Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 11
July 2010[edit source]
Writer of the month[edit source]
Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom This fag got robbed out of it last month. Seriously. What the Hell is wrong with you fuckers? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:07, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. His homosexuality in the British military just got featured, and he wrote some UnNews thingy recently. 15:13, 1 July 2010
- WILL YOU GIVE IT TO THAT MOTHERFUCKER ALREADY. ~ 15:29, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- And I think he had an entry in DrSkull's one-hour contest, so he's writing again. The criteria is met, For.. Aleister 16:56 1 7 MMX
- For. homosexuality in the British military, which I voted for, is so good it should be in a category like, UnThesis for UnDoctorate.--Funnybony 17:57, Jul 1
- For.--On Thursday, 06:18, July 01 2010 UTC
- For. --Black Flamingo 18:39, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- About fucking time (time to have hot gay sex) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 06:23, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Obvious for is obvious. He's deserved this for ages. Writes quality stuff. --UU - natter 08:39, Jul 2
- For. Definitely deserves it by now. —Pelozurian (talk) 09:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- For. Nachos for Nachers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:48, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- against SHIT AWARD FOR SHIT PEOPLE --nachlader 01:22, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- For, despite being absolutely cryptic. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 17:48, Jul 14 2010
- For. Long overdue, if you ask me. Give it to BlackFlamingo next month. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:17, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- For. -- Sf13 21:51 EST 28 July, 2010
Black flamingo11 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. I'm voting for Nach this month, but BF11 deserves a nom. He has six featured articles, including Salamander, the PLS best article. Pretty impressive, no?-- On Thursday, 06:18, July 01 2010 UTC
- For Black flamingo has written some of my favourite articles and, for that reason, gets my vote. Write more dammit. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:22, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Me likey. --Matfen 21:01, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Salamander literally made me shit myself with glee. 19:07, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Absolutely swell... so this is one of the ones responsible for getting kicked out of my economics class for laughing too hard... ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100718 - 21:16 (UTC)
DrStrange (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom & For He's won it twice, so he must be pretty awesome. -- mundane Ape (reward) (Riot Porn) 01:44, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For Must be. He's won it twice. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:46, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Fore Three times is the charm! -
- For He is most certainly qualified to win this. --++ 09:04, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
HELPME (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- NomForHELPME is our man, if he can't do it, nobody can. Help has been everywhere and everywhen on Uncy the past few months, and has both learned the ropes and climbed up them to rescue lost cats. A celebration of Uncy usefulness. Aleister 10:14 1 7 MMX
- For! 10:18, 1 July 2010
- Fuck yeah! HELPME is a really awesome dude, and I <3 him! Love,
- For.--Funnybony 17:01, Jul 1
- For. Anybody who disagrees can suck my dick--If you're 555 then I'm 17:05, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- I think I'll take you up on that one.--On Thursday, 06:26, July 01 2010 UTC
- Although I can't remember my reasons for voting for him last month, I'm sure they were logical. --Black Flamingo 18:35, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For -RAHB 22:24, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 06:20, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- What Aleister said... ...minus the "man" part.
- Duh... —Pelozurian (talk) 02:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- For! Helps others more than he helps himself. Will never Helpme though. --Matfen 10:31, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For! hell yeh .Lordarcadian 00:39, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For. What can I say, I see a crowd and want to join it. Don't judge me! --—John Lydon 14:33, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, though I still haven't forgotten that UGotM nom, HELPME. You're on the list. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 17:50, Jul 14 2010
- For since I just got back from a family vacation last week. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 21:46, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Eh, a mildly useful fellow, I suppose
it'she's decent enough... for. ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100718 - 21:12 (UTC) - Against He agreed on reviewing my article on Pee Review, waited 5 days and then wrote he was not going to review this. In my opinion, it disqualifies him as an Uncyclopedian of the Month. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:57, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
- KILL IT WITH FIRE! That means jacking up the score in the absence of a mercy rule here in The South. (aka For.) -- Sf13 21:51 EST 28 July, 2010
- For. ~ 07:14, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
This guy's new? He's been so bloody helpful I thought he was a seasoned user of many moons. For. --Andorin Kato 07:28, July 29, 2010 (UTC)- I'm an idiot. I thought this was Noob of the Month. Nonetheless, this user has been very helpful, so for nonetheless. --Andorin Kato 07:30, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For This noob is so helpful, it's like he has been here for months. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:43, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
- Against.. C-c-c-combo breaker....and you still scare me...and you are homosexual...and because it's fun to c-c-c-combo break. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 05:52, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Simsilikesims (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and For. No, fuck me. (literally) Sims does a lot more than I do, and has been around longer. She reports and reverts vandals, does cleanups instead of drivebys, and makes a much bigger difference. --On Thursday, 06:25, July 01 2010 UTC
- For. I was going to nominate the Count of Monkey Cristo but as it seems Helpme has this in the bag, a nod for Simsiilikesims. I think she and Guildy should marry by the way as their names are equally easy to misspell when written out in full. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:24, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
- That is the best reason for a marriage that I have ever heard. 17:41, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Ethine (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom but never gonna be for Stupid whore stole it from HELPME last month. Mock her. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:26, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- against cocks 70.179.49.110 02:05, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- for dicks lol 17:40, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
- against 84.194.169.151 10:18, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Saberwolf116 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom + For. Guy needs a mention. He comes and goes, but when he's here, he does more good than mostly anyone else. -- 19:54, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Vain for. Partly because I'm glad to be nommed, and partly because I'll be here for a while. Saberwolf116 21:45, July 19, 2010 (UTC)
Noob of the Month[edit source]
Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- My little nooblet has written some good articles (like Manhole, Crossbow and Fern) and he has a cool sig. Anyway, For. —Pelozurian (talk) 22:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- For. Looks......promising. Maybe she can be useful so we won't have to send her to the to the mines, after all. I do like the article on Man Holes.-- 08:32, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Something about this person just bothers me... ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100708 - 14:27 (UTC)
- I'm changing my vote for absolutely no reason at all, certainly not due to mind control, being guilt tripped, or as a result of a recent anonymous donation of free hookers. Of course not. Absolutely no reason at all. ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100718 - 07:09 (UTC)
- Er, that's a for. ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100719 - 21:59 (UTC)
For. Just cause i know em' and...well ya that's it. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 15:00, July 14, 2010 (UTC)- Spiritual For for hir posts on talk pages and her pees, some of he funniest cleverest language and concepts I've seen since I arrived here (by walking through the wrong mirror). Not many actual articles though, and a couple of more pages of just hir free-flowing writing would probably be gems. But huge spiritual for right now. Aleister 12:41 14 7
- Certainly for. Crossbow. WTF?? 20:31, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- The best one so far. -- 02:45, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- For. No real alternative this month. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:43, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, we're having a good month here. The lady had a different account that was active in July 2009. So not eligible I'm afraid. Let's save the usual long discussion and get on with our lives. ~ 15:39, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- And guess what happened. Sir MacMania GUN—[18:42 23 Jul 2010]
Horace Donald Westenchester (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Horace is an complete asshole who was already banned once. But he is a fantastic writer who is consistent, prolific, and fun to read. Has joined the pee team too. Just because he's so good, is he a sock? Probably not, although. . .Toast??? Cousin of Toast??? Nah. ? . Aleister 23:15 1 7 MMX
- Alison, at this point, I'm positive that wasn't intentionally an asshole move.--On Friday, 01:45, July 02 2010 UTC
- He's definitely not TOAST-related. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:59, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Alison, at this point, I'm positive that wasn't intentionally an asshole move.--On Friday, 01:45, July 02 2010 UTC
- Against He's a troll. -- mundane Ape (reward) (Riot Porn) 01:47, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- What does that even mean? He has posted no comments outside of his pees, as far as I know, even on his talk page. So a comment on his hair? Seems to be a very good addition to our writing corps. AIC 2:09 2 7 MMX
- He voted against every article on VFH without reading them. Fuck him. He should get some sick. -- mundane Ape (reward) (Riot Porn) 02:20, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, OK. But it turns out he did vote "For" on two or three. But a noob, so he got a probation, and has stuck to it. Anyway, he's saving pages on VFD now. I'm turning into a Horace fanboy. AIC 2:23 2 7 MMX
- He voted against every article on VFH without reading them. Fuck him. He should get some sick. -- mundane Ape (reward) (Riot Porn) 02:20, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- What does that even mean? He has posted no comments outside of his pees, as far as I know, even on his talk page. So a comment on his hair? Seems to be a very good addition to our writing corps. AIC 2:09 2 7 MMX
- Sock No doubt in my mind that he's a sock. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:26, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed sock. ~ 18:23, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Who is "he"? Dexter says he knows, but there is no sockpuppet template on his user page. Who, pray tell, has tricked me into nomming "him" for NotM, as I must extract my revenge. Served cold, of course. Aleister 1:26 10 7 MMX
- Ah, revenge being contemplated. Heh heh heh, /wrings hands/, heh heh. Aleister 12:44 14 7
Lordarcadian (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. My adorable noob has written HowTo:Get things for free and HowTo:Kill by Drowning, plus, he's a funny person overall. Withholding my vote until the end of the month.-- On Friday, 01:45, July 02 2010 UTC
- for I know its in poor taste but I will vote for me ~ The* ~ 05:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Showing great promise so should be encouraged. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:51, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- And another Spiritual For here (spirits can divide into many parts). Prolific, good writer with a knack for filling up a page with goodies. Aleister 17:51 14 7
- For. Hes a good ol' fella and he has my vote --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 16:15, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: User was temporarily blocked for a bad upload. I don't know whether this affects their ability to receive NotM, which is why I mention it. --Andorin Kato 01:32, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- As long as he behave well from now on there are not further implications. ~ 05:53, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Apparently the only promising one on here that's not a sockpuppet, so yeah. Sir MacMania GUN—[15:42 23 Jul 2010]
- A Real For A really good writer, creator, chopper, and pee reviewer. Too bad he retired, for like what, 5 minutes? Nice to work on the same site with him. (I knew I'd vote for him eventually for a couple of weeks, once Lyteria was struck out, see my note on Lyteria's nom) Aleister 15:49 23 7
- Ok this whole month got very odd. Lordarcadian 00:58, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Of course it did, it's the month you and I joined! -Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 21:40, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok this whole month got very odd. Lordarcadian 00:58, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
- For. He beat me at Conservation Week, dammit! 08:35, 29 July 2010
- For. I didn't just vote for because I adopted him. No way.--HM (T)
Jcameronfan123 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Nom+For. Like a less experienced mini-Guildy. Has done decent writes on directors such as Christopher Nolan, and James Cameron, and therefore has also been reducing the requested articles list. The articles aren't exactly Guildy-standard (who's are?), but I think in time, when he gets to know the ropes, he could be a good user. I'll stop sucking Guildy's dick now. --Matfen 10:27, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
Happymonkey39 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Nom+For. Happymonkey has constantly shrived to better himself here amongst us despite, well, being amongst us. Always fun to read on talk pages, this user has already written more than myself AND Micheal Jackson combined, and has thus far only had one of seven compositions huffed. Years from now when you look back at this Nobel prize winning potentiate and exclaim, "What a Fantastic noob!" you will do so with a grin on your face and a smile in your heart. Verily I cannot begin to extol the virtues of such a wonderful addition to our family as this new guy who "rocks" very much indeed. A giant among giant-midgets, this user has already received praise like, "You are doing lots of interesting pages!"[1] "Damn, that is some SEXY writing!"[2] "Don't try pulling 'im a noob' sympathies on me, sonny..."[3] & "... you have a lot of potential..."[4] Despite his ineligibility for this award, he's a new noob to me so please help me to welcome such a future endearing soul to the party that is Uncyclopedia. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 15 Jul 2010 ~ 02:40 (UTC)
- necessarily i am a noob, ive had this account for a while, but never really used it till june...that was absolutely touching happytimes...i think you deserve a cookie, too bad Alister stole them all.... --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:12, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- *gives the happy fellows a big hug* Hail the happy. *runs off, having stolen all of the rest of their cookies* ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100715 - 05:00 (UTC)
- Aw shucks... ...munches on 'last' cookie...
- Wait, what cookies could Lyrithya have stolen if they were all stolen my Aliester? --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 15:21, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Aw shucks... ...munches on 'last' cookie...
- *gives the happy fellows a big hug* Hail the happy. *runs off, having stolen all of the rest of their cookies* ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20100715 - 05:00 (UTC)
- necessarily i am a noob, ive had this account for a while, but never really used it till june...that was absolutely touching happytimes...i think you deserve a cookie, too bad Alister stole them all.... --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:12, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Invalid nom. I really hate to be the killjoy here, but if Happymonkey has had his account for longer than the required 27-33 days, then he can't be nommed for this. The same thing happened with Miley Spears last summer. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 07:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Long and unnecessary discussion moved here. ~ 16:36, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and Strong against. This noob walks around the site like he's an admin or something.--On Friday, 09:47, July 09 2010 UTC
Mrowa (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and for . Mrowa is one of the Nonsa's refugee and according to the international law, he needs to get a dole, quarters and an award. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:24, July 26, 2010 (UTC)
August[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Black flamingo11 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and For. With consistently good writing and many features, Black Flamingo has carried the legacy of all Flamingo-kind to a new level. One of the best writers here. Yay! Aleister 15:02 1 8
- For. Considering the fact that I thrive on recognition and giggled like a little girl when I saw my nom, I have to say it was hard to be honest and vote for the guy who deserves it more. Believe me, he deserves it more. Also I actually have one feature less than he does. Just stating facts. User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For. For all sorts of reasons I'm too lazy to list. I mean, it's a good writer and whatnot. Consistently good. Doesn't even irritate me... much. ~ Apheori *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100802 - 13:59 (UTC)
- For. Some very good articles. - [14:43 2 August 2010] PlebYettie
- For. YES!--Funnybony 14:10, Aug 6
- For. Takes me months to form concepts that have taken him days. Also can count well... sometimes. --Matfen 19:33, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Abstain for now.Flamingo has 8 features, but doesn't appear on UN:HS. Someone ought to fix that. I believe his last three FAs were Frog, Roger Ebert, and Robert De Niro. 18:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I think it was Ebert, Takeshi's Castle and... I forget. --Black Flamingo 22:40, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Dragon Warrior - I'm fairly sure that was mine. --Black Flamingo 23:08, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I KILL YOU!
- Don't forget one of his most recent gropings, Marilyn Monroe. Aleister 00:56 6 8
23:11, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- I KILL YOU!
- Dragon Warrior - I'm fairly sure that was mine. --Black Flamingo 23:08, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Per all that stuff everyone else said. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:16, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Two words: Salamander. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 03:29, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Mustn't to forget longer-in-the-works entries such as Dragon Age: Origins and a large part played in the expansion of Alice in Sunderland, articles I had the pleasure of reading as a consequence of time spent at UN:PIC. 21:36, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 14:07, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Due to goodness. --UU - natter 15:33, Aug 23
- For.The Ayes have it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:42, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I think I'm going to vote solely on the basis that Salamander is probably one of my top ten favorite articles ever. 20:40, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Aye. The Fors have it. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 03:53 Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- For. Per above. 03:55, 25 August 2010
- Arf. It the Yeos have. Sir MacMania GUN—[03:59 25 Aug 2010]
- For. See band-wagon, jump on. --Sog1970 08:58, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Per above mentioned band-wagon and general writing goodness. -Dame 12:19, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Produces some of the best genuinely-funny satire articles.--HM (T) 21:46, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Mrthejazz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. Jazz has one more feature than flamingo and a PLS winner. His writing style is new and interesting. Withholding my vote until the end of the month.--HM (T)
- This guy is the man. -- 07:25, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Since I was going to nom him this month anyway.... Also, he has done one of my favorite articles, Necrophiliphobia, and won PLS multiple times. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:03, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I still laugh at HowTo:Staple toast to a wall... although you're wrong HELPME, I actually have .5 more features than him. Still, I think Jazz deserves this more, his articles are genuinely hilarious, while mine are just mildly tittilating. --Black Flamingo 17:04, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck yeah! Mrthejazz is pretty much the coolest guy ever. I <3 his toast article so hard it might explode. Love,
- For. Easily the most overlooked Uncyclopedia writer. Here's to you, captain! -RAHB 08:20, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- CHYEAAH I'd have sex with this guy --++ 09:12, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Abstain for now. Mrthejazz has 7 features. His last three FAs were HowTo:Be Enthusiastic Like Jack Black, Hello there! I'm a kite, and I will ruin your day!, and HowTo:Staple toast to a wall. 18:51, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, I think my last three features were HowTo:Staple toast to a wall, Unreliable Narrator, and UnNews:Warrant sent out for the arrest of the Wonderpets. I think now would also be a good time to point out that flamingo is my sock-puppet. Also, I breathe fire. User:Mrthejazz/sig 14:15, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This guy. Let me tell you about this guy... -- mundane Ape (reward) (Riot Porn) 18:56, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- I'd vote for this guy, but I already voted for the other person. But he deserves it too. Perhaps more, but perhaps not, so... eh. Whatever. He has my hungover love, anyhow. *wanders off* ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100828 - 13:35 (UTC)
Benson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and For I want in on this dramathon.
- comment This is a dramathon?User:Mrthejazz/sig 20:06, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes --++ 09:13, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Abstain for now. I believe Benson's only featured article is Pond Whales, which he wrote in November 2006. It was featured two years later. 19:01, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
Thekillerfroggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom equal representation. ~ The* ~ 03:30, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For Filial Piety is more than enough reason to give him WOTY, let alone WOTM. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:52, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Inanimate brick wall (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom Nobody has been better at stopping vandals in their tracks. Saberwolf116 20:26, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. User failed to vote for Whatcha thinking about?. Yes, spite is a legitimate grounds for voting. 20:34, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- A Rock-Solid For.
- Fo' sho' --Roman Dog Bird 21:09, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
Saberwolf116 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- WTF? Saber hasn't won this yet? Weird. He's done a huge amount of indepth reviews, voting, and other services to the site, such as moving the archive pages on VFD. Withholding vote blah blah.--HM (T)
I'm so cool. Saberwolf116 13:28, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Simsilikesims (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and for! Sims is awesome. She's always fixin' stuff, and helpin' out, and she's a really cool chick. Love,
- For -
71.110.135.234 08:26, August 3, 2010 (UTC)You saw nothing! -RAHB 08:27, August 3, 2010 (UTC) - Maybe next month. I've only been active for the past month or so, but Simslikesims has been consistently helpful and useful throughout Uncyclopedia since time immemorial. Saberwolf116 14:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Time for everyone else to like Sims too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:31, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- We like Sim. So should you. ~ 15:58, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Forget withholding my vote. This girl works a lot harder than me, that's for sure.--HM (T) 18:30, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Keeps low on the radar, just gets on with doing good stuff. My kinda user. --UU - natter 09:39, Aug 4
- For. Been a great user ever since she first showed up. Took me ages to work out what her name meant, though. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 09:26, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This seems to be the month! Aleister 9:43 5 8
- Yah. Under the Radar. Over Arrest. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 04:12, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Forivotefor. --Matfen 18:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Five. Even I know who Sims is. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 04:16 Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- For. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 06:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Count of Monkey Crisco (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom + For. This guy's developed serial bridesmaid syndrome about 2 years ago and never grew out of it. Still, he's pretty good, and was category spamming before it was cool. -- 03:19, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:37, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I like this guy. --Black Flamingo 20:25, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Ogopogo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. 5 years later and still not a single pointless edit. He doesn't do as much work in bulk as the rest of us, but this guy's had a lifetime achievement award overdue for about 3 years. -- 03:19, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:22, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Happytimes (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and for. Wait wait wait. He hasn't won yet? He's been here for over a year, has made over half a thousand page edits, gives aid to those in need and always brings happytimes. If he don't win then I...I... well actually i wont do anything, but seriously this dude should definitely win. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 15:24, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Spiritual For Everyone nommed here should win. Even the brick wall. And Happytimes is an obvious nom, and will carve his name on this very soon. A great user and a great nom. All of the above, plus he suggested the wording of Uncy's third holy law. Aleister 9:48 5 8
- For. Yes.--Funnybony 14:19, Aug 6
- Keep. Yeah Fudgemobile 01:16, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Aleister in Chains (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nomination and For Has anybody seen the impressive work Almeister has been pouring into VFD these days? This is in addition to creating his regularly phenomenal articles and being involved in other groups all over the wiki. Al deserves to be recognized for that work. -- Sf13 16:43 EST 7 Aug, 2010
- Just saw this, thanks very much for the compliment. I blush and climb a tree. But Sims, especially this month, and all these other folks, are the best of the best, so don't throw your vote away here because I'll just eat it with fava beans. Aleister 13:20 8 8
- Spiritual For This dude may steal cookies, but he is a great guy --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 01:42, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Genuine For —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [02:07 11 August 2010]
- Penis SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 03:26, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Brotha. Jenny? 22:34,16August,2010
- For. One of the good guys. --Sog1970 09:01, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Because I actually know who this guy is and he's decent and seems fairly deserving. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100828 - 14:19 (UTC)
Noob of the Month[edit source]
Fudgemobile (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and For. With over eight correct contributions to the Uncyclopedia:Proofreading Service[1] (beating the only other contributor in recent times by a factor of 4.) As well as offering to help the community fix the incorrect and wrongs[2] of the written works of others. Successfully uploaded an image and placed it in an article. Has taken indirect direction[3]. I believe this user has what it takes to win this award despite not writing an article (or creating 4 of the 5 required images) needed as a normal prerequisite to qualifying for such. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 16 Aug 2010 ~ 06:35 (UTC)
- Keep. Because I've Proofread a total of 11 Articles, and currently doing another. (PS, In Category:Proofread most of the articles are about Wrestling (thats why i don't have more)) – Preceding unsigned comment added by Fudgemobile (talk • contribs) 07:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Sign your posts with four tildes, kid! -- 07:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Ineligible for now. Has to write a full-length article or several shorter ones or several well-chopped images first (doesn't look like the image he uploaded was original, either), maintenance ain't enough. Which reminds me, weren't we supposed to reconsider these eligibility requirements? --
- Yes, seems unfair to me. For example, completely ignores PEEING. Or just general good Uncyclopeding? —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [10:40 16 August 2010]
07:27, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
- ↑ That more people should be using & contributing to, IMHO (including myself).
- ↑ I'm "Currently on Uncyclopedia 1-6 Hours a day, ask me to fix or spellcheck pages, I'm bored so please, PLEASE, give me something to do"
- ↑ Corrected editing mistakes after viewing my comment here and researching what he did wrong.
Thatdamnedfollowspot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and For. Has been doing some good stuff, and he's only 11 days old, also I noticed some praise from Chiefjustice. - [14:24 7 August 2010] The•
- All the cool kids are doing it. And I'm honored. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 17:25 Saturday, August 7, 2010
- He joined in 2010, which is obviously not 2005. Methamphetamine Was Here (21:00 08-7-2010)
- Hell Yes This guy is awesome, and for an eleven day old noob he's already writing fantastic stuff. --Some Idiot 22:12, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
- The rest of my partial for. Assuming I can do that. Anyhow, what a promising little nooblet... I may have to go give it a hug soon. ~ Apheori *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100808 - 04:22 (UTC)
- For. Seems the most enthusiastic new users. Not sure that voting for yourself is the done thing here (unlike articles). If not, have my vote as a replacement. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:57, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- You can definitely vote for yourself here, see the rules and such, above. I voted for myself when I won. —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [13:28 10 August 2010]
- I hadn't seen it done before. I have seen people vote against themselves so I guess there is no rule about voting for yourself on the grounds of modesty - false or otherwise.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:36, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Under eligibility requirements: "You can vote for yourself, but you can't nominate yourself.". —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:07 10 August 2010]
- People vote for themselves all the time. --
- Every time I vote for myself an angel gets its wings. Aleister 18:10 24 8
05:27, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
- People vote for themselves all the time. --
- Under eligibility requirements: "You can vote for yourself, but you can't nominate yourself.". —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:07 10 August 2010]
- I hadn't seen it done before. I have seen people vote against themselves so I guess there is no rule about voting for yourself on the grounds of modesty - false or otherwise.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:36, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- You can definitely vote for yourself here, see the rules and such, above. I voted for myself when I won. —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [13:28 10 August 2010]
- Not rc and a good user. Sir MacMania GUN—[13:03 24 Aug 2010]
- For. A good guy, and very active on the site. Aleister 14:20 24 8
- For. To break the tie. Also, he's active on VFD, which is always good. Saberwolf116 02:59, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A promising new user. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:28, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Seriously, don't let Rcmurphy beat a promising new user like this, it would be like Nazism... somehow. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:48, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
- There's no law against them tying, you know (or Rcmurphy winning). -- 08:59, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Chief kicks TKF in the Rcmurphies. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:41, August 31, 2010 (UTC)
Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and
For.(Oh fine, I'll be mature. It's so much less fun, though.) There's really nobody else, so this is his month.--HM (T) 20:18, August 5, 2010 (UTC) - It's about time. --Roman Dog Bird 21:10, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
Partial for. Yeah, why not. ~ Apheori *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100807 - 14:15 (UTC)- For. Spirit of competition. -- 08:29, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- I was told to. --Andorin Kato 03:18, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Nobody noobs it up like rcmurphy --CharitwoTalk 03:20, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
Against. Rcmurphy has never made me giggle. ~ Happytimes are here! 10 Aug 2010 ~ 20:28 (UTC)- Ahem see above. Joke vote or no, you're allowed one... —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:07 10 August 2010]
- I don't see him voting anywhere else. --
- Uhh...I don't know why I said that. I think I meant to direct it at Lyrithya. —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [17:09 14 August 2010]
21:59, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see him voting anywhere else. --
- Ahem see above. Joke vote or no, you're allowed one... —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:07 10 August 2010]
- For. In the spirit of making me the only two-time winner of an award for which I am ineligible.. —rc (t) 04:50, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Fuck the system! -- 04:52, Aug. 19, 2010
- In that case i should have won last month! GAAAAAAHH --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 13:54, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
- As per Rcmurphy.
- For Why not? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 10:02, August 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck yeah. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 05:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
September[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Maniac1075 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nomination. When it comes to making middle-high to high quality and high profile articles in bulk, this guy's got a resume that would make One-eyed Jack blush. -- 02:33, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes Yeah, he has written a SHITLOAD of articles, after UN:PSing a few of his articles. Most of them are good. Fudgemobile 04:21, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes He be cool!--Funnybony 19:34, Sep 3
- Spiritual, ah, Demonic, For It's a real (was going to link to Living Hell but it doesn't exist) joy to read or proof or vomit-followed-by-bedrest some of his hundreds of pages--over 40 from requested articles alone. One of our finest writers, and I'm proud to have blown him for a couple of Ritz crackers. Aleister 16:51 3 9
Mrthejazz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom + For. As per last month, this guy is the shit. -- 02:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Fur -- mundane Ape (reward) (Riot Porn) 12:17, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:26 1 Sep 2010]
- Constantly makes me laugh. For Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:39, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- WAkka wakka wakka! User:Mrthejazz/sig 21:23, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Got robbed last month. By a dirty theif who won't give it back. --Black Flamingo 18:04, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck yeah! <3 Mrthejazz!!!! Love,
- For. I love these other guys, and they be long overdue for this cup of spud (as are Skinfan and SPIKE!), yet Jazzman is playing the right notes the last couple of months on a great hot streak and deserves this with a ribbon tied-'round it. Aleister 16:38 3 9
- For not just Beige in August, but for a flurry of activity in the past few months and his tenure at Uncyclopedia at large, a legacy that has been providing us with tone-evoking masterpieces that have taught us everything from how to staple toast to a wall to how to be enthusiastic like a certain typecast actor, and in the process teaching us some of humanity's greatest lessons: whether that meant exploring the surprising depth of human-mannequin relations or imparting a harrowing account of one of the greatest human tragedies: getting pushed into bananas in Mario Kart.. -- 23:04, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
- For. He writes great pieces. Not just good, mind you, great pieces. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 23:27, Sep 4 2010
- Yeah, like this! User:Mrthejazz/sig 02:42, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Jazzy is one of the few Uncyclopedians who consistently displays a really good understanding of absurdism in his work. Viva la Jazz! -RAHB 05:26, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- For. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 21:01 (UTC)
- For. --Matfen 22:43, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
Funnybony (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom To get him in the que again. Funnybony has written (avert your eyes, noobies) over 250 articles, almost every one of very good quality. He has one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight feature articles, and (you can open your eyes, noobies) he polishes many of his pages for months at a time to get them in the shape he and others appreciate. A backbone of UnNews and HowTo's, Funnybony rides his magic keyboard like most of us ride a $50 hooker. Aleister 11:41 1 9
- For. Writes some great stuff.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:11, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Funnybony keeps on writing and even if you don't vote for his articles, he doesn't take it personally..well at least not yet! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:01, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's impossible for me to say why one of these writers deserves this award more than any others, but I have to give a huge shout of approval for Funnybony. The level of determination to work on a piece again and again until he's happy with it and then move on to next next is applaudable, as is the sheer volume of his work. Kudos. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 23:58, Sep 4 2010 UTC
- For. My vote goes to this man. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 20:59, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nomination. As far as people who should have won this twice go, the Cap'n is definitely the most deserving. He's made another comeback this past month with HowTo:Be a Detective: Lessons from the Masters, which is on the fast track to Top 3, and Sydney Opera House, which is on the slightly slower track to featurehood. -- 22:15, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. -- The Zombiebaron 05:31, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
Anybody but <insert name here> (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)[edit source]
Nom + For. Has been, and will always be awesome. Just vote yes.I no longer like <insert name here>. Disregard. User:Mrthejazz/sig 04:10, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Why am I nominated here, I haven't even written an article and why don't you like me? Fudgemobile 04:15, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- OOOH, I get it lolz Fudgemobile 04:17, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
This does seem a rather strange place for this... but hell with it. I was going to vote for that grey fellow who won't change his signature, but... he nominated this. So For. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100901 - 04:23 (UTC)- Actually, I may want to vote on an actual person at some point. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100913 - 01:36 (UTC)
- Against. I do not like the way this guy writes. Besides, he is very annoying. -- 06:08, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Ha ha, USERNAME is funny. Why do people still nominate USERNAME in votes?! Seriously. Sir MacMania GUN—[14:31 1 Sep 2010]
- Because they can? ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100901 - 16:00 (UTC)
You're utterly and completely correct. It was terrible of me to use USERLINK when it's been so overused. I suppose I should have been more mindful of the response I was generating. I'm a stupid, terrible cunt. (Kills self).I didn't nominate USERNAME, I nominated <insert name here>! User:Mrthejazz/sig 21:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Because they can? ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100901 - 16:00 (UTC)
- Okay, let's clear something up. Why am I here again? Who are you goddamn lunatics!? AMRadioHits 06:56, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
All of the above (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem- lst-all) • Logs )[edit source]
- Spiritual For Including anyone who commented and voted as well. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 05:01, Sep 2 2010 UTC
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Count of Monkey Crisco (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom + For. As per last month, this guy is awesome and has had this coming for too long. He's been quietly doing lots of work in lots of areas for lots of months, particularly VFD. -- 02:36, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Black Flamingo 17:30, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:14, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh god, Romartus voted *for* something. Holy carp. Love,
- Yes shocking news..that's why I voted twice here before I realised I had done so in error! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:31, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 19:39, Sep 3
For. After my failure to nominate the Count some months ago, this award should be his. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:28, September 7, 2010 (UTC)I thought the earlier vote hadn't been registered. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:30, September 7, 2010 (UTC)- For. per above. --Mn-z 03:55, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Since I don't vote for assholes--an excellent example is the guy below--and since after working on categories, and seeing how tedious it is, I am totally impressed with Count's amazing work on files (and VFD!), and, since he's deserved this award for a long time, my vote lands here with appreciation of his great contributions to our shared playground. Aleister 1:28 22 9
- For. Because they both deserve it, and because I can try to hope this might end in a tie. Because that would just be awesome. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100927 - 03:46 (UTC)
- Let's see if I can get really lucky... make that a partial for! +.5 for the Count. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100930 - 23:47 (UTC)
- For. I thought he won this already. -- The Zombiebaron 04:06, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
Aleister in Chains (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and for From writing good articles to fixing stuff up on VFD to categorising several war images, he's definitely fit for this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:34, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
- He definitely is. I may even have to vote for him. For now I'm too lazy, though. So I'll just expend more effort explaining how lazy I am, or some such... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100910 - 04:04 (UTC)
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 05:05, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Why not? Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 00:12, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Hell yeah--If you're 555 then I'm 00:27, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Because just watching what he does does on VFD makes me tired. --—John Lydon 13:08, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Competitive Humility! --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:37, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Ajraddatz Talk 03:27, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Partial For: +.5 for Aleister! I can try, right? I mean, they're both epic. And I do rather love Al... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100930 - 23:47 (UTC)
Noob of the Month[edit source]
S3ahawk (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Invalid nom and Six thumbs up How did we miss this guy???!!! He came in July, and has kicked out the jams ever since. Noobish still, so I will nom and vote for this legally invalid nom so you can look at his stuff and see what a motivated and creative noob can do. Six thumbs up. Aleister 22:00 10 9
- Invalid, obviously.--HM (T) 22:15, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
Invalid for. If we're doing invalid things here, why not? Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 22:19 Friday, September 10, 2010- Invalid nomination --ChiefjusticePSX 22:21, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Invalid for MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:18, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Invalid for. This guy invalidly deserves this invalid award. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 00:25 (UTC)
Spam Man (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- For. and Nom. SPAM --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 19:35, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Invalid nom, no? Hasn't made any articles or images. Today's bout of attempting to counter everything Happymonkey does brought to you by: ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100905 - 20:36 (UTC)
- For. Possibly a sockpuppet, but he is still a funny guy (and in saying 'funny', I mean 'strange').-- (CUN) 00:09, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Bighead (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and For This cat is so cool I think he may be a spiritual sockpuppet. Not only has he figured out the random colour template from contextual clues, he has so far they've given us the outrageous Hydrocephalus, Deodorant, HowTo:Identify the Anti-Christ, and HowTo:Sell Your Soul To the Devil. Oscar Wilde would be proud. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 04 Sep 2010 ~ 03:36 (UTC)
- For that "smite" template! —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [21:59 4 September 2010]
Indeed! He does seem like a promising new user; I may go and introduce myself to him at some point. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:58 Sunday, September 5, 2010
- After some careful thought, I have decided to change my vote. Or something.Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:31 Tuesday, September 21, 2010
- For. Because the other person seems illegal and didn't RCMurphy win last month? Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 03:23, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Some other guy won. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 03:24 Tuesday, September 14, 2010
- Comment. This fellow had hope about him. He should return and actualise that hope. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 00:29 (UTC)
Tonillero (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. This new user has a fantastic article already, and he seems like a promising new user. Plus, he's active on VFD. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 04:00 Thursday, September 16, 2010
- Fuck yeah! Noticed this guy on recent changes tonight, and he has edit summaries. Sexy, sexy edit summaries. Love,
- Well then. This is who my new vote goes to. Such a promising young noob! Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:34 Tuesday, September 21, 2010
- For. A very promising individual, indeed. He deserves our encouragement, not that he needs it. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 00:26 (UTC)
- Comment. Thanks for the nom. Besides salsa (music), I could use some advice on blowing (life into) my stub (article). —Tonillero (heckle • stalk) 22:32, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
-- Done. - For. He came, he stayed, he conquered, at least he done good. Nice work. Aleister 1:59 30 9
Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. Spirit of competition and whatnot. I don't actually care enough to vote, though. Yet. ~ (talk) (stalk) -- 20100905 - 02:20 (UTC)
- ajhfvsdjhf bahjkf
- Got robbed -- 05:09, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- What a fucking noob. -- The Zombiebaron 04:34, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Didn't Rcmurphy just win last month? I know I'm missing something but I don't know what. --—John Lydon 13:02, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, although it was close, the guy who just changed his vote and put Rcmurphy in the lead did. Strange move, that. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100921 - 14:33 (UTC)
Happytimes (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Self nom & for Because of this and because I'm toooo lazy to make a sockpuppet for these types of things. Go UN:IC! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 24 Sep 2010 ~ 03:45 (UTC)
- For!!! I absofuckinglutley LOVE this guy! Or gal! Or whatever!!! ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 24 Sep 2010 ~ 03:47 (UTC)
- For. (But only to tie this guy up with murph.) ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 24 Sep 2010 ~ 03:50 (UTC)
- Against. This is obviously a joke. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 24 Sep 2010 ~ 04:30 (UTC)
- Fake for He's only been here like 2 days...-- 04:43, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Meh. (Don't change the score) She's good at copy editing and maintenance, but terrible at putting out article content... all in all, he's only mediocre at best. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 24 Sep 2010 ~ 22:50 (UTC)
- For. Actually, this guy is quite an impressive noob. I'll admit to being very impressed. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100925 - 00:28 (UTC)
- Against. Gay. --HM (T) 00:45, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Against slightly. No. He/She/It anal raped me on the first date Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 04:27, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Gay. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 29 Sep 2010 ~ 02:54 (UTC)
- Comment. This guy got banned the other day for messing up a template; he's still in the running, right? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100929 - 03:07 (UTC)
- Fro as in afro. This guy is black, right? ~ Readmesoon 03:15, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
MEGA FOR I don't think I voted on this yet!!!03:19, September 29, 2010 (UTC)- Invalid nomination --ChiefjusticePSX 20:29, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
October[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Funnybony (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nomf'r Even with over 260 articles and a nillion (twelve) feature pages, maybe Funnybony's main Uncy asset is setting an example for the rest of us on HowTo polish favorite pages--among other things. He works on many of his close-to-the-heart articles for weeks, months, and even years (literally) to either perfect them or run them into the ground. A key bony in the spine of UnNews and HowTo's, Funnybony is probably writing or reporting on something at this very minute. He crazy that boy. Aleister 10:00 1 10
- For. After all the work he's put into all his articles, I think that he deserves it more than anybody.-- 14:17, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's felt rare for quite a while that someone has come along and really deserved this award. Funnybony deserves this.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:58, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I agree with the above statements 100%. Plus, he's nice to talk to. --—John Lydon 15:55, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For.. Funnybony is the only contributor here who has lead a very different life to the rest of us so we should be grateful he has been so productive on this website. A definite and very worthy contender for this award. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:58, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. No need to explain this dude torally deserves this Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 08:39, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Hardest working man in show business --Sog1970 13:50, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Shazam, bing-bang-pow.
- Yes. -- The Zombiebaron 23:10, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Because. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101018 - 23:25 (UTC)
- Jack Dempsey. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:35, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. So they don't win with a total of 15 votes with no other nominations:) Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 03:43, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A most excellent writer. --Dame 11:11, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- The funniest bony there is. --Black Flamingo 12:13, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For. He deserves this. --Mimo 11:59, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Funny and bony too. 01:39, 22 October 2010
- For. I remember when he started, and seeing him getting frustrated while he worked the site out and found his voice. But since he found his feet, he's settled down to pump out real quality, and it's a real pleasure to have him around. Keep it up, FB! --UU - natter 18:55, Oct 22
- For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:36, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Massive Revelationto the site. --Matfen 20:18, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom &
For!I can't hit a talk page or forum without seeing this one leave behind something that at least makes me grin. (Also, because this user helped tie up UOTM last time around.) And, erm, they're a fine writer as well, & stuff. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 02 Oct 2010 ~ 01:57 (UTC) - What?! NO! *bonks Happytimes* BAD! *chases him out with a frying pan* BAD! BAD! ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101002 - 02:28 (UTC)
What?!? you alwayses generally making it tidy 'round here. Who's wit me?
Oh, really? Then name one thing I've done. One thing to make it tidy... seriously, there isn't anything, now is there?- Spreaded out the graphics on African American last night. So there--and, thank you! Spıke ¬ 10:09 18-Oct-10
- For. As per Happytimes and the large amount of data that has been attached to my talkpage. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 22:26 Wednesday, October 13, 2010
- I appreciate the sentiment, but you must agree there are others who deserve it much more... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101013 - 23:11 (UTC)
- For. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:50, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Shit, yeah. 23:36, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For.----Mimo 19:19, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. *sigh* ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20101025 - 19:25 (UTC)
- Comment.What was that sight? Was it a happy *sigh* or a sad *sigh*?--User:Mimo&maxus
- It was a why are people voting for me? sigh... *shifty eyes* ~ Lyrithya *shifty eyes* (words) (actions) -- 20101025 - 19:37 (UTC)
- For. She's our new Alpha Bitch.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:41, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and probable for. I am bemused that apparently this guy hasn't gotten this yet... he does all these useful things and stuff. Like saving articles from VFD and audio stuff and who knows what else; I really haven't been paying attention. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101005 - 23:48 (UTC)
- For. Lyrithya is right, SPIKE has been everywhere lately, upholding our news department, saving pages on VFD, kicking butt on talk pages and VFD and other pages (seriously, he kicks butt! He's been kicking mine so much that I've put in an iron plate, and don't feel it, but I feel a slight vibration which alerts me to his presence). SPIKE should also get Writer of the Month, so maybe this could be a one month UotM and next month WotM sweep. And Lyrithya for UotM soon! Soon I begs ya! Aleister 00:32 6 10
- For. Spike hasn't been afraid to stand up for what he believes in. Some other users don't like it but I think that is the best attitude to adopt here.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:32, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Logic like this only comes around once in awhile so I'm changing my vote. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 07 Oct 2010 ~ 02:57 (UTC)
- Ja. --Black Flamingo 10:58, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Reverting one vandal doesn't make you UOTM... SPIKE's been working for much, much longer.--HM (T) 19:03, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Hey! You didn't need to say that. You could have just voted for him, instead of making a jab at me. -- 23:37, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't make a jab at you, I made a jab at your nomination. HM
- Yeah, so... I've decided. Definitely for. The guy's amazing. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101016 - 19:22 (UTC)
- For: This guy does good stuffs. -- The Zombiebaron 20:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I'm surprised we hasn't won this yet. --Mn-z 21:02, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, but I had never before nominated for deletion the linch-pin of a tangle of templates, won the vote, and then had to beg for my achievement to be reversed. Spıke ¬ 21:16 18-Oct-10
- I call that evidence that you care. Which is why you're getting this. *beams* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101018 - 23:34 (UTC)
- Ah, but I had never before nominated for deletion the linch-pin of a tangle of templates, won the vote, and then had to beg for my achievement to be reversed. Spıke ¬ 21:16 18-Oct-10
- For Continuously helpful. Knows when to say 'recall' or 'recalls'. I still don't understand it. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:12, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Because he hasn't won it yet. 01:36, 22 October 2010
- For. Because he's Spike!--Funnybony 19:24, Oct 22
- Alarmingly Overdue --Matfen 20:20, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
Magic man (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom and for. For all the reverted vandalism that he/she/it did, they have worked/working through over 150 pages of blanking and vandalism. Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 03:53, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
For. Because he reverted me many times and never gave up. 189.239.53.190 04:39, October 13, 2010 (UTC)Vote stricken, vandals don't get a say. --ChiefjusticePSX 16:55, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm all around impressed. A rival paying tribute to his equal, very Knightly. And not the Kiera kind, the olden days kind. Aleister 11:07 13 10
- For. --Dancing dude 12:25, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --Manny clown 12:34, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
Wait why doesn't he/she get a say? -- 02:56, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Racism. We're racist against vandals here. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101016 - 03:05 (UTC)
- yep that must be it... But really he/she is just as good as any of us! now... -- 03:13, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I've always liked this guy.-- (CUN) 02:40, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Noob of the Month[edit source]
Mimo&maxus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nomo&forus Mimo&maxus has done a really good job since he got here from the Greek uncy. A guy who can send all of us some free premo Olive Oil, m&m has uploaded some quality pics, added them to appropriate articles, written pages, and has done lots of edits. Prior to kicking in within eligable time he created a small user page with a link to his Greek uncy, something I wouldn't even count as an edit but as a placeholder. I've been following his short but productive career here, and he's for real. Aleister 18:25 19 10
- For. Seen him voting on the VFH forum so I will go along with Aleister's nom. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:24, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Certainly. I have decided I like this fellow. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101025 - 13:07 (UTC)
- For. I didn't know that I can vote my self. ----M&M 10:10, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I am in for this one. ~ The* ~ 17:41, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
Secret Agent (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. I found another one! This guy's also new (joined a couple of hours ago) and has also written an article (not sure if it's any good, but if it doesn't get deleted, good enough), so... whee. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101019 - 01:08 (UTC)
Valdimir (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. This user is actually a noob, seems to actually be trying, and actually wrote an article, even though it's currently in his userspace. But still... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101018 - 15:40 (UTC)
- Conditional For on the condition that he/she works on proper noob training. Otherwise, that userspace article did make me laugh a few times.
Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. I'm scared. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101014 - 12:14 (UTC)
- So be it Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 22:51, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron: rc is such a huge noob. -- The Zombiebaron 19:14, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron —rc (t) 02:50, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Whatever the bid is, I double it! Nominally Humane! some time Wednesday, 03:07, Oct 20 2010 UTC
- Did you copy Happytimes' sig colour? Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 05:34, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that's exactly what he copied. 23:04, 23 October 2010
- n00biness. 03:09, 20 October 2010
- what? once a noob, always a noob. -- sannse (talk) 04:51, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
November[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. Actually, I meant to nom him for UotM, but for some reason didn't realise I was on this page instead, and actually... this works too. He's a damn good writer, after all; just tends not to parade it around like a lot of folks here. Naw, this lovely fellow takes the time to flesh things out and fix them up and make them impeccable, not just creating as many folks do, but more often collaborating and especially generally helping others' articles just be better, regardless of how little credit folks tend to get for that kind of thing around here. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101101 - 07:31 (UTC)
- For. WTF? He hasn't won this yet? He has many featurable pages, has written many others, has collabed with people to produce great articles for which he wanted no credit, and so much more. Whenever someone needs a historical addition on their page they go to Romartus. Can't praise him enough here, so I'll quit trying, and just say Yay! Aleister 12:25 1 11
- For. Per above. 12:44, 1 November 2010
- For. Per WTF? He hasn't won this yet?--Funnybony 13:50, Nov 1
- For. Even if it is just for Lord Dalhousie;)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:03, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Has had some long deserved recognition on VFH and deserves a bit more. --Sog1970 20:54, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. ~ 16:45, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm surprised more people haven't voted on this. --Black Flamingo 17:49, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Some of us are lazy and put it off toward the end of the month. Anyhow, for. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101122 - 03:06 (UTC)
- For. He follows form, he follows all the rules. -- Style Guide 06:47, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Fake Against. He once made Googly eyes at my wife. User:Mrthejazz/sig 14:04, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Not a nom (I love when SPIKE does that). SPIKE deserves this award like Cher deserved Sonny, like Cola deserved Coca. He's so good and so proficient that we tend to overlook his work in the newsroom and on saving articles from VFD with total rewrite after total rewrite. Plus his collab's which go unrecognized and uncredited. And more. An extremely hard pick between him and Romartus, who go together like Sonny and Cher, like Asia and Euroasia, like. . . Aleister 12:30 1 11
- Hypothetical For. Hypothetical because it's not a nom. 12:44, 1 November 2010
- This isn't a nom either. Yay! drama within the Newsroom! You have often seen me call on Romartus (nominated above) for help tugging an article in new directions or for his panoramic knowledge of history and culture, in exchange for which I provide a vital clerical post-edit. Have you read our best collabs, Hmor and Jam Jesus? Spıke ¬ 12:47 1-Nov-10
- For. Spike deserves this award as he has rescued so many sick puppies out of the VFD pound and turned them into Uncyclopedian greyhounds...well, at least got them back on four paws and happily padding around this website. That is as important as celebrating original works in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:01, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm... this guy's good, too. I may wind up voting for him, even. I may also wind up not voting for him, of course. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 00:59 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom & For. Guardaviewer has served his one purpose; to write and write and write Until the Cows Come Home. He has mantained the art of literal brilliance, butted heads with excellent comedic elements, and has generally put the rest of Uncyclopedian users to shame. For this, I bless him.user:Guardaviewer/signature
- What? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101124 - 15:58 (UTC)
- Nom & For. Lyrithya has done it all. Helped everyone, befriended everyone, has brought the playfulness of the site up at least three notches, and has added things to pages which help them become features over and over again, etc. etc. I'd better run out of here after this nom, or I'll be whacked on the head with a frying pan. /runs away and hides Aleister 12:53 1 11
- Also: seems never to sleep, and has a faster trigger finger than I. Twice in the last week I've gone to roll back prolific vandals only to find she's on top of the situation. Most of us see only the notorious indecision and not the behind-the-scenes hard work. Spıke ¬ 12:59 1-Nov-10
- Actually, I just tend to come on Uncyclopedia while asleep. It makes me seem more active than I am, but also has the unfortunate side effect in which I don't generally remember any of it when I wake up. On that note, who are you, again? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 03:30 (UTC)
- Wait... is this why you've been hiding from me today, Aleister? Oh, blimey... I'm not going to hit you with a frying pan, okay? You can relax. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 03:30 (UTC)
- Also: seems never to sleep, and has a faster trigger finger than I. Twice in the last week I've gone to roll back prolific vandals only to find she's on top of the situation. Most of us see only the notorious indecision and not the behind-the-scenes hard work. Spıke ¬ 12:59 1-Nov-10
- Lyrithya is one of those rare users who contributes to virtually every part of the site, whether it's VFH, VFP, PEEING, recent changes and all those other things no one else bothers with. He's been the only person helping me with the pee queue for the last month or so. Plus, I don't think there's a user_talk page in existence that isn't littered with his witty ramblings. Rather strong for. --Black Flamingo 13:12, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I have decided. I like this fellow. I can't remember who said this before...mmm...It was probably some kind of pervert----M&M 13:30, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. and For and For.=3 more votes, right?--Funnybony 17:04, Nov 1
- For. Lyrithya is here, there and everywhere - and all in a good cause. No one can ask for me but we should give her this award. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:29, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- yams! For all the edits, always editing my articles, and everyone else's articles by the looks of it (Note: Lyrithya is a boy now?) Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 22:43, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll be whatever you want me to be, love. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 03:30 (UTC)
- For. another vote for the elf/cat -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 04:06, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Lyrithya is crazy. But in a good way. Like the sort way where somebody doesn't sleep for a couple days. And instead they just watch Recent Changes all the time. And talk to everyone in IRC. -- The Zombiebaron 04:39, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For. -- 13:04, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
For.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:08, November 2, 2010 (UTC)- Comment. I hate you all. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 13:30 (UTC)
- For. Because she doesn't hate me!
- I do now. *whithering glare* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 14:23 (UTC)
13:39, 2 November 2010
- For. --Matfen 19:33, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Sure! - Helpful. These young'ns make me feel old in the good kind of non-grumpy way... ^_^ -- DameViktoria 19:52, 2 Nov
- Absolutely - Don't believe her when she tells you she is useless, it's a cake. --ChiefjusticePSX 20:04, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- The Edit Count Is 2 Damn High
- Abstain. User has shown no signs of improvment since being concieved in the backseat of my girlfriend's car, but then again I haven't been here for the past four months. So instead I'll just be a useless fuck and abstain. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 06:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
- Pelargonium, I love you. *huggle* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101108 - 06:40 (UTC)
- WTF Lyrithya? What are you? A masochist? --M&M 09:23, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe. Or perhaps Aleister is right; I'm actually the sockpuppet of about ten other users. Would that not explain everything? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101108 - 13:28 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet? More of a Sockhamster. The sockpuppet thing came from a couple of others, I just played with it. But Paizuri abstained because he is a sockpuppet, of HELPME's I believe. Aleister 11:37 12 11
- Maybe. Or perhaps Aleister is right; I'm actually the sockpuppet of about ten other users. Would that not explain everything? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101108 - 13:28 (UTC)
- For.hi there O_o?--Legocat 11:09, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
- ...hi? Hello. I'm Fred. Who are you? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101112 - 14:17 (UTC)
- For. Good user, that one. Ajraddatz Talk 15:23, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
For.I don't think Lyr sleeps, everywhere I go, it's already haunted by a Lyrithya. Are we sure there aren't six of them? -- DameViktoria 15:19, 24 Nov- Luvvy, you already voted. Although I appreciate the sentiment... sort of. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101124 - 15:58 (UTC)
- Darn. Ah well... I did say I'm old. And grumpy. So I guess dementia is part of the package... GET OFF MY YOGHURT RAISINS YOU TWERP! -- DameViktoria 16:45, 24 Nov
- *hastily passes the bag of raisins over* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101124 - 17:06 (UTC)
- I knew it! The puppy's stealing them for you! I knew she was working for someone... /me wanders off afk to give the doggie another raisin... -- DameViktoria 17:29, 24 Nov
- Are you... erm... you do realise you're effectively rewarding unwanted behaviour, doing that, right? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101124 - 17:35 (UTC)
- I knew it! The puppy's stealing them for you! I knew she was working for someone... /me wanders off afk to give the doggie another raisin... -- DameViktoria 17:29, 24 Nov
- *hastily passes the bag of raisins over* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101124 - 17:06 (UTC)
- Darn. Ah well... I did say I'm old. And grumpy. So I guess dementia is part of the package... GET OFF MY YOGHURT RAISINS YOU TWERP! -- DameViktoria 16:45, 24 Nov
- Luvvy, you already voted. Although I appreciate the sentiment... sort of. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101124 - 15:58 (UTC)
- For. I was going to nom her myself, but ah well, there's always UotY -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 17:38, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. So, I know I already nominated him for WotM, but this is what I meant to do, for pretty much the reasons I listed on that one except with a lot less emphasis on the writing bits and a lot more emphasis on how gosh-darned helpful this guy is. Seriously, it's crazy. He's always willing to give input or help fix things up, and won't even sugar-coat it before reality. It's this honesty that makes his votes so worthwhile, too; he'll only vote for or against things if he thinks they actually deserve it, which I really wish more people would do, and which makes it so much more meaningful when he does vote for something. Which is also why I'm kind of scared that he voted for me here. Erm... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 03:30 (UTC)
- And For. *grumbles irritably* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101115 - 03:24 (UTC)
Happytimes (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. Because apparently I was going to nominate him before and then forgot, although right now I can't remember why. But I must have had a good reason; he's Happytimes. Just kidding; I actually love the feller. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 03:30 (UTC)
Noob of the Month[edit source]
Putthatknifedown (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom. This fellow's so promising, I just had to nominate him behind his adopter's back. *whistles innocently and dashes off* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 13:19, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I think I'm funny I'm just voting myself because I can is that OK? I'm to stop writing NOW ok stop writing NOW dam it STOP User:Putthatknifedown 3/11 14:35 (UTC)
- Maybe Nom. I would say For but the most of your edits were made on your userpage so... --M&M 12:52, November 4, 2010 (UTC)--
- For. Worth a vote for the name alone.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:48, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This guy has potential; I like him. --Black Flamingo 12:50, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
- For. It's a for --M&M 15:01, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- We-ell... alright. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101122 - 07:35 (UTC)
- For. If that shifty-eyes person has signed on, I'll be complacent. Writer is trying hard, is having fun, and is dodging bullets and getting so many good users helping in polishing his pages that he must have a magic rock or mystical beans or something. Aleister 1:40 27 11
- For. 20:58, 29 November 2010
- For. --ChiefjusticePSX 21:18, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
Secret Agent (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom
and for.This Illogicopedian seeks to learn the way of Uncyclopedia, or some such. I say we kidnap him and lock him in a small room and feed him newts. Or... wait, that doesn't even make any sense, does it? Perhaps I've been spending a little too much time over there, myself... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101102 - 20:46 (UTC) - Comment. What exactly is Illogicpedia? Also I searched for User:Secret Agent and I didn't find anyone. --M&M 12:56, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
- This is him on Illogicopedia. And that's Illogicopedia. It's really a lovely place, actually. It has... bananas! A bunch of us invaded recently, though. Guess it's only fair they invade us back... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101104 - 13:19 (UTC)
- Comment. I have an account on Illogicopedia. I don't think I'm any good. But I was here first. So... ya. -- 14:39, November 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Meh, for We can vote for ourselves. Pathetic, really. And I led the Illogicopedian invasion. You're welcome. And, I guess, uh, I can't think of anything else. --Colonel Sanders July 4, 1776
- Comment. and
For. WTF? Did you just welcomed yourself? --M&M 18:53, November 4, 2010 (UTC)How can you retire now? You just came. --M&M 17:22, November 19, 2010 (UTC)- Comment Congrats! You have three votes and, as of this writing, as many main space edits. Must be a record, and you should get some kind of template for this. Welcome, and thanks for invading us. Aleister 19:40 4 11
- How... illogical. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101104 - 19:44 (UTC)
- Comment Meh, I've been too lazy to do more mainspace edits. I'll get to some more eventually.--Secret Agent 00:50, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
- But ah, you've done an UnNews article or two. Very gooth. Aleister 1:01 5 11
- Comment Congrats! You have three votes and, as of this writing, as many main space edits. Must be a record, and you should get some kind of template for this. Welcome, and thanks for invading us. Aleister 19:40 4 11
- Comment. User appears to have left. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101114 - 19:16 (UTC)
rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nomination and Foratude. rcmurphy is a such a huge a noob. why didn't he win this last month. he is the noobiest noob of all noobs. -- The Zombiebaron 04:29, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For After winning last month with a score of +6 to Mimo&maxus's +5 and yet not being awarded my due, I'm starting to think that this whole contest isn't entirely legit. —rc (t) 09:19, November 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Nom I don't want to hear anything else about how fair was the last win. But, don't worry. I can understand how you feel. Poor rcmurphy. You live under my shadow. *evil laugh* Master of boastfulness, also known as Mimo&maxus
- For. Yes, just yes. -- 14:43, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. the noobiest noob in all of noobville-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 06:12, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
December[edit source]
Writer of the Month[edit source]
SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom& For. Those who know of Spike's work in the UnNews office, where his many many articles are legion, and are aware of his pen/computer machine being used to save pages on VFD by rewriting or fixing full articles, and of his uncredited assistance to writers needing help on their pages, no explanation for this nom is needed. To paraphrase Quentin Tarantino about Uma Thurman for her work in "Kill Bill", well, never mind, but it was good. Aleister 4:57 1 12 MMX
- Oh good. I don't have to nominate him... love ya, Spike! *blows a kiss* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101201 - 05:21 (UTC) And for. ~ 15:53, December 13, 2010 (UTC)
- For. If I hadn't got in the way, Spike would have had this award in November 2010. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:40, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- For. You bet!--Funnybony 11:46, Dec 2
- For. SPIKE lurks about, orchestrating mayhem for UnNews and all concerned. In his spare time he cranks out consistently great UnNews and other namespace articles by the fistsful, intimidating some, delighting many and pissing me off because I wish I could write as well. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 05:15, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Fucking For Why go through a nomination? Just give him the prize right now, he deserves it.--If you're 555 then I'm 23:08, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I like his writing. TheDoor
- For. --M&M 11:55, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Another case of "it's about time". --Black Flamingo 12:10, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
- 4 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:56, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
- SPIKE! 15:25, 27 December 2010
- For. SPIKE does a lot of work to keep the site filled with quality material. He writes for UnNews, saves stuff from VFD, and more! Order yours today! → 23:55 27-Dec-10 ←
Noob of the Month[edit source]
rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Nomination. For. rcmurphy is suck a noob. He is the noobiest noob I've ever met and he shows no signs of improvement. No other noob has ever deserved this award more than that noob rcmurphy. What a noob. -- The Zombiebaron 05:58, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination rejected. I appreciate the gesture, but I want to do this the right way. The nooby way. —rc (t) 01:05, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Well played. Only a true noob would refuse to be nominated for NotM. -- The Zombiebaron 03:41, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Self-Nomination and For. He deserves it. Come on. He does. —rc (t) 01:05, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong For -- The Zombiebaron 17:57, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Very strong For -- Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:48, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
Cat the Colourful (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom s/he is a noob nuff said --PUTTY 10:19, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A promising Noob, has already worked on some edits and hasn't asked to be made an uncyclopedia administrator on day two. Everything is pointing true so far! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:43, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. -- 13:59, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I didn't ask to be an administrator at day 2 too...can I be at day 3? Also nice noob. --M&M 14:02, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --PUTTY 21:45, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks everybody! I dont gonna be so noob to vote myself, but, an guestion from me: Have i done a "full" article? If i had done, i want to know, which of them is "full". They are full of shit, but im just interest... And pretty proud... (Ok, this thing actually made me feel like n00b...) Well, at your service, Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)
- Not rc, I hear he's actually quite a well established user with a long running in joke of being extremely nooby, even though he is, in fact, quiet unnooby, relative to some other noobs, although, on the other hand, this noob in question is quite nooby, but to the extent of some of the noobiest of noobs, but more of a noob than rc, who is, in fact, not at all a noob, but an experienced user in the guise of a permanent noob, and as such, I therefore, do believe that this brightly adorned cat is the way forwards in terms of noobiness! —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [22:54 13 December 2010]
- That was... A lot of things... - Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)
- Indeed! —GOBSHITE WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [16:55 14 December 2010]
- For. Eventhough I'm not PUTTY, as it turns out. 15:27, 17 December 2010
- For.Simsilikesims 23:07, December 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Socky, Putty... It sounds so same... thanx - Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 13:45, December 20, 2010
- For, I think. I only have one major gripe with him, and that is that he keeps forgetting to close tags in his signature, but as that seems to be the most of his problems here... ~ 16:43, 20 December 2010
- Cats does not have a good memory. Its a fact. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!) 09:19, December 21, 2010
- I bet my memory is worse. And actually, I'ma vote a large yak instead of a number; two lovely fellows, and choosing would just seem wrong. ~ 03:24, 28 December 2010
Bevanz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- How did we miss this guy? And the timing sucks - joined end of November, but come January it'd be too late. By, like, two days... *grumble mumble mutter mumble grumble* I forgot he was a noob. He is a noob, no? ~ 22:11, 27 December 2010
- Thanks Lyrithya :D → 22:31 27-Dec-10 ←
- I figured you should at least get a mention. Cheers. Now welcome to the ranks of the awesome who didn't get this! Hahah! ~ 22:38, 27 December 2010
- Thanks Lyrithya :D → 22:31 27-Dec-10 ←
- For. "I forgot he was a noob" -- one of the best compliments that can be given to a noob. Bevanz feels like the real deal, and when January 1 rolls around he will have been here for 35 days instead of the "legal" 33. Hmmmmmm. Aleister 3:06 28 12
- And I'll vote a giant squid on this guy. Huzzah. ~ 03:25, 28 December 2010
- And I'll vote an Uga Buga on this guy. --M&M 10:40, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
Fudgemobile (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
Nom + For He does soo much for uncyc. ICUs, QVFDs, BPs, and so much more! He was nominated to be Noob of the Month before, but he didn't get it. But he should've. -- 02:48, December 2, 2010 (UTC)Doesn't change the fact that he has now been here much too long. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 02:57 (UTC)
Damn... -- 02:58, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
Lolz Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 03:04, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
For.Mimo&maxus gives fries and a for with this lulz --M&M 12:16, December 2, 2010 (UTC)- This user is not eligible for this award. Nomination rejected. -- The Zombiebaron 18:00, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Not to sound rude or anything, but... We kinda figured that out already. Again, not trying to be rude or anything. -- 00:04, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, someone did remove the strikethrough the first time, so... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101203 - 00:06 (UTC)
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit source]
Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]
- Nom, for whatever reasons I said before. They still apply. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101201 - 04:09 (UTC)
- For. 4 He's a jolly good fellooowwww - which nobody can deny!--Funnybony 11:54, Dec 2
- For. A longtime solid contributor, active in many areas and has a cute butt. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 02:48, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Has helped many people do many things. And even when he is a critic, bashing VFH pages with a baseball bat while giggling maniacly, he still often leaves behind valid criticisms which improve the pages when acted upon. Much more, but the story of Romartus reads like one of his vastly researched and stylistically interesting pages. Hail to ye, Romartus. Aleister 3:04 8 12
- Cricket bat Aleister, as seen in Spinal Tap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:03, December 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Fucking For This bad ass mother fucker deserves this reward for all the good contributations he has done on Uncyclopedia, and if you disagree then suck my dick.--If you're 555 then I'm 02:11, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
- When I first arrived back in mid-2009, I was certain Romartus had already won this. That says it all really. --Black Flamingo 12:26, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
- And for some reason I forgot to mention... for. Perhaps the fellow really is too obvious. ~ 15:32, 23 December 2010
- For. Obvious choice. --Sog1970 16:11, December 23, 2010 (UTC)
- Seeing as he's the only one to vote for --Dancing dude 06:51, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Per Aleister's "bashing VFH with a cricket bat". Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:47, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --M&M 14:15, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Weird For. 15:30, 27 December 2010