Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 5

2005 • 2006 (part 1) • 2006 (part 2) • 2007 (part 1) • 2007 (part 2) • 2008 (part 1) • 2008 (part 2) • 2009 (part 1) • 2009 (part 2) • 2010 (part 1) • 2010 (part 2) • 2011 (part 1) • 2011 (part 2) • 2012 (part 1) • 2012 (part 2) • 2013 (part 1) • 2013 (part 2) • 2014 • 2015 • 2017 to now

Welcome to Past Winners 5: Revenge of the Aphids. This page covers the major Uncyc awards for the second half of 2007.

Writer of the Month

July 2007

Ljlego (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: TWEENty-fiiiversjlego

• For As I said I would vote for him this month, might as well make him the first nom. Per several articles that I don't care to list, and his several VFH noms in the past month. -RAHB 09:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. Fuck you RAHB, now I'm going to have to nominate someone else D: -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

You don't have to do anything, guvn'a.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Eh, I'll still nominate someone. Real late in the month though, unless the Doktor is in ;) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't matter because the guy I nommed will win =p -RAHB 04:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Ljlego is a VFH monster and total MILF. Big for. --EMC ^[TALK] 17:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• That Ljlego, what a....guy.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:42, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• for --Hrodulf 22:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For, because I hate it when people nominate the people that I want to nominate before I nominate them. -- The Zombiebaron 22:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Dig Lj is like my bratty son-in-writing, and the most effective vote whore I've ever seen. ;) --THINKER 00:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Ah, yes, Thinker. He's a brilliant mind. Showed me the ropes. Sucky sucky five dollar is a thing of the past.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:16, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah... -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Why not? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 16:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --General Insineratehymn 20:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. Even though, you know, it's probably the Dokter's turn...   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• For I have too much of his "Thank you for voting" things already. -- 11:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Lovely chap, amazing writer, exceptional electric violin player. Plus, he let me cum on his face --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

  Hey, shh with that!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

  Lj, things with the ladies will get better, I promise! No need to switch teams just yet buddy seriously!!! lol ;) --THINKER 02:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

  IT WAS COMPLETELY AGAINST MY WILL! SRSLY! /me washes his mouth out emphatically and half-heartedly-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• For--~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  17:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• For--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 02:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Has produced a terrifyingly high number of hilarious articles. Wish I knew how to pronounce his username. --THE 15:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

He's no §ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ, at least -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think he actually got tired of that name himself. That's why he's Squiggle now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• For This guy adopted me when no one else would. *sniff* Plus he is cranking out great articles in no time at all. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Wow. What a nice user. User:Mrthejazz/sig 21:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 13:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• oh dear, I like the Dok, he's got good brain, but...next month?? For now...For "Big Guy" Lj--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 07:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• very yes --» >UF|TLK|▋» UNKNOWNFILE 21:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
• Foreskin shaped appendages began to erupt from R'yaleths body, forming star patterns with a great, gaping maw poised to ensnare it's victims... H. P. Lovecraft Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Despite mainly paying attention to the bad articles on the site, I've got round to reading the occasional hilarious Ljlego contribution. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:53, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• He's had an excellent month and well worth the entrance fee. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 15:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R, 09:31, 30 July 2007

HerrDoktor (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +13

• Nominierung und für. That's all the German I know. In fact, that's more than I know. The good doctor has written a bunch of good stuff, like UnBooks:Practical Lessons on Communism, UnBooks:Gallows Humor, HowTo:Run Away From Fat Ladies, & The Black And White Man. He's written more, probably. I don't know; he won't let me into his lab anymore. "Don't poke my monster." he said. I though it was a euphemism. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:56, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• I flattered quite enough last month, so I'll give the short short versions this time. Good. Brazilian. Handsome. Scientist. Mad. Vote. Now. ~ 20:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• I'll give the short short short version then. Über For. –—Hv (talk) 1/07 20:31
• For I like the way his brain works, which has lead to good writing, and he gives a mean foot massage (and my vote can be bought for a good foot massage). Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - Gute Artikel...bah, I shouldn't even try to speak other languages. I'm useless. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Kelpan 20:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Slithy Tove 22:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 00:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. Ljlego's pretty good too, but I'm a bigger fan of the Doc. He's been contributing longer and has been consistently good longer as well. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Lambic HarkHark! It's 1:38 AM and already July the 7th 2007 here, and I actually only needed to try my new (and really modest) sig...
• For Leatherboundbooks^TalkContributions 04:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. I remember pee reviewing his early works. We talked about adding more boob jokes. Ah, memories. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• Sorry I'm Late--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  00:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1 sitcom watchers

Nomination + For One of the better writers here. Should get paid to write a sitcom. Maybe one about a couple who are forced to move to Canada. And they have a talking dog! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Ineligible, as he (deservedly) won already, forever ago. And come on, don't nom this late in the month! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 23:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Who says you can only win once? (But yeah, it is a bit late in the month for new additions) --THINKER 00:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

There's no rule which says that you can't win an award more than once. The sole exception to this non-rule, however, is, understandably, Mhaille. Ineligible. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

HerrDoktor (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 3 failed WotM nominations

• Nom and For Do I really have to say anything here? Really? The guy's been so close the last 2 months, I really think he deserves it. My personal favorite of his is UnBooks:Gallows Humor, but I'm sure there's many more. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 07:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Really, this is making me embarrassed. Let's see if this old rusted tincan can score at least once more, so we can try it over again. -- herr doktor needsApistol  [scream!] 15:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Start writing again, then we'll talk :) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I hate to say it, but TKF is right. The guy who beat you out last time has like twelve features, or something crazy like that. You gotta get writin, man. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

To be fair, I only have ten features and this dude has 5.5. Just the facts, man.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 12:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, and he's like a handsome Brazilian dude! That has to count for something! ~ 13:43, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Typical. Simply typical. I type a few sentences in the colloquial and all of a sudden I am the target of unbecoming impersonations. Very well, from now henceforth my typing shall recall to mind the dialect of an 85-year-old British butler. I hope that you are quite pleased with yourselves. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Whoa! Seems that I didn't make myself clear. I'm talking that being a candidate and losing every month is making me embarrassed. No word about the merit of the other contenders, of course there's better people around, people, that, for instance, do things here. -- herr doktor needsApistol  [scream!] 20:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

In his defense, he's busy sailing the majestic fjords of Brazil, fishing for herring to pickle, before the long, cold embrace of winter descends. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:42, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I'm taking my initiation rituals. One guy will play a drum made of calabash, then famelic kids will throw coconuts at you and the chief will let loose the ferocious amazons from their enclosure, and the amazons will try to tear your thong up with their teeth. If you keep the thong, the test is suceed, and you're considered gay enough to wear Carnaval peacock costumes. Failing is part of my expertise, I'm gonna tell you. -- herr doktor needsApistol  [scream!] 20:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• He is a great writer. He is a friend. I hope this vote will convince him to return to his glorious days as a maniacal writer and a noob drill sergeant. ~ 12:24, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• He should've got this before, dagnabit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 4 repetitions of the word So

• Nom + For. So So is really a pretty mundane guy. He loves his stuffed animals, likes long walks on the beach, occasionally gets sick, wants fries with that, and even spent a short time in the army. Despite his mundane appearance, So So fucking pwns at writing. He's saucy, new, and improved. Plus, he's written two of my favorite articles on the whole site: You are dead and Fire hydrant. So So exhibits both talent and consistency on par with the most celebrated writers on this site.-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Dang you, TKF. I'm a huge So So fan, from Fire hydrant, my all-time favorite article, all the way to the obscure yet oh-so-subtly funny Very Special Article. But as much as I wanted to vote for So So, even to the point of copying your comment on Thinker, word for word (I couldn't agree more), I think it's Thinker's time to shine. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• For --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 06:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Dig absolutely. I knew I liked So So's stuff, but this nom has given me the opportunity to read some articles I hadn't gotten to before. And they're all funny. :) --THINKER 12:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Yep Victory is assured. Wait...oh BobbyBobson 22:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

The Thinker (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 20 live whales down your trousers

• Nom + For This guy is certainly one of the funniest writers to ever hit us. The writer of Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?, Uncyc's most favored article for feature, and countless other masterpieces, he has helped countless noobs (including yours truly) to higher places than they were before. Continually undervalued at VFH, this funny guy is robbed of credit he so sorely deserves. This award is rightfully his, especially considering all the good stuff he's put out this month, and I intend to let him have it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment with obscene gestures indicating a wanton For vote. Damn you, spirit of competition! As much as I want to crazily vote For, So So wrote Fire hydrant. Fire hydrant! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• FOR'D I said I was gonna go Dokktor this month, but I lied. This guy deserves it more than anyone right now. He's a fucking titan. -RAHB 02:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• I thought he was a fucking fire hydrant. Oh wait, wrong author. Excuse me while I feign idiocy elsewhere.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• Strong for The most intelligent writer on the website. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak for, not because Thinker isn't a great writer (he is), but because I'm so torn between So So and him. I'm letting position on the VFH HoS determine my stance at this point, because they're both so great. (Oh, and you forgot to mention my favorite Thinkerism.) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• DIG Slithy Tove 05:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• For, in accordance with prophecy. --So So 06:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• For Been working with him for quite a while on an extended collab, and this has further convinced me of his general awesomeness. --THE 16:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Anone who does not vote for this guy is in sore need of a humor transplant. The guy is hilarious! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:36, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Way to insult the person you're voting for. :P -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• This guy is all, "Oh look at me I'm so cool and smart and write big articles and neener-neener-neener." Big for. --EMC ^[TALK] 18:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• I think, therefore I vote For. --Under user 10:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• For - All of the nominations this month are excellent writers. I only vote for The Thinker because he has written more great articles in the last two months or so than the other three. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• By all means, certainly! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:03, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• For, just to seal in the fact that he's going to win 2 awards this month. ~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  19/08/2007 @ 21:06
• For --Sir Manforman 20:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R,
• For. I was wavering, but then read UnNews:Stuffy intellectuals discover internet memes (I was on holiday during the VFHing). That's the best article I've read in a while. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• For.--Chrissy 00:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. if writing the most supported article in uncyclopedia history doesnt earn you a potato trophy, then i don't know what does. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Last minute for that won't make the slightest difference. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 19:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Keitei (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Negativeonetei

• Nomination. Someone should have done this a while ago, but nobody cared. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Not to take away anything from KT's past contributions, but I can't understand why someone who has had one single edit in the last two months has a nomination for Writer of the Month? The idea of these awards is to award "the member who has written the funniest, highest-quality stuff in the past month". Not "the member who hasn't had this award before, and it was a shame they didn't get nommed when they were contributing their best stuff, so here's a belated nomination". -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Don't blame me, I didn't vote for her. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Against. Not a single worthwhile contribution. Ever. -- 13:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
  • That's a bit pessemistic... -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 16:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Nobody cares.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
      • Well, I d–no, wait; nevermind. I don't. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 03:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5 token Jew

• Nom and For Why not give this award to our token jew? Author of such classics as HowTo:Prevent your car radio from being stolen, HowTo:Learn Hebrew, and Jewish Holidays.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Obligatory vote due to Lanski's unwritten rules. ALL OF YOUR BASE WERE BELONG TO US. -- herr doktor needsApistol  [scream!] 17:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm a token Jew?! Oy....~ 12:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed. Kvetch and cavil all you want, the truth is that Judaism is token nowadays. Kakun would be our token Jew, but he's the token idiot instead. And, of course, MO is the token hilarious genius nutcase-type-person. You're the token Jew. Forget that you're a good writer and a good adopter. Forget it all. Oy vey.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

If I can be serious for a moment; you're far more than a token anything. I'll vote for you next month. Also @Ljlego, "nutcase"? I'd be offended if my bathtub wasn't full of strawberry pudding. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Also, yeah, I like your writing, Mord ol' buddy ol' pal. But don't be insulted, Modus. It's a compliment. Anyway, isn't the strawberry pudding actually jelly flavored jelly?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, yes. It heats up when you blow on it. I've said too much. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

I will pay 15 of your dollars for this jelly. Is good price, please take money and give to me goo. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:42, Sep 8, 2007

• For. Perhaps its the liberation from the fleshy confines of the foreskin that removes the blinkers and lifts the scales from the eye of man's creative cock -- just consider Philip Roth, Woody Allen, Joel & Ethan Cohen, Jerry Seinfeld, Larry David, Krusty the Klown .... and Mordillo. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 05:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• For this man is in dire need of a sockpuppet... and he's really talented! --Kenvalyi 16:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For, -- The Zombiebaron 01:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +7 crappy sequels to Fire Hydrant

• Nomination I can't rightly vote here, because I've voted below. However, I feel like So So also deserves yet another WotM nod. He's been clutch for a long time. Long walks on the beach, Fire hydrant, Fire Hydrant 2: Rehydrated, Pufflebump Snugglekins, Sauce, You Are Dead, the list goes on. So just throw a chair at me, I like him too. You should consider strongly before voting this month, as both candidates are crazy good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:51, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For. This guy's got it coming for a while. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• As much as I'd like to give the obligatory self-for, You Are Dead may be my favorite page on the site. So So seems to be consistently writing good stuff. So for. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:59, Sep 1, 2007
• For Slithy Tove 02:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• DIG Listen, if I had my way, all three of these gentlemen would be WotM. Led is phenomenal. Dr. S, fucking brilliant. And I'm sure that next month, my vote will go to one of them. However, this month, it is still for So So, and his understanding of subtlety, nuance, and also the more blatant humor that makes you do the hyena laugh. THINKER approved: this man deserves it. --THINKER 06:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• The Forest For that ever Fored. Jesus, he still hasn't won yet? What the hell is wrong with you people? Easily my favorite writer on the site ever, and certainly one of the best of all time from any perspective. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 13:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• For - darnit, I already told you why, look it up in the history. I nommed him once, he deserved it then, and he still deserves it now. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

TheLedBalloon (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +16 neighbors of the beast

• NF OK, here's the scoop. This brotha has written about a lot of funny articles. He's done so in the past month. Also, he finds time to do other stuff, like get stuck on a desert island, write medical literature, and lobby for political causes. Have I mentioned his penchant for irony? Yeah, it's there. Go Leddy!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. I'd say that I discovered him, but when I found him he was busy discovering himself. I don't go to that park anymore. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• Definite For I didn't realize Led wrote all of those pages. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 04:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For Out of these three authors, I'd have to go with led and his Walls. Although Fire Hydrant was amazing too. --- UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 04:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• WotM: This site’s 2nd most illustrious accomplishment. Is it a Lifetime Achievement Award or a prize for the person writing the most great stuff recently? The rules seem to state the latter, so this month he’s the man. Skullthumper’s next --So So 05:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• For It's so damn hard to choose this month, but I'm gonna have to go with Led, for the same reasons that So So just stated. He's been a titan as of late, and the award is for recent stuff. I think So So still deserves this award, and so does Dr S, but Led is the guy who deserves it this month. -RAHB 14:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• For - Dr. Skullthumper is very deserving as well but I'm voting for TheLedBalloon because he's been here longer than Dr. Skullthumper. I'll vote for you next month Dr. Skullthumper--Sir Manforman 14:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Love to self-for, but no. For! This guy deserves it, as much as I like Fire Hydrant and Fire Hydrant 2. Don't worry, self, I'll vote for you next month. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 15:14 Sep 02, 2007
• Fir. Sorry, jist got back frae Scotland. He wrote my fave HowTo and is good and funny. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For --El legend 13:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Yeeah God, this was a tough choice. But a re-read of "castaway" convinced me to vote for LedBalloon here. --THE 20:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• I'm so proud I could just burst a kidney. One of my children nominated for WotM by ANOTHER of my children who is ALREADY WotM. sniff. Oh, and he's a fine writer too! ~ 12:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• For An impressive body of work and I understand that there is alo an impresive body from working out. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

• TWO TIMER!!! Hey everybody, don't make out with PrettiestPretty! She's a two timer!!!!! --THINKER 00:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• I smell drama! That could be me, because I forgot my deodorantizer today, but then again it could also be emitting from EvilZak. Why, you ask? Because I feel like gratuitous namedropping is why, so FU!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

• Strong For - Your mom. 'Nuff said. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Er...For the record, I didn't rewrite Chuck. That was Lj. I did, however, rewrite Star Wars. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:29, Sep 26

• Chuck Norris? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Noted and corrected. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• FORE! Like, this guy rules. --User:Banjo2e/SIGGY 23:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Oh yeah, totally forgot: I love loopholes, and so does he. --User:Banjo2e/SIGGY 04:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

• For. a balloon, made of lead? how absurdly delicious! --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Skullthumper (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 0 symphonies composed at the age of five

• Nomination. This guy is a bit too new to get my vote (also, he didn't write Fire hydrant), but he's still shown an amazing amount of writing talent in the relatively short time he's been here, already with five features and another half on VFH. This guy has pulled off some of the best intellectual-sounding humor I've seen on this site. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For --Sir Manforman 17:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Mordillo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4 person who may or may not be Jewish. Who are we to judge him? I, for one, twist the heads off of midgets. I'm sure that you do worse...

• Nom and for. I didn't vote for him last month because I'm violently antisemitic (that means I can't drink milk, right?), but he wrote Jewish Holidays, HowTo:Prevent your car radio from being stolen, The Porchesian Holocaust, My Journeys with the GPS, HowTo:Learn Hebrew, and they're good. Good enough to get featured. Good enough to make the Top Whateveritis of the Month. Good enough to get my vote, and I'm an insufferable old coot. Also, git off me lawn! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:50, 2, Oct 2007
• For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Would vote For were So So not nominated. Another time, perhaps. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 00:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Because Uncyclopedian's resident mohel deserves recognition this recognition, and I am torn equally between the other two Nominee's. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. Now that my chances are nil, I think I can vote for the writer I prefer without controversy. The better writer... for WotM. The better writer! For WotM! It has a certain ring to it! --So So 00:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +22 undead members of the nobility

• C☭MMIE NATI☭N & F☭R, He wrote the article "Zombiebaron" 7 times! That's a lot of work & commitment.
• Yay, Yay for Zombie! My hero!!!11one1 — Shadyman (Talk • Contribs) 21:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Hes got the lips of an angel. And the ass of a 5-year-old Filipino boy. Big for. --EMC ^[TALK] 01:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• FORE! Now this guy, this guy, he's that guy who does those guy things. Not those sexy guy things, just those other guy things the regular guys do here whenever guys do their guy stuff. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 01:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For because apparently no one got the hint. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For This vote is totally not based on the fact that this guy could ban me with the click of a button. It's not even based on the fact that he's an all around good guy.....seriously though, it isn't. He's a good writer. I'm surprised he's never received this before. -RAHB 02:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For BARHAH! BANNANA GANGBANG AZZ??? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For You left that condom in last time. Don't do it again. -- \o/
• For it's about time.--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For - He hasn't got this before? Well that has to change :) (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 2, 17:32
• For --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 17:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For - I don't usually concern myself with WotM, but what Bonner said back there persuaded me to vote. RabbiTechno 17:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - I usually vote for the person that votes for me, but I'm struggling this time because from what I have read so far I personally think Mordillo's writing is superior to Zombiebaron's. However, ZB seems like a good guy, and everyone above seems to think so too, so I'll make my vote later in the month. --So So 23:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I simply must protest to the current lead that teh Zombiebaron has. Don't get me wrong, I love my Zombie (and I hope this doesn't interfere with our liaison tonight ;), but how is it that someone who has written NOTHING (read: nothing) in the past month can possibly be beating So So, who has consistently produced stellar work. Despite his lack of enthusiasm for my article-writing (which Zombiebaron displays), So So is really the only eligible candidate. Sorry, guys, but these votes just don't seem....fair.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Yeah, I find myself agreeing with Lj here...ZB is a great writer when he sets his mind to it, he's a diligent admin, and he's a great guy, but So So is pretty much above and beyond in writing, as is Mordillo, IMHO. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:24, Oct 3
    • If ZB beats So So this month (or any month), then I won't hesitate in declaring it a National Disgrace/Tragedy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. Wee :). Finntastic 14:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - I am a bit puzzeled ZB was nominated. I know he has some features, but when was the last article he has writen? I voted for So So because he has written more recent articles. Sorry ZB, maybe another time--Sir Manforman 00:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Comment - I can understand your puzzlement. The story is convoluted. But the truth is, if the WotM template makes contact with my user page the Third Impact will occur and everyone will be fucked. NERV is working night and day to prevent this. We should all be thankful. --So So 01:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Pbbt! Nerd... (says the guy with Eva models on his bookshelf...beside his Evangelion DVDs) Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• For. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 02:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• For I stupidly rewrote it with factual content, but ol' Zombie knowing good writing from bad reverted it. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 02:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Hell yeah! (=strong FOR) --Jack Phoenix _(Contact) 15:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• Against, as per the above shouts of outrage. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
• For That goddamned Badger. Parlay? 16:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• For :-) --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 15:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. Wanker of the month or what? -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:27, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Hell yus. --cobain_angel
• Surprise For - Zombiebaron did something to earn my vote--Sir Manforman 18:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
• Agreed just basically he's one of my favourite writers here at the moment. Definitely deserves it <3 .talk.work.?pedia.$A_{ward}^{waits}$

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 15o So

• Nom, For, etc. This guy still writes, too. Sorta. He's not a "one-article-a-day" guy, but he's definitely solid and consistent. Just give him the damn thing already! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Also, FIRE HYDRANT! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• You will be dead if you do not support this user--Sir Manforman 22:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• For I don't get it. No offense, I love my Zombiebaron, but his volume of work doesn't even hope to compare to that of So So. I nommed him last month, and I stand by.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• For - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 23:34, Oct 1
• For, has never written Zombiebaron. -- The Zombiebaron 23:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• DIG I have now voted for the same person for 3 months straight. Now, god damn it, give him this award! --THINKER 00:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. He's had it coming for a long, long time. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:10, Oct 2
• For --THE 01:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For again. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:08, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Uber-Strong For! Fire Hydrant, dammit. FIRE! HYDRANT! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:49 Oct 02, 2007
• For. Deserves it. It's that simple. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For, though I am thinking by now that So So is becoming something of a WotM standby. When he finally wins, it won't be the same without him. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 19:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Again. Slithy Tove 01:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
• ...make me feel, like a virgin. Touched for the very first time. --EMC ^[TALK] 13:31, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Go, go, go! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. ~ 11:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  10:29, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

THE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5 poorly spelled userpages

• Nom & For with articles like HowTo:Turn Your Computer On, UnNews:Geology classes in Alabama now mandating alternative "Paul Bunyan" theory, UnNews:Anti-genocide group announces new plan to get American government to intervene in Darfur, UnScripts:Grass in the Mist and several others, this guy is getting my vote--Sir Manforman 20:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• FOR VOTE VOTE VOT-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 23:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For A very good writer. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• FOR THE greater good of mankind. --Polystyrene Man 20:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• So So has this in the bag this month, but for me THE has slaved away writing, not just his own new articles, but also very decent contributions to other articles, the mark, I feel, of a great writer. FOR. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 8 flamboyant fonts and colors employed in a single article

• Nom + For. Believe it or not, but I'm not voting for So So. Yes, I am probably one of his greatest fans. Yes, he did write Fire hydrant and You Are Dead. However, he did not write anything in the last month, which irks me a bit. Cajek, however, wrote a lot in the last month. His articles are innovative, refreshing, abundant, and most of all just plain funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• MASSIVE FOR *sheds a tear* They grow up so fast...*sniff* - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:48, Nov 1
• holy crap Thank you guys! Can I still be Led's noob? --  Le Cejak • <-> 20:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Cancer is great.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• For an excellent month of excellent articles. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• For I liked your hunting unicorns article more than I will admit.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Most definitely. The sense of humor of this lad/lass, being eccentric, bizarre, and still managing to remain mainstream, is quite a breath of fresh air. Super yes.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

So So (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: SIXTEEN So

• Nomination and For. This man/woman/user totally deserves this award, and has deserved it for several months. Time after time, the immense charisma of other users has left So So in the mud, crying. -- The Zombiebaron 15:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• YES, about damn time. --EMC ^[TALK] 21:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• If you don't give him the fucking award, I'll execute every last one of you. ~ 21:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Per last month, and per every month following until he wins the damn thing! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 22:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For great justice! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• For yet again. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• I say we string up everybody that doesn't vote for. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong for What? He still hasn't won? At this point So So should have won this, like, eight times over. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
• For He should have won this before I joined the site. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs -20:50, Nov 13
• Comment + GAAAH! How come So So has to be winning now, when I don't vote for him?! D: -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• For He deserves it far more than I do. Don't make him wait another month!!!!111 --THE 22:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• This is ridiculous, but thankfully it looks like no bandwagon users are nommed so finally quality may shine. Shine on, silver...quality... SO SO FOR PREZ! (And THE, you know that its you next month) --THINKER 22:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• For with a proposition to form a category of users who love Fire hydrant, since there seem to be so many as judging by last month's votes. Maybe "Hydries?" — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Because I have to honor the promise to myself to honor this writer. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• For SHIIIINE OOOOON You CRAAAAAAZY DIIIIAAAAAMOOOOOOOOND! -RAHB 06:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• For --Æ 14:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Like it matters now... MrN 01:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Official Nominations for December

THE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6HE

• Nom and For This guy's been cranking out quality articles for six months now. If anyone on the site deserves this award, it's this 3-year-old genius.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:37, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• DIG Absolutely. He works hard to make readers laugh. --THINKER 20:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• ForD Quality stuffs - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:38, Dec 2
• FOR! One of the best around. -RAHB 08:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - Naming yourself after a featured article has got to be nominal determinism of some sort. -- The Zombiebaron 21:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: The was never featured..... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:51, Dec 8
    • I think they just featured the word "the" one day. It confuses me. --THE 21:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
      • Yeah, back when Uncyc was new they realized that the word "the" (which is, grammatically, an article) was the best "article" on the site. So they threw it, by itself, into the feature box. I say "they" because this was before even I showed up, and I've been around a while. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 18:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
        • And we wonder why people think we're geeks.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. ~ Mordillo where is my PISS? 15:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Cajek (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 12 __NOCAJEK__

• Nom & For - I bet you he has written more quality articles than any other Uncyclopedian in the past month. --Æ 18:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. Hasn't slowed down since last month a bit. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Agreed. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:08, Dec 1
• For -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - He don't stop crankin' out them articles. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  21:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. Tres Funny (13.58, 8 December 2007)
• Pro-Cajek =D of course ~Fag x FS
• For The quantity of articles from the Cajek factory this month has been incredible. Although some of them have been a bit on the random side, there has easily been enough excellent stuff to justify this award. (Hang on, we're going to give Cajek a GUN??? Wonder if he'll be banned at the time if he gets it???) MrN 14:56, Dec 23
• For. Keep up the good work! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 23:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
• Quite fond of Cajek's work and of his warm apple pie. And yes, that's a euphemism. Mmm. --EMC ^[TALK] 00:03, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. I left my vote 'til the end of the month as all of the nominees are damn good in my eyes, and I wanted to see who cranked out the most good stuff. Need I have bothered? The volume of stuff pumped out by Cajek's Madness Factory is incredible, and a good deal of it makes me laugh. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 7KF

• Nom + For = TKF has been "on", so to speak, in this past month. He hasn't had an incredibly high amount of features, but with juggling an incredible amount of sitework with his extremely amusing article-writery, there is no equal. TKF for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:07, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• For   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 3 @ 22:43)
• For --THE 21:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - The funny level of his stuff is way up there --MaddMax 01:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - Because whoring is funny, and you whored and I'm not going to slap you for it like you slapped me. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 04:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Christmas cheer through all the year! That's what TKF brings. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 01:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• One of those writers who spends longer working on improving other people's articles, rather than seeking presonal glory via the Halls of VFH. A gentleman, a scholar and a drunk most weekdays. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Noob of the Month

July 2007

Dr. Skullthumper (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +17 Bathroom sinks

• Nom + For. Never since Procopius and Braydie has a noob of this much writing talent come along. Bravo, doctor, bravo. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• I want that pizza game thing. (For) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 21:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Saturn1 (contributions) (talk) Cult 18:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 22:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Dig Looks promising. --THINKER 06:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Oh dear. He's the only feller what I heard of. Fore!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 07:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - Now this guy's deserving. {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Everybody run. This guy has subtle humor and he's not afraid to use it. For. --So So 02:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Yeah, shut up, kids. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 04:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Did I not vote yet? Nah, someone must have deleted it or something. Surely I wouldn't have waited this long.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - I've seen him around, doing useful things. Which is more than I can say for most n00bs. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• For -- The Zombiebaron 14:54, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Pointless self-for Because I believe sharp objects can hurt people. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:25 Dec 06, 2024 04:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R, 09:32, 30 July 2007

Official Nominations for August

BobbyBobson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2 oddly named ex-Newcastle managers

• Nom+For, wrote a very good article. SRXT. 19/08 06.25pm
• For, I've written a few more 'very good' articles, and because the Irish people haven't won anything recently. --BobbyBobson 06:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)BobbyBobson
• Next month -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Gerrycheevers (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +14.5 pucks that would have hit him in the face had he not been wearing that trendy mask

• Nom and For He has only been here for less than a month and has already written 5 articles (one of which is currently on VFH). He is also very polite as he asked me on my talk page to nominate him. --General Insineratehymn 14:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• FOR! I dig this guy. He's polite, a decent writer, and named himself after some hockey player or other. -RAHB 19:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
• 4 for having a page up for VFH that doesn't get -3'd in the first day. Plus, I like hockey. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:21, August 15, 2007
• For. i'd be an idiot to not vote for myself, right? --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Nice. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• Dig seems like a stand-up gent.. --THINKER 05:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• For Good job for a noob, though, let's admit it, he's had a fair bit of assistance from Bobbyorr. Slithy Tove 07:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Setting slovenly n00bs like myself a good example! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. What's with this RCMurphy stuff anyways? -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 16:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Has added some brilliant articles --84.70.134.11 20:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks for your compliment and your support, 84.70.134.11. however, i have deducted 50% from your vote because IP addresses count for half. i have deducted a further 50% from the remaining 1/2 of a vote for your being redlinked. again, thanks! --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

There's no rule about being redlinked, Gerry :P -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Go Bruins! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:16, Aug 23, 2007

• F☭R,
• For. Because he doesn't suck. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:24 Aug 26, 2007
• For Because I hate douche bags. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:37, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• FORE!!! Because he is eligible. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• For - because he is the best candidate, now that Rcmurphy is gone.--Sir Manforman 12:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• For ~ 21:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +5 painfully worn out jokes

• Nom and for Yes, again. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 05:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against Guy goes around the site like he owns the freaking place. Featuring articles, taking on admin jobs. We should temp ban him to teach him a lesson. -RAHB 09:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• For -Because there's nobody else to vote for! --Ye Olde Luke 09:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Banana. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 17:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against Nominating Rcmurphy for Noob of the Month is the equivalent of beating a dead horse. Please, just let this tired joke die already. --General Insineratehymn 17:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• For I do less than ever around here, so it's almost like I'm a noob again, right? —rc (t) 17:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • No, as you have been here longer than any of us. --General Insineratehymn 17:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• For /me continues to beat said horse. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

• comment Sorry, Rc, maybe you'll be more of a noob next month. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:06, Aug 17, 2007

• For. This should actually happen, just for the sake of it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 05:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• For.--Chrissy 00:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

• As I say every month, INELIGIBLE, DARN IT!!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • Poopy head. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:59 Aug 30, 2007

Wilhelm Ritter von Schnifflindorf (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0 german sounding names

• Nom + For. I don't know anything about this guy, except for the facts that he's new, he wrote an article, and he's not Rcmurphy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Retracting, an actual candidate appeared. Sorry Wilhelm! D: -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Official Nominations for September

The UnIdiot (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Un17diot

• Nomination He is eligible next month, but I'm laying claim to his initial nom. Yay me!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Self For I've only been here a few days too! Kansas whales forever! --- UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 03:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Fo' Shizzle. So he lives in my town, and I helped him out a bit. The idea and 99% of the writing is his. Good work, Unidiot! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:45, Sep 3, 2007
• INDEED Already seems like he's been here forever. He's adapted well to the Uncyc environment. Something that took me months to do. -RAHB 04:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For--Sir Manforman 13:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong strong strongest for, stronger than all the other Fors. Just so he could like me more than you punks. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Sure, sure...I read, I liked, I attempted to vote for him twice.--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 03:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• UnAgainst -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 03:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• Yes • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. Why the hell not? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:40, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• 'For GopherKiller Questions? Comments?
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• String For --EL LEGEND(ALL HAIL EL LEGEND, HE IS GOD, JESUS, ZEUS AND BUDDHA ROLLED INTO ONE) 18:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R,
• For Despite being a total whore. -- pocket-sized Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 21:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
• For I definitely agree with Commander Ape. — Shadyman (Talk • Contribs) 05:36, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• (...innocent whistle....) --- UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 18:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

• Don't you take that tone of whistle with me, Mister. I don't see any rules saying I can't Un-For you. Not that it would matter, you're more than 13 votes ahead of the competition... :p — Shadyman (Talk • Contribs) 23:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• For, with a witty reason why. -- The Zombiebaron 01:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. Didn't even realize the guy was a noob. Impressive stuff. Plus he recorded an audio of my article. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:12 Sep 29, 2007

Jim Dandy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +0

• Nomination. This guy is a noob. He wrote several articles. I think he likes music. Sentence fragment. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:47, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment eh.. I mean, a few chuckles, but I'm gunna hold out. Looks like definite potential though, so I'm hoping this comment will invigorate Mr. Dandy into proving his NotM worthiness. 28 days: GO! --THINKER 07:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

BobbyBobson (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

• Nomination. Also a noob. Also wrote a few articles. This guy's been around the front more though, so he gets my nomination.-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• For--Sir Manforman 15:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Oh dear This just isn't going to happen. This could will be a rare loss for an Irishman in a straight fight--BobbyBobson 00:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Stoop3881 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

• Nom - his contributions says it all--Sir Manforman 20:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

That's not even remotely amusing, not everyone know our mutual war against Blake C and his bloody army. ~ 20:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Retracting per the above, but still, this user's contributions were hilarious--Sir Manforman 21:35, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Not nearly as good as Heap's. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Your correct, but close enough--Sir Manforman 21:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

• C☭MMIE NATI☭N & F☭R, FU n00b.
• Comment - First Rcmurphy and now Mhaille?--Sir Manforman 22:15, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• For But Mhaille's not a noob is he? -- pocket-sized Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 20:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille is an ubernoob! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• For haha, ur such a n00b, Mhaille! Lulz etc. RabbiTechno 12:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Moneke (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 6

• Nom * For- This guy registered an account a month ago and has written 10+ articles, one of which is on VFH. His Worst 100 Cars of All-Time impressed me--Sir Manforman 20:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Giving this guy the nod because I fixed up and rewrote part of his unnews which is now on VFH. Not sure who I'm gunna vote for yet! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:13, Oct 1

• Comment - His article Riot is also on VFH--Sir Manforman 21:15, 1 October 2007(UTC)
• for Well it is me --Moneke 08:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Has been extremely helpful as a noob and has a few solid articles. I'm really impressed by how helpful he seems to be though! Good job! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 14:56, Oct 7
• For. I never vote on NotM. But just this once...Moneke is an excellent writer. RabbiTechno 13:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• For This guy knows how to write. Awesomely awesome. --THE 13:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
• For n00b! LOLZ... couldn't resist. --  Le Cejak • <-> 12:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Jim Groovester (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 12

• Nom+For. Was here for about 3 days when he wrote The Destiniad. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:05, Oct 1

• Comment: The fact he doesn't have any contribs for the last week prevents me from voting for him right now! Come back Jim! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:09, Oct 1

• Don't worry, he should be back. Skullthumper got me into a similar scare in August, but sure enough he's back now, ain't he? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

• August? I was July. And I still have no idea who to vote for here. Just gonna hafta wait a few weeks. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:56 Oct 02, 2007

• For! Bravo, young noob and adoptee! Now get your ass back here and keep writing! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Oh, goodness. This is a surprise. Self-for, naturally. Well, I better get my ass in gear then, huh? Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 11:28, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For His contribs show he's working on stuff now! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 20:23, Oct 3

Comment: Going to have to retract this vote, it already looks like he's going to win, and Moneke has been extremely helpful! Jim: your articles are great, keep up the work! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 14:55, Oct 7

• Five-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Dig the Destiniad was a great read. --THINKER 06:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, this guy seems to have his head screwed on right. I checked. With my big spanner. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• Support all users nominated deserve it, but Jim is the one who deserves it most--Sir Manforman 17:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• I'm torn between him and Moneke, but I'm gonna have to say For. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• It's a for. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 17:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 16:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. ~ 20:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Keep on groovin' groovester -RAHB 22:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. I don't think I've ever voted for a NotM, but...he wrote the Destiniad, you say? After this, we should help him not have this go to his head by stealing his pants and pushing him into the gym during cheerleader practice. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Doovad (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom Very nice rewrite Right arrow. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:05, Oct 1
• Comment - is he eligible next month?--Sir Manforman 21:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

• His contribs show he started the 24st of September. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:11, Oct 1
• I guess not. Not sure who to vote for--Sir Manforman 21:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

• He is eligible next month! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:44, Oct 2

• Not for next month, though. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

• Well I got confused! This is the only month he is eligible! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:20, Oct 2

• Wait, I'm not eligible next month? Damn. I better write a lot more. Jeez. Well, thanks for the nom anyways, Led Balloon. I'll be giving myself a big ol' Self-For -- Sir FS Doovad Read You got somethin to say? 00:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Loved his right arrow article, keep it up. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

St. Fenix (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• Nomination. This guy has been found doing plenty of stuff to help the site as only a wee noob, including lots of V-Week related stuff. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• self-for. thanks muchly for the nomination, I am very much in the spirit of these awards and would be interested in seeing who wins in the end. -St. Fenix (User•Talk) 14:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 dead horse

• Nomination and For DEAD HORSE TIME! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Although I'm facing another veteran this month so it'll be a hard battle. But I think I am more noobish and incompetent than Mhaille and I probably smell worse. —rc (t) 23:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For ROFLPANCAKES cobain_angel
• For. Seems like the best way to waste cast my vote. -- The Zombiebaron 01:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

GopherKiller (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom - I can't vote for as I already voted, but this guy is deserving of the nomination--Sir Manforman 01:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• 'Self-For Thanks for the nomination.--GopherKiller Questions? Comments? 01:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R, I like this n00b.

November 2007

Razorflame (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +12

• Nom + For His first articles have been a bit shaky, but he's showing improvement at a remarkable rate and acts like he really wants to be a major contributor one day. Plus, he's not Rcmurphy! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Agreed. Really seems to want to do things the right way around here. (Don't now go and prove me wrong, Razorflame!) --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 20:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Has helped me loads in my first week on here.... and he smells much better than Rcmurphy too. --GoldFishRock  contribs talk
• For - He must be the hardest working n00b since Braydie. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Mega Lazy For Meh. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 01:37, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Good with punctuation, helps with TYATU (TYATU!) and is an overall good user. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 05:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. ~ 09:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Hoping that everyone will think I'm not trying too hard to win myself (Vote MrN9000 below). MrN 02:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Yeah, I like this guy. --THE 21:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• For A good guy. Not like those bad guys. --  Le Cejak • <-> Nov 21, 14:32
• Agreed here's hoping for a nom for me next month =P ~Fag x FS
• Comment - just so you know, he hasn't had activity since the 23rd. --Æ 23:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanksgiving break, likely. He'll be back. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
    • I think he will to. A lot of people come in and out--Æ 00:00, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +3 Considered Voters (Some possibly not Rcmurphy...)

• NOM & ULTRA STRONG FOR--Sir Manforman 21:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. I'm not spending enough time here to get to know the noobier noobs.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:45, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Oprah Winfrey plz --AAA! (AAAA) 05:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Making my vote more worth while. --AAA! (AAAA) 05:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• Against. Not a noob. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron -- The Zombiebaron 20:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• For once, let's give it to him. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:19, Nov 4
• Forgainst I don't not doesn't won't not want to not give Rc not the Noob of the Month award. -RAHB 02:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Against. Not enough contributions. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Zombiebaron as per Zombiebaron. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. This is the stuff of legend. Years from now, as our progeny gather around us, we will be able to say that we voted for on Rcmurphy, the biggest n00b of us all. Amen and Hallelujah! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Against - Rcmurphy is not a n00b; he's been around longer than I have. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
• Vote. I can't believe I forgot to vote on this already. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:21, 12 Nov 2007
• INELIGIBLE yet again. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
  • STFU NOOB -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• Super sneaky spy vote. I'm sneaky. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 00:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Super nooby. Plus, he's not Rcmurphy! —rc (t) 18:01, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

God dam this voting process! Grr MrN 18:19, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

MrN9000 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 13 lords a leaping

• Nom and For. Has made a few decent articles in the short time he's been here, as well as making an effort to "learn the ropes". Also, he's not Rcmurphy. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• For Hmmm...he voted for me, so why not me vote for him?-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 02:16, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Sorry Rc, maybe you'll be more of a noob next month. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:13, Nov 17

Comment. Both Razor and MrN9000 are still legal for next month, just for you folks to know. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Comment - but whilst they're still legal its no fun. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• For. Has actually been one of the better n00bs I've seen around here- asking all sorts of questions to learn stuff about the wiki, and trying not to get in anyone's way. Reminds me of me when I was new. --Andorin Kato 03:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I remember you giving a strip show in the village square a day after you arrived. Or was it me? ~ 22:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
    • So I was a little excited. C'mon. --Andorin Kato 22:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Project Managers are the bane of my existence.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 18:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• For --EMC ^[TALK] 02:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
• For One of the more civil and reasonable users I've encountered--new or old. he's got my vote. --Sir gwax (talk) 16:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
• For - I liked The Color Problem--AE 00:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Solid noob meat - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:43, Nov 26
• for. this guy's got style. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
• Dig --THINKER 01:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
• For Civil, likable, productive, and most importantly, willing to learn. A model for all noobs. --_CUN RA ^{Talk to me} _ 03:53, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
• For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Official Nominations for December

Would You Kindly (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

• Nom & For. My Friend here is amazing, his articles are simply outstanding and very funny, please vote for him or else. Also he has a crappy userpage, so please help him fill it with NOOB of the month. GO READ HIS ARTICLES NOW! --Theskydivingoat 19:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - it's pretty late in the month to nominate, and he is eligible next month so I say we give it to him than--Æ 22:03, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - AE is right, the first week of each month is for nominations. Please remove your nomination here and vote for me instead find an appropriate candidate to vote for. Please. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 16:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
  • I think people can nominate when ever they want to guys, [1] I don't know anything about a 'first week' rule. I was nominated on the 16th last month. MrN 16:34, Dec 21
    • You can nom at any time as long as the candidate is eligible. --THINKER 16:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
      • Yah, there is no 'first week' rule. However, his chances of winning this month are slim, and since he's eligible next month, we might as well nom than. He also seems to be off to a great start--Æ 20:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
        • AE, being an interested party, I'd let it go. ~ Mordillo where is my PISS? 19:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
          • Party hard! Woo!...oh, 'interested party'...my bad. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Ggarfield (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +19 Reformed whores with nothing to do with pussies.

• Nom + For. This little noob's been writing a few articles, one of which is on VFH, and has been working on pee reviews, too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Oh damn, good nomination.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 4 @ 00:42)
  • Comment I would vote For, except that they think you can't make fun of Democrats. Hence, I had to make fun of them instead. Dreadfully sorry, old chap. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 22:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Reply: That was, in it self, a joke. You didn't think I was actually serious. I'm not even a Democrat, I'm a true Green (party-pooper). --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 21:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Cannibalism It's hard to tell if someone's being serious in that vein over the Internet. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 18:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• Good N00bing Though it's early in the month, I'm backing this horse (I mean cat) right now.. MrN 16:42, Dec 5
• For, as per something thingy. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 18:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - I'm American, and we always vote for ourselves. I'll keep up the tradition. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 00:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
• For I beleive I shall get untold riches if I vote for this nooblet User:Hippo666/sig 01:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
• Woot. Heh...more explanation needed? wot a nub. --MaddMax 01:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
• Yep. Wire tapping +++ --Stfuyou 00:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

• Semi-sockpuppet. -- The Zombiebaron 00:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

• For - This kid is just an all around good guy, and seems to have proven his worth on here so far. He also learns fast :) JustusThane 02:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

• Semi-sockpuppet. -- The Zombiebaron 00:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

• As the guy who talked him into sticking around, extreme lesbian for. —Hinoa talk.kun 02:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
• Beezlebub - Hm... I only know that from playing Starcraft... wow... what a way to learn.... YES by the way. --The Duke of Spork 00:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
• ForHe gave me a great score on Pee Review, along with some really useful advice. Pieface 05:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - As per the Semi-Sock Puppet scandal, I believe I owe everyone involved, and/or troubled by such, apologies. When I came into this, I thought a Sock-puppet was multiple accounts held by one user. I now know that having asked my friends to consider voting for me was almost sock-puppetry b/c they were not exactly "active" community members. Again, I did not mean to cheat, and hope I have not caused to much trouble. Regardless, "I did not have sex with that wom"...wait wrong speech, "cough", but no really, I wouldn't do that. And I'm not speaking about the "sex with that woman", I would so totally have done THAT. Cheers. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 04:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
• The Whoring Ends! - I appreciate anyone who liked my whoring tactics and voted for me accordingly, but THE has a point, we n00bs should have humility and integrity, and not be showing the community that we are immediately ready to take on the role of whoring for articles, awards, etc. Tis a sad thing I've done, and it ends NOW! All I will say, is please check out my articles Canadian Jesus, Wire tapping, and UnNews:News Corp. buys Uncyclomedia Foundation. Then look at the other n00b's contributions, and determine who is most worthy of your votes. I may not in fact be the best n00b, but from now on, I will try to be the most dignified.

--Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 00:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Against -- Fou-Lu 03:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Only one vote allowed: Either your For or Against. Take your pick. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• For-Your message scared me into action. I must have too many skeletons in my closet.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 15:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Tough choice, but I'm going with this guy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• For He was nice to me, he's amusing, he's apparently French. This guy's top class!--OnionHeadHat 18:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• For...I admit, he offered me beer, then an upgrade to vodka--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 06:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• Whore - You know how to beg well, young one. -- \o/ 20:15, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• 4 as per Kalir —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]  MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 20:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• # Wait, there are too many lines in that 4. Oh well, I like him anyways.--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 20:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Whopper 21:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
•  Against. He keeps on whoring too much on #uncyclopedia. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 02:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Can't vote twice Sawblade5--Æ 02:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

***Since when, look I don't see that rule in the heading. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 02:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

my Bad ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 02:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

• For Wasup.  Sunderland06  20:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• For ~ He offered me beer, like Shandon, but I demanded it be upgraded to 27 Black Tooth Grins. This better be worth it. sleepygamer _{Phencyclidine} TALK _STUFF 20:59, Dec 31

AE (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +22 often used vowels

• AE, looking over his contributions, AE has done more than just nominate me for awards. He helps with the upkeep of the site as a whole. Definitely a n00b worthy of recognition.   Le Cejak • <-> Dec 19:03, 1
• For--Æ 19:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Strives to be a great uncyclopedian, and off to a great start. Asks questions, contributes to VFD, and is actually a N00b, unlike the other guy! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:50, Dec 2
• For --General Insineratehymn 04:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, seems to be going about things the right way. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Works hard, especially on Pee Review. Also is not Rcmurphy. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• For. ~ 14:07, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• For purely 'cos i've seen alot more around of AE than I have Ggarfield. Sorry Ggarfield! ~Fag x FS
• For -- Fou-Lu 03:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• • Only one vote allowed: Either your For or Against. Take your pick. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK

03:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• • • Apology - I owe you an apology, AE, for my smear campaign. It was rather rude, and I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. However, I think it only improved your score and hurt mine. Go ahead, dance...you've earned it --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 05:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• For -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 14:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Dig --THINKER 20:20, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. thanks for rewriting Alberto Gonzalez.--MNM5150 19:49, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment thanks for the compliment. However, I'm note done with the rewrite yet, though I should be pretty soon--Æ 20:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Done now--Æ 22:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

*Agianst --NXWave 21:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

• Dammit, yeah. As much as I hate voting for a NotM (considering I never got one, is that a silly thing to be bitter over?), AE is pretty much my hero. If my lifestyle were more accepted on this website, I would french-kiss that guy. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF  22:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• Throwing in a for Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 01:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• Huge For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
• I extend my approval and extend my genitalia as well. You may only accept one, and one of them has herpes. But I'm not gonna tell you which one. It'll be a surprise. --EMC ^[TALK] 00:01, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 23:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - I've seen him out and about on Recent changes, and he's been doing a fine job of it as well (Bonner) (Talk) Dec 27, 21:35
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 23:51, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. Won me on the improvements to There. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
•  For. I swear this guys has bene around a long time. I guess not if he's only a n00b. He seems to be great here. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 01:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• For I have high hopes for him. --NXWave 19:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

UnTalented (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +6 LIBERALS!!!!!

• Nom+4 -- Well, he doesn't seem to have done anything yet, but look at his userpage! It's hilarious! Plus he's from mine and UnIdiot's town... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:08, Dec 2

So tempted to vote.... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:21, Dec 3

That userpage is so sexay...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 3) @ 01:27

• Have him write an article or two and we'll talk. --THINKER 01:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm trying to force him to, and he probably will before this week ends. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 23:49, Dec 3

UnNews:Liberal insurrection heroically crushed. So funny..... GOOD JOB UNTALENTED! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 19:42, Dec 5

Indeed, a fine starting effort. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:40, Dec 5

• 'For Great first article. But, I feel left out of Led's nomination about OUR town! GopherKiller Questions? Comments? 21:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  • D'oh! Mine, UnIdiot's, GopherKiller's, and Masterof9puppets's town. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:33, Dec 5
    • Common everyone, don't be afraid to vote for him! He's an awesome writer! </end norwellian whore> - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 03:28, Dec 8
      • But he's only written one article. It's good though, but is it enough? Maybe. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• For -- As grateful as I am for the nomination, I think I may need either a vote or a word of praise of some sort from someone who isn't from our little town if I hope to win. UnTalented 01:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Well voting for yourself is a great Noob trick dude, but I think you might need to work on your whoring skill a little, maybe take a few tips from a whoring master to get yourself more noticed if your really that bothered about winning. Your up against some some rather aggressive whores this month. MrN 21:47, Dec 10

Agreed, I'm probably going to whore for him. I'm good like that. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:15, Dec 10

Comment - Oh great, AE and I get threatened with bannation for whoring, and a KUn openly states that he's going to go do some whoring for this guy. Thanks for setting the example, but my whoring is over. Can't speak for AE. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Well there was nothing like all this nonsense back in my day I tell ya, me and Razorflame had a good clean battle. I guess we managed to whore whilst being funny. Actually I only beat Razorflame cos he got banned by his mum! Seriously, he was not allowed to log onto Uncyc cos he was spending soooo much time on here. Maybe we should plan a break in and hook him up with the net again? MrN 03:37, Dec 11

Oh come on guys. I'm not seriously whoring votes for UnTalented. And you can't really get banned for whoring, unless it gets really out of control. It just annoys people. Believe me, I was WhotM once. I'm cutting down on the whoring. We'll see how long that lasts when I get something on VFH! But seriously, I was joking. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 11:49, Dec 11

• Four. Just to make the other two candidates, who incidentally are shameless suck-ups, mad. --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA WH 02:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Ironic For. The Norwellian is the only one who didn't whore, so he gets my vote. Also, his article is great. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• For To stop the evil resurrection of ManForMan mAttlobster. (hello) 13:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: $e^{{\pi }i}$ + 3 dead horses continued to be beaten

• Nom & For. Who am I to go against tradition? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:16 Dec 01, 2007
• Kalir as per Zombiebaron. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 03:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For What a f*cking n00b ~ Kakun · talk 03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Per Kakun. I think this may be the month! —rc (t) 03:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• No --General Insineratehymn 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• No --Well this bugger did not vote for me last month. So I'm not voting for him this month. So there. MrN 04:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron as per Kalir. -- The Zombiebaron 00:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Abstain Not sure if I can vote for someone who loves to run over turtles and/or have sexual experiences with them. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 03:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
• FOR. I'm so voting for someone who loves to run over turtles and/or have sexual experiences with them. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:41, 08 Dec 2007
• Well, this is boring. Against Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Against he's nommed again?! That's really fucking annoying now. Stopnowplskthx. ~Fag x FS
• For - Someone this hot has got to be a better candidate then me. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 13:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment You, sir, are a gentlemen. I appreciate your discerning eye. —rc (t) 22:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• For I can't decide between any of the other n00bs. All of them seem to be whoring excessively, something that drives me mad. So I'm voting for RcMurphy. I remember back when n00bs had MODESTY!!! --THE 22:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment If you can find one time UnTalented whored, I'd like to see it. I whore for him! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:39, Dec 10

Comment he's from whore world. Doesn't that alone count as whoring??--Æ 22:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

I am so gonna wind up getting stalked.... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:43, Dec 10

Ya, its going to be hell when outsiders find out about "Whore World"! Whore World! The "amusement" park for you and your friends! Have fun "riding" - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:47, Dec 10

Already booked my plane ticket! Thanks for the tip-off. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 02:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

• For Who am I to go against tradition?-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 18:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

*For better than AE. --NXWave 21:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

• comment- You do realize RcMurphy isn't really a n00b? Also, even though I'm opposition, I think it would be nice to at least say why you voted against AE. If AE didn't actually do anything you don't approve of, it would be advisable to abstain as votes against hurt people's feelings. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 02:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - I'm 90% sure he's voting against me based on my opposition of Mr winkler im SORRY. He blames me for deletion as well even though I clearly didn't delete.--Æ 13:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Be proud of yourself. You're still a noob and you've already been confused for an administrator! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:05 Dec 18, 2007

And theres the fact you can't vote both for someone and against another. But that, is another tale for another time... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 22:10, Dec 18

And do you really seriously enforce that regarding RcMurphy? RcMurphy is a friggen GUN, and how can you take "joke" votes seriously? --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 00:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Against. Who am I to go against tradition? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF  22:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - please don't leave the site forever, you're a great n00b--Æ 00:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

July 2007

Ogopogo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: FOURgopogo

• Nomination and For. Sadly, you've probably never heard of Ogopogo. You probably didn't even know that he's a sysop. Even worse, you probably have never seen his username on any important pages. But that's not why I'm nominating Ogopogo. I'm nominating Ogopogo because for almost two years now, Ogopogo has tirelessly helped Uncyclopedia, through both the creation of a huge amount of articles, and through tireless adminly workings. I could link to a bunch of stuff he's done, but his userpage and contribs list speak for themselves. Oh, and he's also Canadian. -- The Zombiebaron 19:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
• Against... what the hell Zombiebaron? (still, I get to use a cool count) -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 04:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I could ask you the same question, but I'd already know the answer. Also, don't vote twice. -- The Zombiebaron 22:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I feel slighted that you did that, and I will actively wait for you to fuck up now, and when you do, I shall pounce and expose you for the little bitch you are. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• For - I rarely vote, but twice now I've almost nommed him for admin, only to realize that he's already an admin. He's like good cancer. Slowly eating away the bad parts of Uncyclopedia, without the body realizing it. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 07/2 02:44
• I haven't voted yet. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 18:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Whoa, Famine voted for this guy?! I have to vote for him! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Insineratehymn (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +9 genocides for the good of Uncyclopedia!

• Nom + For. Some of you have heard of Insinerate. In fact, most of you should have heard of Insinerate. If you've ever looked at recent changes, it's very likely that he's reverting vandalism, fixing up articles, or just plain welcoming new users. Any old user could accomplish these tasks, I guess, but the fact that Insinerate has done this for so long without official recognition made me nominate him today. Not to mention that he spearheaded the entire recent "Quoticide" campaign of purging just plain crappy quotes from pages, and is also one of the most active of all VFD frequenters. He's donated enough time and energy in his 10k edits to improving the site, and it's about damn time he should be recognized. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Self-for My hard work at deleting quotes has finally paid off. --General Insineratehymn 01:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Because I want a cookie. That, and Insinerate's a cool guy. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. I like what he's doing with the long pages on countries.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 15:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Continually working on VFD. His large number of edits speak for themselves. Slithy Tove 08:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - Good work, old chum. --AAA! (AAAA) 16:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. He is the very model of a good Uncyclopedian. Quoticide in particular has made this site a thousand times better. (Although it does seem close this month!) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Definitely For. It blew my mind when I checked his contribs and saw how much vandalism he's reverted. --Ye Olde Luke 02:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

*For I like bread. Turns out I can only vote for one. Still undecided. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

• Hard choice this month, Insiny just steals it for me. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 14:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• For This dude does lots of heavy lifting around here, plus he's cool and sucks up to me. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 18:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Strange but untrue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +7 forgotten scoretexts

• Nomination & For. Heartfelt nominations this month is it? Ok. I believe every edit she makes contributes to the betterment of uncyclopedia, be it tagging crap, saving not-so-crap, helping noobs, or just bringing general smileyness to people which is too often underappreciated. An invaluable uncyclopedian. Or is that unvaluable? Nope, definitely the first one. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:07, 01 Jul 2007
• Strong For SbU is fantastic! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:34, 01 July 2007
• For. Tough one between SbU and Insinerate, but SbU just edges it. I don't know why. –—Hv (talk) 1/07 09:28
• SbFor. ~ 19:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For - How many times has she been nommed for this? I mean she's the VFD Poopsmith. I don't know why she isn't a sysop yet. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

• I thought no-one had noticed that little covert appointment by Famine, but yes, tis true, I now shovel shit for a living. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:45, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• Oh I noticed it too, there was a time I had a lot of ppl's userpages in my watchlist, but the flood of bold blue links daily started to drive me nuts! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:09, 03 July 2007

• Dig the housekeeping skills of a good woman, and funny too! ;) --THINKER 01:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - Very tough choice this month. Too many good candidates. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

*For Because I said so. Turns out I can only vote for one. Still undecided. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Ceridwyn (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +14 Vows of Non-Self-Effacing

• Nom+For. one of my favourite peeps, even though she buggered off IRC :(... and she's definitely above Strange but untrue in the beauty pageant, sorry SBU. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 04:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Awww :) I've just been busy, I've been popping into IRC again lately ;P <3 Oli. However I disagree with the latter comment, SbU is lovely! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:00, 01 July 2007

It's all about the pink, I think! He'll be cosying up to Modus below in a minute.  :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• For. She is, literally, the bee's knees. All six of them. Plus there's still that whole Proofreading Service, which she invented. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

<3 MO too, for your adorability ;) Here's me thinking you'd forgotten :P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:00, 01 July 2007

• For, if only to fulfill my vow of Yestermonth.--<<>> 05:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Because she deserved it last month, and deserves it this month too. -RAHB 09:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comments of a verbose nature moved to talkpage
• For an all around good egg in my book. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 20:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Yes. She works hard. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:54, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 02:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• For As promised in the comments of verbose nature! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• An acceptional human being. We've had our differences in the past. Like arguing over American television, which we all know is superior to all other television. Especially New Zealand television. But we both like Flight of the Conchords. Oh, and she helps clean up Uncyclopedia and all that other good stuff. Big for. --EMC ^[TALK] 18:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Nom nom nomed :) -- Xenophage 22:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R, Hotness. 10:57, 11 July 2007

Luckilly for you, she didn't see that QDB quote. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

• Gratuitous Anzac for (now I've offended people in twelve official languages...)--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 07:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Sir Manforman 18:17, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Strange but untrue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11 but untrue

• Nom + For - It's about time too. I'm sure she'll do a great job as an admin. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Forget nomming me, vote SbU! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For Deserved it last month, definately deserves it now! Go go Sbu!!!!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:13, 01 August 2007
• For Slithy Tove 05:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Friendly, helpful, handy, useful. All characteristics that will be detrimental now that she's an admin. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Fooor. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:08, 02 Aug 2007
• Dig Big, bold, sassy and brassy. Like Mary Tyler Moore without the horse teeth (I hope) ;) --THINKER 04:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Very much for. Deserved last month AND the one before that. GIVE ME SBU OR GIVE ME BORSCHT! ~ 10:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• For - No abuses of power so far, except for joke bans. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 19:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R,

Insineratehymn (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +15 death metal breads

• Nom + For. With MadMax now an admin, Insineratehymn is by far the most efficient non-sysop out there. All my reasons for nomming last month stand. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

• By far the most efficient? That's an insult to yourself, not to mention about 10 other non-sysops I can think of. If what you said is true, I think he would have received more votes on VFS. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Maybe by far is pretty strong wording, but he still is one hell of an efficient guy. His 13,000 edits speak for themselves. As for VFS, that was mostly due to him being nommed late and... well, getting into fisticuffs with another Uncyclopedian. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• That and asking to be nommed... :P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:36, 02 August 2007

Goddamn I hated that flameawr. But it was my first time firefighting. :D --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• For --General Insineratehymn 13:14, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• 4 -RAHB 20:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong for -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For - Go bread boy. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• 4, because he probably would've been opped as well if he knew to keep his mouth shut pre-VFS. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• For -He's cleaned up Uncyclopedia too much to not be awarded this. --YeOldeLuke 09:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• For Yep, cleaning up and so... good job-- Lambic HarkHark! 18:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Every time I go on VFD there's more evidence of his hard work to improve the place. That, and the random fact that he welcomed me. It was close for me though, SBU is also very deserving. --Under user 10:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• For--Chrissy 19:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Eh, why not? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:34, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. he maneuvers around uncyclopedia like a chicken with its head cut off. also, the chicken has a jet pack. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 12:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• I normally prefer soda bread, but Insineratehymm is such a hard worker, and tasty to boot. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 14:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
• For --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 01:23, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
• For I reserve the right to rescind my vote if he doesn't do more UnNews audios. this guy's great. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 01:42, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Both deserving though, IMO. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 11:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Strange but untrue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +20 but untrue

• Nom and for. She deserved it last month, and the month before that. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:18, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For, dagnabit. Adminhood has soured her once rosy demeanor and snuffed that spark behind her eyes. She's dead inside, now. I saw her stealing candy from a baby. Well, I was dressed up as a baby. She's strong. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:27, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:50 Sep 01, 2007
• Yes. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:00, Sep 1, 2007
• For How can I say no? -RAHB 05:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For as many votes for Sbu as possible in the first day. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• ...and the one before that and the one before that...~ 12:07, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For Slithy Tove 02:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For as per the last two months. Just let the girl win already dagnammit. What Han said. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:41, 02 September 2007
• Dig Seriously people, lets have this be the last month of queue for this helpful and humorous female. This about how many helpful AND humorous females you know... ... ...Exactly. --THINKER 07:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• For She's always been cool. Now she's an admin. This is natural, as all admins are cool and sexy, and she is a woman on teh intarwebs, which automatically makes her both. My logic is flawless.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• I demand some of whatever it is you're taking. ~ 09:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

• /me hands some allergy medication to Mordillo. Take this Allegra twice a day until your sneezing, wheezing, and coughing symptoms are virtually nonexistent. Side effects may include bloating, cramps, oily stool, perpetual catatonia, and in the case of a serious but not-as-rare-as-one-would-hope side-effect, death.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:32, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

• For. MadMax 04:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 04:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. Because it must happen. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For--Sir Manforman 13:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For--El legend 15:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
• For - How many times have we done this? --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Thanks once again peeps - although I don't know how I managed to get 16 votes for Uncyclopedian of the Month while having made absolutely no edits so far this month! (You can blame the strange and wonderful world of particle physics summer school for that.) Time for some catching up today, methinks. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• For. One of our smartest moves this year was opping her. A cornerstone of the site. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R, Cause she works hard. Just like me.
• For --YeOldeLuke 04:48, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
• For, Cause she works hard. Just like me. -- The Zombiebaron 01:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• For, Very funny editor (ps editor is pronounced 'Throat Wobbler Mangrove.'") --MacMad 12:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

High Gen. Grue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 1

• Nomination I can't rightly vote for him, as I've voted above, as you can see above. However, he's pretty good, and I feel like he should at least know that I know that he is so hooray run-on sentences.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Even though he's got a snowball's chance of success at this rate. ~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  3/09/2007 @ 03:57
• Comment Next month, this award has his name written all over it, which is something he would probably actually do. -RAHB 09:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, vote SbU. No, seriously. But still, I was nommed? ??? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Indeed you were.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Nope, it was all a lie. LIES! CONSPIRACY! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:19, Sep 7, 2007

October 2007

Thekillerfroggy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +12

• For - Per what I said on VFS last month. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Per what I said in my head last month. I says "That TKF is something else." Then I decided I was going to nominate him for UotM. Then I forgot, and that damn Aussie Cs1987 (in a shocking turn of humility) nominated him. Long story short, TKF is one of the most useful members of the site, bar none. It's a crime if he doesn't win this award.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• Hard worker (and it says a lot that I'm voting for him ahead of Cs1987) and my tip for one of the site's next Admins. Very For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• F☭R, I'd have to agree with Mhaille. He's as good a user as Madmax... well, close enough.
• 4 P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:09, Oct 5
• Four I nomed him for sysop last month, and would again this month if the voting wasn't every other month. He does great work for this site.--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 04:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• 7, I mean..... FOR - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 20:27, Oct 9
• For --YeOldeLuke 04:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• f|o|r -EMC ^[TALK] 13:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• I have never seen someone put articles on QVFD that fast. ~ 11:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
• For :-) --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 15:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Dig Helluva guy, great Uncyclopedian, and a damn good lay (if I remember correctly) --THINKER 14:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Cs1987 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11987

• Nom + For - Per what happened on VFS last month. Most people tend to grow lazy as they help out a lot, but he's never slowed down over the many months he's been contributing to this site. It's only a shame he hasn't gotten this sooner. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• For I've been persuaded. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃ 18:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For He's been doing a lot of damn good stuff around here (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 4, 15:06
• Support--Sir Manforman 22:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, he always seems to be on the case. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
• For, he works wonders with VFD. -- The Zombiebaron 23:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
• Strong for Cs1987 is AWESOME! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:18, 10 October 2007
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 12:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
• For He's best out of these named. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Super Strong Fore Has this guy won the award yet? --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 05:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Would it make sense to be nommed again if he already did? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment What'll happen if there's a tie? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • We both get the award. It wouldn't be the first time. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
• For He's like a l'il Braydie. Aww. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

High Gen. Grue (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: NegativeoneSolo

• NMFR! I CaN HAZ NUmma-NashuN!? -RAHB 18:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 23:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• HUFF! HUFF!!!!! - Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 22:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST! WHAT THE HELL?! --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 23:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Fuck you Trar. DA, not so much. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

• Against. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:38 Oct 05, 2007
  • Voting against someone who already had score 0 when two people are tied at 5? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Yessir, TKF. Your observational skills are working properly. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:48 Oct 05, 2007
      • Interesting, to say the least. To each his own. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
        • Sometimes I'm just a mystery wrapped inside an enigma wrapped inside a taco shell smothered in a bit of hopeless metaphors. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 22:51 Oct 05, 2007
• Against All the cool people are voting against HanSolo, so I guess I will too.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:23, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Isn't that a little counterintuitive? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Surprise For! -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
• Please, don't turn this page in to another UGotM page. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:32, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I dunno. It's only a G off. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:33 Oct 06, 2007

APATHY! (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: one wasted vote

• For I was told to vote for someone by CS1987, just he didn't care who I voted for, So I spoilt my vote.--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 15:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 5 users down this sort of thing

• Nom & For - Under user has accepted multiple requests at UN:PIC, which users rarely do these days. He is also a big asset to Pee Review. He contributes nicely to VFD, QVFD and Ban Patrol. Under user rewrote a bunch of crap articles instead of sending them to VFD, props to him! --Sir Manforman 21:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Yes please --EMC ^[TALK] 21:10, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. What a great guy. Definitely an asset to the site. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:48, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• FOR - down with this sort of thing! --thematrixeætsyou, the karate black belt (talk) (flames) 06:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• for - helpful and prompt, the two things i look for in a lover uncyclopedian. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Cs1987 (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +11987

• Nom + For. Well, obviously... he's Cs1987. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Very much a staple of the community --  Le Cejak • <-> 21:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Per last month. He deserves this. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 22:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For, though I'm going with RDB next month. --YeOldeLuke 04:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 00:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• For After serious contemplation.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
• Dig --THINKER 00:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For CS works tirelessy doing the thankless jobs and he definately deserves some thanks, its long overdue! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:41, 18 November 2007
• FOR -RAHB 06:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. ~ 23:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. -Well it looks like Cs has got it this month, so my vote will not make too much difference, but this guy has been by far the most noticeable in the eyes of this N00b. MrN 01:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Nomination. This guy's done a lot of work for a mere user, but my vote goes to last month's runner up. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Deserves some recognition for being so helpful in purging crap. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:06, Nov 1
• For - Wow, I was about to make a comment, then I realised it was almost exactly the same as what TLB said. So, yeah, for per TLB. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:53, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Skullthumper (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• Nomination. This guy's done a lot of work and been very helpful for a mere user, but my vote goes to last month's runner up. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• For. Wow, that's messed up, this guy is nominated and doesn't even have any votes? sad. sad. :(. I'm new here, so I will just vote for him. Rock on Dr. Skullthumper (even though you reverted some of my edits.... :( thas kinda lame.... ) – Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitarplayer001 (talk • contribs)
  • Well, thanks, but I don't consider it sad. Fact is, the others nominated here have been here a lot longer than I have, and deserve the award now. Maybe if I stick around I'll get it later, but it's all just a matter of time and how long I've been here versus the others. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:48 Nov 18, 2007
    • Er, point of order, unless you mean users that deserve to win this month, then I am more n00b-licious than you! However, Cs1987, RDB, yourself and many others deserve this a long time before I get anywhere near it! I was kinda embarassed to be nommed, tbh. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
      • Blah, blah, technicalities. Technicalities make my brain hurt. Go wear a stygium ring at noon. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 19:10 Nov 25, 2007
• Strong For This guy's cool. First one to greet me after I came back. That's way cool. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF  22:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Official Nominations for December

Mhaille (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: Twoaille

• Alright, so I'm sure you're all just bleeding to know why on earth I'd nom Mhaille of all people. Sure, it seems that he won this award back in March 2006. That was well over a year ago. And he hasn't stopped. Mhaille has never stopped. Despite many dubious "images", this manbeast has shined on like some kind of crazy diamond, and I feel that this nomination, short of telling him how wonderful he is, is probably the best way to say "Hey you sack-of-crap! THANKS! KEEP IT UP!" -- The Zombiebaron 03:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
• SHIIIIIIINE OOOOOOOON YOU CRAAAAAAAAAAAAZY DIIIIIIAMOOOOOOOOOOND! -RAHB 23:48, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Under user (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 2

• Nom + For as per last month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• 1/2 vote for YOU   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 3) @ 01:17 Okay, I'll vote for Skull since UU said to on his userpage, and I have to do whatever he says.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 3 @ 15:11)
• I did not! --UU 05:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Man, don't confuse me! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
• Why not? --EMC ^[TALK] 00:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Skullthumper (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: 20 skull thumpers

• Nom as per last month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• For   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 3 @ 15:11)
• Yes. He thumped my skull and cured my brain cancer. On a side note, I had brain cancer a while ago. Ж Kalir _{hippies! yay!} 03:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. OK, reasons to vote Skullthumper: 1. Does more stuff than that other bloke above; 2. Is a harder worker for the good of the site than that other bloke above; 3. That other bloke above hasn't been very active recently. 4. Vote Skullthumper, dammit! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For --Æ 21:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Ouch! My skull! It's been thumped! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:42, Dec 3
• F☭R,
• For UU said it on his page? Fine, but only cos I'm voting for him next month lol ^^ Nothing personal Skullthumper, I hope ywl understand that I haven't really seen much of yew as I have of UU ~Fag x FS
  • Heck yeah. I come on in small but rather powerful bursts, whereas Under user is a constant presence. Personally I'm looking forward to him winning next month... – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:43 Dec 11, 2007
• For --THE 21:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• For -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Dig --THINKER 03:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• For - Keep up the good work, but make more glorious attempts improve UNSOC, Minor. Now look busy! --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 18:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• For --YeOldeLuke 22:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
• Skullthumper is no asshat. He's my best friend. I love him. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF  01:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
• DrSkullFuckThumper- fuck... I mean... For :D sleepygamer _{Phencyclidine} TALK _STUFF
• For Why not. Was passing anyway... MrN 00:21, Dec 27 03:52, Dec 23
• For per his increased activity this month. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• DrSkullhumper - or For --AAA! (AAAA) 23:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• I haven't voted yet? I guess that's fixed. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 18:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
• I haven't voted twice yet? I guess that's fixed.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 29) 14:41
• Cajek made me do it. ~ Mordillo where is my PISS? 15:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Indeed - He's a damn hard worker :) (Bonner) (Talk) Dec 29, 15:34
• For - No seriously, he's very formal. --NXWave 20:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)