Forum:Proposal: Delete 2005 and 2006

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Proposal: Delete 2005 and 2006

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4817 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

What we really need to do, is to delete every mainspace article written before January 1, 2007. We might throw out a few babies with that six billion gallons of bathwater, but the quality of the wiki would nonetheless improve by approximately 850%.

Could some admin get on this ASAP, please? pillow talk 16:19, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

I, on the other hand, think everything after 2007 sucks so delete those. -- Style  Guide 18:42, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

So, just 2007, then? pillow talk 18:47, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. -- Style  Guide 18:51, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

While we're at it uncyclopedia is the worst, so why not just delete everything? ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 18:52, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

• Can't we just delete everything? Then we can start banning users that don't meet "the new quality requirement". The wiki would be so much funnier. -- The Zombiebaron 19:56, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

I believe that the proposal is just to keep 2007 pages. This sounds reasonable. Let's vote already and be done with the rest:

Should Uncyclopedia delete everything on its website except for pages added in the year 2007?

1.  For. A reasonable compromise. Aleister 18:56 28 10
2.  For. Ha, obviously. And while you're at it, feature this forum post tomorrow. -- Style  Guide 19:00, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
3.  For. 2007 was a fine vintage. pillow talk 19:10, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
4.  Against. Do re really need all of 2007? How about we just keep the featured content from 2007? --Mn-z 02:13, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
5.  Against. A former "friend" of mine told me the number 207 represented masturbation, and 2007 looks too close for comfort, I say we kill it. ◄► UnUnUn ium ◄► 04:53, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
6.  Against. I prefer the delete everything idea. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101029 - 04:56 (UTC)
7.              Deleteman.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  29 Oct 2010 ~ 05:45 (UTC)
8. Comment. -- Style  Guide 06:33, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
9.  OBJECTION! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 10:49, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
10. Opinion! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:57, 4 November 2010
11.  Batman! I hate the month of April so if we could just keep January 07 - March 07, and also May 07 - December 07 I would be fine with that. ~ *You can be Robin* (talk) 11:53, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
12. Against A lot of stuff started sucking after 2007. I vote we delete all articles (with the exception of features) from the post-2007 era. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 21:39, Thursday 04 November 2010 -
13. Simplificate. Delete everything after this. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:07, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
14. I still maintain that deleting everything that I haven't edited is the way to go. Also I note that Mhaillepedia.org is available. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

    Hmm, maybe I should register it. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101106 - 15:15 (UTC)

    And then use it to dump pictures of animals close-up with a wide-angle lens? ◄► UnUnUn ium ◄► 20:37, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

    Well, now that you mention it, pointing the domain to a picture of a tremendous, dangerous-looking yak might be kind of funny. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101107 - 02:25 (UTC)