Uncyclopedia:Uncyclopedian of the Year/archive/2000s

Official nominations for 2009

Under user

Score: 15

• Nom - if I may, in the most platonic way possible, the man is a true gem. Other than being a very able admin, he manages to go around doing his thing in the nicest way possible, always helping when asked and never loses his temper. Did a grand job with the PEE company and with the UnSignPost alongside normal maintenance and writing. Give the man a round of applause. ~ 00:10, January 1, 2010 (UTC)...and For. If only for fixing my atrocious spelling over and over again. Oh, and for being the UU that he is. ~ 13:36, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
•  For.--He's just awesome. Eelpop
•  For.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:55, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
•  For.--An admin and writer who takes his work seriously but always with humour and recognition that he can be fallible too. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:34, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
•  For. Very helpful and polite; he definitely has my vote. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 00:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
• He does his thang, and he does it right. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:25, Jan 2
• This guy has been my favorite user ever since Down with this sort of thing! Through the years, he has always come through as a very sensible, very nice, and very funny. You go, UU. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 01:00, Jan 3 2010
• Yes indeed. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:49, 03 Jan 2010
• Kay. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 07:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Keeps his head when all around are losing theirs, is helpful and works hard. What a guy. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:18, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. -- Roman Dog Bird 18:40, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• For. This man is like Superman.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 07:56, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. This man is like, er... Wonderwoman. ☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃ 12:32 January 4

  It's the hotpants, isn't it? --UU - natter 13:01, Jan 4

• For - --Thehallway 18:21, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
• For - This was tough for me. Socky's contributions are well known, of course. And I don't think Spang, or Modus get the credit they deserve. But UU gets it for me. But UU has been great around this place too. He is usually quite active, an extremely approachable admin (which is quite nice), and is always around to help with the site, having good, adult insights on the dramas that happen around here, and very rarely gets brought down by the crap that gets slung around him (and if he does, I just don't see it.). And for all that, I think he deserves the award this year. Good day. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:14, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

MrN9000

Score: 0

• Nom- the prince of pants, who is a bit absent lately unfortunately, is another fine example of why the world would have been better have the British Empire did not collapse. An office and a gentlemen, dealing with vandals and blankers with his tweed pants on while waving his elegant cane at their head. A monocle and a bow tie complete his attire of this perfect example of an English admin, even if he does use the word dude a bit too much. ~ 00:14, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

MadMax

Score: 5

• Nom Do I really have to explain? He's the only person who deserves to win this twice. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He's still at it. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:24, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. He's a good user. DW 18:09, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Make that "Good-natured Uncyclopedian of the Year".--Funnybony 14:46, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
• Tough choice year in year out, the fact that after five long, long, long years MadMax is still plugging away is a testiment in itself. That his contributions are almost universally overlooked saddens me greatly. VERY FOR. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Flour I can't stand it anymore, everytime I look in recent changes MadMax is all over the place fixing and editing and writing and commenting and adding graphics, and apparantly he's been doing this for years! There's nothing wrong with the other nominess, all of them are amazing, friendly, and helpful as far as I can tell, but I'm voting for a second MVP award for this deserving bot. Aleister in Chains Groundhog Day, MMX

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user

Score: 15

• Nom This guy is the next admin, no contest. That is if we ever get a new one. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Helped me more than anybody else. He's (one of) my favourite user(s). Period. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME • 11:33 • Friday, 1-01-2010
•  For. per above, and has over 35 thousand edits. --Mn-z 00:25, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Tough decision, I was torn between UU, Spang, and Socky. But 35 thousand edits?! And of the nominees, other than Mn-z, he's been here the least amount of time, so I think as far as stuff done-to-time to do so ratio, Socky takes more than the cake. He takes the whole damn dessert tray! And here I was promising my date one of those chocolate eclairs. But no. Socky took it. He took everything. Even those little frozen cream puffs. I don't know where he puts it all. -RAHB 13:10, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Actually, Socky's earliest edit is even newer than mine. --Mn-z 19:04, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Tough call, what with UU, MadMax and Spang also nommed. In the end I settled on Socky because he's been consistantly busting his ass with maintainance since he signed up. Plus he's a good dude and I love his username. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:13, 2 Jan
• Fuck Yes. += 04:24,3January,2010
• Yes. My heart was torn between few candidates but the dices decided. G'd f'r y S'ck'! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 23:27, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
•  FOR GOATSE, GOD AND ALL OF THE CLAN! Socky is part of Goa Tse Clan like me. Good writer. Vote for him or you will DIE! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 10:37, January 4, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Basically per what RAHB said. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:25, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
•  For. File:Gba3.jpg File:The empire small.jpg Join Us 01:14, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
•  For. It was between Socky and UU. Socky won my vote based on a photo finish involving a loose thread. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 06:47, 11 January 2010
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 09:59, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Bloody heck. That was a tricky choice. UU already knows how awesome I know he is. Well Socky does 2... MrN 05:53, Jan 17
• For. Socky's stuff roxes my soxes, so there. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 00:49 EST 23 January, 2010
•  For. Socky deserves this. Now he's almost to UU! HELPME
•  For. Really tough decision between sock and UU.--    23:47, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. I could still vote for myself, ya know. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:58, 31 January 2010

  NO! Don't do it! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:59, 31 January 2010

• Comment. Edit Conflict! I was just about to suggest a 23:59 edit war for kicks!--    00:01, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

RabbiTechno

Score: 4

• Nom - other than being a certified Rabbi, our surviving poopsmith has been dealing with the never ending crapflood day and night. Always nice and helpful doing one of the most ungrateful jobs around Uncyc tirelessly. ~ 00:19, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  What do you mean "surviving poopsmith" as if I weren't around? Just cause he or MadMax often beat me to archiving? Well? Do you want me to die or something, you sonvabitch? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:30, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  Yes. ~ 00:32, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

  All right. Just making sure we're on the same page. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:33, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

• For. sausage lol 07:23, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong For The nicest user I have met on Uncyclopedia so far, not taking away from anyone else though. --Nikau 01:25, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• For. If MrN hadn't gone missing, this may have been closer, but it's the Rabbi for me. It's the little things he does - taking the time to leave a helpful, friendly tip on pretty much every ICU he applies is a good example - this is a guy who doesn't just maintain, he helps out and encourages. I remember back when I hadn't been here long, I tidied up an apostrophe or two in an article, and got a huge friendly template on my talk page from RT - really helped me settle in. That's the RT difference. --UU - natter 09:26, Jan 3
• For basically everything in the first half of what UU said, combined with everything in the first half of what Nikau said. —talk 09:50, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Mordillo

Score: 3

• Nomination. The admin that has survived every kind of drama, for which I respect him an immense deal. He has also continued exercising his many administrative duties throughout the year. Basically, he's one of the people that keep the site running on a continuous basis. Also, he won this award last year. Even if he doesn't win it again, he definitely deserves this nomination. Give it up for Mordillo! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:01, 1 January 2010

  Mister Moardildos here told me to go down, though, not up. He's a man, dammit! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:05, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

• For There are a lot of people who deserve to win this, so with all due respect to those people (you know who you are), here goes: Uncyclopedia is the worst, but Dildos puts up with it and keeps coming back for more, and how he manages to do that and still maintain his sanity (just a little bit of it, mind you) is beyond me. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 08:15, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
• 4, and a strong one. -- Jack Phoenix, professional killer admin (Whine?) • (Wikia ♥ ads) 17:46, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For I can always count on Mordillo to give me shit, and deservedly so.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:05, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Mnbvcxz

Score: 1

• Nom and for. Beyond all the various site maintenance he does, and beyond rarely missing an opportunity to vote on anything, Mnbvcxz is sort of the tireless gardener and cultivator of Uncyclopedia in-jokes. Which may make people roll their eyes at him sometimes. But it also means he has a real affection and passion for this site which is hard to match. Plus, he practically lives here. Does the guy ever sleep? pillow talk 19:14, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

In my defense somebody else was responsible for mainspacing that one thing --Mn-z 00:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Spang

Score: 0

• Nom The go-to-guy for most of the coding and site maintenance around here. How many of us have had issues with coding, Wikia/site fuck-ups, and getting things to work, go to Spang, and have him give you the answer quickly, and allowing us coding idiots the ability to understand what in the hell he's talking about? Whenever something goes wrong with this place, he is THE guy to go to, and has been for a while. For that, at the very least, he deserves a nom. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:34, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird

Score: 1

• Nom - Energizer bunny on hard drugs. Trash basher, vandal basher, QVFD basher, bashers basher. In the darkest hours of Uncyclopedia, RDB was there, bashing the terror away. ~ 17:52, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
• A glittering beacon of unending admiration for this guy. Gets shit done and keeps it real. There is nothing else you need to do to get UotY, and this guy does both in spades, with flying colors, and better than anybody else, and when I think about him I touch myself. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:18, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Modusoperandi

Score: +0

• Nomination. I know I've been hard on MO in the past for "doing nothing" and "being useless" and also "horrible and unfunny" and "sucks cock like a champ", but it turns out that I was proved wrong for the very first time when I realized that he is quite the opposite of "doing nothing" and "useless" and "horrible and unfunny" and... well, that's it. Basically, he should get some votes, because he's the paste that holds this community's fragmented sanity together. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 10:09, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
• Yup, and he introduced all of us to mybrute.] carrot lol 13:14 January 15

  That was TheLedBalloon, actually. I just made it erotic. Terribly so. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:24, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Gerrycheevers

Score: 0

• Would-have-been for Until Gerry disappeared near the end of the year, he was my hands down winner of this award. The guy single-handedly kept the USP up and running, and was consistantly funny while doing it. He was a huge contributer to PEEing, pretty much re-wrote that other thing that has slipped my mind right now (On this day...? Anniversaries? I can't remember), and still found time to populate our land with new, hilarious articles the entire time. If he hadn't left, this vote would have been his. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:22, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

  What he said. Every last word of it. Where are you Gerry? --UU - natter 13:16, Jan 15

  Oh balls. I was gonna do this, but then, well, what y'all said. Also, for WotY too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:45, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Electrified mocha chinchilla

Score: 1

• Nomination. He was asking for it, kinda. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:36, 31 January 2010
•  For. Did I win yet? --EMC ^[TALK] 23:41 Jan 31 2010

Official winners

Under user and Sockpuppet of an unregistered user are Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedians of the Year 2009, with a score of +15 each.

Official nominations for 2008

Cajek

Score: 6

• Nomination - Aside from his obvious qualities as a writer Cajek doesn't get the respect he deserves for the work he does on Uncyclopedia. Always helpful to other writers both established and newcomers Cajek has been one of the real workhorses that has seen Uncyclopedia go from strength to strength this year. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For. Cajek doesn't just improve the site; he has a knack for encouraging others to get behind him and... oh, dear, that's turning into a sexual innuendo. pillow talk 21:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
•  F☭R 03:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
•  Very Strong For Cajek makes this site very fun. He deserves very strong bannination it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For What they said. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:28, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Only limited action by me lately, but I've seen him hard at work helping others.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 05:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
• This is not an easy year to vote. There are quite a few here that I admire for what they did this year...in a non sexual way...or such. But I think that Cajek has initiated the Pee Review revolution which revitalized a part of the site that was dormant for...well...forever! I think Cajek injected us with new energies (as well as sexually transmitted diseases) which managed to make us look, if only for a short while as not being the worst. Unlike the majority of us Cajek cared. ~ 13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
  • You guys are awesome: I love this place, sexually speaking.   Le Cejak • <14:09 Jan 16, 2009>

TheLedBalloon

Score: 7

• Nomination - Bloody funny, generous with his time, much as with Cajek so much goes unnoticed, I am going to struggle to choose between them. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
  • Wuv 10 years from now, I'll still remember my adopter's username. And his home address. Because I'm kinda weird.   Le Cejak • <17:16 Jan 01, 2009>
• For. IronLung 02:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. An ever present, ever friendly, ever helpful admin, and great all-around guy too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. I love this man. Goddamn if I ever met leddy in a bathroom goddamn some shit would happen. Goddamn. -

  kingkitty ~Fuck you~

• For. He fixes things when I broked them. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 03:26, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Pretty much per TKF. Nothing else to say on that one. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 07:08, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Looks like Mordillo is going to win (which I agree with), but I would like to make special mention of Led. Led's style of handling the crap, whilst not getting upset by assholes yet still continuing to write quality articles shows what a awesome dude this guy is. Another thing about Led... When he has made a mistake, he admits it. Twice in over a year I think it was. ;) MrN 16:12, Jan 9
• For There's nothing that Led can't do. Really. Try him. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

84.194.239.31

Score: 1 + 1 vote for the institution of IPotY

The hamsters will always remember us of his greatness.

• Nomination - 84.194.239.31 was the one that prophecy had spoken of, the one who would bring balance to the wiki. The awesome 84.194.239.31 was always there to state the obvious, out-grammar anyone and talk existentially. Maybe he's still there, lurking in the shadows, ready to act, to do what is necessary. 84.194.239.31, he was the coolest IP of 2008. He said "nobody has to worry about what happened to me" but still I wonder what happened to him. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 01:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For - I know I'm trowing my vote away, but I can't stand 84.194.239.31 not getting some of the credit he deserves. I wouldn't be able to decide who else to vote for anyway. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For the creation of IP of the Year and this guy being the first. 84.194.239.31 is a stellar chap, killing a rather pesky troll for us and being exceptionally helpful before vanishing off into the distance, preferring the anonymity of his searchable, easily identifiable IP address. This award should be saved for an actual Uncyclopedian, which means that the user must be a MUN at least, in my book anyways. However, this guy still deserves some recognition. (I mean it, IPotY would be awesome, can we make that happen?) —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

  Do you seriously believe that the almighty 84.194.239.31 can be traced by such simple mechanisms? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 16:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

  I don't know what it was that I was trying to say. Don't call me on this shit, I'm making it up as I go, man. —Sir SysRq (talk) 22:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

MrN9000

Score: 2

• Nom & for - A real workhorse, and he's everywhere - encouraging new writers, smithing, reverting, formatting, fixing, helping out and being a real gent. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
• Near-woot The only reason I'm not voting for Pants is because that other guy from England, the one that lives under the ground and controls my thoughts, has been around longer, and helped me navigate this crazy website. GO N!   Le Cejak • <17:15 Jan 01, 2009>
• Comment. I just want to express my gratitude to MrN for being one of the most effective and essential Uncyclopedians to the site for the past year or so. Had Mordillo not been as awesome as he is, my vote would go here. I hold MrN in high regard as being one of the members who sparked a good chain reaction of users doing maintenance and helping to keep the site going, and think he was quite possibly the single most important user in that particular "revolution", as it were. As such, he deserves at the very least, this statement of praise. -RAHB 18:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
• For - hard choice for me to make this year, some fine contributors. His finer points are detailed by others above. The only thing I would add to this is that the work he does has been achieved without the "benefit" of admin rights, which speaks for itself. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Sycamore

Score: 2

• Nom - Another absolute Trojan - a recent changes monster, reverter of shite, fixer of vandalism, fighter of fires and wearer of a stylish sporran. Probably does more work than you. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
• For per above. --Mnbvcxz 21:41, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Since nobody will make him an admin. Harumph! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Mordillo

Score: +21

• Nom - He's the admin I see about the place the most, making the bans that need to be made, doing the big bad wolf stuff to keep fuckwits at bay, and generally being the controlling zionist influence on this wiki. --UU - natter 09:24, Jan 1
•  For. - He's good, plus a good admin too. Makes good articles. I fear that I'll be blocked if I don't vote for him. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 02:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• PHWHORE And stuffs. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Diplomatic, a work horse, responsible, and as I've said time and time again, and will continue to say until the day the Earth stands still, he simply knows how to get shit done. -RAHB 03:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Tough call this year, but I'm voting Mordillo, per RAHB. 'Dillo's the man. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 14:06, Jan 2
• And I thought WotY was hard. Of the nine current noms, there are seven more than deserving candidates here (I'll let you guys work out who that is), and there's an argument to be made for every one of them. I've thought especially hard about voting for UU, then MrN, then Sycamore. Then I noticed a common thread among them - who is it that they all look up to in a way, and who they ask for help in a firefight? Mordillo. He's been on fire all year pretty much, and overall, I feel I have to vote for him. –—Hv (talk) 2/01 18:18
• For. Hard working, friendly, effective. Did I forget to mention Jewish? Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 18:21, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Four as per him being awesome. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• Yeah, he's cool. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:47, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For despite the whole Gaza thing... -- bare Ape (eat) (Riot Porn) 21:13, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For, BECAUSE of the Gaza thing. Yes. What? Oh, I'm sorry I misunderstood. For anyway.--<<>> 00:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Sure. Gramps earns it. It's now or never, considering how old he already is... -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 16:37, 7 Jan
• For. One of the best. And apparently his wife is cute too -- sannse (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Mordillo pwns spammers, and is an all around nice guy. --Meganew POST NOW!!! 23:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Always the guy who lays down the law and gets stuff done, without being too serious about it. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:42, Jan 11
• W♥v. Hebrew boner. Level headed. Role model. Mediator. More dildos. Only one of these terms refers to Mordillo. And yes, it is "role model." Wait, all of those describe Mordillo perfectly. I think Hv did it for me, made me realize that everyone comes to one person time after time for advice and a little tough love. I don't know who that person is, so I'm basing my vote on userpage vandalism. Mordillo's page has seen more action than...er...Codeine's mum. Oh, and he's a Jew that controls the internet, something you don't see too much these days and therefore needs to be rewarded and recognized. Good work, Mordillo. —Sir SysRq (talk) 02:21, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• Yes. He has shiny shoes. - [13:41 12 January] Sir FSt Don Yettie
• Bandwagon --EMC ^[TALK] 02:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment restored Boobs after it had accidentally been deleted for whatever reason.--Mnbvcxz 15:53, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

No agenda here, I just love boobs. ~ 16:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

• Dig I love this man. To the point that his girlfriend is seriously distraught by it. Could I be more subtle about it? Absolutely. Will I be more subtle about it? I think you know the answer to that question. You think I care what that bitch thinks? ;) --THINKER 01:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

That's my wife you're talking about! O_O ~ 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• For he's pure gold and have you looked at the price of Au lately? Let's mine this bastard! --Kenvalyi 01:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
• Why not? -- REGRETTENENBAUMIS DEAD TALK! 00:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
•  For. Woo! Mord! go mord! Woo! woo... I'm going home ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 18:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Under user

Score: 9

• Nom - One word - awesome — Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Can I vote more than once? How does this thing work? What does this button do? Oh sh-   Le Cejak • <17:12 Jan 01, 2009>
•  For. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Backed me all the way in numerous parts of the site in the past few months. --Nachlader 18:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. He's like OnStar: always there. (groan) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:51, Jan 2
• For. Parsat (talk / contribs) 04:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
• For - It's about time a non-sysop like myself got this award. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Damn right UU has kept this site running all year. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
• For helping out around the site and constantly peeing. --Docile hippopotamus 00:37, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. Devoted enough to not only do my job for a year, but then take the title to go with it. Good people. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi

Score: 2

• Nom nom nom. He has flavor.--<<>> 15:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
• For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:29, 02 Jan 2009
• For, as per myself. ~ Readmesoon 18:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Heerenveen

Score: 0

• Nom I just don't think he gets enough credit for all the stuff he does around here. Deserves at least a nom. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 17:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

A nomination just for the sake of nomination? --EMC ^[TALK] 02:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

No, a nomination for the sake of everyone saying, "Oh yeah! Heerenveen totally deserves this award. Seeing him here makes me want to vote for him, and whomever nominated him is a sexy, manly, awesome guy!" That's what I was generally going for. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 06:08, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

SysRq

Score: 1

• Nom&For I don't even know if Sys would approve of me nominating and for-ing him but I'm going to do it anyway. In my opinion he is one of the brightest lights on uncyclopedia : always funny, always friendly and compassionate as well as passionate (the speeches on WotY demonstrate that) and although my opinion probably doesn't count for much because I keep procrastinating myself on and off the site to the point where I'm shit at everything Uncyclopedia-wise, I still feel strongly that this guy deserves this award. —talk 11:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Man, fuck you. Thanks buddy, I appreciate the kind words. To say thank you, I am going to make a simple comment without bitching about you voting for me. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Official winner

Mordillo is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2008, with a score of +21.

Official nominations for 2007

67.72.98.46

Score: 1

• Nom and super for!!! - I know he's been inactive for a while, but this guy deserves it! --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)

Thekillerfroggy

Score: 0 homicidal amphibians

1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. There are so many people I wanted to nom for this, and TKF is definitely one of them. His talents stretch to all areas of work in the site, from welcoming new users to huffing and ICUing in Newpages. He even has time to write some amazing fantastic articles. His sysopping has only made him an even more helpful contributor, and I hope he continues as one of the most reasonable admins around. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:56, Jan 1
2. For TKF has been around since time immemorial. He's been an admin since November. Trust in Frog.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 01:24

   Erm, he has been admin since December. I know, I was in his inauguration. He wore light green robe with a very big cleavage. I know, it seemed strange to me as well at the time. ~ Mordillo where is my INCEST? 09:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

3. For A tough decision, and yet I am very clear on who I think deserves it the most. -RAHB 02:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
4.  For. if it's good enough for Cajek, it's good enough for me. Also, I agree. Also, wut? Also, buttsecks? Also, ~Fag x FS

• Comment! Everyone who voted for me should read this! I'm hereby throwing my base behind Algorithm, so if you love me more than the other guys, it's time for you guys to suddenly love Algo more than me. VOTE/EAT ALGO! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

MadMax

Score: +18 ass-less leather pants

1. Nomination and a BIG For. What can be said about MadMax? Probably very little actually, for a guy who quietly goes about the business of cleaning up all the crap on Uncyclopedia. For the guy who should have been made a sysop at least a year before he was. For the guy who is a one man army, organising, deleting cruft, he never sleeps. One of the few contributors that you can almost guarantee will have edited something on most articles on this site. Step forward, MadMax! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
2. For No offense to the other nominees, of course, but I'm inclined to say that anybody not voting for MadMax has simply failed to notice all the work he actually does, and not just in 2007 (although he fully deserves the award for this year alone). In honor of his long, long history at Uncyc, unmatched in length and efficiency, Max had better win or I'm machete-ing somebody's dog or small child. —rc (t) 06:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

   Always the charmer...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

3. For. Although all of the nominees are extremely worthy, the sheer volume of work MadMax does is phenomenal, and deserves full recognition. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. For. The man with the single greatest volume of contributions to the site, and the true unsung hero of Uncyclopedia. So let's sing already. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
5.  Strong For--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
6. Approve. This guy deserves it more than anyone else. ~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   1/01/2008 @ 23:37
7. Dah! Does good work, is efficient, performs quanity, but with quality. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
8. For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
9. For - Yah, and not just because I'm worried about what rc will do to my dog. -- sannse esnnas 11:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
10. For - Bastard beats me to the revert far too often. He's also a total mainspace whore. — Sir Manticore 12:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
11.  EXTREME STRAIGHT FOR - Mhaille and RC say it all really, he does a hell of a lot of work that the rest of us are too lazy to do and never seems to let up (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 3, 13:49
12. For ... quietly goes about the business of fighting crime on uncyc...and he's Mhaille-Approved!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 14:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
13. For. As much as I want to vote for Algorithm, I never seem to go onto recent changes without seeing MadMax on it. For the sheer volume of work he does, MadMax gets my vote. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
14. For - Yeah, I s'pose he makes edits here occasionally. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
15. Hell yes —Hinoa talk.kun 23:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
16.  Definitely Among much else, even took time to thank me for my Cristmas card. --YeOldeLuke 04:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
17. For I can't even look at Special:Recentchanges without seeing his darn name all over it. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 14:37, Jan. 14, 2008
18. For. ~ Mordillo where is my INCEST? 14:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack

Score: 7-eyed Jack

1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. OEJ is a little bit inactive in the past couple weeks, but that doesn't change the fact that he has done some great stuff for the site. I know he's done a bunch of great stuff in VFD, but I mostly know him as a pee reviewer. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that he invented the real review, the one that's actually helpful, and ushered in an age of extremely helpful reviewers. He has also written more articles about more things than I've ever seen. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:13, Jan 1
2. Strong For--Æ 01:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3. Very Strong For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 06:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. For per LedBalloon. I remember the olden times, when putting an article on Pee Review basically meant you were waiting for OEJ to look it over for you. Now that the tradition is distributed a tiny bit more evenly, we can finally acknowledge his amazingness. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 21:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
5. For my favorite non-op at Uncyclopedia.--<<>> 22:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
6. For ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
7. 4 --DJ Irreverent 06:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Algorithm

Score: 12 dog foods...

1. Nomination and For. There are people like MadMax who do lots of little work around the site. Then there are people like myself, who do more noticeable stuff in bulk. Then there are people like Algorithm, who keep the site functioning. If not for Algorithm, we'd likely be stuck in 2005, and probably not even exist. He's done more background work and tinkled around in Uncyclopedia's circuit board more than any other user for the past three years; it's a total shame that he's without this award so far. Algo is a vital cornerstone of the site, and a damned great dog food, too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

   Comment I agree with everything TKF said. Algo has contributed the Forum system, the <choose> extension and numerous other bits of now-used-everywhere Uncyc tech. I stand by my vote for MadMax, but if you must vote for someone else, make it Algorithm or else I'll piano-wire your wife or husband. —rc (t) 06:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

2. DIG Algo is my hero, and one helluva guy. Almost like Yanni. He kept this asshole around when I was very close to leaving. I hope Max wins too, because he certainly deserves it, but Algo is just quality people and the ratchet that keeps this place running like a well-oiled topless wrestler machine. --THINKER 16:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
3. 4: Al is one of the great unsung heroes of Uncyclopedia and until his song gets sung, I'll keep pushing to make that happen. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Strong For I want to start off by saying that this was one of the hardest choices I've had to make, and that all of these people would probably make a better president than any of the nominees. That said, Algo is, as TKF said, among the most hardworking, helpful, and all-around good guys of the site. We have him to thank for the wonderful new VFP system (which has sadly gone unnoticed, if one takes the quality of nominations into account), those things that rcmurphy mentioned, and being the only active admin on the site for the better part of this summer. When louder and more noticeable admins were contributing to the forum madness instead of doing their duties, Algo quietly took over, banning blankers, featuring articles, and moving this site along at a clip that never seemed to miss a beat. Without MadMax, we would have several more uncategorized pages, several fewer redirects, and a volume of edits that, now that we have them, is seemingly indispensable. Without TKF, we would be less several hilarious pages, thousands of unreverted vandalizations, and an all-around good user. Without One-Eyed Jack, Pee Review would be a festering hole of unloved crap, much of which is a chore to read. Without RDB, we'd see a lot less recent changes. Without Zombiebaron, we'd have a lot of trouble moving forward. But where everyone on this page is a recent-changes monster and revert-o-matic, Algorithm offers something more, something that puts him a cut above the rest. And that's why he gets my vote.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Yeah. Lj said it all. TKF is my close 2nd choice, but I had no idea of all the things that Algo did behind the scenes before this award; I've taken so much of it for granted. So yeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:37, Jan 7
6. For Did I say I was very clear before? Oh, that was a lie. Yes, everybody here deserves this, though Lj seemed to say everything best. Algo FTW. -RAHB 00:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
7. For, a scholar and a gentleman. Plus, he's good with the codeystuff. And no, not just Codeine's stuff. Other codeystuff too. -- The Zombiebaron 02:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
8. For TKF convinced me.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 9 (02:48)
9. For I agree with TKF.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 19:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
10.  For. as per TKF. Could I eat yew too? :P ~Fag x FS
11.  Fore per TKF. I tend to agree with him here. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
12. For -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird

Score: 0

1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. All over the site, from RecentChanges to Special:Random, RDB finds crap that has festered on otherwise-decent articles. He then purges that crap. For this reason, he is more than qualified to be up for this award. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:22, Jan 1
2. Comment Unfortunately, it seems that there are so very many unsung heroes of Uncyclopedia. RDB is another one of these greats. His horn isn't being tooted quite so much as the rest of these candidates, but it deserves some. Toot toot. I'm tired, let's get some pork or something.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Zombiebaron

Score: Zomb1ebaron

1. Nomination As Led, I'm holding off on voting. And for fun, I'm making things even more difficult when it comes to choices. Like it or not, Zombiebaron has been integral to this site that we love so much as this past year has gone on. Whether it be banning the 'tards that most people don't have the balls to ban, or being one of the two or three active admins on the site come August/September (and probably the most efficient of them), ZB has fully marked himself deserving of this award. Sure, he may be a little bit abrasive at times, but just like Famine before him, without Zombiebaron, we wouldn't be nothing.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

   Comment You used a double negative in that last sentence, Lj. I guess what you mean is that Zombiebaron is the root of all our problems.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   Just my luck. I try to give my nomination a nice, down-home appeal to it and you come around with your fickle grammar and whatnot.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   I told you that English was an idiotic language!!!! ~ Mordillo where is my INCEST? 13:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   You did? I couldn't understand what you were saying. You're sure it was English?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

2. For Because of what I have seen in my short time here... MrN 21:31, Jan 6

Official winner

MadMax is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2007, with a score of +18 ass-less leather pants.

Official nominations for 2006

Algorithm

Score: 0

Nominate: Over the past year this site has grown immensely, and we've faced many new challenges as a result. From content management to communication, we've faced technical hurdles that needed to be solved, and Algorithm has been the lynchpin that has allowed us to face them. A year ago, the Village Dump was a different place that could never have handled the level of traffic it now recieves. A year ago there were no lists of tagged pages whose times had expired. Even the much-maligned NRV tag has been vital, and Algo was responsible for making it possible and for allowing it to improve. The fundemental reality is that this site could not exist as it is now without the work that Algo has done. Other than the prior winners of this award, I think Algo is the only person I could make such a statement about. -Rev. Isra (talk)

Todd Lyons

Score: +7

Nominate and For: I know that Todd has won just about everything there is to be won on this site, all with good reason. From the moment he arrived on Uncyclopedia you just knew that he was going to be successful here. Not only have the levels of his writing and general contributions been consistantly high, as the stats will show he has just done so much more than the rest of us, and done it well. That he has created some of the best work on the site, whilst at the same time knee-deep in the Admin duties says everything to me about his commitment. Regardless of what the future may hold, this is the Year of the Todd. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

• For.' Todd has been one of my favourite writers on this site since December 24th 2005 (brownie points if you know why), and although I've been missing for most of the year, even when I returned Todd was still an extremely prominent user, to all. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 19:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - Great writer, great admin, great contributions, just great all round. I think the fact that he wrote the controversial Asperger's Syndrome only gives him extra points in my book. Then again, I am notoriously uncool. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Although I don't have a nice long reason for voting like everyone else, I do know that Todd deserves this award. When I first came to Uncyclopedia, only a month or so after Todd had joined, I could've sworn he was master of the site. His name was everywhere, and everyone loved him. Although he may not be as universally popular as he once was, neither is anyone who's been here for over a year.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For I've known I was gonna vote for him from the moment I learned he hadn't won. To say that his writing is hilarious, focused, and clearly a shining example of some of the best of this site is only scratching the thinnest surface of this fine User's contributions. He huffs, he cleans up, he helps n00bs, and he even sings for UnTunes. I can't list nearly the tiniest percent within the scope that he contributes to. It's an honor for Todd to have graced Uncyclopedia, and if he hasn't improved it more than nearly anyone else, I don't know who has. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• (chanting) Todd. Todd. Todd. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [03:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)]
• I've forseen this nomination an year ago. Mhaille is a strong candidate too.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille

Score: +22

Nomination and For: Anyone thinking of voting for me should probably vote for Mhaille instead, because I'm not certain there would've been a "me" if there wasn't a "him" already here. The same could be said of many other users who call this site home. Though the "official" welcoming committee is a fairly recent phenomenon, Mhaille was already an expert n00b coddler when I was still in wikidiapers.  :) Within minutes of posting, he started making pictures for my crappy first articles. I was thrilled, wrote some more, and kept on writing because of the unconditional support he gave me. He hooked me, and scores of other users, and didn't ask for anything in return. It took a long time for this site to recognize his own immense talent as a writer, editor and artist, mostly because he was always the last person to promote himself. Rather, he buoyed a lot of us up into awards that he rightfully should have received first. I'm glad, but not the least bit surprised that despite his modesty he's finally been recognized for his creative talent and administrative leadership. This award would be due recognition for everything he's given us, and my vote goes to him. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

• For, Honestly, Mhaille is the Uncyclopedia user I am closest too, due to his good nature and guiding lights. While Splaka created my talk page, Mhaille was the second user to edit it (after me), pointing out that the all seeing eye was always watching. Since then Mhaille has helped me with my Photoshops (read "Potatochops"), articles, and good will. "Good will?", you ask. Well, at one point I thanked Mhaille for some favor that he had done me, and I said that I owed him a favor. At that point Mhaille decline my favor, saying that the reason that he does favors is not to recive favors, but that "the idea is that you do nice stuff for other people and the circle continues". Well, I could go on and on about Mhaille and all the wonderful things he has done for the site, but I'll stop here. Lotsa Love, --Sir Zombiebaron 01:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. What can I say? I was paid to vote for him. In my opinion, he's a vagrant, a gobshite, and above all, an insult to the Uncyclopedia name. God forbid we never had Mhaille; I mean, Holocaust Tycoon, Neolithic Age, and Biggles: what tasteless piles of trash. These articles should have been QVFDed immediately. Sorry to break it to you Mhaille, but we all conspired to feature your crap to make you feel good about yourself, and apparently that's all gone to your head. I've only been here six months, and even I know that. And I expect you're going to vote for yourself you selfish whore. In all seriousness, go fuck yourself. I love you. --EMC ^[TALK] 04:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For Re-iterating the above message, Mhaille was one of the very first people (along with Bradaphraser) to welcome and support me on IRC over the summer, back when I was we lil' noobling without the slighest bit of humor or sense to guide me in a first farcical forays into article writing. Mhaille always helped me with my articles, added to them, asked me to help him on his (though God knows that my additions/revisions were of dubious quality), provided me with pictures, always was willing to indulge my silly, flippant attitude and style, and above all was willing to make this place hospitable for a new user. I can safely say that without him, and those like him, I wouldn't be here today. This may seem like an overwrought, drawn-out display of decadence, which, to a degree it is, but mixed in here, somewhere (you can see it if you kind of squint), is a real honest appreciation for someone who embodies all that is great about "Uncyclopedia." All the people currently nominated are deserving in every way. Mhaille is just more deserving. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 05:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, even if he is a Scouser.
  Seriously, though, he rules. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 12:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For - Yes, I agree with ENeGMA, although I seemed to gain a lot of support from people when I first came here. Mhaille was one of them, (the others know who they are.... if they don't.. maybe I dreamt all this). I think he is the most deserving candidate here at this time, so I'm giving my vote to him. —Braydie at 12:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. If you aren't going to give this to the same people every year, and there enough great people here that we don't need to do that, then we need to find the most-deserving people of those who are left. Todd and Mhaille both come to mind, in this case, as people who are always very classy AND do good work here. I have to give the overall nod between the two to Mhaille because he's been here the whole time, and I don't think he's ever left for more than a couple days at a time. Thus, he gets my vote, with a nod to Todd as well.--<<>> 20:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• I Approve This Message, /me cries like a baby for bein' torn between the 2 men that he loves 20:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For He Who Watches From Behind The Code--Shandon 20:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For being bloody awesome. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 22:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For just to see how high this vote can go. Seriously though, Mhaille sounds great. He hasn't helped me yet, though(it's not too late!). --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, let me tell you a little story; starting a potential rewrite on a page...got the text basics fleshed out (maybe an hour or so in), and 'Boom', suddenly there's a friggin' picture there. Retouched, too. And appropriate! Get this; Mhaille does this all the time. Some users are helpful, he's pre-helpful.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• For He's really nice and he makes some of the best articles here on Uncyclopedia. --General Insineratehymn 02:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, 4, Four and fore. Best. Person. Ever. I WAS HERE -kjhf!- 13:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• For: He seems to be incurably benevolent, and really is helpful without being asked. --Sir Jam 10:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. First off let me say that anything nice said about Mhaille is a blatant lie, and also completely untrue. He's probably definitely the reason why this place sucks so much, and is the worst site on the internet. A world without Mhaille is as close to Utopia most of us will ever come. Did I mention he once put a bomb inside a puppy? Anyway, hope you win UotY! (Dear Todd, this is all a trick, I really hope you win) (Dear Mhaille, don't read that) --Anyone 21:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

(Dear Anyone, no chance. Thanks anyway. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 14:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC))

• For. I've been fond of him (in an platonic way, stop staring at me!) since he welcomed me to Uncync. Besides the fact that he is virtually everywhere (there's a good expression in Hebrew which describes him: His hand is in all, and everyones' hands are in him. Just an expression you sick sick people!) he manages to do so without ever losing his temper. He actually makes vandals feel ashamed with his dry British bans. All in all, Mhaille's my vote. God save the queen. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 10:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• for. consistantly dilligent and fair admin, consistantly solid writer, so dedicated an uncyclopedian that he may be in need of psychiatric help. Get outside, smell the trees - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. So, I voted for Todd for WOTY, therefore Mhaille is the only choice for UOTY. "Ooh, but Codeine, that's tactical voting. That's hardly right, is it?" Shut the fuck up. Every last one of you should make the effort to thank these two men personally for making this website what it is today. Mhaille keeps our signal-to-noise ratio cleaner than a digital mastering studio; he not only welcomes, but invests time and effort into helping noobs, he writes consistently outstanding articles, he makes consistently outstanding pictures, he damn near lives on IRC pointing people in useful directions... in short, he is the very definition of an Uncyclopedian. Mr. M., I salute you sir. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• For- Mhaille is a real nice fella :) I know, and Mhaille does help out with images alot, and even contibuted to the DNA article of mine, what, he must have been watching recent changes and saw my plea. What a nice fella. I wish I could vote for Todd too, since hes such a cool guy too, and he even audio recorded one of my unnews stories.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 01:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• For - He's a nice guy... --AAA! (AAAA) 08:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. What.. er... everyone else said. Damn, there was going to be a pithy comment here. -- 02:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Rcmurphy

Score: =|:D\-<

Nomination and for. Yes, I know he won last year's award, but this shouldn't be an issue at all. Rc has been ever present, augmenting what I believe to be correct Uncyclopedic behavior, giving up a lot of his free time to keep the site running smoothly. That's not to say the other candidates are undeserving, of course. They all should get props for their excellent contributions. But, in my humble opinion, no-one is equally... erm... without sin? ... as our very own, radio-controlled father Murphy. *raises glass* To RC! *ching!* ~ sin($) ^tan(€) 19:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• All the nominees thus far are deserving (Mhaille in particular for his ability to help out on a couple of my pages...sometimes before I'd started writing them...), but RC is my moral compass. My calm port in a stormy sea, if you will. For that, and for putting up with my histrionics, RC gets my for.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Quite possibly the best uncyclopedian, like, ever. For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:19, 1 Jan 2007
• I really, really appreciate the nomination and votes, but just as with the other awards I think it's more fitting for the candidates to be people who haven't won it before, so I'm turning down the nomination. Also I'd never win anyway. So you guys can blow your votes on somebody else. :D —rc (t) 23:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Just remember that we still love you.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

And I love you all. Except Spang   Tompkins   ERTW   Apples. —rc (t) 06:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

How can you not love Apples!?! So he and Fat Sandy are in some sort of fight - he's still a good guy.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I always assumed Apples was a girl... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:01, 9 Jan 2007

Well, his 10 year-old voice is probably pitched similar to that of a girl's.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Why are you talking about yourself in the third person, Tomps? —rc (t) 01:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I thought everyone already knew.... It's true, I'm ten years old, and have yet to hit puberty. I'm sorry to everyone that I've secretly cybered with throughout the past year (you, Murph, especially).   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Official winner

Mhaille is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2006, with a score of +22.

Official nominations for 2005

RadicalX

RadicalX (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +1

• Nomination because une image vaut mille mots and a picture is worth a thousand words. --Carlb 23:35, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Carlb

Carlb (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

Nomination. ~ Look at his edit history, or the (link removed) wikistats. It's like War and Peace. -- T. (talk) 11:40, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• Vote ~ For carrying a huge load of the unglamourous but essential trench slogging duty on top of his article and template work. I'm in awe. Can I buy you a beer, or a Subaru, or something? :) -- T. (talk) 00:57, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Rcmurphy

Rcmurphy (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +8

• Nomation and vote No one has done more for Uncyclopedia than Rcmurphy, well, except for deletions, bans, protects, moves, reverts. But Rc has selflessly handled the thankless crappy tasks of VFH, VFP, VFS, VFD, and VFVF for months. Maybe a bribe will make him stay longer. --Splaka 23:30, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Because FPSPPs stick together... --~ sin($) ^tan(€) 00:18, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Conditional For Only if you can get the smell of ham out of your clothes.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 04:37, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Here here, rc totally deserves my vote and the award. --Sir gwax (talk) 04:10, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For: --Ogopogo 04:50, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• ForThe reasons are already listed by others.--Bradaphraser 05:14, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:41, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. Murph and Uncyclopedia are synonymous in my mind, and I'm sure in many others. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:46, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. On behalf of all of the preschoolers in the world.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:40, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• Forrety for. --KATIE!! 00:43, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Splaka

Splaka (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +4

• For, There is no God but Splaka. There is no God but Splaka. There is no God but Splaka. There is no God but Splaka. - Nonymous 04:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For And not just because he voted for me, oh no. Even as a regular user (before he was adminned) he did more for the site than many admins have done - I'm looking at you, RC - and he's done even more since his deflowering sysopping. Aside from the deletions, bannings, etc., he's introduced a lot of coding tricks and has organized or helped organize some very useful stuff (MTU, NRV, and so on). --—rc (t) 02:43, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For. While rc trudged through crap in VFH for months on end...at most 4 times a week...Splaka reads and handles recent changes almost constantly. Nobody is more committed to the quality of uncyclopedia's articles. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For What's not to love about (Insert name of candidate here)? --The Zombiebaron 00:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Ralph Nader

Score: 0

NAMINATION' EYE THNIK TPOCICAL HUMAR IS FNNYU.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 04:39, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• Against He may be the best candidate on the board, but I don't want to take a chance of Bush winning because I threw away my vote.--Bradaphraser 03:06, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Official winner

Rcmurphy is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2005, with a score of +8.

Official nominations for 2004

Chronarion

Chronarion (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +9

• For possibly having conceived of it sometime during the calendar year of 2004. --Splaka 03:58, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• For. The best absent dictator ever, qualities that were present long before Uncyclopedia. KATIE!! 04:05, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• File:For.JPG CAN'T TOUCH HIM ---Kakun 23:50, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For because he invented this thing and all. --Sir gwax (talk) 04:39, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For: --Ogopogo 04:51, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For reasons already given by others.--Bradaphraser 05:16, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For I found out Sophia was cheating on me. --—rc (t) 06:24, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• For » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
• Stop! It's For Time --The Zombiebaron 00:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Sophia

Sophia (talk) – contribs (new • del) • edit-count • block (rem • list) • all logs • groups • checkuser

Score: +2

• All hail! --Algorithm (talk) 23:32, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
• For Chron is great and everything, but he ain't divine. --—rc (t) 05:42, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • Retracted --—rc (t) 06:27, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Official winner

Chronarion is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2004, with a score of +9.