From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Expired Images
These images no longer appear on the main page, since their Vote Score dropped to below five. For the full list, see here.
| Vote
|
Score: 4
|
| Nomination:
|
Cassandra (talk) 23:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 6
|
Wet pussy. You go, Bernie. Cassandra (talk) 11:14pm January 23, 2021
Semi-self for Combining an alternate-universe Bernie presidency with the 2021 Bernie meme = comedy gold PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 23:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
For. Closest that jelly geezer will ever get to sitting behind the Resolute desk. MrX blow me 16:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
For. Vote Bernie for America! ~ HipponiasCUN - Talk - Contribs - Articles 16:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
For. Undoing Gale5050's vote. DoctorJones (talk) 00:26, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
For. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 19:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 2
|
Against. Ehhhhhhhhhh. Not funny. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- Against Not a joke. -- The Zombiebaron 18:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
| Vote
|
Score: 1 sockpuppet(s)
|
| Nomination:
|
WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 00:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 10
|
C'mon. WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 00:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
For. Duh. And I forgot to type an "e" at the end of "mem" whilst uploading this picture. How dumb (on my end). Cassandra (talk) 01:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
For. MrX blow me 17:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
For. lets go ~GoatLordServa/ent talk 21:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Five PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 00:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
For. I find this to be quite hilarious lol. I'm going to vote for it, just to see how this works. TheKingCartii (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
FOReskin Crocotta1 (talk) 03:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Indefinitely banned user.
 16:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
For. Made me BURST out laughing. Randomguy9000 (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
For. Sure, why not. Plus, to SG1... I know. Though it's kinda because I'm not your average Uncyclopedian... ARandomPage, the named space (ARandomTalkPage) (Stuff they do) 03:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
For. Made me laugh. Pasmorade (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
mem — L10nM4st3r ROAR at me! / What my paws scratched 23:36, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 9
|
Against. It's a funny meme if you've actively followed Cassie's talk page over the course of this year, but is anyone going to know who Gale is 6 months from now? — SG1|Hereish [citation needed] 13:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
It STINKS! - Per Supergeeky1. While it's tempting to have a dumb Simpsons meme I slapped together become a featured image, I feel like as of late we're beginning to indulge in self-indulgent vanity. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 13:57, May. 11, 2021
Nope! Sorry, meme/text-based images on the front page are unimpressive. ~Formerly Annoying Crap 22:02, 15 November 2021
- Indefinitely banned user.
 16:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Zombiebaron. -- The Zombiebaron 16:22, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Against. I don’t get it. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Larrymcjoneshas17bones (talk • contribs)
Against. It may be a good in-joke, but I don't understand and probably neither will a lot of other users. Fenris2010 (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Meh. Kinda funny, but definitely not featureable material. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely not. It's just a meme about a person getting banned 3 years ago and returning with a sock.
 16:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Strong against Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 18:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
Against. This was like, 3 years ago. GlitchyZorua (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
@Alula: Why hasn't this been locked? It's 4 years old and it doesn't show up on the actual VFP. Oᑭöᔑᔑᙀᙏ (vandalize my talk page) 15:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
- Because it was previously featured. I'm not entirely familiar with how VFP works (it's probably one of the most confusing systems i've ever seen honestly), but i'm pretty sure anything that was featured at some point gets to stay up for voting until it properly fails or something.
 15:18, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
|
| Vote
|
Score: 2 bowls of noodles
|
| Nomination:
|
|
For Votes: 16
|
- SN+F This image is also text-based... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah --
Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir Tripod2282
cun vfp talk Active ~01:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- For---Asteroid B612
(aka Rataube) - Ñ 22:08, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- For - It sucks Sliferjam's balls. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For Hilarious. I laughed at this one out loud.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- For Rogpyvbc 00:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- For Much better than that other fortune cookie image. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:24, 04 June 2007
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk
- 00:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak For Blah Blah Blah 06:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)#*
For. i hate that i have to eat all the time, it's ceaseless - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- One vote only, Jack. —rc (t) 06:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. I like it kid.--Witt,
of UNion Entertain me* 03:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh for the love of god! And this time a Strong One. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 16:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ah. For. --EMC [TALK] 00:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For and its been on VFP so long that I'm hungry again. Put it on the blasted front page already! Dame
GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Moniker42
- Azuramothren
|
Against Votes: 14
|
- Against, the first reason that I like it is because it is text based. But the reason that this vote is a Strong For has something to do with how the cookie is blurry and the text isn't. -- The Zombiebaron 00:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against —rc (t) 00:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against I doubt this is the best Unc has to offer... Zana Dark 19:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against The joke is only an "eh" to begin with, but the execution is also uncannily poor considering that MO made it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against It sucks chink balls so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick?
19:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Good jokes, meh execution (coming from MO). --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't think this is MO's best work. Against, sorry. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 11:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Martinultima
- Bradaphraser
- Enzo Aquarius
Against. I've seen fortune cookies that actually had this fortune in them:-\ Robertodole 17:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- DJ Irreverent
Against. --Prätt Körp (talk) 11:17, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
- No what is this?Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
Featured —rc (t) 06:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Vote
|
Score: 3.5 Dead Kennedys
|
| Nomination:
|
Mhaille
|
For Votes: 13
|
- Nomandfor - seamless work of art -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 09:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. I've liked this one for a long time, and seeing it here on VFP is a good excuse to vote for it now.--<<
>> 16:34, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 16:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, but that's an awful caption. Since it doesn't look like a statue, it should read more like "Et tu, Oswaldus?". Yeh, I'm all literate 'n shit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  06:55, 30 June 2007
- For, It's more than good, it's fucking great, bitch!® --Sir Tripod2282
cun vfp talk Active ~15:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, but please, use Modus's caption! — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 19:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 07:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- For, and I agree with Modus & Wehpud. Change the caption. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- For - Although the hair is a little funny, I like the image quite a bit. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- For. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 21:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- For --
» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)              09:30, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 9.5
|
- Weak Against. I get it, and its every so slightly funny, and all that. But the head. The head doesn't look like its made out of stone at all! -- The Zombiebaron 15:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against and my vote can be switched if the neck is touched up a bit. Dame
GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:59, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against I also hesitate to vote against, but I agree that the head doesn't look right. The hair shouldn't be dark like that, and the neck is a bit odd. --Spin 01:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against Doesn't look much like a statue.
Megalomaniac Martin “The Unfortunately Unfeatured” Ultima • (VOTE FOR ME!) • talk • (AND MY PICS TOO!) • contribs 00:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Against I don't get it. Is this just an allusion to greek sculpturing? Well, if it's intelligent, it must be funny. You'll prob get it featured in that case. --AmericanBastard 06:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- DJ Irreverent
- --Mn-z 17:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hair's too dark for stone, etc, and that's harder to fix than making a new image. 1234 ~
19:49, 14 January 2012
- Against I don't get it, but then of course I never get anything. :P -- UserTalkContributions 23:34, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
1/2 against I don't understand it, but besides that it is ok. Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 19:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
|
| Vote
|
Score: 4 inches across
|
| Nomination:
|
For Votes: 19
|
N+F Nomination - VFP is a little slow right now, but I don't have the courage to nominate the shit cross. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 03:04, Jun. 2, 2008
- I didn't think anyone would actually vote for it. -- Thankful Kippy
Share blessings Bountiful harvest 05:38, Jun. 3, 2008
- I laughed. A lot. --Algorithm 05:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Incredible - UnIdiot |
| Talk | Contribs - 19:28, Jun 2
- Epic. - Don Leddy the Crunch
(Nyah, see, nyah!) 19:34, Jun 2
- First LOL of the night. I saw the title. I look at the picture. I laugh. I vote. VFP is easy! MrN
19:42, Jun 2
- "Fuck you, Adams. The British'll never recognize me with this bastard on!" (Self for) ~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 2/06/2008 @ 20:20
- Funny --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Lol --The Linkifier!!!!!? 00:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- :) Mightydandylion
(talk) Fk 20:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- F♥r. Amazing. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:17 Jun 6
- ' That IS a gynoumous mustache!!! IT IS HUGE!!! LOL!!! RTOFLOL!!!!! --- DJ Mixerr
- For I feel guilty voting for this. but it made me laugh. --THE 23:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- For I feel like THE is guilty voting for this. Le Cejak • <12:51, 11 Jun 2008>
- For. Voting for this hurts, but I laughed too hard not to. I hope others can share my pain.
Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. It would be insanely ironic if in several thousand years, they got this picture mixed up with the accurate one, and Jefferson went down in history for having a massive stache. Lol.
- For --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Phor--Sgt. Fluffy 19:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Cancelling out Mnz's vote because I quite like this. Woody On Fire!
Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
For. Thomas Jefferson with a beard for sure would have won the 1796 election! Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 16:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 15
|
- Against. Moustache humour is sooo 1820's. Plus, absurd humour with such a tenuous link to the real world isn't absurd, it's nonsense (Jefferson I get, but moustache?). Plus, it's crooked. I hope that it works better on whateverpageitison. One about Thomas Jefferson, probably. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Stache -RAHB 04:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Go to the source-image for the moustache. Crop the mustache. Do a colour-select (or its equivalent in whateverprogramyouuse). Get rid of the freakin' crufty background pinky stuff. Make mustache bigger. Rinse. Repeat. -- The Zombiebaron 21:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against. It's somehow NOT absurd enough for me. Or whatever. --
Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against Hmm...It could be better if the moustache was ridiculously enormous or something... --Sir Seeker
(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 13:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against. I looked at it. My face remained stoic. Not even the faintest twitch of the corners of my mouth in an upward direction. It's a picture with a badly cut-out 'tache slapped on it. Oh. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:44, Jun 11
- Against I'm normally all for these "the joke is that minimal effort was put into the creation and thought process of this joke, further enhanced by the fact that hordes of people enjoy it for this perceived humor value, or for the ironic appreciation of its lack of humor", but this one is all meh. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Um, yeah, how is this funny? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:20, Jun 13
- Against. Rather obviously, this picture was created in under 30 seconds. The least you could do would be to make the mustache blend in with the painting.--The Nails 03:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Super dumb paper moustache--LOLsupreme 16:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
- NO! My god, our standards are going to hell these days. --
Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- --Mn-z 15:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Nty - That's just bad. How long did it take to make, 10 minutes? Smuff [kthnxbai] 20:29, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Against. The mustache is absurdly large. Make the mustache on Thomas Jefferson smaller in size and not obscenely large. DJ Mixerr 17:51, February 5, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Against. Poorly done I'm afraid Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:38, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I don't care how easy it was to make. Also Kip, where is this "shit cross" of which you speak? MrN
22:16, Jun 3
- This:

- -- Thankful Kippy
Share blessings Bountiful harvest 22:39, Jun. 3, 2008
- Ahh, well not even Zombiebaron would nominate that. Just look at the quality. :P MrN
22:46, Jun 3
- *ahem* I have nominated that. Three times. Long story, that. Or those. -- The Zombiebaron 23:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Like this story? God dammit, Kip has withdrawn his vote? MrN
20:05, Jun 4
- I undid the explaination because I knew it'd be funnier just to show the pic. But thanks for pointing out what a prude I am. -- Thankful Kippy
Share blessings Bountiful harvest 23:42, Jun. 4, 2008
- Make the mustache on Thomas Jefferson smaller in size and so absurdly large. It would be more funnier. DJ Mixerr 17:55, February 5, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
- You're welcome for the idea Jockey but I have no idea how this achieved featured status because it's just plain stupid... I think what I said so many years ago was that you could do something as simple as adding a moustache to a historical figure b/c classical or decadent characters tend to be viewed favorably when under critique for featured status. Perhaps voting "for" towards such images or articles is a way for voters to proclaim their intelligence (intelligence = knowledge of historical things). --AmericanBastard 06:35, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
| Vote
|
Score: 4 kikes flown
|
| Nomination:
|
Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 17
|
- NF Super terrifically funny image.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron, per Zombiebaron. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:15, Dec 2
- Zombiebaron - I'm so going to hell for this one. -- The Zombiebaron 21:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, Would bring back memories if I could remember 'em.
  
- For. It's like a combination of "o_0" and "xD". --Andorin Kato 01:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- FORE. Wow, that's bad. :P -
Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 01:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Før —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S]
MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- For EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- OMG. I feel so dirty for laughing.
Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 03:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wordpress Long live drupal! \o/ 22:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- It works. --Mr. Alberto "Letters" ℜwg ☃ FU ☃ 04:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Timeless Truly timeless-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Squash. Yes. Squash. Don't ask. --THE 01:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- For...funny, who cares if it's text-based? Have all'y'all forgotten WRITING IS TEXT???--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 08:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- For — Sir Manticore
08:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- For Superkikefragilistic..but yes it needs something to really identify it as jewish

Zombiebaron. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:21, 9 May 2011
|
Against Votes: 13
|
- Against, textual joke. Trust me, ZB would've wanted it this way, were it not his image. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey or was it a giant monster or a robot? 03:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Against, text based joke. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:01, 03 Dec 2007
- Against, text based joke. Excuse me, I have to go hang myself now. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:25 Dec 03, 2007
- Zombiebaron. Text based, needs more flying jew heads, and at least one bloody yarmulke. --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 00:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Against - Text based, and peer pressure. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Funny, but (1) I can barely see the one Jew head, and (2) there's only one kike being flown. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Not Jewie enough. C'mon, Zb, let your redneck'dness run wild! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Text based humour is great, but this isn't entirely obvious at first. The idea is there, just needs more jew. Also, shouldn't have been here until the competition that its in was over. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
A whah? Robertodole 07:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Against. The picture itself is not funny... 96.2.214.171 21:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Sockpuppet. -- The Zombiebaron 16:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- --Mn-z 17:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
What is this doing on the front page? — Rbpolsen ♦ Come Rant · Come Look at all My Crap 23:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Meh. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:18, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh. 1234 ~
01:29, 9 May 2011
|