) I'm sorry, is this fucking Wikipedia? Is it? IS IT? NO? WHAT IS IT, THEN? IS IT SPARTA? IT IS NOT SPARTA! THIS IS UNCYCLOPEDIA! BE FUNNY, NOT JUST BORING! Funny at all costs. Yeah. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Sep 8 '13 3:44 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I'm against deleting this article wholesale. My suggestion, should you choose to delete it, will be to put all the images in this article into a gallery that will be the basis for a new article about this movie. ｡◕‿◕｡ 20:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC) Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:02, 17 September 2013

London

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Nom & keep Challenging Zombie's nomination. I cleaned this page up ages ago. 1) don't think it's one of the worst pages on here. 2) don't think that deleting pages of noteworthy people or places is conducive to encouraging new user activity - new users are, in my opinion, much more likely to edit an existing London than create one from scratch. 3) think this is symptomatic of the FFW overkill, which, if anything, will serve to piss off the few contributors the site has. 4) Another general principle that applies here is that it will be a slightly rude awakening for returning users to find their pages gone, especially when they are still present at the Wikia site. 5) After all the file transferring, all the fretting over the 1000 pages, or 100 pages more that were there that were not here, I don't see what purpose is served by leaving redlinks everywhere. to me, it would make the site look even more neglected, and definitely like the inferior of the two. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Leverage (talk • contribs) Keep. Could use a bit of a cleanup and some extra images, but hardly bad enough to delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:42, 3 September 2013 Of course. I hope and pray to Jah that someone other than Zombinebaron (bless his dead unbeating heard) goes over each and every page "nominated" (cough cough) for deletion via the aptly named Forest Fire Week. Aleister 20something 7-9-'13 I think there are going to multiple reviews? I dunno. I forgot the rules. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Sep 8 '13 3:24 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Meh. Needs more work. Remember, I voted to delete the United States of America. Pretty significant, no? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Sep 8 '13 3:24 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC) DELETE If we need this article then someone can rewrite it. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	We do need this article. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Abstain. Needs fixing. A lot of fixing. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Yes. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 11:18, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Kept. Not enough support for deletion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:04, 17 September 2013

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)‎

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. I dunno, I kinda like this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:10, 5 September 2013 Surrealistic keep. Surrelism is often satire. user:Aleister 20xomething 7-9-'13 Keep. Anton (talk) 20:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 12:50, 10 September, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. This article - that is, the jokes in it - is quite tired. Needs to be put to sleep. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Where's the content? ｡◕‿◕｡ 22:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC) The content consists entirely of several Uncyc injokes repeated with ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) in place of the original subject. Some will find it funny because the injokes are funny to them; others will consider the injokes to only work in their original context, which excludes this article, or simply not at all. My opinion is that injokes should be restricted to their original contexts wherever possible, because we are ultimately writing for the readers, not so much for ourselves. That notwithstanding, it appears as if this will be kept. sigh – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Maybe you have not noticed but there is an <choose> and <option> system that gives a reader a new text every time. The option thing is not very good, if it is not funny, unless you read all the options, but in this case we can keep the best and even though the reader will not know there are other versions, it will still be good. Anton (talk) 12:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC) And this is not as bad as some of the in-jokes we have. For example, I see no reason for keeping Fisher Price as the general reader will most definitely not understand it. Anton (talk) 12:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC) I did notice the choose thing. I suppose it could be ok if the worse/more opaque parts were removed. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:06, 17 September 2013

Pokémon (video games series)

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep. Don't you guys see the joke here? Every Pokémon game is the same shit in a different colour. And no, this isn't taking up space. Write whatever you want about Pokémon at Pokémon. It's only a redirect atm. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:29, 9 September 2013 I do see that joke, and it's a valid one; however I think it ought to have a little more than that. What it's got at the moment would fit ok on Illogicopedia but doesn't quite so well here. Sorry. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:52, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Move to Illogicopedia. As Zombiebaron kindly said, this article has been the subject of controversy for a while and therefore was locked after a while. When I tagged it for FFW recently, it was for two reasons: not funny IMHO, and taking up space for new, possibly better articles. ｡◕‿◕｡ 02:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC) I for one, support this move to Illogicopedia. RedHot (talk) 05:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC) We shall have to find out what the consequences are – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:42, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	I also support moving to illogicopedia as it doesn't quite fit here; however I'm afraid of what might happen if this were deleted. I hope something better comes of this if it is deleted. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

UnScripts:Dragon Ball Z: The Missing Episode Transcript‎

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep. Why is this tagged? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:40, 7 September 2013
Delete (4)	Delete. Why does this exist? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC) You don't think we should have any articles about Dragon Ball Z? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:07, 8 September 2013 It's not that, I just don't get the point of this particular one. At least not today. I'm also not familiar with the subject. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:59, 8 September 2013 (UTC) It pokes fun at the absurdity of the series. If you don't get any of the humour because you don't know Dragon Ball Z, I don't know how you consider yourself able to determine that this article should be deleted. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:35, 9 September 2013 Maybe so; however it would probably be better if the humour were comprehensible to even those who do not know Dragon Ball Z. If you have to know it to understand the article, it needs a bit more work. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Why do you search for it, if you are not interested in Dragon Ball? Anton (talk) 08:49, 10 September 2013 (UTC) What? I go on VFD. I read the articles there. Otherwise I would never have known about this. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC) You vote against an article because you don't understand the concept. That means that it is not the problem of the article, because anyone who is not interested in the theme will not search for it and will not read it. In my last post, I meant "a reader" instead of "you". Anton (talk) 17:10, 11 September 2013 (UTC) I see what you mean - but then the question is, is it funny to those who do understand the concept? RedHot seems to, yet he still voted delete. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Oh, thanks for pointing this out. Anton (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. This is just an unfunny version of those "abridged series" with powerful enemies, overt love interests and weak satire. And you know what, those "abridged series" were never funny to begin with. RedHot (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 07:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Delete. Anton (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	So we're now deleting pages with only 4 delete votes? the rules must have changed. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

HowTo:Drive a Car on LSD

Score: 2
Keep (3)	Nom and keep I remember finding this some years back, before I joined here. I noticed recently that it had been tagged for FFW, and I read through it again and realised I don't think it should get burnt. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. Needs more work, humour and content but should not be deleted. Anton (talk) 14:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. And if I remember I'll edit it for a few minutes at some point soon. Been watching Season 7 most recent Dr. Who, very good stuff, like this page. Aleister 20omething 7-9-'13
Delete (5)	Not good. -- The Zombiebaron 01:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Um, this really needs fixing if you want this kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:05, 1 September 2013 I agree with ^ . That's why I tagged it (sorry Llwy). -.- Me, You, You, talk to me >^.^< 17:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC) This is a delicious idea but needs more fixing though :/ If it was a bit longer... Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:24, 3 September, 2013 (UTC) My God, it's full of stars! — S G1 ^{[citation needed]} 09:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Can this be closed as delete? (Because I'm now able to make it a redlink if need be.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

A wizard probably did it

Score: 3
Keep (3)	Keep. A page I constructed in connection with a discussion of some sort about rewriting feature articles. Sucks is in the eye and mouth of the beholder. Aleister 00:27 31-8-'13 Keep. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 09:02, 31 August, 2013 (UTC) Keep. You can, of course, disagree with me but I deleted all the text (which seemed to be an in-joke) and I think that the page is still good even if it has only images. Anton (talk) 09:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Yes, that works. Thanks! Aleister 20:20 7-9-'13
Delete (6)	A contested FFW candidate. I happen to think it sucks, but someone disagrees. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Dwi ddim yn deall hwn o gwbl. Thus proving my point. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:36, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Ban from mainspace That contest in question was actually my idea. And though I kinda like this, maybe it's better off in userspace. Lord Scofield Stark 10:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 01:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC) I find it "dumb". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Sep 8 '13 3:18 (UTC) Straight to my rectal passage. — S G1 ^{[citation needed]} 08:56, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments

An Article Written by Somebody that Didn't Read How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid: A Retrospective

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Keep. Way too good to delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 1 September 2013 Keep. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 17:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. It may be a partly serious-sounding injoke, but it's not worth deleting. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (2)	*It STINKS!* -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 18:50, Sep. 1, 2013 Not funny ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Stephen Hawking

Score: -3
Keep (4)	For.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC) For -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:02, Sep. 5, 2013 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:02, 5 September 2013 Keep. I assume you mean 'keep', rather than 'for'. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:55, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)	For. Anton (talk) 20:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Against.
Comments

Nobody

Score: -4
Keep (4)	Puppyontheradio rewritten this and i think it's a For.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Keep -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:03, Sep. 5, 2013 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:03, 5 September 2013 Keep. This is good enough that I'd translate it to Welsh and put it up on the Welsh site if I were actually fluent. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments

Emo

Score: -4
Keep (4)	i want this--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Keep -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:03, Sep. 5, 2013 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:04, 5 September 2013 Keep. This needs a lot of work, but somehow I don't think deleting it is the right solution. It does have a few good ideas. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments

Your mom

Score: -4
Keep (4)	we need this--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Keep -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:04, Sep. 5, 2013 Keep. Don't be hatin' on the sluts! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:05, 5 September 2013 This is tagged??????? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete ()	No delete votes.
Comments

Satan

Score: -3
Keep (3)	I have been said many times, this is hardly a forest fire, but more like some form of mindless slaughter.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. I like the idea that the Bible is a novel. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Keep.Akita Neru (Bored, going to sleep) --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 01:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Keep -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:05, Sep. 5, 2013
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments

UnNews:Boring shit happens

Score: -1
Keep (3)	N+K - IFYMB! is a self-hating twat. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 15:55, Aug. 30, 2013 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:16, 30 August 2013 Keep. Give it a chance. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Ducks. Aleister 20something 7-9-'13
Delete (2)	Delete. It's about ducks!!! There is nothing funny in it! IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 07:45, 2 September 2013 (UTC) CSD G7 - can't argue with that. Indeed there is no actual humour in the article itself from what I see; the only two jokes are in the caption for the picture and the title, and I'm not sure about the title. The caption is funny because one would expect it to describe the picture and its significance in more detail, but instead it says only 'duck', which is self-evident, and the title is of course making fun of the content. It does in theory have some potential, but since the author requests deletion I concur. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Belgium

Score: -3
Keep (3)	Keep. Needs some fixing but is still okay. Anton (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. Some of this is pretty decent, just need to weed out the crap. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:22, 4 September 2013 Keep. Haven't got enough time to read this through but it starts off well. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Keep.Akita Neru (Bored, going to sleep) --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 01:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments

Ass

Score: -6
Keep (6)	Keep. But what did you expect? There are many funny jokes, even in the introduction. Anton (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. I agree. It's juvenile, but it is funny too, in a way I expect of Uncyclopedia.As Anton says, no one looking up "ass" in a spoof encyclopedia can claim to be too highbrow anyway.--Leverage (talk) 10:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. A bit short, but otherwise okay. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:24, 4 September 2013 Keep. Like it or not, we need this. Uncyclopedia is not censored and I think a reasonable job has been done with this perfectly eligible and notable subject, even if I may not find it funny myself and would not have written this article. I'm amazed this got tagged. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. GAY-Z APPROVED! --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 23:07, 5 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. Needs to be a little longer and the formatting should look better too but otherwise okay. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 05:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments

French

Score: -1
Keep (2)	Keep. Why is it FFW? Anton (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. Seems decent enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:26, 4 September 2013
Delete (1)	Because it's not very good. Someone tried to VFH it but it wasn't nearly good enough so I and some others voted against it. Delete and redirect to French language, which is titled correctly. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments

England

Score: -5
Keep (5)	Why is this article put on FFW? i have no idea.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:12, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. Anton (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Keep. Essential topic, could probably stand a fix up but not bad. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:42, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Keep -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 11:05, Sep. 5, 2013
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments

Wheeling Jesuit University (and all subpages)

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Nom for & Delete I really couldn't find anything funny within this article, just seems like someones personal pet project. RedHot (talk) 07:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Are you aware that this vote is in the keep section? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:53, 30 August 2013 keep. i seem to vaguely recall this being a very early uncyc in-joke for some reason. there has to be a better version in the history somewhere, and many of the subpages seem coherent and relatively un-crapified. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC) I have reverted to an earlier version; I invite all of you to take a look at it now and see what you think. I like it better but you may disagree. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Keep. This is one of those things that popped up at some point and became a wild ride for a few people. They pulled it off okay. The pages stand like an ancient statue that moves sometimes, like in Vegas. Nothing I will spend a lot of time with, but a structure which has a history, is known by the old timers here, and once had a quirky following. For years I thought it was a made up University and that people were populating a fake school with history and a specific society. Then I find out it's a real school! And besides, the new Pope is a Jesuit, maybe something can be done with that. Aleister 23:20 31-8-13
Delete (3)	Delete. Not funny; kind of illogical but I think it makes too much sense for Illogicopedia. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC) This page has been kept on VFD a whole bunch of times over the years, but it's time has finally come. -- The Zombiebaron 22:04, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments

UnBooks:A Logical Interpretation of “Green Eggs and Ham"

Score: -2
Keep (3)	I dunno, I thought it was pretty funny. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:11, 30 August 2013 Keep. Good concept; might need a bit of work, but relatively developed so far. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC) keep. meh, seems ok. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete - Don't know if it wants to be philosophical or funny, lean towards philosophical most of the time. What do you think?– Preceding unsigned comment added by RedHot (talk • contribs) Who nommed this? Your sig is missing. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:11, 30 August 2013 RedHot. I dug through the history and added the unsigned template. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Cowbell

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Nom & keep I'm nominating this because it got tagged in the Forest Fire Week, which I personally believe is proof Zombiebaron has lost his mind. It's an entertaining take on the legendary SNL skit and musical instrument, and I think regardless of whether or not this is the best parody possible, it doesn't deserve deletion. Lord Scofield Stark 14:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Keep. I always liked this. It may consist of no more than the same template many times over, but the template in this case is sufficient. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:11, 30 August 2013 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:12, 30 August 2013 This was tagged? Are you blowing me?? And what happened to all the Cowbell it used to have???? Aleister 00:30 31-8-'13 kouvbelf! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 09:12, 31 August, 2013 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. yeah no ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:28, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Delete. Wut??? IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 09:24, 31 August 2013 (UTC) Delete -- The Zombiebaron 01:14, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Comments	This thing is an absolute snowball of crap. Lord knows how many times it's changed for each time I visit it. Not to mention that people always feel the urge to spam the template more. What it needs one excellent rewrite to seal it. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:01, Aug. 30, 2013 What about the a rewrite of this article? Anton (talk) 08:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC) We should have both articles here if you ask me. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive273

Wheeling Jesuit University (and all subpages)

Navigation menu

Search