Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 12

2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) • 2009 (part 1) • 2009 (part 2) • 2010 (part 1) • 2010 (part 2) • 2011 (part 1) • 2011 (part 2) • 2012 (part 1) • 2012 (part 2) • 2013 (part 1) • 2013 (part 2) • 2014 • 2015 • 2017 to now

Writer of the Year

Sog1970 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 12

•  Nom &  For. Uncy's all-around tour de force, Sog combines talent with diverse interests to produce lively and interesting pages that are a joy to read. Nearng 50 features, for his articles just click on our Hall of Shame and schroll down to, ah, the first name, sit back with a cup of something, and spend an hour or so. Purr-fection. Aleister 11:11 1 1 2011
•  For.Consistent, quality work from the Great Sog. I hope he remains inspired as this site would be a lesser place without his talents. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:03, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Has to be. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:22, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 10:26, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. As a past reviewer, I have oft had the pleasure of reviewing his budding features beforehand and seeing how he writes them. This man certainly knows something. --Matfen 12:19, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Gad! This is like a mine field - so many great writers here and we only get one vote!? I would love to vote for them all. Especially Al. But I must agree with Aleister: Sog's rise through the ranks this year has been awesome. He's the heavyweight champ now.--Funnybony    16:25, Jan 2
• I did want to vote for that Mhaille guy, but my money is on Soggy this year.  For.. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
•  For. Mhaille, Sog and Aleister should all win this award. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:14, 12 January 2011
• For. After great deliberation, I've decided to throw my lot it with Sog. Though Al has certainly had a fantastic year, Sog earned himself a whopping 30 features in 2010, the best year by an Uncyclopedian ever, not to mention the fact that he also sits atop the Hall of Shame list by a pretty healthy margin, and is just a stone's throw away from a totally obscene 50 features. Holy living fuck. I'm surprised Sog isn't running away with this thing, quite frankly.—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:37, January 23, 2011 (UTC) So it seems as though Sog only earned himself 28.5 features this past year, which puts him 0.5 articles behind Al for the all-time record in a single year. (My bad Al, sorry for the miscounting.) This revelation doesn't change my vote, however, as Sog's other accomplishments and general funniness can't be warped by my inability to count. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:18, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

  After checking with Baseball statistician Bill James (or I may be Bill James) Sog could arguably be credited with 30 features in MMX. His feature of December 31, 2009, was still on the two-feature template on January 1. And his Funnybony collab featured Jan. 2, 2011, had enough votes to be featured a few days earlier. And his errorless streak of 287 games without a spelling error is also a record. Bill Jam. . .ah, Aleister 14:13 24-1-'11

•  For. I have not forgotten SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 11:45, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
• For. I wanted there to be a tie, suck it Al.→ I am greatSoup? 17:15 27-Jan-11 ←
• Five minutes left and either way my vote won't matter. I wish everyone here could win, especially me, but I just wanted to let Sog know how I feel about him... For. --Black Flamingo 23:56, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 13

• Nomination. One of the most prolific writers, and turns out a lot of very original work here.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:33, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For I haven't read any of Guildenstein's(I know I didn't spell his name right) but from all the other nominated users I think Aleister is the best. --M&M (christmas mood) 14:11, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Almost For. Though Guildy deserves it slightly more, Aleister has been coming out with some really good stuff this year. Che } 16:14,1January,2011
• For -- I appreciate all the writers but I have to choose one. But I think we should set the voting in such a way that everybody wins. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 16:35, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. A no brainer! -- 00:47, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I like him. --Scofield 11:37, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

  After I let you have your way with me you don't like me anymore. Typical. When will I ever learn? Aleister 12:02 3 1 '11

•  For. Not only does he crank out a seemingly endless supply of quality articles, he also has breathed life into quite a few articles that were facing deletion as well. --—John Lydon 15:56, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  Fucking For This guy writes good articles like a master novelist or something.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 00:44, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
•  In the beginning the world was formless and void, and then Al said "Let us make light." And bugger all happened, except that people started to laugh at him. I understand that Al originally came here after being banned from Conservapedia for being too right wing, and he has since been working tirelessly to remove the obviously liberal bias from this place, and that is the only reason for writing so many high quality articles. However his method of signing drives me up the wall, and so I'm voting  For. him to get a new sig. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 21:27, Jan 7 2011 UTC
•  For. He's funny and works like a team of absolute bastards. Who can challenge him? Myocardialinfarction 21:13, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
• For I think all the writers are great but gotta give a special thumbs up to this guy. --Dr. Fenwick 02:16, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.I havent been on for about 6 months now, but i came on just to help ol Al my ol bud win this here award... hey wait. I made articles... WHERES MY NOMINATION! --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:43, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

  You realise Al was gonna win it anyway without your vote? All you've done is ruin the glorious 3-way tie we had going on. Not that you aren't entitled to do so. --Black Flamingo 23:08, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

  I would enjoyed that comment a lot more without the word "tie." pillow talk 23:16, January 14, 2011 (UTC)

• Yes! It wouldn't feel right to vote any other way, you earned it buddy! -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2359 14 JAN 2011}}
•  For - As much as I appreciate Soggy, I can't vote for anyone other than Aleister. This guy shit gold bricks and diamonds. Very rarely does he write an article that doesn't hit it out of the ballpark. We desperately need his writing in a time when Uncyclopedia's entropy count is ever rising. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 19:11, Jan. 18, 2011
•  For.. "Narrow it down to one writer who deserves this award," I thought, "when we have so many very good writers?" So I wasn't going to vote at all. Then I read Snow angels. Seriously, folks, when Aleister gets famous we'll all be boring our friends by telling them that we used to know him on Uncyclopedia. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:44, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Could this be the deciding vote? Will Mhaille and Sog hate me forever? ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 20:13, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11

• Nomination. Already won writer of the 5.5 years, this writing wizard/Pedo has still made this year his own with a whole bunch of new and original work. Deserves to win this.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:40, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:57, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Obviously. Why haven't we given it to this guy yet? Also he made me waffles one time. --ChiefjusticePS3 13:53, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Epic for. Look Al, Guildy and Sog are fantastic. Any of them would be deserving and worthy winners of this award. But the fact that Mhaille hasn't won this yet is frankly astonishing. The man is consistent, classy, quality and bloody funny. And he doesn't just do his own stuff. Countless times, a noob has posted up a stub with a kernel of an idea, and before they know it, Mhaille has wandered past, dropped half a dozen good ideas into it, nodded in encouragement, and left, making the wiki a funnier place in his wake. How many times has he made a difference in this way? How many times has this wiki benefitted from his touch? It is, and has to be, Mhaille for me. tl;dr version: Mhaille rocks. --UU - natter 21:20, Jan 1
• Strong For. Mhaille deserves this so much it's not even funny. -- The Zombiebaron 21:38, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. His parents paid me to vote for him. --EMC ^[TALK] 22:03 Jan 1 2011
•  For. I couldn't decide... I mean, really couldn't decide; too much amazingness on this page. Sog, Aleister, Funnybony, that guy with the really long name, that other fellow with the not so long name, and someone else with some other name... hells. Somehow I gravitated toward this guy, though... odd. He's not that good, is he? Or is he? Maybe he is... 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 05:26, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

• For. as well. This year has been a tough decider for me, as I think there's been a very strong showing from all the nominated writers. After sleeping on it, I think Mhaille still has the edge overall this year, simply because of the history of him and the site and the continuation of one or two really cracking articles this year.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:08, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  VERY STRONG FOR Funny, indeed. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 17:51, 9 January 2011
•  For. Only candidate which did not attempt to bribe me. Ajraddatz _Talk 05:57, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.. I thought I was above the whole "WHAT HE DIDN'T WIN THAT YET?". But, seriously, "HE DIDN'T WIN THAT YET?!". Mhaille has been delivering "quality" "content" not only this year, but has been consistent about it throughout the eons that he has been around. Honor the man for his contributions. He's also damn handsome. ~ 18:37, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I moved back and forth between Mhaille and Sog about 12 or 13 times. I don't know man, they both make me laugh a lot. They both deserve it. Mhaille kind of wins out because of his longevity for me. But, above all, it is a great sign for the writing on this website when I vote for WOTY, and still don't know if I made the right decision. Good job everybody. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:10, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4

•  Nom I have not come across a Guildy article I haven't liked, and although he may not have breached the 50 mark yet, some of his works are epic sized, and still quality throughout. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 13:05, Jan 1 2011 UTC
• For. Guildy is a very, very funny man with a very, very inadvisible beard. pillow talk 13:26, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Pacman. He's really impressed with many of his articles. He deserves this. Che } 16:13,1January,2011

I saw you have made lots of articles that are now featured. It will be a hard decision. You or Aleister? --M&M (christmas mood) 16:37, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

• Comment. I appreciate all the support off the bat, but considering Sog has over a dozen more features than I do and almost all of Al's 30ish features were written in the past calendar year (compared to the mere eleven features I've earned this past year, four of those actually being articles that I wrote the previous year that were featured well after the fact), I'd say there are at least two much more deserving writers nominated on this page. I know I'll probably be voting for one of them. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:06, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

You're right. It will be a harder decision now. --M&M (christmas mood) 19:14, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

• For. Your modesty wont get you extra votes! :) I love your articles and the subtle humour that comes after you after reading the line and slaps you in the back of the head. You dont have as many features as others, but your articles really are awsomely groovy, they make me laugh, that kind of deep inside laugh, a laugh in a laugh, a feeling deep inside, where if it wasnt a laugh, but still as deep, I would go to the hospital. --Shabidoo 03:47, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Cheese

• Nomination and cheese. He write good. 1234 ~ 16:40, 1 January 2011

Funnybony (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

•  Nom and Soma. What a year! I don't know how many of his 239 news articles (that's right, 239!!?) Funnybony wrote in MMX, please list a number here somebody. And all of his 13 feature articles, which keep on coming, were from last year. Can never get enough Funnybony pages, and his news eye and creative mind covers the entire globe and then some. Aleister 20:00 2 1 '11
• If had another vote, it would have been cast here, Funnybony has had a breakthrough year has pulled a real stormer on both UnNews and mainspace articles.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:13, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. If I hadn't voted for Soggy, it would have been Funny. In 2010 he has written so many articles, he might have to apply for an extension on his user page. And what's more, FB may the on-site veteran here, he has taken to this writing lark with an amazing level of enthusiasm that puts everyone else to shame. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:48, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Black flamingo11 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 3 more than anybody else

•  Nom and hurrahs! Another "What a year!" user. Black flamingoes feature articles flowed like water this year, 16 in all, and his participation in frat collabs pushed a few of those to feature status too. And his many pee reviews have helped other users and made the site a much better place to look for shrubs and things under every rock in the place. Nice work! Aleister 20:03 2 1 '11
•  For. Northern nepotism <3! And because I don't know what anybody else has written in the last year. :/ --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 20:20, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.. Wrote some of my favourite articles of the past year. I particularly liked Shakespeare Authorship Debate and Kate Bush. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  21:04, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. He's a great writer, teacher, editor, etc and as his student, he's helped me more than I could have imagined. Plus, he promised he'd loosen my chains if I voted for him ...please sir, the chains chaff my wrists... -- --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   23:22, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

•  Nom&For All hail this guy too. --Scofield 11:38, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
• big ups 2 my nigga Wonderful author, and amazing to collaborate with in the wee hours of the morning. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 22:15, Tuesday 04 January 2011 -

SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

•  Nom&For All hail he who is the Lord of UnNews! --Scofield 11:32, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

• Comment. Nom&For means you nominate and vote  for. And you have putted "Nom&For" at two users, so your  for doesn't count now. --M&M (christmas mood) 12:02, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

• Old for. There are a lot of good writers that I see on here, but I think that SPIKE deserves the award. He is able to write humor related to a wide range of subjects, regularly saving articles from VFD and writing countless articles for UnNews. Additionally, he is all around quite active on the site and helps people out when they need it. → I am greatSoup? 19:57 3-Jan-11 ←

  Sorry, ol' chap. I decided to contribute to the main race. I still stand my all my comments, and wish you luck on future awards, because I think you do deserve them.→ I am greatSoup? 17:15 27-Jan-11 ←

Kingkitty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3

• Nom and For. this mother fucker is a riot --Roman Dog Bird 05:28, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For He never ceases to make me laugh. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 07:56, Tuesday 04 January 2011 -
• Solid props without a vote. UnNews:Obama doodles random shit is the best article of the year and sadly cannot get credit in the top 10, so I'll give that motherfucker some hosannas right here. Hosanna! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:58, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For I will not explain my reasons... Unless somebody asks... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:00, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

  Is it because he's good? 1234 ~ 17:35, 9 January 2011

  No. It's because he's the best. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:12, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

  Good reason. 1234 ~ 03:33, 12 January 2011

Maniac1075 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• You know what, a good case can be made so I'm going to nom this fucking hermit. Maniac1075 has written so many articles that they have to be listed in hidden categories, and 42 of those are off of the Requested Articles list alone. That's not counting many of his pages which have been huffed back to user space because they were too gross to even consider reading in impolite society. He has lots of features, well, maybe four, or even less, but he doesn't even try for features, unlike myself, the whore of Babalon. He just writes and writes and writes for the fun of it. He hasn't been around for a few weeks, had to get a job, or a hand job, or something. You can tell that by the smell of clean air and the fact that some of the birds have returned. Aleister 20:55 6 1 '11

 For. For all his articles I proofread Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 09:46, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Year

Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4

•  Nom &  For. Since coming here seven months ago Lyrithya has given two or three years of giant armidillos to the site. For in addition to constant editing, fixing, befriending, writing, reviewing, eyeing, coding, welcoming, and othering, probably the best thing Lyrithya has done is to improve the culture of Uncy and make it lots more fun to come here. Many users come and go, Lyrithya improves everything everyday and only then runs away flailing. Aleister 11:40 1 1 2011
•  For. I managed to conscript her into doing some off-site shit for me. No one else has ever done such a thing, unless you count that time that Spang gave me advice about gif animators, which I don't. pillow talk 11:58, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

  Although since I still haven't gotten around to finishing it, does it really count? Also, when did you need that done by, anyhow? *shifty eyes* 1234 ~ 14:56, 1 January 2011

  Probably not until March or April, although the earlier I get it, the fewer times I'll wake up excited, leap out of bed, check my inbox, and feel my enthusiasm melt into soul-crushing disappointment! pillow talk 18:22, January 1, 2011 (UTC)

  I'll be sure to drag it out as long as I can, then. 1234 ~ 18:28, 1 January 2011

•  For. Done a lot in 7 months. Nobody messes with her. --MANIAC MCPEE 03:48, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. She helped me with my sig, and did a lot of motavation with me. Voted for the second time! -- 23:13, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

  Thanks, I think, though it doesn't count. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 23:24, 7 January, 2011 (UTC)

• And stop voting everywhere. Screw it, I'm deciding you voted for Chief. Because he's my bot operator, and stuff. Ta. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 23:32, 7 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  F**k yeah! Probably the most useful bot I have come across to date. Anyone who happily volunteers to deliver Unsignpost multiple times deserves this award. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 21:52, Jan 1 2011 UTC

  One vote, love, one vote... 1234 ~ 05:30, 15 January 2011

• Against. I will not give an explanation. -RAHB 10:25, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  Against. Because Rob said so. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:22, 2 January 2011
•  Um.. yes?!? -- 00:49, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Because I love her.....signature, yeah, I love her s-s-s-signature..hrrmph --Scofield 11:43, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For everyone else. I've been here, what, 6 months? Seven-ish, if you count the one I spent playing Oblivion, but that's only half a year; the rest of these folks have not only been amazing, hard working, scary people, but been amazing, hard working, scary people for the entire year and much more. Those of you that voted for me, I appreciate it, but I really cannot compare to these other fellows. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

• Who cares how long you've been here, this is a year award and you have done more to change the culture of the place, the flavor of the backroom discussions and how people get-along-ness, than anyone else. And on top of that the constant problem-solving, vandal zapping, nudging good articles to be better articles, taking at least half-a-dozen noobs in hand and leading them every step of the way not only to be exceptionately welcomed but to be good users. All of that, and squeezing two years worth of editing and pee reviewing into six months of constant vigil too, and even though you aren't an admin your admin powers are self-given and almost legendary. So instead of "boo hooing, I'm not all that", give yourself your own due, and instead of mysterious voting againstists, everyone here should be cheering and throwing stuff to eat in your path so you wouldn't have to waste time shopping. Aleister 00:50 4 1 '11

  Nice things from Aleister... how could any award compare to that? Damn, man, you flatter me... now go vote for someone else, will you? You've done too much already; adding the vote on top of this is just too much. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 02:16, 4 January, 2011 (UTC)

• AHA! You really are a bot! That's why you don't want people paying attention to this page, so that they can vote for ChiefjusticeDS, your REAL account! Either that or you're attempting to woo more voters with your "selfless" gesture. Works every time *wink*. --Scofield 07:42, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

•  For not coming out of hibernation to be a spiteful shithead, and being actually useful to the site. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 07:48, Tuesday 04 January 2011 -

  There's someone else who came out of hibernation to be a spiteful shithead on an awards page? Shit, looks like I've been replaced. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:54, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

  At least one, apparently. You may need to up your game lest they leave you in the dust... 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)

• Clearly a spiteful shithead deathmatch is in order. But only if we can have it in claymation. -RAHB 20:09, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. --~   19:02, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

  You sure like voting, don't you? 1234 ~ 18:22, 30 January 2011

•  For. Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 09:44, January 16, 2011 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 20 fairy princesses

• Nomination and Vote. A model Uncyclopedian, and the best of the year by far. Consistent, helpful and knows how to roll his sleeves up.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:28, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.: Its plain to everyone that this passing year belongs to the Chief. Taking a look at his edits for the year (and before for that matter) he's done so much, managing to maintain an even hand in doing so, along with becoming the subject of a featured article about how much of a bastard he really is. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
•  For. The Chief is the Dumbledore of Uncyclopedia. If he hasn't got a beard to add authority, he ought to grow one and post the result on-line. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:07, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• The work Chief has done for this site is extraordinary, both before and after the op... Plus, he makes a pretty lady. --Black Flamingo 15:14, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ChiefjusticeDS, as many pieces on this site suggest, is a terrible person. We know that he hates humor, we know that he hates people, and we know that he barely knows how to use a computer. To top it all off, he's British. At the end of the day, what we all want is the sinking ship that is Uncyclopedia to be grabbed by the numerous, powerful tridactyl tentacles of a sea monster thing and quickly pulled to the bottom of the ocean where it will never be seen again until James Cameron decides he can make money off of it. ChiefjusticeDS, at least in my eyes, is just one of those many, important tentacles helping pull Uncyclopedia back to the depths from which it came. But why ChiefjusticeDS? Why not any of the other succulent tentacles? Look closely. You may notice, upon looking closely, that ChiefjusticeDS is the fairest tentacle of them all. His suction cups are the largest, his precision is superb, and unlike the other tentacles, he has never been forecfully all up in some anime chick's anus/vagina/mouth/nostrils (and probably never will be). For his efforts in helping ruin us all, I give ChiefjusticeDS my vote. --EMC ^[TALK] 22:15 Jan 1 2011
•  For. Great person with a great humor. Helps me with many things. -- 02:55, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Pretty much the coolest guy ever. Seriously. Check out recent changes. Love,  
•  For. --Matfen 12:15, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Large cod. I may put in a proper for later, but this guy and Sycamore really seem to be a team deal. They do a lot of separate things, but I see them bouncing off each other on recent changes; sometimes it's actually kind of scary. Anyway, they're awesome, and stuff. Deciding between them seems wrong. 1234 ~ 16:41, 2 January 2011

  Also, he puts up with me. Usually. But that in of itself might be worth a for... 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. Because of Fuck ChiefjusticeDS. Also, he fixed You Are Dead. --Scofield 11:46, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

That's your second vote. Pick one, stick with one. ~ 18:23, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. If you seriously don't know why Chief should be the UotY, just watch his talk page for one day. He's constantly getting bombarded with every type of complaint, request, or general rant one could imagine and he handles them all in stride. Even though he has recently unleashed his fairy princess side on all of us, he still deserves this award. – Preceding unsigned comment added by John Lydon (talk • contribs)
• For ChiefjusticeDS is the butter that lubricates the cogs and gears of Uncyclopedia. -- The Zombiebaron 19:07, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Out of all the nominees, I think that the Chief deserves the award. Dedicates a lot of time to the site in many different ways, and is an overall upstanding citizen uncyclopedian or whatever. Plus, his name is great (cause you can call him "The Chief". Nobody can deny that "The Chief" is a cool person, no matter the setting.) → I am greatSoup? 23:27 3-Jan-11 ←

  Eh, Zim will always be 'the Chief'. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 22:11, 4 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. Does anyone else put up with as much shit? --Sog1970 23:51, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I have no idea who this user is, but I have arbitrarily decided that he sucks balls. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 09:20, Jan 4 2011 UTC
• For. Knows his stuff. Does it. Chief is the man. --UU - natter 09:48, Jan 4
• Vote of Confidence/Uselessness I voted Lyrithya because of her accomplishments in her tenure here, but that's not to say that Chief's have been any less significant. I just figured those achievements were why he was made an admin. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 21:57, Tuesday 04 January 2011 -
• Comment. He impersonates me sometimes. I just thought everyone should know. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. Without a doubt last year's most useful uncyclopedian. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:34, 13 January 2011
•  For. Al in Chains may have been last year's best writer, but why is this even being put to a vote. Chief in a landslide fellas. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 00:21 15 JAN 2011
•  For. He puts up with Pedobear's visits to the channel. Smuff ^[kthnxbai] 00:46, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. He is like my hero and stuff. --^Dame 14:14, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. Who is this, some new kid? Never heard of em. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:18, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
• He is the hand that rocks the cradle. ~ 13:52, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
•  Obviously. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:56, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
•  Fuck ChiefJusticeDS. ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 20:16, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom. When it comes to general making tidy, cleaning up after people and admins, and all-around helpfulness, it's hard to beat Sycamore... really is. 1234 ~ 15:19, 1 January 2011
• For. Splendid fellow, works hard, cleans up my mess... he's like my mum in a way. --ChiefjusticePS3 20:25, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. He'll also sometimes be seen defending VFD against mobs of spiteful againsters, not just facing the odds, but defying them and even convincing other people to stand up for seemingly doomed articles as well. And he seems to go out of his way to be nice to and supportive of various noobs. Place could use more of that. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

• Comment. A bit of a Scottish curmudgeon (a type of rare fish if you are asking) but it was his example that I have followed here more than anyone else when it comes to standing for what you honestly believe in. Did I say curmudgeon..or did I mean a Scottish sturgeon?? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:40, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

  Just wanted to say I am moved in some way by those very kind comments you have said about me.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:08, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

• For No contest. Hell, half of the nominees combined don't have the number quality edits this damned bastard has. Chief is the closest, but he's a fucking admin. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
• Spiritual For Wow! I knew he's been around, and doing his thing, and doing everyone elses thing, the whole time I've been here. I didn't know the extent of it. Nice nice nice work. We have so many good people wandering around this place. Aleister 18:10 10 1 '11
• Another spiritual for. The phrase "our next admin" is thrown around a lot these days... but you get my point. --Black Flamingo 18:54, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

The Woodburninator (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 flaming woods

• He's hot. Uncyclopedia is about being funny, and this guy knows funny better than anyone else I've seen on the internet, even if he will never, ever contribute to 18th Century. Not the scandal-a-day type, but whenever he has something to say, he actually says something. Isn't that what counts? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:27, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. I'd like to say something nice about this guy, but I just don't know him. Haven't seen him around much... shame; sounds like one of the wonders of the site. Get on here more, dammit, Woody! 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 23:30, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

• • I just got engaged, so you fuckers can wait for me as long as you want. I'm busy. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:30, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

    *clobbers the Woodburninator with a frying pan* 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 00:33, 4 January, 2011 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5 chained people

• Nom He's a good man here. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 16:40, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
  • You can't have half a vote. Pick a horse and go with him/her/Romartus all the way. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:16, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I was just going to Nom Al, but here he is. Amazingly helpful and good-hearted to everyone. He really deserves this.--Funnybony    17:45, Jan 2
• Comment. Mmm, this guy... I could tell you about this guy, but then you might be inclined to run screaming into the night, forever plagued by a thousand ravening dreams... the things he does, however, are another matter. Drifting around like a butterfly of dementia, he is the most helpful, strange, everywhere individual I have encountered. Clueless in some regards and far too knowledgeable in others, he is more than just an asset to Uncyclopedia. I can't even imagine what the place would be like without him. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. So many great Uncyclopedians nominated here, it's almost impossible choose. Can't we all be winners? No. Okay fuck you guys, I'm voting for this chained up guy. No, no come back...I love you all...Or some such something. —SUITCASE PENIS WHORE Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [17:56 3 January 2011]
•  For.Maybe if he wins, his chains will be removed. -- 00:56, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

  They were never really there to start with. But thanks for giving me my freedom, I can fly I can fly! Aleister 1:00 18 1-'11

  They're not removed yet. --    00:56, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 11:42, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. --~  18:13, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Romartus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: + 0.5 people who defend VFH with cricket bats against attacks of Romartus

• Nom and 1/2 for I think he deserves the nom and a half of my vote. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 16:40, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. Romartus is amazing. The stuff he do here... er, I mean, the things he does here may not earn him the greatest of love, but he's fair, honest, and consistent and he stands by what he believes. Few put the extent of hard work into what they do like Romartus does, and fewer still extend that same effort on behalf of others should they ask. Be it forcing writers to improve their works before they pass VFH, helping remove cruft through VFD or general writerly acts and advices, this guy increases the quality of Uncyclopedia one piece at a time. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 00:39, 4 January, 2011 (UTC)

Iwillkillyou333 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

• Nom He's entertained me like no one else could. --Scofield 16:43, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. Amusement, writings, reviews, and an attitude unlike most others... he may come across as a total hard-ass from his username and what he puts on his userpage, but don't let that fool you. This guy is usually a total sweety. Always willing to help out or chat or what have you, he's a wonder when he's actually around, and unlike some people I could name if I could even remember their names, he also seems to accept criticism gracefully and even seems to consider it before ignoring it completely moving on. While he still has a bit to learn, so do we all, and folks could learn from him as well. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)

RabbiTechno (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• Nom a veteran of over 4 years, who is one of the most helpful helpers, as well as writers in this place. He's also one of the nicest which is a rare quality both with admins and Rabbis. ~ 18:26, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks, 'Dillo. However, over the last six months or so I haven't had even a fraction of the time to devote to Uncyclopedia as I used to and would like, so I think there are other people on this list who deserve it more than me. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:30, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

• Comment. He's too nice. Especially for an admin, it ain't right. Even his block reasons tend to be polite... 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. i find his politeness refreshing, i'm certain his reasons aren't completely selfless, but nevertheless, i vote for him the finger that flames

Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0 dog birds

• Customary shout-out to the hardest working man on Uncyclopedia who isn't actually the hardest working man on Uncyclopedia. Deserves some sort of nomination, at the very least, for the great stuff he's done for the last X years, including 2010. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0 UGotYs

• See above. Say what you will about him, he's a fucking workhorse. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:53, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

•  Nom. Why has he not been nominated already? Does single-handedly keeping UnNews running for the past few months count for nothing? Does his constant vigil over VFD, supplying well-reasoned votes and comments as well as often complete overhauls of the articles themselves, so that even if they were horrors, they need not be deleted in the end after all, make no impression? But those aside, he is also simply all-around helpful, advising users with and critiquing their writings, welcoming the young and old alike to areas of his interest in a more personal way than most, and with directed pointers for each person. He even patrols recent changes at times, which on top of everything else is a little scary, especially since unlike a lot of folks, he still finds time to write amidst all this. So I guess my point is, SPIKE is awesome. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)

• Comment.Yeah, that's why I voted for him for Writer of the Year, although I was a little less verbose than you. → I am greatSoup? 18:42 5-Jan-11 ←

  Excellent. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 19:11, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)

•  Spike for Poopsmith --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:40, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. An integral cog in the Uncyclopedia machine. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 19:20, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

Writer of the Month

Maniac1075 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5

•  Nom &  For. Maniac1075 has flown well under the radar since he got here, and yet his strange habits of writing thousands of quality (by quality read gross, in need of proofreading, and quality) articles a week, photochopping like a ferret on speed, sticking his finger in the eye of all things normal to see if they blink, and his lack of interest in the rest of us all add up to a he-should-have-gotten-this-award-long-ago moment. Among his articles are 42 articles written from the Requested List. Gulp. Aleister 13:21 1 1 '11
• For This guy writes tons. Al, you said you were going to nominate him again way back after me and Matfen tied. What happened, broseph? Anybody up for making Maniac and Woody tie? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:11, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

  I think I've nommed him three times now and Mordillo's nommed him once. One of Maniac's things is he's a loner user, and doesn't wander the site, so people don't know of his body of work and writing style unless they actually look at five or ten of his pages. Then they either love him or hate him. I hate him, but give the devil his due. Aleister 12:55 4 1 '11

  Well somebody needs to tell me to come and look at these voting pages more often. I love Maniac's articles. I'm convinced he has so many typos just to make sure somebody reads the article. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:58, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

• For Contributes to the site much more than I do. Plus he seems to like wrestling, so I'm a fan. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 01:00, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 04:19, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. This guy definitely has the humour part of humour writing down - uses and mixes in some pretty swell ideas... and so many of them, at that; ruddy impressive. But the writing itself is kind of scary. 1234 ~ 18:02, 21 January 2011
• 4, woody's gonna win anyway but let the maniac lose by a smaller margin :p Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

The Woodburninator (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 8

•  Nom Was surprised awhile back that Woody, too, has never gotten this award. One of the writers who has gone along, written well, gathered six features now and then, and, as the Killerfroggy points out at UotY, excels at everything Uncy. Aleister 14:21 3 1 '11
• For. That is surprising; he's written some great stuff. In fact, his Michael Phelps article is one of the articles that inspired me to sign up. --Black Flamingo 16:47, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, that's about the best thing anyone has ever said to me on this site. I am happy to have helped bring you on. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:56, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
• This is a vote. I'm up for making Maniac and Woody tie. What I said about Woody on UotY also applies here. Take some time to read his essays in addition to his articles, too. He's a smart guy, and also apparently engaged. Plus, Maniac is a bitch to proofread. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:15, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

  Maniac is ruddy horrible to proofread! I came across one of his pieces during a page-blanking spree, and it completely threw me off! Although it didn't help that Zombiebaron banned me. 1234 ~ 23:22, 14 January 2011

•  They both deserve it, so let's tie this bitch up. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 03:34, Sunday 09 January 2011 -
•  For. This guy's good. 1234 ~ 23:22, 14 January 2011
•  For. He walks on water but swims in alcohol. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:30, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
  • Actually, I don't really drink. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:16, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • I was working on that one for P.O.E.T.S. Day. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:33, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Woody = Funny. --UU - natter 12:01, Jan 20
• For. He should have literally won this award years ago. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:58, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Colin "All your base" Heaney (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10

• For Colin occasionally does good shit. He's always willing to stand for what he believes and doesn't afraid of anything. He calls out people who are bullshitting. He's posted goaste on the main page TWICE. That's more than I have. Oh, and I think he may have some featured articles, too, as if that means anything. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:10, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
• Fuck YES. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:55, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
• my hero --Roman Dog Bird 05:45, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
• He's a gentleman. At least he can be. Sometimes. 1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 •

GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 15:47, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)

• What is this I don't even -- opaque Ape (disintegrate) (Riot Porn) 02:21, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
• Just saw this nom. Colin is one of the joys here when he comes by, and I always enjoy seeing his sig box floating on pages. One of those "he hasn't won this yet???" noms. Aleister 2:31 7 1 '11
•  For. Defender of the Uncyclopedian faith. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:14, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
• Of course! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:29, 16 January 2011
• For. A gentleman and a scholar. --Black Flamingo 22:27, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I don't know. But, sure! Why not? From the looks of this one-man competition it seems doubtful that he will fail.--Funnybony    22:39, Jan 22
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:59, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
• Last minute for :P Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 15:27, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Omnifluff (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5

•  Nom Has come on strong with an ongoing page about Woolly mammoth, and he seems literate so he must have been educated at Oxford or in the neighborhood of Oxford. Maybe down the block, at that grocers. A good writer, and friendly fellow. Aleister 13:27 11 1 '11

&  For.. Woolly mammoth turned out fine, and now Omnifluff is going strong on Nike

•  For. If it is a recommend from Aleister and Omnifluff (or is it Oliphant now?) seems to be the bees knees, then he(?) will receive my voting support! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:45, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
• He did the lower case one, not the uppercase... I fixed the link, but anyhoo... is a rather promising fella, though, aye. 1234 ~ 14:48, 11 January 2011

  That actually wasn't a for... except now it is.  Decent bloke. 1234 ~ 22:33, 31 January 2011

•  For.<insert Mimo&maxus stupid quote here> --~   16:44, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.He is a jolly good fellow? --Shadowsnacker 18:27, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
• For I've made my decision. Omnifluff is the winner and should be given 5 million rupees as a reward. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:03, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Mimo&maxus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

 Nom What a nutty n00b. Deserves it. -- 00:50, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

He already got this, silly. 1234 ~ 00:59, 18 January 2011

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• Nom We can't have noob month without Rcmurphy nominated. --~   16:47, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
•  Score one for the good guys. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 07:49 EST 18 JAN 2011

Repairmanman (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4

• Nom& For. I may vote for this guy later. Nah, I vote now. ITSA FOR ~  19:37, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Well I am pretty awesome! =3 Repairmanman 20:04, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

  Comment Impressive work. He (you) is (are) also eligible next month, although there's another guy too. But some of us love ties, so who knows but the wind Gods, and those elf things. Aleister 20:19 25-1-'11

• bluuuuu Pretty solid articles from what I've seen. ICP was a surprisingly pretty good article.→ I am greatSoup? 22:52 26-Jan-11 ←
• For Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:37, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Writer of the Month

Maniac1075 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Nom and For. People seem to dig this guy. I can't say I do since I don't think I've ever read any of his articles. Or anybody else's for that matter (just kidding). Uh, like, go at it. This guy's a fuckin' genius. --Roman Dog Bird 03:05, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Having just fapped to Rachel Bilson during her interview with that Mexican man, I am happy to vote for Maniac yet again. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:59, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

•  Aum &  For. FuckChiefJustice, the protaganist, with a crossbow. Lyrithya has so many good pages, both featured and unfeatured, and is usually creating more even as hundreds of new users shower requests for help hier way. When not furiosuly writing, usually will be found helping other users complete or polish some of their best articles. Maybe not overdue for this award, but just about right. Aleister 4:26 1-2-'11
•  For. She achieved more in 6 months than I did in my entire time here! Oh, wait. Even I was in for 6 months....... --Scofield 13:57, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. The term 'woefully premature' comes to mind... no offence to Aleister, and I appreciate that he seems to think I have done well, but the last thing I wrote in mainspace that wasn't intended for ?pedia was an article saying how awful one of our horrible admins is, and that was finished in November. Only stuff I've written since was some news; very little of what I've been doing here of late has involved actual writing. 1234 ~ 07:55, 2 February 2011

  Bullpucks. The only thing "woefully premature" is that you have guessed my real life nickname. Do you always have to be so troublesome? Yay Lyrithya! Aleister 13:00 3-2-'11

  Yes. Yes, I do. 1234 ~ 05:52, 4 February 2011

• Spiritual for for User:Lyrithya/Workaround-oriented programming, which is my favorite article this month. pillow talk 22:24, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 14ish

•  Nome Since Lyrithya chooses to fall upon a sword (I have a 3 1/2" sword, and named it Junior), and I just realized with a shock that, WTF, Socky hasn't won this yet?!!!? He has written so many things that one page can't hold them all, even the largest page (which he didn't write, blame Romartus and Zarbag for that). Two of my favorite articles on "this thing we do" are Bettie Page and Elfen Lied. And not even counting all the edits and help he has given other people's pages. Aleister 13:03 3-2-'11
• Who? Me? Yes! My writings have finally been noticed! Woohoo! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:09, 3 February 2011
• Score! We did a sorta collab on Major urinary proteins that I think should have been capitalized on a lot more because he's a great writer and it's a great idea. Anyway the point is he's a great writer. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:40, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
• Yeah, he's pretty good and only getting better with each new article... I suspect he'd have gotten this months, if not years ago, had he not been so busy maintaining half the bloody website all by his lonesome... silly bloke. 1234 ~ 05:52, 4 February 2011
•  Nome Was nice to me (I'm a noob, though I've been lurking since 2005), and I throughly enjoyed the articles under the nominee's authorship. +1 vote. ^.^ Yahoobox 05:08, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. The only candidate. User:Mrthejazz/sig 05:27, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
•  ITSA FOR --~  09:22, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. S is for Socky! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:48, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Even though he is just a Sogpuppet of mine --Sog1970 19:33, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
• For. You tend not to think of Socky as a writer, probably because his works get lost in the blizzard of all the other useful edits he makes. But if you can brave that snowstorm, you'll find a lovely little ice-cave full of funny little penguins. Also his writings are good. --Black Flamingo 14:29, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

  For me it was actually "WTF he hasn't won this yet???" because I always thought of him as a writer who liked to do other stuff too. I've enjoyed his pages since I got here, esp. his Bettie Page page. So I'm still at WTF??? for his writing, and now for his edit count. Aleister 20:33 9-2-'11

•  He has an eight-inch penis and loves children. pillow talk 20:37, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Long overdue--Funnybony    09:10, Feb 11
•  YES (talk) 21:45, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
• For, Had fun collaborating with him on UnBooks:The Children's Guide to Your First School Shooting. -- The Zombiebaron 21:50, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. The Rio-Tintin-Zinc of Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:28, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. See bandwagon, jump on. Also, well deserved. --Sog1970 13:15, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. --Matfen 21:28, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Squid

• nomming him because he's so ON MY NERVES RIGHT NOW --nachlader 21:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Fuck you Nachlader. --ChiefjusticePS3 21:48, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

• Squid! 1234 ~ 21:55, 9 February 2011

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Black flamingo11 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 13

• Nom. This guy hasn't gotten this yet, eh? Anyhow, he's helpful and stuff. And he starts things. And he's just nice to have around. 1234 ~ 04:21, 1 February 2011
•  For. --Matfen 22:37, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. -- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:51, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.. He's around, he's doing shit, he's makin' bacon. pillow talk 23:09, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. For some reason Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:49, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Just looked at this page, and my vote is Yes! Yes! A thousand times yes! Aleister 23:08 6-2-'11
•  For.--Funnybony    12:49, Feb 8
•  For. The Pole is worth splitting a vote for but this guy is all over the place being helpful, helping old ladies across the road and other sickening stuff like that. --Sog1970 13:17, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Meh... --~  13:18, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. For the birdman. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:26, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
  • BTW, Ptok means bird. so for the birdman... for me ;P Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 00:19, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Just...For. --HM (T) 00:00, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
•  Last minute for (talk) 06:49, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. 'Cause he's awesome. 1234 ~ 23:22, 28 February 2011
•  Yesh. -- 23:24, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

Ptok-Bentoniczny (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5 reasons God invented copying and pasting

• Thumbs up for the Pole everyone loves knows. Been here for a while, always spurring cross-wiki initiatives, and even fluently writes (and features) in English! Also if he wins this it will probably be some sort of record maybe? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:32, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
• Ptok is one of the nicest guys here, never causes drama, always helpful, and only does good for the wiki. I can only imagine how good of a job he does over at his native Uncyc. I wish his people would stop stealing our jobs though. --Black Flamingo 13:41, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
• For MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:47, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
•  Fuck him up the butt. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 01:10, Monday 14 February 2011 -
•  Poles need love and vodka. I have no vodka. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 18:23, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

TheHumbucker (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom and  For. Been doing..... work I guess? Anyways, I like him Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 04:05, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Excuse me while my head inflates ~  Talk 04:54, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

Rpm (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 9

• Nom and for Well, he's a noob who partakes in writing UnNews, he had a good article in PLS, and his name is simple. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:51, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
•  What does this button do? -- 03:54, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:47, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
•  half for You're winning. Sorry fellow. It's all Neopowell's fault. --~  13:08, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
•  Quite nooby -- 23:27, February 12, 2011 (UTC) I DON'T LOVE YOU ANYMORE!!! -- 16:28, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
•  Because all of the other n00bs here have <s>:ed, and RcMurphy is sooooooo old joke, i think I vote this weirdo. Never heard of him, but i looked his PLS thing. I did not vote for it, but this RPM could be a NoTM. Yeah. Cat the Colourful 13:35, February 13, 2011
• No idea who he is but yes Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 18:15, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
• For All general's infantry is hilarious.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 16:30, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Showing great versatility by writing UnNews and possible future feature candidates like the work-in-progress HowTo:Reenact History. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:38, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

  Whew, HowTo:Reenact History is a very impressive article. Very nice work. Aleister 00:29 19-2-'11

• Yeah sure, 'specially given the other kid's future eligibility -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:32, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
• Strangely, this guy's good. But.. er... I already voted. Whatever. 1234 ~ 18:37, 19 February 2011
•  For. ...I'm a self-loathing self-voting super silly stupe. Rpm 21:57, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

Neopowell (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 8

• Best noob of the month, maybe of many moons, imnho, and he's only been here like 12 days. So, importantly for the vote, he's good-to-go next month as well. I've tried to find plagerism in the google on him, and has come up clean so far. I wish he were my sockpuppet. Aleister 20:00 14-2-'11
• I don't like him. He's writing too good and he reminds me that I haven't written anything in Eons. I wish we had more people that I don't like. ~ 19:08, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
• I don't like him, either. I happened across his writing awhile ago (could have been this morning), and it doesn't suck. Most writing here sucks. Mine sucks. I think I could resent this. Although... more like him probably wouldn't go amiss, either. That'd be nicer. 1234 ~ 20:52, 17 February 2011
•  a for You're too great to leave you without a vote. --~  13:28, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
•  I love you now! Yay! -- 16:29, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
•  I just saw the rule that you can vote for yourself. I should leave a message to thank myself. And maybe a thank-you pie. --Holy shit it's Neopowell 18:09, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
• For. This guy's really impressed me so far. Plus, he's from Bristol, and therefore has a hilarious accent no doubt. --Black Flamingo 14:17, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
•  Also for I love bandwagons! Also this guy seems legit. (talk) 22:06, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

• Nom Always and forever. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:09, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
•  Might be an against if I wasn't voting for someone else. He has actually made himself useful this month. 1234 ~ 22:10, 9 February 2011
•  Against. Too new to be a noob. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:22, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
• Rcmurphy smells like peaches. -- The Zombiebaron 03:26, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
• A negative response. I don't believe that he has done enough yet to be in the running for this. Maybe next month. Pup 01:16 18 Feb '11

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1 so totally rocks

• OMG hes such a n00b! 1234 ~ 22:07, 9 February 2011
• There can be only one. --ChiefjusticePS3 22:10, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Jerk

• This noob is such a fun-hater! 1234 ~ 22:12, 9 February 2011
• nope --nachlader 22:13, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

76.118.76.68 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

•  Nom only On my reading of the qualifications of this award, I have determined that this n00b has been a MEMBER for no more than 30 ish days, and previously completely rewrote an article. The edits have been high quality and should be used as an example to all users everywhere of the heights to which we can achieve here. Pup 01:21 24 Feb '11

March 2011

Writer of the Month

Zarbag (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

•  Nom Zarbag! Who, you say? One of our most prolific, intelligent, and good writers, and one of the most silent users on the website (check his edit counts, main and talk pages). Many good articles, mostly on historic figures and eras (perfect for an encyclopedic wiki), but he may be worthy of this award for just his ongoing work with Romartus on "the epic". Aleister 00:24 1-3-'11
• Austria-Hungary kicks ass. Just sayin', not voting yet. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:11, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I have been amiss in not nominating Zarbag myself before - he really is one of the will-of-the-wisp contributors who usually stays below the radar. However as my earliest co-collaborator on this wiki, he does deserve this award, it is very long overdue. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:09, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• I think I really, really like this guy. o__o 1234 ~ 10:52, 16 March 2011

Maniac1075 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5

• Obligatory nom. Has about a million + 1 articles, and even came out of his brief hibernation last month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:11, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:15, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Yeah. --Master Bates 09:36, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 21:46, Friday 04 March 2011 -
•  For. It looks like he may have a chance this month, so I'll do the Maniac! dance. His many good articles speak for themselves, but I choose to cover my ears whenever I approach them. Aleister 13:49 6-3-'11
•  For.--Funnybony    12:09, Mar 9
• As you all probably already know, this guy's funny. I just can't stand his syntax. 1234 ~ 10:53, 16 March 2011

  His sin tax? If he had to pay sin tax he'd be broke. Aleister 00:07 17-3-'11

  You're kind of hopeless too, for the record. 1234 ~ 02:00, 17 March 2011

Sog1970 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0

• Once upon a time, a guy won this award twice, then Cap'n Ben almost did it again... twice, actually. Anyway, the point is, sometimes people have such ridiculous months that they deserve WotM twice. This guy is one of those guys. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:09, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Soggy is almost too good for this award. In stead they should create the Soggy Biscuit Award in his honor.--Funnybony    19:47, Mar 31

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4

• This guy, he just rubs me up the right way. --ChiefjusticePS3 10:49, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
• This guy, he's prettier than nearly all of you. 1234 ~ 10:53, 16 March 2011
• For -- The Zombiebaron 15:13, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
• For. ---I have a talking zombie 14:21, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
• For --^Dame 22:03, March 31, 2011 (UTC)

Matt lobster (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Hey, Matt Lobster hasn't won this yet. In fact, I don't think anyone even noticed he wrote for a while, because he wasn't in the Hall of Shame until I put him and his seven features up in there yesterday. Plus, he still writes, and had the fantastically absurd Lionel Richie Ceiling Dance Conspiracy Theory featured last month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:51, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
• Mhm ! --ShabiDOO 09:37, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
• You know what's depressing? I have more features than him. His are better, though. A lot better. Numbers are silly. 1234 ~ 09:51, 26 March 2011

  The only number of features that's silly is Sog's number. I can't even count that high using all of my pointy places twice. Aleister 9:57 26-3-'11

  I don't think 'silly' quite covers the number of Sog's... Dammit, I should have tied you two. Why the hell didn't I? 1234 ~ 10:09, 26 March 2011

But we also lose track of good ole Matty, good ole Lobsty! Dont forget, he also started a really cool article on the 1hr competition as well!!! --ShabiDOO 13:17, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Ptok-Bentoniczny (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 12 nicxnyzny

• Nom + Ptok -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:45, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I LOVE YOU!! -- 17:45, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Polski! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:23, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. A man, a plan, a canal, Ptok. Whenever he comes around good things happen, and he should come around more often and bring some of those eastern european babes with him. Aleister 17:35 4-3-'11
•  For. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 21:47, Friday 04 March 2011 -
•  For. ~  14:25, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Even if Nonsensopedia hates him, we still love him. --EMC ^[TALK] 04:42 Mar 7 2011
•  For. Why not?--Funnybony    17:24, Mar 8
• Pollock (talk) 00:55, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Nice guy with no competition, no brainer (that's the decision, not him)--Sog1970 21:20, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
•  Cholera. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:36, 16 March 2011
• I hate to bandwagon, but Ptok's always there when you need him... like a wonderful... er, wonderful thing. I mean, he legalises my invalid UGOTM noms and everything. 1234 ~ 22:35, 22 March 2011

Matt lobster (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1 people who have invested countless hours only to get screwed over

• Nom and for No seriously, he should have won this years ago. Can we get a tie up in this bitch? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:41, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

BobNewbie (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

•  Nom & For Nice guy, he's really friendly. - LOL vandalz 16:40, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
• Ditto, albeit vulgar, but aren't we all? Apparently, I can't vote twice because uncyclopedia is a dictatorship, but come time the anarchists, I'll revolt in your favor. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   18:55, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Neopowell (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6

•  Nom & For I've been waiting for someone else to nom him because I heep too much praise sometimes. So heep, heep, heep, there, lots and lots of praise. A thousand and one thumbs up. Aleister 17:57 1-3-'11
•  heep, heep, heep. There, more praise. -- 18:01, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  sure --~  18:02, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  Meow. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 10:42, March 5, 2011
• This guy's a good okay one, though I could swear I've seen that exact same userpage somewhere else before. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:37, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
• for. --Black Flamingo 17:14, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

TheHumbucker (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6

• Nom.This guy has his hands everywhere. Making me feel a little... paranoid. And he's apparently a noob. 1234 ~ 20:57, 1 March 2011
• Blueberries. pillow talk 21:02, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes Even though he pretty much stole my sig. (talk) 00:55, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

  With these two writers nommed there hasn't been this much talent on the NotM voting page since Hardwick Fundlebuggy dined alone. (spork) Aleister 13:35 7-3-'11

• For Because he didn't win last month Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 22:33, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Invalid, I nominated him last month. Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 22:30, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

1. For A certain UnNews article made me do this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:05, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. He gave me a buck or something... --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   18:56, March 23, 2011 (UTC)
• Neopowell and Humbucker are both awesome; both of them started strong, both of them already have a featured article, both are pleasant people with which to have conversations, and are willing to have conversations, and have already been helpful to other users... and they are both still around at the end of the month, after all that. I really hope they both continue to stick around, as somehow they are both more of an asset to the place than most of the older users, and they put said older users to shame, but more important to me are the... other things - Neopowell really likes hats, which is always a good sign, because hats are... well, I digress. Meantime, Humbucker has expressed (and then suppressed, but that can be overcome) a desire to delete the wiki, which I cannot help but adore. These two... I love them. I could never choose one over the other, so I'm just voting for the one with less votes. 1234 ~ 00:08, 1 April 2011

April 2011

Writer of the Month

Matt lobster (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +10

• Nom and for He deserved this a long time ago. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:01, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For. A real "he hasn't won this yet? Seriously"? Moment. --UU - natter 09:03, Apr 5
• I hereby designate April "Matt Lobster Finally Wins Awards Month." -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:12, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
•  Shakalaka Shakalaka Shakalaka Shakalaka Shakalaka - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 02:49, Wednesday 06 April 2011 -
•  For. So many good pages, articles and UnNews, that the term "deserved this a long time ago" should have been used a long time ago. Aleister 9:55 11-4-'11
•  For.--Funnybony    19:53, Apr 16
• For. Matt is very cool. All three of these guys deserve it, but I guess there are always more months. --Black Flamingo 21:37, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
• Yes yes yes, I like Mats writing style...and I bet he is also a babe magnet, and I bet hes also a hyper neo conervative republican. Two out of three not bad! Im also hopping on the band wagon! --ShabiDOO 18:21, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
• One of those folks a person is inclined to assume has already gotten the thing... may as well make it true. 1234 ~ 19:17, 18 April 2011
•  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:01, 30 April 2011

Thekillerfroggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4

• Nom In case you didn't notice, this guy had an amazing time recently. Several great PLS articles, and he surpassed Procopius in the HOS. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:55, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For - let's tie this voting up, guys! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:57, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  FUCK I'M FALLING DOWN ALL THESE FEATURES it keeps happening – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 14:34 Apr 11, 2011
•  For. (talk) 19:02, 18 April 2011
•  For. ~  Talk 01:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Skinfan13 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

• Nom Skinfan belongs in the que. He has 9.5 features, 3.5 of those roughly in one month, February, and created and ran the successful frat collabs. Well past his time for this award too. Aleister 10:36 1-4-'11
• For. Having worked in part with Skinfan on Aristotle and his willingness to discuss his articles, agree he deserves this award. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:17, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

I'm flattered guys, thanks! -- Sf13 1228 EST 30 April, 2011

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Matt lobster (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10

• Nom, for, and automatic winner MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:59, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For + another 1400 points. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:02, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For He's never won this?!? (talk) 17:38, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. The tastiest part is the writing claw. Aleister 18:07 2-4-'11
•  For. Certainly. Not one for the pot! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:13, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. --Sog1970 11:29, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He's a moron, but he's a useful moron. We need more of those. Useful ones, I mean. Too many useless ones, and worse... 1234 ~ 19:48, 18 April 2011
•  For. In my diamond-studded charcoal opinion Aleister is the most enthusiastically helpful Uncyclopedian, but there is next month, and, it seems, Matt never got this before.--Funnybony    18:15, Apr 21
• Latt mobster. --Black Flamingo 00:10, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:01, 30 April 2011

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0

• People reacted to the Temp Ops thing in different ways. Some became admins and did admin stuff. Some became admins and didn't do admin stuff. Some were admins anyway and did/didn't do admin stuff. But there was only one user who wasn't an admin last month who kept the site's maintenance running: me! Oh, and also Dexter. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:55, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Oh, and also also Al. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:56, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Nom and For (froggy forgot to write it's a nom :P), I can't vote otherwise. Al does a great job here. He is a good spirit of Uncy and can motivate everyone to work. Go, Al! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 17:34, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

  Thanks Froggy and Ptok, appreciated. But no thanks, I "wonned" this before, and Matt lobster is up this month! Ptok, please send me beautiful Polish women to sooth my fragile ego. Aleister 18:10 2-4-'11

• For --NoNamesLeft 00:36, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Mattsnow (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• This guy can get it next month, but just mentioning that he's new, awesome, and eligible now (and next month). -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:02, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
• Has a feature coming, has quickly adapted to Uncyclopedia, and will be destined to be a great here. The supposed first to break the wiki barrier. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 05:07, 30 April 2011

Lockdandload (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 8

• Nom. He's apparently a noob. He's written stuff. He gets drunk on IRC sometimes. This bodes. Not sure what it bodes, but... er... 1234 ~ 07:09, 3 April 2011
•  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:50, 3 April 2011
•  For. Seeing as how the other competitors are figurative symbols of imperialistic oppression by the uncyclopedia admins, I feel obliged to vote for this tangible character who has contributed, if you will, "to the better of mankind." For those who couldn't comprehend that sentence, "Thiz guyz is goooood. He funny and make me laugh lots. Those other n00bs are stoopid. ROFLROFLROFLROFL." --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   22:34, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. -- 03:55, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Long as Lockandload doesn't fire blanks after this vote..i.e.. disappear for good...why not? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:31, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
• I got Nom'd?! Ohw me gawd :) – Preceding unsigned comment added by Lockdandload (talk • contribs)

  Telling you would have made too much sense, though. 1234 ~ 19:43, 7 April 2011

•  For. Nice noob. --~  07:15, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
•  He`s picture that Enjoy life is so sick and I like sick n00bs, so I dont seee a reason why I WON`T say FOR! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 05:48, 12 April, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ~  Talk 01:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I realize I am voting against myself, but he's a better n00b than I am - he can work with images in a way I just can't. --NoNamesLeft 19:07, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

NoNamesLeft (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 8

• Nom and For. This guy is pretty cool. Even though he seems to have a crush on Judge Dredd. (talk) 21:49, 8 April 2011
• Thanks for the nod, Jack of Spades.--NoNamesLeft 00:54, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 00:14, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
•  Goobily for Quality writing and a great deal of it (check out editcount, contributions, etc.). I was waiting to see if he was a one or two weeker, but seems like the real deal and may stick around. Nice work, NoNamesLeft! Aleister 23:14 18-4-'11

  p.s. Has kept working and improving. Heavy on the Sporks, but then works on them. 18:52 24-4-'11

•  Strong for I've read a couple of his entries, including the one on my favorite quiz show and he's done well. He's a better n00b than I am and I commend him for that. Good work!--Respond 00:54, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  I know I'm using the  For. template but this is not a  For. vote I just wanted to say "This guy is good". --~  14:12, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. rites arbicle --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 18:27, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Hilarious! 18:27, April 26, 2011--Jspeak01 15:47, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Churnin' out articles like nobody's business. Hot damn! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:23 Apr 29, 2011
• Per this guy's editcount, excess of articles, and the fact that he's been on in the past week. Although I rather like Lockdandload's style, and his comfort with the ways of wikiing seems better... eh. 1234 ~ 00:19, 1 May 2011
  • This was a bit of a late vote, but since this is NotM, it'd be like stealing a kid's little league trophy away because the umpire was a crack addict. Right? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:30, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0

• Nom per Zombiebaron. --~  15:42, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Official Vote To Abolish NotM

Score: -2

• Nom and For, -- The Zombiebaron 07:42, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Can't possibly turn this down, given my history of starting multiple pointless votes such as this. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:57, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I don't get this shit - Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I didn't win it. 11:22, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
• For Remember when I had that amazing idea to replace it? I still stand behind that. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:42, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

  That means I'm going to lose the only award that I didn't pay to win it? --~  15:46, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

• No, of course not, and you won't lose the award, as this vote not only means nothing but means next to nothing, a place reserved for people who hang out with Justin Bieber. Aleister 15:55 3-4-'11 & 15:26 4-4-'11
• Abolish it? No. Drop the requirements, or relax them from 33 days to 6 months? Absolutely! pillow talk 16:54, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

  I've been here eight months. Was I a noob two months ago? Or am I still a noob? What's a noob? 1234 ~ 17:05, 3 April 2011

  You've been here 10 months. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Really? What month is it? Crap, when did I even join? Which account was I checking from? How do you know me better than I do? What?! 1234 ~ 17:15, 3 April 2011

• Against. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 20:27, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Against. Mostly because it is very unfair on Lockdandload for us to be having this discussion here. I know I'd feel pretty crap about being nominated for an award and the only other voting going on is about abolishing said award because it's no use. Just my opinion. --ChiefjusticePS3 08:53, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

  Agree with Chiefster. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:55, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

• Against Chief's right, man. I wasn't terribly happy, myself, having this pop up right after I'd just nominated someone, let alone how that someone might feel. It ain't proper. 1234 ~ 10:10, 4 April 2011
• Zombiebaron Gen. Fudgem0bile She laughs when you ask her out. You laugh when you bury her. 11:45, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  Against. Because RCMurphy hasn't won enough times. -- 03:53, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
• Against. Yes, I haven't been as active here for several months due to various reasons. But the main reason I got active here was because I got nommed for NotM. I thought, "Damn, I'd better do something before they realize I don't deserve the nom." Starting out here can be very discouraging and confusing, and I think this is a bright spot for noobs. Do you want to encourage new people to sign up and make productive contributions? Then I think this is a great way to do it. And if you want to discourage people from signing up and making productive edits, then I think having this discussion here is a great way to do that. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:01, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
• I said no before, and I say no now. Same reasons as before. --HM (T) 01:09, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

• I never was voted for NotM. Or nommed. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 05:08, 30 April 2011

Official Vote To Change NotM formula to awarding the user who makes the funniest/most stupid/retarded/idiotic mishap/blooper or who writes the funniest/most stupid thing on forums/talk pages during the last month (nom obligatory with link to the edit that causes the nommer to nom the user)

Score: -1

• Nom and For Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 15:51, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  Against. Because I can't write artciles. --~  16:13, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • It's not about articles. It's more about behaving like an idiot on forums. Lol. Actually, the sentence you write would result in a nom. At least that's how they do it in Polish Nonsensopedia :P Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 16:18, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

o_0 whatever. --~  16:23, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

• So, in other words, UGOTM? pillow talk 16:53, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Yes. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 20:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

  I still haven't been nominated for that this month... 1234 ~ 17:04, 3 April 2011

  Actually, you have been. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:53, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

  *hugs Ptok and dances around happily* 1234 ~ 22:56, 3 April 2011

• Against. Say, let's make an award to discourage new people from writing articles. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:05, April 5, 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Writer of the Month

Skinfan13 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10

•  Nommeder & For Skinfan has double digit features (almost), has written exceptional stuff here for a time and then some, and founded a frat that works on articles which don't exist but still have many links (and which has a perfect record on feature pages). This is one of those "He hasn't won this before?" noms. Yay Skinfan! Aleister 23:57 1-5-'11
•  For. I too am a fan of skin. --EMC ^[TALK] 14:09 May 2 2011
•  For. As per my recommendation the previous month. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:42, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. As per Romartus recommendation the previous month.--Funnybony    15:30, May 2
• For. My cat told me to. 1234 ~ 15:44, 9 May 2011
• :) DABI DOO SHA LA LAH --ShabiDOO 22:13, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
• Skinfan has written a few great articles and organised collabs like Weird, Chicken and Blockbuster - all of which were tremendous fun to write. He's also a war hero. Next month: TheKillerTKF (unless someone unearths another great up-and-coming writer who hasn't won it yet). --Black Flamingo 19:52, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
• (Me) Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 09:50, 13 May, 2011 (UTC)
• Because I just discovered the disquieting "N" in his name. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:53, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
•  Hell yeah Love this dude, in a non-gay way---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:02, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Hasn't won it yet, and deserves it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:12, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5

• He got the same article featured three FUCKING times. Can't explain that. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:59, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
• Foar turning the weirdest article ever that he wrote while on meth (Milton Babbitt) into something readable Milton Babbitt/rewrite Mattsnow 06:52, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He called me warrior or something. Mr. Cat likes religious persons... Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 11:37, 12 May, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He's good, he's consistent, and he's highly visible. --Sir NoNamesLeft CUN NotM 20:35, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
• F☭R. -- 04:29, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Composure1 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +_+

• A nom in that writer of the month is like a Hall of Fame vote, and Composure1 was somehow overlooked for WOTM when he was very active here. He has 209 UnNews stories! Probably most of them high quality. The only user I know of who has more is Funnybony (280 plus). Does anyone know of others who have more than 150 or so, or even 100? Yay Composure1, wherever you may roam. Aleister 21:26 15-5-'11

  Weebils also had tremendous numbers of UnNewses (and sizable amounts of regular articles too). -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:47, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

  Whooa! This Weebils guy was great, 205 UnNews and random reads indicates they may all be very good. Thanks, I'm glad I asked. Aleister 6:00 16-5-'11

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Frosty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

• This guy is on the fast track to becoming a decent user, almost. Vote for him. I'm not, though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:41, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For He does more work than his competitors. The kind of work one doesn't get recognition for. The kind of work that prevents this site from being filled with cyber-bullying and jokes about how much he sucks. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:23, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
• For I like this guy. He pays attention to what's going on.--Sir NoNamesLeft CUN NotM 20:01, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
• sure --Roman Dog Bird 19:59, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
• For He's roaming silently around the place, waiting in the shadows for the perfect opportunity to furiously revert vandals. And he's cold-related! Mattsnow 06:17, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
• Strong keep. If Sonje hadn't been nommed then Frosty would have had this in a landslide, although he would have been under the landslide, which is always a drawback when landslides are brought into the conversation. Aleister 3:18 30-5-'11

Sonje (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 18

•  Nommeder & For For Sonje's work illustrating articles like Scraggle and many others. Also for causing a political storm in Australia with her illustration for the 2010 World Cup logo which got used on a mainstream channel unaware her work was a spoof. Sonje can also sing too...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:47, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  WTF For WTF she hasn't won this yet? I searched for her name on the winners list and couldn't find it, so maybe a vandal removed it. I can't believe it wasn't there. wtf. The amount of work Sonje has put in on the site is not only huge, but responsible for many of the best pics and chops ever. Aleister 22:45 2-5-'11
•  For. per above. (talk) 22:47, 2 May 2011
•  For. Oh my god! I had no idea Sonje's image was used as the real one! I just looked it up, and you weren't lying! I can't believe it! Great job Sonje! You're my hero now! -- 01:27, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

[1] [2] -- 01:28, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

•  Shoulda won this long ago – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:17 May 09, 2011
•  For. - I can claim to have come back to the wiki just to vote for Sonje. She's talented, smart, pretty, and mostly sane, despite hanging around this site for ages! :P -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 20:26, 9 May
• For. The UoTM nominee with breasts - and one of the most helpful uncyclopedians about especially with images and bringing a positive and helpful presence on the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:12, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Aw, thanks guys. --^Dame 18:43, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. She's useful when she's around. Shame it ain't more. For us, anyhow. 1234 ~ 23:43, 13 May 2011
•  For.  For.  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:51, 13 May 2011
• What they said, but funnier. --Black Flamingo 00:45, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Could easily have voted for one of the others but Sonje is one of the people makes Uncyclopedia.

--Sog1970 08:36, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. As per Sog--Funnybony    02:04, May 19
• Yes! --ShabiDOO 23:34, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. He helped me with the image I added for RYA, plus voting for myself being the only other option would make me look like a douchebag. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 05:34, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- The Zombiebaron 16:16, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
• Voting props to Sonje. Frosty is okay but he isn't going to win, and I have to thank Sonje for all those requested images somehow. So thanks. You deserve this. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:49, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
•  Fucking For Because she's awesome.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:00, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:13, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

JackOfSpades (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Bastard

• Nom. One of them oldtimers or something, he disappeared for a goodly long while and came back a force to be reckoned with. He's also kind of useful and stuff sometimes. 1234 ~ 22:47, 2 May 2011

lol, nope. (talk) 22:49, 2 May 2011

Noob of the Month

Mattsnow (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 20

• Vote for him again. Heaven's Gate. Nuff said. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:31, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
• I'll also come in mucho early on this month's vote. Mattsnow melts my resistance. A very good writer, polishes his pages, and seems to like the site enough to grow some roots. Aleister 23:51 1-5-'11
• Yep (talk) 00:08, 2 May 2011
• Aye--Respond 00:13, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  strong for -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:23, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. ED/Successor states loss, Uncyclopedia's gain. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:46, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  I like his sig. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:48, 4 May, 2011 (UTC)

I can thank Lollipop/Chupa Chups/multiple person personality disorder for that :) Mattsnow 16:10, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. Obviously not a "real" noob, but I like his/her articles ;) Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 15:27, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  Duh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:32, 6 May 2011
•  That was easy. It's astonishing to see what he has done to this wiki. Not even a month old, and he already has a feature. Considering he broke the wiki barrier, I see a great future for him. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 18:22, 7 May 2011
• Matt's now. --Black Flamingo 23:01, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Per TKF. --^Dame 18:54, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
•  Decent... or something. 1234 ~ 23:41, 13 May 2011
•  For. Yay! --Mimo&maxus 11:18, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
• Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --ShabiDOO 23:53, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
•  Two thumbs up. -- 23:57, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
• What's everyone lining up for? Is this the cookie queue? ~  Talk 02:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
•  A fine young man. --EMC ^[TALK] 05:13 May 23 2011
• For More like this please... MrN 11:22, May 27
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:14, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom &  For. Beat ya to it Lyri Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 16:10, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
• For Because I've never voted for a sockpuppet to be noob of the month. Oh look, it's in your pipe. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:01, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

• Out of deference to Mattsnow, I am turning down my nomination this month. Because he has fairly built up a lead already, I don't feel that it's sportsmanlike for me to take away that lead now (as I would undoubtedly do). Thanks to all my supporters. I will be back with a vengeance in June. —rc (t) 18:58, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: "9" strikes.... & "1" WTF

• Nom &  For. Beat ya to it Lyri Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 16:10, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
• For Because I've never voted for a sockpuppet to be noob of the month. Oh look, it's in your pipe. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:01, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

• You suck. You suck?!. You didn't. You still suck.! Mattsnow 08:02, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
• Out of deference to Mattsnow, I am turning down my nomination this month. Because he has fairly built up a lead already, I don't feel that it's sportsmanlike for me to take away that lead now (as I would undoubtedly do). Thanks to all my supporters. I will be back with a vengeance in June.—rc (t) 18:58, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
• Stop striking us!, Or I'll strike everything. Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 19:12, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. —rc (t) 19:31, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
• Abstain. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:49, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
• WTF? Is this the elderly of the month contest?! Mattsnow 12:36, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

   Against. This is madness. Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 13:02, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

•  That was easy. He's a bigger noob than me, and according to Skully, i'm a big noob. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 23:51, 13 May 2011
• I don't think so. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 04:08, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

And by I don't think so. you must mean "Yes" Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 12:17, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

RCmurphy is a nice guy, but he is so desperate, I feel he has some kind of frustration within... :P Mattsnow 12:16, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

You may be onto something. 1234 ~ 23:01, 18 May 2011

Lyrithya (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Waffles. Syrup.

• Vote for me! 1234 ~ 00:56, 12 May 2011
• Waffle! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:58, 12 May 2011

 For. Lyrithya made me do it --Sir NoNamesLeft CUN NotM 01:00, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

You are older than 30 days and are not Rcmurphy what is this? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 23:26, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

A joke. 1234 ~ 23:40, 13 May 2011

• Syrup Aleister 15:36 16-5-'11

  NO WAY! unless you correct tha spallin misstackse hon may nhecst hartikle. Dwal? Mattsnow 17:53, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

  Ew... 1234 ~ 17:56, 16 May 2011

• There can be only one. --ChiefjusticePS3 14:38, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

ChiefjusticeDS (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Scaffold

• He is suck a noob. 1234 ~ 00:16, 18 May 2011

  He is sooooo suck a noob. Aleister 00:20 18-5-'11

• He tuk are jobs! --ShabiDOO 01:11, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
• he sucked my noob --Roman Dog Bird 02:24, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
• Invalid nom. Not a boob. MrN 11:20, May 27

June 2011

Writer of the month

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 figures of speech

•  nom +4 attempted necromancy nom + vote. --Mn-z 22:50, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. -- 01:22, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. (talk) 01:23, 3 June 2011

NoNamesLeft (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +12

• This kid's output in the last few months (and his first few months) has been absolutely fecking ridiculous. Tons of articles, good articles, all about requested or popular topics too! Look through them! They're all good! All of them! I am not kidding! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:35, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. This newcomer will become so good at making requested articles, Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles will have to be renamed "Unyclopedia:Articles that NoNamesLeft hasn't created yet, but soon will". -- >> Hello, my name is Sir Lollipop, and I am Canadian! 01:40, 3 June 2011
•  For. Per TFK's suggestion to look through NNL's pages. I've spent a lot of time since yesterday doing so, and have even looked into his user-pages in progress. This guy is either a team of writers, a human with advanced writer-DNA, or a hard-core humourist who really enjoys the site. In his short time here he has done lots of requested articles (though a long way from Maniac1075's ra output), and each of his pages are excellent while still having room for polishing and improvement. So as someone who hasn't kept track of NoNamesLeft progress, I can only conclude, WTF!!!? Aleister 18:40 3-6-'11
• I kind of have the strange feeling that this guy writes about as fast as I do, but the result after then end of his typing frenzy is a polished, well structured, good and super funny article with minimal corrections needed. His secretary article was written in about an hour. You could take any of his articles, polish it up a little bit and feature it...and not even Lyrithya would vote against it ;) . I hope he joins in the summer version of Happy Monkey :) --ShabiDOO 19:18, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Do I really have to offer an explanation? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:47, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
•  For.--Funnybony    06:44, Jun 6
•  For. Energetic new contributor. Seems to be bursting out all over with articles right now. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:59, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Mattsnow 04:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Deserves it. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 11:26 8 June 2011
•  For. Awesompressive output! --Imrealized ...hmm? 01:58, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Wow, yeah, that's good. --Black Flamingo 10:33, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Pointless yes. 1234 ~ 23:45, 30 June 2011

---

Noob of the month

Void Raven (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1 (for now)

• I am just putting this guy in your faces for next month, if he keeps this up this is the scariest output I have seen so far, and it is good. See for yourself with his contribs. He's not a goth though. Mattsnow 02:29, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

1.  For. PMP has it this month but this new under-the-radar contributor is worth my vote here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:53, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Big Duck (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

• This guy's been hopping around a couple different places on the site, as of late. Got my attention when he was given a damning pee review and actually improved his article. That shows charisma. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

This guy is eligible next month, so I'll say now he has my nom and vote for july. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 05:59, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

HauntedUndies (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• Read some of the unnews articles, thought he should have a nom! Lock'd And Loaded ~CUN ~ (Shoot!) 14:40, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Good shit. I would have totally voted for him as his nearest competitor hasn't yet written anything quite as good as this but it's too late in the month to be winning notm's already. That and the fact I am PoopManPoop. My vote's for him, next month. -- -> That's Poop Man Poop 14:54, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

•  Against. I broke two letters off my keyboard, proceeded to spill beer onto the exposed electrical bits, and then zapped myself when a wayward arm hair sought refuge from the rest of me in the earphone hole while I wrote a bunch of thinly veiled poo jokes. Booooo. -- HauntedUndies 12:33, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

You know what they say, the competition always takes care of itself. Well..yeah, they do.-- -> That's Poop Man Poop 14:27, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

•  For.. Also, is he in the running for next month, too? ~  Talk 01:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

PoopManPoop (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 12

PoopManPoop is editing Uncy. Mattsnow 11:10, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

• Nom. He has his faults, but he is nevertheless a quite promising noob. 1234 ~ 07:19, 1 June 2011
•  For. -- 16:02, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. On second thought -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:14, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Got him started, seems like a good followup to Mattsnow. -- >> Hello, my name is Sir Lollipop, and I am Canadian! 05:19, 7 June 2011
•  For. No reason in particular. -- - Big★Duck ☭ 22:19, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

' For. Big Duck, rememer to put your vote scores up when you vote, okay? You forgot it. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 11:54 8 June 2011

•  For. He's writing well and shows a lot of enthusiasm. Mattsnow 14:11, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. I just figured out I can vote for myself too.-- -> That's Poop Man Poop 17:01, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

How self centred, I MIGHT JUST TAKE BACK MY VOTE!!! Or no because I'm too lazy. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 08:01, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Voting for oneself disqualifies you automatically. Your life's goal of being NotM is finished. The dream is over, PMP. :'( Mattsnow 03:23, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Ok blame it on Aleister. He said self voting is both allowed and encouraged. Encouraged! Let's kill him.Please don't do that to me. I will even pat you on the head if you help me win this. Maybe even something else. Don't take this away from me, pleaassse!-- -> That's Poop Man Poop 17:16, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

I meant voting for your own features, not to be given an award for goddesses sake. What an ego on you, what a set of steel balls you have to carry around. What is that, an extra five pounds? Ah, never mind, you've earned it. Yay! Aleister 20:42 13-6-'11

•  For. I'm voting for this wonderful newcomer in a futile attempt to seem like part of the community--User:CandidToaster/sig 14:42, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. his name makes me laugh --Roman Dog Bird 22:02, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
•  ForDuckFor Same reason with Roman Dog Bird --Mimo&maxus 18:42, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. /Climbs upon bandwagon with no complaints. Lots of straw in the bandwagon. Horses pull it down a country road. Aleister 20:39 13-6-'11
• Biryani. --Black Flamingo 10:39, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Lol-- -> That's Poop Man Poop 12:15, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

Nom + For Lets be honest, he really deserves it this time. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:52, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

• For -- The Zombiebaron 04:28, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Frosty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +7 fnoodles

• He's the best bot that Skully ever thought to make. Great job, Skully. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:20, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For per what I said last month. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:30, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
•  For racking up more good edits in one day than I make in a week here. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 09:28 June 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Wait, I thought this was Fnoodle's nom.... (?) -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 17:41 June 3, 2011 (UTC)

  I'll go ahead and give Frosty the  For vote he really deserves. His efforts to clear the site of cruft have been tireless. Cheers, dude; you deserve it! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 08:59 June 19, 2011 (UTC)

•  For. One thumb up, I literally flipped a coin between Frosty and Jack O'Spades. Frosty has done so much here the past half year or so it's hard even complaining about him. Great work from a great user, and well deserved (except for Jack, who well deserves it as well, deserved). Aleister 1:16 6-6-'11
•  For. Good users like him and vandals fear his unmerciful wrath. Mattsnow 04:06, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
• i like this guy --Roman Dog Bird 21:56, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. - I want to vote for TheHumbucker but he's already winning, so this might bring a smile to Frosty. Also, he's been around for a long time apparently. Also, I like him (but then I like TheHumbucker even more, though, as I said, he's already winning). :) -- -> That's Poop Man Poop 15:37, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

TheHumbucker (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 10

• Nom. This guy agreed to look after UnNews and has actually been doing it, and despite a fair amount of needless hassle, it still doing it. He's a real Uncyclopedian, and an impressive one at that. Also, he does other stuff. 1234 ~ 06:05, 1 June 2011
•  lol what a n00b! -- 15:28, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Straight-up asshole. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:29, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
• For -- The Zombiebaron 17:00, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
• Yep (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2011
• Straight up non-dick. Goodluck filling Spikes shoes. Sure you can --ShabiDOO 01:23, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. UnNews Editor--Funnybony    06:40, Jun 6
•  For. Stepping into the breach after SPIKE declined to return to duty at the News Front. Has already survived a few onslaughts and held his ground. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:05, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:32 Jun 08, 2011
•  For. Once again I will avoid voting for myself and let the better man win. Plus I want to see how many times I get nommed before winning this thing... -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:34, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
•  For. Yes. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 01:12, 15 June 2011

JackOfSpades (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Nom. He does useful stuff sometimes. 1234 ~ 06:05, 1 June 2011
•  FOUR --EMC ^[TALK] 17:44 Jun 3 2011
• Four good noms, but this guy's been around for a surprisingly long time now (albeit in two shifts) and only does good; no bad and no mediocre. --Black Flamingo 19:32, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Spiritual For (see my coin-flipping note above) Aleister 2:22 17-6-'11

SPIKE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

•  nom + 4 attempted necromancy vote. --Mn-z 22:52, June 2, 2011 (UTC)