Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 16
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Writer of the Year 2012[edit source]
Leverage (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom & For He's a newer user, who joined in September of last year. He's contributed a LOT of UnNews articles, and had 7 features, which is a lot for only being around a few months. He jumped right in and got on top of things quick. I'm impressed. I could never do anything like that. If anyone is more worthy, hell, I can't think of them. 16:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. Writes an UnNews nearly every day, horoscopes every week, and has had a bunch of features from different sista projects on the site. A positive presence around the place, his articles always make me laugh, and he is a generous and sensitive lover who puts his partner's needs before his own. Writes less UnNews than mbncbz but tries to make them funny. Leverage (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Funnybony (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- Nom & For With 14 features in 2012 plus an amazing 70 UnNews articles Funnybony is at the top of his game. His imaginative unique twists on the news have set the pace for the UnNews team, and his amazingly worded articles stretch the space/time continuum. Yet I'm supporting Funnybony because he polishes his 533 pages (dats right, 533 pages, check out his user page if'un you don't 'lieve me) like a master jeweler polishes his prized stones, and he perfects his work for months or even years. The title "Writer of the Year" is no laughing matter, which is why Funnybony laughs at it. Aleister 1:53 1-1-'13
- Funnybony quietly writes mountains of good and funny articles and is a GREAT collaborator. He spits out 25 articles in the time it takes me to agonize over and polish one of my own. I wish I could write as prolificly, confidently, consistantly and funny as he does. --ShabiDOO 04:41, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. It is about time that Uncyclopedia's true star receives this recognition. Without his contributions, UnNews would have long ago curled up and died for want of others taking care. Funnybony is here for the love of writing and making other people laugh. He is also a great team player , a genuine 'collaborator' (in the positive sense) with many writers here. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:38, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For Prolific, funny and at the top of his game. --mAttlobster. (hello) 12:44, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- {{Boner}} While I'm here I might as well give a nod to a fantastic writer, and one of my faves. India has to be by far the best two person collab I've been part of. He picked up where I stopped, and vice versa. And he's actually written a book which I thoroughly enjoyed reading, and really wish I hadn't deleted the copy I had of it. The Soma addict's Hardwick Fundlebuggy. Nominally Humane! 11:27 06 Jan
SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- Nom & SpiritualFor With the most featured articles in 2012 (18.5), a trainload of saves, and a dripping but literally tireless helping hand always extended for new and experienced writers both, SPIKE is an invaluable resource for a site he obviously loves. He's one of our treasures, and is well deserving of this award. Aleister 1:53 1-1-'13
I succumb to the might of Spike--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:33, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Not active.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- For - Most features in one year is an amazing feat. There Isn't Any reason I shouldn't vote for him. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:54, Jan. 1, 2013
For. I told myself years ago that, no matter what, I would always vote for Spike. And this time is no exception. The only reason he has any less articles than me is because he spends a major portion of his time helping MANY others. And He is certainly Come Back of the Year after a looong period. I'm really glad he came back. Spike was one of my first mentors here. And it took a bit of practice but I finally realized that behind Spike's dry words on a computer screen is a sincere joker. He actually takes time to read other articles and then formulate good constructive advice. And he does so sincerely, without malice, even though others might misunderstand him or feel offended and try to insult him. But insults rarely phase him, and he keeps on offering genuine and well thought-out advice. I really feel happy just to be nominated. But I have to vote for Spike. Happy New Year of the Spike!!!: "Don't blame me, I didn't vote for him!"--Funnybony 13:22, Jan 1- Unfortunately no longer a member of our community. --
- Then again Shabidoo makes an okay point below. But if he wins, be sure to expect plenty of "Don't blame me, I didn't vote for him!" T-Shirts to be circulated. -- 07:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
00:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately no longer a member of our community. --
Kamek98 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom nom nom - What can I say? He crawled up my arse and into my heart. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:25, Jan. 1, 2013
Boner. - I'm feeling greedy tonight Motherfucker!--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 17:26, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- For.- I like the way he writes articles. MagicBus (talk) 11:46, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- For. + Boner. - Obviously the worthy one.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Xamralco (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 3
- He may be temporarily dead, but Xamralco showed us for much of 2012 what the bright future of Uncyc could have looked like. His articles were snappier, punchier, and wittier than anyone else could muster, and about as well-crafted as anything that a Procopious or Fundlebuggy might have made six years ago. It's no coincidence that most of his features this year claimed top spots in Of the month and the PLS. In terms of quality, Xam stood heads and shoulders above the competition in 2012, no contest. -- 10:20, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Because, as TKF put it quite neatly above, we all suck monkey asses compared to this guy. 17:15, 1 January 2013
- Other guys are worthy too, but Xamralco deserves more votes. Also, FU Xamralco. I saw you log into the wiki. I KNOW YOU'RE OUT THERE. You sneaky lurking quitter. ~ Mon, Jan 7 '13 14:54 (UTC)
Thekillerfroggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 8
- TKF wrote like the demon he is and threw down 15.5 features in 2012, single-handidly chased away the Aztec prophets, and gave us some boners, all in the name of caring for and contributing very good writing to uncyclopedia. TKF is also a great teacher of comedy here on the site - his many lessons and tips are all available online (right on his user page,under "Humor Theory"). Long may he live large from the lily pad, and write about it! Aleister 11:36 1-1-'12
For.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 17:27, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- This fag should have won years ago. -- The Zombiebaron 02:25, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:35, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- This guy is.... terrible. Just fucking reprehensibly awful. A list of things we all need to think about in his nomination here:
- He is somehow... the worst writer we have, the most power-hungry, trolling cum guzzler we have, AND-and we really have no one to blame but ourselves for this- the most powerful user on the entire site.
- He has accomplished some impressive stats. For instance, he has the most features of any person in the history of the site so far, a truly great achievement. An even greater achievement: That he has done so without writing a single humorous article to date. Which brings me to my next point:
- The begging. The unending, unmitigated, merciless begging. Really, it has to stop. Groveling at everyone on IRC. Whining on talk pages. Crying on VFH. 5 years of this shit, and it's got to stop.
- He has put into doubt the idea that you can't get put into positions of power without making some friends and enemies along the way. He doesn't have friends, he has the ability to annoy people into doing what he wants. We've created a monster whose only way of defeat is to get his way, or feature another of his articles. But the enemies...
- OH GOD THE ENEMIES! Too many to name here, but a moment of silence for the thousands of needlessly permabanned users that have fallen to his prodigious ego.
- ...
- His best trait is that he's been around for too long. Like any troll, or spouse, let them hang around you for long enough and those horrible character flaws shift from grating to endearing. Awww, look! He's nominated Filial Piety again! Classic TKF! How painfully adorable! When you know for a fact this motherfucker would have been run off the sight if we hadn't desensitized to his bull shit long, long ago. We have been enabling him for far too long, and as his family before us learned, you have to cut him off cold turkey.
- No more love. No more comfort. No more conversations. No more contact. I appreciate that we moved the site in, what I assume, was an attempt to leave him behind with the rest of Wikia. I don't appreciate that he found out and followed us here. Time to regroup everyone!
- He's probably going to win anyway, isn't he? Fuck it, man... just fuck it. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 03:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- All that being said, For. I mean, the guy got Filial Piety featured after nominating it so many times! I find his longevity and persistence endearing! The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 04:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I should probably find out what I'm even voting on, but For. anyways. ajr 23:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- FUT YEH — Jan 7 2013 05:33
- For. Sure why not, although I haden't read anything of his while sober I sure as hell giggled like a five year old when drunk. --MasterWangs 23:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Quite the battlefield this year, as with every year. This year TKF's articles made me laugh more consistently than anybody else's, so the vote is easy. -RAHB 03:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- F☭R 14:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- Nom +
For.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 17:31, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- Romartus is another well deserving nom. As far as I can tell all his pages should be featured. He has helped many writers with their pages as well, me included, and helped us to be featured with his advice and additions. Then there's what I call "The Epic" that he and Zarbag put together and which hopefully will be featured this year and in place for article of the year. Aleister 16:17 3-1-'13
- While Romartus may not be an active member on this site, his contributions to the wiki have been uploaded in full. There is no reason he should not be considered for this award, seeing as his content from 2012 is here, and members of the community may chose to nominate him and deem him best writer if they so chose. --ShabiDOO 06:47, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Not active? [user page shows he has done stuff here.] I think of him more in terms of Uncyclopedian than a writer, but I enjoy his occasional UnNews, and he is someone who, if he left, I would cry. Leverage (talk) 10:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Aleister (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
Nom + For.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 17:27, January 1, 2013 (UTC)Thank you, that was nice. But not only was I not here for the better part of seven months - ducking in once in awhile - but this is a one time award imnho, and I already snuck in a couple of years ago on a fluke, a handjob, and quite a few pieces of eight, I'll tell you that in strict confidence my friend. Aleister 18:14 1-1-'12
- Spiritual Against. Lazier than me. Nominally Humane! 11:57 06 Jan
Uncyclopedian of the Year 2012[edit source]
Zombiebaron (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom Zombiebaron has kept the ship running for the last year, wasting most of his life dedicated to this website. He hasn't complained or bitched about the "sinking" of the website, but has instead proposed ways to make it better, has show incredible patience with the little drama that there was, tried to get new members, organized competitions and drives, and over all did not suck as an admin. His penis is also much bigger than his mothers, which is an accomplishment of its own. It would not be a stretch to say he deserves this two years in a row. --ShabiDOO 00:25, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Yes--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- Would vote for him easily, if I didn't just vote for Bizzee. He's like all of the good parts of me without the other 9/10ths of me. -- 09:57, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- I voted for him last year! But seeing as he helped pioneer the IRC spam month... -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:01, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Frosty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 9
- Nom Everyone would agree that Frosty is at the very least a satisfactory admin who completes his tasks at a level higher than mediochre, and who makes the website more good on a higher than average basis, spending more than just a little time here getting a fairly high level of admiration from a reasonable amount of people here. --ShabiDOO 01:56, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Boner.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- So I will direct you to my vote from last year, which Frosty has conveniently immortalized on his user page, much to my distress and dismay. ~ Wed, Jan 2 '13 7:29 (UTC)
- I would also vote for this guy, were it not for only having one vote and stuff. Frankly, I'm surprised he isn't running away with the vote already. -- 22:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- I concur with our esteemed colleagues. You are my obvious and close second choice, and I too thought you'd be very far ahead of anyone nominated. Aleister 00:02 3-1-'13 (that's a cool number)
- For. bribed via IRC. Might be a good candidate too, idk. ajr 23:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. I think Frosty and Bizzeebeever deserve this equally, so I am hoping by voting for the one with fewer votes a tie will become more likely. --MasterWangs 23:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. i cast my vote for the guy who made Boner.. -hipcrime 01:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. All hail the great and hard-working Frosty. If you don't vote for him for being hardworking, at least vote for him because he's gay. 16:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- F☭R 14:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Opping Frosty was the best decision our community made this year. Finally all the lazy admins could return to our natural state of rest, instead of having to constantly respond to Frosty's ban and deletion requests. Every year at UotY I vote for the person who I saw as the "grease of the wiki" that year. Frosty was this year's grease. -- The Zombiebaron 23:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. I refuse to comment Madclaw @ talk 00:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 6
- For. Romartus makes me proud to be an uncyclopedian. His caring for the site shines through with every post, with his legendary votes on VFH, and with the help he gives to writers without complaint (well, some complaint). A helping hand to noobs, the back of the hand to veterans, and a writing style of a wise drunken historian, Romartus befriends his enemies and kills his friends - kills them with kindness! And then there's this. Aleister 2:02 1-1-'12
- For. Of course! Great dude. And, what Aleister said, especially the part about helping noobs like I. --Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 02:52, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Boner. Probably my favorite person here. If I could just get him to make me a sandwich. --Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- For. He has been a stellar contributer for a very long time indeed.--Sycamore (Talk) 03:54, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Per Aleister 100%. YES YES YES!!!--Funnybony 07:21, Jan 1
For. --EMC [TALK] 20:06 Jan 1 2013Has a boner for Bizzeebeever. He requested this be strucken with precision.-- 00:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. I almost left the site in November when I felt like the drama surrounding votes wasn't really worth it at all. Romartus is someone who makes the site feel pleasant and civilised. I guess he's been around ages but I've never seen any ego, any "I have been here longer than you" bullshit. These qualities I think are essential for welcoming (and keeping) new writers. --Leverage (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- (for) One doesn't see much of what Romartus does, as he does lots of stuff that doesn't appear on watch lists. He also does stuff that appears on watch lists. Also on feature lists. He's a smacking example of an uncyclopedian that makes American what it is. America wouldn't be half of what it was if it wasn't for what Romartus makes it be! --ShabiDOO 01:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- If being British makes what America is today then...am I doing something right or wrong? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- NOM
+ For.Spike is naughty. He is tough and is willing to kill people to get Uncyclopedia tidied up. He is committed and bitch slapped 2012 like he owned it. Vote or die.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC) - For. Spike has kept a steady weather eye on this website, despite some awkward storms and squalls in certain quarters. Very often he has spotted something that needed urgent attention or alternatively, required a bucket of water and mop to clean up an existing mess. None of this sounds very exciting but it is crucial work to make a website like this work to the benefit of all users. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:04, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. The janitor must get his due! --Lord Scofield Stark 12:11, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Bizzeebeever (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 9
- For. He seems like a nice
guybeaver. 04:16, 1 January 2013 - For - ♪ People, let me tell you 'bout my beeest friend. ♫ -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:27, Jan. 1, 2013
- Sucks cock like a champ. Also, because I feel obliged to always justify my Year votes with long rambling dirges about why people rule, I'll return that cocksucking favor. Bizzeebeever is a wiki saint. He knows his code, was instrumental to the moving process, and hung around the year performing the shit jobs that literally nobody else ever wanted to do. Among all this, he still managed to write a little bit, always kept a great sense of humor, and was even more shockingly reasonable behind his jokes. He's got every factor of a great Uncyclopedian within him. Gooooooo BB! --
- Dude stop that I'm not wearing a condom. I have no idea where your mouth has been. ~ Tue, Jan 8 '13 4:57 (UTC)
09:53, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Pretty sure he'd lend me five bucks if I asked him. --Bill Melater (talk) 11:01, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Always gives me a pillow for my knees, which is more than I can say for some people. -RAHB 00:40, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
- '— Jan 7 2013 05:31
- Yes, him. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 19:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. --EMC [TALK] 04:39 Jan 8 2013
- Another really hard-working, positive presence on the site. I know nothing about programming, so I will leave it to someone else to praise him on his technical contributions. What I will say: When you first come on Uncyclopedia, there are a flurry of weird names and it takes time to distinguish one from another, and to work out who likes and hates each other. Bizzie seems to want new writers to mix, get to know other writers, and I think that social aspect (assuming we can all talk for five minutes without drama) is also something which makes contributors stick with a site. --Leverage (talk) 10:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- For.---- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Kamek98 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 0
- Nom nom nom - What can I say? He crawled up my arse and into my heart. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:25, Jan. 1, 2013
Boner. - Obviously deserves it more than Jesus.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Noob of the Moment Jan 13[edit source]
Y (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- For.+nomination - Contributing lots to a new project! -- 21:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. I like him. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 22:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- <3 — Jan 26 2013 21:17.
- Comment - Under a different name he has been registered for almost 2 years. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:31, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- ...........--
- User:Mnidaydwisww ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
22:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- ...........--
- For. because I'm awesome — Jan 26 2013 21:12.
- What a noob. -- The Zombiebaron 21:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- Noob boner. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month Jan 13[edit source]
Sir Peasewhizz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- Boner. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. --Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 15:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. --ShabiDOO 09:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron. — Jan 27 2013 18:17.
Team MoveCabal (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- A lot of Uncyclopedians worked hard throughout 2012, particularly in recent days, to do a little small thing called moving the entire site. Therefore, I vote that we give the team behind Operation Screaming Seagull this official, honorary UotM badge. -- 00:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. "Screaming Seagull." Has a nice ring to it. -RAHB 03:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. Per RAHB.
- I see how is is. 20:43, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
05:36, 10 January 2013
- This is probably the only way I'm gonna get another UotM -- The Zombiebaron 00:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- This, means, war!-- 00:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. Per ZB ~ 07:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Frosty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- YOU BASTARDS DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH FROSTY HAS PUT TIME, SWEAT, BLOOD, AND TEARS INTO POST-MOVE CLEANUP!! You wanna know what Frosty says on IRC? I'm busy cleaning up. :'D.... this guy is NOT doing his homework just FOR YOU! And nobody cared to nom? Well... he's gonna win either way as the above nomination. Whatevs. Vote or die.
- We don't? Frosty and MadMax have done an incredible job fixing links, redirects, and the like on pages, but this has been a community endeavour and they are not alone in putting considerable effort into the matter. Among other things, Bizzeebeever and Jack Phoenix have done phenomenal work getting our javascript updated and working on the current version of MediaWiki, and Jack Phoenix and Skizzerz in particular have put considerable effort into fixing and writing extensions so we can use them without explosion. Hotadmin4u69 has done more than most anyone realises to get the word out about the move, and I don't even care to think about some of the painful scripts legoktm has had to write. And these are just specific folk I can think of off the top of my head, but even every bug report is valuable, since it gives us something to work from, and those take some trouble to make as well. As amazing as Frosty has been, and as much as we need him to continue to be so we can get this place top-notch once more, you do a disservice to the rest of the community by phrasing your nomination in such a manner. -— Lyrithya ༆ 16:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ly, this was a joke nomination. lol-- 20:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
22:52, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- We don't? Frosty and MadMax have done an incredible job fixing links, redirects, and the like on pages, but this has been a community endeavour and they are not alone in putting considerable effort into the matter. Among other things, Bizzeebeever and Jack Phoenix have done phenomenal work getting our javascript updated and working on the current version of MediaWiki, and Jack Phoenix and Skizzerz in particular have put considerable effort into fixing and writing extensions so we can use them without explosion. Hotadmin4u69 has done more than most anyone realises to get the word out about the move, and I don't even care to think about some of the painful scripts legoktm has had to write. And these are just specific folk I can think of off the top of my head, but even every bug report is valuable, since it gives us something to work from, and those take some trouble to make as well. As amazing as Frosty has been, and as much as we need him to continue to be so we can get this place top-notch once more, you do a disservice to the rest of the community by phrasing your nomination in such a manner. -— Lyrithya ༆ 16:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
GOTY 2012[edit source]
Olipro (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 118
- Nom + For He really deserves it this year. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:07, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- He really earned it this time -- 09:54, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Definitely! The first thing he did in 5 months was block me for no reason. :| -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 19:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- For. And my vote counts for whatever amount is needed to tie Zombiebaron and Olipro. 03:36, 6 January 2013
- For. - Whatever the score becomes fix it plzzz-- 21:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. - users whos names are one character get 100 votes — Jan 30 2013 22:21.
Zombiebaron (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 169
- Nom + Admin Votes Count As Double. Who the fuck does this JERK think he is??? -- 03:01, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Users votes count as triple. Zombiebaron is such a zombiebaron. Pfff! What a fu*king zombiebaron. --ShabiDOO 18:26, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- For And votes by users whose names are in all caps count quadruple. -RAHB 00:42, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
- For Madclaw @ talk 14:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- F☭R. 15:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- te'o plus users whose names are their last names backwards count as quintuple. — Jan 19 2013 03:46
- For. i dunno who he is, but ok. I also get 49 votes because LOL 69!!!!! man im drunk... --MasterWangs 01:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- When Shabidoo votes twice its worth 100. --ShabiDOO 23:00, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
GOTM Jan 13[edit source]
Zombiebaron[edit source]
Score: 6
- Nom & F☭R. Seriously, I've know this useless gobshite for years. I know for a fact he is useless. 14:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Cannot be denied -- 15:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. -- 16:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:44, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- A gobshite monthly, a gobshite yearly, a gobshite forever and always. -RAHB 02:56, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron. — Jan 27 2013 22:54.
Foolitzer Prize Jan 13[edit source]
Bill Melater[edit source]
Score: +3
- N+F. Brings good cheer and ribald puns to the UnNewses. Vote for him or I'll kill you. ~ Wed, Jan 2 '13 14:44 (UTC)
- Waves of cum I don't know what to say about this guy other than: "No fair!!" Always has funny, fresh UnNews articles. --Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 05:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Yes, but you did also mention the waves of cum. That's certainly saying something. – Preceding unsigned comment added by RAHB (talk • contribs)
Foolitzer Prize Feb 13[edit source]
Kip the Dip[edit source]
Score: 4
- NOM + FOR - I think you know why :) --Sir Peasewhizz de New York 20:54, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Nipples and Sunset Strip One of the best writers playing football today. Aleister 21:44 2-2-13
- Comment - This feels too easy; no real challange involved in winning this at all. Let's kick things up a notch, shall we? I refuse to accept this award unless I write at least 7 quality news articles by the end of the month. A Foolitzer Prize won from UnNews being in a rut is no Foolitzer Prize at all. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 03:30, Feb. 19, 2013
- I vote FOR. Kip has shown unrelenting UnNews enthusiasm over the years, and has written at least several fantastic UnNews articles despite being constantly bollocksed by SPIKE. ~ Wed, Feb 20 '13 2:00 (UTC)
Writer of the Month Feb 13[edit source]
MagicBus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 3
- NOM & FOR - Has been working his ass off in the userspace he has :D --Sir Peasewhizz de New York 20:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah sure. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah! Thanks! -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 18:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Frosty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- NOM & FOR - Has written things.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 23:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Dawg (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- NOM & FOR - Has written stuff.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 23:37, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- FOR -- Style Guide 08:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Gobshite of the Month Feb 2013[edit source]
Official Nominations for February[edit source]
This user does not exist (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
NF — Feb 1 2013 23:58.
- Not registered.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 00:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month Feb 2013[edit source]
RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- NOM + FOR - For taking care of VFH last month. --Sir Peasewhizz de New York 04:27, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
MadMax (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 11
- Nom + For This guy have over 68k edits and since his recent comeback has been updating our URL links like a fucking machine. Seriously guys, I cannot believe he's actually only won this once. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- you are my #1 active hero — Feb 2 2013 03:54.
- He deserves hundreds of UotMs -- The Zombiebaron 04:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Probably makes more edits in two weeks than I typically do in a year. I move that after this we award Max a custom Uncyclopedian Of The Forever award, and then three or four more of these. -RAHB 08:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Batman -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 08:38, Feb. 2, 2013
- For. Makes more edits in an average day than I have ever. --MasterWangs 10:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- As long as we're giving this award twice now, of course. Aleister 14:51 3-2-'13
- +1. MadMax is my hero. The greatest uncyclopedian of all time. I'm glad he is with us here. 2013.02.07.07:55
- He's named after an epic movie saga, which is good enough for me. ~[ths] UotM 19:57, 02/18/2013
- Forever and always -- 21:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. --Snippy 06:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Noob of the Moment Feb 2013[edit source]
Hoof Hearted (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- Nom + For Arrived a few days ago and has been writing a lot of thingies. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Per Frosty--Sir Peasewhizz de New York 23:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yup. --Snippy 02:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. what frosty and peasewhizz say. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 12:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- He came back and is doing things which look really good. And has a hoof. Aleister 23:57 26-2-'13
- Against.'''' --— 00:40, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
March[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Sir Peasewhizz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 8 eager beavers
- Nom and boner. Writes all of the things, all of the time. And if he wins he'll stop bringing it up :P -RAHB 01:02, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Cumming - ARGGHYAYYAGSGDGDDFHHHHHHHH ahhh nice... 01:04 3.01.13
- For. One of the best writers here, when he's not writing about sex, and does some polishing. One of the fastest writers for sure, and one of the most determined writers. He's kept VFH picking and choosing among his pages, with lots of winners. Well earned!!! Nice work. Aleister 4:27 1-3-'13
- Ok ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- Question. Didn't he already win this? Or else how is he a GUN? — 22:08, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out! I guess when I won UOTM I thought it was under GUN, and that was UOTY. I shouldn't be a gun right now but it doesn't matter. Sorry, thanks for finding that. I wouldn't have ever noticed.
- You're welcome. — 22:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
22:14 3.05.13
- Thanks for pointing that out! I guess when I won UOTM I thought it was under GUN, and that was UOTY. I shouldn't be a gun right now but it doesn't matter. Sorry, thanks for finding that. I wouldn't have ever noticed.
Against. — 21:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not rebelling on this vote, but voting against here is a one-way ticket to a bad reputation here. 23:20 3.08.13
- For. This guy right here is fantastic. --EMC [TALK] 00:30 Mar 12 2013
- For.OIRJUETNIOP WEVP JSEVHARG M, ;LAQVI'WERT8O[7YQ2NF V' Helen Keller 00:36, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
- For. This user is great. Not! — 03:52:44 2013/03/19 UTC
- You don't have to vote for me if you don't want to lol 22:33 3.19.13
- Why not? -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 17:46, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Hotadmin4u69 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- NOM 00:50 3.01.13
- For. Has helped a lot. — 01:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Shabidoo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
NOM00:50 3.01.13- Awww seeing the scorenumber made me want to cry! ;( 06:03, 12 March, 2013 (UTC)
Dawg (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 6
- 00:50 3.01.13
- Boner. Came back to hold us tight. Been edit-machine and uncyclopatriot extraordinaire since returning and is funding the PLS, which clearly will save Uncyclopedia from the darkness. Oh, that darkness, always causing mischief. -RAHB 01:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- I believe in a thing called love? -- The Zombiebaron 02:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
- For. MadMax (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- yeh ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- If MadMax can vote for this, so can I. — 01:31, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- For. Very glad to have him back. --EMC [TALK] 00:29 Mar 12 2013
- Dawg is cool. He's the kind of guy who would help you on moving day. And he'd only expect a dozen cases of beer in return and the keys to your car for the night. Nice guy. --ShabiDOO 07:12, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Legoktm (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- NOM+FOR 01:14 3.02.13
Noob of the Moment[edit source]
Tiz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom+For --Sir Peasewhizz de New York 19:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Fs—Thank you for making my UnVoyage logo. ~Y KUN — Tuesday 05 February 2013 23-30-24 ¿
Mike the Great (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 3
- N+F Although he has had an account for ages, he has been recently active more so lately. In addition to his amusing IRC antics, he has given birth to a welcome script which ensures all new users get the info they need instantly and allows the admins to be even more lazy. He also makes the odd useful edit. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:56, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Against. I hate you all. Mike the Great (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- things I've done: I edited a mainspace article once and I've picked fights on UN:IRC Also there's always the other thing at wikia Mike the Great (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. The bot is enough to push Mike up the ladder of the greats or near greats of the moment. Confusingsus say "Man who hates you all has love in his heart for all after all" Aleister 23:54 26-2-'13
- The bot is disabled, they want welcomes to be personal and only for productive users. We'll see what functionality comes in the future, it's still in active developement. Mike the Great (talk) 03:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Also, they don't like the 2kB/s bandwidth it uses. Mike the Great (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- For. His coding skillz make me wet. -hipcrime 03:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. 15:36 3.03.13
ProfessorScience (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 6
- Nom. Has written two great UnDebates and an UnNews in the short time he has been here. --Snippy 02:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- CUMMING -- 02:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- As I have never seen any of this man's work, I have seen his username and nomination and that is all I need — 21:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. I guess. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 22:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Against. Read Debates / News - didn't really find them funny :/ Maybe it's my Brit sense ofHoof Hearted (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)humorhumour. And no other existing articles impproved either. My taxi awaits :p- Nah. Don't do that. 02:29 3.26.13
- For. Loved the UnNews. --IFYMB! (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
- Comment:I have my more than reasonable suspicions that this was a casual revisitor to the site. Though...you didn't hear me say that...or type it out...or mention anything. What did I just say? We are almost in April? Jesus was tortured with hooks and spikes two milenia ago!? --ShabiDOO 20:45, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
C'Raisin (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom. Has written two articles so far. Good job for him. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 11:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- For. 15:35 3.03.13
Foolitzer Prize[edit source]
Kip the Dip[edit source]
Score: 5
- N+F - He'll take March by the balls for his February month. HE WAS AWESOME. 15:37 3.03.13
- For. Of course. -- Style Guide 19:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
- Egg. I got an Uncyclopedian of the Month badge for Christmas and now I want a Foolitzer Prize in my Easter basket. It is chocolate wrapped in gold-colored foil, right? -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 19:44, Mar. 11, 2013
- For. And looking forward to next month: Kip the Dip vs. Multiliteralist - WotM. Be there! -RAHB 17:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
- For. A very good writer. — 20:44:53 2013/03/19 UTC
Useless Gobshite March[edit source]
Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- — 22:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- 22:33 3.05.13
Auror Andrachome (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- — 22:29, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Discussion[edit source]
I might just log in to my sockpuppet and nominate Y... Hey, it'll be a different account. — 21:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
April 2013[edit source]
Writer of the Month April[edit source]
Funnybony[edit source]
Score: 2
- NOM+4 16:39 4.01.13 -> Updated: 16:52 4.01.13
- Spiritual For. Funnybony, our co-writer of the year, writes so much so well that we all are jealous and can't even lend him a hand when he's drowning in quicksand. Don't struggle, Funnybony, it just sucks you in quicker (that's why they call it "quick"). I'll vote for Kip because he's never won before and deserves it, and my spirit votes for Funnybony! 11:43 3-4-'13
- For - I'm not worthy to be up for the same award in the same month as.. *grabs Funnybony over the shoulder in a half bro hug; sloshes beer on the floor* ..this guy right here! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 02:06, Apr. 5, 2013
Kip the Dip[edit source]
Score: 6
- NOM 16:39 4.01.13
- Boner. Kip's been ripping it up, mostly in UnNews. He has a knack for both original satire and poop jokes, proving his versatility. He also has penisman on his page. -RAHB 00:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- He's never won before?????? Can't believe it, but seems to be true. Kip is one of our best writers and he keeps getting better. Christmas would be Satanmas without Kip, and UnNews would be News. I was coming here to vote for Funnybony, who could win this every month if the Gods were fair and he were Jewish, yet seeing that Kip has never won has made me spit up my quinoa. Aleister 11:37 3-4-'13
- Sure... -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 11:39, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- For. Per Pease, RAHB, Al, Magic, and all--Funnybony 10:52, Apr 5
- This guy is terrible. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- yay Kip ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:18, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- For making me an alternate main page!--198.91.151.71 19:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- I get a little teary eyed when i think of the man kip tye dipnwas. RIP Kip! --ShabiDOO 00:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month April[edit source]
Legoktm (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 7 Toy brick sets from Kathmandu
- Nom and boner Does pretty much every cool thing all the time. Instrumental in the move from Wikia and upkeep of the server. Has been known to fix loads of bugs all the time and ban spambots, a lot. Also looks damn fine in a three piece suit. -RAHB 14:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes 16:53 4.01.13
- Boner. -- The Zombiebaron 23:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Absolutely Although, I have heard lately that he eats vomit cum and dies and has no life. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 02:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Allows the actual administrators to assume their normal state of being lazy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- He's the only nominee!--198.91.151.71 19:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
- He smells like fabric softener on a foggy winter afternoon. --ShabiDOO 00:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Clearly[1]. 89.182.46.194 00:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Noob of the Month April[edit source]
RedHot[edit source]
Score: 9 RedHots
- HELL YES. 16:55 4.01.13
- Oh yeah baby! -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 10:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- YUP! --Snippy 11:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- For. IFYMB! 17:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- For -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 04:46, Apr. 15, 2013
- Boner. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:25, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- Double Boner.: Becaause one boner wasn't enough. All rise for Acmed2 (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- For. Some very good work has flowed from his pen...his keyboard. Aleister 23:12 19-4-'13
- Boner. -RAHB 21:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Good luck in PLS!--198.91.151.71 19:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Sarah Baldewijns[edit source]
Score: 3
- NOM+FOR 16:56 4.01.13
- Sarah is not likely going to write...but shes always given me great feedback. If you have a near finished article you want some last minute advice on and you ask her nicely shell maybe say ok.--ShabiDOO 00:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- She judged a contest in which I came in second, so I second this motion. hahahahahaha. Yay Sarah! Aleister 23:15 19-4-'13
Very Crazy Rafael[edit source]
Score: 1
- NOM+FOR 17:00 4.01.13
Foolitzer Prize April[edit source]
Multiliteralist[edit source]
Score: 7
- N&4 16:43 4.01.13
- For - I've sincerely waited a month for this. Though he's gone now, he gave UnNews a rush a adrenaline when he was here. Besides his idea to expand articles into interconnected serials in a way that would make the writers of Seinfeld impressed, he did more to polish and nitpick away at UnNews itself than I have in my entire short time as News Tzar. If more of you were like Multiliteralist, Uncyclopedia would shine and TKF might still be here. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 04:41, Apr. 3, 2013
- Boner. What Kip said. Also, I saw him on IRC this morning, so maybe all is not lost! -RAHB 02:23, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
- Finns deserve this! :D 09:35, 6 April, 2013 (UTC)
- Strong for MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- For. You make me all mushy-weepy with this nice gesture. But I'm still more moved by voting for myself. It is ever so sympathetic! -- Style Guide 18:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- For. RedHot (talk) 10:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Useless Gobshite[edit source]
Y (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- N+F 16:50 4.01.13
- Against? — 21:10:57 2013/04/05 UTC
Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Who the fuck is he ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
May 2013[edit source]
WRITER OF THE MONTH[edit source]
Multiliteralist[edit source]
Score: 8.5
- Nom & For - Great writer, has a grasp on literary posture that I have never seen before, respect him admirably. RedHot (talk) 23:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
- For. Not bad for a Scandinavian. A bit more hairy than I anticipated but I'm no complainer. Wait, what is this for again? --EMC [TALK] 14:35 May 3 2013
- For. Because if I don't vote for myself, nobody else is going to vote for myself as me. -- Style Guide 18:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- 1/2 Vote For - I was bribed. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 21:04, 3 May 2013
- For. --Snippy 10:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Prolific as all fuck, and brilliant. -RAHB 11:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- For. Greatness (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- For. Hell ya! -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 10:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Smexy writer. I mean he writes smexy articles. You know. 13:45, 30 May, 2013 (UTC)
IFYMB![edit source]
Score: 4.5
- N+F 20:17 5.01.13
- Thanks It means a lot to me, being nominated, it's nice to see my work dosen't go overlooked. IFYMB! 05:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- 1/2 For. (See other vote, sorry) ~Formerly Annoying Crap 21:04, 3 May 2013
- For - As much as I love my homeboy Multiliteralist, I have to go with IFYMB! here. IFYMB! has proven to be a talented and productive writer who certainly shouldn't be overlooked. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:48, May. 29, 2013
- You spineless maggot! I gave you that special rubdown and all! I will avenge this at next year's Anal Twitmas party, man! I'll go with RAHB! (Yeah I'll probably vote for IFYMB next month myself.) -- Style Guide 04:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- For. I like him and makes a lot of good articles. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 10:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
UNCYCLOPEDIAN OF THE MONTH[edit source]
MadMax[edit source]
Score: 11
- N+F No matter whether it's day or night, MadMax will be tidying up this site like he's being paid to do it. IFYMB! 09:47, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- For - Everytime I look at Special:RecentChanges, MadMax does magic. RedHot (talk) 10:31, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- For - Yes. 00:29 5.05.13
- For - I picture him on top of a tank. Leverage (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- For - It's almost impossible to not see him on recent changes, damn this guy has too much time on his hands :D 15:31, 21 May, 2013 (UTC)
- Batman. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 16:11, May. 21, 2013
- For - Good work, MadMax – Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyingbird (talk • contribs)
- Boner. Every month. It's almost an insult to even go through the formalities of giving him only this third award. Three months out of the 8 (I think) years of non-stop Uncyclopedism. -RAHB 11:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- For Tireless categorization of articles, and general maintenance that makes it hard for me to see other established users edits. Except maybe Legoktm. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:14, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- For Lord Protector of the Fork. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- For. Greatness (talk) 08:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
NOOB OF THE SOMETHING[edit source]
F.I.G.A. World Cup[edit source]
Score: 3
- Sure. 15:35 5.05.13
- For. Greatness (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- For. No one else will get it. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 06:12 31 May 2013
Comment. - What the fuck Peasie? I'm sorry, but a n00b has to write at least one article mainspace before he/she can be nominated here. What I see, all this guy has been doing is to edit his userpage (which is pretty fucking stupid) and so cannot be nommed. Pease read the rules better(ly?) next time, ok? I don't think F.I.G.A. deserves this, bro. 04:57, 28 May, 2013 (UTC)
June 2013[edit source]
Writer Of The Month[edit source]
IFYMB! (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 11
- Boner. Just look at that list of articles grow! -RAHB 06:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. -- Style Guide 09:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. I hear he's quite handsome. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 14:00 1 June 2013
- For. --Zigers (talk) 16:40, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- For -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 17:54, Jun. 1, 2013
- For. It's his time. RedHot (talk) 07:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. 11:04, 5 June, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Yay IFYMB! f.y.i. The WOTM award makes a very nice hood ornament. Aleister 13:30 5-6-'13
- Yes...of course! --ShabiDOO 21:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. IFMYB! is determined to write articles; if there's anybody trying to resurrect the good act of writing, it's him. RedHot (talk) 00:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- For! For! For! --Tumb13weed (talk) 19:08, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian Of The Month[edit source]
IFYMB! (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 7
- Boner. He does stuff, and sometimes he does some things. And he's also a prolific writer and now he's a poopsmith. -RAHB 07:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. This is all part of my plan to become an
adminegotistical maniac. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 14:03 1 June 2013 - For. --Zigers (talk) 16:41, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. - The doctor told me to 08:44, 6 June, 2013 (UTC)
- For Even though he voted for himself. -- The Zombiebaron 15:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- He's really good at chewing on expired condoms while blowing up cow sheds! --ShabiDOO 21:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. RedHot (talk) 00:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Foolitzer[edit source]
Leverage[edit source]
Score: 6
- This users intelligence is astounding, his UnNews ideas are completly genius. ~! 04:46 9 May 2013
- Boner. Four more years! Four more years! -RAHB 11:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. Leverage has more twists in him than Angeline Jolie's brother gives her breasts (yes, he got them - see what calling dibs can get you!). Aleister 20:41 3-6-'13
- For. I like his hat. --Dame 20:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. Cool! -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 20:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- For. Deserves it here, treasure this contributor. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)