From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Apparently copied from Wikipedia itself. 14:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Meh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Terrible. User:MagicBus/sig6 21:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. A laptop or a mobile porn unit is a three dimensional form of the magic box that can be carried around to satisfy the needs of some world's notable users, such as Osama Bin Laden, former human Saddam Hussein and Condoleezza Rice. --Nikau (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Ugh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Wrastling? --Nikau (talk) 09:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The BooGAYman is a current WWE star. Wow, just the first sentence and I'm already turned off. And it only gets worse. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Starts with a far too factual description of that Chilean miner thing from quite a while ago and then lists a bunch of overused stereotypes in the most underdeveloped way possible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Boring stereotypes in a boring list. --Nikau (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Nikau (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Just random and doesn't make any sense. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 14:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Ha ha ha, drugs are so funny, especially when they have nothing to do with the subject of the article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 14:08, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Dumb. Also, what person looking up "Body" will want to read about Jesse Ventura? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 14:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. And apparently, we also have an article called "Jesse Ventura," which is just as bad if not worse. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:12, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Yucky --Nikau (talk) 09:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- I voted to delete it some time ago, but I changed my opinion now. It's funny, especially the repetition. Excessive spoilers are pretty funny. Excessive quotes might be pretty funny as well. But it does need to be cleaned-up, though. Anton (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. What the shit? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:23, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- I actually like this There's a vague idea behind it. --Nikau (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Cliche and boring. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:56, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Boring, listy, esoteric --Nikau (talk) 09:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Just a long list of who the hell cares. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Big list --Nikau (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Very stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- What? Incoherent and derivative of something. --Nikau (talk) 09:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I hate it when an article has such an awesome name and then I read it, and it's this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Moderately gross, incredibly boring. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- No comment. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I don't see how Mickey is related to Martin Luther King, Jr., and I don't find it very funny, all in all. Anton (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. lolwut? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:39, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Fucking sucks! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ugh --Nikau (talk) 03:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Very ugly and, in many places, incoherent and random too. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. It's an article about shaving your dick and yet still manages to be boring. All of the jokes present are very cliche and overdone. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A topic like this and that is all somebody could come up with? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. This is just straight-up bad. Chock full of overused memes like "The Star Wars Prequels Suck," "Kitten Huffing," and "Nobody Cares." -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Jokes about George Lucas eating Doritos... -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. There are no jokes. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Nikau (talk) 06:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Ugh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Nikau (talk) 06:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Nothing but overused Canadian stereotypes. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Nikau (talk) 12:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete Ancient, abandoned WIP. There might be an idea here, but most of it reads like one joke (Chinese make bad products lol) constantly retold with bad puns. --Nikau (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even finished. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
In 2006, UMICW made steps to expand its US customer base, announcing a modification in its US stores from a, "one-size-fits-all," communist merchandising strategy to a custom-fitting merchandise assortment designed to, "rip-off reflect each of six demographic groups – Niggers, rich bastards, hobos, illegal immigrants, convicted criminals and rednecks." About six months later, the company went public with a variation on their customer profile which loosely translates as: "Enslaving people. Money. So we can live better lives." --Nikau (talk) 12:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Just plain bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 05:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Holy shit. --Nikau (talk) 11:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Burn it Clean up of country articles. This one is awful; "The first inhabitants of the region that is now Equatorial Mobil™ are believed to have been Pygmies or Oompa Loompas, of whom only isolated pockets remain in Tie Nee-Fuckar. Gangsta migrations between the seventeenth and nineteend centuries brought the coastal hoods and later the shizz. Elements of the latter may have generated the West Side Dawgz, who emigrated to the ghetto from surrounding slums. The West Side Dawgz were the very first human inhabitants of Pimpin' Island." --Nikau (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, this is pretty stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Fucking embarrassment Is that the best we can do with that name? --Nikau (talk) 10:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. So much potential too. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:38, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete The basis of the humor seems to be that the phoenix lives there. Ha. Ha ha. --Nikau (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Looking through the history of this, I saw that it was originally a pretty awful article that was nommed on VFD and then fixed up by Aleister. Although he definitely improved it, I think that it still needs more work. If it gets deleted, I'll put it in his userspace. Hopefully, this can get him to come back to the site and write more stuff. :) -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:36, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Horrible --Nikau (talk) 11:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The region occupied by today's Guinea has been part of a series of empires, beginning with the "British Empire" which came into being in the year 1037. This was followed by the Jackass kingdom in the 12th and 13th centuries. The Douchebag Empire came to power in the area after the Battle of Twat in 1235, and prospered until internal problems weakened it, and its states seized power in the 15th century. One chief state was the CNN state which became the CNN Empire. It exceeded its predecessors in territory and wealth, but it too fell prey to internal wrangling and wanging and was eventually toppled in 1591. Europeans first came to the area during the Euroipods Discoveries, that started the slave trade, beginning in the 15th century. --Nikau (talk) 11:04, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete Dear god. --Nikau (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Ugh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Another bad football manager article, only I don't even know what this one is trying to achieve. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 00:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Random and stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 05:35, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. OK, talking boats are annoying, but where's the joke? Anton (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --EMC [TALK] 03:47 Dec 9 2014
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. It isn't badly written in places, but it just doesn't aim at humour. Anton (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I really don't find it funny. Some parts are downright stupid. TheMillionRabbit (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, this sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Just a huge list of unfunniness. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:44, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 19:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. "This article makes me sad." Anton (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:58, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Just one long boring list. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --EMC [TALK] 00:42 Jan 15 2015
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --EMC [TALK] 16:08 Jan 19 2015
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Because I flipped a coin on this one. --EMC [TALK] 03:54 Jan 28 2015
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. An IP just placed a VFD tag on this. I think he's on to something. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:58, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- I nominated this as someone pointed out that the article seems to be plaguerised. I had a read through and it doesn't seem very funny. Maybe there is an in joke I'm missing? - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Oh I get it lol. But still it seems plaguerised. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I didn't laugh. This might be somewhat salvageable with a bit of work though. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 00:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I looked at the Wikipedia entry for the software and looked up the official software page. It is apparently forum software. The jokes this article does attempt to tell (heavy load on CPU, price too high) fall flat and are not fleshed out. Only one sentence per section. I tried messing with it, but salvaging it is beyond me. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 18:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- By no means fantastic but Everyother's additions were enough to make me vote Keep. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
Sonk eeble. Too short anyway. XY007 • talk • contributions 23:36, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I actually kind of like the start of this, which is why I gave it a construction tag and didn't straight delete it. It starts with gibberish as what a pet cat would type but then suddenly shifts to the cat discussing what it likes. Then it loses any small merit it may have had. So probably get rid of it
- I've re-done now so it's like an OkCupid dating profile. I might be a bit funnier but I think it should have a basic details box. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 13:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks man. XY007 • talk • contributions 04:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept -RAHB 23:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
Delete. Aleks - Meow To Me 08:17, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept, solely because the article was created just yesterday and the author added a construction tag. If that expires and they haven't written anything else then we can delete it outright. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. short, idiot article --Aleks - Meow To Me 07:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. This article was so poor it doesnt really deserve being considered on VFD. I've deleted it.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. It's kind of sparse and I can't see much hope for this one without a total rewrite. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:43, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete -- The Zombiebaron 19:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Not funny at all.--TheMillionRabbit (talk) 20:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Full of not-funny randomness --Aleks - Meow To Me 10:55, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Just a series of random ideas that make absolutely no sense. --TheMillionRabbit (talk) 18:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- What the serious fuck? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (1) |
Keep. You just don't know how making a hobby lucrative. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 19:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:29, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. per my comment, and that this is a perfectly fine article. If an article is formatted poorly, just fix the formatting, don't delete it. The Woodburninator The vote was legitimate! ™
- Keep. I didn't see this when it was first nominated, but this is a good article. I loled! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Dead-End. --Aleks - Meow To Me 19:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I've seen worse, but this is still not funny. --TheMillionRabbit (talk) 18:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
There are no links? Well boy-oh-boy do I have a template for you!
Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe the Votes for deletion page needs improvement, please feel free to change it. You can edit almost any page on Uncyclopedia by just following the "Edit" link at the top of the page. We encourage you to write articles, since wikis like ours develop faster when everybody contributes. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in your userspace. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at AAN. The Woodburninator The vote was legitimate! ™ 17:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, just added links. Took me 4 minutes, and I was able to link to two different features, including one of my own. Minimal effort + vanity! That's the Uncyclopedia way! The Woodburninator The vote was legitimate! ™ 17:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Aleks, remember to read the stuff at the top. You're supposed to put the Vfd template on the page in question. You might have deleted this page without me even knowing it had been nominated... Leverage (talk) 18:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. This could use some improvement, but I think it's got a lot going for it. History, poetry, pics. It's better than a lot of articles I see here. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 16:54, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Calling Jimmy Carter "Mr. Peanut" is somehow very amusing for the author, who doesn't bother coming up with other jokes. Anton (talk) 11:19, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (5) |
- Strong keep The Woodburninator The vote was legitimate! ™ 13:27, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Stronger Keep - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 17:36, Saturday 08 August 2015 -
- As the talk-page points out, this is the only That time I was nearly raped during my sojourn article that's based on a true story. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 00:59, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. 20:28, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I really enjoyed some of the sojourns, but this one... Is probably one of the worst. An in-joke impossible to understand for outsiders and not particularly to insiders. Not even mentioning the original use of the formula and the lack of an illustration. Anton (talk) 12:36, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Deleviate These sojourn articles are getting out of hand. MUN MyOwnBadSelf, The BFDI Fan (talk - stalk - block) 22:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
Not funny enough! User:Aleks Poporinov
|
Comments |
- I think QVFD is sufficient for this. Anton (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (4) |
- Strong keep The Woodburninator The vote was legitimate! ™ 13:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Stronger keep - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 17:34, Saturday 08 August 2015 -
- Keep. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Keep -- The Zombiebaron 16:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Boring. Anton (talk) 12:41, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Yep. MUN MyOwnBadSelf, The BFDI Fan (talk - stalk - block) 22:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. As much as I like to protect injokes, this one just seems extremely stupid. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 08:35, 8 August, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. So there I was... 10:22, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- No comment. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- Just... what? Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 20:58, 9 August, 2015 (UTC)
- We don't actually need a vote on this. It's pretty old, but it can still be QVFD'ed, seeing there's almost no content and no one contributed to it apart from the author. Anton (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Somebody might be able to salvage this one... but you'd probably be better off starting again. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! Nothing to save for a re-write really Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 21:01, 9 August, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It should have been userspaced when it was created. Anton (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Nom + Redirect I undeleted the Blowjob page and re-wrote it into something a bit funnier/better looking than it was before deletion. This should be redirected to it on account of my page being better. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, might as well redirect to blowjob. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 17:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect Per Frosty. 12:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- It should just redirect to blowjob --Alphaslucas talk 06:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The two pages have different concepts. The joke of this one is that it actually has little to do with sex, but focuses on glass-blowing instead. So I'm quite undecided. Anton (talk) 11:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Redirected MadMax (talk) 08:08, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Nom + Redirect Not funny, just a barrage of Bush-bushing that is tired out by now. Only a few nuggets of humor, which I moved over to this article.--EpicWinner (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah.Anton (talk)11:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect Per Epicwinner. 12:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Since there already is an article for Bush this seems useless and unneeded. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 15:54, 19 August, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. A parody of Asperger's Syndrome. 12:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- I can't find anything particularly wrong with this one. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 15:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Uhm, what's this. Anton (talk) 12:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Has some decent moments, but the writing always ends up degenerating into randomness. Anton (talk) 12:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Weird, not funny, just repetition on the same joke.--EpicWinner (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I think that the list of character names should be added as a section of the main Sailor Moon article, but ditch the descriptions. TheMillionRabbit (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Unfunny article about a very minor character who's hard to make funny.
- Delete. Too random and too short to amount to anything, can't see any way to fix it. TheMillionRabbit (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Delete MadMax (talk) 08:08, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Once again, not funny, and it's hard to write anything funny about him other than "he looks cool".
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Once again, random, not funny.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Bush-bashing which we've seen about a million times. Maybe funny in 2005, but stale in 2015.--EpicWinner (talk) 17:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. per nom. Stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 11:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- No Bush please. At least Obama.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 15:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- This is awful. Unless it is a new article I suggest not restoring content from a previously deleted article. Rewrite = Mr. Peanut ~Formerly Annoying Crap 16:49, 1 September 2015
- Delete per nom. Stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 11:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Deleted, redirected to Mr. Peanut. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 26 '15 22:54 (UTC)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (3) |
- Move to User:Stranger195/Game:TheGreatQuestForTheMagicTaco Another dead-end text adventure with too many grues. I've played the whole game and every option leads you to death. --Stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook • wt • aotm • unf) 13:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
- Did we have something like this before?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 08:16, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete As per my quest to delete the entire game namespace. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
|
Comments |
- Deleted As an abandoned WIP. Such articles should be listed on QVFD. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
- Send this to the trash bin and fast. --Aleks - Meow To Me 15:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (1) |
Too short and not funny. Aleks - Meow To Me 10:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Thanks for the heads-up, but in the future, please check the history. Someone merely vandalized a redirect. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Oct 26 '15 22:16 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Blatant vandalism. If this gets VFD you were tricked into supporting vandalism.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 16:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Its terrible and not funny. It reads like something a 5 year old wrote.
|
Comments |
|