Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Uncyclopedia:VFD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Symbol keep vote.svg DO...
For nominators: DO...
  1. ... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
  2. ... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
  3. ... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
  4. ... Add {{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
  5. ... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.
For voters: DO...
  1. ... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
  2. ... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so: '''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
  3. ... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.
For Administrators: DO...
  • ... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
  • ... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
  • ... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
  • ... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.
Symbol delete vote.svg DON'T...
  • ... Revert administrators.
  • ... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
  • ... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
  • ... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like VFD-padlock.png THIS to indicate that they have been kept.



Pages for Deletion

New entries will be at the bottom of this page.

Oeiras international school

Score: 3
Elapsed Time: 1149 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (3)
  1. This article does have a few funny comments, but overall it has very little redeeming value. It's random garbage at best. Codeine's mum hasn't heard of this school, and we have no use for this article. MrX blow me 18:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
  2. Agreed with MrX. β€”Kevπ”Žπ”’π”³β €α  09:25pm  October 26, 2020
  3. Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments

Beak Lions

Score: -2
Elapsed Time: 824 hours
Keep (3)
  1. You didn't take hours out of your time to create something, humor is suggestive, and people do find this funny. Your opinion is just that, an opinion. I know people that genuinely love this creation, and just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it needs to be deleted. Countless months of effort and time has went into this for the objective to laugh, and you see it as fit to delete something because it doesn't blend in with the rest. Who is going to read this except people I mention this to, right, nobody. This was my effort on creating something, I guess it was all for nothing huh? User:Dank Memes 21 I would like for it to stay up so I can continue my journey on creating something, but I suppose that request is going to get shot down, am I right? (Adressing the Ethan Casity tag, that's a random name I through together, I personally don't know someone by that name, that was a random name i threw together with random events and spesifics, and the images were one's from google images, but I'll replace the images, but I don't see a reason the Ethan Casity needs removed since i never met the guy in my life)
  2. I personally enjoy the insanity of it. Granted, it is really vulgar and at times reads out like it was written by a 12-year old with Tourette's, but it looks encyclopedic enough and delivers some chuckles ala something like 2005cruft. I also removed the second ICU you tagged Aasim, because I didn't feel it's eligible to be ICU'd at this far in its history. It's cool that you did put this in VFD however to create some discussion about this.
    However, I do have an issue with the article violating our Vanity-guidelines. I deleted the two personal pictures you uploaded and inserted to this Dank Memes 21, and I hope to see the entire Ethan Casity-section removed the next time I take a look. This site isn't Facebook, nor is it your personal hub for your friends to talk shit about each other. You can remodel the stuff to remove the vanity-stuff or I can delete it all, it's up to you. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 15:55, 22 October, 2020 (UTC)
  3. Keep If this article is still a work in progress perhaps it would be best worked on in Dank Memes 21's userspace. I disagree with Awesome Aasim's assertion that this page should be deleted on the grounds that it doesn't follow Wikipedia formatting, just take a look at the in-jokes category for some examples of notable non-encyclopedic articles. Once the article is completed (that includes removing vanity) I see no reason it cannot be a part of mainspace. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
  4. Keep This article is waaay longer than necessary, but it is not HTBFANJS gone wrong, not even close. MrX blow me 22:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete (1)
  1. We are a parody of Wikipedia. I have ICU'd this twice but the tag was removed in each case. I think this may be a case of UN:HTBFANJS gone wrong. As much as I think the sole creator is acting in good faith to make the article funnier, they have been the only one adding stuff to the page, and in its current form, it does not at all appear funny, seems to be littered with inside jokes, and does not follow the traditionally accepted style for such articles. Even our own in-joke AAAAAAAAA resembles a Wikipedia entry. Awesome Aasim 07:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments

I have spent countless days coming up with an entire dimension, yes it's supposed to be a dimension, and apparently to you it isn't funny and it doesn't support the uncyclopdeia look, well so be it, it never was made for you. This was made for the other people that have enjoyed what i have made in the past and want to see more of it. What do you even do beside patrol the page for things you deem as irrelevant. I love working on this page because it gives me something to do im my life I enjoy, make people laugh. I have made people laugh and your inside jokes you said, those are random images, from random places, with random names. The beak lions was a project i wanted to do on my own because i wanted to reflect my side of humor and to give people who has having some difficult issues a good laugh. But all you can do is sit behind this screen and want the page deleted, we have more than enough articles for people to read, and who sits and reads an entire article, are you getting paid? You are the only one that cares about how an article looks, and just because you don't find it appealing, doesn't mean other people do. Guess this is why we can't have nice things, people like you take a parody way to seriously. From the creator:Dank Memes 21

  • (Adressing the Ethan Casity tag, that's a random name I through together, I personally don't know someone by that name, that was a random name i threw together with random events and spesifics, and the images were one's from google images, but I'll replace the images, but I don't see a reason the Ethan Casity needs removed since i never met the guy in my life)
Ok, but I fail to see the connection between Casity or any of the random names in the article and the article's subject matter. Especially so because there's seemingly no attempts of introducting and tying any of these characters to "Beak Lions". You can't really blame me or anyone else for mistaking that as vanity if you straight-out make it look like vanity. I really do hope to see all these mentions removed or otherwise expanded upon to not make them look so random and out-of-place, otherwise I don't feel comfortable enough to keep this article on the mainspace, which is why I'm removing my vote for now. Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 16:17, 22 October, 2020 (UTC)

I see where you coming from and the images have been replaced, and I will expand upon the names I've chosen, and I made Ethan a cube, and will expand on that later on. Point is I'll make the effort to remove suspicion of vanity in the page, I'm going to need to come up with something, and therefore time, but I'm going to make the names better part of the page, and connect it deeper into the "lore" if you can even call that abomination lore, but I digress. I'll either 1. rename them completely or 2. tie it better as in a creation of the beak lions themselves. Not sure where I'll be doing yet, but I'll be consistent with updates. (Dank Memes 21)

Yeah that's cool, that's awesome. I'm looking forward to what you come up with! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 16:52, 22 October, 2020 (UTC)

Well I do hope it is worth while, just because I don't want something as minute as vanity to ruin over half a years of work, If it as simple as i think it is, I'll have a blast correcting the errors, but in it's idiotic sense of course. So I'll see what i can draft up, and hopefully it fixes all the vanity issues, since my intentions weren't on it, but it came across as vanity and I do see how it can be seen as that without context or a proper character introduction, I am planning to have an entire D&D universe where the beak lions reign supreme, maybe i have their characters developed there, and yes, I will be adding more names, but I will correct the error of not connecting it to the overall beak lion article, it's a thought I had and maybe it will do good? (Dank Memes 21)

File:Captain Obvious has a sign.jpg

Preview of image
Score: 1
Elapsed Time: 714 hours
Keep (1)
  1. Keep I think it's funny, and I think it's use and caption in Captain Obvious are funny too. If this is kept, I don't think anything needs to be blurred, because as Zombiebaron pointed out, the guy with the pink sign is mocking the assholes next to him. MrX blow me 22:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete (2)
  1. Blatant unfunny homophobia, used in Captain Obvious page. The least I would do is blur all the homophobic signs, in order to make the image only cover the "I have a sign" sign. β€”Kevπ”Žπ”’π”³β €α  09:24pm  October 26, 2020
    In my opinion this image is attempting to satirize the famous Westboro Baptist Church hate group (they are in the image) and blurring the hate speech would serve no comedic purpose. This image is not espousing hate speech; it is making fun of it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
  2. Delete Not original content and whether or not the hate speech is blurred its not very funny either. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments
  • Note that target "article" to be deleted is an image.

Fall Guys: Ultimate Knockout

Score: 2
Elapsed Time: 527 hours
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Delete (2)

MeVΙͺα΄„α΄›α΄œ Talk 54 16:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
β€”Kevπ”Žπ”’π”³β €α  

Comments

Initiating unilateral deletion because the page is blank. Next time, to delete a blank page... use QVFD instead for faster deletion! β€”Kevπ”Žπ”’π”³β €α  04:32pm  November 3, 2020