User talk:ChiefjusticeDS/Archive 4

Hi.

How is the foetus doing? Has it's heart developed, yet? Are you going to wait till your girlfriend's 8 months pregnant to get that abortion? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:57, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

I would have preferred rape to be honest, it would be less protracted. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:09, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Hey

I recently did 2 pee review, and i was wondering how were they?--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 23:51, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

Drama

Hi, I have just wrote an article that parodies the social phenomenon on Uncyclopedia known as Drama. Seeing as its become a bit of a problem in the past few months (years?) I thought it would be quite cool to make a section at the bottom of the article about other users' opinions of Drama. So I thought I'd invite you to write one, preferably humourous. It's no big deal if you don't want to, but if you are interested, you can come up with a quote and either leave it here on your talk page and I'll add it later, or you can go straight to the article itself and add it there. Any suggestions on improvement are also welcome. Thnx. --Matfen 00:23, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Article link here.

Pee Review

Here. If you got time of course.--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:41, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Certainly, I'll get it at some point tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:00, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Please remove Pee Review request

Could you remove this? Or let me know how to remove these? Puppy requested it be removed after I made a short comment, not a full Pee Review, as you can see here. I made my comments there. Thanks! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:05, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Removed for you. For future reference and in case of vandalism you can easily remove a request from the queue by clicking on review now and just filling the score fields with 0 and the comments sections with N/A, put your reason for removing the review in the final comments section and then sign as you would had you carried out a review, then you just hit save and the review will move off the queue. Equally should you come across a vandalised request in the reviewed list you can move it back to the queue by deleting any text that has been entered into any of the review fields. There you go, it's that simple. Happy Christmas by the way. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:17, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

That's funny, because I just got an edit conflict with you as I was posting a message asking whether in the future you'd prefer I notify you or do it myself just as you suggested above. So you answered my question before I even asked it! Also Merry Chanukah back to you! And by the way, it's weird that in Great Britain people typically say "Happy Christmas," whereas in America they typically use the traditional British form of "Merry Christmas." King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:22, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

It is somewhat strange, but then I also devote hours of my free time to rolling around in the gutters of Leicester city centre and standing in the cold and rain for no money, so I am probably not the best measure of crazy. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:26, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Fantastic.

That review was just what the doctor ordered, and you gave me some things to think about as well. Thank you so much.

	Rejoice, ChiefjusticeDS! You have been entitled to the Golden Shower Award
	For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:56, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Next Rank? (Pee Review)

When can I move up from Fresh Stain to Steel Kidney? I'm eager for a promotion--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 09:35, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

The most common means of promotion to Steel Kidney comes from winning the Reviewer of the month award, this grants automatic promotion. The interim rank between the two is Attending Urologist though we have not had any of those in a while. Other promotions are at the discretion of the the Captain. If you really want a promotion don't ask for one, I have learned that doing so rarely yields results around here. If you desperately want a promotion: work on your reviews and try for a reviewer of the month nomination, I keep an eye on all the reviews getting done so I will nominate you myself if I feel you can consistently PEE at a level likely to gain votes. I hope this helps, good luck! --ChiefjusticeDS 21:06, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I see. I'll work harder on my reviews and aim for Reviewer of the Month. Thanks.--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:47, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

I'm in need of some ideas, Can you help

I am currently working or a article on the show Whale Wars (it can be viewed here), but I'm kinda having some trouble of thinking what else to put on there, so I'm asking a few people on ideas, including you. If you have an idea, you can either go to the discussion page on that article or my talk page and tell me your idea. And please, don't suggest anything stupid (something that contradicts the HTBFANJS). If you don't have an idea, then sorry for wasting your time (or am I?). Thanks!--WILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 08:25, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Eee Review

Well, I did read the rules and I read that all guidlines are jsut guidlines and can be ignored. I also read in your example of review that with an exeption of the first "humor" section, rest are just short, as mine. And I just like the articles so I didn't have to point out evrything what's wrong. Look at my Rwanda review. I pointed section by section what I didn't like. If formating was nice, I wrote it. If prose was ok, I wrote it. If it wasn't OK, I wrote it. But those articles were cool. I had positive attitude to the writers as was written in guidelines. I think you treated me patronizingly, as I was a typical Noob. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 23:12, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry if you felt I was patronising, my intention was simply to draw your attention to the fact that your reviews were of an unacceptable standard. The PEE guidelines may be ignored but ignoring them is not good for the writers or yourself. I reiterate, please make an attempt to work on your reviews; deliberately ignoring my advice and the guidelines is a good way to draw the ire of both writers and admins. My advice was for your benefit not my own, whether you follow it or not is up to you. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:16, December 26, 2009 (UTC)

If you want another helping of Pee Review

(Just to let you know I posted this or a variation of this on the user talk pages of some users who were recently reviewed in a manner that may have been less than satisfactory)

Yes, you may well already know this. But just a reminder that if a Pee Review by any reviewer, including me, doesn't help you in the way you hoped, you are free to request another one. Happy editing! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  17:40, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

Kreator

Why would you have deleted my Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kreator?

1. 03:05, December 29, 2009 (hist) (diff) m Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kreator ‎ (←Undid revision 4301142 by ChiefjusticeDS (talk) Why would my pee review be DELETED?) (top)

No talk? Must have been an error? L!$@ (Meow!)(Contribs) 03:08, 29 December 2009

I deleted it because the standard was unacceptable and was borderline vandalism, while your intentions may have been good, your review gave no useful feedback to the author and was of a damnably poor standard. Please read the review guidelines before you contribute to PEE review in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:34, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

"Was of a damnably poor standard"? Don't forget the whole "friendly, encouraging" bit, Chief! ;-) --UU - natter 09:45, Dec 29

Yeah, sorry, just in from work, it sounded worse than I meant it to. Need morning Coffee. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:47, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

There was a complete section rewrite? Golly, where did I PUT that? It's customary to dialog with ANY PEE Reviewer, is it not, prior to dasterdly descimation of the undesired review score? Thanks for the fun! L!$@ (Meow!)(Contribs) 12:14, 29 December 2009

It is also advisable to be friendly and encouraging to new editors, but not to vandals. It's like the difference between sunning yourself to get a tan and sticking your head in a microwave. I'm happy for you to go back and do a complete review of the article, Lisa, but make sure that what you are doing is supporting good writing. One sentence reviews can be fed back directly to the writer or can be added onto the review page, but detail and recommendations are essential to a good review. Pup

When I'm attempting to give suggestions or criticisms, I try rereading what I've written to sound as mean and nasty as possible because that's the way the person I'm speaking to may hear it. Then, if necessary, I rewrite it. It's the problem we all know--you can't see the person's face, hear their voice, see what they're wearing, etc. For example, right now I'm dressed in a lovely new for 2010 Clarisse Prom Dress 1301! It's absolutely Adorable for Prom 2010!! This Clarisse 2010 knee-length dress, featured in light pink/silver and light blue/silver, has a crumb catcher neckline and dotted metallic tulle skirt. A center sequined design pulls the whole look together, making you shine on your special night! The perfect dress for prom or your sweet 16! (Actually, I'm wearing a pair of old pants and a T-shirt, but that doesn't sound nearly as exciting). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:49, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Dunno, context is lost with a good dose of grim awful truth!?$# I love metallic tulle! Go vote me Noob of the month already? L!$@ (Meow!)(Contribs) 06:30, 4 January 2010

UnSignpost Delivery! - December something!

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper that took a long enough vacation to make former President Bush jealous.

December 17^th, 2009• Issue 70 • Fuck You! I Felt Like It!

UnSignpost and random editor return from two month break, find that not much has changed By THEDUDEMAN After 2 months, one would think that things would change. But from the looks of it, nothing really has for Uncyclopedia in the past few months with out UnSignpost. In particular, the problems in caring, changing things, doing other things and caring have gone from the problems of two months ago, to the problems of now, with nothing really changing. The causes of these problems, discovered after much digging through archives seems to be the general Nobody cares aditude of the site, and the general populations inability to really change anything, because they don't care. A random user who had been missing since around the last issue of UnSignpost made this comment. "Well, when I left, uncyc had been having its own problems and everyone had been complaining about the same things for some time and nobody really cared enough to do anything, or just couldn't make anything happen." says THEDUDEMAN, who had been missing since late September. "I thought I'd come back and see what was happening in the world of Uncyclopedia, and by the looks of it, nothing has changed" While the general population of Uncyclopedia has been alerted to these aging problems, nobody has raised any fuss to get any of them solved. It seems nothing will ever happen because as they all say, nobody cares. UU notices return of USP, hijacks article for own nefarious ends By UU Yeah, that title pretty much gives it away - evil admin UU has hijacked this section of the USP to announce two festive initiatives: the Mince Pie contest, and the Ban Parto-ho-ho-l, both of which are to be found on his userpage. So if you think you can eat more mince pies this Christmas than UU or current runaway leader Barry Gibb of Bee Gees fame, or if you want to request a friendly festive joke ban for one of your Uncyc chums, get yourselves across to the most festive userpage on the wiki! YOU ARE ALL LAZY TALLYWHACKERS! An Editorial. By The Woodburninator Alright you lazy sons of bitches (no offense to Zana, of course), what in the hell have you been doing these last few months? Gerry takes time away from this awful place for, like 3 months, and no one is able to do a single UnSignpost? Not once. SINCE OCTOBER! Have we as a community forgotten the fine, upstanding tradition that this here barely read online journal has kept going since May of 2008? It is time for a little history lesson boys and girls (No offense to Zombiebaron, of course). The Post was started by Cajek and Skully in May of 2008. That's really as far as I got with my research though, so I guess your history lesson is over. Regardless, how many amazing stories have been broken from the fine investigative journaling over the years? Like the time we broke the story that the UnSignpost was starting up. Or the time we told everyone Spang's talkpage was destroying the Wikia servers. A problem that still haunts us today. Without this venerable post, those stories never would have been unleashed upon the moronic and ignorant public that includes you, who are both a moron and ignorant. We need this thing to bring us the news, and make us laugh. We need this thing for the sake of parody. But, above anything else, we need this post in order to waste Dexter's time when he's forced to deliver them. Have you seen his edits around here over the past few weeks? That guy's getting to be WAY too useful, and if we don't stop him now, who knows what he'll do next. Fix VFH? Win Last person to edit wins? Nip this in the bud Uncyc. Nip this in the fucking bud.

Check out these pages! A Caption Contest... or something... Some sort of war of templates? WTF? Shit like this still going on... Really? From our logs: 19:53, December 15, 2009 Mordillo blocked Bobbinator with an expiry time of infinite ‎ (end of the line, fuckwit. I'm going to track down your IP address and report it to the abuse department of your ISP. run and hide motherfucker, run and hide.) 16:56, December 15, 2009 Under user blocked 209.175.13.46 with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (oy, fuck off. no blanking, no cyberbullying, and NO personal details like phone numbers. GTFO.) 13:20, December 15, 2009 Mordillo blocked 199.43.172.254 with an expiry time of infinite ‎ ("199.43.172.254, causing trouble since 2005") BIOPIC OF THE WEEK AH, WHAT CAN BE SAID ABOUT THEDUDEMAN? THE GUY EXHUDES DUDLINESS AT ALL TIMES DURING HIS TIME HERE. HE WON UNCYCLOPEDIAN OF THE MONTH IN AUGUST OF 2009. HE WON A PLS WHEN HE RE-WROTE DUDE, AN ARTICLE THAT LATER GOT FEATURED, AND FROM WHICH HE TAKES HIS NAMESAKE. HE HALFHEARTEDLY EVEN TRIED TO START THIS EDITION. HAS HE DONE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE COOL, NOTEWORTHY, AND I SHOULD BE TELLING YOU ABOUT? PROBABLY. BUT RESEARCHING ANY OF THAT WOULD FORCE ME TO GO ONTO HIS USERPAGE, AND SINCE I AM AT WORK, I AM UNABLE TO ACTUALY DO THAT. INSTEAD I'LL JUST STICK TO THE ALL CAPS GIMMICK IN A COY TIE-IN TO HIS NAME. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THEDUDEMAN. Quote of the Week <zim_ulator> no penis involved here LadyCS has left #uncyclopedia <DrSkullthumper> You just lost LadyCS's interest Old School Featured Article of the Week MonthTri-Month Let Someone Else Do It tm is every intelligent person's philosophy of life. There are plenty of things that if we stop doing them for a long enough time, some other sucker with less patience and a greater sense of responsibility will do them instead. This is an established law of our social reality, and it is our obligation to uphold it. VFD Keep vote of the week. Keep The less use something is, the more I identify with it. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:41, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Late deliver courtesy of MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:06, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Please review Stewie Grifin

I know I mostly ask you to do one, but you so good at it, and I think this one will be easy. At least it was proofread. Link--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 06:55, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Done for you now. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:14, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Please sign in

Chiefster, don't be ashamed to sign your vote on UotM! Happy editing! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:40, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

The wiki religion ICU tag

Hi mate I removed the ICU tag after some very serious editing. Not sure why you put it back on. The Wiki Religion

Since we're on the topic of PEEing

There's an article up for review that is umm... maybe you should check it yourself, as I think you'll know best what to do with it. --Matfen 21:54, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/YouTubers

Fixed, thanks for spotting that for me. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:57, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

I think the creator might be a noob. Alternately, a moron. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:32, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Well let's assume a noob, it still shouldn't be reviewed though. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:07, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

UotM thanks

'Sincere Thanks'

Thank you very much for helping to make me December 2009's Uncyclopedian of the Month.

In the words of the immortal Sally Field, "You like me, you really like me!"

• • • Necropaxx (T) {~}

---

A bouncy thanks!

Chuck would like to thank you!  For. finding his Story so firm, so round and so... attractive.

Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 17:59, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Obama

You didn't even say why in the summary. Did I do something wrong?--Jondel 08:38, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Mostly because the picture was not displaying properly and the caption didn't work with the article. Admittedly it isn't one of our best articles but I decided it was better to err on the side of caution and remove the image code in case you didn't do anything else with the article, no offence meant. Feel free to add it again. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:40, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Please continue your work but do explain in the summary or somewhere. It is indeed always better to be on the safe side of caution even if you have to remove everything. I assume Good faith. Err. what is the image code?--Jondel 09:13, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

No offence taken. The image and text has nothing to do with the article but hilarious (for me). You know this is a 'fun wiki'. I don't think readers will mind and may even be more interested in the images than being (very) consistent.--Jondel 09:17, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

The correct image code is similar to what you had done already, just have a look at the way the other images have been put into the article and copy that, and use the preview button. I suspect the problem you had before was just a single typo, just preview before you save. It's good to see someone making an effort, on one part at least. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:27, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Give me an Idea.

I want to write something but I just can't find an idea, do you have any? Also, hi, I'm back, how are ya, ect...    Orian57    Talk   07:27 5 January 2010

Hi Orian, sorry for the delayed response, but I have been as busy as someone who is gainfully employed by the government for no money can be. As for an idea... I would be inclined to say that I am relatively blank on the ideas front, perhaps that sequel you were considering for Daddy there's a zombie in the etc, could be gainfully persued. By the way, on a totally unrelated note, I really like your UnRadio article that is currently on VFH, if the long marriage proposal of a review I gave it didn't give that away already. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:36, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Blingin' Pee Review

I has decided to drive-by your talk page and pop a thanks message in yo ass. Me likes yo suggestions and will implement them some time. Probably not soon, cuz just got a new temp job which is taking up a ridiculous amount of time. Keep easy Big C... --Matfen 11:25, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Word up bro. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:05, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!

For your vigilance to my Fire arbicle, I give you this tasty delicacy!

Necropaxx has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Enjoy! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 23:19, Jan 5 2010

Thanks very much. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:32, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

When did you become the Messiah?

I mean I know that you're great, but having your User page changed to describe you as the Alpha and the Omega is pretty damned special. Pup

I am indeed, totally righteous. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:50, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

And justice was kind of served

Thank You For Finally Taking Out The Trash Unfortunately, the situation in the kitchen has not changed. I made it a point to not create a single dirty dish in this sink for the very purpose of demonstrating to you that the mess in the kitchen is not somehow our problem but is, in fact, your problem. Technically, that makes it my problem as well but said problem is one of inconvenience as opposed to the complete negligence inherent in your failure to clean up after yourself. It's also come to my attention that you and your friends have been urinating in the kitchen sink, despite the fact that it's full of dirty dishes. while your reluctance to touch the dishes is understandable it does not form a basis for me to empathize with you. While I shouldn't be bargaining with you again, I'll agree to clear a path to the bathroom sink so that everyone will have a place to urinate. All you need to do is simply dispose of the dirty dishes. We'll buy more at the flea market.

Trash is dish best served cold and covered in urine.--    13:06, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Images

hey Chiefjustice, i am a noob and need help with putting images on my user page.

I have tryed and failed.

Partly because i dont know howt to use the image link thing shown in the editing tips sidebar

thanks, -Jesus-

OK, which image are you wanting to use? If you can link me to it I will put it on your page for you and then you can see how to do it. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:00, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

-Jesus-

i was trying to use an image from my files, but yeah ile give you a link. [1]

Here:

And also

That image is here.

~Formerly Annoying Crap 06:43, 8 January 2010

To make your life more comfortable

You don't need to list broken redirects under QVFD, they all appear here. ~ 08:49, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

That was the list I was using to find them, I was listing them on QVFD simply because it seemed the most expedient way to get them deleted, but I understand, I'll just leave them there or redirect them in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:54, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

OK, it's just that when most admins do their daily maintenance run, this is one of the places we check, so I'm just saving you some work on this one. ~ 09:05, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Okay then, thanks for letting me know. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:11, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Sob

Heya Chief. I feel real bad. I was planning my full force return to uncyclopedia in November, then shortly after that I got accepted to work on a project that could really speed things up for me. I've been very busy and horribly ignored my uncyclopedian duties. Just wanna say that I am still a member and I will write again as soon as I get time. I still have a soccer 2010 guide I would like to do.

Yes. Guess I just needed someone to talk to. That and it is fun to write meaningless stuff on your talk page.--165.145.51.248 17:34, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

See that. I'm not even auto logged in on my home PC. It's worse than I thought.--BlueSpiritGuy 17:37, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Hi again, not to worry, the real lives we all have are part of the reason we have so few regular contributors, I have been less active than I would like recently too. But it is good to see that you are still in the land of the living and it will be good to see you editing again. Oh and nobody writes stuff on my talk page any more, they are all too busy writing great articles and winning awards these days. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:53, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Well that just makes me feel a lot better. Hearing of all the great articles. Still, I'll try to be around more often now, just to be kept in the loop...--BlueSpiritGuy 17:59, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry...

Sorry, my bad. first time contributing to uncyclicopedia, so please forgive the ignorance if I crashed your Pee Review. Thanks for being patient!

Sakai4eva 08:43, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

It's no problem, we all learn at some stage, I'm still learning myself. It's better to see someone new contributing to the wiki, there are also plenty of other articles in the list for me to do. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:35, January 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

That was a very in-depth and helpful review. I struggled all along with trying to make the article about "Hollywood" rather than a discursive rant about a terrible actor, and I think the line you suggested (or something like it) would be a great addition in helping bring the story back towards the subject at hand.

If you would permit me to explain the Keyser Söze reference: the film The Usual Suspects, in which Baldwin got his "big break", involved a mythical crime lord named Keyser Söze as the main protagonist. Eventually, he is revealed to be Kevin Spacey -- the narrator of the movie who is spinning a tall tale to police all along. Anyway, much of the intrigue in that movie involves the true identity of Söze, and many viewers somehow still come away perplexed despite the character clearly being Spacey. Come to think of it, it would be funnier if Baldwin answered "yes" rather than no. I've added a wikipedia link to assist others who are confused.

I also wanted to add that the break in the question/answer flow of the article is intentional: I was trying to indicate that the story was taking a rough turn. IronLung 00:12, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

The doctor will see you now Oh, by the way, before we begin today's session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.--You know what the music means... Our time is up.

Help Please

I am in need of some ideas for my article HowTo:Date A Emo Girl. It has been in my user space for some time, and I really want to get it done. If you have any good ideas, click here, make a new section, and put down what would make this article good. Thanks!--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 05:12, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Stalker article and YouTube videos

Hi! I thought I would look at this edit summary: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/w/index.php?title=Stalker&diff=4336163&oldid=4336152 "That's one more youtube video than this article needs" - By looking at the edit changes and the version of the page, it's implied that the article needs zero YouTube videos.

So, why would a YouTube video be inappropriate for this article? I look at the article itself and I think this video would fit. In the video the man takes a lot of effort to look up the girl's personal information and then stalks her. I think this video would enhance this article. As for the humor, well, the video itself is campy in the way it was dramatized, and then there's the touch where the stalker talks about liking Lolita in an IM conversation.

Thanks, Vzvartnots 07:45, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

My feeling on Youtube videos in articles is that they are mostly unnecessary, regardless of how amusing they are they are often someone else's work and they look ugly on the page. My general policy as far as they go is that prose can tell a story or get a point across faster and in a way that flows with the rest of the article. With Youtube videos a reader has to stop reading and watch the video and this rarely pays off positively for an article.

Take a look at the best articles we have and you will notice the absence of You tube videos in practically all of them. This is how I feel about them, a lot of other users have more time for these videos than I do and would not have taken the same action. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:24, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost January several-days-ago^th

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper That Openly Admits Its Liberal And Conservative Biases!

Jan 14th, 2010 • Issue71 • Keeping You Guessing

Uncyclopedia Voting Season Arrives, Users Driven To Voting Frenzy By UU 'Tis the season to abstain with extreme prejudice! Yes, every anal-retentive voting obsessive's favourite time of the year has arrived: January marks the point of the year when the awards for the best things of the previous year are voted on! If that's not an oxymoron on a site that is acknowledged to be the worst, of course. This poll-packed month sees WotY, UotY and PotY join (deep breath) WotM, UotM, PotM, NotM, AotM, RotM, EGA, FP, PWotM, ANOTM, Top 10 o' the month, UGotM, VFH, VFD, VFS and VFP as forums for people to air their opinions, prejudices, minor rivalries and petty jealousies. And as if this wasn't enough voting-related thrills 'n' spills, when the Top 10 articles of December 2009 have been decided, there'll be the Top 10 articles of 2009 proper to vote for! UnSignpost's fearless reporter and mascot DogNewspaper (pictured) predicts a bumper month for whoring, in-fighting, backstabbing and bitching as users scramble to secure themselves a fleeting moment's recognition from up to several of their peers. Followed by next to no voting in February, as everyone recovers. From the desk of the Cabal: 2010 ordered to be Drama free By The Cabal As Uncyclopedia drunkenly stumbles into the new decade, barely managing to hold down that spicy dinner it had for lunch, the non-existent cabal would like to wish all residents a happy new year. And by wish we mean order, residents would be subjects and by happy new year we mean fuck you all where communism hasn't failed yet. Yes ladies and gentlemen, we saw it all in 2009. We saw dozens of forums declaring that we're the worst (which we know), we saw numerous editors leave the front door open on the way out (come on people! it's bloody -7 outside!), we saw epic banninations (the simple joys of life), we saw prolific gay bashing (ideologically pure of course), we saw religious wars over sausages, we saw the worst 100 reflections of 2009 barely close before the midnight of December 31st. You promised in 2008 you wouldn't do that. You failed us. And so, ladies and gentlemen, we raise our collective arses from the toilet which was 2009, wiping it with the first anniversary edition of the UnSignpost, as this is the only good thing that ever came out of this rag of a newspaper. We would like to ask humbly that the population of Uncyclopedia do the following: Please, for the love of Sophia, remain calm; exit the building in an orderly fashion; remember that objects in the rear view mirror may appear closer than they are; understand that allergen traces may be found in this Uncyclopedia. And always remember the prime directive: you are here to have fun. Or in short - shut the fuck up and go write an article. Thank you for your undivided attention citizens. You may now remove your muzzles.

Check out these pages! Now you have no excuse Pretend people care what you like It makes as much sense as Scientology, I suppose From our logs: 09:22, 12 January 2010 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 64.40.243.245 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ ("raccist"? what's that, prejudiced against raccoons?) 03:33, 12 January 2010 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 98.101.196.155 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (lol i'm astral projecting an image of two gay guys having sex into your mind or something) 19:06, 6 January 2010 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 216.64.230.79 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (Nigger to you too, sir.) 19:05, 5 January 2010 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked JeChr (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite ‎ (Jesus is dead. He's not coming back.) 23:05, 3 January 2010 TheLedBalloon (Talk | contribs) blocked 98.217.57.240 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (That was a waste of an edit. There are edit-starved kids in China that would've used that to its fullest extent, you know.) Biopic of the Week Prowling the corridors of pee review with a light step but a heavy hand, ChiefjusticeDS is Uncyc's reigning king of the golden river. He's reviewed more articles than most Uncyclopedians have read. In their entire lives. And he keeps a benevolent eye on everyone else, making sure there's no stale pee in the pond. If you've had a good review in the last year or so, he probably had a hand in that somewhere. Doff your cap and move on. Old-School Featured Article of the Week HowTo:Run away from home is a guide to every early teenager's ultimate weapon in the never-ending battle with the forces of evil as represented by their parents. Written by Alksub - who most of our readership won't remember - this is exactly what to do next time your parents don't let you stay out late to meet that nice-sounding kid you met over MSN who seemed very keen to hook up and get to know you better! Trend of the Year (so far) Username changing. Username a little short? Lengthen it for no good reason! All the cool kids are doing it, apparently.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

I swore I'd never hand-deliver this again. Here it is. --UU - natter 10:11, Jan 18

Hey Chief

The pee table hasnt been checked yet. Mind doing it? I already put up the articles that have not been checked.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 20:45, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

I get round to it when I can, it will be before the end of the week, but this isn't my 9-5 job. I tend to do it in the evenings, and when I'm having to juggle work, uncyclopedia and university exams, things can take a little while. You only need to worry if it gets to be longer than a week before I update it. Also, for future reference you should be a Steel Kidney before editing the list, don't worry it will get done, probably today or tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:05, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Better late than later

Thank you Geez, now don't I feel like an idiot. I forgot to thank you for voting me Noob of the Month...back in August 2009. While I disappeared shortly after receiving the award, I have now, like Spiderman, decided to live up the responsibility of wielding it's power. If you, like Jesus, can find it in your heart to forgive me, please send $1 to Forgetful Man P.O Box 5564 NSW, Australia.

Thanks for the vote. I'll try and help out with the PQ again now I'm back. Sequence 05:57, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 21th January 2009

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Better sign it.

Jan 21st, 2010 • Issue 72 • Yorkshire-style news

Awards of the Year race thrillingly poised By UU Yes folks, as the first month of this new decade lurches slowly and falteringly towards conclusion, the ... of the Year awards showdown is accelerating towards a thrilling climax! Your ever-topical UnSignpost mascot DogNewspaper therefore brings you this essential and timely guide to the runners and riders!. In the most prestigious award of the lot, Writer of the Year, the race for second place behind prolific funny factory and champion-elect Hype is neck and neck between apparently-no-longer-hirsute TKF fan-club president and feature-machine Guildy and low-profile but high-quality-output, er, feature-machine Sog1970. But wait! There's still a chance they could get caught by the chasing pack of little-known and modest Scouser Mhaille, hetero macho-man Orian57, antipodean canine PuppyOnTheRadio and none-more-metal mosher Monika. Oh, and some other chancers have been nommed without polling a single vote (including DrStrange, who is currently looking likely to become the first Uncyclopedian ever to win WotM twice, but hasn't carried that form over to WotY - odd). Meanwhile, over at PotY, the race for second place behind Sonje is even closer, with both Modus and some n00b polling a creditable one nom but no votes each! Who will pull ahead by the end of the month? It's a competition you just can't keep your eyes off! Disappointingly, the UotY vote lets the side down, with seemingly a boring old race for first place between Belgian one-man categorisation whirlwind, maintenance addict, broken thing fixer, BUTT POOP!!! junkie and footwear-as-handwear exponent Socky and handsome English admin who wrote this article and is not in the least bit biased UU. The apparent scramble to be runner-up to whichever of these two is runner-up is far more interesting, as non-stop wikifixer MadMax goes up against Welsh Rarebit RabbiTechno, not-Yorkshire-enough admin Mordillo, vowel-free-zone Mnbvcxz and Moterfucking Nigger Lover Roman Dog Bird. Damned with the faint praise of a nom with no votes in this category are the pants bomber, talk page king FU Spang, human non-sequitur generator Modus and absent but deadly hockey nut Gerry. And finally, over where it's really at, the NotD cockfight is almost impossible to call! Will plucky outsider RC hold off the challenge of Apple, Apples and Maddie's life? The tension is quite literally unbearable! But remember kids: whoever "wins", we're all still losers. And now, your not-at-all-struggling-for-material Signpost brings you... Horoscopes! By GlobalTourniquet Aquarius (Jan. 20 - Feb. 18) - This week, you have a dream, that one day you will be judged not by the color of your skin but by Simon Cowell. Virgo (Aug. 23 - Sept. 22) - If Martin Luther King had believed them when they told him "Silence is golden", he never would have accomplished his great work in the cause of civil rights. You, on the other hand, are just a mouthy bitch. Silence is golden. For the rest of this week's horoscopes in full, see the horoscopes page, obviously.

Check out these pages! Narcissism? On the intertubes? Serious businesszzzzszszz - sorry, nodded off there Breaking News: We're The Worst! From our logs: 06:45, 20 January 2010 Dr. Skullthumper (Talk | contribs) blocked I LIKE PIE!!! (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 48 hours ‎ (This is your local formatting nazi-admin reminding you to stop undoing people's formatting fixes. Learn to wiki, pl0x. And don't harrass people trying to help.) 01:04, 18 January 2010 Roman Dog Bird (Talk | contribs) blocked 68.61.194.228 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (suspected homophobe. might hate gays. or he's just a faggot.) 12:33, 18 January 2010 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 196.12.233.26 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (And the Lord said unto me, "Cursed are the page blankers, for they are the least of my creations; take up thy banhammer and smite them") Biopic of the Week Conscientious vote-machine Romartus has been around longer than you might think - kick-starting his Uncyc career with a series of DYK suggestions, before hitting his stride. Known as one of the more "demanding" voters on VFH, Romartus has also been diligently saving some of the less-deserving articles on VFD. He also breeds tropical ferrets. One of the previous statements is a lie, introduced by the biographer in lieu of a joke. Use your skill and judgement to work out which one! Old-School Featured Article of the Week Really Big Tree is an article about a really big tree. This tree is of such an immense size, it is scarcely credible. Few trees deserve their own Uncyclopedia article, but the Really Big Tree deserves its own wiki. You may think you have encountered trees of impressive size before, but you haven't seen a tree at all until you've experienced the Really Big Tree! Cajek UnBlock of the week! MrN9000 (Talk | contribs) resurrected Cajek (Talk | contribs) (blocking Cajek is Sooooo old school. Unblocking Cajek is the new, new school. Not that I went to school. Obviously.) The (probably short-lived) return of UU's Obscure British Dialect Expression of the Week Were you to find yourself in Norwich, Engerland, you may happen upon a local. Were that local to then say to you "dew yew keep a troshin'", you may find yourself somewhat at a loss for a reasonable response - well, no more! Yes, your ever-useful UnSignpost is here to furnish you with a translation, which is: "take care of yourself". (It comes from "carry on with the threshing", if that helps, although we can't see how it would). So now if you find yourself in Norwich, Engerland, the only thing you have to worry about is getting out of there. Fast!

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

Also, it's MrN9000's mum's 60th birthday! 9001(bot)  17:32, Jan 21

Thank you, bitch!

No really, thanks for the review. You kinda hit on all the stuff I was trying to do. The thing is, I had so many ideas for that article, but when I actually started to write it, I was kind of like "Eh, I don't like that, that won't work, what the hell am I doing" and stuff like that. I had this vision of a great article perfectly parodying actual racism throughout history, tied in to the whole "meat is murder" thing of today. I guess it just started to fall as I was writing it, which is why I actually decided to go get Mooshy's help on it. But yeah, I'll try to go with what you said, which is what I had wanted to do anyways, but in a better way. Ciao. Don Puttano cHeDDs 20:35,21January,2010

Fresh Stain

I'm flattered (is that sad?). I'll go and add my sig now. And thank you for the award, Mr. Chief. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 23:06, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for doing all the excellent reviews. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:09, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Help on Pee

Apparently, I have a difficult time on doing big articles, as looking at the Pee list neither of my two lasts reviews were considered indepth. I honestly thought Laird Hamilton would have been considered indepth. Is there anything I need to work on so that my articles can be as indepth as posssible?--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 00:31, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Right, my main reason for complaint is not that there is a problem with what you are saying, but rather a problem with the depth you go into when you say it. Rather than saying something like "This is a bad thing because it is a Chuck Norris joke and people do not like them" try saying something like "This is a bad thing because it is a Chuck Norris joke, people don't like them, here is why. Try doing this, here is why this is better etc etc". It is literally the need to go deeper with your criticisms, even on an article you really like, you should try to look past that and read it as critically as you can. Take a look at this review by someone who is relatively new to reviewing and try to identify some differences between your styles. You are a competent reviewer and you bring up some good points, you just need to try and go deeper with it. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:23, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

D:

Now the IPs are attacking your innocent user page! When will it end? YOUR FUCKING FACE LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Dude

I think its time you archive this talk page--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 16:26, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Against. People should be AT LEAST as unorganized as me.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  24 Jan 2010 ~ 19:27 (UTC)

 Against. I decide such things based on the instructions of the idols and the idols have informed me that the stars are not in position for archiving. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:11, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

The Big Crunch

Chief! Thanks! That was really a serious Pee. I appreciate all the work you put into that. I WILL do as you advise. Within 2-3 days I hope to ask your opinion on the first section specially. I knew it was too short. So it's off to work... Much appreciated!--Funnybony 20:47, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

No problems, it's nice to see another article from you. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:49, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

---Question, please, what angle did you finally in-vision for the general meaning, based on ego being non material, vs contracting material energy? Now you know both the silly and the serious explanations, how to reconcile? Any starter suggestions? How did you finally see the concept? Thanks again--Funnybony 20:53, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

My feeling was that the general meaning in itself be clearer, you can still go with the same ideas, but you just need to make them clearer, just explain the above as best you can in the article. If you feel you need to reconcile the two then I would suggest experimenting by constructing sentences about contracting material, and then substituting the words contracting material for the word ego, thus "The contracting material will kill us all in the end" would become "The ego's will kill us all in the end"; that is a good way to start constructing your jokes. The concept I thought worked better with the encyclopaedic tone, partly because the article's subject lends itself to that and partly because the implicit humour you are going for is easier to achieve with it. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:03, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

How about a multiple meaning lead in like this:

The Big Crunch: 1. In meta-physical mythology, the Big Crunch is one dead-certain scenario for doomsday, in which the non-material expansion of egos eventually reverses and all the falling ego, now anti-matter, devoid of personality disorders, cause the universe to re-collapse back to it’s starting point, viz., a giant gun barrel where the big bang came from, and ultimately ending as a black hole that just fucking sucks big-time; 2. A lumpy American candy bar composed of dark chocolate, sugar and nuts-n-bolts - invented by artist Don Martin; 3. (大擠壓) A death-wielding blow in Kung Fu, that consists of kicking one’s opponent square in the balls.

I don't want to put it unless you think it's the right track. Thanks always--Funnybony 21:32, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

The Big Crunch

If you could take another look and let me know. I feel like "making sense" of it would scare people rather than be funny. So I simplified and diversified the intro and concept, then made it absurdly mind-numbing. I guess is just a question of humor style, I like absurd, specially in matters concerning doomsday. Think it's any better now? Much appreciated--Funnybony 09:22, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

That does seem to be a lot better, from the precursory look I just had I would suggest that you do a couple of things to make it more accessible: Firstly if you are going to make the starting list, where you say that the Big Crunch could refer to these things (which I think is quite good), make sure you state which one the article focuses on. You should also make an effirt to define ego for the reader, just so that they can be sure what you are talking about; this is because it is a difficult concept to pin down and this is made harder when you use it in the way your article requires. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:04, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

• Hi Chief, you're probably sick to death of my BS, but if you could take another peek and see if I covered your two points above, that would help me know what the heck I'm doing. Thanks ever--Funnybony 12:36, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Soma

Dude! I also used your advice on Soma, and made quite a change. It's been up their for 10 days. If you could take a glance to see I'm on the right track. I think short starter definitions are great, and that's how I usually do it for Wikipedia. But I don't see that much of it here. Anyway, I applied your same advice to soma as well. Cheers!!!--Funnybony 12:36, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:44, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

---

Pee Reviewer Colonization

I don't know if you've heard the vicious rumour or not, but it's true. I'm now the head of Imperial Colonization. Something about my asking, "say, why hasn't IC been updated, and why hasn't this been done with IC, and why hasn't that been done with IC," and then being told "because Why?, who's now in charge, hasn't done it yet. Go do it." So I may be doing fewer Pee Reviews than in the past. I don't plan to give it up entirely, by any means--I think it's one of the most importants parts of Uncyc. Just wanted to let you know. (And if you'd like to sign up, I would love to have you. We'll start nominations and voting on our next project on Sunday, 31 January.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:35, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, don't worry about doing less reviewing, I will always be happy to see you around PEE. As for colonization, I'm unsure if I could commit the required amount of time to it, I am being somewhat haphazard right now, editing loads at some times and just dashing in and out at others. I will carry on at PEE for now, but if I find I have the time I'd be happy to sign up for colonization. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:30, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

This isn't a formal request, but if you feel like doing it, Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Transformers. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:55, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! If I keep to my schedule, I'll be sending a notice out to IC members in a little over half a day letting them know about it. I plan to attach that with my notice of voting and nomination for the next project. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:51, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

Barack Obama

Thank you for policing the article. "Fritzsche" tried to add the same quotes again; I did the second revert and Opty got him the third time. He (now in his second week of life) has also added quotes to Cheese and listcruft to Nazi. Zana has given him the ceremonial welcome but it's not clear he talks to people. Good luck. Spıke ¬  01:41 28-Jan-10

Hello

Hi, why were the quotations deleted from my article Rock_In_India? Please let me know.. Thanks! – Preceding unsigned comment added by Unease.a (talk • contribs)

Hi there, the quotations were deleted firstly because I felt that they added very little to the article, a lot of the jokes have been done hundreds of times before and just feel tired (see HTBFANJS for details). Also they were along the same lines as many other lead-in quotes, they were too long or they were just profane.

Some general advice, lead-in quotes have been done loads of times on uncyclopedia and anyone who reads articles frequently will have seen almost every joke they have to offer. There is nothing wrong with using one or two carefully considered quotes but you need to spend time on them and you need them to be appropriate. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:07, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, that makes perfect sense.. Can I retain the first three ones though? They're genuine and were real comments which were intended to be serious on other forums. Just let me know. Else, I'll come up with new ones. Thank you for your time. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Unease.a (talk • contribs)

You can retain them, though you may wish to consider making them a bit more concise. Also make sure you sign your posts on talk pages with 4 tildes like this: ~~~~ or use the signature button. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 28th January 2010

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper that won't leave you the same way they did!

Jan 28th • Issue 73 • A Periodical. Period.

Continuing Absence Of Certain Users Forces Other Users To Do Things By UU It has come to the notice of our fearless journalists that some users have recently been desperately attempting to fill the gaping void left by the absence of some other users. For instance, in the absence of part-time dinosaur and popular keyboard feature SysRq, Why do I need to provide this? has stepped bravely into the Colonization brief (and has not, for instance, been forcefully volunteered for the task by MrN), dedicating himself to bringing colons where there are none (such is our understanding). Also bravely stepping into the "ban magnet" position created by the continuing and lamented absence of hyperactive loon Cajek is, well, a plethora of users. Admins, deprived of their favourite joke-ban target, have taken to joke banning anyone in an attempt to get their fix. Even those devoted to doing only good, just and true works have recently been targeted; and as if to prove this very statement, some power-crazed asshole went and joke banned Socky, RabbiTechno and Optimuschris as soon as he'd written this sentence. Elsewhere, ChiefjusticeDS has been filling the gap left by the absence of someone's enthusiasm for anything pee-related right at the moment by looking after the pee list, taking over as the person with the most in-depth reviews, reviewing everyone else's reviews, and generally not being lazy about it all. At the same time, the continuing absence of the yellow and black sig of Gerrycheevers has forced grumbling British curmudgeon UU to return to the Wiki's only newspaper, the UnSignpost, churning out issues that are, let's be honest, mere placeholders until Gerry gets his arse back here and writes something worth reading. YOU HEAR ME GERRY? GET THE FUCK BACK HERE NOW DAMMIT! Rumours that, in the relative absence of Orian57, Roman Dog Bird will take over the position of "token gay" are unconfirmed at the time of going to press. And finally, in the absence of enough content to make this issue balance out nicely, the UnSignpost is once again resorting to using blatant filler for the first time this year. Shameless, that's what it is. Complain to someone - it's the only way they'll learn.

Check out these pages! This seems to mean something to some people Bonzer Bruce, throw another stereotype on the barbie! Like. Comment. From our logs: 20:30, 26 January 2010 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 68.223.27.16 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (No-one talks that way about my favourite Jew. Learn some manners or GTFO.) 00:48, 26 January 2010 RAHB (Talk | contribs) blocked Why do I need to provide this? (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 20 minutes ‎ (Sometimes I feel, like I've been TIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEDDD to the Whipping Post!!!!) 18:19, 24 January 2010 MrN9000 (Talk | contribs) blocked 68.42.246.27 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 year ‎ (Toll. Idiot. Whatever. Banned, UnBanned, Banned, Banned. BYE. Try IRC next time. The guys in there will enjoy it.) Biopic of the Week Users today, they barely know they're born. The problem? Too little exposure to Flammable. The permanent curator of the Principal's office rarely deigns to grace us mortals with his presence these days, but the very sight of his rainbow-strewn sig used to inspire fear, dread, terror and, for some reason, carol singing. "While shepherds fed their flocks thermite..." Old-School Featured Article of the Week This one's for you, Guildy: HowTo:Be pretentious. Don your black polo-neck, cock a snook at the hoi polloi, and sit back, secure in your superiority, thanks to this indispensable guide! Cursory Mention of the Week CheddarBBQ wanted to be mentioned in this week's Signpost. So he is.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

9001(bot)  14:51, Jan 28

For Your Information

I spanked a tardy would-be Pee Reviewer here. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:13, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough, that is rather excessive, a good spot from you. Nice job. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:37, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I learned from the master. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:33, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Ditto with this. I posted a follow-up message in the same section of the same user's page. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  08:31, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

I did notice that one, my feeling was more relief that he had actually gotten it done, my wrath would have been far greater had a review not appeared after all that time. But again this is another very tardy piece of work. Let's call it strike 2, and hope it doesn't happen any more. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:56, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

If this happens again, let me know, and bans shall happen. This is absolutely one of my pet hates, which is why I put that red text on the pee review page. One warning, then I ban their asses. Quick and clean. --UU - natter 09:39, Feb 4

Yeah, that's what I was thinking of doing, so last chance for this one. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:12, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Review (Again)

Mind doing this? Nobody has yet and its really making me impatient--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 21:54, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Can do, I've already agreed to do one, but I'll aim to get yours on Saturday. Hope this okay. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:09, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, someone else already reviewed it, but I think it needs one more. I'll leave it for you, link--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:38, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

I have a question Chief

Do you think Charlotte's Web and The Rescuers suck bad enough to go onto the VFD? Or do they have potintal? I ask you as I think you would know and because you're online. 70.146.241.227 21:46, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

The way I would call it is that Charlotte's Web has been badly edited by a couple of people over time and needs reverting back to the revisions as of November last year. As for The Rescuers Roman Dog Bird had a look quite recently and doesn't seem to be that bothered by it, my feeling is that it would fair better with this: {{Rewrite|hard}}. Though perhaps a run on VFD may persuade someone to fix it up. So no to the first one, reverts needed, the second one I would say no too, and add a rewrite tag, but it is ultimately up to you. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:55, January 29, 2010 (UTC)

Honoured

Hola! I would be honoured to adopt you. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamatamamayo (talk • contribs)

I'm guessing this user would like to be adopted by you, as opposed to adopting you. But who knows? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:01, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

I am likewise unsure, perhaps if the user can leave another message I can process their request in a more meaningful way. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:31, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Check out Panda

Check out the article Giant panda. I've made some repairs to it, and nominate for VFH, but failed miserably. If anything needs to be fixed up, say so on my talk page.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 18:46, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Ha Ha

Right now Skinfan13 has done more detailed Pee Reviews this month than you have. So it is possible! Ha Ha! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:23, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I am ashamed, I will now do the noble thing and fall on my sword, which is harder than it looks so I may be a while. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:40, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

uhm

Well, why don't you treat my pee review of an extremely short unnews as in-depth? And that one of "the big W letter" too? How long do you expect me to write about such short articles? Writing more would be senseless... Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 14:46, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't even check the big W review in as the article shouldn't have been submitted to the queue in the first place since there is nothing a reviewer can say. As you demonstrated in reviewing it. The point I am trying to make is that reviewing is hard work and you need to devote time to doing it. My recommendation if you want to improve is to try to do the same as was done here. Read the guidelines and try to choose some articles to review that you will have something to say about.

I'm not trying to come off harsh here, I'm trying to explain to you why you are having problems. Please try to appreciate that I can't consider a tiny review of a really short article in the same criteria as I can consider a huge review about a normal length article, it isn't fair on people who have put in large amounts of time reviewing, they should have an advantage over someone who writes a review of a short article in about 5 minutes. Also writing a short review is not always the only thing to do, I have seen reviews that come out far longer than the article they are written about, it is just a matter of spending the time. I hope this makes things a bit clearer for you. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:59, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for review

Rejoice, ChiefjusticeDS! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

I'll be going through the points you made on my Passive–aggressive behavior article and hopefully improving it. Thanks there:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 14:54, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

No problem. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:59, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

iPad pee

Thanks for reviewing the iPad the first go around. I took some of your suggestions to heart and redid a few things and expanded the article. If you want, you can give it another review to see how you like it now --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 1853 EST 3 Feb 2010

UnSignpost 4th February 2010

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Now with 20% more ninjas!

Feb 4th, 2010 • Issue 74 • Ain't It Uncool? News!

Spang Archives Talkpage; End of World Expected Imminently By UU Renowned Wikia fan, code monkey and sexy admin Spang has performed what many users believe to be the clearest sign to date of impending apocalypse: he's archived his talk page. After almost 2 years of torturing the Wiki's servers, and having amassed a fairly impressive 410,844 bytes of content, Spang finally decided to give people the chance to talk to him without waiting for half an hour for his page to load. When asked for his reasoning behind this unprecedented move, the muddy funster quipped "no comment". Faced with such dazzling repartee, this reporter has no choice but to cut to the next story and hope he has some better quotes to pad it out with. Award Winners Speak Exclusively to UnSignpost By Someone who definitely isn't running out of ideas already this year Well, there you go folks, looks like the "... of the Year" award voting is done and dusted for another year. Thanks to all who voted; without you, the admins would probably have less to do, which would obviously be dangerous. Anyway, that aside, your ever-topical Unsignpost went and mugged the various winners for comments on their various wins. Several of them, of course, have already made their feelings clear to those who voted for them by way of the traditional thanks templates. Apart from UU, because he's a lazy ass. Or because he's busy writing this. Whichever. Anyway again, for the benefit of those who didn't vote for the winners, and don't watch their talk pages, here's what they had to say: Runaway WotY Hype said: "Thanks, you guys!! If you'll permit me to be dead serious for the first time ever on the wiki, this really is an honor, and it's pretty damn touching that so many people came out in support of my work. Whew. Being serious felt weird. I feel... strange. BALLS BALLS PENIS COCK. Ah... there's the stuff!" He then went off to write another My Sojourn spin-off. Even more runaway PotY Sonje said: "Thank you, I intend to return as soon as I can. I am currently in Africa with very limited internet access. I'll try to time my return to co-incide with the Oscars so that I can get some pointers for my acceptance speech." Admittedly, that was before we asked her for a comment, but then, she is in Africa with limited internet access. Joint UotY Socky channeled Churchill to say: "*scrapes throat* Ahem! I would like to say to the community as I would say to anyone who joined this website: Uncyclopedia has nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory. Victory at all costs — Victory in spite of all error — Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival. … That seems to be the wrong Churchill speech. Okay, I'll give it another try. *scrapes throat again* The gratitude of every home throughout the world, except in the abodes of the guilty, goes out to the British airmen and Belgian spies who, undaunted by odds, unwearied in their constant challenge and mortal danger, are turning the tide of the Wiki War by their prowess and by their devotion. Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to two people. And so on and so on… Woot! Woot!" Long-winded bugger. And other joint UotY UU said: "wow, Socky's already left me needing a lot of filler for the right panel, so I'll keep this shortish. First, it's good to see someone who isn't an admin get their hands on this award, and Socky's hard work deserves recognition. Second, it's great to have my complete lack of a life recognised in this way. Third, did someone say Spang's archived his talk page? What the fuck's that all about?." Oh, and Dr. Skullthumper was UGotY, but that was a foregone conclusion anyway. He didn't seem to have any comment of his own to make, so TKF hopped in to the breach with "I call the award a "fascist disgrace" and "move to permanently disbar Mike Socia, that ape from Lighting who made my mole visible to all of the goddamn world watching the ceremony."" Which about wraps it all up, I hope.

Check out these pages! No really, it's archived and everything! There are moar quesitons than answers Not sure what the point is, but it's not made with a certain style A question we have all asked, so many times From our logs: 13:56, 2 February 2010 Codeine (Talk | contribs) blocked 161.12.7.4 (Talk) with an expiry time of 6 months ‎ (Excess stupid detected. Take it to Niggermania, VNN or one of the many charming forums for racist lunatics like yourself out there.) 11:15, 1 February 2010 MrN9000 (Talk | contribs) blocked 151.49.98.244 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 week ‎ (ITALY does not rule and has not ruled for quite some time now actually. Blame the Christians if I were you...) 19:46, 29 January 2010 Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked 76.11.81.96 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (Improve your manners, cunt) 09:51, 29 January 2010 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 70.167.51.90 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 hours ‎ (UN:VAIN. have a quick read of it, and see why we're not interested in you. although you could probably just look in a mirror and figure that out...) Biopic Legend of the Week MadMax. Forty two thousand edits. Countless other contributions that can never be measured by simple Wiki stats software. No drama. Ever. Probably the single greatest force for good on this miserable little wiki. And it took us until issue 74 to profile him. The UnSignpost sucks; Max certainly doesn't. Old School Featured Article of the Week The 1x1x1 Rubik's Cube is by far "The Most Difficult Puzzle Of All Time™". Many have scrambled, twisted and turned this mythical puzzle, but few have solved it. By the end of this article, YOU TOO will be able to solve this puzzle. Unfortunately... you may encounter some problems on the way though... such as, twisting the cube the wrong way when speedsolving. The Desperate Return of Cajek Ban of the Week! (Block log); 10:20 . . Mordillo (Talk | contribs) blocked Cajek (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 10000 years ("And he shall scourage the Earth for 9999 years. And then one more" Book of Mordillo, chapter 1 verse plox. ) Horoscope of the Week Scorpio (Oct. 23 - Nov. 22) - So, yeah, it's the start of Black History Month. And speaking of Black History, seems like it's an appropriate time to finally track down your real father. You see, it turns out, that's not just a Jew-fro. For the rest of this week's 'scopes, see here. Redundancy of the Week Did we mention Spang's archived his talk page?

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

9001(bot)  15:09, Feb 4

For return of my UotM

Actually, I found your post quite funny. Keep posting things like that and people will figure out you can write.

(To any anally-retentive types like myself who might wonder is it appropriate to include the UotM symbol in this award, this is from an UotM to an UotM, so go jump in a lake or something). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:34, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pedobear

Chief it totally seems like you reviewed Pedobear a long time ago. But I can't find the review! Did you review it? DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:11, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

I did review a version of it, when it was still in your user space and when it was still being called Pedobear News, the review is here. I also did a review of an article that is much closer to the current version which, after a long long time of searching, I have pulled out of the talk page archives as it appears to have been lost to the pages of PEE. You can find this here. I will investigate reasons for this later. But there you go. Hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:18, February 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcoming

I'm new here so its great to be welcomed. I have a question though, I was wondering how you make a article. Is there a new page button or something? And thanks again for the welcoming.--Coolguywholikesgirls 02:25, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

I'm butting in to Chiefster's page, but he should be used to that by now. The best way is probably to start it in your user space, which is described not described in your welcome message (Chiefster, you might want to think about adding that). You can go to the search box to the left of your screen, and type in a name like User:Coolguywholikesgirls/My New Article (make that last part whatever you want to call it). Then press go, and you'll get a message like "Would you like to create User:Coolguywholikesgirls/My New Article or Search for User:Coolguywholikesgirls/My New Article in Uncyclopedia?" Click on the first option, and start editing! The nice thing about starting an article in your user space is that, unless you do something that violates some rare Uncyclopedia policy, no one should come around and mess with it. Later on, when you think it's ready for main space, you can move it if you like. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:32, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for dealing with that while I was not here Why? Also, to Coolguywholikesgirls, it is no problem at all. Though make sure you read the message carefully, there are instructions for creating a new page in the italicised part at the bottom, but at least the problem has been solved. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:22, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

I guess I've gotten so used to it being in normal text red I didn't even see it when it was in italicized blue. Shows how people's preconceived ideas (me guilty) can get in the way of seeing what's actually there. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:00, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Belated thanks for the pee review

I'll work on improving my article as soon as I'm able. —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 07:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Shameless Vote Whoring

Hi Chief. When you get the time, do you mind voting on my Keanu Reeves article? Thank you. I'd tell you to keep up the good work, but you obviously are anyway. --Matfen 11:35, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Tadaaaa. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:38, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Frog PEE

Just a late thanks for the frog review (or maybe an early thanks for its second review, who knows?). Seriously though, great stuff as per. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 14:14, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

YO MAN!!!

Thanks for the advice, I am now going to make some user pages.--Yo Big Fat Mama and Yo Big Fanny Granny 00:23, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Enjoy. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:24, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Yep, thanks.--Yo Big Fat Mama and Yo Big Fanny Granny 00:39, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Also, um... what was I going to say, oh well. You may see my creations soon.--Yo Big Fat Mama and Yo Big Fanny Granny 00:39, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Can you adopt me? PLEASE!!!--Yo Big Fat Mama and Yo Big Fanny Granny 02:07, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

I can adopt you, leave another message here when you are next online and I will sort everything out with you. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:22, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'm here.--Yo Big Fat Mama and Yo Big Fanny Granny 13:08, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

See your talk page for Mordillo's comment, oh indefinitely banned user. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:48, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hi Chief!

I have nothing important to say or any questions to ask. I just like editing your talk page. Is this bad? —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 01:13, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

I too have nothing to say or do. Should I sing a Jim Croce song? "...And it’s bad, bad Leroy Brown, The baddest man in the whole damn town..."  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  10 Feb 2010 ~ 04:15 (UTC)

"Badder than old King Kong and meaner than a junkyard dog..." --ChiefjusticeDS 08:25, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Double Diamond Pee Award

Thank you very much Why? I really appreciate the recognition. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:47, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Jewish Cuisine Review

Rejoice, ChiefjusticeDS! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

Thanks! I recognized some of the points you mentioned already, but wasn't sure that those are real issues. Thanks very much, I'll put some more work into it. Hopefully the Rabbi agrees as well. ~ 11:11, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

No problem, I hope it helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:46, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Chief picked up on the same things I've been thinking about too - very good review, incidentally; high quality constructive criticism. I'll proof-read it again at some point and see if I can hunt out the typos of which you speak. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:16, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Revert wars on Classical

Hi, it's me, User:DJ Mixerr, about the revert war, all I was trying to do was use some of the quotes on Classical music and put them on Classical. Is it ok if I do so?? If not, please tell me why. I'll see you later. DJ Mixerr 22:03, February 10, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr

My concern was that you were overloading the article with quotes, I have no issue at all with you adding them responsibly, and I don't have the inclination to try and stop you if that is the case.

A general rule is to try to stick to a 4 quote maximum since after that they get a bit tiresome to read. I am generally quite quick to revert large quote additions since we get a lot of vandalism or just plain unfunny additions through quotes. So please feel free to carry on working on the quotes, just try to do so on a more limited basis, i.e. just bring over the better ones. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:11, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. I'll limit my quotes to 4 only. DJ Mixerr 00:25, February 11, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr

Jenny thanks you for protecting her special area.

Yeah, thanks for dealing with that stubborn IP that I just now noticed. Grazie. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:49,10February,2010

No problem, well done for getting into the top ten articles of 2009. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:22, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Grazie ancora. Don Puttano cHeDDs 23:53,10February,2010

UnSignpost 11th February 2010

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

Word to your mother.

Feb 11th, 2010 • Issue 75 • Picking the nuts of truth out of the muesli of news. Or something.

New way to win awards, impress friends, crush rivals! By UU Writing competitions, eh? With the Poo Lit Surprise, the Turkey Day Ball, and a conservation week or two, it would seem Uncyclopedians can't get enough of 'em. And now there's another! But this one has a point that separates it from the herd. Well a couple of points, actually. One: it's organised by human wiki-whirlwind MadMax, so it'll probably be efficient as all get-out; two: it's a sneaky way of fulfilling a need. See, there are all these great ideas for articles floating around at UN:REQ; articles that would undoubtedly improve this festering little wiki. And there they sit, being good ideas, but not being used. This competition aims to change all that! Yes, that's right, The Article Whisperer is a competition that gives you the ideas to get you started, all you need to do is supply the funny. What could be easier? Well, since you ask, perhaps judging it could? Max is also looking for at least 4 more opinionated types, unafraid of passing withering judgement on their peers. If you're interested in judging or entering, or if you have a good idea that would elevate this competition from being a damn good idea to a colossally awesome one, let MadMax know either on his talk page, or on the article's talk page. For those who want to selflessly improve the wiki while crushing all around them under the steel wheels of their genius, there can be no finer opportunity! General news round-up By UU As several things have been happening recently in Uncyclopedia, and ace cub reporter DogNewspaper is in some sort of snow-induced hibernation, and consequently too lazy to write individual articles on any of them, here is a quick synopsis of a couple of the more newsworthy recent events on the wiki in handy easy-to-digest bite-sized chunks. Mordillo nearly went mad attempting to feature all articles tied for tenth place in the top 10 of last year. And then spent the rest of this month to date patiently fielding questions about how long the rest of the featuring was going to take, and when normal featuring would resume. POTR did his best to help. When not asked for a quote, Mordillo said "FUCK YOU VERY MUCH AND SEE YOU IN 2011". We think he's just talking about the top 10, and not about taking a 10 month hiatus. That is, we hope so. A recent VFD nomination ended in a deletion marathon, as MrN and RDB spent 2 hours removing every last trace of the notorious Game:Page. Apart from the traces Mordillo deleted, that is. And the redirects to it that UU took care of, come to think of it. But still, all told, an impressive act of mass carnage only made more awesome by the fact that they somehow managed to delete Socky's userpage at one point during the proceedings. MrN claims "Both RDB and me still have sore huffing fingers you know".

Check out these pages! Insulting sports players - the future of comedy When is a month not a month? The most important link you'll ever click From our logs: 15:04, 8 February 2010 Mordillo (Talk | contribs | block) blocked 169.139.1.20 (Talk) with an expiry time of 2 hours ‎ (We are having communications issues here. When I say don't recreate, it means don't press that little create button and paste the same content for the third time) 11:55, 8 February 2010 Under user (Talk | contribs) blocked 74.75.78.223 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (there are a million better things you could be doing with your life right now, but you're inserting barely literate insults to a sports player on a comedy wiki. must suck really hard to be you.) 08:35, 7 February 2010 MrN9000 (Talk | contribs) blocked 76.92.151.225 (Talk) with an expiry time of 3 months ‎ (We don't care if you fuck horses. No need to tell the world. Maybe the police, but that's up to you.) Biopic of the Week Being as he's now been on Uncyclopedia for three bastardin' years, this seems as good a time as any to profile Kip the Dip. A man of many contrasts, Kip appears to be some sort of useful gobshite. His enthusiasm for all things Uncyclopedia, including his tireless championing of Euroipods and sterling work on The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times have helped make this wiki what it is today. The Worst. Thanks, Kip. Old School Featured Article of the Week Patriotism is an air-borne disease caused by the bacterium enlistment bonusai. It was first observed in 1776 by Dr. Arnold Bazonga, but was initially confused with the alcohol-borne illness bravery. Patriotism is communicable through the auditory ingestion of feces. Contamination often occurs from politicians, entrepreneurs, country music singers, Richard Albinger and French Emperors. Final Side-Panel Box of the Week Because we don't need that much padding this week.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

9001(bot)  12:58, Feb 11

Your detailed, ego-building Pee Review

Thanks for going to such trouble in reviewing my submission. Your careful analysis was unexpected and flattering, and I find I must take some time later to digest your comments while carefully rereading the article. I'm not much of a writer, and gems like this will help me become better. Just to skim your review, it seems that my sometimes oblique approach to a subject can be confusing, whether intended or not. I am an avid enthusiast of obfuscation, which can be a curse... just ask most people who know me in real life.

That was a kickass review, dude. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 15:41, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Your high-falutin' rootin-tootin' bureacracy-dootin' grade of your Pee Review

To which I must say, "what's all this then?" when I consider that you have OK'd your own review without so much as a by your leave. (That is to say, it was in-depth and passed my test. Carry on!) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 16:02, Feb 11 2010

It's my list, so there. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:38, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Touché, Justice. touché. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 00:59, Feb 12 2010

• Butts in rudely* Nuh-uh! You're not Cajek! Or...are you?—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:52, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Cajek created it, but UU put in most of the work in actually running it. Chief has helped shit loads. That's why Chief gets to call it HIS list if he wants to. MrN 08:55, Feb 12

:P I know. But then again, let us not ignore this undeniable evidence that Chief is Cajek.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 09:01, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Just don't tell anyone that I am really Mhaille. MrN 12:10, Feb 12

Could you...

Check out my latest review and see if it is in-depth, please? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 08:50, Feb 12 2010

Yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:03, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Testicles!

Pup 10:15, 12/02/2010

The man makes a fair point, although his signature code is questionable. MrN 10:18, Feb 12

This is a topic change that took an above average amount of balls. Pup 11:08, 12/02/2010

Just an average amount, no more, no less. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:21, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

2? Pup 12:42, 12/02/2010

Well I'm not a doctor but I believe that is the average amount. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:44, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

iPad

Hey Chief, I forgot to mention, I followed your advice with your review and the 2nd review I got for the iPad and it's currently doing well of VFH, just thought I'd say thanks for helping me improve the article --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 01:13 EST 13 Feb, 2010

No problem, good luck on VFH. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:40, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Two things.

One: If you're not careful, Skinfan is going to beat you for Pee this month! :P

Two: You really need to archive this talk page. It's stretching to the sides.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 09:45, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Well if Skinfan13 can do more reviews than me this month and they are all in-depth then Uncyclopedia has truly won, and all credit to him if he is successful, though he should know I will be expecting the same from him every month afterwards. Also, as I said somewhere above here, I decide all archiving decisions on the advice of the idols, and they have informed me that the stars are not in position for archiving. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:54, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

Wow...that was deep...penis.

Anyway, it's just that it's stretching the window. Tell your idols to go fuck themselves, you do what you want, when you want. That's what I do, and has nothing to do with the fact that I make so many mistakes. None whatsoever!—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 09:59, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

The idols are vital for a productive editing environment. Archiving is the only thing they are responsible for. --ChiefjusticeDS 10:02, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

I archive when I want because I am a rebellious teenager, bitches.

(Serious question: Are you really a judge? I like legal stuff)—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 10:07, February 13, 2010 (UTC)

I am but a proud servant of Her Majesty /adjusts hat/. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:11, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Clare GAA

Well, just wonderin what you did with the page and could you please review it Seányg

Submit it to Pee review and someone will have a look at it when they can. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:57, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Odd PEE review

Hey. I've thrown up a request for a review of Tropical cyclone but specifically a version that's back in the history of it. I don't know how many you've promised to do at present, but I've had feedback from Skinfan13 and Why do I need to provide this?, but I need feedback on this version specifically, as I'm having some significant doubts. Do you think you could help out? Pup 21:36, 14/02/2010

I will do, I'm in the middle of doing one for Skinfan13 right now, but I will do yours tomorrow. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:44, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review

[[File:{{{image}}}|link={{{link}}}]] ChiefjusticeDS

I appreciate the feedback and I'll probably be working on improving the howto poets piece this week. If I have anything specific to ask, I'll be sure to drop a line --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 18:56 EST 14 Feb, 2010

btw

I see you voted for my new iPad Many thanks.

Thanks for voting on my first featured article! --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 19:55 EST 14 Feb, 2010

And I thank you too, for getting me and Al to the front page. Now Al wants to watch as I thank you in my own unique way. Get down here, and gavel court to order.

Tropical cyclone review

Okay, sorry for the somewhat random stuff above this but there was something not closed off properly and I'd rather just tidy up a little. Relating to the concept of this one - the concept was actually to have an article swirling away like a cyclone, but the text has to be strong enough to keep people reading until that kicks in, and that's where it fell apart. The text is slightly different in this version and the swirly version - the conclusion was removed - but I still wasn't quite happy with it. The other thing is in order to have the effect being most effective (ha!) I need to try and keep the article the same width as height. But very good in-depth review. Much appreciated! Pup 03:10, 16/02/2010

Oh, and why don't I get an award for creating templates? Pup 06:56, 16/02/2010

Which ones have you made? Show me and I will do my utmost to remedy this injustice. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:36, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Oh here we go... (I'd like to know too.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  17 Feb 2010 ~ 01:07 (UTC)

You Sir!

The Rabbi and myself fixed most of the issues you've mentioned in your reviews of Jewish Cuisine. Care to take a look? ~ 13:40, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Well done for making the changes, I do think it feels much more like an actual report now and you have mitigated a few of the other issues I mentioned. The things you haven't done I believe were mostly things I thought were problems, you seem to have sorted all the major(ish) problems that I mentioned. I was having a hard time finding reasonable critique's for my review and now that you have sorted out the main problem I mentioned the article is looking really good. Very best of luck on VFH. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:30, February 17, 2010 (UTC)

Cheers! ~ 09:58, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

UnSignpost 18th February 2010

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

83.54% more reliable than The Daily Mail

Feb 18th, 2010 • Issue 76 • Now with 20% more vanity!

Understanding of the universe is shattered; Creation as we know it is defunct By POTR Imperial colonisation is back, and in true colonisation style, is taking religion to the masses. One of the most controversial elements of religious understanding has been the answer to the question "How did we get here?" This has often been seen in the debate that has been long held between Creationists and Evolutionists. Now that Imperial Colonisation is back on its feet, under the able guidance of IC Buccaneer Admiral Why?, they are educating the masses on this as we speak. "The article had been befouled by some evil doers, probably French or Spanish or Americans or worse. We are diligently researching and writing to bring the article in line with the Truth." stated Buccaneer Admiral Why?. A dramatic re-write is in process, as Why? has all his seamen working towards the noble goal of indoctrinating the masses in Creationist theory. After some false starts involving a banana and a jar of peanut butter, the recreation of creationism is being created. "The colonized article will show how the Empire has the right and duty to colonize everywhere by any methods available, and that anything we do is God's will. We will finish it by Saturday, 20 of February, or by Saturday, 27 of February, depending upon how long it takes us to colonize the natives. Anyone who wishes to apply to join our noble effort may do so at Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization." Why? stated in closing. Darwin awards - Uncyclopedia Stylie By POTR Recently a n00b by the name of I LIKE PIE!!! chose to join the Uncyclopedia family. After a very short time he demonstrated the behaviours that make Uncyclopedia the place that it is. Of course, removing edits and formatting fixes by other users had him come to the attention of Dr. Skullthumper, who politely left him a message along with a 48 hour ban. Fortunately he showed the resilience that 10 year olds have when they are in the middle of doing something completely idiotic, and continued to trawl through people's talk pages, undo their edits, and generally be a dick. MrN9000, understanding the right balance of politeness and harshness, gave I LIKE PIE!!! a friendly message on his talk page, with a 1 week ban to support the severity of his words. Undeterred, I LIKE PIE!!! later returned. 1 week and 35 minutes after his previous ban, MrN repeated his previous words to the young man, along with a further 1 week ban. Thankfully, it appears that I LIKE PIE!!! took MrN's words to heart, as he managed to last a further 30 minutes after this second ban before he ran afoul of Roman Dog Bird, who in true RDB style demonstrated what an infinite ban actually means. When hard-hitting journalists pressed for details relating to the banning of this pre-pubescent pestilence, MrN replied "What kinda a journalist are you man!?!" Congratulations, I LIKE PIE!!!, for becoming the inaugural Uncyclopedia Darwin award winner, and removing yourself from the meme pool that we all enjoy.

Check out these pages! Some people are just too vain... Sluts get VD, I think Everyone loves a bad winner From our logs: Under user blocked 206.113.136.253 (Talk) with an expiry time of 1 day ‎ (y0u h@v3 b33n b@nn3d (don't be a tw@t)) MrN9000 huffed "Onlytheashesremain" ‎ (You call that an article? Put your back into it!!!, not that we are calling you stupid you understand. Dave, can we call you Dave?) Roman Dog Bird huffed "Bucket of Shit" ‎ (Funny title, but the content proves that you like to suck big, fat, black, dick. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but you obviously have trouble admitting it. Well....I'm not here for you dude. Sorry.) Biopic of the Week Hmm, who to bio this week? Well, it's been a while since we covered {{username}}, we could always go back to that old chestnut... Or maybe something esoteric, like profiling the sidebar, that'd fit with Unsignpost tradition. Hmm. Or maybe we could note that Turbo-Whoring machine, one-man Doritos fan club and Torch-Carrier by appointment to someone called "Jenny", CheddarBBQ hasn't actually asked to be profiled this week, and therefore decide this is the perfect opportunity to profile him. Usurping of the Week The Unführer of Der Unwehr has recently demonstrated the concept of survival of the fittest by finally having someone with more DU points than him threatening his position. "This is unacceptable, and will not be tolerated. Following standard Nazi protocol, the young officer in question will be forced to resign his position due to his disturbing excess of competence, just like what Hitler did to Rundstedt, List, Manstein, Bock, Rundstedt again, Busch, Leeb, and Rundstedt a third time. I wash my hands of this." Unführer Guildensternenstein said in response. Stand-in of the Week It has come to our attention that an anonymous user has infiltrated the presses here and overtaken the majority of the writing for an issue of the Unsignpost. When approached by Necropaxx to discuss this catastrophe, he is quoted as saying "I... is a... butt." This editorial team couldn't agree more.

UnSignpost Main Page • Contact the Editors • Sign Up for Delivery • Get the Userbox

9001(bot)  23:32, Feb 18

Vandalism of Gaijin article on your part

I've noticed that you've been editing the "3. US Navy sailor" section of the Gaijin article. The original text had been there for several years exactly as I had written it when I created the article back in 2006.

Since humor is a matter of personal taste, I won't argue with you whether your text is funnier, or mine.

I only have grief with the fact your text is clearly shorter and contributes absolutely nothing of substance to the article. I'm even getting the feeling that you're upset by jokes about US Navy sailors and that due to that you're constantly editing the section to remove any negative things about the group of people the section is referring to. You might be patriotic, or just a member of US Navy, but this IS UNCYCLOPEDIA, and if you can't take a joke without being offended and vandalising the article every time, maybe you shouldn't spend so much time here. If the Chinese and Brazilians can take the hit by the article, there is no reason why US Navy sailors should make an exception. It's just a funny article man, there is no reason to get upset and change contents just because you don't like something.

For the record, how much time have you spend in Japan? Have you ever lived there? What do you know about the culture to warrant your contributions to that article?

It's not even funny man, just plain sad. I'll refrain from further comments, but I do expect you to explain yourself about this.

Thanks – Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.152.181 (talk • contribs)

Righto, first off, I did not write the jokes or the article in the first place. What I did was remove an edit that I felt was in violation of Uncyclopedia's guide to funny. I spend quite a bit of time here and a lot of what I do is monitor articles for changes, sad you may think, probably says I, but the point is, at the time I thought that what was there originally was better than what was added, and I stand by that. The joke before relied on sarcasm and while not the funniest joke in the world, was better than someone's personal view on the behaviour of US navy sailors. My advice is that you read HTBFANJS and the beginner's guide yourself so that you know how things work here. Coming to someone's talk page and accusing them of various things, being American for a start, is not good practice. I hope that upon reading the guides I mentioned above that you can contribute much more to Uncyclopedia in future. Enjoy. --ChiefjusticeDS 15:40, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

I was accused of being an American once. Ruins a reputation, that. Aleister in Chains 15:47 20 Feb. MMX

It is not my personal view on the behavior of US Navy sailors. Every expat who has ever lived in Japan knows that these things about raping women and starting troubles are true. Also, it's common knowledge among expats in Japan that there is a district of Tokyo called Roppongi where American troops and various other foreigners go to pick up gaijin-hunters due to lack of skills with normal women. Also, it's common knowledge that chicks there are STD bags. I believe that I am more competent than you to speak on the matter, because I have lived in Japan, dated Japanese women and have extensive experience with Japan in general. I wrote that article 4 years ago to give something funny to the expat community in Japan. You do not find the jokes funny because you can't relate to that. Most gaijin in Japan DO find them funny because they are true and they're kinda inside jokes of the community. I know you try hard to keep Uncyclopedia a funny place, but sometimes there are people more competent to talk about certain matters than yourself, and unlike most articles on this site that are complete unintelligible crap, I tried to give something to this community that target population would find funny. Well, sorry for trying, because OCD ridden geeks of this website obviously can't stand when someone challenges their internet alpha male dominance. I'm not going to enter an edit war with you. Just do what you will with the article. I have better things to do than waste my time arguing with some random internet people. Goodbye. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.152.181 (talk • contribs)

I think we may have made a bit of a mountain out a molehill here, it is 4 lines, at the very most. Inside jokes of the community rarely make for funny reading for everyone else, thus they are discouraged here. I do like being referred to as an internet alpha male though, so thank you and farewell.--ChiefjusticeDS 18:45, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Hey Chief

If you're not to busy vandalising articles, could you let me know what you think of the new ending to frog? I've tried to do what you suggested but I feel it's still a bit first-drafty. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 16:00, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look now. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:01, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

OK, I like the new ending to the "Cultural Beliefs, though some re-drafting may be desirable in a couple of places, not changing what is said, but rather the way it is said to ensure it fits with the tone of what is said in the rest of the article. The ending to the article does feel a little bit weaker but I think you are definitely on the right lines with it. For the ending I would recommend that you try and emphasise the inner conflict that the narrator is supposed to be having, his faith in FROG versus the word of the church. Try and play this idea of a crisis of faith up a bit more before he finally comes to a conclusion. Obviously you want the text to be relatively concise, but a bit of expansion on his feelings may help the article feel like it has come to an appropriate conclusion. I hope this helps. --ChiefjusticeDS 16:18, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Ta very much, I'll see what I can do. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 16:22, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

PEEING contributions

Well, seeing as awarding yourself would be a douchey thing to do, I present you with the new and shiny Chrome Crapper award, newly minted to congratulate people who are exceedingly good at urinating! --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 01:29 EST 21 Feb, 2010

Chrome Crapper

You are a great piss master! For your achievement of over 100 in-depth pee reviews, we bestow upon you this lavish and shiny chrome-plated crapper. Keep the streams flowing!

---

Thanks very much, keep up the good work yourself. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:45, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Matfen thanks you for your vote! His article could not have been featured without you...

--Matfen 11:37, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

HELP

HOW U PUT PICTURES ON MY FRIEND?

First, find a good tattoo artist... Nominally Humane! some time 02:56, 23/02/2010

UnSignpost

Need something to put into Unsignpost now that UU is otherwise occupied. Have you got any news? Nominally Humane! some time 03:05, 23/02/2010

There are only two articles on the PEE queue, that is the most exciting thing going on here, I would also like to object to your new signature, it confuses me. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:44, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

why cant i edit some articles

You're a robot.

That's all I have to say, really. • "Spang" • contribs | talk • 05:19, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Database error 7, critical overload, contact technical support. --ChiefjusticeDS 08:48, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

No, no, contact Microsoft Products Online Technical Support ~ 14:41, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Thx for the review on Spherical Cows

Thanks, Chief. Your feedback was very specific and actionable, although I'd quibble with reliance on HTBFANJS. I do appreciate you individually addressing each of the questions I asked. You put a lot of work into the review. Your advice that I focus on only one of the two main themes will probably lead to a better article.--Dbtng 00:28, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

No problem, glad it helped. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:30, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review chief!

It's like you read my mind. --Matfen 10:33, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Happy to help, and no, she is just afraid of commitment. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:19, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Since this is a welcome whore zone

I have a question about it. I want to welcome people and stuff, but how do I actually change he message to my own little modified thing?(Instead of just {{subst:welcome}}) —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 19:53, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Create User:HELPME/Welcome and {{subst:User:HELPME/Welcome}}. Also this isn't my talkpage. Nominally Humane! some time 20:01, 27/02/2010

What he said. Create a page for your welcome, e.g. User:HELPME/welcome, and then put the standard message in and start editing it, just change the subst thing on your welcome script to {{subst:User:HELPME/Welcome}}. Hope that is clear enough. Now, back to work, shouldn't be on here on a work PC. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:04, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Puppy, but, you have been replaced. :P (Nah, I just figured you and Why wouldn't know because I haven't seen you welcome anyone) —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 20:06, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Why is a welcoming champion, and I'm honestly just too lazy. Also check out Uncyclopedia:Welcoming_Committee/Tools for a few other tricks. The js added by splaka can be changed to whatever welcome message you like. Also, people seem to be a little put off when they read User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Welcome. Don't know why. Nominally Humane! some time 20:11, 27/02/2010

UnSignpost 25th February 2010 (It's not late your mum is)

The Uncyclopedia UnSignpost

The Newspaper That DOESN'T Think It's Better Than You!

Feb 25th, 2010 • Issue 77 • Slurping the froth of Truth off the cappuccino of News

Games, games and more games! We have more games then you can poke a stick at! By POTR Is the games namespace 99.9% shit was the question elegantly asked by OptyC recently. A simple question that has sparked a storm in a teacup. While Uncyclopedia is, undoubtably, the pinnacle of fine parody, it has been suggested the this particular poor cousin of the Main space has been allowed to fall into disrepair and disrepute due to the influx of poorly crafted content. In the words of one editor Delete it. It's cruft and I'm not even sure if it qualifies as a parody namespace of anything on Wikipedia. However, despite the lack of quality content, a significant portion of users have requested that it remain in play, however it be improved by having a little tender loving care given to it, along with a more rigid amount of cruft huffing. As such, it is with open arms we welcome the inclusion into this realm of the new moderator of the Games namespace OptyC, who will be referred to going forward as the Game Master. Upon the announcement of this singularly spectacular accolade, Optyc's first words were Maybe I shoulda just kept my mouth shut, eh? Although much respect must be levelled his way at the way he has taken to his new role with much gusto, winnowing through the chaff to find the kernels of wheat available in there. For more information on these developments, visit Forum:The Games namespace. It's Alive! By Mordillo A new blow to the "democrats"/"liberals"/"whiny bitches" of Uncyclopedia, opposing the disputed hereditary law. Senior member of the non existent Cabal and editor-in-chief-in-absentia of this newspaper, UU has announced the birth of heiress to the throne, also known as UUette. UUette was reportedly born holding a scepter and a miniature ban hammer, wearing a crown and QVFD grade galoshes and waving frantically at the hysterical cheering masses. The non existent cabal promptly announced a reserved seat for UUette in the VFS round of 2026 as well as the prestigious position of "Noob of the Month". A shrouded spokesperson for the Cabal noted that "it would have been important for the Cabal, were it to exist, that the existing Cabal dynasty, especially one coming from such a quality genetic specimen such as UU, shall continue without disturbance. The Cabal is greatly pleased with UU and Mrs. UU for bolstering its numbers for the greater Cabal's good." Sporadic demonstration of support were noted around the Uncyclopedia realm, as supporters of the Cabal were seen with "DEAR UUette IS GREAT" and "ALL HAIL THE HEIR APPARENT" signs. So called "democratic"/"liberals"/"whiny bitches" protests were dealt with swiftly and efficiently. And from all of us in the UnSignpost here is one big congratulations UU, may your daughter have huge...errr..tracks of land.

Check out these pages! A very pointed question Something about penises? Damn this self-referential humour From our logs: sannse blocked EugeneKay with an expiry time of 2 hours ‎ (WILL YOU PLEASE STOP GETTING BLOCKED!) MrN9000 blocked 173.53.142.210 with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (HOWARD STERN IS *NOT* THE GREATEST. Steve Davis is considerably better for example. As is Burt Reynolds.) Under user 80.239.242.142 with an expiry time of 1 month ‎ (me again - I see you're still a twat. have much longer to do something about that.) Biopic of the Week Puppy on the radio's signature has been a long and respectable member of the Uncyclopedia community for many months. Undergoing genetic manipulations and constant radiation bombardment, it now qualifies as a sentient entity by its own accord. The signature, expecting to be emancipated in the near future, indicated that it likes funny articles, men who are not afraid to be in touch with their feelings and long strolls on the beach. Mordillo's profound statement of the Week "I don't mind boobs" Source: User talk:MrN9000 Word of the Week Abodespotism IPA: /əˈbəʊˈdɛs.pɒt.ɪzəm/ the rule of a household despot; the exercise of absolute authority over the household. absolute power or control of all housemates; tyranny of shared living.(n) (eg. "While you live in my house you will abide by my rules.") Origin: Abode + Despotism Related forms: Ab⋅od⋅es⋅pot⋅ic  , Ab⋅od⋅esp⋅o⋅tis⋅tic, Ab⋅od⋅esp⋅o⋅tis⋅ti⋅cal, adjective Ab⋅od⋅esp⋅o⋅tist, noun Note: Often confused with Nespotism. Source: Undictionary Underwater Sea Monster Sighting of the Week Deep sea recent changes fishermen have been repeatedly reporting sightings of a huge scaled fire breathing creature, roaming the deep. Later on, the on call coast guard confirmed that this was a "once in a generation sighting of Ogopogo. Ogopogo, a mythical see creature than has been tamed by the Cabal many generations ago, has been lost for decades but now apparently decided to come back and check what's for dinner. Tsunami waves are expected all across the pond for the next few weeks. Administrative Notification of the Week Uncyclopedia's management would like to thank all participants of the 2nd Dubai Uncyclocon and would like to emphasize that it takes no responsibility for the excessive usage of forged passports. Please, people, try to be more discreet next time eh?

9001(bot)  20:40, Feb 28

It feels so weird

Not being in the number two spot (behind you) for most in depth Pee Reviews. I was going to at least do two for the month, but only did one--like an idiot I was thinking February ended on Monday. I think I'll go stick my head in a light socket. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:37, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Aye, well you have been busy with IC have you not? It is more important that that runs at all, also there weren't that many reviews to be done towards the end of last month, Skinfan13 performed excellently, as did the other new reviewers we had around. It is always good to see you around and we will take the reviews you can provide (insert hilarious user name related joke here). --ChiefjusticeDS 23:05, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

I'm very glad you've got some really helpful reviewers; that way I don't have to feel too guilty. I remember when I started doing lots of reviews--the backlog was as long as the Amazon. I mean the river, not the website. Although that's pretty long, too. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:36, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Unnews Snickers campaign blah blah blah

Hi Chief, I've noticed that you struck down a vote on that page. As justified as it was I'd like to ask you again not to strike votes or suspend them. Drop me or any other admin a line and we'll deal with that. Thanks. ~ 16:04, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. I hope you aren't getting the impression I somehow get off on striking votes, I just do it when I see them, cheers for letting me know the way to do that sort of thing in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:17, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

I have no doubt that you do that from best intentions. The only thing is, if everyone starts striking votes we'll end up in complete chaos, which is why we'd like to keep it as an admin only action. ~ 19:02, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Senator Jim Bunning

Thank you for defending my UnNews article. (There is a postscript available in the "February follow-up.") But Anon was right, the photograph was not Jim Bunning; I had heard that he was old and demented. The solution was to re-upload the image, which I have now done. It proves my running UnNews joke, though; the opposition party and its leaders are not known even to this news junkie. Spıke ¬ 00:13 4-Mar-10

No problem, as long as you have been able to sort it. I personally had no idea if it was or not, I just thought that the way the IP presented their point was inappropriate. Thanks for letting me know. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:17, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

It was, and I dropped him a brief line although he is an IP (call me an idiot on my talk page, not in the article). And inviting him to sign in, as he's done a couple dozen edits. If Anon is correct and the photo I posted was Boehner--the Senate Republican leader--it's doubly astonishing, but a sign of the times, that I didn't know that. Spıke ¬ 00:39 4-Mar-10