Uncyclopedia:VFH

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

VFH contents

• All nominated articles
• See also

• Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
• Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
• This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
• Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
• View recent changes for VFH here, and if deleted nominations are showing up and that bugs you, .
• Due to a technical glitch caused by DPL being a dumbass, any signature with two dashes (i.e. "--") will cause the VFH page to go kaput.

Any and all violators of policy will be cancelled.

   

VFH status:
7.17 votes per article • Goal: 5

Search VFH archive

VFH is not a discussion page. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.

All nominated articles

Worst 100 Nutty Conspiracy Theories of All Time

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: -1
Nomination:	OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 00:45, 29 January 2026 (UTC)OrdinaryJoe1234
For Votes: 0	No for votes
Against Votes: 1	Against. Comment IS noted!! BUT having attempted 4 of my own "Top 100" lists AND noting the blatant quality/length falloff after #60 shows that the real reason so many are blank is because they simply couldn't come up with any more. Been there, done that: the first few are easy and then its a chore. It's less intentional, and more "100 was way more than i thought it was." The joke would fly soooo much better if it was missing maybe 9-11 lines... not 37 whole lines. Lucyna K 12:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Before you go and complain, conspiracy theories number 16 through 54 being blank are intentional. OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 00:45, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

You

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 12 of YOU people
Nomination:	🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 04:13, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 12	Nom. You know what? It may be 9:11 PM (this was not intentional) in the evening where I live, and I needa sleep right now, but I feel like this should've been featured sooner, huh?!? Might be a bit Uncyclopedian centric, but screw it. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 04:13, 28 January 2026 (UTC)  For. How has this not been fully featured yet? Mr. George / talk 09:02, 28 January 2026 (UTC)  For. 09:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)  For. This article was scrumptious. Purplexed INSULT ME!!! 13:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)  For. Me? You mean like, little old me? A whole article? Gosh, I'm flattered... Ryan Gosling  YOUUUUUU crank dat Soulja Boy! Haha sorry, I know it's an old reference but the Millenial in me came out when I saw that.. OranguTang94 (Complaint board) (Damage trail) 22:06, 28 January 2026 (UTC)  You. You you you you, you you you! You, you you you you you you. Lieutenant Gamma Here, Friend, have some meth. 00:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)  For. this should've been featured by now 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 00:13, 29 January 2026 (UTC) Give it a hug!! GlitchyZorua 🎩🦊 (give floofy hug) 03:54, 29 January 2026 (UTC)  For. Would have been featured years ago but they were off by 0.5 votes. Redemption, perchance? Lucyna K 18:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC)  For. You? Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump • 20:41, 29 January 2026 (UTC) Defo. Great edits. ShabiDOO 21:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	This was quasi-featured thirteen years ago, and quasi it should remain. pillow talk 07:21, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Who, me? OrdinaryJoe1234 (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2026 (UTC) Yes, you! Lieutenant Gamma Here, Friend, have some meth. 05:12, 29 January 2026 (UTC) Plese give one week from nom before closing to give time for people to cast votes ShabiDOO 21:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

UnNews:Trump still wants Greenland; Wall Street shits itself

(feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 1.5
Nomination:	Purplexed (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
For Votes: 5	For. Purplexed (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  For. You know what? It may be because of my Cannuck bias, but it doesn't suck, eh? 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 01:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Yes. Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 20:28, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  For. It's funny and written in a unique style but it could definitely use some copy edits. Considering this was made by a new user, I'd say it's good enough to be featured. Soviet☭ (Ask for free votes) 20:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  For. I am still, in no way an authority on good articles. But you know what, having another look at it, I like it. It's short but sweet, and seeing as it was written by a new user, it's a pretty damn good news article. Therealcmack (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3.5	Against. Another UnNews article about Trump being a dumbass, how original. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 01:15, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  Against. There is a reason why the TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and "Orange Man Bad" memes are still alive, if on their death beds. I think Trump is a horrible leader but we really need to stop with this this.Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 15:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)  Half against. Mr. George / talk 01:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)  Against. 09:09, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Comments	My greatest work yet, it's only my second but I'm determined to make something amazing Purplexed (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Abstain. having been to Greenland before, I can confidently say it is the world's most useless landmass, and is about as fun to visit as watching ice melt... coincidentally, that is all there is to do there. Lucyna K 11:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC) @OPOSSUM: @ColonelKurtz: Normally I'd agree with you, TDS sucks balls. But I don't think that applies here, we satirize basically everything and that's good. You can still support good satire and be pro-Trump. Maybe the language in it could be toned down a tad Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 21:27, 22 January 2026 (UTC) @Purplexed: You can indent by adding colons (:) to the start of a message in the code :) Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 21:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC) I'm not pro Trump either, and don't get me wrong, this isn't a bad article at all, PF4Eva would be proud. But originality. That's what seperates the good articles from the featured ones. OᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏHAWK TUAH! (vandalize my talk page) 17:22, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Comment. @Noopnurf: where was the Joe Biden articles when he was derailing America into the ground? where were the y when Obama was making healthcare a fantasy? that's right, no whereOh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 18:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 18:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC) @ColonelKurtz: The page for Obamacare literally redirects to a page called 'HowTo:Create a Healthcare system that kills people'. They've all been fairly lampooned here. Outside here is a different story Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 18:19, 23 January 2026 (UTC) @ColonelKurtz: I probably would've made articles on that if my account wasn't made six days ago, it isn't just Trump I love making fun of all politicians. Fact of the matter is I wanted to make an UnNews article and Trump happened to be the politician doing stupid shit at the time. It isn't TDS or bias I just make fun of whoever's in the news. The whole reason the memes are alive is because he's the President in office, and is constantly on the real news for one thing or another, constant new stories. It isn't beating a dead horse if said horse is actually still alive and making stuff that can be mocked. Purplexed (talk) Comment. @Purplexed: Yeah well there is a reason late night comedians mocking trump became a deconstructed parody. Orange man still bad?Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 19:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC) Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 19:52, 23 January 2026 (UTC) It's not like Trump is the only thing being posted on UnNews if you want a different article to be featured just nominate it. My first two articles were about Trump because it was breaking news, is that the thing I'll make articles about? FUCK NO. I'm not brain dead. I'm not spamming articles about the guy. I'm currently drafting a humorous UnNews article about the sun right now. My point is that Trump jokes are repeated for a reason, and while some are unoriginal and spammed, that doesn't mean they all are. Purplexed (talk) Comment. trump will always be in the news because the media is obsessed with making him look like satan incarnate. plus we have articles going back to 2016 mocking him. nothing has changed in ten years. Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 21:43, 23 January 2026 (UTC) @ColonelKurtz: Because he's a very active political figure, the reason Obama and Joe Biden aren't talked about as much as Trump is once again because they aren't politically active anymore. Of course he's going to be in the media he's the President of the United States. It isn't abnormal for someone who is trying to make big moves in politics to be in the media, Kamala Harris's was talked about for a few months at most because she was a candidate for president, but as soon as campaigning was over she vanished since she was no longer politically active enough for there to be an interesting story to cover. The reason he's been talked about for so long is because he's been politically active for so long. Purplexed (talk) Comment. rumors are kamala harris is gonna try her hand at the 2028 election so we might have plenty of material then Oh, Kurtz, you can do stupid things! 00:53, 24 January 2026 (UTC) Precisely Purplexed (talk)

See also

Old VFH archives: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14