Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/First!!!!(LAst, Last Review)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
First!!!![edit source]
I think the article needs at least one more. I reviwed this fo ChiefJustice, since he so wise--
Director
WILL
YOU 333 03:42, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
DirectorWILLYOU 333 03:42, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Like I said in that other review there is no point anyone else reviewing this since you haven't acted upon any of the plentiful good advice given so far. While it possible to ask for an additional review if you fundamentally disagree with what the reviewer has said, when it is obvious that all the reviews are going to say the same thing then it becomes silly. The last review was on the 7th of July 2009. Since then you have made three changes, all relatively minor - hold the two pages up side by and side and compare the differences. Act on the adivce given by Staircase in the previous review (and that I have seconded) and then request a review when you have made significant changes or expansions. Knowing ChiefjusticeDS's reviewing style I can assure you you will receive much the same review from him. Read HTBFANJS, edit the article, then have it pee reviewed. As I said before if you want to discuss this further then please feel free to do so on my talk page. Sequence 04:01, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
| Humour: | 0 | N/A |
| Concept: | 0 | N/A |
| Prose and formatting: | 0 | N/A |
| Images: | 0 | N/A |
| Miscellaneous: | 0 | N/A |
| Final Score: | 0 | I'm pulling this one off the queue. The reason is that Sequence is correct, having examined the reviews you have had so far and the changes you have made I have concluded that my reviewing it will simply confirm what has already been said and there are other articles I could take a look at. Feel free to ask for my opinion informally or as you are making changes, but I don't see any reason to keep this here. |
| Reviewer: | -ChiefjusticeDS 13:41, February 5, 2010 (UTC) | |