Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 18
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Writer of the Year[edit source]
Leverage (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 14
- For keeping UnNews going pretty much single-handedly (unless you count Kippy, of course, or all those other guys who write stuff), and having 55 featured articles in a year when people just couldn't be goddamned bothered to care anymore. Yeah. ~ Wed, Jan 1 '14 13:10 (UTC)
- For. You beat me to this nom, and there has never been a better nom in Uncy's history, imnho, than The Journalist (as we in the foxholes call him). Leverage has provided the finest written UnNews items except for Kip's and Funnybony's and those other guys, by the trainload, and has also spiced the site with articles which have taken us everywhere at once and back again. And per BB and all other voters who can't say enough about Leverage's contributions this year. Aleister 13:20 (not unlike 4:20) 1-1-14
- Extremely talented comedic genius. --ShabiDOO 14:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. :D Mattsnow 16:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 20:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Yeah Leverage! - Strainj 1 . . . . TALK 22:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Aye. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Writes lots and lots of stuff. Good stuff. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Boner. -- The Zombiebaron 00:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Leverage has become a Mr UnNewsman here. Also does features too which he has shared between the Fork and the Spoon. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Boner. He's got the whole world in his hands. Twice! -RAHB 20:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. - Why not 23:34 1.04.14
- For. --Mimo&maxus 13:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. While I feel at least a small fraction of the credit in some of the journalistic endeavors should go to subject matter expert Joanna Corey, how can this writer not win this award? The real question is whether there were actually more days in the year that were not covered by this unremittingly vigilant reporter. The BBC's pack-in RSS feed should be ashamed of itself for not keeping up to this lone, highly talented writer's uncompromising commitment to sampling the cream of the crop in sex-and-death-related news. 00:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Shabidoo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 0
- Nom and Spiritual for Shabidoo, who has written so many good pages here that I've lost count (not enough fingers and toes, sorry), deserves at least a nom, even if he doesn't want it. He, or probably she, writes so fast and so well that I'd suspect Isaac Asimov was here, if he hadn't died 22 years ago. Long may his, or more likely her, flag wave. Aleister 14:52 1-1-14
- Thanks Ali...but no. I appreciate it very much...but Leverage deserves this mucho mucho more :) p.s. go nom some articles for best of 2012!!! --ShabiDOO 16:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Aleister (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 0
- For. Our heavyweight. --Leverage (talk) 12:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- FUCK A YOU, and NO Please remove this abomination of a nom, as this user has won this already and only then by paying, sucking, and washing the windows of a scant few users. Seriously, thanks, but this is a one-time thing and, in case you've forgotten, I was gone for like most of seven months this year! Jeez, these noobs. Aleister 13:14 1-1-14
Multiliteralist (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 0
- Nom. I don't know how many articles this fool wrote this year, but he collaborated on Buttworm Barbecue Assball with RAHB and a randombot we have in the IRC channel named derpyy. For that article alone, I'd nominate him. Also, I should probably nominate RAHB, too... ~ Sun, Jan 5 '14 12:25 (UTC)
- Wrote last year... – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 06:56, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Year[edit source]
4.252.99.182 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 0
- Nom One of the unsung heroes of the past year, whose contributions have been many and varied, and is the model for so many new Uncyclopedians. Also deserves based on the “how hasn't he won this yet?” principle. Nominally Humane! 07:54 01 Jan
Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 11
- For. Put her money where her mouth was. --Leverage (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Put her mouth where my money was. Lyrithiya or whatever the name is has not only spearheaded the creation of this site and helped kept it moving, but her work for uncyclopedia as a whole and during her years guiding its principles makes this almost a no-brainer (except for people who've won it before and some others). Yay Lyrithyaz! Aleister 13:26 1-1-14
- For. For that whole thing with moving the entire damned site away from Wikia. The rest of that group has already won this so... yeah. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Per Frosty. That's really something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Strong For. Lyrithya gave this community a lot this year and I know she doesn't always understand how thankful we are. *shifty eyes* -- The Zombiebaron 00:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. I received so many frying pan hits through the years :) Mattsnow 16:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Massive Boner This vote is only necessary in that it's completely appropriate to have a visual representation of what Lyrithya means to Uncyclopedia. And yet I'm not going to say a whole lot of stuff because I don't like saying a whole lot of stuff about things. Unless those things are spices and peppers, but that's another story. Lyrithya is pretty much the most awesome person for every single reason and we wouldn't be voting on this page right now if it weren't for her. -RAHB 07:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. She pays for the server and does stuff behind the scenes. ~ Sun, Jan 5 '14 12:36 (UTC)
- Only because people won't donate. Bloody stingy bastards. -— Lyrithya ༆ 23:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd donate but I think somebody would object or something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:06, 29 Jan 2014
- If it's any consolation, Mark Zuckerberg says his users won't cough up either. We're a generation of freeloaders. Leverage (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- I know that there are some Aunts who are really cool and they pay for their nieces abortions. --ShabiDOO 11:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Who would want to abort their own niece? Nominally Humane! 12:10 29 Jan
- I know that there are some Aunts who are really cool and they pay for their nieces abortions. --ShabiDOO 11:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- If it's any consolation, Mark Zuckerberg says his users won't cough up either. We're a generation of freeloaders. Leverage (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd donate but I think somebody would object or something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:06, 29 Jan 2014
- Only because people won't donate. Bloody stingy bastards. -— Lyrithya ༆ 23:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. --Mimo&maxus 13:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Providing free trips to San Francisco for myself and Simsilikesims in 2013. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Oh yesh, definitely. 15:07, 29 January, 2014 (UTC)
MadMax (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom- Made about a gazillion edits. --Leverage (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. I hope I'm not going to regret voting Madmax in case somebody else nominates better role-models, but now I have to vote on him because I liked how Madmax basically did everything. 12:13, 1 January, 2014 (UTC)
- You beat me to it Leverage! Madmax is the rock and roll star dude bro sandwhich! --ShabiDOO 14:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- To me this is a one-time award, but MM is a good vote and the kind of user I want handling my edits. Aleister 13:28 1-1-14
Llwy-ar-lawr (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: -1
- Talk about being everywhere!! Since she arrived here she's been a large piece of the bedrock of this site, and if you don't know what I mean then you don't surf recent changes. What a wonderful user. Aleister 13:35 1-1-14
- Against. I only got here in April and pretty much the first thing I did here was threaten to recreate a deleted page that really did kind of suck. Lyrithya's been here for all of 2013, though she hasn't been that active the past few months, and she did a lot more for us. She knows all about importing wikis and I don't know diddly, and my coding skills are mediocre compared with hers. And everyone's voting for her anyway. Thanks though. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Huge amount of respect for Spoony-floor. But maybe next year. Nominally Humane! 12:19 05 Jan
- Comment. Not only a super active user, but a friendly face, and a GIRL. Unencyclopedia needs a fair few of these to keep us from tipping over into sausage festery. Now, I have to look up how to pronounce her name, because at the moment my brain recognises LLw and then moves on to her comments. --Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Aleister (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- Genuine for, this time. Al has been one of the pieces of glue who has kept the community together, keeping an “us and us” rather than an “us and them” mentality. His coding sucks, and he does bugger all admin stuff, but he supports new writers and old, and always tries to see the positive. While this award is usually given to those that do the custodial work around here, Al is the example of an Uncyclopedian at his best - making the site and the community better in his own way, and keeping focus on what makes us great - the comedy. Nominally Humane! 12:19 05 Jan
- This makes me literally want to puke on my own vomit. But I do appreciate the nom and the kind words Puppy made up after a few hours of hard liquor dulled his senses. I was away for a long time in 2013, so this is a mute nomination, and not only don't I support new writers but I try to take their stuff when they go to church, and leave the house unattended (true story, ask Anton where he thinks his watch and rubles went a few weeks ago. Ka-ching!). Something I am proud of is that some of us, Puppy, myself, ScottPat and maybe lots of others, teamed up and nudged Wikia into getting rid of that stupid warning label. Yay Puppy and ScottPat (who we should really try to get to put his pages on this site, he's a fine writer). But more important than any of this, did everyone know but me that R. Rodriquez is coming out with "Sin City 2" in August!!! Aleister 00:35 5-1-14
- ScottPat believes the half-truths about this place being full of poop filled condoms or whatever ridiculous thing it was, so I don't think he's coming here. Too bad. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- This makes me literally want to puke on my own vomit. But I do appreciate the nom and the kind words Puppy made up after a few hours of hard liquor dulled his senses. I was away for a long time in 2013, so this is a mute nomination, and not only don't I support new writers but I try to take their stuff when they go to church, and leave the house unattended (true story, ask Anton where he thinks his watch and rubles went a few weeks ago. Ka-ching!). Something I am proud of is that some of us, Puppy, myself, ScottPat and maybe lots of others, teamed up and nudged Wikia into getting rid of that stupid warning label. Yay Puppy and ScottPat (who we should really try to get to put his pages on this site, he's a fine writer). But more important than any of this, did everyone know but me that R. Rodriquez is coming out with "Sin City 2" in August!!! Aleister 00:35 5-1-14
- Spiritual for What Puppy said. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:39, 18/01/2014
Puppy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom - He is the Magneto to our X Men - not always on our side as his user page demonstrates, but regularly drawn back to us as this page shows. And we all know, when Magneto and the X men get together, it makes the reader/viewer´s heart sing. --Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Pfft! Nominally Humane! 08:57 06 Jan
- Spiritual for, although no soup for you Puppy is uncy's vastly unsung hero and guy about town. Coder, writer, helper (for me from day one), and remember this: When he was banned for a looooonnnngggggg time from wikia's site he not only defended himself and rubbed noses in their stuff, but during the ban time he edited the mirror site!! So far beyond the call of duty that he's uncy's best doggie ever. Aleister 21:25 6-1-14
- By “Pfft!” I mean to say: Thank you both, but as my genitals are outties I'm unable to win this year. Nominally Humane! 09:08 07 Jan
- Spiritual for Should have been an admin back in 2012. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:38, 18/01/2014
Bizzeebeever (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 1
- Nom - one of the reasons I came over to the east side of the wall. he went missing on me for a while this year, but he s still probably the admin i am most happy to see. i can't really describe it, but i wish he were immortal. --Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spiritual for. Has a strange way of always being right, or seeming to be. Knows his stuff. Created a qvfd gadget that is really nice and makes things more convenient, though it could use a way of making headers automatically. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:17, 12/01/2014
- Second easiest vote of my life. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 22:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom - I like this user for two reasons. number one, he has seemed very sensible and approachable in all our dealings, and two, I associate his name with the Scottish comedy character Rab C Nesbitt, which makes me happy.--Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spiritual' Boner.' The wiki wouldn't be the same without him, with the humor thing and the patience and the common sense when it's needed. He's one of the reasons I stuck around when I came here (and I reason I stick to my sheets in the morning). Aleister 22:16 7-1-14
- Spiritual abstain. RAHB and I chatted a little on a dating site...and nothing much came of it. We said we would meet up as friends and have a coffee...but neither of us have phoned each other yet. I can give any of you his phone number if you like. --ShabiDOO 23:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Metaphysical comment. I still pronounce his user name as “Rub”. But also deserving of this award. Nominally Humane! 02:26 08 Jan 02:26, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spiritual for I don't know, stuff. And don't put anything under that there template like I just did. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:36, 18/01/2014
January 2014[edit source]
NotM[edit source]
Lizbink (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 7
- A newbie who wants to write things. We should encourage this. ~ Sun, Jan 5 '14 17:46 (UTC)
- Her humor on Tour de France is just fantastic! :) Mattsnow 17:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- We got a live one! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Welcome, and enjoy this playground for adults. Aleister 22:14 5-1-14
- Hell yeah! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 22:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Because of Tour de France --Mimo&maxus 06:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
Snarglefoop (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 9
- Another newbie who wants to write things. I would have supported Lizbink, but I think Snarglefoop deserves recognition too. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- You can support both. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Also For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- For.' ~ Mon, Jan 6 '14 0:17 (UTC)
- For. "Vote for who makes you giggle.", it sez, somewhere on this page. Well, I always laugh when I read my own stuff, so I really have to support me, according to the rules here, I think. (Of course I laugh when I read a lot of other things too but maybe we'd better not go there just now.) Snarglefoop (talk) 03:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Sure why not! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 14:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 00:53, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. - It's cool to see this guy on recent changes almost every day! 05:43, 21 January, 2014 (UTC)
- For. Tries to do everything at once so none of us has to do anything. Aleister 12:27 21-1-14
- For. Is around. --Mimo&maxus 18:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
February[edit source]
Uncyclopedian Of The Month[edit source]
Llwy-ar-lawr (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 6
- N+F - "Fuck it." She's still the most painfully active Uncyclopedia around. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:39, Feb. 17, 2014
- Thanks but I already got this...isn't there someone else more deserving? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:46, 17 Feb 2014
- Nope.avi -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 21:48, Feb. 17, 2014
- Thanks but I already got this...isn't there someone else more deserving? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:46, 17 Feb 2014
- For. Kip's right. She's the man (well, kinda, ah, you know what I mean). Aleister 22:02 17-2-14
- For She does all the stuff. -- The Zombiebaron 23:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- For She does all the stuff. ~ Mon, Feb 17 '14 23:45 (UTC)
- How can you say that when you did so much yourself? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:48, 17 Feb 2014
- For. I heard a rumor Llwy-ar-lawr takes time off to sleep but I don't believe it. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- For. She does stuff all… er… she stuffs all of it… all the stuff is her… whatever. She be goodly at it. Nominally Humane! 04:22 18 Feb
Febmarpril[edit source]
Noob of the Moment[edit source]
Kavlozs (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 6
- NOM + For: For being here and helping remove redlinks. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 11:50, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- For. Does constructive stuff and is ready and able to follow advice. I'm told he contributed to wikia and that made me hesitate, because if you've been around a certain amount of time (and yes, wikia is still uncyclopedia btw) you're not eligible, but I can't find his contribs there. (If I should find them somehow and they date back far enough I may withdraw my vote.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 01:06, 4 Feb 2014
- How does contributing to wikia make you ineligible? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it like that, I just meant that if you have contributed to either wikia or here for a certain period of time you probably aren't eligible. (For reference, I know Lyrithya ran up against this rule in 2010 over having a sockpuppet that edited as far back as 2009.) – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 21:49, 5 Feb 2014
- How does contributing to wikia make you ineligible? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- For. Hooray!!!! --Kavlozs (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
- --Mimo&maxus 22:19, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- For. Why hasn't this guy won yet? Banzaikitten (talk) 15:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
- Because the admins never pay attention to nothing. Sometimes. Maybe. You'd think I'd know, I expect, but I don't know nothing neither... – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:07, 16 Apr 2014
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Bizzeebeever (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 9
- PENUS Helped fix a lot of articles (per llwy), and was overall awesome like a special zoomi we all love this month, so yeah I guess. -- 02:48, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- For. Fixes all sorts of weird bugs, or at least tries to, and is regularly available to help with stuff. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:50, 31 Mar 2014
- For. He collects weird bugs. On strings, with their legs still moving. Aleister 3:00 31-3-14
- For. Because I don't believe Aleister. About the strings, I mean. Snarglefoop (talk) 04:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Against. i deserve this nomination. i voted for bizzbeevr for uoty and poty. he won both. e shouldnt win this shit. i should. — 01:25:35 2014/04/17 UTC
- You are risking the wrath of the muffins. Depriving them of food is dangerous. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:53, 17 Apr 2014
- For. 04:58, 17 April, 2014 (UTC)
- For. Edit conflict. — SG1|Hereish [citation needed] 04:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Batman. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:46, Apr. 17, 2014
- Against ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- For. Anton (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- WRATH OF THE MUFFINS!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 16:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
May[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Snarglefoop (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- For. Snarglefoop has only joined Uncyclopedia in January 2014 but has already written eighteen articles, which must be very good, judging by the ones I have read, and in writing which he puts a lot of efforts. Anton (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- For. Sure. We should have someone for writer of the month too so {{MonthlyAwards}} doesn't look so egregiously mouldy. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:07, 12 May 2014
- A nom made in heaven, but raised in hell. Nice work! Aleister 23:33 12-5-14
- Alright, Snarglefoop! Keep up the good work! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 00:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
- Who? --EMC [TALK] 08:26 May 24 2014
Noob of the Moment[edit source]
Banzaikitten (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: ((6,0,0,0,5,7??,?!, _((>__<))_) + 1) ≈ >9000
- For. Is it too late yet? Banzaikitten should definitely win some kind of award for being one of the rare new users who stuck around, and for really getting to know the site in a relatively short amount of time. And if not this, I'm not sure what. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 19:45, 8 May 2014
- Banzaikitten is one hot pepper! --ShabiDOO 20:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Llwy I feel all warm and fuzzy inside For. 20:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- dicks
- For -- The Zombiebaron 22:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 09:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Definitely should have won this award at some point. ~ Fri, May 9 '14 10:22 (UTC)
- Boner. -RAHB 10:26, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- Barnacle dick. 10:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
- There's someone else writing UnNewaes! Huzzah! Leverage (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- GayGayGay Fuck off. -- 16:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure who you are, why you can't format votes correctly or why you felt the need to say that but thanks for the vote :)
- I can format your votes correctly even if you can't. So there...where? What? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 18:45, 12 May 2014
16:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Not sure who you are, why you can't format votes correctly or why you felt the need to say that but thanks for the vote :)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 16:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 20:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- For. If he was an éclair he'd be stuffed with cream and runneth over. From what I've read, people should give him their awards. Aleister 23:34 12-5-14
-
KeepHighlight Yeah by all means! Can't quite figure out what to do with the score, tho, it seems a little twisted. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC) - Oh why I hadn't voted for this yet? Fucking For. 04:52, 14 May, 2014 (UTC)
- for --Mimo&maxus 16:59, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- For Can we give this dude their award now? That way we can open up NotM again for someone else to have a go... JFC 17:20. Jun 9
- Not sure what you mean; you can nominate people for Noob of the Moment whenever you want. -- The Zombiebaron 17:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand why this user has not been awarded this award. The criteria appear to have been met. No? Perhaps I'm mis-understanding it, or something is not clear. I don't want to nominate anyone else currently, I'm not sure why you mentioned that. I do know that trying to climb a very steep hill looks harder than a shallow one, so some might start trying to climb a shallow one, when they might not a steeper one. JFC 17:40. Jun 9
- Not sure what you mean; you can nominate people for Noob of the Moment whenever you want. -- The Zombiebaron 17:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
DavyK17 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 0
- For. This guy has wrote an article, and it's pretty fucking good! -- MagicBus Talk to me! 21:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Pretty sure this is invalid. He's not a new user. Good, but not new. Sorry. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:30, 21 May 2014
- When did he join? -- MagicBus Talk to me! 23:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- 4 September 2011. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:01, 22 May 2014
- Oops I did not know that. Sorry. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 09:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- 14:24, 4 September 2011- joined ... 11:29, 13 September 2011 (diff | hist) gone. Only made a few edits and most of those were to his user page. Looking at his contributions I wonder if perhaps this individual was affected by the tragic events of Sept 11. He's like a returning war hero or something. Came back 22:40, 19 May 2014 (diff | hist), and since then has been fixing Africa. Why is this user not eligible for this award? JFC 10:43. May 22
- Didn't get back to you for a while, sorry. He's eligible, sure. There isn't anything actually in the rules that says he's not; I was thinking of something that must have been removed a while back. There used to be some rule about not being eligible if you were here for more than three months or thereabouts. I assume it was removed because there was something about how the competition-y stuff was unfriendly to new users. However, I don't think I'd say he's generally considered new or nooby because he knows about articles and stuff, and he doesn't have 5 votes and the month is almost up so the question is moot anyway.
- Anyway, apologies for making anyone feel unwelcome if that was the effect of all this discussion of eligibility. DavyK17 is cool and should certainly be acknowledged as such in some way. However, I will fiercely defend my right to vote against on any of these thingies because making against votes into a blockable offence just makes the atmosphere more toxic, not less. Besides, blocking me is stupid. Was I going somewhere with this? Perhaps not. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:58, 30 May 2014
- 14:24, 4 September 2011- joined ... 11:29, 13 September 2011 (diff | hist) gone. Only made a few edits and most of those were to his user page. Looking at his contributions I wonder if perhaps this individual was affected by the tragic events of Sept 11. He's like a returning war hero or something. Came back 22:40, 19 May 2014 (diff | hist), and since then has been fixing Africa. Why is this user not eligible for this award? JFC 10:43. May 22
- Oops I did not know that. Sorry. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 09:44, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- 4 September 2011. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:01, 22 May 2014
- When did he join? -- MagicBus Talk to me! 23:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
August[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 3
- Nom + Hall of Fame For. This guy, in his prime, had a featured article each day. And that article was recent changes. Go through his old contributions and you can compile enough hilarious ban reasons and edit summaries to populate a toilet-reading book. --Argylesocks (talk) 01:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- For his ban reasons are the only thing that come close to comedy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- For per Frosty. His hilarious bans have spawned hilarious revenge songs. No one can even come close to Roman Dog Bird. Seriously, stay away from this guy. --EMC [TALK] 20:52 Aug 26 2014
Noob of the Moment[edit source]
Everyotherusernamewastaken (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 11
- Nom and for Every is with us since June and has already helped us a lot. He has many good ideas, articles and a positive attitude! What to say - he is already a featured author! Anton (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- I concur 21:52, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Aye ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:34, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, girl, yes!! 22:51 8.27.14
- For. Seen him around a bit, seems alright. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 23:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- For. Okay. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 23:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- For. A welcome addition to our team. --Leverage (talk) 08:38, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- Boner. 'Nuff said.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 17:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- For. Knows his shit. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 02:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- For. Welcome :) Mattsnow 03:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- Feels like he's been around so much longer. --ShabiDOO 04:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- That's probably because I edited solely on the other uncy for a few months. The first you saw of me was at the inter-wiki happy monkey.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 22:34, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
September[edit source]
Noob of the Moment[edit source]
Mjduniverse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 5
- N+ Boner. 00:15 9.06.14
- 4 Hopig he doesn't jump the boat within the first week... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:12, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. Anton (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. Active in the last two weeks. --Nikau (talk) 12:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- For. Get your ass in gear Mattsnow 12:27, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Wbthrower (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 3
- N+ For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 11:23, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. Anton (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. 02:58 10.06.14
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Leverage (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 13
- FOR--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 19:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- For -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 07:00, Sep. 6, 2014
- Major boner -RAHB 07:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Majorer boner
- ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING Worse than GNU/HURD. -- 07:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 07:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. Totally. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 11:22, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- 12:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. Leverage thinks he's so cool with his copious output of helarious articles and his...like...admin stuff and ideas and shit. Fuck Leverage. Fuck him in his precious little british twat. --ShabiDOO 16:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- For. He does have a very lovely little British twat. 15:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Writer of the Month[edit source]
IFYMB![edit source]
Score: 5
- N+F Has been going ham. 03:39 8.31.14
- For. Right! Anton (talk) 15:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- He gives me a massive boner -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 21:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Same. 00:39 9.03.14
October[edit source]
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Xamralco[edit source]
Score: 9
- N+F 02:56 10.06.14
- For. Both Xamralco and Shabidoo deserve this twice! Xam's been back for less than two months and has already done a great amount of (great) things! Anton (talk) 16:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. I don't think I really knew Xamralco before, and I still have no idea how to pronounce his name (that seems to be a theme with admins) but he has been a very welcome return to the site, the wind beneath our wings. Leverage (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Has written many great articles recently, has a very keen sense of humour.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 11:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- Glad he's back. Hope he stays. --ShabiDOO 11:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- For He's a categorizing machine. He should write more though because he's damn funny too. --Nikau (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 17:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 12:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Anton199[edit source]
Score: 8
- N+F 02:56 10.06.14
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. One of those double-headed threats, who writes and does technical stuff. Very happy to see him around more. Leverage (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- I'm a big fan of this guy. He's really found his voice in writing quickly, very nice user, will do any favour you asks, cares about the place and is pretty funny. --ShabiDOO 11:46, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. This guy. I like this guy. -- 13:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Makes me feel like cookies. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 20:42, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 12:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Shabidoo[edit source]
Score: 10
- N+F For hosting his competition n stuff. 03:00 10.06.14
- For. Both Xamralco and Shabidoo deserve it twice. The Happy Monkey was great! Anton (talk) 16:19, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Ever since Aleister got arrested, Shabidoo has been our token Nice Person, which is no mean feat on a website. Leverage (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Tries his best to promote community spirit even when surrounded by lazy assholes like myself who won't join in. 12:15, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. I just realized that his name is a Scooby-Doo reference like 2 minutes ago so yeah... -- 13:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. because he is a good friend and also I have little experience with the other nominees. I would like to get to know them more... :) -- the dorky contralto 03:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- For His competition turned out quality all around and he's a great guy.--Nikau (talk) 14:40, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- For Amazing dude. Also I kind of have to vote for him since I feel so bad for not participating on the competition. Active, great writer and helds competitions and stuff often, keeps up the team-spirit and holds everyone's hands while dancing in circles. 14:54, 14 October, 2014 (UTC)
- For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 12:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Nikau[edit source]
Score: 9
- NOM+FOR 22:35 10.03.14
- For. Of course! Anton (talk) 12:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. Could quite easily be up for UoTm too, he does all kinds of good stuff. Leverage (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. He's written a lot recently and it's all really good too. -- 13:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. --EMC [TALK] 21:53 Oct 9 2014
- For. He's on fire!!! Mattsnow 16:15, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah. Totally. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
- For. This guy is fucking great. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 20:40, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- For. I have now read something by Nikau and I agree 11:58, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Xamralco[edit source]
Score: 4
- NOM+FOR 22:35 10.03.14
- For. Xamralco deserves to get this twice! Anton (talk) 12:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- For I adore Xamralcos articles. There is a consistency of helarious excelence in almost everything he writes. Also he really knows how to build automatic sliding glass doors from scratch. --ShabiDOO 18:38, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- For Next month I guess. --Nikau (talk) 13:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
November[edit source]
Uncyclopedia of the Month[edit source]
MadMax[edit source]
Score: 3
- Nom and For. This guy is a boss. Plain and simple. -- 16:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- For. Agreed! Anton (talk) 17:08, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- For. 22:19 11.01.14
Anton199[edit source]
Score: 3
- Nom and For. This guy's really good too. I just discovered he hasn't won this before, which is surprising. -- 17:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- For. 01:22 11.09.14
- For. He hasn't won it yet? --Nikau (talk) 13:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Xamralco[edit source]
Score: 5
- Nom & For How does he only have one of these? 30+ features and he's recently had Solar flares featured and there's more coming soon. --Nikau (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- For. What I said last month. Great writer! Anton (talk) 17:03, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Boner. Yes. 22:19 11.01.14
- For. I can't think of anyone who's written better articles this year. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 13:28, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
- No way. Xam doesn't have a writer of the month? How about writer of the year? --ShabiDOO 15:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
December[edit source]
Noob of the Moment[edit source]
Xander (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Score: 3
- N+ For. He has been very active and is willing to write articles. -- A MagicSleigh Ride Hot Chocolate! 17:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- For. Mattsnow 19:43, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- 4 ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:41, 10 January 2015 (UTC)