Forum:Best Article of All Time

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Best Article of All Time

Note: This topic has been unedited for 751 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Throughout all the top 10 voting, I've been wondering "Are these really the best articles we've got?" I can only begin to imagine what hidden gems lay beneath the waste of regular articles. That's why I'd like to start a vote to decide "The Best Article of All Time". This is not an award, however. "Of All Time" is supposed to imply that the vote will go on until Uncyclopedia kicks the bucket. You're free to nominate any article you like. They don't need to be features or anything. Hell, nominate an article in userspace if you feel like it. The only requirement is that they are "articles", not userpages or image galleries. If there's demand for it, we could split up in-jokes and other stuff, but it's a little early to decide anything like that right now. Oh, and before I forget, self-noms are totally allowed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:07, 6 February 2011

So then, this is just a continuous award, and any article can hold it for as long as they want, until the next one has a higher score? If so, I would think it would require a page in the Uncyclopedia: namespace. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 23:46, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

Wel, sure, you could call it a continuous award. At some point it might warrant a page in Uncyclopedia namespace, but it's a bit too soon for anything official-ish like that right now. Talking about official-ish stuff, I think creating Template:BAAT so suddenly might've been a bit rash. And the symbol at the top right is bound to interfere with the top 10 symbols. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:19, 7 February 2011

Why are you against speedy progress? I suppose, since you created it, it would be inappropriate for me to really take charge. And this being a wiki, you can always undo me anyway. As for the topicon, I moved it over 25 so it wouldn't interfere with the featured symbol. I can move it over another 25 if needs be. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 06:11, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Features, move it over. Top ten, move it over again. Collaborations... move it over again? How many little symboly things do we really want to shove up there, though? And for that matter, how long will this last? Would the templates even be feasible for every one nominated, which could well become an exponential amount? And would they not pander to the whims of anyone who feels like nominating anything, then? Perhaps holding templates in reserve for only ones that actually manage to stay on the page would be more sensible... things to consider before jumping into official namespace, mon. 1234 ~ 09:48, 7 February 2011

When is the deadline for this? DJ Mixerr 03:55, March 8, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

The death of Uncyclopedia. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 14:08, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Seriously? When is the deadline? DJ Mixerr 07:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

I'm serious, the "competition" goes to the end of Uncyclopedia's existence, whenby whichever article has the most votes will be the user-decided winner. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 04:47, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

On Wikipedia, it lets you put in how many icons are on the page and it moves it over accordingly. See wikipedia:Template:Topicon. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 22:46, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

What is the finest catch of them all?

Eh, I modified the template a... bit. Thoughts? Better, worse, completely idiotic, I should stop editing this wiki and go overdose on meth like the rest of my demographic? 1234 ~ 10:17, 18 February 2011

Miracle Science

Score: 2

1. I wrote this and I think it's good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:07, 6 February 2011
2. Yup. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

Physics

Score: 2.5

1. Lyrithya pointed me to this article by MacMania and I laughed my arse off reading it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:07, 6 February 2011
2. I didn't laugh my anything off, I'm too tired. I guess I'll re-read it tomorrow and re-review it. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 10:27, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
   • Nope, still just ¹/₂ from me. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 23:37, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
3. Hodge, yes. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

UnBooks:The Whimsical World of Freedom of Expression

Score: 2

1. I worked on this with Colin. I think it turned out great. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:07, 6 February 2011
2. Craziness. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

UnScripts:Good Cop Inanimate Cop

Score: 3

1. An ingenious UnScript by MacMania. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:07, 6 February 2011
2. Oh god yes! Gen. Fudgem0bile Head-butt unicorns 01:18, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
3. Quite good. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

Fire Hydrant

Score: 5

1. Reminds me of that 5.5 years thing I never did. Anyway, Fire Hydrant is the article to end all articles. The only other article that even comes close is... -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:14, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
2. Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:19, 8 February 2011
3. Aw yee. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:16, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
4. Aye. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011
5. :) --ShabiDOO 22:53, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Ima let you finish but Beyonce had one of the best articles of all time. All time!!!

Printer Ink

Score: 5.5

1. This one. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:14, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
2. Maybe that one. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 10:14, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
3. Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:19, 8 February 2011
4. I hate that you made me love you. -- 04:24, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
5. Yes. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011
6. Like. Simsilikesims 02:32, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

Being and Nothingness

Score: 4

1. Or this one. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:16, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
2. "Also, this book was originally written in French but now you can get it in English so you can read that shit." —rc (t) 17:26, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
3. Both! 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011
4. ;) --ShabiDOO 16:42, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

Protagonist

Score: 4

1. Admit it, this one is awesome. 1234 ~ 08:29, 6 February 2011
2. It's alright. I don't know if it's the best ever, especially due to the British spelling (which I detest), but I think it's funny. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 10:07, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

   That's weird, why would you hate correct spelling? --Black Flamingo

   Because it's unamerican. It's communism. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 23:48, February 6, 2011 (UTC)

   So accuracy is communist? That's... ironic. 1234 ~ 01:33, 7 February 2011

   That's right, especially on Uncyclopedia, a shrine to incorrectness. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 06:08, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

   Uncyclopedia is communist, yes. 1234 ~ 06:25, 7 February 2011

   At least I voted for the darned article. Jeezus Christ! —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 06:41, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

   Damn Commies. I heard they eat babies. Or was it borscht? Something disgusting anyway. --Black Flamingo 10:08, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

3. I too believe this one is awesome. As this is more a "favorites" page, this is also one of my favorites. Aleister 11:01 7-2-'11
4. Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:19, 8 February 2011

BUTT POOP!!!!

Score: 3

1. I eat apples with Mike Tyson and Oscar Wilde in Belgium. --Mn-z 17:17, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
2. Against There's no text on this page. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 00:27, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

   Please, no against votes. If you're saying the nom's invalid because it's not an article, you could be right. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:19, 7 February 2011

   I'm saying both. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 06:12, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

   I believe "I eat apples with Mike Tyson & Oscar Wilde in Belgium." counts as text. Also, the templatedness is part of the joke. --Mn-z 22:02, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

3. Against For. There's something appealing about the idea of eating apples with Mike Tyson. pillow talk 03:45, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
4. For Against For. It's pretty bad, but, like, whatever. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:14, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
5. How did this even get nominated?  Against. Aimsplode Talk 15:36, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

   Its an inside joke with a long and controversial history. --Mn-z 23:38, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

6.  Against. If there's a Butt poop, what about wiener piss? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:10, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Walls

Score: 3

1. Support I like this one! —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 23:43, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
2. I can really get behind this one (in a not gay way(well, let's see where the night takes us)). -- 04:28, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
3. Sure. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

Don't some work

Score: 8

1. For Why yes, this is an excellent place to whore my new article, thank you. User:Mrthejazz/sig 06:23, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
2. I like it, but a few notes:
   • The idea is good... it's a journal of you creating a page. But it diverges from the main point... to don't work.
   • For future reference, Google Language tools translates from English to just about everything, including Yiddish.

   Anyway, you have a vote from me. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 08:06, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

   Read this? 1234 ~ 09:57, 7 February 2011

   No, but now I know it's Famine I should complain to. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 22:43, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

3. Brilliant parody! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:19, 8 February 2011
4.  For. --~  20:07, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
5. A surprising amount of not work went into this. Well not done. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:06, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
6. For DJ Mixerr 03:13, February 10, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
7. Meh, work... 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011
8.  For. I loved it! Deefinitely the best so far.--— Yipyapper (talk)
9.  Against. Not especially funny, being that the author put no work into it, canceling out the meaning of the whole article. Aimsplode Talk 15:34, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
10.  Yes, but You used pictures. The original didn't. madmadmad   06:20 March 26

UnNews:My testicle might have partially detached

Score: 1

1.  Vote for my balls! - Especially since today is, in fact, the 10th anniversary of my real testicle injury. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 07:55, Feb. 7, 2011

UnBooks:The Adventures of Baron Ringpiece

Score: 2

1. Might I interest you in my Ringpiece? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
2. Certainly. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

The Camera Obscura Collection of Hans Helmuth Saltzman (1602-1668)

Score: 2

1. I guess this is like a "favorite page" vote, which could get to be thousands of pages long. That one is my favorite. Some of my others, in no order, although I haven't sat down and read the entire body of work of some of the great ones, which I should: Fluffy Bunny World, Microsoft Knowledge Base, Gay Jesus, History of Great Britain, BabyTV, UnBooks:The Night I Slept with Björk, Elfen Lied, and others. Of my own stuff, my faves include Warm piss water, UnBooks:The Old Man and LV, People Who Like to Fuck Naked, Mortal Sin and others. Aleister 10:48 7-2-'11

   Some good choices there. Mortal sin would definitely be up there for me, if I could be bothered with this, which I can't. Also IMDb - that's pretty much the best page on the site. --Black Flamingo 14:42, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

2. Aye. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

• Comment. DID YOU SAY OBSCURA?!?!?!?!?!?!? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:28, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

Dan Kwon

Score: 2.5

1. 0,5 Lol Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 15:45, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
2. I don't know who Dan Kwon is but I've arbitrarily decided to vote For. pillow talk 03:46, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
3. I like Hyperbole's reason. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

Fisher Price: A Retrospective

Score: 2.5

1. Go eat etc. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 15:46, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
2.  For. It was the ultimate Uncyclopedia article of 2005. DJ Mixerr 03:11, February 10, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
3. Jas --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:18, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
4.  For. :) laughed the whole way ;) Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 11:09, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

Gay People

Score: 2

1. Short, simple, stupid. I love it. --Roman Dog Bird 04:19, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
2. Actually... o__o 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

HowTo:Cut Your Own Head Off With a Chainsaw

Score: 3

1. An oldie that I like. User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:26, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
2.  For. One of the best. -- 01:14, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
3. But of course. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

Sidney Poitier

Score: 1,000,000 2

1. My best work in my opinion and it was never read by anyone. :( -- 04:19, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
2. I read it. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011
3.  Against. DJ Mixerr 21:03, February 20, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

User:Roman Dog Bird/Giga Bowser

Score: 2

1. Penned by the late, great, Dominic dudley. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
2. poooooooooopoooooop. Meaning For. pillow talk 03:47, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

User:Roman Dog Bird/Fungo Chu Chu Christ

Score: 1

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

User:Roman Dog Bird/Lars' Magical Fantabulous Bingo Shorts

Score: 2

1. Why in God's name did you idiots delete this? --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
2. I find this quite funny. DJ Mixerr 22:37, March 22, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

User:Roman Dog Bird/Palfince

Score: 1

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

User:Roman Dog Bird/Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Taking A Shit In A Loved Ones Mouth

Score: 1

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

User:Roman Dog Bird/biggest wood

Score: 1

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
2.  But needs some work DJ Mixerr 22:46, March 22, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

User:Roman Dog Bird/genocide

Score: 1

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

I eat my own shit

Score: 3

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:50, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
2. For. User:Mrthejazz/sig 15:07, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
3. Yes. --EMC ^[TALK] 11:42 Feb 13 2011

User:Starnestommy/Ct

Score: 4

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 23:55, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
2. For Yes yes yes yes. DJ Mixerr 03:46, February 12, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
3. are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? are you talking to me? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:53, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
4. For. Better than crack your mom.--FISH!ALISH!ALISH!RANDOM!TALK?(lol.) 06:04, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

UnBooks:Boop!

Score: 3

1. Obviously. pillow talk 23:58, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
2. For /me giggles, claps, rolls over on to side. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:23, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
3.  BOOP! Never said you only get one vote! -- 20:49, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

HowTo:Date an Emo Girl

Score: 1

1. Fucking For Gotta love those emo girls. Especially the mean ones.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 13:42, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Every single one of Kingkitty's articles

Score: 5

1. For. --Roman Dog Bird 20:41, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
2. Fuck yeah -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:46, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
3. Okay. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011
4. Yeah, the hobo urine one. pillow talk 05:29, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
5. yeh sure -

   kingkitty ~Fuck you~

Kitten Huffing

1.  For. Obviously. - LOL vandalz 09:43, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
2.  For. Why not? DJ Mixerr 23:21, March 31, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

What's the Best Article? Nobody Cares

(I'd vote for if I cared.) User:Mrthejazz/sig 02:43, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

...pretty much. I'm just voting for what's here. 1234 ~ 21:54, 17 February 2011

User:Mimo&maxus/NAKJ

Score: 1

1.  For. I don't care. It's good. --~  15:11, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA!

Score: 4

1.  For. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! --      Go Crazy Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 21:13, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
   • B --Mn-z 01:59, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
2.  What that angry guy said to me over the phone yesterday. Simsilikesims 02:15, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
3.  Yes, for the vote. DJ Mixerr 17:19, March 19, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

Obviously the best page on Uncyclopedia today, tomorrow, and forever until the site is discovered by the Chinese people, who I think banned us from their country, so  For., and  For. again. Aimsplode Talk 01:38, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

{{CABBAGE}}

Score: 3

1. N+F. It's got cabbage. It's got template. Anything more would be extraneous. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:02, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
2. One of the best templates on the site. 1234 ~ 09:59, 19 February 2011
3.  Against. Rather useless though, isn't it? - Another n00b 14:36, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
4.  For. Best template ever!! DJ Mixerr 07:22, March 12, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
5.  For. Very impressive. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume • • • • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 00:58, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

United States presidential election, 1840

Score: 2

1.  For. --Mn-z 21:34, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
2. RIP Kwakerjak -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:48, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

User:Airhogs777/Uncyclopedia:Don't abbreviate Uncyclopedia as Un

Score: 1

1. For+Nom
2. ' For.' About time. DJ Mixerr 00:50, April 7, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

Really Big Tree

Score: 1

1. For+Nom --ShabiDOO 05:38, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

The Most Quotable Smackdown of All Time

Score: 1

1. Pretty funny, I guess.  For. Aimsplode Talk 15:43, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Wheres Waldo?

Score: 1

1.  For. Took me long enough but I found him.... Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 11:07, April 7, 2011 (UTC)