Talk:White House

Because the re-write tag was on this entry and I didn't see much coherence worth salvaging, I did a complete re-write. I tried to get any discernable themes from the old version into the new article, but I only kept the categories and external link from the old one. If I have erred in removing the old material, please comment and we can work on integrating the two pieces. --Isra1337 05:47, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thanks to Mad Max and Epynephrin for their additions. I have now added more material to bolster those additions and make the timeline work better. --Isra1337 06:29, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I would like to contribute with this pic?? Can anyone add this??

---

Um ...

@Alula: Why? --Brogo13 (talk) 23:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

@Brogo13: I'd say at this point you shouldn't even have to ask what the reasons for you getting reverted is, Brogo. you've been already told several times of them. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 23:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

@DaniPine3: Did you deliberately begin that sentence with a lower case "y"? Never mind. As for this particular article, y'all "... already told [me] 'of them'" – which? --Brogo13 (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Did you deliberately begin that sentence with a lower case "y"?
@Brogo13 doES Gramer matter on Talk pages ? — L10nM4st3r ^{ROAR at me!} / _{What my paws scratched} 14:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@L10nM4st3r: for a grammars nazi, Brogo13 is really be hard to be understanded. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 14:21, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Exactly. — L10nM4st3r ^{ROAR at me!} / _{What my paws scratched} 14:24, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@L10nM4st3r: *eaxtcly 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 14:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@L01n4rs3t: *eaxtcly — L10nM4st3r ^{ROAR at me!} / _{What my paws scratched} 14:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@L01n4rs3t: *eaxtcly — LMn41ts3r0 ^{OARR ta em!} / _{Wtah ym psaw scdrtaceh} 43:31, 2 Aiplr 2502 (CUT)

In other words

I see. (Somebody's got their panties in a bunch.)

1. Most of my edits are supposedly copy edits, but they usually end up making the articles look worse.
2. I reduce or greatly expand the size of many images, sometimes make several of them frameless, and sometimes move them to a close but different section.
3. I make nonsensical edits such as adding images, links and footnotes that have little to do with the article I'm editing and Wikipedia templates to topics that the article isn't about – not to mention templates inside templates, which also makes pages look worse.
4. I'm hard to communicate with, barely interacting with users, and when I do I speak in a really weird way that makes it nearly impossible to tell what I'm trying to say. I also delete any message that's left on my talk page, most of the time without even replying.
5. Sometimes I add vanity into articles when I'm mad, such as links to the revision history where I was reverted.
6. I generally just create tons of problems for established editors, especially for someone who claims to "just be lurking" around here.

“Comics, a.k.a. clowns, say funny things. Comedians say things funny.”

~ damifino
I just lurk here. --Brogo13 (talk) 11:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)