Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive14

UnNews:Procrastinators Unite Today; Shirt Enthusiasts Enraged

Vote: UnNews:Procrastinators Unite Today; Shirt Enthusiasts Enraged	Score: 21 ....later
Nomination:	Ljlego
For Votes: 25	Featured —rc (t) 05:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC) SN + F Braydie said I should. It got a 46 in the Pee (by Braydie) and, well, I like it..Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Rfo Yay, 1st vote! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC) like it --THE 11:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC) I would say For, but I just can't be bothered. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Fur, yaw me like. -- The Zombiebaron 19:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC) For I would have voted for this earlier, but I'm a procrastinator myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Yeah. —Braydie 22:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC) '"," -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC) I'll vote for this tomorrow. Next Tuesday, at the latest. --El Zoof 02:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For Because I meant to do it late.r Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For Can't think of anything witty, sorry. --Hrodulf 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For Cute. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Redeemed. :) I like it.--Mr.Vib 13:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC) for love this article from the day i saw it. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN22:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Short, but sweet. --EMC [TALK] 23:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 03:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC) Eh, i'll vote later. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC) fo- I vot- so sa- Sli- ~ Tal- * S- * JA- * GALLE- * Cu- F☭R, 06:02, 27 June 2007 for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC) For --Saturn1 02:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC) Für. --Andorin Kato 02:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC) For. Hey, I finally got around to voting for this. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC) For and I'll update the total later.... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4	Against Could be a great article, but needs a lot more (or less, depending on your level of procrastination) --Andreasegde 14:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Not enough there to be featured, content or length-wise. --So So 05:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC) I agree, there seems to be a few parts missing. Add more to the article and I might reconsider. --Eiyuu Kou 15:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Nothing is missing. The parts that are cut off are supposed to be cut off. I didn't forget anything.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Against Nothing special -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Abs Yaknow how people have those things they just don't find hilarious (like pedophilia or religious humor)? Procrastination is mine; just never thought it was all that funny a topic. Its a good little piece, but the subject just doesn't make me chucklez. --THINKER 21:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC) I see.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC) I'm sorry buddy. I'd buy you an ice cream cone but someone might misinterpret it, and I'm not going back to the clink, man.. :( --THINKER 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Eh, the Mr. Softee truck already passed anyway. Perhaps another day.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Abstain - It has its good points, but I wasn't laughing through most of it, so I'll abstain for this one. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 16:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

UnBooks:Mr. Beluncle

Vote: UnBooks:Mr. Beluncle	Score: 19.5 shameful tears
Nomination:	Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP
For Votes: 19.5	Featured —rc (t) 04:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC) Nom + for A quasi-featured and a runner up in the last PLS competition. It was robbed last time it was nominated; I thought it deserved another chance. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 14:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For Sweet merciful tiddlywinks, YES! --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 19:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For, it's the Mr. Grumpikins of its generation. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R 08:50, 07 June 2007 For If you don't for this, I think we should end our relationship before anyone gets hurt. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Dig fun read --THINKER 23:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For, although I can see how it missed out before, as it takes a little while to get going. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For I can see that damn smudge. That jerk kid...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Again For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 16:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC) For Mr. Beluncle shamed me into voting for this article. But, aside from that, it's very well written, and gets better and better toward the end. Great work. -- Big Brother (a.k.a. #1_ALF_FAN) Miniluv•Minitrue 17:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC) For - It could also be an UnBook, from the way I read it. Just a thought. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For. -- Mitch 18:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC) love. I doubt most people find this hysterical though, its just enjoyable, until that last part. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 04:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 21:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For - This is actually more disturbing than hilarious, but... IT'S SO WELL WRITTEN. I can't help myself. 206.248.135.200 23:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Holy Mind! That's a good piece -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Weak for It's good until that horrible anti-climax. The Humbled Master 00:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. I'm not sure why... completely damn insane rubbish. More! --El Zoof 12:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For -RAHB 06:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Severian: A number of users (including myself) brought that up last time. Unless somebody objects soon, I'll move it to UnBooks myself. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC) DOOOOO it. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) Done. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Ooo! Now make it an UnTune! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Darn it, Modus, I'm a doctor, not a songwriter. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Bipolar bear

Vote: Bipolar bear	Score: 20.5 severely crazed teddy bears
Nomination:	rogpyvbc
For Votes: 23.5	Featured —rc (t) 05:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC) Self-nom + For Slithy Tove 23:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC) Dig I liked it so much I was upset I didn't get to review it. :) --THINKER 02:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For This is such an awesome idea. Pulled it off too. -Epical Zamora Strong For! This is the epitome of the perfect Uncyclopedia article. Can you say "top article of June?" — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For Worthy of the front page --WesternLotus 15:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For Tackles mental ilness in grislys with immense sensitivety. The Oblong Lobster 18:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For - I'm so impressed by this article I want to buy Bipolar Bear merchandise.--Dr. Fenwick 02:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For. Terrific! --EMC [TALK] 23:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 04:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For--Gaberou 01:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  13:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC) I never want to hear another polar pun again as long as I live, no matter how subtle. That being said, For. You can just hear some National Geographic narrator softly talking about these poor, magnificent, messed-up creatures.--Mr.Vib 17:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 15:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For The bits about Nunavut and the toonie really drove it home for me. Save the bipolar bears! -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC) For Don alun 21:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For'd Yay to BiPolar Bears! --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 15:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For --193.77.238.223 23:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For - Really clever. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For - Very well written, clever. A+++ would read again --nimper 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 06:05, 27 June 2007 4 - It's good --Uncle J 19:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Frosted - Seriously, this article may be one of the funniest things I've ever read. Mad props, dawg.--a-slice-of-cake 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3	Somehow this just doesn't work at all for me. --So So 06:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC) against I just didn't laugh -RAHB 01:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Against - Neither did I. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

UnNews:Bashing your head against a brick wall discovered to have hallucinogenic effects

Vote: UnNews:Bashing your head against a brick wall discovered to have hallucinogenic effects	Score: 21 head-bashing-induced highs
Nomination:	Leoispotter
For Votes: 21	Featured —rc (t) 05:28, 4 July 2007 (UTC) sNom and For Giving it another go -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For'd - I liked it when you made it. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 16:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For although I find that stapling your nose shut can give you a much better high. --THE 20:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For Improved since my Pee Review, and it was good then.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC) I should try that some time. (translation: For) --General Insineratehymn 22:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC) I tried it - it was so incredible I'm voting for Slithy Tove 00:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For Man, I'm still out of it, dude. Like, wow. RabbiTechno 13:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For, because Leo threatened to put me into "a permanent high" -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)C) For. Very nice. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Dig between this and my iTrip it really isn't surprising that I don't get any work accomplished.. --THINKER 23:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For As with the iTrip, I still prefer tradition over convenience, but still a good one. -RAHB 01:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 05:46, 27 June 2007 For --AAA! (AAAA) 23:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC) For, A gentleman and a scholar. -- The Zombiebaron 02:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC) For this one has it at the title. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 05:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC) For the delectable silliness that is this article. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC) For Mindnumbingly brilliant. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Horrible Feature it! --Dexter111344 15:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC) For--Sir Manforman 16:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

A Visit with your Psychopathic Grandmother

Vote: A Visit with your Psychopathic Grandmother	Score: 21 silly dogs
Nomination:	Mr.Vib
For Votes: 21	Featured —rc (t) 04:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC) Self Nom & For. She's the sweetest crazy person you'll ever meet!--Mr.Vib 00:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Dig poor uncle Morty... --THINKER 01:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For.--vyvyan 03:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For That silly lady was out of her mind, but this article was hella fine!Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For Don alun 22:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC) For User:Supermoose For Disturbing... The Humbled Master 03:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 15:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Ja Though what's possibly even more bizarre is apparently a friend of mine has relatives who've named their dogs Lenin and Stalin...seriously. I don't think they'd get along with Goering very well. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 20:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC) At least they didn't name one Molotov. Burnt dog flesh...not good.--Mr.Vib 21:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. Not enough pages reference Sir Oswald Mosley, I think. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Probably because South America has gone out of style...and I'll give a cookie to the first person to guess the song reference.--Mr.Vib 23:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Best article of the month. --L 05:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For. Oh god, for. The most funniest thing I've come across all day. Hanyouman 19:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC) For oooh. nasty. --Phantom Grammar 11:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For I pictured myself in my grandmother's house with her as the main character, making this all the more funny. -RAHB 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 06:03, 27 June 2007 + --General Insineratehymn 01:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Fuore Doubleplusbatfuckinsane lolz !!11ONEONE!!11! Draven bui 08:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC) FORE!!! Sweetie, can you get me those balls? Not that guys testicles!!! The golf balls!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

UnNews:Your grandma might be Al-Qaeda

Vote: UnNews:Your grandma might be Al-Qaeda	Score: 19.5 Grannie Terrorists
Nomination:	Sonic80
For Votes: 21.5	Featured —rc (t) 04:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Nom and For'd. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 00:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC) sDig thanks Sonic!! :) --THINKER 03:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Yeah, I really liked this one.--<<>> 04:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For - we must take a stand against these cheek-pinching sweater-knitting maniacs! --El Zoof 06:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 11:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. NOT GRANDMA! NOOOOOO!!!--Mr.Vib 13:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Laa Ilia Il'allah wha'Muhammad rasul Allah! ~ 15:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 16:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Allahu Uhallalah! The Humbled Master 16:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Wait, do you mean dead Grandma or "I got 20 years left and I'm gonna use 'em" Grandma? Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 17:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For--Gaberou 20:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC) I had long suspected it. Thank goodness Uncyclopedia shines the light of truth on us! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For Honestly, how can you deny sweet little old granny a shot at the front page? -RAHB 08:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC) YEAH! This article is AWESOME! Slash-dev-slash-random 01:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Definately For --ORION 05:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC) For just because of the title! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! F☭R, 05:53, 27 June 2007 For Probably the funniest UnNews article I've ever read. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC) For Well I guess Granny is Gitmo bound... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC) For – Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.63.214 (talk • contribs) Diff
Against Votes: 2	Against, An okay story, just a bit hackneyed. --Brit-guit 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC) NO--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  00:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hoboeroticism

Vote: Hoboeroticism	Score: 21 Horny Bums
Nomination:	User:Mhaille
For Votes: 25	Featured —rc (t) 06:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC) Nomandfor - a delightful little piece, sat in a sandbox for a month and now finally free to make its way in the world. Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 00:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC) lawl LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 04:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Hooray! Mhaille and Codeine learned how to write again! :D -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For. If I didn't vote for my own article, I might as well go shag a tramp. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 07:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For! \o/. Finntastic 10:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For You know why... --Roger The Bum Full sig! <a href="http://rdoger6424.jaywebdesigns.com/recipient.php">psychotomimetic</a> CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 11:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For. Y'know, I think we are all so fascinated by tramps that we secretly want to be one. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For - FEATURE!!! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 12:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For Anything to stop Codeine's non-stop IRC whoring. Oh, and 'cos it's a great article too :) RabbiTechno 13:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For a steaming pile of literary treasure -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 16:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For, it maded me lol. -- TheOminousMan 16:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For Nicely done guys, and the article is good too -- sannse (talk) 18:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For Beautiful The Oblong Lobster 19:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC) DIG I knew I would be voting for this one before clicking the damn link; glad I did though, because its funny too! :) --THINKER 23:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 07:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 04:53, 27 June 2007 For, but only if this image is on the front page, not the one at the top of the article, for the love of god. --General Insineratehymn 18:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Conditional for. Only if the top pic is on the frontpage. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) For and I agree with MO -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 00:31, 29 June 2007 (UTC) For the love of God, who cares which image we use?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC) For the picture being on the front page! Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 4	Against Because it didn't have any against votes.--24.176.12.20 02:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC) So... motion to get this scrapped for obvious reasons? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Motion seconded. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Conditional against. Please, please, please, please, PLEASE don't put the top picture on the front page. Please. Otherwise, you kids can do what you want.--<<>> 13:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC) But it's the only one that'll fit.. the others wouldn't be comprehensible at the reduced size of the FA template. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Against --AAA! (AAAA) 23:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 'gainst -RAHB 01:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Against. Good pictures, though... --vyvyan 02:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	What's with the objections to Image:Greekhobo.jpg? Are you people really so repressed that 5000 year old Greek homosexuality offends your sensibilities? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC) The short answer is "yes."--<<>> 20:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC) /me looks uncomfortable. That doesn't explain your erection. Or why you left the webcam plugged in. Or the nudity. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Doesn't it? You don't know Brad very well do you? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) ...and why are you sitting on his lap? Are those $20 bills in your thong? Why do I keep lending you my clothing? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC) /me vomits. Sorry, that acid reflux again.....I'll just go ahead and clean that up.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:53, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Do you think you guys could keep your fantasies off VFH's comment areas and back on your blogs where they belong, maybe?--<<>> 15:10, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Clearly the answer is "No". Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

U.S. Presidential Election, 1948

Vote: U.S. Presidential Election, 1948	Score: 21 red-faced up-to-the-minute Chicago Tribune editors
Nomination:	<<>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 21	Featured —rc (t) 06:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC) If someone wants to nom Hermaphrodite, that had the next-best percentage on the list. I didn't particularly care for that one, though, so I'm nomming one I liked.--<<>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For. OMG! Brad's got a list! Run! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Dig a great take on one of our nation's funniest debacles. Gotta check those error margins, Chicago! hehe.. oh and "Dewey Cheatem & Howe" got a real live lol. :) --THINKER 22:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For--Gaberou 22:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For --EMC [TALK] 02:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Kwakerjak, you are much missed. Brad, thanks for the list. Strong For, and blast it all if this one doesn't make it! We are going to feature a US presidential election article eventually, darnit! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC) For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:11 For just like before. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For. Once again, Uncyclopedia teaches me about American history. I didn't even know there was ever a President Dewey before this! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Give 'em Hell, Mister President-HST...yeah, he'd vote Fortoo--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 17:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Kwakerjak! YAARRRRR! (And my Strom Thurmond photoshop).--Procopius 13:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC) FOR! Kwakerjak was so great. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For Poor Kwakerjak... The Humbled Master 00:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For Finally got around to reading this one. I was not disappointed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For. Dew-EY! Dew-EY! Dew-EY! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Dewey for president!!! --Vanaelin 16:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For Hehe, jokes about politics. -RAHB 01:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 06:06, 27 June 2007 [For vote] --General Insineratehymn 23:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

Is This Some Kind of Fucking Joke?!

Vote: Is This Some Kind of Fucking Joke?!	Score: 24 fucking jokes
Nomination:	Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 24	Featured —rc (t) 06:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC) Nom + For I reviewed it, and laughed like hell, cuz this article is that swell. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC) For Slithy Tove 22:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC) For The writer of this magnificent article deserves some sort of award -RAHB 02:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC) --L 05:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For some fucking funny kind of joke--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 05:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 05:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For Because this article makes me laugh very much --Masterd 07:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 10:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For. This is a pretty sweet article. I spruced it up a bit and hopefully it gets there. :D Mightywayne 13:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC) IS THIS SOME KIND of FUCKING ARTICLE? ~ 16:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Hellz Ya! - IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING TALENT? -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 17:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For--vyvyan 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Nice.--Mr.Vib 13:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 19:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For Read it, dug it. And no, that 4 is not some kind of a fucking joke at all! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Dig though this vote is, in fact, a fucking joke, so I don't know if it really counts.. --THINKER 23:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 05:47, 27 June 2007 For IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING VOTE?!?! Kip the Dip For - What Kip said. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC) This is fucking brilliant. Seriously. Though I wonder why the author didn't save it for the PLS? It could've won, I bet. Certainly done well, anyway. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC) For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Smokin' -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Yerp// Sgt.Montez, SIR! 19:16, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Interestingly enough, this nomination inspired my band to create a song of the same name in practice today. It does my heart good to see the word "fucking" used so many times in such a jovial musical arrangement. -RAHB 08:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC) I look forward to hearing that. :) -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC) I'd put it on untunes if it wasn't a serious piece of music. Maybe myspace...-RAHB 21:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Kip, I think you need to take a look at your sig. The numbers always reset after it. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Looking back on it I kick myself for not saving it for the PLS. Unfortunately, I had no idea the PLS existed until they put that fancy little template on the main page. -RAHB 07:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

iTrip

Vote: iTrip	Score: 22.5 hallucination-inducing electronic devices
Nomination:	THE
For Votes: 23.5	Featured —rc (t) 03:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC) Nom and For I love my iTrip. Though listening to it when I mow the lawn usually doesn't work out too well. --THE 16:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 21:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Dig ..and I've been enjoying CCR ever since! --THINKER 22:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Yes -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Oh, Yes. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC) For --193.77.238.223 20:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 09:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Self-for -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For: But somebody needs to stop Ljlego. Like now. --EMC [TALK] 21:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Sure. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For. whoa dude... all those colours -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Weak for Not absurdly, ball-crushingly, pants-wettingly, brilliantly hilarious like some of Ljlego's other stuff, but good enough for the front page. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For I wish this product was real Hrodulf 02:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC) Definite For'd -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 14:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For - Seriously, Ljlego. Enough with the funniness. How are us decent mediocre-writing class folk supposed to make a living? --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For, it is taller then most. -- The Zombiebaron 20:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For Create plz. —Braydie 22:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 4 he asked me to vote, so I did. Never even looked at the article. It could be a horrendous piece of shit for all I know... so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 23:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC) 'F☭R, 12:05, 27 June 2007 For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC) For Good article, even though I still say tradition may as well reign. -RAHB 00:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Uhhhhh... hold on... lemme just... get... no... the.... yes. --Andorin Kato 01:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC) For...iGuess--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 00:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1	Weak Against. I can see the gist, but it doesn't seem all that funny to me. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

The Meeting: A Play in One Act

Vote: The Meeting: A Play in One Act	Score: 21.5 painted-on Powerpoint slides
Nomination:	Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 24.5	Featured —rc (t) 04:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC) Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC) For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC) DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC) YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC) -- 20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC) ForInfiniteMonkey -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC) For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC) For. Nothing like corporate asses dying inside...or something like that. --Mr.Vib 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC) For Heeheehee... I am laughing... --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC) For Loved it! <3 ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:08, 02 June 2007 For Terriffic - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC) For nice. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) Thoroughly fun to read. For!--vyvyan 00:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC) So morbid... yet so funny. For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For I love this article. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For'd Very good -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 14:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For Absolutely. -- User:GarethC/sig 19:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 06:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC) For spectacular -RAHB 01:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 4 I shat a squirrel. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 02:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3	Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC) Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC) Against: It's okay, but something about play scripts just doesn't appeal to me. --EMC [TALK] 01:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Preflight procedures

Vote: Preflight procedures	Score: 19 disasters averted
Nomination:	Yours truly — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 19	Featured —rc (t) 04:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC) Nom And Strong For. A brilliant take on, well, preflight procedures. This article proved to me that e|m|c fully deserves WotM. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Yes thanks.-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Ooooohhhyeaaaah Fasten Your Seatbelts!!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For e|m|c's a jolly good personage and so say 19 of us! So far. Um. You may want to edit this if you're adding later. Or not. I'm good either way, really. --El Zoof 04:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 07:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Dig These mid-air chickens are just begging to be put in the upright-lock position, OH! --THINKER 08:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Attention passengers: We are currently flying through an area of turbulence caused by mounting numbers of For votes. Please fasten your seat belts. We expect this inconvenience to subside as soon as this article is featured, which should be very soon. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 22:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Okay then. --EMC [TALK] 04:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For. ~ 08:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 09:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC) For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 12:56, 25 June 2007 Umm... hell yes. --Andorin Kato 17:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC) brilliant. --Pcgamermofo 19:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC) For because I love aviation. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For I'm in a plane, suicide bombing your article -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

The Lake District

Vote: The Lake District	Score: 19.5 indignant North-West Evening Mail editorials
Nomination:	08:26, 13 June 2007
For Votes: 24.5	Featured —rc (t) 05:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, It made the news so it has to be true. 08:26, 13 June 2007 Yes. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC) DIG the article is only slightly amusing, but the fact that it apparently pisses off the city officials makes me support it strongly. --THINKER 21:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC) YES I like the idea that the people objecting to the article and alerting the newspaper could indirectly cause this article to be featured. The Oblong Lobster 21:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For I laughed. And then some more Don alun 22:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Yes, please --General Insineratehymn 22:31, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Strong for. The background with the newspaper is great, and the article is great too. Reads like a good STM piece. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Whoever added that image and sorted out the content is a genius. Oh, wait...FOR. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 00:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For increasing awareness of The Lake District.--Procopius 23:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Thumbs up --THE 01:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For I was set on voting against from its whole town-y motiff. But the article convinced me otherwise.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For - This has suddenly become one of the most significant articles on our website. I wonder if anyone will try to edit it... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC) FEATURE IT --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC) for --Ekashp 03:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For, not just because it was mentioned outside. It's the blatant exaggeration ("the only permanent resident is Farmer Giles," and "sheep, sheep, and more sheep") that makes it stand out. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC) I saw this in the papers! Nathalalias 00:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For Obscure, yet hilarious! The Humbled Master 05:36, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 07:39, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For Hilarious! --Miles Edgeworth 20:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Yup. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For – Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.216.110.89 (talk • contribs) Apparently --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 10:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC) --L 11:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Yeah. I've been there loads of times and I can say it's all bollocks. But it's funny. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For. on weekends, my name is Sierra Lovelace. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 5	Better than most towncruft, but still towncruft. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC) No. “Most local people can be much, much funnier about the Lake District than this.” I'm sure it's true. We would make ourselves look very mediocre if we put this forward as the kind of thing we feature. Slithy Tove 18:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Against. It needs a lot more work and needs to be more subtle about the town's features. Right now, it reads as somewhat of a cheap knockoff of Blandford.--Mr.Vib 12:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry Not bad, but just not quite Front Page material. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Feature the people complaining about the page instead. --Kelpan 23:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	This article has been cleaned up and improved since the paper's "Most local people can be much, much funnier about the Lake District than this" comments. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Someone more intelligent than me please put the "referenced in the media" template on this. It's found here, but I can't seem to get it working right and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.--<<>> 15:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC) I put it in manually – you know, copied the code straight out of the template. I don't think that the template and the equals signs in the URL get along. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Is it me, or is 4 vote # 21 unsigned? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

UnNews:Florida flooded by global warming, Sea World ironically left above water

	Score: 20 Moist Floridians
Nomination:	Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 21	Featured —rc (t) 06:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC) I'm a grumpy gus, but this is good stuff. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC) self for - I've never had someone nom an article for me before.... *wipes a tear from his eye*....this may be the greatest day of my life! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For Yep. Well done, my Led man.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Big For. I laughed out loud at the pic, I must admit. I don't know what I was expecting, but there it was. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For. Froggy found it funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For It's funny and featured article worthy. The Oblong Lobster 15:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For'd It's a good article, and I like it. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭16:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Dig! Good to know that I'll be safe when this god forsaken state goes under! :) --THINKER 21:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For--Gaberou 04:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 07:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For -- Miles Edgeworth 20:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  21:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For. It's funny, I've got to admit. Social Studiously 12:55, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For. ~ 19:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Para. Si, me gusta el articulo! FumbDucker 15:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC) For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 15:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For - Funny and wet. --Eiyuu Kou 15:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC) For --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 04:48, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Tie-Breaking For sorry I didn't get to voting for this sooner. --THE 23:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Für. --Andorin Kato 02:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1	It's funny, but not featured article worthy. Perhaps being listed in the UnNews column? --Ekashp 03:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

UnNews:Christianity hoax exposed; bogus belief system baffles western civilization for 2,000 years

Vote: UnNews:Christianity hoax exposed; bogus belief system baffles western civilization for 2,000 years	Score: 20 happy Pontiffs
Nomination:	Hrodulf
For Votes: 23	Featured —rc (t) 06:03, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Nom & For A present from 1998 for everybody who voted against my "In God We Trust" article --Hrodulf 15:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Well-written, and funny too. RabbiTechno 17:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For the body of christ, that tasty jew. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Funny, comprehensive, well formatted with good pictures, and of course there's the Pope jokes. OOPS I FORGOT TO SIGN/VOTED IN THE WRONG PLACE LAST TIME. My bad. Feebas factor 17:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Against. No, wait, For. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 19:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Judaism. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Change of mind The Oblong Lobster 20:00, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Very for -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Dig much funnier than the other one --THINKER 20:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For. To be honest, I can't quite tell why I liked it all so much, but liked I did. --The Dit 07:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC) For - Quite funny. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 12:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For - How can anyone vote against an article as funny as this one --Uncle J 15:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC) For Voting against would be offensive to Christians. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC) For the fancy goyim thing. -- The Zombiebaron 03:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 21:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For. All the articles on here seem to be pro-christianity! Nice to see a bit of variety! --PirateFaafy 10:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Hrodulf is vastly underrated. He needs the recognition he deserves. --General Insineratehymn 17:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Indeed. The Humbled Master 05:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC) It could happen... Wish you'd take out the last Jew reference though; anti-semitism really isn't funny. --Kelpan 21:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For. Hardly laugh-a-minute, but its satire is both subtle and precise. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Weak for I changed my mind-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3	No Too long for the one joke. No Pee review for this self-nom. The Oblong Lobster 15:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)) No Agrees with the oblong lobster, too long for the joke. -- You have been Censored by Jew Boy, You'd better Complain 17:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Against. Kip the Dip Against It was well written but the joke takes way too long to get to.--Dr. Fenwick 02:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Against See above. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	It was pee reviewed, see this --Hrodulf 16:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC) I should have checked more carefully before opening my big mouth.. The Oblong Lobster 18:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC) No I believe that the person who wrote this has no idea about the Catholic church and had little knowledge or gave the effort to add the realism to the article to make is credible as unnews. There is no such thing as St. Peter's it's St. Peter's Basilica. And i changed car to Popemobile. Most likely the guy who wrote it just saw the picture and did little reasearch -Sith Penguin Lord 19:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Yes. First, if you want to vote against, do it in the right section. Second, this is Uncyclopedia. Do we look like sticklers for accuracy? Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 20:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC) (Moved from above) —Braydie 08:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Comment I was parodying the hypocricy of anti-semitism with that passage. --Hrodulf 03:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC) I'm not accusing you of anti-semitism. Don't worry, it's just a personal gripe. --Kelpan 12:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?

Vote: Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?	Score: 35 uses other than tea!
Nomination:	THINKER 05:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 35	Featured —rc (t) 06:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Nom+sDig - I haven't self nommed in a while, but I think this is worth it :) --THINKER 05:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC) I liked it. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 06:25, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For Well done. Slithy Tove 06:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Funny! Good. Social Studiously 12:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For. I'm going to try it. --vyvyan 16:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 18:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For Very informative --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 19:49, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:43, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For You had me at Why? But for good measure, I read it. Very helpful. /me attempts a smile amid the hot steam from his pants.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For The arising steam can also really clear up the sinuses. Don alun 22:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 11:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC) For It's quite funny. --Andreasegde 14:20, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For because the images are funny.Manforman 12:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Very Strong For Probably one of the best new articles on this site! The Humbled Master 18:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC) I should try that some time. (translation: For) --General Insineratehymn 20:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Clear and compelling. -- 21:34, 20 June 2007 Hot to trot! For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)(UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Why ask why? Pour boiling hot water down your pants. --So So 02:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For I lawled - RAHB 02:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC) You sick bastard. --El Zoof 03:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Sure. This vote doesn't mean anything, as this is already well on its way to being featured, but I just want a thank you template. That and it's also a good article. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For -Just one question, why?--Gaberou 14:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC) "For" - Ahhhh. Refreshing. --SirIsaac 14:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 15:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For'd, funny! -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 16:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For I want to see this get 30 votes -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Classic - Beats the record of pwnage. --Eiyuu Kou 22:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Best Why Ever — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC) For. The Schluttz comment put it over the top.--Mr.Vib 23:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Ohhhhhhhhhh....that felt good. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Woot! --EMC [TALK] 23:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC) No real reason to for it, it's gonna win anyways...P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Aaaagh, it burns Kevin Costner to his kneees!--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Trust me, I sincerely appreciate it, but I do believe it's one vote per person. Thanks though THM! :) --THINKER 22:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Oh, dear. I'd forgotten I voted! Sorry, Thinker. :( The Humbled Master 23:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Hey, man, if it were my choice you could vote 8 million times (on my articles)! hehe.. honest mistake, stricken. :) --THINKER 23:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC) All right, thanks! :) The Humbled Master 23:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC) I believe this is a new voting record - beating Horton Hires a Ho and The Anarchist Cookbook, which both had 28. Slithy Tove 22:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Let's see this go all the way to 42! The Humbled Master 22:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC) It's already at 31. Love to see it, but it's going to get featured before it happens.--Mr.Vib 23:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Holy hell, THANK YOU EVERYONE!!! Damn, I wish I could make a White Russian for each and every one of you! I'm quite honored by this. :) --THINKER 23:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC) What can I say, the article really ties the room together. Now make me my White Russian. Dude. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC) The Dude abides, man. ;) --THINKER 23:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Y'know, this agression, will not stand, man... The Humbled Master 00:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Well, guys, I dunno. Maybe with a little luck this'll get quasi, but I just don't see 35 as a high enough score for feature these days.  ;-) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Do you know how crazy this is?! Well.. its freakin crazy, man!! :-D --THINKER 05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Old McDonald

Vote: Old McDonald	Score: 22 votes here, there and everywhere
Nomination:	15Mickey20
For Votes: 22	Featured —rc (t) 05:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Self-nom and for. I feel like giving this a go. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For McDonald must be stopped. I'm the only serial killer around here. Don alun 15:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Strong for. I was actually going to put this up a while ago, but I forgot. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Dig NOT QUACKY!!! NOOOO!!!!! --THINKER 21:18, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Yep. Also makes me want to reexamine my stories from childhood...what did they mean by the wolf "eating" grandma?--Mr.Vib 21:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For Brilliant! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Fors Nathalalias 00:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For--Gaberou 04:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 07:47, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Like it --THE 21:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Mummm Good! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 00:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Woah...disturbingly For--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 01:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 03:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For And on that farm, he had some... ax-murderers?! The Humbled Master 03:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For Slithy Tove 05:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Excellent, but was it just me who was expecting the more literal interpretation of "had a <insert innocent young farmyard animal>"? --Kelpan 19:12, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For One of those rare articles that made me burst out laughing. Could do with a reference to Animal Farm somewhere in my opinion, though. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 14:02, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Eat --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 16:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	I took the liberty of added Old McDonald to the first paragraph. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:04, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Obsessive-compulsive rhyming disorder

Vote: Obsessive-compulsive rhyming disorder	Score: 22 compulsive uses of poetry leading to insanity
Nomination:	CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 19:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 24	Featured —rc (t) 05:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Self-nom and For It's been Pee Reviewed twice, and added to significantly after each review, including the incorporation of material written by One-eyed Jack. After my latest round of edits, the second reviewer (Sir Roger) said that he couldn't think of anything else to add, and that I should put it up for VFH. I've decided to take his advice. -- CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 19:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC) I guess I'll vote for, and say I hope this gets more. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:54, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For I like this more than oranges. Birds.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For to up the score to four. Soon we'll croon "no more rhymes" a thousand times! Slithy Tove 21:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For has improved quite a bit since its first pee review. I can't think of a rhyme for "first pee review". --THE 21:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC) -- For Because it'd look real nice on the front page, not one thing in it caused me rage. I think I may even read it again, it's one of my favorites, just between us men. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For - Not my fancy on the humor side but very well written and creative.--Gaberou 01:47, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Cute.--vyvyan 02:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC) There shall be no end to the rhymes, I say, as cessation of poetry results in dismay. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Wow. -- 04:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Weak for. --L 04:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC) With this for, I open the door, to a brighter, new future than ever before! Have faith, take a care; there's no need to beware, for, with all these good votes, you're already there! The Humbled Master For. -- Mitch 08:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For, but don't expect any rhymes from me. I have to say it gets old quite quickly. --The Dit 10:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For...and glad to see my Rudolph Hess pic found a new home--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:14, 15 June 2007 (UTC) VERY well-written. For.--Mr.Vib 21:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC) FOR Although it may upset some who have been stuck down with the debilitating condition. But it is great The Oblong Lobster 13:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For -- Claire'05 01:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For I've actually been talking like this the past week. Damn, I guess I just wasn't that unique. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 06:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For. Clever and well-written. --Andorin Kato 02:28, 18 June 2007 (UTC) AAAAAAAAA! For --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For. ~ 19:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC) For Don alun 22:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2	Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 22:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC) No thanks. Seems a bit forced, and not much actual rhyming in the main bit of the article. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 14:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Personally, I wish that there was more rhyming in the actual body. The caption "Finding just one pup is enough trouble, but the problem is twofold when one needs a double." Was hysterical. I just don't know how to vote on this one. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 21:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC) I was really really hoping it had something to do with Cockney Rhyming Slang. You broke my obsessive compulsive heart. --monika 23:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Film noir

Vote: Film noir	Score: 21 dramatic swirlies in black and white
Nomination:	THINKER 22:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 21	Featured —rc (t) 05:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC) Nom+Ultra Dig I think this is the highest I've ever scored a piece in pee review. Amazingly well written, intelligently hilarious; one of the best parody's on the subject I've ever seen. Bravo to you Don! --THINKER 22:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Self For (Blush) Don alun 22:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For That is just too great for words, damn I used some already --Hugh pym 22:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC) For - I was amazed to see there was no article called Film noir, so I thought I might have to write one myself. Now I'm glad I don't. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC) --L 02:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For! Excellent --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC) I haven't even read it (except the first sentence), but I know I want to. -- 04:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 04:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For. Every so often, an article appears that completely redefines Uncyclopedia in a good way. Now's the time to acknowledge that! --The Dit 09:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC) I sit among the barren desolation of city life, Don's article in my hand. I want to vote for it; perhaps because it's good, perhaps because he could whack me at a moment's notice. In any case, For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For Slithy Tove 18:39, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For You sure did it.--Gaberou 01:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 17:43, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For Jones 12:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Fors Nathalalias 00:42, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For 172.143.185.85 21:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC) I cannot imagine any reasonable person not enjoying this. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC) It was a dark night, darker than the inky-cold blackness of deep, cold space. I voted for an article that tasted not unlike a plumber's hankerchief. The Humbled Master 03:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For 195.10.45.203 15:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Hot.--vyvyan 15:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Moved to Film noir, as per the Wikipedia article. --L 02:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Thank you for that, I thought it was more appropriate too! Thanks to everyone for formatting input. It make the article look much better. Don alun 12:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Abstain...the writing is OK, but the whole idea is too much like MO's UnBooks:Pulp Novel, the case of the dashing dame--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:18, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Ah, didn't see that one... Don alun 10:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Eh, I don't see the difference really.. I was commenting to Don that it's also similar to one of my WIPs.. and the subject is pretty different from both mine and MO's.. --THINKER 04:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Turn Your Computer On

Vote: HowTo:Turn Your Computer On	Score: 20 computers turned on
Nomination:	Leoispotter
For Votes: 20	Featured —rc (t) 05:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Nom and forAnother gem from THE-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC) self-for mmm...I kind of like this article...I guess... --THE 01:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For, very funny. I'm still chuckling like a little schoolgirl with herpes. --EMC [TALK] 01:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For I didn't expect that subject matter. And I've always loved that animation, though looking at the whole thing does give me the creeps. Yeah, it's good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Dig hilarious, as usual. --THINKER 03:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 04:59, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Amazingly Creative  Weasel 3689 05:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)' I was turned on by the chick licking her computer --General Insineratehymn 18:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Mmm...yes...--VyvyanWilde 18:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For--Dr. Fenwick 12:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC) On --Ekashp 15:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC) I'm with Insineratehymn'. For The Humbled Master 01:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For subtle joke, well executed, and pretty damn funny, too! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For- VERY nice. --Andorin Kato 03:41, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For Brilliant idea, and well-done. A lot of sex, but nothing to shun. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 06:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  22:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC) I think this article is perfect for being friendly person in the local household all the time--Fonchezzz 23:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 01:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

Kitchen sink

Vote: Kitchen sink	Score: 19 scientific impossibilities
Nomination:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 19	Featured —rc (t) 04:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Nom + For. A modern gem. I was surprised to learn that it was made only today by a person who joined only today as well. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 01:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For Well closed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:51, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Very Adamsesque. I enjoyed it. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 08:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 10:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For --Ekashp 15:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For oddly compelling. thumbs up --THE 17:49, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Enjoyable to the last. Maybe this writer is the chosen one, his medichlorian count is in the tens of thousands. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 20:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For Now Uncyclopedia has everything! Insane-Contrast 22:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC) They explained the existence of George Bush but not kitchen sinks?!?!? Well then, this is a for. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Fo' Shizzle my bizzle P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For. Makes you think. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  12:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For Very good and kind of bigger than the sum. The Oblong Lobster 12:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For Hmmm... The Humbled Master 18:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC) For Don alun 00:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

HowTo:Be a Jehovah's Witness

Vote: HowTo:Be a Jehovah's Witness	Score: 19 witnesses
Nomination:	EMC [TALK]
For Votes: 19	Featured —rc (t) 05:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Another goody from Ljlego. He's on fire! --EMC [TALK] 01:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC) for very funny --THE 01:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Bold Text -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:02, 14 June 2007 (UTC) M-M-M-M-MONSTER KILL --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 05:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For. "Did you know that we are in the End Times? Did you know that we've been saying that for a couple thousand years? We only have to be right once, you know." Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC) No one, and I do mean no one, will throw another stone even if you hear the word 'Yahweh. ~ 14:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) He said Yahweh! Get him! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Yes, please --General Insineratehymn 18:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For Slithy Tove 18:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Self-for I liked it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For because I hid from them per mother's instructions. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For because I've always had a special place in my heart for the HowTo's. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC) Yes-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Ok, fine... I've finally been drawn in by Ljlego's spell.--<<>> 02:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC) "Despellus Ljlegoatus!" Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC) I'm such a nerd "[insert fancy Latin-type spell here]" Bear with me, these are trying times at the Ministry. I can't be bothered to use a Latin-English translator at the moment. Stay in school.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:06, 15 June 2007 (UTC) 16 --Private Gert5 UGotM 06:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC) DIG Hilarity --THINKER 07:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC) For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:23, 16 June 2007 (UTC) Erm. I know a Jehovah's Witness, and she's nowhere near as messed up or deluded as this guy. Still, FOR. The Humbled Master 00:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

Mr. Kearsy

Vote: Mr. Kearsy	Score: 16 Totally Rad Dudes!
Nomination:	Mr.Vib
For Votes: 19	Featured —rc (t) 05:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC) Nom & For. Really funny article by The Thinker. Style is really good, humo(u)r is great, and the length is just right for a high school student with the attention span of a gerbil.--Mr.Vib 16:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For because it makes it quite obvious that it's just past the normal "awesome" teacher Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 16:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For One of the thinker's most inspired ("inspir'd"?) articles. Thumbs up --THE 18:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC) sDig Thanks Vib. He really did bring in a real live whale, man.. :-D --THINKER 21:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For--Gaberou 22:51, 2 June 2007 (UTC) You don't understand just how friggin' wicked he is! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Okay, okay...it's been fifteen frickin years man since I was in highschool, but I remember the guy. Hasn't changed a bit, and I'm still for!--GUN Shandon 02:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For --Leoispotter 18:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For and we got to smoke weed after class until some prick narked to the Board of Education - and man, Mr. Kearsy got even cooler in prison. Slithy Tove 20:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For Aawww, I never get the cool teachers....Fuckin Ms. Walker....P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For When you say "Ms. Walker," do you mean Tommy Walker's mother? Because she is a bitch!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For. --Emmzee 15:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Awesome, Duuuuude! Necropaxx half-for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Comment There's no such thing, yer either fer it, or agin it. I've updated your vote accordingly. Also, there's doughnut filling on my tie. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Personally I think it could have been executed a little better, but I love the concept so much I've gotta go for. --So So 10:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 12:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For. --Hrodulf 18:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Weak for as per So So. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC) --L 04:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 3	Against He made me wash his motorcycle and failed me after I questioned his teaching methods. Fuckin' jackass... --Dexter111344 17:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Against--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  21:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Against I don't like it, that's all. --Ekashp 01:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Ljlego - In a roundabout way, you're right. I was watching Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome in which the annoying feral childrens chant about Captain and Mrs. Walker, referencing Tommy (as Tina Turner was in the film version). And, since its one of my favorite records, I thought I'd throw it in. Good job kid! :) --THINKER 03:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Changing my vote to abstain. I think this one-trick pony could have been bred better, but the concept is good enough to not vote against. Sorry. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Changed it back after some convincing from Ljlego yesterday -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Socratic Method

Vote: Socratic Method	Score: 17 is a number, right?
Nomination:	Ljlego
For Votes: 23	Featured —rc (t) 04:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC) For Why? Must you ask?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Shall I vote for? -- The Zombiebaron 02:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Wasn't this a game on Whose Line Is It Anyway? Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 02:42, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 03:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Shouldn't I vote for since I proofread it? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:07, 12 June 2007 Why is it so? --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 03:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For? --Hrodulf 03:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC) ?--<<>> 04:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Yes Compact comedy. The Oblong Lobster 07:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Do I get it? If so, would a vote FOR be appropriate? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 10:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For. And longer would be bad, it would be too repetitive. Should I have phrased that as a question? -- sannse (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For (kisses ZB in front of the Romans) -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For Do I need to explain why? do you want me to explain why? why should I have to explain why? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 21:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC) For --EMC [TALK] 21:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Should I repeat everyone expected pattern and vote For? Was that Mordillo? For Despite the shortness, do I like it? Does it matter? --Ekashp 00:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Hesitant for. It's short, but it doesn't seem to leave much room for expansion. Fine as it is, I guess. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Strong For I <3 cookies. -- \o/ 01:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R, 03:07, 13 June 2007 Yeah LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 03:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Verily, I laughed, and yea, I did vote for. --General Insineratehymn 22:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC) YES Don alun 23:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 6	Isn't it a bit too short? Do you really think this is up to front-page standard? Perhaps it is funny enough for a while, but doesn't the fact that the text doesn't even pass the Google ads bring the page down a notch? ...Ah, screw it. Too short. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 20:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Against A short one-tricker that I'd probably like to come across whilst hitting random, but don't see as a feature. It'll get it anyway though, so I ask, does this really matter? ;) --THINKER 04:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Eeeh.... I get the idea, but I also get this feeling that the author has taken a fairly complex system and watered it down to a simplistic form and repeated this form ad infinitum. Which is too reminiscent of high school. So I gotta vote no. -- 05:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Against It doesn't matter because I'm going to feature it in two minutes anyway, but this is not much of a parody of the Socratic method. It's just the Whose Line question game. —rc (t) 05:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Against Am I missing something, or is this not the Socrates Method at all? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:03, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain --Is it possible that I just haven't decided yet?-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Meh-- I see potential, but it's still pretty short, and slightly esoteric. --Theo 00:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC) I swear the fact that Keitei and I voted against at nearly the exact same time (she edit conflicted me twice, actually >:|) and that this means another article gets featured tonight is a complete coincidence. —rc (t) 05:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry about the edit conflict, Rc. I hope this edit conflicts you, too (In a good way!). -- 06:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC) I just broke VFH with an emoticon. And got my third edit conflict. That means it's time for bed, ladies and gents. —rc (t) 06:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry... — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Mad TV

Vote: Mad TV	Score: 16 Alfred E. Neuman grins
Nomination:	EMC [TALK]
For Votes: 18	Featured —rc (t) 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Nom & For -- Reviewed in the Pee Review and thought it was great. Another goody from Ljlego. --EMC [TALK] 22:36, 4 June 2007 (UTC) I agree. We can all learn something from this. It takes the whole first-person narrative and twists it at the end. A great article.--Mr.Vib 23:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For--GUN Shandon 00:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For--Mad for it. --Back Door 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Self-for I think I like it. Not sure though...-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Hesitant For. Ljlego is writing too many good articles. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC) I watched an episode a couple of years ago. In one episode they made fun of cripples, the elderly, the homeless and the mentally retarded. TV sucks. They should've stuck with the Vancome Lady and Javaman. Still, for. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For But SNL is funnier!--Dr. Fenwick 12:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For Another nice one, Ljlego. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For This is funny, and UKNOWNFILE is an utter cockend. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For, did someone say cockend? -- The Zombiebaron 00:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC) For, What, me worry? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 20:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R 09:08, 07 June 2007 For --THE 01:08, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 4 Amusing P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC) reread this, and voting for now... sorry about that incident lj, this article is actually very good when read aloud --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:41, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For...better than a lot of articles nommed right now--GUN Shandon 18:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC) ...oops I can't vote 2X this ARTICLE is mad. And Ljlego bribed me. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC) For - This article totally WASN'T featured already. No seriously it wasn't. -- Hell0ihateyou 21:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2	Uh-oh, hotdog! I didn't really like this article. I watch MadTV and it doesn't do the show justice. (P.S. Saturday Night Live sucks) Kip the Dip 17:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC) a) this article is poop b) you wanted me to vote so there you go --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC) sorry - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. To be fair, I don't really hate the article, I'm just tired of people criticizing MadTV. And SNL doesn't actually suck (more cowbell!), just nowadays I feel all they do is overyly political humor and lame Weekend Update jokes. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ That hardly seems fair to me. So you don't like that I made fun of a show that you like? Big deal! If you don't dislike the article, at the very least abstain.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC) I was trying to be nice. Although I don't hate the article, I definately don't think it's feature worthy. It has nothing to do with the fact that I watch the show. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ Regarding UF's vote: "Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism." What part of that is hard to understand, UNKNOWNFILE? --EMC [TALK] 00:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC) I agree wholly with e|m|c, I say his votes against my own and this article be stricken. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Sorry, but his vote still counts. Even if he is a dick. --EMC [TALK] 01:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC) to emc, initially i voted against when he was going around on irc saying "omgomg vote", and i was a bit tired at the time, so i reread it and it's actually pretty good, now my vote is keep, and you may now leave me alone --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Thank you, UF. I respect your decision, and now am a lot happier about it too :). Cheers-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:36, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Nazi

Vote: Nazi	Score: 19 Presidents and Chancellors rolled into one
Nomination:	Ljlego
For Votes: 19	Featured —rc (t) 05:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC) SN + For ..I don't know what to say.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For. Improved somewhat muchly since my pee review, though I still liked it back then too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For. Had some good points here and there, enough for me. -- You have been Censored by Jew Boy, You'd better Complain 16:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Aye That's not bad, not bad at all. RabbiTechno 17:16, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Dig heil! --THINKER 17:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For...got me reminiscing about the fond childhood days of Scouting...--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 17:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For I really like the beginning --Hrodulf 17:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For rallies, book burnings, and cheese. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For I hated it. It was badly written and the humor was sub-standard. The formatting reminded me of puke. Definite For-- 17:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Nice bit of quality in there. And a random swipe at the Daily Mail is always welcome. The Oblong Lobster 17:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For. Brilliant opening. –—Hv (talk) 10/06 17:54 For. -- Mitch 18:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Frei --General Insineratehymn 20:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Das ist gut. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 23:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For --THE 00:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC) I know my Nazi material. Trust me. This is good. Very good. I think I Pee Reviewed it too (the third time). Oh well. Big for. --EMC [TALK] 00:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC) Just feature it already --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC) For - Nice Rewrite. NOW FEATURE AND SEMI-PROTECT! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 12:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC) Heil!• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes

Moustache-o-meter

Vote: Moustache-o-meter	Score: 23 virile staches
Nomination:	This is one of those classic articles that never gets old.
For Votes: 23	Featured —rc (t) 05:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC) --KATIE!! 21:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC) I think I said this last time, but I've got a Selleck. Also, monobrow. But that's another story. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC) This should have been featured TWO YEARS AGO. —rc (t) 21:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For I shaved my stache today, and now I miss it.--Ekashp 21:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For Though the formatting is a bit ugly, I love the article in every imaginable way except that one way which I know you're thinking about.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC) For. I forget if Chuck Norris has a stache, but his would represent helpless embellishment and aggrandizement. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 03:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Oh my. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Yes Facial hairlarity. hahahahahahahahahaha The Oblong Lobster 15:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Very Nice!  Weasel 3689 19:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC) Yes, please --General Insineratehymn 22:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC) For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Dig The Bronson is my 'stache of choice. --THINKER 02:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For...I had one once, the Errol Flynn (oh, you think I'm joking--I have photos) --Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For - I thought this article was funny and well-crafted! --Jlmathwhiz 06:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For Very, very good. RabbiTechno 17:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 18:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 18:34, 10 June 2007 (UTC) For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Amazing this was so funny that I sneezed on myself and was covered in snot. Maybe I should have voted against. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 19:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC) /me strokes mine. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 21:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC) 23 is the magic number-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 23:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	Abstain Something told me it was funny, but I just didn't feel the same way. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)

Ganges

Vote: Ganges	Score: 17 doody rivers
Nomination:	Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 17	Featured —rc (t) 06:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC) Nom & For. Give this one a very good read before voting here. The more carefully you read it, the more you should realise how awesome it is. Oh, and see if you can guess who the author is without looking. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For Very humorous.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Dig I love it! hilarity!!! --THINKER 21:53, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For -- Has more theme than a lot of this guy's stuff, IMHO. ----OEJ 23:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For. Very good. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:10 For, I plan my vacations around Dirk Snyddering mad ramblings. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC) for It captures the atmosphere with incredible accuracy, whilst still being 100 percent satire. My good Lady, or hounouroable Sir, you earned my r.e.s.p.e.c.t -- di Mario 16:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Fer Shizzle satire-licious P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For Genius. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For Necropaxx For. Palinesque journalism. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Me likely --Dexter111344 21:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC) for. genius - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:19, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 12:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For. Funny, sharp, imaginative and very well-written. --Zarbag 12:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Excusing me, but I am absolutely wanting to be for - I'm from India, and I love it. Very well-researched humour (and ROTFLMAO at the Mother Ganga poem!). An ideal example of HTBFANJS. Two thumbs up. - MaximvsDecimvs 05:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For, pure genius.--Nydas 14:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 0	No against votes
Comments	A bit tedious, it only needs about 1 week to achieve featured in my book. But that's just me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Welcome to the Real World of VFH. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

UnNews:Geology classes in Alabama now mandating alternative "Paul Bunyan" theory

Vote: UnNews:Geology classes in Alabama now mandating alternative "Paul Bunyan" theory	Score: 18 mythical lumberjacks
Nomination:	Hrodulf 16:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 19	Featured —rc (t) 05:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC) nom & for Fantastic parody of Intelligent Design. Onion level humor! --Hrodulf 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC) weak for Not hilarious, but still pretty good satire. Why'd it get such a shitty pee review though?-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For Very funny An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays Consult the Oracle 21:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Scopes v. State of Tennesse --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 21:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Self-For Thanks for the nom Hrodulf --THE 21:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC) i'm a lumber-- wait, that's not original, so saying for will do for now --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Dig another good one Mr. THE --THINKER 01:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC) For The sad thing is that this is more true than anything else. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) Strong For Awesome article --Uncle J 21:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC) For Great satire. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 14:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For iz nice Feureau 20:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC) For This is absolutely hilarious. AdeptOmega 20:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC) F☭R 08:57, 07 June 2007 For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC) for Being raised in a strict Bunyanist household, brings a tear to my eye --Mb240d 01:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For--Gaberou 03:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For - WHAT! PAUL BUNYAN DIDN'T MAKE THE MOUNTAINS AND LAKES!! NOES I MUST GO CUT MYSELF! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 15:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For and quickly before The Onion steals it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC) For. Witty. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 1	- jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	The scopes v. state of tennessee guy didn't say "for" so I guess that doesn't count as a vote. --Hrodulf 21:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC) I'm pretty sure it does-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC) We've got this thing called a table now that says "for" and "against". It's not even really required anymore here. --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 22:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC) IDNKT --Hrodulf 22:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL

Vote: TONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL	Score: 21 fiery banquets
Nomination:	General Insineratehymn 22:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For Votes: 23	Featured —rc (t) 06:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC) this article was incredible, smart, and funny. if it doesn't get featured article, i may be forced to eat mine own head. I could not stop giggling when I read this article. --General Insineratehymn 22:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC) I think dining in hell might be a better name, but it's still funny, and that's what counts. --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 22:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC) For The title leaves a little to be desired, but the article as a whole is genius.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC) THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAAAAA --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC) I do like this one very much. --Pcgamermofo 03:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Very Nice!'  Weasel 3689 06:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For Not quite my impression of what dining in hell would be like. Thanks for clearing it up for me, I plan to be dining there a lot in the future. -- RAHB 10:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For--Shandon 18:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC) For - Hooray for hell! No, wait... {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 02:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC) For ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:14, 03 June 2007 Very very much for. And please, DO NOT TOUCH THE TITLE. It's just a part of the charm. ~ 17:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Calm down, dear. It's only a For. Made me laugh plenty. Famous film quote + Michael Winner = A, erm, Winner. --Zarbag 17:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- Mitch 17:41, 3 June 2007 (UTC) "Curry with an unusual but piquant tang of petrol" --KATIE!! 21:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC) For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC) For. Absobloodylutely hilarious! Vanaelin 02:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC) For You really should be a restaurant critic. That was very awesome. The title can stay, as I felt like it set the opening mood. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) For. She made me do it. plus it's actually pretty funny -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 12:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC) SelfFor. With thanks to those who helped with advice and puns :) -- sannse (talk) 16:27, 5 June 2007 What the Hell. Featured articles for everybody! whoo! so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Ja ja ja. -- herr doktor needsAcharge  [scream!] 13:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC) The spotted dick sounds delightful --Mb240d 01:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Against Votes: 2	#AGAINST Sparta is overdone. Tonight we dine in SUCK. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC) I changed my mind. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 21:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Against - Slifer put it perfectly. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:13 Against - Maybe I'm missing something, maybe I'm a philistine, but this article just doesn't do it for me. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC) sorry, really average - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Conditional for. The title has got to go for this to be acceptable on the front page. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Move to traditional titling with title hack on the page for the all caps? --THINKER 05:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC) What's wrong with the title? --KATIE!! 00:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Its Bensonized? --THINKER 21:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC) BENSONIZED??! BENSON is a mere statuesque phantom to you--he was a myth even to me. The title has nothing to do with that user, and must remain as-is. Because it's funny.--GUN Shandon 03:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Abstain. I have an enormously strong feeling emanating from somewhere in my person that says that this article is funny. However, it isn't making me laugh. Is there a backstory to this? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC) The short answer is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Winner - it seems from the votes that it also works as "general restaurant critic" for those that don't know of MW, but really he's the target here. Not that I expect your vote for this explanation of course, if it has to be explained then it obviously doesn't work for you ;) -- sannse (talk) 14:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC) Abstain. Not against material anymore, but still don't think it's quite right. –—Hv (talk) 7/06 21:09