From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


You're an asshole

You just constantly ban new users for months on end for doing the same thing you and other admins do all the time and play favorites like shit.

Sometimes you read something that makes you realise why you stay here...

And that was your moon article, my friend.

Also, if you aren't too busy, can you please get back onto Moving the goalposts (guess that wasn't the exact title, shrug). Your style is so refined and pleasant to read. I mean, there are so few other places on the net you can find such subtle wit, most of it is just crass uhrm.. shite.. rammed down your throat with vigor. --Nikau (talk) 17:02, April 17, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Glad you liked UnScripts:Who built the moon. I have been planning that one for a while. I even had to nominate it on Saturday the 14th (the day after) just to make sure all the stars lined up right. I'm joking (obviously). Moving the goal posts was the fist article I wrote/created at Uncyc. :-) As for style, I try to not have one, although obviously I do. Personally I appreciate lots of different styles such as Data Protection Act which (honestly) had me in stitches laughing more than any other article on Uncyc for years...
If you are looking for refined and pleasant to read I suggest you check out everything written, and all the edits made by Hardwick Fundlebuggy (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:45, Apr 17
...especially Bouncy Castle, for my taste, although there are many many others. Say, MrN, Nikau has been around quite a while, although not necessarily active the whole while. Also, he's an awesome writer. You two should get acquainted. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, Apr 17 '12 21:39 (UTC)
We are old tradesman going back almost to Genesis. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:18, Apr 18

Sometimes you read something that makes you realise why you stay here…

That wasn't it. Nominally Humane! 12:19 18 Apr

I think this is the one that still keeps you here. For me its this one. Aleister 00:22 18-4-'12
You guys actually read the articles? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:19, Apr 18
Occasionally I read something as I write it. I usually write blindfolded though. Nominally Humane! 09:35 18 Apr
If I type "who built the moon" into google, Uncyclopedia is the number 2 hit. FU David Icke. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:35, Apr 19
It should be number one. A page worthy of the gods. Although on BING it's number nine. Surprises me lately that google and bing use such different criteria for searches, which changes on a daily basis. If you type in YOUR MOTHER SUCKS COCKS IN HELL MOTHERFUCKER! google will take you to Mother's Day, while Bing will only bring you to uncy if the saying is in quotes, and it does not even mention Puppy. We live in a world of wonder and mystery. Aleister 10:47 19-4-'12

RC checking

With the help of Bizzeebeever I have the bones of an RC patrol script. What I have in mind would work most effectively with ungrouped changes but it'll do something like this:

(diff | hist) . . Ron Paul‎; 22:33 . . (+133) . . Aleister in Chains (talk | contribs) (tweaks and tried to fix inconsistencies but failed.) [rollback]
(diff | hist) . . India‎; 22:31 . . (+2) . . Funnybony (talk | contribs) (→British Raaj: ) [rollback]
(diff | hist) . . Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol‎; 22:30 . . (+64) . . Sycamore (talk | contribs) (+User: [rollback]
(diff | hist) . . Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD‎; 22:29 . . (+25) . . Sycamore (talk | contribs) (+Chicago Blackhawks) [rollback]
(diff | hist) . . Uncyclopedia:QuickVFD‎; 22:29 . . (+21) . . Sycamore (talk | contribs) (+Buffalo Sabres)
(diff | hist) . . Amelia Earhart‎; 22:29 . . (+31) . . (talk) (→Childhood: ) [rollback]

Where the highlighted "diff" is those that have been checked. I was also thinking of something along the lines of a double-check system as well (so we could have yellow for one check and green for the other) but I'm half hearted about it as it takes a fair amount of coding for something that we may not use. To say that something has been checked I'd add a tab to "diff" pages (like the standard edit/move/watch tabs for instance) so that those that aren't checked you can check quickly by clicking the unhighlighted links, and then clicking the "check" tab when done. (I usually use dif pages for checking recent changes myself, and I assume that most editors checking these would.)

By protecting a page as "auto confirmed" we can reduce the number of people who can patrol recent changes. I haven't yet worked out a way to limit it any further than that.

What are your thoughts so far? Oh, and is MrN9001 around for the USP delivery? Nominally Humane! 12:44 19 Apr

Hea dude. I kinda understand what you are talking about, but I'm not sure how you are suggesting it would actually work. Personally I check recent changes with a combination of grouped and non-grouped changes and mostly check diff pages. If we could get something like this working which actually did work then it would be awesome. I'm not totally sure that this kinda approach is the right way, as maybe all we need is to change the {{BPC}} template, or maybe have a new similar one which allows more text input, but you may well be onto something. How would we control who had the extra tab? All the rollbackers maybe? Also... Something like this is going to be very controversial to get accepted by the wider community. Not saying don't try... Just going to be tricky! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:24, Apr 19


We Need More Bots!

If you fancy getting yourself a bot MrN9001 runs on this. It's actually not that hard to download, setup and figure out. Anyone who is able to do that has probably got enough understanding about things to run a bot... There is an sysop protected page somewhere which needs to be changed to allow new bots to actually make changes, but anyone can get AWB running. It's really not that tricky. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:24, Apr 19

I'm working on a slightly different type of bot at the moment, based upon the stuff I've been doing with BB above. Problem with AWB is that it sits on a single computer, whereas my script bot should go wherever I can log on. Once I have it running I'll share the details around to a few select individuals who have nice hair. Nominally Humane! 12:41 20 Apr

UnSignpost 19th April 2012

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 14:51, Apr 19

Ron Pawed by Pirat

Looks like the page you and I were dragged into will be featured at some point. I checked the history and lo and behold, Jocke Pirat did most of the reshaping and rewrite which was the core of any good stuff we worked on. It's an honor to be associated with you two. And this is the puurrrfect chance to nom Jocke Pirat for WotM in May (since he'd have a 1/2 feature in April) and finally fight and claw for him to get his place in the hall of shemed. (I looked to see if any of his non-featured are good enough for feature, can't find one but haven't looked at them all) Shining a light of Jocke P. may be one of the best things to come from the article on this boring politician and do-gooder (my motto is "Never do good before they don't do it to you") Al 10:51 20-4-'12

Nice. It came out OK I think. Cool, I had looked through the history a bit, and had not noticed the Jocke P's edits but if you think he's due a 1/2 credit then I'm sure he is. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:05, Apr 20
Yes, check it out, he did a total rewrite and then claimed it as "his" article. Oh, if you are online, please check out User talk:Funnybony, last edits under Help, he's got a vandal problem that's persisting when I just looked. Thankis. Aleister 16:16 20-4-'12
Cool. I'm not really "around" today, but I protected that page. Have fun. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:53, Apr 20

Alo alo

So, eh, me 'n' Pup got a patrol script working. It's here. To try it out yourself, include this line -

importScript( "User:Bizzeebeever/scripts/patrol.js" )

- in either your uncyclopedia.js file or your monobook.js file (depending on which skin you use). Granted, mediawiki *has* a function for patrolling pages, but we would have to ask wikia to activate it, and then we would have to ask them to change our user groups so that rollbackers could use it.

My version is a bit rough around the edges, and every time you mark a page, the edit to the control page shows up on Special:RecentChanges, but I hope to get that solved soonly. Ah me so hawny. Me love you long time. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngSun, Apr 22 '12 3:11 (UTC)

Nice! Replied on your talkpage. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 12:05, Apr 22
Also, hate to bug you again, but could you have a gander at this puddle of spooge? This version seems like it might be the last decent one before a bunch of IPs started using it as a glory hole, but I know nothing of English-rools football. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngSun, Apr 22 '12 17:04 (UTC)
Hea dude. I took a look at it. Oddly enough a mate of mine who I'm getting into Uncyc came over on the weekend and actually mentioned that he had read this article and found it really funny. I'm not really a fan myself, but will clean it up a bit more, and leave it at that. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:38, Apr 23
Also, that patrol script is mostly finished, for now anyway. It regulates the size of the control file now -- when the file reaches 20kB, it resets it to 4kB. And I'm not sure it will flood RC much -- IP edits tend to be either crap (which is reverted) or work on new pages (which are {{Fix}}'d or {{ICU}}'d anyway). Although...yeah, I guess there are quite a few edits by new users sometimes...hmm...well, at any rate, still working on how to prevent it from showing up on RC. Cheers, anyway. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngMon, Apr 23 '12 12:42 (UTC)
Dude, what you are doing is awesome. However this one is not in the bag yet... We still have some problems to sort out... The change file can't show up in RC, and what is going to stop sophisticated vandals changing that page? If it's not shown on RC who would notice if they did? It's probably possible for a sysop to change the site scripts to not show edits to a particular page (I don't know how to do it, but I suspect it's possible). It may also be possible to restrict edits to a page based on group membership (rollback I guess) but again I don't know how to do that if it can be done. Also... Be ready to field questions about why this is a good idea and understand the pros/cons of implementing something like this. I suspect that not everyone will agree that we actually want something like this, so there might be some opposition. I do totally think this could work very well and be very useful, but we need to iron out all the issues first. With all the above bullshit bullshitted... It is awesome. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 12:57, Apr 23
I agree. The fact that it shows on RC is the major con of the whole shemozzle. Beyond that, though, there is no reason as to why it can't be considered as a useful tool, even if it is only half a dozen of us using it. The other thought I had is that it adds the page once a single page has been checked - is there a way to add the page details to a cookie or something similar and add it once you've checked a dozen or so? Nominally Humane! 01:55 23 Apr
If anything like this is going to start being actually used (by anyone) it should be done via a VD forum after lots of community discussion. Lots of people will want their say about this... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 14:01, Apr 23
  1. Protect that page so only rollbackers+ can edit it. Boom, vandals can't touch it. Anyway, it's not like it has a mission-critical function.
  2. I don't think a sysop can change site settings to prevent a page's edits from showing up on RC. Sannse could probably do it, but if we're going to ask for that, we might as well just ask for her to turn on the patrol extension and allow rollbackers to use it.
  3. Pros: it works. Cons: it shows up on RC; it's a clumsy workaround to take the place of something that already exists, but isn't turned on. That's about it.
  4. I wasn't thinking of forcing it to be used site-wide. We've got a few regular RC patrollers like Pup, Frosty, Sycamore, Xamralco, Aleister, and Mattsnow, and those are the folks whose lives would be made easier. I figured we'd just show up at their houses in the middle of the night and make 'em an offer they couldn't refuse: "Da boss says, 'use the script or get kneecapped.'" If that fails, we send 'em a bunch of haddock wrapped in newspaper, or wire their toilets to explode. Boom, message sent.
  5. @pup: cookies are a fine idea, but what if you mark N pages, where N is < 12? I can implement that pretty easily, but how should the script know when you want to commit your marks?
Anyway, I'm still looking into other options, like using a bot to do the actual edits, or using an off-site server to store our mark "database". On that tack: MrN, how do you "poke" a bot, like, for instance, fnoodle? I'd ask the Thumper of Skulls, but he seems busy playing online Lego or something. Never mind, got my answer. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngMon, Apr 23 '12 20:48 (UTC)
That message box - yes/no box "You have marked x pages. Would you like to commit them?" or something like that. If it's less than 5 it's probably not worth asking/committing. If it's more than 10 it's probably worth auto committing. Nominally Humane! 10:53 23 Apr
As for vandalism of the changes page - anyone who uses that script (as it currently is) would be seeing edits to it on RC. And rollbacker only protection is a major hassle. Auto confirmed is probably sufficient. Nominally Humane! 10:58 23 Apr
How's it a hassle? I thought you just change the protection level, and in the field where it asks "for whom", you say "rollbacks". Do we want non-rollbacks using that script? ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngMon, Apr 23 '12 23:10 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, protection levels are none, auto confirmed, and admin. adding rollback in would be a good idea overall, but hasn't been done yet. Nominally Humane! 12:13 24 Apr
Yep. Just 3 levels. Course we could always sysop protect the page... ;) As I said... This is not done yet. We might possibly need someone running an offsite "verification" server or something. Also... what would happen if... someone reverted vandalism, but did not have or click the tab? Lots to think about here, and as I said, I don't want anyone using this or anything like it "seriously" until it's got agreement from everyone else. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:16, Apr 24
It has kinks, definitely. The principle itself is good though, and worth working out the kinks prior to throwing it on VD and saying "Hey, this is what we've got. What'ya reckon?" I'm happy to have it as admin only checking, but of course that means it'd only be admins who would be able to take advantage of it and use it for checking, which would mean there's more work for admins to do - which I'm sure you need. Also having it open to autoconfirmed - it means when we have people like Tasmania come along he can start partying with it once he's learnt enough about the place. Yeah - it'll never be a perfect idea, because there's always an element of judgement in these things. But i we can reduce/remove it popping up in RC, then we have a winner. As BB says, if we go along and say "nah, that won't do" and undo/revert/ICU/Fix/Construction, then there's no need for check. If we add the further restriction of only adding once the total of "new" marks hits 5+ or 10 total, then we reduce the amount of amendments to a minimum. (For the sake of figures, let's assume one in three amendments need to be marked, and we only add once we've hit 5-10 marks - average 7.5 - then we have one amendment via the script when we hit around the 20-25ish mark. That's 4-5 every hundred, or 20-25 every 500 recent changes. It's a signifiant percentage, but not a terrible one.) Nominally Humane! 01:51 24 Apr
It is a good concept. Per the bit about "only add once we've hit 5-10 marks " I think a lot of times it would end up getting clicked a lot more often than that if available like that. It would also need to be able to handle grouped recent changes. If a change has been checked and reverted... Who checks the revert? who will check the checker? who guards the guards? and who will check the checker who checks the checker? and... who will check the checker who checks the checker who checked that checker? and? Keith Chegwin probably has the answers but he is not telling us. The bastard. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 02:36, Apr 24
As for grouped changes - it's half there. It'll highlight the last diff checked (assuming BB made the change we were chatting about) when you expand it. If the last diff was the last change, it'll highlight that. Was thinking about a double check system (yellow first check, green the second) but it was an aside. If we need to it can be done, but I figured the K.I.S.S principle at first. (As in Keep it simple not Party every day.) Nominally Humane! 05:21 24 Apr
Never mind. Look at Forum:ATTENTION: This vote will give you longer-lasting erections AND bigger boobs! Nominally Humane! 09:11 24 Apr

Thanks for the "hats off"

...but you should really give Pup his props, too. It was his idea in the first place; he just didn't know there was such a thing as patrolling already built in. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, Apr 25 '12 22:16 (UTC)

Agreed, but personally I blame Simsilikesims the most. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:33, Apr 25
Vitramin C? Nominally Humane! 10:59 25 Apr
It's the vitamin D that people don't get enough of you know. That's cos it's made in the skin from the sun. Anyway, where did I put my slippers? In addition, we need a "big forum and such" about "The big Feature Cleanup" where we list all the FA articles at the top, and then when people have correctly checked that each article is not vandalised, and that the edits are good or merged or whatever then it's moved down to another list for the completed ones (allowing the user who did it to whore their sig or user Id in some appropriate way so as to ensure that everyone else knows who was actually doing something useful). Or something similar. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:21, Apr 25
Yay forums. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, Apr 25 '12 23:49 (UTC)
Good idea, but maybe we should have a forum to see if there are too many forums first. Nominally Humane! 01:25 26 Apr

The Unsignpost

It's done. Could you please have MrN9001 drop it off. Thanks. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:13, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Yes. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:44, Apr 26

UnSignpost Apr 26th 2012

9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 00:48, Apr 26

mark as patrolled

Yes, I did see a "mark as patrolled" button. I'm sure exactly of how it works, I guess it's some type of feature that is supposed to show that an edit that a non-autoconfirmed user and/or IP did was reviewed and is deemed to be alright. I may be wrong, I'm not sure. -- UserTalkContributions 22:21, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Cool. Yea, we just turned it on apparently. Like you said I think the way it works is that if someone has "patrolled" or checked the diff (or new page) and done whatever is needed then they can click the patrolled button and then the red ! does not show up in RC. That way everyone else will know which pages have been checked so we don't need to check them again. If you use rollback it automatically clears the red ! but, if you use undo (which is obviously better as it allows us to say why it's a bad edit) then it does not automatically mark it as patrolled. I think you have to click it before. Anyway, I guess I'm also saying go ahead and start clicking em if you want to! I'm hoping that others watching RC will do the same, and others are starting to do it already, so it should be good. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:34, Apr 26
Yesterday I was clicking mark as patrolled as "open in new tab" and then undoing on the original tab. (Someone didn't agree with me and started undoing my undos. He's a meanie!) Nominally Humane! 11:58 26 Apr
Nothing wrong with undoing undos! So long as the undooer is not undone by the undoing. It's the doing of the doing that's making the doing doing the thing which is important. That and you not checking page histories enough. :P Also, I have finally given up and started using google chrome. It is faster than Firefox for me. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:07, Apr 27
The annoying red ! shows up on things like changes to user pages, VFD, and other weird places. It will probably put up a warning !!!!! at me for leaving you a note here. And I saw you gave Funnybony rollback, hahaahahaha, he's never used recent changes (although it could be good for his own article checks, he's got them all patroled on his user page like I do, all both of us have to do is hit Related changes. UFO's rule! They visit me nightly, and we fight on the lawn. Aleister 00:13 27-4-'12
We are going to have to put up with manually marking VFD and other similar edits if we want to get all the pages needing to be patrolled clicked and checked. That's got to be a good goal... I can't get rid of some of the ones where a new redirect is created though. If you go to your "my preferences" there is a thing about not showing patrolled edits on RC. If you do that it's possible to look back in RC for as far as the edits are patrolled up to 500 I think. Yea, Funnybony is no RC hound, but now his edits don't leave any !!!!! all over RC. ;) I would not want everyone to get rollback just based on that justification, but I think we are OK with Funnybony. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:26, Apr 27
@aleister: I can set up a script that will remove the "!" for user-space/user-page/user-talk-page edits as well as VFD and VFH pages, if you like. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngFri, Apr 27 '12 1:02 (UTC)
What I think we might end up wanting is a tab to automatically mark all unmarked pages. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:09, Apr 27
All unmarked pages or all unmarked revisions of a particular page? And where was that redirect you were talking aboot? Nominally Humane! 01:32 27 Apr
That redirect I could not get appears to have disappeared. A tab to mark all the unmarked revisions of a particular page might be handy. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:48, Apr 27


(diff | hist) . . N! Steve jobs‎; 23:08 . . (+24) . . Ahadwick (talk | contribs | block) (←Redirected page to Steve Jobs)

That's the bugger! Also, if you have not tried it yet... Go into "my preferences" and "under the hood" and click " Hide patrolled edits in recent changes". It's great! You can ignore practically everyone! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:54, Apr 27

Steve jobs.GIF
Sorted! Nominally Humane! 02:01 27 Apr
Good Jobs! I blame Al Gore. He tricked me into not noticing that. Also google translate says your sig says "Knight On The puppy dishwasher" :D MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 02:04, Apr 27
It would read more accurately as KnightPuppyOnTheDishwasher. ince Guildy's been gone a while I figured I'd take on Der Unwehr, but I don't want to take his title, so I looked for something like "busboy" as an alternative title. This was about the closest I could come up with. It's also why I've gone German with my sig. And damned long. Nominally Humane! 02:41 27 Apr
So... Rather than deleting spam userpages created to spam links to advertise commercial companies and products, should we not be keeping them, but slightly changing them somehow so as to piss off the company who was being advertised as much as possible. Aleister would know about this! Actually, it's not maybe not a good idea, cos of it actually taking up a user page and such, but still. I was tempted then. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 05:20, Apr 27
But that page is... It's why I saved proofread and made Scam letter. I love these badly translated English thingies. And Al did a brilliant job with that article created by spam IPs from that drinks place, but I'm saving that other one as it's just do bad it's poetic. Nominally Humane! 08:52 27 Apr
I'm just thinking about how amusing it is that if the company in question protests in any way we can claim that we accepted their page, and that we are just improving it. Actually, as the author of the page they might then have QVFD privileges. Hmm. It would be funny if we could get Uncyc onto a blacklist of some kind which means that spammers avoid us. Considering what we do here on Uncyc we are in a position to do that in a way that most other websites are not. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:04, Apr 27
A spammer blacklist? And I don't know if I'm ever going to do anything with stuff in my user space. It just sits there until I work out if I want to do anything. Nominally Humane! 09:10 27 Apr
A spammer blacklist would be blacklist for spammers. A list of sites which spammers would avoid spamming because the company who was paying them to spam did not want their name linked from that site. Clearly commercial spammers are now hitting wiki in a bigger way than they have b4. It never used to be like this... Back in the old days when I still remembered where my slippers were.. Oh, did I mention that I was in the war? Because if I did I was bullshitting you. I never was. Fuck that shit. Anyway, any page which is on this wiki is visible from the outside world, and so can get web links, and hits. The commercial spammers are spamming us for a good reason. They know/think it's worth it for the traffic it generates and the company who pays the bill likes it because people are also reading their advert. They are not used to people changing their spam pages. Normally most other sites would either not notice, or delete them. I see many possibilities for future amusement. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:21, Apr 27
I have a tendency to delete them as one of the reasons why wikis are so good for spammers is that they are easy as anything to edit, and a lot of inactive wikis have no-one around to check recent activity and so stuff gets ignored. Google algorithms, however, pick up that a reputable site is linking to the spammers site do the spammers site gets google credibility by association. How we ever became reputable according to google is beyond me, but I'm starting to get a little annoyed at external links that don't add funny to the site. Boone's Farm targeted us more than any other site except urban dictionary though, to the point where we became a top ten link for them. Changing that page was not just a good idea, it was our duty as netizens. Nominally Humane! 09:31 27 Apr
Oh hell yes. We would not actually want to actually have any real external links to them on the page, as that would be noticed by the web bots, but so long as there are no links... then would google still kick us in the balls? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:38, Apr 27
Unlikely. If it was a recognised brand name then we might show high on searches for it. If it was more generic (like "registry cleaner") then it could relate to one of the nillion other products with a similar name. Nominally Humane! 10:29 27 Apr
Agreed. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:34, Apr 27

More silly ideas

I'm full of silly ideas today... Can {{Exlinkto}} be made to automatically display the article's position on google? For example Boone's Farm is currently the number 5 link on Google as shown at the top of Talk:Boone's Farm. Now that would also be useful. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 12:25, Apr 27

Probably not. Google search results differ with the location of the searcher or the server that it takes you to. Google also don't appreciate when you throw bots at their search engines either. Nominally Humane! 12:48 27 Apr
I have no idea what you are suggesting. 9001(bot) Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png MrNCyber.JPG 12:54, Apr 27
Like Dwarf tossing, but more metallic. Nominally Humane! 01:02 27 Apr
Dwarf Tossing makes Wife carrying appear rather pointless by comparison. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:05, Apr 27
Still both make more sense than Cheese rolling. Nominally Humane! 01:27 27 Apr
They do that near me. It was banned last year for the first time for being too dangerous. Dudes been rolling down that hill after the cheese for thousands of years you know... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:33, Apr 27


I really loved my biopic in this week's UnSignpost! Who wrote it? --Qzekrom sig trans.gif This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:14, April 27, 2012 (UTC)

Not I. MrN9001 just delivered it. Check out this to find your answers! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:20, Apr 27


Either isn't being done or isn't being marked. You should probably poke people to keep a track on that. Nominally Humane! 01:29 29 Apr

Cool. I will make a forum when I have the chance. I'm not really around at the moment... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:15, May 1

Request to delete Part Maori Page

-- 16:55, May 1, 2012 (UTC)According to your site's standards, racism and personal attacks are prohibited. So why is this page allowed to be published given that it a) links to a 'Nigger Job Application' and b) names Adam Rangiaho who is a real person and a poster on Topix.

There is also a reference to the intelligence of Maori, the highest of which is compared to a 'white' four year old. I get that this site is all about mocking, but this is moving in the direction of denegrating an entire people, and the message behind the IQ reference might be a joke, but given the context of the entire page, I fail to see how this could be interpreted as anything else but racist.

This page isn't funny. It's beyond stupid. The Part Maori page was created by Topix user KKKeenAZ_new_name who makes frequent anti-Maori and racist comments against Maori on Topix, and is basically an outgrowth of racist commentary found on the NZ Topix site which has now spilled over into Uncyclopeadia.

This page should be taken down.

Could you show me where is says that racism and personal attacks are not allowed on Uncyclopedia? We have a UN:CBN policy which this page may be in violation of if the person in question is not a well known, and as Adam Rangiaho appears to fit into that criteria I will remove his name. I don't really have any strong feeling one way or the other on this page, but it's not really that funny. We have a page called VFD where anyone who has created an account and waited 4 days can nominate any page for deletion. If you want this page deleted, I suggest you do that. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:27, May 1

-- 21:01, May 1, 2012 (UTC)I had already contacted someone at Uncyclopedia and I think what I quoted wasnt' a 'standard' but terms of use, specifically that users shold not:

"Post or transmit any content that is obscene, pornographic, abusive, offensive, profane, or otherwise violates any law or right of any third party, or content that contains homophobia, ethnic slurs, religious intolerance, or encourages criminal conduct;"

But for some reason I can't locate this specific phrase on your site, and it seems your Terms of Use are actually not meant to be taken seriously anyway. I suppose I shouldn't be too surprised.

A 'Nigger Job Application' in reference to Maori isn't funny, it's racist. As I said before, this page was created by a bunch of regular posters from Topix who have decided to take their racist commentary to this site in order to mock (i.e. bully) other Topix users, and anyone who spends anytime in Topix New Zealand knows these guys have problems because they also refer to Maori on Topix as 'coons' etc, so the whole 'jest' thing doesn't wash.

This might be 'funny' over at Storm Front or maybe some local chapter of the KKK, but Uncyclopedia?

I know nobody asked me, but I am sorta on the IP's side. Article ain't funny. Also, fuck racists. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, May 2 '12 3:12 (UTC)
Check out User_talk:Nzicednz also. Cool dude. As you know I'm not a fan of racists either, and agree that this article is very close to the edge, but I'm just trying to uphold the way we do things here on Uncyc. If ya think that Part Maori is not funny stick it on VFD. I will not vote either way if you do as I have no strong views either way on this. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 07:15, May 2
Nzicednz says "some of my work mates are MOSTLY part Maoris, and they absolutely loved [this article]!" I'm with him, dude. Some of my best friends are gay Jews. They all love my new article, UnBooks:Faggy McJewJew Steals Everybody's Gold and Sodomizes Some Gentile Children. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, May 2 '12 8:25 (UTC)
Yea, I saw that. Holocaust Tycoon probably upset some people also. Like I said... Trying to convince me to delete an article "because it's racist" will NEVER work. However... Trying to convince me that... "It's not funny" is a different matter which is why I recommend VFD so that the community (and not me) gets to decide. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 08:36, May 2

Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion#Part_Maori MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:04, May 2

Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive263#Part_Maori wins! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 12:55, May 8


must you ruin my vengeful schemes! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 10:29, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

Because I don't like anything which is in anyway amusing or fun. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:33, May 2
Hi. A little while after I joined, and while you were still MIA, Frostee and I started a tradition: when Frosty is feeling bored, I vandalize his user page, and he reciprocates. It's less fun if an admin comes along and bans one of us for doing it, y'know? ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngMon, May 7 '12 11:48 (UTC)
Back in "my day" they used to ban us for 1 day for doing that. Dude you got 20 mins, and the other dude (who did not start it and also blanked your page) did not get banned. So he "won". As he pointed out at the time. Think of it this way... Why is it fun to do it? It's fun because it's "risky". Also think of it from an admin point of view... What if... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:34, May 7
Whatever. Alls I'm saying is, nobody ever banned me for vandalizing Frosty's page. Anyway, carry on, Captain Funkiller. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 6:13 (UTC)


Pleasure to meet you. I just added numerous pages to VFD. After I added them I noticed there was a restriction on flooding there. I had picked up on these earlier but had been unable to add them previously, which is why I did that. I don't intend to do this regularly, however if it was too much too soon feel free to undo what I did, and I'd prefer to remain unbanned if at all possible. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:39, May 2, 2012 (UTC)

I also have to say, your diplomacy on Part Maori was commendable. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:43, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
Na. What you did was fine. The days of people flooding VFD appear to have past anyway. That was something which used to happen a lot in the in the old days, but these days VFD is a lot less busy so I don't think anyone will mind now. If you want to be sure of not being accused of flooding in the future, and you want to nom lots more pages, leave a bit of a gap (in time) between your nominations (doing a few at the same time is OK, but if you nom loads of pages then leave a gap of a few hours). Also, make sure that you leave some space for other to nominate on VFD by making sure that you don't fill up the 20 limit. Nominating 5 or 6 at the same time is fine. Assuming that you have read all our related guidelines and policies and such... Yea. Boring I know. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 10:48, May 2
I have to admit that I have not read them in detail. I did read the How to be funny guide, but that multi-page one was more than I could pay attention to. I read the guidelines on deletion as well but they assume some prior knowledge on the readers part. The one thing I did check was that the total number of articles would remain below 20. Having watched that page for a few days since Mattsnow brought it to my attention I've noticed it doesn't get very busy. I also have to say I'm very impressed by the sense of community here. Having previously been at other forums there tends to be a lot of trolling and harsh words thrown about in similar places. For a community built around satire the support I've had here has been tremendous. And nobody has once criticised me for knowing nothing about the mark-up language. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:57, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
It's worth reading up if you do plan on sticking around. I hope you do... ... Oh we have our share of trolls and idiots, but we allow them to get away with it so long as they are funny enough when they do it. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:02, May 2
I'm sure you do. I wonder if you see this place clearly though. Rather than criticise you support, and rather than admonish you correct. If you are anywhere for too long there is a tendency to become jaded, as you are dealing with the minutiae and issues and that's what you remember. The bigger picture though is that you're creating - have created - a vast library of humour. You have a community that focuses on helping each other. From the perspective of someone with fresh eyes, it feels like Augustus Gloop walking into Wonka's factory. Be proud of what you have done! --C₂H₆O (hic) 11:11, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
It's true! ...and I claim all the credit! Just me! Well, actually a few others probably helped a bit here and there if I'm honest... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:34, May 2

Should I create categories for UnNews dates?

I would have to go back a very long freaking way... What do you think? Talk Mattsnow 16:35, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

Hea Matt. Not sure what you mean. I just made the two cats for today and yesterday that we needed. Is that what you meant? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:38, May 4
Yep, that's it. I never created any :S Should I do that when I have time? Talk Mattsnow 16:42, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
Dude you run UnNews don't you? Why the hell are you asking me? YES DO IT!!!! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:44, May 4
Well, nobody ever told me to do that! Thanks for the template, means a lot. Talk Mattsnow 20:51, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

I would like to bring your attention to this forum

Forum:Vote to De-Op Lyrithya Nominally Humane! 03:20 07 May

I would like to bring your attention to these boobs


Ok, now, while your attention is diverted to the margin over there...>

...I figured I'd tell you to do this:

  • Step 1: stick the following code in either your uncyclopedia.js or else your monobook.js:
importScript( "User:Bizzeebeever/scripts/patrol.js" )
  • Step 2: do a hard refresh.
  • Step 2½: enjoy.

You should see a "patrol all changes" link for groups of unpatrolled changes on RC. You're welcome. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 13:05 (UTC)

As Kuato said in Total Recall "Those tits are fucking amazing". No wait. He said... "You are what you do". Thanks dude, your .js is proving very, very handy. I will do some more testing and see how it goes before advertising it more widely to everyone. I'm not sure the pop up conformation box is needed... Would it be possible to have a tab which appears at the top of the page which does a similar thing? I guess it's more tricky to know how far back to go with them. Maybe it could clear everything back to April 1st or something like that? If it could just clear all the edits made by the last user it would also be very useful. I have a feeling that doing this using a page tab might be more useful as that's more likely to fit with the order of how people would be likely to use it. With it being on RC you have to click it first, and then check after, which is kinda backwards, although this is still a hell of a lot better than nothing. Thanks again. :) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:35, May 8
It just "patrols" the unpatrolled changes shown, right there, on the recentchanges page. Nothing more, nothing less. And there doesn't seem to be a way to find the rcids for all intervening changes when looking at the diff page itself, so...I suppose it's doable, but difficult. If you want to literally patrol all edits, that's doable, too, but ...time-consuming. I should change the link text, too, seeing as it confused you. Should read, "patrol these changes". I'm stoopit. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 13:40 (UTC)
It IS very useful, and may well turn this whole patrolled edits thing into something which is actually feasible to manage and workable. I don't think there would be a need to patrol ALL changes going back to 2005 or whatever, but if it could simply do all the changes for the last user/IP that would catch most of them. Obviously if we could select any group of changes from any point to any point and mark them all with one click that would probably be the holy grail of patrolling! I figure a tab which appears at the top of the page and can just mark all the edits by the most recent user would also help a lot. Anyway, I guess you are all out of .js juice for now so I suggest we both nip off and watch Total Recall another 300 times. Actually my copy appears to go all corrupt in a few places. I really must transfer my VHS based porn back catalogue onto digital media at some point. I'm sure there is some .js to do that somewhere. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:57, May 8
Actually... I just realised. We probably want it to show the "patrol these changes" thing on RC even if it's only 1 change. Currently it only does that for groups? NSFW!!! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 14:00, May 8
It does it for single changes, too, (now). ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 14:55 (UTC)
Also, I'll tweak the script so it puts a li'l check-mark next to the patrolled item, instead of having a pop-up. The popup is a quick solution for now. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 14:56 (UTC)
I just noticed that magically appear on my RC before you post your message! Do you think we could loose the "Revision Patrolled" pop up box also? If it can just do it without bothering to tell us that's probably better as it's a pain having to close it all the time. dam wizards. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 14:59, May 8
OK BB... If you get a chance... Take a look at this. Any ideas why these pages are not showing up with your wizardry? I can't seem to get the new pages marked. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:17, May 8
Yeahhhh...that's because MediaWiki's software is retarded. When a user makes a new page and then makes a bunch of changes to it, here's what you see:
N ! 09:36 Talk:Agile software development‎‎ (4 changes | hist) . . (+1,531) . . [‎; AlisDarling‎ (3×)]
Here's what you SHOULD see:
N ! 09:36 Talk:Agile software development‎‎ (>>4 changes<< | patrol these changes | hist) . . (+1,531) . . [‎; AlisDarling‎ (3×)]
The lack of that link is what screws it up. However, you can click "patrol this change" for the very first change, and then refresh RC. The page will then show up with a "N changes" link, as well as a "patrol these changes" link. There's no way to fix the script, I don't think, except through a very kludgy workaround. I'll have a look-see, though. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 16:53 (UTC)
I think it's also due to other people having edited the page who might be auto patrolled. For example...
N  ! 14:01 	 Talk:Agile software development‎‎ (3 changes | hist) . . (+1,201) . . [‎; AlisDarling‎ (2×)]

Actually has 5 changes, but because 1 of them was me (an auto patrolled user), and I manually clicked one of them it's gone wrong and displayed the wrong stuff due to the way I'm viewing RC with this. I guess we can live with that, as it's probably very tricky to get around. It's still very useful as it is... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 17:12, May 8

Well, I'm feeling a little sick right now, because of this. I think I'm going to take a couple of days off. Pup was one of my favorite writers. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, May 8 '12 18:14 (UTC)
I just e-mailed him. I can't believe it. If that is really his sockpuppet then he deserves to be blocked for ever. He knows better, and this is particularly disappointing, and if it's true it represents a total betrayal of trust to the community. It's very unlikely that this is a mistake. Fucking hell. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:26, May 8
Yeah, Frosty was suspicious of "Alcohol" when he told me about him on IRC. I was even going to leave a couple of dog-related puns on Alcohol's talk page, because I was suspicious myself. But I figured he wouldn't be that dumb. I knew "Alcohol" was from a commonwealth country; he was wordy; and of course he tackled some of the "vital" pages immediately. Man, people just fly to their fate, don't they? – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzeebeever (talk • contribs)
This really sucks. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:05, May 8

I was serious about clearer lines being drawn about having reverence for the dead.

Don't ban me. I seriously am wondering about that. I was only using Puppy as an example (I just learned about his sockpuppetry through various sources, which sickens me). Could you please answer me about the questions I asked in the forum (that you deleted)? ~Pleb General Wiseguy the magic! TheHappySpaceman.jpg Eclipse.PNG BANANA BATLETH.png 23:48, 05/08/2012

I thought I answered you in my deletion reason? Don't worry I won't ban you for talking to me, or asking questions. I just don't want that forum there. :-) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:49, May 8
@MrN9000: Okay, thanks, I'll try to remember that in the future. :) Anyway, my main question is why he got banned in the first place (before he created a sockpuppet). Also, I was wondering about what we should say/how we should act when someone dies. ~Pleb General Wiseguy the magic! TheHappySpaceman.jpg Eclipse.PNG BANANA BATLETH.png 23:58, 05/08/2012
He was banned because he was... being a dick. When a real (famous) person dies... You create an article. Like UnNews:Porn star Nora Batty dies for example. If it's an Uncyc user and you don't know enough about Uncyc politics to know or understand why that user was banned you keep your head down and accept that hopefully some of the admins do know what they are doing and trust their judgement. How about you trust me? Puppy was one of my all time favourite users on Uncyc. If I thought ZB was wrong to block him I would take the issue up with him. I don't, and have not. You can always find out what happened by looking in peoples contributions and following conversations. That's all the rest of us do. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:06, May 9
MrN speaks wise words, and can be trusted. I know nothing myself about what goes on at IRC, and some of that may have been involved. But MrN, do you agree with an infiban? Lots of dicks around this situation, and Puppy seems to have been on the volley end of a lot of people at once. So is that point of view wrong, or was Puppy, by being the only one to be so totally punished, deserving of it? Not to create any drama, I'm just interested in your opinion per above. Thanks. And what if everyone apologies to everyone else? Aleister 00:23 9-5-'12
I'm not active in IRC and have not been for months. If YOU agreed to go into IRC more then I would also. :P As for the perm ban... Fucking hell. Fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck. That's my initial comment. But yes, I do agree with the perm ban. Even if none of the other stuff had happened regarding all the other drama the one single offence of creating a sock and pretending to be new... Asking for help, wasting everyone's time and then allowing that sock to be nominated for NotM and then voting on that sock... TWICE... using both accounts? That's worthy of a perm ban on it's own right. Forget everything else. Forget the reasons why he created the sock. I don't mind sock puppets. It's what people do with them that I mind. I feel totally betrayed by PuppyOnTheRadio. I have e-mailed him. I even told him my real name in that e-mail. That's how much I care about him. Dude I really love Puppy, but he's lost his marbles here. PuppyOnTheRadio as a user is dead now. If the man behind that account somehow managed to continue to edit at Uncyc undetected I personally would turn a blind eye so long as NotM and other awards were not in question, but yes. Puppy deserved what he got. We can't tolerate that. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:37, May 9
Agree word-for-word with what MrN just said. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, May 9 '12 0:45 (UTC)
By the way, I'm on IRC ...wayyyy more than I should be. Did you know they've got trivia back in the channel? No joke. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, May 9 '12 0:48 (UTC)
If so, he went out with a bang! Alcohol is a classic sock. He says that he voted on the Noob twice because to "win" the NoobOfTheMoment only takes 5 votes, so Alcohol had won already. But if he came back under a different name, and noone knew it, he'd get nommed for NotM and WotM (maybe it will take him a little longer than nine days next time, but who knows?). He didn't nom himself for the awards, and agreed not to take the Writer of the Month thing. An interesting series of circumstances and logger rolls, yep. Aleister 00:53 9-5-'12
Great. Now every time a new user shows promise, we have to worry if it's Pup coming back again to be a douche. Classy. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, May 9 '12 0:58 (UTC)
He did accept the nomination though, and would have won it. Similar things have happened many times before with various other users. We are used to it. Also... It is totally possible for an experience user to run a sock puppet without it getting noticed or nominated or affecting anything important which we/they don't want it to. Trust me ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:03, May 9
Oh poop. Everyone got way too serious about this whole thing, everybody who was involved is at fault. So Puppy played a game and then voted on something his game had already won (he never nommed Alcohol or his articles for anything). After a day it seems to me (or imnho) that uncy needs Puppy's value more than it needs to make a point that really is just about someone playing. The value Puppy brings to the site each and every day would pay off his deep blah deep wounding of the site and some bruised egos in days if not hours, so maybe after a couple of days go by everyone can rethink this in a cost/valueadded real-world real-site value context. Aleister 10:59 9-5-'12
I agree with most of what you say. IMO Puppy has been THE MOST useful and productive user on this site for sometime now. But there is now way back for PuppyOnTheRadio now. I don't seriously think for one second that's the last we have seen of the man behind the account, but I do think his PuppyOnTheRadio account is dead now. He betrayed my trust (and I think the trust of the community) when he switched from creating a sock because he loves Uncyc and wanted to edit and started to enjoy the trolling associated with pretending to be someone else actively on other people's talk pages, forums, votes, and competitions. Take a good look at all the contributions of his sock. I did. I could list a large number of particular things which I found particularly repugnant about what that sock did, but I will not unless you really want me to. It would take a while to list them all, and I don't think it would help matter to do it, but I will if you ask me. If Puppy had created a harmless sock like say... ThatGuyThatEdits *Whistles innocently* then I would agree with you. Like I said, I don't mind socks, it's what people do with them. Actually it's not even what people do it's what they intend which matters to me. What Puppy did and I think intended to do showed a total lack of respect for the community, and I personally feel lack of respect (and friendship) for myself as I personally put a shit load of effort into trying to calm the waters. When I read his recent IP comments on your talk page it's clear he still does not understand or "get it". I hope he will soon. Puppy was not to blame for much of what happened, and all great artists struggle to manage their emotions and judgement and I wish that others would recognise that more sometimes... We have banned a good few other great users because of nothing more than clashes of personality with some admins. I don't blame Puppy for feeling upset and aggrieved about how he was treated. He refused to put his tail between his legs when asked to by someone who was wrong. I do blame him for making a concious choice over many, many days to deliberately attempt to make a mockery of the entire site, and me. Puppy will be back I'm sure. It's a wiki. It's impossible to stop an intelligent person from editing here, but the man behind PuppyOnTheRadio deserves to be punished, and his punishment is to loose that account. If he comes back later with a new account and I notice it... I will keep my mouth shut. If one of the other admins notices it, and bans him again... I will not fight his corner any more. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:44, May 9
I'm not going to 'peach on him, either. However, I will say that if Lyrithya were making comments on other peoples' talk pages, she'd (a) link to WP:DIVA, and then (b) tell us we were encouraging him to break rules by talking about him. :D ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngWed, May 9 '12 11:51 (UTC)
WP does not have or need divas, it has and needs machines. Uncyc does not really have rules, it has feelings. Puppy has hurt them badly. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:56, May 9
Thanks for the long thought, this isn't easy on anybody (I hope), and all of us have different takes on it. As far as I know someone of Puppy's prominence here has never been infibanned, and if he does come back as Jason and the Argonauts or Whiskey is my downfall I would welcome it. But we are early in this experience, and maybe in a few days or weeks...who knows. Thanks again. Aleister 12:32 9-5-'12

Pee Buddy contest!!

Judging is over and the results are here! It would be cool if you could change the header to something like "The Pee Buddy Results are in! See who is the most stupid journalist!". And link to the page of course. I sent the prizes and congrats to everyone! Talk Mattsnow 01:41, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

How's that? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:47, May 9
Thanks! Coiuld you also unlock the UnNews? They were locked for judging. Hosting a competition is a lot more work than I thought! Thank God there was only 8 entries (one was written by C2H6O, I was shocked to find out who it really was) Talk Mattsnow 02:04, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
Think I got em all. I have not been paying as much attention to this comp as I should have, and did not know that you were running it. Nice one. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 02:20, May 9


I forbid you to use your signature. In fact I might even put it on VFD if it didn't have consequences. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 09:09, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

I'm hoping that the other admins make similar changes. It actually could be funny that article. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:10, May 9


Just looking over UN:BAN I don't think creating the sockpuppet account warranted an indefinite block. Why don't you go talk to Zombiebaron about it? --Qzekrom sig trans.gif This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:10, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Out of the mouths of babes. Aleister 23-9-'12 A.P. (afterPuppy)
Yeah. He kind of needs to be here to run Pee Buddy (if it happens next year). --Qzekrom sig trans.gif This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:40, May 9, 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to bed... Night all. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:05, May 10
Good night... do you mind if we stay overnight and discuss this shit a little more? --Qzekrom sig trans.gif This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 00:09, May 10, 2012 (UTC)


Dick. That said and that lololol, (edit conflict) you maybe should put down the keyboard before you write again. A group has now turned on you, which makes those users seem really something, so take it with a grain of cyanide, ah, salt, and please don't talk of giving up your admin post. I don't believe this has taken this new turn so quickly!!! - and that's exactly what happened to Puppy!!!!! Look at your quick reaction to the attack, it's like, Wha??? WTF???? Puppy was just hanging out winning the vote in the second round of VFS when, la la la, when bammmmmMMM, the attack came suddenly from several directions. I've seen this before in real life situations, and it's more of a crowd mentality. But this, for whatever reason, is exactly the problem here. Your entire career here has been called on the carpet by a few users very quickly, they didn't even read what you had written. So it was with Puppy, he's a proud man who was knocked down from behind. I never understood why, and he didn't either, and was wondering just what he'd done. What just happened to you puts front and center that there is something going on with lots of people here, some with big bansticks, and I hope that they now can see that things have gotten way too extreme and many apologies are in order left and right and down the middle. Your apology to the injured Mattsnow (oh god, the humanity, he's, he's hurt, man) was very nice. Aleister everybody please admit their excesses and let's see if a clean slate works best for the site, what say ye? 00:14 10-5-'12

Actually I think you should address your concerns about Pups to Zombiebaron because he banned the guy. Great man. See also:

--Qzekrom sig trans.gif This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 00:38, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
I addressed this specific point to MrN because he supports an infiban (which imnho is way too much, and devalues the site instead of improving it) and I wanted to point out how quick things can fly and how his reaction of possibly leaving his admin post happened within minutes. The same thing happened to Puppy, whose reaction was first to quit VFS and then get defensive, and then finally made a sockpuppet to keep helping the site. I want to say that everyone should see this as a cosmic joke, ala Ivan Stang and the Church of the Subgenius, and give everyone a clean slate and let everybody play and dance like we've never danced before. Too many monkeys not enough cooks! Bojo, Chimp #29 00:46 10-5-'12
Could everybody just take a step back and take some deep breaths? MrN had almost nothing to do with this "Pup" fiasco. Just chill, and it will sort itself. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngThu, May 10 '12 1:09 (UTC)
I posted that YouTube video for a reason. I just have a knack for entertainment. I actually know the first part of the song by heart. --Qzekrom sig trans.gif This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 01:16, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
I'm sometimes discouraged by the efforts people are investing in drama. With the forum plus all the debates on talk pages, the sum of these efforts could have produced 2 or 3 great articles. That's a shame really, because I like this site and everyone here (and I'm not lying, everyone without exception, Puppy included). Talk Mattsnow 03:20, May 10, 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrolled is now a thing

  • Hey MrN. Since it was your idea, I thought you'd like to know that autopatrolled is now a usergroup on Uncyclopedia. Check out this page for more details. Also, the Wikia staffer who turned it on had the great idea of allowing both admins and bureaucrats to assign autopatrolled. I agreed, and that function should be turned on shortly too. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:15, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
  • Also, I've put out what should be the final version of my multi-patrol script. I fixed it so that there are no more alert boxes, and it will be able to mark all changes for NewPages with one click, as well. Probably no need to refresh your cache. Let me know how it works for you, and notify me of any issues. Spread the word. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngThu, May 10 '12 17:43 (UTC)

Cool dudes. I might be wrong, but I think Wikipedia allow rollback to be granted by any sysop. Maybe we should also. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:36, May 14

Hey, man.

Sorry for being so spicy about the page. I guess when two of your first creations go bad, you get a little irritated. Anyway, thanks for the advice. I'm starting to learn the ropes, and I almost got my template creation technique down. Josuketho.pngThe Hamon Master WeinribJo Joestar of EarthJosuketho.png 15:49, May 11, 2012 (UTC)

"I ain't mad at cha" - 2Pac MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:36, May 14 15:36, May 14, 2012 (UTC)

Yo Cap'n Haddock

I wish to win PLS, and have decided to irritate you until you agree to run PLS. Are we of an understanding white boy?--Sycamore (Talk) 16:53, May 11, 2012 (UTC)

Dude, you know that normally any single comment from yourself would be irritating enough to provoke me into almost anything, but unfortunately, I have other "plans", and must respectfully recommend that you find some other victim organiser to run it. Tell Optimuschris that he's got to do it. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:36, May 14
Cool stuff... I'll go pester Opty:0)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:42, May 14, 2012 (UTC)


You're alive! -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN19:36, 12 May

Welcome home son. Also apparently you (see above) are running the PLS. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 15:36, May 14

Thank you

Thanks for the thing. It is a high honor (seriously, and no, I'm not high, no pun intended), and I don't think I've earned it yet, but thank you again. The promotion of the site will be one thing to do to actually earn it, and I've tried a couple of things but no fish yet. You are a gentleman and a scholar, both of which are in short but not-impossible to find supply in the innernest world. Aleister 18:53 14-5-'12

UnSignpost May 25th, 2012

--EMC [TALK] 00:09 May 25 2012

Ideal Hardware Store

Why was my article deleted? What is this Death Row thing you speak of? I must have been asleep when Ideal Hardware Store went through any deletion process, because I completely missed it. TV4Fun (talk) 17:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

Bring out your dead! It's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticeGameBoy 10:03, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

Assume the position! it's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticeGameBoy 00:42, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Stop, drop and roll! It's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticeGameBoy 08:16, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Can you explain

When and why the rules changed? I try to live by them in my daily life and finding a third is like finding I have a new daddy. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 18:54, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

We've got boner for news! It's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticeGameBoy 16:52, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Get Your UnSignPost! Now More Respected Than The Town Crier!

--OliOmniOmbudsman Dumbo.jpg 15:16, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

No need for eye protection, it's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticeGameBoy 07:07, August 10, 2012 (UTC)

Joe Colton article deletion

hi there, I have moved the article I created at General Joseph Brady Colton to General Joseph B. Colton and all that remains on that page is a redirect and since nothing links to the original page it should be deleted could you do this for me?

Added to QVFD Nominally Humane! 02:01 16 Aug

ChiefjusticeDS enjoys buttsex: The UnSignpost!

~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Proudly bogan 08:23, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Set phasers to frag! It's the UnSignpost!

--ChiefjusticeGameBoy 10:51, September 6, 2012 (UTC)

Extra! Extra! News that's not new to you!

 ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngTue, Nov 20 '12 9:00 (UTC)

The UnSignpost! Cancel Your Subscription Today!

 ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.pngThu, Nov 29 '12 5:26 (UTC)

Journalism so yellow it's orange: The UnSignpost

 ~ Capt. Sock Monkey ~ (berate) Beeverpedia.png ~ Thu, Dec 6 '12 12:57 (UTC)

Sloppy, falling-apart, and duct-taped-together: the UnSignpost!

-- Kippy the Elf Candycane2.png Talk Candycane2.png Works Candycane2.png Candycane2.png Candycane2.png Candycane2.png 14:10, Dec. 12, 2012

Watch your step! It's a steaming-hot pile of UnSignpost

 ~ Capt. Sock Monkey ~ (berate) Beeverpedia.png ~ Wed, Dec 19 '12 17:31 (UTC)

Drop your pants and grab the eggnog! It's the UnSignpost.

 ~ Capt. Sock Monkey ~ (berate) Beeverpedia.png ~ Wed, Jan 2 '13 13:22 (UTC)

UnSignpost sez, "Give Pease a Chance!"

 ~ Capt. Sock Monkey ~ (berate) Beeverpedia.png ~ Fri, Jan 11 '13 5:30 (UTC)

Unsignpost - 20130119042144 gibberish asdf

~ Pointy.png I am Haydrahlienne, I am a bot, and I have no feelings. 04:23, 19 January 2013

Unsignpost - 20130124050125 gibberish asdf

~ Pointy.png I am Haydrahlienne, I am a bot, and I have no feelings. 05:02, 24 January 2013

Unsignpost - 20130131002159 gibberish asdf

~ Pointy.png I am Haydrahlienne, I am a bot, and I have no feelings. 00:24, 31 January 2013

Unsignpost - 20130207013217 gibberish asdf

~ Pointy.png I am Haydrahlienne, I am a bot, and I have no feelings. 01:34, 7 February 2013