DO...

For nominators: DO...

... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
... Add {{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.

For voters: DO...

... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so: '''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.

For Administrators: DO...

... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.

DON'T...

... Revert administrators.
... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like THIS to indicate that they have been kept.

Pages for Deletion

New entries will be at the bottom of this page.

Dio Brando

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 6421 hours
Keep (2)	Rewrite Might wanna rewrite it. They said it's pretty unfunny, but this article existed WAYYYY back in 2006. So don't blame whoever wrote this article. --Robo1699 (talk) 00:50, 24 February 2020 (UTC) Rewrite I concur. If anything, I'd keep the Marlon Brando and Ronnie James Dio joke and purge the rest. PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 10:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Nom, Delete and Limp boner this article is pretty unfunny, whoever made it obviously didn't read How to be funny and not just stupid товарищ Rooomy of the Soviet Union (Yell at me) 15:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC) Wryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 14:15, 2 December, 2019 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Dio may be a funny meme, and an article about him COULD be funny, but this one is not ---товарищ Rooomy of the Soviet Union (Yell at me) 17:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC) Del. If a rewrite is attempted, best to start from zero. —𝔎 𝔢 𝔳 ⠀Ꮠ

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 2813 hours
Keep (1)	Rewrite Maybe get rid of all the puns. Orangutang94 (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Completely garbage. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC) Delete. Its shit! whytheonlyone ^💬 _🤠 23:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 1 Elapsed Time: 1272 hours
Keep (2)	I understand your one-handed comment, and I think the article probably either went too far or got hijacked by another editor after about halfway, but to me there is enough irony in it to subvert the imperial sex tourist tone, and I quite like the writer's voice, and I am always a big fan of what looks to be local knowledge (i.e. the references to certain words, local practices, stereotypes). Leverage (talk) 07:23, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Keep. I also get where Toaster is coming from. This article's tone hardly even tries to be "encyclopedic", and that perhaps could use some improvement. But I do find it to be funny. And Leverage is right, at least in the Chinese section, there is a ton of local knowledge, which I am also a big fan of. MrX blow me 15:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Delete. This may be controversial, and I understand a lot of work went into this article, but it's just not funny. It reads like the author(s) wrote this with one hand. (talk · ctb · log) 04:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC) 2005cruft -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC) Delete I don't like it. I do acknowledge the hard work that Aleister and MrN put in it, but I don't think what is currently there is salvageable. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:41, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Comments

Score: 6 Elapsed Time: 864 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Nom and Delete , Kev and I added a "serious zone" to the top recently, but after a discussion on Discord I think its probably best to just delete this unfunny article. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:29, 4 July 2020 (UTC) Delete — (talk) (contributions) 04:32:52 2020/07/04 UTC Delete. No redeeming value, at all. (talk · ctb · log) 04:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC) Delete. --EMC^[TALK]04:35 Jul 4 2020 Delete No matter what can be done to render the article more acceptable, it won't even come close to being acceptable. Deletion is probably in the best interests of Uncyclopedia(ns). —𝔎 𝔢 𝔳 ⠀Ꮠ Delete. Lame. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:51, 4 July, 2020 (UTC)
Comments	This might be our fastest VFD in a long time. —𝔎 𝔢 𝔳 ⠀Ꮠ

Score: 2 Elapsed Time: 466 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete. Article does not meet Uncyclopedia's guidelines. In particular, it is not really funny at all, and has some formatting issues (no links or categories or bold article title). TheTrangGuy (talk) 18:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC) Delete. Quick Google search shows that this is a vanity article, probably should be at QVFD. MrX blow me 22:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted due to breaking the vanity-guidelines. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 22:53, 6 August, 2020 (UTC)