From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion. |
Score: 0
|
Keep (4) |
- I think this might have been worked on since it was nommed but, uh, I didn't think it was that bad. Well, apart from the joke about venereal disease but hey, you can like an article without 'getting' all the 'jokes'. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:29, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Per above. He is sexy and all the VFD people should listen very carefully to him...--Sycamore (Talk) 09:21, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Images is what it needs, but yeah some good stuff. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:22, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Kind of okay. I like the commas, and some of the letters. Aleister 11:31 6-5-'12
|
Delete (4) |
- Ugly randomy stubby nonsensey. --Black Flamingo 21:06, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Blah blah blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:25, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete It's fairly terrible. --C₂H₆O (hic) 23:25, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Who was that?--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:29, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 17:23, May 8
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Very keep. I like this. Also 'lack of images' and 'boring' are bad reasons and should not be here.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:24, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- I beg to differ. Boring and unfunny are synonymous. That is the prime reason to delete anything. --C₂H₆O (hic) 13:14, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- When Sycamore speaks thusly, there is reason behind it. Aleister 11:29 6-5-'12
- Keep Got a giggle without reading far. MrN 17:22, May 8
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete Lack of images, and not very funny. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Boring. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- De-lete. --Black Flamingo 23:03, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Less ugly now. --C₂H₆O (hic) 13:35, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
Kept MrN 17:22, May 8
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete It has a lot of redlinks, a lot of lists, and not a lot of funny. There is also an article called The Islamic Republic of Iran, which I think is supposed to be the same geographic region, which makes this redundant. --C₂H₆O (hic) 05:34, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Both articles suck, but this one is a little bit worse. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:29, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- delete Mattsnow 13:05, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Deli Eat A rip-off of Persia which seems like it has gone out of its way to be worse. Remove so that no man, child or farm animal may see its wretchedness ever again. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 19:57, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete It's a silly article about an actress who only has one real claim to notoriety. It's not funny as much as a jumbled, confused mess.--C₂H₆O (hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- No. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:24, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Fix tag's basically expired anyway. Also, what C2 said. --Black Flamingo 21:30, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Article about a minor character. The quote at the top is terrible and just leads into more terrible. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:24, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Mattsnow 13:08, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. The fix tags (or what they have become gratis Skullthumper/Lyrithya) are a really ugly thing... they intrinsically favour soft contributers and admins in their critique of other peoples work and essentially place the actual contributer/writer at their behest. This should be the other way around:/--Sycamore (Talk) 09:29, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
- I may be new here, but I see that as your perspective. I'm looking at the articles to fix as a huge opportunity. There are just over 500 articles tagged like this. Some tags are less effort to fix than others. I'm currently going through about 5 or so of these a day and cleaning them up a bit and getting them back out there - but actually making them quality. Some of the articles are well beyond redemption - Yosemite Sam as a case in point. Isn't it better to allow those who have the capacity to fix them an opportunity of minimum 30 days to fix them? (When I started the number was closer to 530, in case you were curious.) --C₂H₆O (hic) 11:16, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Dudes, with all you guys living in Knowle's suburbs, just walk over there and get a feel for the town, then fix up this page if it needs it. Why delete something which major users use to do their shopping, drinking, and pick-ups. Jeex. Aleister Former Mayor of Knowle West (UTC) (Removed keep vote per MrN, who knows)
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete It isn't funny, has no concept, is random, has no images, and is about a town nobody has heard of. The only joke in there is that it isn't Dorridge, which could surprisingly relate to anywhere. Except Dorridge. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- What? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:23, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 22:26, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I know the area well, and can't fix this article. Too much random, and virtually no actual humour which is actually related to the place. It's just another "this place sucks and is full of chavs" article IMO. MrN 14:24, May 5
- WHERE THE HELL AM I????????? --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 08:21, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Knowle West is about 4 miles from my house! MrN 10:24, May 2
- 5.2 miles from my house. Thus I am less tainted. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:37, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Sweet. According to Google, my house is about 120 miles from wherever Knowle West is. How far is everybody else from Knowle West? --Black Flamingo 16:43, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
- I am not only in Knowle West, I'm running through the hearts and minds of the populace as we speak. I still think it's carp, or at the least a little fishy. --C₂H₆O (hic) 11:32, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
- If it's carp you are looking for you need Fishponds. If it's whores you need try Horfield which is obviously where I moved to when I got the chance. MrN 14:24, May 5
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete It really just isn't very funny. It has a whole bunch of lists but the only joke is that he is annoying. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
“That was the worst article I've ever read.” -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:20, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Cowell pun goes here, i suppose EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:22, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 11:59, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Not sure just asking! I can't decide on this one as I'm a asshole when it comes to enforcing freedom of speech so I'm asking you guys. Is this funny enough to warrant the pointless racism it also contains? Looking at this does not help the authors case that "some of my work mates are MOSTLY part Maoris, and they absolutely loved [this article]"... so you decide! MrN 10:22, May 2
- Delete I just don't see it being funny of it's own accord. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:32, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Ha ha ha. --Chiefjustice3DS 13:01, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, this isn't funny at all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:19, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --EMC [TALK] 22:20 May 4 2012
|
Comments |
One more opinion please before I kill this? MrN 16:31, May 4
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. The new version is subtler than the old one, as much as I like both of them, the new one edges it for me. I like the jarring transitions between very broken English and very fluent English, it works a bit better than the other version's way of presenting the fact it's a scam. --Chiefjustice3DS 14:46, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Much better than before. The subtlety makes it more original and enjoyable. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:12, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:21, 30 April 2012
|
Delete (0) |
- Odd one. I am trying to determine if this, or the previous version, is better. I don't think it should be deleted either way, but I'd like delete votes to go back to the old version, or keep votes to keep it as is. Nominally Humane! 02:03 29 Apr
|
Comments |
- I'd say it's better now but as an article... I don't know. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 14:29, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
Something or Other Puppy can sort it out... MrN 16:29, May 4
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete It's not funny, and is random. The humour in here consists of repeating memes. All Chuck Norris' base belong to Kanye West. Imagine that previous sentence 50 times. I wouldn't laugh either. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- CHCUK NORRIS RULEZ BITCHESS!!!!111!1!1!!!!111!1!!!11!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:23, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I guess the author forget to add any jokes here. One for the bucket. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:27, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 22:44, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete It has been tagged a lacking images, but it's also just a fairly large list, and doesn't have many laughs. It would need a rewrite to make it worth keeping. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:21, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Listcruft. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:22, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Kill -- Zyniker (talk) 13:26, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Detele. --Black Flamingo 13:32, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Lol he's gay. --Black Flamingo 22:25, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete That was astonishingly terrible. --C₂H₆O (hic) 23:28, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete This article is condemned. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:23, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Lolfail. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:28, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Nice try Hindleyite, but this is still random carp IMO. MrN 16:35, May 4
|
Comments |
- Removed bullshit. Some (a lot?) remains, but still, 'ave another look. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:39, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Ew. Srsly? So gross. Hahaha! Actually, it's just kinda stubby and stupid. Picture made me laugh, though. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 29 '12 11:47 (UTC)
- I'm not really sure which part is supposed to be funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:07, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 23:16, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't feel that there is anything remarkably funny in here. --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:10, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Unsure. He's notable in his own way, but this article is irredeemable without complete rewrite. Consider this a delete vote that could be changed by a decent rewrite. (I may even be around to add a real vote at some stage.) Nominally Humane! 01:25 29 Apr
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- I found it oddly appealing. It needs some images, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:24, 30 April 2012
- Keep Let the dude work on it. Someone probably needs to check the page history a bit more before nomination. MrN 10:31, May 2
- Keep as it is an early draft. However, it does lack a ((construction)). --C₂H₆O (hic) 10:47, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
This is retarded shit with {{Fix}} tags on it. Let's just delete it already. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 29 '12 3:17 (UTC)
- Delete it despite the obscure reason for it being added here. Nominally Humane! 01:21 29 Apr
- Wumbo. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hello, I'm the main author of Wumbo. If you are going to vote against it, please mention why. I am still trying to improve it (haven't abandoned it yet!). --Craw1 (talk) 21:38, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Apologies Craw1, we obviously didn't realise you were working on it. I would advise you read our featured articles for some good examples of what passes for humour around here. You need more pictures and more coherent jokes, if possible. The main problem with this article in particular is that it is a non-existent subject which uses random humour, so as a reader it is difficult to care about anything the article is saying. You should ask yourself; why would someone want to read this? You have to keep them interested. Feel free to consult me if you want any more substantial help. --Black Flamingo 23:12, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- I retract my vote for the moment. Craw1 wasn't finished with it. Let 'em work on it some more. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 1 '12 6:16 (UTC)
Kept The author is responding to messages and is tying to work on it. Let the dude work on it. MrN 10:31, May 2
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. Or I could move it to my namespace for further work. Änjelajs (talk) 18:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Author wants to keep working on it, which is commendable. And Bildt is a former Prime Minister of Sweden, so of course he's notable. Unless all of Sweden is unnotable, which I can go along with. Aleister 20:52 30-4-'12
- Needs some work, but isn't horrible. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:28, 30 April 2012
- Keep --Chiefjustice3DS 12:48, May 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Please obliterate it. This is completely unfunny. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 07:05, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.--Mimo&maxus 18:07, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm... Article about Carl Bildt includes a picture drawn by Carl Barks... Erm... What? OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 18:52 27 April 2012
- Meh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:05, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. As someone who actually knows who this guy is and knows what he does, I can't safely say this is not funny. --OliOmniOmbudsman 21:34, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I have no idea who he is. Assuming he is notable then the article is okay with a little effort. If he's not notable then the effort is probably not worth it. Nominally Humane! 01:20 29 Apr
- If he's not so well known it may be better to just mension him a little in an other article. Änjelajs (talk) 18:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. I really don't think it can be improved, and it sucks. Mattsnow 09:43, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
- trash. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 29 '12 11:48 (UTC)
- The dark side of uncyclopedia.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 13:08, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
- We have a lighter side? By Don Berg? (Funnybony would have gotten that reference.) Nominally Humane! 01:22 29 Apr
- Whuh? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
- My people have only one response to this. Delete. --OliOmniOmbudsman 21:35, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- An entire world of war-cruft. (Do we really have to have stupid war articles around the place? Aren't real war articles stupid enough?) Nominally Humane! 08:24 26 Apr
- NRV. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:30, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Why do we have this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:16, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Deleet itt pleazzEpicAwesomeness (talk) 14:31, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- I moved this to ASCII because the name is more appropriate. By the way, this rules. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:01, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, this is good. Thanks for sharing this. Instead of deleting, why not add good ones to it? Long ago I enjoyed the See also list at Spider, which has simple but interesting looking spider designs. Aleister 1:04 25-4-'12
- I remember that this has been once before on the dangerzone we simply know as VFD. But that version wasn't as good as this. And it features a cat, so it must be good enough. Meow. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 17:55 27 April 2012
- Worth keeping. Nominally Humane! 01:18 29 Apr
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete I admit to liking this when I saw it ages ago, but have to admit that it's not funny. MrN 00:52, Apr 25
- Nope This unsigned vote was left by EpicAwesomeness at 16:39 (UTC), April 25, 2012. Welcome back, Epic, and sign your motherfucking voets plz
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete Some made up sport which is not funny. MrN 00:52, Apr 25
- Dumb. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:18, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
- It's a real made-up game. And ...Canadians play it? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 9:26 (UTC)
- No jokes. Not a single one, just like an wikipedia article.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:09, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. That's kind of intentional, Frosty. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:57, 26 April 2012
- Feature! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:20, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Feature Althought the pictures and videos sections are pretty shitty. --Mimo&maxus 18:10, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- This is dumb. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:59, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm not going to vote "delete", but I'm on frosty's side, especially when you read this. Oliphaunte's points were all pretty much right-on. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 27 '12 0:52 (UTC)
Kept MrN 19:15, Apr 28
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- This is funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:21, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
- OMGILIKEIT--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:14, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Why delete it? |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 07:04, April 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- This is not funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:53, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- See, like I said to SlyFox...leave it up to the Krauts and the Japs to come up with words for weird concepts... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 9:18 (UTC)
Kept MrN 19:10, Apr 27
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- This is bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:52, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Ew. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:07, April 25, 2012 (UTC)
- ...how...in...the...world...has this existed for the past six years? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 9:15 (UTC)
- Yeah, trash. --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 03:22, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- This is bad. -- The Zombiebaron 17:55, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Where? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:26, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:56, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
- I wish people could write well about their cities. On a completely unrelated note, I'm going to re-write Denver, Colorado some day. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 9:12 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (3) |
- Not that bad, and since its on a userpage only I have no problem with it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:02, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
Here ya go, Al. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 20 '12 2:27 (UTC) Love in bloom. If we have one photo of George Bush (either one, take your pick) it's worst than this. All we need is love, doo doo doo doodoo. Aleister 00:11 20-4-'12
- Keep It's a cartoon. MrN 12:12, Apr 22
|
Delete (5) |
- Used in only one place, and tiny there. Not suitable for main space, and potentially Wikia issue. Nominally Humane! 02:08 19 Apr
- Fuck you for linking that here, Pup. You suck. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Apr 19 '12 14:28 (UTC)
- NRV. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:49, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:35, 20 April 2012
- Delete. --Chiefjustice3DS 19:00, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- One week and the score is at two. That's a keep. --Chiefjustice3DS 10:45, April 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- I would really like to delete this but I thought I'd best run it by you guys first. --Black Flamingo 13:40, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Pretty dull, and a little too in-jokey. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:56, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:48, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I find it to be wanting in humour. --Chiefjustice3DS 19:01, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- This is the true definition of "what not to do". Bandcruft, hitler, gay, fag, nazi, it's all covered in the first paragraph. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 22 '12 10:42 (UTC)
- FJGGDHFGBFJGGJFGG??????? AGDFFHFVFHFHGFGGG!!!!!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:47, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- When MrEx saves a copy in his namespace, you know it's bad! Nominally Humane! 10:52 22 Apr
- If an article can contain the words "sex," "Jesus," "Gay," "Nazi," and "Nyan cat" in the introduction alone and yet have nothing to do with any of those things, you know it sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:22, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Youch. --Black Flamingo 14:18, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- This is bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:00, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- delete, because Frosty removed my comment. Nominally Humane! 07:09 22 Apr
- Had this not been a real game, I would say "keep," because the concept is genious. However, this is a real game and all the author did was basically describe it while adding nothing of his own. Thus, I say "delete." -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:20, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Xamralco said it. MrN 12:43, Apr 23
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (6) |
- Really bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:54, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, silly commies! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:48, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- delete them all, except a couple. Aleister 1:20s 22-4-'12
- not invloving money and projectng a society that is ha-hap-, how do you read this word dagnabbit, I ain't ever heard of hap-pin-ess, that must mean it's a terrorist, bomb him boys ehehehehehe Nominally Humane! 07:13 22 Apr
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 13:28, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
- 13375933EAKER!!!!!! 567834569845698426 HAX0RZ!!!!!!! --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:23, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Needs more funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:54, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- J00 eat? J00? Not did you. J00. J00 eat? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:48, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh for fuck's sake. --Black Flamingo 23:49, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- So bad it's almost good, but something is missing. Delete them all, except a couple. Aleister 1:20s 22-4-'12
- Delete, but willing to be convinced otherwise. There may be something worth salvaging, but I'm not that excited by the concept that I think it's worthwhile. Redirect to You as one of our earlier IC triumphs. Nominally Humane! 01:07 22 Apr
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (4) |
- Only used on some guys userpage, we have worse stuff on the site imo. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:01, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck him. Aleister 00:13 20-4-'12
- Keep It's a cartoon. MrN 12:11, Apr 22
- Keep Meh. --Chiefjustice3DS 18:59, April 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Barely used, and contentious in main space. Nominally Humane! 02:08 19 Apr
- ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Apr 19 '12 14:30 (UTC)
- NRV. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:49, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:34, 20 April 2012
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Has had a fix tag (images) for over a month, and is fairly bad as is. Suggest delete and redirect to Psyche with the addition of Category:Redirects with possibilities and Category:Vital articles (with key "|2"). Nominally Humane! 05:25 21 Apr
- Yeah, this is just... bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:07, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Delicious. --Black Flamingo 16:39, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Ehhhhh... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:52, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- You know what? I did like this at first (sort of), but Psyché really is infinitely better, and since "mind" really is synonymous with "psyche", I can't defend having two of these around when one kicks the other's ass. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 22 '12 5:15 (UTC)
Huffed and Redirected MrN 12:10, Apr 22
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Bad? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:28, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Uh... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:06, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Jist delete. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 22 '12 0:38 (UTC)
- ⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓On second thoughts, just delete it. Nominally Humane! 01:22 21 Apr
|
Comments |
- I can see what has been attempted. Merge with Scam letter? Nominally Humane! 01:16 21 Apr
- Nahhh. I mean...that one's yours, right? Do what ya want. But I don't see anything worth keeping. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 22 '12 0:38 (UTC)
- I've got a copy in user space if I ever decide to do the merge. So for now I'll just say delete. Nominally Humane! 07:29 22 Apr
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Overused, unfunny gay jokes, anyone? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:31, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Abusing the number 6. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:17, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- 666666666666666666666666666666!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 03:55, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, quaars is queers mispronounced. Now I get it. Shame it's not funny. Nominally Humane! 01:19 21 Apr
- This is so gay. --Black Flamingo 13:25, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Just plain crap. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:07, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Red links anyone? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:58, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Not as funny as Pasta of Muppets. Nominally Humane! 01:20 21 Apr
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 13:23, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm putting this comment here, just to fuck with Frosty's email account. Forgetting to uncheck "Email me every time a page I'm watching is changed", for the loss. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Apr 21 '12 11:08 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- I would like to submit this article to be considered for eternal destruction, please. --Black Flamingo 21:57, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- WTF? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:07, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- If it was about the real disco demolition night I'd have voted for it. This is just stupid. Aleister 00:14 20-4-'12
- lol nah ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:51, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Steel Railcats had a stadium capacity of 65,000 people, including Smurfs, but, by 1977, attendance had fallen to 13 hooligans, with two of them being British yobs paid to show up and throw eggs at the team Nominally Humane! 01:28 20 Apr
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Whaa? --Black Flamingo 21:37, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- I have no idea. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:07, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- See, Jean Reno is French, so his first name is pronounced "Zhean", not "Gene"...and when you disrespect Jean Reno, you get ...uh... jaundice? Jeandiss? See, it kinda sorta sounds like "jaundice" when you say it...um...I guess two stoners came up with it while playing mad-libs and getting...uh, stoned? That's what stoners do, right? They play Mad Libs™ and get stoned? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 20 '12 2:16 (UTC)
- H A G G E R ???????????? FIND WALDO TO CURE THE HGDFHDFHJDFHJFDH!!!!! --WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:43, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
- ok... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:51, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (2) |
- Rape? Shock? It's a nice picture of a bunch of friends showering together, smiling and happy. The one guy is drying off the neck of another guy with a towel, and the male bonding between them is obviously joyful. The world needs more joy and drying off necks of friends with towels. What kind of minds do you people have? You all sicken me, get a room. This could be hung up in a kindergarten room as an example of friendship and commaderie. Aleister 00:22 20-4-'12
- Not shock.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 04:23, April 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Unused and shock porn. Nominally Humane! 02:08 19 Apr
- I'm assuming that this is a picture of Leon Trotsky with two fluffy kittens in his lap, which Pup takes issue with because he's a Commie hater. I don't know this for sure, because after the last two images, there's no fucking way I'm clicking on a third link. You were counting on that, weren't you, you sly fox-hound, you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Apr 19 '12 14:34 (UTC)
- In case anyone is wondering, it is a B&W image of a naked man wearing a scarf seemingly being attacked in a shower by several tough-men with their cock out. Delete this file, remove all links to it and then re-upload it and then delete it again. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 15:12, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, it's not that bad, though it does depict rape, which is bad. Since it's unused and isn't funny, I'd say delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:48, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Not all that shocking, but unfunny and unused. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:00, April 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Shock as in surprise. That and the rape aspect kinda irks me. Nominally Humane! 11:58 19 Apr
- Delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:34, 20 April 2012
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- Cool story bro. Unfunny, barely coherent and looks like it was written by twelve year olds. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:13, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
- We don't, however, need two versions of the same thing. Nominally Humane! 09:38 18 Apr
- Turds. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 18 '12 9:44 (UTC)
- I would say merge with Your mom but this isn't funny at all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:48, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- I like it. One of the best pages in uncyclopedia history.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 09:00, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
- The "on wheels" articles are a significant part of the Uncyc story, coming from Willy on wheels over at Wikipedia. Just for that reason, I'd say keep. Shock porn definitely should be deleted at the File: itself, and external links to it removed. Nominally Humane! 09:35 18 Apr
- Keep Stupid page for stupid historical sake. But to me the real shock porn is the pic of the smiling George Bush. There is no porn in sex, imnho, I reserve that word for pics of people like Bush and for specific war and food images. Aleister 12:38 18-4-'12
- Yoghurt Nominally Humane! 01:49 19 Apr
|
Delete (1) |
- Undoubtedly this has been done before, but really no offence to the "writers" of this but this is like the worst stuff on the site period. Other than being a hotspot for posting shock porn, crashing my browser and simply distracting certain users from being constructive it's plain and simple not funny. Wasting precious kilobytes of spaces also. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:12, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If FkucMan, also-know'd-as Mister Ex, votes to keep this page, I almost have to vote "delete", in solidarity with Frosty. Almost. However, without this page, where will the vandalfaggots go to post vanity? 4chan? Encyclopedia Britannica? Heavens, they might use the goddamned Sandbox talk page! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 18 '12 9:25 (UTC)
- This page is a sandbox except instead of editing tests it's for editing... failures.. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:48, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
- This is page is completely unnecessary, yet, it is in a way a part of Uncyc history. I'll abstain for that reason. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:46, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Reverted to earlier version. Nominally Humane! 02:10 19 Apr
Kept MrN 15:13, Apr 19
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Pretty funny. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 01:52, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Really funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:09, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Got to be the dumbest article I have ever seen. How dare you, Frosty, you turncoat, you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Apr 17 '12 13:54 (UTC)
- Keep MrN 05:38, Apr 17
- Keep. Per above.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:12, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Pretty stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:18, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Really stupid --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 15:12, Apr 19
|
Score: 10
|
Keep (1) |
- fap fap fap... sorry, what? Nominally Humane! 07:18 17 Apr
|
Delete (11) |
- Yuck, George Bush! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:50, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Eep. --Black Flamingo 20:53, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
- I won't even look at it. Delete all articles and pics of that prick, imnho. Aleister 20:53 16-4-'12
- HowTo:Write an article without putting any effort into it whatsoever. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 16 '12 20:56 (UTC)
- Disgusting... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 21:50, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
- ?????????? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:06, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
- BGSFDNHDGJHGDJGDHNGFHHDFHR!!!!!!! BGHGRHRTHTDHTDHRH?????? HDRHDFHDHRDHRHREHRDHREY!?@#$%^&*()_+!!!!!!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 03:59, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Wot? --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 04:19, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- What an idiot! He started the "War on Terror" all on his own and achieved only the theft of oil reserves. He didn't even have congress permission for Iraq Gabriel Turner (talk) 18:23, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Don't mind me. I'm just hopin' on the bandwagon. -- 01:33, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure my first vote carried enough ...eh... let's say "heft". So I'm voting again. Let's call 'em "Chicago Rules." ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 18 '12 6:00 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This is the first time in the 2012 history of uncyclopedia that more than 5 people are voting for delete. cool.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 04:52, April 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (4) |
- This no longer works for vector skin. I've edited it to not have any effect at all for now, but we probably shouldn't have this as an option anyway except for reskins, which are done differently. Nominally Humane! 03:17 14 Apr
- Agreed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:20, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
- qvfd ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:42, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
- There's nothing to transclude there. What kind of template is that? -- This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 23:42, April 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I should make this clear - the way this is set up works on monobook, but not very well (the size is wrong) and it doesn't work on Vector at all (except that it can put an ugly background behind part of the nav menu). This could probably be worked on to be able to change the background on vector skin with no major issue. To get this to work properly on both vector and monobook would take a lot more effort including screwing with the current skin (css and js files) - more than it's worth for the handful of pages currently using it. That, and the fact that we probably shouldn't have people able to play with the nav menu to the point where you could create a nav menu that looks fine but takes you to Conservapedia. Or the short version - It's ugly, doesn't work, and we probably shouldn't have it. Nominally Humane! 06:04 15 Apr
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- Kind of in-jokey (and created during an IRC session). Not so bad, and can be improved with tweaks and/or a few additions. Aleister 11:07 13-4-'12
- For.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 11:08, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Aleister. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:36, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Not Garbage. "Step 5: Enter 'Roman Dog Bird is a nigger' into the edit box. Then insert the name of one of your sexier classmates and/or your most hated enemy.". Other parts are also worthy of salvation, and we need an article on this. MrN 15:18, Apr 14
- I especially like the go vandalise Wikipedia part. I've added the IRC conversation to the end, but hidden. Nominally Humane! 03:35 14 Apr
|
Delete (4) |
- This is crap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:10, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- With Frosty on this one. We've too many in-jokes. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 13 '12 15:16 (UTC)
- Delete please. --Black Flamingo 20:37, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- GarbageEpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:15, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Warning: You did not read this article. It does not exist. Shhh. Now Bugger Off. And don't say anything to anybody or you will be huffed. MrN 17:34, Apr 14
Kept MrN 23:44, Apr 15
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (6) |
- I like it. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:20, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- I actually laughed while reading this. Therefore, I may not vote delete. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 13 '12 15:23 (UTC)
- Yeah this is fine. --Black Flamingo 20:36, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Godly.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 08:31, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
- one of my all time favorites --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 08:43, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Cluck --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master
|
Delete (2) |
- Too much without a point. Nominally Humane! 02:33 13 Apr
- Puppy, did you...happen to read the links? (whisper) They tell a story. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 13 '12 15:23 (UTC)
- qvfd. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:41, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, Frosty, c'mon, it's not one of the world's greatest articles, but it's not just "buck buck buck". Read the links. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Apr 14 '12 14:33 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 15:20, Apr 14
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (4) |
- Doesn't look that bad to me. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:32, 13 April 2012
- Aint that bad.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 06:47, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- I just put Miley Spears into the Hall of Shame (kicking and screaming. on my part.) and was going to look at her "Preteen Slut" to see if it was feature worthy, and saw the VFD tag instead! Why not just revert it to Miley's last edit? I haven't looked at the history, and don't know if the IP's ravaged it or not. I hope they did, I would have. Aleister 10:57 13-4-'12
- There are some really obscure references in here. Must keep. Nominally Humane! 02:42 13 Apr
|
Delete (6) |
- There's like only one joke in the whole article. Mattsnow 01:13, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Shit and idiot magnet. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:17, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- No redeeming value at all. --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 01:20, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Just retarded. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:49, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- I was hoping "slut" had left the general vocabulary. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:44, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Considering the stuff that is in my browser history and google searches over the past week ("hitler", "nazis", "doggy-style screenshots", "cockfighting", "nuclear bomb")...I'm pretty sure that if I visit this page, I'm-a get flagged by the Department of Homeland Security. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 13 '12 9:19 (UTC)
|
Comments |
You did not make a good enough effort to find the best version in the page history before nomination, and people have voted based on what was not the best version so... Kept. If you still hate this article wait a while and try nominating it again. MrN 16:44, Apr 13
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (6) |
- Towncruft--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:14, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
- Yep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:23, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
- Never heard of it. Also it's crap. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:57, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
- You never heard of it because you live in Australia, silly. I live in Canada and never heard of it too. Mattsnow 01:18, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
- It Nominally Humane! 02:35 13 Apr
- Because the article is dumb, and I want a ninjastar from Magic Man. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 13 '12 15:18 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- I think this is pretty bad but what do you guys think. --Black Flamingo 13:48, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- That's not what I thought a cornhole was... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:51, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Blackie, I think it was written of fucktards, by fucktards, for fucktards. And we aren't fucktards here, are we? We're more...eh...unitards. We're equal-opportunity idiots. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 13:52 (UTC)
- Delete. --EMC [TALK] 15:49 Apr 9 2012
- Delete. Mattsnow 01:19, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Delete (5) |
- Cruft, in-joke, cruft, stale joke, cruft. And cruft. Nominally Humane! 12:43 09 Apr
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 13:46, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- No funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:50, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- I started to remove the templates and fix the infobox, and then I realized that there was no content in this tissue of ineptitude. I wouldn't wipe my ass with this article. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 14:06 (UTC)
- Delete. Mattsnow 01:23, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (7) |
- Surprisingly little rot over the last 4 years. An older style of article that is actually funny. Not VFH material but worth keeping. Nominally Humane! 01:36 08 Apr
- I don't wanna die! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:58, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
- The article's wish is my command. Aleister 13:58 Ease-her Sunday, He is risen! '12
- One of few injokes that I actual like. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:45, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- I don't really like it but then maybe I have low standards. --Black Flamingo 13:51, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:38, 9 April 2012
- I found i didn't vote for for that!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 10:15, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Should be deleted as serves no purpose Gabriel Turner (talk) 13:08, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Eeeehhh... EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:33, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm honestly a li'l "meh" about it, myself, so I shall register my disapprobation, the votes shall be far short of a "delete", and the article shall be kept. Next! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 8:46 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 16:38, Apr 13
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (4) |
- It's not great, but it's not that bad. Cut out the Mexican jokes, the 2nd image (unrelated), the 3rd image (UN:CM), and you have an okay stub. Add in MrN's welding puns, slap on a {{fix}}, and it'll fuse into an okay stub. Ore have I got that wrong? After all, this site is in a constant state of flux, so some bright spark should be able to fix this. Stopping now Nominally Humane! 06:55 07 Apr
- This is okay. --Black Flamingo 13:54, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Short, but not terrible. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:21, 10 April 2012
- Expand ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:58, April 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete I'm not an arc enemy of this article, but in spots it's melting. MrN 19:03, Apr 5
- Where's the humor? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:30, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- This article looks like my welds: a bunch of bird shit. No seriously. That's what my welds look like. Of course, it's not really my fault; I just don't have a MIG welder. MAN I wish I had a MIG welder. Or a TIG welder. Jesus, I'd take a wire-feed welder. Arc welders suck. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Apr 9 '12 4:38 (UTC)
- Wouldn't you rather have people read an article and say to themselves, "Wow that was funny!" rather than, "Well that wasn't that bad." However, on a related note, I really can't see anyone looking at this and saying, "Well that wasn't that bad." much less "Wow that was funny!" -- 01:10, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN 16:37, Apr 13
|