2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) • 2009 (part 1) • 2009 (part 2) • 2010 (part 1) • 2010 (part 2) • 2011 (part 1) • 2011 (part 2) • 2012 (part 1) • 2012 (part 2) • 2013 (part 1) • 2013 (part 2) • 2014 • 2015 • 2017 to now

Hello and welcome to the Past Winners volume 4. This page shows the results of the first half of 2007, enjoy!

Writer of the Month

January 2007

David Gerard (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 vote thingys

Nom & For - Copious contributor, very funny, kicks ass, nice use of the English language, for a Brit... what more can an admin ask for? Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment He's, uh, already won. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment As has been pointed out in some of the other award voting pages - there is no rule against winning twice. --Composure1 14:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +10 useless sockets

Nom & For ~ One of the best writers out there who hasn't yet won this award. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 16:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For. ... And who still deserves it. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:02, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 15:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For, even though this award won't mean anything to him. Or maybe that's what he wants us to think... --Sir Jam 17:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For ...again. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 12:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For How many times do I have to do this? --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 20:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For Mr. Inconspicuous here has done lots of great articles, and where's his recognition?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
For As far as Uncyclopedians go, he's P.I.M.P. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +21

Nom and For, as for Procopius last month's nom - a well deserved reward for a bloody marvelous job, which includes Dune, Sunni days and Arabian Nights, UnBooks:Diary of a Caveman, The Bureaucracy Channel and many more. This month, if he doesn't get it, I will personally ask Famine to ban each and every one of you. Thank you for your cooperation. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 21:57, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For; I mean, the guy is just an eccentric genius. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For. I love this man right here. He's Canadian, right? --EMC^[TALK] 06:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For A class act. Modusoperandi deserves this almost as much as this delicious Enchilada in front of me deserves to be eaten. --Danny Himself 17:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Mordillo said it all. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 17:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
I Approve This Message, 01:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For. OEJ, I'll vote for you next month, but I've invested too much in Mod's candidacy.--Procopius 17:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For. I never thought I'd say this, but I'm running out of bad things to say about this guy when I vote for him. He gets off to snuff-nazi-puppy-cancer-porn...on Sundays. Also, he's late filing his taxes, and never calls his mother even on mother's day. --Anyone 20:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Nice name... --Aznboy93 00:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For Modusoperandi has a name that is very long and hard (to spell). He is also a speaker of 3 or 4 languages, and can act out every CNN Special Report ever. On one last final point, --The Zombiebaron 11:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For He's been on the waiting list for this for so long.... but take a wild guess at who I'll be voting for next month. Composure1 21:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For He definitely deserves it. --General Insineratehymn 02:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
For - It's gne om I 06:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
For —Braydie at 14:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
For --Shandon 15:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
For I need more of them thank you boxes on my page. Feureau 00:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. See my above comment, you can only vote once. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For - He always has great jokes at his disposal. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
For - Shas 00:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
For, because it's his turn, he's paid his dues, he's a funny chap, etc. etc. etc...--<<>> 03:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
For. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 21:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

Electrified mocha chinchilla (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +6.5

Nom and For This guy has incredible writing talent, and helps scrub down lots of articles for featurehood, yet we've always robbed him of a feature of his own. Nevertheless, he's hilarious, and has written some brilliant Quasi-Features, UnBooks, UnNews, etc., and I'm confident that he deserves this deserves this award and no less for his efforts. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
For--Shas 07:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Vote that shit! --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Yeah, you're right. This guy is really good. I really like his work. Not bad. --EMC^[TALK] 22:50, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
For-- This man, is the MAN. --70.149.33.94 23:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
For...every time he arrives on irc, I want to get into a fistfight with him...what a class act.--Shandon 04:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
For Ja, ja, dast ist communistm to havre to vote efry munth. Feureau 15:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +6

Nomination and For With three featured articles under his belt, and plenty more great ones floating around, Braydie has come much farther then most people can ever hope to come. So yah, he basically deserves this. --The Zombiebaron 22:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
For - He threatened to ban me if I didn't vote for him, even if he *DID* win last month... -Paine ^T^C 22:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Last month's winner was Modusoperandi. --The Zombiebaron 22:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah, my bad, Braydie won UotM... same crap. -Paine ^T^C 22:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The winner gets a golden banjo. True story.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment Curse you, ZB. I was planning to nominate Braydie next month. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Well I planned on nominating him last month, so I guess we're even. --The Zombiebaron 03:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Friggin FOR - Braydie is one kick-awesome utility writer. He does articles, UnNews, and if he's good enough for one award, he's good enough for another one. Love his HowTos, to. Err, two. Tew? love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 00:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. How could I vote any other way? --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 22:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I'll take this one. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 16:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +15

Nom and For He's written the most articles out of any writer here. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
For. All of these writers are great, but for Christsake, OEJ has been writing great articles for a long, long, time - and he comes up just a little bit short here every month. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Just so I can stop hearing the "always the bridesmaid" jokes with OEJ as the punchline.--<<>> 01:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. He puts the right words in the right places. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 07:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For.~ 07:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 12:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Patrick Henry is comedic genius. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For --Composure1 23:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Partly because I am sick of seeing him miss out every month, but mostly because he is a genius. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
For Mr. Beluncle, the article that should have won the PLS. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 04:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I knew him when he still had two eyes and was known as Dick-nosed Jack. Those were the days.....FOR. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
bloody prolific - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For%--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For --Kenvalyi 19:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 03:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Emmzee (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nom+for. Some very good articles, wrote Decapitation Disease and Alcoholics Anonymous, the latter being featured on St. Patrick's day. --Molotovnight 13:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
For He looked so lonley with only +1. \o / 22:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

Nom and For. A great writer with two features and several more quasis. Plus, the guy wrote Fire hydrant. You can't top that. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 23:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
For My favorite writer on this site (whom I admired long before Fire hydrant was ever featured), and he also nominated me for WotM, so now our little nonexistent back-handed dealing is complete.-- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:56, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
For - *reminds self to nominate Sauce sometime in the near future*. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
For: just because Fire hydrant was a slight inspiration for the Inanimate Sponge piece. Hats off to you, good sir. --EMC^[TALK] 01:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Prettiestpretty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +17.5 Pretties that is prettier then all other pretties

Nomination and For, she may be a "woman", but she's one of the funny women, like that lady on television...you know...the one who reads the news, right? Yah, well, she's written ~~several~~ ~~many~~ tons of great articles that I enjoyed reading. -- The Zombiebaron 22:37, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
For They haven't got this already? Shame. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 04:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
For I've enjoyed all the work of yours that I've read. --Kenvalyi 19:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
for i vote PP cos tho her and soso are both good shes's been more active lately, and it is meant to be "of the month" but renom soso and i'll vote him for april - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For. Great writer. Ikabu 07:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For she always is voting for people's articles on VFH BUT NEVER LEAVES ANYTHING BUT HER SIGNATURE Weasel 3689 05:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For. Soooo Prettty...202.138.226.2 22:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
For. At a party once, she removed her thumb. Then she took my nose. I miss my nose. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
For. Very underated. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
For You just gotta love the girl. --General Insineratehymn 10:50, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
For, because H.R. Pufnstuf should have been featured. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 17:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 20:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Ultra For. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 20:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
For. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 15:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
For. -- » >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 03:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
For Fou-Lu 07:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Last minute for -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Even last minuter for. ~ 21:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +29, FU BRAY... DIE

Nomination and For, Braydie can write. No joke. He's even funny sometimes. -- The Zombiebaron 14:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For Great at everything, and yes, I mean even at that. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For I second that Fou-Lu 17:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Better give it to him soon before he just gives up and stops writing. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm...Yeah, ok. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Sure Why Not --RA HB 01:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
It's Cuba, right? -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
For Even though he's dirty, unshaven, ~~and strangely handsome~~, I still feel the need to vote for him. Also he buys me alcohol and tells me dirty stories. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Why Hasn't He Won Yet!--☭Mr.Huffy☭ 03:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
For: What a funny man. --EMC^[TALK] 21:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
For because apparently he bedded PrettiestPretty. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Haha. —Braydie 22:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Is that a confirmation or a denial? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 18:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Heh heh. —Braydie 21:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

For because he's well good and deserves a medal or something. Scissor really was the unsung hero of PLS. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 19:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
For. I was gonna nom Rei, but he/she/it/they is up against Braydie, man. You don't go up against Braydie. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 15:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong For Due to his exuberant and frequent Braydery. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
For - Braydie give us a kiss. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Drzim Ti Meisto! --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
02:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 14:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
For He fancies Flyingfeline. --General Insineratehymn 23:03, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
For --Ilona06 02:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
For There's good, there's brilliant and there's Braydie on the floor with a bottle of whisky. Vomiting. Singing dirty songs. That's what you call a sophisticated man! Ikabu 11:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
For. He's the one and only Braydie. All you other Braydies out there are just impersonators. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

i.e Bradaphraser, the bard, the brad, the bardiephraser and etc.--

» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

For. That's the man (and it seems that it is now in all manliness). -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 04:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Well I think he's funny. So does everyone else, but i like the word I.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
For because I have no opinion of my own--Shandon 18:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 17:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Forte. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For. To the best writer goes the spoils. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For --Composure1 01:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For. ~ 13:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For I told you guys he got the chicks too! Stupid sexy Braydie. --Kenvalyi 14:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007

Electrified mocha chinchilla

Score: 5|m|c

N + F. emc has written some seriously good stuff. He may have a really big ego reminiscent of a dictator, but his works really show talent and animation. You can't deny it. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
He also has a perty mouth. FOR. == Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
For Hrodulf 22:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
For reverend zim This dude has a profoundly sick mind, which shows in his writing. Big for! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 22:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Shandon

Score: 24 half hours of Canadian Content on the CBC

Nom & For: I can't believe hes never been WotM. Just look at these articles! --EMC^[TALK] 20:47, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes. I remember, back in the summer of '06, a younger, naiver Shandon asked if I'd like to collaborate on a page. I said "OMG!". He said "LOL". Then, when it was done, we ROFL'd and ROFL'd. Ahh, good times. Most of his other stuff makes our collab look like crap. Stuff like The Life and Times of Kraft Dinner. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Go Shandon Go You rule! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 22:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
For. Hard to decide, but I have voted for more of his articles than for EMC's ones. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 03:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
For, because even though he lives on the other side of the country from me, I still love his CanCon. -- The Zombiebaron 23:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Strong for with a comment to the effect that American Dream should have been featured. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 17:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Dig great works; a highly worthwhile repertoire. --THINKER 03:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
For. Clearly well deserving -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
For. --» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 01:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
For Great, great, great, great! I'm awed by this person much as any self-respecting rock fan likes either Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, or The Who. Just obligatory.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
For I really liked Escher, among others. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 01:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Look. This guy... I mean, sure, he's written some good articles... and he's been nominated to the front page... but maybe he eats baby seals or something... Aaah crap. For. --El Zoof 08:00, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
For Brendon Shanahan. He represents his country well, eh? And he doesn't cough up the puck too much either, eh? --Kenvalyi 00:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
For Shandon is pretty neat-o --Quall 10:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
For Clever and literate. —rc (t) 22:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
For. I was this close to voting for emc *shows fingers* t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Am I too late? ~ 13:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 02:47, 30 May 2007
For <3 Shandon! :) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:23, 30 May 2007
For I heard I like Shandon. —Braydie 15:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
For I loved Nuremberg Rally and UnUsual Suspects so Kudos to you Weasel 3689 02:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Nydas

Score: +1

Nom Apparently he has four featured articles (UnBooks:Adventure gamebook, Memento, Commemorative plate and Wallet moth). Note that I don't think I've actually read any of these, but I figure some of you probably have. —rc (t) 04:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
For. After a ringing endorsement like that, how can I lose? --Nydas 22:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment. I'd vote Nydas if Shandon weren't running. Will you nom him next month, Rc? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 01:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I may. But I make no promises. —rc (t) 18:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

El Zoof

Score: +2 One Letter Words Starting with A

Nom Inching up the VFH Hall of Shame. Again, I haven't read his stuff - it may suck. Vote at your own peril. —rc (t) 04:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Good noms Rc. If they fail this time, try them again when there is less competition.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:05, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Rc fails at life. —Braydie 18:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

No, YOU fail at life. Haha, I bet you are saying "touché" right now.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:43, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Boris Yeltsin fails at life. lol —rc (t) 07:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Ouch. Poor Boris.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't fail as much as Rc does. —Braydie 21:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

EXTREMELY Strong For -- Zoof is Zany! {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 06:31, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Ikabu, you are only allowed one vote.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I sadly withdraw the e|m|c vote. Sorry. (Note: I have no idea how to do the strike through thing so I just deleted it. {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 01:26, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Ljlego (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

Nom and For - Ljlego has really impressed me his writing has really improved and so far the most recent articles have been stellar.--Gaberou 03:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment sometime soon. --THINKER 03:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment Thanks a lot, dude. However, my vote is already cast and I intend to stick by it. Perhaps next month....:) Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
This vote is reserved for next month. One of my favorite newer writers. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 15:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
For. Awesome. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:06, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
For all of the above. --THE 14:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment -- If I hadn't already cast my vote for HerrDoktor, you'd have it, Ljlego. Whoever nommed you nommed late...:( Sometime soon, though, you will definitely win this. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:29, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
For - Always and forever. Call me. --EMC^[TALK] 05:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment Ljlego has my vote next month. I voted too early this month (or he was nommed too late....additionally this comment is rather late)-RA HB 10:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

Nom & For. Not only is he responsible for classics such as Fire hydrant, You Are Dead and Dissociative Identity Disorder, he is also still doing stuff, as evidenced by recent nomination Drill sergeant. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For. YAD is linked from my sig (sometimes) and I think Drill sergeant is being undervalued at VFH. -- herr doktor needsAraygun [scream!] 07:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For. This month's competition is fierce, but So So has both quantity and quality. He truly deserves it. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Gotta give emc my vote for this month. I still say So So is awesome, though, and he'll have my vote in the future. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

FOUR -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Nydas (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

Nomandfor - a growing collection of classic articles including Enid Blyton, Memento and I forget the others. With lashing and lashing of whipped cream. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 09:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

HerrDoktor (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +12 poorly rendered tesla coils

Nom & For- HerrDoktor is a great ~~writer~~ Mad Scientist. Just look at these ~~funny~~ slimey pages

Onomatopoeia (rewrite)	HowTo:Make Cheesy Sci-Fi - with FoxyBabe
UnBooks:Practical Lessons on Communism	HowTo:Run Away From Fat Ladies
The Black And White Man	UnBooks:Gallows Humor

If he doesn't win I'll eat my hat--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E throw a snowball 08:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

For. To cancel out his vote for me, and because I liked HowTo:Make Cheesy Sci-Fi. --So So 09:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For. My personal fave is the communism one. Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 15:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Our friend here became a real VFH monster in a very short time. He moved swiftly and surely from the new guy on the block, who dumped his sig's code all over the place to an empire of articles, growing up a whole family of followers whom he make sure to call "kid". `Tis a pleasure to end this rambling by voting For. ~ 15:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
3 features in a month, though strictly speaking that was last month so maybe he should have won it then but this isn't actually that kind of award so umm.. oh yeah; For --Kelpan 19:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For. He's from Brazil. I like Brazil so much that I can do nothing but vote for him.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 23:44, 2 June 2007

(UTC)

For All of these writers are so good, but HerrDoktor helped me out with Phrases spoken before death. This is a popularity contest, right? I think he's pretty popular. Oh, good pages, too. (Each of these writers could easily win, it seems really close) P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but you're wrong. I was to say that Uncyclopedian of the Month is a popularity contest, but it also is not, it's for the most useful contributor. This is not a "who is your buddy", "who is more friendly", "who has the neater hair" or "who made more featured articles" contest. This is a simple "who writes the best" contest. Bear this in mind, friends, you all. And please don't discuss the merits of one candidate among the votes of another, this is embarrassing. -- herr doktor needsAraygun [scream!] 21:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

But if it were about "who has the neater hair", I'd totally win. --EMC^[TALK] 01:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm giving you that, I can't beat a chinchilla in a hair contest. -- herr doktor needsAraygun [scream!] 01:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

For --General Insineratehymn 01:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
For he deserves it Weasel 3689 06:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
For Slithy Tove 06:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
FOR...yes...yes....I....must....agree......with....the...above....statements--The Hunt A dash of Dickensian 03:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
For, because I thought HowTo:Run Away From Fat Ladies was great.-- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 16:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Electrified mocha chinchilla (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +e=mc¹⁶

Nom + For. As much as I love Fire hydrant and HerrDoktor's goods, e|m|c still has me won over, like last month. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 12:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I will vote for him next month I thinks it's HerrDoktor time to shine. This month is sure gonna be close Wot?--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E

throw a snowball

12:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

There will be no need to do that, because e|m|c is going to win THIS month :) -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

I think I forgot to mention Letter to the Isle, too. Because e|m|c totally did that. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 14:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

For--Shandon 14:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For Really Big Tree FTW --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 20:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Want to sign in so that your vote would count more, Mr. George? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:36, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

His vote counts as half. No cheating--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E

throw a snowball

04:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

But he actually does have an account, check his contributions. I guess he'll realize one time or another and fix his vote. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 12:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Ooops. Fixed. --

» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)

20:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I was going to wait a while into the month, but I don't think it'd change this man's brilliance. --THINKER 03:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For <3 e|m|c. Sorry HerrDoktor, it was a close one =/ ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:06, 02 June 2007
FOR Completely deserving --RA HB 10:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For Hmmmm. What was my reasoning for this? Oh well, I'll figure it out sooner or later.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
For. –—Hv (talk) 4/06 17:21
For. Gonna be a close one. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
For. Hrodulf 02:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
For, he, quite literally, taught me the meaning of humour. -- The Zombiebaron 02:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
For. Viva El e|m|c! {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 08:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
yep, yep --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Y-E-S, yes. Don alun 14:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
For - I loved Preflight procedures, even though I'm taking a plane today... --AAA! (AAAA) 00:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
For. Preflight procedures was, indeed, awesome. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

January 2007

JohnQ.Public (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

Nom and For He has made a lot of good contributions within the past 2 weeks alone and he even personally asked me to nominate him for Noob of the month. How could I turn down such a polite user? --General Insineratehymn 21:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For I voted for myself because the rules say I can. Self indulgence, or just acknowledgement that I'm unknown and need all the help I can get? You decide. --JohnQ.Public 17:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For —Braydie at 23:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Ben DeRoy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +Three DeRoy

Nom and For His expansive contributions and three great articles prove him a worthy n00b. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For - Those are a fine group of n00b articles. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For - A major contributor to Dear John letter. I didn't check, but if he authored it, hurrah again ben!--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment ~ No dice. :) --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

The Bard (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11

Nom and For Has done some great poetry, which is a type of literature not seen too oft round these parts. --Anyone 20:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Helped me cool my head once. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [20:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)]
He IS a poet even if he doesn't know it. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For UnPoetia and Life's Answerable Questions. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Wait, who am I voting for again? Braydie or Bradaphraser? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment -- Not to mention User:The Brad. ^_^ --The Bard of Uncyclopedia 19:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
For. We must continue the Brad/bard/braydie dynasty. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For, 01:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Has written some great poetry.-- Themuppetshow 18:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
For. He must've done sumthin do get all them votes above.Feureau 00:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Yes, good work. Nice name. Nothing not to love.--<<>> 16:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
For. ~ 18:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
A big for. UnPoetia is great. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 21:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Dynamo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

Numb floor Works include The Robot, Zen Garden, and apparently translating You have two cows into Sumerian. Not an asshat. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 19:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For I vote for me because I am the best noob, with articles like those above and Camouflage as well as Sonnet to a girl I met at the New Year's Party at Jason's. Thanks to Kalir for the nom.--//Dyn amo// 22:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
For He kept asking to vote... --Gourgetn 10:48, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 11:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
For - He threatened to kill my goat. It's gne om I 09:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

Blahshoe (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

Nominating: has written HowTo:Spay or Neuter Your Own Pet -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 16:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
for i liked that article--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
for --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 06:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
For Of course I'm going to vote for myself! Check out my other article, HowTo:Rap - The Wiggers Guide to Phat Rhymes --Blahshoe 00:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Captain Carcass (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nominating: has written What the fuck? -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 16:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Number-One ALF Fan (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nominating: has written MacBook -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 16:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Contestant (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +23

Nominating: has written HowTo:Start a Religion -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 16:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
For He has only been here for a few days, and he has already produced one of the best articles I have seen in the form of HowTo:Start a Religion. --General Insineratehymn 14:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For. And I've welcomed him! Such a pride. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 15:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Playing the for card. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 15:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For - Good to see, I was worried we would have no candidates for a while. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
For, I guess. I feel very awkward, having people say such nice things. Thank you, all. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 02:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
For. It's funnier than mine. Captain Carcass 03:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For. That UnNews was great. Keep up the good work! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 05:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
for so good so fast - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For Talent like this is as rare as a camel through the eye of a haystack. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 23:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
For this guy's gonna be big, just wait. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For Great job this is something could prospectively make it to the featured page if you expand it some more and add some funny ass pictures. Weasel 3689 21:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For - I don't know why. It's gne om I 05:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. That article is great stuff, and besides, he reverted vandalism on my userpage, which is doubleplusgood. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
For...yeah...OK...he's actually appeared on my radar screen--Shandon 04:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
For I normally don't even vote in this category at all, but this guy is great. --Composure1 15:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
For. ~ 15:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For —Braydie 16:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For He helps me work my funny muscles. --Kenvalyi 17:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For Great HowTo:Start a religion article, also amusing on chatrooms. {{RabbiTechno 18:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)}}
For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 03:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Come on down! You're the next contestant on The Price is Right! —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 17:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
For He's throwing ninja stars around, and I want a slice of the pie. -- The Zombiebaron 00:10, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Heap (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0 joke nominaitons

Nomination, Every edit this guy has made is funny. -- The Zombiebaron 22:27, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Ineligible; blocked for more than one day within the last thirty days. Shame, though; he'd be a damn good naughtem. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 01:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You're thinking of UGotM buddy, I don't see anything about bans on this page. Not that it really matters in the end... -- The Zombiebaron 15:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Bah, they're all the same. --

Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 21:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Actually, every edit except for his first one was hilarious. I can't vote for him because of that first one though. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +9

Nomination and For, good articles in UnNews my favorite being Nation in panic as meteorologists predict end of World with excellent audio (null, info). And I greatly enjoyed HowTo:Get To Sesame Street more than I'd like to admit. Great work! --Kenvalyi 23:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For, and I've nommed Sesame Street for feature. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 04:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For He's got spunk! Weasel 3689 05:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment I'd feel like more a n00b than I am by voting for myself, but I'll say thanks to those who voted for me, and glad I could entertain you guys. -- RAHB 06:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

It's a time-honoured uncyclopedia tradition to vote for one's self. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 13:01, 13 Mar 2007

For Well, in that case (inconspicuously changes comment to for) -- RAHB 23:08, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For Funny n00b? HowTo article? UnNews and audio? He seems familiar. ... Braydie was just like him! -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 20:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
For. ~ 12:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
For Fou-Lu 07:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: NegativeThreecmurphy

For. He's still learning the ropes, but he seems to be making a good enough job of things. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:12, 1 Apr 2007
Against. His outbursts of "FU" and "SPANG", while probably out of his control, are rude and abrasive. Giving him this award will only contribute negatively to the uncyclopedia community. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Against, while he received a richly deserved PotM for his 'chops, like FU and Spang, he's just not NotM material. Literally. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For He has a bright future here, and I hear talk that he'll probably be an admin soon, which is nuts. -- The Zombiebaron 22:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Psh. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Psh. -- The Zombiebaron 04:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Tosh. —rc (t) 08:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Pshtosh. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 19:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Pistachio. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Pinochet. -- The Zombiebaron 07:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Pinochle? That's my favorite game! O.o'' Uncyclops-pedia?

Comment Thanks guys! Please help me learn about Uncyclopedia, I want to be an admin someday! —rc (t) 22:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment Well, perhaps, but you need to make sure you go about it the right way. If you work at it though, you too could become a fine upstanding admin like CRUSHERBOT or Sophia. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:54, 11 Apr 2007

I don't know Spang, he seems a bit... childish. Maybe give 'im a few more years, wait for his little boy brain to catch up with his big boy body.

t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Against Remote Controlled Murphy? I suspect this to be not but a mischief making bot run by User:Murphy behind the curtains. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Against Ineligible. Has been a member since March 2005. That is not within 30 days of the current date. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Fucking DUH!!!

This user has stated the obvious.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Against Ditto. --Mad Dog 19:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

MichaelHax (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5 of 100 people think this user should be shot into space.

Although, he did a good job cleaning up the place.

Nomination & For good articles like Robin, Wonder Girl and funny UnNews stories like Tom Cruise Converts to Islam. and Man Shot Into Space, Possibly Being Tortured. Along with Unquality audios: Greeks hate new documentary (743KB, info) and Do your own stunts do you? (758KB, info).
For --General Insineratehymn 23:05, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
For. He's... so... promising... sorta. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 23:32, 19 April 2007
For I like me. Plus, I smell like apples. MichaelHax (Y'wanna say that to my face?)(UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
For --Mad Dog 19:29, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007

Rcmurphy

~~Score: 0~~
Nom+for He's making a great job of doing small and pointless things around the site. Who knows, maybe one day he'll do something useful!--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 00:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Extreme Lesbian Against --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all}

The nominateor is mad x9, he is a BUREAUCRAT of Uncyclopedia. The guy who started it all. Geez, what is this? An inside joke? --Sir General Minister G 5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 10:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I am a simple nooblet and do not understand your talk of "bureaucrats" and such. Please use simple language for me, I am only two weeks on the intronet. —rc (t) 15:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
RC, you (Rcmurphy) have some (not a lot, I probably have more) control (tells people (us) what to do) of uncyclopedia (humour website (don't ask)). —Braydie 18:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-Votational Support I've already voted this month, but I look forward to somebody nomming rcmurphy next month so we can all shake our collective heads in awe again. -- The Zombiebaron 19:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Strong against Not a noob... and its NOT funny. W1k13rh3nry 20:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Still ineligible Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 19:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

۞ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

If you don't vote for me I'm removing the porn from The Thong Dynasty you have been warned. ۞ 21:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

o__O Pigeon's pretty much already got this now, but there's always next month, since you're still technically eligible. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 21:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Score: +8 weird symbols

Nom on a whim, since there really isn't anyone else at all to nom. Only a few days old and only wrote one article, but it's a pretty good one, no? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
For It's about time we have more unicode individuals receiving awards. --General Insineratehymn 23:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
For they were making edits. This is an admirable trait in an Uncyclopedian. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 04:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
For You just can't have too much cheap smut :) --User:Professor Booty
For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
For His contributions to the (re)discovery of Skid Valley give History a decisive twist! --Lambic 23:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
For as I actually have seen this one doing something {constructive}--Shandon 11:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Comment In case this guy doesn't win, we can nominate him for User of the Month when June comes around. --General Insineratehymn 19:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
For This is real history --User:Lilith75
Yaar!I couldn't vote for Norway --Alchemist 14:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
For What a n00b! Weasel 3689 02:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Pat_Sharp (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 literate headbangers

Nominating and for. Per Evolution of Heavy Metal. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 00:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Against. After I checked his contributions, all of his articles are not funny. - Jtaylor117:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Necropaxx (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 Converts

Nominating and for. Per Great Mormon-Catholic War and Holy Cheese. -- User:Kathumandu 15:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
For Per same, and some funny quotes and such - RA HB 20:04, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
For. Per the above, and also a bunch of tattling on QVFD. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~}

Pigeon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +12 feathery friends

Nom and for - Has been around for almost exactly a month now, and has been helping out a lot in various places. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
For - Does quite a bit considering his time here. And Cs; you're lucky April only has 30 days. –—Hv (talk) 18/05 21:55
Blasphemous Vote For Myself - Because it'll REALLY annoy that guy who vandalised my page, and just about everything else earlier. Also, I found my laptop gathering dust in the attic, for more sexytime outside of college hours on Uncyc. - Some Random Pigeon (Bird Feed) (Bird Droppings). 18:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
For --AAA! (AAAA) 01:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
For —Braydie 12:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
For. My, this guy does a lot for a noob. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:12, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
For --EMC^[TALK] 19:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
For As much as I desire this award, I must acknowledge that Pigeon seems to be doing good stuff and a lot of it. And if I vote for him maybe he'll nominate me next month. —rc (t) 22:40, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
For, because Bert rubbed off on me as a child. -- The Zombiebaron 02:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
For. His contributions speak for themselves. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 05:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Cooing to signify for~ 14:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 02:50, 30 May 2007

Lambic (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 well read noobs

Nom and For - settled in very quickly to life in Uncyclopedialand, and already has quite a few decent articles under his belt. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 21:19, 19 May 2007 {UTC)
For - I always love to hear about a Pirate having a good time - Professor Booty

Only one vote allowed Booty. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 15:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Argh - sorry, missed that bit - can I give half a vote each? ;)

Nah, you're gonna have to get rid of one of them :\ sorry, but it's the rules. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

OK :( Sorry JB, Had to give it to the Captain. Vote deleted. Professor Booty

For - Great enthusiasm, jokes and copy editing. ۞ 09:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Jafandahalf (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 late votes

Nomination; For. --So So 09:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

for some really good contributitions, and he hasn't irritated me, so... he must be > OK. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 22:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Dr. Skullthumper (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

Nom and For. Kitchen sink says it all. --Andorin Kato 02:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Extreme super amazing for... next month. This is (Unicode)'s last month eligible, and Skullthumper still has plenty of time left to win this next month. Like last month with Pigeon. Sorry Skully :( -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

۞ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11 Uninoobs

Nom + For before it's too late! -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

For, like last month!--"Shure" Shandon 20:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

For, again! Professor Booty

For, as he's still eligible. --General Insineratehymn 18:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

For - Now I don't feel so guilty about nominating someone else last month. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

For , and stay tuned on the Thong Dynasty, the Real McCoy is surely yet to come! Some real peer pressure from --Lambic 14:19, 3 June 2007(UTC)

For deserves it just for his name Weasel 3689 06:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Yep. Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 03:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

For for the Thong Dynasty! Keep up the good work! --User:Lilith75

Fumble --Sir General Minister G 5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 11:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Fore! Darn it, this guy is beating me in my golf game!!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

For Was I supposed to do something fancy? Well fuck that.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Lambic (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nomandfor get contributions over the last month. Has my vote. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)14:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
For, because his name is cool. -- The Zombiebaron 16:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

~~Score: -1 nomination jokes beaten to death~~

What a n00b! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Against This is just getting old. --General Insineratehymn 16:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

~~Okay. We get it. Rcmurphy is not a noob. He's been here longer than any of us. Let this joke die. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 19:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)~~
~~For...wait, Rcmurphy isn't a n00b? Oh noes! Against. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)~~

For thanx necropaxx! i'll nom you next month k? k!! wooooo etc. etc. —rc (t) 04:21, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

~~WOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooo... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)~~

Against - The last time RC was nommed, it was jointly with me, and we didn't get it. No fair if he gets it alone. Sir Famine , Gun ♣ Petition » 06/14 22:51

~~Remove this tomfoolery from this page AT 1CE! --Sir General Minister G 5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 11:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)~~
Ineligible still. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Incredulous comment Still? What about next month? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:21, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Then Rcmurphy will be even more ineligible. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
I will be eligible some day! SOME DAY, GADGET!! —rc (t) 03:10, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, but you will never be eligible, you are too old. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Hey! You said the same thing to me when I was waiting on the front stoop of that house on Paper Street. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:55, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Huh? What house? What Paper Street? Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Good, you've got the first two rules down. —rc (t) 04:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Wait, does this have to do with Fight Club? Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Pieface (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 pleas for noms

Nom and FORE! Because he asked nicely with many reasons. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 14:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
For! It's embarrassing, but I can't let my adopted mentor stand all by himself...Pieface 13:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

January 2007

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +22

Nom and For. Really deserves this award.--<<>> 03:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I Approve This Message, 03:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For - Braydie's quick rise to fame seems similar to that of Todd Lyons, although admittedly I wasn't here when Todd joined. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For - He was robbed, man. Or at least that's what his banker told me to say after he handed me $50. In any case, this guy should win. Vote yes on Prop. 232! --JohnQ.Public 16:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For, like last time. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
The only reason I didn't vote for Braydie last time is because Brad was up. Sup4r-133t ph0r3!!!11! (read as: "for") —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [03:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)]
For Braydie is one of the finest chaps I've ever "dealt with". He certaintly "deserves" this "award". Also, --The Zombiebaron 21:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For - As last time! --Tt22 Talk 23:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)'
For...friendly and enthusiastic...not that Tom isn't, but the House Select Committee on UnAmerican Activities will be putting him away soon...--Shandon 23:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Restored my faith in the youth of the internet. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For. I remember when this young whipper-snapper was just the glint in his mother's eye. We all had faith in him...we sure did. And he made us proud. If only your old man was around to see you and how far you've come...but he's watching up in heaven right now...(gets choked up) and he's smiling, oh is he smiling! You did it champ! --Anyone 20:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Thomas Maefaer nextmonth! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Braydie is truly an asset to Uncyclopedia. For a good person. Mayfair in February! gosh zillacorrespondence 02:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
For. N00bs these days; helping people and doing stuff. When I was but a wee n00b I mostly hung around the 7/11 and smoked.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
For. For so much work in QVFD. -K j h f !- (feeling chatty?) 15:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
For Definitely deserves this award. --General Insineratehymn 23:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Suck eggs. --EMC^[TALK] 22:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Thumbs up. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 20:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
For ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 20:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Meh... Gotta vote someone. Feureau 00:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Only one, choose wisely. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For He does so much work, and all for little or no thanks. Except this award. And his recent adminning. And his Noob of the Month award. And his dozens of other awards. I still don't understand how he does it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 18:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
For - A tough choice, but Braydie wins by a nose hair. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
For - As Zim said, it was tough. Don't worry, Tom. We still love you! -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 21:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Tom_mayfair (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +13

Does... well, everything, really, and I've never seen him get an award for it. This award is supposed to be for the people who do the dirty jobs, and Tom seems to do nothing but. About the only person I know who actually goes through articles tagged with {{ugly}} and fixes them, and does a million other similar things. Should have got this before now. -- 14:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Comrade Tom is indeed doing a good job in holding back the capitalist pigs, greetings new arrivals and generally looking after the place. I say - DA! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 19:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Tom, enjoy being editor of the month. You are a great uncyclopedian. I 100% support you. Sir james paul 23:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For - He gave communism a whole new meaning... --AAA! (AAAA) 00:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment, while I voted for someone else, you should get the Most Improved Uncyclopedian of the Month for, um, being the most improved uncyclopedian of the month.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  - Same I like Tom as well. Shame I like Braydie more down in QVFD. -K j h f !- (feeling chatty?) 16:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Though I like Braydie very much, I'm saddened that this looks like such a one-sided contest. Tom has continuously impressed me as a friendly, helpful and hard working user, and I think he's excellent admin material for a future draft. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
For Braydie is great and super-helpful, but Tom has really impressed me by improving so much in a relatively short time. —rc (t) 01:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
For Braydie is not our comrade GSPbeetle ^{complains Vandalisms} 09:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
For the Communist party, and probably this guy too. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 07:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Looks like Braydie is going to take the award this month, but I'm going to throw my vote towards Tom. He's worked bloody hard for months now, and is definately on my "one to watch out for" list. For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For. Great user and his user page is funny enough to be a featured article.--Themuppetshow 18:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
For It's the Premier! All Hail Tom Mayfair! Feureau 00:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- One vote, please... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For- seems like anice guy. Chancellor Krieger 20:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2007

Flyingfeline (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 house cats strapped into an outdated and ridiculous looking 19^th century flying machine and pushed off a cliff

Nomination & For, since becomin' an administrator she has done some outstandin' work 'round here. Kudos. 01:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Oh come on, I do practically nothing. Don't be silly. ;) --

02:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Nomination but not for, because Tom crossed out his nom and I've already voted. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:24, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment, I didn't cross it out. She did.

02:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Apology Sorry. I thought you crossed it out at her request, as I saw that you changed your vote. Either way, she stills retains a nom for any potential voters. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

OMG...What??!--no. Uh, what??! You guys are frickin' crazy for not saying For. I mean, you must be on crack.--Shandon 04:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
For, because Premier Tom once called me a gobshite. It was a while ago, but this is the first chance I have had to get revenge, even though Premier Tom is miles ahead of everyone else now. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment, When & where did I say that? I'm sorry if I hurt your feelin's.

14:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Another comment - Meh, it was in some forum topic. I don't care really, and I probably deserved it, anyways. Actually, the real reason why I voted is because I do think FF deserves this, even if she doesn't think so.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment, We'll retake her arse next month. ^_^

14:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Tom mayfair (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: ☭24 Communist Conspirators

Nomination and For - Last month's runner up, I really don't know why he hasn't got this award before. —Braydie at 07:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
For. Deserveth muchly. -- 02:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
For. I'd love to vote for ff, but from what I hear she's female, and I don't believe in that. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment I can't see from laughing so much. No disrespect miss. —Braydie at 07:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

F☭Я When I first heard that Mayfair was a communist, I thought "Communism? That is so Cold War-era Soviet Russia". Now he has me saying "Ио́сиф Виссарио́нович Джугашвили!" with gusto! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
For, Same as the last time. Chancellor Krieger 21:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
For Motherland!!! One eye jack is not our comrade GSPbeetle ^{complains Vandalisms} 09:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
MayFOR Good. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
For - Tom's the kind of commie we can all aspire to be one day: stoic, cold-hearted, and completely oblivious to all notions of human liberty. Go get em, TommyBoy! --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 15:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
For I saw him punch a nun once. It was for charity. At least that's what he said it was for while I was writing the cheque.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:16, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Tom might be singlehandedly trying to destroy the western world, but he does it with a smile. That and the fact that he works damn hard. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For - In Soviet Russia, Communist nominates YOU!! --AAA! (AAAA) 01:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
For - In Soviet Russia, Bribed gets YOU!! --» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Da for Comrade Mayfair. —Sir Comrade Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [17:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)]
For - In Soviet Russia, dead horse beats YOU!! -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 17:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
AgainstThis guy has been banned by more admins than your mom and only some of his articles are truly funny Weasel 3689 21:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

True, Tom had a rough start here. But it's the fact that he's become a very helpful member of Uncyc that makes him worthy of the award. And nobody nominated him for Writer of the Month, anyway. —rc (t) 05:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

For Same reasons as last month. —rc (t) 05:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
For. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 14:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia is Communism. gosh zillacorrespondence 18:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)¡
For. I may not be communist, but I support this guy! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:33, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For. ~~He bribed me with a pack of MMs~~ Altough I feel he has a little less revolutionary spirit than we are lead to imagine. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 22:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
For comrade Tom. ~ 15:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
For ALL HAIL COMRADE TOM Feureau 14:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For --Kenvalyi 18:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:07, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
For. No idea what the vote is, but the guy is badass...--Dantoller 10:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5 donated eyes

Nomination and For. This user has been dedicated to improving Uncyclopedia's quality for months, but since he doesn't come onto IRC or spam his username much, it often gets ignored. When I decided to revamp pee review because no one was reviewing there, I quickly discovered that OEJ HAD indeed been trying to go through and keep pee review alive the preceding months, by himself. Add to this the long list of articles he writes but often doesn't get recognized for, and you've got one Hell of an Uncyclopedian.--<<>> 12:40, 1

February 2007 (UTC)

For. --The Bard of Uncyclopedia 14:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
For ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 16:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
For I see his name on Recent Changes all the time, and he gets no credit. --The Zombiebaron 19:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
For, because people that whore their usernames are gobshites. 21:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
For, for his great work on the Pee Review. And because Tom is a ~~VAGINA~~ great guy. --EMC^[TALK] 18:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

70.149.33.94 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: +0

Nom & For -- Revoke all nominations, this guy is IT. --EMC^[TALK] 01:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Against Is this nomination a joke? --General Insineratehymn 01:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment -- No. --EMC^[TALK] 01:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Dear Diary ~ Today that bad boy who smokes behind the gym during lunch hour voted for EMC on WotM, then schmootzed up his userpage. EMC then nom'd him for UotM. They make a cute couple...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nom & abstain - He always has really good jokes up his sleeve, he's helpful, and he knows how to lighten up a bad situation. Why isn't he an admin? --AAA! (AAAA) 22:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Changed vote to Tom mayfair. Abstained --AAA! (AAAA) 01:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment. Obvious reasons. --Anyone 22:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Because he's mad? MAD? MAD? MAD? or maybe because he's Canadian? eh?~

07:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

March 2007

Flyingfeline (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +13 airborne cats

N☭MINATI☭N & F☭R, since becomin' an administrator she has done some outstandin' work 'round here. Kudos. Plus she can't refuse it at the moment. 01:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
For - We won't let her refuse it this time. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
For - more than worthy --Kenvalyi 03:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
For - Protected one of my articles against vandals and recorded some of my news articles, she has my vote --Uncle J 23:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment Ummm... she's pretty inactive, and (based on the first like of this comment) she probably will be for awhile. -- The Zombiebaron 00:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
For Very good anti-vandal --GAMESPOT=666 01:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For I love you, girl. :) --General Insineratehymn 01:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For Very good anti-vandal --GAMESPOT=666 01:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Person below me added it. Or something.. —Braydie 03:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

'For 'Keep up the good work!! Fou-Lu 03:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For...like I did last month--Shandon 15:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For --EMC^[TALK] 23:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
FOR --» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 10:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
FOR --  21:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
For Aerodynamic domesticated house cats ftw! \o / 22:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
For ~ 12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Lugiatm (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

For and Nom, Loogie/Lugi/Loog/Lo/Lugiatm/Lamchops was away for a long time, but has come back with his colors flying and his trumpets blaring. -- The Zombiebaron 18:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment Yaaaaay! But what can I do about this? --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 19:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For because ff is not here and I don't know the other guy. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 15:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +19 cycloptic playing cards

For and Nom. I will not give this up until he wins the award he so rightfully deserves. The reason (for those who forgot from last time) is his single-handed attempts to keep Pee Review going even when no one else cared. Now it's been revamped, more people care, and he's still contributing there, just like always. A great example of unselfishness for the masses.--<<>> 22:29, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

For. Like Brad says, OEJ's work at Pee Review is a great example of unmassiveness for the shelves. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 22:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
For He's like the father I always had, except he's not... O_o --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
For —Braydie 01:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For. He's the kind of guy who'd give you the last slice of pizza. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Modusoperandi (talk • contribs)

diff —Braydie 03:29, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Comment My bad. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

For. I will not give this up until Brad does.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 16:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For He's been a good and sensitive lover, always making sure that my needs are met and fantasies fulfilled; he's able to hit just the right spot that makes me so glad that I'm his at the moment that the earth moves. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
For a never ending supply of lubrication to keep things well oiled here, OEJ is always pounding away within all those dark, hidden places around Uncyclopedia, and as such has never enjoyed the kudos he so deserves. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For. Feline is kinda out nowadays and, as it concerns to me, OEJ is a nice fella. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 16:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
yes - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
For All work and no play makes one-eyed jack a dull boy! Weasel 3689 05:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
For One-Eyed Jack is such a cool honest guy. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Witt E, (talk • contribs) diff
FOR OEJ beeth an excellent individual. He giveth good advice upon Ye Urine Examination, and he giveth much of his time in providing the poor authors of articles encouragement. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 01:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
HELL YES --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Monocle-sporting for. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 20:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
For crying out loud, give him the stinking award already so we don't have to feel guilty about not being as awesome as he is. --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 06:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
HITLER SAYS YES!, Hitler! 04:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
For We haven't met our quota of awards to cyclopses for this month yet. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +17 (one heptadecapoint)

Nomination and For, Modusoperandi is always on. I mean, look at this man's votes, responces on his talk page, articles, images, and face. Having him around means that there there will always be someone to bring a smile to the faces of Uncyclopedians. For that, and all the other stuff he probably does, I nominate him. -- The Zombiebaron 22:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For. He's crazy good at crazy good stuff. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
For - What Zombiebaron said. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes And that's all she wrote --RA HB 01:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
For. I've been gone this long and he still hasnt won this...what the hell? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, I think I nominated him once but everyone was blind to his work. Shame on you all. 04:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes Strange_but_untrue edits everything funny and reverts deleted potty humor. This person has the most votes and is therefore most likely to beat Strange_but_untrue so I'm voting for him. Strange_but_untrue also stalks me on Uncyclopedia and reverts most of my notable edits, even those that follow Uncyclopedia's, strict, wikipedish rules.SteveSims 21:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment This is probably the worst reason to vote for someone. MO deserves this award for many reasons, not because you can't settle your differences with another candidate. ~ 12:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Question - Does anyone think that vote should be discounted? I certainly do. It doesn't seem like a legitimate reason. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Answer. I crossed it out. I'm not so much of a whore as to accept bad votes. If SteveSims is kidding, I'll accept it; but the "joke", if it is one, doesn't come across in the comments. It sounds, dare I say, Dramaish. Just say "No" to Drama, kids. And stay in school. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow - hate mail under somebody else's nom. I feel strangely honoured (although not as much as for getting nommed - thanks again Mordillo!). I thought it was USERNAME abuse at first! -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

For. He's always making us laugh indeed.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 15:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
MO makes me feel all warm and fluffly, he's comforting like your favourite old socks, or that jumper that Aunty knitted for you, that, even though it breaks seven of the nine main rules of fashion still makes you feel great, especially when you're not wearing anything underneath it. I'd give him a big FOR. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 19:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Dig. Rather entertaining, definitely deserves. --THINKER 19:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
For- Helpful, non-flaming, and always doing stuff.--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Dla dobrzego sprawiedliwosc, grzeczny pan! --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
02:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
For. Never fails to put a smile on my face. But I swear I'm laughing with him. Honest. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:26, 21 Apr 2007
For I would totally hire him to write...if only I had a show...--Shandon 18:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Fore! Wait, this isn't golf? Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For, even though every bone in my body is telling me to rip his arm off and beat him with the wet end. --Anyone 03:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For -- Well, it doesn't really matter anymore. Still, this is me sucking up to someone supreme. Ikabu 10:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
For I was going to leave it until the very last minute and swoop in and maybe get the deciding vote, but I can't be bothered to wait that long. Modus is very funny, nice even to idiots, and... well, he rolls a good, umm, grumpy baby. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Strange but untrue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4 strangenesses corrected

N+F. It seems that these days the lady is just everywhere, cleaning, tidying and being nice to everyone. More than deserving. ~ 19:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
For - She is a very frequent voter, and excelent member of the Capercorn Trials Jury.Capercorn 23:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
For. --EMC^[TALK] 08:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Against. I don't like her Madretsma 10:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

If I change my vote to delete on Genocide, can I have a for (or at least a non-against)? I'll do it, ya know! (Yeah, vote for me, I have such strong principles... :-) ) -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

For. There's bad vibes here, man. This is karma correction. Also Sbu rolls the tightest joints, which is a bonus. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Negative (that means against) - it's not funny, and I doubt it's actually even alive --Weebils 17:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

You know, if I happen to get nommed again at some point, I think I'm leaving the template off my userpage - it seems like everybody with a grudge has immediately found this page. And I was trying to be nice about the VFD thing, Weebils. Sigh. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 06:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

For a tough choice with three great Uncyclopedians. SBU gets my nod because he doesn't bogart. It's the little things. --Kenvalyi 14:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
For. gosh zillacorrespondence 19:42, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Strong For. She's one of my favorite people here. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest

Spang (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0xE hexapoints (+14 decimal)!

Nom and For - Whenever I'm online, Spang seems to be working his/her (seems to be in both categories) ass off doing general cleanup stuff. He/she is also happy to help us non-admins if we prod him/her hard enough. FU SPANG! Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
CommentI fell for that he/she trap, and nearly bought her a drink before I realized he was actually a drunk Scot. FU SPANG!~ 06:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment: For the record, I am indeed male. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:20, 4 Apr 2007
For FU SPANG —rc (t) 08:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
<Insert affirmative vote riffing off the "FU SPANG" motif here> —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 12:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
<Insert different FU SPANG rip-off FOR vote here> ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 17:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Again, I seem to be voting For Spang--TKF 12:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
For This time it's a real vote.SteveSims 21:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
For Who else deserves such a honour and prestige? Surely none! Without Spang we would have no hilarious captialtised motifs nor would we have the whole is he/she isn't he/she debate. Truly Spangle G. Glittersprinkles deserves this award. --Ceridwyn 00:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
For. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 16:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
IV. He sets an appropriate (if not good) image for teh grAEt Uncyclopedica. Heil Spang! --thematrixeætsyou, the ass kicker (talk) (flames) 03:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
For --Ilona06 02:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment - I would just like to say that UotM is becoming rather difficult right now. All of this month's candidates are very deserving of the award, and there are several more users who deserve it too. Hmm, who to nominate next month... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Next month is going to be relatively easy to decide, since the person that comes in 2nd this time around would most likely just get nommed again and recieve an onslaught of votes. The month after that, though, will be hard. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:47, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

For FU SPANG, FU RC, FU BRAYDIE, AND FU, KYLE! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
For FU SQUIGGLE.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 06:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
For FU Hexadecimal. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 06:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
FOR. FU SPANG. --Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

May 2007

Spang (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +FU 21!!

N+FSpang is the man. What more can I say? He does a bunch of stuff around here, some of which is actually useful. That makes Spang more useful than the rest of us who are, by definition, less useful. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For - FU SPANG. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
FU FOR FU SPANG FU! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
For For For Ceridwyn^talk_contribs^arc2.0 03:22, 01 May 2007
FU Again, okay? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 12:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For - yeah, sure -- The Llama Llo ver !!! 16:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For. - Most definitely. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 18:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For --RA HB 23:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For I've seen him around. I believe in him.--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment May I just say how sporting it is of MO to nom Spang for this month's vote after winning last month's vote himself. ^_^ Ceridwyn^talk_contribs^arc2.0 01:45, 02 May 2007

Also comment I would've voted for him myself last month, but I used my vote to counter an ugly against on another user. Ugly against, by the way, is a euphemism for "crotch". Use it in your next conversation. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

For Spang, just to spite him, since he was in IRC telling everyone he'd kill the next person who voted for him for UotM.--<<>> 02:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment he did WHAT?!?! Well tell him he'll have to start with me, since I voted too. I can't get on IRC from school :*( Ceridwyn^talk_contribs^arc2.0 02:42, 02 May 2007

He lies! I just said I didn't need Zombiebaron's vote. Although my recommendation for UotM is STM, he's awesome and stuff. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:12, 02 May 2007

Well thats ok then :P Ceridwyn^talk_contribs^arc2.0 03:15, 02 May 2007

Killing the next person who votes for you... not needing undead votes... Honestly, who can tell the difference between these two turns of phrase?--<<

>> 11:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

For. «rips off FU SPANG, same as last month». —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 2/05 15:31
For COLOUR SPANG!!!!--Sloga n - (T/C/med) 09:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
For - Modus told me to. Also FU people who don't like Spang. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:13, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
For Foregone conclusion. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 15:24, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
For Useful Spang. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 15:38, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Oh dear....For United we all stand with Spang. ~ 16:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
For Good work and good works should be recognized. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:58, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
For Spang is a very special Uncyclopedian. --Kenvalyi 03:59, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Dig I'll vote for Alksub again sometime. Spang has actually helped me though, so I think he should get it right now. --THINKER 22:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
FU Hate hate hat. —rc (t) 22:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 02:48, 30 May 2007
For Weasel 3689 02:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Savethemooses (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +FREEthemooses

Nomination and For, last month Savethemooses was robbed of UGotM, and I'm fairly certain that it was because he was too good for UGotM. I mean, 19 featured articles, 1 featured image, and a handsome mustache. All of those things point to one award, one month, and one year. All of which are this month, year, and award. -- The Zombiebaron 02:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For Also, I rock at banning noobs. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For. Moose deserves it. I've saved several of them. --Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Amazing that he's been around this long and still not won it. FOR. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
UBER AGAINST well... you deserve it -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Guns!! Neh... --Sir General Minister G 5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 09:59, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Olipro (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4 Buggering Brits

I think Oli more than deserves a nom. I had doubts on his work ethic during the recent VFS, but he has come down on recent changes like a man possessed and shows no let up. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For Yeah, okay. --Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 15:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
ULTIMATE AGAINST FU OLI!!!!!!1one -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 03:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
ULTIMATE NEGATE! FU STM!!!!!!1one --Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Comment Oh, mooses...one is the correct number of votes that you have. Two is one too many. Particularly silly ones like this. And the other one, too. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:40, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Technically I made a +1 vote and a -1 vote, which evens out to zero votes. So I could vote again for myself. --

» Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 15:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

For. Nice job as a new sysop. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 04:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Placeholder Vote for next month's voting. Yes. I'm voting for you in advance. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:19, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Ditto I had to give my vote to Spangles this month but I'll totally vote for you next month Oli ^_~ Ceridwyn^talk_contribs^arc2.0 08:36, 06 May 2007
- You can vote for me next month too. I'll nominate myself again. It'll be fun. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:53, 07 May 2007
  - Sounds cool! Sorry Oli! Maybe in July! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:50, 08 May 2007
AGAINST FU OLI!!!!! --General Insineratehymn 22:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah crap. Insineratehymn hates me too? ;_; -- Prof. Olipro

KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Shouldn't the score be 3 or did Mhaille only nom and not for? O_o Poor Oli. He needs moar votes! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:54, 10 May 2007

I gave my vote to that Moose guy....but its Oli for me next month. -- Sir Mhaille

(talk to me)

For! He gives me a reason to laugh at ban summaries and engage in wild orgies on IRC. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

for This dude is the evil seamy underpresence of nauseating crap, the stink of which results in UnNews. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 22:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Alksub (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 Retards

Nom & For, because the bloody admins are hogging the votes at the moment. Also, he really deserves it. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Pro Alksub is awesome. --THINKER 03:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
For Alksub is nuff wicked and ting. --Dantoller
For. Fixes up a lot of my articles when people screw them up, etc. --So So 07:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Cs1987 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nom I don't know, I hear he does stuff. I think I voted for him for admin. —rc (t) 03:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Huh? Where have you been hearing these things?

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

That's been the scuttlebutt down at the Rainbow Brite Tavern. Even if you don't actually do stuff, that's no obstacle to winning UotM - just look at some of the losers who have gotten it. —rc (t) 04:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I noticed that's even been happening at UotY too.

Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Except for TheTris. That guy was freakin' unstoppable back in 2004 before Uncyclopedia existed. —rc (t) 04:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Pro Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit --Kip the Dip 16:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Pro --Ye Olde Luke 10:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

Ceridwyn (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11 pages speld real good

Nom + For. For starting our Proofreading Service. This ingenious idea helps turn good pages wif bad speling and pore punkuashin into good pages with good spelling and good grammar. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:08, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Yup. I almost have a moral obligation to vote for her, since I used her service about 5 times. -- herr doktor needsAraygun [scream!] 07:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

her service you say? is that an hourly rate? -- Prof. Olipro

KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Nasty, man. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Oui! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:09, 01 Jun 2007
What can possibly go wrong? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Of Course-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For: Oh yeah. She rocks the house. --EMC^[TALK] 07:04, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 23:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For - Great contributions, and made me feel truly welcomed and wanted here by posting a welcome message with tips and advice on my user page when I made my first edit. Thanks! --Jlmathwhiz 06:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
For Because she created something useful that has stayed the course, which doesn't happen often enough around here. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
For. For the Proofreading Service, an idea that I thought of myself at one point, but couldn't be bothered executing. -- Mitch 18:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Olipro (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +23 insomniac sysops

Nom & For Look at his logs. 'Nuff said. –—Hv (talk) 1/06 11:10
Without a single doubt its Oli for me. He's been nothing short of phenomenal of late. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 13:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Yes please -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 17:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Aye - even though he is stinky. RabbiTechno 17:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Strong For, it makes me sad to note that I wasn't quick enough to nominate him. -- The Zombiebaron 19:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
yeeeeess --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For...his ability to balance beer consumption and administrative activity is nothing less than astonishing.--'Big Sur' Shandon 20:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
For Oli definately deserves this award, the other candidate is rubbish! But seriously, theres no competition here, Olipro does amazing work around here and completely deserves this! <3 That and I promised him last month I'd vote for him!!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:41, 01 June 2007
PINK FLOYD IS OVERRATED!!!!!!!!!1!11111 ;) --THINKER 23:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- You... fucked up old hag, ha ha charade you are. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
  - Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away, you're balanced on the biggest wave, racing towards an early grave, Mr. Thinker.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
    - Thinker, have a good drown as you go down all alone. Dragged down by the stone--Leoispotter
      - When you grow up and turn off your radios, you'll find a wondrous world of music which is so expansive that my statement is true. They're a good band. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got a Mahavishnu record to listen to (followed by a double-shot of Shadowfax, and a little Camel on the side!).. ;) --THINKER 21:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
        A little Camel? I always thought you were into that kind of stuff... -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 04:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
        Don't be jealous that Camel has better hair and more living members than the Floyd, man.. :-D --THINKER 04:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
        
        Oh snap! Somebody just threw down the My Taste In Music Is More Obscure Than Yours gauntlet! —rc (t) 05:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
      - Oooo 'tis a slippery slope to try to fight that battle with me. Accordingly, I welcome all challengers. ;) --THINKER 05:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
      - PS - He started this whole mess back in IRC; I would never have played my musical douchebaggery hand without provocation!! --THINKER 05:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
        The memories of a man in his old age, are the deeds of a man in his prime. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
    - Pink Floyd is NOT overrated! Pink Floyd is awesome! Almost as awesome as Led Zep! 'Nuff said.P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
For I am an insomniac too. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
For Oli in June, and Ceridwyn in July!--<<>> 17:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For His block summaries are hilarious. --General Insineratehymn 17:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
For He's just about the best sex on Uncyclopedia. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- "Just about" /snicker ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:34, 02 June 2007
  - I assume you two ladies want to get into his pants? --General Insineratehymn 20:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
    - You assume wrong :P I was making a dig at the wording used. That hes "just about" the best sex on Uncyc. Clearly someone else was better... ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:53, 04 June 2007
      - Thanks PP.....it WAS a special night, wasn't it. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
        Yes, but we'll always have Paris (now that she's out of jail). Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
For Weasel 3689 06:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
For stealing like half my reverts you bastard! Ж Kalir _{totally not Wario at all} 03:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
For - He set me straight. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
4 - Even though he dissed Floyd, he has the balls to get into a banning war with Famine.....He deserves this before he gets nuked and must burn in Hell for eternity.P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Me? dissing Floyd? you must have me confused with someone else... I suggest you see my Userpage -- Prof. Olipro

KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Yai! --Private Gert 5 UGotM 08:03, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
HELLZ YEAZ Everyone loves Famine because he is a ruthless Admin. I love Olipro cause he is a nice admin who probably dose about the same amout of work as Famine. He is the most deserving of this award, plus he bribed me--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E throw a snowball 03:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment - Oli? Nice? You must mean Olicro, his nice twin. ~

06:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Comment - He treats me with respect and kindess, Famine just calls me a mother fucker and bans me for no reason.--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E

throw a snowball

07:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

For. This might be the most amazing transformation I've ever seen here, from a lazy unnews bastard to a lazy bastard with a ban stick. All hail Oli the insomniac! ~ 06:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
YES!!! Verrrrrrry good. Dattebayo321 17:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
For Olipro, Olipro, wherefore art thou, Olipro? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
For He's in the lead. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

... of the Year

Uncyclopedian of the Year

Algorithm (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

Nominate: Over the past year this site has grown immensely, and we've faced many new challenges as a result. From content management to communication, we've faced technical hurdles that needed to be solved, and Algorithm has been the lynchpin that has allowed us to face them. A year ago, the Village Dump was a different place that could never have handled the level of traffic it now recieves. A year ago there were no lists of tagged pages whose times had expired. Even the much-maligned NRV tag has been vital, and Algo was responsible for making it possible and for allowing it to improve. The fundemental reality is that this site could not exist as it is now without the work that Algo has done. Other than the prior winners of this award, I think Algo is the only person I could make such a statement about. -Rev. Isra (talk)

Todd Lyons (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +7

Nominate and For: I know that Todd has won just about everything there is to be won on this site, all with good reason. From the moment he arrived on Uncyclopedia you just knew that he was going to be successful here. Not only have the levels of his writing and general contributions been consistantly high, as the stats will show he has just done so much more than the rest of us, and done it well. That he has created some of the best work on the site, whilst at the same time knee-deep in the Admin duties says everything to me about his commitment. Regardless of what the future may hold, this is the Year of the Todd. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)

For.' Todd has been one of my favourite writers on this site since December 24th 2005 (brownie points if you know why), and although I've been missing for most of the year, even when I returned Todd was still an extremely prominent user, to all. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 19:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
For - Great writer, great admin, great contributions, just great all round. I think the fact that he wrote the controversial Asperger's Syndrome only gives him extra points in my book. Then again, I am notoriously uncool. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Although I don't have a nice long reason for voting like everyone else, I do know that Todd deserves this award. When I first came to Uncyclopedia, only a month or so after Todd had joined, I could've sworn he was master of the site. His name was everywhere, and everyone loved him. Although he may not be as universally popular as he once was, neither is anyone who's been here for over a year. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For I've known I was gonna vote for him from the moment I learned he hadn't won. To say that his writing is hilarious, focused, and clearly a shining example of some of the best of this site is only scratching the thinnest surface of this fine User's contributions. He huffs, he cleans up, he helps n00bs, and he even sings for UnTunes. I can't list nearly the tiniest percent within the scope that he contributes to. It's an honor for Todd to have graced Uncyclopedia, and if he hasn't improved it more than nearly anyone else, I don't know who has. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
(chanting) Todd. Todd. Todd. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [03:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)]
I've forseen this nomination an year ago. Mhaille is a strong candidate too.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +22

Nomination and For: Anyone thinking of voting for me should probably vote for Mhaille instead, because I'm not certain there would've been a "me" if there wasn't a "him" already here. The same could be said of many other users who call this site home. Though the "official" welcoming committee is a fairly recent phenomenon, Mhaille was already an expert n00b coddler when I was still in wikidiapers. :) Within minutes of posting, he started making pictures for my crappy first articles. I was thrilled, wrote some more, and kept on writing because of the unconditional support he gave me. He hooked me, and scores of other users, and didn't ask for anything in return. It took a long time for this site to recognize his own immense talent as a writer, editor and artist, mostly because he was always the last person to promote himself. Rather, he buoyed a lot of us up into awards that he rightfully should have received first. I'm glad, but not the least bit surprised that despite his modesty he's finally been recognized for his creative talent and administrative leadership. This award would be due recognition for everything he's given us, and my vote goes to him. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

For, Honestly, Mhaille is the Uncyclopedia user I am closest too, due to his good nature and guiding lights. While Splaka created my talk page, Mhaille was the second user to edit it (after me), pointing out that the all seeing eye was always watching. Since then Mhaille has helped me with my Photoshops (read "Potatochops"), articles, and good will. "Good will?", you ask. Well, at one point I thanked Mhaille for some favor that he had done me, and I said that I owed him a favor. At that point Mhaille decline my favor, saying that the reason that he does favors is not to recive favors, but that "the idea is that you do nice stuff for other people and the circle continues". Well, I could go on and on about Mhaille and all the wonderful things he has done for the site, but I'll stop here. Lotsa Love, --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 01:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For. What can I say? I was paid to vote for him. In my opinion, he's a vagrant, a gobshite, and above all, an insult to the Uncyclopedia name. God forbid we never had Mhaille; I mean, Holocaust Tycoon, Neolithic Age, and Biggles: what tasteless piles of trash. These articles should have been QVFDed immediately. Sorry to break it to you Mhaille, but we all conspired to feature your crap to make you feel good about yourself, and apparently that's all gone to your head. I've only been here six months, and even I know that. And I expect you're going to vote for yourself you selfish whore. In all seriousness, go fuck yourself. I love you. --EMC^[TALK] 04:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For Re-iterating the above message, Mhaille was one of the very first people (along with Bradaphraser) to welcome and support me on IRC over the summer, back when I was we lil' noobling without the slighest bit of humor or sense to guide me in a first farcical forays into article writing. Mhaille always helped me with my articles, added to them, asked me to help him on his (though God knows that my additions/revisions were of dubious quality), provided me with pictures, always was willing to indulge my silly, flippant attitude and style, and above all was willing to make this place hospitable for a new user. I can safely say that without him, and those like him, I wouldn't be here today. This may seem like an overwrought, drawn-out display of decadence, which, to a degree it is, but mixed in here, somewhere (you can see it if you kind of squint), is a real honest appreciation for someone who embodies all that is great about "Uncyclopedia." All the people currently nominated are deserving in every way. Mhaille is just more deserving. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 05:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For, even if he is a Scouser.
Seriously, though, he rules. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For - Yes, I agree with ENeGMA, although I seemed to gain a lot of support from people when I first came here. Mhaille was one of them, (the others know who they are.... if they don't.. maybe I dreamt all this). I think he is the most deserving candidate here at this time, so I'm giving my vote to him. —Braydie at 12:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For. If you aren't going to give this to the same people every year, and there enough great people here that we don't need to do that, then we need to find the most-deserving people of those who are left. Todd and Mhaille both come to mind, in this case, as people who are always very classy AND do good work here. I have to give the overall nod between the two to Mhaille because he's been here the whole time, and I don't think he's ever left for more than a couple days at a time. Thus, he gets my vote, with a nod to Todd as well.--<<>> 20:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I Approve This Message, /me cries like a baby for bein' torn between the 2 men that he loves 20:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For He Who Watches From Behind The Code--Shandon 20:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For being bloody awesome. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 22:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For just to see how high this vote can go. Seriously though, Mhaille sounds great. He hasn't helped me yet, though(it's not too late!). --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
For, let me tell you a little story; starting a potential rewrite on a page...got the text basics fleshed out (maybe an hour or so in), and 'Boom', suddenly there's a friggin' picture there. Retouched, too. And appropriate! Get this; Mhaille does this all the time. Some users are helpful, he's pre-helpful.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For He's really nice and he makes some of the best articles here on Uncyclopedia. --General Insineratehymn 02:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For, 4, Four and fore. Best. Person. Ever. ~~I WAS HERE~~ -k j h f !- 13:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For: He seems to be incurably benevolent, and really is helpful without being asked. --Sir Jam 10:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
For. First off let me say that anything nice said about Mhaille is a blatant lie, and also completely untrue. He's ~~probably~~ definitely the reason why this place sucks so much, and is the worst site on the internet. A world without Mhaille is as close to Utopia most of us will ever come. Did I mention he once put a bomb inside a puppy? Anyway, hope you win UotY! (Dear Todd, this is all a trick, I really hope you win) (Dear Mhaille, don't read that) --Anyone 21:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

(Dear Anyone, no chance. Thanks anyway. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 14:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC))

For. I've been fond of him (in an platonic way, stop staring at me!) since he welcomed me to Uncync. Besides the fact that he is virtually everywhere (there's a good expression in Hebrew which describes him: His hand is in all, and everyones' hands are in him. Just an expression you sick sick people!) he manages to do so without ever losing his temper. He actually makes vandals feel ashamed with his dry British bans. All in all, Mhaille's my vote. God save the queen. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 10:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
for. consistantly dilligent and fair admin, consistantly solid writer, so dedicated an uncyclopedian that he may be in need of psychiatric help. Get outside, smell the trees - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
For. So, I voted for Todd for WOTY, therefore Mhaille is the only choice for UOTY. "Ooh, but Codeine, that's tactical voting. That's hardly right, is it?" Shut the fuck up. Every last one of you should make the effort to thank these two men personally for making this website what it is today. Mhaille keeps our signal-to-noise ratio cleaner than a digital mastering studio; he not only welcomes, but invests time and effort into helping noobs, he writes consistently outstanding articles, he makes consistently outstanding pictures, he damn near lives on IRC pointing people in useful directions... in short, he is the very definition of an Uncyclopedian. Mr. M., I salute you sir. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For- Mhaille is a real nice fella :) I know, and Mhaille does help out with images alot, and even contibuted to the DNA article of mine, what, he must have been watching recent changes and saw my plea. What a nice fella. I wish I could vote for Todd too, since hes such a cool guy too, and he even audio recorded one of my unnews stories.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 01:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
For - He's a nice guy... --AAA! (AAAA) 08:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
For. What.. er... everyone else said. Damn, there was going to be a pithy comment here. -- 02:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: =|:D\-<

Nomination and for. Yes, I know he won last year's award, but this shouldn't be an issue at all. Rc has been ever present, augmenting what I believe to be correct Uncyclopedic behavior, giving up a lot of his free time to keep the site running smoothly. That's not to say the other candidates are undeserving, of course. They all should get props for their excellent contributions. But, in my humble opinion, no-one is equally... erm... without sin? ... as our very own, radio-controlled father Murphy. *raises glass* To RC! *ching!* ~ sin($) ^tan(€) 19:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

All the nominees thus far are deserving (Mhaille in particular for his ability to help out on a couple of my pages...sometimes before I'd started writing them...), but RC is my moral compass. My calm port in a stormy sea, if you will. For that, and for putting up with my histrionics, RC gets my for.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Quite possibly the best uncyclopedian, like, ever. For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:19, 1 Jan 2007
I really, really appreciate the nomination and votes, but just as with the other awards I think it's more fitting for the candidates to be people who haven't won it before, so I'm turning down the nomination. Also I'd never win anyway. So you guys can blow your votes on somebody else. :D —rc (t) 23:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Just remember that we still love you.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

And I love you all. Except ~~Spang~~ ~~Tompkins~~ ~~ERTW~~ Apples. —rc (t) 06:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

How can you not love Apples!?! So he and Fat Sandy are in some sort of fight - he's still a good guy.

t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I always assumed Apples was a girl... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:01, 9 Jan 2007

Well, his 10 year-old voice is probably pitched similar to that of a girl's.

t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Why are you talking about yourself in the third person, Tomps? —rc (t) 01:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I thought everyone already knew.... It's true, I'm ten years old, and have yet to hit puberty. I'm sorry to everyone that I've secretly cybered with throughout the past year (you, Murph, especially).

t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Writer of the Year

Hardwick Fundlebuggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +13

Nomination and For. He's one of my favourite writers, no wait, he is my favourite writer. Big up the 'Buggy. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 14:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For In my opinion, probably the best writer here, and the only one with a very distinct style. Hindleyite, Todd, and Procopius are the guys who get the chicks at parties for their writing. Hardwick's the distraught, mumbling clown in the corner with a typewriter and a comically large caveman stick, cranking out witticisms by the dozens and fending off spiders. And we love him for it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For It's Hardwick. I admire his writing more than anyone else's, and that's no light claim. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Hardwick was the guy who first showed me that there was more to Uncyc than Wilde quotes and amateurish pages about whatever. HF's helpful edits to a page of mine opened my eyes to how a simple turn of phrase could improve a page immeasurably. He continually raises the bar; in doing so he encourages all of us to improve, if only to stay one or more (mostly more) steps behind him. All of the writers nom'd here deserve WotY, but HF deserves it the most. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For Bouncy Castle et al. were a work of sheer brilliance. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 17:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For. It was a tough choice between hardwick and savethemooses, but HW just came out on top. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:24, 4 Jan 2007
for both quality and quantity - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
For.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For- Says it all really. --Sir Jam 21:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For. --So So 07:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Agains...agains...AARGH...I can't vote against a good writer. For. :) DaBlade (Click here to bitch. :)) 23:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
For...lots of good writers here, but I haveta pick the one that makes me laugh the most consistently and shows the greatest ingenuity--Shandon 18:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hindleyite (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nomination -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 14:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For - Master of the English culture. —Braydie at 23:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
For - Makes UnNews look good, and by association, me too. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Todd Lyons (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +8

Nomination -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 14:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For [Insert Reason Here] --General Insineratehymn 16:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For While the other users so far nominated are all excellent writers, Todd Lyons has again and again made me laugh, drawing many looks of wonder from passersby. I could, of course, list the articles he has written, but you all know them, or could visit his userpage and view the long long long list of them. --The Zombiebaron 21:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
I Approve This Message, 02:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Really difficult, three of my favourite writers on the site are listed here, all of stunning quality, in the end I think I've got to add quantity into the mix to seperate them. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
If Todd does not get this award, I shall be very sad indeed. Think about what you're doing. :) For. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [00:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)]
For. Ever since the day he rewrote David Gilmour before my very eyes (and within 15 minutes of me putting a rewrite tag on it), I knew we had someone special here. As Zombiebaron said, just go to his userpage and marvel at the list of consistently excellent work he's produced. Voting on this award has been such a hard decision for me, as both Todd and Mhaille hold the most special of places in my heart for their writing abilities; but I'll be damned if I let that egotistical Scouser win two annual awards at once. ;P Now stop listening to me gushing and go read Todd's articles. I said Now. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For He writes great articles, and he adopted me.--Shas 00:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment. Dear Shas, although ~~both Todd Lyons and Mhaille deserve~~ just Todd Lyons deserves your vote, you have to pick one. --Anyone 16:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

Nomination, someone had to do it.--<<>> 16:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For, with love to everyone else here (particularly myself). He wrote Voynich Manuscript and Neolithic Age, two of the more erudite featured articles. But mainly for his unstinting advocacy of Erraticus.--Procopius 19:12, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Even if he weren't my friend, I'd be hard-pressed to not vote FOR him anyway. He toiled hard for a long time before people started to actually read the great material he was putting out. Kudos, because that might have been the nail in the coffin for your typical prima donna, attention-whore writer. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 16:05, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
My favourite writer by far.--Shas 00:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Procopius (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +7

Nomination This guy should be paid for his writing, it's just one good thing after another. I look up to him as a writer and so do you probably.. —Braydie at 16:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Definitely deserves it, though I'm torn between him and Hardwick. --EMC^[TALK] 22:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
For - has produced more of my favourite articles from last year than anyone else. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
For
For, though the competition here is insane. We have too many awesome writers here (not to say that some of you should leave, of course).--<<>> 19:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
For. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 20:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
For I often wonder whether he's some famous author, writing under a pseudonym here. J.D. Salinger, is that you? --Composure1 21:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
For I love pseudo-historical articles, and Procopius has that kind of stuff down. —rc (t) 21:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Savethemooses (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nom and For. These are all good candidates, but I feel that because this is the first year we've had this award, and because Stm is (to me at least) the figurehead of Uncyclopedian writing, he deserves this award the most. The others are good, even great - but Stm is, in his own words "the best." t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment Savethemooses is one of my all-time favorite writers, within Uncyclopedia and outside of it, but STM's more of 2005's Writer of the Year. Could he, perhaps, win Writer of the Month 2005 as a Lifetime Achievement Award of some sort? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually yes, that's probably quite possible - of course he'd have to duke it out with Slackerboy, but maybe we can have something arranged after all of this is over. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment If this was WotY 2005, I'd vote Mooses. If it was WotAll Time, I'd vote Mooses. But even though we didn't have this award last year, I don't feel right about voting based on past articles...and while everything I read by Stm in 2006 was great, Procopius had it in quality and quantity. —rc (t) 21:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
For Makin' a competition out of it! -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's the spirit, man! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Gubby (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

Crazy Nom and Crazier For. I know, I know, where did I get those paint chips and why didn't I share, right? I looked at this vote and it is by far the hardest vote I've ever had to choose...which is why I didn't. Hardwick, Hindleyite, Todd, Mhaille, Procopius, and Savethemooses are some of the funniest writers ever, bar none, and there was no way I could pick just one. Gubby's HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia was the first article I read when I came here, and still one of the funniest. He isn't really around anymore and I doubt he'll win this, but what the hell. --Anyone 21:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment this is a bit like if I nominated Nakedman. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment. Besides rational and common sense, what's stopping you? --Anyone 19:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Reasoning. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 4

Writer of the Month

January 2007

David Gerard (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

February 2007

Electrified mocha chinchilla (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

March 2007

Emmzee (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Prettiestpretty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

April 2007

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

May 2007

Electrified mocha chinchilla

Shandon

Nydas

El Zoof

June 2007

Ljlego (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Nydas (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

HerrDoktor (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Electrified mocha chinchilla (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Noob of the Month

January 2007

JohnQ.Public (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Ben DeRoy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

The Bard (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Dynamo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

February 2007

Blahshoe (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Captain Carcass (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

The Number-One ALF Fan (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Contestant (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

March 2007

Heap (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

April 2007

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

MichaelHax (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

May 2007

Rcmurphy

۞ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Pat_Sharp (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Necropaxx (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Pigeon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Lambic (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Jafandahalf (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

June 2007

Dr. Skullthumper (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

۞ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Lambic (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Pieface (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Uncyclopedian of the Month

January 2007

Braydie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Tom_mayfair (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

February 2007

Flyingfeline (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Tom mayfair (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

70.149.33.94 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

March 2007

Flyingfeline (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Lugiatm (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

One-eyed Jack (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

April 2007

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Strange but untrue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Spang (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

May 2007

Spang (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Savethemooses (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Olipro (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser