2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) • 2009 (part 1) • 2009 (part 2) • 2010 (part 1) • 2010 (part 2) • 2011 (part 1) • 2011 (part 2) • 2012 (part 1) • 2012 (part 2) • 2013 (part 1) • 2013 (part 2) • 2014 • 2015 • 2017 to now

July

NotM

Liz muffin (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 bastard children

Nom ~~and For - Well, this one might be a bit premature, since this user is all of four days old, but I seriously got a kick out of I had sex with your wife‎. Lots and lots of promise here.~~ For general lack of activity, changing my vote to Mrmonkey72 --Hyperbole 00:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
For The force is strong with this one. -RA HB 05:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
~~Fore~~ForFounding Member Baseball16 16:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Abstain I guess there's not much choice. I was going to vote for, but I'm still not quite sure. - [08:10 27 July] Sir FSt Don Yettie
Abst Looking at the caliber of recent NotM winners - YTTE, Cheap, Woody and runner up Hype - this one isn't really close. Shouldn't win by default because there are no other candidates. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Mrmonkey72 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +12 self-righteous gun-totin' monkeys

Nom and For - This guy's had an exceptional ten days on Uncyclopedia - writing in several namespaces, nomming on VFH, voting on VFD, doing in-depth pee reviews... if this isn't NXWave, I think we may have found our noob. pillow talk 08:26, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Foreplay Yay a noob! - [08:29 27 July] Sir FSt Don Yettie
For Good writer and does stuff to. ~~With-holding until check of NXWaveitude.~~ --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
For Writes a lot. Does lots of things. -RA HB 08:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Abstain: I can't seem to establish a real decision on myself. Also, I am not NXWave, unless I have some sort of schizophrenia... --mrmonkey72 14:59, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
For NXWho? Mr N 15:06, Jul 27
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
For I'm rarely on anymore, and even I see the contributions this monkey has made. Le Cejak • <5:03, 28 Jul 2008>
For. Technically, I've adopted this fine primate. I say "technically", because he seems to need no help. I like easy jobs! --UU - natter 08:06, Jul 28
For Gave me a good pee review. That makes him NotM in my book. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
for. what a well-behaved little nooblet. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Fer shizzle. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:16, Jul 28
For has the cheek to hav a go at Mr N for nominating him, what a noob. --Tilt 21:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- What? I nominated him, you damn noob. pillow talk 21:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  - And I don't really think I've had a go at anybody... my emergency 'having a go at somebody' gloves are still securely inside their case. --mrmonkey72 21:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
    - Not anymore they ain't. - [22:35 29 July] Sir FSt Don Yettie
for h00ray for n00bs. In fact, he doesn't act n00bish at all. Reminds me of a previous, awesome, really cool, past winner... The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 21:44, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: OMG! SIX!cmurphy

N♥m. The boy got robbed last month. And the last 38 months. But this is his time to shine. sir sysrq @ 01:40 Jul 6
Strong against, as Rcmurphy's diameter can be evenly divided into his circumference. Plus, I heard he prefers cake. --π
One vote per user. -- The Zombiebaron 19:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
...because apparently it's realllly important that we take this particular vote seriously... --Hyperbole 19:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Destriking vote, Hyperbole is right. Anyone, at any time, can cast a vote for Rcmurphy. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Strong for -- The Zombiebaron 19:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I heard rumor that he sucks. At least his recent change pseudonym says so. ~

19:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Fuck yes. Sorry Liz, it's just I want Rc to win... Finally. Not like he has a chance either way. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Strong apathetic feelings of general indifference In summation, meh.~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 02:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
makamakamakamakamakamaka - Yes. This boy has not done anything rong. --Sir General Minister G 5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 07:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Those much /holds up 4 fingers --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Strong against, He's not even a fucking n00b! vote for Liz muffin and all your wildest dreams will come true--Liz muffin 00:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC) P.S. Yeah, I'm so lame I even messed with the article, but if you want to ban me, at least I will have had my fun... Ha! Haha!
For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:23, 31 Jul 2008

For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:23, 31 Jul 2008

For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:23, 31 Jul 2008
- Votes stricken--Nice try, NX. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:09, Jul 31

UotM

Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Roman9Bird

Nom + For. Pretty cool guy, I think he needs this award though. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Strongest For Ever For'd He's been up for admin almost as long as Modusoperandi, but he hasn't gotten the reward yet. He still tireless MadMaxes around, blissfully de-shitting hundreds of pages which would have otherwise gone unnoticed. Not only an active VFD voter, he is yet another unsung backbone to this site.~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 00:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
For I thought this guy had won this already. Certainly more deserving than the rest of us (even PENIS). -RA HB 00:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
For Damn, three remarkable users up for UotM. Oh, and me too. But Frankie deserves it the most out of us. Next month, PENIS. Next month. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
For - Again, this seems overdue. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
For - I've seen him do stuff around here or something--Sycamore (Talk) 14:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
For - Like everyone else, I thought he already won this. We're idiots. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 18:53, Jul 4
For - Pretty much per LJ. blissfully de-shitting hundreds of pages, I like that line. Oh, and he's a pretty cool guy. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
for. this guy is a VFD fiend. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2111344

Nom ~~and for~~ Yeah. So this guy does a lot of things. From what I understand, that's pretty important. Kinda nice to have guys like this around. You know...guys who do...a lot of things. -RA HB 12:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
For Because although I love love love RAHB (audios, articles, was nearly made an admin), Dex has less recognition for his work around the site. Le Cejak • <13:14, 01 Jul 2008> NEVERMIND! YTTE brought up something... Le Cejak • <2:26, 19 Jul 2008>

You lied, Cajek! /me cries into my whore-hat - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)

QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

[11:43 5 July]

For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:05, Jul 2
For. Another pretty cool guy. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 13AHB

Nom&For. So, let's see. He writes bloody good articles, does fantastic audios, cleans up a load of the crap that others don't, votes everywhere, and basically does everything you could ask of an Uncyclopedian. Definitely worth a nom. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 1/07 12:19
For. Wow, what a choice. Well, Dex is awesome. And RAHB is awesome. But RAHB, with his audios, 'chops, tidying, ban patrolling, reverting, voting and writing is a bit more of an all-round Uncyclopedian. And I hear he makes really nice cupcakes. --UU - natter 14:32, Jul 1
I should mention Frankie and YTTE are also awesome, and this is a really strong field this month, but my vote stays right here. --UU - natter 09:41, Jul 4
For. I coooouuuld say a wide reaching stateme- --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
~~For~~ I don't do audios or vote in most places. I mainly do on VFD. Plus, he nominated and voted for me. I can win it next time. Not. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Abstaining for now, just to be safe, in case someone else is nominated. It's only the 2nd, you know. But RAHB is pretty much the model Uncyclopedian around here, I can't imagine anyone else but him winning this. Still, I'm just going to post my intention to vote For. sir sysrq @ 19:38 Jul 2
- Changing to for. Yeah, Yettie's cool and all, but this RAHB fellah's got my vote for this month. I LOVE YOU YETTIE. sir sysrq @ 18:49 Jul 12
For - Per Under User, although I haven't had any cupcakes yet :( (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 4, 09:33
For; Mister America, walk on by, your supermarket dream. -- The Zombiebaron 19:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
For ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 00:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I'd love to give it to Penis, but I'm funny like that. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For. — Sir Manticore 12:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Fáur ~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
12/07/2008 @ 16:22
For Someone who writes a quantity of quality --Knucmo2 20:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
For. Not pants. Mr N 22:38, Jul 21
Aye A salute to the Captain! -- =Hex= TALK: WORKSHOP: CONTRIBUTIONS: 07:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

YesTimeToEdit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10 UnProvising Bond Impersonators

Nom and For I think Yettie deserves another crack at this as he does loads around here and he promised me a statue! Have Fun! MuCal. BFF Sir Orian57!Talk!PEE!Read!UnProvise!Awards! 09:32 3 July 2008

Self4 - Statues all round! - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)
QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
[11:40 3 July]
Strong For - I'm just gonna keep voting for this guy until he gets it. YTTE is the paste that holds our potato together. Mmmm... potato paste. --Hyperbole 03:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Why thank you. I enjoy a good bit of potato paste and I'm very proud of myself, I haven't started whoring for votes yet! Yaaay. - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)

QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

[09:28 4 July]

Not that I normally do.... *cough* - Sir FSt. Yettie (talk) (>>)

QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

[09:39 4 July]

4~~Fore~~For u r awesome.Founding Member Baseball16 16:34, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
ƒǿř Yettie must be appeased, lest we all be consumed! Bugger! I still love you mate, but RAHB got me out of a tight spot... =Hex= TALK: WORKSHOP: CONTRIBUTIONS: 01:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I believe the word is "consumethed" :-) - [07:48 7 July] Sir FSt Don

Yettie

For Good writer and good stuff-doer. Remember that time he did stuff? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Damn, that was good stuff. Good, good stuff. - [22:38 10 July] Sir FSt Don

Yettie

For so that those incriminating photos will not surface on the internet. ----_Mgr. _Sir Sonic80^☭ 22:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Titanic For because some memory in the back of my head is telling me to. Evil Pi, founder of UNAP
Yes Because I promised, and because he contributes many good things, this yettie person. Le Cejak • <2:27, 19 Jul 2008>
Yes, Time to Win a shitload of awards.(Strong 4) Plox? Mesos Plox? I can't beleive Jasper Ain't dead yet! I'm happy too, sire. DR2 ASA or Nutella? Decide. Talk to meh.

Jesus Christ, erm...sorry...I mean...DJDN. That style of er YesTimeToEdit-wiriting is almost exactly my very second sig...Er... /me backs out through the door - [07:44 27 July] Sir FSt Don Yettie

Still. [19:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)]Choose a fate of epic proportions. One Two Three Four Five Six and Seven

For. ~ 07:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

PENIS (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0 Giant dicks.

Nom Great user. Deserves mention. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Comment Ha ha ha ha. Abstain my ass. I can't beleive Jasper Ain't dead yet! I'm happy too, sire. DR2 ASA or Nutella? Decide. Talk to meh.
This kids goin' places. Mark my words. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 07:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

WotM

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 wooden condoms

Nom & For. As I recall saying last month, this here is our most featured author not to have the WotM award. And he deserves it too, those articles were pretty spiffy. Go UnIdiot, yay! --UU - natter 14:09, Jul 1
For I wanted to vote for Sys too. But I want to vote for UnIdiot more. -RA HB 14:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +10 sewer dwellers

Nom and FOR Been. Too. Long. Vote. UU. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
For. - He writes stuff--Sycamore (Talk) 14:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Spore -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
For. He writes good stuff. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:54, Jul 1
This vote not only give vast amounts of information regarding why I chose to cast it thus, but also has the required amounts of information regarding the methods of preparation used in cooking bison meat. -- The Zombiebaron 20:48, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Yes. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
for. an all-around stand-up guy. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
For. ~ 07:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
For. --mrmonkey72 12:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 person you wouldn't want to meet in a narrow hallway

Nom Deserves recognition for his work. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
For - Every single article this guy writes is comedy gold. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 18:47, Jul 4
For Cos he's in between Sys and UU on this page and I can't choose between the two of them... Also RAHB threatened to remove my Penis. Mr N 21:36, Jul 21
FOR! The man never sleeps! He obviously does something with that time! -- =Hex= TALK: WORKSHOP: CONTRIBUTIONS: 01:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 7 hat-tricks

Nom. Sys here managed a hat-trick of features in one week in June. If this is truly writer of the month, then the award should probably be his for the last month. He even has his own fan club! I'd love to vote for him were it not for The Unidiot, but this here nom should show I love you as well Sys! --UU - natter 14:17, Jul 1
Self-f♥r. Whatever, I'm a whore. This is the one I've been wanting to win, so I have no problem voting for myself. Now I just have to earn the damn thing by actually writing a few articles this month. Dammit. Also, I may comment that with UnIdiot being nommed, this may be the third month in a row that I get nommed for this award and don't win it. As much as I love UnIdiot's work, I hope this doesn't turn into another kind of hat trick for me. sir sysrq @ 18:29 Jul 1
For. The definition of WoTM. Except that he'd actually get it for the following month, but whatever. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 11:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Most definitely. UnBooks:My New Life as a T-Rex and Dishwasher were two of my favorite articles in June. --Hyperbole 03:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Yes Dishwasher opened my eyes to a lot of truth. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
For Pretty much per Hyperbole. Last month was his. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I'd like four diseased, rotting sewer dogs, please. - [22:02 28 July] Sir FSt Don Yettie

August

NotM

MAGICALLYWONDERFULLEXCELLENTLYGREEN (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 Almost Benson-Like Pieces Of Green

Has done some great images [nom], but is he a constant-enough contributor. Well it seems like he's the best we've got [for]! - [12:32 16 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie
Conditional For The requirements say NotM has to have written at least one article. This guy hasn't, but he has done some great images, and I'm not sure how that translates over to article count, or if it does in fact count. I think it probably should count, if he's just more of an image guy, which he is. Though I'd like to see him contribute a little more, he has like, twenty contribs. -RA HB 12:39, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
...Maybe. Sire M e t h a m p h e t a m i n e SMOKE METH! 17:50, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Elite (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 Good Spoolers

Nom+4 Well this guy just cropped up just a fiw dayz ago and he started editing artikles left tight and center. Loks like he's a good speller, and we appear to require thems... Not written a full article yet, but with the lack of noms on this page, I see no problem making this one. He's 1337 you know. (whatever that means *cough*) Mr N 22:59, Aug 27
For (At least for now): While I'm a little bit disappointed that neither of my potential successors have really begun writing articles, this one seems handy to have around the site, perhaps as a dedicated proofreader. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 noobs who wrote a top article of 2007

Nom and for. So So might not technically be a noob, per se. However, he's exactly as eligible for this award as the two users who have not written articles, and his contributions are far better. So: So So. pillow talk 23:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
So-so For -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

UotM

Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 7-15.5

Nom For This month, do the right thing. Vote for this guy. -RA HB 04:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
HELL YEAH!!! per last month! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:30, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
YeahYeahYeah! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:37, Aug 1
For - Pah, I'm never going to win this... *sigh* oh well, RDB deserves this. - [09:42 1 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie
For Jumping on band wagons. Yettie you're up for UGotM anyway -- it wasn't me! --, you can't have this too. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 09:59 1 August 2008
For - as per last month--Sycamore (Talk) 10:32, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
for. another VFD fiend. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
for. --mrmonkey72 15:58, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Big Dick Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 16:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Stronger for than the strongest for of all possible strong fors that Ljlego made those two or three times. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 09:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Relatively strong for - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 14:41, Aug 2
Fuck you TKF~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 18:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
For. Yepper. --UU - natter 07:54, Aug 3
Yessir! The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 23:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Against: Don't vote for this guy, he hasn't been deleting bad pages, just random ones so that he could win this comp. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.49.10 (talk • contribs)

o shit nigga, ya got me, mah secrets out!!!!11 -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 04:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Stronger for than TKF, probably less strong than Lj. Wait, what? ~~Heeren ["Meh"] [t e c ħ] [k u r k] [16/08 08:12]
TINC — Sir Manticore 05:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 astronomically useful goaltenders.

Nom+4 Since returning to the site Gerry has sprung into action. Bashing out Pee Reviews, working like a slave on VFD, writing funny stuff, voting, cleaning articles and helping out with UnSignpost. We are very lucky to have Gerry back. Mr N 16:04, Aug 1
For. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Moral support. My vote is for Yettie, but Gerry's outstanding work at UN:PS has definitely not gone unnoticed. pillow talk 20:18, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

YesTimeToEdit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6 YesTimeToBeUncyclopedianOfTheMonths

Nom and for Apparently, there's an informal agreement that Yettie's going to be the Martin Scorsese of UotM. Nonetheless, he gets my vote. pillow talk 19:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Good sir, Roman Dog Bird is the Martin Scorsese of UotM (and VFS, but that's another story). Before that, it was MadMax. Yettie is, at best, the Under User of Uotm.~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 18:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't forget SbU. -RA HB 06:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Loveth you more. Nothing was said about June. They said I was going to win in July. They said I was going to win in August...but I don't care! I have my teddy bear to keep me company. - [20:05 1 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie

3 noms without a win on UotM would see you equal the record of SBU, Some User and me. That's some exalted company. And me. You could then go on and set a brand new record next month! Wouldn't that be more unique that winning the thing? --UU - natter 22:40, Aug 1

But on the other hand, wouldn't winning UGotM and UotM in one month be even more unique? - [08:03 2 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie

There is no such thing as "more unique". Unique is a binary state. Either something is unique or it is not. If it is a one-time occurrence, it is unique. If it is not, it is not unique. Don't fall into the trap of thinking there are degrees of uniqueness. There are not. pillow talk 17:50, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

...you're gay. sir sysrq @ 21:46 Aug 2

I say that it is you, Hyperbole, who falls into the trap of calling anything a binary state. As most things in life do, uniqueness has shades of gray. Consider two situations that have both only occurred once. One is very easy to do but simply doesn't hold much interest to many people, and the other is very difficult to do yet everyone wishes to do it. Has the achiever of the first outcome done something equally unique as the second one?~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 23:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes. pillow talk 05:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

He's got you there, Lj. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Oh noes. One word has undermined me. I suppose it's time to go on sabbatical, then.~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 03:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I say Yettie wins in August. sir sysrq @ 20:09 Aug 1
YesTimeToWin UotM and UGotM in the same month! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 05:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
YTTE deserves this the most. Uhhh... for? ~ Mgr.ReadMeSoon!? 23:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
YTTAppreciate A Fine Soul =Hex= TALK: WORKSHOP: CONTRIBUTIONS: 06:11, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
THE STRONGEST FOR IN THE UNIVERSE... BE FOR HARDER I'm using all 2 votes. I'll add 1 for good measure. Dot JasperDotNot! Mgt Nutella UnProvise Pee Review ASA .com. The time is 15:06, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

Nom. I'm still voting for RDB. But Sycamore does an awful, awful lot around this place, and I think he's more than worthy of a nom. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20/08 10:39

Wow! thanks for the nom:)— Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:45, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Have a For, too. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)

WotM

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 9 people you do not want to come face to face with in a narrow hallway

Nom & For - RAHB consistently puts out great articles. Vote for him. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 04:12, Aug 1
4 UnIdiot has it mostly right, just not the last two words... =Hex= TALK: WORKSHOP: CONTRIBUTIONS: 11:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Another double entendre

Floor RAHB done write good. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
For - RAHB writes some top notch stuff--Sycamore (Talk) 15:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
for. this vote is no sort of joke. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Comment. As much as I loves RAHB, I have the same problem with him that I have with UnIdiot: he's got many funny articles, but they're all from the same dimension. He's got too few (if any) actual encyclopedia-style articles, much like how UnIdiot only has 1 article in the actual mainspace (which is also a concept article). -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:45, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hypocritical For because I suddenly feel dirty voting for SysRq -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
For + Rebuttal I don't feel that WotM should be denied to those who do not write articles in the mainspace. Good writers are good writers wherever or whatever they write. This is an award for celebrating those writers, and giving them all a nice little pat on the back by way of saying "Good job, keep up the good work," Only one of these writers can win each month, but I think that just the honor of being nominated alone is a pat on the back in and of itself. I think I may have gone off subject a bit there in that last bit, but, what I'm saying is, good writers are good writers everywhere and anywhere, and those are the people who get this award, and RAHB is one of those people. -- The Zombiebaron 14:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
For. I don't care if his articles are all (or mostly, or some, or none) from the same dimension. It's a good dimension. I vacationed there back in '92. His List of people you do not want to come face to face with in a narrow hallway, in particular, makes me smile. Also, it warms my loins. Either that, or I've spilled my coffee. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:52, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
For --Moneke 08:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Abstain - I just can't choose between RAHB and SysRQ. I just can't. pillow talk 22:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5 people who use wooden condoms

Nom+For What I like about UnIdiot's humor is that it's very original. The concepts are untouched upon in most cases, or have an odd approach to them. That is why you should vote for him. Do it. -RA HB 04:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
For. A whoppingly tough choice again, but I have to stay consistent to my votes of the last couple of months. Most features without getting this award. And I like his stuff. Come on! --UU - natter 10:23, Aug 1
for That is all. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 13:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
For - A tough call, but I agree with RAHB --Knucmo2 21:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
For. This is a close one and in such cases I side with the funniest single article by the authors on display. That honour goes to Why:Use a wooden condom and UnIdiot. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 11:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6

Nom Per my comment for UnIdiot. These guys should both get it. I just want UnIdiot to get it first. -RA HB 04:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
For The Moonites compel me. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:25, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Yup - [09:47 1 August] Sir FSt Don Yettie
Hugs You're the bestest! SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 09:55 1 August 2008
Self...f♥r? Meh. I'm a selfish asshole. Thanks guys, every month I'm nominated for this makes me feel just that much more special. sir sysrq @ 15:46 Aug 1
~~For~~ -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
For Le Cejak • <5:26, 09 Aug 2008>
Abstain - I just can't choose between RAHB and SysRQ. I just can't. pillow talk 22:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Nom + Deserves recognition Has written a lot of stuff quietly and well. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

Nom I jumped on his page and was amazed how much good stuff this guy has written, most certainly a contender. Also I really have nommed an obscene amount of people this month. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 15:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
For - thanks dude. -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 20:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
For. a very good writer. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:04, Aug 26

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Nom Let us never say there is a lack of writing talent on this site. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Self-abstain - Obviously, either RAHB or SysRQ deserves it this month. Of course, I can't decide which, so I'm sitting the whole thing out. pillow talk 22:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Slackerboy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Texas

Nom Common sense said no but what has common sense done for me lately? Kickass good writer. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Doing things that Zombiebaron did almost 2 years ago, eh? I would, however, be in favor of awarding Slackerboy with some sort of "Lifetime Achievement In Writing Without The Prospect Of Ever Winning WotM Because He's No Longer An Active Writer Award", if other people agree. -- The Zombiebaron 14:37, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Second, as long as he has to battle it out with Keitei. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Of course. -- The Zombiebaron 16:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Mediocre minds think alike? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

05:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

That depends. What do you think? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

That depends --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

12:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Has DJ done it? [1] The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

I'd blame RadX for potentially bringing him back. They are, after all, brothers, and brothers do talk. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

September

WotM

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 finely aged wines

Nom + Okay, Listen Here. I'm tipping my hat at the Cap'n again this month, vetting him for a second term as WotM for three reasons: He's been around forever and still writing, he's been around forever and still writing features, and he's been around for so much forever that he managed to win this award back when it didn't mean much. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Cap'n has been writing a lot of good stuff recently, enough to merit this award again, if you ask me. However, Hyperbole's recent work puts him ahead of Ben this month, irrespective of who's had the award before. If Cap'n Ben writes another article of the quality of The Gathering Horror in the next thirty days, he'll have my vote. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 14:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
I was actually planning on nominating him for WotY for the very same exact reasons TKF gave above. However, I don't think anyone would debate that he deserves WotM even in this post-2005 pre-apocalyptic world, so... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 09:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11 billion zillion super-votes

Nom & For Simply a good writer, and a good contributor. Also, giving the award to someone who's won it already? I don't know how that would feel to all the other people who contribute well and haven't gotten this silly award. Le Cejak • <2:25, 01 Sep 2008>
For. What Cajek said. Hype knows his funny. --UU - natter 09:33, Sep 1
Yes --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
For, but I'm still not sure about his Iraq policy. - [12:50 1 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie
For. The only reason I haven't voted for him already is the way he took to writing great articles infuriatingly quickly. In the last month or so he has added UnNews:God Rewrites the Bible, Color Me Badd and UnNews:Man forgets 9-11 to his earlier successes, confirming himself as one of the best writers on the site. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
For. The Cap'n is definitely one of the great writers of the site, but so is Hyperbole. And one of them hasn't won yet. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 14:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
It's a bit early in the month, but I think I've already seen enough to say he is winner! Congratulation!! --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 09:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Hyperbole is without a doubt the single greatest writer in the history of Uncyclopedia. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:11, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes -RA HB 00:49, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Hyper for. ~ 13:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
for. i have filed Cell biologists are cooler than molecular biologists under the 'articles receiving the gerry cheevers stamp of awesomeness' category. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +8

Wrote I think 3 FAs last month, has more before that, and somehow still doesn't have this award. Nom n' For. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:06, Sep 1
I concur. Whoever this An Apecat that Only Exists on Thursdays guy is, I like the cut of his jib, whatever a jib is. -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 21:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
YEAH - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:33, Sep 1
Nod without vote. In my mind, Ape is the Ty Cobb of Uncyclopedia. He's sort of a dick, but he's one of the best sluggers you'll ever see. Plus, he managed to write something about a horrible vandal in-joke that got featured. Only Andorin Kato can also attest to that honor. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
for Good stuff. Iraq Attack made me laugh pretty hard. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 05:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Because IRAQATTACK was hilarious. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:55, Sep 10
For It was a hard decision between those two though. -- Style Guide 20:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
For Hyperbole appears to be trailing of a bit this month, so my vote goes to Ape. Mr N 13:06, Sep 27

UotM

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +17 biters of Casey Jones' style

Nom and For. Basically what MrN said last month. Has written many articles, frequents VFD, has put alot of hard work into the UnSignpost, etc. ~~I just can't decide between him and Sycamore, though.~~ -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
For. When I first joined, I actually thought Gerry was an admin, because he did so much. Definitely deserves some sort of award for all of his recent work. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Yettie does deserve his award at some point for all the hard work he's done on Uncyclopedia. But this is not that point. Given Yettie's semi-vacation, and the incredible amount of work Gerry's been putting in, this month just has to go to Gerry. No other result would make any sense. pillow talk 05:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Could you nom me so that I've been nommed four times in a row? That would be totally awesome, Hypey. I don't deserve it but...uh...um...er... /me scurries off - [08:38 1 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie

For. Has worked tirelessly since his return and no-one deserves this more in the last month. --UU - natter 08:30, Sep 1
For! - [08:38 1 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie
For. - a top notch user — Sir Sycamore (talk) 13:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
For. because he's the real Gerry Cheevers. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Just fantastic. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 12:34 12 September 2008
For. See USP. Le Cejak • <19:25, 12 Sep 2008>
For. — Sir Manticore 00:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
For. --Meta 500 11:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
DuhFor I thought I already voted. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 12:22, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes. I love his reviewing style especially, and overall very cool. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:09, Sep 23
For. Amy Rose 02:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Cheese --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Sounds good to me Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 14:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5

Nom. Almost the same that I have to say for Gerry. A very courteous user, as well. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:44, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
for. syc is, at the very least, consistent. he is, at the most, consistently awesome. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
For. ~ 12:16, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
For Planned on nomming him this month, if it hadn't been for me having no connection to the internet. -RA HB 00:54, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
For Great user (But so are Gerry and Yettie...). --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
For Gerry has got more than enough votes, so mine goes to Sycamore. He's a tireless worker who knows his humour, and does many, many useful things around the place. Next month dude... ;-) Mr N 13:11, Sep 27

YesTimeToEdit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1 Fedoraed Sasquatches who believe the fourth time may be a charm

Nom. Mark my words: Yettie will eventually be UotM. Even if it has to happen posthumously. pillow talk 17:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
poop !-- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 03:04, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

NotM

W.T. Door (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 skirt-wearing tuba players

nom and for. this little n00blet has written what is, in my opinion, a very good article. i see good things in his future. things like candy! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Huh. That's not a bad little article at all. As for W.T. Door himself, I will reserve judgment for at least 10 days. pillow talk 17:24, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Mlle. Door has now written HowTo:Be a Great Writer, UnNews:Mad Scientists Prepare to Activate Doomsday Device, and has done a Pee Review. He has now officially earned my vote. Also, he may or may not have a picture on Facebook of himself wearing a skirt and playing the tuba. pillow talk 22:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC) I've got to give this one to Multi. pillow talk 21:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Same. This is a tentative for. W.T. Door, if you're reading this, you can easily sway me by voting on VFD and VFH on a regular basis. That makes me happy. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
For. Could we be seeing our next Ljlego here? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:59, Sep 10
For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1 Cats in a hammock with a bronze fork.

Nom - This guy is showing a lot of promise. -- -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 21:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Om Nom Nom Nom - If Rcmurphy wins this one twice in a row (despite clearly being beaten by So So last month - clearly!) then it is probably time to close Uncyclopedia entirely. Just replace it with a page that says "Closed for lack of interest." Then protect that page and let the six or seven active admins vandalize it from time to time. pillow talk 22:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
For He needs to win it. Again. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
For. There's only one person who can't win NotM too many times... JudgeZarbi TALK 19:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Extreme Philippines For —rc (t) 08:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
There's something iffy about this n00b. - [09:34 21 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie

Multiliteralist (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11 literalists with lateralist sigs

N+F - The man (?) is just all over the place - writing, tiding up, cooking some strange things in the kitchen, the works. The lack of a user page only increases the mystery that surrounds this person-thing. ~ 07:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
For as little as I am around, I can still see that he's (?) cool. Le Cejak • <0:35, 21 Sep 2008>
4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:48, Sep 21
For of course I'll vote for myself (now that I saw it can be done)- I want that pacifier! The cat ate mine when I was about 2, or so the bastards told me. -- Style Guide 07:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Changing vote to Multi. This guy has almost 900 edits in just over 2 weeks, and most have been very good. W.T. Door's edits have also been good, but he has more like 70. pillow talk 21:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Dinosaurs. Does that count as a for? It should. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Dinosaurs until I get nom-ed, I'm voting for M (that's your new nickname, get used to it!) -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 03:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
For - I've noticed him, even though I'm never here these days. That's an achievement. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
The cut of his gib appeals to me. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
F - Gave me a good Pee, so he must be all right. Geoffprickett 08:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Very sleek noob, his Moron section is a good idea --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:39, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
For -RA HB 11:13, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Geoffprickett (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

N+F Well, he created an article. I added a pic with the caption "Screw drinking up your cider, I'm going to stick this where your son might find it" and he changed it to "Screw drinking up your cider, I'm going to stick it inside her." so I had to nominate this (supposedly) non farmer who is obviously not from Somerset‎ but knows his double entente... Mr N 20:35, Sep 22
Against Vote for myself? The very idea! Geoffprickett 13:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
A man who votes against himself? FOR! The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 05:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

October

WotM

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +8

N&F Mostly because of the Unsignpost, but also because he's a pretty funny guy. In the last month he upped the funny, and I trust him to keep working this month. Le Cejak • <21:02, 01 Oct 2008>
Hells yeah! Gerry's had this award coming for a while, now, methinks. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:36, Oct 1
For. - Writes some top notch stuff — Sir Sycamore (talk) 11:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I nommed him a few months ago! Like I had this time machine and it was all wooosh and vroom and then I was like Gerry's an awesome writer and Cajek put on some pants for once and then I had icecream. Yeah. Rambling is cool. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

*For - how has he not won this already? -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 14:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

For b/c Ape on Thursdays hasn't been writing so much as of right now. Gerry, on the other hand, is on fire. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:04, Oct 8
For [insert racist ramblings here] --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:44, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 05:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Yes. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 01:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

Nomination and Formal apology to Ape. Sorry for all the e-pain I might have caused you, I was just going through some rough times on the road and needed to be angry at someone. Now, for God's sake, write more articles! You're friggin' hilarious! -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Self For & Comment Thanks, TKF, I appreciate it. I've been busy recently, but I should be able to start writing stuff again soon. -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 17:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
for. ape's stuff makes me giggle. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +9

Nom&for. It is my hope, that by winning this, UnIdiot will become complacent and cease overtaking me in the feature count. Also, he had three features last month. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
For - Because I'm a huge whore! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 20:55, Oct 5

how DARE you!!! (Unidiot deserves this award, too, but I still like saying "how dare you" like a weirdo) Le Cejak • <5:39 Oct 06, 2008>

For -RA HB 05:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
FOR! FOR! DAMMIT FOR! The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
For. Per the other times I've nommed/voted for him here. Most featured articles without winning this award, and bloody good ones too. It's about time he finally got this. --UU - natter 09:06, Oct 6
He's an idiot. But he's our idiot. ~ 15:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
For and when he reads this, I hope he nominates me for writer next month--Crankybot 20:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
F☭R Cause I like causin' ties. 16:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Slight lead, because he has 13.5 features and I only have 7.5.--<<>> 02:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Orian57 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5

Nom and for. Although this nom probably comes too late in the month for Orian to have any chance, let me just point out that he wrote the #3 article of July and is on track to win the #1 article of September. And both those articles are fantastic. pillow talk 00:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
For. JudgeZarbi TALK 00:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Vigorous FOR -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment OMG! Cool! No one told be about this. I'm all flattered. *giggles* I'll need to put that "vote me" template on my page now, I'll feel so cool! Thanks Hype! and the others!!! SK Sir Orian57Talk

RotM 05:36 12 October 2008

For. Orian clearly has the Freak vote in this election (I mean seriously Yettie voted for him). :) - [15:50 13 October] Sir FSt Don Yettie
For. He makes teh funnies. Also: Look at the "sweets" on his current sig. COLIN ALL YOUR BASEHEANEY! AMERICA

JOE THE PLUMBER IN '08!!! 16:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

UotM

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +15 types of trees which are awesome

nom and strong for. syc has kept VFD going in the past month during a dry spell. he continues to churn out in-depth, helpful pee reviews. his 10,000+ edits dwarf some of this award's previous winners, and many of those edits are boring but noble stuff like categorization. in short, syc deserves recognition...immediately! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
For Rare that I vote this early in the month for anything, but Sycamore is impossible to ignore. Mr N 18:28, Oct 1
For I don't feel stronger about any one person for winning any award this month than Sycamore for UotM. -RA HB 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
For. In addiction to the above (and, no doubt, the below), Sycamore is always posting crap on QVFD. This makes more work for me, as I then have to look at the crappy/vanity/cyberbullying/towncruft/schoolcruft stubs that Sycamore has listed there. Then, to make matters worse, I have to click a button to delete them. Even Sycamore's name bothers me. I hate Sycamore. Sycamore! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
In addition, Sycamore is always posting on Ban Patrol. If anything, that takes my rage from sight-impaired rage all the way up to blind rage. Sycamore! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Aww, do I not get a mention? I've been doing a shitload recently too you know!! JudgeZarbi TALK 20:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
I hate you too, but at this point you only generate seething rage. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:11, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
For I can only bow and quiver with hideous sycophancy in the presence of his vast shadow Geoffprickett 16:46, 3 October 2008 (UTC) ... By that I'm not saying he's fat or anything ... Oh you know what I mean.
For. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Trees!! :P JudgeZarbi TALK 20:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
For Next month can be Cajek's time. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
For the guy who beats me in races to the QVFD. I find something bad and then it's already there, and I blame Sycamore. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:12, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
For. Syc is great. He keeps his head down, and just keeps on doing useful stuff all over the place. This must and shall be his month. --UU - natter 14:21, Oct 6
For - Although if someone could nominate me that would be nice...what with it being 5 in a row, now, I think, or something... - [17:32 7 October] Sir FSt Don Yettie
For. He's all over the place, lately. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 11:32, Oct 11
For. Welcomed me. Mww113 00:20, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Bastard stole my jaffa cakes. 'Nuff said. Also, for. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Plants Well, the Plantae kingdom is superior to the Animalia kingdom. 16:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
/me jumps in at the last second for a vote . --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 votes for Cajek? Seriously, what were you people thinking?

Hey, it's that guy Cajek. Before, all he did was completely reconstruct Pee Review from the ground up. Now, he has that and he votes on VFD and posts on Ban Patrol. Plus, did I mention that he completely reconstructed Pee Review in such a novel and efficient way that would make One-eyed Jack blush? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Froggy! I'm gonna do more cleaning up around this place... maybe I can earn this next month! Le Cejak • <13:06, 05 Oct 2008>
  - "I'm gonna do more cleaning up around this place" You bloody dare. WRITE MOH ARTICLES! (the Pee-queue is fuller than my trousers also...) Mr N 13:11, Oct 5
    - FOR! I dunno, you tryed to save my ass, and you have a sense of humour about my absurdly blatent sock puppet, you've got my vote!!! --UrawoK 05:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
      - For Oh, now I'm just being sick...Please ignore this vote, it's here solely for humour purposes....--Kowaru 05:12, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4 votes for Dexter

Nom He cares about Uncyc as a whole. A lot. I don't know of another user who has shown more long term commitment to cleaning up the site than Dex. Although he might not win this month his consistent dedication to site quality deserves to be mentioned. He can't suck cock for shit though. Mr N 19:33, Oct 3
For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

May I please be taken off? Please? --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Why? you do great stuff on the site:-( — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Because, I'd rather not get in the way of two people who deserve it before me. And I just don't like the template on my userpage. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

You desreve this far more than Cajek - As keen as i am to win this, if you win this month I would not think it unfair:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

For. Don't listen to him: Take me off the site instead! I suck! Ban me hurry ban Le Cejak • <13:05, 05 Oct 2008>
For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:52, Oct 6
For. - Velosi-T {] Screech * Vomit * Mutilations [} 21:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

NotM

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +Nach5ader

Valid nom & for. Joined this month, started some articles, and has done some helpful reviews around the place. Seems to be a decent sort thus far, therefore here he is. --UU - natter 15:06, Oct 22
For.. Already a Fresh Stain in less than a month. Got my vote. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:22, Oct 22
Sure. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:13, Oct 22
Yeah, what he said. Le Cejak • <0:56 Oct 23, 2008>
F☭R A good example of what I am not. 16:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Geoffprickett (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0prickett. Not a noob. Invalid nom.

For. He's done many things, much of which is noteworthy! Also, unless I'm mistaken, he's younger than 30 days! If I am mistaken however, make the ban really long and don't tell me why. Wait a few days so I forget what the hell was going on. But yeah, Geoff: I see him all over the place, doing things in VFD and all that stuff. He looks like a good member of society unless he's NXWave, in which case: DAMN HIM! Okay, this has gone on for a while, and it looks like I don't have a point. You'd be wrong: I just wanted to throw my ENTIRE support behind this candidate, and I mean that in a heterosexual way. Le Cejak • <6:02 Oct 06, 2008>
Very for — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Tentative for. Deserves it more than Rcmurphy. Whether he deserves it more than any other noob remains to be seen. pillow talk 23:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

*For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:02, Oct 8

For Rcmurphy finally got his win and shouldn't be awarded again, don't you think? A more helpful noob should get it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
VIGOROUS FOR -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 03:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
INVALID NOM. see here. pity. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Eh. I'm going to say that this should remain valid, for a few reasons. 1. He really is very, very helpful under this new username, 2. He didn't really do that much under the old one, and 3. He's definitely been the most notable noob lately. Unless a really good replacement comes along, I think he should still get it. (Then again, I'm a dumb American. What do I know?) --Mr. Monkey

Pant-hoot here. 21:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I adopted Geoff (with his new user name) and I think he would agree that he is not eligible for this award. The excellent quality of his writing shows that he is far from a N00b. Also, he had better be reading this, or it's no dinner for him. Mr N

21:50, Oct 10

But...But I won the award because of the excellent quality of my articles!!! Quality isn't equal to noobity. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 03:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

If Geoff agrees, then okay, fair enough. --Mr. Monkey

Pant-hoot here. 22:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

November

WotM

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +14

N&F Win! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 02:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Fuckin' A. pillow talk 02:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
For. Had two excellent features last month. Gerry's time is now. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 00:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
For. Gerry's been going at it for far longer than I have and continually turns out top quality material. He deserves to finally earn this. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 02:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
For. I'm a fan of the Monkey man, but Gerry's been showing he knows his funny for over a year now, and some quality stuff means he deserves this. --UU - natter 11:49, Nov 2
For per UU's comment on monkey. Le Cejak • <3:38 Nov 03, 2008>
Yep. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:00, Nov 3
Ohh-Yeah The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Gerry He deserves it. -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 04:56, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
For.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Every once in a great while a writer comes along, and that writer writes things. The name of that writer is: Gerrycheevers. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 01:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Fo' sho'. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:22, Nov 17
For - I remember voting for this guy a few years ago or something. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
For -- Style Guide 18:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Go Gerry!' ~ 16:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Mrmonkey72 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5

Nom and For Let me tell you. I fell in love with the Monkey Man from the day I saw him exasperatedly posting articles in UnNews, like a little puppy, trustingly following his owner at the other side of a fast-moving treadmill, perpetually suspended just above ground, running faster than any pup should be expected to go. Just running. Running. RUNNING! And all the while, he had that playful puppy smile on his face, his tongue hanging out the side of his mouth. As he tenaciously kept it up, his owner went inside for some lemonade, but alas, he forgot he had left the pup out on the treadmill. When he came back the next day, old Sparky was barely clinging to life, still going. Going. Going... The man was crushed. After the vet told him the news, he drove his dead friend home, gave him a loving funeral, and then pulled the pistol from his back pocket. After the shot, the man fell next to the tombstone, and for the briefest of moments, he felt comfort, knowing that he had died alongside his life-long companion. -RA HB 03:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
For I'm new here, but judging from some of this guys articles I've read, I believe this user deserves some recognition.--Diphenhydramine 03:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
For I like this user. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 04:26, Nov 6
W♥v. As painful as it is to vote for someone that is not me for a change, I feel I have to give my wuv to Harvey Monkeyman, Attorney At Law. This boy has some serious talent, and if I remember correctly, we reward that kinda thing around here. Gerry, I love you. Gerry puts out some fantastic shit and certainly deserves this award just as much as Monkey does, but I feel my vote must go to this sexy gentleman right here. Good job to all of the nominees this month, we have some good ones (namely because none of them are me) and *tears up* I WISH WE COULD GIVE IT TO ALL OF YOU YOU'RE ALL JUST SO GREAT!!! sir sysrq @ 17:09 Nov 9
For.--PaddyAtkinson 02:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nom :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 11:11, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Fuck you. Not my time, son. sir sysrq @ 18:17 Nov 11

Can I take you up on that offer? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

12:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

No. And by no, I mean yes. Seriosly, I appreciate the nom, but I haven't written anything in ages. sir

sysrq @ 15:22 Nov 13

Nydas (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nom He may not have written anything for a good while but he definitely deserves it. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Knucmo2 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

Nom - not a feature machine, but writes some some top notch stuff--Sycamore (Talk) 14:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Self-For - Thanks, the nomination is appreciated. --Knucmo2 02:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nom. I've already placed my cross by Gerry this month, but Ape deserves another nom at the very least. 10 features, all of which are excellent reads, and some other good articles as well. definitely worthy of at least your consideration. --UU - natter 22:37, Nov 3

UotM

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +18 people who don't want sannse to win

Nomination and Cajek because he rebuilt Pee Review from the ground up, and did many other wonderful things that changed this site forever for the better. Whenever there's a crisis, a horrible dark cloud of impending doom, there's a turquoise lining around the edges that gracefully spells out __NOCAJEK__. He's our man. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 05:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
For and STRONG ABOUT DAMN TIME – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:27 Nov 01, 2008
Cajek: when Uncyclopedia is endangered, he's there, with delicious, moist cake. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
lol -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
I thought he had won this already. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:09, Nov 3
For Might as well. Sannse is Wikia staff so that's not gonna happen, and there is no one else. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
W♥v because of that thing. It was great or something. Good job or whatever. sir sysrq @ 17:01 Nov 9
For I sometimes find it fun to just follow one editor around by reading their contributions for a bit. I'm a stalker like that... Anyway, What was I saying? Oh, yea... Cajek is the most fun user on this site. Seriously. With Mhaille, and a few others Cajek inspired and motivated me in my early days of Uncyc, and he has done the same for countless others. Whenever I am taking Uncyc too seriously, I try to think to myself... "What would Cajek do?". Then do the opposite (obviously), but still it's funny to think about it. :-) Also he helped out a bit or something with some stuff or whatever it was. :-) Also, he paid me. Mr N 22:18, Nov 13
For. If Cajek had his way we'd probably be located at cajek.com, which is actually preferable to our current situation I think. — Sir Manticore 05:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
PHWHORE things and stuff. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Yes Apart from the obvious, he almost singlehandedly keeps VFH going by continuing to write awesome articles, and is one of the best help to n00bs on this site (both to me and others). The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 23:04, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
For -- Style Guide 16:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
I say yay Cake J! Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 18:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
For Now I must go ban him for inactivity. -RA HB 22:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
For I did not get bribed to vote in this section. --Charitwo^Talk 00:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
__CAJEK__! he's always needed to win this! —talk 12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
_NOCAJEK__ times four ~ 12:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
~~Against. Placemarker for for vote if I see the numpty do anything this month. Where is he? --UU - natter 12:35, Nov 21~~
For. Phew, he's made a whole extra contribution, and as such I feel totally justified in changing my vote. The fact that that contribution was voting for one of my articles is neither here nor there. Now my completely serious against vote is no barrier to his winning this award... --UU - natter 09:09, Nov 24
For - I won UotM in a relatively lazy month for me (by last year's standards). Let's give Cajek the same honour. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nom - I don't know is she is eligable, however sannse helps me and others out all the time, a consistently helpful and beneficial presence on the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
F☭R, because she said I am beautiful. 18:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
For.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

Nom - Has flagged a little, but he's helped out a number of articles and keeps VFD running, along with general site maintenence, top fella.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Has Dex really not gotten this yet? 4. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:52, Nov 13
- Dexter hates being nominated for this... note to self: Nominate Dexter next month... Mr N 22:20, Nov 13

NotM

PaddyAtkinson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +9 Flaming piss artists

Nom+For He's new, he's here and he's written some dam funny stuff. Also, various contributions elsewhere show that this chap knows his humour. Mr N 16:20, Nov 16
For. - Yes--Sycamore (Talk) 16:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
For. - but that kid who wrote "I'll rubber your duck" deserves a nom, too. Alas, I can't remember his username... -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 18:59, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
For. Yay! A candidate and everything! And I've seen his stuff and it's got promise. Therefore this is a vote and everything! --UU - natter 19:56, Nov 16
W♥v. Not just because he's the only nom right now, either. I've seen this guy around and his heart is certainly in the right place. Plus, those articles look pretty good for a noob. Keep it up, buddy. sir sysrq @ 21:31 Nov 16
For! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:34, Nov 17
For. Awesome newbie, with a lot of promise. We don't have to give this to Rcmurphy now. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
For -RA HB 01:27, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

DrStrange (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 Strangely proficient editors

Nom Like Paddy, this chap shows some real promise. He's already written some good stuff including a bombardment of Un-News. He's also been tidying up some of our more sorry works, and might just manage to get Paddy looking over his shoulder. Check his user page for the stuff he has done... Mr N 20:00, Nov 20
- Actually, as real life finally takes over I'll be having to take an extended break starting in about a week...so if you want your noob to stick around, Strange is your man.--PaddyAtkinson 23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
- I wish I found this site 6 months ago, the amount of time I've been unemployed. I'd been screwing around and annoying (some) people on my local Disc Golf message board where the bar for creativity was really low. Two guys calling each other homo seemed to be a hit there. I finally got sick of having to explain my jokes, which is always the death of humor. Winter is starting in New England and I'm probably going to be spending WAY TOO MUCH TIME on this website as I don't expect to find work anytime soon. I haven't had the chance to check out Paddy's work yet but let the best man win. I'm honored and appreciate the validation of just being nominated.--DrStrange 08:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  - Another New Englander? Our ranks grow with each day! Midwesterners, southeasterners, and southcalifornians beware! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:21, Nov 22
I like the good doc's work. ~ 09:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
For.. What Mordillo said. -- Style Guide 14:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Against PaddyAtkinson. Oh yea, and <insert name here>...that prick--PaddyAtkinson 11:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, I'm so used to always being "Mr Popular"......--DrStrange 10:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
  - Was someone just a victim of {{USERNAME}}? ;) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 11:55, Nov 24
  - Thanks for the username tip, Just added it to my page! (such a noob)--DrStrange 15:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
    - Don't worry about it. Falling for USERNAME is almost an Uncyclopedian rite of passage. It got me back when I first joined, too. ;) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:53, Nov 25
      - I believe the last time I fell for {{USERNAME}}, I almost choked on my own dick. Everyone is supposed to fall for it at some point; someday, you will watch some other noob fall for it and realize just how hilarious it is. Almost as hilarious as watching <insert name here> try to write articles with his own dick in his mouth. sir sysrq @ 03:07 Nov 25
        Golly, that <insert name here> certainly does like to autofellate himself, doesn't he? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:11, Nov 25
        
        I just gagged on a sip of coffee. Too funny!--DrStrange 09:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
        Uh, sure, "coffee". We'll go with that. I think I like you, buddy. I wish I could vote for both you and Paddy, both of you are just such fine candidates. But I can't vote for neither of you, either. Hmmph. =( sir sysrq @ 14:29 Nov 25

December

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 3

N♥m && w♥v. Allow me to somewhat copypaste from what I said on the talkpage. Sure, Sycamore has recently won this award. However, he continues to be the one name that always jumps out at me every time I check Recent Changes. I believe our resident treewithballs deserves to be honored for another month. Sycamore has demonstrated tremendous work ethic, a spirit of helpfulness, and a true passion for this site that has continued without fail since he was awarded Uncyclopedian of the Month of October. Therefore, I can think of no better candidate for our last Uncyclopedian of the Month for 2008. sir sysrq @ 23:16 Dec 1

Comment. Sycamore for admin!. That'll teach 'im. Teach 'im good. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Amen to that. Sycamore would make a fine op. He's the reason I'm stressing about VFS all of a sudden; I really think he needs to be opped now. But he deserves this award too. sir sysrq @ 01:41 Dec 2
For Opping Sycamore. The "we don't need more opps" view is valid, we don't. But... I would rather see people like Led and Modus concentrating more on writing than doing maintenance. If we opped Sycamore, he would hugely lift the burden.

Mr N 01:52, Dec 2

Agreed. Syc's already a Recent Changes fiend. Maybe we should have a vote of some sort to make sure others current ops agree, but his adminship would make sure that QVFD remains tight as he deletes all the stuff he'd normally post there, and BP clear as well. Definitely. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 02:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Against. - Smells funny--Sycamore (Talk) 16:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For. his work on various maintenance tasks. BTW, I think the vote total is off.--Mnbvcxz 19:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Charitwo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10

Nom and For. Normally, I think robots should not get this award, but I'm willing to make this one exception. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I didn't even know about this, nor was I aware I was of the robot caliber. I should check my pants more often. --Charitwo^Talk 22:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

What?! Chairtwo hasn't gotten this yet? Aww man, that's terrible. for The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 02:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For Dam ya Colin! Mr N 22:32, Dec 2
For. —talk 12:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
For.. Tough call this month, but Chari's always there, always reverting, tidying and fixing stuff. He's undone all the vandalism that some IP did to your article, and you didn't even notice it, it happened so fast. All that, and he still finds time to score with hot chicks IRL, a shining example to us all. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:35, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
For.. pillow talk 19:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
For --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:31, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
For It's all true. Reverts asshats, reports vandals in IRC, etc. etc. -RA HB 22:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
For. Silent but deadly. --UU - natter 09:34, Dec 28
Against. This is getting scary, must resort to drastic measures. --Charitwo^Talk 18:24, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
YOU ALREADY VOTED! YOU ALREADY VOTED! YOU ALREADY VOTED! sir sysrq @ 20:03 Dec 28
For. Changing my vote. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:25, Dec 29

sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 9

Nom and For - She helps out all the time, per last month.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For - Sycamore and Charitwo both deserve it too, but what can I say...Sannse's Sannse. RabbiTechno 16:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For Because on IRC it was mentioned that Charitwo would win. And the hell I'm going to let things be the way they should be... Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 22:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For Per colin. I am never supposed to win things I'm nominated for. --Charitwo^Talk 22:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
She's like the momma of the site. Sexy momma that is. ~ Mordillo where is my WANK? 16:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
FORE WTF Sannse has never won this? Let's fix this now! --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
What's going on? Where am I? Who are you? Why do I have fantastic breasts? Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 21:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
MAHOGANY! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 04:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
4 As per charitwo Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 05:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

~~*Nom and For. My favorite user who hasn't already won this award. :-) <-- I was a bit surprised by that. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:39, Dec 3~~

comment umm, he's up for WotM at the moment, can people win both in one month? —

talk 16:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

There's no rule against it. I don't think there's any rule about how many awards you can win in one month. Just like there's no rule about winning it more than once, so Syc's nom stands. --UU - natter

16:43, Dec 3

Clearly we're running short of candidates for this one then--Sycamore (Talk) 16:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, clearly... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, quite. sir

sysrq @ 02:05 Dec 28

Comment Not to undermine this nom, which I am very grateful for, but what the hell do I do around here other than pick my ass and listen to Franz Schmidt? I think there are more deserving people up for this right now. As for WotM, well, I totally deserve that one. =D sir sysrq @ 18:45 Dec 6
Alright then. Never mind. Changing my vote then. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:24, Dec 29

WotM

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10 votes that only exist on Sundays

Nom. Saving my vote for now, but Ape deserves this nom: some top quality features, and a consistent body of work. --UU - natter 10:17, Dec 1
Full Frontal Fuck Yes -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Holy Crap! Ape wrote The Dog Dies at the End??? Every time I see what he's written I get happily surprised again and again. for The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 02:28, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Strong For. AAOET has written some of my favorite articles on the entire site. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:33, Dec 3
For. I really liked his article about the US election. He also wrote my favourite entry to last year's Turkey Day Ball. Whenever I think of Ape, I think of the phrase "head-cunt". -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 17:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
For.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Chikin --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:50, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
For. --EMC^[TALK] 07:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
for. i've said it before and i'll say it again: ape's stuff makes me giggle. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
The ape dies at the end. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 01:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
I vote for me though I expect accusations of bias. -- cut-rate Ape (seizurize) (Riot Porn) 21:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Mrmonkey72 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

Nom. Saving my vote for now, but I'm a fan of the Monkey man. Apart from being the lowest maintenance adoptee ever, he's written plenty of quality UnNews, some quality rewrites during conservation week, and a bunch of other good stuffs. --UU - natter 10:17, Dec 1
For --Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 02:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 13

Nom. Still saving my vote, but I'm on a nom frenzy. Sys is ace. Plenty of good stuff, and he's come back from hiatus with more. --UU - natter 10:32, Dec 1
For Now that he's actively writing again, it's time for him to win this. -RA HB 15:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
F♥G! o yes, he deserves this so much. —talk 20:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
4 - Writes great stuffs, and is active! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:06, Dec 2
PHWORE Is a real standup character, that ~~JimBob~~ SysRq. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 22:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For. Reactive and re-rocking. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
For. I wanted to vote for Mrmonkey72, but he kicks me in the shins every time I try and feed him ink toner. IronLung 05:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
For. Because now I'll get special attention. Sir Orian57~Christmas!~Talk 05:57 4 December 2008
SysRq has been denied this award for far too long, probably because he named himself after an utterly worthless button, giving him the appearance of being utterly worthless. Which he is. Fuck him. For. pillow talk 18:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
For. It's time for SysRq to win this. --Docile hippopotamus 00:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
FEATURE! ~ Mordillo where is my WANK? 23:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

/me squeaks For. It's about time... I want this guy to get some attention, too :P -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 00:03, 23 Dec
For. Finally voting, and the twin facts of Sys's greater recent activity and the fact that his stuff makes me giggle slightly more than Ape's sways my vote this way, but it was close. --UU - natter 09:36, Dec 28
For...........(comment loading!)...........(This is gonna rock your world!)............(almost done!)..............(Here it comes!)..............404 ERROR-- 02:38, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi guys. Here it is, New Year's Eve, and it looks like I'm set up to win this after two years of writing stupid crap that nobody likes. I can't tell you how honored, skeptical, suspicious, and paranoid I feel right now. I'm not going to vote for myself, because I know that the minute I do, I will lose. However, that is not the only reason I am not voting for myself. That is just the real reason. The fake reason is that I'm not even sure if I deserve it this month. Earlier this year, when I wrote UnBooks:My New Life as a T-Rex, I really felt like I deserved it. That was a great time for me. I had a hat trick under my belt, too, a feat not easy to achieve. I still remember STM getting his hat trick and just how impressive that was. I am truly proud of that accomplishment. However, this month is different. I have had two VFH nominations fail, and no successful features. I think of these "-otMs" as they relate to a user's performance in that particular month. Winning Writer of the Month for December 2008 wouldn't feel right to me. I've failed the community this month. This is not the month that I want to be honored for. I want to feel like I earned this. However, being the whore that I am, I will not take myself out of the ring for this month. Shit, that's a cool trophy. (Lookit that potato. Lookit that ol' boy. He's just hangin' out.) Instead, I want to just let you guys know that, while I may be honored this month, I am not being honored for this month, if you catch my meaning. ATOEOT is a great writer, too, and he, like me, has been one of those candidates that has been hanging on for months, waiting to be awarded what he earned months ago. I hope to see him writing again so I may vote for him next month for Writer of the Month. As for me, I thank you and promise that I will try harder to return to the level of quality that I had before I left in August. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

NotM

Dogshead (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4 dogs giving head

Nom. Withholding my vote for now, but I've read some of his UnNewses and they are good. Check this noob out! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:51, Dec 12
For. I can see great things coming from this one. His Peter Sutcliffe Turkey Day Ball entry is great. RabbiTechno 16:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
For. Abundant with ideas, Dogshead glimmers with promise. --Nachlader 22:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment. While I have already voted, I still feel a need to give a nice shoutout to my boy, here. Dogshead is a very promising user who already seems to have this "writing" thing down pat. He is a needed and very welcome new writer that I'm very sure will at least help breathe some life back into VFH. Also, pretty much every noob I vote for loses, so my not-voting for you actually helps your chances. Good luck, kiddo, and keep up the good work. sir sysrq @ 03:10 Dec 16
Surprise for DrStrange is quite the fellow as well, but after reading his Peter Sutcliffe, Dogshead is inching ahead on this one. I forgot he was even a noob. -RA HB 23:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
For - Peter Sutcliffe wins it for me Asahatter (annoy) 23:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

DrStrange (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +8

Nom. He's not over 30 days of being here now, but by the time the month ends he will be over 30 days old. Does the nom still count? If not, just invalidate. If it does count, the doctor has written many good articles. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:57, Dec 12
W♥v. He's a wrecking machine. sir sysrq @ 20:30 Dec 12

Umm, I hate to be a spoilsport but he's one month old today... see what i meant about joining in the middle of the month fucking things up for people? —

talk 20:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

This is a valid nom I believe. Mr N

01:06, Dec 16

Yes, as long as he was nominated before the month-mark, I believe this is good. I think we've hashed all this out before, I'm just too lazy to go find the actual forum. sir

sysrq @ 03:01 Dec 16

Well in that case...

Very close For. I feel that both DrStrange's and Dogshead's articles are of about the same (good) quality, but DrStrange has written more. No offense to Dogshead (and in fact I voted for him for Foolitzer), I just feel that DrS (lol) should get it this time. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:14, Dec 16
Floor -RA HB 07:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
For. He's a noob after my own heart. Also, comic books FTW! --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 17:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Yup I'm a fan. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 18:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
For He's less lazy than I --Dogshead 21:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
For: The Female Drivers' Guide to the Road (American Version). pillow talk 23:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
- Jd227, who you can see is MIA, is the main contributor. Me and Syc have tweaked with it and I just added the photos/captions. I wish I could call it mine because it's very good. I had it on my Userpage at the bottom of my link list under the heading "links and categories" (because I added links and categories only)It was at the bottom after "Uncyclopedia entries" & "salvage operations" so I'm mystified why anyone thought it was mine. Being an ultra-n00b at the time, it seemed like a contribution of some sort but minor maintenance "triumphs" got purged from my userpage a few weeks ago. The only remaining link that I didn't heavily edit or add to is Toronto Maple Leafs which was a nasty re-formatting job that kept me busy awhile. Sometimes I dedicate entire days to pouring through articles on the "ugly" or "missing something" list and it's fairly thankless work that's not going to turn something into VFH material.-- 12:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
  - This man is so obvious it makes me want to cry. We ought to just discontinue this award.

-- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 04:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Against -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 06:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- If you have something to say, let's hear it. Plop Plopping like a seagull and making statements shorter than the length of your title-laden ID translates as "pussy" to a New Englander.-- 12:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
  - To pull a Colin: OOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH!!!!!! DrStrange done TOLD you!! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:09, Dec 26
    - To pull a TKFeck: Ban. sir sysrq @ 21:20 Dec 26
      - I shall report myself to the ban patrol immediately! Look at some Images while I'm gone.-- 12:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
For he's the only one on I hear I know about, and I need to vote for someone.--Mnbvcxz (Annoy) 03:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
For. Tough choice, coulda flipped a coin. Which is a good thing - more top quality n00bs please! --UU - natter 09:39, Dec 28
For I see this guy around alot, so... yeah... Le Cejak • <5:37 Dec 30, 2008>

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

Nom. Great new user, and probably the best candidate as far as anyone or anything is really concerned. Got more features, more images, more site experience, and barely more friends than the other two candidates. But damn if I haven't already voted. For shame. sir sysrq @ 03:04 Dec 16
√ For. Murph can have my vote. He should get a special template for two-time n00b-o-luna if he wins. --DrStrange 15:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- One-time n00b-o-luna. The month that Rcmurphy won, he received no votes against two for So So. The election was later retroactively rigged. pillow talk 23:29, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  - I don't see what that has to do with anything. sir sysrq @ 14:18 Dec 17
    - I think it has something to do with So So being awesome. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 22:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Against Too nooby. —rc (t) 04:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 7

July

NotM

Liz muffin (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Mrmonkey72 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

UotM

Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

YesTimeToEdit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

PENIS (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

WotM

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

August

NotM

MAGICALLYWONDERFULLEXCELLENTLYGREEN (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Elite (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

UotM

Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

YesTimeToEdit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

WotM

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Slackerboy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

September

WotM

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

UotM

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

YesTimeToEdit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

NotM

W.T. Door (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Multiliteralist (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Geoffprickett (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

October

WotM

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Orian57 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

UotM

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

NotM

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Geoffprickett (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

November

WotM

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Mrmonkey72 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Nydas (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Knucmo2 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

UotM

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

NotM

PaddyAtkinson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

DrStrange (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

December

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser