User talk:Gale5050

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is Gale5050's talk page, where you can send messages, comments, and pie to Gale5050.
For a listing of unused images related to this topic, please see the image subpage.

Gale5050 (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


Note. I will archive this page when sections become irrelevant so it doesn't get long. Here is the archive.--Gale 5050 Complaint Department 13:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)




January 2021[edit]

The right approach here[edit]

Gale, it's true that in some contexts, being super direct, assertive, fiercely arguing your point and fighting to get what you think is right is a wise strategy. I can promise you that on uncyclopedia this is NOT a good strategy ever (trust me I know from my own embarrassing experience). Gale...please listen carefully: this is a voluntary website, we are here above all to have fun, enjoy funny articles, develop our writing skills and support one another in improving our writing. People can improve their writing without badgering, demands, enforcing one single opinion, stubbornly fighting to make a point nobody else cares about or agrees with. It is always good to know your own point of view and share that point of view but you really have to look around in any situation and note how everyone else reacts (especially on a website where people just contribute in their own free time). If you are in a casual environment like encyclopedia and nobody else agrees with your way of doing things or your ideas...then accept that, adapt to the way people do things and perhaps you can influence things in the future (by setting your own example). It's slightly like the wikipedia "be bold" motto. You can be bold, propose or try out new things...if people react unfavourably then well: at least you were bold and you tried, it didn't succeed you can try something else but just concede the fucking point and stop badgering people. You are truly testing everyone's patience and it's not an endearing, admirable or noble thing. It's extremely frustrating to everyone else. Perhaps you struggle with picking up on social cues or adapting to new environments. If that is the case then feel free to ask people what their limits are and when people tell you your behaviour is not acceptable then LISTEN TO THEM and consider they may have a good point. ShabiDOO 08:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

My view on this matter[edit]

IMO, you creating a forum vote was not wrong in and of itself (heck, zombie literally told you to). However, when other people are against the idea, just concede (don't be like Trump) and don't keep arguing your point while categorically ignoring everyone else's arguments. If you continue like this you will almost certainly be banned. ~ HipponiasCUN Talk - Contribs - Articles  08:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Statement by Gale5050[edit]

Voting on VFH shouldn’t count against me. Sure, not all of them were ok, but voting against should not be one of them. Second of all, I agree that the forum probably wasn’t smart. Unfortunately the only way to close it is to not have anyone edit it for 7 days(might be best here, let it stale out). I also should note that for VFD, I am considering a forum that allows an option to redirect. I probably won’t as it’s probably pointless, but when I want to redirect I don’t know whether to put it in the Keep or Delete sections, or do Symbol keep vote.svg Redirect or Symbol delete vote.svg Redirect. Unfortunately there is no other way to close it, but this way it will end with consensus against any changes. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Correction: 5 days. I see JJP left a comment two days ago. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

You are still not listening. The forum was not a problem. The problem is not conceding that other people have different points of view. No one is angry that you voted against anything, just please try to be more tactful when doing so and not issuing demands or commands. ShabiDOO 13:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Ok, I’ll think about starting a VFD forum. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Sanctions...again...[edit]

Gale5050, I would like to remind you, again, that you are only allowed to edit interstate articles (and their related pages), hurricane articles (and their related pages), geography articles (and their related pages), and voting pages. You may edit users' talk pages only when it is related to one or more of the four categories specified in your restrictions. Your restrictions, as you have already been told, do not allow you to welcome or warn users about anything, even when you think there is "blatant vandalism". The edit you made creating User talk:Barushi was a violation of your sanctions. Please stop unless you want to be placed on Ban Patrol again. MrX blow me 18:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Do you want blatant vandalism to stand?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
No. I also don't want you trying make that judgement call, because, again, you have demonstrated an inability to do so. I almost went straight to Ban Patrol, instead of offering you a warning. Maybe next time, when someone points out that you've messed up, instead of trying to defend your obvious mistakes, just apologize and try not to do it again. MrX blow me 18:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
There needs to be an equivalent of BANEX. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 18:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Gale5050, please listen to what I am telling you (it's something you've been told before). You have, on numerous occasions, reverted edits that you said were "blatant vandalism" (or something similar), when in fact they were not vandalism. This is why you do not have any exceptions to your restrictions. MrX blow me 19:04, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
BANEX wouldn't be explicity stated, it would be a think that would have to be directly in your sanctions for it not to apply. Also, it could be that the edits were blatant vandalism, and you miscategorized that, as you have done that in the past, and your persistent lack of edit summaries. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 19:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021[edit]

Ok. Is that in UN:OFFICE?--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 22:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Yup. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  11:00pm  January 18, 2021
As a quick side note-sometimes it’s obvious two IPs are the same in which case they are best treated like one. This may lead to split warnings, but if anyone begins with over a Level 1 warning it will clearly say the previous IPs. I will not install RW yet. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

MrX's talk page[edit]

Please do not edit talk page comments by other users, as you did here. If their statement contains a factual inaccuracy, post clarification underneath but don't edit the comment. It makes the conversation hard to follow and others can think that the user (in this case, MrX) posted it themselves. ~ HipponiasCUN Talk - Contribs - Articles  15:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, maybe I should sign me changing it? Think I’ll do that. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 15:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
🤦 Breaking up another user's text with your own sig is even worse... Just... I'll revert it for you. ~ HipponiasCUN Talk - Contribs - Articles  15:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Oh wow, didn't even see this when I came here. Thanks Hipponias. MrX blow me 15:34, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Talk page[edit]

Wow, wow, wow. My comment was about as civil as anyone could be right now. I used caps, but I was still very civil. You changed my words. Then you told me to calm down. You tried to somehow make it so that you are not responsible for your own behavior. MrX blow me 15:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

I used caps in two parts of the message, not shouting the whole time, and your behavior is unbelievable, to put it mildly. MrX blow me 16:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021[edit]

So basically, this is the same as Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. , right? Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah. I'm a fan of custom amboxes though. Kev𝔎𝔢𝔳  05:47pm  January 19, 2021

Username template[edit]

It kinda kills the joke every time you point that out. Please consider removing that part of your comment. Thanks. Cheers. MrX blow me 20:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I know, it does. However, that joke is extremely corny, cringy and nobody gets it. I wanted to spare everyone for why they thought there username was the best. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
MrX I hid it. I made it smaller by a margin of 4 times. Now it's hard to see.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Eh, ok I guess. FWIW, almost everyone gets it. MrX blow me 20:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 :) Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

WotY[edit]

Thanks for the vote, but you're only allowed 1.0 vote, so you'll probably have to remove it. MrX blow me 17:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Yeah. removing now.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
@MrX: Removed.--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 17:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

QVFD notes for posting[edit]

Gale5050, seriously, how many times do we have to tell you? Read. Please read the notes for posting on QVFD. It says not to sign. You don’t need to sign your comments, and you definitely don’t need to add the unsigned template to somebody else’s comment. MrX blow me 19:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Personally, admins sign all the time and it should be removed. I don't want a situation like the one where I put words on your mouth--Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Unbelievable...smh... It says not to sign because it takes up space and annoys people. Admins sign for a very different reason. They do not sign all the time. Most articles that get put on QVFD get huffed. Rarely, an article that ended up on QVFD doesn’t get huffed (at least not right away). In that situation, admins sign to let everyone know that an admin has reviewed the situation. If everyone signs QVFD posts, it will get way too confusing, and the times when admins sign won’t stick out like they should. And again, seriously, please stop trying to defend mistakes and listen to the people trying to help you. Your attitude and behavior make working with you impossible. MrX blow me 20:15, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, but again, hijacking posts. How else do I signal something? --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
What is post hijacking? Anyway, the following is stated in the QVFD-page itself. "Do not sign QVFD nominations. It just takes up space and annoys people." Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz Zzz...morning? 21:29, 21 January, 2021 (UTC)
Cat the Colourful Post hijacking is-when Hipponias puts a page for QVFD and I leave an unsigned comment. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 21:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Then to answer your question, you don't leave a comment for a page that someone else put on QVFD. The admins are more than capable of reviewing the situation and gathering all necessary and relevant information. Whether or not you warned the article's creater (which, again, is something that Zombiebaron told you quite plainly you shouldn't be doing) is irrelevant to whether or not the article should be huffed. MrX blow me 23:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Well, I should at least say thank you for answering my question. See January 18 update however --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Kev's talk page[edit]

Is there a reason you reverted our two messages? Kev's gonna be a little confused by the amount of messages on his alerts. He'll be able to see it all by looking through the history, but isn't it better to just leave it all there? MrX blow me 23:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Kev resolved the issue. Yeah, probably shouldn't have done that. --Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 23:59, 22 January 2021 (UTC)