Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
Voters: Please try and include some kind of reasoning. When voting against, explain where the article falls short so that the author can perhaps try and fix it up and improve it.
This is not a discussion page. If you'd like detailed feedback on your article, please submit it for a PeeReview.
Want a gadget that lets you mark the articles you've already voted on? Follow the instructions here to enable it.
Abstain. I was gonna rewrite this eventually. Screw it, now I'm gonna. Renom this in a week or so. SirTurb0-SunriseGunTalk 13:04, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment. You know what? Let's see where it goes. SirTurb0-SunriseGunTalk 13:21, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment. I'll wait to see what Turb0 does with it, as I think its kinda really really really short right now, no? MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 16:13, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment. what i meant was that this nom would take place, and then if it failed it would get rewritten. SirTurb0-SunriseGunTalk 16:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC) SirTurb0-SunriseGunTalk 16:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
oh i see. uhhhhhhh... well, Abstinence then since I like Boston, but I can't in good faith vote for a near-stub article when I've been harping on others about that very same thing. MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 16:32, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Against. potential to be ok. but not that potentialed. i added a fly. besides that, whoever wrote this decided to impart all the isms of their community into it. including the bad taste ~GoatLordServa/enttalk 16:05, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment. uhhhh what in the red link hell is going on? I'll wait to cast my vote, but this is egregious... MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 15:52, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Against.Feed this to a Grue! The first citizen was Oscar Wilde, not Chuck Norris. AtomicAnon (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Half against. well, its an alright article as far as most go, but not quite VFH worthy. Also, FIVE WHOLE RED LINKS?? :( MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 18:18, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. hm yes very good article. I will not vote for sake of fairness. Deemox (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC) Deemox (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Half against. no offense, but this really isn't that funny. AtomicAnon (talk) 02:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Half against. Maybe my attention span is like 3 seconds, but this was overall just confusing. It feels like it references something, but I'm missing the joke big time if so. MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 18:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
For. hardly a rare syndrome, ever tried to speak Mexican mr president? the accent always comes out... MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 18:22, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Half for.AtomicAnon (talk) 13:31, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1.5
Against. Too short. Not funny. Not enough images. Want me to continue? TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 01:25, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Half against. feels like the ramblings of a 10 year old who just discovered a new swear word. Not the worst, but poop humor loses its power when you turn 11 MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 18:24, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
For. it has a pretty good and decent amount of images 174.53.85.127 (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 8.5
Against. this article needs so much cleanup before it actually gets featured. also, you forgot the ) in Я (country). 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 23:49, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Against. Ya? I never heard of country with name "Ya", also this is real Donald, not Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin hacking this account. Это бессодержательная и жалкая статья, написанная глупцами. Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump • 04:53, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Half against. THREE RED LINKS? Ok, aside from that foulness, not a bad article, I don't hate it. Just not VFH worthy. MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 18:26, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Against.Deploy MOAB!AtomicAnon (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
For. looks good enough 174.53.85.127 (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2.5
Half against. It's VERY difficult to read, and more confusing than funny. Also, only ONE single stock image??? :( MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 19:02, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Against. Not particularly funny, image deprived. PurplexedINSULT ME!!! 13:41, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Half for. It just looks like an unfinished article. still, not bad. TheLitThing 16:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC) TheLitThing 16:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
For. not even sure if I'm supposed to do this, but let's push this up to five. Deemox (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1.5
Half against. Could be improved, funny, but not VFH funny. PurplexedINSULT ME!!! 13:43, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
idk I just think it's funny. ignore the fact that I wrote it. Deemox (talk) 14:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Abstain. its a funny start, but far from VFH ready in its current state. Also, red links? nuhhh uhhhhhh, soooo naughty! Finish it, THEN submit it. MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 17:01, 13 February 2026 (UTC)
@Deemox: yeah, you can vote for the article you've nominated. in fact, it's what most people do. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 13:38, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Comment. welp, I guess it's featured now. take that MK. Deemox (talk) 14:14, 25 February 2026 (UTC) Deemox (talk) 14:14, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
well that's kinda mean, and based on the fact I never even voted, I still could exile it to the shadow realm, but I'm not a meanie, so do enjoy the feature!!!! 90 more (or so) and you'll be #1! MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 23:24, 25 February 2026 (UTC)