User talk:Gubby

Welcome!

Hello, Gubby, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

• Beginner's Guide
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Dump. Again, welcome!    t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia

I nominated your article from the front page. It's getting strong support, as it should. Great work!--Procopius 12:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. A great article well 'researched'. Bravo! -- Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 16:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks guys! :) Gubby 16:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Don't believe them.....they are after your gusset. Run, run as fast as you can.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Damn, he's onto us. Everyone scatter. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 16:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

About the article you seem to have "vandalized" on Wikipedia, I must ask... was that a real article, or did you just make one that looked real with your name in it? Wehpudicabok 00:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hm? You mean,.. did I really make those articles on wikipedia, only to have them deleted instantly? Yes. (I'm not sure I get your question. If this didn't do the job, try rephrasing it).--Gubby 01:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

I mean, was there an article called "Sister ___" before you came along, or did you make all of that page up? Wehpudicabok 02:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You haven't been reading my article properly! I hope you're not in school anymore because the Awesomeness teacher would surely mark you WAY low for that. I took a random article from wikipedia and replaced every instance of the subject's name with mine (with the help of the Find&Replace tool in notepad--Gubby 02:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)), then pasted it in "Gubby".

Okay, I finally found it. I kept trying to find the original article that you had vandalized, but couldn't. That's why I tried asking you, because it wouldn't come up in searches, even if I left out the word "Gubby." I had to go to through the category "Former students of St Anne's College, Oxford" before I did, but I finally found that the article was in fact on Sister Wendy Beckett.

What a waste of time that was. Oh well. Wehpudicabok 00:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Um, sorry, I was thinking "maybe I should say what the article was called", but fact is I couldn't remember ^^;--Gubby 01:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Is this undelete request on Meta-Wiki about your vanity page attempt? It seems someone was fooled into thinking that it was legitimate... Pentium5dot1 05:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

This prank just keeps on giving. XD--Gubby 21:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Fisher Price

Just nominated it separately on the VFH page. Go Vote! -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 20:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Arguement

• • • • Reply. Anyone has the right to edit an article. I watch that article. So if I see something that's unfunny then I edit it. If you disagree with me by all means start an edit war. (PS the "what if I don't have microsoft word" section wasn't mine. Oh noes!)--Gubby 14:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

VFH-HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia

What is this "admin XD", and why am I it? Modusoperandi 15:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• XD is an emoticon.--Gubby 15:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Didn't they fight the Autobots? I'm pretty sure I had the one that turned from a robot into a "winky" face. Modusoperandi 15:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Why Did You Remove My Gibson Quote From Snakes on a Plane?!?!

Why???? --TaintedCell 01:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Uh... can't remember. It probably sucked. But maybe I just didn't get it. You can put it back if you like. :P--Gubby 10:48, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

DeviantART

Hi! as the seemingly Main watcher and "person who has generally given up on things" of the DevArt article, I wanted to thank you for helping to make the article actually almost worth reading, and comment that you're more than welcome to continue working on and loving the little adopted retard tyke. --epynephrin 02:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

American Fundie Magazine

This humble Uncyclopedian thanks you for your vote. It warms my jaded heart to know that there is, indeed, a place for satire on Uncyc, even the blunt, spooky shit.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

HMS Potatore

I'd heard of it, but only read it when Shandon dragged me along on our mad adventure. Our version is better, as it's shorter (we cover the whole plot in one paragraph) and the cast breaks out into song less often.

Having read it, do you feel more cultured, at least?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Link at the bottom

Should we change the pseudo-external link at the bottom of your user page to something obviously invalid like http://www.example.com/ ? (It confused me the first time around... Don't worry, that was a long time ago. I'm not that much of a n00b now.) Pentium5dot1 02:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

You could I suppose, if you think it'll confuse more n00bs... my own reaction would be to leave well alone. Whatever really. --Gubby 13:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

• It's not to confuse more n00bs; it's to stop them from being confused. Since my logic has been pwned, however, I think I'll leave it alone. Pentium5dot1 20:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello

Might I suggest that, rather than just blanking other people's contributions, you add your quote on 'homosexuality'? You're much less likely to get banned - which wouldn't be good, because your contribution on My Chemical Romance was funny. RabbiTechno 19:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Also, vandalising other people's userpages is a seriously bad idea. RabbiTechno 19:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Gubby, my bad. Got vandalised by an IP...sorry, wasn't you. Ignore that last bit. RabbiTechno 19:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Shalom! Yum! You've received a basket of delicious fresh bagels from RabbiTechno! Lekhaim! מזל טוב

David DeAngelo's Newsletter

Hi. I'm not entirely sure if you were sarcastic or not when you said you liked the article, but either way, it's clear you are not indifferent to it. Which is good. I recently nominated the page for feature status (after receiving some positive feedback), but it's entry is pretty much stagnating. I would appreciate you voting either way. --Medvedev ^(scream) 21:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Medvedev has deemed you worthy of a bearhug. Avoid struggling to minimize injury.

Thanks for the vote! --Medvedev ^(scream) 16:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Uncyclopedia

Please take a look and make any changes you think of....--Dantoller 17:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

RE: blah

Because a current article exists for Bureaucracy, your version would be a rewrite. Good luck by the way. --EMC ^[TALK] 15:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Picture

Who's that in the picture you used to replace Angelina Jolie's pic?

Say what? Be more specific here.----Gubby 14:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Image:Angelinajolie.jpg ----sign please

I think it says "Andrea Puccini" or Paccini or something written there on the photo. But I don't know really, I was just looking for someone hot to put up.

Why did I call it Angelina Jolie? Wierd. --Gubby 08:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Andrea Puccini is a photographer. And on there you said you got it off Wikipedia... Oh well, it'd remain a mystery then. 74.97.32.140 21:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Alright, after some internet sleuthing: That model is Daniella Sarahyba Fernandes - I knew she looked familiar because she was on SI a couple of times. 74.97.32.140 21:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

--Gubby 07:36, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Hate repetition articles?

Than could you do me a favor and vote delete on Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion#The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest

HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia

I fucking lol'd at step 4, I love that idea. You're hilarious. Mightywayne 15:55, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Oops!

My bad on the infiniblock. I forgot you were the guy who wrote the vanity on Wikipedia stuff. I've severed my itchy trigger finger. Accept it as a token of apology.

PS: As per rewriting Cake. Make it in your namespace first, submit to pee review, then we cna replace the article wholesale.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 21:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

...Okay. *catches breath* --Gubby 21:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Maddox

hey! I have a programming job and a college degree to study for, and if I manage to clear myself some free time this weekend I'd love to get on my pirate ship and gatecrash a hippy naturalist commune with nerve gas bombs, but actually what I'd REALLY like to do is to read Uncyclopedia for nine hours straight!" At some point after seven hours of bloodshot-eyed staring and the occasional pause to mop up my own drool, I suddenly almost laughed:

— Your edit to Maddox.

The point of the Maddox article is to parody Maddox's style of writing. Now what you have wrote here, I don't know, I personally have never seen him write anything like this. If you could point out a part of one of his articles that looks like this, then yes it should be kept, otherwise, I don't think it really fits.

Hmmm, interesting are the artices of his style you have pointed out. When I had envisioned a parody of Maddox's writing, I had imagined along the lines of this article: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=bill_oreilly I guess we can do a combination of both styles for the Maddox article.--Little Jimmy 03:14, 1 December 2007 (UTC)