RationalWiki
 | |
Type of site | Wiki |
|---|---|
| Available in | Technobabble |
| Owner | LiberalMedia Foundation |
| Key people | Saddam Hussein (operations manager) |
| URL | stupidwiki.org |
| Users |
|
| Launched | April Fool's Day |
| Current status | Active (sadly) |
“Who knew that so many pseudo-intellectuals, crybabies, Redditards, and pseudo-intellectual crybaby Redditards could exist in this world?”
RationalWiki is an online collaborative space with so called "content" meant to trick readers into believing whatever agenda is at in woke vogue. The supposed substance of the wiki is copied Wikipedia[1] articles seasoned with snark and straight white guilt, all in line with far left lunacy.
A user-base on RationalWiki comes across as far-left mentally ill antifa failures whose liberal interpretation of everything makes the website the biggest echo chamber ever known. While the wiki has five hundred active editors, they are all sock-puppets of one single editor, so bored out of their mind that they play the role of "content" creators, antagonists, admins, vandals, assholes and you name it based on a multiple-personality complex that got completely out of hand.
On RationalWiki, the user(s) relish in their know-it-all social justice warrior woke-ism to prove themselves worthy of copying and pasting bits of Wikipedia on a blank page before adding a spin about justice or communist nonsense. This process is informally known as "writing an article". Whilst this is all blasphemy against God, that is exactly why RationalWikipedians do it, because their "self-declared" atheism requires them to hate Jesus and break all of God's rules. They genuinely take pleasure out of defying the lord's greatness and spitting on traditional American family values.[2] Their short term fun will likely not be worth the eternal consequence.
The site heavily focusses on minority grievances and what they claim are "conspiracy theories" when in reality everybody knows that trickle down economics work perfectly, everyone should spend $5,000 on a gram of healing diamond dust and that 5G towers DO give you COVID. They also give a third rate rundown of critical thinking and fallacies and butcher every political concept and historical event known, through the lens of justice gayness and empowerment or whatever.
RationalWiki is neither rational nor a wiki because a wiki is a functional website that involves collaboration. One user playing every role cannot collaborate. It isn't rational as they reject the holiness of God, are skeptical of magnet therapy (which is the best way to deal with aggressive breast cancer), and deny the superiority of rich straight white men.
Origin and purpose[edit | edit source]
| “ | To spread the ideals of pure mathematics to audiences it could not before have reached by taunting them with articles written in ratios | ” |
The ratio of an article's Wikipedia copy and past vs. rationalwikification is the most important factor for RationalWiki. Featured articles use the Golden Ratio which is 99 to 1. That is 99 parts brazenly stolen word-for-word from wikipedia and then 1 part injected snarky rationalwiki bias. If the article is a 100% copy of wikipedia then, people might as well just read wikipedia. But if the article is only say, a 95% copy of Wikipedia content, the article becomes so incoherent nobody could make sense of it. That's why the 99-1 ratio is so essential. The "snarky point of view" they consider a pillar, is their way of expressing their smugness, righteousness and know-it-all holier-than-thou-ness by peppering their articles with snappy lines that insinuate you are retarded if you don't agree with everything they say.
Politics[edit | edit source]
Attacks on America[edit | edit source]
RationalWiki is said to have a particular agenda against America because they hate freedom and want everyone to think the way they do. As Trump supporters have shown again and again, thinking differently is a bad thing and the only way to be truly free is to agree with whatever Trump and supporters think and say. Rationalwikians hate this kind of freedom. They also hate guns, which is the cornerstone upon which America was founded. Those 50 stars on the flag? Nope...they are pointy bullet holes. The Statue of Liberty? Filled with guns. And rationalwikians despise guns and therefore America (as well as freedom). The original pilgrims literally sailed to America on a stack of guns all tied together. But you won't find any article on rationalwiki claiming this. No, if they did have an article on the subject, it would likely be all about vegans floating on a raft made of tampons spending the three month trip talking about each others feelings and perspectives.
Even though RationalWiki wasn't around at the time of 9/11 it is quite clear that the users all knew it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it. Al Qaeda is one of their favourite terrorist organisations and rationalwiki's only regret about 9/11 is that they didn't fly the planes themselves.
Liberal bias[edit | edit source]
RationalWiki has a liberal bias that is so plain to see that some think it is a satirical joke. It even mentions purging the site, like some Communist authority. Communism is just another word for liberal in the same way that money is just another word for right-wing. RationalWiki also has a Conservative bias, slight though it may be, in the sense that it is not liberal enough for readers (all five of them) who think that rationalwiki should be so far-left that it would implode under its own authoritarianism and inability to manage itself.
Godless atheism[edit | edit source]
Most of the site is written by people who admire Richard Dawkins not for his science but just how snarky and mean he is to anyone he disagrees with. That is the woke rationalwiki way, bully people who don't agree with you. Conservatives and Republicans never ever do that.
Community and administration[edit | edit source]
Membership[edit | edit source]
Rationalwiki was created as a reply to those who were kicked out of the web's best website Conservapedia. At first, rationalwiki was a more neutral site but, as one would when they depart from Conservativism, decayed into a terrifying "safe space" where you are hung drawn and quartered if you don't agree that kindergarteners who identify as cats shouldn't be fed cat food. The two websites have had a friendly comradery which can be best illustrated by reading the article which each website has lovingly written to describe their counterparts. RationalWiki's article on Conservapedia is mostly a copy of Wikipedia's article with a snarky rewrite barely concealing their contemptuous rage against their former internet friends. Conservapedia's article on RationalWiki is mostly a list of helpful suggestions on how their editors of rationalwiki should be SWATTED by the FBI and the kind of tortures that await them in a special place in hell. They really are good friends
Conservapedians seem convinced that the authorities will imminently shut down RationalWiki for numerous unamericanisms. Ultimately though, both groups realize that neither site could exist without the other, as, if there weren't other people to trigger and get angry at, neither site would have any reason to exist. They secretly love one another in a torrid toxic co-dependent love affair.
Welcomeness to outsides[edit | edit source]
Anyone who passes by hoping to have a genuine fair and rational conversation about a not overly contentious point can enjoy being insulted, laughed at, treated with the highest level of assholtry and contempt and then sent to their "chicken-coop" (more on that later). Anyone new who asks how things work will be laughed at for not knowing everything despite the non-existence of any useful manual. Of course, it's all just a farce because, again, it's just one editor in their mother's basement pretending to be 500 users, who surprisingly doesn't even smoke meth!
Headless chicken mode[edit | edit source]
The website tends to have a drama fueled melt down every other month or so. They call this one user going into "headless chicken mode" when the user visits every usertalkpage and forum to rant about past grievances and rehash dramas because, what else are they going to do? This goes on until what the community calls "the mob", holds a kangaroo court and unfairly banishes a user for the mere crime of being an insufferable ass. What makes the whole thing so bizarre yet fascinating is, every user is just the sock puppet of a single user meaning one person must have an extremely overactive imagination and a lot of time on his hands to sign out, sign in with a new user and keep all of their multi-personalities in check scripting out a massive drama that only exists in their head. It is utterly compelling psycho-drama at the pinnacle of internet-weirdness. Though that isn't really that weird by rationalwiki standards.
Criticism[edit | edit source]
RationalWiki receives very little criticism as hardly anybody reads the website except those who edit it which as we know is just a single person, probably a gamer who likes to type out nonsense in between sessions of Red Dead Redemption 2. Though they can be critical of themselves, in fact they are prolifically critical of themselves and reserve their highest criticism in the previously-mentioned chicken coop. External criticisms are few and far between though the website does once in a while get mentioned in a more known source but almost only because the people had actually thought rationalwiki was a trending site as opposed to a website sinking under the weight of its own reason.
As long as wikipedia keeps creating articles, rationalwiki will be there to steal it's content and mark the articles with their own scent of snarky Bolshevism. It will likely end when the single editor is swatted, at last, by the FBI, sent by their loving former palls at conservapedia, once Trump passes an executive order making it a crime to make fun of his toupee and orange make-up.
