User talk:BieberAxeKiller
Welcome![edit source]
Hello, BieberAxeKiller, and thanks for joining Uncyclopedia! Before editing further, please take a gander at our Beginner's Guide. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, check out the following pages:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, ask at the community forum or in the chatroom, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, our Adopt-a-Noob program can bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:39, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
Milwaukee[edit source]
Hi, I see that you're new and first things first, welcome to the site. Now, I also see that you wrote this article which is a pretty good first attempt (God knows my first article sucked) but there are definitely ways to make it better. Try and steer clear from saying that a city sucks. Though it might seem funny, its pretty overused. Also keep pop culture references, large numbers, and especially swearing at low numbers, as these are hardly funny to other people. I would recommend checking out HTBFANJS for more info on how to make your article better. I'll go fix some formatting stuff right now. Good luck! :) -- 15:28, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
User Page[edit source]
Looks a bit of a mess? Why don't you add some subpages for your articles if you want to keep copies close to hand. EG BieberAxeKiller/Stuff. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:33, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
Templates[edit source]
Since you're a bit new round here, don't start creating templates and throwing them around. Keep them on your user pages for now. If you think a template should be created, take it to the Village Dump so others can contribute and suggest ideas. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:37, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Moved it here. User:BieberAxeKiller/Template/Unfunny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:47, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
Silence in not always golden here[edit source]
When a new user starts to throw pages around and fails to respond to enquiries, I will consider that you are not here for the common good. Your failure to respond will only go to prove my point. So? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:09, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
Okay :([edit source]
Okay, i'll stop making pages :(. It's fun, but yeah, I do kinda agree with you. BieberAxeKiller (talk) 12:51, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
Milwaukee[edit source]
I have changed this from a 7 day delete to a 30 one if this article isn't improved. Also can you remove the red links and sign all your messages and posts on this site? I see you signed after my last message here so I thnk you are getting the hang of it. I hope. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:49, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
Okay[edit source]
Yeah, i guess I thought the articles might be popular enough that other people would create the ones they linked to. Apparently I was wrong. Oh well, at least they still exist and yeah, the links will be removed. --BieberAxeKiller (talk) 00:29, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
Fuck[edit source]
I filled the page that specifically said not to fuck it up with fuck. Seriously, Vandalism example on wheels is literally filled with the word fuck! --BieberAxeKiller (talk) 01:04, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
- I am beginning to think you are not here for good reasons. I saw that you have sent a link to an existing article to someone you want to bully. No name is mentioned but I don't think that is very polite. So one day ban and will also delete that link as well. Uncyclopedia isn't for people to carry on a private vendetta against someone else. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:45, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
Why[edit source]
Are you creating subpages to a user talk page? Put your stuff on his talkpage instead. Also, if you want to know if a user is active, just look at his contributions by accessing the history of a page he/she/it might have edited. Thanks. :) Mattsnow 14:31, April 28, 2012 (UTC)
Hey[edit source]
Your signature is too long, and Please fix your userpage so that it doesn't not mess up people's browsers.
(I will make you a custom sig for free if you ask)
Thanks.
→L A B O R A T O R I E S 14:39, 28 June 2012
Thanks, but I think i've shortened my sig now, see? (unless ur talkin about height, then i'll shrink the pics) --8===>~ (Play With Me???) 03:28, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
Hey kiddo[edit source]
You only need to put one ICU tag on a new page (read here for the full instructions). Although I will admit that four separate ICUs will certainly get the message across that it sucks. :) ~ Tue, Jul 10 '12 14:33 (UTC)
- P.S. Pay no attention to the Aimsplode.
User:Idontexist and your signature[edit source]
Hey. You can't create a user page for an account that doesn't exist. Technically that should be deleted. You may want to add it, and the relevant talk page, to QVFD. Also, your signature is spilling code everywhere. Go to UN:SIG for guidelines on how you should set it up. Nominally Humane! 05:30 13 Aug
Red link patrol[edit source]
Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic. |
For your work on cleaning those up. The other thing that you may not be aware of is I recently threw together a template to deal with redlinks called {{RL}}. What it's for is for redlinks that are significant topics, rather than removing them as links from articles, or taking them out of Special:Wantedpages, it "hides" the redlink and leaves plain text in it's place. So as an example:
- Smurf pornography is a red link. Having it as
{{RL|Smurf pornography}}
gives us: Smurf pornography - If later in someone creates that article, like Tom Cruise for example, then
{{RL|Tom Cruise}}
gives us: Tom Cruise
(I'll have to remove that second one later, as it also does a categorisation trick to let me know when an article is complete.)
It's a quick way to clear up redlinks. I'd suggest not using it for titles that are unlikely to exist, like Matthew Broderick is a wiener muncher, for example, as there's no point. But for people of historical importance it's definitely worth it. Nominally Humane! 12:48 29 Aug
- Smurf pornography was a red link. Smart arse. Nominally Humane! 12:57 29 Aug
Redirecting[edit source]
Alright, just a quick word about the large number of redirects you have been putting in recently. Most of them are fine and are good uses of the redirect function to get rid of red links. Some of them would be better suited to a link in the article in question rather than a redirect page. If you want to link a person or object to something that they are not publicly associated with then use a link like this instead of a redirect. It will save me the job of deleting superfluous redirects you create and will free up more of your time for doing much more exciting things. Try to exercise a bit of discretion with redirects, remember they are there, primarily, to assist in searching. Nobody likes being redirected to an irrelevant article, so make sure you are careful when redirecting for that purpose.
Otherwise keep up the good work. --ChiefjusticePS2 22:07, August 29, 2012 (UTC)