2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) • 2009 (part 1) • 2009 (part 2) • 2010 (part 1) • 2010 (part 2) • 2011 (part 1) • 2011 (part 2) • 2012 (part 1) • 2012 (part 2) • 2013 (part 1) • 2013 (part 2) • 2014 • 2015 • 2017 to now

Writer of the Year[edit source]

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +9

Nom. Cajek is crazy. Cajek is the craziest loon on this site, and has written more articles this year than Saturn's rings have little pieces of rock. He never writes the same way twice, and has executed some of the wackiest, most hilarious first-person monologues that I've ever read. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Um Downright one of the best people on the site - a great writer and even more a great person who really made this a great place to be. He probably deserves this for that Japanese opera thing alone buuuuuut I can't decide between hiiiim aaaaannddd... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For per above. --Mnbvcxz 21:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For Fuck you TKF for nomming him before me. Cajek has been the living example of an Uncyclopedian writer this entire year, but I don't think we should hold that against him. My mind was made up months ago on this, and he still kept producing quality. -RA HB 03:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I think WotY is the hardest thing to vote for on Uncyclopedia. Hell, choosing a President wasn't this hard. Cajek is one of my favorite writers on this site. I've seen every aspect of his freakish talent, both on this site and off of it. He's smart. He's talented. Most of all, he's fucking hilarious. Never does the man cease to make me laugh. His wit is that of one you could only find on a site like this. And yet...I'm not voting for Cajek. Every single nominee thus far deserves this award, and yet I can only cast one vote. Cajek, if you decide to come back to Uncyc and read this, know that I love you, buddy. In the butt, that is. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
...shit. SysRq's right, this is a tough choice. Mhaille, Modus, So So, the Cap'n, so many of these guys are amazing writers. This year, though, has belonged to Cajek right from the start. He's consistently hilarious, every time he writes, and despite being on a bit of a hiatus right now, he deserves this. For. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:14, Jan 2
For As per TKF - Amy Rose 22:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
'For All of his article made me laugh so hard that urine came out my nose. ~ Readmesoon 18:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
For Cajek is my far one of the most creative, brilliant users I've ever seen on my extremely procrastinative (is that even a word?) life on this site. Oh, and also, literally everything SysRq said I could also say in equal measures. Except the not voting part. —talk 11:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For. What thekillerfroggy said. --Docile hippopotamus 00:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
As much as I'd love to vote for that Mhaille guy, or even MO, or the superslick writing machine that is PP, Cajek has been a busy boy this year. He was one of my nomination for UOTY, the fact that he is still in the running for WOTY as well shows his worth and his talent. For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For. EVERYONE BOW DOWN!!! --^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 18:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

TheLedBalloon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom. Here's the man whose taught several fantastic writers, including one directly above him, everything he knew, and in the process created talented monsters. Not only is he an incredible writer whose written three of my all-time top five favorite articles, but he has a knack for spreading his love to his dedicated wing of protégés, too. Aside from fantastic writing, the most important characteristic of a fantastic writer is his influence, and TLB's influence is widespread and evident. Plus, he's a fantastic writer. He gets a ~~nod~~ from me. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Speech No. 2: TLB is easily among my favorite writers. I'll admit that I was nervous when he was opped, fearful that perhaps this unstoppable deluge of hilarious articles would subside and eventually dry up, as seems to happen with many good writers that are given bansteeqs. This was not the case with my funny, inflatable friend. Instead, he has mastered both parts of himself, and has become something more. It was an honor writing with him, and through that experience I learned more about just what kind of writer he is: a great writer. I'm not voting for Leddy, although it pains me not to. I love you, brah. In the butt. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For I recognise his name, therefore he must have been in the edit history of an article I like --Veggieburgerfish 23:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +18

Nom. Ever classy, ever prolific Mhaille. He's been the top banana on this site for three years, both as a writer and as an Uncyclopedian, and in this time he's hardly ever let up. Some people may excel at being crazy or unusual, but Mhaille's wit rarely falls down into the gutter. Even when he's writing his patented tasteless articles, his articles still exude a thick air of classiness, and executes the tastelessness in the most clever way you've ever seen. He's funny, highly versatile, and going strong since 2005. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Eh... hate to be a jerk, but I'm changing my vote to for Mhaille, seeing as TLB's pretty much a lost cause, and if not him, I'd like to see Mhaille win this instead. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
For the longest time, I was a stand-off observer of Mr. Mhaille. A bit of a secret admirer, if you will. I saw that this great force on Uncyclopedia that has carried this site for so long truly deserved everything he had earned. This is the personification of passion: Mhaille's full of it, and he shows us this in his writing. Recently, I have gotten to know Mhaille a little better through random encounters and whatnot. This has only furthered my view of him as both a strong pillar for the community, and an unstoppable force as a humorist. He's got it all. Mhaille's a great guy, a great op, and a great writer. I'm not voting for Mhaille. But if I'm writing nice little speeches for Cajek and Leddy, then Mhaille is just as deserving of my respect. I love you, man. Butt. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. - Writes good stuffs, most features etc. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. 'Cos he promised me £10 if I did. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. He deserves this award. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
If I could, I'd split my vote 50/50 between him and Modus, I would. And then I'd still have to give serious consideration to Cajek and Led. As I can't, however, after several minutes thought on the subject, I figured that Mhaille's articles consistently made me laugh more than anyone else's have done. Just. Add in the fact he's been going as long as anyone, and I'm going to have to vote for Mhaille. It's a ridiculously close race though. –—Hv (talk) 2/01 16:24
I seriously thought he won this award years ago. I was a bit amused that he was up for it again - deserving as he still is of it - until I just realized that he had never won it in the first place. Anyway, that should be changed forthwith, as Mhaille has not only been writing good articles and whatnot all year, but also last year, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before. -- The Zombiebaron 23:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For --Simon Brown (Talk) 22:06, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
For Although others write well, Mhaille contributes to a very large and diverse number of different articles especially at new pages. Mhaille has created many articles, but he has had an influence on many. For that, he gets my vote. Mr N 16:05, Jan 9
For - Mhaille's distinct style of writing, and even more distinct sense of humour makes for fantastic articles (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 13, 18:41
For - His writing is fantastic, and when he helps me with mine, it makes mine better.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 05:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
For. It's Mhaille. It's always Mhaille. Even when I don't "get" his pages, because their all foreign 'n' shit, I know that they don't suck...because it's Mhaille. Everybody here deserves a vote, but only one of these people is Mhaille. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Dig. - Brilliant. Go on, my son. --THINKER 01:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes - --Knucmo2 14:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
For when I say his name, I wonder if I have a cold. Am I saying his name right? OMG! AM I DYING????? --Kenvalyi 01:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
For. He has touched me and countless others in places we never thought we would be touched. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 00:51, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
For? --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 18:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
4'. » DJ "Reaper of Fail" Gentoo, now with wit, sarcasm, and even more obscure folk metal. Now in lime green! 21:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 01:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Er Cap'n Ben, whom has been producing hilarious articles since nigh on the creation of time itself and managed to step up even more this year to fill the void left by users such as me who have been too busy/lazy/writers blocked to write any more stuff. I'll try to form a list of what he's written... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:47, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Funny, highly versatile, and going strong since 2005. Who else can you say that about on this site? FOR--S0.S0S.0S.0S0 22:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Touche, TKF, but seriously, the Cap'n kicked so much ass in this year of lazy writers. I thought he would be a lock for this... --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 01:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Moral support: I've got to go with So So this year, but Ben has also been fucking hilarious. pillow talk 01:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +20

Nom & For. He's probably the most consistently funny person on the site, writing real quality articles and chucklesome one-liners all over the place. Tends to brighten my day whenever I see him, although that could be the light reflecting off his gleaming naked body. --UU - natter 10:37, Jan 1
PHWHORE As per above. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
F☭R 02:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I know, this is getting real old (unless you have tl;dr'd my other speeches) for y'all, but there are just so many great nominees this year. However, this is my man. Modus is forever a symbol of genius in my mind. Everything from his talk page banter to his most recent articles and images demonstrates just how fucking funny this silly Canadian is. Modus is just one of those users that has always been here, has always been writing comedic gold, and is just fine with or without recognition. I've never seen him tire, I've never seen the quality of his works slip in the least. He's consistent. He just never runs out. Of the three other nominees I have taken the time to recognize, two have been ops. What Modus has in common with those ops is that they all are great at everything that they do. Modus gets things done, and still has time to write. He's a powerhouse, and is my ideal Uncyclopedian that I someday hope to be. I think we all aspire to be Modus in some form. As a writer, he is unstoppable, and it is for that reason that he has my vote. I love your butt. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For Per above, even though Cajek almost got my vote here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Darn, but this was close. However, unlike the rest of the candidates, Modus is Modus. No one can compare to his seemingly limitless supply of jokes, be they one-liners, high-hat satires, side-splitting parodies, et cetera. The defense rests, your honor. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:58, Jan 2
I vote for this guy. -- impressive Ape (ruminate) (Riot Porn) 21:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. IronLung 22:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
For. This man is made of God and win. --B O M B 15:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Against. Because I'm confused how this works, exactly. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradaphraser (talk • contribs) diff
For - I probably shouldn't be voting here, since I haven't really existed very much for the past six months or so. Though I suspected this hasn't been Modus's most prolific year, I have read some of his new stuff and it is great. He deserves this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For. I never would have thought that casting a vote would be so painful as this, but it is. Not that Modus isn't great, he is, but everyone on this page (except moi) is terrific and deserves this award. Still, Modus' star is just that much brighter, because he makes it look so damn easy. And Canada deserves at least one major award for producing something of merit in 2008. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

But what about the Toronto Maple Leafs? --Kenvalyi 01:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Duh. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 08:06, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The choice is clear! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Really tough choice, but For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
For - For the 1 1/2 years I've been on this site, I've seen a large amount of featured articles. You don't always know what you'll get on the magical world of VFH, but if I see the author is good ol' Modus, I always know I'll love it, without exception. This year's candidates are incredibly hard to choose from, but basing this on consistency, I think Modus has it. Also, his Village Dump posts are always good for a chuckle. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 02:26, Jan 15
For - There are a lot of good writers here: shit. I thought about who I should vote for, and Modus's name kept coming up. I wish I had this guy's mind, because it's probably delicious. Definitely Modus... or Mhaille... or Led. [note: Thank you for nominating and voting for me, guys! Makes me feel good.] Le Cejak • <14:12 Jan 16, 2009>

For User:Frenchfried
For. Modus is like maple syrup. On the outside he's all golden, sweet and sticky. On the inside however, he's all golden, sweet and sticky. This has nothing to do with the vote though. I just like pancakes. And Modus is the pancake of my life. Did I say that out loud? ~ 15:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
For As many great writers there are to choose from today, i think modus takes the cake... I wonder if a pancake is considered a cake... I want pancakes. Wait, I want pancakes. /me goes to get pancakes. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 15:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Procopius (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1.5

Nom Even though he has been dead for a good majority of the year - coming back periodically to write a few newses and devour brains - I still believe he deserves this for being the most talented individual to ever grace this site. Because I'll never decide between Cajek and Cap'n Ben I'm going to vote for Procopius on principle. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
1/2 For on behalf of an IP. This is a totally illegal vote, and strike it if you feel you must, but I think it's clear at Talk:The white guy in All-4-One that Tony Borowiak, the white guy in All-4-One, editing as IP 12.88.49.178, would like to throw in his lot for Procopius. pillow talk 22:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

15Mickey20 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom I am a fan. Has done great work all year, especially on the tennis articles, and deserves, at the very least, a nom. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
gah I strongly urge you all to vote for Mickey as he is without doubt one of the funniest people to ever grace this site, and has even stepped up in the last year making even more hilarious articles. However I am just too stuck to vote for Mickey over Cajek and Cap'n Ben. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
& For No one makes me laugh as consistantly, or as hard as Mickey does. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 07:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom and for Of my favorite 20 Uncyclopedia articles, So So has written at least six of them. This guy would be one of our national treasures if we were a nation of some sort. pillow talk 20:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:32, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 5

Nom & for. Got the hang of this writing thing infuriatingly quickly. Hype dominates the list of my favourite articles of the year, with Turing Duck Test, Schindler's Listcruft and Cell biologists are cooler than molecular biologists just being the tip of the proverbial iceberg. -- 15Mickey20 (Ho ho ho to Mickey) 11:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
FOR Despite being a liar (molecular biologists are way cooler), he's managed to get my attention in the past, and kept it there for a surprising amount of time. Mr. Lavrenti "Digits" Hex 23:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
FOR I went to random.org and told it to give me a random number between the total number of candidates. His number came up and so he gets my vote. Congrats, Hyperbole! Anyway, I may have gotten the total number of candidates wrong by plus or minus 1, because I often use zero-based arrays in Pascal and COBOL. But that's neither here nor there for this guy Hyperbole. Only the first or last guy in the list has any reason to complain. User:Rsnbrgr 23:53, 10 January 2009 (EST)

Thank you. I will treasure this particular vote always. pillow talk 18:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

For Good writer, writes good, etc. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Fuck Yeah -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Prettiestpretty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom. Looking through PP's work earlier, I came to realise she's got a real wealth of quality articles out there, and I'd kind of forgotten just how much good stuff she's produced. Alas, my vote is cast elsewhere, and must remain there, but I think she's certainly worthy of a nom here at the very, very least. --UU - natter 21:55, Jan 5
Further comment: As some folks are putting comments all over this page, I thought I'd just make the one here. All the nominees here are awesome. I wouldn't complain if any of them won. I love the lot of them, and consider myself lucky to have read their best work and even to know some of them (as well as you can know someone you just edit the same wiki as.) This is the single hardest choice to make on this site, and it shows we have a real depth of talent. I'd just like to mention that, and the fact that if I met any of the people nominated on this page, I'd hug them for being great, and buy them a large measure of their favourite tipple. --UU - natter 21:55, Jan 5
6/10. /me golfclaps —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Bows. --UU - natter 21:59, Jan 5
You are just to kind ~me weeps~ Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For I have my reasons. -
kingkitty ~Fuck you~

Tell me so I can understand what I have done to deserve your support! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
He wants to get laid. =] —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:38, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh... Hugs! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I wanted to get laid too, which is why I voted for Modus. I voted for you on PotY though, that's worth something. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Sex is overrated. Now, a disturbingly thorough knowledge of the ancient writings of Luo Guanzhong - there's something you can take to the bank. pillow talk 22:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
So when do I get laid? -
kingkitty ~Fuck you~

Uncyclopedian of the Year[edit source]

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 6

Nomination - Aside from his obvious qualities as a writer Cajek doesn't get the respect he deserves for the work he does on Uncyclopedia. Always helpful to other writers both established and newcomers Cajek has been one of the real workhorses that has seen Uncyclopedia go from strength to strength this year. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For. Cajek doesn't just improve the site; he has a knack for encouraging others to get behind him and... oh, dear, that's turning into a sexual innuendo. pillow talk 21:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
F☭R 03:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Very Strong For Cajek makes this site very fun. He deserves ~~very strong bannination~~ it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For What they said. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
For Only limited action by me lately, but I've seen him hard at work helping others.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 05:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
This is not an easy year to vote. There are quite a few here that I admire for what they did this year...in a non sexual way...or such. But I think that Cajek has initiated the Pee Review revolution which revitalized a part of the site that was dormant for...well...forever! I think Cajek injected us with new energies (as well as sexually transmitted diseases) which managed to make us look, if only for a short while as not being the worst. Unlike the majority of us Cajek cared. ~ 13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- You guys are awesome: I love this place, sexually speaking. Le Cejak • <14:09 Jan 16, 2009>

TheLedBalloon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 8

Nomination - Bloody funny, generous with his time, much as with Cajek so much goes unnoticed, I am going to struggle to choose between them. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Wuv 10 years from now, I'll still remember my adopter's username. And his home address. Because I'm kinda weird. Le Cejak • <17:16 Jan 01, 2009>
For. IronLung 02:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. An ever present, ever friendly, ever helpful admin, and great all-around guy too. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. I love this man. Goddamn if I ever met leddy in a bathroom goddamn some shit would happen. Goddamn. -
kingkitty ~Fuck you~
For. He fixes things when I broked them. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For Pretty much per TKF. Nothing else to say on that one. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 07:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For Looks like Mordillo is going to win (which I agree with), but I would like to make special mention of Led. Led's style of handling the crap, whilst not getting upset by assholes yet still continuing to write quality articles shows what a awesome dude this guy is. Another thing about Led... When he has made a mistake, he admits it. Twice in over a year I think it was. ;) Mr N 16:12, Jan 9
For There's nothing that Led can't do. Really. Try him. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

84.194.239.31 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)[edit source]

Score: 1 + 1 vote for the institution of IPotY

The hamsters will always remember us of his greatness.

Nomination - 84.194.239.31 was the one that prophecy had spoken of, the one who would bring balance to the wiki. The awesome 84.194.239.31 was always there to state the obvious, out-grammar anyone and talk existentially. Maybe he's still there, lurking in the shadows, ready to act, to do what is necessary. 84.194.239.31, he was the coolest IP of 2008. He said "nobody has to worry about what happened to me" but still I wonder what happened to him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For - I know I'm trowing my vote away, but I can't stand 84.194.239.31 not getting some of the credit he deserves. I wouldn't be able to decide who else to vote for anyway. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For the creation of IP of the Year and this guy being the first. 84.194.239.31 is a stellar chap, killing a rather pesky troll for us and being exceptionally helpful before vanishing off into the distance, preferring the anonymity of his searchable, easily identifiable IP address. This award should be saved for an actual Uncyclopedian, which means that the user must be a MUN at least, in my book anyways. However, this guy still deserves some recognition. (I mean it, IPotY would be awesome, can we make that happen?) —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Do you seriously believe that the almighty 84.194.239.31 can be traced by such simple mechanisms? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what it was that I was trying to say. Don't call me on this shit, I'm making it up as I go, man. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

MrN9000 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom & for - A real workhorse, and he's everywhere - encouraging new writers, smithing, reverting, formatting, fixing, helping out and being a real gent. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
Near-woot The only reason I'm not voting for Pants is because that other guy from England, the one that lives under the ground and controls my thoughts, has been around longer, and helped me navigate this crazy website. GO N! Le Cejak • <17:15 Jan 01, 2009>
Comment. I just want to express my gratitude to MrN for being one of the most effective and essential Uncyclopedians to the site for the past year or so. Had Mordillo not been as awesome as he is, my vote would go here. I hold MrN in high regard as being one of the members who sparked a good chain reaction of users doing maintenance and helping to keep the site going, and think he was quite possibly the single most important user in that particular "revolution", as it were. As such, he deserves at the very least, this statement of praise. -RA HB 18:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
For - hard choice for me to make this year, some fine contributors. His finer points are detailed by others above. The only thing I would add to this is that the work he does has been achieved without the "benefit" of admin rights, which speaks for itself. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom - Another absolute Trojan - a recent changes monster, reverter of shite, fixer of vandalism, fighter of fires and wearer of a stylish sporran. Probably does more work than you. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
For per above. --Mnbvcxz 21:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Since nobody will make him an admin. Harumph! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +21

Nom - He's the admin I see about the place the most, making the bans that need to be made, doing the big bad wolf stuff to keep fuckwits at bay, and generally being the controlling zionist influence on this wiki. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
For. - He's good, plus a good admin too. Makes good articles. ~~I fear that I'll be blocked if I don't vote for him.~~ |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 02:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
PHWHORE And stuffs. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Diplomatic, a work horse, responsible, and as I've said time and time again, and will continue to say until the day the Earth stands still, he simply knows how to get shit done. -RA HB 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Tough call this year, but I'm voting Mordillo, per RAHB. 'Dillo's the man. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:06, Jan 2
And I thought WotY was hard. Of the nine current noms, there are seven more than deserving candidates here (I'll let you guys work out who that is), and there's an argument to be made for every one of them. I've thought especially hard about voting for UU, then MrN, then Sycamore. Then I noticed a common thread among them - who is it that they all look up to in a way, and who they ask for help in a firefight? Mordillo. He's been on fire all year pretty much, and overall, I feel I have to vote for him. –—Hv (talk) 2/01 18:18
For. Hard working, friendly, effective. Did I forget to mention Jewish? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Four as per him being awesome. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, he's cool. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For despite the whole Gaza thing... -- impressive Ape (ruminate) (Riot Porn) 21:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For, BECAUSE of the Gaza thing. Yes. What? Oh, I'm sorry I misunderstood. For anyway.--<<>> 00:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For Sure. Gramps earns it. It's now or never, considering how old he already is... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 16:37, 7 Jan
For. One of the best. And apparently his wife is cute too -- sannse (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Mordillo pwns spammers, and is an all around nice guy. --Meganew POST NOW!!! 23:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Always the guy who lays down the law and gets stuff done, without being too serious about it. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:42, Jan 11
W♥v. Hebrew boner. Level headed. Role model. Mediator. More dildos. Only one of these terms refers to Mordillo. And yes, it is "role model." Wait, all of those describe Mordillo perfectly. I think Hv did it for me, made me realize that everyone comes to one person time after time for advice and a little tough love. I don't know who that person is, so I'm basing my vote on userpage vandalism. Mordillo's page has seen more action than...er...Codeine's mum. Oh, and he's a Jew that controls the internet, something you don't see too much these days and therefore needs to be rewarded and recognized. Good work, Mordillo. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes. He has shiny shoes. - [13:41 12 January] Sir FSt Don Yettie
Bandwagon --EMC^[TALK] 02:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment restored Boobs after it had accidentally been deleted for whatever reason.--Mnbvcxz 15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

No agenda here, I just love boobs. ~

16:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Dig I love this man. To the point that his girlfriend is seriously distraught by it. Could I be more subtle about it? Absolutely. Will I be more subtle about it? I think you know the answer to that question. You think I care what that bitch thinks? ;) --THINKER 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

That's my wife you're talking about! O_O ~

10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

For he's pure gold and have you looked at the price of Au lately? Let's mine this bastard! --Kenvalyi 01:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Why not? -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Woo! Mord! go mord! Woo! woo... I'm going home ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 18:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 9

Nom - One word - awesome — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For Can I vote more than once? How does this thing work? What does this button do? Oh sh- Le Cejak • <17:12 Jan 01, 2009>
For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Backed me all the way in numerous parts of the site in the past few months. --Nachlader 18:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For. He's like OnStar: always there. (groan) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:51, Jan 2
For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
For - It's about time a non-sysop like myself got this award. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Damn right UU has kept this site running all year. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
For helping out around the site and constantly peeing. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Devoted enough to not only do my job for a year, but then take the title to go with it. Good people. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom nom nom. He has flavor.--<<>> 15:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:29, 02 Jan 2009
For, as per myself. ~ Readmesoon 18:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Heerenveen (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 0

Nom I just don't think he gets enough credit for all the stuff he does around here. Deserves at least a nom. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

A nomination just for the sake of nomination? --EMC^[TALK] 02:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

No, a nomination for the sake of everyone saying, "Oh yeah! Heerenveen totally deserves this award. Seeing him here makes me want to vote for him, and whomever nominated him is a sexy, manly, awesome guy!" That's what I was generally going for. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom&For I don't even know if Sys would approve of me nominating and for-ing him but I'm going to do it anyway. In my opinion he is one of the brightest lights on uncyclopedia : always funny, always friendly and compassionate as well as passionate (the speeches on WotY demonstrate that) and although my opinion probably doesn't count for much because I keep procrastinating myself on and off the site to the point where I'm shit at everything Uncyclopedia-wise, I still feel strongly that this guy deserves this award. —talk 11:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Man, fuck you. Thanks buddy, I appreciate the kind words. To say thank you, I am going to make a simple comment without bitching about you voting for me. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009[edit source]

NotM[edit source]

Tagstit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +12 tits (or tags, if you're into that sort of thing)

Nom & for. A good start from Tagstit - writing stuff, reviewing stuff, doing maintenance stuff, and generally being useful. --UU - natter 11:12, Jan 15
Nom and for. Exactly what Under user said. --Docile hippopotamus 11:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
For per above, and doing pee reviews. --Mnbvcxz 16:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
My god I feel incredibly old every time I come onto this page and For - [17:44 15 January 2009] YYettie
W♥v. Welcome to Uncyclopedia. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Looks good Le Cejak • <14:36 Jan 16, 2009>
For - Low profile, though. Nonetheless, a good user. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:38, Jan 16
Wow! And may I note the stiff competition this month? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 03:30 17 January 2009

That actually brings up a good point. Tagstit (whom I have adopted only after seeing that there is no way he could go wrong) shouldn't just win this because there is no other competition. I hope that fact doesn't cheapen the award for him, because he has certainly earned it, being one of the most stellar noobs I have seen since Yettie. Also, he's a freak in the sack. (Not to mention a freaky sack. Weird.) This isn't like my WotM speech, by the way, he should certainly win this. tl;dr version: He's earned it, even though he's the only nominee. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Hey! Good job. IronLung 08:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
For. A valuable addition to Uncyclopedia. Seriously, we could probably get $4.75 for him. pillow talk 18:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
For - It is quite possible that this young user has, in his possession, the skillz, which would be required to pay the billz. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 23:47, Jan 17
For A charming gent. -RA HB 09:48, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +1 of Tagstit's fiercest competitors

Nom. He's done some good stuff, I guess. Actually, to be honest, I don't know who the fuck he is, but he seems like good competition for Tagstit. pillow talk 18:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

For. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Invalid nom, been on the site since March 2005. --Mnbvcxz 17:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

“Be a MEMBER of no more than 30±3 days membership (Unless you are Rcmurphy)”
~ them rules up there

- [20:51 20 January 2009] YYettie

Kit paddle (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +0

Nom. Competition for Tagstit, you say? Well, Kit here has also made a good start - friendly, helpful, done a couple of good reviews, started writing, seems to be settling well. Tagstit still gets my vote, but Kit deserves a nod for starting off in the right way. --UU - natter 18:44, Jan 17

UotM[edit source]

Benson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1 USERS WHO IS NOT BENSON!

*Nom For. . For creating the league of Benson. For the pictures and templates on his userpage about Benson. Creating Bensons own cult on Uncyclopedia. For being Benson. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC).
Against as per Roman Dog Bird. And per Docile hippopotamus. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 16:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

One user, one vote. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

And as per Colin. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 20:52 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment: This is 2009. Not 2006. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment: I know, and Benson is still Benson. --Docile hippopotamus 05:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment Tired, old in-jokes are tired and old. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
~~Strongest Possible For Because Their is No Alternative.~~ For the love of Oscar Wilde, somebody make a real nomination! But on a serious note, if there isn't anyone who deserves this award, I think it should go to Benson, he did alot of work for the site, and deserves to be recognized. --Mnbvcxz 17:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Frankly I find this nomination insulting to all these who work day and night to keep this place working. This is as bad as nominating Cow go poo for PotM. I think we had enough of Benson. 17:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
  - These joke nominations do get actual nominations made. I could easily think of half a dozen users who deserve this award, but all of them already won it. Seriously, tho, this nomination was made on the 17th! If its insulting to nominate Benson, then its also insulting to nominate no one at all. At least nominating Benson gets someone's attention. --Mnbvcxz 06:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
    - Better not nominate at all then to nominate someone for the sake of it. I'm sure that if the nominator looked harder he would find a plethora of people to nominate. ~ 09:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
      - In his defense, it is the 21st, and we have but one other nomination. This joke nomination did get the attention of others and we have a real candidate safely ahead of joke one. If the joke nomination would not have been made, this award would probably have gone idle this year. There are alot of other joke nominations going on to. For example, they are throwing the UGoTY award away on a fake "Wikia" username. At least give it to a person like Jimbo Wales! --Mnbvcxz 18:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Against. - fuck off--Sycamore (Talk) 17:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

One user, one vote. Both of your votes had the same date/time group, so I'm crossing them both off. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Hellz yeah! -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Did you know that your the only one still voting for Benson? --Mnbvcxz 17:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Did you know that Benson was over in 2006? —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Benson is never "over". --Docile hippopotamus 12:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4

N+F. I think it's time that Sannse get some recognition for her work around here. Sure, she's a member of minitrue and that staff hat doesn't really fit her eyes, but all in all over the years I think she's done more than enough to help the site and support it. Now if we can only get her to resign that organization who shall not be named and form a new one who will be called....errr...Likia or Quickia, we will all be happy. ~ 17:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
For. - Per last time--Sycamore (Talk) 17:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

One user, one vote. Both of your votes had the same date/time group, so I'm crossing them both off. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

For. - She's not Benson. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 17:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Sycamore and Syko: You've voted twice on the same page. I know you can do that in some circumstances (e.g., you can cast all the votes you want for or against Rcmurphy on NotM), but I don't know if Benson and Rcmurphy share the same kind of... thing. pillow talk 21:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
One user, one vote. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Two users, three votes. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 21:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, you're not allowed to do that?Gis ym esiladnav!

_LOB 23:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Dannse! Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 18:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
For --Mnbvcxz 06:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
For 'lo sannse -RA HB 09:47, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Mnbvcxz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 9 Backward bottom rows of your keyboard

Nom+For. Despite being nominated GOTM IN THE SAME MONTH, I think this little row of buttons deserves some recognition for peeing all over the place and making lots of templates. And this has nothing to do with him nominating an article of mine for VFH. Really. Oh, and he's not Benson. But mostly for the peeing. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 21:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Dude, that's two for votes and an against vote you've cast. pillow talk 17:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
For. even though he sucks and is a gobshite. pillow talk 21:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
For. per above. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
For. A qaulity addition to this site. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:15, Jan 22
4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:02, Jan 23
For A very useful and welcome addition to the site. Mnbvcxz shows interest in improving how Uncyc works at VFD, Pee Review and just about everywhere else for that matter. He works hard all over the site, and his enthusiasm for trying to make us the best we can be is very admirable. Keep it up sir. Mr N 16:10, Jan 25
For, because the score just revealed to me where the heck his name came from! That's amazing. - [16:31 25 January 2009] YYettie
A must-have, the feel-good user of the previous months, 3.75 out of four stars. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
For His name means something! That is pretty crazy. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 06:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

WotM[edit source]

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 11

Nom + For — Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
for per above. --Mnbvcxz 18:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
W♥v. Got friggin' robbed last month. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Ape is brilliant. He's one of those writers who seem to stay under the radar, then you visit their userpage and realise just how many good articles they've written, and therefore how many times the've made you laugh. --UU - natter 19:15, Jan 8
Per SysRq Yeah! Some Asshole beat him last month. It was awful! Actually, Sys is a pretty great author as well, and deserved it.... not that he can ever know I think that. And now to insult him more... Whomever beat him sucks. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 19:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
For as per last month, and the year before that, and the year before that... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:07, Jan 13
For As per pretty much everything he's ever written. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:01, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Despite the whole Gaza thing. ~ 17:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Before I forget to vote for him. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 13:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
For Hesitant due to his lack of recent activity, but he is deserving of getting this. -RA HB 09:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
As Before -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
For ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 06:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

IronLung (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom + For. This is a tough call. Ape has written several awesome articles, but has done virtually nothing in two and a half months. IronLung has written only one feature, but that feature was my favorite article of December. He's not incredibly experienced, but he really did come through in the very slow month that was December. pillow talk 18:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Holy crab cakes! I'm honoured and surprised to even get a mention. IronLung 22:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Spiritual For. I've already voted, but when you nomm'd next month, you've got my vote. : ) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:41, Jan 20

February 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

DrStrange (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 10 strange fans

Nom and FOR - Impressive work with two VFH articles in January 2009 and the February 1, 2009 spot as well. HowTo:Be A Damsel In Distress with its prose AND formatting is an instant Uncyclopedia classic. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
For. He's a great writer. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
For. per above. --Mnbvcxz 19:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
For., obviously. IronLung 20:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Stands out. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 01:21, Feb 24
W♥v per Socky. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
OK. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:30, Feb 24
For I've loved everything I've seen from this guy. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:47, 25 Feb
For. Trying to *squeeze* one last vote in! ~Formerly Annoying Crap 19:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4

Nom & For. Syc rocks in so many ways, but among those is that way he rocks as an author. As well as fixing up and keeping an eye on pretty much every Scottish article to stop them being total shite, he's written quality, articles, by, the, crate, load, and has been doing so for a good while now. Time to recognise that. --UU - natter 09:46, Feb 2
For. DrStrange is really good too, but Syc's been doing this consistently for ages. To be honest, I thought he'd already won it, but since he hasn't, my vote must go here. –—Hv (talk) 3/02 17:48
For. Indeed, Dr Strange is great but so is Syc and, as its already been said, he's done this for quite a while. --Kit talk 12:57 23 February
For doing an awful lot of small, inglorious work that requires solid writing nonetheless. Every morning I wake up here in the states (at a godawful early hour) and Syc's ID is like a rash across the "recent changes" page.-- 13:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- How pathetic--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  - Just accept the bloody compliment, it's sincere. Your service is an additional consideration on top your writing skills and a valid reason to vote for you. My values hold that I vote for one of my opponents and you get the nod. Tough Noogies-- 23:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 9

Nom & For. Yes, Ben's won this before, more than three years ago. But he's been so fucking hilarious for the last few months that I think he deserves seconds. Sloppy seconds, if you will. pillow talk 18:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Got totally dicked on WotY, completely deserves this thingy again. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Writer of the Month is a different beast to what it was three years ago. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 20:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Holla. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 10:05, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
for. i subscribe to the school of thought which claims that cap'n ben deserves this award again. i also subscribe to Gigantic Asses, but i'm not sure that's relevant. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
for. --Docile hippopotamus 04:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
For Per the above. Seems the Captain is our earliest WotM who's still writing actively, and even that in itself is an accomplishment. -RA HB 07:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
I did the longest audio I ever managed for this schmuck and he never even said thank you. ~ 17:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
For. - Some of the best work on the site is by the Cap.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit source]

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +9 admins who takes way to much flak

N+F, he's everywhere, and despite winning this award already (as well as UOTY), he continues to do the things that need to be done, but aren't being done by other people because every other user is a lazy drunk. There. I said it. You all are lazy drunks. Mordillo may be a drunk, but at least he's a motivated drunk. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
For. There is no cabal. TYATU does not say that there is a cabal. Muganez knows nothing about the nonexistant cabal. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 21:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
For. - The Zionist conspiracy can sap and impurify all my bodily fluids...--Sycamore (Talk) 16:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For Whatever it was 'dillo did to win this last time, he's been accomplishing ten-fold as of late, and been one of the main driving forces in the maintaining of what little redeeming value we allegedly have left. Oh, who am I kidding. Uncyclopedia never had any redeeming value.. -RA HB 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For --Docile hippopotamus 05:28, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
A relative is as close as I'm going to get to this award. - [17:00 9 February 2009] YYettie
Moar Dildos plz k thx. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 17:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
For. I write an article and it gets fixed seconds after, first I thought it was automated :P that guy is amazing. Besides he lives just across the border (bur don't count on me to cross) ChadiW
4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:00, Feb 20

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2 obsessed admirers

RAHB is a relentless greeting party for shitty articles. Last month he performed valuable functions such as protecting his own user page, featuring his own article, and barely mentioning his own penis. Legend. IronLung 07:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have been a little behind on my penis quota lately, I suppose... -RA HB 22:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For, reminds me of a young me. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Please. Yung Mi was a hack compared to this guy. I am unable to resist. --UU - natter 11:11, Feb 11

Sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +10 minions of Wikia that aren't evil

Nom + 4 per last month, hasn't won the award yet. --S'r Mnbvcxz 15:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For - Girls FTW! ^_^ -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 16:41, 7 Feb
For. I'd vote for all the entrants this month, but if Mnbvcxz is right and Sannse hasn't won this yet then something is seriously wrong with the world. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
As before. ~ 17:42, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Hell yes --Charitwo^Talk 08:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Per my odd policy of wanting to give awards to people who are deserving but haven't won them yet ahead of people who are ace but have already won the damn award (see also WotM and Cap'n Ben v Syc). Mordillo's great, but he's already got this and UotY. That's tons of recognition. Sannse does plenty of helpful stuff and deserves this. --UU - natter 11:09, Feb 11
For. Because I can =) (and other reasons that make sense but are too long too list.. blah) --kit 09:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
For per UU. Also, grammar, damnit. –—Hv (talk) 18/02 19:34
STRONG FOR Per UU. We seriously haven't given Sannse this yet? I'm slightly disappointed in you, <insert name here>. What the hell's your problem? -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:56, 25 Feb
- sannse should have won a few months ago in my opinion, I was little "disappointed" myself - Mordillo deserves some serious kudos this month - he's has carried a lot in the past while. It is my understanding that this award is often dodgy in the order of winners and hopefully normal service will resume:)--Sycamore (Talk) 20:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
W♥v, just to make y'all shut the fuck up about sannse. – Preceding unsigned comment added by SysRq (talk • contribs)
- Sig yourself, person who I assume to be SysRq >:| -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  - Fine, just to make y'all shut the fuck up about four tildes. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 5 Sockpuppet voters

Nom+4 Well, I have no idea who any of these guys above are, so here is an actual nomination... When I first met this user I thought he was nothing but trouble. Now, um... Yea. All the usual attributes for a UotM, votes well on VFH/VFD, fights vandals, welcomes users, QVFD... You know the drill. Generally a very useful and welcome guy to have around the place. Mr N 16:37, Feb 7
Woohoo! I'm nominated! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Like I said, the guy has real class... Mr N

16:43, Feb 7

It feels good to be great. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Motherfucker keeps jumping out from behind a dumpster and categorizing all my pictures. pillow talk 23:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I do it with love. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
That's what you said about the rape case. I still can't believe the judge let you off. -RA HB 23:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
But I was telling the truth! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:40, Feb 10
For. I almost decided against this when you said you wanted to rape a shemale. Not mentioning that anymore. Best of luck! S-9 8 4 21:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey, wait I didn't do that (or I don't remember doing that... damn this shortterm memory)! Oh well, I guess that does count as a vote anyways, so... Eh. S-9 8 4 01:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 5 systems that meet Uncyclopedia's requirements

Nom - I've been impressed with a number of thing about Sys, and I feel that hes stepped up the plate in recent months to be a really worthwhile contender for this. I've been exceptionally impressed with the contribuions to colonization - its green shoots at the moment, but its the kind of effort which I beleive will make the place nicer in a much more meaningful way. I'm going to stick with Mordillo as I think that a bit of firworks is deserved, but next month I think Sys should be the winner of this award.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
For. BECAUSE NOBODY ELSE WILL. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
For. He peed on my work and generally abuses me! Definatly a worthy contender for UotM ^^ ...Flare 22:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Get back in your cage. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
For. For taking up the mantle of Imperial Colonization. I'm mean, fuck, that's a fairly major thing alone, and he does other things on top of that, so yeah. --Guildensternenstein 03:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
For sure! I am surprised he hasn't won this! I couldn't ask for a better UnDaddy because of his help and positive criticism which is grounds enough alone to vote for him. He write hilarious and quality stuff. He is fun to talk to. And he even started The Imperial Colonization! He is an example of an Uncyclopedia Man (rip off of Renaissance Man for those less historically gifted) and although other's are going to win it this month, he deserves it for next month hands down. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 03:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
for. for stealing my idea, and by 'stealing' i mean 'doing better than i ever could have'. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh Jesus Christ. If there are any more votes making my original sympathy vote sound irrelevant, I'm going home. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 14:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit source]

CheddarBBQ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

~~Score: +3 Triangular Snackfoods~~

Nom+For The AFI article. Made me laugh my ass off. Can't believe he's a n00b.--The Limon Killer 21:05, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
For I love that guy.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
For Fucking AFI! YEAAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!!!! (I like AFI)--Davey Havok 21:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry. I checked the contribs of these other two voters and their only edits have been these votes. I'm not absolutely certain, but I'm certain enough to strike out this nom and be corrected later. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +10 Stern guilded steiner, sterns...

Nom+For From what I can see there is great potential to mold this Noob-User, and he follows instructions about the importance of signing his posts. So I'm cutting him some slack and nomming him. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
For. A fine humorist of the top-notchest sort. Even though you clean-swept my Mars Volta article, calling it "not very good" and falsely accusing it of being listed for deletion. At least you replaced it with a slightly amusing piece, so I don't hate all of your guts. TPLN 02:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Vote change. I don't really like vote changers, but Metal Gear Solid was brilliant, along with UnBooks:The Lost Introduction to Walden, and I haven't really seen Kit paddle around for a while. So there. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:30, Feb 21
For.. I fucking hate vote changing. It says to people, "I am indecisive and my constitution is weak, and I have the internal fortitude of a meringue". However, as these folks will only be eligible for the award once, I wanted to make sure it went to the absolute best candidate. Guildensternenstein is absolutely that best candidate. IronLung 03:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Sold me with Walden -- 03:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
For I am not just following a pattern here. Although I found Guildensternenstein with a rough first week with rather empty reviews and such, I see now that the improvement of this guy is unmatched! With a great mind, as proven in Metal Gear Solid, and a strong satirical talent, as proven in his new unbook, he is on the way to becoming an amazing writer. He also has improved in his reviews drastically. I think Kit is still a good guy, but you don't see him around as much anymore and since this is the last month for Guildensternstein to be awarded this, he should definitely have it. Keep up the good work! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 01:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Stealth for. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 06:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
For. - I love his work, a really great addition to the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Wow, Metal Gear Solid was written by a noob? Well, Fuckin' A. pillow talk 21:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
W♥v. It took me all month, but I came up with Gildy as my Noob of the Month. He's probably the most impressive writer of the bunch (as impressive as all of them are) and is also turning out to be quite the Uncyclopedian. Good job, buddy. This was probably the hardest NotM I've ever voted on. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Kit paddle (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +4 Paddles

Nom~~+For~~ A few high quality articles from Kit, does reviews, and edits. His reviews are in depth and informative. Besides, Guildensternstein begged me to nominate him for this in a review and I thought that was a little weak. Sorry man. Good luck to all nominees though! No hard feelings Guildensternenstein! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 22:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
For. Oh cool, he's still eligible, by my count. Yeah, I like Kit - helpful, friendly, done a few good reviews, written some interesting stuff, including Star Trek Online, and seems very promising. --UU - natter 22:19, Feb 2
Yes. IronLung 07:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Whoa! We actually have a race! Kit's done the most in my eyes, and gets my vote. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:22, Feb 5
For. --Docile hippopotamus 04:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
You betcha. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
For I've heard of this guy! -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:52, 25 Feb

Maybe I havent been writing my own stuff for a week or so but Ive been around editing and peeing. I understand though why some would rather go with one that writes more. No hard feelings =) Im not here to get awards anyway, just hang out and have a good time. Cheers! --Kit talk 07:35 23 February

I don't care if my votes never amount to anything. You're noob of the month in my eyes. --

-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Apage (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +1 votes on a page

Nom Well, this chap has only been around for a few days, but he has already written one rather nice article and show great promise for the future. Mr N 21:15, Feb 3
For. Much potential I sense in this one. You've got what it takes, my friend, just keep 'em coming. :) - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 04:12, Feb 4

ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +4 People who just noticed the genital references

Nom I noticed him, when I saw one of his reviews. He also shows a lot of writing talent in his edits, and looks to be a great addition to Uncyc. Check out his contributions, and see what this chap is up to... Mr N 01:55, Feb 5
~~For.~~ Brilliant. And a gentleman to boot. Give him the little pacifier, I say. May I also suggest such delicious fare as Leonard Cohen, Coen Brothers and Canadian Football League. Oh shit. Each one of those is worse than the last. I've just self-deprecated myself out of this prize. Well, you all can go suck a box, anyways. TPLN 02:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

HeHe. Unfortunately, tis one vote per user. Mr N

04:24, Feb 5

Just stuffing the ballot box in my favor, per longstanding democratic principles. Oh, hey, and how about you go visit my horoscopes contribution and vote for (or against) me based solely on that? Hmmmm?--TPLN 00:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

For I reviewed two of his articles, and found them both fairly entertaining. I also re-wrote his Mars Volta article that I didn't know was his, so I'm more-or-less obligated to make up for that. Anyway, TPLN is sick because he, like I, like Pynchon, TMV, Coach Dungy, and who knows what else. I think I've found a soul mate. Well, not really. And now I've rambled on for a good long time without actually saying anything or being funny. Anyway, he's my pick. --Guildensternenstein 04:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
For Tough choice this month. Very happy to see the influx in good new editors coming in, we've been devoid of that extra boost for far too long it seems. -RA HB 07:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
You too can be James Bond and/or Roger Moore. - [17:09 11 February 2009] YYettie
Comment. TPLN is my runner up. He's up on my list because he's becoming a great Uncyclopedian as well. However, I only get one vote per month. Boo. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm with you, SysRq. TPLN is my runner-up also. But, as per my still standing vote Guildenboob is still my choice unless he changes his vote to himself. -- TPLN 22:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

for. ever so polite. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:26, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

ChadiW (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +4

N+F Good noob, contributing nice Unnews articles. We like this kind of noobs. He is also, as far as I know, the only Lebanese Uncyclopedian we have. So instead of bombing him, I nominate him. O_O ~ 13:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
For. I don't vote here often, but this guy stands out - he's very good. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Sympathy For, in the wake of just seeing Waltz with Bashir. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You know that an Israeli movie. ~

19:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but it was about the horrors of the war in Lebanon. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +3

Who honestly thought we were going to go a month without an RC nomination? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:38, 16 Feb 2009
- Okay, NOW this race just got tight. —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
+1 To be honest, so few on that years, two of the only thing I've reading that has made sense is Spang. —Braydie 22:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Seriously this time he really deserves it. Plus I've never heard of those other guys. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:50, 25 Feb
- Oh yeah? Well Rc has never heard of you. Whatcha gonna do now? —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
  - Build him a shrine in my closet and shoot a random celebrity to get his attention? -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:46, 26 Feb

March 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +10 tartan scribes

Nom & For. Quality articles by the crate load, countless improvements to shite articles, sterling service for ages now, and thoroughly deserving of this award. --UU - natter 09:38, Mar 1
For per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Per last month and above.-- 11:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Don't need to give a reason - we all know why Syccy deserves this. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 11:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For. This wasn't a hard choice. IronLung 02:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For --Mnb'z 02:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For Now is the time --Asahatter (annoy) 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For because he's my bro Djdorama 22:15, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
For Mr N 13:33, Mar 28
For Asswipe. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:10, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Asahatter (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +9 Mad headgear enthusiasts

Nom & for. Every so often, one comes across an article which really makes you sit up and take notice of an up-and-coming writer. For Mr Hatter, that article was the brilliant Printer Ink. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 11:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
W♥v. Syc's good, damn good. But Printer Ink was brilliant satire and was a shining example of what I think this site is (or should be) all about. Asahatter has exhibited tremendous writing talent and a lot of potential. He's already been putting out other great works, and for that he is my Writer of the Month. This month's Dramatic SysRq Speechvote is brought to you by the letter K and the number 4. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For Cool, made me giggle, just a little, very apt, you thought of me--Aitch1968 23:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Über-for. Every single one of his articles has forced me into fits of mirth. Love this guy's work. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:03, Mar 2
For Mostly just because I like his username. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:31, 4 Mar
Yeah! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 05:10, Mar 6
For. --Docile hippopotamus 03:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Actually made me bother to come back and leave again. Thanks a lot, bastard. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Printer Ink, mother fuckers. —Sir Guildensternenstein 03:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +4 tasteful characters

Nom & For. It said I should nominate and vote for the user that had me giggle and chuckle. Nachlader did more than that. I laughed 'til I peed (yes.. I started writing reviews!). With his sexual fantasies, his geographical knowledge, his historical knowledge and his unmatched knowledge on contemporary events I nominate thee. Cheers for your great work! --Kit talk 21:12 1 March
Somebody nom'd me? Ohgodohgodohgodohgodohgodohgod. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 21:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Very inspirational chap this. Even if the inspiration made me think about dongs an awful lot --^Dame 00:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
for. my favorite writer here --Allmightyred 11:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n_Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +9 Again (Again)

Again -RA HB 03:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Again again again -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Because he didn't get it last month. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 22:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For. - Looking over the noms it looks like Asahatter will win, however I kind of feel that the Cap has produced a far greater portfolio of work, despite winning this award few years ago. As per last month.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Er no. I'm a spasmodic contributor. Happy for Sycamore or Cap'n Ben to win for their consistency & longevity. See where my vote lies, but thanks to those who've voted for me - watch this space. --Asahatter (annoy) 00:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

As per last month. Ben deserves more recognition. MORE MORE MOR. pillow talk 19:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
For. He's still here, and he's still writing. I'm kind of surprised that he hasn't got a promotion. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Ben there; he done that. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 14:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
for. 90% because i feel ben should win, 10% to force a three-way tie on the 17th. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
If he doesn't win I'll donate my body to science. ~ 16:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Docile hippopotamus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

I'm not even nomming this guy. I have no idea who he is, or his other works. All I know is that HowTo:Become RAHB made me laugh very hard. True, it's the only article I've read in over a month, and I have no idea if he's even written anything else, but whatever. I have schoolwork to be busy with. And I broke my nose. That sucked. But none of that is important now because I laughed at what this guy wrote, and I don't know where else to give him credit. But he deserves credit. And I don't even know what credit is, but he gets a lot of it from me. That is if it is a boy. If it isn't I apologize to you, Ma'am, for getting your gender wrong. You see, we don't get many lady-types around these parts, and I'm generalizing. Sorry if you were at all offended. And, as a side note, shouldn't this page be updated???1?1? Whatever, its really late, and I'm going to bed. But this article ruled. YEAH! The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 09:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

This may be better suited for [[Talk:HowTo:Become RAHB]]
We know you broke your nose
????
Profit!

—Sir SysRq (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Shaw. Better suited, phhhh. No one looks at those pages. Who gets credit from people on discussion pages? Here is the place to be. For all the cool kids. And this guy is cool, and I'm talking about him here. Power to the little guys who I know nothing about, but made me laugh. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 02:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

No one knows why RAHB listens to Frank Zappa, not even RAHB. The man speaks volumes of truth. -RA HB 01:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit source]

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +15

Nom + For - Per last month--Sycamore (Talk) 09:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For. He gets my support. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
for. revived UN:IC in its most awesome form yet. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Because not only did he revive IC, it actually works! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:13, Mar 3
For. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
For. --Guildensternenstein 04:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Whore And that's why I love him. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:52, 5 Mar
For. Per my comments here.-- 18:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Traitor! Nah, I don't mind at all. After all, I voted for Syssy too. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. My love for SysRq and my hate for SoaUU cancel each other out, rendering me unable to vote. pillow talk 22:20, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- Aww. How cute. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:12, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
For Purely based upon IC and some of the names below. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 23:05, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
For Prick. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Sys does stuff. Good stuff. --UU - natter 09:34, Mar 23
For. per imperial colonization. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
For My Undaddy, and undoubtly one of the most chill users on this site. His help for me here is greatly appreciated. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 23:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Only because I crave his body. ~ 16:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
For as per everyone else up there. –—Hv (talk) 28/03 13:58

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 9 registered users using a sockpuppet

Nom - He does some very helpful stuff around here.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)‎
Comment: I'm tempted to vote for myself, but I'll see how things work out. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 10:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For. I am much attracted to the prospect of voting for SysRq, but I gotta vote for the person who has a near-omnipotent presence around the damn place. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment. I'm going to be lurking on this contest. Sock vs Sys.-- 23:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Cute. Make a shirt. —Sir SysRq (talk) 00:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  - Actually, that sounds like a great idea. A quick chop-job using a mooninite and the familiar socky pic. Maybe a movie poster. It'll have lasers.-- 00:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
    - Indeed. Lasers make everything better. Well, sometimes not. Like if you're giving birth. Then lasers become an obstacle. Let me rephrase: lasers make everything more awesome. There, that works. —Sir SysRq (talk) 00:33, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
      - SysRq makes everything more anus. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
        OK, we have a battle poster! --> -- 12:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
        I love it! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
For --Mnb'z 02:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For -RA HB 03:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
For --Docile hippopotamus 08:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
For. He does a lot of stuff here. Also he saved my first page from an unregistered user who replaced all the content for one sentence. You are my hero man (Uh... maybe I'm exaggerating).--A guy with a pipe 19:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
For. I want SysRq to lose. Oh, and SOAUU is cool too.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 18:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Sissy is awesome but Socky is my hero. --^Dame 00:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
For. He's done much for me lately, unlike Janet Jackson. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 04:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
For. I tossed a coin and it landed heads (which meant I voted for Sys) then Socky gave me a large pile of cash. Simple eh. Mr N 13:41, Mar 28

NotM[edit source]

ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: ~~1 testicle(s) of a reclusive writer~~

*Nom & For. As every bit as funny as I am (*is humble*), and a HELL of a lot more prolific. I mean, hell, the guy's written well over twice the number of articles I have, including the first IC effort Al Gore. This shouldn't even be a contest, really. Although I guess sort of it is. Anyway...--Guildensternenstein 02:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Ineligible. Misses the age limit by a good half a month. You're right, it was no contest. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't feel like a noob anyway. The gesture is sweet. --TPLN 04:59, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh...hell...well, nevermind then. --Guildensternenstein 05:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

And I'm deleting my vote for future voting-for-this-award purposes. --Guildensternenstein 05:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Sonje (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 14 photoshop pros

Nom+for. So have we ever had a nomination for NotM based on images alone? Sonje has been here some two or three weeks, has yet to write an article... But no matter. Uncyclopedia has 700 writers for every one user who can manipulate the hardy mistress of the sea that is potatochop with immense skill, right? Plus, she has made some pretty good images, including the latter being a current VFP nomination. Also, she's a female. You're not gonna go vote on gender prejudice, are you? ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 11:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For per above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
For Even though the rules say she technically has to write an article first. But I AM ADMIN! I SCOFF AT YOUR RULES! -RA HB 03:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

That's a stuuuuupid rule anyway. When I won the NotM, I got my next-door neighbour to write my articles. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 16:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Aw! Thanks 4FOR the nom Nachlader! And RAHB, I promise to have some articles by the end of the month, potatochopping is just so very addictive. Still, I appreciate your scoff --^Dame 19:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I think that rule can be ignored so long as the noob in question uses proper English and does not use numbers to replace words...ahem. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

For already, now go write an article! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:02, Mar 2
For. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Against. I hate to be a stickler, but rules are rules. I need to see an article. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 03:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

You can't vote both "for" and "against" in the same month. That would be voting twice, you see. pillow talk 22:49, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I also hate to be a stickler for rules, but you can't vote twice. Same goes for the below. I'm going to cancel out the ill-will against votes, though if you wish to keep them and cancel your For votes instead that's fine with me. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Against. I agree with Zana yeah your pics are cool, but you should write something. Why doesn't someone nominate for potatochopper of the month instead?-- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 00:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Dude, that's two votes. You, like, totally only get one. Hippy. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

They already have, thank you. But I think it is a bit unfair, I mean this award is not for "Writer" of the month, it is for N00b of the month. I'm sure there is an award for Writers too. So I think it is rather discriminatory. But each to his own... --^Dame 01:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Relax I don't care...-- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 01:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

For because IKEA told me to. --Kit talk 21:55 15 March

*Against This kid is perfect for Photoshopper of the month. But rules are rules. I don't even think he should be considered here. Good pictures are great, but I need to see some writing. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagstit (talk • contribs) diff

Sorry! I didn't even see the rules changed recently, making this guy/girl an obvious for! I can't even do close to that good photoshop. No hard feelings I hope! ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:19, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Please sign your vote, or else it won't count. --Mnb'z 04:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, I was almost sure I did. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 21:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

For any idiot can write an article, and the rules don't even say it has to be a good article. And, the rules have been changed. --Mnb'z 04:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Emphatic for. Showing up and improving the art on established articles is, like, the most useful thing anyone's ever done here since Benson of the Month. We already have quite a few good writers; good artists are hard to come by. pillow talk 22:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
For. She has talent. And she doesn't make a fuss unlike some other people in this month's vote. ~ 10:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

*You win Half way, through the month and already ten votes, it's no contest.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 19:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

You probably do win, but I just found out I was nominated, and although this will make me look like a dick, I have to give myself that tiny bit of hope--

Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

No hard feelings, thanks anyway. Congrats on the nom and may the best n00b win. --^Dame

20:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

You will. (Unless 7 random people decide to simultaneously create accounts and vote me NotM as their first Uncyclopedian acts of course, fingers crossed)--

Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

soitenly. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
For. CBBQ has developed quicker and betterer than I expected, but Sonje has been doing a fantastic job and gets my support. --UU - natter 09:48, Mar 23
F♥r per the against votes she has received. Dicks. —Sir SysRq (talk) 13:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
For changing the rules when necessary. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

StonedJeff (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4

Nom and for. StonedJeff has written the great HowTo:Take a Dump and as of my nominating is working on this, this and this. --Docile hippopotamus 23:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
For. Not bad at all, for a noob ~Formerly Annoying Crap 03:30, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- One man, one vote includes you, lady. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
For. thanks for the nom hippo man...and zana thanks for all your help with my articles they would be hurtful to the eye without you--StonedJeff 20:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
For. This guy is funnyFresh meat 01:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

haha alright thanks maaan-- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unsigned comment. Doesn't count. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

yo your a fuckin dork how about i come knock your dick in the dirt?-- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Conversing with you is problematic, as it appears that we are using two different languages. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I tried to knock Modus's dick in the dirt this one time, but he nearly banned me. In fact, let me tell you that story. pillow talk 23:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

~~So there I was~~

sitting on the fucking couch, doing my Stoned Jeff thing with bong and the dogs, right? Like, pothead nerd shit.

and fucking Modusoperandi

comes into the forum, musk all over the place, and instead of going for the bong, he makes an unsignedline straight for me

so I grabbed for his

dick and tried to knock it in the dirt, and he tries to ban me! WTF?

~~I barely got away with an eternal reputation for general faggotry and a severed brachialis radial.~~

Unsigned story. Doesn't count. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

In Russia, Comments unsign you!--

00:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

CheddarBBQ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 6 Triangular Snackfoods

Nom & For. He's improved a lot since first joining, and his recent articles have been quite good. He pesters me on my talk page a lot, but only because he's a dedicated Uncyclopedian commited to whatever admittedly ill-defined standards of excellence we carry. —Sir Guildensternenstein 04:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Glad to see you appreciate my pestering. I'll be sure to keep it up.--

Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

Beautiful. —Sir Guildensternenstein 02:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

For.. Constantly patrols VFH, VFP, VFD (WTF?), PEE, etc. x2. For. Did I mention "For"? » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 15:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
For.. Good stuffs, this guy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:06, Mar 18
Holy Crap I never thought I'd been nominated. *sniff* I just want to thank all my fans. Oh, I promised myself I wouldn't cry.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods
For. this ~~noob~~ guy helped me a lot, he also.. ahem.. ADOPTED ME! I have to vote for him, Adopapa. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 22:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
For. This guy has serious potential. Mr N 13:36, Mar 28

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

For. Phew, almost missed it. Pretty sure he's still in with a chance though. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:23, 29 Mar 2009

April 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4

NOM&FOR. It seems like its been ages since we both helped fill that old Youth VFH page with assorted debate but since that time (especially in the last month or so) I've seen Nach pump out some highlight material in quick succession. Do I even need to list them here? It should be damn fresh in your mind! Promote the kid to GUN, he deserves it.-- 10:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Good writer, good bloke. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
For per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
For per last month. --^Dame 22:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
I still luv u Nachy but Guildy is on a rol this month. --^Dame 12:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
You break my heart, Sonje. I almost forgot I was on the WotM list anyway, heh. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 15:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
For. I may have been busy this month but I won't forget voting for you! You're still the best in my eyes! --Kit talk 23:22 24 April
<3 ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

RabbiTechno (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +3

nom + for - Writes good stuffs--Sycamore (Talk) 11:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Floor Rough Pubs was inspired --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Like Sycamore said, writes good stuff. Gotta love the anarchist sparrows and and Nazi cows. ImNotASunbeam 22:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 6

nomination - Per last month--Sycamore (Talk) 11:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
for. you and the cap'n, makin' it happen. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
You bastards had to break the 3 way tie. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Dammit he deserves it! ~Formerly Annoying Crap 05:32, 2 April 2009
For -RA HB 03:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
For and a promotion. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 20:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 14

Nom and for - GSS is a little new here, but he's written four awesome FAs in just two months, as well as several other outstanding articles. ~~I'm not sure how I'm going to vote this month, yet, but he definitely deserves a nom.~~ After reviewing his contributions, I'm throwing him my support. Ben is hilarious, but then, Ben's won before. pillow talk 20:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Guildy definitely deserves this for putting up with my pestering (which, mind you, WILL CONTINUE!)--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 00:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Enthusiastic Self-For. Thank you all, seriously. —Sir Guildensternenstein 00:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
for Djdorama 20:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
well-deserved For. I like the guy's articles. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 04:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Good stuffs. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:31, Apr 13
For.He is prolific and funny, a rare combination. --CrabPope 12:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 16:16, Apr 19
For. My talkpage is spammed with his 'danke schon' templates. --^Dame 12:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
For Ya, more of a pity vote because as hard as he tries, he still doesn't have as many features as me...oh wait...shit...~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 16:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Madam I'm Adam --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Comment Hurray for John Milton! —Sir Guildensternenstein 01:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
For. --Docile hippopotamus 04:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
For. On a hot streak this month, and I hope it continues. --UU - natter 16:59, Apr 25
For. No contest this month. --Romartus 22:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Asahatter (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +1

N♥m && w♥v per last month. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom and For. Modus is a genius, and because he'll never win writer of the year again, we should make him Writer of the Month at least twelve times. IronLung 01:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
For For For Good idea. » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 12:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit source]

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

NOMFOR Pretty obvious reasons. List not necessary.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 22:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
A would-be self against... ...but I voted for Dexter just a second ago. I can see getting WotM, but I in no way deserve this. I mean, I'm not an admin, I don't photoshop my own images (props to my friend Lee for doing that for me), and I just got slapped on the wrist by TKF for a not-so-great Pee I gave of the most recent Colonization. Although, to be fair, he nominated it well before I had a chance to review it, and so should have caught said mistakes himself. But in any event, I don't deserve this. And seeing as I'm 12 votes down, I'm not going to get it. So yeah. —Sir Guildensternenstein 22:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 17

nom + for--Sycamore (Talk) 13:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Liar. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes yes yes yes. I wanted to do this. I really wanted to. Dexter should have gotten this months ago, yet for some reason he seems to be just under the radar with every coming vote. Despite this, he's always worked tirelessly and consistently since 2007. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Consistently my ass. I've been here since 2006. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

And this is like my... 4th or 5th time being nominated. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't pay attention ever okay I just think you're awesome deal with it. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 03:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

lol who -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Probably a douche. Definitely not Jessica Alba, though. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

For -RA HB 03:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
For. I would feel guilty if he didn't win this award. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Dex seems alright to me. Would've voted for Socky, but uh... Yeah, people are entitled to their own opinions and such, but it seems like if you gave Socky half a punchline, he'd go and try get it featured on the front page. Sorry man. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 21:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
What's that supposed to mean? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
He's just have fantasies about me making you do stuff. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
F♥r. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
delete. oh, sorry...for. there we go. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
For. A really hard decision to make. Socky and Sabrewolf are great users, but Dexter just pips them to the post because of having recently become a poopsmith. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was a great movie. Jimmy Stewart is awesome. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I learned more about American government from that movie than from four years of high school social studies. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:32, Apr 16
I know nothing about this guy, who he is, or what he stands for. I have never had a conversation with, or thought about him. To add to it, I've never even seen him edit a page. Therefore, I vote for, as everyone I've ever met sucks. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
OH!!! Someone with a good reason!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
[Insert for vote here] --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
No Dee Dee's SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 05:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
For. For running various things, and answering my various questions, and stuff. —Sir Guildensternenstein 22:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
For. --^Dame 12:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:13, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Does things. Well. --UU - natter 08:39, Apr 28
For per above. It was a toss up between him and Socky. --Mnb'z 06:11, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 3

Nom You are not getting it that easy Dex. I will vote depending on who give me the most money. Mr N 04:06, Apr 3
For Cause I want a feasible competitor. This vote won't change unless somebody better is nommed. Someone like NXWave or Jesus (Remember him???). --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
You think they were better than me? You must be joking, right? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
You wish I were joking, but I'm not funny. I don't know how to be. That's why I'll never be WotM. Now excuse but I need to suck my balls. ... It's not gay! It's masturbation!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Okay, how's this: clone yourself. Fuck your clone. Gay or masturbation? —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Hmm... I think of clones as children so... Incestuous homosexual child molestation. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Lol For. I do accept bribes. Just give it to me and I won't change. » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 12:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Voting for Benson. User:Zheliel/sigz2 11:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  - TRAITOR! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Socky's without a doubt my favorite new(ish) user. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:14, 9 Apr
For. Yeah, Socky rules. He's helped me out on more than one occasion. --MaxPayne 20:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Against. I disapprove of socks. Should use their real name like me. --Romartus 19:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)<
You only get one vote. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Um. I hate to rain on your sunny day, but while you're right, it's the most recent vote that stays. That's, like, a rule 'n' shit. Try not take it personally. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Gouncyclopedia! 23:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)i vote for him he's awesome
Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:37, Apr 22

Saberwolf116 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom and for. I like this guy. He sort of lurks in the background, never makes a fuss, and goes through the Uncyclopedia putting good stuff on VFH and bad stuff on VFD. Give me a hundred Saberwolf116s, and I will show you a good comedy website. pillow talk 22:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Give me 100 Jews and the power to huff and the site would be gold. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

For. A cruft detector. Excellent. --Romartus 19:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
One man, one vote. Commie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Aww, you shouldn't have! Saberwolf116 20:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Benson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

NOM+FOR! BENSON ONLY TALKS IN CAPS AND HE RULES! Actually the imposter rules. User:Zheliel/sigz2 11:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit source]

Mahm00shA (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

~~Score: 3~~

Nomination - I think that my adoson has shown great progress since starting. Maybe he can win the award his adopapa sadly failed to win last month.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

Saving my vote for now, but I would like to say that Mahmoosha has been an exceptional noob over at IC, and I see tremendous promise in this one. However, pussy that I am, I want to see how things play out before casting my vote. —Sir SysRq (talk) 01:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

For. Thank you CBBQ! SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 04:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Yay! » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 11:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment I haven't checked the dates very carefully, but I believe that MahmOOshA is over the time limit for NotM. ~ 11:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Nope. 18:50, 15 February 2009. To old. He's driving his own car and everything guys! Mr N

12:14, Apr 2

holy fuck! :( SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 12:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry adoson, I thought you still qualified.--

Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods

Jrubio (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

nom ~~& for.~~ ~~he wrote an article. it doesn't suck! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)~~

changing vote due to lack of activity. nom stands. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

~~For per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)~~
Changing my vote. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
For. per above. --Docile hippopotamus 06:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4.6

Nom+for. So this guy has come in, written some articles, even some images, cleaned up the place a teeny bit, even started his own TV show. I think this guy has it all coming for him. NotY confirmed. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
lol. » Zheliel Talk Contribs Cow » 12:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Why the fuck not? —Sir Guildensternenstein 22:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
3/5ths for. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:09, 22 Apr 2009
Yea Verily this boy is fit to rule the realm -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Rogue ball of tumbleweed (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)[edit source]

Score: Sexual Thunder

For. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 01:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
For! Rogue the Weed is our most valuable asset. pillow talk 02:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Now that we have two promising noobs, I'm changing my vote to abstain, which lowers Rogue the Weed's score from Sexual Thunder to Sexual Thunder. pillow talk 19:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Questioning For I'll say for for now, but Im not sure he meets the requiremtents.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 11:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm changin my vote. He lacks true skills.--

Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 21:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

WinFTW Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
~~Five. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:35, Apr 16~~

Sexual Thunder my butt. YKWTMM is much better. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:03, Apr 23

For -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 05:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
2/5ths for. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 07:09, 22 Apr 2009

YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 15

Nom & For. I dunno if he's still able to get this or not (does doing stuff as an IP count toward the month? I'm not sure), but Hydrogen is mad funny, and no one else nominated really *ahem* deserves this award in my eyes, so yeah. —Sir Guildensternenstein 19:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
For. As per Guildy. --^Dame 19:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah None of the others meet the extremely high bar set by the 3 of u s !--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 20:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

you only get one vote, mr. doritos bag man! choose or perish! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I know that. For doubting my infinite knowledge, you are henceforth shunned.--

Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 11:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

You're all too kind. If the previous is true, than I've got some great ideas for this site. We should start a big music band! I know this guy, Mr. Harold Hill, Who'll get all the users marching and playing for only 7 easy payments of $9.99.....99. Oh, and Self For. -- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 20:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

A Music Man reference? God damn, this kid is cultured! I like this. I also hate that play, but that's an entirely different story. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, since I am a band geek, that musical has always had a special place in my heart, especially since my first band teacher had us watch it when I was 12 after Florida-mandated standardized testing was done. Plus, The Simpsons' parody of it was great. "The name's Lanley, Lyle Lanely."-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 23:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

One should always have a full repertoire of potential references to the great American musicals of bygone days. Shipoopi on the Da-woopie. Eh? --

00:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Ohhh, shipoopi! Shipoopi! Bah dah dah dah dah dah... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:01, Apr 23

Yeah, one of the years I was in pit orchestra in high school we did that show (I play the cello), and I fucking loathed having to play most of the music. Still gives me nightmares. —Sir Guildensternenstein 01:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

For -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:16, 22 Apr
Obvious for. Saberwolf116 21:17, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hydrogen is fantastic. Just awesome. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
For I don't really know what to write after the "For"...--JackOfSpades (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Good start, much better than mine 07:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Also, who is that handsome fellow just above me with the obviously sporked sig? O_O ~ 08:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

nah, that handome fellow learnt the code and made his sig by himself... Honest, yea ;)

10:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Mahmoosha, I like the new sig. Therefore, I will vote f♥r. —Sir SysRq (talk) 13:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Strong For. I feel kind of good pushing him to make an account. Look at what he's done! Music, you interested in adoption? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:01, Apr 23

Sure, why the hell not? I might be a bit Cousin-Oliveresque, though. -- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 01:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
For. Impressive start - now the next task is keeping it up! --UU - natter 17:04, Apr 25

Nikau (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom and For. Not too long ago, I came across what I thought was an abondoned article called Tradesmen. There was something about it which made me think, "No - I'm not going to QVFD this one, I'm going to talk to the author and see what gives." A couple of days ago Nikau told me the article was complete, so I took a quick look. And what an absolute belter it is too! Undoubtedly one of the funniest articles I've read in a while, and the funniest by a noob ever, IMO. It's on VFH now and doing well for itself, too. Nikau, a man of few words but enormous talent, has been with us for nearly 30 days, so take a look at his work and vote for him quickly - this guy is going to be one of the Uncyc greats. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Comment.. Is Nikau eligible next month? Tradesmen was very, very good. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:40, Apr 23

He started working on that article on March 27. He's barely eligible now. pillow talk 19:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
So he gets punished for putting time into an article? Luckily Nikau seems fine without it --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I say we bend the rules and nom. him anyway. We did that with Sonje, after all. It's better the award go to someone deserving than someone who gets it by default due to some stupid self-imposed technicality. —Sir Guildensternenstein 19:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I think this is just a case where either Nikau or YKWTMM can win, but not both. Hell, I've been here less than a year myself, I've written like 20 features in that time, and I flat-out lost NotM to that Cheapinitreal guy who don't come around here no more. And now it's the one award I will never, ever be able to win. pillow talk 19:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Actually, YKwhatever became a member on April 17. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 16:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Hehehehe.... The one thing I have over the mighty Hyperbole. Of course, I showed up a month after you, and they were about to give it to that one guy we don't name...NXWave under the username Qua and kind of won by default after that. And the three features I have were all written in my first month. So, you had a one-month head-start, and have 17 more features than me.... Whelp, I won NotM, so, I guess we're even. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't really need the award if it causes that much trouble, as long as people find my work funny I'm happy. :) --Nikau 14:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I like this guy already. Let's keep him. -OptyC Sucks!

CUN14:22, 25 Apr

For. Birth of a Tradesman. --Romartus 21:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

RabbiTechno (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: +23 beat mitzvahs

nom + for - Top notch writer.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For Thought he had this already for some reason... -RA HB 11:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
He won the Foolitzer Prize twice. Now it's time for a WotM. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
SheikhMetal blesses RabbiTechno as a writer for May 2009 11:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. The RabbiTechno deserves this honour. A Vote For. --Romartus 15:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Massive thanks to all of the above and anyone else who votes for me. I don't pay a lot of attention to the various awards and I've had UotM (Jan 08) as well as, as Socky says, Foolitzer twice - but this is the one I've always wanted to win. Oh, and by the way - I don't eat ice cream, so if I win you can all share it amongst yourselves. :-) Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
YAY, ICE CREAM FOR FREE!! This way I might vote RabbiTechno for president :þ 15:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. per above--Mnb'z 00:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes. --Nikau 05:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Look at the guy's userpage, he has been contributing serious quality for aaaaages now. Plus I forgot how much I like Rough Pubs. His time is now. --UU - natter 08:45, May 2
For! Writes the stuff that I dream of writing in UnNews. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Newsical, as well as some good mainspacers. Plus he gave me a nice mechanical thing on my talk page. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:21, May 5
For. You had me at ice cream. --^Dame 16:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Yup. Saberwolf116 22:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
For. History of Google. Case closed. IronLung 22:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Can't go wrong with a man endorsed my Mountain Dew. JackOfSpades (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Killz ~Formerly Annoying Crap 18:44, 14 May 2009
For, although I was sure that he'd already won this. I distinctly remember sending a stripper over to his house in celebration of said achievement. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Late to the party|For He writes good things. 'Nuff said. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:15, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes Le Cejak • <16:22 May 16, 2009>
For. I don't pay much attention and so I'm not sure if the voting is over. If it is just pay me in Karma.ImNotASunbeam 13:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Very Awesome! --Iwillkillyou333 05:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
GAH, with the bandwagon or something... User:Zheliel/sigz2 09:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Zionist dominance and vegan blinches. ~ 15:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
For. - don't even try to make me confess why. -- Style Guide 16:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:28, May 30

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 3

... -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 15:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Yep. Still writing hilarious stuff after all this time. pillow talk 23:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. --Docile hippopotamus 02:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

GlobalTourniquet (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom & For. Yes, I know he hasn't been around in a while, but he's written five features, and may very well be on his way to a sixth. Oh, he also won best article in PLS. Yeah. Besides, both nominees have won the award already. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Uh, when did the Rabbi win this? --UU - natter

08:40, May 2

I...don't know. That's actually a really massive "my bad" on my part. My bad. —Sir Guildensternenstein 02:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Your not forgiven. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 04:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

So I dub thee Unforgiven

06:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Damn. —Sir Guildensternenstein 14:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

For. I've determined that his articles are quite superior. ~ ♥ ♠ ♦ ♣ 05:14, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Zoidberg (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

~~Score: 2 broken slinkys~~
Nomination Come on, give the lobster a break. Saberwolf116 22:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

For. Bless Zoidberg User:Zheliel/sigz2 10:41, 9 May 2009 (UTC) UnValid nomination. We don't serve "their kind" here. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Seperate but Equal, right Modus? Saberwolf116 12:10, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Cartoons aren't people. Soylent Green, now that's people. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Cartoonophobic bigot. --Mnb'z 17:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Obviously. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Hurray for the Soylent Green referrence! —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Winner!! You know why. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Orian57 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4 sprirtual FORs and 6 ACTUAL ONEs (Aparently)

Nom Since my for is a bit useless at this point with so many people voting for Rabbi this month, I am just nominating. He has written a ton this past month and has gotten two features in a short time (about to be three). He definitely deserves this next month. Tagstit talk contribs awards 14:28, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Spiritual For I already voted for Rabbi, and Orian57 is gay. No, seriously, he is a admitted homosexual. I bet none of you knew that. --Mnb'z 15:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm left-handed. I bet none of you knew that. Saberwolf116 17:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

You know I read somewhere that left handed men are 33% more likely to be gay than right handed men. Although I'm right handed and 33% really proves nothing. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

20:31 14 May 2009

You can only get to heaven if you're a rightie. --

-kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 09:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

100% true

(talk) 09:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Bah, you righties and your anti-lefty crap. You just wait. When you get to Heaven, i'll be right at the gate saying "What now?" You just wait... Saberwolf116 12:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

anyone religious here? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool

12:39, May, 15 '9

Is anyone here actually gonna vote for me? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

12:43 15 May 2009

No. Fucking homophobes, the whole lot of them.. Here is a spiritual

blessing anyway. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool

13:06, May, 15 '9

Awww, thank you. /blushes ~Orian57~ ~Talk~

13:07 15 May 2009

It's my pleasure ;) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool

13:40, May, 15 '9

For. Where's my blowjob? -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:01, 15 May
Something spiritual. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
For the way he's been writing, there's no way he shouldn't win this. Staircase CUN^t 19:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Spiritual For. I too have already voted for the good Rabbi, but Orian has been award-worthy this month too. --^Dame 23:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Actual For. His writing is awesome, no way he doesnt deserve this. - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 20:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Actual For. I like both these guys, but Orian is... y'know... a special guy. Plus, he's getting his ass handed to him here. ;) --T. (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Gotta say yes. Guy adopted me. --LongLiverh3 23:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Real For. He deserves it. He's not gonna get it, because there's an uber-popular Rabbi around, but still. =) --Nameable ((talk?)) 10:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

May[edit source]

Optimuschris (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 3

Nomination - Been doing a lot of good things.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Is this a bad time to mention that I hate you all? -OptyC Sucks!

CUN15:31, 9 May

Me too? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

All of you except Socky. -OptyC Sucks!

CUN15:34, 9 May

Woohoo! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:40, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

For. If he has a big enough chest - then add a medal or two. --Romartus 22:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

All of you except Socky and Romartus. -OptyC Sucks!

CUN17:41, 15 May

For. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

All of you except Romartus and TKF. I've decided I hate Socky after all. -OptyC Sucks!

CUN20:42, 19 May

But... Why? *sob* —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:45, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Because Billy told me that Bobby told him that Timmy said Johnny heard you say that stuff you said about me. -OptyC Sucks!

CUN20:52, 19 May

You hate me because I said you rule? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

How dare you insinuate I don't support democracy? -OptyC Sucks!

CUN18:43, 20 May

Okay then. You suck. Happy now? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I'm less miserable, does that count? -OptyC Sucks!

CUN14:26, 21 May

Sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk)

GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Woohoo! -OptyC Sucks!

CUN14:52, 21 May

what now? Are you a warewolf? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool

21:23 May 21 '09

A Spiritual Blessing from thy local High Priest Of Horus. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:20, May, 20 '09
For a good guy. Staircase CUN^t 19:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
I think optyC is a pretty cool guy. eh does great shit on uncyc and doesn't afraid of anything. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:29, May 30

Simsilikesims (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Nomination - Also been doing a lot of good things for ages without much thanks, time for some recognition.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 26

for+nom he writes da best articels (Shurely "organising"?) ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 16:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
for per above. --Mnb'z 16:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For per last month. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:51, 1 May
For. He's helped me out in the past. Saberwolf116 17:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For The others will get theirs eventually. Socky's waited long enough, though. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
SelfFor. Thanks guys. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Bless. Socky is ALWAYS there when I need him. He is ~~one of~~ the most helpful uncyclopedians, for me at least. He perfectly deserves the UoTM award. Go Socky! 21:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For -RA HB 22:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. --T. (talk) 22:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. This guy manages to be everywhere at once, even if "everywhere" is sometimes "writing an extremely X-rated spinoff of my most recent article." pillow talk 22:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. --Docile hippopotamus 02:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Simsilikesims next month. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 10:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
wat the hell guise stop voating for him =( ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:58, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
actually screw that, i'm sure you're all making the right choice with this procedure. the fees are hell, but it's quick and all. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 23:37, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
For--JackOfSpades (talk) 04:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
For Easily one of my favorite users. ~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 06:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
For, even though he'll turn out to be NXWave. They always turn out to be NXWave. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
For, as per last time. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:18, May 4
For! Yay for Socky! --^Dame 16:40, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Penis --C:\syndrome\_ 16:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Fore! --MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me}_Failings 22:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
For Per mostly everyone, but Socky and Modus in particular. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 05:53 18 May 2009
For -- Style Guide 16:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
For- useful uncyclopedian Fahrenheit 19:24, 27 May 2009
Phwhore I wanted to vbote Opty, but the large amount of names on this list convinced me that maybe the cool kids would let me sit at their lunch table if I voted here. Oh yeah, and Socky is pretty fuckin' cool and helpful. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 19:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
For I love Socky! Sexy Chick Zeitgeist 19:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

4.252.99.182 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1 Writers of our time

Nomination because i'd like to see an injoke other than Benson put on UOTM. Saberwolf116 00:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Alright seriously. That's the second person in as many days to reference writing as some sort of lone requirement for this award. You're probably thinking of WRITER of the month. Yeah, writing can factor into this award, but it's usually not the main factor. End rant. -RA HB 21:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

But the difference is his writing actually shaped the foundation of all of the work of an Uncyclopedian of the Month (QVFD, VFD, Ban Patrol, helping noobs, etc.) MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:32, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

RAHB, it's a joke, so why is it important? Saberwolf116 00:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Cause Nachlader nominated Socky on the basis of his writing, then you nominated Mr. Fisher Price on his "writing". He's just trying to remind people this isn't WotM, that writing awesome things isn't what qualifies someone to get this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:55, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

In other words, ignore RAHB. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Socky does do alot of maintenance work too. --Mnb'z 04:38, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Right. I think most people voted for him because of that. Also, ignore RAHB. -RA HB 10:51, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

For. Lolz i nommed benson. User:Zheliel/sigz2 14:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit source]

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 3 Brits allowed

Om nom nom and for. -RA HB 22:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Against vote I will probably strike later. When I nommed So So and he won, I was informed that only Rcmurphy is eligible to take this one home. Then, Soviet-style, we scrubbed away every mention of So So ever having won. So, Mhaille? Feh. pillow talk 22:20, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
I could be a perpetual n00b too! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
For. lol. User:Zheliel/sigz2 14:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Against. I really, really, really, really hate British people with their last-wordism. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 19:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Strong Hi-Five -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 18:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Bless. Yes Don Puttano cHeDDs 20:46,31May,2009

Nikau (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 3

Nom and Bless Per Tradesmen 22:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Note: By my count, he's been here 35 days, putting him about two days over the eligibility threshold. So, the question is: Does anyone care? pillow talk 22:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
They will bend the rules, as they did with sonje 22:26, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Rule bending lol. It will never happen, though I like your thinking. Not many bend rules around here. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 23:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Rules are never bent around here. They are changed mid-process and retroactively by admin decree. Lean the difference. --Mnb'z 23:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Gods can change rules, too, as Ra has just done 23:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, perhaps my difference leaning is not as good as usual. Still, I've tried to get some rules changed. I usually run into a wild Modusoperandi who uses his stupid Logic and knowledge to show me what is what. I've never won a battle, but I'll try dammit. I'll try. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Screw the rules. Two days making someone illegible is just stupid. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thing is, it's a bending of the original rules that +3 days is eligible. The reason we stick to the rules is that eventually, +5 becomes eligible, then +10, then 2 months, and before you know it, Noob of the Month becomes Noob of the Year. It's not as much a matter of 5 days over a month making any difference whatsoever, it's a matter of the slow turn into the rules becoming more and more relaxed. I realize that 99% of people don't see the negative connotation of that, so please, go about your business, as you were. -RA HB 23:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Thing is, there'll still be people around who remember the original rule who can judge when the leniency is going too far. I'd say adding another two days is far from being too lenient. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:01, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
As I said, I quite agree with you. Another two days is nothing here nor there. The matter to deal with is the future of the rule, and people overtime saying "well, adding another two days seems fine to me", every couple of months, which will just add more and more days to eligibility. I don't have any problem bending the rules to accommodate this chap, but I don't think changing the official rules is very wise. -RA HB 21:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Socky, in that I think it should way more than two days to make something impossible to read. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:27, May 30
For. It's not like rule bending is going to become a regular thing. It should only be used when someone clearly deserves the award. Sonje, and now Nikau, are case and point. —Sir Guildensternenstein 23:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Rule-bending has always been a regular thing, particularly on this award, and that's how we got to the current state of the rules. Nice thing is though, I don't see any problem with continuously bending the +3 rule. It's changing it all over again to a +5 rules that bothers me. Because then that rules will be bent, changed, bent again, changed again, etcetera, etcetera.-RA HB 22:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
For maybe invalid, but I don't care. --Mnb'z 23:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC) changed vote. --Mnb'z 03:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
For can't wait to see what he has in store for us next.-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 23:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)Changed my vote.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 00:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Great start. --Romartus 10:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for being the town's schmuck but no. This is mainly to encourage new users. As Nikau got recognized already as a very good writer with a first feature, I hope that will encourage him to write further. There are some very good noobs around that are eligible under the rules. Also, I encourage certain worshipers of Ra to avoid changing the rules in the future. ~ 22:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

:-) the worshiper of Ra didn't do it. Ra did it himself, you blasphemer.

04:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Score. I should be a psychic. Woody On Fire!

Talking Woody Stalking Woody 23:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Silly Angel (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

Nom+for. Bored mostly. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 17:27, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Comment ~ Is there an article from this user in the mainspace yet? Maybe I missed it.. --T. (talk) 17:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

No idea. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 18:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

I want to make clear that I was here for 20 days on the date of my nomination. - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 01:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry about eligibility, GET CONTRIBUTIN'! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 11:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Ok its in the mainspace: Antigua-Barbuda - - - Silly Angel Speak Contribs 20:29, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Fahrenheit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 2

Nom / For ~ For trudging through vandalism, crappy spelling and other editorial and cleanup work. Plus he's written his required article. I'm probably biased, seeing as he's my adoptee, but damn you if you don't vote for him anyway. :) --T. (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

~~#For per above. --Mnb'z 03:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)~~

For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Clemens177 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 16

Nom & for. Fact: Clemens177 is a noob. Fact: Clemens177 has written a bunch of stuff, none of which is crap. Fact: Clemens177 has yet to annoy me. Fact: Clemens177 will turn out to be NXWave. Conclusion: Clemens177 should be Noob of the Month. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
for This guy seems like he's been doing a good job for a new user. Staircase (aka: "Steps") 03:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
for Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 06:22 May 26 '09
For. Well spotted, Modus. --^Dame 09:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Eh, Now it's 5-5! User:Zheliel/sigz2 09:59, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
For. A n00b doing writing stuff, you say? Why, that's the very thing we need! --UU - natter 12:52, May 26
For. Stap me, Jensen, this could be the very user we've been looking for! Zounds! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:54, May 26
What, so you're cheating on me? How could you do this to me? Oh, and For--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 21:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
For per the above comments. Though we seem to have a lot of other nice n00bs this month as well. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Where's this guy been? Why haven't I even heard of him until about a minute ago? Why, I say? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
For. Whatever those guys said up there. (talk) 01:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
This guy is good Le Cejak • <6:07 May 27, 2009>
For. per above. --Mnb'z 06:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Real for. -RA HB 20:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Noob. IronLung 07:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 20:28, May 30

I'm not voting for or against, because I do not believe people should vote for themselves. I just want to thank all of you for voting for me. I'm glad you have enjoyed my articles. I've definitely been enjoying this place and look forward to a long and happy association with you all. Some of the articles here are soooo brilliant - I came across one on Schrodinger's cat and the buttered toast phenomena that was remarkable for it's humor and science. You guys are just great!!! --Clemens177 07:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

P.S. My local store is the County Market - I will get complimentary beef jerky if I win, right? --Clemens177 07:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

For Though I was ineligible for this award by 2 days, I believe Clemens here deserved the award more anyway and once I overcome this flu (no, the few proteins needed to make it swine flu were 2 days late, so I have to make do with the boring garden variety) I hope to write something with Clemens. I should probably conclude this ramble before someone thinks I'm voting for the libertarian party. --Nikau 15:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
For This guy deserves it more than me or any other of the nominees Fahrenheit 18:21, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

June 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

Orian57 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 27 stellar homos

He's been writing excellent articles lately. I believe he deserves this. Staircase CUN^t 04:26, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
VERY STRONG FOR Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 04:27 June 1 '09
Yeah unless someone more deserving comes along. You know, Orian is a good writer and very helpful. I would enjoy seeing an encyclopedic article by him, but that's just me. Le Cejak • <5:04 Jun 01, 2009>
For --Mnb'z 05:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Writes good, funny stuffs. Mind you, I agree with Cajek about the encyclopedic article though. --UU - natter 11:48, Jun 1
For. I really think this belongs to him this month. --T. (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Saberwolf116 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Fuck it, why not? When have I ever been humble anyway? Anyway, huge thanks to everyone who's voted and anyone who may yet vote. As for experementing with my writing I do intend to try over the next month, but when that doesn't work out I'll just retreat back to where I'm comfortable. Probably. And just to turn this into a proper essay, I hope no one minds me changing the bullet points to numbers. aren't numbers usually used? ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 02:08 2 June 2009
Super for. --^Dame 10:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Quite. Think he deserves it. I loved Nursery. Nameable ((talk?)) 16:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
For. With Todd voting for Orian, any possible doubts have been eliminated. He gets my full support. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Per UU and Socky. Sire それは驚くばかりの性交である !! -4- (20:31 06-7-2009)
Forgainst. I reckon he's one o' them queer fellas. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:56, 7 Jun
Orian is queer?! Oh my!! Holy Water, Holy Water Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 21:25 June 7 '09
And to think I used to think he only reviewed stuff. Orian, your writing continues to get better and better. Keep it up. For Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Bless. Sorry I'm late. Don Puttano cHeDDs 21:52,11June,2009
for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
I am amazed he hasn't won this yet. For. It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you.
Orian's writing has just been spectacular this month. pillow talk 20:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Damn talented homos grumble grumble ~ 08:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
For I hear he's straight. True story. I was there when he came in. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
For-You know what the music means... Our time is up. 00:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
How I did giggle at Nursery. Im Not A Sunbeam 01:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
He's long deserved this. Best of all, not once did he whore himself to me for WotM. Sure, he's whored every single one of his articles to me. But they're all funny, so whatever. FORGIVEN. —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
For--IwillKILLyou333 Talk If you dare 20:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
'Eh, this is for' BENSON. Mr Zhe-me l-talk i-sign e-singapore l-bling^Brute! 06:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
For.. This guy has really stepped it up several notches this month. Deserves it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:39, Jun 30

Todd Lyons (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 8 actual loins, 6 spiritual lengths of meat

NomFor As a returned and ancient admin, Todd Lyons has surprised us all by eliminating the standard actions of such a situation, in favor of getting actual things done. -RA HB 06:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment ~ ^_^ I'm gratified and completely surprised by the nomination, but I've voted for Orian this month. Indeed I've had 5 features since returning (with no more on VFH as of now), but I'm completely outclassed by him. I'm going to keep the "Alleged Works of Fact: Recent" portion of my page complete if anyone is curious what all I've done since returning in late April. --T. (talk) 12:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

For.. I know he doesn't want the vote this month but the audio about white meat made me laugh out loud in the office. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 20:03, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Spiritual For. Tood Lyons next month. Saberwolf116 13:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Spiritual For. For no other reason than to make his scoring header say "2 spiritual lengths of meat", making it sound like he has 2 metaphysical penises. (though seriously. Awsome writer.) Orian57 Talk 14:42 14 June 2009

For; because I mistakenly assume that my voting for Toddy will in some way matter this month. Also because he deserves it. -- The Zombiebaron 17:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Spiritual For. Loved the Diary article. Also, now he has 3 pretend dicks. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Orian's a great writer, and he deserves this award. But Todd...well, Uncyclopedia would be a very different place without his contributions. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Comment for some reason, I respect Todd Lyons more than anybody else on uncyc. Nobody cares anyway, One more spiritual For Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 17:17 June 15 '09
Spiritual Support. Orian's a great writer, but Todd certainly is as well. If you're nommed again next month, I'll most likely vote for you. Todd, you rock! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Orian's done a lot of good work, but I have to vote for the guy who, out of all the articles I've read over the years, has made me laugh more than anyone else on this website, bar none. An Uncyc legend. –—Hv (talk) 15/06 19:01
Spiritual For per Socky and awesomeness. --^Dame 09:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
For. - Shows us all how it's done.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
For. I've never been a fan of his work, but the masses, I hear, find it somewhat amusing. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
For. --Docile hippopotamus 11:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

UotM[edit source]

Simsilikesims (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 5

Nom and for. Been around for a while, helping with the site in general. Saberwolf116 22:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Dig -RA HB 00:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For. I'm sure I said recently that Simsilikesims ought to win this, but nevertheless it's a very hard choice between her (?) and Multiliteralist. Next month, I'll nom Multi myself if he doesn't win this time round. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 16:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
For. - RAHB and Rabbi--Sycamore (Talk) 17:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
<insert emotional speech here> My Angry Anniversary Celebration! Nice... (16:55 06-17-2009)

Mahm00shA (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 7

Nom + Bless He's worked very hard ever since he started off here, and has done fairly weel in all aspects of Uncyc. And he's cool. And Egyptian. So yeah. Don Puttano cHeDDs 23:00,1June,2009
Self Ra Blessing I love myself Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 23:09 June 1 '09

Fuck it, I am voting for my competition like any gentleman would do Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 19:43 June 12 '09
Rats, Cheddar nommed Mooshie before I could. Anyway, For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:52, Jun 3
OK, I go for him |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill |
For.. This is for Mido as well. Best Egyptian footballer in the English premier league ? Seriously - a positive vote for ! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 20:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
For. He's my older adopted brother, but I've read some of his things and I really like his stuff. --VERTO my talk 21:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Ooh I thought I voted already. User:Zheliel/sigz2 04:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
For. --Docile hippopotamus 11:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Optimuschris (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 3

Nomination & For He's one of them there good users. He helps all the ladies. Yeah. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
If by "help" you mean "penis"... Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 05:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4

Nom & for. Heil the UnFuhrer! Uncyclopedia's rewriting efforts have never been so organised. Also, he writes lots, votes lots, and generally makes a positive contribution. IronLung 00:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For Yes, portals are nice, but I have to say Guildy has been doing a good job with the writing and rewriting drive. Staircase CUN^t 05:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
For We're even now, right? -- Style Guide 15:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I suppose so. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
UotY. --It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you. 00:30, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Multiliteralist (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 15

Nom. Portals! IronLung 00:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Portals Le Cejak • <1:13 Jun 02, 2009>
Portals per above. --Mnb'z 05:25, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Portals also. --^Dame 10:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For. As tempting as voting for myself is, I have to give my vote to Multi. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Someone said ~~purr?~~ port...ales... Sure I'm voting. :) -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 15:55, 3 Jun
For! Nice work. Nothing I would ever have the patience to do... Tagstit talk contribs awards 01:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
For. ~ 16:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
This was a triumph. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:20, Jun 7
Yes. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 01:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Porter Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
bandwagon for. plus, you know, he actually deserves it and stuff. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Portals 'n shit. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:26, 12 Jun
I admit defeat. Congratulations, Mr. Multiliteralist :) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 19:45 June 12 '09
For per the portals. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

CheddarBBQ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 0

Nom. Though my vote is cast elsewhere, I think Cheddar at very least deserves at least a nomination. He's without a doubt Uncyclopedia's most underappreciated member, in my opinion. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Guildy. Damn, too late to vote for myself. Don Puttano cHeDDs 16:12,6June,2009
Whore. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 16:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

NotM[edit source]

Staircase (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 18

Nom and for. He's written several good articles, and is a good addition to Pee Review as well. Saberwolf116 14:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
OH! oh, oh, oh! I didn't know! Yes, very good writer and he's mostly kept his nose clean. Has done a lot in the... week he's been here as of this vote! He's written about five articles and was the second best reviewer last month in only a week. He's my noob: you must vote for him. Le Cejak • <14:12 Jun 01, 2009>
Nom + For Bitch! I said I was going to nom him. I called it! Don Puttano cHeDDs 16:41,1June,2009
For. per above. --Mnb'z 18:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Per Cajek. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Definitely! I have decided to call you SuperN00b! Nameable ((talk?)) 18:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For. per everybody above me.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:12, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
For -RA HB 19:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
~~He doesn't act at all like a n00b, which usually means he is not. Still, guilty until proven innocent. For. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)~~
- Siento. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Per those voices in my head that say I'm hungry Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 21:10 June 1 '09
For. -- impressive Ape (ruminate) (Riot Porn) 02:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
~~The all time highest score for a Noob of the Month award is 23. Do you think we can beat it? YES! Only ten left! Greedy Self For.~~ Staircase CUN^t 10:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Very for. --^Dame 10:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:54, Jun 3
For Fahrenheit 14:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Really these votes are about what was done in May and before rather than June.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 20:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Cajek's noob. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:21, 6 Jun
Didn't even realize he was a noob. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:21, Jun 7
This guy annoys my guts. Against. He set off my "sockpuppet alarm". Whether my gut feeling is right or just post-op cramps, I don't like the vibe this guy gives me. I want 'em pink and buzzing! -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 08:39, 12 Jun
Nose on my phone. On Luvvy's talkpage. Mr Zhe-me l-talk i-sign e-singapore l-bling^Brute! 13:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
For. Sir Sunbeam ~~no u~~ F@H KUN 23:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Fuentfue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 7

Nom and for. Well, (s)he may not win seeing as there's currently a 15 to 1 landslide, but here's to hoping. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 05:24, 4 June 2009
For. I always vote for the competition. Staircase CUN^t 05:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
For Everyone likes an under-dog. But I feel honored just being nominated :) -- fuentfue My Talk : My Awards 20:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I gotta say, I'm liking what fuentfue is doing around these here parts. A lot. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
For -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 20:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
For --T. (talk) 10:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Go down fighting. Because the status is not quo. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 01:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Sog1970 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

N+F. Apart from his starting habit to upload a gazillion pictures all at once, the guy is coming out as a grand writer. And this, friends, foes and sockpuppets, is what we're all about. ~ 07:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Is he really a n00b? I looked at his contribs one day, because I was going to do this very thing, but I didn't think he met the age requirement... Woody On Fire!

Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

You know what, you're absolutly right, I didn't notice he was active since April. Sorry Sog, I guess we'll need to find another one for you, but keep up the good work! ~

19:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Spiritual For.. Already voted for Steps but I too considered doing this very thing. Looks like its a good month for noobs. --^Dame 14:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, it's gonna be really close next month, when many of these people are re-nommed. Don Puttano cHeDDs 00:50,16June,2009
Spiritual For. My recommend for Noob next month..so I am sort of putting a marker down here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 15:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- I would, too, but he's over the age limit. Staircase CUN^t 15:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Verto (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 1

N+F He's Very Nice. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Zheliel (talk • contribs)
Sorry, but I think Steps has got this one, but I will nom you next month. And if anyone tries to before me, I'll get my Italian friends after them. Don Puttano cHeDDs 17:28,15June,2009
I'm going to disqualify him on grounds of plagiarism. Don't renom next month. ~ 08:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Discussion moved to talk page ~ 15:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

LittlePinkSock (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Score: 4

N&F. Another contender. OK, so there don't seem to be that many people who haven't already voted, but nonetheless, LPS is worthy of your consideration. Has written a fine article, hasn't started any drama, has been friendly and so forth despite being sleep-deprived by a crying baby and has generally impressed me so far. --UU - natter 10:58, Jun 15
- Next month, UU. I'll vote next month. She is doing good, or at least I think she is, I don't really know for sure. Staircase CUN^t 23:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Spiritual For She has done well here, and is a promising n00b. She will most likely have my vote next month. Don Puttano cHeDDs 15:19,16June,2009
no drama? for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
For MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
For --Docile hippopotamus 11:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 8

Writer of the Year[edit source]

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

TheLedBalloon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Procopius (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

15Mickey20 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Hyperbole (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Prettiestpretty (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Uncyclopedian of the Year[edit source]

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

TheLedBalloon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

84.194.239.31 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)[edit source]

MrN9000 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Heerenveen (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

January 2009[edit source]

NotM[edit source]

Tagstit (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Kit paddle (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

UotM[edit source]

Benson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Mnbvcxz (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

IronLung (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

February 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

DrStrange (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

UotM[edit source]

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

RAHB (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Sannse (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

NotM[edit source]

CheddarBBQ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Kit paddle (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Apage (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

ChadiW (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

March 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

Sycamore (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Asahatter (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Cap'n_Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Docile hippopotamus (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

UotM[edit source]

SysRq (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

NotM[edit source]

ThomasPynchonsLeftNut (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Sonje (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

StonedJeff (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

CheddarBBQ (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

April 2009[edit source]

WotM[edit source]

Nachlader (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

RabbiTechno (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Cap'n Ben (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Asahatter (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

Modusoperandi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]

UotM[edit source]

Guildensternenstein (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser[edit source]