Forum:The Great Administrator Mixup: Vote for your temporary admins here

Forums: Index > Village Dump > The Great Administrator Mixup: Vote for your temporary admins here

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4762 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Voting has ended. Your new temporary objects of hate are: Sockpuppet of an unregistered user, Hyperbole, PuppyOnTheRadio and Lyrithya. To the new admins: please use this page to guide your admin decisions. Don't do anything Marcos Malo wouldn't do.

Their term of service will extend to approximately April 1, then we can all fight about the results.

Rcmurphy, Codeine, Thekillerfroggy and Under user are now barred from using their admin powers and are free to commence trolling of the new admins. —rc (t) 18:04, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Voting will end on March 4 at 12:00 CST (18:00 UTC). All votes cast after this time will be thrown out. All votes for Dex will be thrown out regardless.

Per this thread, we will be electing temporary admins for the month of March. These temps will "take over" admin duties from current administrators, who will spend the next month acting as regular users and not utilizing their admin powers. At the end of March, we will evaluate the exercise as a community and decide if this type of thing is something we'd like to pursue further.

Nominations and voting will be open for a week. On March 4, voting will be closed and winners declared. Three Four current admins have volunteered to repress their naturally bloodthirsty instincts for the next month: Rcmurphy, Codeine and Thekillerfroggy (and now UU, because he won't be here anyway). Thus we will be electing threefour temporary admins to take their place. Here are the rules:

1. Every user, admin and regular, gets three four votes. All votes are equal.
2. You cannot cast more than one vote on a particular nominee.
3. No self-nominations, but you can vote for yourself.
4. No "against" votes.
5. You are free to change your votes at any time. Unless it's already after March 4.

This is not a popularity contest! Vote for people you think would make good admins (whatever you think that might entail). Please put discussion on the... wait, there's no talk page. Hm. Okay, don't discuss anything.

Nominations

Electrified mocha chinchilla

Score: 3

• Nom and for MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:23, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Against. Who is he again? Sounds kinda familiar... --EMC ^[TALK] 05:00 Feb 27 2011

• Apparently no against votes allowed. Pup 10:06 27 Feb '11

•  For. Because diminutive mammals should stick together. Pup 10:06 27 Feb '11
•  For. swag. -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

Mrthejizz

Score: 2

• Nom and for MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:23, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. he got swagga -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

Colin

Score: 2

• Nom and for MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:23, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For - I wanna see how many things he can replace with goatse. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 21:12, Mar. 1, 2011
•  For. based god -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

•  Mos Definitely DJ Mixerr 06:50, March 12, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

Socky

Score: 23

• Nom and for pillow talk 04:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. (talk) 05:16, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• For. --Roman Dog Bird 06:58, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Well yeah -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• NOOOOO!! He's the worst! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:41, 25 February 2011
• For. Actually, can we not just make him a real op? --Black Flamingo 23:48, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Obvious choice, why he wasn't carried on the shoulders of the other admins over a years ago is one of the remaining mysteries of the website. Aleister 00:12 26-2-'11
• For -- The Zombiebaron 04:34, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. 'Cause he looks like an admin already. Or else a sockpuppet... can't tell the difference really. ◄► UnUnUn ium ◄► 17:48, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. He will make a great admin. --~  18:01, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
• What the hell is HELPME doing here? Oh yeah, he's voting for someone who just barely lost the last VFS and has been doing all of the work he needs to be an admin for years. That's all. --HM (T) 23:39, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
• I hate him and I hope he dies. On a related note, for. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:18, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Socky is a nice guy. He does nice things. He lets me keep my rabbits. GOOD RABBIT, GOOD BUNNY, PET THE BUNNY! --
•  For. Because he's not me, and I keep forgetting he's not already an admin. Pup 10:03 27 Feb '11
•  For. Mature, adept, and impartial. Spıke ¬ 00:02 1-Mar-11
•  For. —rc (t) 03:27, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I love this guy! -- 05:35, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Tintin. Socky to be the next Prime Minister of Belgium too - if he can manage that job as well.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:31, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Well, duh. --UU - natter 21:10, Mar 1
• Aye, duh. 1234 ~ 22:23, 1 March 2011
•  For. --^Dame 12:31, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. thank you based god -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

•  For. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 21:25, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  On the condition that he still writes during his tenure as temporary admin. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 01:22, Friday 04 March 2011 -
•  GEAH! DJ Mixerr 06:53, March 12, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig

Aleister

Score: refuses to serve

• Nom and for pillow talk 04:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

  A shame, Aleister, I think you'd have done a good job of it... pillow talk 06:28, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

• For -- The Zombiebaron 04:47, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Thanks Hyperbole and Zombiebaron, this is nice of you and makes me feel like a real live boy. But no thanks. If elected I will not serve. If forced to serve I will permaban Hyperbole (if he isn't selected), and when he is ressurected I will ban him again until I am deopped from the faux op. That's what I'd do, and I would enjoy the experience. Aleister 00:15 26-2-'11

  So...I won't vote for you? -- The Zombiebaron 04:32, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

  Vote for me. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 21:31, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

  For. You may not want to serve, but I still think you'd do a hell of a job at this. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:10, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

•  Idon't care if you refuses to serve, you'll serve, and you'll like it! -- 05:36, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

  Thanks. As I explained on Zombiebaron's page, my inability to handle some coding functions, as well as my tendency for seeing discordian-type occurances, would lead me to not ban the 92 vandal and other interesting characters, but to actually befriend them and give them our secret admin codes just to see what they would do. I would actually do too many things that would shake the boat too much, and drown me along with the other crewmembers. The wisest thing is to lock me into the user pen and keep me out of the admin's banquet hall. Aleister 13:34 2-3-'11

  Well when you put it that way... I don't care. You would be an amazing admin. -- 18:11, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

  Roman Dog Bird does that kind of thing, too, and he's a lovely admin. Just saying. 1234 ~ 18:16, 2 March 2011

  Thank you Lyrithya! See Al? There. Roman Dog Bird does it too, and we all love him anyway. -- 18:24, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

  Discordianism and lack of coding skills does not a bad admin make. 72.178.158.9 19:30, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Mn-z

Score: 1

• Nom and for pillow talk 04:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• self-for normally, I wouldn't be so crass to vote for myself. However, I'm inactive enough now that I no longer want to be a real admin, so like whatever. --Mn-z 00:35, February 26, 2011 (UTC) removing futile vote --Mn-z 21:49, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

SPIKE

Score: +1

• Nom —rc (t) 04:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ~  Talk 04:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. —rc (t) 23:30, February 26, 2011 (UTC) Vote withdrawn. —rc (t) 03:23, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Sincere thanks, but no. Stewardship of the UnNews Front Page (for which I don't need Admin power) has replaced authorship with list maintenance, tidying up articles, giving advice, and rewrites, and this vote would continue the trend. My opinions (in favor of written rules and against silliness) are still outside the Uncyclopedia mainstream. And regarding "temporary" experiments, I am a writer and not a computer programmer solely by agreeing to a two-week assignment--during which my former department disappeared. Spıke ¬ 14:59 28-Feb-11
  • Despite what are probably your best efforts, I find myself liking you more every day;)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:23, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
• I still think Spike would be an excellent candidate for Poopsmith. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 03:02, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Dexter111344

Score: 9

• Nom. 1234 ~ 04:31, 25 February 2011
•  For. Only guy who consistently beats me to QVFD when I'm actively looking for cruft. (talk) 05:18, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Yep. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• He's already an admin in my playbook. Aleister 00:09 26-2-'11
• Green light. User:Mrthejazz/sig 06:04, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
• For. --Roman Dog Bird 17:58, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. —rc (t) 03:27, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:33, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

May I kindly back out and ask those who voted for me to please vote for one of the others? I wouldn't even be up for consideration if this was an actual VFS, so why pretend like I deserve ops temporarily? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:17, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

The first rule of Ops Club is that you shouldn't think you deserve Ops. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Three admins and a few of the more rabbleous of the rabble think you deserve it, and you would get these votes if it were a VFS too. So you're saying we all got together and made this up during a card game? I wish their were four spots open (hint to one of the ops who hasn't logged on in three years - you know who you are). Aleister 11:38 1-3-'11

I believe you can cancel your nomination (per the example of Sycamore and Aleister) if you really don't want to be a temporary op. --Mn-z 22:10, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

•  If you want beef then bring the ruckus. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:23, Wednesday 02 March 2011 -
•  fourth vote a QVFD master. deserves to be an admin. --~  20:16, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. I like this guy. -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

Hyperbole

Score: 13

• Nom. 1234 ~ 04:31, 25 February 2011
• For -- The Zombiebaron 04:48, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron (talk) 05:20, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Aaaaand yes. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Something. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:41, 25 February 2011
• For. --Black Flamingo 23:48, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. If he wants to play with this hat for a month, of course. Aleister 00:32 26-2-'11
• For. --Roman Dog Bird 20:51, February 26, 2011 (UTC) 15:08, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
•  Spiritual for Actual Four He actually wants this for some insane reason, and insanity is a trait that I look for in an admin. Pup 10:08 27 Feb '11
•  For. Hype really has to be admin for a month at least as he has been the leading campaigner for change. Invest him with the ban stick of temporal authority. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:27, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• It's about the only thing he hasn't done. --UU - natter 21:10, Mar 1
•  For. I wonder if a month is enough to really get a feel for it? 1234 ~ 22:23, 1 March 2011

  History says it isn't. I only got jaded after 3 months. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:04, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

  Aye, took me about as long as well, but I was kind of hoping it was just my own intolerable denseness. So much for that potential use of this whole... experiment-dealy. 1234 ~ 18:35, 2 March 2011

•  For. per above and stuff. --Mn-z 02:35, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 21:25, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sycamore

Score: 2

• Nom. 1234 ~ 04:31, 25 February 2011
• For. --Black Flamingo 23:48, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. He/She spends so much time on VFD, Ban patrol and QVFD, that he(let's make it a he) deserves to be an admin. --~  18:12, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

No chance - totally disagree with this little power whoring experiment. I want no part of it.--Sycamore (Talk) 22:29, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Mimo&maxus

Score: +2.5

• Nom —rc (t) 04:34, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• self-half-for What? I put shitty articles on QVFD on a nearly daily basis. I also put anons in Ban Patrol many times. I still have to learn things, thought and that's why it's a half for. --~  18:07, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I mean, just how much irreversable carnage could there be? Whats the worst that could happen? Uncyclopedia self destructs? (p.s. this vote is TOTALLY serious) --ShabiDOO 15:08, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Awsome. Awsome. Awsome. He'd make the place more fun and charming and not this dungeon that if you make one small move you're banned. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 21:13, March 1, 2011 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio

Score: 11

• Nom'd (talk) 05:22, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- The Zombiebaron 06:14, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• For - LOL vandalz
• For -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! 21:32, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. He hasn't said no, so I say "no way". Aleister 13:27 28-2-'11

  Comment. Hey! You said you didn't have another vote! --~  13:28, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. —rc (t) 03:27, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:33, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Make this happen. --UU - natter 21:10, Mar 1
•  For. per above and stuff. --Mn-z 21:50, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Now that we have four votes, Puppy deserves my fourth. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:04, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  Fourth (talk) 07:10, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. wooo a fourth vote! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:14, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

THEDUDEMAN

Score: 0

• Real nom. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • comment I'm not sure he's active enough at the moment to notice that he's a temporary op. --Mn-z 00:27, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
    • If he wins, I'll personally make him come back. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:37, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Charitwo

Score: 2

• Perennial nom. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
• for I don't think oping someone who does very little more than patrol recent changes is a good idea. I'd like to see that theory tested in practice. --Mn-z 00:39, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
• Penile for. --EMC ^[TALK] 05:01 Feb 27 2011

Villahj Ideeut

Score: 0

• Token joke nom. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

Mhaille

Score: +0

• Nom. Let's give the kid a chance eh? --Black Flamingo 23:48, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

Against this whole idea, I've said before I'm not someone that holds grudges against people but its telling that the people who are doing reasonably well in the voting in this are the ones who have shown repeatedly in the past that they have difficulties dealing with other users who they disagree with. Despite the fact that we haven't voted to accept this whole idea I'd like to make the point that should anyone utilise admin rights to perpetuate petty grudges against other users I will spank very, very hard. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

The only one doing well who is on that list is Dex, who is in 4th, and he got 2 votes of his 5 votes from admins. --Mn-z 22:07, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea what's going on here, but I'm going to comment anyway. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:11, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

I wasn't specifically speaking about people on the list. Also Dex sucks fat cocks. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

So your saying Socky will make a bad admin then? --Mn-z 00:47, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Socky, like Uncyclopedia itself, is the worst... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Lyrithya

Score: 11

• Nom. To see if L. wants it. You never know which way the wind takes this one. Already an admin in my little black book. Aleister 00:19 26-2-'11
• for we need more women admins. --Mn-z 00:36, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ~  Talk 04:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Lyri's certainly earned my trust. pillow talk 06:29, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

  Comment. I was between you and Sycamore but I thought you will get more votes than Sycamore so I didn't vote for you. Anyway, good luck. --~  18:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. Actually I'll vote for. Same reasons. --~  20:08, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  Against. She hits me with a frying pan too often. --EMC ^[TALK] 05:04 Feb 27 2011

  Invalid vote. The rules state: "No 'against' votes." -- The Zombiebaron 05:11, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. Because she's not me. Pup 10:01 27 Feb '11
•  For. At least somebody will unilaterally huff all my articles. --Scofield 16:27, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Tireless worker, whether writing, doing marquee tasks, or doing maintenance work and defense against vandals. No history of dickery, ever. Has already been a wiki admin. Only drawback: Still loves to be vague and noncommittal; an Admin ought to be clear, whether administering rewards or punishments. Spıke ¬ 23:59 28-Feb-11
•  For. The obvious choice. -- 05:32, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. As admin over at The Other Place, Lyrithya is already showing that she has a good grasp of what is required. Hope it becomes permanent soon. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:20, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. We DO need an adminbot.--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 18:18, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 21:25, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
• I don't I don't think I wanna. 1234 ~ 18:04, 4 March 2011

  You're four minutes too late to back out now. That's like an astronaut four minutes into the flight deciding to unbuckle and open the hatch. Doesn't mean you have to do anything, you can just be one of those admins who haven't logged on in two years, and wear the title like a flag pin or something. Aleister 7 minutes past closing of the vote

Ah ha! I've been watching Recent Changes, and Conservapedia is right!

"Uncyclopedia has a rigid hierarchy and is perhaps even more legalistic and collectivistic than Wikipedia. Admininistrators are afforded the same reverence as gods and goddesses. They are able to ridicule, deride and permanently block other users on a whim. Uncyclopedia administrators are also permitted to delete any article they dislike and promote one anothers articles by featuring them on the main page." ~ Conservapedia on Uncyclopedia admins

It's a fact! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:12, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

...................Damn. --Roman Dog Bird 18:36, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

I don't recall us ever pretending that this was a democracy. -- |c|o|d|e|i|n|e| 10:26, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

We are a democracy, unlike Conservapedia, which seems to be run by a shadowy cabal. Pup 11:01 07 Mar '11

Rigid? I knew Puppy was a horn dog, but the rest of you? And this ridicule business, they've got it right there. Lyrtheria or whatever the name is has been standing outside my window and pointing at me for hours, holding one of those "GOD HATES FAGS" billboards, and I don't even smoke. Aleister 11:06 7-3-'11

On that topic, can I get some of that God-like reverence now? Pup 11:15 07 Mar '11

I don't see how that description sets us aside from any other moderated site on the web, including just about every forum that ever existed and, uh, Conservapedia. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:16, March 7, 2011 (UTC)