Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive266

Uncyclopedia:List of countries

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Pointless list with no funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:58, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Just add all the pages here to a category. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 03:11, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Useless. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:26, July 13, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Dittoes Xamralco. Lists of countries (real or not) with real Uncyclopedia articles are covered by our nav templates; on which subject, Bizzeebeever and I have been discussing the countries-of-the-world template and the countries-of-this-continent templates, and how they might be consolidated with show/hide logic to look less cluttered at the bottom of country articles. Spıke ¬ 14:34 13-Jul-12 Delete. --EMC [TALK] 23:11 Jul 13 2012
Comments

Prison

Score: -5
Keep (6)	Keep. A lot here for a new writer to work with, also amusing and a major topic.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:33, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Started the cleanup. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:41, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Keep There's quite a bit of funny there. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:43, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Keep. The slimmed-down intro sets out the valid comedy concept. Surely these able editors will soon bring the remaining sections into it. Spıke ¬ 20:24 12-Jul-12 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:10, 12 July 2012 Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:23, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Previously on Imperial Colonization which is (as far as I know) inactive. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 01:09, July 12, 2012 (UTC) LISTS LOTS OF THEM--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:32, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Qzekrom, since you bring it up are you interested in maybe starting a new wave of IC?--Sycamore (Talk) 08:33, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Abstain. At least it's funny. Maybe rewrite.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 08:48, July 12, 2012 (UTC) If it's funny 'Abstain'. What does it have to be for you to vote not to delete? mAttlobster. (hello) 08:52, July 12, 2012 (UTC) because it's a huge pile of listcruft.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 11:34, July 12, 2012 (UTC) So take some time out of your busy, busy day, give a little minimal effort, and get rid of the lists. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 19:00, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Keen work, chaps. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:01, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

Southampton F.C.

Score: 4
Keep (0)	Against Oy Beever face. We are most definitely in the fucking Premiere League. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:14, July 11, 2012 (UTC) What, I can't make a joke? Touchy touchy. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 11 '12 12:23 (UTC) I did get a little overexicited. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:13, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)	More ugly, unfunny, fucktarded sports-related bullshit for your perusal. I looked in the history, and there's really nothing to choose from. This club ain't even Premiere League! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 11 '12 11:51 (UTC) Delete It is bad though. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:13, July 11, 2012 (UTC) Piss --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:28, July 11, 2012 (UTC) No. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:22, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Gross

Score: -5
Keep (7)	I'm a little devil, I am. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 11 '12 15:33 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:42, July 11, 2012 (UTC) Per the update. I didn't read what it used to be, but I chuckled a few times at what it currently is. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 07:28, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Keep. (Formerly Delete.) Undercuts everyone's complaints about the Wikia Content Warning--and for no good purpose. 14:12 11-Jul-12 Y'all fixed it. Spıke ¬ 20:27 12-Jul-12 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:14, 12 July 2012 Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:22, July 12, 2012 (UTC) Oh fuck you, I come home literally about to rewrite it and seen it's already been done. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:42, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Gross. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:54, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete Doesn't work on any level. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:09, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete and redirect to The Bureaucrats (Joke) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:58, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	You know, this is why I hate uncyclopedia. Time was, when I wrote retarded crap at 8 in the morning and then came back later to read it, it WASN'T ACCESSIBLE TO THE FUCKING PUBLIC. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 12 '12 2:57 (UTC) Speedy keep -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:45, July 12, 2012 (UTC)

Lag

Score: 1
Keep (3)	Keep. Some IP that's probably a user in disguise is working on it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:27, 8 July 2012 Keep. its not that bad --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:17, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Per above.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:45, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Inconsistent, shitty, then really shitty. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:48, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Quotes by sum n00b lol? Random symbols? WTF! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:14, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Read the re-arranged version somebody put there, you nobs. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 8 '12 13:18 (UTC) I just did. It still sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:29, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Your father's 9-iron, your father's chainsaw, your father's sledgehammer. Better idea, Anon: Have your father write the next mainspace article. Spıke ¬ 16:39 8-Jul-12 Meh. Can't be improved. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 2:00 (UTC)
Comments	See, this is the main problem with writing "in the style of". If you write too carefully, it sounds inauthentic. If, on the other hand, you throw yourself into the character, people can't tell the difference between your parody of an idiot and an actual idiot. There's some sort of "rule" that encapsulates this concept, but I have forgotten its name. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 4:07 (UTC) Exaggerating the features of the character you seek to parody generally does the trick. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:22, 9 July 2012 Debatable. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 6:05 (UTC) Exaggerating the features of a character where adversaries already do so in total seriousness is problematic, as in the cases of religions and politicians. This is not the problem here, nor is this article about service-provider data lag written "in the style of." It is written by an idiot, whose main humor recourse is his own stupidity: that is, calling attention to the author rather than delivering value to the reader. Data lag--and indeed the other false promises of ISPs--is a fertile field for humor. This should be started over. Spıke ¬ 14:23 12-Jul-12 Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:44, July 12, 2012 (UTC)

The History of The World (Short Version)

Score: 0
Keep (3)	Keep. This picture-less, too-long-to-read article has dozens of hooks, all of them at the moment unused except to showcase how jauntily the author scoffs at world history. Any good author could start anywhere and turn some of these hooks into actual humor. So it is better than starting over. Spıke ¬ 16:50 8-Jul-12 Boner. Of course. This is a good template for an edit, lots of work went into it. SPIKE spikes the ball and scoooooorrrrrreeessssssss! Aleister July 9 this year Keep. It's not that bad, also Spike makes a sound point.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:47, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Mel Brooks, this ain't -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:48, July 8, 2012 (UTC) True that. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:13, July 8, 2012 (UTC) I would vote but i plucked my eyes out. Pictures would help my pot-crusted mind. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:30, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Still no consensus after 110 hours. Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:26, 12 July 2012

Mr. Falcon

Score: 2
Keep (5)	Keep. Per Socky. Yes, it's just listcruft, but it's funny listcruft. I removed the nonsensical second paragraph in the intro; with an image or two, I think this could be a non-VFD article. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:53, July 7, 2012 (UTC) No! it will take much more than a photo. The huge table translates the original movie script into the supposedly censored language. You can't tell if it's a lame attempt at humor or a dry recitation of actual censored movie renditions. What you, or someone, must do, in each row of the table, is show how the incompetent Mr. Falcon, in trying to censor a movie, unwittingly came up with something even more obscene or politically incorrect. Spıke ¬ 20:14 7-Jul-12 That's not an awful idea. Why not give it a try, SPIKE, since you came up with it? The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 19:02, July 11, 2012 (UTC) I laughed, and that's enough for a keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:31, July 7, 2012 (UTC) Keep. lol funny. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:32, July 9, 2012 (UTC) I'm a vegan fucker and will vote for this piece of shit just to prove how fair or stupid I am. Aleister today I chuckled a couple times. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 18:54, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Crap. Total crap. It's literally a (relatively) short list of famous movie quotes, with their censored versions. Lame execution of what would be, at best, a middling idea.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 7 '12 14:09 (UTC) This article is clucking grit. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:57, July 7, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Explains what a "euphemism" is with a truly tedious number of examples. The irony in the intro is store-bought and there is utterly no cleverness in the table. Spıke ¬ 17:41 7-Jul-12 You know, for kids? --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 02:03, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Kill it... UNLESS SOMEONE FULFILLS THIS ONE CONDITION: Do a recording for each of the mentioned lines, with the original movie clip in the background, then a blatantly different, vanilla, cheerful voice interrupting the obscene parts with the bowdlerized phrase. I get the joke, but right now this non-article is doing a pretty shit job of translating it. Either do a complete rewrite or go the extra mile. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:33, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Weak delete. This doesn't really make enough of an attempt at comedy. Minus Mr. Falcon's weird name, it just looks... pretty damn accurate. Which is not satire. pillow talk 17:55, July 11, 2012 (UTC) Delete. No article here except a lift from somewhere else (unless this is original research). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:08, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Lol, a rapist melon farmer. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:39, 7 July 2012 Not a sufficient delete majority. Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:25, 12 July 2012

UnNews:2,500 Year-Old Chewing Gum Discovered

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep UnNews. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:06, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Meh, I just didn't laugh when I read it. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:28, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Who gives a fuck -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:32, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Kind of bland, but still redeemable. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:42, July 11, 2012 (UTC) Good enough to stay. pillow talk 17:52, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	2006cruft. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:04, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. Also 2006cruft isn't a thing. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:22, July 12, 2012 (UTC)

Craigavon

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Go. Away.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 10 '12 14:08 (UTC) Nobody cares about your town. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:21, July 10, 2012 (UTC) It is widely renowned as a cunt hole full of dump rats. Would like to steal this line for an article on my town. Spıke ¬ 14:09 11-Jul-12 Cunt hole --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:29, July 11, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 04:04, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

David Wenham

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	An article about a guy who (possibly) starred in 300. Gosh, another 300 themed article?!?! THAT CAN'T POSSIBLY GO WRONG!  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 10 '12 14:27 (UTC) THIS~IS~SPARTAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!11111111111 THIS~IS~VANITEEEEEEE!!!111111  --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 15:20, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Yeah no Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:44, July 10, 2012 (UTC) This is an actual actor from 300 but this article still sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:22, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete.Author mashes up the actor with the role he played in 300 and comes up with a turd. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:25, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Kill it with hammers. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:47, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Gayman Islands

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Um, what?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jul 10 '12 8:51 (UTC) OMGITSSOOOLISTYANDGHEYGHEYGHEY!!!!1!1!!!!!1111111  --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 08:53, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete. As with several recent nominations, this page has only one driving force, a dumb pun and the resulting gay-bashing; you have to know the punch line to type the name of the page, and the contents of the page are the author strutting for his own benefit rather than delivering value to the reader. The Table of Contents is proudly ugly and the use of categories has jumped the shark. Spıke ¬ 12:58 10-Jul-12 Pen Island makes for better vacations. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:19, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Take one pun and repeat and repeat and repeat and....--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:31, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Too many puns. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:34, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Huff. The sections are each too short (mostly listcruft), and the article contains too many gay references (which, while it's the joke, is a bit too much) and categories. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:34, July 10, 2012 (UTC) OVERKILL. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 17:48, July 11, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Get rich QUICK!!!!

Score: -5
Keep (8)	Keep. And maybe feature it too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:19, 9 July 2012 Keep. It's a good one. Mattsnow 00:23, July 9, 2012 (UTC) I probably wouldn't feature this, but it's pretty good. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 00:27, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Strong keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:45, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:06, July 9, 2012 (UTC) A busy, well-tread concept, but an execution that isn't lacking in any particular way. No qualms. And Skeetdemon accidentally hit the nail on the head for a strong Keep argument. Thanks Skeetdemon! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:03, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Grammar could be better, but this is far from deletion-worthy. --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:20, July 10, 2012 (UTC) Keep Annoying and stupid nomination. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:16, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Obliterate. Annoying and stupid. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! Delete. Obviously doesn't fit the encyclopedia canon; and the illustrations are proudly crude. Might fit some other namespace. Spıke ¬ 01:21 9-Jul-12 Delete. format is weird and confusing, profoundly un-uncyclopedian. Looks like a spam mail advertisement. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:42, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Well, I don't know about that. A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid was voted our #3 article of 2008 and it looks nothing like an Uncyclopedia article. But it's funny. So it is there. And this is supposed to look like spam. It's trying to look like the thing it is parodying. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 03:19, July 9, 2012 (UTC) And A wizard did it was voted #2 of 2010. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:28, 9 July 2012 And Inbox was #1 of 2011. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:57, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Not to mention Why?:IPs can't edit the main page, Lonely hearts column, Little Adolf's School Report, Suddenly, Raccoons, Microsoft Knowledge Base, the list goes on and on. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:50, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	We should probably move it to Get-rich-quick scheme if that doesn't exist. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 00:23, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Can I put this at the top of it, or at the bottom of it, or somewhere? I feel it isn't annoying enough. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 5:23 (UTC) That's a kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:04, July 11, 2012 (UTC)

HowTo:Become an Evil Genius

Score: -1
Keep (5)	Could use with a cleanup on some of the lists, sure. But not all that terrible. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 00:33, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Woody fixed it good -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:23, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Woody sprinkled his Minimal Effort ™ magic all over it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:32, 9 July 2012 Socky, I am stealing the shit out of that. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 04:55, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Same here. Only, you won't know it's me that's stealing it. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 5:01 (UTC) Boner. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:50, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 21:32, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Warning: Contains unfunny penis references and listcruft. It's giving me a boner in real time. (Literally.) --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! Delete. Mattsnow 00:26, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Listy and not all that funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:43, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete. a good topic totally ruined with half-assed lists --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:00, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Lists deleted with minimal effort. Seriously guys. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 04:21, July 9, 2012 (UTC) That's a kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:04, July 11, 2012 (UTC)

Mama Luigi

Score: -1
Keep (5)	classic.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:52, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Self-keep. I tried to write a half-decent article about this subject after all the meme-y super-random forerunners of the present article were deleted. If you think I've failed that miserably, go ahead and vote delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:21, 8 July 2012 Keep. This article entails none of the qualities listed in the official reasons for deletion. It is of sufficient length, has relevant photos, does not contain random cursing gibberish, doesnt say AAAAAAAAAAAAA for 700 lines, has a logical storyline, and is not full of errors. I'm glad you pointed out the article, because I find it funny. Not lets call SNL and nominate the author as replacement of Lorne Michael funny, but funny enough. Maybe it is an inside joke, but so are alot of things on this site. This article seems to be here as a matter of taste, not poor style or vandalism. --Skeetdemon (talk) 00:47, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Not bad enough for a delete vote, but it could use a touch up. At least this is not another God-awful Sonic the Hedgehog article... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:53, July 9, 2012 (UTC) I'm a vegan fucker and will vote for this piece of shit just to prove how fair or stupid I am. Aleister today
Delete (4)	As far as inexplicable video game pregnancy themed articles go, this is one of the worse ones. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:55, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Regarding this article as a "classic" is really just excusing its terribleness by calling it an in-joke. Frosty doesn't find it funny, I don't find it funny, I can guarantee you that no potential new user will find it funny. When I joined up here last year, this is one of the first articles I found that made me rethink my decision. I've said what I had to say. I will now wait for Socky to vote "keep". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 8 '12 12:17 (UTC) I agree with Bizzee. This isn't one of those articles that's so stupid that it's funny. It's one of those articles that's so stupid that you sigh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:16, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Delete. So glad I learned how the P-Balloon implants an egg in one's magically created womb. Spıke ¬ 16:35 8-Jul-12
Comments	Comment. In reaction to the "inexplicable video game pregnancy" allegation, I'd like to point out that "Mama Luigi" was the title of an actual episode of the Super Mario World TV series. It's not some random shit made up by Mnbvcxz. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:47, 8 July 2012 I think the "inexplicable" refers to how attracted to preggo-stuff Mnbvcxzcxzcv was. Er, is. I keep forgetting that being banned from the site doesn't mean you're dead. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 2:02 (UTC) Well, the person controlling the account may not have died, but the online persona of "Mnbvcxz", for all intents and purposes, can be considered dead. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:44, 9 July 2012 Well that basically implies that the dude socked away and you know who his new "persona" is. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:07, July 9, 2012 (UTC) I ain't implying any of the sort. The guy may have just as easily decided to quit Uncyclopedia for good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:14, 9 July 2012 RIP Mnbvcxz. That's a kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:04, July 11, 2012 (UTC)

Vegetable Rights

Score: -2
Keep (7)	Strongest possible keep. This is the top three arguments to fuck up those Vegan fuckers. It's hilarious and encourages them to become fruitarians and fuck up their libidos and thus wipe them out.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:33, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Keep Please read the article before nominating for deletion. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:46, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Not just a stub, but a funny stub! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:00, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:14, 8 July 2012 Yeah... The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 00:35, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Keep. This is a brilliant idea. I've made some additions to make it at least a little bit funnier, but with more work done on it, it could go a long way. --Scofield & The Machine 09:04, July 9, 2012 (UTC) I'm a vegan fucker (most of the time - cookies and cake still grab my ass), or a literal vegan fucker which is fun, and will vote for this piece of shit just to prove how fair or stupid I am. Aleister today
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. 10 VFD nominees and not one of them is mine? This can't be. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:40, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Delete. This five-year-old article has three paragraphs and its only theme is made-up names for advocacy organizations and movements. Spıke ¬ 16:52 8-Jul-12 Vegetarians shouldn't write articles. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:07, July 8, 2012 (UTC) *cough* Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:17, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Unless it's a self-deprecating vegetarian, it seems more likely that a supplementarian wrote this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:35, 8 July 2012 Delete. unless someone can expand on this and make it funny, which if it has been on here for 5 years in its present form, i doubt anyone is going to do. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:10, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Has unnecessary navbox. Kill the 99% for the good of Uncyclopedia! --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 01:16, July 9, 2012 (UTC) And the reasons to delete just grow more and more mystifying. It's like solving a puzzle in reverse. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:05, July 9, 2012 (UTC) I'm starting to think he's doing it on purpose... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:43, 9 July 2012
Comments	All three comments are just not valid reasons - and it's disappointing to see Saberwolf116 setting such a bad example.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:33, July 8, 2012 (UTC) SPIKE gave a perfectly valid reason, and just because my reason doesn't state what I don't find funny about it doesn't mean that I find it funny. I think the article's joke is overused and nothing original, which is why I voted Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:03, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Is it just as lacking in validity for Aleister to vote to keep several bad articles by copypasting the exact same text? Spıke ¬ 00:04 10-Jul-12 “Vegetable rights and peace!” ~ Neil --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 21:04, July 8, 2012 (UTC) That's a kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:04, July 11, 2012 (UTC)

Navy SEAL

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. So much cruft, so little humor... Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:51, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Super Elite Awesome l337ness this is not. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:52, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete. There is nothing coherent to this except pursuit of the single obvious pun. Spıke ¬ 22:08 9-Jul-12 Anything mentioning "Master Chief" needs to be incinerated... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 03:23, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Rabillia

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	This is from Uncyclopedia's proud tradition of making up fake countries/principalities/municipalities under the principle of "Doods! Wacky!" and then taking another bong hit. It is rather coherent (for a hesher-authored article, anyway), but is straight-faced and remarkably lacking in humor. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 15:34 (UTC) Delete. "Rabillia" is nowhere on Wikipedia (in other words, no one is ever going to look for this article), and its overt goal is to explain the reality of this unreality and not to evoke any laughs. Anon added "Economy" and "Military" today, which are equally unlikely to amuse. Spıke ¬ 15:46 9-Jul-12 Aint done laughed none -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:53, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Per TKF Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:44, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Yep, just some more made-up bullshit. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:51, July 9, 2012 (UTC) WTF? --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 21:50, July 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

History of Croatia

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Maybe it's because I'm slightly tipsy, but I can't bring myself to vote delete. If we end up deleting this, could someone put it in my mainspace? I might want to mess with it. Saberwolf116 (talk) 02:06, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Wasn't aware that there was a http://saberwolf116.wikia.com. And now I am. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 5:03 (UTC) Are you implying that I'm selfish/doing this on a whim? I'm not. I liked the intro, chuckled at it, and wish to hack away at it if it's deleted. And I stand by my decision even now that I'm sober. Saberwolf116 (talk) 05:25, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Oh wait...just saw I said "mainspace". IGNORE. Saberwolf116 (talk) 05:26, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Don't you just want to track down Larry Sanger and stick sharp things in him for putting the "save" button RIGHT NEXT to the "preview" button? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 9 '12 5:59 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Improperly formatted listcruft. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 23:58, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Mattsnow 00:24, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Probably deletable. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 00:37, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Nobody cares. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:42, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete. this is horrible, short, irrelevant, and the people of Croatia deserve a more well thought out disparaging of their lives. So much to go off of, so little of it was used. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:03, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete. All of the above; plus, the intro about pwning bitches had me thinking it was History of Detroit. Spıke ¬ 01:19 9-Jul-12
Comments

Air America

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Stupid, random article about a dead radio station. Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:37, July 8, 2012 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 00:28, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:42, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete. The anti-capitalist radio network, to which capitalism said the feeling is mutual, is a treasure trove of humor. This article is a Randumbo intro and a Listcruft body. Spıke ¬ 01:17 9-Jul-12 Delete. i dont see the point. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:39, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Mega Man 9

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Oy -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:16, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Meh. If the Germans had a word for this (trust me, they probably do), it would be something along the lines of Gamecruftliststupidscheisse. Its only redeeming quality is that it's short. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 8 '12 12:22 (UTC) Total gamecruft. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:17, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:42, July 8, 2012 (UTC) It links to a dead image. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 00:47, July 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete. this is bad --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:21, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Sadly, author's latest article, yet another incarnation of Bugs Bunny, is too new to VFD. Spıke ¬ 17:10 8-Jul-12

Soviet Galactic Battle Fleet

Score: 1
Keep (4)	This page has been +1ed. Deleting it would fuck up Google's systems. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 03:24, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Agreed.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 03:53, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Very weak keep I don't know why, but this article just does not strike me as deletion worthy. Too much work put into it, and it's semi-coherent with a few chuckles. Ax the last few sections after 1991, and you've got a salvageable article. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC) Keep. i like what saberwolf has done with it. not everything has to be real, it just can't be stupid. i dont find it stupid now, its actually kind of funny. --Skeetdemon (talk) 01:37, July 9, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	100% made up bullshit -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:31, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Welllll...that applies to half of our featured articles, so that's not a reason by itself. But this article blows huge whale tits. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 5 '12 3:15 (UTC) no. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:08, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Per TKF. Also: Soviets plus kitten-huffing is again imitation rather than humor. Socky asked me recently why this is precluded; my answer is that it is not automatically precluded, but would only be saved by very good writing, and an author who sets out to imitate rather than amuse usually does so because that is all he knows how to do, and the result usually doesn't amuse. Am not considering Qzekrom's comment because I do not know what "+1ed" means nor why we care about Google's systems. Spıke ¬ 17:14 5-Jul-12 Just plain dumb.-- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:15, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Out of all of the reasons to keep an article, Qzekrom's is the most ill-informed and terrible that I have possibly ever seen. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:27, July 5, 2012 (UTC) He probably just thinks the article will let him sleep with it if he votes "keep". Got news for ya, Q. That never works. Justine Bieber is a lying bitch. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 5 '12 6:00 (UTC) Nah, I'm talking about Google+'s page tagging system. My browser has a +1 button installed in the navbar. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:18, July 5, 2012 (UTC) In other words, no one gets to huff this article because Qzekrom has Like'd it? Spıke ¬ 17:24 5-Jul-12 I didn't +1 it, someone else did. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:57, July 5, 2012 (UTC) it's unrealistic to expect Google to survive the deletion of this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:22, July 5, 2012 (UTC) We all need to sell our stock immediately. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:28, July 6, 2012 (UTC) I did some major cleanup and axed the last few sections of random bullshit. Is it salvageable now? Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:15, July 7, 2012 (UTC) It's not as ugly as before but its premise is still random. It needs a hook to convince me I am reading an explanation I had never gotten for some real thing--not a description of a fantasy fleet the article still doesn't convince me to care about. Spıke ¬ 17:50 7-Jul-12 Userfication Request. If you decide to huff it, can you salvage the good parts and copy them to my userspace? --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 23:52, July 8, 2012 (UTC) Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:55, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

Hario

Score: 10
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (10)	(1) Fake-gamecruft. (2) Random-random-random. (3) No pictures. (4) List. (5) Unfunny. The end.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 7 '12 14:05 (UTC) Obliterate. How did this survive all the Forest Fire weeks and other deletion sprees we've had? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:44, 7 July 2012 Delete. The only "joke" here seems to be to change one letter in the names of Mario and other characters; and the reader has to know the joke before gaining access to the page. Spıke ¬ 17:42 7-Jul-12 Disintegrate. Per SPIKE Saberwolf116 (talk) 18:04, July 7, 2012 (UTC) Honky Kong. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:27, July 7, 2012 (UTC)  Burninate! --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 02:00, July 8, 2012 (UTC)  I rather save Malaysia and make a new page than go through pages that missed FFW. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 06:03, July 8, 2012 (UTC) CRUSH. KILL. DESTROY. SWAG. --2nd Chance for me (because I was banned.) (Say) 07:26, July 8, 2012 (UTC) CCCOMBOBREAKER!!!!!!!KERKILL!!!!!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:55, July 8, 2012 (UTC) T-t-t-t-ten delete votes! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:58, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Featured! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:58, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

Ivan Drago

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Huh? A bizarre Star Wars/Rocky hybrid with zero humor and a lot of confusion. Saberwolf116 (talk) 21:52, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Trash. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 7 '12 14:12 (UTC) Delete. How did the five-year-old who dreamed up this recombination of things he had seen on television ever convince an older brother to type it in for him? Spıke ¬ 17:45 7-Jul-12 Ivan the Terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:26, July 7, 2012 (UTC) A masterpiece of imitation. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 02:05, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Saints Row 3

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Ugly gamecruft. Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:09, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Delete. This article about "the official sequel to it's predecessor" is a public-service ad for remedial writing courses. The article by Charlie The Man repeatedly cops out and says that the real story is not known. "The drama continues, live, on C-SPAN..." Unfunny is only funny so many times. Spıke ¬ 21:01 6-Jul-12 Trash. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 7 '12 14:14 (UTC) Umm... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:16, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

DMCA

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Not a proper disambiguation page. I was expecting something about the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 19:26, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. I hate this article almost as much as the real life DMCA. Saberwolf116 (talk) 19:59, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Yawn! how many things can you contrive for D.M.C.A. to stand for? Spıke ¬ 20:53 6-Jul-12 Trash. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 7 '12 14:15 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Gruestub

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Do we really need this? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:52, July 5, 2012 (UTC) No, no we don't. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:11, July 6, 2012 (UTC) WTF? -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 18:15, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Unnecessary Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:00, July 6, 2012 (UTC) This is QVFD material, this is. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 7 '12 14:16 (UTC)
Comments

Partially Huffable Kitten

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	memes ahoy! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:31, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:09, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Uncyclopedia meme dealt with through the language of pseudo-intellectualism. Spıke ¬ 17:06 5-Jul-12 Wait, pseudo-intellectualism is bad? What the hell am I doing here then...(gets up and leaves)... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 6 '12 1:21 (UTC) I huffz teh kittenz, yez! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:10, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Saturn

Score: -1
Keep (6)	Aw, come on! VFD is for deleting crap, not placeholder-quality pages. We already have a link to the "lying bitch" version right at he beginning of the page, and I say that's good enough. Besides if it wasn't for the PLS entry, this article wouldn't even be here! --Scofield & The Machine 12:23, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Placeholder means "place holder." No we have a full article available, so the place no longer needs to be held. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:29, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Keep. No where near bad enough to delete... --Sycamore (Talk) 12:28, July 5, 2012 (UTC) per sycamore in the comments.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:41, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Keep. More than placeholder-quality. It is a real article, about something real, with a real comedy strategy (describe the planet in terms of cell biology) and a real hook (authentic wordplay in the intro). That it fizzles soon after is a public call for completion rather than deletion. It would be less encyclopedic to redirect it to a good essay that is nominally on the same topic but not an encyclopedia article about Saturn. Spıke ¬ 17:10 5-Jul-12 I find the idea that a perfectly fine article should be deleted because a funnier article exists on the same subject but with a completely different angle deplorable. I see no reason why the articles "Saturn (cell-estial body)" and "Saturn (lying bitch)" couldn't peacefully co-exist. If you want to vote on which one deserves to be the 'main' article, then vote on that and keep the other article under a different title, but for heaven's sake, don't delete a good article for no good reason. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:13, 5 July 2012 In defense of this nomination being deplorable, I didn't find the article funny at all, rather really dry. But I like the way you think. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:32, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Keep ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:49, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	This is a stubby "meh" article, and Woody Woodburninator just won the PLS with an infinitely-better article. I say delete and redirect, because if this crummy article is our first result in a Google search for "Saturn", nobody's going to stick around to read the site. (I'm betting that a sufficient number of people will disagree with me enough to keep this.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 5 '12 1:12 (UTC) I, for one, agree. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:19, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Huff and turn into a content fork. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 01:22, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Huff that lying bitch! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:28, July 5, 2012 (UTC) When I first read this a few weeks ago, I didn't think it was so bad. I... changed my mind. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:54, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	If this is to be deleted, I would prefer Saturn is a Lying Bitch to be moved to plain old Saturn, and leave the old page as a redirect. Anyone have any issues with this? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:54, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Not a single issue is had. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:25, July 5, 2012 (UTC) I would raise issue against it... this follows a fairly common theme of redirecting actual topics to other articles related to them. A sure fire way of getting more ?pedia and confusing.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:30, July 5, 2012 (UTC) I would argue that funny is funny no matter how the job gets done. We've already got articles like Martin Van Buren that do the same thing, but no one complains about them because they're funny, nearly top 10 material. Still, these types of articles are remarkably less of an epidemic than you think they are; 90% of our articles are still straight-faced wikipedia parodies. I would much rather see an article of significantly higher caliber in the main title slot than something much less funnier, regardless of how either is executed. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:39, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Question: If Woodburn had entered his article in the PLS rewrite category under the title "Saturn", would anybody have quibbled when it was mainspaced...as Saturn? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 5 '12 13:43 (UTC) This. Bringing this here was a mistake, I should have replaced it immediately as a rewrite. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:55, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Spilled milk. Let's just feature the shit out of Woody's article, and let Saturn languish where it is until folks either change their minds or Hell gets...rather more endothermic than it currently is. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 5 '12 14:03 (UTC) Rewrite into a content fork. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:17, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Who cares? Keep them both, let everyone have their fun. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 18:26, July 5, 2012 (UTC) I do (but it's just a quibble): Saturn is in the form of an encyclopedia article, while the other one is in the form of a rant, although a fine one. Spıke ¬ 21:54 5-Jul-12 Closed by nominator, me. I like the way Socky thinks, so I'm going to give both articles equal standing and make Saturn a disambiguation. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:32, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Looks like I won my bet. You owe me $3 million. I'll take payment in form of transferable corporate bonds or a cashier's check drawn on the First National Bank of Northeast Poughkeepsie. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jul 6 '12 1:04 (UTC)

File:NailfromPassion.png

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. Ancient shock/gore image that may or may not be copyright infringement. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 00:35, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	And now it's an unused image that I deleted. Use QVFD next time for images or else. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:48, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Oops, forgot to press the button twice for image deletions. Thanks Xam. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:15, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Things that happen

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	this is bad -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:48, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Trash. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:52, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Please god make the pain stop. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jul 5 '12 6:17 (UTC) Delete. Listy and rambling. Spıke ¬ 16:59 5-Jul-12 : ( Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:48, 5 July, 2012 (UTC) What the... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:18, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. I saw some chance of dry humor in the beginning, but the end just trailed off into listcruft and unfunny...whatever. --Scofield & The Machine 17:42, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

The Rifleman

Score: 0
Keep (1)	Keep. Comes close to humor in a few places. I've done a copy-edit. Spıke ¬ 14:39 3-Jul-12 Also: Bizzeebeever has now inserted content that seems to pursue an actual humor strategy. Spıke ¬ 00:32 5-Jul-12
Delete (1)	Disintegrate. I don't get it. Where's the humor? Saberwolf116 (talk) 08:22, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept, 2-N Clause. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:18, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

History of England

Score: 1
Keep (1)	Keep. Alright in parts... also it's important to remember Great Britain is another country entirely made up of other smaller countries fucked onto England. This is a different topic.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:35, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Redundant and inferior to History of Great Britain and Great Britain. Not good in general. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:03, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Poo. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:29, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Yes, all of all of the above. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:18, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Oh wait, Romartus is rewritting this. I based my vote on the version I read earlier today. Never mind. Formerly Delete. Yes, all of the above. 14:21 3-Jul-12 "If Romartus is treating, make mine a double." Spıke ¬ 00:35 5-Jul-12
Comments	Have asked Romartus to scavenge from this anything he can for his version. Spıke ¬ 14:23 3-Jul-12 I am having a go on this one, trying not to repeat what I have done with the article on the same topic above. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:50, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:19, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

AP Euro

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	high school nerds bitching about an easy-ass test -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:08, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Ugly, and ugliest up-front: The quotes are all either generic or vanity, the intro hits you with a Wacky Year Number, and the first two sections are listcruft. There is some humor afterwards, but all of it covered by TKF's point. Spıke ¬ 15:24 4-Jul-12 Funny. Why does this exist? This is basically AP European History before somebody got hold of it and fixed it. Delete and redirect there. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 4 '12 21:50 (UTC) Per Bizzee. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:49, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

1336

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	nah -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:07, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Leet for Leet's sake. Nearly no content, and no effort to develop an article on the number just before 1337. Spıke ¬ 15:21 4-Jul-12 QVFD ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:55, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Quick, Frosty! If you build a time machine, I promise to spend ten minutes in 2005 just to stick this on whatever quick-deletion page we had back then. (I promise not to spend 10 minutes in 1995 banging your mom.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 4 '12 22:58 (UTC) 50 |\|07 1337. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:48, July 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Apparently, the intention was to bash up the number 1336 as not being "leet" enough. Needless to say, the execution leaves a pointless, unfunny stub. --Scofield & The Machine 15:36, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Leixões S.C.

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Delete. I do not mind that it has a niche audience, nor that local fans have axes to grind; that is true for every article on a sports team, including New York Mets. Leixões is a legitimate article about a real team and is better than Mets. It follows correct form (Infobox, and even footnotes, for Chrissakes!), has lots of real gallows humor, and makes legitimate attempts to explain soccer to non-fans. Spıke ¬ 15:25 29-Jun-12 It is still not a real knee-slapper, but I've done a complete copy-edit and added a photo. Spıke ¬ 15:03 30-Jun-12 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:23, 30 June 2012 No reason to delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:37, June 30, 2012 (UTC) This shouldn't be here. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:13, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Disintegrate. Speaking of sports articles written by fans with an axe to grind... Saberwolf116 (talk) 02:19, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Inoffensive, somewhat well-written; its only crime is having no images. But it's approximately as dry as sawdust. I don't know which way to vote. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jun 30 '12 3:52 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox 21:01, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Nation of Joe

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. It's amusing and now thanks to the zealous efforts of some, a rare piece of Uncyclopedia's history...--Sycamore (Talk) 18:04, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Nearly seven years? Really, guys...? Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:13, June 30, 2012 (UTC) Delete. An article in the awful fictional-organization genre is "for the prevention of cruelty to those called Joe." It is an introduction to a massive list of people and things named Joe. Spıke ¬ 17:18 30-Jun-12 Dafuq? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:58, June 30, 2012 (UTC) Trash. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:27, July 2, 2012 (UTC) It was written by IPs, expanded by IPs...look, there's no funny in it. It may elicit a tiny, weak sigh of amusement from a middle-aged librarian, but...that's what Illogicopedia is for, mang. And I really, really wanted to like it, because Sycamore does. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 4 '12 12:57 (UTC)
Comments	“Hup, two, three, four / Got one Joe / Get some more” ~ A television commercial. Spıke ¬ 17:18 30-Jun-12

Peugeot 205

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	We get it. You like this car. Saberwolf116 (talk) 08:18, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Delete. The cheerleading is unencyclopedic. Also, some of this must be personal inside-jokes. Spıke ¬ 14:26 3-Jul-12 OH. MY. GOD... I LOVE THE PEUGEOT 205! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:21, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Boring. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 02:55, July 4, 2012 (UTC) OMG!!!! PUEGOT205 IS SOOOOO 1337 KAWAIIIIIII!!!!!!11!!111--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 03:20, July 4, 2012 (UTC)  Burninate! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 10:28, July 4, 2012 (UTC) I shit better articles than this. Seriously. I shit them. Go ahead. Try me. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jul 4 '12 12:54 (UTC)
Comments	Let's make this a combo breaker--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Wankel rotary engine

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:57, July 1, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Author gets the obligatory theme for this page (wank being British for masturbate, ironically applied to an engine most of whose parts uniquely do not go up and down and up and down) but can do nothing with it other than babble about John Candy's rectum and Hitler's Luftwaffe. Delete this filler and let someone start over some day. Spıke ¬ 17:51 1-Jul-12 Damn stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:54, July 1, 2012 (UTC) That picture of the actual rotary engine was the only good part and it ain't even there anymore. RIP that picture. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:49, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

File:Falha-critica.gif

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	An unfunny Blue Screen of Death that doesn't look real. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 19:20, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	This is not the right place for uncontroversial, un-"obscene" images. The only page where it's linked is in your userspace. If you just get rid of it there then it will be unused and customarily ignored/eventually deleted. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:29, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Done. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 20:37, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Baconated Grapefruit

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Stupid article based on a throwaway line from Futurama. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:09, June 30, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Yup; the only real humor in this article, whose babble digresses to Dick Cheney and Oscar Wilde, belongs to someone else. Spıke ¬ 17:13 30-Jun-12 Per everything those guys said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:57, June 30, 2012 (UTC) Admiral Crunch???!!! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:03, July 1, 2012 (UTC) Begone. --Black Flamingo 21:14, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I prefer Archduke Chocula. Saberwolf116 (talk) 06:59, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

SPON

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Err... Sorry, didn't laugh. Mattsnow 09:31, June 29, 2012 (UTC) Sweet Jesus, that is one bad fake-organization article. No concept, random bullshit, and amateurish execution. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 29 '12 9:34 (UTC) Delete. Per BB. Spıke ¬ 12:47 29-Jun-12 Delete. Yes, another unfunny article about "n00b domination". Bad writing ruins it completely. --Scofield & The Machine 11:32, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Filip Hammar and Fredrik Vikingsson

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. Oh look! Two Swedish TV celebrities nobody outside of there has heard of. Unsurprisingly, the IP that created it is from southern Sweden. Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:08, June 29, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. Mattsnow 09:36, June 29, 2012 (UTC) "Hej, I've gout an ideea! Dese guize er soou gay, let's write en artikle on Ooncyclopedia aboout haw ghey dey are! Dey love to steer pashionnatelee into eech udder's eyes and sey, 'Jag älskar dig!' I em sou humorous! Ja!" ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 29 '12 9:40 (UTC) Delete. Spıke ¬ 12:48 29-Jun-12 THIZ PERSOON SOOO GHEY LOL--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 15:05, June 29, 2012 (UTC) Bleargh! --Scofield & The Machine 11:15, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Real Madrid

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	This is a shining example of why retarded sports fans shouldn't edit Uncyclopedia. There is really nothing here worth reading, much less saving. Also, it is IP flypaper.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 29 '12 1:06 (UTC) Disintegrate. Blah blah blah I don't like this team blah blah blah. Saberwolf116 (talk) 02:08, June 29, 2012 (UTC) Neh -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:42, June 30, 2012 (UTC) delete Notable subjects should have better articles than this. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:10, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I would like for there to be an article, even a placeholder, on Real Madrid, which is a very notable subject for European soccer fans. But the "humor" in this article, from start to finish, is bad in textbook ways: nonsense numbers, toilet humor, and alien-species jokes--even before it descends into listcruft and with a current roster that no one is going to keep up-to-date. It does, and will continue to, attract IPs as well as non-English-speakers. Spıke ¬ 15:35 29-Jun-12 Notable or not, if sports fans can't write a decent article about their team, they don't deserve one at all. The authors of this one should be tied into burlap bags and beaten with paddles. And then dropped into a river. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 29 '12 23:42 (UTC) If that's what you want, you should have opened a vote on that instead Spıke ¬ 23:59 29-Jun-12 Well, I was speaking in an incidental manner. However, now that you mention it... An additional vote: should we tie the authors of this article into burlap bags and beat them with paddles, before dropping them into a fast-flowing river? Score: +2  Absolutely necessary for the good of Uncyclopedia. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jun 30 '12 0:11 (UTC)  Get 'er done. Except me for rewriting the intro. Spıke ¬ 02:40 30-Jun-12

John Scherer

Score: -6
Keep (7)	Seriously, that is and was really hilarious. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:26, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Wait, is this a rewrite? -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:31, June 28, 2012 (UTC) In your face, John. Spıke ¬ 17:46 28-Jun-12 Keep Why was this nominated??? mAttlobster. (hello) 18:23, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Because Wikipedia's article on us claims that we haven't removed the content yet. Rather, we've made a riot out of it. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 18:25, June 28, 2012 (UTC) And this is bad? mAttlobster. (hello) 19:02, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Oh, young and naive Queuznuejokcorm. You have much to learn. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:12, June 28, 2012 (UTC) TRY MY PRODUCT! --Scofield & The Machine 20:16, June 28, 2012 (UTC) History. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:52, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Because Wikipedia's article on us claims that we haven't removed the content yet. Rather, we've made a riot out of it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:15, 28 June 2012 Keep. This entire article was rewritten AFTER the complaint letter was received. I think this version is much funnier than the version that was removed. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 02:06, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Seriously. The man got pissed off about this article. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 17:13, June 28, 2012 (UTC) So we delete it??? Spıke ¬ 17:46 28-Jun-12
Comments	Yeah nah -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:59, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Oscar Calme

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. It won't be a feature like this but I think it is a touch harsh to have this up for deletion. Perhaps the joke doesn't work well but it shouldn't be in the slop bucket quite yet. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:12, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Because it's not even near bad enough to delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:22, 27 June 2012 Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Mattsnow 09:35, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Huff. I just reviewed this. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 23:10, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. I did too. Spıke ¬ 03:06 27-Jun-12 I saw this article when it occurred (for, as you can see, it sprang into being in one edit), and was intrigued. Oscar Wilde's opposite number... But, you see, the first paragraph is all this article has. It is a one-trick pony. It has no substance, no pizazz, no panache, no oomph, and no chutzpah, either. It lies on the screen, turd-like, and offends you with the withered substance of what it could have been and yet fails to be. I broke my jaw, yawning at it, and I say kill it for that reason alone. I have no fucking health insurance. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 28 '12 15:25 (UTC) We have a lot of one-trick ponies around here. Some are even that good at their one trick that we've allowed them to show it on the front page. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:20, 28 June 2012 Yeah, but... as the author of eight of those "one trick ponies", I can say that this one-trick pony has only got one paragraph. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 29 '12 1:27 (UTC)
Comments	I think you meant to say Oscar Calme... Saberwolf116 (talk) 23:24, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Oscar Calme is Oscar Wilde with an Italian mustache. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 01:34, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Kept? I was too rash in marking this sh!t for deletion (even though it is sh!t in its current state); we should probably spend more time rewriting it. If you would like to close the nomination now, you can. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:13, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Why do you think it's "sh!t"? Seems fine to me. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:18, 27 June 2012 That was a joke. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC) You mean writing an exclamation point instead of an i or claiming that the article is crap? If the former, you haven't answered my question. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:30, 28 June 2012 No we should not try harder to keep it. The concept fails. As I said in the review, this is not a work of humor but of imitation. Spıke ¬ 12:37 28-Jun-12 Since when can't imitations be humorous? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:27, 28 June 2012 Kept. Also, it's pretty rude to nominate something for deletion right after you review it. Just saying. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:24, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Liberal Agenda for America

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Quite the opposite of liberal advocacy, actually. I never knew OEJ to stoop to something so simple, and of course he doesn't. I'm not usually a big fan of political articles either, but this is just well-written enough and sharply tongue-in-cheek to get by. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:23, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:26, 27 June 2012 "Iraq was the wrong war", well, Duh! Why the entire Bush administration isn't in jail or hung is a mystery to me. Aleister 17:57 27-6-'12 Keep It's political, but then so is Kate Bush, Lionel Richie and...no that's the complete list. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:24, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Overt political advocacy, from the usual Bush/Cheney hatchet-jobs to the map that shows that Iraq was the wrong war, plus a little Conspiracy Talk. The wry and jaunty approach doesn't change that it is primarily advocacy, which is sometimes wry and jaunty. Anon today has been inserting anti-abortion and anti-Obama quips; far from moving this article into balance, it is making it incoherent. But I come to bury this, not to revert it. Spıke ¬ 19:01 26-Jun-12
Comments	As this is one of One-Eyed Jack's early works, perhaps he mightn't be too proud of it; tongue-in-cheek or not, I find it too dry. But I'm too much of a fence-sitter to vote "kill", so there you go. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jun 27 '12 7:32 (UTC) Nuh uh -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:59, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Vicodin

Score: 0
Keep (6)	Are you sure It's all random? I actually find this to be a slightly amusing piece which advocates Vicodin usage. It just needs a cleanup, that's all. --Scofield & The Machine 08:39, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Nice stub.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:55, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Keep-Expand. Scofield has skillfully focused this article on the recommendation to ingest a "slightly higher than recommended dose" of Vicodin. Unfortunately, that left only four paragraphs and no photos. Tag it with {{Expand}} and let the clock run toward administrative deletion unless he finishes the job. Spıke ¬ 14:21 28-Jun-12 Keep "It is the flesh of the God of happiness compressed into a small tablet mixed with an amount of tylenol." mAttlobster. (hello) 14:53, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Keep Mattsnow 09:33, June 29, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:30, 29 June 2012
Delete (6)	...the fuck is this shit? Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:18, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Random fucking insanity. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 26 '12 7:32 (UTC) Nicotine, Valium, Vicodin, Marijuana, Ecstasy and Alcohol... D-d-delete --Nikau (talk) 12:47, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Not all that funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:42, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Delete for lack of images/paragraphs..pretty much all else. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:18, June 27, 2012 (UTC) C'mon. Can't we produce better drugs articles? More importantly, can't we produce better articles that aren't drug-related? -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 13:49, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	The article was a product of Editing Under the Influence. Scofield is going in for the Save, and has already cleared away the listcruft. Spıke ¬ 09:34 26-Jun-12 Did some more editing. Was it enough to save this article's soul? --Scofield & The Machine 20:13, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Yes. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:01, June 29, 2012 (UTC) Noooooope. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:00, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

State University of New York at Plattsburgh

Score: 0
Keep (2)	Meh. It seems like an alright stub to me. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:44, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Keep Lots of pictures now. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:14, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. More school-cruft for your viewing pleasure; this time a photo-less stub about a state college where--wait for it--the main activity is alcoholism. Spıke ¬ 23:55 25-Jun-12 Meh. Saberwolf116 (talk) 07:05, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Meh. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 28 '12 11:55 (UTC) Bizzee said it all. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:00, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Galactic Empire

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	No.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jun 27 '12 23:05 (UTC) Disintegrate. Stupid concept executed poorly. Saberwolf116 (talk) 01:54, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Per BB. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:06, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:18, June 28, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Further to Saberwolf: What does this article try to do? Flesh out a personal fantasy universe. What does it succeed in doing? Cheerlead in the first line that the reader is going to shit himself, then provide a narrative heavy in details and light in humor before degenerating into lists. No one wants to read this. Spıke ¬ 12:34 28-Jun-12
Comments

Terence Trent D'Arby

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. I will be astounded if the usual keepers don't vote to huff this. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:46, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Yuck! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC) No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 28 '12 4:26 (UTC) Delete. Article morphs an American singer-songwriter into an Irish footballer, thence Michael Jackson, thence Susan Sarandon; in other words, the usual grade-school genre of picking a topic and babbling for ten minutes about nothing. Spıke ¬ 12:41 28-Jun-12
Comments

Mudhoney

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	HUFF ME I'M SICK!! Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:18, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Really dumb. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:26, June 27, 2012 (UTC) No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jun 28 '12 4:32 (UTC) Delete. Ugly bandcruft has nothing to do with the band, except perhaps the caption on the final illustration. Spıke ¬ 12:43 28-Jun-12
Comments

Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit

Score: 1
Keep (5)	This may be an injoke, but because it's an injoke, it should not even be nominated anyway. Also, I love it. History! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:03, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Historical relevance Saberwolf116 (talk) 20:25, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Keep. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kyurem CUN|IC Kill | 05:46, June 27, 2012 (UTC) WTF--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 05:58, June 27, 2012 (UTC) Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:33, 27 June 2012
Delete (6)	Delete.Has no redeeming value at all, complete incoherent nonsense. --Teh Penis Guy 8==> (Ask My Dick A Question) 15:51, June 26, 2012 (UTC) This may be an in-joke, but its better off kept in someone's userspace. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:59, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Spıke ¬ 16:13 26-Jun-12 Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:54, June 26, 2012 (UTC)  In-jokes should be funny. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 01:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC) In-Jokes aren't funny ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:11, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	This should have been on QVFD, I think, but I thought some people might actually like it. The talk page is funnier than the article, in my opinion. --Teh Penis Guy 8==> (Ask My Dick A Question) 15:51, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Not good for QVFD; this has a long history, including visits by Kip the Dip. Spıke ¬ 19:04 26-Jun-12 Plus a mention on Uncyclopedia:About. Please, please do some research (and read the rules up above more closely) before nominating such an old, ingrained in-joke. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:24, June 27, 2012 (UTC) In-joke, plus I rewrote the sections with significant content. If you are so inclined to think this page is cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit and completely willing to overlook the whole "don't nominate in-jokes" rule, then feel free to bring up this conversation again in never. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:54, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Daniel Jackson

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Ok, first off (oh, man I can't believe I'm about to say this), let me admit that I have actually watched the horrible, horrible show Stargate: SG-1 as well as...um...(Jesus I can't believe I'm admitting this) several episodes of its spinoff(s). This page...just isn't funny, man. No laughs. None. Tedious stupidity, has this article. In spades. But no laughs. Not even unintentional ones. Make this go away.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 26 '12 7:20 (UTC) Delete. This 2008 article about a fictional character wobbles between Wikipedia spork and disconnected babble. Spıke ¬ 09:42 26-Jun-12 I admit that I've watched the series too and it didn't have anything to do with Gotham City... Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:25, 26 June, 2012 (UTC) --Nikau (talk) 12:43, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Not good. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:00, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Claremont Colleges

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. This schoolcruft is listcruft, where every list item is an inside joke. Spıke ¬ 02:12 26-Jun-12 That's it? Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:39, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Per SPIKE. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:43, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:55, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Unabomber

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Multiple issues, looks hopeless. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 16:07, June 25, 2012 (UTC) Delete. The article supposedly about domestic terrorist Ted Kaczynski starts with dopey deconstruction before inexplicably pursuing its two real themes: Segways and genitalia. No photos, no humor, nothing about Kaczynski. PS--Would it hurt for nominator to spell out the "multiple issues"? Spıke ¬ 16:25 25-Jun-12  Random fucking stupidity. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 26 '12 7:30 (UTC) Segways and genitalia. Shit. Sounds like my last visit to gran in her old folks home. --Nikau (talk) 12:50, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Bomb it. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:54, June 26, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Randumbo (I haven't used that expression recently). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:17, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Bangor

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	This-city-sucks-cruft. Also, do you realize how much more trouble and money it takes to turn flourescent lights into "neon" undercarriage lighting? If you think about the joke for more than two seconds, you realize how dumb it is.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jun 25 '12 4:16 (UTC) Delete. In addition, the article is so vague as to convince some contributors it was about Bangor, Maine. That city is not a hotbed of support for Congressman Ron Paul, despite Section 2; as the Irish one certainly is not either. Spıke ¬ 04:36 25-Jun-12 Delete. Per above. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:50, June 25, 2012 (UTC) And I was expecting something about sausages. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:55, June 25, 2012 (UTC) Tasteless Hitler Cruft. Huff. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 15:07, June 25, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Standard 'this place is crap' without any sign of working some original material into the main mix. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:15, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Bucknell University

Score: -1
Keep (3)	Keep Made me laugh. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:55, June 24, 2012 (UTC) An actual pretty good laugh about Bucknell, as someone who's been there once or twice. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:45, June 24, 2012 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:22, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. The latest in my search for schoolcruft. The joke here is that Bucknell is in an embarrassingly white part of the US. Everything else is inside jokes, memes, and triteness written poorly. "(insert stale marijuana joke here)" Spıke ¬ 09:08 24-Jun-12 Weak Disintegrate There are some funny jokes here and there, but the execution is too sloppy to have anything worthwhile. Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:13, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:13, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Mauritius

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Keep. A credible-looking article about a place that's real. The intro is a Wikipedia spork with subtle puns; the body degenerates into "Uranus lolololol" as author(s) have nothing they really want to say about the place. Spıke ¬ 02:43 24-Jun-12 Now rewritten based on more junk from Wikipedia and photos lying around the site. Spıke ¬ 11:34 24-Jun-12 Keep ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:58, June 24, 2012 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:21, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Disintegrate and redirect to Africa. Aside from the Tony Blair joke, there's pretty much nothing to like about this article. Saberwolf116 (talk) 01:52, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:13, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

San Andreas Fault

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Inoffensive stub. Also a major topic.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:33, June 23, 2012 (UTC) Fixed. Carlb seemed to have had a humor concept--the apostle Andrew as a fault-finder--but never fleshed it out when he finished this in 2006, and his use of memes seems to have attracted more of the same since. Didn't take long to correct this. Spıke ¬ 10:51 23-Jun-12 Better. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:01, June 23, 2012 (UTC) Good one -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:48, June 24, 2012 (UTC) Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:20, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Three quotes, three lines. Then, in two short paragraphs you have: "kitten huffing", "gonorrhoea", "scientologists", "vagina", "they chop off their penises". Then a load of red links. I'm nominating this, but I'll be damned if I want to delete it. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:49, June 23, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Vital or not, this is crap. Not even half of this article focuses on it's topic. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:45, June 23, 2012 (UTC) Has nothing to do with its subject. Huff. -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 22:36, June 23, 2012 (UTC) Q, I hate to break this to ya, but that's ...kinda the point of Uncyclopedia. You, an innocent web-researcher, type "San Andreas Fault" into Google, get Uncyclopedia's page spewed back at you, read it, and then shout "What the hell! This has nothing to do with... oh, wait! LOL! I get it!" Humor is 1/2 "surprise, bitch!" and 1/2...something else important. I forget what. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 24 '12 1:23 (UTC) It's still funny though! -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 00:24, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I wish Spike would find a way to keep the reference to the chopping-off of penises. That was the only laugh in the old version. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 26 '12 8:45 (UTC) Kept -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:13, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Bermuda Square

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. Short, incoherent article created by a noob that didn't read HTBFANJS. Saberwolf116 (talk) 16:50, June 24, 2012 (UTC) Delete. A Sandbox-quality page written about a nonexistent subject; a joke that you have to type its own punch line to see. Spıke ¬ 16:57 24-Jun-12 I Fucking Hate the Bermuda Square. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:24, June 24, 2012 (UTC) Remind me again what the French word for "garbage" is? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 24 '12 20:35 (UTC) My Google Dictionary browser extension informs me that it is ordures. Actually, I think shit sounds better. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 11:44, June 25, 2012 (UTC) Disintegrate. This is pretty much how my old Pi article went LOL! -- Sir CuteGroudonOnTheRadio [CUN • PBJ'12 • PLS(0) • Stuy'16] 14:53, June 25, 2012 (UTC) I want to have this idea's babies. But the article is sad. --Nikau (talk) 12:53, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
Comments