For. Duh. And I forgot to type an "e" at the end of "mem" whilst uploading this picture. How dumb (on my end). Cassandra (talk) 01:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
For. Made me laugh. Pasmorade (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Against Votes: 7
Against. It's a funny meme if you've actively followed Cassie's talk page over the course of this year, but is anyone going to know who Gale is 6 months from now? — SG1|Hereish[citation needed] 13:17, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
It STINKS! - Per Supergeeky1. While it's tempting to have a dumb Simpsons meme I slapped together become a featured image, I feel like as of late we're beginning to indulge in self-indulgent vanity. – Kip > Talk•Works•• 13:57, May. 11, 2021
Weak ForBlah Blah Blah 06:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)#*For. i hate that i have to eat all the time, it's ceaseless - jack mort |cunt| talk - 19:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
One vote only, Jack. —rc(t) 06:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
For and its been on VFP so long that I'm hungry again. Put it on the blasted front page already! DameGUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 14:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Against, the first reason that I like it is because it is text based. But the reason that this vote is a Strong For has something to do with how the cookie is blurry and the text isn't. -- TheZombiebaron 00:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Against I doubt this is the best Unc has to offer... Zana Dark 19:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Against The joke is only an "eh" to begin with, but the execution is also uncannily poor considering that MO made it. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 22:12, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Statue of John F. Kennedy, first Caesar of the American Empire, located close to the Senate steps upon which he was brutally murdered by Liius Brutus Oswaldii in AD 63.
For, but that's an awful caption. Since it doesn't look like a statue, it should read more like "Et tu, Oswaldus?". Yeh, I'm all literate 'n shit. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 19:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
F☭R, 06:55, 30 June 2007
For, It's more than good, it's fucking great, bitch!® --Sir Tripod2282cunvfptalkActive~15:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
For, but please, use Modus's caption! — SirWehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Weak Against. I get it, and its every so slightly funny, and all that. But the head. The head doesn't look like its made out of stone at all! -- TheZombiebaron 15:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Against I also hesitate to vote against, but I agree that the head doesn't look right. The hair shouldn't be dark like that, and the neck is a bit odd. --Spin 01:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Against I don't get it. Is this just an allusion to greek sculpturing? Well, if it's intelligent, it must be funny. You'll prob get it featured in that case. --AmericanBastard 06:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Wow. It would be insanely ironic if in several thousand years, they got this picture mixed up with the accurate one, and Jefferson went down in history for having a massive stache. Lol.
Against. Moustache humour is sooo 1820's. Plus, absurd humour with such a tenuous link to the real world isn't absurd, it's nonsense (Jefferson I get, but moustache?). Plus, it's crooked. I hope that it works better on whateverpageitison. One about Thomas Jefferson, probably. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 23:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Go to the source-image for the moustache. Crop the mustache. Do a colour-select (or its equivalent in whateverprogramyouuse). Get rid of the freakin' crufty background pinky stuff. Make mustache bigger. Rinse. Repeat. -- TheZombiebaron 21:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Against Hmm...It could be better if the moustache was ridiculously enormous or something... --Sir Seeker(Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 13:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Against. I looked at it. My face remained stoic. Not even the faintest twitch of the corners of my mouth in an upward direction. It's a picture with a badly cut-out 'tache slapped on it. Oh. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee12:44, Jun 11
Against I'm normally all for these "the joke is that minimal effort was put into the creation and thought process of this joke, further enhanced by the fact that hordes of people enjoy it for this perceived humor value, or for the ironic appreciation of its lack of humor", but this one is all meh. --§.|WotM|PLS|T|C|A 06:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Against. Um, yeah, how is this funny? •••Necropaxx(T){~} 23:20, Jun 13
Against. Rather obviously, this picture was created in under 30 seconds. The least you could do would be to make the mustache blend in with the painting.--The Nails 03:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Super dumb paper moustache--LOLsupreme 16:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Nty - That's just bad. How long did it take to make, 10 minutes? Smuff[kthnxbai] 20:29, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
Against. The mustache is absurdly large. Make the mustache on Thomas Jefferson smaller in size and not obscenely large. DJ Mixerr 17:51, February 5, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
I undid the explaination because I knew it'd be funnier just to show the pic. But thanks for pointing out what a prude I am. – Kip > Talk•Works•• 23:42, Jun. 4, 2008
Make the mustache on Thomas Jefferson smaller in size and so absurdly large. It would be more funnier. DJ Mixerr 17:55, February 5, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
You're welcome for the idea Jockey but I have no idea how this achieved featured status because it's just plain stupid... I think what I said so many years ago was that you could do something as simple as adding a moustache to a historical figure b/c classical or decadent characters tend to be viewed favorably when under critique for featured status. Perhaps voting "for" towards such images or articles is a way for voters to proclaim their intelligence (intelligence = knowledge of historical things). --AmericanBastard 06:35, March 25, 2011 (UTC)
Zombiebaron. Text based, needs more flying jew heads, and at least one bloody yarmulke. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Against - Text based, and peer pressure. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Against. Funny, but (1) I can barely see the one Jew head, and (2) there's only one kike being flown. •••Necropaxx(T){~} 02:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Against. Not Jewie enough. C'mon, Zb, let your redneck'dness run wild! SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Against. Text based humour is great, but this isn't entirely obvious at first. The idea is there, just needs more jew. Also, shouldn't have been here until the competition that its in was over. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)