User talk:Strange but untrue

Archived at: 1

Welcome!

Hello, Strange but untrue, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Again, welcome!  17:18, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

TPDNE

Yes... I created it, and I edited the site javascript so it behaves EXACTLY as if it doesn't exist, right down to red links if you link to it like this so shutup whining -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Cruft

I'll move them all to your userspace, then you can decide what you want to do with them. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 17:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Archive

I archived your talk page from 11/12/06 to 5/18/07, leaving what I saw as active conversations still intact. This archive can be found here. Sorry if this isn't what you wanted, leave me a message flaming me if you want. I'll restore it for you free of charge.

That's cool, I guess. It did need doing. I wouldn't go round doing that to just anyone though - some people get kinda iffy about their userspaces. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I know, I did it for you with a 200% money-back guarantee (ie: I would've given you a free foot massage coupon too), only because I was almost positive that you weren't a dick and also because it seemed as if you were indeed being distracted by shiny things. Which I totally understand, I mean- SHINY! LOOK AT THE SHINY!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Zaphod!

Thanks for the DYK spelling. That's the problem with reading the Hebrew translation (which is excellent I have to say) more times than the original....:) ~ 07:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Broken Redirect

I appreciate you fixing my redirect page. You're right, without being linked to the original page, it's not that funny. However, technically it's not really a redirect anymore. After Olipro messed up This page does not exist, Olipro had to change it so it still looked like a broken redirect with actually redirecting to the page he created. You think I should revert it back? ---- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

I kind of do, actually (now the page has ceased to exist again) - despite the whole "appearing on broken redirects page" thing I was quite sorry to see it go. Then again, if it does go back on there it'll be running the gauntlet against certain admins who might get more annoyed about it than me... so I'll leave it up to you! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it's one of those that you just have to have, and I think most admins wouldn't delete it. Like, say, for example, if someone created an article that contains nothing but a full stop. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:58, 26 May 2007

Now why would anyone create anything as pointlessly short as that, eh? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

LORD FLUFFY

Was the quote on the lolcarps forum topic from "Hopscotch"? If not, please give me another hint on my userpage. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 22:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

thanks

"mArks for restraint" never got that before. not my thing--FREDD 03:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Forum:Lolcarps

The quote is from Catch-22, isn't it? –—Hv (talk) 30/05 14:08

Oui, mais ou est les Neigedens d'antan? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Poopsmith!

Since you just voted on 10/16 articles on VFD, I hereby designate you a poopsmith. While I may not understand/agree with your voting, you obviously spend a great deal of time looking at VFD. Thus, you hereby gain the title Poopsmith, with all the rights and responsibilities commensurate with the title. Those rights and responsibilities are limited to:

1. Adding Poopsmith to any signature you might make upon this site, or in any legal document or fan signature.
2. Removing deleted articles from VFD and moving the entire discussion to the appropriate archive page, with the edit summary of "Poopsmithing" on each page.

Congratulations! If, for some reason, you decline this appointment, you may elect to never do any of the above. If that is the case, this appointment will be declared null and void after a period of 1 (one) week of complete inactivity on your part. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 05/31 21:42

I find this rather hilariously ironic, since I was one of those who voted to delete the poopsmith template on the grounds that it would never be used. Which is not to say I won't take the job seriously - I've been rather close to just going ahead doing such chores anyway, but it's nice to get the go-ahead officially. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

You and you alone. That's what you get for constantly turning up underfoot. Keep your head down, and stuff like this won't get dropped on you. I warn you - it just gets worse and worse. Responsibility is a terrible thing. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 05/31 22:19

Tell me about it - just when I'd managed to escape a lot of the stuff in real life, I went and discovered Uncyc... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Grue killer

Please be patient i am at a college orientation for today and was at it yesterday and the day before i will try to move everything by tonight they don't let us use computers so i have been sneaking for example i used the computer in the sports room i am moving stuff under the name of austinsucks --  User:Java7837 (contributions) (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey, it's not me you need to convince - Famine's the one with the superpowers. Ah, but I see the situation has been resolved anyway by UF and others. Just please don't try to put it into the mainspace again before checking on the Village Dump that we think it's been massively improved. And I'd recommend not wasting any time trying to make it so... Write it off as a sunk cost. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Cookie

Kip the Dip has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Vacation

This user went on vacation, sabbatical, administrative leave, or was otherwise goofing off without the knowledge and/or consent of the Admins. However, they forgot to put this template on their page at the time, thus making it a bit pointless to be placing it now. If you're lonely, or you miss them, then they are back, so you're a bit late. But you can still leave a message saying how much you missed them while they were away, with the added bonus that they'll be able to quickly reply to it, what with being back from vacation and all. No? Never mind then.

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Beer!

Beer! For impressing me greatly with Bunglebrot! 'Bout the best thing I've seen on here in ages! Rabbi Techno

Tis not actually of my own creating, although funnily enough I can't find who it's by on the interweb, so maybe I ought to just claim it! Very odd stuff though. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:08, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Javascript

The reason I never got the Javascript thing is becaue I thought you could disable the {{USERNAME}} template and I never wanted that to be disabled. I copy and pasted the text in your Javascript and previewed it, it looked very wierd and I when I saved it, It didn't change anything. Can you help me a bit more? --Sir Manforman 00:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah - you kind of have to tailor these things to your own browser a bit - copying and pasting someone else's javascript is fraught with problems if you can't work out for yourself what each bit means. I'm going to bed in a moment, but tomorrow I'll maybe have a go at creating a script that will put up just those buttons. What browser are you using, by the way? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Didn't mean to increase the VFD number over 15. It's actually quite unlike me to not read those things... won't happen again! Mightywayne 14:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

It's alright really (and we're down under 15 again now) - if someone less understanding than me happens to give you a day's ban don't take it personal - it's just the most effective way to get it through to n00bs! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:47, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Seven Sisters Falls

Saw you put a NRV on this page. I messed up and forgot to add the Under Construction tag and have done so now. It's part of a series of linked towns that I'm working on.The humour definitely helps if you have some prior knowledge, but I think if you know anything about small towns or have any preconcieved notions about small towns there should be some redeeming value.

Prior to beginning this project I did find a few similar pages where towns or provinces were spoofed. This lead me to believe that mine was a suitable endeavour. Am I wrong? Any constructive feedback is appreciated.

Roadrunner3

Hmmm... I guess small town articles aren't forbidden or anything - the problem is that it's incredibly difficult to make them truly funny for a wide audience. Add to that the fact that many, many people have tried (so many people here are automatically prejudiced against such things) and you end up with quite a challenge! As for the other examples you've found, they may just be things that have slipped past the radar or were created in older, laxer days - if they're rubbish, put them on VFD. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

C is for..

User:The Thinker has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Because this made me laugh unexpectedly. :) --THINKER 08:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Ping! (That means thank you.) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Research

Cheers! Thanks for your help. --Sutton4019 17:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your complete survey. Sutton4019 13:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

DYK

I was merging my version of June 8th with the most recent one. ie. the one with all the crap taken out and the one with the latest additions. I'm pretty sure I did that. You know it would be a really good idea for you to just ask me what I was doing on my talk page rather than instantly reverting a lot of work. --Kelpan 10:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but as far as I could see you just reverted a load of Zork L's hard work (and he's officially in charge of it, after all). Plus the fact that Codeine reverted you the last time you tried to do anything to DYK... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

See here under DYK. If you look more closely you'll see that I've actually spent a large amount of time taking out poor DYKs. In merging the two versions I put in all the ones which had been added since I made the changes originally (which were reverted) but regrettably had not been able to redo all the minor changes made by L to existing ones yet. I was actually about to do that but found all my work to have been reverted again. Can I ask you to undo your revert yourself since if I do it then the next person to come along will just assume I'm in an edit war with you guys and revert it all again. Thanks. --Kelpan 14:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... I'm still not convinced. I'd probably leave in at least half the ones you took out - some are pretty funny. I'd leave it to Zork L, who does these things occasionally, or at very least talk to him before playing around with his baby! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:56, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Fine, whatever. --Kelpan 14:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I know you put a lot into it, I'm just trying to do the right thing.  :-( -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey

hi saw your thing in village dump, i posted a topic to, yous hould check it out,sometime

Template:ut

I need to automatically load Template: in front of the variable please help--Saturn1 02:19, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Apology

I apologize, I think move once not twice the article. The mistake would be mine. I revert to history before save under the new name. I don’t know a thing for category and will not allow my self to redirect page twice--Seraphita 19:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure I know what you're saying exactly. If you mean that you didn't mean to move the article back then apology accepted. I shall move it back. Otherwise, I shall move it back anyway, because it'll get deleted if it stays where it is. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Ou peut-etre j'essayerai mon Français mauvais, si vous pouvez le comprendre? Les articles qui sont en les langues different, il faut les appeller avec le prefixe "Babel:" et la nom de la langue. Pour le Bulgare, c'est: "Babel:Bg/". C'est une convention pour séparer les langues, et pour essayer de ne confondre pas les admins qui ne parlent pas cette langues! D'accord? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

After slow thinking about, you may be right, sorry for my voluntarism.--Seraphita 21:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Yikes! Cyber-Stalkers (re: Vern page)

Thanks again for your help on getting this post flagged. I'll be honest, I'd never heard of this site before happening upon a link to that entry, so I wasn't immediately sure how to rid the world of it. (It is more than a little creepy to discover a made-up biography about your dad that alleges he is some kind of pedophile, no?) I am about 95% sure the kids who created it are going to try to put something else up, so if there is some way to keep an eye on what they're posting that would be fannnntastic. I believe this all started when my dad was asked to be a moderator of sorts for some ESPN message board, and he ended up having to repeatedly ban these users for inappropriate photos/content (shocking, right? they seem like such nice kids!). Unfortunately he's not quite as cyber-savvy as he should be, and used the same handle for ESPN, Photobucket, MySpace, etc. Whoopsie.  :)

--The One In The Blue Shirt :) 11:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

That's quite all right. Unfortunately, I was an idiot and forgot to get those IP addresses before the page got deleted today, so I can't watch them. But I'll keep an eye on the space where the page was at least. I suspect they'll get bored before long and go off to some site where that sort of hate stuff is allowed. It is creepy, but we're far too used to finding that sort of thing on here; we've even got a name for it: slandanity (a cross between slander and vanity, where vanity pages are ones about people or things we've never heard of). I expect Wikipedia have it similar. Anyway, feel free to stick around and get some more positive experiences of the site - we've got a lot of stuff that actually is funny too! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Though not through official means, you actually did help to get the page deleted - I only saw it when it appeared on the list of short pages after you'd blanked most of the content!

Hey, that's all right about the IP addresses -- it's just a couple of teenage boys whose favorite past time is to harass complete strangers online, so they were probably going through a proxy anyhow. Besides ... I am relatively sure they have the collective attention span of a goldfish, so they will probably find a new victim soon enough.  :) And in the meantime I will definitely check out the site ... the whole premise of it sounds hilarious and I've always harbored a secret desire to be an editor.  :) --The One In The Blue Shirt :) 14:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Quite honestly, Vern is NOT a nice guy. He harasses any and all ESPN posters that don't worship Lebron James. He also harasses any and all ESPN posters that don't hold his political views. And when I mean harass, he calls other posters names and will report them as soon as he's riled them up enough to defend themselves. I have no idea about his children...or whoever wrote the above. I'm sure THEY think he's a great guy. And I'm sure his kids are nice people. But to non family members, Vern is a vicious, venomous guy. The following is a prime example http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?t=323776 . I'm no soccer fan. But to seek out soccer fans that actually remember having problems with this guy, only to harass them more? This is a grown man with grown children apparently. Very simply, Google Erievern and do some research. People across the internet complaining about this guy. Wherever he goes he creates enemies. To his kids; I'm sure you're very nice. But you must realize, your Father is not the nicest of people. He seems to be having trouble letting go of his HS sports career (at 50 something) and he likes to insult and alienate people across the internet. I just felt that both sides of the story needed to be told.

Poopsmithery

Hey SbU. Since you're a respectable poop smith, what do you think about creating a list somewhere on your userspace of "next-in-line-vfd-designated-poop". When I encounter VFD I almost never get the chance to post it, since it's always crowded and guarded by Zombies. So, possibly creating a waiting line? What do you think? ~ 17:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... interesting thought. Off the top of my head, it seems like such a scheme might get so backed up that no-one would ever get to put anything straight onto VFD ever again. I don't know if you've seen some of the pages where our regulars keep their own waiting lists, but there are usually enough on those to fill VFD 10 times over or more.

I don't know - I'll have a think about how it might be possible though, because we should indeed try to let the non-regulars in a bit more than we do. Meanwhile if you want to report anything yourself just leave it on here and I'll add it to my own list of things to VFD. Although I don't guarantee speed-deletion, because I come up against the same problem as you a lot of the time! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

hmmmm....I think we should try and improve the VFD system somehow, but I haven't a clue how to approach that....did you give it any thought? ~ 18:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry - too busy playing with Dynamic Page Lists right now (oh, and eating, at some point, that would be a plan). The more cruft I can stop coming in in the first place the less has to be dealt with later. Have a patience-flavoured icecream while you wait.  :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hmmmm....icecream.....:) I had a pretty nasty crash with my bicycle last night, so an ice pack would work as well.....~ 09:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Ooh dear, hope you're okay - I still have the scars from the last time that happened to me. Admittedly it was my own fault for trying to jump off at too high a speed, and gracefully skidding to a halt on my hands, but it still wasn't nice.

Anyway, after seeing someone on the VFD talk page complaining of this very thing, I think there's definitely a need to do something. (Not that I don't trust your word alone, m'dear!) I think perhaps if I implement this for non-VFD regulars only, and make it just a list somewhat like QVFD that I can patrol to separate the rubbish from the "just not to certain people's tastes", it might just work. I'll get to work on setting up a trial version soon. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Great. Hope you get the +S btw! :) ~ 10:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Ooh, I hadn't even noticed we'd moved on to general voting. Coolness. Fingers crossed, then. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

THE POWER!!

Grrr. Spang beat me at nomming you for Sysop. For a long time, I thought you would make an excelent sysop. Good luck at VFS, and have fun on IRC. Actually, when I moved in here, I thought you were a Op (then I checked Special:Listadmins). --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 15:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I hope that when you become royalty you don't forget about us peasant users. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

It's not exactly a foregone conclusion yet guys! I kind of have to hope they decide to op more than one person really... and that it's me! So put those bribes away for now, eh?-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:39, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Zombiebaron and Spang were discussing Opping two users this month, and if not this month, August will come. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot, Being nommed for Sysop by an admin promotes you Captain Strange but untrue! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Really? Hmm, who nommed me last time? Ah yes, 'twas Cs. I was going to say, it would have been funny if I'd already been a captain for months and not known about it. Although I'm not so bothered about ranks really, I'd just appreciate the extra tools. (All the praise I'm getting right now is also nice though, I won't deny!) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, the point is that you can promote anyone to the rank of First Lieutenant. BTW here is your template. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 16:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[{{{link}}} {{{image}}}] {{{heading}}}

Thankee - I shall... well, probably not wear it - it might give off the wrong impression since I'm not too keen on encouraging the military. But I shall put it in my box of shiny things, anyway. Meanwhile, if you want meaningless promotions, I suggest HGG!  :-) I think I'm more of an award-templatey kind of girl. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Just managed to read this. I think he told you that so you'd promote him to First Lieutenant.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Templasexual

You had to coin the term, so I had to write the artcile. Templasexual 01:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Heehee - I love how throw-away lines can turn into whole articles on Uncyc! Disturbing but funny - I won't say it excites me in case anyone hears and writes Templasexualsexual... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

In case anyone happens to wonder

This user is on vacation, sabbatical, administrative leave, or is otherwise goofing off with the knowledge and/or consent of the Admins. Or, more likely, they've buggered off without saying boo to anyone. Their expected return date is Monday evening. If you're lonely, or you miss them, leave a message.

I care! I care! ~ 20:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm scared! I'm scared! Also: I'm back! I'm back! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

She's scared of your Shuriken Star of David.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Nah, she's just trying to get over the hang over and that spinning blob makes it difficult! ~ 06:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Poopsmith

You are an excellent candidate for sysop. I have voted for you and sincerely believe that you will make it this month. As such, your job as Poopsmith will be vacant, and I would like to volunteer to fill its position.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Again, I shall say "don't count your chickens before they're eaten". I was wondering about this the other day, though. If I'm opped, I think I'll see how much poopsmithery I can still be bothered to do before thinking about a new incumbent. Also I'm reluctant to let go of/rename the lounge so soon after its creation, but again, we'll see. I have to confess I'm slightly disappointed that you went against the general rule of Uncyclopedia promotions by asking for it, but I'll not hold it against you if and when it comes to decision time. Rest assured, you would have been in my list of people to think about anyway. :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't aware that poopsmithery was a promotion in itself anyway. I thought I was helping out. Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, you know what I mean. It's extra responsibility and suchlike, which kind of makes it a promotion even if it doesn't come with fancy titles. I'm not that disappointed in you - it's not like it's adminship which everyone knows you don't ask for! This mainly might serve as a warning that I won't appreciate being asked by a million other people! As Famine did to me, I shall choose someone whether or not they've volunteered to do it. Umm, you know, if I need to. (There I go counting those chickens again. Squawk.) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Poopsmith's Lounge

This is perfect for people who won't get off their asses to wait to put an article on VFD. Damn lazy people. Hey! You're a lazy idiot! That I am, concience. Anyway, I see this Lounge to be helpful.

High Gen. Grue has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

--Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 18:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Awards from Capercorn

The Capercorn Award Capercorn Gives you much thankings for giving Capercorn Great Success! Congrats! Awarded for creating the Poopsmith's Lounge.

I award you an award award! Capercorn awards you the award award for giving them an award!

Thanks for the Award Award. For that, you get one too. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 20:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

--The white lodge 16:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)The White Lodge Ok, im a noob and i probably have just written where i wasnt supposed to but i couldnt finda usertalk page for you. Anyway, I need to ask if it is possible if you can remove the vanity page 7 day huff from the page on William Hulme's grammer school. Its a page thats still under construction, i know its not a laugh a minute, but i hope to improve it. I also read the vanity page and there is a section which says that a page has to apply to 2 of those things and the page on william hulme grammer school does. It does have a page on wikipedia and it does get a decent amount of hits on goodle, predominantly in the news. if you still disagree, then tell me and i will correct the vanity parts where ever possible

--The white lodge 16:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)The white lodge 9:59 Indian time saturday, 11 August

Rutger Hauer

I revised it some more. It's still small, but at least it's not the one-trick pony that it was last week. Spikebrennan 21:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Ooh dear - sorry, from the point of view of an Uncyclopedian that's actually worse. We tend to prefer text in proper paragraphs rather than lists, and we're not that fond of quotes despite what the rest of the site would have you believe. I think you've picked a difficult article to make really - people who are not internationally known are very difficult to parody successfully. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I guess a dry sense of humor isn't what people are looking for around here. I should have put in more four-letter words and masturbation jokes-- that way the article would have been more consistent with the rest of the crap I've been seeing around here. (I'm not ranting at you, I'm just ranting in general.) I'm a little surprised that you think Rutger Hauer isn't internationally known. Spikebrennan 19:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

.

User:Clown Time's user page was put up for your lounge. Since it was the author's request, I added a comment that that was not the proper place for the user page to be, but it was supposed to be at QVFD. Can you strike that nomination out?--Sir Manforman 22:17, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Done. I appreciate we're bound to get a bit of accidental QVFD traffic on there, and any help in weeding it out is appreciated. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Why did you put my article on the vfd

As my article was on the vfd before and deleted but i got bradey helped me out by undeleting it and placing it in User:Richardson j/Alfred kahn and after 3 or 4 month i thought it was time to move it to alfred Kahn and you put that notice up on it . and is there anything that can be done about it . And i be talking to Braydie about it as well as i trust him even if the first meeting with him was because he blocked me once .Richardson j 00:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure there is much that can be done with this one, Richardson. The very first line rings alarm bells: "Alfred Khan is somebody who hates Japanese." This is just an accusation, and therefore doesn't make us laugh even if it's not true. The rape and suicide are not funny, just like they aren't generally funny when they happen for real. And as the random tag hints, a bunch of rather unconnected fictions isn't going to be all that funny - you need to tell a real story, probably one that closely parallels his real life. Your untruths should be more subtle, so that it takes just a tiny bit of brain power to work out that they are untrue. And again they should probably be connected to real life in some way. And then there's the barrier of grammar - you really need to sort that out, because it distracts from the article if we can't read it easily. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you so much for saving the broken redirect. (I didn't know you cared so much!) At this point I had given up on it and decided to let it stay huffed. But after reading the VFD discussion, I found out that people actually liked it. So, thank you so very much. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Yes, it's a bit of a mystery to me why I've done so much championing the cause of a page with just one red link on it! But you know, I think it's a joke that has to be done, and now we've finally got it protected all has ended well. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Pic

If you do this in a higher resolution, with Bush's brightnest/contrast matching the background, I think it's featurable. The current version is on VFP right now, and some of the complaints are related to the execution, rather than the idea. Of course, what do I know? Just a thought..."George W. Bush, shown searching for 'Iraqian' WMDs during playtime at the White House.", or something for the caption. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Really? Wow, thanks for letting me know! Given my general drawing skills I am not really someone who expects to get a picture featured. Especially not that one, which was knocked up completely on a whim! But I think I still have the properly layered file somewhere, so maybe I'll give it a go! Getting a picture featured before an article would indeed be a brilliant irony. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

No guarantees, of course. I'd vote for a better version, anyway. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, no guarantees I can make it better either! My current editing tools are as blunt as large foam elephant-hands... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

"A poor workman blames his tools.". Get GIMP. It's free, and not bad, apparently. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Okay, but I'd be a little scared of using the masking tools in a program called Gimp. Ohohoho, my aching sides. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:59, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, GIMP is good. I use it, and just look at my pics! Oh, wait....don't do that, now that I think of it. But I can answer any questions you may have about it (and if I don't I will certainly steal it off of the Internet so you don't have to).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

<Formal Bow>

As it would appear that one is on the road to being a potatochopper of the photograph sciences, would M'lady care to join the Guild? Tis filled with persons; some of renoun, others of infamy. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Heehee - thanks Modus. Even if you can't see half the picture (maybe I'll try resaving/reuploading it and see if that helps). As for the Guild, why not - I need somebody to protect me when I find myself being paid peanuts for my artwork and need to go on strike. It's working real well for our postal service right now. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

We're also fighting for a good health plan. And free donuts. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

I thought it was free health plan and good donuts. Maybe some of us could read the handouts if someone didn't get donut fillin' all over the original, hmm? No, wait. That was me. My excuse is that I'm used to crullers. This whole "stuff inside a doughnut" thing is new to me. I'm used to the middle being full of nothing. A void, if you will. Y'know, funny story, once I stared at the void for so long... Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Idealism

This is the humble beginning of what will become the single most mediocre VFD turnaround since Fat Albert! I figured I'd let you, one of the most conservative VFDers out there, in on it. Now that I did, I'm not sure what my rationale was, but there it is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I would indeed have probably voted to delete that, conservative as I am. I eagerly await the result now though... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

It appears that you are in an Edit War with AAA!

Tell me if it ascends into something... bad. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Russian reversal? It's okay - I didn't plan to push things further than that one revert. But it seems that our resident communism expert Tom has made his judgement anyway, and who's gonna argue with someone whose userpage is that red? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Mayfair's page scares me, it crashes my PC ever time... or at least makes it lag to 10 seconds. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

ICU

Yeah, that's what I was doing. I was kinda doing it because I wanted to prune it out for the admins. Also, I was actually only going through the WIP to take off the construction tags. Then I saw that those particular articles were in a sad, sad state, and I would be irresponsible to let them go out without a warning. Sorry if I seemed to be overstepping my bounds, but, as you say, it was not in bad faith. Cheerio.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

EEK! I got "talked-to" by Famine. Good thing you showed up first!  :)-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations!

You made sysop, and for that I congratulate you. You certainly deserved it, and I will be eager to see what you do with the Poopsmith's Lounge now (I still say it was all a plan ;). Congrats again.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Can you fix this parking ticket? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Sure. Free parking for all! In a metaphorical sense, anyway. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Can I have something for my headache? (oh, and congrats!) ~ 09:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations on becoming an Admin. :) MadMax 06:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

It's aliiiive! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:42, 01 Aug 2007

Please don't ban me. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

/me is so tempted to make you my first joke ban. Aww go on... I need the practice... :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

No. I've been the target of 3 joke bans now and I don't want another. Ban MadMAx for a congratulations. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats on becoming an admin. I guess this means your job as poopsmith will be a lot easier. --Dexter111344 10:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Well done! Now you can kiss goodbye to your free time, and any sense of enjoyment you used to get from editing this site relax, secure in the knowledge that idiots will bother you at all hours of the day or night with stupid questions you're a member of a cabal of incompetent power-crazed elitists our highly respected and compassionate admin team! Your industrial strength BanHammer9000™ and extra high shit-wading galoshes are in the post. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! I don't really know much about you, but you did have some rather impressive supporters, so you must be good stuff. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.08.01.16:35

Don't you believe it. It's the Cabal at work! The Cabal, I tells ya! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Uh oh. De-op time. TINC. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.08.04.00:53

Query

Think back. Waay back. Was it you who, like me, voted to keep a small and unloved stub that went by the name of "Manna manna", or somesuch? I ask because a) I need a second brain to critique a page on a similar, if not identical subject, with a similar, but not identical name, and b) due to forces I can't control, I don't have access to my computer, and the other computers to which I have access can't "see" the youtube video of manna manna. As such I can't confirm that the lyrics that I have presented in the page, previously mentioned, are the correct ones (and won't be able to for some time).

Are you a) the correct person to be asking and b) the correct person for the mission in question, previously mentioned? If either a, previously mentioned, twice, or b, previously mentioned a couple of times, are "no", or is "no" and "no" for a second time, or if either or both are a response or responses in the negative, my apologies. Also, Mah Nà Mah Nà...doo doo doo-doo doo. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Ummmmm... Yes? Between all those alphabeticals and commas, I think I may have no idea what you just said.  :-) But the answer is yes. I think. I voted keep on that page, and I have the video on my computer. Please take a deep breath, repeat my mission, and I shall accept it. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:46, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh. Keep it simple. Got it.

1. Watch that youtube video
2. Read this
3. Compare and contrast the two, paying particular attention to the lyrics in the song versus the lyrics on the page (hopefully they match or, failing that, they're close).
4. ???
5. Profit! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Got it. The mission will be fraught with peril, but I will do it. Soon. Umm... yes Mr TV, I'm coming back now... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Consume this cookie!

Modusoperandi has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

For foolishly accepting an errand and being exceptional at the completion of said errand. Or, as they say in Norwegia, "Jeg er trist. Jeg ikke taler Engelsk.". Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Ooh, snowth flavour! Yum! I think I shall add Mah Nà Mah Nà to my list of pages helped with. I'm oddly proud of having done that. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 06:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm oddly proud of something something something'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

So you should be. It is, by the way, an excellent article. I don't think I'd actually mentioned that part yet... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:11, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll come back to it, eventually, to see if whateveritwas that I wrote makes any sense at all. Whether yes or no, thanks again for making sure that it conforms with reality, such as it is. If you ever need lyrics confirmed, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the MO team. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Incidentally, the "Muppets Tonite" version is awful. The only good thing about "Muppets Tonite" was Pepe the Prawn, who should've got an Emmy for his role as Pepe the Prawn, IMO. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Muppets Tonite was the only bit of the Muppets I've managed to see all of, to be honest - for the rest I've relied on odd bits of repeats and things which don't come around nearly as often as they should. Then again, I used to bemoan that I never got to see Spitting Image until I finally did see a lot of it and understood very little. The Chicken Song is still a favourite of mine though. "Hoooold aaaa chicken in the air, stick a deckchair up your nose..." -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I had to clear a path to my fridge (which, like my computer, I haven't been able to use for a week and a half. Unlike my computer, however, it's full of food), since it appears that I won't be able to get to it again for a couple of weeks. Long story-short: I hit my computer on the way there and watched both that version and the Muppet '76 one. One bad. One good. Also, I got to throw out a half pound of rancid prawns and four nectarines that were at the "furry" stage of decomposition. But that's another story.

The Muppets should be on more. After all, there's a TV channel for everything now. If I can click around and, say, stumble across an episode of the Two Ronnies from 1972...the little one was like a Muppet, actually. Also, I've lost my train of thought. /me shakes fist at sky. "Damn you, Ronnies!"

For me, Spitting Image was a bunch of puppets that looked just like people I'd never heard of ('cept for Thatcher and a few others). Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Mahna Mahna II: The Mahna Mahna-ing

Wow. The muppet version is the real deal. I youtube'd the original, and it's awful. Live and learn, eh? Let us never speak of this again. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

That isn't exactly the original. Apparently it first appeared on an Italian porno film. Also, it was the theme for the Benny Hill show for a brief period of time. Why do I know these things? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:02, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Wait, no, that is the original. But it did appear first on pr0n. See here. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

See what happens when you stumble in late to a conversation? Chaos! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:53, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah! All that actual truth stuff on Wikipedia completely passed me by. Italio-Swedish porn, eh? No wonder poor Piero looks so harried. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm picturing him, for Top-o-the-Pops, leaning on a piano and looking bored while two girls with bob haircuts and A-line skirts faun over him. Of course I imagine that with pretty much everyone. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks muchly!

Thank you for voting For me, of course. You voted for Dr. Skullthumper for Noob of the Month! Yes, really. You did, honest. Check the history logs. You still don't remember? Maybe you were drunk, or something. Well anyway — just take my word for it, you did. So as a thank you, I've decided to give you one of the few existing Magic 8.1 balls. Unlike the Magic 8 ball, it will never give you an inaccurate answer. I've made sure of that. Use it wisely. Like as a paperweight.

– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:55 Dec 03, 2024 04:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I saw that!

Your first huffing I think...So, to honor that:

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has awarded you a Nuclear missile Now go and destroy the The Zionist Entity This Template Will Self Destruct in seconds

~ 10:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Congradulations!

Here's to the new Admin! Now you have the power!!! (Also, the stress.) -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Apologies, Thanks, and Congratulations

I wanted to apologize for wasting your time like that. But thanks for not making me feel more foolish for my tired, headache-y ICUing excursions. I'll take far more care to pay attention in the future. Also, congratulations on your recent sysop-ing. I actually saw Rcmurphy opp you and MadMax and felt strangely tingly for witnessing it. :) Thanks again, vyvyan 16:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

That's alright - it's an easy mistake. As long as we admins (tingle!) are careful when we're huffing the things then no harm done. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Woot!

Alrighty, where to begin. First of all, congratulations again on your adminship /me grumbles something about this event eclipsing his and second, thanks for your vote in Writer of the Month. While, again, this is nothing compared to sysophood (which you deserve far more than I deserve this award), it fills my heart with joy to know that someone who knows crap very well doesn't think that my work is crap. Also, Heavy Classical is done, and it just needs another image before it's ready for the main. Thanks again.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

"Distaste at the lack of lyrics in Heavy Classical also became prominent as the increasingly disgusting lyrics of popular music became the status quo." You old fogey you!  :-) Excellent work though - that's one more page I will never have to see in a deletion capacity again! Your next and even more difficult challenge, if you remember, is D...! Meanwhile, feel free to hijack the acceptance speech forum for WotM if you like - in the general scale of things a good writer's better than yet another smelly old admin any day! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Woohoo! Erm, yeah, that whole D thing. I'll get to it very soon. Not now, I have to go practice swimming. But soon. Swear. And, no, keep your acceptance speech. Adminship is a harder gauntlet to achieve.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Congrats!

You were the best option for admin anyway. Yay for Uncyclopedia. Congrats, and for this, I have one request. Could you give me a joke ban? Please? Well, Congrats! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

BTW, here is a template to declare your Adminness.

Admin

Oh, you and your shiny shiny badges Capercorn. By way of thank you, you have, as requested, been honoured with the first wielding of my banstick. Hope you enjoyed that at least one eighth as much as I did. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

I am greatly honored to be the first victim of your brand new shiny banstick. Yay. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Abuse of power? Already? Jeez, you're good at this!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

D

Yep, I started it. I'll be working on it steadily until I go to sleep. Then I have swim championships tomorrow (yeah, I swim a lot), but I'll be back to work by 2. It should be done by tomorrow night, Sunday afternoon at the latest.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I like it. It's probably the best page I've seen from the keyboard series, but then again, that's not saying much. Still, I like the direction you've gone in. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Procrastination

Aside from your consistent reverts, clearly the consensus is that the version of the article that does not have the unfunny journal section (yes, trust me, it's not funny) should stay, as expressed through the talk page and the ultimate measure of consensus: "Silence equals consent". Aside from that, the current version on the page is Version 3 of what was on the forum (see here), whereas the version you seem to be mistaking this article with is Version 2 (see here). You're simply reverting my edits, then citing a forum discussion that "decided" on a completely different version. So because of this, it is my understanding that the forum relating to this article is completely irrelevant, because if you were reverting to the version that was decided upon in the forum, you would have reverted it to Version 2, as would I have. So it's not about me trying to "get my way", as it is me trying to preserve what I, and others feel, is a funnier version. Additionally, I'd like to point out that the following excerpt:

"DigiWebuary 201, Spaceyear 41.128: Dick Clark's untimely passing yesterday really has motivated me to improve this page. I'll get to it after lunch."

Is utterly moronic and may simply violate this. Congrats on your recent adminship by the way! --EMC ^[TALK] 18:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

You are banned, as per my warning. I can't decide whether to bother arguing with you when I clearly won't be able to make you change your mind, so for the moment I shall leave it at saying that. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

e|m|c would like to speak with you directly on the chat, if you would be so kind as to oblige. If not, at least lemme know so I can tell him. Cheers!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

PS: How do you like D so far?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry - not right now, I'm off to eat in a minute and I have a feeling this would take rather longer than that. Might be back on later. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:57, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'll split the tab if you give D a good review!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Who really has no life?

While reading your hufflog I noticed some anonymous vandal created a page saying you had no life. That made me think. Someone who knows who you are and how much you contribute to this site shouldn't call you a wikiloser. That's the pot calling the kettle black! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Meh - I dunno if it was really aimed at me anyway - the article was called SbuT. I don't really mind what random people think anyway - if one of you guys said it I might be a bit more offended! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh Mistress Poopyhead

I need thou help with some poop management :) Apparently some happy gang are having an urgent need to edit this. My ICU was removed twice, once by a registered user and once by an IP. You think you can chop some heads? ~ 19:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

As long as they're not the same person, that makes one offense each. I'm going to try desperately to uphold my "nice person" reputation and give them one chance to become better people. Second offenses and they're for it, though. I'll add the page to my watchlist, although that doesn't get checked spectacularly often so feel free to warn me if it happens again!  :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

It would seem that the time for good heartiness has passed - take a look at the page. HASSAN CHOPS! ~ 00:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Hinoa got one of them, I got the other. The site is safe... until next time... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:45, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah, it's good to know that fine men and women are defending our democracy insane oligarchy. Thanks! ~ 09:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

.

Could you restore Interstate 84 (east) and move it to User:Manforman/Interstate 84 (east) so I could work on it there. That's good material I could work on. Thanks!--Sir Manforman 18:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Done. P.S. Are you nearly finished deleting your old rubbish yet? I hope so... /me returns to QVFD... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Pretty much, I put a few more stuff on. --Sir Manforman 20:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Playing God

Was I taking too long to edit this? Sorry. I do have something ready to go, which I could put up now for some Pee Review... -Guybles 20:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

/me looks to see which article we're talking about.

Oh yes, I remember this one. The construction template "expires" after a week and may get things deleted if you're not careful - we don't normally use it on non-new articles (although some people occasionally use it like you did I guess). I had a look at your rewrite after I'd removed the template from the main article - it's looking very good. I always like to see rewrites that incorporate the funny stuff from the old page - it means all those old edits don't go to waste! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

I did it

I made the parakeet page under an anonymous IP, and now it's haunting me. -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

I see... you forgot to say "It's been six months since my last confession" before you started, you know. But I shall keep your secret anyway. Now let's have 242 "Hail Mary"s, and you'll be absolved of all your sins. Or perhaps this calls for a joke ban - I know you're fond of them... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Wisconsin

Yeah... IPs keep adding vainity to it. Could you semi-protect it, so I can fix it. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 07:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Done. Fix away. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Vacation

This admin went on vacation, except they were silly enough to go somewhere which still had computers such as their family home, so are probably going to be editing Uncyc just as much despite the whole "vacation" thing. So you can leave a message, but I can't absolutely guarantee that I'll fail to reply until I get back.

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

D, da Arbicle

DONE! Woohoo!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, your post was weirdly invisible to the stupid IE7 I'm having to use at the moment. Oh well, no harm in replying to it anyway...

Yay for a decent D article! I mean, it's no heavy classical, but it'll not get deleted again. I hacked up the old history back underneath it just so people can see what went before. Hmm... I shall have to think up a new task for you now! Or maybe I'll stop annoying you with tasks for the moment, eh? :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's not my best work. If it went to VFH, it would probably not make it. However, "D" is a rather difficult subject to tackle, whereas Heavy Classical is a good concept. Ah well.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, don't mistake me - I don't think anybody else could have done better with a one-letter subject! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Aw shucks, thanks for that. I'm glad you think so.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Except perhaps Savethemooses. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:21, 11 Aug 2007

Hmm. Well, I couldn't very well do the same thing as him, now could I-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Worst reason for a knighthood ever...

...At least since that time the Queen got stoned and knighted her dealer for "provision of some seriously fucked-up shit". Still, thanks to everyone who voted for my picture - you will all get proper thank-you templates (along with people who voted me for admin) as soon as I get inspiration for one. Judging by my article-writing rate, that may be next year... :-) Speaking of article-writing, hopefully soon I'll come up with something to get me a feature I actually deserve... Watch this space: [Insert award-winning article here]. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:25, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

BraydieStrange but untrue thanks you for supporting him to become admin. I would have done this sooner, but admins are supposed to be lazy. There is no personalised message either.

I'd do that, sic.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Aargh! I HATE HATE HAT that picture! And presumably I wouldn't call myself Braydie. But otherwise, yes, I'll do something like that. Soon. Like next week when I get home again and have more time to go round loads of talk pages. It'll be brilliant, wait and see. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Protection

Can you fully-protect UnNews:Alberto Gonzales claims he doesn't recall saying "I may have created confusion" to prevent MaxMangel from revert-warring with me. He was recently banned for listing Rangeley on Ban Patrol, when he got into yet, another revert-war with him on the Iraq War page. I have a feeling when the ban comes back, he's going to continue to revert war with me and I don't want to further deal with that. Thanks--Sir Manforman 15:24, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Oh, not the right tone to take, eh?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid I'm not quite going to come down on your side on this one, Manforman. You seem to be giving as good as you're getting to me. At very least, this guy's minor edits were good for the style and shouldn't have been reverted en masse. And maybe he had a point about the confrontational style of certain bits - okay, so you probably don't have to get rid of entire paragraphs like he did, but certain sentences could do with a rethink perhaps, and maybe if you'd carefully worked around this guy's ego he might have helped you. As for his other ban, that is a separate issue, and I don't think a person should have all their comments on the talk page striken out because of one (and a half) mistakes. If you can't resolve the issue when he returns (and please do try), come back here then. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Help?

I hate to be the kid that runs to grandma's house when mother yells at him, but I was blocked by Famine for adding some Russian Reversal quotes as Easter eggs. Could you help a brother out? If it were any other week I wouldn't care, but I'm in a wiki reality show. If I don't win, I get to be banned! w00t! -- Kippy the Elf Talk Works ☃

Going against other admins (especially more senior ones) is kind of bad policy. But I do believe you're not out to deliberately do bad, so I've left a message on Famine's page in the hope that it'll get your ban shortened. I'll be away (even more so than currently) for the next few days, so I hope I come back to find you're back...!) If he does, I'll hope you'll quickly learn the relevant lessons, the main one being Don't Set Out To Annoy Famine. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

A good thing

Hi SBU. I just found Lipogram and thought I'd say it's good. It's a hard topic to work with, and although not laugh-out-loud funny, you did a good job of making it work. Slightly surprising that no vandal has put a "funny" contribution in. Particularly an obvious addition... --Undr Usr, 14 August 2007 etc.

Yay! Someone saw it! Glad you liked it - I really should put some of these obscure things up for Pee Review at some point just so that a few people see them at least! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:23, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Vacation

This admin went on an even more vacationy vacation, without coming back from the first one even. But this time there will be no computers. So you can leave a message, and I'll be back on Friday sometime.

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Signature

I would like to know how did you turn this image () into a direct link to your user page in your sig. Matheus Wahl Who?  38,457  Portuguese 13:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

It's like this. Upload the image, then click on the filename of the image on its Uncyclopedia page. The URL (address in the top bar) should look something like (the URL of the above image). Then, in your sig, you format the link like this: [http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Matheus Wahl <Image URL without brackets>]. This makes it end up as you desire. Leave me a message on my talk page if you still have questions, as Sbu is currently vacationing.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Incidentally, the way I've done mine is arguably way too complicated. I think the way Ljlego has suggested isn't perfect, as [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Strange_but_untrue http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/49/Strange.PNG] gives: which has an arrow after it for most skins. Let me see if I can find the way to get rid of that... Ah yes:

<span class="plainlinks">[http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Strange_but_untrue http://images.wikia.com/uncyclopedia/images/4/49/Strange.PNG]</span>

gives:

Also, I'm back. By the way. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about the picture issue. I hope you meant that only about the picture you removed and not about any of the other ones I use on many pages. If you have any other concerns, I'd be happy to address them. Popebenedictxvi 00:42, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey that's okay. But generally it's good to use a variety of pictures - if all your writing has the same pictures on it, it almost looks like the same article! Try fishing around on Google images for new and exciting things that are relevant to each article. Happy editing! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

.

I was just wondering, if you could explain to me why you blank user pages of users that have lost nominations instead of deleting them (i.e. User:Pat Sharp) I don't see how they serve a function to Uncyclopedia. I don't think there so important that they should be kept for historical purposes, so I'd like to know why you do that. Thanks.--Sir Manforman 00:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean (me being not SbU), but I don't think you can "delete" users unless you're staff, which she is not.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

That's not what I'm referring to. I'm referring to there user pages which were outdated nominates that the user even hasn't edited themselves. Before it was appearing in the category Category:Nominated User, and there user pages are no longer needed. --Sir Manforman 01:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Meh - I just think it's kind of rude to delete user pages unless I'm told to by the user specifically. Y'know, it redlinkifies up the signature and all. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Barney the Dinosaur

Could you redirect this to Barney the Dinosaur Hitler? It seems like a decent article, and I think it would be better as a redirect to that article, as suppose to CVP, thanks. --Sir Manforman 16:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Meh - whatever'll keep people from crapping it up. Although I wouldn't go quite as far as "decent" necessarily... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleted work in progress

I was working on a day-old work in progress Barzilla when it was deleted WHILE I was editing it. I was serious about finishing that article.

Sorry - I wouldn't normally, but it was so short I figured in the unlikely event you came back to it (and we get a lot of people who write that much and then don't) you could read what you'd written already in the deletion summary (which you can). Write a bit more, and all shall be well with the world. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Vacation

This admin went on another vacation (although one where she has to work this time), and she may or may not have access to a computer there. If she does, she may or may not respond to queries. But she will be back on the 8th of September, so be good until then and don't do anything she wouldn't do. Except possibly writing good articles, you can do that if you like.

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:17, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Human

Come on, I'm not the only one edit warring and you know that. You're doing it as well. But let's just read what each other writes and try to make a version that combines the one you like and the one I do. I'm sure we can come to some agreement without any doubtful ban warnings. R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 16:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Okay. Perhaps I should have gone through the reasons in painstaking detail with you, but I don't have the time to do that for everyone I revert. The first thing to realise is that Uncyclopedia is not Wikipedia. We have our own rules, guidelines and common sense which you'll get to know when you've been here longer. The main one I'm using here is that you don't delete something just because you personally don't find it hilarious. Because often, another person will find it funnier than you do. Again, once you've been around a while you get to realise what sort of thing people like. You can call this something like "Neutral Point of Funny" if you like. It's why I resist deleting at least some of the sex-jokes despite not caring for them particularly, and it's why I don't use my adminly powers to delete everything I don't like. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, I guess I missed any part where I mentioned Wikipedia or guildelines over there... but aside from that, did you even read what I wrote? I suggested to make the next version of the article one combining "Neutral Point of Funniest" bits from the version you reverted to and the one I actually liked. If we do that, everybody's happy and the article is better. Just answer with your opinion to this with a yes or no. Besides, I didn't revert it simply because "I didn't like it". Maybe people actually didn't like what you called funny, therefore the article moved on, did not get vandalized, and you are the one who reverted that whole process. Just a possibility. Both sides must be taken into account, not just the admin side. You are pretty much doing what you last described on your last sentences. You're reverting a version you didn't like to one you did and trying to convince me you're right just because you're an admin. Everything you are accusing me of doing, you are doing yourself. P.S.: I'm actually pretty flexible towards new guidelines and didn't once even think of applying wikipedia guidelines here. Please, I'm just a bit new at Uncyclopedia, I'm not a complete moron. R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 01:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Of course I might be wrong. But since this is mainly about deletion and not changing stuff for other stuff (except for the quotes at the top, which tend to change faster than most people change their sheets), I'm thinking it's not going to matter a whole bunch if I just assume I'm not, and go with the fact that admin decisions are final. For the record (having read through the changes for the millionth time - yawn), there are a couple of paragraphs in there I thought were borderline, but the way the deletion was done was with no regard for consistency or sense-making. Case closed. (Please?) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. I don't really care and I'm tired of being a pain in the ass. Lol. R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 13:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

ICU fix

I fixed my Michael Waltrip article, and I wonder if it still needs more work to be removed from the ICU. Can you read it and tell me how to make it better? Your help would be greatly appreciated.

UPDATE: I made some more changes to make it look less like Wikipedia. If it still needs more work, could you just edit this page and tell me what needs to be done? Thank you.

Did you check out the video link? I think you may find it entertaining.

Not to sound like a whore or anything

....but I put D up for VFH.....mind taking a look?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Mebbe later - I'm trying my best to be on holiday right now. And a couple of hours in a day is doing pretty well I guess compared to my usual Uncyc quota. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, thanks to your extended "holiday," D made it without you! Oh, wait, never mind. This isn't a bad thing. What is, however, is your woeful absence from Uncyc for the past couple days.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey - well done! Meanwhile, I actually managed to go a week without looking at a computer! Me is proud of me. Now to spend the entire day catching up with everything I missed... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

To sound like a whore or anything

You lookin' for a good time? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Why yes, I would like to visit your brothel. I mean, what kind of a good time? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I, uh, I don't know. I'm kind of new at this. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, I was planning to have a good time by doing a whole bunch of maintenance on Uncyclopedia. /me blows party-whistle thing in a rather anticlimactic way. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

And we thank you for it. Don't ever leave us again. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

/me handcuffs self to keyboard. Oh, wait, that wasn't what you meant. Was it? -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

So you aren't normally handcuffed to your keyboard? I need to have a word with my boss. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:35, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Well I am, but I like to pretend otherwise. In other news, I'm sitting in a field of fluffy kittens right now. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

If you're looking for a good time, look no further than "SUPER INCREDIBLY HAPPY FUN GREAT TIME VARIETY SHOW WITH SAVINGS!" Also known as a slew of Unicode characters no one cares about, this Japanese import (edited for Uncyclopedia) is super fun! Just watch those n00bs beg for mercy, those 1337 haxxors crapflood the IRC! And let's not forget the "ULTRA TERRIFIC SMILES POWER HOUR!" which is the same thing.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

OMG!? WTF!! Sheesh, School really has crapped up my Uncyc life... --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

template:math

Hey, glad you like the template, however what did you mean by "unnerve people"? OMG! THE COMPUTER KNOWS MY USER NAME!! AAAAHHHHHHH!

I added that part because nobody is going to click on that template. It's helpful for the thing to suggest which page to go to. But, whatev.

AAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! --Cajek 04:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Hiya - overuse of the USERNAME template is generally frowned upon around here, especially on something that's going to be seen by so many people. It sounds strange perhaps, but it really does unnerve people to see their name on a page, so we try to restrict it to pages where it serves comedic value to scare, like You. As for the suggestion thing, it was a nice thought, but for one thing it wasn't inside the template box, and for another I figured you'd already suggested all the articles by putting them in the template in the first place! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok that sounds reasonable... what if, in the template, "SHIT" will redirect you to a random page in the template? --Cajek 14:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... people might just suppose that redirects to shit. I'm coming round to the idea though - how about you add a "random" link above or below the pictures? What with randomness being mathematical and all... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Vacation

This admin went on vacation and is in too much of a hurry to even find something to say about it this time. Her expected return date is Monday.

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:08, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

What in the fajoodle? What's with all these vacations? LAZY!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

How come you go on so many vacations, seriously?--Sir Manforman 00:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Anyway, a weekend isn't a vacation! It's a weekend. Yeesh. Nitpicky much, Ljlego?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

It's a vacation if I say it's a vacation.  :-) Tee hee. Anyway, yes, I'm back and resuming being lazy in the comfort of my own home. Hopefully that's the last of the vacations for a while, and I can be around long enough to give this place some attention again. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:01, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Articles

The articles Ho Yeow Sun, Kong Hee and City Harvest Church should be deleted as they are not notable enough to be on uncyclopedia. 202.156.12.12 14:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Hiya - they seem to have articles on Wikipedia, so I guess they are notable. You'll have to go to VFD with everyone else if you want to get them deleted. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

VFS Voting

I've had to remove one of your vote, as apparently we are only allowed 2 each in this section. I took out the one you added last of all, if you need to change any of them around I'll leave it to you. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Says who? Ah well, whatever. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

A Grudge?

Next time I'll just go out of my way & put the construction template on for you. Geez.

:-( It really wasn't a grudge Tom - and I'm sorry if I was a bit blunt with my vote. It's absolutely nothing personal - after all, you were my welcomer, and you're the only user who features as part of my userpage saga! Maybe I shouldn't have started the whole against-voting thing, but what's done is done. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Six down...

“Moo ha-ha!”

~ Modusoperandi on this picture

...a million zillion more to go. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Fiend! But I am quite impressed that one of them is a mainspace page though. And don't be so pessimistic - according to the statistics special page, you only have 23,939 pages to go. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

And take heart! With Vigilance Week, it may well end up going down 1,000 or more pages! Which leaves only 22,000-summat pages! Your task is getting easier yet.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Ack!! /me spits at floor. Somebody mentioned the V word on my talk page! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

You old fogey, you! You sound like me! "Distaste at the lack of lyrics in Heavy Classical also became prominent as the increasingly disgusting lyrics of popular music became the status quo." Remember that? Anyway, yeah. I did it. And I'll do it again too! VBLEEP! VBLEEP! VBLEEP! VBLEEP! VBLEEP! Vig-/me gets banned.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Mwah-ha-ha! Mwah-ha-ha! Say, this colour business is kind of fun. Hats off to U, Spang. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

I can hasn't been banned! IM IN UR TAWK PAYJE, YANKIN UR CHANE! VIGILANCE!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

If memory serves, I found that picture and liked it so much that I had to write a story around it. I'm not entirely sure why I like that picture. His expression is just so excited and yet...uncomfortable. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:09, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

thanks

You've been lucky enough to get my post-operative, two-toothed version of audio on your story. I'm glad you were touched, or damaged, as the case may be. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 20:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

What is this image?

{{need fat kid}}

Connell66 08:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing that template to my attention. To answer your question: this image is gone. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Hah! It is too late! I now have the image in my collection! Oh yes! It's mine, my own...M-my pr-r-reciosss...

AND it's still on my userpage. What does it mean to "huff" something? Connell66 18:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I thought I'd be nice and substitute the template code onto your userpage before I deleted it. "Huff" means "delete" - for its origins, see here, but be warned, the subject is now so old hat that any jokes you make about this subject will themselves be huffed. See, we say we hate cliches like the fat kid, then we go and create our own. How hypocritical are we? The answer is very. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh noes!

My interweb surfing habits have come around and bit me in the ass.

This guy is Marvin Olasky, right-wing nutjob (who among other crimes, helped put the bug in Dubya's head that faith-based programs are a good way to spend taxpayer dollars), which I found at the stubborn curmudgeon blog (I thought it was a blog about me. My initial disappointment was tempered somewhat when I noticed that it's a funny blog).

Sigh. I don't think I'll use it on any other pages. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:18, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it has suddenly rather lost its appeal, hasn't it? /me goes through all the pages he's landed on, and looks for ironies.

“The tubes of the internet will soon be clogged with this guy.”

~ Modus on a guy that turns out to be already clogging the internet with stuff.

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

It was good while it lasted, wasn't it? /me stares off at setting sun. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Dammit. He hasn't even made it to the front page yet. I'm not sure what to do with myself... *sniff* I guess I'll follow through with the attempted feature, but... oh goodness, I'm sorry SbU, I'm blubbering all over your talk page. Also, you'll burn your retinas off with all that sunset staring, Modus. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 05:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh noes! II: Electric boogaloo

Dinesh D’Souza & Christopher Hitchens had a debate, apparently. I haven't had a chance to view it, but look at the guy in the middle. I'm starting to think that he only owns one tie. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 12:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

And I'm starting to think maybe you two need some time apart. Or you know, just get a room and sort things out the old fashioned way. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, I am a spurned lover. Spurned! (I've watched part of the debate on Youtube and he's an awful speaker. Luckily he just did an intro. Then D'Souza comes out and says a bunch of feel-good bafflegab that makes sense as long as you ignore the bits that he fails to mention...then Hitchens comes out and mentions those bits. Then, they dance! <cue Bolero>). Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

/me holds up card with "6.0" printed on it. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

/me puts rose in teeth. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:01, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

/me scribbles out 6.0, writes 3.0. Technical fault for having a thorn through your lip. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 05:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

*pout* Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Now pouting with a thorn through your lip - that's quite an achievement. The crowd goes wild! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 05:49, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind...

But since you're a fancy admin and I'm the new poopsmith (official-like), I am moving around the Poopsmith's Lounge. I changed all the links to my page, and I archived it. I also was italic and moved it to the Uncyclopedia mainspace. Cheers.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Cool - good idea, actually. Although I reserve the right to come back and have my wicked way with the page when I get back to being properly active. Oh - the link on VFD needs updating, and yes, I am too lazy right now to do even that...! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:06, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Oh boy, maths!

This forum + that page =

Apparently the tiny percentage of people here that understand that page (three?) belong in elementary school. Weee! Lol, etc. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Even though I know it's about the Muppet song, whenever I see it I think of the song Palladio, for some reason. "Mah Nà Mah Nà, Mah Nà Mah Nà!"-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

The diamond commercial song? Really? Whenever I hear that song, I imagine Muppet penguins playing volleyball. I do that a lot. The song doesn't even really matter all that much. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have some imagining to do. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

RE your post in that IP Newpages thingy

Well, it's locked, so now I have to make semi-relevant witty banter on the talk page of whoever posted. Let me just say right off the bat that I agree with whatever it was you said that I've now forgotten because it was such a long journey from the forums to here. Hey, Journey! Dooooon't stop! Beliiieeeeeeevin'! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:58, Nov 13

Aww, who locked it? I think I'm still going to tell people the vote is ongoing - it'll save so much time... And, as a bonus, they won't even be able to add their pointlessly badly-thought-out vote. It's win-win! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You know, that's pretty much what Spang said. Keeping it locked keeps out all of those useless jerks who aren't admins. Man, I really hate them, don't you? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:25, Nov 13

Then it's official. Let the word go out through all the land: voting will never close! Endless democracy! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

A Worthy Sacrifice?

Thank you for your comment and suggesting the appropriate course of action for me. I will follow your wisdom on this matter...

I do however have a related idea on a slightly different note... I see that several of the "more likely to be vandalised" pages e.g "Gay" are protected from edits by the likes of us n00bs and IPs.... I wonder if this is a good idea. I guess that they got protected because they kept getting vandalised. Assuming that the average run of the mill vandal will want to add something somewhere would it not make sense to allow them to do their dirty deeds in the places which they really want to? My thinking is that if they did, it would then be easier to find what they had done rather than having them go to a less obvious place and have their fun there... If we allowed edits to "certain key vandal magnet pages" then the experienced vandal reverters would know those pages well and could easily keep an eye on them. I think I get the point of protecting the "vandal magnet" pages, but is it not the case that this is done at the expense of causing more general vandalism through the whole of the rest of the Uncyclopedia? By protecting the pages I feel that we do not stop the vandal, just move him elsewhere where he/she is more difficult to find and deal with?

I guess this idea has probably been considered before, in which case I would be grateful if you could provide a link to the discussion (I am very interested in the subject). Also if you think that I am causing trouble here (please, please) simply tell me to drop this one and you will hear nothing more from me on this matter... If this is a new idea, which I doubt, I will write a better version of my comments about and post them in the dump... I'm new here, and definitely not trying to cause cause any trouble, I just wondered if this might be an idea which had not been though of before, that's all. Your comments very welcome... MrN 16:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... I think this one might be taking the good idea a smidgen too far. People do tend to vandalise everything they can get their grubby little paws on, and I think unprotecting the popular ones would just lead to more vandals, and so more work for no practical gain. It's all a delicate balancing act.

Anyway, keep observing the whole business - searching for key words in the forum namespace is always fun (although the search capabilities are a bit rubbish). Just don't be proposing too much too early, because to be frank people will tend to not listen to you so much until you've been around a while! Not me, obviously, I'm much too... I'm sorry, did you say something?  :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Chuckle! Chuckle! Actually, I just noticed that Gay is now not protected any more (neither is the main page for that matter it seems!), so I have decided to "keep an eye on it" to see what happens... Many thanks for your words of advice... MrN 02:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello Mr Strange

Just wondered if you might have the time to look at Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Color Problem... Obviously no problem if not... Thanks MrN 23:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

"Mr" Strange? Somehow, SbU, I don't think the beard and testicles are quite you... -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello Ms. Strange

Where art thou? I still remember the days when Famine actually had to ban you to get some sleep...Why hast thou abandoned us? ~ 17:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm doing some hardcore biding of my time right now - events are conspiring to give me no time or inclination to tidy, and that goes for my house as well as Uncyclopedia. (It's actually looking a bit like the Poopsmith's Lounge picture at the moment.) I still intend to make a proper blazing comeback at some point though, and meanwhile I'm watching the forums to make sure there's still a decent Uncyclopedia for me to come back to! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Not to worry, We'll shuffle to worse out so you can actually see the floor when you come back. I'll advise against eating from it though...~ 11:49, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Xmas

Merry Christmas Despite being required by British law to carry an umbrella throughout December, and to respond to all festive cheer with "Bah Humbug", nonetheless I wish you a very Merry Christmas. Or Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, or whatever other gnostic mystical mumbo-jumbo you colonials practice these days. Just don't tell the Queen.

Have a good one! -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:40, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Pagans, the Whole Lot of Yous Premier Tom Mayfair has been a naughty boy this year, but he still deserves a kiss from under the mistletoe. His external organ is fair game.

Have a not-shitty Christmas!

	Heya, The Led Balloon here, wishing you merry Christmas, or any other holiday you feel like celebrating. Just remember what it's all really about: NO WORK, NO SCHOOL, FREE STUFF!!!
	Here's to hoping your school(or work) calendar for December doesn't look too much like this...

Merry Christmas, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:08, Dec 17

Christmas and stuff

Merry Christmas! or whatever it is you new-fangled Christians do at this time of year. From Rabbi Techno

I found it, hahahaha

I found your little website with fake facts! I didn't read one word of it, because my dad suddenly appeared with REAL DUTCH CHOCOLATE FROM T3H DEUTSCHLAND but it was the very first Google result, so you should be proud of that. OM NOM NOM NOM NOM (me eating chocolate) Heck no techno | chitchat | stuff..

Ah, my old old baby. Haven't touched the thing for half a decade, but I'm still oddly proud of it. I recommend the madness test for an amusing afternoon. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas. ~ Mitch

-- Mitch 13:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Xmas!

~ Merry Xmas Strange but untrue! ~ Ye Olde Luke

--YeOldeLuke 08:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Where did you go?

Seriously. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Bizarre, I was wondering the same thing myself not a short while back. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 16:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Me too. My guess: alien abduction. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm going with: discovered an alternate world in the back of her wardrobe where time passes at an accelerated rate. She'll be back on here shortly as a twinkly eyed grandmother, mark my words... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:22, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I also was wondering this. Perhaps she has been lost to the dreaded outside. I've heard terrible things about that place. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:38, 08 Feb 2008

SBU! Come baaaaaaack!! We miss yoooouuuuuu! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:08, Feb 9

Mistress Pussy

This user is a Mistress Pussy of the SISTERHOOD. Beware her wet tee.

We are trying to build a female user group here at Uncyc, and are awarding all established female Uncyclopedians the title of Mistress Pussy. You are free to use this lovely template on your userpage {{User:Luvvy/Template:UnSisSophia}} from here on to eternity. All praise Sophia! -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 20:21, 11 Mar 20:21, 11 March 2008 (UTC) -XOXOXO, Love ya! Sk8R Grl UnSis Dude Slut! 21:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Join The CMC! Make Your Inner Cow Happy!

Moo, Strange but untrue!

What is it about cows that gets us all hot and bothered? Where do cows come from? What are cows?

These are the questions that drive the Cow Moo Cult and its brethren, who are very, VERY interested in cows and cow by-products.

The CMC is devoted not only to cows, but to helping Uncyclopedia through general acts of goodness and through motivating people with cow-treats and the like.

So, Strange but untrue, why not join the CMC? It's free (unless you count virginity as money) and it's fun (and it's full of clichés)! You'll get a pretty template for your userpage and a nice title for your signature! What could be better? Sign Up Now!

Double moos from your cowy friend,
YTTE

You haz feature!

Now you have to come back. Return at once! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:54, Oct 7

Yeah, dagnabit! The dog is lonely, someone smoked all of your pot, and your side of the bed is losing that you shape. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

You haz another feature!

UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary is today's feature. At this rate, you'll be writer of the month. Come back and do something to deserve it! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  14:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

You haz yet ANOTHER FEETTOOR!

Now you simply HAVE to come back. ~ 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Sig image

Now it is used.  –     (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 22:12, 20 August 2021