imported>AAA! |
imported>AAA! |
Line 265: |
Line 265: |
|
#'''For''' - WHOA! {{User:Cs1987/sig}} 03:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
#'''For''' - WHOA! {{User:Cs1987/sig}} 03:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
#'''F☭R''', {{User:Tom_mayfair/sig}}<span style="color:#DF0500"><small>05:48, 27 June 2007</small></span> |
|
#'''F☭R''', {{User:Tom_mayfair/sig}}<span style="color:#DF0500"><small>05:48, 27 June 2007</small></span> |
− |
|againstnumber=6 |
+ |
|againstnumber=7 |
|
|against= |
|
|against= |
|
#'''Weka Against''' I think this is one of those articles that needs a lot of substance and jokes not the opposite, the point is gotten across yes, but not enough chuckles in between. {{unsigned|Dr. Fenwick}} |
|
#'''Weka Against''' I think this is one of those articles that needs a lot of substance and jokes not the opposite, the point is gotten across yes, but not enough chuckles in between. {{unsigned|Dr. Fenwick}} |
Line 273: |
Line 273: |
|
#Good idea, <s>weak</s> weka execution. --[[User:So So|So So]] 00:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
#Good idea, <s>weak</s> weka execution. --[[User:So So|So So]] 00:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
#'''Crotch''' No -{{User:RAHB/sig}} 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
#'''Crotch''' No -{{User:RAHB/sig}} 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
+ |
#'''Against''' - What? --23:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC) |
|
|comments= |
|
|comments= |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Template:CommentBox
- Vote for an article you find excellent. Please add new nominations on the top.
- Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
- When voting For or Against, please change the score number accordingly—this saves a lot of time later.
- IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
- Nonsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (
) above the edit box.
- When nominating an article, the template Template:VFH should be added to the end of the article using {{VFH}}. Anything you add {{VFH}} to also shows up in Category:Feature nomination.
- Failed VFH nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
- Previous featured articles can be found on the archive pages.
- Voters: don't be dicks and do be constructive with criticism. Writers: Don't be prima donnas. Be open to criticism.
- Articles from all namespaces (including UnNews, HowTo, UnBooks, etc.) are eligible for VFH. Votes against articles based on namespace prejudice will be discarded.
- If your article doesn't make it to the front page, don't despair. It may be eligible to be Quasi-featured so long as it meets certain criteria.
THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION.
If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it
HERE.
Violators of this policy will be annihilated.
Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )
SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated articles (i.e. you write an article and then decide to nominate it yourself) must receive at least one critique via Pee Review before nomination (or at spend a week on Pee Review if you can't get anyone to look at it). Articles nominated by people other than the author can still be nominated at any time and require no review (though it is still recommended).
VFH IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE. If you'd like constructive criticism for your article, please submit it to Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Vote: HowTo:Catch a Predator
|
Score: 5 bitter secretions
|
Nomination:
|
Ljlego
|
For Votes: 6
|
- Nom + For Very funny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I love the Looney Toons style capture. -RAHB 00:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For It's not ultimately funny, but pretty good nonetheless. Social Studiously 11:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Since reading this, I have Olipro secured and in my basement. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 17:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I love cherry pie. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Your place or mine? --AAA! (AAAA) 23:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Not ready for the front page--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Bathroom humor
|
Score: 7 corny excrement jokes
|
Nomination:
|
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
- Nom + For. --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig this article's mouth needs a soap-rinsing. --THINKER 23:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For'D! -RAHB 00:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Nice images. Social Studiously 11:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For...not bad, not bad.--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 15:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:37, 27 June 2007
- For - At least this is better than I maed a yuky doody. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: UnBooks:Dane Cook: An Unauthorized Autobiography, 2nd Edition (New Pictures)
|
Score: 4 hits in the fucking balls
|
Nomination:
|
None other than RAHB 22:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 5
|
- Nom/For Gonna give this one the second chance it deserves -RAHB 22:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig, even though I apparently didn't work on this article whatsoever, according to some people.. ;) --THINKER 23:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Self For Oh Thinker, you're so wacky. You obviously haven't looked at my bibliography page, which clearly states that you did work on this article. I just wrote it. GUYS! THINKER DID STUFF ON THIS ARTICLE! Happy now? :)-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:38, 27 June 2007
- Excellent parody of that
twat fine young lad known as Dane Cook. --EMC [TALK] 23:28, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Against - Well, I would have voted yes, but it doesn't make too much sense... or is my sense of humour just bad? Social Studiously 11:53, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, uh, it's Dane Cook's style. If you don't get that, I can understand. Perhaps watch some of his standup and reconsider.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- Happy'd. And see, theres even a template already made so you wont have to share the credit. :) --THINKER 23:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnNews:Host of NBC's "To Catch a Predator" arrested for attempted rape of a minor
|
Score: 4 handcuffed predators
|
Nomination:
|
RAHB 00:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 4
|
- Nom & For I'm being quite the vote whore lately, but I enjoyed this far too much -RAHB 00:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yay, self for! You guys make me so happy, what with your nominating my pages and all. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Nice work Led Balloon. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 14:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, Hehehe
  05:41, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
Well Led, it's quite an honor isn't it. Almost too much to handle. Fortunately, this world has graced us with several opportunities of returning the favor.
Not saying you should read, and likewise vote on, this piece of course. Heavens no I would never pull your leg like that. -RAHB 03:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd appreciate it if you return the favor, as well. I know, I'm a shameless whore. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 17:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd appreciate it if you returned the favor myself.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Guys, guys, if I could, I'd return all of your favors. I will soon, probably. Unfortunately, I'm still a bit sore from returning Whelp's favor. (/me walks away, with a disturbing limp)P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Hoboeroticism
|
Score: 18 Horny Bums
|
Nomination:
|
User:Mhaille
|
For Votes: 19
|
- Nomandfor - a delightful little piece, sat in a sandbox for a month and now finally free to make its way in the world. Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 00:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:37, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- lawl LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 04:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hooray! Mhaille and Codeine learned how to write again! :D --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 04:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. If I didn't vote for my own article, I might as well go shag a tramp. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 07:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For! \o/. Finntastic 10:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For You know why... --Roger The Bum Full sig! CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 11:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Y'know, I think we are all so fascinated by tramps that we secretly want to be one. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - FEATURE!!! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 12:35, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Anything to stop Codeine's non-stop IRC whoring. Oh, and 'cos it's a great article too :) RabbiTechno 13:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For a steaming pile of literary treasure -- Prof. Olipro
KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 16:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, it maded me lol. -- TheOminousMan 16:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Nicely done guys, and the article is good too -- sannse (talk) 18:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Beautiful The Oblong Lobster 19:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- DIG I knew I would be voting for this one before clicking the damn link; glad I did though, because its funny too! :) --THINKER 23:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
07:49, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  04:53, 27 June 2007
- For, but only if this image is on the front page, not the one at the top of the article, for the love of god. --General Insineratehymn 18:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
Against Because it didn't have any against votes.--24.176.12.20 02:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- So... motion to get this scrapped for obvious reasons? --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:35, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Motion seconded.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional against. Please, please, please, please, PLEASE don't put the top picture on the front page. Please. Otherwise, you kids can do what you want.--<<
>> 13:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- But it's the only one that'll fit.. the others wouldn't be comprehensible at the reduced size of the FA template. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 14:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
What's with the objections to Image:Greekhobo.jpg? Are you people really so repressed that 5000 year old Greek homosexuality offends your sensibilities? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 20:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- The short answer is "yes."--<<
>> 20:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnNews:Team Rocket Captures Pikachu, Ash Commits Suicide
|
Score: 2 Crying Pokemon Fanboys
|
Nomination:
|
Sonic80 Nommed it!
|
For Votes: 6
|
- Nom and For'd - I found this article very funny. --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 22:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Great article. I've always been waiting for a Pokemon character to die. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Some funny stuff in that one. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For' Thanks guys. This is my crowning article, and my first funny one! Please read comments, if you're having trouble deciding.. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For!! - Made me laugh till sundown. Actually, the sun was already down, but the images (especially the ones with 'the rolemodel' and the animation) were absolutely hilarious! I don't really know why some are against, but... what the heck! Social Studiously 11:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:43, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- Against Sorry but I really don't get it. The Oblong Lobster 19:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Doesn't quite seem FA calibre. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 21:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sry. maybe 5-7 years ago when one could use the Pokemon craze as an excuse for liking Pokemon.. --THINKER 23:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against The idea is good, and I must admit I crack up every time I see the headline on UnNews. Just not feature quality though. -RAHB 01:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- When I joined Uncyclopedia, I wanted to make Pokemon better. As I have rambled on many a talk page, it was filled with gay jokes, which I fixed. This was supposed to be my first article, but then I realised that by making this article, I could highlight the changes the pokemon pages have endured. This article was 3 months in the making. Please enjoy the new revamped Pkemon section, and behave yourselves. (I revert like a bitch.) Thanks for your votes. I love you all! Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- All of the funny images and animations were uploaded by one user, and placed on my talk page. Theres some funny shit he gave me. Before, all I had were a collection of the OH NOS! Some were good (Ash raping Pikachu, Brock spanking Ash) Now I have these ones! I'll use most of them in the following up article, Ash's Funeral... Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 14:43, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
- I would suggest not niching yourself into one category. Very soon people are going to start getting sick of all the Pokemon crap. It's just not that popular anymore. Sorry to burst your bubble, but I would say that after this, stop writing Pokemon articles for good. Otherwise, you'll end up like Kwakerjak, who niched himself into Presidential Elections. No one's heard from him since.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Vote: UnNews:Superman loses endorsements over foot fetish scandal
|
Score: 3 Super-bromadrosis
|
Nomination:
|
zim ulator
|
For Votes: 8
|
- Nom and For An inspired piece of misinformation.
Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 19:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- fo' a little strange, but hilarious all the same. --THE 20:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Though the source article is gruesome. Slithy Tove 00:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Upon taking a closer look, and realizing what the source was, I've decided to change my vote -RAHB 22:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- 4 Because I knew the story from the news, and found the page hilarious. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- sDig Because my life is shit right now and a feature might help cheer me up. --THINKER 21:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:45, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 5
|
- Against. I don't really care to know about Superman's personal life. Nor, upon reading about it, do I find it funny.--vyvyan 20:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Meh Sorry.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against Not funny --Hrodulf 22:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Meh -RAHB 05:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against--Dr. Fenwick 19:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Not funny.--I can't see the humour. Or is it just me? Social Studiously 12:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnNews:Bashing your head against a brick wall discovered to have hallucinogenic effects
|
Score: 13 head bashing induced highs
|
Nomination:
|
Leoispotter
|
For Votes: 13
|
- sNom and For Giving it another go -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For'd - I liked it when you made it. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 16:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For although I find that stapling your nose shut can give you a much better high. --THE 20:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For Improved since my Pee Review, and it was good then.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- I should try that some time. (translation: For) --General Insineratehymn 22:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- I tried it - it was so incredible I'm voting for Slithy Tove 00:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Man, I'm still out of it, dude. Like, wow. RabbiTechno 13:45, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, because Leo threatened to put me into "a permanent high" --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)C)
- For. Very nice. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig between this and my iTrip it really isn't surprising that I don't get any work accomplished.. --THINKER 23:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For As with the iTrip, I still prefer tradition over convenience, but still a good one. -RAHB 01:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:46, 27 June 2007
- For --AAA! (AAAA) 23:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: Is This Some Kind of Fucking Joke?!
|
Score: 20 fucking jokes
|
Nomination:
|
Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 20
|
- Nom + For I reviewed it, and laughed like hell, cuz this article is that swell. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 22:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For The writer of this magnificent article deserves some sort of award -RAHB 02:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- --L 05:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For some fucking funny kind of joke--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 05:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, please. --General Insineratehymn 05:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Because this article makes me laugh very much --Masterd 07:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
10:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. This is a pretty sweet article. I spruced it up a bit and hopefully it gets there. :D Mightywayne 13:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- IS THIS SOME KIND of FUCKING ARTICLE? ~
16:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hellz Ya! - IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING TALENT? -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 17:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--vyvyan 20:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nice.--Mr.Vib 13:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 19:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Read it, dug it. And no, that 4 is not some kind of a fucking joke at all! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig though this vote is, in fact, a fucking joke, so I don't know if it really counts.. --THINKER 23:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:47, 27 June 2007
- For IS THIS SOME KIND OF FUCKING VOTE?!?! -- Kip the Egg
Talk Works 
- For - What Kip said. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
- Interestingly enough, this nomination inspired my band to create a song of the same name in practice today. It does my heart good to see the word "fucking" used so many times in such a jovial musical arrangement. -RAHB 08:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- I look forward to hearing that. :) -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:28, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'd put it on untunes if it wasn't a serious piece of music. Maybe myspace...-RAHB 21:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Being and Nothingness
|
Score: 0 philosophical ideas that fucking rock
|
Nomination:
|
General Insineratehymn 21:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 7
|
- Requested for nomination by none other than Rcmurphy. --General Insineratehymn 21:22, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I am smarter for having read this article. —rc (t) 23:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for'd -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 17:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For One of the greatest articles to ever fucking rock. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - WHOA!
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:48, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 7
|
- Weka Against I think this is one of those articles that needs a lot of substance and jokes not the opposite, the point is gotten across yes, but not enough chuckles in between. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Fenwick (talk • contribs)
- Nahhh--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sartre is smarter than me. This, however, is not. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against I'd agree with Dr. Fenwick, but I don't know wtf "Weka" is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Good idea,
weak weka execution. --So So 00:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Crotch No -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against - What? --23:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: iTrip
|
Score: 21.5 hallucination-inducing electronic devices
|
Nomination:
|
THE
|
For Votes: 22.5
|
- Nom and For I love my iTrip. Though listening to it when I mow the lawn usually doesn't work out too well. --THE 16:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 21:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig ..and I've been enjoying CCR ever since! --THINKER 22:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, Yes. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --193.77.238.223 20:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
09:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Self-for -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For: But somebody needs to stop Ljlego. Like now. --EMC [TALK] 21:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. whoa dude... all those colours -- Prof. Olipro
KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 23:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for Not absurdly, ball-crushingly, pants-wettingly, brilliantly hilarious like some of Ljlego's other stuff, but good enough for the front page. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I wish this product was real Hrodulf 02:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Definite For'd -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 14:32, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Seriously, Ljlego. Enough with the funniness. How are us decent mediocre-writing class folk supposed to make a living? --Señor DiZtheGreat
CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, it is taller then most. -- The Zombiebaron 20:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Create plz. —Braydie 22:13, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- 4 he asked me to vote, so I did. Never even looked at the article. It could be a horrendous piece of shit for all I know... so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick?
23:41, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- 'F☭R,
  12:05, 27 June 2007
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Good article, even though I still say tradition may as well reign. -RAHB 00:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Uhhhhh... hold on... lemme just... get... no... the.... yes. --Andorin Kato 01:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 1
|
- Weak Against. I can see the gist, but it doesn't seem all that funny to me. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnBooks:Only Business
|
Score: 13 axes apologetically put through your head
|
Nomination:
|
RAHB
|
For Votes: 13
|
- Nom and For Quite witty I do say -RAHB 14:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - I simply must for this article. To any other pages here I haven't, you just gotta know, it's not personal, it's just business... P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Winstanley1 20:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Such wonderful dark humour. --
CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For At first I thought this was going to be so typical but it really got so good at the end.--Dr. Fenwick 21:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For hilarious --THE 22:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig Its cool by me; all my friends call me Trotsky with this stylish icepick in my skull! ;) --THINKER 22:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 18:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
09:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Yup.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:01, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. Another great one from Winstanley --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:49, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: Vulva
|
Score: 14 Gear Sticks Shoved into Overdrive
|
Nomination:
|
El Zoof
|
For Votes: 21
|
- For I still think I'm funny. Your mileage may vary, depending on the number of passengers in your Vulva. --El Zoof 07:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig I say: Funny! --THINKER 07:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Too funny. Slithy Tove 07:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
16:13, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sadly enough, I've never driven a Vulva, but I've heard that it's a great ride. The Humbled Master 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I've always liked this article. --THE 17:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For Because I'd love one of these...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I'd like to take one for a spin myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For If only for the picture of a Vulva in the swimming pool. --Andreasegde 20:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Gaberou 20:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- ForI've never even heard of a Vulva until now lol.--Dr. Fenwick 00:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've driven one for years, steering can be a bit sticky, but they have a nice little engine under the bonnet. For. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 11:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For My husband works on my Vulva frequently Dame
GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- ForLOL nice Inuendo Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 17:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC
- For Don alun 20:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I'm always up for good Vulvaaaaa Lasss Vegas! Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- lol --Pcgamermofo 19:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Drive stick with the kung fu grip, let the banana split and let it go right to your thighs. --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 02:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For' LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 17:51, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:50, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 7
|
- Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 17:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds like a delightful car, I don't see why everyone's laughing.--vyvyan 03:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- --L 05:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against. There's not a lot there, and what's there isn't making me want to get one. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against -Whats here is good stuff, but thers not enough of it. --WesternLotus 13:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against: A tad short. Needs some more UMPF! --EMC [TALK] 07:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against - Just not enough clever parts. Sounds like something from a seventh grade hallway. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:52, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- Abstain Could be great, and has good stuff already, but simply can't for it. -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnNews:Your grandma might be Al-Qaeda
|
Score: 16 Grannie Terrorists
|
Nomination:
|
Sonic80
|
For Votes: 18
|
- Nom and For'd. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 00:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- sDig thanks Sonic!! :) --THINKER 03:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I really liked this one.--<<
>> 04:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - we must take a stand against these cheek-pinching sweater-knitting maniacs! --El Zoof 06:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 11:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. NOT GRANDMA! NOOOOOO!!!--Mr.Vib 13:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Laa Ilia Il'allah wha'Muhammad rasul Allah! ~
15:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
16:07, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Allahu Uhallalah! The Humbled Master 16:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Wait, do you mean dead Grandma or "I got 20 years left and I'm gonna use 'em" Grandma? • "Spang" • contribs | talk • 17:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Gaberou 20:24, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- I had long suspected it. Thank goodness Uncyclopedia shines the light of truth on us! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For--Dr. Fenwick 00:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Honestly, how can you deny sweet little old granny a shot at the front page? -RAHB 08:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- YEAH! This article is AWESOME! Slash-dev-slash-random 01:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Definately For --ORION 05:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- For just because of the title! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- F☭R,
  05:53, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 2
|
- Against, An okay story, just a bit hackneyed. --Brit-guit 13:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- NO--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E
throw a snowball 00:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Old hippie chick who's always collecting money
|
Score: 14 feral kittens
|
Nomination:
|
Leoispotter
|
For Votes: 17
|
- Nom and for Prettiestpretty's best article.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 01:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For...this is, indeed, funny--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Slithy Tove 06:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Peace, dude This article is far out. --
CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig Because I see her at every show I go to. This state is full of em. --THINKER 21:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Of course I am compelled to vote For Dame
GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- like it --THE 11:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 13:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
16:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Gaberou 20:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Weak For. Text is great, but could use another picture or two. See comment that I'm about to leave on the talk page. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 22:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Full For with new pic. Thanks, PP! :) — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 00:53, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I actually know plenty of people like this, if only they knew...For. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 11:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Don alun 21:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely For'd -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 14:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  05:57, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Against -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against Thought the lead was funny and the ending but there was a desert of not laughing in the middle. --Andreasegde 14:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against -RAHB 01:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- I don't know where to put this, but people will read it here. Anyone who hasn't yet voted for top 10 articles of May, please consider voting for one of the four articles with 10 votes each - they're trying to break a tie, and we'll be into July soon. The link is at the top right of this page. Slithy Tove 19:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- What Roger means to say is everyone vote for Folgers Crystals, propelling it higher that 17 votes, thus breaking the tie. Thank you Roger. ;) --THINKER 21:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnNews:Procrastinators Unite Today; Shirt Enthusiasts Enraged
|
Score: 16 ....later
|
Nomination:
|
Ljlego
|
For Votes: 20
|
- SN + F Braydie said I should. It got a 46 in the Pee (by Braydie) and, well, I like it..Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Rfo Yay, 1st vote! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- like it --THE 11:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would say For, but I just can't be bothered. --
CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:32, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fur, yaw me like. -- The Zombiebaron 19:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I would have voted for this earlier, but I'm a procrastinator myself. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. —Braydie 22:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- '"," -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'll vote for this tomorrow. Next Tuesday, at the latest. --El Zoof 02:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Because I meant to do it late.r Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- For Can't think of anything witty, sorry. --Hrodulf 21:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Cute. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Redeemed. :) I like it.--Mr.Vib 13:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- for love this article from the day i saw it. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN
22:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Short, but sweet. --EMC [TALK] 23:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
03:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, i'll vote later. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- fo- I vot- so sa- Sli- ~ Tal- * S- * JA- * GALLE- * Cu-

- F☭R,
  06:02, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- Against Could be a great article, but needs a lot more (or less, depending on your level of procrastination) --Andreasegde 14:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Not enough there to be featured, content or length-wise. --So So 05:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, there seems to be a few parts missing. Add more to the article and I might reconsider. --Eiyuu Kou 15:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing is missing. The parts that are cut off are supposed to be cut off. I didn't forget anything.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:01, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against Nothing special -RAHB 05:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
- Abs Yaknow how people have those things they just don't find hilarious (like pedophilia or religious humor)? Procrastination is mine; just never thought it was all that funny a topic. Its a good little piece, but the subject just doesn't make me chucklez. --THINKER 21:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I see.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry buddy. I'd buy you an ice cream cone but someone might misinterpret it, and I'm not going back to the clink, man.. :( --THINKER 21:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, the Mr. Softee truck already passed anyway. Perhaps another day.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:25, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Abstain - It has its good points, but I wasn't laughing through most of it, so I'll abstain for this one. -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 16:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: A Visit with your Psychopathic Grandmother
|
Score: 18 silly dogs
|
Nomination:
|
Mr.Vib
|
For Votes: 18
|
- Self Nom & For. She's the sweetest crazy person you'll ever meet!--Mr.Vib 00:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig poor uncle Morty... --THINKER 01:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- For.--vyvyan 03:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- For That silly lady was out of her mind, but this article was hella fine!Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Don alun 22:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 19:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For User:Supermoose
- For Disturbing... The Humbled Master 03:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
15:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 19:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ja Though what's possibly even more bizarre is apparently a friend of mine has relatives who've named their dogs Lenin and Stalin...seriously. I don't think they'd get along with Goering very well. --
CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 20:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- At least they didn't name one Molotov. Burnt dog flesh...not good.--Mr.Vib 21:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Not enough pages reference Sir Oswald Mosley, I think. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Probably because South America has gone out of style...and I'll give a cookie to the first person to guess the song reference.--Mr.Vib 23:20, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Best article of the month. --L 05:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Oh god, for. The most funniest thing I've come across all day. Hanyouman 19:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For oooh. nasty. --Phantom Grammar 11:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I pictured myself in my grandmother's house with her as the main character, making this all the more funny. -RAHB 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  06:03, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Vote: Bipolar bear
|
Score: 19.5 severely crazed teddy bears
|
Nomination:
|
rogpyvbc
|
For Votes: 21.5
|
- Self-nom + For Slithy Tove 23:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig I liked it so much I was upset I didn't get to review it. :) --THINKER 02:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- For This is such an awesome idea. Pulled it off too. -Epical Zamora
- Strong For! This is the epitome of the perfect Uncyclopedia article. Can you say "top article of June?" — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Worthy of the front page --WesternLotus 15:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Tackles mental ilness in grislys with immense sensitivety. The Oblong Lobster 18:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - I'm so impressed by this article I want to buy Bipolar Bear merchandise.--Dr. Fenwick 02:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- For. Terrific! --EMC [TALK] 23:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
04:34, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For--Gaberou 01:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- I never want to hear another polar pun again as long as I live, no matter how subtle. That being said, For. You can just hear some National Geographic narrator softly talking about these poor, magnificent, messed-up creatures.--Mr.Vib 17:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 15:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- For The bits about Nunavut and the toonie really drove it home for me. Save the bipolar bears! --
CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 13:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Don alun 21:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For'd Yay to BiPolar Bears! --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 15:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --193.77.238.223 23:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Really clever. Slash-dev-slash-random 01:49, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - Very well written, clever. A+++ would read again --nimper 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  06:05, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 2
|
- Somehow this just doesn't work at all for me. --So So 06:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- against I just didn't laugh -RAHB 01:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: UnBooks:Mr. Beluncle
|
Score: 17.5 shameful tears
|
Nomination:
|
Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP
|
For Votes: 17.5
|
- Nom + for A quasi-featured and a runner up in the last PLS competition. It was robbed last time it was nominated; I thought it deserved another chance. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 14:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sweet merciful tiddlywinks, YES! --The Acceptable
Cainad (Fnord) 19:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, it's the Mr. Grumpikins of its generation. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R
  08:50, 07 June 2007
- For If you don't for this, I think we should end our relationship before anyone gets hurt. Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig fun read --THINKER 23:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, although I can see how it missed out before, as it takes a little while to get going. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I can see that damn smudge. That jerk kid...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Again For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 16:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Mr. Beluncle shamed me into voting for this article. But, aside from that, it's very well written, and gets better and better toward the end. Great work. --
Big Brother (a.k.a. #1_ALF_FAN) Miniluv•Minitrue 17:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - It could also be an UnBook, from the way I read it. Just a thought. Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- For. -- Mitch
18:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- love. I doubt most people find this hysterical though, its just enjoyable, until that last part. LeatherboundbooksTalkContributions 04:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 21:42, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - This is actually more disturbing than hilarious, but... IT'S SO WELL WRITTEN. I can't help myself. 206.248.135.200 23:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Holy Mind! That's a good piece --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for It's good until that horrible anti-climax. The Humbled Master 00:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm not sure why... completely damn insane rubbish. More! --El Zoof 12:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
- Severian: A number of users (including myself) brought that up last time. Unless somebody objects soon, I'll move it to UnBooks myself. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- DOOOOO it. Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
-
- Ooo! Now make it an UnTune! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:47, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Darn it, Modus, I'm a doctor, not a songwriter. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 05:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Celebrity Manufacture
|
Score: 16 shares in Nicole Kidman
|
Nomination:
|
Winstanley1
|
For Votes: 16
|
- SNF Thought I'd give this another chance as last time I nominated it before it was ready. --Winstanley1 09:34, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Super FOR! --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 12:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --THE 19:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I like this more than plastic. The Oblong Lobster 20:22, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R
  08:51, 07 June 2007
- For Beautiful, freewheeling in its cynicism. --Phantom Grammar 21:17, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig its back, and still funny --THINKER 23:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 03:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Sure, why not. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:28, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
18:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- For As promised.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:03, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. I was fixing it up for CPS (didn't see that you had already done that, Mitch!) and laughed all the way through. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Have watched this grow, and loved it from the beginning. For. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me) 11:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Good stuff -RAHB 01:14, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Comments
|
- Needs cleaning up nice ideas, but the writing's a bit iffy and the text has too many punctuation and grammar mistakes. I've cleaned up the first few paragraphs but hey, I have work to do. I'll change this to a For if the text gets tidied up. Phantom Grammar 12:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've sorted out the typos now. Most of them spring from the fact that this was originally written as a magazine feature in the first person, then re-wrtitten into an encyclopedic format. I handn't noticed that it messed up the grammar in some places.--Winstanley1 13:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks - vote duly switched to for
Conditional For Submit to Ceridwyn's Proofreading Service and have someone take care of it and I'll vote for.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've added it to the proofreading service. --Winstanley1 11:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Constipation
|
Score: 14.5 soiled pairs of pants
|
Nomination:
|
Ljlego
|
For Votes: 18.5
|
- Nom + For Very funny work courtesy of DiZ.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 17:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I said it was funny when it was in the piss, and I say it's funny now (and the captions are better!)P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - A sheer work of genius, if I do say so myself. 'Cough-cough' --Señor DiZtheGreat
CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:37, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Gaberou 04:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. --L 06:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- FOR. Thought it was hilarious. --Polyamorousx 16:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Gave me a whole new philosophy. I used to consider it a mild annoyance, but I'll value every crap from now on. Slithy Tove 19:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- For funny. Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- For Push! Push! Kip the Dip 17:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- XD Brilliant! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 12:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I like the Hello Kitty picture --24.215.168.140 16:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk
- 00:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R
  09:14, 07 June 2007
- For. -- Mitch
12:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- For a brown stain. --Ekashp 01:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- For 172.143.185.85 17:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- For 86.152.82.149 17:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- For -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 18:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Poop --THE 23:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 4
|
- Against scatological just-okay-edness. Sry. --THINKER 16:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against as per the Thinker -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against Constipation is no laughing matter. I had constipation once, and I had great discomfort for the next three days. --General Insineratehymn 22:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against - OK, not FA material IMO. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments
|
ROTFLOL at the last sentence of the article. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works
- Same w/ me, but I think it's really that the article sets up for the joke through the entire thing to make it funny. Standing alone, it's alright, but after the article, brilliant!P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- True dat. -- Kip the Egg
Talk Works 
|
Vote: U.S. Presidential Election, 1948
|
Score: 20 red-faced up-to-the-minute Chicago Tribune editors
|
Nomination:
|
<< >> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 20
|
- If someone wants to nom Hermaphrodite, that had the next-best percentage on the list. I didn't particularly care for that one, though, so I'm nomming one I liked.--<<
>> 15:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. OMG! Brad's got a list! Run! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig a great take on one of our nation's funniest debacles. Gotta check those error margins, Chicago! hehe.. oh and "Dewey Cheatem & Howe" got a real live lol. :) --THINKER 22:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Gaberou 22:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --EMC [TALK] 02:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- Kwakerjak, you are much missed. Brad, thanks for the list. Strong For, and blast it all if this one doesn't make it! We are going to feature a US presidential election article eventually, darnit! --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. –—Hv (talk) 3/06 14:11
- For just like before. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Once again, Uncyclopedia teaches me about American history. I didn't even know there was ever a President Dewey before this! -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk
- 00:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Give 'em Hell, Mister President-HST...yeah, he'd vote Fortoo--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 17:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Kwakerjak! YAARRRRR! (And my Strom Thurmond photoshop).--Procopius 13:12, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- FOR! Kwakerjak was so great. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Poor Kwakerjak... The Humbled Master 00:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Finally got around to reading this one. I was not disappointed.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. Dew-EY! Dew-EY! Dew-EY! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dewey for president!!! --Vanaelin 16:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Hehe, jokes about politics. -RAHB 01:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  06:06, 27 June 2007
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Previously Featured
Vote: The Meeting: A Play in One Act
|
Score: 21.5 painted-on Powerpoint slides
|
Nomination:
|
Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 24.5
|
Featured —rc (t) 04:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- For. This generation's Waiting for Godot? Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:51, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Could've sworn Mandaliet wrote this one from the corporate drone's parts... • "Spang" • contribs | talk • 15:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- DIG I thought the same thing as ENeGMA. Brilliant! :) --THINKER 18:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- YEs I really like this kind of thing. The Oblong Lobster 23:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- --
20:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 13:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Brilliant -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- ForInfiniteMonkey
- --
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 22:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- For Suicide looms... lol 134.226.1.229 19:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- For. Nothing like corporate asses dying inside...or something like that. --Mr.Vib 18:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- For Heeheehee... I am laughing... --The Acceptable
Cainad (Fnord) 07:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- For Loved it! <3 ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:08, 02 June 2007
- For Terriffic - jack mort | cunt | talk
- 23:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- For nice. Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- Thoroughly fun to read. For!--vyvyan 00:59, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- So morbid... yet so funny. For — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 03:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- For I love this article. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 20:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- For'd Very good -- --Mgr. Sir Sonic80☭ 14:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For Absolutely. -- User:GarethC/sig 19:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
06:31, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- For spectacular -RAHB 01:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- 4 I shat a squirrel. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick?
02:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 3
|
- Not bad, I chuckled at parts but definitely not featured article material. ennui2778 dif
- Naaah--Sir Shandon 06:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Sucks Ass --Steve Johnsenson 04:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Vote Discarded; blatant troll -- Prof. Olipro
KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 05:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against: It's okay, but something about play scripts just doesn't appeal to me. --EMC [TALK] 01:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Vote: Preflight procedures
|
Score: 19 disasters averted
|
Nomination:
|
Yours truly — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
|
For Votes: 19
|
Featured —rc (t) 04:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nom And Strong For. A brilliant take on, well, preflight procedures. This article proved to me that e|m|c fully deserves WotM. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes thanks.--
TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 04:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ooooohhhyeaaaah Fasten Your Seatbelts!!--Sir Shandon
(Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:46, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For e|m|c's a jolly good personage and so say 19 of us! So far. Um. You may want to edit this if you're adding later. Or not. I'm good either way, really. --El Zoof 04:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For - {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 07:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Dig These mid-air chickens are just begging to be put in the upright-lock position, OH! --THINKER 08:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Attention passengers: We are currently flying through an area of turbulence caused by mounting numbers of For votes. Please fasten your seat belts. We expect this inconvenience to subside as soon as this article is featured, which should be very soon. --
CUN PLS VFH (Miniluv•Minitrue•Unsoc) 21:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- For--Dr. Fenwick 22:05, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Okay then. --EMC [TALK] 04:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- For
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~
08:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
09:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
  12:56, 25 June 2007
- Umm... hell yes. --Andorin Kato 17:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- brilliant. --Pcgamermofo 19:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- For because I love aviation. Sir Severian
(Sprich mit mir!) 
- For I'm in a plane, suicide bombing your article -- Prof. Olipro
KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
|
Against Votes: 0
|
No against votes
|
Archives