From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Are you deleting every article that guy made, or just certain ones? I just deleted Bugs Bunny and would like to help. --Redlips10.gif Roman Dog Bird I hope you know I pack a chainsaw 00:38, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

I'm deleting everything he did which was not edited significantly by anyone else. I actually was going to leave the bugs bunny one and ET as they had been edited a bit. I'm almost done though I think man so I guess it's cool. Huff his un-used images maybe? I do think we need to consider some kinda range block on ... Maybe just block IPs and creating accounts but let people with accounts edit. Maybe just for a month or so... That's one bastard of a lot of IPs though. I don't remember many good edits coming from 68. something though... I'm planning on going through his other edits and doing my best to strip out his various crap also. He's pissed on a lot of other pages... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:43, Feb 15

Soma divisions

Dude! I tried to delete all the not funny stuff from Soma, and divide it into 4 types:, 1) non-material-mythological, 2) bogus, 3) sexy model, and 4) synthetic. Is it headed in the right direction? whattaya think?--Funnybony 07:59, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

Yep, I like that a lot more than last time I looked at it. The people at VFH would still complain because it's too "listy" though... They like nice juicy paragraphs rather than lists or anything else which is not a paragraph generally... Same issue as with 2012 I guess. Trouble is, I'm not sure how it could be done differently. Well, maybe it's not really "listy" but it's more... "Broken" ? I think if you have looked at a good few on UN:BEST you will see that they style which you are using in many of your articles is not that popular. You tend to have a short bit of text... Then a list... Then a quote maybe... Then a short bit of text.... Then a section with only 2 lines in it... Then another list... Not that there is anything "wrong" with what you do, it's just always going to struggle at VFH. People have got list based articles through VFH such as Schindler's Listcruft for example, but that was exceptional, mostly because it was actually (in part) taking the piss out of people who hate lists in articles. :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:54, Feb 15

I like pie ban

The staff at Unsignpost have come to the realisation that you are - in part - responsible for the banning of I LIKE PIE!!!. While we are known for our gutter journalism and our ability to create complete stories out of minimal factual information, we would like to get a comment from yourself that we can twist dramatically out of context and show you in the least flattering light. Any comment? Pup 09:32, 15/02/2010

Who? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:21, Feb 15
Hmmm... Stretching my journalistic principles to take that out of context. Okay, what do you say to claims that it was your relationship with Nicole Kidman that broke up her marraige to Tom Cruise? Pup 11:24, 15/02/2010
What kinda a journalist are you man!?! Anyway, I think it's almost impossible that anyone found all those photographs of me naked with Roger Daltrey. Regardless, we both had a perfectly good reasons for being so. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:41, Feb 15

insert subject/headline here

Npsty just came on IRC a few minutes ago and complained being banned. He says that he "deleted" (by which he probably meant "blanked") User:Naveenwoahnoise because it was supposedly cyberbullying. I'm not quite sure if the cyberbullying rules apply to user pages or if this evern counts as cyberbullying, but you might want to take a look at it. --Sir Starnestommy Icons-flag-us.png (TalkContribsCUN) 15:45, Feb. 15, 2010

Can You Make This Page Better?

I know I have had problems with you in the past, but I have come to you for help. I am stumped on this page and I wanted to know if you could make Ping of death any better?

--Gamma287 15:52, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure I can. What I suggest you do, is check out the Wikipedia page for Ping. Find out actually what it is. The history of the thing and what it is really used for. Talking about alienware servers is IMO kinda lame as UN:N about alienware servers... Write it about something better than that. You might get ideas from reading the wikipedia page. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:14, Feb 15

MrN Deleting YOU!!!

MrN deleting dorks or banning arse holes

The grass is always greener on the Uncyclopedia side of the divide!!!--Funnybony 16:09, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

If only I really had that much hair. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:16, Feb 15
Fuck 'em, and their law... --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 16:21, Feb 15
Actually it would be more accurate if he was smiling and waving them across and onto the bridge before cutting the rope. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:29, Feb 15
That's as cool as -

~Jewriken.GIF 18:38, February 15, 2010 (UTC)

They even ruled the world back then!

Har de Har, har. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:14, Feb 15

Yeah! just remember, if you pay Joe Pesci enough "protection money", then he will not hurt you!

Userspace question

What's the policy on including advertisement, such as google ads, on your userspace, say at the bottom? --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 11:31 EST 15 Feb, 2010

Adverts are against the creative commons license we use here so I guess that would be a no. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:36, Feb 15
You could have said it in a much simpler way - anyone trying to make money out of his usage of Uncyclopedia will get his ass burned by me. ~Jewriken.GIF 16:41, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Well I probably would not block them straight away. First I would slowly start deleting all their pages, say 1 every 5 mins or so... But let them hang around the wiki long enough so that everyone could have a good laugh at them as they screamed for mercy.... Then when all the pages were deleted I would then block them. Then block their mother (regardless if she had an account here) and then cut their pet hamster up into 37 small pieces roll it into a joint and smoke it in front of them while taking their sister upstairs for a good seeing to. That's regardless of if their sister was fit or not. It's just a service I'm willing to offer Uncyclopedia. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:54, Feb 15
hmmm, well I suppose I will have to find better, more secret ways to make money here heed your wise advice and bow in reverence to the mighty creative commons license. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 12:41 EST 15 Feb, 2010
Bowing to the mighty MrN would have made you more popular to be honest. ~Jewriken.GIF 18:15, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
Have at you! I move... for no man. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 17:31 EST 15 Feb, 2010

Ummm.... Pear

Damn my dysleck... duslex... deislicks... bad spelling! Pup 00:31, 16/02/2010

Do you think this is some kinda pear to pear network or something? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:33, Feb 16
A pear would taste really good right about now. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 00:38, 16 February 2010
Au pairs taste even better. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:45, Feb 16


Am still tugging on it and would like your opinion. Everything is more or less good now except Section 6.2, which is flagrant listcruft, some clear vanity, some irrelevance, much of it cryptic. I had a notion to move it to Penis joke, which seems to be a collection of all the Not-Ready-for-Uncyclopedia stuff about penii [sic], but there is a sensible warning on its talk page that the list of fun names for the penis is already unwieldy.

Separately, Penis joke seems almost VFD-ready, as when I split off the listcruft from Peru into Peruvian slang, only to see it recently meet its VFD Maker.

I would also toast the NSFW template (instant humor! just add humor) and the Oscar Wilde quote. Spıke ¬  00:52 16-Feb-10

Well, penis is not really one of my specialist subjects, though I do have a giant cock on my userpage.if you look here there is a list of place names in the UK which might have a place somehow in the article... There really is a place in Cornwall called Cocks and obviously there is a Cockermouth in the Lake district. To say nothing of the two Twats in the Shetland, and Orkney Islands... Um... It still looks rather childish in places and it's ranting in others without really being funny. You have made it a lot better though. Obviously. The list of cock names at the end is kinda pants and might work better as I did with Tits. Maybe, maybe not... Many of those names are pants, and it could be stripped down a lot to the better more notable ones. Like John Thomas for example. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:02, Feb 16

New article TITLE suggestion

It's about bloody time to write THIS article: Lord Christopher Monckton denial: Rather than reading that, it's far better to post a message to this user telling him that you know everything contained in this article is wrong, or that this should not be here in the first place <---it's only red cause it's not created yet. Dude!--Funnybony 08:15, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Soma Good Work

Dude! I noticed you did Soma good work. It's always good to do soma work. It keeps you fit and healthy. It also gets things done. Every time you do soma work, therefore, is a day of healthy progress.--Funnybony 08:57, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


could you please place back File:Gisele Bundchen.jpg? 18:33, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Eh? I had a look at it, but it was not actually an image. Basically I got no idea what you are talking about man. Upload it again if you want. To do that you will need to create an account here, then you get a link on the toolbar on the left. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:44, Feb 16


Please stop deleting my comments like popcorn and matches! I like what I write and I don't get why you keep deleting my stuff! --Armynavy123 12:15, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

I don't like you spamming pointless templates onto lots of pages. As I explained on your talk page in a longer message. Then you deleted my message to you. Best not to delete messages from your talk page. Read HTBFANJS and you will understand. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 12:43, Feb 17
Deleting like popcorn and matches. And I thought Aussies had odd slang. Pup 13:17, 17/02/2010

YouTube VFD

I'm probably going to regret this, and I hope that us butting heads twice in two days is just a coincidence. I know you hate lies, so I'll admit, I did not think to check the backhistory. As far as I can remember this was the first time I nominated something for VFD, and I'm not that used to it (although that doesn't excuse not checking). So after you closed the nom and chastised me for nominating, I decided I would check the back history and after look through around 15 edits spaced out all the way through its history. In my personal opinion, there was nothing significantly better, and I would have made the same VFD nomination without any changes whatsoever.

Similar to the last discussion we had, it wasn't my aim to piss you off; in that one I wanted Reqaward fixing. In this one, I wanted the YouTube page fixed, not huffed just to leave a blank space behind. I think the original author of YouTubers, didn't realise how much of a triumph his idea would turn out. But if he did, and the article space for YouTube was free, I believe he would have put it there. I just think it's a shame that the article for YouTube is utter crap, IMHO at least. It may surprise you that I actually realise I don't account for everyone. That's why I did the VFD nom; so it would be done democratically. The YouTubers article just seems so much better and relevant, and it's sitting there being ignored because of its obscure title, while the YouTube article is getting vandalised to death.

Sorry to be so wordy about my gripes, but I thought you should know I don't aim to get rid of articles for trivial reasons. That's why I usually stay away from VFD, especially making noms myself. And like our last argument, this isn't for vanity reasons. My edit on YouTubers was only minor. However, I'm sure I'm missing the point of something entirely, as I am aware I have no idea how you think, and shouldn't pretend to. You want my blood, don't you? --Matfen 20:10, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

The YouTube article became carp because it was not given semi-edit protection a while ago when it needed it. It's got it now, so I suspect it will now improve rather than get worse. As I said, I think that with a little effort something rather good can be made out of the current page.
There is a trick to finding the "best" page in the history... Try to look for where a regular user (someone you know, or at-least someone who has created a userpage) has done some serious editing. You can tell that by the number of edits they made, the file size changing, and if they bother to leave a edit summary. Often you will see a user returning to a page a few times after, and that again is a good sign that the page got some love at that time. People who leave edit summaries usually make good edits. That's how I found the version I reverted to, and I only checked I think it was... 3 versions.
Especially for pages which have LOTS of history such as this one I do get rather annoyed if people nominate based only on the current state of the page, rather than what was in the history. Especially as there is a bold faced blinking text warning at the top of the VFD page warning people about that. You clearly did not read that. THAT was what got me upset. As you may have noticed from looking at the edit history of the page, I did find a version which IMO was rather better. What you should have done was to make some kinda effort to find a better version and nominate the better version, rather than just go with what was there at the time. This principle is a general one for VFD, but applies especially where pages have lots of history such as this one. I'm sure out of the 15 versions you looked at you will agree you saw some better versions than the current one. What I reverted to may still be suitable for deletion. I suspect there are better versions still in the history. That may be for VFD to decide at some point in the future. You may well still be of the opinion that this page does need to be nominated for VFD. If you do, please leave it a few weeks, and then make another nomination. If you do that... Do try to find the best version in the history, and nominate that. That's kinda what I'm saying. Don't worry, I'm not going to bite your toes off. I know that you are trying to do what's best for the wiki. :-)

Does that answer your questions? If not... Ask more... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:45, Feb 17

Yes that answers my question very well. Thankyou for being so patient with me. I think I'll just stick to writing articles from now on. Less drama, More Lols. Thanks again. --Matfen 13:39, February 18, 2010 (UTC)


Would you like another headache today? The said new user isn't exactly a vandal, but his 4 edits today generally deprecate the subject matter and aren't funny. I've just reverted him on Islam--Yes, it's to Islam's credit that no one ever says what a rant the Koran is--but we're trying to say the same thing, only a whole lot more subtly. No talk page or user page yet. Spıke ¬  23:06 17-Feb-10

I'm not sure what you are asking me to do here dude. Did you look at all his edits? Looks to me like those edits are all good faith efforts to improve the article. What you should have done was welcome him (firstly) and also maybe drop him a message saying that you had reverted him, and why. I actually think some of his other edits were perfectly fine. Maybe the Islam edit is a bit ranty, but certainly there is no need for admin involvement here. The best thing for Uncyc is if the more experienced non-admin users (such as yourself) use talk pages to sort out these issues between themselves. It's best if admins only get involved when things get out of hand. Things are not getting out of hand here right now... Bottom line... Don't be afraid to take the initiative yourself, and talk to users. That's what talk pages are for. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:53, Feb 17

Will do, thanks. Spıke ¬  00:18 18-Feb-10

Have now done so. Indeed, I had reviewed all 4 edits; the first on the list is merely misspelled; the remaining two turn a conversation in the direction of shit or toilets. What I wanted you to do? at the least be aware of the situation. Thanks. Spıke ¬  00:27 18-Feb-10

QNL template

'Fraid I'm back, as POTR says you are a good man to see about a 'bot, and may be able to go to work on the problem I note in Section 10 of Spang's talk page. Spıke ¬  02:45 18-Feb-10

I let him loose! Also, I have turned "general fixes on". When the stream of complaints arrives, I shall tell them it's all your fault! HeHe... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:55, Feb 18
Think I got most of em. Did not do the forums as I don't want to bump em all... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:36, Feb 18

Thanks much! Spıke ¬  14:03 18-Feb-10

What on Earth is the matter with you?

I say Earth but frankly your idiocy seems closer to Mars. I considered you a friend. A mentor even. And what do you do to repay my friendship? You humiliate and insult me for a harmlessly sardonic remark on the user page of an editor with whom I have a mutual respect. I am NOT an "asshole", I am a positive presence on the website. Now, as you concede, I have a quick temper but I do NOT look for arguments and I do not, 'NOT' troll.

Now, on the subject of the Anne Hathaway article, to my mind it is an abomination that this article which should have been ICUed or otherwise deleted, should be granted feature article status. I do not find it offensive, when it comes to humour I am very difficult to offend. I do however find it sinfully boring and hideously unfunny and I think the majority of right-minded Uncyclopedians will agree with me. But that’s not the topic of debate. Your comment on my page pacified my considerable anger to a certain extent so with that in mind and in the spirit of reconciliation, I will pardon your insult if you remove your incendiary remark regarding my assholery from Under user’s talk page. On the subject of my acerbic comment about him needing help from a priest, it was meant in jest and I would hate to think I had offended Under user as he is an editor I greatly respect and if you’re lucky, there’s a chance I won’t entirely lose my respect for you. --Ozymandiaz 16:05, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Um. You do troll around talk pages trying to start trouble. You have been banned for this b4. I could find various cases of this in your contributions. Specifically the way you talk to people. You have a habit of getting involved in things which don't concern you, and attempting to provoke a confrontational response. With this ban, and message on your talk page, I asked you to stop doing that. You have been cautioned about doing this in the past, yet you ignored it... What does that make you if you ignore such requests? In my book, and in that situation the way you acted made you appear to be an asshole. I know you are not, most of the time, but sometimes you are. You need to control your temper. UU did not even FA that article. Mordillo did, and anyway you are arguing with the will of the wiki. Complaining to one user is pointless and confrontational. You should have started a post in the VD if you wanted to protest the FA. You would have been laughed at. Picking on one random users is... Random. Go back and read my comments to you on your talk page again. The bottom line is that we do not tolerate people acting like you have here. If you genuinely were joking in your comment to UU then I'm very sorry. I made a mistake. Had you had a relationship with UU where he would have known that your comment was totally in fun then I'm sure he would have removed your block, and told me I was wrong. However, as you just said that you hate the article in question and given your past track record I find it very difficult to believe that your motives were based in humour, and I feel that they were more based on wanting to vent away some frustration. That's why I blocked you. Also, I did remove the block later that night when I realised that 3 days was probably too harsh and that I should have only blocked you for maybe another day (like you were before when you did a similar thing to this). MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:31, Feb 18
Troll around? I can only think of one occasion when I did something approaching trolling and that was when I kicked off at Sycamore on his talk-page. The issue was resolved and I apologised. But this isn’t about that. The reason I mentioned the featuring of the Anne Hathaway article on Under user’s page was because its creator further up the page had thanked him for contributing to its featuring. At the time I had been lovingly observing (with a telescope) the discussion with the so-called editor who goes by the handle, Under user the homosexual, shit-eating faggot. And you say I'm a troll. But back to the issue at hand, clearly I hadn’t make my humorous intentions in making the comment entirely clear. But even then, you might have just talked to me instead of assuming the worst. Regards. --Ozymandiaz 17:25, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I am an asshole and a "positive presence on the website." Spıke ¬  17:49 18-Feb-10
Where I come from, being called an asshole is a complement. That's what everyone tells me anyway. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:11, Feb 18
I'm a whole ass. So is Ozymandias. "majority of right-minded Uncyclopedians will agree with me"? Orly? Then how did it pass VFH? Shut the fuck up and go write an article. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:13, 18 Feb
--Maybe there is hope for Wikipedia yet... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:18, Feb 18
Naturally it was only a matter of time until the posse of sycophants came running to the defence of the authority figure. Puh-leeze. Give me strength. --Ozymandiaz 14:39, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
I can't be bothered to justify why I banned you any more. Look at all your edits since you got here. You are often rude, offensive and confrontational. I tried being polite to you and explaining why, if that's not going to work kindly fuck off. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 14:43, Feb 19
Or, to put it another way: naturally, it was only a matter of time before the friends MrN has made through being a diligent, helpful and all-round decent guy came along to show their support for him against someone who seems to be going out of their way to be confrontational and unreasonable. FWIW, I think you might be like I was a few years ago Ozy: unable to make it clear when you're joking, which rubs people up the wrong way. I'd like to think that's the case anyway. Lighten up a little - this isn't a sycophantic circle-jerk, MrN has proved his worth many, many times over on this wiki, perhaps you could do the same? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:50, Feb 19
Yes! I third the notion. MrN is a very reasonable chap, quite helpful bloke, and usually right on the nose' Granted, get punched in the nose is not necessarily pleasant. But I never saw MrN be the one to start it. So if you wanna mess with him, then, You better get your own fuckin' army, pal! A much better suggestion is to make friends!--Funnybony 15:07, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, but I'd rather be a man and defend myself than give in to an army of bootlickers. --Ozymandiaz 14:57, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
Let's see... When you came here you said: " I have a quick temper but I do NOT look for arguments and I do not, 'NOT' troll. ". Hmm. This latest comment looks like more trolling, and more looking for arguments to me. We really can't be bothered with that kinda drama generating shit. That's why I banned you before. That's why you were banned for the first time. I'm happy to block you indefinitely if that's what you would like? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:53, Feb 20
Hate to look like I'm a bootlicker, or even treading on your toes here, MrN, but I've given Ozy another day off. Ozy: take that goddamn chip off your shoulder, and learn how to interact with people in a slightly less abrasive manner. Whether you intend to or not, you wind people right up with your comments, and that's not something we'll happily accept indefinitely. I'm not telling you to bow to authority and become a mindless drone, I'm asking you to play nicely. Fair? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 17:08, Feb 20


You still about? Your bot stilll awake? This is ready any time you are! (If you would be so kind, of course). --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 22:42, Feb 18

Anything for UU. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:30, Feb 18
Sir is a true gent. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:36, Feb 19

UnSignpost 18th February 2010

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 23:37, Feb 18

Dude! Do you write this paper?--Funnybony 15:12, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
Na. I just know someone who delivers it. Check out Uncyclopedia:UnSignpost for a list of authors. UU writes most of em these days, with a few others helping out from time to time. Anyone can edit ya know. That includes you. There is also a "press room" for those too lazy to actually write a whole section. It's good for the community spirit and such... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:18, Feb 19

It's not the same guy, but regarding your recent lesson not to reward vandals with the attention they might crave, UnSignpost took a giant step backward. Spıke ¬  15:21 19-Feb-10

1. It could be worse - could be a featured article; 2. Why are you telling him? As he just said, he's not responsible for anything except the delivery. As the main editor at present, if you have a problem with the Signpost, bring it to me, OK? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 15:27, Feb 19
Well I made my feelings clear about that at the time, but sometimes people just want a bit of fuss to entertain them I guess. I'm not going to cause more fuss by telling people not to make a fuss. Basically, I'm not really that fussed. Hopefully that's the end of it now... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:31, Feb 19
Sorry, UU. I brought it here because Mr.N and I had a talk recently about another vandal. Mr.N's thesis was that my query about the actions of the vandal, whom I specified by name on a page he was likely to read, might itself constitute the recognition that motivated him. It was not a complaint against UnSignpost, nor well-formed enough to be. But I'll state it as one: PIE, who can read UnSignpost as an Anon, might take his citation there as a victory. Appropriate reaction is totally up to you. Yes, it could be worse. Spıke ¬  15:44 19-Feb-10
Come on Spike, this is PuppyOnTheRadio's first UnSignpost. You don't have to jump all over him. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 15:46, 19 February 2010
TBH, my reaction is muted: I didn't have much involvement in this week's issue, due to being on 24hr baby red alert. I had hoped it would go out without any input from me, but did a little last-minute work to add the bio and a couple of links. I could have pulled the ILP bit, but: 1. I couldn't think of anything to replace it with, and didn't have any time to spare coming up with anything; 2. I thought it was kinda funny; 3. I don't consider ILP to be the kind of vandal who'll return and cause endless problems with blanking, vandalism and the like, in the way that certain other morons are - he was just a stupid kid who didn't have a clue what he was doing. So taking all that into consideration, plus the fact that I was grateful Puppy had done so much work for me (and done, I think, a good job) I decided to leave it as it was; 4. I don't think we'll be making a habit of it. How does that grab you? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 15:54, Feb 19
SPIKE, again this is a case of you looking for some kinda structure and consistency of policy where none exists or should. I'm sure UU and Puppy considered the issues we discussed (they both understand the thinking behind them I'm sure) and decided that this case was slightly different and that it did not really matter. Which I basically agree with. Puppy asked me for a comment about PIE before, and had I cared enough I would have said something then. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:02, Feb 19
I really need to retract the tone of my initial message in this section. It screams, (1) UnSignpost violates a canon, UU! (2) which you assured me would never happen, MrN! It does communicate dissatisfaction with both of you that I certainly don't feel. Or maybe also a feeling that there are certain lessons here (don't pay attention to vandals) that everyone else here knows but I keep having to get told. Anyway, sorry for writing a message that sounded like it was designed to jump all over anyone. Spıke ¬  16:20 19-Feb-10

Also, penis

Mr.N., you know, some of my posts to you are mere observations (though others are indeed requests for immediate, universal justice). Now separately, which sections of Penis did you think still need work? and work in what direction? Spıke ¬  01:17 20-Feb-10

I think it needs something about penis worship. What do you know about golden penis'? There is actually a recurring theme around the world in many different religions and places. for example. The Zulu people and the Hindu also have a similar legend relating to golden penis, as do many others. just a link I found with a search of "penis worship" Some people believe that penis worship continues to this day. I'm being serious. Some say that many structures around the world actually (like really not joking) represent penis and the worship of which dates back to very old times. There is also a rumour that many of the cathedrals in the UK actually had penis' in the alters such that the congregation was worshipping penis without knowing it. As for the rest of it... The quality of the prose is variable. In some places it's a lot more sophisticated than others. Also you need to do something with the section on penis buildings. Either take a bit from Mhaille's article, or scrap it... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:58, Feb 20

Yikes! I find that the worst writing (along with how to stereotype people according to what's in the room when they get hard) is all that stuff I brought in from Penis sword. Yes, the section on Penis in architecture is a hollow echo of the main article; the section exists mostly to save the illustrations from the listy section in case it went away completely, but I see the illustrations are not endangered. A study of the literature on penis worship is a bit beyond the scope of my involvement with this article. Will boil a little more away, thanks. Spıke ¬  02:22 20-Feb-10


? -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN23:40, 18 Feb

Archive properly, goddamn it!

This doesn't exactly feel like proper despoilment... --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 16:10, Feb 19

Anyone would think I had a lot to say or something... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:19, Feb 19


Dude! Lunar Launch Saga saga is, in my moronic opinion, quite funny because: 1) It takes the piss out of something which took the piss out of us, and 2) The weird interplay of three totally diverse characters. As such it's really an article on the subject, with just ONE SCENE (hardly a script). My question is, does this belong in unScripts? Or, should just leave as an article? Thanks!!--Funnybony 16:27, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

UnScript I figured. Oh, you are a moon landing DENIER also eh? I actually spent about 2 weeks looking into that one. A good book was "NASA Mooned America". There is no doubt that some of the pictures were faked. Looks to me like they faked some of the videos also. Here is my old pall Bill Cooper on the subject. My opinion is yet to be made up though. Just cos they faked a lot of shit does not mean they did not go. The issues about the van halen belt are powerful though. Still how did they make the moon rock? The isotopes don't match anything we have here on Earth, or any other meteorite, and it would not be possible to fake the radioactive decay of the isotopes from what I can tell. I think... They did go, but... Using some technology which they don't want us to know they had/have. It don't matter though, people don't even believe that money is debt yet, so I'm not that bothered about trying to convince anyone about the moon... Except for Socky obviously. He knows WTF is going on ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:08, Feb 19
Um. No doubt some of the pictures were faked? Seriously? I have a doubt... -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN20:07, 19 Feb
Well it's natural to have doubts. Obviously. I did also. That's why I spent a whole two weeks doing nothing much else other than looking into it. Reading books, reading articles on the net, watching videos... I know enough about these things to know that it's not possible to point to one simple thing which would convince anyone. I'm sure you would not want me to anyway. The point is to keep an open mind to such things. There is a lot of crazy bullshit out there. Most of it is bullshit. Some of it is true. As the man said, to find the truth you got to wade through a lot of bullshit. :) Like I said, I think we did go to the moon. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:34, Feb 19
Well, obviously we went to the moon. You'd have to be fucking retarded to think we didn't since there's proof that we did. But why then fake pictures? And why do you believe they're fake? And really MrN, you need to get a better hobby than letting conspiracy nut theories get into your head. :P -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN23:37, 19 Feb
What is a "Conspiracy nut theory"? Anything which differs from what the mainstream media and government tells you right? :-) As for why... There are a lot of possible reasons why they would want to do that. I don't know which are true, only that I'm convinced that some of them were faked. Do your own research man. You have to do your own research, or it's not going to mean jack all to you anyway. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:46, Feb 19
LOL, I have actually read a bunch of faked lunar landing theories. It's a personal pet peeve of mine, I'm a huge fan of NASA and space exploration. What I'm asking is, which pictures do you think were faked and why? Show me a couple of examples. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN23:50, 19 Feb
Yea, most of those theories are bullshit IMO. Dude, I'm not going to try to convince you. It was like summer last year that I looked into this and I don't have bookmarks saved to toss out to you. Even if I did it would not convince you anyway. If you want to look at it seriously, I suggest you start by getting a copy of the book I recommend above and read it. I did. It's got lots of pictures in it. I found a copy in a local book shop actually. I also looked into the many different people who have since tried to discredit what he says in it. I also gave a link above to someone talking about this. I'm sure some of what Bill Cooper says is bullshit btw (but not all). MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:20, Feb 20

Couldn't resist

Tommy Chong and Lou try some Soma: Musss be stepped on!!!
I want some! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:36, Feb 19


Dude! Am I seeing things!? (dah!). It seems we owe the good Lord Monckton one, because he put the Sun on the cover today. Now Gore wants action taken against the Sun! Gore says the Sun should be arrested and deported! Of Course, that's NOT what the good Lord wants nor suggests: "Do THAT and we'll be freezing MORE than our nuts off", concluded Monckton.--Funnybony 09:00, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are talking about. What the Sun the newspaper? I thought that just had pictures of tits in it. I had no idea it contained actual news. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:27, Feb 20
UnNews today--Funnybony 13:28, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Possible Adoption

Hey MrN9000, I was looking for an adopter to help me get going with some insane stuff. Feel free to message me back whether you are available to adopt or not, I have some quotes up which I could show you to see if you like my stuff or not. Let me know if you have time, thanks, FunnyGuy38.

Hi. Well, I don't have the paperwork to hand right now to fill it out, but for now feel free to ask whatever questions on this talk page which you want to. In addition to that Funnybony above might be interested in adopting you also. Maybe ask him on his talk page. I tend to do a fair amount of admin stuff these days, so I'm not sure how much time I can devote to actually editing stuff for you. If you have not already... Start by reading BGBU and then HTBFANJS. Those are kinda the bible of this place. Yea... I saw some of your quotes. They are "OK" but, there is a lot more to writing here than adding quotes. That's what everyone does when they first get here, but they are often deleted when they build up, and generally people get a bit arsed off if adding quotes is all a user does. Try writing an article. After you have read BGBU and HTBFANJS that is. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:25, Feb 20
Oh no! NOT me, I'm jinxed on VFH. Not a single feature. My advice will lead to NOT getting any FA. Although you might get some laughs. Of course you can always write to any Uncyclopedian, including yourself, for help. Get some Pee Reviews. Making friends is a good idea around here. And keeping cool, because everyone is only joking, no matter how many times they call you a mothafuckin' arse hole!--Funnybony 13:19, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
Na. You SHOULD adopt this guy. Why you just got a news article linked on the front page, (did you see?) and it's the headline on the UnNews main page. Looks to me like you are the man for the job! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:22, Feb 20
Wow! Front page! Oh Come All Ye Faithful! It deserves a good wank! But that's OUR bit of nonsense (I mean, fact!), I never ever heard of the good Lord Monckton until I was adopted by you. I suggest FunnyGuy to run his material through Pee Review, then there will be a variety of view points, from a variety of helpers. Put up an article, and I'll Pee Review it. Cheers--Funnybony 13:39, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
Sounds to me like Funnybony has adopted FunnyGuy38. I'm sure between you two, you guys can come up with some "Funny" stuff. See, that's how bad my jokes are. You really don't want to be adopted by me FunnyGuy38, I mean I adopted this Funnybony guy, and look what happened there! :-D Well, you know how to fill out the "paperwork" right? Yea, copy the templates, stick em on yours and his user page and off you go. Now you have someone to pick up the soap in the showers... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:44, Feb 20
Well, I'd be embarrassed to "adopt-a-nOOb" simply because I'm still a student here. But I can surely give you my opinion, which is only one opinion. If you get, say, 10 Pee Reviews, then you will learn from 10 different editors all 10 different points of view, which DO differ considerably, but are all good. Please direct me to one of you funny articles. Cheers!!--Funnybony 14:43, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
MrN, see! He's hell bent on your guidance. And I don't blame him. Too bad he has no user page to see his work!? Everything I advised him was my just repeating what you told me. I'm almost finished that letter BTW. Dude!--Funnybony 11:42, February 21, 2010 (UTC)
UnNews:Sun, 2.5 Billion Plaintiffs, Sue Gore needs a references section. If you look here that's where the news which appears in the front page goes. There are various examples of how to do references. Anyone can edit that if they read the instructions and follow it. You don't have to have a vote, and you can add your own stuff when it's ready. Cool eh? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:51, Feb 21

2 day feature

Thanks for the change if it was unlegal. I know nothing, nothing. Was wondering why the Hathaway page was the feature page for two days, not complaining mind you. Aleister in Chains 20 Feb. MMX

It was cos of the "Featured one year ago today" thing on the main page. I'm not sure, but I think what you did would have made that not work next year. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:55, Feb 20
Was featured for two days since some sod didn't get to feature another article in time. Plus, it's Anne's Hathaway's err...tracks of land on the main page, so I ain't complaining. ~Jewriken.GIF 23:01, February 20, 2010 (UTC)
That was a surprise extra day, no complaints from me. Which brings up two questions I've had. Why not list features "2 years ago today" "3", etc. So many good features are gone from view and that would be one way of bringing them up for air. And is there some way of merging the pre-July (June?) 2007 list with the "main" features list, so they are all in one place? Thanks, Al, a few minutes later
You are talking about UN:BEST right? Well, we have the "random FA" option on that. As for why it just goes back to 2008 on that page... Blame Mordillo. We probably don't want to include everything or the page would be too manic. There is a button to go back, and the random FA option includes everything. There was a battle to try to get a random FA option on the sidebar a while back... I think grues ate those who were petitioning for it. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:21, Feb 20
I mean the Category:VFH archive, which only goes back to mid-2007. I don't know what the random FA is, will study some more. Will this be on the midterm? Since I'm asking questions, why aren't "UnBooks" and "HowTo:" links provided on the navigation template. Last question for now, thanks. Al, few minutes later
DUDE!!!! WTF are you talking about!!! Which things in the what where? Yes, this will be in the paper. Maybe you might provide some links? Ahh... Hang on VFH.. Yea, that changed to become the current system about then I think. I got here November 2007, but I think b4 that it was done all on one page, and so the archives were different. UN:BEST is where you find the random article. Ah HowTo and Why are not voted on. Some dude, just kinda does it from time to time. I think the good Mr Teckno is looking after that at the moment. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:39, Feb 20
lol. Someone fixed it, the link was to Category:VFH archive, that's the place I'm talking about. Will leave you in peace now, over and out. Al

Game huffing

When you want to remove big games, let me know we'll do it together. ~Jewriken.GIF 13:04, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I noticed that Spang appeared to still have some kinda mass huffing tool the other day. I left a message for him on his talk page asking if he might let the rest of us in on it. There is something about "mass huffing" in MediaWiki:Common.js but the site it points to appears to not work any more. Whatever we do, it floods the heck out of recent changes. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:10, Feb 21
Mass huffing ftw! ~Jewriken.GIF 13:11, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

As the in house tinky winky expert

Take a look at A very dumb name (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups). ~Jewriken.GIF 16:27, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

My winky radar was firing from recent changes even before I checked my talk page. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:30, Feb 21

UnNews:Voodoo helping Haiti's quake dead

Dude! Took your astute advice. And also cranked-out this little ditty: UnNews:Voodoo helping Haiti's quake dead--Funnybony 20:13, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

I added a little bit... :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:12, Feb 21
Dude! Could you please come to rescue me from a fuckup!? The above voodoo unnews was submitted by me on the 22nd ( here in Thailand) plus the real article source is dated 22nd. Could you please move that news where it belongs, in the Feb 22 unnews!?

That would be most appreciated. If I knew how to change you can be sure I wouldn't trouble you, dude----

Ya just needed to swap the dates. Course it will not show up on UnNews until Uncyc time rolls over to the new day. Should it be Vodou? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:26, Feb 21

Thanks Dude!

By Jove, fancy meeting you here!? Hey! Is THIS the Moon!? Well, you can take off that bulky space suit, because it's nice and breezy out here! In fact, we're in our global warming (holiday) season, so rejoice, dude!

--Funnybony 21:43, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

MrN on-the-rag

On leaving the front page, MrN, speaking about Funnybony, told UnNews in strange English accent, “I demand justice! This bloody imposter is a thief. He’s been following me around for over a year. I’m sick of it. Every time I fancy a ducky, he fancies her too; and there’s only one dicky! So which one of us will get the pleasure? I work, and HE gets the nut! Always I do all the writing and he gets the credit. Really! There is no justice in this world! I hate Uncyclopedia”, he lamented, ”its SOOO unfair!!!"

Mussss be stepped-on!!!--Funnybony 14:28, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
Well I never! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:46, Feb 23
And you never will--Funnybony 12:59, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

UnNews:The Kick of Assassination

UnNews:The Kick of Assassination Kinda long, and totally idiotic = GREAT!!?--Funnybony 17:49, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

"We are not writing this as anti-thrillers; we do not believe the killing of enemies is necessarily boring." was my favourite line. During reading it, I thought... Hang on, how is this a parody of news? Then I looked at the link... Looks like you are enjoying UnNews! HeHe. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:09, Feb 24

Dude, my dear unGuru, I think the best line is:

The mission could only be successfully carried out if the assassin gets his/her Nut; otherwise the mission is just no damn fun. Like a junkie overdosing just to obtain a small kick, the Israelis focused their thrills in targeting just one man, just for fun, not to take the piss out of other thrill seekers or fellow terrorists.

and also, "Long Live Grant's Tomb!"

UnNews is more fun and feels more rewarding than Articles, but articles are way more important. I'm really proud (humbled) by being the author of such a big subject as Mike Tyson, which Max liked enough to lock it, without my request. Because that's a BIG subject. Plus our joint-venture 2012, which is really read a lot (I bet). And it's damn funny!

BTW: Some stranger nom to VFH my NATO news. In case you want to vote. So far, everyone is voting against. Humm? I think it is strange when people let political bias get in the way of absurd humor. To kill 200 Taliban you also must kill 190,000 people, now THAT is bloody absurd!!!--Funnybony 13:11, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

My sig

I've put a little more support under it so it's not spilling out everywhere now. Nominally Humane! some time 01:31, 24/02/2010

It don't look anything like as cool as it did though... :-( (Thanks for that) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:40, Feb 24


Yes, I know what BJAODN was. I still don't get what makes BJAODN funny. It plays it way too straight. Wild at Heart 02:57, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

It's a parody of Wikipedia. If you don't think it's funny then that's why we have a vote I guess... IMO it's not total carp, and we should have an article about this subject and this article is as good a start as any. Not having this would be worse than having it IMO. That's usually the reason I vote keep to most things... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 07:39, Feb 24

Deleting article

Please could you delete the Hereford Cathedral School article, as the school has found out about it and would like it to be taken off? I'm the creator of the original article, Omnissiuntone, and I give my consent for it to be removed.

MrN, due to creative blanking attempts I've protected the article for now. Your call since you were involved in this whole story. ~Jewriken.GIF 17:29, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Mordillo... Cool. I deleted it. Shame, it looked like a good article to me, but as you created it, I'm happy to remove it. You guys obviously have some writing talent, I hope you decide to stick around and write something else for us. Maybe something which will not get you in trouble with your teachers next time! :P Have fun... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:38, Feb 24

Yardbirds reborn

Dude! Bro! You saved and hugely improved the article. My hero! I admit, I was pretty wasted at 4 am when I posted that. I should have sent it to you. So my next UnNews will be sent to you before ever posting. And I hope its no bother for you. More soon. Cheers!!!--Funnybony 10:28, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

If you want to check with me, that's cool. I think you do know what you are doing, maybe you just need to lay off the soma when adding stuff to the UnNews template. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:01, Feb 25


Thanks for calling me Nigga. Sigh. As for the photo, I really like it, she just seems so happy and carefree and just happens to have no clothes on, so I thought it was a candidate for pron which isn't pron. Matfen and I had discussed this, in his pee review and talk page. Now to find a new photo, maybe a very discrete one, go the opposite of what's expected. Any photo candidates come to mind, Mad Max may know. Thanks again. Al 13:36 26 2 2MX

It's a sad day when a Uncyclopedia user needs help finding their own pron... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:56, Feb 26

I have a can of worms to discuss

Following that whole issue with the NSFW pic you deleted. What are we doing about all of the "super secret girl pages" which are all around the site? That has been irking me for a long time now, as we're essentially operating as a pron hosting site. Before I open a serious discussion about that, what do you think? ~Jewriken.GIF 14:37, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

>:( -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN16:04, 26 Feb
Sorry Opty, I promise to find you an alternative source for boobies. ~Jewriken.GIF 16:24, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Not to get too deep into this now, but I looked at Opty's site and found no por|v at all, except for maybe the last two pics (a woman has some kind of shadow at the top of her legs, I don't know what that could be, and the last pic should be up for "Porn VFD". Breasts are not considered por in any civilized country now, and in many areas of the world woman don't have to cover them. Maybe pron a long time ago. And girls touching each other can only mean one thing--they are nicely grooming each other to remove mites. Anyway, bottom line, no pron on Opty's page at all, and now that the smiling girl just standing there has bit her dust, maybe none left on the site anymore. ~ User:Aleister in Chains User talk:Aleister in Chains 16:32 26 2 2MX
Here's the thing, since it's pretty obvious which page we're talking about. If there are specific pictures you think are too racy for Uncyc, then delete them. It's happened on several occasions already and you haven't heard a peep out of me. But why do you gotta mess with my page as a whole? That won't sit right with me at all. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN16:59, 26 Feb
I guess the line is "are breasts obscene?" and in what context. I argue no, in any context, and social norms have evolved to this pov it seems. Maybe tv networks still adhere in the states to "breasts are pron" but that hasn't been really tested in the courts as far as I know because all the networks are fine with the arrangement. Maybe a forum topic, this page can get filled up before Mr.N comes back from his sojurns. Al in Chains, few minutes later
Well, here in the UK the top selling newspaper is called "The Sun". It's been a while since I last checked, but it always used to have a topless girl on page 3. "The Page 3 Girls" and all that... *happy memories of Sam Fox in my younger years...* The Sun is not considered pron, it's not a top self mag, it's sold along with all the other newspapers. The Sunday Sport here also claims to be a "newspaper" *cough* and that has even more pictures of topless girls. It's actually got a "nipple count" in it I think whereby the reader can be sure that they did not miss any of them. The Sport is also sold on the bottom shelf of the newspaper stand along with the Times, The Telegraph, The Guardian and all the rest. Also in the UK if you are 15 you can rent a film, or go to the pictures to see a film (on your own) which has topless girls in it. *MrN wanders off into happy memories of being 15 and legally going to rent a copy of The Delinquents because you actually got to see Kylie Minogue's norks...* (yes norks are tits for those not from the UK). I figure that a 15 year old is still a child, legally they are for sure, (the age of consent here is 16, though it's 15 in France) and I'm sure it's not a good idea to sell "pron" to kids. I figure that by this thinking it's generally accepted here (in the UK) that pictures of topless girls are not pron. As for the "lower area" I tend to think on a case by case basis. Basically I think it's kinda OK if there is some kinda attempt at making it tasteful, but if you can actually tell what she had for breakfast then that's probably not right. I would say that something like this is right on the edge of what we should allow, but it's OK. The one I deleted today after Aleister agreed to remove it was probably too far over the line in that it was not really trying to be anything other than obvious wank material... As for if we should allow people to host these images in their userspace... I think we should allow users to do whatever they want to with their userspace, but I do think that the same rules about images should apply to user space that do to the mainspace. If we would not allow an image in a mainspace article, we should not allow it in userspace. Anyone browsing Category:Pictures of naked girls or any of the others linked from that template could reasonable expect that they were allowed to use anything they find there in a mainspace article. I don't think an image needs to actually be being used in the mainspace to justify someone having it in userspace, but it should be possible for a person to use one of those images in an article if they want to.
As for if it's wrong for a user to create a page specifically just to "host pron" then I don't think we should do anything to stop that so long as the images fit with the "No blatant pictures of girls Fannies" rule... For those not from the UK a Fanny is another name for her muffin. Obviously. ;) We already have various image galleries anyway really with Category:Pictures of naked girls and the many other similar categories which are linked from that template. That is in mainspace also which probably is more of an issue than stuff which is more 'hidden' in userspace... I'm very cautious about imposing rules on what people can do with their userspace. Agreed we are not here to host peoples blogs or provide personal free webspace to anyone who wants it, but I do feel that if a user chooses to have a collection of images which we would permit in the mainspace hidden away somewhere in their userspace then there is not much wrong with that. How many images would constitute an "image gallery" which would make it not acceptable? Yep, it's a can of worms we can't open unless we remove all the pictures of tits from Uncyc (that's just not going to happen IMO). If hosting those images was all a user was using Uncyc for then I might consider that they were taking the piss a bit, but I don't think that's the case with the few examples of this which I know about. Orian has a page for gays full of boys ya know! I recommend you don't investigate that... ;)
Looking around a bit, I do think we have a few images which we probably should not. I will have a bit more of a hunt about, and huff the ones which don't fit with what I said above. From what OptyC says above he probably acknowledges that maybe some of the images he's got there are over the line, and I will remove the ones which are.
Man. It's a dirty job, but someones got to do it. Browsing through pron *cough* artistic images for the betterment of Uncyclopedia is just something I'm willing to do. Just all part of the service... In addition, if anyone has any new images which they would like me to pass judgement on feel free to ask for judgement. Now, all I need to do is get paid for this and I truly will have reached nirvana. :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:45, Feb 26
To be honest, I didn't have Opty's boob page in mind when I started the subject, there are way too many of them all around the place. Also, it's not the boobage by itself. You know? I don't mind boobs on the site at all. What I do mind is people building whole pages that don't include anything but nude or semi nude pictures - for no reason at all. We keep forgetting that this is not a social networking website. OK, there's a lot of socializing going around, but if the primary objective of uploading nude and semi nude pictures isn't, by the end of the day, to contribute to some articles, then you have no business of uploading them or holding them in a "super secret page". I think we might have also exaggerated with the userspace amnesty. Am I making sense or do I sound like comrade Jo? ~Jewriken.GIF 20:55, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I've actually used Opty's page to seek out photos for pages, both my own and just random site articles, quite a few times. It's a very good depository, imnho. So, at least for me, it has been quite useful, and there is at least one photo on it I have in mind for an UnNews page. ~ User:Aleister in Chains User talk:Aleister in Chains 22:11 26 2 2MX
You are making sense. I think it's a tricky one though... I agree that people should not be uploading lots of pron pictures if they have no intention of using them in an article. I just took another look at OptyC's page... (dam this is a hard job, but alas I must) I picked 10 at random, and 8 of them were currently being used in the mainsapce. I think what I have tended to see is that people see an image being used in an article, and grab a copy of the link and put it on their page. As Aleister suggests there is actually an advantage to such a page as OptyC's as it provides users with a list of "approved" images, so they don't need to risk uploading something which might be across the line. I agree with, if I may quote you... "if primary objective of uploading nude and semi nude pictures isn't, by the end of the day, to contribute to some articles, then you have no business of uploading them or holding them in a "super secret page"." That sounds fair enough to me. I don't know of any cases of that happening to a great extent mind, maybe you do... I don't think OptyC's page would come under that category.
I do think there should be a fair amount of scope for allowing people (within reason) to do what they wish with their user pages though. For example, if a user wanted to maintain his own personal shopping list in a sub page of his user page I would not object so long as they were regularly contributing to the site in other useful ways. For me I see Uncyc as kinda "my home" on the internet. It's where I hang out and where most of what I care about on the net is. I think that's the same for a lot of our regular users. Sometimes I might want to store something on here which I never intend to put into the mainspace. I don't see the harm in that, so long as me doing so does not significantly interfere with others. OK someone has to see the entry on recent changes when I add it, but I don't really see the harm in that. I figure that I have done enough for Uncyc that if I (from time to time) wanted to use my userspace for something other than producing mainspace articles then... Well, I figure I have earned the right. I think it's the same for any of our regular contributors. I'm not really talking about pron with that, but generally speaking in terms of intention of use.
If it's pron pictures we are talking about then there is more of an issue of significant interference with the wiki. User pages are still publicly visible, and if people are uploading pictures just for their user space then... Yea, that's probably not the image we want to be presenting to the outside world. If most of those images are being used in articles, and especially if they were uploaded by a different user then it's different I would suggest. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:08, Feb 26

Can you do me a solid?

Can you fix it so that my UotM award goes to Guildy instead of me? TKF has confirmed that I only won because of asshattery and I certainly don't want that on my shoulders. Thanks. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN18:49, 26 Feb

I just read that shit. No. You won the award fair and square. People sometimes don't vote anyway if they can see that others have and as such even if TKF's vote was stricken then you may very well have won. It's far too late to strike votes now anyway. The award history stays as it is. The pair of you need to stop being dicks. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:57, Feb 26
Maybe I would have won, and maybe I wouldn't have. We'll never know for sure now. And having an award that I didn't earn fairly is offensive to me. Might as well slap me in the face. I've removed my name from the list of winners. If you won't give it to Guildy that's fine, but know that I won't claim it either. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN20:33, 26 Feb
You did win if fairly. I'm telling you that. Who do you trust more? Me or him? Don't be an ass. TKF is just trying to make you feel bad because you had a row with him, and it worked. Don't fall for such an obvious troll and stop being so silly. You can remove the award from your userpage if you are daft enough to believe TKF, but I'm going to stop you from removing yourself from the UotM history page. Dude.... Just, Dude. He's a kid half your age. Chill. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:40, Feb 26
You actually reverted before I had the chance. There's no discussion and your name isn't going to be stricken from the record. You can't be a drama queen, Opty, you're too hairy for that. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:46, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Hairy and sexy. But in a strictly heterosexual kinda way, obviously. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:47, Feb 26
Obviously. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:50, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
No. I'm not trying to be a drama queen. TKF is telling the truth, he told me as much at the time but back then I thought he was joking. I seriously don't want an award I didn't earn fairly. I feel strongly about this. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN20:56, 26 Feb
Bollocks to that. Seriously, there is no way this awarded is being removed and there is no way I'm going to change the voting records because of something TKF said or didn't. There is a voting record, you earned it fair and square for stuff you're doing around and that's it. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:59, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
Probably the thing I respect the most about you Chris is that most of the time you are very cool, calm, level headed and a very good judge of what is right and what is wrong. For some reason this one got to you that's all... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:03, Feb 26
Because this is wrong. Guildy deserves the award, I don't. Simple as. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN21:05, 26 Feb
I just went and looked at the vote... Um you won by +15. Guildensternenstein and Zana Dark both tied for second with 9. So TKF drummed up 6 votes from people in IRC who were easy to trick into voting did he... Um... Let's look at the last few people who voted for you... Um... Out of the last few votes Socky, UU, TLB, Boomer, Ape, Sycamore, Sonje ZB ... Yea, all those people are easy to persuade by some bullshit in IRC from TKF. ... I think not. He might have got you 1 or 2 extra votes, but you would still have won regardless. It's VERY rare for any kinda gerrymandering to actually change the result of such things dude. You know that yourself. If there was a cabal you would not be able to fix it. Course there is not one, but I'm talking hypothetically, obviously. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:18, Feb 26
I voted out of love. Deep, meaningful love. Don't try to deny that love, Opty. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 21:43, Feb 26
Hea! Who let you back in! Aren't you meant to be up to you neck in baby vomit or something? :D MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:04, Feb 26

Look, this is how I feel about this

I appreciate that not everyone voted because of TKF's spiteful prodding. I'm not even saying that anybody besides TKF was being spiteful. And in truth, I don't really care about the award. The thing is, if there's even the possibility that it was a tainted nom, then that makes me feel like utter shit. I'd have rather lost than win unfairly. You can tell me that I won fair and square, but the truth is you don't know that any better than I do. I don't want to be the UotM with an asterisk, and I certainly don't want an award that somebody else should have won. If we can't change it now, then I'm not sure what to do. But I am not happy right now. And yes, I still love you UU. How are the baby User and mama doing? -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN22:23, 26 Feb

Actually I know that the majority of the people who voted for you are totally impervious to any kind of "spiteful prodding". Having been around this place for 2 and a half years, and knowing some of those dudes rather well... Yes. I do know that. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:33, Feb 26
Okay - break it down. Does Guildy deserve an award for UotM? Probably, so nominate him next month. Does Opty deserve an award for UotM? Definitely, because he was voted in by the community. Does this bitching about it serve any positive purpose? No, because there's no harm done. Does this possibly have a negative effect? Yes, because it cheapens the value of UotM. Long story short, if Opty got his way, then given the fact that so far the only two people who have said he may not deserve it are Opty and TFK, the bulk of Uncyclopedians would probably vote Opty in next month to clean this up. If not, then I can assure you the fact that Guildy is not UotM is an oversight that I intend to try and remedy by nomming him and voting for him in about an hours time, and I'm sure that I wouldn't be alone in that support. So get over it - you deserve this, Guildy deserves this, the whole conversation is a just a piss in the ocean - so let's get Guildy his UotM and all will be good with the world. Nominally Humane! some time 23:11, 26/02/2010
Wait! Your latest signature is not actually contriving the size regulations! What the hell are you playing at man! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:20, Feb 26
Ummm... I think you meant the one before latest. Actually, it's about 1px too tall, but because it's partially an abs positioning it won't effect any other formatting around it, I assume we're happy to let 1px slide - besides which, you know I'll change it again in about 5 minutes. Nominally Humane! some time 23:39, 26/02/2010
Generally speaking you can get away with anything around here so long as the admins don't find out. Just don't tell em. Um. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:42, Feb 26

Obvious troll is obvious

Penis. FreddCan Shredd 22px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 20:41 • Friday, 26-02-2010

Late apology

Originally I thought I might try and wait til things simply blow over (that time I accidentally stabbed my cousin? I blanked/avoided him until he forgot about it, true story) but I feel like approaching it instead, since we can only ever go forward in whatever circumstances. I'm sorry I was being a bitchy bitch on this talk page about what people want to do with their private space and you're right in that there shouldn't be a limit (anywhere) on where politics can invite itself. I believe it's admirable when someone isn't afraid or quiet about their own views. Also you were right anyway that I don't even know much about Monkfish or whoever it was again, because I can't hear speech on videos very well anyway so I was reluctant to do any research further than the Observer. Again, I apologise for flinging faeces at the fan. --nldr 23:04, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

You probably noticed that I removed the flashing blinking bold IN YOUR BASTARD FACE type text cos... Well... As you pointed out, that probably was kinda a bit over the top... :) Don't worry, I will not say anything more to you about old 'Monkfish' Lol. Thank you for coming here and saying this. You have now won my complete and total respect again. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:17, Feb 26
Same here, thanks sir. :) --nldr 23:23, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
And for the encore - you can apologize for your other sig that calls moi a facist. Stgdish! ~Jewriken.GIF 18:20, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
What? I assumed that was a compliment? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:29, Feb 27

Various from Spike

Sorry I didn't take our recent sockpuppet straight to UN:BP as you suggested. I wasn't sure, just a nagging "Spidey sense" because the VFD nominations related to Don Bluth movies. And--lame excuse coming--I figured there were enough admins on VFD, presumably with tools to do a positive ID on him via IP address--that Someone Else would do it.

Separately, Anon from various IP addresses has repeatedly hit Pie to add a quote referencing "TIMMMMAY!" and, lately, removing the cryptic one from Sursum Corda. Would you mind protecting Pie against Anons for a while?

Am in an abbreviated Internet session parked in front of a public library. My house is without power for a second day due to winter storm; best guess is I will be out for two more. Coverage on VFD and UnNews will suffer. Spıke ¬  13:18 27-Feb-10

I protected Pie... What? You are not allowed time off! Maybe you should move into the library until your internet is restored? Just push some of the bookshelves together and make some kinda a teepee type arrangement or something? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:23, Feb 27

Raptors with Chainsaws

Image done and added - how's it look? Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 13:34, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Rather dame awesome actually. :) I fancy that the guy who wrote that article has some real talent, and I'm sure when he/she sees how much effort you went to on this it might just give them the encouragement they need to go on and write some more for us... Thanks a lot man. Great job. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:40, Feb 27
Thankyou, thankyou. I was a bit worried about the caveman - he's not quite what I had in mind but he'll suffice. I saw the article when it appeared on New Pages back in January and also thought it showed promise, so let's hope the author will develop it further. After all, Uncyclopedia and the Internet will always have room for more velociraptors and/or chainsaws. :-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 13:45, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Why don't you face me like a man, rather than a crypto-fascist?

Don't be an arse.

Thats right, I'm talking to you. You deleted my little recipe without discussing any of the salient points that I raised. There was ample time for you to meet these points before the deletion date but you didn't. My guess is that you were irritated that I made a witty remark about your decision to mark the page. Why would you not discuss it like a reasonable human being? And typing the words 'UN:Pee' does not cut it. I'm sure you get a lot of enjoyment out of the petty power that you wield, but you'd appear more powerful if you had a couple of balls and half a brain to discuss the points that people raise rather than shitting all over their work after nothing more than a cursory glance because you don't get it.

So why don't you at least re-instate my discussion of the topic and join in the debate rather than acting like a coward? --Archie Wah Wah 15:10, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

I don't have to do anything for you. I'm a volunteer here. Tell you what... If you say "Please" I will bother to explain why. Other than that go back to watching Red Dwarf episodes. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:04, Feb 27

Pleeease will you talk to me like a human being? P.S. not sure about the Red Dwarf reference - haven't watched that for about 10 years... --Archie Wah Wah 15:10, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Well... Red Dwarf is (I'm guessing) where you got the term "crypto-fascist" from. You know the episode where they go back in-time to try to give the Tension Sheet to Rimmer? That was the episode where the young Lister was acting like an ass, thinking that all authority figures were sooooo "crypto-fascist", and that everyone was against him. Truth was that his drummer "Dobin" grew up to eventually join a large insurance company and got his own parking space. Maybe you are acting a bit like young Lister. Why don't ya try acting a bit like grown up Lister. You, know the cool one? Who everyone liked and actually had things figured out.
I'm not your enemy ya plonker. I'm a sysop on Uncyclopedia. A comedy website which I do for fun. We do however have ways of doing things here. If we did not the site would turn to shit. OK, to answer your questions...
"My guess is that you were irritated that I made a witty remark about your decision to mark the page" -- Um no. You made a witty remark about me? Sorry I must have missed that. I deal with thousands of articles and delete thousands of others. If you were poking fun at me and I had noticed I would have invited it and welcomed the challenge of replying... Um, it was Under user who put an ICU on the page, not me anyway. Odd that you thought we were the same person.
"if you had a couple of balls" You are in the UK right? Tell you what... How about you come to my home town (Bristol) and we could meet up in person. I would be happy to do so. Tell me when you are coming to Bristol and we can arrange to met somewhere. Perhaps then we could establish if I had any balls or not.
"So why don't you at least re-instate my discussion of the topic and join in the debate rather than acting like a coward?" You mean this? It's still there. How can I re-instate something which is still there?
The point that you are missing is that what you should have done was get a Pee Review. That's why I told you to go to UN:PEE.

You said... "It doesn't need peeing for I do not wish to change it...thanks! What I would like is for some moderator or authority of some kind around here to answer the charge, address the issue, show me the whites of their eyes. Please. Thankyou. Bye."

Had you taken my advice then the person who reviewed your article would have given you the advice which you require. Your mistake was by starting a forum topic and saying Look I has written an article!!!! EVERY ONE MUST READ IT!!!. Dude, we get hundreds of articles created every week here. If we allowed a person to start a forum in the Village Dump for each of their articles then we could not use the Village Dump for what it is intended to be used for. That's general discussion about site wide issues. The reason no one bothered to talk to you in your forum about it was because you somehow think that your article is particularly special and deserves special attention above the articles written by everyone else. We have a place where people can post articles to be reviewed... It's called UN:PEE. You said that you have no intention of changing so I deleted it because as it was it was not suitable as a Uncyclopedia article. You had 7 days to improve it, and you did not. It still needed lots of work. It's not that you have come up with some totally new form of humour which is totally wonderful and people are too scared to discuss it with you. We have had many similar style articles to the one you were trying to write before, yours was just not up to scratch enough to be kept as it was without further work. It was too short, had no links to other articles at all, and whatever humour it contained was probably only funny to fans of Delia Smith. The humour needs to appeal to a wider audience than that, even if it is intended for a narrow audience it still needs to have some humour which will appeal to the masses. Those are just some of the problems it had. I'm not going to go into more detail about it now as this is not a Pee Review. What I can do now is restore the article for you, and you can now take my advice and post a request on Pee Review. If however you don't intend to change the article further than what it was there really is little point in me doing so as it would be deleted again.
Do you want me to restore it for you so that you can request a Pee Review and get some advice and then improve it? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:00, Feb 27
Is it actually possible to have a wider audience than the fans of Delia Smith? The entire population of the world (including and especially Delia Smith) are fans of Delia Smith, surely...? Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 16:09, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
The worrying thing is that Delia Smith has the most fans in the part of the world which UU comes from, and it was him who put the ICU on... Oh Archie Wah Wah... I suggest you read through BGBU and then HTBFANJS if you intend to stick around. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:16, Feb 27
She's popular here too, and throughout the rest of East Anglia. But then, the only famous people from here are Lord Nelson, Oliver Cromwell, Stephen Fry and Delia - when your locals heroes number just four, two of whom are dead, you have little choice in the matter. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 16:28, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Don't give us this nonsense pretending to be from East Anglia! We all know you are Welsh. There is no denying it! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:45, Feb 27
Been living her for almost 30 years though, hence no trace of a Welsh accent. I've still got a tail and webbed feet however. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 17:12, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Back to the topic at hand though. I'm more than happy to do a PEE review of the article. I will point out that I thought it was cruft and had little redeeming value, except I will make the one point - the concept of doing a parody of a recipe is a good one, but that is only half a concept. What you need to do is find the comedy inherent in the concept and bring it to life. I have no suggestions how to do this except to give you the concept that I had in mind, which means odds are somebody will steal it, but it wasn't extremely original anyway. I was going to do a number of recipes for different cocktails, using the format of Wikipedia:Old Fashioned as a basis for it. As the list of cocktails went on it would become obvious that the writer was getting steadily drunker. This would start with a straight voice with a few jokes thrown in, and then get into One shot goes into the glass, and then one goes straight into your mouth and progress to I love you man. Not in a gay way, but I f--king love you.
Alternatively if you were wanting to make fun of the Delia smith type, make it a parody of a cooking show, where you have the straight laced conservative show presenter, along with all the Here's one I prepared earlier cliches, but underlie it with some other personality aspect, like an embittered ex-wife, and the recipes she's preparing are A fantastic leg of lamb, baked to perfection. This shows that you are a wonderful wife as you can cook, and not some giraffe with breasts secretary who should be shot or And the first thing to give your delightful husband in the morning is this delightful breakfast smoothie, complete with shards of broken glass. It's just like a chocolate milkshake, only crunchy.
Humour-wise, random humour rarely - if never - works. The trick to random humour working at least effectively if not brilliantly is to have sense behind the insensible. Read HTBFANJS for more on this.
Beyond that I didn't proof-read the article, but I recall the format was fairly standard. It doesn't need to be any better, but a more professional format drags the reader into the parody that much more effectively. A good example of this is Older version of Stereotype vs Newer version of stereotype. The change in formatting toward the end added an extra element to this article that made it so much better, and the inclusion of just a few dotted lines - while not changing the content - just made this feel so much more like a Hi-fi store catalogue, and as such more easily recognisable, which makes it funnier. You might also benefit from reading User_talk:PuppyOnTheRadio/Pox#Truth as it goes into this in more detail.
Don't really remember images, so they can't have been too exciting.
And that is a nutshell PEE review based on a reading of the article a few days ago. Hope it helps you understand how it needed to be changed in order to make it worth keeping. Nominally Humane! some time 20:49, 27/02/2010
Oh, and one last point. UN:JOB. Won't help with your article, but may help you learn how to treat people a little more politely. Nominally Humane! some time 20:52, 27/02/2010
Puppy can go suck a bag of dicks. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:55, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
Do they have to be bagged? Nominally Humane! some time 21:03, 27/02/2010
Don't give me all that. You only came here cos someone told you there was a picture of an arse on my talkpage. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:05, Feb 27
True, but when I saw it I thought bummer. Nominally Humane! some time 03:03, 28/02/2010

UnNews:Massive Earthquake, Giant Sink Hole Swallows Chile

Dude! I just put this up. I didn't want to put on your talk page. If you think it's funny enough please empower it with "the farce". May the farce be with you! Thanks--Funnybony 15:40, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Nice. That one looks ready to add to the UnNews template to me. Oh you know that they deleted the records from Haarp just before the Haiti Earthquake and that you have googled this. Right. Obviously you have... ;-) You are one of those communists. I can tell. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:06, Feb 27

Here's one that's just totally true

Dude! You might like this and help it. Written by a former Local. Hope you like it, it's just a starter. Bro!--Funnybony 22:50, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Will look at some point later... Did you ever look at The Bro Code? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:49, Feb 27
Didn't I mention? I loved the Bro Code! That's amazingly original. I didn't really pay attention to grammar, etc., but it looked like FA material to me, loads of work, and a lot of laughs out loud. I reread Monckton Denial, and just couldn't think of a single thing to improve, so that is also close to FA once you're satisfied - in my opinion. I'll be glad to Nom it. But the Lord Monckton article is not good for FA vote, because too many people will complain it's like a script (probably, anyway). I did more work on Local, and, having been on both ends of the stick, I know about this subject. Hehe!!--Funnybony 09:45, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
I don't think Lord Christopher Monckton denial would stand a hope in hell of being featured. Na, they are not ready for that one yet... I'm happy with it just being there right now ;) There is nothing wrong with an article being like a script. We have featured scripts before... Lord Monckton is not up to scratch for VFH yet though... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:54, Feb 28
Dude! Why do you think Denial has no chance? Because of the article or the subject-subject? What needs to be done to make it ready? Same with the LORD article..if not worthy, then what is missing/wrong? A Ree Review is just going to give another point of view besides yours. Cheers--Funnybony 10:36, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Probably just not enough funny in both of them I figure. Both are kinda just trying to push our POV about global warming (which will give us big time negative points from the voters) and don't have enough lolz to compensate for that. The trick would be to make them funny so that people who come from both sides of the debate would find them amusing if you wanted VFH. As it is, Denier especially is dam right insulting to people who believe in global warming. This is how I want it. ;) I don't care about FAs man. ;) I did tell you about{{Recent}} right? That's how you get a link to your new (close to completion) articles on the front page... A lot of people appear to forget about {{Recent}} for some reason. So, your challange with Lord Monckton would be to make it so that Lord Monckton himself, and Al Gore would both find it funny. If you can do that and still push your POV... Then you will have mastered Uncyc IMO. ;) I don't know how to do that btw, I still have much to learn myself... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:55, Feb 28
Dude, this {{Recent}} - we can just put an article there without any vote? By ourselves? And who decides what stays? BTW: I understand you about wanting to keep denier as YOU like, rather than having it changed. I feel like that about some articles we have, like Soma is great (in my 1/6.2 billionth of opinion). But, personally, I think new Local is pretty damn silly AND very true. Can I just put it here {{Recent}}? If so, would you please have a look first. I know you have lots to do, but I think it's a good one that came out of nowhere. Cheers!--Funnybony 14:15, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
{{Recent}} works just like {{RecentUnNews}} does. If you know enough to know how you probably know enough to not put something there which is pants. Yes, you can put Local there right now. Just make sure you follow the guidelines on the page. :) There is no vote. I will take a look at it, but you can go ahead and put it there now anyway. I'm sure you know what you are doing enough now to be able to judge if it's OK or not. The person who decides if it stays is anyone who decides to remove something. Generally people don't remove stuff which others have put up there, unless it's REALLY bad. Actually that hardly ever happens. To be honest we probably need to advertise both these templates more than we do. Enjoy. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:44, Feb 28


I think you were going for iCarly, not lcarly. As for the change, yayyyy!. On the Nicholson thing, I just wanted other people's opinions, it's a very interesting random filled but segments like UnBook page and I wanted to see what other people thought about keeping it, huffing it, or locking it in a cage and look at it from time to time. iJack. ~ User:Aleister in Chains User talk:Aleister in Chains 23:41 27 2 2MX

Dude. I'm now so confused I don't know which end is up. How about you fix it like it should be? As for VFD If you are not going to even make a delete vote yourself you are wasting our time. "Shit or get off the pot" as my grandmother used to say... VFD is for deleting articles. Not chatting about them. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:45, Feb 27
Yea, Um. iCarly, not lcarly? Yea, you totally lost me. Tell me what is wrong please? lcarly? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:59, Feb 27
I just tried to move it to iCarly, small i, but the innernest machine that controls moves won't accept that, keeps saying that it's already named ICarly. That's it in a nutshell, the show's name was with a small i. -- On Nicholson, does Uncy have anyplace just to discuss a particular article other than creating a forum topic? That's all I wanted to do, discuss the Nicholson page, and when I log on again I guess I can create a talk page for the article and see if anyone else has thoughts about it. But if there was a meeting place where people could toss out names of articles and discuss them all, or some of them, on the same page, that may or may not end up to be a populated site. Done for today, enjoy. ~ User:Aleister in Chains User talk:Aleister in Chains 1:10 28 Feb. MMX
Well the page I origionally huffed was :
23:15, 27 February 2010 MrN9000 (Talk | contribs | block) huffed "ICarly" ‎ 

With a Capital "I". To be honest I'm not sure you can have a page starting with a lower case letter. Maybe you are confused? You certainly confused me b4 by talking about "lcarly" With a lowercase "L".

I suspect that what confused you was the {{title-left|iCarly}} which was on the old page. That changes the title which appears at the top of the page, but not the actual page name.

As for talking about a page, you should use the talk page of the article, or if you want to improve the article UN:PEE. If we had a single page for people to discuss each page on here then it would be rather full don't you think? Would we call it the everything page? :P That's what talk pages are for dude. If you think it's pants, nom it for VFD and give a delete vote. As I said... If you are willing to work on improving it, use UN:PEE, if ya just want to chat about it, that's the talk page. Sometimes people create forums about a particular article, but that's generally not recommended unless it's some kinda special case or something. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:27, Feb 28

Quick and seriously out of here this time. The tv program's name was "iCarly", with the lower case i. That's all I was saying, but maybe you are right and the code won't let a page start with a small letter. -- I don't want to work on Jack Nicholson, in fact, like I said, it may be a masterpiece of random. To try to clean up the random might ruin the page, and to add random on purpose would seem contrived if not done very well. That's why I wanted to discuss it, to see if others like it, hate it, or have never seen it. It's an unusual page, for the reasons I've mentioned. Over and out, iAleister later that hour
Use the talk page. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 02:00, Feb 28
BTW, it is impossible to start a page with a lower case letter. Or in other words, the first letter is caps insensitive. The rest of the title is caps-sensitive, however. I believe it so cat and Cat link to the same page. --Mn-z 05:10, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
Nein! The whole thing is caps sensitive, however when doing a search wiki will look for it as it is, and then look for it capitalising just the first letter, and then search capitalising the first letter of every word. Which is why you can find User talk:PuppyOnTheRadio with user talk:puppyOnTheRadio or user talk:PuppyOnTheRadio, but not with User talk:Puppyontheradio or USER TALK:PUPPYONTHERADIO or uSER TALK:pUPPYoNtHErADIO. That's why when choosing a user name for yourself it is advisable to not have caps in the middle of a word. Damn damn damn! Nominally Humane! some time 05:56, 28/02/2010
Ya are missing the point young puppy! Try creating a page which starts with a lowercase letter. Go on. :P MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:48, Feb 28

You sir! With the fake boobs!

I believe the Unsignpost is ready to be delivered. Can you unleash hell? (and maybe do a quick proofreading before you do?) ~Jewriken.GIF 13:48, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

I let him loose! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:36, Feb 28

Joe Pesci

Dude! Thanks for reverting from that vandalism on Joe Pesci. On the ball, bro!--Funnybony 15:55, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

I'm actually trying to do a quick trawl though every new contribution to the mainspace on the wiki at the moment (which has not already been checked) and that one just came up with the rest that I fixed... NP man. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:38, Feb 28


Why did you delete the vast majority of my work on England? you could of at least reworked it... Dienkonig 22:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

I'm an admin. I'm not a regular editor of that page. I just saw some edits which appeared to be out of character with the tone and style of the rest of the article (as I said in my edit summary). Looking back, maybe I was a little too hasty with you on that one and my judgement may have been a little off. Your style was rather different, but still you did make it better so I will put it back, and will not revert you again. Sorry, my bad. Enjoy. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:09, Feb 28

UnSignpost 25th February 2010 (It's not late your mum is)

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 20:54, Feb 28


Can you clear this up for March when you get the chance? Nominally Humane! some time 02:46, 1/03/2010

Just curious

I was just wondering why File:Albacore.png was huffed, considering the rest of the content of Category:Pictures of naked girls. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:24, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

There is no rule I just made a judgement call on that image. Basically a bit too much fanny showing and in a more obvious pornographic way. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 04:29, Mar 1
I'm assuming by "fanny" you mean the British definition and not the American. But I guess it's a matter of perspective--to me, personally, the women who are looking lustful and spreading their legs, even if censored, appear more sexual than a naked woman smiling. But then again I don't find nude art necessarily sexual, but do the word "fuck" even when used as an insult. Again, a difference in perspective. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:50, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
That's why we have Sysops. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:49, Mar 1
Oh, is that why? I thought the purpose of Sysops was to have someone to blame for everything that goes wrong here so the rest of us don't have to take responsibility for our own actions. And then to whine at to fix everything when something goes wrong. You know, sort of like a parent. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:50, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
That's about it. The advantage of being a Sysop is that sometimes (like a parent) you get to say "because I said so" and the associated megalomania kinda makes it all worthwhile. Oh, and the hot chicks that we obviously get. *cough* MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:47, Mar 1
It's a tough job, but someone has to do it. Nominally Humane! some time 22:51, 1/03/2010


And a super-wide sideways smile for the retouching ;)  –  User talk:Zana Dark User:Zana Dark Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 07:46, 1 March 2010

Potato chopper nom

Dude! Amazing! I probably won't get it, but the nom is great enough! You really are a cool cat. Thanks for all your tolerance and kindness. I really am very proud to be an Uncyclopedian. And the longer I'm here, the more I understand all my fellow Uncyclopedians. Specially, the special ones who are specially special, like Spike, opps! - MrN! Really. Cheers!--Funnybony 10:40, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Don't thank me for the nomination. Aleister in Chains did that. He just forgot to put the template on your page. :P MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:45, Mar 1
Funnybony, you won already. That was a February nom. I looked, nobody was nommed for Potatochopper or for the UnBooks, and like I did at the end of January, made my selection after studying the records for the UnBooks and for common sense on Potatochopper (you've done amazing work). This is not tainted. A nominee for an award for a month, (apparantly unlike the Writer of the Month which is a Hall of Fame award) should maybe be done late so the month's work can be assessed. That others did not nom anyone has nothing to do, imnho, with a legit nom for the month. If this is a new rule shouldn't it be stated on the page (and how would it be stated? Noms only allowed well before the complete month's data is in on who should win?), and not decided retroactively? A better rule may be that no noms are allowed until at least the 15th of a month, so a users work up to that point can be judged. Both of the worthy nominees deserve this, imnho, as in January and probably many other months. ~ User:Aleister in Chains User talk:Aleister in Chains 11:11 1 3 mmx
It's not a new rule. We don't need one, I'm just doing this, this time. Dude you did not even put the template onto his page so he himself did not know he was nominated. You left it sooooooo late to nominate it was crazy, I doubt if anyone else even knew it had happened. I just thought we would have a better contest next month (this month) if people actually knew about it. Dude, Funnybony is a very good friend of mine on here. If I was trying do something unfair I would not do it to Funnybony. I'm sure he would like the option to win this award in a more conventional manner than if I were to have allowed what you did. I suspect Funnybony might consider winning it last month to be somewhat like tainting the award, and not really with the actual spirit behind what it is actually all about. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:22, Mar 1
Of course its not tainted. He deserved it for his work. Again, it is not my fault nobody else nominated. I think this question isn't even an argument. What occurred, as in January, is I went to vote, saw nobody was nommed, assessed the data for the month, and then choose who I thought was deserving. On the UnBooks, I looked through the entire months work, esp. on new articles, and read all the new UnBooks, and one stood out. No taint on any of these. I think a much bigger problem is the Writer of the Month, the language on the page should be changed as to who to nominate. It is a Hall of Fame award, and maybe the category should be so named. I didn't know Asshatter, but did study his contributions in considering my vote, and he hadn't written anything new in a year or so. A deserving Hall of Fame win, but far from Writer of the Month. Maybe an assessment of rules and wording on the award structure? Al, few minutes later
I don't agree. So if someone were to make a nomination on an open award 1 min before the closing time it's still valid? I did not see what happened in January. Uncyc does not work by predicate anyway. You did not add the templates to the user pages so I could (if I wanted) claim that the award was not correctly nominated anyway.
I don't think there is need to change the rules.
I'm not attacking you, I'm just doing what I think is in the spirit of the awards on this occasion.
Sorry. If you don't trust my judgement, consult another admin. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:40, Mar 1
Ah, you are tech. correct about the template, so there is the place we can both agree. And it would be nice to let Funnybony get his very well deserved praise this month. So let's let it stand, but nobody was wrong in this, except for the template. But the writer of the month rules do, imnho, need a change, towards the Hall of Fame statement maybe. Ok, nuff said. Al, a few minutes later
You were not "wrong" about the template. Plenty of nominations have been made before when people have forgotten to add them and it was not a problem. IMO this case is different because it was so late in the month, and only you knew about it (possibly). Had there suddenly been other people all voting after your nomination I would have allowed it. That's why I don't want to change the rules on that. You are wrong about WotM if you think it's just about how many FA templates you have on your user page. WotM is about how good a writer someone is, not how many articles you have been able to claim credit for. Some users contribute very good work to a very large number of articles but never actually start a new one, or claim enough credit to warent a HOS entry. HOS IS NOT WHAT UNCYC IS ALL ABOUT. Of that I am sure... As you said though... No one was wrong about anything here... I just did what I thought was best, and so did you. :) Have fun. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 12:22, Mar 1


Cool, Dude! Really! If I can get enough of a laugh out of you that you bother to help, then it's "Mission Accomplished" (ref. Dubya). As always, good edits, please continue. I mean, there's loads we can say about Naught. Cheers--Funnybony 19:16, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

There are probably not that many people who would have gotten that reference. Your articles do serve as an excellent platform for me to dispense my propaganda! ;) I'm off to the gym now. Honest! No really! I am!!! I will take a look at that other new article you did when I get back later tonight... I actually don't really need to bother watching the news on TV. I just wait to see what new stuff you will write! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:20, Mar 1
I was wondering, 1) Was there a Potato-chopper for Feb? and 2) Is there a Category for, like, "Article with an attitude problem"? or "article written with an attitude"? - because (nothing to do with me) but Local has the biggest attitude problem I was ever not about. Cheers!--Funnybony 20:42, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Did you read the 'Potato chopper nom' section up there? That kinda explains what happened. Read it... Aleister did actually nom you in February, but because it was soooo late in the month, and only he voted for you (and there were no other nominations) I got on my combine harvester and drove is straight through the middle of the rule book. So... Nope, there was no winner of Potato-chopper for Feb. That's not something new, it's not always won. The big three awards are NotM, UotM and WotM. Someone always wins those, but the others sometimes miss a month or two. Sorry man... Basically I pissed on your bonfire. However, I do know what I'm doing. My reasons were complex and related to lots of different stuff in many different ways, which I'm sure you don't want me to have to fully explain. Just from your point of view... A lot more people will check out your work (cos you are still on the page for this month). You will still almost certainly win IMO (so long as you keep being as awesome as you have been), and you will also get a lot more comments about your work than just the one you had from Aleister. I'm hoping that you trust my judgement on this one man, but... Yea, I did piss on yours (and Aleister's) bonfire a little bit. Sorry. It will be better like this. ;) Trust me.


Whoaaa..! OK, OK! You're, like, probably even Locals. IF I didn't trust my GURU, then I wouldn't be here amongst you all today. So, the proof of the pudding, and all that...

--Funnybony 09:28, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

As for the different awards, all we got are those listed on the bottom of any of the other award pages in that template. There are many other various "user" awards, but those are not kept updated much as only those listed on the template are handled by the admins. Only those on the template are "official" awards... Whatever that is worth/means... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:03, Mar 1
Bro, Actually I was wondering about a "Category", like "Article written in style of" or some such, but for Local - "Article with an attitude problem" or "Article with an attitude" or "Article with a terrible superiority complex" - is there such a category? Local NEEDS one.. Cheers!--Funnybony 09:40, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, well I put "attitude" into the search box and came up with Bad_Nigger_Attitude and NWA. Maybe one of the categories used by either of those might be what you need. Get farmiliar with using the search tool dude. It will provide you with all kinds of useful stuff. You can search in only the mainspace, or only in article titles if you want to. "Go" and "Search" do something slightly different... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:09, Mar 2

WFMU Marathon on now They sometimes play music by somebody who's "misunderstood." Also I have a link at the top of my talk page--I hope that doesn't violate some policy here. The radio station is the oldest freeform station in America, and is not some big corporation--it's listener supported so it depends on donations. They are not a for profit organization, but a few paid people and a lot of volunteers. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:34, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

So long as you are not getting paid to have it there it's not a problem for me. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:04, Mar 1
Cool. I'm actually one of the (admittedly minor) financial supporters, so in a way it's costing me. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:39, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Court Rules on Zombie unhuman Rights

Dude! UnNews:'Zombies' have free speech rights too, US court rules - THIS IS REAL NEWS (check the ref) - I kid you naught! Amazing, I just changed a very few words. Cheers!--Funnybony 23:14, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

I read both the actual article and yours... Wow. Yea, the authorities just keep trying to push the boundaries back to see what they can get away with. 3 steps forward, 2 steps back. It's called the "Totalitarian Tiptoe" dude. ;) ONLY Funnybony can save the world with his up to the second news reporting!!! I will see if I can toss a few sarcastic edits in. :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:22, Mar 1
I call dibs on Audio. Nominally Humane! some time 23:45, 1/03/2010
Actually, going to the full logical conclusion, if we have dead people with free speech, then they should have the right to vote. If they have the right to vote, and they outnumber the living by a significant number, then the next president would most likely be someone who the majority can relate to. So the next president could potentially be a zombie. Nominally Humane! some time 23:47, 1/03/2010
America already had one of those from 2001 to 2008. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:54, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
He was a puppet not a Zombie. Well, maybe a zombie puppet. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:57, Mar 1
Haven't you actually had a dead man winning the popular vote over there at some stage in the past? And a ficus? And Ronald Reagan? Nominally Humane! some time 00:58, 2/03/2010
Pitt the Embryo? I think there is a good chance that the Russians had a few leaders who had actually died, but they pretended they had not for a while... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:04, Mar 2
Dead people have won other elections (seriously--I remember someone died shortly before an election, but lots of people still voted for him), but I don't think for President. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:08, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
[[1]], [[2]], and [[3]] - although I'm sure there are more. Echoes of the zombie vote already being felt? Nominally Humane! some time 01:36, 2/03/2010
Now that is some seriously fucked up shit about there. How the living hell did that happen? ... and several times! That's one heck of a lot of VERY stupid/ignorant people all in one place at one time. Wow. Seriously. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 02:44, Mar 2
By the way, just read the original and the Unc version--like it. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:34, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
If you want to show someone you like their article... Don't bother telling them... Edit it! That is what people want. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:36, Mar 2
When I'm not at work I'll do a few edits, and definitely do the audio. Nominally Humane! some time 02:31, 2/03/2010
OK, here's my ideas for edits. We'll start with a quote by Zombie Oscar Wilde, who gets chopped off in mid sentence by Zombie Chuck Norris--oh, this is beautiful. Then we'll have Zombie Russian Reversal, where the Zombie's not dead you are!--oh, funny stuff. Then.... King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  02:41, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

sob! we're, like, soooo lucky

When I saw the headline I was blown out! What? Then I thought about the Constitution, and freedom, and that even a Zombie has rights, and it brought tears to my eyes..SOB! And I realized how lucky I was to be a Zombie, ah, I mean, FREE!--Funnybony 09:34, March 2, 2010 (UTC)


Well, it was only a half archive... Nominally Humane! some time 23:17, 1/03/2010

Amun-Ra? Jesus Christ. Whatever next. Amen. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:26, Mar 1
Just Ra. Nominally Humane! some time 23:45, 1/03/2010
Who speaketh of Ra, mortals? FreddCan Shredd 22px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 04:39 • Tuesday, 2-03-2010
Well, you know... Moses, David, Jesus, Muhammad, the Bible, the Torah, the Qur'an ... What? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:17, Mar 2
Non of those explicitly mentions Ra almighty. FreddCan Shredd 22px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 12:42 • Tuesday, 2-03-2010
Maybe I can illuminate you with some words from our lord most high. For he is God's sun. He is the light of the world, for he will die for 3 days and after leaving his tomb he will rise again reborn. In the spring equinox he will pass over the equator. Amen (Ra). I consider myself a Christian if anyone cares MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:16, Mar 2
It's Amon-Re actually, so yeah. Pants FreddCan Shredd 22px-Flag_of_Egypt.png 18px-Foxicon.png 13:47 • Tuesday, 2-03-2010


what is the name of that template that tells the reader to check the talk page of an article before editing it? I need for use on the iCarly page. --Mn-z 03:20, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

{{SeeTalk}} maybe? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 03:23, Mar 2
that is the one I meant, ty. --Mn-z 03:44, March 2, 2010 (UTC) blanking

Always makes me laugh when they try to blank an article in little bits at a time like that. As though we're not going to notice! :-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 14:25, March 2, 2010 (UTC)

PS. When I say "makes me laugh," I don't mean as in rolling around on the floor gasping for breath - I'm not that sad. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 14:26, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
The sneaky blankers... I sometimes let em work their way through to the end, just so as to waste a bit more time for em... :) Still I do think our vandals have more class than those of other wiki. */me feels proud* MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 14:28, Mar 2
Heh, I do that too. Nice to let 'em know that their hard work takes a fraction of a second to repair - hopefully proves to them that to us (by which I mean admins and us users with rollback) they are as flies to wanton boys and all that. Also, you're right - our vandals are the best. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 14:32, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
You know what the really, really, really classy and sneaky vandals do, don't you? They act like really productive, outstanding contributing users until they get made an admin. Then.... King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:01, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
That's why none of our admins are really productive, outstanding contributing users. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:05, Mar 3

On a related note, I find the fact that you needed to semi-protect this article quite amusing. --Mn-z 03:11, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pic for article


Would you be alright with this--the tiny picture 10px, The Babe Over There On The Right, for the "People Who Like to" page? She's got that happy light energy I was going for with the other pic, and the present ones I've either used or are finding don't have this lightness to them. Thanks, ~ User:Aleister in Chains User talk:Aleister in Chains 1:08 3 3 2MX

From a sysop type as in "you can't have that" sort of thing? Sure, that's totally fine IMO. Tits are OK man. We have loads of em. It's the open gaping pussy shots which are more of an issue... As for if that's a good pic to use... I'm not sure. You will loose votes if it's for an FA. Enough people will care I suspect. Although many are happy with tits in articles, they often don't want em in an article which is on the front page... So my advice would be... Um... Maybe? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:15, Mar 3
Thanks. I think I'll try it, with a slight tweek to the caption. For FA status, the entire article is the point, and not just the pics, but the thing I'm going for in the last pick is nude or almost nude but totally happy and calm about it. This one might have more of that than the huffed one, and it was right under my nose (ah, not literally, well. . .) the whole time, as I've had it on my user page since I got here. There she was all the time! Al chainy a few minutes later

Oh Brother!

UnNews:FED Sues Uncyclopedia, Demands NWO Evidence Removed <---Here's one about YOU, er, kinda. Better see what you can do, cause this is your day! Yeah!--Funnybony 09:24, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

The vanity is shameless! Although we do appear to have The Powers That Be so I guess... Take a close look at that picture of me on there. That's Tom Cruise ya know! ;) Also... I really can't tell exactly who you are taking the piss out of here, so well done! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:11, Mar 3

Local almost ready for a poke at VFH (if you Nom it)

Whoaaa..! OK, OK! Daaa...

Dude! Of course, you only Nom what you want. But Local was the easiest article that ever came to me. From past experiences I think - maybe - this stands a chance in hell as a FA. If you think so, it would be great if you could double-check it. I kept to one quote (maximum) intro, as per my mentor, MrYou, who taught me that "quotes" and "lists" are a turn off on VFH.. and also Spike taught me the same lesson. The only articles with many quotes are the ones I wrote for fun, and not VFH. Also I moved the Gentleman Local badge to bottom as an anchor. If you can check it, and think it's got a chance on VFH, then there's nothing to lose as VFH has no registration fee. And I already passed initiation with you, and now I'm your bro, along with all other cool Uncyclopedians. But, I am contemplating an article on the "Uncyclopedian Initiation Proceedure" - which consists, basically, of 1) getting kicked repeatedly in the balls, 2) realizing you own self-worthlessness, 3) becoming adopted by a sysop who's a hipster (jeez! what Uncyclopedian is NOT a hipster?), and 4) Eating an entire "humble pie". If people can't take the initiation then they just do NOT belong, being unworthy swine, unfit for Uncycloperdia and genuine friendship with UnBrothers & Sisters. So, when it comes to joining Uncyclopedia, one MUST make it through the "belt line". Initiation Ceremony. Haa! It's true!! Hope you give Local a shot (but, noooooooot before you checking it for useless crap to delete or change).

I saw you had a ball editing the new FED Sues Unnews, that's a perfect medium for my cat, MrN!!--Funnybony 16:54, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

MrN Says... Funnybony write article... Funnybony put article onto Pee Review... FunnyBony do Pee Review of other person article on Pee Review... Funnybony repeat... Funnybony repeat... Funnybony repeat... Funnybony become better Funnybony.

User:Why do I need to provide this?/IC Batman Begins User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig10 03:42, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

'Scuse me

Politely clears throat. Is there a friendly soul around here with an equally useful bot who could take this and make it appear on numerous talk pages?

Also, can you tell Why? to subst that bloomin' template above? Only when you go to click the edit button on that section, you almost post your message on his bloody template page, then you get all annoyed and want to find someone to ban. Fortunately, I have a cunning plan in that regard... --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:01, Mar 5

This is Why?--I know how to subst for my signature, but not for another template. What can I do to fix it? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:20, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
{{subst:mytemplate}} ~Jewriken.GIF 22:23, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, but where do I put that code? Please don't tell me I have to go to everyone of the 40 or so pages I posted it on and change it....I know, that's what you're going to say, isn't it? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:24, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
On whichever page you want to spill the entire code of the template - to avoid the problem you had with Douglaspanda. Put - {{subst:user:whydoIneed/ic}} on this page and it will place the entirety of the code here. After that, changes in the original template will not effect any pages on which the template was subst'd. This is why we subst the welcome message as well. ~Jewriken.GIF 22:28, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
All right, I think I see what happened. I actually purposely set it up so that when I changed the message on the template, it would change on every page on which it was posted. I did that so if I caught an error later, I wouldn't have to rewrite it on every one of those pages (I had to do that before, and it was a pain). But I didn't realized trying to edit it on someone else's user page would edit it on mine. So what I'll try to do is add a message to the top of the template telling people how to add comments. Hopefully, that will work. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:35, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
I did it--does that work? Also I'm not implying your notes were in any way nasty; they were very helpful. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:46, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Moving Creationism

I know what you said about moving Transformers but, er, um, could you move Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Creationism and its talk page to Creationism? There are a number of reasons it's critically important to preserve the history--checking to see who actually did contribute and what those contributions were, double checking on who gets half credit if it gets featured, seeing what worked in setting up a colonization and what didn't, etc. I tried looking through the history of previous colonizations so I could learn from what was done before, and never did fine much of it, which means I probably repeated a lot of the old mistakes. The only way I thought of keeping the history without an admin doing that huffing/moving/unhuffing magic that you do is to cut and paste the IC version onto the current version, and then posting a BIG NOTICE in the talk page that the rest of the history is on one of the IC pages and linking to it. But that would split the history up which I'd prefer not to do if it's not too much trouble to do your magic. What think? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:20, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Done. I think... IC should just edit the actual mainspace page they are rewriting. I never did really understand why SysRq wanted to do it on a different 'hidden' page. This is not my decision though, and you guys need to sort this one out between you. I do think that continuing to do this delete and re-create trick is not ideal however... It's not really something we are 'meant' to do with MediaWiki. Maybe if you do want to do it on a different page then you could just cut and paste, and attribute credit on the talk page at the time of completion. If you guys decide you do want to keep doing this, I will. I just don't think it's ideal, that's all. That's why I'm suggesting you just do it all on the page in mainspace. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:21, Mar 6
Thanks for your help. There's a few reasons I, like SysRq, think it works better on IC space.
  1. We start out with a blank slate. That doesn't matter on IC, but would mean blanking the article on main space for a day or two or three.
  2. When we start writing something, it's going to be a piece of an article instead of a whole article, which will be what was there before (however bad it might be).
  3. By keeping it in IC space, we can control who edits--I really don't think we have (nor do I want) the authority to say who can or can't edit in main space.
  4. By moving the entire history, as you'll graciously done for us, everything on the article is kept together in one space. It makes it much easier for someone (i.e. me) to go back and check things--as I said above, I got lost trying to track down previous ICs that were just cut and pasted. I found bits and pieces all over the place, and later on I found I had still missed parts of article's I thought I had found all of.
King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:24, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
Well... I don't think "blanking" an article in mainspace is too much of a problem. It would never actually be blanked, but would be a very short version of the new. You should not start editing the new page until there is an agreed new concept. I think that concept should be discussed on the main talk page of the article in question.
You don't 'control' who edits in IC now. Anyone can edit. You don't have to be a 'member' of IC to edit an IC article. Those are your main points, and I think they are invalid. I just realised that this 'fix' of moving the history is not ideal because if someone edits the mainspace page during the IC, then those edits will still show in the history of the page after I have done the huff/recreate. It actually looks VERY wrong. Take a look at this edit at 03:49, 13 February 2010. Look at the page history at this date/time. It looks like this user did something which they did not. I'm actually rather unhappy about that. I would really like you to come up with a way of preventing this from happening. We could sysop protect the mainspace page from editing, but then why do that when we could just edit the mainpage. I think that what has happened here is that both you and SysRq have started to believe that IC is some kinda a club which only you can control. That sir is not correct. Anyone can edit the IC page. People may choose to revert them if they wish, but it's not a private club.
If I might make a suggestion for how IC might be improved... Before voting on which article to IC I suggest that an overall concept be agreed or at-least suggested. You might have several good ideas for what the article should be like before you agree to start it. Rather than saying "lets do this... Um, what shall it be about?" ... It would be better to say "Here is my idea for this article, here is my idea for this article, here is my idea for that article (there may be several different ideas from different users and you might not have chosen which) but... The point is that you already know the concept before starting. I think this would then remove the need to 'blank' the article. Again, I'm not forcing you into changing anything here, but I'm sure you can see that this kinda thing is actually rather a significant problem. I'm hoping to come up with a way to fix this. Maybe thrashing out the basic concept in 'ICspace' but then doing a cut and paste into the mainspace page when you have enough to start the new article. If the edits were done on the mainspace page, I would much prefer to put temporary semi-protection onto the mainspace page in cases of high traffic pages than continue to do this bodge of huffing and recreating. If you can come up with a way of fixing this issue without needing sysop involvement that's going to be by far the best thing IMO. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:12, Mar 6
I'll think about what you said, and see what I can come up with (or what any one else who sees this comes up with--suggestions are welcome). Thanks for the info. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:46, March 6, 2010 (UTC)
I've taken some time to think about this.
  1. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to give a detailed response, and giving helpful suggestions. You could simply have said, "I'm an Admin that's the way it is if you don't like it tough cookies." But you didn't.
  2. I COMPLETELY agree that the editing history being misleading is a major problem. That alone is enough to convince me that my pushing for that huffing/unhuffing thing was a bad idea. I'll probably post a note about it in the talk page to explain what happened, or maybe post a note on that editor's page. What I think I'll do instead is put each IC project on its own page, link to it from the project page (which was an IC member's suggestion), cut and paste from IC space to main space, and put a note in the edit history and on the talk page where the IC history is so it's easy to find and credit. It will be a little more work on both ends, but it's better than having an inaccurate history.
  3. Personally, if IC articles had to be edited on mainspace, I'd rather not do IC. It would be much more efficient for me to simply find a user or two who wanted to work on improving an article with me, and do it that way instead of spending hours and hours writing notices and procedures and updates and checking everyone's edits, etc. Part of the advantage of IC is how it brings oldtimers and newcomers--and experienced editors who've never collaborated and maybe haven't even talked to each other--together, and can guide newcomers, who otherwise would be left out of collaborations, much more effectively than happens in main space.
  4. Yes, I did think IC had control over what was done on IC pages (of course knowing that admins could always overrule anything we did). If IC doesn't have say over its own space, I almost question the point of having IC. But I suppose I can nudge non-IC editors by posting a note on their talk page telling them they're welcome to apply. I've already done that, and so far they've either joined or stopped editing in IC. Or I could consider an edit in IC space a de facto application to join. But I am tempted to move the current work-in-progress pages to my user space so I do have the authority to say only IC members can edit IC projects. Again, if IC is the same as main space, I don't see the point in having it set up as a group instead of just posting a template at the top of an article saying it needs work.
  5. I like your idea of encouraging users to suggest ideas for colonization an article when they nom it, and plan to follow that. I don't, however, want that as a requirement. Frankly, when I nommed Creationism I had no real concept of a direction, which was formed by other colonizers and ended up becoming a feature article. On that article, at least (and so far on Batman), letting the concept come later and being decided by consensus seems to work.
Thanks again for your help and your patience with a bull-header editor! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:46, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
So long as you are willing to put the effort in to run IC... It's up to you how you fix the huff-recreate problem, sounds like you have a way... My suggestion about needing a basic concept was based on what I have seen of how IC works, and when it does not work. When an IC fails it's because one one came up with a good concept for the article, which is daft when people might have ideas for another article which would not have failed. When you have been doing this for longer you will see what I mean... Sure there are times when you can come up with a concept after you start, but I suggest that if concepts are not flowing before you do, then that's probably a sign of trouble ahead. Again, it's up to you there though... As for if IC really is a private "club" and that only "members" can edit? I think UN:N probably applies really... As you said, if someone does edit, then that's an application to join. I do not want you to move IC to your userspace. Do not do that. IC does not belong to you. You are running it. I actually think the whole thing (including getting new members) would work better in mainspace, but as you are running it, you get to decide. The point of IC is that it's one central place where users who want to collaborate can get together and do that. It's NOT a system of exclusion. If you want to create a private club in your userspace go ahead, but that would not be IC, and I would ask someone else to run IC instead. Have fun. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:45, Mar 8
All righty then; I'll continue my practice of considering edits to IC space as grounds for application--or to be reverted on sight if not helpful, as is usually done in main space. As for the no-concept problem, the way it's set up now is the concept has a deadline--it's determined between Sunday and Wednesday, then only after the concept's formed do we begin writing the article. If it's not made by when I check it Thursday, I'll create it or we'll move on to the next article. I remember what you suggested about the benefit of having deadlines, and that's what we're doing. Worked so far. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:00, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 4th March 2010 (your calendar is wrong)

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 00:11, Mar 6

UnNews:Lord Monckton Denies Denying Denial

Dude! You got me into Prefs, and I found the bitchin skin, "Beach" - and it's so cool that it not only makes me feel I'm a Uncyclopedia Beach Local, but also tells me how many edits I've made since 2008, and all kinds of neat looking gizmos. That plus my N-generated Signature, and FOR SURE I'm a Uncyclopedia Beach surfer, kinda, like you...COOL!!

I had this crazy idea for UnNews that is up, but not scheduled until 6th March. And it's even YOU'RE CAT. UnNews:Lord Monckton Denies Denying Denial So maybe you like to improve it BEFORE the release date. --- BUT, as you can see, I screwed-up his name in the headline, and I don't know how to fix it. We owe it to him. Dude! Ahh, daa, DONE!

Here's another UnNews for today: UnNews:Suicide Bomber Commits Suicide

BTW: Two more BS stories for March 7th

UnNews:Death Sues Life
UnNews:Mike Tyson KO’ed By Midriff Bulge

I have to go back and fix Local cause I just realized that surfing the Internet is also SURFING, which means that all Uncyclopedians are Uncyclopedia Beach Surfing Locals - COOL! And that's why we stomp any kooks who mistakenly wonder in. Cheers!!!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 11:17, Mar 6

Surfing = Surfer

Dude! I think it's amazing that of all the words on Earth, the powers-that-be chose, "Surfing" to denote activity on the Internet. Cool!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 12:13, Mar 6

It's used for orgasm control as well, gotta ride the big waves. Aleister in Chains 12:57 5.3.

Erratic Capitalism

I used some of that diplomacy you admins value so highly. Now, put down the ban stick.... no-one needs to get hurt! --Matfen 12:22, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

What? Dammit! I thought I was getting a few bans here! Ban stick is for banning! Um... Cool. Yea... If people then ignore ya after you have made a fair attempt at contacting them and resolving it... Then it's ban time time. I don't like to see people just reverting without bothering to use any talk pages. Cheers dude. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:19, Mar 6

March 8, 2010 (yeah, the future!)

Dude! I like this one as much as Tyson UnNews UnNews:Suicidal Surfer Sues Sea--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 12:53, Mar 6

Nice UnNews dude, but... I'm sure I have seen some of this material somewhere before. Easy on that dude... Otherwise great stuff. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:15, Mar 6
Sure! That crazy idea came from one of my articles, but it developed nicely into a news story. Well, HERE's a total original, also for March 8: UnNews:Atheists Decry SOS - Hope you like it--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 18:19, Mar 6


Could you restore the Princes Peach article that was recently deleted via VFD to my userspace please? I think I can improve it, since the current article doesn't seem to be going anywhere. —Paizuri MUN Talkpage My Contributions 02:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I put a copy of the last version here. It sucked major balls. I suggest you don't use it, and get this subpage deleted asap... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:19, Mar 8
Whoah, you're right. O_O Nevermind, go ahead and delete it again. —Paizuri MUN Talkpage My Contributions 03:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

UnNews: March 10 - peek into the future

Bro! Here's one you might like UnNews:Blanks: Cheap Alternative Or Ulterior Motive scheduled for March 10, 2010 - which is in the future - so you still have time to save the world. BTW: It's already March 8th where I'm sitting, so I topped-up recent UnNews with our SOS (yes, OURS!).

Also here's one for tomorrow, March 9th UnNews:Vietnam Copies Veterans Memorial with 300-Kilometer Wall. Dude!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 18:16, Mar 7

Uncyclopedia Beach Local

Dude! Here's an article you could really get into cause you know you're way around Uncyclopedia so well. Please jump on this partnership: Uncyclopedia Beach Local Hope it doesn't get huffed before we finish it--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 21:41, Mar 7

It's no problem for me, but

you might have a problem with this. Also please read that. Thanks. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:07, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

The author requested it be deleted, and it was an unused image. QVFD would have worked also... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:43, Mar 8
Oh, well, I could have gone to QVFD, but you're cuter. (Seriously, next time I'll try to remember to do that). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:34, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
3 hours ahead of you. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 20:29, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
You're always first. It's not fair. Showoff! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:08, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Random thought

I've just popped a few things on QVFD today, and managed to exceed the 20 items ruling (so therefore ripe for ban-stick, but I claim ignorance). Just thinking it might be advantageous to have another poop-smith on board, and I would suggest pointing the finger at User:SPIKE as he appears to be the most active user on VFD that I can think of, and would also be damned good at it. What say you? Nominally Humane! some time 05:06, 9/03/2010

Well... If you exceeded it, I missed you doing so. Maybe you have not read the rules properly for a while... SPIKE's contributions have been well noted. Bide your time for now though sir. If there were cabal business (which obviously there is not) then things would have a particular way of happening. Obviously they don't, due to there not being one, but if they did then there would be. I assume. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:29, Mar 9
I think after the next round of VFS we'll need to refresh our poopsmith list. Obviously, nothing like that will happen as VFS does not exist. ~Jewriken.GIF 15:26, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Depending on what may or may not happen at said nonexistent VFS process. Obviously. We probably also need to update this at some point. Or would do if that page were actually one which we had. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:32, Mar 9
Obviously, non of that will happen. ~Jewriken.GIF 15:35, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
Well, I feel I can rest assured that nothing is going to happen, and not knowing the cabal, which of course I don't, as there is no cabal, nothing will happen swiftly, and with no well-considered judgement. So there is nothing to worry about. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 07:33, Mar 10 2010 UTC
I'm glad that we didn't have this conversation... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 07:35, Mar 10
Is there some new rule on QVFD, or did you mean VFD? If you were talking about VFD, the 20 article limit is on active nominations, so the rate of poop smithing does not affect the throughput of VFD. --Mn-z 22:12, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
He's obviously really talking about UN:BP. :P Yea... Thanks for reminding us of that rule. I kinda wrote it (by proxy) actually. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 06:17, Mar 12


I was just messing around with that guy. You do know, don't you? Do you really think I'm trying to make this wiki family-friendly? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatblondguy (talk • contribs)

Nope. I don't understand what you are saying at all. What guy by doing what? Please explain in full detail. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:00, Mar 11

A Bloody Winner

Dude! I read that "How to be a jerk without being an ass hole" deal, and, I decided, to just write shit, and if MrN gives it the time of day, then it's good, and if MrN actually improves it THEN it's a bloody winner. Just base my opinion on your reaction and advice. Can't go wrong. Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 17:05, Mar 11

Thank you!

That IP with the Ron Howard obsession has been really getting on our nerves! Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 17:31, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

These "block" buttons are great. You guys should really look into getting yourself one, one day. :P :D (he he he) OH, GOD SAVE ME!!! The POWER IS GOING TO MY HEAD!!!!! /me shoots self MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:57, Mar 11
Chief putting the IP onto UN:BP helps also... ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:05, Mar 11
I asked if they sold them when I was in Maplins the other day. No luck, though. :-( Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 19:03, March 11, 2010 (UTC)


Dude! I read that article, HTBFANJS (How To Butt F**k A Nasty Jewish Slut) - and I can't quite make out what it's on about. Something about humor, or some such!?? Anyway, I'm not a lone wolf, I don't expect to create anything great without a partner or partners, and I'm not really looking for a one-man FA. Lets do them together, which I much prefer. I have good ideas, like when in the band, but I needed a bloke from South Shields, who used to tell me, "Go-on fook yaa granny!", to bring my ideas to completion. So I'm no lone wolf Uncyclopedian, and don't really want to be. I'll be, like, Jerry Lewis and you can be what's his name? The drunk guy who was so straight. Anyway, think about it.. so here's a bit of LUNACY:

Moon Moons

--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 17:52, Mar 11

You are a Funny one Mr "Funnybony". You put so much value in my opinion about some things, but how many time have I pointed to you to read that thing before, yet you have ignored me on that? OK, that sounds a bit like I'm having a go at ya. Dude, you know I'm not, cos I love you to bits cos of all the cool things you do. But... You may not even think it's true, but reading that really will have made you a better writer. Just like if you did some more Pee Reviews that would also make you a better writer 2. Not only that but it would also get a lot more people interested in your work, and you would have more contributors to your other work in the long run. I'm not the expert in comedy dude. Far from it. I have a sense of humour which is different to that of others, just like everyone else. What HTBFANJS does do is point you at some principles which have been shown to be effective in the past.
This guy wanted to be funny, but failed to read our guide.
Here's the thing dude... You keep saying "My style does not cut it" and stuff like "what's the formula for success at VFH"? Well... It's taken you what? A year before you have actually read our document which explains that? Lol. Dude. Come on, you have to agree that that is kinda funny. I know that some of our best writers (I'm not one of them) often go back and read, and re-read HTBFANJS lots of times when writing. It reminds them of what works, and what does not, and is often a source of new ideas and avenues for articles. Dude... If you respect my opinion (I know you do but you're just a lazy arse who don't want to read documentation) then you will read HTBFANJS sometime again in the not too distant future. That's one heck of a read, and there is no way it's all going to have gone in after just one read through. Seriously, read it again sometime soon. You might also want to take a look at our guide to doing reviews. UN:PRG I wrote that in tandem with Cajek who is the author I think you should model yourself on. Even if you don't do any reviews, still read that. Of the great writers here, he's probably the dude closest to you in terms of humour style, and probably the best advice I can give you is to read some more articles from that his of his stuff which I gave you a while back.... It's like I say dude, if you want to get better, you are going to have to do some research. Not that reading Cajek's stuff is hard work. The dude is awesome, and you will love everything which he ever wrote. Or... Are you too old a dog to teach new tricks. :P :P :P MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:57, Mar 11
Also... GO READ THIS AGAIN YOU BUGGER!!! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:20, Mar 11

Thank you

OK, you are right. Thank you for all. I will never forget you. 18:59, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Cool. It should vanish from the mirror next time it's refreshed, but that's nothing to do with us... Now... Why not write something for us? :D MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:02, Mar 11
Where I write? 19:06, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
It's like... A wiki anyone can edit. :-) Whatever interests you... If you want a place to start... Read BGBU and then maybe HTBFANJS then (maybe) create an account here... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:09, Mar 11
Thank you, I know that wiki anyone can edit, but, I don't go to create an account. I don't know how to be funny, because I'm not funny. 19:35, March 11, 2010 (UTC)


Dude! How is the easy way to archive? Do I create a new page as UN:Funnybony/TalkArchives1 ? Or somethin'? Is it really simple? I feel like a bull-in-a-China-shop. PLEASE forgive my ignorance. Quite often I get accused of doing something I've never heard of before. Some people assume I'm a smart guy.. NOT! Big mistake! If someone shows me how to break a rock, then I can do it. BTW: Did I Spork an article? I hope Saint Peter is not going to say, "Dude, sorry, but you "sporked an article!" And I'm like, "Nanu-nanu!" In fact, maybe SPORKING should be added to the 2012 Olympics!? Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 20:01, Mar 11

Did you look at how other users do their archives? Mine are listed at the top of this page for example... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 06:19, Mar 12

Got Bot?

Excuse me, my good fellow, but would you be so good as to spam this all over people's talk pages with the help of your handy dandy (and now Bio'd) bot? Would be awfully grateful. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 10:41, Mar 12

Sure. Yea, he already told me about the top notch bio you did for him. His head has swollen up to 3 times its normal size, which as you can imagine leaves little room left in MrN towers... :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:45, Mar 12
As always, I salute you and your spectacular efficiency. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:21, Mar 12

UnSignpost 11th March 2010

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 11:03, Mar 12

UnCyclopedia GOOGLE ADS on Main Page


Picture taken from Uncyclopedia screen grab. Everyday there is Google Ads at top.. today is religion, other days products/services.-Is THIS a joke?

--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 11:04, Mar 12

Holy Shit.
That appears to be what happens if you select something other than the default "skin" in Special:Preferences. I think the default (and so what I assume everyone else is seeing) has no adverts. Still that's a breach of our creative commons license I assume. Go into Special:Preferences and try some different settings... It's almost certainly an error by Wikia rather than something more sinister. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:27, Mar 12
Yea, if you select any of the "Monaco" skins it's going to do that... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:39, Mar 12
Thanks for the info. It doesn't really bother me, and the Monaco skin is so cool. I'll stick with it for now. Thanks--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 18:32, Mar 12

Trying to make archive of talk page

Dude! So you won't think I'm stupid - therefore I tell you up front. I'm stupid! See how smart I am? It takes a genius to know that he's stupid!

I looked at your archive - and couldn't figure how to save the old (current) talk page to a new name, and start a fresh talk page. All I could try was to MOVE it to another name, so I moved to User talk:Funnybony/archive1 - but all that did was redirect the old page. And, on top of everything, the whole deal is surrounded by warning lights and Uncyclopedia cyber threats. I don't want to be accused of breaking more laws that I never heard of. Now I'm really confused. I'm sure it's something super simple. But I still don't know it... HELP!!!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 18:27, Mar 12

I sorted it for you, it was no problem to sort it out at all... Can you see what I did now? Here is the thing... I would rather you tried, and fucked it up, than not tried, and never learnt anything... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:00, Mar 12
Gee, then I must be doing good. I try things here and fuck them up all the time! No, wait. You said we're supposed to learn something? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:08, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

redirect from MrN9001 - imposter

Dude! I escaped that MrN9001 Punji Stick trap, and finally found my way back to you. I don't trust your sock puppets (being one myself) and am glad to be back in the World. I saw that you made a NEW page for my talk Archives and freed up the original Talk page - which was a well conducted special forces operation of great risk. I'm still not sure how you did it. But give me a little time to solve the puzzle, and DO drop a hint. You're awesome--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 10:35, Mar 13

To see what I did... Why not look at my contributions? You can also look at the page history of the pages involved. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:59, Mar 13
I see WHAT you did. Piece of cake. But I still have no idea HOW you did it?--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 22:43, Mar 13
I don't understand! How can you see what I did, but not know how??? I just copied the contents of your talk page onto a new page! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:51, Mar 14

Ancient Uncyclopedia

Dude, I was reading an actual Sanskrit Purana this morning and had a crazy idea. Did you know that, apart from everything else, the Hindus also were first to have Uncyclopedia!? And in one Purana, the Hip Purana, there is detailed, esoteric, and bone fide information on Uncyclopedia. Even the book is Sanskrit titled "Uncyclopedia" (not very subtle, huh?). I just got started, and please DO join in Ancient Uncyclopedia. Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 22:41, Mar 13

Har Har

"Uncyclopedia Beach Local Initiation Procedure"

The Uncyclopedia Beach Initiation ceremony is the worst form of NOT "hazing"! But it is a gruesome FACT (mainly cause most Locals are "Grue"s at heart). And all Locals have to survive pass it.

This initiation, also called the "belt-line" consists of:

  1. Getting kicked repeatedly in the balls (on-line) - even if you're a she-person.
  2. Getting humiliated constantly until you finally realize your own self-worthlessness.
  3. Getting adopted by a "one-eyed" Sysop who's an “Ego-buster-from-hell”.
  4. Eating an entire "humble pie" in one gulp.

NOTE: During the Uncyclopedia Beach Local Initiation Procedure Suicide is NOT an option. There's nothing funny about suicide (in spite of some idiot killing themselves being patiently absurd). So once the Initiation begins there is no way out, unless you bring a signed hand-written letter from your Mother asking that you be excused.--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 23:57, Mar 13

... How many times did I ask you to read HTBFANJS? How many times did you ignore me, and not bother!?! Dude, if anyone made it harder on you it was you for not taking the advice of all the people who suggested it b4. Lol. You are a silly bugger ya know! I bet you write a shit load better as a result of reading it. Ya will never admit it though! :P :P :P Did you ever read BGBU? Lol I bet not! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:20, Mar 15


ChristianBaleAward.jpg Matfen
thanks you
for your vote!

His article could not have been featured without you...

:) --Matfen 11:42, March 15, 2010 (UTC)


Sorry about that edit. It was intended to be in good faith. Rest assured, I won't be making any more edits like that in the near future. --Matfen 16:55, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Well, obviously I assumed it was in good faith! That's why you are not banned! I did wonder WTF you were doing though. You could have explained that to me in the edit summary when you made the edit. That's kinda what they are for ya know! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:16, Mar 15

David Carradine

Why the hell did you nuke this? This was funnier than most of your articles. 19:02, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Why the hell are you asking me that when you have obviously already read the deletion reason? Also, have you read most of my articles? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:14, Mar 15
Well, MrN, I've read most of your articles. They suck balls. You also smell funny. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:19, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
Actually it's my balls which smell funny, but that's only because you have been sucking on them. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:21, Mar 15
Ah, that makes kind of sense. Carry on. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:22, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

I am so glad!


I am unfortunately fRENCH.

My name´s Jean-Michel Sarga.

A few days ago I was angry thinking that the peron who invented the idea of universal wiki has been f****d by a guy named Whales, and that would lengthen the development of neutral information (example in my field (I am a mathematics addict); definition of some words some people use) and in the same time in the case of human suffering related info( I don´t the phrase for "wars, etc") a pseudo-"neutral" "information".

I was thinking over during hours about this problem.

You can imagine my bliss and laughter when I happened to see a webpage that I thought being a wikipedia stuff on my firefox with the uncyclopedia article "Dick Cheney".

I love you all.

It must be unfortunate to be French. Nominally Humane! some time Monday, 23:52, Mar 15 2010 UTC

The "Scene"

Uncyclopedia Beach. Basically an Uncyclopedia Beach "KOOK" is, by definition, an "UNregistered User"

--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 23:24, Mar 15

If you had done some of the things I suggested... Ya would know a bit more about being a local around here! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:51, Mar 18

Need some expert help for a good cause my dear chap!

Dude! I hope you feel properly glorified in Ancient Uncyclopedia. It was a fluke that I created the article. After creating I realised it was, like, an ancient Zen Uncyclopedia manual that's, maybe, a "must read" for Uncyclopedia success (it even includes HTBFANJS}. I think I might have a chance with this one passing the acid test. It really feels unique, and funny, and useful too. BUT, that could depend on your checking-editing it where necessary, and even adding more ancient Zen instruction, for example, the Ancient Uncyclopedia language with words like nOOb, Spork, Sock puppet, etc. It needs a Uncyclopedia Beach Local jargon, and again for the Uncyclopedia Beach Local article.

It would be good to list the top ten Unwords as jargon, and I'll also learn from reading that, cause I only know about FA, nOOb, Spork, etc, from you. So a mini Undictionary of 10 top Unwords would be actually helpful to both articles, just as I believe that Ancient Uncyclopedia is actually helpful beyond parody and actually quite right on. The article surprised even me. Hope your well, Dude!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 01:36, Mar 16

Sorry dude, I can't really get into that article. I have looked at it a few times and I'm not getting it. Maybe check out The History of the Decline and Fall of Uncyclopedia and some of the pages linked from the bottom of that. In jokes need to be really, really good to be good. As you noticed some people hate em. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:50, Mar 18

User:Why do I need to provide this?/IC Why plank King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  16:53, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Vigilance week

It's all good. I figured if there is a push to delete the category then that may also reflect to the V-week itself (which I hadn't come across prior to now, so I actually do appreciate it as history.) Is there any need from an admin perspective to reawaken V-week? User:PuppyOnTheRadio/deb Thursday, 03:43, Mar 18 2010 UTC

I'm not sure what you are asking me here, but I will be very surprised if we ever get another one. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:06, Mar 18
Okay - as an opinion, do you think we need another one? User:PuppyOnTheRadio/deb Thursday, 09:50, Mar 18 2010 UTC
Na. V week was needed before we got ICU and VFD actually working properly. The standard of our crap these days is much higher than it used to be. Like I said, I will be very surprised if we ever get another one. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:12, Mar 18

Shockingly on-time delivery?

This is ready. On time. When you've picked yourself up off the floor, could you arrange for it to be delivered, please? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:29, Mar 18

Course what I do by cutting and pasting a link into my bot is far more effort than what you do by actually like... Writing the thing every week. ;) It's awesome that you have managed to keep the thing going for so long. I guess doing stuff like this is why they voted ya UotY. ;) Anyway, go and ban the good Rabbi a few more times while you still can and get him to organise this whisky piss up tasting session. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:46, Mar 18
On the other hand, if I hadn't been cranking this out week after week, I may already have won my race to 20 features with Orian, and even written bloke, as you suggested such a long time ago. And I'll leave the Rabbi to organise things in his own sweet time, on the grounds that the longer he takes, the more chance there is I'll actually be able to make it! (Family business is hardest in the first few weeks and months, y'know?) Finally, it's taking the time to get a bot working in the first place that's the important part of what you do - I really, really can't be arsed with even trying that shit, so I remain very appreciative. Cheers! --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:54, Mar 18

Ban patrol

Yeah, sorry for undoing Rabbi's archiving work, I honestly had no idea why it happened, I was just using the Ban Patrol script as normal. It also has the tendency to replace previously reported IP addresses with new ones, meaning that you can try and report 5 people and only one ends up appearing. Something to ask Spang about do you reckon? --ChiefjusticeWii 11:27, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Probably. Maybe the database might be lagging? Try a purge to see if that fixes it? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:31, Mar 18

UnSignpost 18th March 2010 (on time as always)

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 11:48, Mar 18

Gay Pubs

Thanks for the nom and mine's a Babycham if you're offering, big boy. ;-) Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 10:59, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

I have said it before, but there is something deeply concerning about the ability Uncyclopedia has to turn otherwise heterosexual men in raving woofters. With that said, I shall get yours in right away as I'm sure you are keep to have something nice sliding down your throat this evening. :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:03, Mar 19
I blame Olipro. Rabbi Techno Icons-flag-gb.png kvetch Icon rabbi.gif Contribs Foxicon.png FOXES 11:12, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Our current Colonization

Currently, the Main Page link "For the glory of her majesty" goes to the heading "This week's Colonization". As we ain't doing one every week, I changed the name of the heading. So could you change the link to go to Uncyclopedia:Imperial_Colonization#Our_current_Colonization? Thanks (By the way, we're beginning Discordianism, and you're welcome to help out). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:13, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Also I copied and pasted Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/Batman to Batman, and did the same with the talk pages. I have links in each to the other to make it easier for future generations who explore our greatness to check the history. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:14, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

Fort Knox is full of shit!?!

Dude! Here is a new UnNews you might want to edit-add to. Because it's about Fort Knox gold being a FED illusion. Please take look at UnNews:Fort Knox robbed, nothing to steal. Hope you're keeping well, bro! Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 14:12, Mar 22

Discordianism vote needed quickly and member retirement

User:Why do I need to provide this?/Discordianism vote King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:28, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak

Dude! The truth be known. I sporked HTBFANJS and made my OWN: How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak. Hope you "get" it! Cause it pretty right on. Still got more work to do, by this is enough for one night. I hope some VFH (Drab) "content freak" doesn't screw it up or get offended. Fuck them! They're the ones we're talking about. Cheers--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 04:43, Mar 25

I like that article (lol), because I can laugh at myself, but a handful of "content-free" articles do get featured, such as some of Cajek's, and some of Hyperbole's what I call "Adventures in Daily Life" articles (I don't appreciate your reheating of my lasagne or some such thing), and a handful of other ones that you have to look for, and my favourite one is probably Samuel L. Vacuum. I'm also in the process of giving a particularly harsh review on an article full of content, and taking a little break. Still, congrats on your first half-feature, no hard feelings, and boy, do I feel weird butting into your talkpage MrN. ~Scriptsiggy.JPGPlease talk to me. Please. MUN CUN RotM 15:04, Mar 26, 2010
Oh! Dear! THAT!? Why that has been totally revamped and Al nomed it on his own, without any sexual favors. But maybe too late once a feeding starts. But it's much better, well, more politically correct and polite. Take another look if you have a chance, at least the new intro. Cheers!--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 00:59, Mar 31 00:59, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

'Scuse me

You would appear to not be here. Is that a long term thing, or just a few days thing? And will it stop you firing up the bot to deliver this? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 15:06, Mar 25

Say, just realized you haven't edited here for a week. Hope you're OK! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  02:12, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
N told me in an email that he had a new job and would be working. So I bet he's been busy trying to save money for a TRIP. No sweat.--Funnybony Icons-flag-th.png Agnideva-small.jpg AGT-logo-small.jpg 14:40, Mar 26 14:40, March 26, 2010 (UTC)
Tell him if he comes back soon to work here I'll pay him a 20c piece. He'll have to pay postage. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:09, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
Hokay, thanks for the heads up Funnybony. Hope it goes well MrN. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:44, Mar 29

UnSignpost 25th March 2010 (hand delivered for added flavour)

--ChiefjusticeWii 22:09, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

IC Replacement

As you may remember, I took over IC when I got volunteered by somebody and agreed to do it temporarily to get it moving. That's happened--we've had two successful colonizations, Creationism and Batman, the first of which was featured and the second which is currently nommed on VFH. We're working on our third, Discordianism, under my big cheesy leadership, and to give enough time to complete it and to find a suitable replacement, I've announced I'm retiring from the leadership position as of 17 April 2010.

My question is, how is my replacement chosen? Is it an admin decision, does IC do it by vote, do I decide (although even if I could I'd do it with the consensus of colonizers)? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  18:53, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

I may not be around much

We've had a death in the family, so I don't know when I'll be around for the next week, at least. Would you mind checking occasionally UnNews to see if everything's OK? Thanks. Zimbuddha.jpg Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 14:41, March 29, 2010 (UTC)


How would one (1) or several (lots of fingers) users go about reviving a huffed article? This came about when I saw that Ratmaster was deleating his/her pages, and saw the Non-huffable Kitten article, which seems fine for Uncy now, and Mn-z said it was deleted at one point. So the question, how to undelete a deleted page. Thanks. Aleister in Chains 15:24 29 3 mmx


Mr. N, could you please hack up (undelete) Image:Marysenude.jpg? If yes, thanks. If no, okaaay... 11:06, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 1th April 2010 - Always on time

Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 04:45, Apr 2 2010 UTC

Hi theres

Despite your having set up a collaboration page, I brought this idea up again, since it is by far my best one. You're welcome to participate in setting up the office. It will not be a user group but rather an idea tank, to steer writing when a writer is stuck. But we talked about it last year. -- Style Oranssiviiva.jpg Guide 07:10, April 2, 2010 (UTC)


SAFPAS.png For your vote in VFS

and as promised last time
You have been awarded a Certificate guaranteeing you safe passage whilst inside those areas of Uncyclopedia under Zionist domination.
Certificate also redeemable for one (1) free bagel at your nearest grocery - simply print out and present
to the shopkeeper to claim your free bagel with the filling of your choice.

Rabbi Techno

Gay Pubs

UnSignpost 4/8/10 - Oh hi Signpost.

MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 19:54, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 15/4/10 - Yet another on time delivery.

--ChiefjusticeWii 20:34, April 15, 2010 (UTC)


Why did you delete my edit to this page? I thought it was an improvement over a list of purely random ideas, because it shortened it by 2 and added a more original one. --Sbluen 04:59, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Anyways, since you're not on right now, I'm just going to make my edit again until you give a better explanation. --Sbluen 03:25, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
Since MrN is currently not here permit me to make something clear to you for him. If an administrator deletes a page or reverts a contribution you make to a page and you wish to take issue with it then you wait for a reply from the administrator, or if they are not around you take it up with another administrator. You most certainly do not restore whatever was deleted and justify it through the absence of that admin, do it again and you will end up banned. I hope I am making myself clear. --ChiefjusticeWii 12:03, April 29, 2010 (UTC)


Hello, would you be so kind as to pee review an article I have been writing? I needed an early review and a few comments on the overall concept. It is here, if you are able to help. Thanks. Latin is for sissies 05:03, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Vote now for Colonisation

Hello ladies, gentlemen, and other,

As you may be aware we have now reached the point where April's Colonisation, Discordianism, has been successfully moved to mainspace, and we are currently voting on our colonisation for May.

As I have been press-ganged encouraged strongly to take the reigns of IC, I'm sending this out to remind all current and previous members of IC to vote on next months colonisation. Voting is taking place here as we speak. As of 1st of May I will be announcing the page that will get our tender mercies, so I encourage you to vote - or nominate - now.

Good luck, and may the farce be with you!

Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 03:35, Apr 27 2010 UTC

Discordianism has been added to VFH. Go, read, enjoy, vote. Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 09:45, Apr 28 2010 UTC

UnSignpost 1 May

Brought to you by fucking magic. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 10:18, 1 May 2010

Article Space

Howdy MrN. I have this article that I've done as a rewrite for the Tony Stark page, but I'm unsure how to go about it. Can I just copy and paste, or am I supposed to go through the whole VFD thing? --Matfen 09:19, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Since MrN is a little inactive at the moment, I'll answer for him. You can just copy and paste yours over; I have looked them both through and yours looks far better, and the text is spaced out. Just copy and paste, call it a rewrite, pay me a small gratuity and head home. --ChiefjusticeWii 09:22, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
I would normally ignore you out of fear for MrN bollocking both of us, but seeing as he's gone off somewhere, I'll go along with it. Oh thankyou, tahnkyo ChiefJusticeDS! I shall be sending my imaginary sister round shortly... --Matfen 09:30, May 19, 2010 (UTC)


This isn't going to be a thing about how you should return, or anything. Just a little thing to say that wherever you are, and whatever you're up to, I hope you're well. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 12:51, Jun 7


Can you make this page any better:

The Twilight Virus


--Gamma287 20:06, June 12, 2010 (UTC)

Also can you stop touching me inappropriately. And where are your pants? -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)

The UnSignpost Is Not Dead!

A new UnSignpost issue, another template spammed onto your talkpage, enjoy! Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 14:11, 24 June 2010


I understand why you got rid of this page but i think something extremely funny could be done with the name, if you or one of your talented friends wrote a strong article it would fill a large hole in uncyclopedia Pireninja 08:34, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Just to let you know, if you want to increase the chances of someone writing the article you should try listing it here. List it in the correct place and one of our editors is far more likely to spot it. --ChiefjusticeWii 08:56, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

All the news that's unfit to print!

--ChiefjusticeWii 12:09, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

You thought I forgot?

Thanks! Also, get back here, you old chap! Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 14:53, 1 July 2010

Signpost: normal service resumed

Oh dear god, am I really doing this again? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 10:51, Jul 9

Re one of your Top 10 of 2009 votes from January 2010

Better late than never, or at least that's the thought. (I guess you might not be around right now, so maybe there is such a thing as being too late ...) (Sorry about the length of this, by the way.) Horribly belated thanks for voting 2001: A Space Odyssey into #2 of 2009! MacManiasig.png MacManiasig-cheerios.png MacManiasig-holmes.png MacManiasig-starwars.png MacManiasig-firefly.png MacManiasig-pixar.png MacManiasig-oregon.png MacManiasig-lesmiz.png MacManiasig-doctor.png 16px-HalLogo.png Portal16px.png UncycLensFlare16px.pngDalek16px.png 16px-ChekhovSig.png16px-JapanSig.png Sir MacMania GUN[01:53 16 Jul 2010]

Another UnSignpost! Rejoice!

Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 09:59, 16 July 2010

Read all about it! The UnSignpost rides again!

--ChiefjusticeWii 13:52, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

You sir, are a tosser

And a wanker for thinking that RL is more important than us. Just hope you should know that. ~Jewriken.GIF 14:36, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

He impregnated me and then abandoned me.....hope he gets his.... -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me)
I thought you were into that sort of thing -- Prof. Olipro Icons-flag-gb.png KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 15:17, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

It's new and it's news! It's the latest UnSignpost!

Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotYPotM WotM 15:50, 5 August 2010


:( --Roman Dog Bird 06:07, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Ruddy hell! It's the UnSignpost

--ChiefjusticeWii 11:56, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Avast me hearties!

Colony Potato.jpg
By the powers! this e'er be fer a reminder o' tha great, grand Imperial Colonization be startin' up again!

Whether you be a sprog or a privateer we be expectin' ya ta come 'round an participate in this sweet trade lessen' you be a lily-livered squiffy, scallywag, or scurvy dog thar.

Aye! ~ Buccaneer Happytimes. Happytimes_pi.gif

The current project: Dinosaur

Now in the writing phase
(Oh UN:IC, how your rules are now broken....)

UnSignpost - This is definitely not late; you're just drunk

MegaPleb Dexter111344 Complain here 12:49, September 9, 2010 (UTC)


You tried to get me to make an account. I never even noticed. That's odd. Seriously, it is. I mean, I've noticed now, but... huh. Although I suppose for an IP, I wasn't that bad, but... well...

Yes, I came all this way just to be confused at you concerning an old article in no direction in particular. Admittedly, your attempt came after I'd joined not once, but twice (the first shortly after creating those two articles; that account lasted all of six hours), but... huh.


I guess I mean to say... thank you. For the gesture. ~ Pointy.png *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100929 - 03:38 (UTC)

I noticed you haven't been around lately...

I hope everything's ok. :) MadMax 08:44, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Daddyyyyy... come back!

I'm back. Although I think I did say during my hopefully last dramathlon that I wouldn't return... Anyways. I hope you'll get back in time for my wedding! You know the usual sulking in a corner, mulling over a glass too many of alcoholic beverage of your choice, and stumbling down the aisle, tearing the white dress and that. But don't worry! I'm eloping, so you can just toast for me with friends of your choice! ^_^ -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Grew up with a butler, cook and a nanny, she qualifies, doesn't she? - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 09:41, 19 Oct

Dude, I had a dream about you last night...

It was a Harry Potter dream. You played the part of Proffessor Snape. I think my girlfriend was Harry Potter. It was a weird dream. So, you know.... Um.... Hi. Woody On Fire! Wood burning.gifTalking Woody Stalking Woody 17:20, October 30, 2010 (UTC)


I'm all alone in the cold and *sniffle* and the instant noodles and crackers you gave me when you left me in that dark alley are all gone... *wipes tears* and I feel like I've been let down by the uncles since you told me Leddy would pick me up after this game was done and he didn't and I'm cold and soaking wet and smell of dark alleyway trash... COME BACK! -- DameViktoria Heart_anim.gif Grew up with a butler, cook and a nanny, she qualifies, doesn't she? - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 12:56, 31 Oct

UnSignpost - The UnSignpost Rides Again!

The Case of the Missing Admin

Checking the talk page, it seems you just walked out the door in March 2010 and never came back . Something in RL? And since the other admins have also asked you , no word to them either which is strange or even a farewell rant if it was anger. Hope you pop back and tell us how you're doing. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:29, November 12, 2010 (UTC)

Read All About It!

--ChiefjusticeWii 14:34, November 18, 2010 (UTC)

Run for your lives! It's another UnSignpost.

~ Pointy.png *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 01:04 (UTC)

Don't you love the smell of the UnSignpost in the morning?

--Wanna see a magic trick? 03:39, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

The UnSignpost, now with 25% less saturated fat

--ChiefjusticeWii 16:15, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Oh shit! It's another unsignpost!

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 05:21, 16 December 2010

This is it... the 100th UnSignpost.

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 06:53, 23 December 2010

UnSignpost, UnSignpost, eat it right here...

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 21:31, 30 December 2010

UnSignpost Delivery!

Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 09:53, Jan 6 2011 UTC

UnSignpost Delivery!

Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 03:13, Jan 13 2011 UTC

Do not attempt to adjust your set. This is the UnSignpost.

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 08:13, 20 January 2011

UnSignpost! Wheeee!

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 04:42, 27 January 2011


Where are you???? I miss you.  –  User talk:Zana Dark User:Zana Dark Sheenicon.gif (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 17:53, 2 February 2011

The UnSignpost is now served with complimentary tacos.

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 02:33, 3 February 2011

This edition of the UnSignpost brought to you in two's complement...

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 02:25, 10 February 2011


Leddy's back (kind of) so why aren't you ya fuckin' limey bastard??!??!!?! --Roman Dog Bird 06:51, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Is anyone here actually black? I need to know how guilty I should feel for saying nigger. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 06:53, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
I am you racist mother fucker (and so is mordillo). --Roman Dog Bird 07:04, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Nigger. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:55, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Lurg luuurg unsignpost luuuuurg

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 06:14, 17 February 2011

UnSignnull pointer exception

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 07:44, 24 February 2011

All the UnSignpost you ever wanted

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 16:08, 3 March 2011

UnSignpost: March 10th, 2011

~ Fnoodle (talk) (my creator) 03:07, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

AdminBots presents: The UnSignpost

1234 ~ 16px-Pointy.png 05:12, 17 March 2011