Keep |
- Keep. per the fact that this is the last bastion of FREEDOM OF SPEECH on teh internetz or something. --Mn-z 17:18, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:20, 19 December 2009
- Keep.---So NOW we know what is Sacred here? Is this not racism against racism? I read where you insult religions, cultures, everyone, and I never knew what was the "line" until I crossed it. Conclusion: NOTHING is sacred on Uncyclopedia, EXCEPT "African Americans". Everyone else can go to hell in name of Freedom of speech. And this in spite of the fact that BNA DOES EXIST AS A REAL PROBLEM IN SOCIETY? Mike Tyson's BNA!? I rest my case. For reason of reality alone it should be kept.--Funnybony 19:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Well written, mildly funny. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME • 17:56 • Saturday, 19-12-2009
- Keep It's kinda funny. Is this nomination only because it's offensive? I find John Lennon's odour offensive, but that doesn't mean I wanted to kill him. Why do you? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:36, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't like it, but I find the idea of deleting things just because they might be offensive far more distasteful. You stupid niggers. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:47, 19 Dec
- Um, yeah. Keep. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 19:58, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I see Romartus voting, I go the opposite ;P but seriously they're just trying to get rid of it cos of offensiveness and that's just not a good reason —talk 20:45, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The last time I checked, Chris Rock used half this article for his stand up routine. Nowhere near delete quality. Defo needs a rewrite though. --Matfen 21:27, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Nigger hush. Until it's nommed for just being shit as opposed to any racism, I vote Keep.. The Ugandan Government Should Cease Existence. Yoweri Museveni can go die, too. Fuck Uganda. 06:59, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Recently on VFH. It's racist in a dumb no-satire kind of way. It's not funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:16, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.As per above. Why do we have to keep it ? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:25, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. American blacks will take offense at this article, its nigger-jokes, and its photo of an ape. Separatist affectations are ripe for ridicule, but this article repeatedly veers to the race's inherent inferiority. As with the Mohammad/penis photo, the issue is not our freedom of speech but our reputation and that of our hosts when giving offense unnecessarily to comedy. Spıke ¬ 19:26 19-Dec-09
- Delete. Too many musty jokes and an irrelevant "history" section not enough Bad Nigger Attitude. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:12, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Because it's wrong for Funnybony to act like he has a martyr complex when in reality he just writes crappy articles.
It's also wrong for me to vote without reading it all the way, but two wrongs make a right, right? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:24, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Read it. Still delete. I don't care how many instances of not racism you can claim in your life. If people can easily mistake your speech for hate speech, you need to sit down and think about what you're doing wrong. The hate in this is too chilling for the article to be funny. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:36, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Delete.normally, i go easy on articles i vote for on this site,but seriously,bashing an a particular ethnic group is not funny at all.mabeye conterversial .but this site isnt made for intellectual debates on the state of a particular race.--Jupiterfox 20:35,December 19,2009 (UTC)
- Delete. I found this unfunny and overly racist, but most importantly, unfunny. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:59, Dec. 20, 2009
- Delete. - It sucks ass. I honestly could care less if it's offensive to black people or symbolic as a beacon of free speech. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 07:01, Dec. 20, 2009
- Delete. per Kip. I don't give a fuck whether it's offensive. Rewrite it, start over, whatever. But this is just shitty writing. Plus, quite a few of those jokes are just plain plagiarized. pillow talk 03:22, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
- Don't care about racism, still not funny. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:11, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- lol --Roman Dog Bird 23:19, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- So NOW we know what is Sacred here? Is this not racism against racism? I read where you insult religions, cultures, everyone, and I never knew what was the "line" until I crossed it. Conclusion: NOTHING is sacred on Uncyclopedia, EXCEPT "African Americans". Everyone else can go to hell in name of Freedom of speech. And this in spite of the fact that BNA DOES EXIST AS A REAL PROBLEM IN SOCIETY? Mike Tyson's BNA!? I rest my case. For reason of reality alone it should be kept.--Funnybony 19:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. If it isn't deleted, can it be moved to the user's own page instead ? Having read through Funnybony's discussion page, I admit I am puzzled why he thought this particular article would be funny. That it could be placed straight into a racial hate website without an edit is a bit disturbing. I hope I am wrong as regards to the intentions behind this article.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:49, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- BTW: The author of the article is NOT a racist. I have always had African American friends. But NOT those with BNA. Even my African American friends hate BNA. I used to be in the GG (Golden Gloves) and 90% of my team mates were black, and (even in boxing) none had BNA. In fact, if I was racist then how is it I live in the Orient and do business with African-Africans, have an Asian wife, and a Amerasian son!?? You sure the article is by a racist?---Don't be daft!--Funnybony 19:41, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
And what's this BS? "American blacks will take offense at this article"?? (NOTE: All others can go to hell-RIGHT? ha ha ha! Get real!--Funnybony 19:19, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- The MEANING of "racist" based on example of funnybony: "An expatriate multi-lingual cross-culturalist who accepts all cultures and religions - and is a pacifist who lived 12 years in exile rather than kill Vietnamese in Vietnam - married to foreigner with Amerasian child! YEAH!!! That's Racism!! Har har!!!--Funnybony 20:01, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Shut up. Any more and you'll be officially causing drama, so quit. Seriously. Just shut up. It's clearly going to get kept. Now quit. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:04, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. Guess what, your article's lame and spastic and it survives I'm going to rewrite the bits that are lame and/or seizure writing, that is to say everything past the first four paragraphs. I'm racist against people who can't write an article that holds together.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:12, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Ouch. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:13, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Be your guest!!! And make it better. Everyone! This is Uncyclopedia, I hope--Funnybony 20:22, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
BTW: Merry Christmas to you all jokers.
- Comment. Tyson and his misconduct don't prove anything about blackness but that (1) gifted athletes get away with lots of stuff, especially (2) in a U.S. where whites now see controversy if they try to correct misconduct by blacks. That's political fad, not racial determinism. Separately, there is no double standard here against individual users, except when criticism elicits overlong defenses. Spıke ¬ 20:21 19-Dec-09
- This nom is probably going to give Mordillo a heart attack, just saying. --Mn-z 20:23, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I think you guys are getting way too personal and miles off subject. What happened wrong--Funnybony 20:41, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. I do believe that Funnybony's Mike Tyson article IS racist, however. There's a difference between an article about racism and a Racist article... --Matfen 21:50, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- Really, quit using "It's racist!" as an excuse to vote delete. Instead, just say, "I don't believe it to be funny." No more. That's all you gotta say. Or just say, "Delete". Hell, that's even simpler. Now shut the fuck up and go write something funny. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:48, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- I didn't say it wasn't fnny. It's partly fnny, and partly deep offense given not on the way to being fnny. That's a valid reason to vote Delete. And NO U. Spıke ¬ 22:29 19-Dec-09
Cool down, get rational, and edit
I don't think "handle bias" a valid reason to delete. The solution is to keep (as a real subject that is amusing) and everyone who is interested should edit and rewrite until it's perfect. But, like all articles, it will always be offensive to some one, no matter how it's done. This being my 30th article, I shall go write another one, just for fun. And thanks for keeping the others too! Merry Christmas--Funnybony 21:10, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think "I don't like the delete reasons" is a valid reason to keep. This may be a real subject within the dark recesses of your mind, but we're here on this page to decide whether or not it's amusing. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 21:34, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
Sorry Syn, but I happen to disagree. The idea of deleting this just to be PC offends me far more than the article itself does. Why start down that slippery slope when we all know it just leads to a bland homogeneous Uncyclopedia? Nevermind, I misunderstood what you were getting at. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:41, 19 Dec
"Less Drama, more writing."*
* This message approved by Dr. Fred Bortz
Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:07, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
You are cool and rational...and we're not
I do have a bit of "handle bias": Count offered to rewrite this article; but I believe he will find himself not in a rewrite but a collaboration that will ultimately frustrate him. I worked with the author on the horrible ITSCON for two days, finally concluding that "You have agendas other than humor." Our collaboration ended. What brings this to mind? The sanctimonious section heading. When I copied our dialogue from my talk page to the talk page of ITSCON, the author inserted section headings explaining which days I was "belligerent" and which days I was merely "confused." And sent a couple messages to third parties touting his unconditional cordiality in the same paragraph that he dished more armchair psychology about me. Consequently, my vote on this article was not just based on its offensiveness but on the belief from experience that those parts will never be excised. Spıke ¬ 21:41 22-Dec-09
THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE AND YA'LL STILL CANNOT CONDUCT A DISCUSSION IN A CIVILIZED MANNER
So in the spirit of Xmas, the next person writing anything other than FOR or AGAINST will get a holiday period curtsy of me. I'll repeat for all of you who are bound to write something "funny" just underneath this heading. FOR or AGAINST with nice civilized reasoning. MERRY CHRISTMAS! ~ 23:05, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- It should say "write something funny." Homophony has gotten you again, Mr. Foreignpants! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 00:45, Dec 23
- I'll take his "foreign" over your funny words. "Homophony". *giggle* Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:05, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- *more laughs* MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:49, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Cleaned up-But needs more work
I'm sorry to write again. But I have attempted to clean up the "N" word, remove all the high-school jokes, and rewrite it better. I hope it is more acceptable as it is now.
- Hi Spike! I don't remember having any falling out with you. You helped a TON on my article, I learned a lot from your perspective, I made all changes you suggested, and for what it's worth you improved the article 100%. And I thanked you repeatedly, and still do. The only thing was that another writer disliked it. And there it sort of stopped. Subsequently I have made further improvements in line with your advice, but there was noting else to do, because the subject was a bit too esoteric for young readers who are not aware of that Cult (subject). In any case, I'm unaware of any hard feelings, so please do think so. I really am thankful to you, and all critics. Because it can only improve If I pay attention.
- As to my being racist, In writing the BNA article I'm racist just like De Nero is Jewish or Pachino is Cuban. Not.--Funnybony 11:22, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
- Gone for the duration of Xmas. Anyone else? ~ 23:40, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Kept. ~ 23:56, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
|