Uncyclopedia:Uncyclopedian of the Year/archive/2010s
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Uncyclopedian of the Year. |
 |
Nominations for 2019[edit source]
EMC[edit source]
Score: 9
Nom+For. EMC has shown a level of dedication to the Uncyclopedian cause that is nearly unparalled. Definite For. Cassandra (talk)- For. ~ Kakun · talk 07:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- For Deserves this award more than anyone. —
(talk) (contributions) 07:32:24 2020/01/01 UTC - For. He stole $68 from Mark Zuckerberg just to pay for the server. A real mensch. User:CandidToaster/sig 15:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- For. Uncyclopedian of every year, as far as I'm concerned. — SG1|Hereish [citation needed] 07:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- For. Successfully finished judging the 2019 aristocrats before 2021. Zzz
14:53, 5 January, 2020 (UTC) - I couldn't think of a more worthy sack of shit than EMC. Mazel tov. ShabiDOO 20:34, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- For - He was already just about the most dedicated user we had, but going to bat with legal issues and bringing in a lawyer is next level. -- Kip the Egg
Talk Works 02:27, Jan. 6, 2020 - F☭R
Nom+For. EMC has shown a level of dedication to the Uncyclopedian cause that is nearly unparalled. Definite For. 
EMC is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year for 2019.
Nominations for 2014[edit source]
Xamralco[edit source]
Score: 6
- For. Xamralco's return has been marked by hundreds of categorised pages and projects with nice-sounding names! Anton (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- For. Just voted for Nikau as a writer. Xamralco's return has been just as important. All round Ninja in the house. Leverage (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- For. -- IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 18:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- For.
Mattsnow 01:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC) - For. Allows the other administrators to assume their natural state of doing fuck all. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
09:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC) - For. --EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 20:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
MadMax[edit source]
Score: 3
- For. I know this now resembles the monthly awards, but this dude needs a big hand, a pat on the back, and various other anatomical things. Leverage (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- The quiet guy who does tons of shit you wouldnt even notice unless you looked at recent changes ALL THE TIME! --ShabiDOO 19:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- For. I heart Maxxy pads.
ŤäŁķ ¿Ș₮áłĶ?฿¡฿↓¡ography 22:17 1.03.15
Anton199[edit source]
Score: 2
- For. Combines the friendliness of Aleister with the competition-based proactivity of Shabidoo - and both of those users have been largely (and sadly absent) this year. If only the other 198 Antons pulled their weight. Leverage (talk) 22:10, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- For. at Wikipedia, they don't have a template for this. -- 19:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Official winner[edit source]
Xamralco is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2014, with a score of 6.
Nominations for 2013[edit source]
4.252.99.182[edit source]
Score: 0
Nom One of the unsung heroes of the past year, whose contributions have been many and varied, and is the model for so many new Uncyclopedians. Also deserves based on the “how hasn't he won this yet?” principle. Nominally Humane! 07:54 01 Jan
Nom One of the unsung heroes of the past year, whose contributions have been many and varied, and is the model for so many new Uncyclopedians. Also deserves based on the “how hasn't he won this yet?” principle. Lyrithya[edit source]
Score: 11
- For. Put her money where her mouth was. --Leverage (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Put her mouth where my money was. Lyrithiya or whatever the name is has not only spearheaded the creation of this site and helped kept it moving, but her work for uncyclopedia as a whole and during her years guiding its principles makes this almost a no-brainer (except for people who've won it before and some others). Yay Lyrithyaz! Aleister 13:26 1-1-14
- For. For that whole thing with moving the entire damned site away from Wikia. The rest of that group has already won this so... yeah. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Per Frosty. That's really something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- Strong For. Lyrithya gave this community a lot this year and I know she doesn't always understand how thankful we are. *shifty eyes* -- The Zombiebaron 00:23, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. I received so many frying pan hits through the years :) Mattsnow 16:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Massive Boner This vote is only necessary in that it's completely appropriate to have a visual representation of what Lyrithya means to Uncyclopedia. And yet I'm not going to say a whole lot of stuff because I don't like saying a whole lot of stuff about things. Unless those things are spices and peppers, but that's another story. Lyrithya is pretty much the most awesome person for every single reason and we wouldn't be voting on this page right now if it weren't for her. -RAHB 07:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)- For. She pays for the server and does stuff behind the scenes. ~ BB ~ (T)
~ Sun, Jan 5 '14 12:36 (UTC)
- Only because people won't donate. Bloody stingy bastards. -— Lyrithya ༆ 23:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd donate but I think somebody would object or something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:06, 29 Jan 2014
- If it's any consolation, Mark Zuckerberg says his users won't cough up either. We're a generation of freeloaders. Leverage (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- I know that there are some Aunts who are really cool and they pay for their nieces abortions. --ShabiDOO 11:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- Who would want to abort their own niece? Nominally Humane! 12:10 29 Jan
- I know that there are some Aunts who are really cool and they pay for their nieces abortions. --ShabiDOO 11:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- If it's any consolation, Mark Zuckerberg says his users won't cough up either. We're a generation of freeloaders. Leverage (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'd donate but I think somebody would object or something. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 00:06, 29 Jan 2014
- Only because people won't donate. Bloody stingy bastards. -— Lyrithya ༆ 23:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. --Mimo&maxus 13:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. Providing free trips to San Francisco for myself and Simsilikesims in 2013. --
RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC) - For. Oh yesh, definitely. Zzz 15:07, 29 January, 2014 (UTC)
MadMax[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom- Made about a gazillion edits. --Leverage (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- For. I hope I'm not going to regret voting Madmax in case somebody else nominates better role-models, but now I have to vote on him because I liked how Madmax basically did everything. Zzz 12:13, 1 January, 2014 (UTC)
- You beat me to it Leverage! Madmax is the rock and roll star dude bro sandwhich! --ShabiDOO 14:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- To me this is a one-time award, but MM is a good vote and the kind of user I want handling my edits. Aleister 13:28 1-1-14
Llwy-ar-lawr[edit source]
Score: -1
- Talk about being everywhere!! Since she arrived here she's been a large piece of the bedrock of this site, and if you don't know what I mean then you don't surf recent changes. What a wonderful user. Aleister 13:35 1-1-14
Against. I only got here in April and pretty much the first thing I did here was threaten to recreate a deleted page that really did kind of suck. Lyrithya's been here for all of 2013, though she hasn't been that active the past few months, and she did a lot more for us. She knows all about importing wikis and I don't know diddly, and my coding skills are mediocre compared with hers. And everyone's voting for her anyway. Thanks though. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)- Comment. Huge amount of respect for Spoony-floor. But maybe next year. Nominally Humane! 12:19 05 Jan
- Comment. Not only a super active user, but a friendly face, and a GIRL. Unencyclopedia needs a fair few of these to keep us from tipping over into sausage festery. Now, I have to look up how to pronounce her name, because at the moment my brain recognises LLw and then moves on to her comments. --Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Against. I only got here in April and pretty much the first thing I did here was threaten to recreate a deleted page that really did kind of suck. Lyrithya's been here for all of 2013, though she hasn't been that active the past few months, and she did a lot more for us. She knows all about importing wikis and I don't know diddly, and my coding skills are mediocre compared with hers. And everyone's voting for her anyway. Thanks though. Aleister[edit source]
Score: 1
- Genuine for, this time. Al has been one of the pieces of glue who has kept the community together, keeping an “us and us” rather than an “us and them” mentality. His coding sucks, and he does bugger all admin stuff, but he supports new writers and old, and always tries to see the positive. While this award is usually given to those that do the custodial work around here, Al is the example of an Uncyclopedian at his best - making the site and the community better in his own way, and keeping focus on what makes us great - the comedy. Nominally Humane! 12:19 05 Jan
- This makes me literally want to puke on my own vomit. But I do appreciate the nom and the kind words Puppy made up after a few hours of hard liquor dulled his senses. I was away for a long time in 2013, so this is a mute nomination, and not only don't I support new writers but I try to take their stuff when they go to church, and leave the house unattended (true story, ask Anton where he thinks his watch and rubles went a few weeks ago. Ka-ching!). Something I am proud of is that some of us, Puppy, myself, ScottPat and maybe lots of others, teamed up and nudged Wikia into getting rid of that stupid warning label. Yay Puppy and ScottPat (who we should really try to get to put his pages on this site, he's a fine writer). But more important than any of this, did everyone know but me that R. Rodriquez is coming out with "Sin City 2" in August!!! Aleister 00:35 5-1-14
- ScottPat believes the half-truths about this place being full of poop filled condoms or whatever ridiculous thing it was, so I don't think he's coming here. Too bad. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- This makes me literally want to puke on my own vomit. But I do appreciate the nom and the kind words Puppy made up after a few hours of hard liquor dulled his senses. I was away for a long time in 2013, so this is a mute nomination, and not only don't I support new writers but I try to take their stuff when they go to church, and leave the house unattended (true story, ask Anton where he thinks his watch and rubles went a few weeks ago. Ka-ching!). Something I am proud of is that some of us, Puppy, myself, ScottPat and maybe lots of others, teamed up and nudged Wikia into getting rid of that stupid warning label. Yay Puppy and ScottPat (who we should really try to get to put his pages on this site, he's a fine writer). But more important than any of this, did everyone know but me that R. Rodriquez is coming out with "Sin City 2" in August!!! Aleister 00:35 5-1-14
- Spiritual for What Puppy said. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:39, 18/01/2014
Puppy[edit source]
- Nom - He is the Magneto to our X Men - not always on our side as his user page demonstrates, but regularly drawn back to us as this page shows. And we all know, when Magneto and the X men get together, it makes the reader/viewer´s heart sing. --Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Pfft! Nominally Humane! 08:57 06 Jan
- Spiritual for, although no soup for you Puppy is uncy's vastly unsung hero and guy about town. Coder, writer, helper (for me from day one), and remember this: When he was banned for a looooonnnngggggg time from wikia's site he not only defended himself and rubbed noses in their stuff, but during the ban time he edited the mirror site!! So far beyond the call of duty that he's uncy's best doggie ever. Aleister 21:25 6-1-14
- By “Pfft!” I mean to say: Thank you both, but as my genitals are outties I'm unable to win this year. Nominally Humane! 09:08 07 Jan
- Spiritual for Should have been an admin back in 2012. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:38, 18/01/2014
Bizzeebeever[edit source]
Score: 1
- Nom - one of the reasons I came over to the east side of the wall. he went missing on me for a while this year, but he s still probably the admin i am most happy to see. i can't really describe it, but i wish he were immortal. --Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spiritual for. Has a strange way of always being right, or seeming to be. Knows his stuff. Created a qvfd gadget that is really nice and makes things more convenient, though it could use a way of making headers automatically. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 23:17, 12/01/2014
- Second easiest vote of my life. The Woodburninator
Minimal Effort ™ 22:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
RAHB[edit source]
- Nom - I like this user for two reasons. number one, he has seemed very sensible and approachable in all our dealings, and two, I associate his name with the Scottish comedy character Rab C Nesbitt, which makes me happy.--Leverage (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spiritual' Boner.' The wiki wouldn't be the same without him, with the humor thing and the patience and the common sense when it's needed. He's one of the reasons I stuck around when I came here (and I reason I stick to my sheets in the morning). Aleister 22:16 7-1-14
- Spiritual abstain. RAHB and I chatted a little on a dating site...and nothing much came of it. We said we would meet up as friends and have a coffee...but neither of us have phoned each other yet. I can give any of you his phone number if you like. --ShabiDOO 23:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Metaphysical comment. I still pronounce his user name as “Rub”. But also deserving of this award. Nominally Humane! 02:26 08 Jan 02:26, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Spiritual for I don't know, stuff. And don't put anything under that there template like I just did. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:36, 18/01/2014
Official winner[edit source]
Lyrithya is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2013, with a score of 11.
Nominations for 2012[edit source]
Zombiebaron[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom Zombiebaron has kept the ship running for the last year, wasting most of his life dedicated to this website. He hasn't complained or bitched about the "sinking" of the website, but has instead proposed ways to make it better, has show incredible patience with the little drama that there was, tried to get new members, organized competitions and drives, and over all did not suck as an admin. His penis is also much bigger than his mothers, which is an accomplishment of its own. It would not be a stretch to say he deserves this two years in a row. --ShabiDOO 00:25, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Yes--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)- Would vote for him easily, if I didn't just vote for Bizzee. He's like all of the good parts of me without the other 9/10ths of me. --
TKFU
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 
09:57, January 1, 2013 (UTC) - I voted for him last year! But seeing as he helped pioneer the IRC spam month... -- Lost Labyrinth
• (t) • (c) • (a) 21:01, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Frosty[edit source]
Score: 9
- Nom Everyone would agree that Frosty is at the very least a satisfactory admin who completes his tasks at a level higher than mediochre, and who makes the website more good on a higher than average basis, spending more than just a little time here getting a fairly high level of admiration from a reasonable amount of people here. --ShabiDOO 01:56, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Boner.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- So I will direct you to my vote from last year, which Frosty has conveniently immortalized on his user page, much to my distress and dismay. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 2 '13 7:29 (UTC)
- I would also vote for this guy, were it not for only having one vote and stuff. Frankly, I'm surprised he isn't running away with the vote already. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- I concur with our esteemed colleagues. You are my obvious and close second choice, and I too thought you'd be very far ahead of anyone nominated. Aleister 00:02 3-1-'13 (that's a cool number)
- For. bribed via IRC. Might be a good candidate too, idk. ajr 23:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. I think Frosty and Bizzeebeever deserve this equally, so I am hoping by voting for the one with fewer votes a tie will become more likely. --MasterWangs
23:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC) - For. i cast my vote for the guy who made Boner.. -hipcrime 01:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. All hail the great and hard-working Frosty. If you don't vote for him for being hardworking, at least vote for him because he's gay.
16:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC) - F☭R 14:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Opping Frosty was the best decision our community made this year. Finally all the lazy admins could return to our natural state of rest, instead of having to constantly respond to Frosty's ban and deletion requests. Every year at UotY I vote for the person who I saw as the "grease of the wiki" that year. Frosty was this year's grease. -- The Zombiebaron 23:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. I refuse to comment Madclaw @ talk 00:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Romartus[edit source]
Score: 6
- For. Romartus makes me proud to be an uncyclopedian. His caring for the site shines through with every post, with his legendary votes on VFH, and with the help he gives to writers without complaint (well, some complaint). A helping hand to noobs, the back of the hand to veterans, and a writing style of a wise drunken historian, Romartus befriends his enemies and kills his friends - kills them with kindness! And then there's this. Aleister 2:02 1-1-'12
- For. Of course! Great dude. And, what Aleister said, especially the part about helping noobs like I. --
Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 02:52, January 1, 2013 (UTC) - Boner. Probably my favorite person here. If I could just get him to make me a sandwich. --Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. He has been a stellar contributer for a very long time indeed.--Sycamore (Talk) 03:54, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Per Aleister 100%. YES YES YES!!!--Funnybony
07:21, Jan 1
- For. I almost left the site in November when I felt like the drama surrounding votes wasn't really worth it at all. Romartus is someone who makes the site feel pleasant and civilised. I guess he's been around ages but I've never seen any ego, any "I have been here longer than you" bullshit. These qualities I think are essential for welcoming (and keeping) new writers. --Leverage (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- (for) One doesn't see much of what Romartus does, as he does lots of stuff that doesn't appear on watch lists. He also does stuff that appears on watch lists. Also on feature lists. He's a smacking example of an uncyclopedian that makes American what it is. America wouldn't be half of what it was if it wasn't for what Romartus makes it be! --ShabiDOO 01:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- If being British makes what America is today then...am I doing something right or wrong? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- If being British makes what America is today then...am I doing something right or wrong? --
SPIKE[edit source]
Score: 2
- NOM
+Spike is naughty. He is tough and is willing to kill people to get Uncyclopedia tidied up. He is committed and bitch slapped 2012 like he owned it. Vote or die.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 03:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC) For. - For. Spike has kept a steady weather eye on this website, despite some awkward storms and squalls in certain quarters. Very often he has spotted something that needed urgent attention or alternatively, required a bucket of water and mop to clean up an existing mess. None of this sounds very exciting but it is crucial work to make a website like this work to the benefit of all users. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:04, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. The janitor must get his due! --Lord Scofield Stark 12:11, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
Bizzeebeever[edit source]
Score: 9
- For. He seems like a nice
guybeaver. —Sir Socky
(talk) (stalk)
GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:16, 1 January 2013 - For - ♪ People, let me tell you 'bout my beeest friend. ♫ -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:27, Jan. 1, 2013
- Sucks cock like a champ. Also, because I feel obliged to always justify my Year votes with long rambling dirges about why people rule, I'll return that cocksucking favor. Bizzeebeever is a wiki saint. He knows his code, was instrumental to the moving process, and hung around the year performing the shit jobs that literally nobody else ever wanted to do. Among all this, he still managed to write a little bit, always kept a great sense of humor, and was even more shockingly reasonable behind his jokes. He's got every factor of a great Uncyclopedian within him. Gooooooo BB! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:53, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Pretty sure he'd lend me five bucks if I asked him. --Bill Melater (talk) 11:01, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Boner. Always gives me a pillow for my knees, which is more than I can say for some people. -RAHB 00:40, January 3, 2013 (UTC)
- '— (talk) (contributions) Jan 7 2013 05:31
- Yes, him. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 19:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- For. --EMC [TALK] 04:39 Jan 8 2013
- Another really hard-working, positive presence on the site. I know nothing about programming, so I will leave it to someone else to praise him on his technical contributions. What I will say: When you first come on Uncyclopedia, there are a flurry of weird names and it takes time to distinguish one from another, and to work out who likes and hates each other. Bizzie seems to want new writers to mix, get to know other writers, and I think that social aspect (assuming we can all talk for five minutes without drama) is also something which makes contributors stick with a site. --Leverage (talk) 10:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- For.---- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 22:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Kamek98[edit source]
Score: 0
- Nom nom nom - What can I say? He crawled up my arse and into my heart. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 07:25, Jan. 1, 2013
- Boner. - Obviously deserves it more than Jesus.--Sir Peasewhizz de New York (Chat) (Stalk?) 23:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Official winners[edit source]
Bizzeebeever and Frosty are Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedians of the Year 2012, with a score of +9 each.
Nominations for 2011[edit source]
Zombiebaron[edit source]
Score: 16
- Nom. To put it lengthily, Zombiebaron has been a presence on the site both behind, in front of, and during the scenes though all of 2011, from January to December; an authority figure on-and-off-wiki; a consistent and effective administrator to our users, and an active mediator during battles with Wikia, other outside forces, and between them admins themselves; an influential spearhead of multiple movements and renovations, including this year's highly successful FFW and the remodeled Maintenance tags; a friendly and reliable presence on IRC all-year round; a newly, and righteously, crowned bureaucrat; a patient man who's earned his laurels after seven years of dedicated, hard work; and, last and least leastly of all; a fecking great drinking buddy. To put it shortly, Zombiebaron is the Uncyclopedian of the Year. To put it Zombiebaron, Zombiebaron. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:38, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, the maintenance templates thing was Skully and me. You can tell because we never actually cleaned up after ourselves and now I'm hiding from my talkpage where PotR... noticed. Perhaps this is a sign that Zombiebaron should finish what we started. ~
22:36, 1 January 2012
- Actually, the maintenance templates thing was Skully and me. You can tell because we never actually cleaned up after ourselves and now I'm hiding from my talkpage where PotR... noticed. Perhaps this is a sign that Zombiebaron should finish what we started. ~
- Frankly, the sentence "because it's fucking Zombiebaron!" is more than enough to justify this vote, but TKF made a soppy speech so I probably should too. Ahem. If anyone can save this 'pedia, it's ZB. There are other great candidates, of course, but after seven years of rarely-matched hard work, maintenance, mediation, innovation, good advice, omnipresence and (let's not forget) hilarious articles and images; there is no else who should win it while he's in the running. Hell, sometimes it feels like he's running this place single-handedly. If you hadn't guessed already, strong for. --Black Flamingo 22:14, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron. He's been here since '05 (that's over 6 years!) and has never stopped maintaining this site. TKF and Blackflamingo have said it all already. --
18:31, January 2, 2012 (UTC) - For. He is the light that never goes out. Outside that is. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:17, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. I was going to vote for Lyrithya, but then she tore my heart out (and crossed her nomination out). Then I was going to vote for one of the other candidates, but then I was like "lolno." Then I was like "Zombiebaron." In conclusion, Zombiebaron. -RAHB 02:57, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For. --Roman Dog Bird 07:34, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For. A very productive year for ZB - not to mention the amount of stuff he has done since 2006 for the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:35, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Of course. Zombiebaron is the heart of Uncyc - without it, there is no Uncyc. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:37, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:02 Jan 07, 2012
- For 2005 to 2012, he's apparantly been going strong here the whole time, including a year of major work in '011. A man, a plan, a canal, Zombiebaron. Aleister 2:51 10-1-'12
- For Panama. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:20, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
- For Is aboot fucking time, eh? Congrats ~ Kakun · talk
- For Because once upon a time this man nominated me for NotM. I think. I don't even remember anymore. -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 07:55, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- For because he's willing to accept it, unlike some people I could name. Also if there was an adopter of the year he would get that, as he is the first person in two years who has been willing to adopt me. Which means whatever I do wrong it's his fault. Pup 06:47 21 Jan '12
*For So many great candidates, but this one's probably done the most for the site this year. --
23:51, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, voted twice. --
01:24, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, voted twice. --
- /me Zombiebaron Aw, that doesn't work here. Shame. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)
00:34, January 31, 2012 (UTC) - YES AND I DON'T CARE THAT THIS IS LATE GOOD DAY. Night. Whatever. ~ 00:06, 1 February 2012
Lyrithya[edit source]
Score: 3
- Nom. She's just so weird. More to follow. Possibly. If I remember. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:54, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Spiritual for. The best Lyrithya we've ever had. Next year, sister... next year. --Black Flamingo 22:26, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Why, yes! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:18, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Because it's fucking Lyrithya. Now, I am a huge fan of our undead overlord, but whenever I pop my head over the parapet here (not often these days, admittedly), it's Lyrithya I see doing what needs doing. She does maintenance stuffs, making-things-work stuffs, and thankless stuffs, and does it well. I also have it on pretty good authority that she has an oppable piggy, and that counts for a lot, in my book (page seven, just after the bit about penguins, in case you want to check). --UU - natter
18:20, Jan 2 - For. Lyrithya is Uncyclopedia's own Fairy Princess. A wave of her wiki admin wand and even the croakers who hop about her talk page will go quiet (well, usually). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:24, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
As much as I appreciate the support, this whole award thing just gives me unhappy feelings and I don't want to be here, so why don't you all vote for Zombles and Skullthumper and Aleister and whoever? They're lovelies and they keep the site going, whereas I neither want nor need the distraction and pointless unhappiness this thing gives me. ~ 
02:41, 4 January 2012
- Spiritual For She deserves it, but is choosing not to take it. But I'm not going to not vote as a result of that. So if she changes her mind, this is becoming a for. Pup 03:31 04 Jan '12
Dr. Skullthumper[edit source]
Score: 1
- If we were only counting the first eight months of the year, and Wikia didn't suck, then Skully (and his sidekick Fnoodle) would be a fierce contender for this title. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:38, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Spiritual for. As per TKF. If Dr. Skullthumper could stop playing Minecraft for five minutes he could also save this god-awful site from itself. --Black Flamingo 22:28, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Per everything he does, and has ever done for the site. All seriously great candidates, but when it really comes down to it, he has done the most for the site over time. -- 02:22, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Aleister in Chains[edit source]
Score: +3
- He does things and he's crazy and he is one of very few folks who actually bothers to recognise the merits of what others do. So, uh, cows. ~ 02:54, 4 January 2012
- Thanks, very appreciated. But I wasn't even here for most of the year. I'm not even here now (this is being written by bot). You and the others are much better candidates than myself, if I were to be serious for a moment, so vote for one of those. I won't erase this though, as that would be drama (hahahahahaheeheeheeheeheehahahaha huh?) Aleister 3:16 3-1-'12
- Giving Aleister a positive score. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:38, 12 January 2012
- For. -- Sf13
0717 EST 24 JAN, 2012 - For.
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 12:59, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
Frosty[edit source]
Score: 7 cold motherfuckers
- Nom + for. He does so many things around the wiki that it's scary. Awesome Uncyclopedian! Mattsnow 11:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
- For. He deserves it. --Mimo&maxus 12:03, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
- I could voet for any of the other persons listed above or below, but after prolonged consideration, I won't. I'm voting for Frosty. And here's why:
- Do you realize that Zombiebaron is dead? Why in Fuckville are you voting for a dead guy? This isn't Missouri, you morons. Also, he's an admin, and Fuck The Admins. Anyway, I doubt he does...whatever he does around here...for the awards.
- As for Dr. Strangelove and All The Young Girls Love Alice, how can you give either of them an "of the Year" award? Skullthumper's been gone for six months, and Aleis had an extended absence. Also, both of them are sperm receptacles. ME CAGO EN SUS LECHE!
- Lyrithya? Boo, her hovercraft is filled with eels. Too many eels, in fact. She has BUCKETS of them. I can't in good conscience vote for someone with so many eels. IN THE NAME OF SHARK JESUS, HOW DOES ONE PROCURE SO GODDAMNED MANY EELS? DOES SHE BREED THEM? FUCK!
- Now that we've established that the others suck, why should you vote for Frosty? I'll TELL you why. He cleans up after vandals, tidies up in general, is nice to newbies and losers, has a good sense of humor, routinely demonstrates a greater maturity than half the users here, and is an all-around humble little bogan. ALSO, HE'S FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. Do you know that this spunky bastard thinks he can't write? So what does he hang around here for? To be part of a community, and help out in any way he can. THAT'S the damn definition of "community spirit", you faggots! So put your hand over your hearts and salute this Aussie spark of joy, you deviant homosexuals, because if you don't, he may become disillusioned and leave. And if he does, WOE BETIDE YOU ALL. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jan 6 '12 10:28 (UTC)
- For. He's not even an admin, but he does lots and lots of cleanup work, votes regularly, and should be encouraged. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:21, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
- For Frosty is awsome. --ShabiDOO 00:06, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
- For. I understand and I wish to continue.
. 09:05, January 15, 2012 (UTC) - For Frosty helped me so many times and bailed me out so much that I actually feel embarrased to mention it. BUT if anyone deserves to win Uncyclopedian of the year, it's Frosty, I tell you. --POP!GoesTheWeasel
10:43, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
Lyrithya[edit source]
Score: 2 spiritual pats on the back
*Nom + for. Lyrithya, lyrithya, lyrithya. While she is probably mostly modest and most likely an uncyclopedian for the sake of uncyclopedia, she deserves to be the uncyclopedian of the year ... and everyone knows it. She may detest and resist and feign a dislike for it ... but everyone appreciates some gratitude ... everyone likes a thanks ... no matter how hard they say they don't. It is no secret that I find Lyrithya as the most stubborn, hard headed, irritating, unilateral, self defacing users, but she is also a novel, thoughtful, creative, solution finding, problem solving, wit of steel, never says no to a request for help, always finds an elegant and helpful solution to everything, maintains her unique and quirky style and is that humour filled user we all love. She made uncyclopedia what it was in 2011. If she crosses this out ... ignore it. Vote for her. --ShabiDOO 23:46, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
- But it would make her unhappy...so no. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:08, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 18:19, Jan 10
- I love you. ~ 00:08, 1 February 2012
- I love you. ~
Official winner[edit source]
Zombiebaron is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2011, with a score of +16.
Official nominations for 2010[edit source]
Lyrithya[edit source]
Score: 4
- Nom & For. Since coming here seven months ago Lyrithya has given two or three years of giant armidillos to the site. For in addition to constant editing, fixing, befriending, writing, reviewing, eyeing, coding, welcoming, and othering, probably the best thing Lyrithya has done is to improve the culture of Uncy and make it lots more fun to come here. Many users come and go, Lyrithya improves everything everyday and only then runs away flailing. Aleister 11:40 1 1 2011
- For. I managed to conscript her into doing some off-site shit for me. No one else has ever done such a thing, unless you count that time that Spang gave me advice about gif animators, which I don't.
pillow talk 11:58, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Although since I still haven't gotten around to finishing it, does it really count? Also, when did you need that done by, anyhow? *shifty eyes* ~ 14:56, 1 January 2011
- Probably not until March or April, although the earlier I get it, the fewer times I'll wake up excited, leap out of bed, check my inbox, and feel my enthusiasm melt into soul-crushing disappointment! pillow talk 18:22, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll be sure to drag it out as long as I can, then. ~ 18:28, 1 January 2011
- I'll be sure to drag it out as long as I can, then. ~
- Probably not until March or April, although the earlier I get it, the fewer times I'll wake up excited, leap out of bed, check my inbox, and feel my enthusiasm melt into soul-crushing disappointment!
- Although since I still haven't gotten around to finishing it, does it really count? Also, when did you need that done by, anyhow? *shifty eyes* ~
- For. Done a lot in 7 months. Nobody messes with her. --MANIAC MCPEE 03:48, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
- For. She helped me with my sig, and did a lot of motavation with me. Voted for the second time! --
23:13, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 23:24, 7 January, 2011 (UTC)
GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 23:32, 7 January, 2011 (UTC)
- F**k yeah! Probably the most useful bot I have come across to date. Anyone who happily volunteers to deliver Unsignpost multiple times deserves this award. Nominally Humane! some time Saturday, 21:52, Jan 1 2011 UTC
- One vote, love, one vote... ~ 05:30, 15 January 2011
- One vote, love, one vote... ~
- Against. I will not give an explanation. -RAHB 10:25, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. Because Rob said so. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:22, 2 January 2011
- Um.. yes?!? -- 00:49, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Because I love her.....signature, yeah, I love her s-s-s-signature..hrrmph --Scofield 11:43, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- For everyone else. I've been here, what, 6 months? Seven-ish, if you count the one I spent playing Oblivion, but that's only half a year; the rest of these folks have not only been amazing, hard working, scary people, but been amazing, hard working, scary people for the entire year and much more. Those of you that voted for me, I appreciate it, but I really cannot compare to these other fellows. ~ Major Pleb Sir
GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Who cares how long you've been here, this is a year award and you have done more to change the culture of the place, the flavor of the backroom discussions and how people get-along-ness, than anyone else. And on top of that the constant problem-solving, vandal zapping, nudging good articles to be better articles, taking at least half-a-dozen noobs in hand and leading them every step of the way not only to be exceptionately welcomed but to be good users. All of that, and squeezing two years worth of editing and pee reviewing into six months of constant vigil too, and even though you aren't an admin your admin powers are self-given and almost legendary. So instead of "boo hooing, I'm not all that", give yourself your own due, and instead of mysterious voting againstists, everyone here should be cheering and throwing stuff to eat in your path so you wouldn't have to waste time shopping. Aleister 00:50 4 1 '11
GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 02:16, 4 January, 2011 (UTC)
- AHA! You really are a bot! That's why you don't want people paying attention to this page, so that they can vote for ChiefjusticeDS, your REAL account! Either that or you're attempting to woo more voters with your "selfless" gesture. Works every time *wink*. --Scofield 07:42, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
- For not coming out of hibernation to be a spiteful shithead, and being actually useful to the site.
- Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 07:48, Tuesday 04 January 2011 -
GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)
- For. --~
19:02, January 13, 2011 (UTC)- You sure like voting, don't you? ~ 18:22, 30 January 2011
- You sure like voting, don't you? ~
- For. Gen. Fudgem0bile It's not rape. If she's dead. 09:44, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
ChiefjusticeDS[edit source]
Score: 20 fairy princesses
- Nomination and Vote. A model Uncyclopedian, and the best of the year by far. Consistent, helpful and knows how to roll his sleeves up.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:28, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For.: Its plain to everyone that this passing year belongs to the Chief. Taking a look at his edits for the year (and before for that matter) he's done so much, managing to maintain an even hand in doing so, along with becoming the subject of a featured article about how much of a bastard he really is. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- For. The Chief is the Dumbledore of Uncyclopedia. If he hasn't got a beard to add authority, he ought to grow one and post the result on-line. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:07, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- The work Chief has done for this site is extraordinary, both before and after the op... Plus, he makes a pretty lady. --Black Flamingo 15:14, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For. ChiefjusticeDS, as many pieces on this site suggest, is a terrible person. We know that he hates humor, we know that he hates people, and we know that he barely knows how to use a computer. To top it all off, he's British. At the end of the day, what we all want is the sinking ship that is Uncyclopedia to be grabbed by the numerous, powerful tridactyl tentacles of a sea monster thing and quickly pulled to the bottom of the ocean where it will never be seen again until James Cameron decides he can make money off of it. ChiefjusticeDS, at least in my eyes, is just one of those many, important tentacles helping pull Uncyclopedia back to the depths from which it came. But why ChiefjusticeDS? Why not any of the other succulent tentacles? Look closely. You may notice, upon looking closely, that ChiefjusticeDS is the fairest tentacle of them all. His suction cups are the largest, his precision is superb, and unlike the other tentacles, he has never been forecfully all up in some anime chick's anus/vagina/mouth/nostrils (and probably never will be). For his efforts in helping ruin us all, I give ChiefjusticeDS my vote. --EMC [TALK] 22:15 Jan 1 2011
- For. Great person with a great humor. Helps me with many things. -- 02:55, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Pretty much the coolest guy ever. Seriously. Check out recent changes. Love,
- For. --Matfen 12:15, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Large cod. I may put in a proper for later, but this guy and Sycamore really seem to be a team deal. They do a lot of separate things, but I see them bouncing off each other on recent changes; sometimes it's actually kind of scary. Anyway, they're awesome, and stuff. Deciding between them seems wrong. ~ 16:41, 2 January 2011
- For. Because of Fuck ChiefjusticeDS. Also, he fixed You Are Dead. --Scofield 11:46, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- That's your second vote. Pick one, stick with one. ~ 18:23, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- For. If you seriously don't know why Chief should be the UotY, just watch his talk page for one day. He's constantly getting bombarded with every type of complaint, request, or general rant one could imagine and he handles them all in stride. Even though he has recently unleashed his fairy princess side on all of us, he still deserves this award. – Preceding unsigned comment added by John Lydon (talk • contribs)
- For ChiefjusticeDS is the butter that lubricates the cogs and gears of Uncyclopedia. -- The Zombiebaron 19:07, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
For. Out of all the nominees, I think that the Chief deserves the award. Dedicates a lot of time to the site in many different ways, and is an overall upstanding citizenuncyclopedian or whatever. Plus, his name is great (cause you can call him "The Chief". Nobody can deny that "The Chief" is a cool person, no matter the setting.) → 23:27 3-Jan-11 ←- For. Does anyone else put up with as much shit? --Sog1970 23:51, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I have no idea who this user is, but I have arbitrarily decided that he sucks balls. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 09:20, Jan 4 2011 UTC
- For. Knows his stuff. Does it. Chief is the man. --UU - natter 09:48, Jan 4
- Vote of Confidence/Uselessness I voted Lyrithya because of her accomplishments in her tenure here, but that's not to say that Chief's have been any less significant. I just figured those achievements were why he was made an admin. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 21:57, Tuesday 04 January 2011 -
- Comment. He impersonates me sometimes. I just thought everyone should know. ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Without a doubt last year's most useful uncyclopedian. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:34, 13 January 2011
- For. Al in Chains may have been last year's best writer, but why is this even being put to a vote. Chief in a landslide fellas. -- GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 00:21 15 JAN 2011
- For. He puts up with Pedobear's visits to the channel. Smuff [i is an hero] 00:46, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- For. He is like my hero and stuff. --Dame
14:14, January 16, 2011 (UTC) - Comment. Who is this, some new kid? Never heard of em. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 04:18, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- He is the hand that rocks the cradle. ~ 13:52, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Obviously. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:56, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Fuck ChiefJusticeDS.
Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 20:16, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
For. Out of all the nominees, I think that the Chief deserves the award. Dedicates a lot of time to the site in many different ways, and is an overall upstanding 
Sycamore[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom. When it comes to general making tidy, cleaning up after people and admins, and all-around helpfulness, it's hard to beat Sycamore... really is. ~ 15:19, 1 January 2011
- For. Splendid fellow, works hard, cleans up my mess... he's like my mum in a way. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:25, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. He'll also sometimes be seen defending VFD against mobs of spiteful againsters, not just facing the odds, but defying them and even convincing other people to stand up for seemingly doomed articles as well. And he seems to go out of his way to be nice to and supportive of various noobs. Place could use more of that. ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. A bit of a Scottish curmudgeon (a type of rare fish if you are asking) but it was his example that I have followed here more than anyone else when it comes to standing for what you honestly believe in. Did I say curmudgeon..or did I mean a Scottish sturgeon?? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:40, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- For No contest. Hell, half of the nominees combined don't have the number quality edits this damned bastard has. Chief is the closest, but he's a fucking admin. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Spiritual For Wow! I knew he's been around, and doing his thing, and doing everyone elses thing, the whole time I've been here. I didn't know the extent of it. Nice nice nice work. We have so many good people wandering around this place. Aleister 18:10 10 1 '11
- Another spiritual for. The phrase "our next admin" is thrown around a lot these days... but you get my point. --Black Flamingo 18:54, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
The Woodburninator[edit source]
Score: +1 flaming woods
- He's hot. Uncyclopedia is about being funny, and this guy knows funny better than anyone else I've seen on the internet, even if he will never, ever contribute to 18th Century. Not the scandal-a-day type, but whenever he has something to say, he actually says something. Isn't that what counts? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:27, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. I'd like to say something nice about this guy, but I just don't know him. Haven't seen him around much... shame; sounds like one of the wonders of the site. Get on here more, dammit, Woody! ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 23:30, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)
- I just got engaged, so you fuckers can wait for me as long as you want. I'm busy. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:30, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I just got engaged, so you fuckers can wait for me as long as you want. I'm busy. Woody On Fire!
Aleister in Chains[edit source]
Score: +5 chained people
- Nom He's a good man here. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 16:40, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I was just going to Nom Al, but here he is. Amazingly helpful and good-hearted to everyone. He really deserves this.--Funnybony 17:45, Jan 2
- Comment. Mmm, this guy... I could tell you about this guy, but then you might be inclined to run screaming into the night, forever plagued by a thousand ravening dreams... the things he does, however, are another matter. Drifting around like a butterfly of dementia, he is the most helpful, strange, everywhere individual I have encountered. Clueless in some regards and far too knowledgeable in others, he is more than just an asset to Uncyclopedia. I can't even imagine what the place would be like without him. ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 16:44, 3 January, 2011 (UTC)
- For. So many great Uncyclopedians nominated here, it's almost impossible choose. Can't we all be winners? No. Okay fuck you guys, I'm voting for this chained up guy. No, no come back...I love you all...Or some such something. —HITLER WHORE
Mr. Antonio Yettie (talk) [17:56 3 January 2011] - For.Maybe if he wins, his chains will be removed. -- 00:56, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- They were never really there to start with. But thanks for giving me my freedom, I can fly I can fly! Aleister 1:00 18 1-'11
- They're not removed yet. --
00:56, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
- They're not removed yet. --
- They were never really there to start with. But thanks for giving me my freedom, I can fly I can fly! Aleister 1:00 18 1-'11
- For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA
AMUSE ME 11:42, January 26, 2011 (UTC) - For. --~
18:13, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
Romartus[edit source]
Score: + 0.5 people who defend VFH with cricket bats against attacks of Romartus
- Nom and 1/2 for I think he deserves the nom and a half of my vote. Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 16:40, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Romartus is amazing. The stuff he do here... er, I mean, the things he does here may not earn him the greatest of love, but he's fair, honest, and consistent and he stands by what he believes. Few put the extent of hard work into what they do like Romartus does, and fewer still extend that same effort on behalf of others should they ask. Be it forcing writers to improve their works before they pass VFH, helping remove cruft through VFD or general writerly acts and advices, this guy increases the quality of Uncyclopedia one piece at a time. ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 00:39, 4 January, 2011 (UTC)
Iwillkillyou333[edit source]
Score: 0
- Nom He's entertained me like no one else could. --Scofield 16:43, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Amusement, writings, reviews, and an attitude unlike most others... he may come across as a total hard-ass from his username and what he puts on his userpage, but don't let that fool you. This guy is usually a total sweety. Always willing to help out or chat or what have you, he's a wonder when he's actually around, and unlike some people I could name if I could even remember their names, he also seems to accept criticism gracefully and even seems to consider it before
ignoring it completelymoving on. While he still has a bit to learn, so do we all, and folks could learn from him as well. ~ Major Pleb Dame -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)
RabbiTechno[edit source]
Score: 1
- Nom a veteran of over 4 years, who is one of the most helpful helpers, as well as writers in this place. He's also one of the nicest which is a rare quality both with admins and Rabbis. ~ 18:26, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks, 'Dillo. However, over the last six months or so I haven't had even a fraction of the time to devote to Uncyclopedia as I used to and would like, so I think there are other people on this list who deserve it more than me. Rabbi Techno kvetch
Contribs 
FOXES 18:30, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. He's too nice. Especially for an admin, it ain't right. Even his block reasons tend to be polite... ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)
- For. i find his politeness refreshing, i'm certain his reasons aren't completely selfless, but nevertheless, i vote for him the finger that flames
Roman Dog Bird[edit source]
Score: +0 dog birds
- Customary shout-out to the hardest working man on Uncyclopedia who isn't actually the hardest working man on Uncyclopedia. Deserves some sort of nomination, at the very least, for the great stuff he's done for the last X years, including 2010. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:53, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Dexter111344[edit source]
Score: +0 UGotYs
- See above. Say what you will about him, he's a fucking workhorse. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:53, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
SPIKE[edit source]
Score: 2
- Nom. Why has he not been nominated already? Does single-handedly keeping UnNews running for the past few months count for nothing? Does his constant vigil over VFD, supplying well-reasoned votes and comments as well as often complete overhauls of the articles themselves, so that even if they were horrors, they need not be deleted in the end after all, make no impression? But those aside, he is also simply all-around helpful, advising users with and critiquing their writings, welcoming the young and old alike to areas of his interest in a more personal way than most, and with directed pointers for each person. He even patrols recent changes at times, which on top of everything else is a little scary, especially since unlike a lot of folks, he still finds time to write amidst all this. So I guess my point is, SPIKE is awesome. ~ Major Pleb Sir -- 18:30, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment.Yeah, that's why I voted for him for Writer of the Year, although I was a little less verbose than you. → 18:42 5-Jan-11 ←
- Spike for Poopsmith --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:40, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- For. An integral cog in the Uncyclopedia machine.
Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 19:20, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
Official winner[edit source]
ChiefjusticeDS is Uncyclopedia's Uncyclopedian of the Year 2010, with a score of 20 fairy princesses.