Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive275

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Portal:Games/Sonic

Score: 5
Keep (0)	~~Lots of blue links. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:31, 7 May 2014~~
Delete (5)	Deleting a bunch of basically empty and useless portals.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 14:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC) This is kind of dumb. Not a lot of stuff in it and it's stupid looking because it highlights an article that I assume got burnt in ffw. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:26, 10 May 2014 Delete. I read it again. Doesn't seem to have much value. And the silly text about what game begat what is just wrong, though it's quoted in a bunch of places around the Internet at this point. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 03:56, May. 13, 2014 Did you know that: ...Amy Rose was governor of Florida from 2007-2009 - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:59, Tuesday 13 May 2014 -
Comments	Rouge the Bat? WTF? Never heard of it and clicking the link didn't leave me feeling informed, partly 'cause the Rouge the Bat page is now a red link. If we keep the Sonic portal somebody should at least fix some of the other links on the page which point nowhere (recreating Rouge the Bat's probably not a good quest to sign up for tho). Snarglefoop (talk) 03:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Ghettoistan

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Listcruft, memes, and stupidity. Not very funny. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 16:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)(Who am I to talk?) What in the name of... look, if you're going to make an article about something fake, at least have a decent concept. Or any concept at all. Otherwise, forget it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:24, 13 May 2014 Delete. It's too bad -- it had a significant amount of work put into it, but it's not even a little bit funny. Just a random mishmosh of fictitious "facts" which don't hang together. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Yo momma so ghetto..when she breast feeds kool-aid comes out! The only good thing in this article. Too bad this isn't the playground at my elementary school. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:54, Tuesday 13 May 2014 - That was added by UNmarine777 in Oct 2011 (it's totally not the style of the original author!). UNmarine777's last contribution was on 1 Jan 2013, unfortunately ('nuff said). Snarglefoop (talk) 05:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 03:56, May. 13, 2014 ugh Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 06:28, 13 May, 2014 (UTC) Gay. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 10:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Battle of Antietam

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Same author as Ghettoistan and in many ways a similar article, though in this case the event was real enough. Random collection of non-facts that doesn't hang together and, as far as I can see, has no humor value. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC) There are even some real facts here that could be used to write an article, but no, this is just random boring nonsense. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:50, 13 May 2014 *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 03:55, May. 13, 2014 including random photographer - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:57, Tuesday 13 May 2014 - Delete. Seems to be mainly facts. Only bit I found mildly amusing, I'm ashamed to say, was the bit about goat rape at the beginning. So, more goat rape in future please. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 18:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Facts? No...I don't think so. I know something about this from history class and nothing about that is in there. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:13, 13 May 2014 Delete. Never heard of this. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 20:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

2009 World Bloodbath Classic

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. I find this article murky; it just seems to be a fictitious report of a bunch of fictitious matches in a fictitious game with no apparent point. The Bloodbath article makes it clear that it's war that's being discussed; this page, OTOH, doesn't make that at all clear. If someone feels like performing major surgery on it, or if folks feel that it really is clear what it's about and find it amusing, then we should keep it. Otherwise, it should go. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Exactly. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:34, 13 May 2014 In the words of Kippy, " *It STINKS!" - - B@NZai k!tten* (Meow?)B 18:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. It's not a real event. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 20:31, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Mashed Potatoes War

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. Random bunch of made up nonfacts without much of a plan. It's almost offensive, but ultimately fails at that, too. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC) Guck. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:05, 13 May 2014 What the hell? -- MagicBus Talk to me! 20:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC) unfinished?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 04:46, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments	The Oscar Wilde quote 'This was supposed to be the war that ended all wars...the only problem was that it never ended' might serve as the basis for something, but it would probably have to be an entirely different article. The rest of this thing has potato blight and couldn't be saved even with salt. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 05:08, 13 May 2014

User:SPIKE

Score: -1
Keep (4)	What is wrong with you people? Has SPIKE become to new NXWave, in that merely evoking his name causes a minor shitstorm in a kilometer radius? I didn't create this out of SPIKE hate. I've been saying for months that all the SPIKE hate is uncalled for and a major overkill. However, after his userpage was deleted on VFD - which, I was told was some kind of joke - I figured, hey, why not leave a monument to him as Dwight Schrute and link it to his existing account. No. Even that lead to drama. We might as well change our logo now. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 08:06, May. 15, 2014 Interesting question! What is wrong with us these people? Perhaps it deserves an article. What, exactly, is the reason these people spend great green gobs of greasy grimy time on Uncyclopedia? What is it, exactly, which causes such deep and irresistible fascination of this site for ~~so many~~ some people? Is it something in the Outside World that they're running away from, or is it some addictive property of the site itself? This needs further thought... Snarglefoop (talk) 15:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Yes, Spike is in that sense the new NXWave I should think. There are a lot of people who feel very strongly one way or the other about him, and I don't just mean hate - much of the community does hate him but there are also those who think he's cool or should at least be treated with a certain level of respect. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 17 May 2014 Everything that man said up there. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 12:48, 15 May, 2014 (UTC) Fixed the uncyclowikia link. I hope it's better.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 08:50, 16 May 2014 (UTC) For. This should be kept. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 17:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Scratch out from the page of Time This page is indeed cute and "humorous", as they say. However, it is also an Obscenity, an offence against God and Man, a violation of the rules of Nature, and what's worse it names He Who Must Not Be Named, and it links to That Which Must Not Be Linked. And besides all that, it is now simultaneously on VFH, VFD, and QVFD, which may be some sort of record. Snarglefoop (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. If you really want to make fun of Spike, write about him in the main encyclopedia, not in his own userspace. When this page was nominated for deletion first, the main reasons were that you found it annoying and didn't want it here anymore. Well, why are you recreating it? Anton (talk) 15:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC) Noone wants to write an article about spike. Spike has no userspace as he does not have an account here. It was nominated as a joke i.e. the reasons were a joke. Kippy remade it- he never voted to delete it. Everything you say makes little sense, I'm not sure if you are being intentionally obtuse. Also, I thought you had retired? - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 16:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC) I did. Also, I think you are confusing "I disagree" with "Everything you say makes little sense". Anton (talk) 14:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Pretty sure I'm not confusing anything considering what you said makes little sense due to the reasons I just explained. Not really going to say them again they are just a few cms above this. Try reading them again? - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 14:48, 15 May 2014 (UTC) What he said makes little sense because he based it on too little information. Also, I'm not going to close this nomination, ever. Some other admin can deal with it and its black hole of stupidity. They don't do enough work anyway. No fair. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:57, 15 May 2014 Black Hole of Stupidity ... I'm not sure what that means, but I like it -- it's a cool phrase. There should be an article to go with it. Snarglefoop (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Hah! And now there is. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Blargh! Calm down or I'll get the spray bottle! (It's what I tell the cats here, anyway. It never does any good; they know I'm bluffing.) "Everything you say makes little sense" is a compliment, as you will see as soon as you realize that "little sense" implies "nonzero sense" and in turn that means it is just the same as "Nothing you said was nonsense" turned inside out. Snarglefoop (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC) Yeah...but unfortunately it is I, not you, who has the spray bottle. Nuff said. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:07, 15 May 2014 This is not what. Very much not what. Such not-what-ness cannot stand. Writing about Spike in mainspace would also most likely be not what, and would have to be whattified for the sake of the Great What. So yes, what indeed. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:19, 14 May 2014 ~~Linking to uncyclowikia just promotes them.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 15:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)~~
Comments	I'd like to point out that putting this on VFD is just bringing more attention to a page that would otherwise probably never be seen by an outsider or noob and this is generally working to continue this minor event I have started, which seems to be beginning to irritate various users, which is not my intention. However, personally I think this is hilarious so, happy voting everyone! - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC) That is all perfectly true, but I should think that your nominating it for VFH would also bring attention to it. Not that you hadn't thought of that already, of course; so what purpose does it serve to remind you of it? That I cannot say. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:19, 14 May 2014 User:SPIKE ranks 259th on Special:MostLinkedPages [1] so if someone was browsing around that for whatever reason they'd be somewhat likely to run into it. Thought that was worth pointing out. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:01, 17 May 2014

Paradox in a Can

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Not funny, plus, it's a stub. Paradox already covers this. Me, You, You, talk to me >^.^< 21:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC) This subject is intriguing, but the execution is crap. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:37, May. 18, 2014 Would need a good deal more to it to be worth keeping. I don't think I'm up to it - not an essential topic, got other things to do. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:40, 18 May 2014 Unfortunately it is not funny - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Terra Branford (Final Fantasy)

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	So video game articles are rarely any good, and this one does not break the pattern. Dumb opening quotes, she's the offspring of a gorilla and a prostitute, rape jokes, anus jokes, more rape jokes, some more anus jokes, abstruse in-jokes, "but then he dies", wrap up with some unfunny dialog. Seriously fuck off. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, May 25 '14 3:36 (UTC) Too random to be any good. Doesn't have that 'rewritten by IPs' look to it either. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:52, 25 May 2014 Delete. What that Beaver guy said. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC) FACKYOU --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 11:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted --EMC^[TALK]16:00 May 31 2014

Why?:DeviantART is the realm of faggotry

Score: 4
Keep (1)	llwy is just trying to delete every single article i ever created. this sucks.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC) I am sorry if I've hurt your feelings, but actually that isn't what I'm trying to do. You have written some stuff I think is reasonably decent, for example the thing about Haribo gummy bears, and that I wouldn't nominate for deletion. What I put on vfd is the stuff that I don't think is worth keeping, and if a good chunk of it happens to be your articles, it may be because you have a thing or two to learn about writing. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:29, 17 May 2014
Delete (5)	That's nice. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:23, 16 May 2014 Delete. It's way too short. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:34, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not funny, just an attack page. Seriously, what's with all the friggin attack pages? Somebody got a vendetta going here or something? Snarglefoop (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Excruft -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 09:43, May. 17, 2014 Delete. --EMC^[TALK]00:43 May 19 2014
Comments

Pikey

Score: 4
Keep (2)	For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 17:17, 17 May 2014 (UTC) Weak Keep Could take my rewrite, but i know nothing about it.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 15:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Delete (6)	I remember finding this back before I fully realised Uncyclopedia was supposed to be funny. Probably didn't help my impression of the place. It's 21000 bytes of stupid. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:16, 17 May 2014 Ugh ugh ugh ugh Yet another attack article. This one's directed against Gypsies and the Irish. And it's not funny; just offensive. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC) *It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:35, May. 18, 2014 Delete I'm all 4 racism in articles, but this stinks. Huff this, and try for another which is actually written by someone who understands the pikeys well enough to tell them apart from most of the other people who live round here... Mr N 11:19. May 19 Bleeeeep. Aleister 14:20 25-5-14 Delete. --EMC^[TALK]20:49 May 26 2014
Comments	Some things just need to be deleted. Other than that, It's a good article. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 17:17, 17 May 2014 (UTC) "Good" how? Perhaps I missed something. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC) I give up on archiving. Everyone has different ideas or something, it's too confusing and my nice archive page I made is totally misordered now. I really think the pages should stay in the order they were on vfd which is oldest at the top but some people seem to think they should mix up the order just for the sake of fooblepoo. And don't tell me you expect me to believe that {{VFDc}} can be indiscriminately slapped on any closed nomination because I'm quite sure it's for kept pages. If you want to change the rules out from under my feet and confuse me to death, though, don't let me stop you. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:26, 31 May 2014

This page does not exist

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Is this against the rules? I looked all around but couldn't find anything prohibiting this, so I'll have to assume it's allowed. I'm also laughing at the idea of doing this which means it's either a good thing to do or I've gone crazy. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:43, 1 Jun 2014 I just looked at the page, and it appears that it's already been deleted at least ten times. Doesn't it seem somewhat backwards to only now take the step of actually voting to delete it? Snarglefoop (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Why hasn't this page already been featured? Snarglefoop (talk) 03:51, 1 June 2014 (UTC) Shhh. This page does not exist. Shhh. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jun 2 '14 8:48 (UTC)

CNet

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	*It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 11:34, Jun. 4, 2014 Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 15:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC) "CNet? More like C nothing, because there's nothing on the website. Nothing of value at least." This is a very appropriate quote when you apply it to the article. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 17:00, Wednesday 04 June 2014 - Delete Let it die. J F C 18:16. Jun 4 While it does use the word "vagina", the rest of the article is random, short, and stupid. --EMC^[TALK]21:33 Jun 4 2014
Comments	Comment. I checked. It does only use the word "vagina" once. J F C 18:36. Jun 6

Political Party

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Nope Listcruft. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 14:54, 6 June 2014 (UTC) Nope What is this left right paradigm of which it speaks? In my experience most "political parties" contain more rent boys and old men. Not that I have been to any political parties. Obviously. J F C 15:06. Jun 6
Comments

Garry's Mod

Score: -2
Keep (3)	For. It has a promising start but turns fast into a text full of grammar mistakes and spelling errors. Not sure if this should be deleted but some work on it could make it look pretty cool. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 08:53, 2 June, 2014 (UTC) Limp boner. What cat said is something I agree with and not just because I am a kitten and respect my elders. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 08:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC) The cat meows true. Keep if only for the part about banning the problems away. A new user came along and did some work on it; I'm not sure if it was an improvement, but I could see he was editing in good faith so I left it alone. Maybe that was good, maybe not. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:50, 11 Jun 2014
Delete (1)	I tried my hand at cleaning this up and failed spectacularly. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 1 '14 11:33 (UTC) No you didn't. I wish you hadn't reverted yourself. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:50, 11 Jun 2014
Comments	This might be a better version that I found in the history. Less bullcarp in it anyway. Here is a diff between this version, and the current version. J F C 09:34. Jun 2

Cheesecake of Doom

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Keep It's actually reasonably well written, and not too random or annoying to make me hate it enough to want it dead. J F C 10:30. Jun 5 Keep. Though it does need some more Chuck Norris jokes... --Mimo &maxus 11:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Poor chef, resorting to evil cheesecakes to keep the critics in line. But it needs fewer Chuck Norris jokes, not more. I suspect some random person added them after the article had been written. I'd remove them myself, except that you're not allowed to revert me so it would be wrong or something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:54, 11 Jun 2014
Delete (1)	Delete. Found this using the random page feature. And... its a typical “chuck norris is god” and short attempt at an article Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Dude, the Big C is only mentioned twice in the article. Did you only read the first and last line of text? --Mimo &maxus 11:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Howard Stern

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Feature! --Mimo &maxus 08:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC) omg i luv it --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 07:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC) There's some redeeming value here, to be sure. I didn't see anything random. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 14:47, 11 Jun 2014
Delete (1)	This page says that Howard Stern is Godzilla and wears Care Bears type diapers with some random crap.--Ketchup Boss (talk) 04:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	It has a lot of nonsense. Even worse the Care Bears shit.--Ketchup Boss (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Philosophers

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	Delete. It's pretty bad, and doesn't have images. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 15:46, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Well written but kind of boring, misses the humour. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:43, 11 June, 2014 (UTC) It's a pity This seems like it ought to be a good topic but the page is poor. It's another one of these articles which starts by spewing a lot of totally stupid dates for historical events and then lards more obvious misinformation on top of that to try to glue it together but it doesn't stick. Snarglefoop (talk) 18:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Delete Never really went anywhere this one... Let's try for a better article next time. J F C 20:25. Jun 11 There are two worthwhile sentences in this article: 'The Economers turned common sense and family tradition around, preferring to sip Truth and talk about coffee.' and 'They try to coffee Truth and to talk sip, but don't do either very well.', but that is not enough to save it. Delete – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:11, 11 Jun 2014
Comments	I was wondering if I could improve on this a bit (not feeling too inspired tonight, the answer wasn't obvious) when I looked around and realized we already have an article on philosophy which, while not quite VFH material, is none the less pretty good. So "Philosophers" seems a bit redundant as well as poor, so it really might as well go to the great beyond, and if anyone thinks there should be an article of that name, just redirect it. (IMHOFWIW) Snarglefoop (talk) 02:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC) Agreed. This article has a few pages linking to it, so if we deleted it we could redirect to philosophy, or if we want to have more chance of getting a new article on 'Philosophers' then we would leave the red links and not redirect it. J F C 02:40. Jun 12

Dusty Tickbush

Score: -4
Keep (5)	For. It has a nice idea, sort of a plot there. Plus Uncyclopedia def needs more british english Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:38, 11 June, 2014 (UTC) Keep It needs a few pics. J F C 20:22. Jun 11 KEEP! My God it's so Aussie it's almost entirely incomprehensible -- it's priceless! Nooooo, don't delete it! And how could you delete such a perfect description of local industries: "There's raising flies, watching the dust blow, and riding the town bike..." "THE" town bike -- OMG! And what the Heck is a "slash"? Snarglefoop (talk) 20:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC) whut ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jun 11 '14 21:29 (UTC) It's ok. It has a few pics. Are you saying it needs to have more than a few? Is anything too obscure? Pwy a ŵyr? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:53, 11 Jun 2014
Delete (1)	Delete. Stubby, unfunny, and too obscure. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 16:11, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Per Snarglefoop: A "slash" is a piss. I thought everyone knew that. J F C 20:53. Jun 11 No. (See above voting entry for proof.) (Natively I speak Philadelphia Nerd. I tried to teach myself Common English after I moved away from home and found out everybody I met talked funny, but I wasn't very successful.) Snarglefoop (talk) 21:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC) What are you talking about sir! "Around about 1853 Dickie Snarks went for a slash and never come back" That translates into :"Around about 1853 Dickie Snarks went for a piss and never come back". Loads of people go for a piss and never come back. It's very common. J F C 21:40. Jun 11 Say what? Are you disagreeing with me? How can you do that? Are you seriously claiming that I did understand it the first time through? Or are we discommunicating here -- I said "no" as in "no not everybody understands that, because I'm an existence proof of somebody who didn't" but that was too ~~prolix~~ ~~multiloquent~~ ~~verbose~~ many words even for my taste so I just said "no" (as I just said I said). And as to the piss thing, well, yeah, particularly if there are horses involved, and they have to walk around them first. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:08, 11 June 2014 (UTC) I will confess that this argument has progressed beyond my point of understanding. I am however willing to continue this debate should you be able to explain to me what it is exactly we are arguing about. J F C 02:48. Jun 12 You'll note that I put this article up for VFH once. Didn't fly, but c'mon Denza. I'm American and I still get the jokes. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jun 11 '14 21:29 (UTC) Per Llwy's, I'm saying it needs a few pics (which it has), and also that it needs a few pics. In my opinion. J F C 02:44. Jun 12

HowTo:Avoid Being Struck By Lightning

Score: -2
Keep (3)	Keep. Not funny enough, perhaps, but at least it's kind of funny, and the idea of lightning proof underwear was totally unexpected so I don't think we should just throw it away. And a few of the "Other Tips" were really pretty funny, too, I thought. Snarglefoop (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Keep. Someone with some talent could turn this article into something good without too much effort. J F C 20:19. Jun 11 Funny enough for me. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:15, 11 Jun 2014
Delete (1)	Delete. Too short, not funny enough, needs more pictures. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 18:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Varndean School

Score: -2
Keep (2)	Snarglefoop: No, and yes. I'll just let this cool its heels here since I don't know of any actual rule dealing with this situation, but no, it shouldn't be here. Wait until it hasn't been edited for a week, then poke an admin if the construction tag is still there; alternatively, if it isn't, it's fair game for vfd. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:34, 14 Jun 2014 Keep Per Gabriel Turner:Did you check the page history? It's been edited by many different people. I can personally guarantee you that at least one of those people does not go to that school. That however is irrelevant... The school has a wikipidea page, and that makes it more than notable enough for Codeine's mum. To me this nomination smites of noob biting. If the authors of this article were not still actively editing this page, and therefore likely to edit other pages as well as improve this one I might consider this a less smite filled nomination. Lord ferd clearly shows the potential to become an excellent Uncyclopedian, and is still improving a page with a {{WIP}} on it. RE the validity of this nom. Obviously there is no "rule" for this, but if there were it would be that anyone can nominate any page on VFD at any time. However, IMO a nomination like this is just not the done thing. Although you can do it if you want to. J F C 02:02. Jun 14 Yes. Gabriel Turner (talk) 02:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Stinking of a vanity article based on one person writing about their school from their POV (not notable enough by our standards) and in any case not being funny enough as per our guide HTBFANJS Gabriel Turner (talk) 00:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Is it legit to have an "Under Construction" page on VFD? Aren't you supposed to wait for the construction tag to time out or something? (Actually the construction tag shouldn't be doing that anyway IMO and I was going to bring that up someplace or other -- I should go do that...) Snarglefoop (talk) 01:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC) I thought it was a work in progress since the page was made but no it is still legit regardless. 02:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC) So I've removed the tag from the page and am now neither for nor against it's deletion. Gabriel Turner (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Invalid nom Still being worked in. A+ way to scare off newbies doing this. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:37, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks Frosty. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:09, 14 Jun 2014

What If:All women had snouzer faces?

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete. Doesn't need to be in mainspace, already in userspace and seems unfunny and not even relevant to the title. Gabriel Turner (talk) 02:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC) BUTTS -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:55, Jun. 14, 2014 Delete MadMax has far too much Jesus in him. Which is a good thing. J F C 08:57. Jun 14 Keep. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jun 14 '14 9:49 (UTC) Wait -- was that supposed to be " symbol-challenged delete vote" or supposed to be " section-challenged keep vote" ? Snarglefoop (talk) 19:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC) I see the tide of opinion has changed on this one. I was formerly under the impression that rainbow butts were considered the epitome of excellent humour, but now that even the original author supports its deletion, I'll happily follow along. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:08, 14 Jun 2014 Delete. Kinda pointless since it's already got five delete votes but whatever, it should go. Snarglefoop (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Veganism

Score: 4
Keep (0)	Keep Unless we have a better article on the subject. J F C 03:29. Jun 15 dam you Snarglefoop! Now we do... HowTo:Be Vegan Awesome dude. J F C 01:35. Jun 17
Delete (4)	Delete. Article is based on obvious misinformation which is rarely funny. In this case the "joke" is that veganism means an all-dolphin-meat diet, which gets, like, a big "huh?" and not much in the way of a "ha-ha". And BTW it's got lots of edits from a number of people in the history but if you look closely they're nearly all "Mess-this-up ... Revert-mess" type edits. And BTBTW I've got an idea for a rewrite but unless this is successfully VFD'd I'll give it some other title (assuming it turns out well enough to deserve any title). Snarglefoop (talk) 00:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC) Articles that have been edited (successfully) by many people over many years are rarely very good imho. They tend to be more random and have less of a concept. Dragon is an example of such an article and does not make a very good case for promoting the existence of such articles. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:19, 15 Jun 2014 Snarglefooped Per Snarglefoop's Snarglefoop. J F C 01:35. Jun 17 Move to 'Dolphinarian'. So delete as veganism. Aleister 12:32 17-6-14
Comments	imho Llwy you can't have spent that much time fixing up old articles. imho the articles with many edits by many different users over the years are the most important articles of Uncyclopedia. We do not decide that. They did. Those articles can virtually always be turned into something good without too much trouble as they usually have many different ideas and concepts in them from all the different minds which have contributed. J F C 03:29. Jun 15 Yes, no, or maybe, this argument is irrelevant to this article. It has few successful edits, and the whole article is short, with low idea density. It has nothing to do with the kind of thing you're talking about, with many retained contributions from numerous authors. OTOH it's not offensive and it has some humor value. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:20, 15 June 2014 (UTC) As usual Snarglefoop. I agree with everything you say. J F C 04:31. Jun 15 Don't blame JFC for the off-topic comment. What I said wasn't relevant to this article either, and he just replied to it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:50, 17 Jun 2014

Why?:Abortion is FUN

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Keep (TLDR version at end) I think abortion is a F'n terrible thing. It's a brutal nasty process which arguably kills a human. Not a nice thing. I hear some schools are giving abortions to kids without even needing to tell the parents these days... The world IS a fucked up nasty evil place. I do not wish Uncyclopedia to pretend that the world is not a fucked up evil place by not dealing with fucked up evil issues like this. This article attempts to do this... IMO, This article needs to be far more shocking than it currently is. It also needs to be more direct and to the point about the process of abortion. I feel it is a little too "verbose" in places and some of the text could be trimmed down a bit. Aborting is not FUN. That's the point... J F C 19:25. Jun 18 Are you mocking me? Say, what's with all these pro-life men? It's not your body that's at stake. Let women decide for themselves, eh? We have enough pain and suffering without you lot telling us we need more. Abortion has its purpose. It has its disadvantages, yes, but to weigh them properly, perhaps you should walk a mile in the relevant shoes first. Not that I have, or ever will, mind you, but you know. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:55, 18 Jun 2014 I'm not mocking you love. I never have, and I intend never to do so. My only wish is to mock the world. Shocking is required here. Because the issue is shocking... I think you pre-judge people too much. I don't think you understand my world view... That's also my opinion. Socky's also I suspect. He is FAR more sensitive than me, and wrote this. Trust me. The guy is a living saint! ... You guys voting against this don't understand Uncyclopedia. Yet... J F C 20:05. Jun 18 I understand you more than you realise. I admit that I do not understand you as fully as you could be understood, but nobody does, not even yourself. You do not understand me very well either. I use fewer words, address fewer facets and invest less thought in my words than I could because I often have little desire to make the entirety of my thoughts clear to everyone, though I know this does not permit for as full an understanding; but full understanding comes only with patience, and I try to allow those with lesser patience a chance to understand what I say. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:13, 18 Jun 2014 Uncyclopedia is not a soapbox for pro-life, anti-life, pro-war, anti-war, or whatever people -- it's a humor wiki. And the article is not funny. Not even close. And it's apparently not intended to be funny; you've as much as said it's just a serious pro-life shock piece. So all in all, whether or not it's a fine article, it doesn't belong on uncyclopedia. Anal fisting is terribly destructive (da goatse dude has a major problem), hard drugs do untold damage, global warming is on the verge of ruining the planet, turning the world veg is one of the (very few) changes that might actually make a difference -- but none of these things are appropriate topics for serious articles on Uncyclopedia, because that's not what it's for. In fact this article, as it stands, is absolutely in the same category as the articles attacking gays (and "furries") which are so beloved by some people here who find gays (and "furries") offensive. You think this thing is wrong -- OK, but that doesn't mean you should attack it from Uncyclopedia! (IMHO) Snarglefoop (talk) 20:25, 18 June 2014 (UTC) There are two conflicting views here, as I see it. They both spring from the same source, as does everything on this chaotic earth, but they diverge along different paths and rise to meet each other with bared teeth. One is that Uncyclopedia is primarily intended to be funny and anything that isn't funny - regardless of what other purpose it serves - should not be permitted to exist. The other is that Uncyclopedia is primarily (or permissibly) intended to promote various points of view, and if the primary purpose of an article is to promote a point of view that someone considers to be important to promote, and the article is not particularly funny, it should remain, or even be featured. Snarglefoop and I are of the former inclination, and JFC is of the latter. I am willing to respect either inclination if that is what the community dictates, but I believe that in general we as a community tend towards valuing humour over POV-pushing. I said these divergent points of view spring from the same source: this source is SPOV, satirical point of view. This could, I suppose, be interpreted to mean either that our POV must be satirical and nothing else, or that we may have any POV we please as long as it makes some pretence to being satirical. I believe it lends itself more easily to the former; but you know of what persuasion I am so I will rest my case. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:36, 18 Jun 2014 If we admit the point of view that says it's not a humorous satire wiki then WTF did we get our tails in a knot over how we had to track changes on Wikipedia, even if nobody here especially likes them? There was a lot of shouting about how this is a parody of Wikipedia. How does putting serious articles in it which are intended to push particular points of view, because someone thinks those points of view are "right", fit in with that? (And if we're to be a soapbox for anyone's strongly held beliefs, where do you draw the line? Which points of view are acceptable? Are serious articles on gay pride, for example, acceptable content for Uncyclopedia? Or, for that matter, how about women's rights articles, which address the question of how male religious leaders come to dictate what women can and can't do, abortion rights included?) Snarglefoop (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC) You ask a good question, one I would echo but cannot answer. I have no true answers, only questions. The truth is in the questions; the answers are only beliefs, as sturdy and trustworthy as a pattern in the sand. Those who fail to recognise this are those whose voices are the most confident and those who acquire the power to put their answers on a pedestal above others that are just as true or false. Such is the irony of life. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:55, 18 Jun 2014 Indeed. Check out the Dunning–Kruger effect .... somewhat related, I think. (And potentially funny, maybe, even, a little bit.) Snarglefoop (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC) I would love it if people stopped assuming so many things about what others do and do not assume. I have no idea of the actual world views of any of you lot. ... This article IS funny BECAUSE abortion is a not laughing matter. Something like this on many other pages would not be suitable for Uncyclopedia. In this case, it is suitable. Hiding from the truth is not funny. The joke is that it's not funny. J F C 21:08. Jun 18 I don't think anyone was assuming anything about your POV, JFC; rather, we were taking your initial comment in this thread as being a literal and accurate statement of your view of the article, and the issue. (Perhaps you should re-read that comment; maybe it's stronger than you intended.) That comment sure makes it sound like your concern is to get the message out, with no apparent reference to whether it's funny or not. If you didn't mean the comment seriously, well, I'm sorry I took it that way, then. But frankly, I still don't see how "abortion isn't fun(ny)" turns the article into something humorous; it just means it's mistitled. Do you think anyone will laugh when they read it? Snarglefoop (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC) And have you asked yourself if you are assuming anything about us? Mistitled, perhaps, but I believe you are saying that the contrast between the unfunniness of abortion and the title makes the title funny, which means that it is not mistitled. The article was originally titled Why?:Abortion is EVIL but was moved by TKF to its current title. The original title may be truer to Socky's idea of the joke: namely, that pro-choicers would (probably? possibly?) reconsider their stance if they knew how an abortion was really performed. What you say is rather cryptic, I find, so I think I must fall back on what I said about multiple points of view on how important it is for an article to be funny. If you believe that to be untrue, please tell me where I have spoken wrongly and how. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:29, 18 Jun 2014 It's not possible to speak "wrongly". :P ... Does my POV matter so much to this? It should not at all. Would you like me to share it? I stand by my statement "I think abortion is a F'n terrible thing. It's a brutal nasty process which arguably kills a human. Not a nice thing.". ... I have also myself personally been to an abortion clinic on two separate occasions. Does that validate my argument now? ... :P I hope not... I'm not teasing or attacking, maybe just amusing myself, and perhaps only myself as I enjoy dragging pre-justice out of those around me. You want more explanation of why this is funny? A person who choose to read this would no doubt expect to be finding a rather explicit article. Maybe something you might find on say.. ED for example... They might also expect to find some rather graphic images. Which they do. I would also expect that the reader of this article might expect that the article was toned in such as way as rape which plays lite of the subject. I think that after looking at the first few images the reader would assume their assumptions to be correct and would be expecting to find some gross but perhaps humorous punch line. But.. There is not one. They were tricked. They were tricked by the brilliance of Sockpuppet of an unregistered user. That's just one aspect of may ways in which this is funny. I think you are blinded in appreciating the humour because the images are so graphic. There are other reasons I think this is funny also... The amount of fuss something like this causes on a wiki for example. That is funny. I bet we have put as much effort into talking about this now as socky put into creating it. That is funny... There are many other reasons this is funny, but I'm running out of keys to type... J F C 21:43. Jun 18 tl;dr ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC) --Mimo &maxus 12:31, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. Shock or almost shock images mixed with ... no content don't make a funny Uncyclopedia article. Anton (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Not as bad as I expected it to be but it sure isn't good. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Rolling with the tide. I thought it was funny until I found out what the joke was. If it were mainly composed of text, as it was in a now-reverted edit by EpicAwesomeness, I think it would be better. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:33, 18 Jun 2014 Say what? Was there a joke there? I must have missed it... Snarglefoop (talk) 17:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC) It's the kind of joke that isn't a joke to everyone. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:56, 18 Jun 2014 The joke is that it's not funny. The method of parody used is called "deadpan". J F C 20:05. Jun 18 "Deadpan" does not mean "not funny". It means the delivery is done, literally, with a still face -- IOW the comedian does not smile or laugh, but presents the information in a serious manner. The audience, on the other hand, should find it funny, and should be heard to laugh. If it doesn't cause laughter, it's not funny, and it's not "deadpan humor", because it's not humor. From Wordnet: "deadpan adv: without betraying any feeling; "she told the joke deadpan" adj: deliberately impassive in manner; "deadpan humor";" So, here's the nub ... Does this page make you laugh when you read it? Snarglefoop (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC) I know Deadpan. See? ... Also. Edit the deadpan article! I did... Anyway... YOU are not the intended audience of this article. That's why you don't find it funny. I don't find it funny either. I find it funny that many others will expect to find it funny and then not find it funny. ... Get it? J F C 21:55. Jun 18 Delete. No. Just no. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 20:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Delete Ok I nominated this way back in 2011 not because of the shocking content. Shock can be funny if it is pulled off in a way which shows that both some amount of effort went into it and actually attempts to satarise/be ironic about a topic. This does neither, it's just a cartoon of an abortion. What's the joke??? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Delete.. No comments. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 08:11, 19 June, 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. If anyone here thinks articles which present points of view which the author considers important should be included in Uncyclopedia whether or not they are funny, simply because they are important, they should open a Village Dump discussion of the issue. The proposal would be that non-funny pages be included in the Uncyc as long as they're significant enough. At this time, that has not been done and no such proposal has been accepted. Until that's done, it seems to me the "Did it make me laugh?" test is still the primary, and ultimately, only important, check which should be applied when deciding whether an article should be kept. Snarglefoop (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC) As usual Snarglefoop I agree with everything you say. However, I think perhaps the fact that you are making a point of saying the above obvious statement suggests that you have again pre-judged me. I do find this funny. I do not consider this to be important or whatever you perhaps speculate my views might be. I looked at it for the first time today... It made me smile, I thought it was clever, so I voted keep. That's it. Please stop guessing at my or anyones POV and using that to decide things. Or... Keep doing it. Maybe that's what I want. :P J F C 22:54. Jun 18 POV is irrelevant. Humor is relevant. You vote keep if you find it funny, you vote delete if you don't. It's a simple procedure that shouldn't be changed. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:09, 18 June 2014 (UTC) JFC: I'm sorry; I apparently misunderstood! Your comments at the beginning, starting with "I think abortion is ... F'n terrible ... nasty ... kills... I do not wish Uncyclopedia to pretend ... not ... evil", along with your later comment, "I don't find it funny", and the fact that I saw no hint that the article "made you giggle" (as you sometimes say), or that you ever expected anyone else to laugh at the article itself, led me to the conclusion that you were valuing it for its information content. Again, I'm sorry about the misunderstanding. Snarglefoop (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC) FROSTY. I said I found it funny, but apparently you did not read my comments. It's cool. I think we all kinda know everyone else means well. By saying what I did initially I was trying to reply to comments given in delete reasons, and deflect those who might pre-judge me as being a person who thought the subject frivolous. I guess I went too far and was labeled a preacher. Can't think why... :P HeHe. . I should have stuck to the facts... My position is that I'm simply not offended at all by these images, and although I did not "giggle" which is my test for VFH I did "feel amused". You can be assured that I will never and have never voted for anything based on any reason other than humour. Also, some images can offend me. When I was an admin I once cock blocked a better writter than me (who knows who they are) from using a fully clothed non-suggestive picture of a young girl in one article, just because of the title of and context article. I have a line. It's just far from these images... Images which can hurt people that can't defend themselves I don't like. IMO These images can not hurt anyone. I wonder if these images will be nominated for deletion now... J F C 18:06. Jun 19

UnDebate:Does Wikia suck cock?

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Does Wikia suck cock? Maybe. And this page could tell us if it does and when. Aleister 17:48 18-6-14 Keep ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC) NO--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC) yeah stuff Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 08:14, 19 June, 2014 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Not up-to-date and all in all quite unfunny. Sorry, Frosty! Anton (talk) 17:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I dunno -- the article stinks but OTOH it says some stuff that's worth saying, and unfortunately it's up for deletion on the Wikia site, too. If we could somehow conspire to get it kept over there I'd be much happier to have it deleted here. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC) I don't know really. It's ok. It's a lighthearted presentation of some trueish facts; a bit close to being serious, I guess, and could possibly stand updating. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:34, 18 Jun 2014 It could stand updating, but it might be tough to find someone who could stand updating it. To do it well, without having it turn into a screaming-and-shaking-spear-at-the-sky rant, it should be done by someone who sort of likes Wikia but can still see all their faults, and it might be hard to find someone like that. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Why do you keep on looking on what's nominated on the Wikia site? I nominated it there, because I don't find it funny, on either site. Anton (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Why not? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:08, 18 Jun 2014 I find it amusing that the article is still there on the Wikia site, and I'd find it even more amusing if it were still there but had been deleted over here... That's why I went looking to see if it was still there, over there, after I'd noted that the creation date was pre-fork. Snarglefoop (talk) 00:24, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Abstain.I'm not sure - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 08:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC) TLDR version. I am not offended by graphic images. You lot are, and because of that you have accused me of just about everything under the sun because I can see a joke here which you lot can't because you are offended by a picture... Rather like the muslims were with that mohammed cartoon picture... Yep, you are all just like that... J F C 12:59. Jun 19 I fear you have entered this into the wrong vote - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 13:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC) yes, and besides it's not accurate - it's more of that prejudice/assumption stuff you're accusing us of. You seem to have completely missed the point of what we are saying but I won't bother laying it out again because my brain is hiding under the bed. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:58, 19 Jun 2014 My bad. Yep. I did.. :( Sorry. J F C 17:16. Jun 19 And besides that you shouldn't say stuff like that because it offends us and if you say it again we may call fatwa on you. In fact maybe we'll just go ahead and do it anyway because you offended us twice and defended an offensive picture and we have just about had ENOUGH of your satanic nonsense and this has gone far beyond the point at which you should have been erased from the page of time. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC) May the force be with you. Always. J F C 17:50. Jun 19

Seizure Page

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	We already have Epilepsy and Seizure. Do we really need another page where seizure gifs are one of the main jokes? That's all there is to this page, too, whereas the other ones have at least some attempt at text. I find seizure gifs more annoying than funny; they're hard on the eyes and I feel pretty sucky after looking at them too long... overall doesn't add up to an enjoyable experience (though obviously nothing compared with the very real risk of actually causing someone a seizure), and I don't understand how anyone else finds them funny either. Where's the joke? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:05, 23 Jun 2014 Delete. Anton (talk) 07:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Considering there is already two of basically the same page and this one has no words at all I reckon we can probably live without this. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 11:44, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Per above ^ Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:04, 23 June, 2014 (UTC) Delete. This page should not exist! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 13:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Snarglefoop (talk) 13:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Noobz

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Probably Lot of material here but it doesn't seem to be funny and the point, if any, seems to be that new users are stupid, which seems like a counterproductive message to send. Snarglefoop (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC) Wasn't immediately obvious to me that it was relevant to anything real - what are 'posers'? That's never made clear. Not obviously pointful, which probably results in its not being obviously funny either. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:10, 27 Jun 2014 Delete Yea... I like the Urban dictionary def of Poser "Any one who does not follow his/her own ideas of what he/she likes". If we delete this page we will have no article on noobs at all! J F C 11:09. Jun 27 You are killing Oscar Wilde's soul with this article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 27 '14 18:52 (UTC) Why are you killing my soul? Only thing worth saving was a picture. Aleister 19:09 27-6-14 I hope this goes... noobs. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:19, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments

DESUDESUDESUDESUDESUDESUDESUDESU

Score: 3
Keep (5)	~~It looks like my articles are top tier targets for cleansing.~~ If uncyclowikia won't delete it why will you--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Against, or something. Isn't as bad as most of his articles. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:29, 27 June, 2014 (UTC) Neither of the above are good reasons to keep this. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:30, 27 Jun 2014 Keep It's a common meme which needs an article. This meme is commonly used in places like ED and 4chan and biblegateway.com. When this meme is used it's often in the style shown here by the author who is parodying and mocking them. That is funny. If someone wants to write a sophisticated linguistically perfect article on DESU to counterpoint this article it would fit nicely. J F C 11:19. Jun 27 Wait -- biblegateway.com slings random Japanese verbs into their text here and there? Seriously? (And, I assume you mean, outside of any Japanese version of the Bible they may have over there, right?) The world is weirder than I thought. Snarglefoop (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Sorry. My bad. I meant lolcatbible.com. I always get those two confused. Still there is a lot incest in the stuff a biblegateway.com and perhaps that counts as DESU. J F C 17:03. Jun 27 And what if I wrote a 'sophisticated' article to replace this one (which I considered doing)? Would you revert it? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 17:30, 27 Jun 2014 This is a beautiful page. What are we (at least in my mind), Content-free or Freeform? This is a Freeform work of art, so I must vote to keep a masterpiece of the genre. Aleister 19:12 27-6-14 Gargle ... choke ... Aaah, just what "genre" are we talking about here? Snarglefoop (talk) 19:23, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Rewritten. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:19, 27 Jun 2014 Llwy, ah, did you notice that the article was surviving the deletion process? So you deleted it? Huh? Maybe rename yours if it's the same name, how about that, and putting the one which survived deletion back? Thanks. Aleister 19:42 27-6-14 I didn't consider most of the keep arguments to have any substance. If you think my article sucks more, you can revert it - but does it indeed suck more? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:49, 27 Jun 2014 If the old one gets regurgitated back into user space could we at least, like, lose the epilepsy images from the middle of it? One page of that is more than enough and we've already got two or three. Snarglefoop (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Btw, I didn't entirely rewrite it; I just got rid of most of the images and twaggled the text. I think that should be allowed, particularly since there are quite a number of people who weren't happy with the former article. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:57, 27 Jun 2014 Also, didn't something similar to this happen with UnDebate:Does Wikia suck cock?? It was going to be kept as is, but Aleister decided to make some rather significant changes to it anyway. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:39, 27 Jun 2014 Keep And hell, it didn't need a re-write. The old version pretty accurately parodied incessant spamming of the meme. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC) And the repetitious images, too? Ya think? And does it really need to have a jab or four at "faggots" in it? What's that got to do with anything? And WTF do the flashing epilepsy images have to do with anything 'desu' ? Blurg... Snarglefoop (talk) 23:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC) In response to the statements about 'parody', my impression is that it starts off not with parody but a somewhat overblown rant. The images are presumably a parody, but the text is your typical Mr-ex attack piece; I don't know the purpose of the red and green, the bold or the all caps. I happen to think my version of the text is more of a parody of at least something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:39, 27 Jun 2014 Hi, and nothing personal at all. I haven't read yours yet, and will probably love it. But I thought this vote was about deleting or not deleting a particular page. In my memory, at least, we've always rewritten pages which seemed to be a sure-thing for deletion, and that's what a "save" was. The term "saved from VFD" was used a lot. The parody of the older one was good if someone knows the meme, that's all the people voting save may be saying. Thanks, and please whip me like a poodle if my comments made you feel worse than you did before you read them. I felt a little like a dick after writing my last comment, and finally came back to see if I was right, and, yep. Banning myself for two days, starting.... 21:22 28-6-14 Aleister Aw, no, Aleister, you were right. I was wrong. I've reverted myself. There is no defence for my actions that is supported by anything but wet noodles. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:10, 28 Jun 2014
Delete (8)	Delete. Not funny -- barely better than totally senseless, AFAICT -- and it's yet another epilepsy joke page (scroll down), of which we've already got too many. (Like, "to be" in Japanese is supposed to be funny? How about a page titled "etreetreetreetreetreetre" or maybe "seinseinseinseinseinsein" while we're at it?) Snarglefoop (talk) 23:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC) This isn't Encyclopedia Dramatica. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:07, 27 Jun 2014 --Mimo &maxus 16:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC) I looked at this article and my penis fell off. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jun 27 '14 18:47 (UTC) my condolences --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 20:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Too short. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:18, 27 June 2014 (UTC) i don't know how anybody lives with themselves thinking this is acceptable in any way. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 20:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. What's funny? By the way, Llwy's version was a step forward, but it was not finished. Anton (talk) 10:19, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Anton199 Madclaw @ ^talk 16:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Icky page, eh? Soooo desu, yo! Snarglefoop (talk) 23:46, 26 June 2014 (UTC) Comment. Changed my reason why to delete. What article was I reading before? -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC) ~~Kept or somesuch. Feel free to throw wet noodles at me if there is something that bothers you. I feel like a wet noodle anyway. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:52, 28 Jun 2014~~ Discussion reopened due to lots and lots of words. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:40, 28 Jun 2014 Google trends J F C 00:26. Jun 29 In response to JFC's comment that we need an article on this, Wikipedia doesn't have one, and Codeine's mum probably hasn't heard of it. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:33, 29 Jun 2014 If you read UN:CM again you will see that the test has been more than past. "Whether or not any of the admins have heard of it." ... They have. I don't know why you are talking about CM. Such a lovely lady I might add... Also I think perhaps the Etymology of DESU comes from this J F C 14:47. Jun 29 Desu is Japanese, unless you were joking. To whoever updated the keep score to include my vote, don't do that again. I crossed it off. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:06, 29 Jun 2014 This is the wikipedia page of DESU. Wikipedia claim that the meme started from the television show Rozen Maiden. That may be what popularised it. IMO it is also used in reference to DESI. Taken from the wikipedia page on DESI "After the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, the United States dramatically increased immigration from the Subcontinent. As increasing number of students from the subcontinent arrived in the US and UK, their countries of origin were colloquially referred to as deś. For example, all things Indian including Indian expatriates were referred to as "desi"" ... IMO sometimes the concepts of DESU and DESI are mixed by those who spam the meme. I may be wrong, that's just a pet theory of mine... Also, I think MagicBus's vote may not be valid as I'm not sure which version of this page that vote was intended for. J F C 15:28. Jun 29 Yes, but the fact that it's a disambiguation page is why I say there is no article on it. The concepts may be mixed up by ignorant English speakers, but that is clearly not the origin of the word; Japanese isn't an Indo-European language. Also, MagicBus's reason may be invalid, but his vote is valid because he merely changed his reason after it was rewritten, and reasons aren't what counts here. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 15:42, 29 Jun 2014 I'm talking about the origin of the meme which is the subject of this article. Not the word. Anyway! ... From wiki Desi: "Desi is an Indo-Aryan term..." J F C 16:02. Jun 29 Here is another reason not to delete this page... You might not like this meme. A lot of other people do. People who do like this meme will come to Uncyclopedia and look for a page called DESU. If there is a page like this page those users might stay and edit other articles. Probably not adding the words DESU DESU DESU lots of times. If there is not an article like this one they will probably will write one which goes DESU DESU DESU DESU lots of times. Probably also in lots of different articles also. IMO this article helps keep most of the DESU on this wiki in one place, which personally I much prefer. J F C 16:50. Jun 29 That's true, I guess. However, if they like the meme and find this page that was obviously written by someone who hates it, they may be turned off and spam desu in revenge or something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 16:59, 29 Jun 2014 I don't think this page was obviously written by someone who hates the meme. :) Bored of it maybe... Rather like the rest of us. Old meme is old. J F C 17:14. Jun 29

Wakistan

It's not offensive but it's also not funny. It's just totally random. Maybe we should move it to Illogicopedia? It might be a good fit there. Snarglefoop (talk) 21:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	Delete, I think... see above. I think this article would be much happier, among its own kind on Illogicopedia... Snarglefoop (talk) 21:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC) 2005cruft I can't believe we still have 2005cruft. -- The Zombiebaron 21:43, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Nuke Wakistan! -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Not clear whether it's about a country or a fruit. Looks a bit like sentence fragments pieced together from various sources; many of the sentences are incoherent and there is nothing that seems funny. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:46, 2 Jul 2014 Delete Per ZB. J F C 22:08. Jul 2 Delete. --EMC^[TALK]18:51 Jul 3 2014
Comments	Filled in the time parameter. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:46, 2 Jul 2014

Online Dating Secrets Males - Approach Ways To Insure Success

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Spam. --TheRealSexyFluttershy (talk) 19:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Spam Comment. As newly created spam shouldn't it go on QVFD? Do we really have to put it to a vote? Snarglefoop (talk) 20:23, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Comment. In fact I just did that. Voting on this seems like waste of time -- just whack it. Snarglefoop (talk) 20:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC) QVFD material Deleted. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Svelvik

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	For. Unfunny, and obscure. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 00:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC) So boring, it made me cry. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jul 19 '14 0:18 (UTC) something Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 17:50, 19 July, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Super Smash Sises. Brawl

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	A recent new user called my attention to this. It's so bad, they don't even want it on the old wiki. And I think the least we can do is BURN THE FUCK OUT OF IT. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jul 21 '14 9:20 (UTC) EXTERMINATE! -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 09:22, Jul. 21, 2014 Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 09:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC) MY EYES!! Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 10:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC) (shivers of horror) Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 16:27, 21 July, 2014 (UTC) Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Nintendo 3DS

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete. I SAW IT AND... it looked boring from the first look at the introduction. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC) Boring. Needs more flying toasters and fanged hams. Fanged hams chasing flying toasters inside rusty plumbing... always good material for amusement. But not this article. Better for getting high on than reading. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:47, 25 Jul 2014
Comments

Rise of the Roman Empire (video game)

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	All part of a grand experiment. Let the race begin! - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 12:59, Wednesday 23 July 2014 - Didn't do anything for me. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:50, 25 Jul 2014 Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 08:11, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments

300 (film)

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Oh I don't know... it's ok. Seems to be at least some redeeming value here. It was also kept once before which may or may not mean anything. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:15, 27 Jul 2014 Keep. For sure! Fun article -- I laughed and stuff. (Is it a real film? I can't tell. Those are the best kind.) Snarglefoop (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Weak keep --EMC^[TALK]00:06 Jul 30 2014 Keep. it 300 like the romans - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 00:48, Wednesday 30 July 2014 - Keep. Certainly not the best parody of 300 I've ever seen, but ignoring the fact that half of the article is more or less the literal synopsis of the movie, I still believe the article is entirely decent and if nothing else, a perfect launchpad for an improved parody. — S G 1\|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 18:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Yawn induceing epicness with slow motion wikipedia alike. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UnBooks:Rescource and Sagacity

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Ehhhhh - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 04:30, Monday 04 August 2014 - It's a pretty jumbled mess. — S G 1\|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 07:21, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UnPoetia:Peter Lorre is a Zombie

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Came across this meme junk thing while searching for an article on Peter Lorre.--Everyotherusernamewastaken(get dtf) 01:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Fisher-Price

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. Russian Reversal is crazy! -- Tiger Juice 18:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Yeah nah --Argylesocks (talk) 20:32, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Nintendon't

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	2007cruft -- The Zombiebaron 19:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC) I LIKE TO VOTE! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 00:02, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UnBooks:A Brief History of Bullshit

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. On skimming it I found a few laughs, and the illustrations are first rate. Keep forever and ever... Aleister 1:56 17-8-14 Keep. It's silly but there's a few chuckles here. Per Aleister. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 14:29, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Keep.'I ripped the shit out of it in my highly overrated, pseudo-scientific A Brief History of Time In which I myself play the second knight of Camelot and fight off evil black holes and shit.' Keep for this alone. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 07:29, Monday 18 August 2014 - Keep. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 11:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Delete. I can't find any humor, only immature writing. Anton (talk) 12:12, 16 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. GRABBIN PEELZ. -- Tiger Juice 15:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Undictionary:Ethnic

Score: -4
Keep (4)	Boner. - If you want to know the truth about Spike, he's an asshole and we hate him. We love you!!! Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 04:52 8.18.14 Keep. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 07:31, Monday 18 August 2014 - Keep. Just because it got deleted there doesn't mean it needs to be deleted here. The article is fine as it is. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC) Seems fine to me. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 19 '14 19:20 (UTC)
Delete (0)	No delete votes.
Comments	I am nominating my own article here because it got deleted on the spoon and I reckoned that I might as well get it deleted asap if it deserves it. Everyone there felt it was horribly offensive and Spike said it was listcruft, so I took heed of this and changed it a fair bit (well it is a short article). The jokes were intended to be ridiculing people who misuse the word nonchalantly, implying their ethnocentrism, but it was construed just as racism. Everyotherusernamewastaken(get dtf) 04:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC) Kept. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Another Day On The Bus

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Six unedited images and no humour whatsoever. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC) Sorry I just don't get it Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 19:11, 19 August, 2014 (UTC) 6 unedited images, no joke. With some substantial work this could be made into an UnBook, but as it hasn't been edited in 10 days I don't think that is going to happen. -- The Zombiebaron 19:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments	I'll make it into a UnBook, if you want it to be an unbook. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 19:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC) User moved article to userspace. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 19 '14 19:30 (UTC)

Emo Philips

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	EXTERMINATE! Pretty awful. -RA HB 02:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Iain Dowie

Score: 5
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (5)	2007cruft. Very little humour to be found here. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:10, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. Made me sad. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 08:21, Monday 18 August 2014 - Bogus. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Aug 19 '14 19:19 (UTC) Not up to snuff. — S G 1\|Hereish ^{[citation needed]} 07:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 12:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UN:VFADH

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. - at least, for historical purpose, as an archive. This would be like deleting an old award page. Anton (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Keep But yeah as an, archive. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Keep as historical. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC) Deactivate per UN:EGA. Also, why have we never used the major award award? --Argylesocks (talk) 03:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Keep. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 22:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. I saw this when I searched "VF". I saw that it hasn't been used since 2007/2008. If it isn't being used it should be removed. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 23:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -- The Zombiebaron 06:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Vanity

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. It's a template that could be useful. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 22:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC) While sticking it on an actual vanity page won't do anything, this is fine.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 05:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC) It is used on several userpages. -- The Zombiebaron 06:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC) As stated, it's fine for userpages. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. This template somehow managed to be still around this time even though all vanity is a instant bannable offence now. This template is now basically pointless as putting it on a vanity article won't do anything. Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 22:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. I think this template tells that vanity can be very funny sometimes and in which case can be kept. It has a point, so I am not sure. Anton (talk) 22:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Kept -- The Zombiebaron 17:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Emo Dynasty

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	N+Delete Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 03:13 8.24.14
Comments

Metal Wars

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	N+Delete Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 03:13 8.24.14 What the fuck did I just read? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC) My earlyest stages of my chao article was better than this Chaoarren Chaohead (talk) 23:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

The Only Emo Holiday: National Emo Day

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	N+Delete Sir Peasewhizz ... Biblio . HOS . Awards 03:17 8.24.14 2009cruft -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Office etiquette

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete - Listcruft bollocks. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:26, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. As per Kip - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 23:42, Tuesday 26 August 2014 - 2005cruft. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:42, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Dolphin uprising

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete - Wacky war cruft. Oh hey! We actually have a category for that! -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:31, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 23:45, Tuesday 26 August 2014 - Delete. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. Anton (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Bush-Dolphin War

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Ditto -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 18:02, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 23:46, Tuesday 26 August 2014 - Delete. These war articles suck. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Great Squirrel-Chipmunk War

Score: 2
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Delete - This one might be potentially funny if given love, but as of now it's worthless. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:32, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Cutters

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	*It STINKS!* -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:34, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. Sardonic tone only goes so far - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 23:54, Tuesday 26 August 2014 - Delete. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Sir Crap Alot

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete - I sang about Sir Craps-A-Lot once. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:36, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. Elmo Immediately after eating Sir Crap Alot's Crap...or was it Hitlers crap...??? - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 23:55, Tuesday 26 August 2014 - Delete. Why? Just why does this exist? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Corpse

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Listcruft. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:38, Aug. 26, 2014 Kill like your sisters hamster and redirect to Corpsearian. Aleister 18:43 26-8-14 Delete. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 00:05, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - Delete. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Woof

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	God, that's crap. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:40, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 00:08, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - Delete. The intro was enough for me. Anton (talk) 14:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. There's stupid, then there's the funny kind of stupid, and then there's this. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Soggy crackers

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	This is what they call wet potato chips in England, where it's a delicacy. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:45, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 02:15, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - Didn't get past the intro. Obliterate it! -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:54, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Things the government wants you to believe

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Listcruft that's paranoid. I believe Richard Nixon wrote this and then immediately resigned out of shame. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:49, Aug. 26, 2014 perfect example of how to not write an article ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. make a hole with a gun perpendicular to the name of this town on a desktop globe - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 02:33, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - Delete. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Jelly beans

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Beansofjelly's magnum opus. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:54, Aug. 26, 2014 Didn't even read past the picture - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 02:36, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - Delete. This isn't even remotely proficient. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. Anton (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Messenger

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	This is so shitty it's artful. Shartful? -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 17:42, Aug. 26, 2014 Delete. EVERYTHING SKIPS LIKE A BROKEN RECORD - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 01:59, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - Delete. The concept could work if only this article wasn't so awful. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Goat stimulator

Score: 6
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (6)	*It STINKS!* - This was a crappy stub that TKF, literally 6 days at most after returning from retirement, decided was a new in-joke. Personally, I think it blows, even by crappy in-joke standards. (Look who's talking.) There seems to be nothing actually funny about it, so I suggest expanding on the concept with an actual article or throw it out. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 11:09, Aug. 27, 2014 Seems (and smells) like spam. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 11:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC) If it's a parody, than it's not very well-made. If it's spam, than it's funny, but still shouldn't stay here. Anton (talk) 11:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Yeah, I can't find any redeeming quality here. At all. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 15:38, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Not every bit of goofy nonsense is going to be the next Mr winkler or Dan Kwon or Fisher Price or <insert any given shitty uncyclopedia in-joke here>. I'll admit that I do find it a little funny, it's repetition and the very broken English make it humourous. But there's been similar spam like this posted to (and subsequently deleted from) the site within the past few months. This one is barely any different. Source of it is here btw. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 22:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC) yeah i was totally gonna delete this off qvfd, i don't know why i didn't... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Bad Nigger Attitude

Score: 7
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (7)	Nominate and abstain This page was deleted by Argylesocks with no community discussion whatsoever. As VFD is how we delete things here, I don't think we should digress from this rule in this case and so the article should still pass here. If there are more delete than keep votes, then let it disappear, and if not, it can be restored. Anton (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Oh, I entirely forgot that people who haven't read this page, can't do it now, so here it is on the uncyclowikia. Anton (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. So long as we're doing this, I guess I'll just copy and paste my reason for voting against on VFH. Aside from the fact that the shit's pretty blatantly racist, it also suffers from the fact that the only jokes I could sort of pull out of it were HURR DURR PULL UP YOUR DAMN PANTS SPEAK ENGLISH BILL COSBY SAID SO DOO WHOP PUDDING POP and that racism is funny because reasons or some shit? The premise itself isn't terribly original (even at points directly referencing stand up acts on the same subject) and it kind of reads like a research paper the racist 13 year old son of a Klansman might turn in for science class. It's racist, and it has no jokes. Kill it with fire. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 19:29, Wednesday 27 August 2014 - I didn't even realize this was the very article tied to the most epic VFD vote I've ever seen. That wasn't so much a deletion vote as the Chinese Civil War. With such a unique piece of history in our midst, I might as well copy and paste my own vote, for which I'm particularly proud: "It sucks ass. I honestly could [not] care less if it's offensive to black people or symbolic as a beacon of free speech." -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 20:03, Aug. 27, 2014 EXTERMINATE! On the off chance that somebody starts an argument about op abuse and it gets restored, there'll be plenty reason to delete it immediately following that decision. -RA HB 20:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC) I don't think this article should have been deleted without a vote, however it should probably be deleted. - B@NZai k!tten (Meow?)B 20:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Despite having originally voted for it over at VFH, I now feel, after carefully re-evaluating how I feel about this article, that maybe it should be left in the author's userspace if not deleted. I agree with Banzaikitten that it probably shouldn't have been deleted without a vote, but better late than never I guess. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 20:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. nearly 5 years later and i still say: lol --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Rip in pieces ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Comments	It might of interest to voters that this article survived VFD once, in 2009 and failed four VFH nominations (including the one that has just been closed). It seems that it has improved significantly since 2009 (relying on various comments), however. Anton (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC) holy shit, f-bony's comments. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC) A copy should surely be restored to Funnybony's user space. For an admin to just remove a page, and then to have no article for VFD voter's to read, shows me that this version of uncy has changed into something that now is censored - the last bastion of freedom is cracking. A sad day. p.s. the page is not racist, a surprise to some people, it's a satire (please look up the word satire, its history, and how it has been used in political and social commentary). Aleister 19:40 28 August 2014 noTC I'm just going to ignore your "hurr hurr this Uncyclopedia is succumbing to censorship" dig and ask you: How is this satire? As I addressed this at the VFH vote, satire is when a mirror is held up to society to point out its flaws with subtle irony, sarcasm and wit. What's being mocked here? That black people act funny? That "nigger" is a real classification, as opposed to being an "African-American"? Classy. This is basically a racist's view of blacks written cleverly. You can call that edgy humor, or whatever, but don't blanket it under "Come on, guys. It's satire!" (With an added "You clearly don't know what satire is" and the classic "CENSORSHIP!" tacked on in your case.) In perspective, my pasty white ass has written some questionably racist material. Chanupocalypse was featured with the approval and support of our resident Jews without a single stink being raised. That's because, while dropping a lot of tasteless stereotypes and conspiracies against Jews, it was overall mocking the bigot, as opposed to the article itself coming off as the bigot. Hell, I will never forget is about as tasteless as it comes, dropping "sand-nigger" at least 14 times, but you're laughing at the bigot. (And the twist.) People here know what satire is, and they'll laugh at racist humor if it's presented well. The fact that most people didn't get the same vibe from this article and find it legitimately racist is probably a sign that it's fundamentally flawed. Anyhoo, I was never really that passionate about deleting it, in comparison to every else, other than the fact that I think it simply blows. I restored it to his userspace. Kıp ¬ 07:57, Aug. 29, 2014 I just reread it from your link and yes, it edges well over the racism line. I did't have a link to it before. Plays with the line of racism and WTF else it's doing so that it's not a good feature article, and I'd change my vote on that. But deletion from uncyclopedia (freed uncyclopedia) not by a vote but by the decision of one person, poof and it's gone after being around for how many years, there's something not right about that one, you think? Aleister 16:44 30-8-14 I agree, but TKF is a bit of a rogue admin, and nobody wants to say anything to be confrontational. (Also, some find it amusing.) I'll be sure to bring it up next time I talk to him. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 11:45, Aug. 31, 2014

A letter about Megan Fox

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. and Replace with User:Anton199/A letter about Megan Fox. The current version has some worthy jokes, but I feel like it's too centered around one angle (Megan's hotness) and so can't spin around any other. Anton (talk) 23:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Delete. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 08:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC) one of many articles on Uncyclopedia written by a horny 13 year old. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Meagan would approve. Seriously, I just asked her "Megan dear, can you stop with the coffee already and come over here a second, I've got something to ask you", showed her the pages, she took her time with them, much more than the second I'd asked of her, and she approves. Lots more happened before that. Aleister 16:47 30-8-14
Comments

Fischer & the Shorties

Score: 3
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete. I literally can't even - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinA Y B CUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 19:11, Wednesday 03 September 2014 - Delete. Holy shit, neither can I. -RA HB 16:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC) Delete. No hits on Wikipedia, just some YouTube video of kids at school. I'd say this is QVFD material. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

End of Summer Classic

Score: 4
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (4)	Delete. What is it? Seriously. Anton (talk) 17:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Looks like Baseball. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 18:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC) What. The. Serious. Fuck? -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 22:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Delete. Ugly. --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 17:15, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Paul Merton

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. No me gusta. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 07:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Paul Merton

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. No me gusta. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 07:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:Cunt flashers will ruin our lives

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. No me gusta. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 07:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

HowTo:Break your vacuum cleaner

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. No me gusta. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 06:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:Small intestine sold for $29.8m

Score: 1
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (1)	Delete. No me gusta. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 06:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive275

Navigation menu

Search