Protected page

Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut:
UN:BP
DaniPine3 has your name and your ass in a sling doesn't he?!

“Sometimes the best solution to morale problems is just to ban all of the unhappy people.”

– Oscar Wilde on Ban Patrol

This page is for reporting IPs or Users who are blanking, vandalizing, improperly reverting, or otherwise disrupting Uncyclopedia! Before adding an entry, READ THE RULES:

  • Check to make sure the IP/user hasn't already been listed below
  • Check Blocked IPs and the block log to see if they've already been blocked
  • If there is a major spam/blanking/vandal outbreak going on, please try to raise an admin in our Discord server.
  • Please do not report users or IPs with only one contribution, it is pointless.
  • Use the template below. Add a short description and your signature (~~~~) as shown, or else
  • THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you feel the need to babble, use the talk page.
  • NEW STUFF ON TOP PLEASE!


To report a user
*{{User|<username>}} <your description> ~~~~
To report an IP
*{{IP|<username>}} <your description> ~~~~
To report an IP RANGE (advanced users only)
*{{Range|<username>}}) <your description> ~~~~


Example
*{{User|127.0.0.1}} Blanked [[World of Warcraft]] --~~~~
Would show as


Attention: "Bad Person" or "Monkey Breath" is not a valid reason for reporting someone to BP. Violators shall be sent for a week in the Alula academy for the Criminally Insane


Manual Ban Patrol (new stuff below this line)

Showi (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser spamming pages and talk pages with nonsense, edit warring --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 02:34, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

I already reverted a ton of his edits when Turb0 be had to leave. He also blanked his talk page a bunch of times. Soviet☭ (Ask for free votes) 02:48, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Turbo Dies!!! (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser and Laredo (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser spamming, socking --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 01:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Not A Bot But Looks Like One (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser spamming --Dame Fish on skates Fish on skates.gif DUN VFH UotM 01:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

RedWarn/Huggle BP

Note to both admins and non-admins: Note that on RedWarn/Huggle BP, new listings are at the bottom instead of the top.


@Alula: @DaniPine3: i'm just pinging so this guy gets banned quicker Turb0-Sunrise de la Merry Christmas 17:52, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise: He IS banned, he just has access to his talk page. 🍂 gergdown🍂(talk) ☀️ 17:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
i just saw that. can somebody take TPA away from the guy now? Turb0-Sunrise de la Merry Christmas 17:56, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
I may have been mistaken. this guy seems to be a regular user (albeit one who needs to be shown the ropes) Turb0-Sunrise de la Merry Christmas 22:59, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
@Turb0-Sunrise: I too find this user's username suspicious, but unless there's evidence of it I don't think we should frame it as such. this is a satirical wiki after all, so it makes sense that users log in with nonsensical names. 🎄🎄🎄DaniPine3 (talk)🎄🎄🎄 22:48, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Well, uh, might not be the guy, but still vandalizing TURB0-SUNRISE DE LA RED SOX 00:34, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  • no contributions/abuse filter hits ever user:alulauser talk:alula 21:54, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
  • !!!!!!obama!!!!!! (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser – Based on username (exclamation points intentionally added so they would appear when you type User:), created user page without prior edits, likely to seem less suspicious on recent changes, and their user page is oddly familiar, like an existing user wrote it. Plus, they have a one word username which I see a lot of socks do. Sovıet 🎙️ 22:08, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Their articles keep on mentioning "impolsion gangsters"
  • They both keep on mentioning Las Vegas hotels
  • Using the same memes accross their articles like a splode and pwnd
  • Use the same emojis in the same context
  • Same violent and dramatic phrases placed out at random
  • Elliot left a message on The lesbian flag !!'s talk page about a very specific event at another hotel

[Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 11:39, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

None of this proves any socking is going on, and CheckUser doesn't show any correlation between these two users at all. user:alulauser talk:alula 11:45, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Do you need more evidence? Also, they might have used a VPN or something when they created the sock. [Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 11:51, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Soviet, i knwo what i'm doing. I geolocate each and every single IP i see on CheckUser. There is no correlation between these two accounts at all, not proxy-wise or geolocation-wise. And none of the evidence here proves that socking is going on, just that they do similar stuff. user:alulauser talk:alula 11:54, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Their articles have the identical see also sections though. [Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 12:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Cool. I still need actual proof to confidently say that there is socking going on here. user:alulauser talk:alula 12:37, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Can you define "actual proof"? [Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 12:40, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
Yes, it's concrete evidence that proves that the accounts are connected. What you have is a bunch of observations of two accounts doing similar stuff. This doesn't actually prove anything, it just implies that the accounts are related. And as i found out through CheckUser (which is the tool we use to prove these things) they aren't. If that happens then that's pretty much the end of the road, because there simply is no other way to prove any sort of socking besides LookupUser, which we (thankfully) don't have access to. user:alulauser talk:alula 12:54, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
@Alula: I understand that you know what you are doing but, "The CheckUser tool cannot confirm with certainty that two accounts are not connected; it can only show whether there is a technical link at the time of the investigation."[1] In addition, WP:SOCK states "Behavioral evidence is often more important when determining whether an account is a sockpuppet." Also, if you look at the contributions, you will see that:
  • Almost immediately after Lesbian Flag finishes editing Dunes Implosion, Elliot makes a string of edits to it.
  • After Lesbian Flag creates and finishes editing the Resorts World Las Vegas article, Elliot edits once, Lesbian Flag edits one more time, halts all edits, and Elliot takes over.

[Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 02:44, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah i get your point, but... the problem is that the technical information CheckUser gave me tells me quite the opposite. We're talking no overlapping ISPs, no overlapping IPs (obviously), both accounts having IPs based on completely different continents, only one of the accounts using proxies (which spoiler alert: they're not even good at, their personal IPs show up pretty frequently throughout the list of IPs too). If there is socking happening here then it's either being done by someone being able to operate two devices tens of thousands of kilometers away from each other simultaneously, which i find extremely unlikely. Like, it's actually more likely that these are two people coordinating their edits. user:alulauser talk:alula 19:55, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Don't you think it's quite strange that Lesbian Flag stopped editing after I informed Elliot about this? [Soviet] »[Ask for free votes] Grammarnazilogo.png » (Ping for reply.) 02:43, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Soviet, you're not convincing me on this. I have literally no information to go off of other than "similar behavior". When CheckUser comes up completely blank (which it didn't, and i know because i just checked again) then there is literally no way to definitely prove anything. user:alulauser talk:alula 23:43, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Older Ban Patrol: v - e

40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45
46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51
52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56

  1. ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#CheckUser
Retrieved from "https://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Ban_Patrol&oldid=6579952"