User talk:Andorin Kato
- This one isn't covered by either... but I post replies on the same pages as the originals. A post here means a response here. The same goes for your talk page.
Viking![edit source]
At least I didn't put that Weegee pic on here; ugh! creepy!
(Looking forward to you new round of talk page talk.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 23 Aug 2010 ~ 06:31 (UTC)
You monkeyspank[edit source]
My five foot cock in your gaping cunt!!!!!!!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 06:35, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- I think you having a five-foot cock would be a bigger problem than me having a gaping cunt. --Andorin Kato 06:38, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Is that a dance I see?[edit source]
Why yes it is!
I knew I saw it. --Dancing dude 23:40, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
'Lo[edit source]
It's me from IRC. Hi. -- Lollipop - 22:13, 11 August 2011
- Shh, keep your voice down. That restraining order still haven't expired and I don't need to get caught and go back to the slammer. --Andorin Kato 22:15, August 11, 2011 (UTC)
Negative potato[edit source]
Hey.................remember me? I did the negative potato edits before you took it on? Glad to see you back. I would love to colaborate with you on the rewrite. this article has always been on my mind since ive seen it. What do you think? --ShabiDOO 23:48, August 11, 2011 (UTC)
- So I guess that means no. I´ve been waiting for you to come back before doing anything on it. Too bad, I really liked this article and wanted to work on it with you before VFH. --ShabiDOO 01:08, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- O hai. Sorry, I didn't notice the message you left here. What, particularly, do you think needs any changing? --Andorin Kato 01:12, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey...its not just a case of what needs changing, but the general theme of the article. There were a lot of things I wanted to add. We both had VERY different ideas for the article, but nor were they incompatible. I was hoping to see how we could integrate them both. --ShabiDOO 01:16, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- If that's the case, why not have two different articles? --Andorin Kato 01:20, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Well...the article as it is now is the sum of various authors. If you arent interested, then go ahead and nominate it...and you can have it. Keep in mind though that you basically reverted almost all of my edits that I made back then (I was just a new user at the time and some were pretty nOOb like but others were not so bad at all) and sort of turned it into your article. Ive been hoping since to colaborate with you on it. So when I saw that you made some edits I was hoping to colab. --ShabiDOO 01:25, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Shabidoo, if someone says no, just accept it, please. Don't keep pushing; it's really kind of rude. That said, I looked at your edit (you apparently only made one), and while you've come a long ways since then, even of your best work you can't always expect your contributions to stay in a finished product regardless of who edits it. There will be other articles, other concepts, other random things. Now don't make me come up with an excuse to ban everyone involved and ragequit, because dammit all, I want my coffee! *thumps* Wait, that made no sense... uh, I was just leaving. ~ 01:37, 13 August 2011
- Lyrithya, to be honest, we both see this totally differently and I disagree that I was being rude. I tried one last time to see if we could work on it, I could have easily taken over the project during the last year and almost did, or started an edit war or been a lot more in your face, but instead I tried in the last message one last time to have a colab. I was going to accept the final answer but I wanted it to be clear how I felt from my side. In the end, there still are more than a few of my edits and ideas in the final article (I made one very very large edit), and its a fine article the way it is now (Andorin did do a good job after all and Im not criticising that), and im sure it will be featured, so, no big deal but I had to try. You dig it? --ShabiDOO 08:36, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll just... smile and nod. Yes. That. ~ 00:40, 14 August 2011
- Lyrithya...you don't get it. The future of all Mozambiquian Chetahs and Australian mini-monkeys depend on this article. In the end, Im really just trying to preserve two very endangered species. Before the two of us take over the world. So...its basically in your interests too! --ShabiDOO 01:44, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't get a lot of things. Like the morning paper. And when to stop smacking people with my umbrella. *stops smacking Andorin* ~ 03:57, 15 August 2011
- Lyrithya...you don't get it. The future of all Mozambiquian Chetahs and Australian mini-monkeys depend on this article. In the end, Im really just trying to preserve two very endangered species. Before the two of us take over the world. So...its basically in your interests too! --ShabiDOO 01:44, August 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll just... smile and nod. Yes. That. ~ 00:40, 14 August 2011
- Lyrithya, to be honest, we both see this totally differently and I disagree that I was being rude. I tried one last time to see if we could work on it, I could have easily taken over the project during the last year and almost did, or started an edit war or been a lot more in your face, but instead I tried in the last message one last time to have a colab. I was going to accept the final answer but I wanted it to be clear how I felt from my side. In the end, there still are more than a few of my edits and ideas in the final article (I made one very very large edit), and its a fine article the way it is now (Andorin did do a good job after all and Im not criticising that), and im sure it will be featured, so, no big deal but I had to try. You dig it? --ShabiDOO 08:36, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Shabidoo, if someone says no, just accept it, please. Don't keep pushing; it's really kind of rude. That said, I looked at your edit (you apparently only made one), and while you've come a long ways since then, even of your best work you can't always expect your contributions to stay in a finished product regardless of who edits it. There will be other articles, other concepts, other random things. Now don't make me come up with an excuse to ban everyone involved and ragequit, because dammit all, I want my coffee! *thumps* Wait, that made no sense... uh, I was just leaving. ~ 01:37, 13 August 2011
- Well...the article as it is now is the sum of various authors. If you arent interested, then go ahead and nominate it...and you can have it. Keep in mind though that you basically reverted almost all of my edits that I made back then (I was just a new user at the time and some were pretty nOOb like but others were not so bad at all) and sort of turned it into your article. Ive been hoping since to colaborate with you on it. So when I saw that you made some edits I was hoping to colab. --ShabiDOO 01:25, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- If that's the case, why not have two different articles? --Andorin Kato 01:20, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Hey...its not just a case of what needs changing, but the general theme of the article. There were a lot of things I wanted to add. We both had VERY different ideas for the article, but nor were they incompatible. I was hoping to see how we could integrate them both. --ShabiDOO 01:16, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
- O hai. Sorry, I didn't notice the message you left here. What, particularly, do you think needs any changing? --Andorin Kato 01:12, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
Guess it's that time of year again[edit source]
ey! --
23:58, August 11, 2011 (UTC)Morning Dew[edit source]
Thanks for the vote and the spelling corrections. Let me know if you are interested in colab at all in the future. I could use the help of someone on a couple articles such as User:Shabidoo/The internet is being raped! and Cool beans. --ShabiDOO 22:36, August 13, 2011 (UTC)
My userpage[edit source]
Is still better.
22:29, 19 August 2011- Mine too. DJ Mixerr 00:36, August 23, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Happy birthday![edit source]
Now stop being an attention whore and go crawl back under your rock.
02:37, August 20, 2011 (UTC)this[edit source]
I added the notfunny ICU tag to this . DJ Mixerr 00:35, August 23, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
- I noticed. Well done. --Andorin Kato 00:36, August 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I learned well when I was blocked after few knocks to the head. DJ Mixerr 00:38, August 23, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
ICU[edit source]
Hey man why did you put back that tag on my article?. As you can clearly see(unless you're blind) that article is as good as complete and should be ICU tag free as i put a lot of work into it. Please can you tell me what the problem is cause i want people to appreciate my work. The article is Assassin's Creed--Swayne16 06:15, August 24, 2011 (UTC).
- I only re-added the tag because on the ICU page, it states that you may not remove the tag yourself unless you make a good-faith effort to improving the article (and until you removed the tag, it hadn't been edited since being tagged). You are of course welcome to dispute the tagging, which I would suggest that you do either on the article's talk page, or the talk page of the person who tagged it in the first place. --Andorin Kato 06:29, August 24, 2011 (UTC)
What better way to revitalize your presence on uncyclopedia[edit source]
than this? --ShabiDOO 11:33, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Kato![edit source]
That's a kick-ass name, how did you come up with it?
Answer me on my talk page because I'm trying to get as many users who are on this list to come to my talk page as possible.
But ssshhh about the second paragraph. Okay, so long! -Sir Matthew Philip Matthlock, Attorney at Law LLC, 1-800-MTT-HLCK (Give me a call!) 23:21, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm guessing it's his last name. 23:23, 10 March 2012
Howdy, pard'ner[edit source]
I saw you in that forum thing and squealed with girlish glee. Nice to see you around again : ) -RAHB 06:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
In case you're still alive...=[edit source]
Please come back to Uncyclopedia soon or we are coming after you for child support. --EMC [TALK] 16:27 Jun 7 2014
Re-feature queue[edit source]
If you want, you can go to Uncyclopedia:Re-feature queue/Nominate and pick one featured article that you wrote to be re-featured. You can also pick three features written by someone else to re-feature. -- 20:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
It's beginning to look a lot like…[edit source]
Up for grabs is the coveted Clark Griswold Award for Holiday Cheer. Who will be crowned Holiday Victor?
Seasons Greetings!
It's that special time of year. A wonderful time for friends and family to rejoice in gaiety. Not you! You usually spend all of your hard-earned money on gifts for them, and now you just want to hibernate until your finances recuperate. Well, here at Uncyclopedia, entering our newest competition won't cost you a penny — Sign Up Today! (pretty please) – ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 15:07, 13 December 2021